Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

34
H.E. Thompson 1 Portfolios & Systematic Risk Expected Return and Variance of a Portfolio E(R)=Σw i E(r i ) V(R)=ΣΣw i w j Cov(r i ,r j ) The Variance Contributed by Stock i Σw j Cov(r i ,r j ) =Cov(r i ,Σw j r) =Cov(r i ,r m )

Transcript of Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

Page 1: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

H.E. Thompson 1

Portfolios & Systematic Risk

Expected Return and Variance of a Portfolio

E(R)=ΣwiE(ri)V(R)=ΣΣwiwjCov(ri,rj)

The Variance Contributed by Stock i

ΣwjCov(ri,rj) =Cov(ri,Σwjr) =Cov(ri,rm)

Page 2: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

H.E. Thompson 2

Portfolios & Systematic Risk

Stocks with small or negative covariances withthe market:

1. will reduce portfolio risk2. will be demanded by investors.

Systematic risk determines value

Page 3: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

H.E. Thompson 3

Residual Risk:Why it Does Not Affect Value

Return Model for SecuritiesReturn on security i: ri=αi+βirm+εiReturn on security j: rj=αj+βjrm+εj

E(εi)=E(εj)=0, Cov(εi,εj)=0

Expected Returns, Variances & CovariancesE(ri)=αi+βiE(rm)

Var(ri)=βi2Var(rm)+Var(ει)

Cov(ri,rj)=βiβjV(rm)

Page 4: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

H.E. Thompson 4

Mean & Variance of Portfolio Returns

Form a Equally Weighted Portfolio of n Stocks

R=(1/n)Σri=(1/n)Σ(αi+βirm)+(1/n)ΣειVar(R)=(1/n)2ΣΣβiβjVar(rm)+(1/n)2ΣVar(εi)

Residual risk is “diversified away” in a portfolio. Therefore it has no effect on the cost of capital.

Page 5: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

H.E. Thompson 5

Calculating the Cost of Equity

Cost of equity=risk free rate+Risk premium

re= rf + β (E(rm) - rf)

where rf is the risk free rate, and E(rm ) is the return on the market portfolio.

β is the measure of systematic risk

β =Cov(re , rm)/Var(rm)

Page 6: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

H.E. Thompson 6

Value of a Stock

large covariance with the market implies

large Betaimplies

high cost of capitalimplies

low stock price

Stock price=ΣE(Cash Flow)/(1+ri)t

Page 7: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

H.E. Thompson 7

Calculating the Cost of Equity

Beta

re

rf

1

E(rm)

Higher than Market risk

Lower than market risk

Risk of the market

Market return

Page 8: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

H.E. Thompson 8

Some Betas

Company Beta COCGrumman 0.617 <MarketHoneywell 1.045 =MarketScientific-Atlanta 1.541 >MarketCyprus Minerals 1.200 >MarketAshland Coal 0.650 <MarketIntel Corp 1.435 >MarketWisc Energy 0.565 <Market

Source Value Line, QuoteCom

Page 9: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

H.E. Thompson 9

Application to lunar mining of Helium-3

How would a market for 3He be organized?

What would be the cost of capital to a lunar mining company?

How much financing would be required?

Could the capital be raised?

Can D3He fusion generated power compete?

Page 10: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

H.E. Thompson 10

Cost of Capital for a Lunar Mining Company

Residual RiskRelated to lunar mining operations

May be substantialCan be diversified away in investor portfolios

Systematic RiskRelated to the sales of electricity

Should be comparable to fuel suppliers toelectric utilities and aerospace companies

Cannot be diversified away in investor portfoliosCost of Capital

Should be comparable to fuel suppliers and aerospace companies

Page 11: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

H.E. Thompson 11

D3He Penetration in US Electricity Market

PredictedYear % of US Energy

Generated by DHe3 Fusion2015 0.03%2020 0.41%2025 1.80%2030 7.19%2050 60.27%

From Thompson, Ott, Kulcinski “Economic Analysis of the Use of Lunar Helium-3 as a Fuel in U.S. Energy Policy,” Wisconsin Working Paper 3-90-5, 1990

Page 12: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

H.E. Thompson 12

Financing the Lunar Mining Company: Production of 3He

Projected Investment in Mining Machines

Year Mach. Mach Invest Launch Invest Total Invest2015 1 $ 10M $ 50M $ 60M2020 10 $ 100M $ 500M $ 600M2025 57 $ 570M $ 2.,850M $ 3,420M2030 230 $ 2,300M $11,500M $13,800M

2050 2050 $20,500M $102,500M $123,000M

Investment per miner-$10,000,000Launch cost per miner $50,000,000

Page 13: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

H.E. Thompson 13

Financing the Lunar Mining Company: R&D

Put in slide with R&D expendituresPut in slide with R&D expenditures

9595 9696 9797 9898 9999 0000 0101 0202 0303 0404 0505 0606 0707 0808 0909 1010 1111 1212 1313 1414 1515

00

5050

100100

150150

200200

250250

Millionsof

$ (1993)

Millionsof

$ (1993)

YearYear

$3.2 Billion Cumulative Investment at 2015

$3.2 Billion Cumulative Investment at 2015

Lunar Mining R&D for 3He Procurement Over and Above R&D Required for a Lunar Scientific Base

Page 14: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

H.E. Thompson 14

Private Financing of Large Projects Is Possible...

Some Large Projects

Investor (Year, Project) SizeGlobalstar (1996) $ 2.00B

(Satellite Communications)General Electric (1986) $ 6.14B

(Acquisition of RCA)KKR (1989) $26.4B

(Takeover of RJR Nabisco)

Page 15: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

H.E. Thompson 15

...But Large Losses Can be Devastating

Orange County, CA (1994)~$1.7B loss on municipal investment pool~Filed for reorganization under Chapter 9,

Federal Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978Barings Bank (1995)

~Nicholas Leeson lost $1.3B on a derivative gamble

~Barings bank ceased to exist as an independent unit

Page 16: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

H.E. Thompson 16

Two Financing Plans

�Government finances R&D; private enterprise finances production

�Private enterprise finances R&D and production

--

Are they feasible?

Page 17: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

H.E. Thompson 17

� Government-Private

3 Government pays R&D 1996-2015 in return for the by-products of lunar mining after 2015.

3 Lunar mining Company finances miner purchases, launches, and mining operations starting in 2015 and recovers 3He. Supplies by-products to the government after 2015.

Page 18: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

H.E. Thompson 18

� Government-Private

F Government

– $3.2B spent between 1996 and 2015

– Return on investment delayed until after 2015

– Taxing power used to raise funds

– Maximum losses to taxpayers are small

F Lunar Mining Co

– No investment required until 2015

– Return on investment begins in 2015 when 3He is recovered and sold to electric utilities

– Minimum risks to investors

Page 19: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

H.E. Thompson 19

� Private Only

3 Lunar Mining Company

– finances R&D 1996-2015

– finances miners, launches, and production after 2015

– recovers and sells both 3He and by-products

3 Government

– buys by-products from Lunar Mining Company after 2015

Page 20: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

H.E. Thompson 20

� Private Only

F Lunar Mining Co

– $3.2B investment 1996-2015 produces no return until 2015

– 3He sales price must include R&D costs

– Risks relating to by-product sales

– High risk venture with questionable profitability

F Government

– Smaller tax revenues needed 1996-2015

– Moon bases must be supplied from earth with high cost launches

– Increased cost of space programs

Page 21: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

H.E. Thompson 21

Government-Private

Put in General Assumptions trans

General Assumptions

• Scientific Base on the Moon Established by Government

• An Investor Owned Lunar Mining Company Exists

• Scientific Base on the Moon Established by Government

• An Investor Owned Lunar Mining Company Exists

– Holds a U.S. Franchise for Mining 3He on the Moon

– Responsible for Transport of Equipment to and 3He from the Moon

– Markets 3He Fuel to Utilities

– Is Financed Entirely with Equity Capital

– Seeks to Earn a Return Commensurate with Risks

– Holds a U.S. Franchise for Mining 3He on the Moon

– Responsible for Transport of Equipment to and 3He from the Moon

– Markets 3He Fuel to Utilities

– Is Financed Entirely with Equity Capital

– Seeks to Earn a Return Commensurate with Risks

• Government Agencies Fund Lunar Mining R&D in Return for Free Volatile By-Products

• First 3He Mining in 2015

• Government Agencies Fund Lunar Mining R&D in Return for Free Volatile By-Products

• First 3He Mining in 2015

Page 22: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

H.E. Thompson 22

Government-Private

Put in Expenditure Categories Used to Analyze transp

Expenditure Categories Used to Analyze the Cost of 3He

• Mining Equipment, Labor, and Habitat Costs

• Launch Costs

• Required Profits

• Income Taxes

• Mining Equipment, Labor, and Habitat Costs

• Launch Costs

• Required Profits

• Income Taxes

• Research and Development Costs

• Cost Offsets from Volatiles

• Research and Development Costs

• Cost Offsets from Volatiles

Operating Cost CategoriesOperating Cost Categories

Development Cost and Cost Offset CategoriesDevelopment Cost and Cost Offset Categories

Page 23: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

H.E. Thompson 23

Government-Private

Put in Assumptions regarding Mining Operations Starting in 2015

Assumptions Regarding Mining Operating Starting in 2015 (cost in 1993$)

Launch Costs $1000/kg

Miner Mass 50 tonnesMiner Economic Life 20 yearsMiner Capacity 33 kg of 3He/year/minerMiner Purchase Price $10,000,000

Labor Force on the Moon 3 persons/minerSalary and Fringe Benefits $500,000/person/yearHabitat and Consumables 820 kg/person/year

Miner Depreciation Straight Line, 20 yearsMiner Launch Cost Amortization Straight Line, 20 yearsIncome Tax Rate 36%

Launch Costs $1000/kg

Miner Mass 50 tonnesMiner Economic Life 20 yearsMiner Capacity 33 kg of 3He/year/minerMiner Purchase Price $10,000,000

Labor Force on the Moon 3 persons/minerSalary and Fringe Benefits $500,000/person/yearHabitat and Consumables 820 kg/person/year

Miner Depreciation Straight Line, 20 yearsMiner Launch Cost Amortization Straight Line, 20 yearsIncome Tax Rate 36%

Page 24: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

H.E. Thompson 24

Yearly Required Revenue Per Miner(Habitat+Labor+Profit+Taxes+Depreciation)

R aH aLL M

pvfD

L M

pvfD D

m

m

= + ++

+−

+− +

[ ]

[ ]τ

τ1H=habitat cost/person /yr, L=salary+fringe/person/yr, Lm=miner launch cost, M= miner initial cost, D=Yearly depreciation=(Lm+M)/n , n=miner life, τ=income tax rate, pvf=present value factor, a=Number of astronauts

� Government-Private

Page 25: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

H.E. Thompson 25

Price Per Gram of 3He(R/33kg)

Put in Cost of helium-3 (including cost of capital) transparancy

� Government-Private

Cost of Helium-3 (Including the Cost of Capital)

15%15% 20%20% 25%25%00

100100

200200

300300

400400

500500

600600

700700

800800

Cost of Capital – %Cost of Capital – %

Cost of

Helium-3

per Gram

($1993)

Cost of

Helium-3

per Gram

($1993) LaborLabor

Income taxesIncome taxes

ProfitProfit

AmortizationAmortization

Habitat & ConsumablesHabitat & Consumables

Page 26: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

H.E. Thompson 26

�Government-Private

Put in Cost of electricity produced by Coal, etc

Cost of Electricity Produced by Coal, D3He Fusion and Fission

mills/kWh

Type of PlantCoalCoal Fusion Fusion Fusion Fusion Fusion Fusion FissionFission

00

1010

2020

3030

4040

5050

6060

7070 FuelO&MPlant Cost

(15%) C.O.C. on Fuel

(20%) C.O.C. on Fuel

(25%) C.O.C. on

Fuel

Page 27: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

H.E. Thompson 27

�Government-Private

Sensitivity of Price of 3He/g to Cost Elements

(15% Cost of Capital)

Launch Cost/kg Price of 3He/g

$1000 $523

$1500 $728

$2000 $933

Number of Astronauts Price of 3He/g

3 $523

6 $568

9 $613

Page 28: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

H.E. Thompson 28

�Government-Private

The Role of By-Products from 3He Mining

ü 18,200kg Volatile By-Products/kg 3He

ü 600,600kg of By-Products per miner per year

ü Assume Government Uses 30% of the By-Products

ü Launch Costs Saved per miner per year =$180,180,000

Year Miners Yearly Savings

2015 1 $ 180,000,000

2020 10 $ 1,180,000,000

2025 57 $10,270,260,000

Page 29: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

H.E. Thompson 29

F Put in Net cash flow to government trans

�Government-Private

1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025

Billions of $ (1993)

Year

Cumulative Avoided Launch Costs @ 1000 $/kg

Net Cash Flow

Cumulative R&D

8

4

0

-4

Net Cash Flow to Government

Page 30: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

H.E. Thompson 30

F Put in conclusions trans

�Government-Private

Conclusions• If the Government Funds all Additional Lunar Mining R&D• If the Government Funds all Additional Lunar Mining R&D

– An adequate profit incentive for a Lunar Mining Company exists

– The selling price to utilities will be between $500/gram and $800/gram

– Electricity cost from 3He fusion power plants will be competitive with coal and fission

– The government will recover its R&D expenditures by 2020

– The government will earn a substantial return (≈20%) on its investment

– An adequate profit incentive for a Lunar Mining Company exists

– The selling price to utilities will be between $500/gram and $800/gram

– Electricity cost from 3He fusion power plants will be competitive with coal and fission

– The government will recover its R&D expenditures by 2020

– The government will earn a substantial return (≈20%) on its investment

Page 31: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

H.E. Thompson 31

�Private Only

F Put in R&D Component of cost if Lunar Mining Company bears all R&D costs

R&D Component of Cost of 3He ($/g) If Lunar Mining Company Bears All R&D Funding

Cost of CapitalCost of Capital15%15% 20%20% 25%25%

00

50005000

1000010000

1500015000

2000020000

2500025000

3000030000

$/g$/g

Page 32: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

H.E. Thompson 32

F Put in Volatile Sales Needed to Offset trans

�Private OnlyVolatile Sales Needed to Offset Additional Space R&D

Price as a

Fraction of

Launch

Costs

Price as a Fraction of Launch Costs

Fraction of Volatiles Sold to BasesFraction of Volatiles Sold to Bases

.1.1 .2.2 .3.3 .4.4 .5.5 .6.6 .7.7 .8.8 .9.900

0.10.10.20.20.30.3

0.40.4

0.50.5

0.60.60.70.70.80.8

0.90.9

$3000/g 3He (15% Cost of Capital)

$9600/g 3He (20% Cost of Capital)

Page 33: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

H.E. Thompson 33

F The key element is financing R&D

– Funding amounts are large but manageable

– Substantial risk for private investors

F 20 years of cash outlays beforea cash inflow

F By-product sales needed to make 3He competitive

F Uncertainty of market for the by-products

F Government risks are minor in government-private undertaking

Can the funds be raised for financing of the Lunar Mining Co., Inc.?

Page 34: Portfolios & Systematic Risk - Fusion Technology Institute

References

Keown, Scott, Martin, Petty, Basic Financial Management, 7th ed. Prentice-Hall 1996

Bodie, Kane, Marcus, Investments, 3rd ed. Irwin, 1996

Greenberg, Hertzfeld, Space Economics, Vol 144, Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, AmericanInstitute of Aeronautics and Astonautics, 1992

Thompson, "Cost of 3He from the Moon," Second Wisconsin Symposium on Helium-3 and FusionPower, Wisconsin Center for Space Automation and Robotics, July 1993, p.159-172