Oh, it’s your standard “boy meets girl, boy loses girl, boy invents a new deposition technique...
-
Upload
jonah-bell -
Category
Documents
-
view
262 -
download
6
Transcript of Oh, it’s your standard “boy meets girl, boy loses girl, boy invents a new deposition technique...
Oh, it’s your standard “boy meets girl, boy loses girl, boy invents a new deposition technique for ultra-thin film semiconductors, boy gets girl back” story!
Ch 5: Rigid Body Eqtns of Motion
• Ch 4: Introduced all kinematical tools to analyze rigid body motion.
• Euler angles: ,θ,ψ: A useful set of 3 generalized coordinates for describing the body orientation.
• Orthogonal transformation A & associated matrix properties & algebra: A powerful, elegant math formalism for the description of rigid body motion.
• Ch 5: Uses these tools & techniques to get general eqtns of motion for rigid body in convenient form
The Euler Dynamical Equations.• Also: Applications of Euler Equations.
Sect 5.1: Angular Momentum & KE• Chasles’ Theorem: The most general displacement of a
rigid body is a rotation about some axis plus a translation. It ought to be possible to divide the problem into 2 separate
problems: 1. Translation, 2. Rotation. – Obviously if one point is fixed, this separation is trivially true.
– Also possible for general problem in some cases.• Ch. 4 discussion: 6 generalized coordinates are needed to
describe rigid body motion: 3 Cartesian coordinates of a fixed point in the body + 3 Euler angles describing the body rotation about an axis through the fixed point.
In general: Equations of motion for all 6 coordinates do not separate into 3 eqtns for translation + 3 for rotation!!
• Most common special case where fixed point in rigid body Center of Mass (CM):
• Can use some Ch. 1 results for angular momentum & kinetic energy which simplify the problem & separate equations of motion for translational & rotational coordinates into 2 sets of 3, so translation & rotation can be treated separately!
• O = arbitrary origin (fixed axes), R = CM position with respect to O. V = CM velocity, M = CM mass.
ri´ = position of particle i with respect to CM (body axes)
pi´ = mivi´ = momentum of same particle in this system.
• A Ch. 1 result for the angular
momentum of a system of
particles:
L = R MV + ∑i[ri´ pi´] (1)
The total angular momentum about point O = the angular momentum of the motion of the CM about O + the angular momentum of the motion of particles about the CM
L = R MV + ∑i[ri´ pi´] (1)
Total angular momentum about O = angular momentum of the CM about O + angular momentum of particles about the CM
• (1) In general, L depends on the origin
O, through vector R. Only if the CM is at rest
with respect to O, will first term in (1)
vanish. Then & only then will L be indep
of the point of reference. Then & only then
L = angular momentum about the CM. If we choose the origin of
the body axes to be the CM, then clearly, as far as L is
concerned, we can treat the translation & rotation of the body
separately. Then, the 1st term in (1) depends only on (X,Y,Z) &
the 2nd term depends on (,θ,ψ) : L = R MV + L´(,θ,ψ)
• O = arbitrary origin (fixed axes), R = CM position with respect to O. V = CM velocity, M = CM mass.
ri´ = position of particle i with respect to CM (body axes)
vi´ = velocity of same particle in this system.
• Ch. 1 result for KE of a system of
particles:
T = (½)MV2 + (½)∑imi(vi´)2 (2)
The total Kinetic Energy of a many particle system is equal to the Kinetic Energy of the CM plus the Kinetic Energy of motion about the CM.
T = (½)MV2 + (½)∑i mi(vi´)2 (2)
Total KE with respect to O = KE of the CM+ KE of motion about the CM.
• (2) In general, T depends on origin
O, through vector V. Only if the CM is at
rest with respect to O, will first term in (2)
vanish. Then & only then will T be indep
of point of reference. Then & only then
T = KE about the CM. If choose origin of body axes to be the
CM, then clearly, as far as T is concerned, we can treat
the translation of body & rotation of body the separately. Then,
the 1st term in (2) depends only on (X,Y,Z), 2nd term depends on
(,θ,ψ): T = (½)MV2 + T´(,θ,ψ)
• We can make this separation for the angular momentum L & the KE T. To do dynamics, using say, the Lagrangian method, we would like to make this same kind of separation in Lagrangian L = T -V
Obviously, we need to be able to separate the PE V in the same way.
• We don’t have a theorem which does this in general for V, like we do for L & T! However, from experience, in a large number of problems (special cases) of practical interest, such a separation is possible. – PE in a uniform gravitational field, PE of a magnetic dipole
in uniform magnetic field, others,...
– In such cases, we can write: L = L (X,Y,Z) + L´(,θ,ψ)
• In cases where: L = L (X,Y,Z) + L´(,θ,ψ)
Lagrange’s Eqtns of motion for translation (X,Y,Z) obviously separate from Lagrange’s Eqtns of motion for rotation (,θ,ψ) & we can treat the translation & rotation as independent.
• Now, work on expressions for angular momentum L & KE T for motion about some fixed point in a rigid body. Work on 2nd terms in previous expressions for these.
Called L´ & T´ in Eqtns (1) & (2) above. Drop prime notation. • Make repeated use of the Ch. 4 result relating the time
derivatives in space & body axes (angular velocity ω):
(d/dt)s = (d/dt)r + ω (I)
• Goldstein proves that angular velocity ω is indep of choice of the origin of body axes. See pages 185-186 for details. Intuitively obvious by definition of rigid body?
• Angular momentum L of rigid body about a fixed point in the body. Dropping the primes of before on positions, momenta, & velocities: L = ∑i[ri pi], pi = mivi
• Follow text & write using summation convention:
L = mi[ri vi] (1)
ri = fixed with respect to body axes (definition of rigid!)
The only contribution to vi is from the body rotation.
Use (I) vi = (dri/dt)s = (dri/dt)r + ω ri = 0 + ω ri
(1) becomes: L = mi [ri (ω ri)] (2)
• Use the vector identity for double cross product:
L = mi[ω(ri)2 - ri(riω)] (3)
• Look at the x, y, & z components: Lx = ωxmi[(ri)2 - (xi)2] - ωymixiyi - ωzmixizi
Ly = ωymi[(ri)2 - (yi)2] - ωxmiyixi - ωzmiyizi
Lx = ωzmi[(ri)2 - (zi)2] - ωymiziyi - ωxmizixi (4)
• (4) Each component of L = Linear combination of components of angular velocity ω. Or: The angular momentum vector is related to the angular velocity vector by a linear transformation!
Define inertia tensor Ijk (summation convention!) :
Lj Ijkωk (5)
Ijk also called the moment of inertia coefficients
• Inertia tensor Ijk (summation convention!) :
Lj Ijkωk
Or: Lx = Ixxωx + Ixyωy + Ixzωz
Ly = Iyxωx + Iyyωy + Iyzωz
Lz = Izxωx + Izyωy + Izzωz
• Diagonal elements Moment of inertia coefficients:
Ixx = mi[(ri)2 - (xi)2], Iyy = mi[(ri)2 - (yi)2], Izz = mi[(ri)2 - (zi)2]
• Off-diagonal elements Products of inertia:
Ixy = Iyx = - mixiyi , Ixz = Izx = - mixizi , Iyz = Izy = - miyizi
• Inertia tensor Ijk (summation convention, i = particle label, j, k = Cartesian x,y,z = 1,2,3 labels!) :
Lj Ijkωk
• Compact form: Ijk mi[(ri)2δjk - (ri)j(ri)k] • All of this is in notation for discrete systems of particles.
• Continuous bodies: Sum over particles integral over volume V. Define: ρ(r) Mass density at position r
Ijk ∫Vρ(r)[r2δjk - xjxk]dV
Or: Ixx = ∫Vρ(r)[r2 - x2]dV, Iyy = ∫Vρ(r)[r2 - y2]dV
Izz = ∫Vρ(r)[r2 - z2]dV
Ixy = Iyx = ∫Vρ(r)[r2 - xy]dV, Ixz = Izx = ∫Vρ(r)[r2 - xz]dV
Iyz = Izy = ∫Vρ(r)[r2 - yz]dV
• Recall: The coordinate system is the BODY axis system (the primes from the last chapter are dropped).
• Since the body is rigid, all elements Ijk are constants in time. Clearly, they DO depend on the origin of coordinates (different if taken about the CM or elsewhere!).
• We can summarize Lj = Ijkωk in an even more compact
form: L Iω where I Inertia Matrix
• This is in the form of the orthogonal transformation of Ch. 4. Clearly we need to take the interpretation that I acts on the vector ω to produce L, rather than the interpretation of I acting on the coordinate system.
Sect 5.2: Tensors• More pure math discussion. Brief! Hopefully, a review!
• I Tensor of 2nd rank. Now, a general discussion.• In Cartesian 3d-space, DEFINE a tensor of the Nth
rank T a quantity with 3N elements or components Tijk.. (N indices) which transform under an orthogonal transformation of coords A (from Ch. 4) as (summation
convention!):
T´ijk..(x´) = ail ajm akn … Tlmn..(x)
(N factors of matrix elements aij of A) • Following the discussion of pseudo-vectors in Ch. 4, we also
need to define a pseudo-tensor, which transforms as a tensor except under inversion. See footnote, p 189.
• Tensor of 0th rank: 1 element scalar. Invariant under an
orthogonal transformation A. • Tensor of 1st rank: 3 elements ordinary vector. Transforms under
orthogonal transformation A as:
T´i(x´) = aij Tj(x)
• Tensor of 2nd rank: 9 elements. Transforms under orthogonal transformation A as:
T´ij(x´) = aik ajl Tkl(x)
• Rigorously, we have a distinction between the 2nd rank tensor T & the square matrix formed from its elements: Tensor: Defined only by its transform properties under orthogonal transforms. Matrix: A representation of a tensor in a particular coordinate system. Every tensor equation In some coordinate system, a corresponding matrix equation. Further discussion, p. 189.
• Various math properties of tensors, p. 190-191: Read on your own!
Sect 5.3: Inertia Tensor & Moment of Inertia• Inertia tensor I = 2nd rank tensor, transforms as such
under orthogonal transformation A. • The angular momentum of a rigid body is: L = Iω.
Should more properly be written L = Iω – Where matrix or tensor multiplication.
• Now, we’ll derive a form for the KE T for a rigid body in terms of I and ω.
• Start with KE of motion about a point in form (summation convention, dropped prime from earlier) :
T (½)mi(vi)2
T (½)mi(vi)2 = (½)mivivi
• Rigid body The only contribution to vi is from body rotation. As before use
vi = (dri/dt)s = (dri/dt)r + ω ri = 0 + ω ri
Convenient to use with only one of the vi in the dot product:
T = (½)mivi(ω ri )
• Permuting vectors in triple product:
T = (½)ω[mi(ri vi )] (½)ωL
• Using L = Iω this becomes:
T = (½)ωIω – Note: Order matters & product with ω when is to left of I
& to right of I is clearly different. T is clearly a scalar, as it should be!
– Often, I may write it as simply T = (½)ωIω (leaving out )
T = (½)ωIω (1)• n unit vector along rotation axis, so that ω = ωn
Can write (1) as:
T = (½)ω2nIn (½)Iω2 (2)
I nIn Moment of Inertia (about rotation axis)
• Using forms of I from before, can write:
I = nIn = mi[(ri)2 - (rin)2] (3) • Text proves (p. 192, figure) that
definition, (3), of I is consistent with
elementary definition as sum over all
particles of products of particle masses
times square of distances from
rotation axis. I = mi[(ri)2] . Read!
T = (½)ωIω (1)• n unit vector along rotation axis:
T = (½)ω2nIn (½)Iω2 (2)
I nIn Moment of Inertia (about rotation axis)
• Clearly, moment of inertia I depends on the direction n of the rotation axis. Also, for a rigid body in motion, that direction & thus the direction of ω can be time dependent. In general, I = I(t)
• In the (important!) special case where the body is constrained to rotate about a fixed axis, clearly then, I = constant.
– When this is the case, T in the form of (1) can be used in the Lagrange formalism if we can write ω as the time derivative of some angle.
I nIn Moment of Inertia (about rotation axis)
• Inertia tensor I & moment of inertia I depend on the choice of the body axes origin. However, the moment of inertia about a given axis is simply related to the moment of inertia about a parallel axis through the CM ( Parallel Axis Theorem).
• Figure: 2 || rotation axes a & b,
direction n. Axis b passes through
CM. R, ri = positions of CM &
particle i with respect to origin O.
ri´ = position of particle i with
respect to CM. ri = R + ri´.
Moment of inertia about axis a:
Ia = ∑imi(ri n)2 = ∑imi[(R + ri´) n]2
= ∑imi(R n)2 + ∑imi(ri´ n)2 + 2∑imi(R n)(ri´ n)
• Moment of inertia about axis a:
Ia = ∑imi(R n)2 + ∑imi(ri´ n)2
+ 2 ∑imi(R n)(ri´ n)
• Moment of inertia about axis b:
Ib = ∑imi(ri´ n)2
• Note that: ∑ imi(R n)2 M(R n)2
Ia = Ib
+ M(R n)2 + 2∑imi(R n)(ri´ n)
• Rewrite 3rd term as: 2(R n)(∑imiri´ n)
Note that, by definition of CM, ∑imiri´ = 0
2∑imi(R n)(ri´ n) = 0
Ia = Ib
+ M(R n)2 For θ = angle between R & rotation axis n, distance between axes a & b = |R n| = Rsinθ = r. Ia
= Ib +
MR2sin2θ
Or: Ia = Ib
+ M(r)2 Parallel Axis Theorem
Ia = Ib
+ M(r)2 Parallel Axis Theorem
• In words: The moment of inertia about an arbitrary axis is equal to the moment of inertia about a parallel axis passing through the center of mass plus the moment of inertia of the body about the arbitrary axis, taken as if all of the mass M of the body were at the center of mass.
• Summary: Rotational KE in terms of inertia tensor:
T = (½)ωIω (1)• Can rewrite in terms of tensor elements as
(summation convention):
T = (½)ωjIjkωk (2)
• Again (summation convention, i = particle label, j, k =
Cartesian x,y,z = 1,2,3 labels!) :
Ijk mi[(ri)2δjk - (ri)j(ri)k]
• Continuous bodies: Sum over particles integral over volume V. Define: ρ(r) Mass density at position r
Ijk ∫Vρ(r)[r2δjk - xjxk]dV