Position sensitivity of the proposed segmented germanium detectors for the DESPEC project
-
Upload
sonya-welch -
Category
Documents
-
view
19 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Position sensitivity of the proposed segmented germanium detectors for the DESPEC project
Position sensitivity of the proposed segmented germanium detectors for the DESPEC project
A. Khaplanov, S. Tashenov, B.Cederwall
2008 11 11
DESPEC project at FAIR
Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research Low-energy branch of the SuperFRS
HISPEC/DESPEC
A. Khaplanov, 2008 11 11
DESPEC Ge array
GSI
FAIR
DESPEC Ge array
24 planar triple modules
16 planar triple modules
6 clovers
γ-ray tracking spectrometer for experiments with stopped exotic beams.
Nuclei implanted in a highly segmented silicon detector, AIDA at the center of Ge array
A. Khaplanov, 2008 11 11
Compton background suppressionenergies of photons interacting in more than one crystals can be added back, while Compton-escape events can be identified and suppressed with no anti-coincidence shields required.
Recoil identificationin case of relatively long-lived nuclei or isomers, it is essential to correlate the γ -rays with an earlier implantation location in the silicon detector.
Background radiation suppressionusing γ-ray imaging, background photons and those originating in other parts of the experiment and in the environment, can be rejected.
Advantages of position sensitive detectors
A. Khaplanov, 2008 11 11
16 pixels 17 x 17mm 8+8 strips 68 x 8.5mm
2 mm guard ring
6
20
72
Proposed detectors
Pixel detector Strip detector
Triple planar detector module
90
75
53.5
1030 29
24.5
Clover detector
depth segmentation of the outer contact, mm
25 – 25 – 40
20 – 40 – 30
20 – 25 – 25 – 20
15 – 25 – 30 – 20
15 – 25 – 25 – 25
12- and 16-fold segmented crystals
A. Khaplanov, 2008 11 11
Similar detectors currently in use
A. Khaplanov, 2008 11 11
KTH planar (25 pixel)
SmartPET (12+12 strips)
EXOGAM (4-segment clovers)
Net and transient signal pulse shape variation as a function of interaction depth in a planar detector.
far
close
net signal
transient signal
interactions
net signal transient signal
Pulse shapes
E
A. Khaplanov, 2008 11 11
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 160
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
segment number
po
sitio
n e
rro
r, m
m
x-errory-errorz-error
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 160
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
segment number
po
sitio
n e
rro
r, m
m
x-errory-errorz-error
1, 5, 9, 13 2, 6, 10, 14
3, 7, 11, 154, 8, 12, 16
1, 2, 3, 4
5, 6, 7, 8
9, 10, 11, 12
13, 14, 15, 16Segment numbering
Position uniformity tests for Clovers
15-25-30-20 15-25-25-25
front middle 1 middle 2 back
A. Khaplanov, 2008 11 11
Monte Carlo eventsPosition resolution for realistic interactions:
250, 662, 1332 keV photons simulated in GEANT4
~3000 for each energy from the implantation point (source events)
~10000 for each energy from all directions isotropically (background events)
Interaction points for source events:
A. Khaplanov, 2008 11 11
Pulse shape analysis
measured/ simulated
signal
energy deposit
distribution
time-matched meta-signal
-20
0
20
-30-20
-100
10
2030
0
10
20
XY
Z
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
segment number
0 50 100 150 200 250
-0.6
-0.5
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
time, ns
Position reconstruction:
•interactions generated in GEANT4
•pulses calculated for simulated interactions
•preamp response and noise added
•pulses used to reconstruct positions
•original and reconstructed positions compared
•mean position errors as function of energy, type and multiplicity of interaction
A. Khaplanov, 2008 11 11
Detector comparison
Detector
(sensitive volume)
16-strip
planar
(68x68x20)
16-pixel
planar
(68x68x20)
15 – 25 – 30 – 20
clover
(<53.5x53.5x90)
physical voxel size 8.5x8.5 mm 17x17 mm different
basis grid 5x5x14x16 5x5x14x16 64x(14to17)x44
Single 1.14 2.13 3.41
Multiple 2.20 3.92 6.63
Single, merged 2.11 3.23 4.89
Multiple, merged 2.58 4.24 7.39
Single, non-merged 0.99 1.79 2.85
Multiple, non-merged 2.05 3.68 6.04
Mean position errors in mm
Multiple interactions in the same segment:
-- merged into 1 effective interaction
-- when resolved, both position and energy resolution are very poor.
This affects 20% (strip16) 30% (pixel16) 40% (clover16) 50% (clover12) of events.
Single – one segment in crystal hit
Multiple – more than one segment hit
A. Khaplanov, 2008 11 11
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Energy, keV
Pos
ition
err
or,
mm
Strip detector
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.40
1
2
3
4
5
6
Energy, keV
Pos
ition
err
or,
mm
Strip detector
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.40
1
2
3
4
5
6
Energy, keV
Pos
ition
err
or,
mm
Pixel detector
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.40
1
2
3
4
5
6
Energy, keV
Pos
ition
err
or,
mm
Pixel detector
mul
tiple
inte
ract
ions
StripPixel
sing
le in
tera
ctio
nsError vs energy
Clover
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.40
2
4
6
8
10
12
Energy, keVP
ositi
on e
rror
, m
m
Clover 15-25-30-20 detector
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.40
2
4
6
8
10
12
Energy, keV
Pos
ition
err
or,
mm
Clover 15-25-30-20 detector
note – the scale is doubled
A. Khaplanov, 2008 11 11
A. Khaplanov, 2008 11 11
γ-ray tracking
θ1
γ
γ’γ’’
θ2
E1
E2
E3
γ-ray tracking
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.080.86
0.88
0.90
0.92
0.94
0.96
0.98
1.00
662 keV strip 24 planar strip 16 planar 6 clover
P/T
efficiency0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.081
10
100
662 keV strip 24 planar strip 16 planar 6 clover
back
grou
nd s
uppr
essi
on fa
ctor
efficiency
A. Khaplanov, 2008 11 11
Compton suppression Ambient Background suppression Imaging
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0100
101
102
103
104
105
coun
ts
energy, MeV0
-20-10
010
20
-20
-10
0
10
20
0
10
20
Conclusions
Planar strip good position resolution,
little merging
64 voxels readout through 16 signals – pile-up in a strip presents problems,
both sides must be instrumented,
guard rings (dead material)
Planar pixel small contacts – little pile-up,
one side needs to be readout,
least data stored for PSA
lower position resolution,
more merging,
guard rings (dead material)
Clover best raw (before tacking) efficiency,
best active/passive material ratio, no guard rings,
only 6 cryostats required
lowest position resolution,
most merging,
large segments – most PSA data required
A. Khaplanov, 2008 11 11