Physics 215 – Quantum Mechanics 1 Assignment...
Transcript of Physics 215 – Quantum Mechanics 1 Assignment...
Physics 215 – Quantum Mechanics 1Assignment 1
Logan A. Morrison
January 19, 2016
Problem 1
Prove via the dual correspondence definition that the hermitian conjugate of |α〉 〈β| is |β〉 〈α|.
Solution
By definition, the hermitian conjugate of an operator A is defined by
A |n〉 → 〈n| A† (1)
under the dual correspondence. Let |n〉 be and arbitrary vector. Then, we know that
(|α〉 〈β|) |n〉 → 〈β|n〉∗ 〈α| (2)= 〈n|β〉 〈α| (3)= 〈n| (|β〉 〈α|) (4)
(5)
Since this hold for all |n〉, we conclude that
(|α〉 〈β|)† = |β〉 〈α| (6)
Logan A. Morrison Assignment 2– Problem 2 Page 2 / 9
Problem 2
Prove that, in the absence of degeneracy, a sufficient condition for the following to be true
∑b′〈c′|b′〉 〈b′|a′〉 〈a′|b′〉 〈b′|c′〉 =
∑b′b′′〈c′|b′〉 〈b′|a′〉 〈a′|b′′〉 〈b′′|c′〉 (7)
(where as usual |a′〉 is and eigen-ket of A etc.) is that [A, B] = 0 or that [B,C] = 0.
Solution
Assume that both A and B are self-adjoint. Additionally, assume that [A, B] = 0. Then,
AB |a′〉 = BA |a′〉 (8)= a′B |a′〉 (9)
Therefore, B |a′〉 is an eigenket of A with eigenvalue a′. Since there is no degeneracy, there is only one eigenvectorof A corresponding to the eigenvalue a′: |a′〉. Therefore, B |a′〉 is proportional to |a′〉. That is, B |a′〉 = b′ |a′〉. Inothere words, the eigenkets of B are proportional to the eigenkets of A. Thus, we can write
|b′〉 = γ′ |a′〉 (10)
Since the states are properly normalized, (〈b′|b′〉 = 1 and 〈a′|a′〉 = 1), we require that |γ′| = 1. Note that sincethe operators are self-adjoint, the eigenvectors are orthogonal. Therefore, 〈b′|a′〉 = 0 unless 〈b′| = γ′∗ 〈b′| Thisyields: ∑
b′〈c′|b′〉 〈b′|a′〉 〈a′|b′〉 〈b′|c′〉 = 〈c′| γ′ |a′〉 〈a′| γ′∗ |a′〉 〈a′| γ′ |a′〉 〈b′| γ′∗ |c′〉 (11)
= |γ′|4 〈c′|a′〉 〈a′|c′〉 (12)= 〈c′|a′〉 〈a′|c′〉 (13)
Since B is hermitian, ∑b′|b′〉 〈b′| =
∑b′′|b′′〉 〈b′′| = I (14)
where I is the identity operator.∑b′b′′〈c′|b′〉 〈b′|a′〉 〈a′|b′′〉 〈b′′|c′〉 = 〈c′| I |a′〉 〈a′| I |c′〉 (15)
= 〈c′|a′〉 〈a′|c′〉 (16)
Thus, the two expressions are equal and we have proved the equality in equation 7.
Logan A. Morrison Assignment 2– Problem 3 Page 3 / 9
Problem 3
Show that for the |S z; +〉 state of a spin 12 system
⟨S 2
x
⟩− 〈S x〉
2 = ~2/4
Solution
First, from class, we know that
|S x,+〉 =|S z,+〉 + |S z,−〉
√2
(17)
|S x,−〉 =|S z,+〉 − |S z,−〉
√2
(18)
We can invert these equations to obtain
|S z,+〉 =|S x,+〉 + |S x,−〉
√2
(19)
(20)
Using this, we find that ⟨S 2
x
⟩= 〈S z; +| S 2
x |S z; +〉 (21)
=12
(〈S x; +| + 〈S x;−|) S xS x (|S x; +〉 + |S x;−〉) (22)
=12
(〈S x; +| + 〈S x;−|) S x
(~
2|S x; +〉 −
~
2|S x;−〉
)(23)
=12
(〈S x; +| + 〈S x;−|)(~2
4|S x; +〉 +
~2
4|S x;−〉
)(24)
=12
(~2
4+~2
4
)(25)
=~2
4(26)
and
〈S x〉 = 〈S z; +| S x |S z; +〉 (27)
=12
(〈S x; +| + 〈S x;−|) S x (|S x; +〉 + |S x;−〉) (28)
=12
(〈S x; +| + 〈S x;−|)(~
2|S x; +〉 −
~
2|S x;−〉
)(29)
=12
(~
2−~
2
)(30)
= 0 (31)
and hence,⟨S 2
x
⟩−〈S x〉
2 = ~2/4. Physically, we know thatσS x =
√⟨S 2
x⟩− 〈S x〉
2 = ~/2 whereσS x is the uncertaintyof the value of S x for a particle in the state |S x; +〉. Since there is a probability of 1/2 that the value ~/2 will bemeasured and a probability of 1/2 that the value −~/2 will be measured.
Logan A. Morrison Assignment 2– Problem 4 Page 4 / 9
Problem 4
A two-state system is characterized by the Hamiltonian
H = H11 |1〉 〈1| + H22 |2〉 〈2| + H12 (|1〉 〈2| + |2〉 〈1|) (32)
where H11,H12 and H22 are real numbers with the dimension of energy, and |1〉 and |2〉 are eigenkets of someobservable , H. FInd the energy eigenkets and corresponding energy eigenvalues.
Solution
To solve this problem, we should choose a representation for our states. Let
|1〉 =
(10
)(33)
and
|2〉 =
(01
)(34)
In this representation, we have that
H =
(H11 H12
H12 H22
)(35)
Now, let’s find the eigenvalues:
0 = det(H − λI) (36)
=
∣∣∣∣∣∣H11 − λ H12
H12 H22 − λ
∣∣∣∣∣∣ (37)
= (H11 − λ) (H22 − λ) − H212 (38)
= H11H22 − (H11 + H22) λ + λ2 − H212 (39)
Therefore,
λ =12
(H11 + H22 ±
√(H11 + H22)2
− 4H11H22 + 4H212
)(40)
=12
(H11 + H22 ±
√(H11 − H22)2 + 4H2
12
)(41)
(42)
Thus, the two possible energies are:
E+ =12
(H11 + H22 +
√(H11 − H22)2 + 4H2
12
)(43)
and
E− =12
(H11 + H22 −
√(H11 − H22)2 + 4H2
12
)(44)
Logan A. Morrison Assignment 2– Problem 4 Page 5 / 9
Now let’s find the energy eigenstate corresponding to E+. To do so, we will determine the null space of H −E+I:
0 = (H − E+I) |E+〉 (45)
=
(H11 − E+ H12
H12 H22 − E+
) (ab
)(46)
12
(H11 − H22 −
√(H11 − H22)2 + 4H2
12
)H12
H1212
(H22 − H11 −
√(H11 − H22)2 + 4H2
12
)(ab
)(47)
Thus,
0 = a(12
(H11 − H22 −
√(H11 − H22)2 + 4H2
12
))+ bH12 (48)
a = −2H12(
H11 − H22 −
√(H11 − H22)2 + 4H2
12
)b (49)
and therefore, choosing b =
(H11 − H22 −
√(H11 − H22)2 + 4H2
12
), we find
|E+〉 =
2H12(H11 − H22 −
√(H11 − H22)2 + 4H2
12
) (50)
And now let’s find the energy eigenstate corresponding to E−. To do so, we will determine the null space ofH − E−I:
0 = (H − E−I) |E−〉 (51)
=
(H11 − E− H12
H12 H22 − E−
) (ab
)(52)
12
(H11 − H22 +
√(H11 − H22)2 + 4H2
12
)H12
H1212
(H22 − H11 +
√(H11 − H22)2 + 4H2
12
)(ab
)(53)
Thus,
0 = a(12
(H11 − H22 +
√(H11 − H22)2 + 4H2
12
))+ bH12 (54)
a = −2H12(
H11 − H22 +
√(H11 − H22)2 + 4H2
12
)b (55)
and therefore, choosing b =
(H11 − H22 −
√(H11 − H22)2 + 4H2
12
), we find
|E−〉 =
2H12(H11 − H22 +
√(H11 − H22)2 + 4H2
12
) (56)
Clearly these states are not normalized to 1. We could do so by defining∣∣∣E′+⟩ =
1〈E+|E+〉
|E+〉 and a similar
expression for∣∣∣E′−⟩.
Logan A. Morrison Assignment 2– Problem 5 Page 6 / 9
Problem 5
Construct the transformation matric that connects the S z diagonal basis to the S x diagonal basis and show thatyour result is consistent with the general relation
U =∑
r
∣∣∣b(r)⟩ ⟨
a(r)∣∣∣ . (57)
Solution
From class, we know that:
|S x; +〉 =1√
2(|S z; +〉 + |S z;−〉) (58)
|S x;−〉 =1√
2(|S z; +〉 − |S z;−〉) (59)
(60)
Thus, in the usual representation of |S z; +〉 and |S z;−〉, i.e.
|S z; +〉 =
(10
)and |S z;−〉 =
(01
)(61)
one can clearly see that the transformation matrix is:
U =1√
2
(1 11 −1
)(62)
In other words,
|S x; +〉 = U |S z; +〉 (63)|S x;−〉 = U |S z;−〉 (64)
In a representation-free form, U is:
U =1√
2(|S z; +〉 〈S z; +| + |S z;−〉 〈S z; +| + |S z; +〉 〈S z;−| − |S z;−〉 〈S z;−|) (65)
Let’s check that this transformation matrix yields the appropriate transformation:
U |S z; +〉 =1√
2(|S z; +〉 〈S z; +| + |S z;−〉 〈S z; +| + |S z; +〉 〈S z;−| − |S z;−〉 〈S z;−|) |S z; +〉 (66)
=1√
2(|S z; +〉 〈S z; +|S z; +〉 + |S z;−〉 〈S z; +|S z; +〉 + |S z; +〉 〈S z;−|S z; +〉 − |S z;−〉 〈S z;−|S z; +〉) (67)
=1√
2(|S z; +〉 + |S z;−〉) (68)
= |S x; +〉 (69)
Logan A. Morrison Assignment 2– Problem 5 Page 7 / 9
and
U |S z;−〉 =1√
2(|S z; +〉 〈S z; +| + |S z;−〉 〈S z; +| + |S z; +〉 〈S z;−| − |S z;−〉 〈S z;−|) |S z;−〉 (70)
=1√
2(|S z; +〉 〈S z; +|S z;−〉 + |S z;−〉 〈S z; +|S z;−〉 + |S z; +〉 〈S z;−|S z;−〉 − |S z;−〉 〈S z;−|S z;−〉) (71)
=1√
2(|S z; +〉 − |S z;−〉) (72)
= |S x;−〉 (73)
Now, we can write our transformation matrix in a slightly different form:
U =1√
2(|S z; +〉 〈S z; +| + |S z;−〉 〈S z; +| + |S z; +〉 〈S z;−| − |S z;−〉 〈S z;−|) |S z; +〉 (74)
=1√
2(|S z; +〉 + |S z;−〉) 〈S z; +| +
1√
2(|S z; +〉 − |S z;−〉) 〈S z;−| (75)
= |S x; +〉 〈S z; +| + |S x;−〉 〈S z;−| (76)
which is of the form∑
r
∣∣∣b(r)⟩ ⟨
a(r)∣∣∣.
Logan A. Morrison Assignment 2– Problem 6 Page 8 / 9
Problem 6
An operator A, corresponding to an observable α, has two normalized eigenstates |φ1〉 and |φ2〉, with eigenvalues a1
and a2. An operator B, corresponding to an observable β, has normalized eigenstates |χ1〉 and |χ2〉. The eigenstatesare related by
|φ1〉 =2 |χ1〉 + 3 |χ2〉
√13
, |φ1〉 =3 |χ1〉 − 2 |χ2〉
√13
. (77)
α is measured and the value a1 is obtained. If β is then measured and then α again, find the probability of obtaininga1 a second time.
Solution
First off, let’s invert equation 78:
|χ1〉 =2 |φ1〉 + 3 |φ2〉√
13, |χ1〉 =
3 |φ1〉 − 2 |φ2〉√
13. (78)
Assume that α is measured and a1 is obtained. Then we know that the state of our system is |φ1〉. Now if wemeasure β and then α, there are two ways of obtaining a1 again. The first case is that we measure β and obtain|χ1〉 and then measure α and obtain a1. The second case is we measure β and obtain |χ2〉 and then measure α andobtain a1. The probability of obtaining a1 after the two measurements will be
Prob(|φ1〉 → |χ1〉 → |φ1〉) + Prob(|φ1〉 → |χ2〉 → |φ1〉) (79)
The probability of obtaining |χ1〉 is:
Prob(|φ1〉 → |χ1〉) = | 〈χ1|φ1〉 |2 (80)
=
∣∣∣∣∣∣〈χ1|
(2 |χ1〉 + 3 |χ2〉
√13
)∣∣∣∣∣∣2 (81)
=4
13(82)
The probability of obtaining |φ1〉 after realizing |χ1〉 is:
Prob(|χ1〉 → |φ1〉) = | 〈φ1|χ1〉 |2 (83)
=
∣∣∣∣∣∣〈φ1|
(2 |φ1〉 + 3 |φ2〉√
13
)∣∣∣∣∣∣2 (84)
=4
13(85)
Thus,Prob(|φ1〉 → |χ1〉 → |φ1〉) = (4/13)(4/13) = 16/169 (86)
The probability of obtaining |χ2〉 after measuring β is:
Prob(|φ1〉 → |χ2〉) = | 〈χ2|φ1〉 |2 (87)
=
∣∣∣∣∣∣〈χ1|
(2 |χ1〉 + 3 |χ2〉
√13
)∣∣∣∣∣∣2 (88)
=9
13(89)
Logan A. Morrison Assignment 2– Problem 6 Page 9 / 9
The probability of obtaining |φ1〉 after realizing |χ2〉 is:
Prob(|χ2〉 → |φ1〉) = | 〈φ1|χ2〉 |2 (90)
=
∣∣∣∣∣∣〈φ1|
(3 |φ1〉 − 2 |φ2〉√
13
)∣∣∣∣∣∣2 (91)
=9
13(92)
Therefore,Prob(|φ1〉 → |χ2〉 → |φ1〉) = (9/13)(9/13) = 81/169 (93)
Therefore, the probability of obtaining a1 after measuring β then α is
Prob(|φ1〉 → |χ1〉 → |φ1〉) + Prob(|φ1〉 → |χ2〉 → |φ1〉) =16169
+81
169=
97169
(94)