On the Non-triviality of the · Nuc. Phys. B 200 [FS4] 281 (1982) Callaway (Rockefeller University)...
Transcript of On the Non-triviality of the · Nuc. Phys. B 200 [FS4] 281 (1982) Callaway (Rockefeller University)...
Content
• Is the model trivial?• Our Approach
– In the continuum– On the lattice– Computation and curve fitting– Approaching continuum limit
• Result – Verification in 2-dimensions– Results in 4-dimensions
• Conclusion & Possible Work
4λϕ
d > 4 : trivial
( ) ⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡++∂= ∫ 42
22
!4221][ ϕλϕϕϕ μ
mxdS dE
4λϕIs the model trivial?
model4λϕ
d < 4 : non-trivial
d = 4 : no conclusive answer!
m2 and λ : bare mass and bare coupling constant
1. Physical coupling constant λR non-zero2. Renormalized propagator shows interaction
Two ways to determine triviality status:
Summary of Past Findings
Triviality of λϕ4
model in 4‐dimensions? ‐
Mixed conclusions
Trivial Non-Trivial
1.
Aizenmann
(1983)2.
Bender & Jones (1988)
3.
Butera
& Comi
(2001)4.
C B Lang (1986)
5.
Freedman (1982)6.
Kuti
(1988)
7.
Luscher
& Weisz
(1987, 88)
1.
W H Huang (1994)2.
Pederson (1992)
3.
Stevenson (1986)4.
J F Yang & J H Ruan
(2002)
5.
Consoli
(1988, 89)
4λϕIs the model trivial?
Others’
approach
• Smaller scale simulations, thus require more extrapolation.
• Restriction on certain parameters‐
Coupling constant λ
→∞
‐
Fixed field value φ
• Analyze only on the renormalized coupling constant λR
• Continuum limit taken L → finite or
a
→ 0
Our approach
• Simulation of larger scale is possible.
• No restriction is imposed on λ and φ to allow a general
conclusion.
• Analyze the two‐point function as well λR
• More rigorous continuum limit approach.
L →∞ AND a
→ 0
Their Limitations
4λϕIs the model trivial?
The Renormalized 2-point connected correlation function
Renormalized propagator
B. DeWitt proposed anzatz for the propagator which we adopt:
proposed, in the broken symmetry phase, the renormalized propagator takes the form
The exact form is not known butM. Luscher and P. Weisz, [ Nucl. Phys. B295, 65 (1988)]
β : measures strength of interaction (deviation from free field propagator)
2effRm physical mass square
Our Approach – In the continuum
Our Approach – On the Lattice
computed on the supercomputer
Curve fitting with lattice version - DeWitt’s ansatz
Z2effRμ α[ ]22222
,
)()(~
kk
Z
effReffR
kkrr
rr
κμακμ +++=Γ −
On lattice / discretize
Monte Carlo method
222 ameffReffR =μ
Z : field renormalization constant
222
lim effRc
αμβμμ →
=
• Monte Carlo method is employed - Embedded Wolff algorithm
Computation and curve fitting- Computation of the propagator
>><<−>=<Γ ''', αααααα φφφφ rrrrrr
The lattice expectation value
[ ]22222
,
)()(~
kk
Z
effReffR
kkrr
rr
κμακμ +++=Γ −
Fourier Transformation
kkrr
−Γ ,~
• Curve fitting - Values of the parameters Z, , α2effRμ
Definition:
Assuming that a shrinks and L expands by same factor
Approaching continuum limit
∞→N
02 →effRμ222 ameffReffR =μ 0→aas
L=Na
Content
• Is the λϕ4 model trivial?• The Approach
– In the continuum– On the lattice– Computation and curve fitting– Approaching continuum limit
• Result – Verification in 2 dimensions– Results in 4 dimensions
• Conclusion & Possible Work
Content
• Is the λϕ4 model trivial?• The Approach
– In the continuum– On the lattice– Computation and curve fitting– Approaching continuum limit
• Result – Verification in 2 dimensions– Results in 4 dimensions
• Conclusion & Possible Work
4D λ = 120
-0.005
-0.0045
-0.004
-0.0035
-0.003
-0.0025
-0.002
-0.0015
-0.001
-0.0005
0-8.5 -8 -7.5 -7 -6.5 -6
N=8
N=10
4D λ = 120
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
-7.2 -7.1 -7 -6.9 -6.8 -6.7 -6.6 -6.5 -6.4 -6.3 -6.2 -6.1 -6 -5.9
μ2
μ eff
R2
N=4
N=6
N=8
N=10
Results in 4 dimensions – parameters from curve fitting
Simulation results fitted with DeWitt’s Ansatz revealed divergence of α
4D
-0.012
-0.01
-0.008
-0.006
-0.004
-0.002
0-0.14 -0.12 -0.1 -0.08 -0.06 -0.04 -0.02 0
lambda = 120
lambda = 240
lambda = 57600
2 2 2effR effRm aμ =
2R*
lim effβ αμ=
Results in 4 dimensions
Simulation results fitted with DeWitt’s Ansatz reveal non-zero of β
2R
2R
0lim effμ
β αμ→
=
Results in 4 dimensions
Non‐zero renormalized coupling constant λR
4D Analysis of renormalized coupling constant
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
-0.14 -0.12 -0.1 -0.08 -0.06 -0.04 -0.02 0
lambda = 57600
lambda = 240
lambda = 120
Li (l bd
2 2
2
2
6limc
RR
Rμ μ
μλφ→
= −
Results in 4 dimensions
Content
• Is the λϕ4 model trivial?• The Approach
– In the continuum– On the lattice– Computation and curve fitting– Approaching continuum limit
• Result – Verification in 2 dimensions– Results in 4 dimensions
• Conclusion & Possible Work
Conclusions & Possible Work
• DeWitt’s Ansatz produce consistent result in 2- dimensions
• It also shows signs that the model is non trivial in 4-dimensions
4λϕ
To study the implication of our results for the Higgs model.
Possible work:
Summary of Past FindingsII. Literature Review
Three main approaches
Analytical NumericalRenormalization Group
M. Aizenmann
(Norbert Wiener, Prize Princeton University)
‐‐
Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1(1981)
J. Frohlich
(Max Planck Medal 2001, ETH Zurich
)
‐‐
Nuc. Phys. B 200 [FS4] 281 (1982)
Callaway
(Rockefeller University) ‐‐
Physics Reports 167, 5 (1988) 241.
Cristiane
Aragao
& Carneiro
‐‐
Phys. Rev. D 68, 065010(2003)
J.F. Yang & J.H. Ruan
‐‐
Phys. Rev. D 65, 125009(2002)
Consoli, Cea, Cosmai
(INFN, Italy), Stevenson
‐‐
Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 14, 1673 (1999)