Beer explored academically 7

THEΩMEGA

VOLUME 22ISSUE 12

NOVEMBER 21, 2012

TRU’s Independent Student Newspaper

Washroom cleanliness explored

Women’s soccer year-in-review 10

Objectivity in journalism? 2

November 21, 20122

ON THE COVER:Some wonder at times if the washroom facilities around TRU ever get cleaned. “We can send a cleaner in at 10 a.m. to clean. At 10:05 it can be

a disaster again,” according to Warren Asuchak, TRU’s assistant director of facilities. See story page 4.—PHOTO BY DEVAN C. TASA

As long as there has been journalism, there have been journalists. As long as there have been journalists, there has been the question of objectivity and bias — or at least the perception of objectiv-ity or bias — in what they do. This is a ridiculous question.

There is no such thing as objectivity in journalism.

Whoa, now! “Slow down, young whippersnapper,” say the old-school journalists who pride themselves on this false proclamation they made their careers based on “fair and balanced” journalism, or at least “from all facets” reportage.

This is simply not true.It is true that many of the things re-

ported in the news media throughout the years have examined things from many angles and strived to not pre-determine a conclusion and force it on the reader.

This is not the same as objectivity.According to the Oxford Canadian

Dictionary, “objective,” in the context of this discussion is defined as, “1. (of a per-son, an opinion, etc.) not influenced by personal bias.”

The key word is influenced. There are too many influences on a piece of jour-nalism to propose that none of those in-fluences were based on personal bias. Or, at least, it is an unrealistic expectation to commit to this idea as the foundation of the industry.

I ask this of those aforementioned journalists with their claims of objectiv-ity: how did you decide to write those articles that were “fair and balanced” and were examined “from all facets?” Did you decide they were worthy of coverage because the public needed to be informed on a topic? If so, you decided those sto-ries were more important than some other pieces you could have done instead. That’s a bias right there.

Maybe an editor as-signed you those stories and you yourself had no bias, intentions or conceptions of how they would turn out when you started your research or writing — they were simply assignments. If this is the case, you have a closer claim to objectivity than others might, but by the time they got to your audi-ence (and in fact before they were even assigned to you), biased choices had been made to it that influenced its reach and message.

Before anyone gets all up in arms about how journal-ism is supposed to be the last bastion of honesty and integrity in a society drown-ing in its own debauchery and lies, and asking how I dare accuse the institution of such malfeasance, I should declare that this is not an attack on the industry, but a celebration.

I don’t believe in objectivity — but only because I don’t think it’s actually possible — and believe we should cel-ebrate and revel in our journalistic sub-jectivity and biases.

The great debate: objectivity

As I do on occasion, I was clicking

links to interesting-sounding articles and blog posts from some social networking platform one day in May 2012. I came across an interesting post about the Ca-nadian government’s cutbacks in regards to environmental regulations. This ar-ticle itself was extremely one-sided but the debate regarding blogs being a part of journalism is not the one I am exam-ining. One of the comments below the piece caught my attention.

It was a damning condemnation of the government regulations by someone who claimed to be editor and publisher of a community newspaper, signed by the author and included his business email address.

“Why would he, as the publisher of a newspaper, put his name as a journalist to an issue like that?” I thought. How would one’s publication retain any pretence or perception from its readership of having an objective viewpoint? I guess my sur-prise was based on the fact that our local papers’ publishers/editors never seem to take a side on controversial issues — de-spite the calls for them to do so at times.

So I asked the author of the comment directly. I thought by posting his busi-ness email address he was inviting such inquiries.

Don Jaque, award-winning publisher and managing editor of the Northern Journal responded to my questions de-fensively, as if I was accusing him of being somehow less of a journalist. He seemed to take my statement of his news-paper as an “activist publication” as par-ticularly insulting.

“I do not understand why you feel it is unusual for me to put my name on such a post,” he replied. “We report on things like that routinely and my name as edi-tor and publisher is on all of them. Why would I not?”

I did not have an answer for this — I only knew there was this supposed (if completely artificial and fictitious) claim

that objectivity is the cornerstone of journalism and was inquiring as to his thoughts on the matter as one who clearly (in my presumptive view) felt otherwise. He would go on to contradict my as-sumption about his way of thinking on the subject.

I asked him, quite forwardly, after reviewing his publication online, which by all accounts, including my own, is an excellent one (especially for such a small community in such a remote location), “Is it more important to be clear with your readers about your goals and biases

than it is to give them unbiased facts and let them choose a position? Do you open-ly show the other side of the coin, or more so promote your impression of things and hope it resonates?”

I typed this question completely in-nocently, as it was clear to me through perusing the articles on the Northern Journal site that they were anti-oil and there was a distinct lack of discussion of economics and business (I have no prob-lems with advocacy journalism, and mis-takenly assumed he would be pleased it was recognized), though will admit that looking back at it knowing what I now know about the divisiveness of the topic of objectivity, it does feel a bit accusatory.

“We do not state our goals, although since they are about things such as fairness, objectivity, jus-tice and playing a strong role in community, we would have no problem doing that, but feel that is not needed,” he replied. “Hopefully we have no biases. We certainly strive to be objective. We at-tempt to present the facts from all issues, from all sides as objectively as possible and present them in an interesting, compel-ling way.”

Based on this response, I would definitely put him on the “objectivity is the cornerstone of the indus-try” side of the debate —

which seemed strange to me, based on his openness in the public sphere about his opinion on things like environmen-tal regulations and government, and his candour and resolve about that openness.

The great debate: Transparency

Jaque’s openness on that environmen-tal blog would seem to reflect the school of thought championed in part by David Weinberger, a senior researcher at Har-vard’s Berkman Center for Internet & Society and co-director of the Harvard

Library Innovation Lab, in an article ti-tled, “Transparency: the new objectivity,” published in September 2009.

“[W]e have taken objectivity into realms where it really should not go,” he said. “For example, for a long time, jour-nalists aimed to be objective. That’s not an achievable aim and the claim that re-porting is objective is not just wrong but seriously misleading.”

He goes on to say that because objec-tivity is technically impossible, despite the long-time journalistic assertion, au-thors should, instead of pretending ob-jectivity, present their own biases to their audience so they can take those biases into account when reading and interpret-ing the work itself.

“Transparency gives the reader infor-mation by which she can undo some of the unintended effects of the ever-present biases,” he said. “Transparency brings us to accept ideas as credible the way the claim of objectivity used to.

“[P]resenting information as objective means hiding the biases that inevitably are there. It’d be more accurate and truth-ful to acknowledge those biases, so that readers can account for them in what they read.”

But according to J-Source, the online “Canadian Journalism Project,” in an ar-ticle dated Nov. 21, 2011, “Transparency is a double-edged sword. It can increase and diminish credibility at the same time. Knowing about a potential conflict of interest is better than not knowing. But no disclosure statement can ever be com-plete enough to satisfy the truly scepti-cal.”

The media landscape: can the audi-ence tell the difference?

Should they be expected to?

“I think average readers can calibrate for bias,” said Reuters columnist Jack Shafer during a live chat session on Poynter.org, a global leader in promoting, informing on and examining the craft of journalism. “For example, is there a viewer in the nation who, when he tunes into the opinion shows on Fox News Channel and MSNBC and Current at

night, doesn’t know he’s hearing biased, opinionated coverage?”

Shafer claims that transparency is not, as some claim, the way to cause an audi-ence to easily dismiss an author or their work based on the writer’s leanings, but instead causes the work itself to be exam-ined on its own merits, because there is no assumption of bias when one’s views are already known.

“We’re kidding ourselves and kidding our readers when we pretend that jour-nalists have no opinions and no biases,” he said. “My view is that journalists can’t be objective, because as human be-ings we are all subjective. What we can do is employ an objective method in the reporting and writing of the news: To be fair, to be accurate, to be comprehensive.”

When I asked Jaque to comment on the state of Canadian media in general, he had a different opinion than the one he shared about his own objectivity.

“Do you feel that the media has been given an image of itself about its respon-sibility?” I had asked. “By that I mean is there an assumption that the media merely reports findings or has it become necessary for them to affect the interpre-tation of the public based on their own (the media’s) views?”

“I think the media in most cases is about, a) making money; and/or b) en-tertaining, rather than journalism for the most part these days and as a result the quality of the information we get (as the public) is low,” he said. “As a result the public’s image of the media is low -- so yes that image is earned, unfortunately. The second part of that question is dif-ficult to answer, mainly because there is no blanket response to it. Some journal-ists within some media report findings in a quality way and some others definitely try to spin the findings,” he said, though he clearly considered this “lesser” jour-nalism.

I suppose that is why he seemed so of-fended by my original line of questions. He thought I was accusing him of being the type of journalist he clearly has dis-taste for.

Ω Editor-in-ChiefMike Davies

There’s no such thing as objectivity in journalismFeature

Peter Mansbridge thinks journalists don’t need to say how they feel about topics they are covering, but some feel it would improve the quality of reportage.

—PHOTO BY JULIA MARKS

“Transparency brings us to accept ideas as credible the way the claim of objectivity

used to.”

—David Weinberger,

“Transparency: the new objectivity”

SEE JOURNALISM p. 4

Full disclosure: this piece is biased, and there’s nothing wrong with that

publishingboardEDITOR-IN-CHIEF * Mike DaviesBUSINESS MGR * VACANTINDUSTRY REP * Mike YoudsFACULTY REP * Charles HaysSTUDENT REP* Sadie Cox

letterspolicyLiterary and visual submissions are welcomed. All submissions are subject to editing for brevity, taste and legality. The Omega will attempt to publish each letter received, barring time and space constraints. The editor will take care not to change the intention or tone of submissions, but will not publish material deemed to exhibit sexism, racism or homophobia. Letters for publication must include the writer’s name (for publication) and contact details (not for publication). The Omega reserves the right not to publish any letter or submitted material. Opinions expressed in the Letters & Opinion section do not represent those of The Omega, the Cariboo Student Newspaper Society, its Board of Directors or its staff. Opinions belong only to those who have signed them.

copyrightAll material in this publication is copyright The Omega and may not be reproduced without the expressed consent of the publisher. All unsolicited submissions become copyright Omega 2012.

3

THE MEGA

November 21, 2012 Volume 22, Issue 12

Published since November 27, 1991

Cariboo Student Newspaper Society(Publisher of The Omega)TRU Campus House #4

Box 3010, Kamloops, B.C. V2C 0C8Phone: 250-372-1272

E-mail: editor@truomega.caAd Enquiries:

managerofomega@gmail.com

(Correspondence not intended for publication should be labelled as such.)

editorialstaffEDITOR-IN-CHIEF

Mike Davieseditor@truomega.ca

250-828-5069@PaperguyDavies

BUSINESS MANAGERVACANT

NEWS EDITORDevan C. Tasa

news@truomega.ca@DCTasa

ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT EDITORBrendan Kerginarts@truomega.ca

@roguetowel

SPORTS EDITORAdam Williams

sports@truomega.ca@AdamWilliams87

ROVING EDITORCourtney Dicksonroving@truomega.ca

@dicksoncourtney

COPY/WEB EDITORTaylor Rocca

copy@truomega.ca@manovrboard

www.theomega.ca

omegacontributors Mark Hendricks, RGeordie Milne, Anum Sultan, Abijah Gupta, Travis Persaud, Mason Buettner, Matthew Pflugfelder, Jess Buick

The Omega · Volume 22, Issue 12

Editorial/Opinions

I’m becoming seriously disap-pointed in the way people treat language.

Like it ain’t no thang.Like it’s jus somethin that we

jus use cuz it gets across what we think. lol

I don’t think people realize that the slack-ass, lazy way they communicate not only makes them sound less intelligent, but could also literally make them less intelligent over time.

Think about it. The lazier you become in your communication, the lazier your brain will get.

I’m not just making this up, either. There are numerous sci-entif ic studies that directly con-nect language to thought.

For example, a study pub-lished in July 2012 in Psycholog-ical Science, one of the premier research journals of psychologi-cal examinations produced by the Association of Psychological

Science, is one of many that has studied the effects of language use on brain functions.

“Our f indings indicate that processing the syntax of lan-guage elicits the known sub-strate of linguistic competence,” according to the study by Monti, Parsons and Osherson from the University of California Los An-geles, University of Sheffield, and Princeton University.

If you need to go back and read that statement again because you use colons and parentheses more often than you say the equivalent of “I agree,” or “just joking,” go ahead.

“This double dissociation ar-gues against the view that lan-guage provides the structure of thought across all cognitive do-mains,” they found.

That’s fancy-speak for “lan-guage use makes your brain op-erate effectively.”

And it’s not just that lazy lan-guage usage induces a cycle of even lazier language use, though that is certainly the case.

This particular study was fo-cused on the cognitive functions of the brain to use arithmetic and algebra based on stimuli of properly structured and worded phrases.

In the test, 64 grammatically correct arguments were pre-sented to the subjects while their brain was being scanned for cog-nitive functions and six ungram-matical arguments were inter-spersed within the trials.

Algebraic expressions such as 2 x (5-3) were then mentally constructed from “syntactic rou-

tines” underlying the interpre-tation of grammatically correct (or incorrect) sentences, such as “The man saw the boy who kicked the ball.”

I’m not going to get into all the data analyses structures and what kind of software they were using, but sufficed to say, peo-ple’s brains work better (even algebraically) when stimulated with grammatically correct statements.

So I will challenge you this, Thompson Rivers University students, faculty and staff: The next time you are going to end a sentence with a sideways smi-ley face, or type “lol” when you think something is funny, think about what the message is that you’re trying to get across and use a sentence.

Use a proper, grammatically correct sentence. Not a frag-ment, either. (See what I did there?)

You might f ind that not only is the act of taking the time to put down in words what you ac-tually mean more satisfying than relegating your feelings into a symbol — knowing that there is no misunderstanding of what you mean because you thought it through and expressed it pre-cisely — but the stimulation you have given your brain just by forcing it to respond differently than it usually would spurs it to bigger and better things.

And hey, according to this study, it might even make you better at math.

editor@truomega.ca

Mike Davies Ω Editor-in-Chief

Editor’s Note

As I say to my toddler, “Use your words”

Usually I like to focus my sights on the bigger picture, the long-term, the overall scope of things.

Sometimes that isn’t an easy thing to do and I f ind myself mired in a closed-off view, a short-term worry about the pres-ent with no consideration for the next step along the way.

In fact, I ran into that exact problem when it came to writing my column this week.

Usually, I have a f irm idea of just what I want to say, how I want to say it and the impact I want it to have.

This was not one of those weeks. In fact, this week I stared blankly at my screen for hours. All I could think about was how to get words in the document that would communicate to our

readers some form of informa-tion, entertainment or other ran-dom value.

I had unknowingly put my blinders on and focused in on too small of a task.

After frustration had mounted to a point where I was ready to give up, I looked to my right and noticed a small blue book sitting beside my computer.

Being a journalist, I keep a small notebook with me at all times.

In fact, I keep multiple note-books with me, each with its own unique and individual purpose.

This small blue notebook hap-pened to be my own personal notebook, one set aside for pen-ning my own random thoughts, questions or interesting obser-vations as I go about my regular everyday misadventures.

And then it hit me. I had al-ready decided on the topic of my column, I was just looking past it as it sat quietly within the pages of my little blue notebook.

Earlier in the day, as I almost always do, I had been going about my regular routine with my ear buds plugged in and my iPod cranking out the tunes.

It was during this seemingly normal sequence that I was ham-mered by a short set of lyrics that really struck a chord with me, so to speak.

“Well, I confess that, so far, happiness eludes me in my life. It better hurry up if it’s ever to

be mine; better hurry up now if we’re ever going to f ind what we’re living for.”

The line came courtesy of Ste-phen Jenkins, the lead singer of Third Eye Blind, on the track “Dao of St. Paul.”

I’m a huge believer in music and how it empowers the listener to take a hold of the reigns of life and direct that sled in whatever direction he or she wants it to go.

While we all go through our own personal struggles, ups, downs and roller coasters of emotion, we still have signif i-cant control over what happens to us.

We shouldn’t be waiting for happiness to “hurry up now.”

No. In fact, we should go out there

and create our own happiness, whatever that might be.

To think otherwise is to be far too focused on the short-term struggles and not enough on the long-term successes that await us.

As we trudge through the f i-nal days of the semester, with all-nighters aplenty, papers to write, presentations to give and a seemingly endless stack of work to complete, don’t get mired in the short-term stress that can easily overtake you.

Instead, while juggling those tasks, keep one eye on the fu-ture and use that bigger picture to keep yourself grounded in the short-term.

copy@truomega.ca

Don’t let the short-term scope fool you, stay focused on the big picture

EDMONTON (CUP) — Taking to the streets in protest of the gov-ernment is an age-old practice and a fundamental right in democratic countries. Great historical figures like Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. have seen its advantages, especially when it’s hard to get your voice heard any other way.

However, far too often there are people involved trying to take the protests too far, inciting violence and vandalizing property. To crack down on these unruly savages, the House of Commons has passed a bill stating that during all violent pro-tests any mask or item used to cover the face will be considered illegal, and result in up to 10 years in prison.

While the bill is intended to help control violent protesters, it’s prob-lematic in a few ways.

There’s no line drawn to define what constitutes a mask. Someone wearing a hat low on their head or a hood will have their face covered. Then there are the people who, for religious reasons, wear burkas or other religious headwear that con-ceals their face. Under this new law, these people, even if they happen to accidentally wander upon a violent protest, might be guilty.

Furthermore, in the event that a peaceful protest turns violent, like in the Quebec tuition protests, it’s un-clear what would happen under this new law. The peaceful protesters wearing masks wouldn’t be guilty of the violence itself, but could still land in prison for up to 10 years.

On top of that, the new bill isn’t going to change anything.

By the time a protest escalates to the point of violence, with people running through the streets hurling Molotovs through windows, flip-ping police cars and breaking ev-erything, the last thing the rioters will be worrying about whether it’s illegal to wear a mask. Telling the violent protesters that it’s illegal to wear a mask while causing all this mayhem seems blatantly futile.

The House of Commons is saying, “Hey guys, we can tell you don’t re-ally care about the law right now, but don’t wear a mask because that’s also illegal.”

The reason would-be violent riot-ers are wearing masks in the first place is so they can’t be identified by police while doing illegal acts. If these people are willing to vandalize and destroy property already, then it’s not too difficult to believe they would be willing to break one more law to protect their identities.

The government’s banning of masks during violent protests is a way to try to crack down on radical groups and make it easier for them to arrest the people involved with violence, but the problems outweigh the benefits.

Many innocent people would be wrongfully accused, and could even serve jail time, just for being in the area. The people already breaking the law in riots don’t seem like the kind of people worried about break-ing one more law.

Though the ban has good inten-tions, it has too many negative con-sequences and would be useless against the intended targets.

This bill needs to be defined bet-ter in order to ensure that truly in-nocent protesters are not lumped in with violent radicals.

Mask ban covers up freedom of

expression

The Gateway (U of A)Alexander Sorochan

Taylor Rocca Ω Copy/Web Editor

TRUe Thoughts

Follow us on

Twitter:

@TRU_Omega

“Like” us on

Facebook.

Do it.

Seriously.

November 21, 20124

News

Walking into an unclean wash-room on campus is something that’s happened to all students, but the onus is on everybody to make sure they don’t become that way in the first place.

Warren Asuchak, TRU’s as-sistant director of facilities, said the washrooms in Old Main are washed five times a day while other washrooms are cleaned three times a day.

During the day, custodians come to make sure the toilets, sinks, f loors and mirrors are clean and the dispensers are full of soap, toilet rolls and paper towels.

At night, the custodians clean the washroom to an APPA level 1 standard, a common cleaning standard for universities.

Level 1 states the washroom

must have shiny clean f loors, all surfaces have a polished appear-ance, washroom fixtures gleam and are odour-free and trash cans are emptied.

Unfor tunate-ly, the standards cannot change the behaviour of washroom users that don’t do tasks such as f lushing the toi-lets and throw-ing used paper towels into the garbage can, Asuchak said.

“It takes one person to use the washroom to make a mess. We can send a cleaner at 10 a.m. to clean. At 10:05 it can be a di-saster again. It’s the nature of the business,” he said.

“Having said that, I don’t want to leave the cleaners off the hook. They can always do a better job and we always need to push them.

But as users, we are part of the problem.”

A s u c h a k said he regu-larly inspects the washrooms, which often meet the stan-dards. If they don’t, he talks to the custodi-ans involved. I mprove me nt s have also been made in the past.

“Over the years, we have increased our fre-quencies in how often we clean during the day,” he said.

“I have added more day por-

ters to go in and clean the wash-rooms.”

Facilities is also looking at long-term solutions to ensure the washrooms remain clean. A way to do that is to lower the water pressure in the sinks so the water doesn’t splash out.

Another way is to get rid of pa-per towels, but that solution re-quires the entrances to the wash-rooms to not have handles that people have to touch.

“We are looking at washrooms like that, that don’t require doors and not have paper towel and just have the hand driers, because that would eliminate a lot of the gar-bage,” Asuchak said.

For those who find a wash-room that’s unacceptably dirty, they can let facilities know by calling the facilities help desk at 250-828-5388 or scanning one of the QR codes within the wash-room.

Shared blame for washroom cleanlinessΩ News EditorDevan C. Tasa

“There are, in certain cases, those in control [who] want to present the news from an ideo-logical perspective, so they pur-posefully see to it that the news is coloured or spun a certain way, or only certain things are reported - and their bias is ap-parent,” he continued. “This is not objective journalism, but it is the reality with some modern day media.”

He concluded his statements with a cold, depressing and bleak view of the current media landscape as far as the public perception is concerned.

“The whole concept and im-portance of a free press and its role in maintaining democracy is no longer held in as high re-gard as it once was by the public, it seems.”

A media legend chimes in

A sweaty, shaky-handed stu-dent journalist sits in an arm-chair and tries to calm his voice as he asks the man in the chair opposite for his take on the is-sue.

“Sometimes there’s a luxu-ry in our job of not having an opinion,” laughs Peter Mans-bridge, CBC’s most recogni-sable personality, and probably the most-respected individual in Canadian media, before giv-ing his thoughts on the debate itself when I was lucky enough to have him grant an interview Jan. 19, 2012.

“There’s nothing new about this debate,” he said. “It’s been going on for as long as I’ve been in journalism, this issue about whether or not you have to lay out how you feel about every topic before you cover it. I don’t agree with that.”

Mansbridge said that despite his serious, unaffected persona on-air, there have been rare oc-casions in his career where he had “personal feelings about a particular subject,” but that it is in everyone’s best interest to not put those feelings forward — be-cause it doesn’t affect his ability to do his job as a journalist.

Therefore, it shouldn’t come into the equation of the audience response and cannot possibly ef-fect their view of his integrity.

“It’s like saying, if you’re a heart surgeon and you hate the patient, you’re going to let that impact the way you do the sur-gery? No, you’re not,” he said emphatically.

“You’re going to do the best job you can to save that person’s life. It’s no different for a jour-nalist, in my view.”

So there’s some disagreement, still — but more importantly, there’s some acceptance and af-f irmation.

We, as a society and as a me-dia-consuming entity, acknowl-edge, as Mansbridge does, that, “It’s not like we’re neutered about every opinion on Earth. Journalists have opinions on things.”

We also need to recognize that these opinions and biases don’t prevent talented journalists from doing their job.

We just can’t agree on whether those opinions and biases affect the work being done by those talented journalists.

I think perhaps Shafer put it best when he said, “Objectivity without transparency increas-ingly will look like arrogance. And then foolishness.”

And no one wants to look foolish.

A culinary team that participat-ed in the recent 2012 World Cu-linary Olympics in Erfurt, Ger-many will be coming to TRU to prepare traditional First Nations dishes with a modern twist.

Aboriginal Culinary Team Can-ada (ACTC) will be at the culinary arts cafeteria at 7 p.m. on Dec. 8 to serve a three-course meal, plus dessert.

Tickets to the dinner are $75 each and can be purchased at the cafeteria.

“We’re doing the dinner to sup-

port the team,” said Ed Walker, the chair of the culinary arts pro-gram. “The funds that we raise from this will go back to the team.”

ACTC was one of 46 regional teams in the culinary Olympics on Oct. 5 to 10. It was one of eight Canadian regional teams compet-ing. Those Olympics are held ev-ery four years.

The regional teams had to cre-ate cold platter displays with fin-ger foods, with the main ingre-dients being fish, shellfish, bird, game, or vegetables.

Leading the team is chef Ben Genaille, who’s currently the head of Vancouver Community

College’s Aboriginal culinary program.

“We know the coach of the team through one of the faculty mem-bers, [who] met him at a meet-ing in Vancouver and just got to talking to him,” Walker said. “So we developed a relationship with him.”

Items on the menu include pheasant and wild mushroom ter-rine, which is a meat dish in the form of a loaf; a sage bannock crisp; a West Coast seafood con-sommé, which is a clear soup made from rich bouillon; sockeye salmon galantine, a poached dish made of stuffed deboned meat; and “Indian ice cream” or sxusem,

a traditional dessert made of buf-falo berries that has the texture of whipped cream.

The dinner will also benefit the culinary arts students, Walker said.

“It has a positive effect for sure,” he said. “Our students will be getting involved in [cooking] the dinner.”

It seems the culinary arts pro-gram is trying to look for ways in integrate more First Nations cook-ing in their teaching. On the TRU human resource page is a job post-ing for a sessional culinary arts lecturer that will develop teaching strategies about Aboriginal food preparation and preservation.

Aboriginal culinary team to prepare feast Ω News EditorDevan C. Tasa

JOURNALISM...from p. 2

Trying to achieve economic suc-cess while maintaining a strong moral ethic is a theme explored in the TRU’s Actor’s Workshop The-atre’s (AWT) next show, The Good Soul of Szechuan.

Directed by Heidi Verwey, this Bertolt Brecht drama is the second of AWT’s series and runs Nov. 22 to 24, Nov. 29 to Dec. 1.

Brittany McCarthy plays the main character, Shen Te, as well as her alter ego, Shui Ta. The two characters represent the dichotomy of good and evil.

“It really is hard,” McCarthy said. “The interludes between be-ing Shen Te to changing into Shui Ta are very short, so there’s very little time to change mindsets.”

She said she tries to find the rea-sons for the actions and behaviour of each personality and tries to re-late it to the audience.

Dan Ondang plays Wang, a wa-ter carrier who tries to please the gods. He said he can relate to his character in trying to accomplish things that are actually out of his control.

Both Ondang and McCarthy are fourth-year theatre arts students, but the cast is made up of a much more diverse group.

“There are first-year theatre stu-dents, English students and inter-

national students,” said Nick Guly-cz, a third-year theatre arts student who will play the character Yang.

Verwey’s own daughter, nine-year-old Emma, is playing the role of ‘the boy.’

“I actually put my life’s blood into the show,” Verwey said.

Overall, there are 28 cast-mem-bers, which is huge according to Verwey.

“I love it,” she said, adding that her first directing jobs were com-munity theatre shows that had thousands of actors, a handful of children and even a few dogs.

“I like big messy shows. The more people, the more chaos. It’s fun.”

The play was written by Ber-tolt Brecht, a prominent German playwright who had never actually been to Szechuan. Verwey said she chose the show partly because it is a cultural show set in an exotic place.

“I did want to make a statement about internationalism,” she said. “It doesn’t matter where we’re from. Half the people [in the play] are from an exotic place.”

“Because it’s set in an exotic place, it could be anywhere,” Gu-lycz added.

The series of plays of the AWT every year are chosen by the direc-tors. Verwey said she wanted to try an epic play, one that focuses more on social problems and activism,

rather than a play that only manip-ulates human emotion.

Auditions for the show were only five weeks ago. Since then, a set has been built, props made, lighting designed and lines and ac-tions memorized.

As well as taking five classes and starring in the show, McCar-thy was also the head painter in building the complicated, struc-

tural set. McCarthy, Ondang and Gulycz

all hope to act professionally after graduation.

Although the show is a drama, there will be a bit of everything, the show as an organism as com-plex as a human being.

“You won’t feel depressed by the end,” McCarthy said. “Some parts we are hoping for laughs.”

Good versus evil in the exotic Szechuan

Ω ContributorSamantha Garvey

Actor’s Workshop Theatre launches second show of the season

The Good Soul of Szechuan is Actor’s Workshop Theatre’s nextproducation, beginning Nov. 22. Here, Brittany McCarthy (right) as Shen Te accepts a gift from the gods, Wyatt Purcha (left) and Brooke Bellam. —PHOTO BY SAMANTHA GARVEY

The Omega · Volume 22, Issue 12 5

News

Israel’s “Pillar of Cloud” mis-sion kills Hamas military leader

Hamas military leader Ahmed Al-Jabaari was killed in a tar-geted missile attack by the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) Wednesday, Nov. 14.

IDF spokesperson Avital Leibovich confirmed via Twitter that this attack was the beginning of “a wide-spread campaign on terror sites and operatives in the Gaza Strip, chief among them Hamas and Islamic Jihad targets.”

The attack -- known as “Operation Pillar of Cloud” -- consisted of a missile strike on Jabaari’s vehicle as it drove through the city of Gaza.

In Gaza, Jabari was con-sidered “a hero because he had managed until now to escape numerous assassi-nation attempts by Israel,” according to Al Jazeera news in Lebanon.

Violence along the bor-der of Gaza and Israel has been ongoing since 2006. This latest violence comes despite a truce that was to take effect at the end of October.

Where you can find out more: theguardian.co.uk

Building better muscles through science

An international team of re-searchers has created artificial muscle fibres that are 200 times stronger for their size than hu-man muscle fibers.

The team is lead by Ray Baugh-

man, a nanotechnology research-er from the University of Texas.

These artificial muscles will let machines move in a more nat-ural way allowing for improved fine motor skills, an application the team is hoping can be used to increase the precision of medical machines.

The muscle fibres are weaved together out of carbon fibre nanotubes that are then filled with a mix of substances includ-ing paraffin wax.

The wax makes the muscle fi-bres react to heat. In the future the team would prefer they react to chemicals, according to Baugh-man.

The way the fibres are woven together resembles a fabric and the team is also hoping to make them into clothing for firefighters that would instantly react to heat in the event of a sudden f lash.

The full research can be found in the journal Science.

Where you can find out more: http://www.sciencemag.org

Will the UN change gover-nance of the Internet?

The Russian government is calling on the United Nations to revise international tele-communications regulations to transfer governance of the Internet from a non-profit or-ganization to the UN’s Inter-national Telecommunications Union (ITU).

The ITU has not been changed since 1988.

The proposed changes would see the control of domain names and IP ad-dresses go from the Interna-tional Corporation for As-signed Names and Numbers (ICANN) to the ITU.

ICANN is a non-govern-mental organization that cur-rently manages IP addresses and domain names through a multi-stakeholder model. It includes representatives from more than 100 govern-ments, commercial interests, internet service providers and more, according to their

website.The changes would give con-

trol to the ITU, which allows only member nations to vote. This would put control into the hands of solely governmental or-ganizations.

A proposed revision to the treaty declares, “Member states shall have the sovereign right to manage the Internet within their national territory, as well as to manage national Internet domain names.”

Where you can find out more: news.cnet.com

Ω ContributorMark Hendricks

International IntonationHamas leader killed, artificial muscle

fibres and governing the internet

—IMAGE COURTESY CHRISTIAN FISCHERWIKIMEDIA COMMONS

A newly formed group on cam-pus is working to f ind ways to create more interaction between international and domestic stu-dents.

The Intercultural Council is a group of 12 students from differ-ent cultural backgrounds. Five of those students are domestic students, while the others come from countries such as Jamaica, Russia, Nigeria and Ukraine.

The coun-cil was cre-ated by TRU World to tackle a spe-cif ic problem on campus — inte r nat ional and domes-tic students don’t seem to be connect-ing with each other.

“We’ve noticed that there are cliques on campus and even though they are here to be in Can-ada, they’re still staying with mem-bers of their own culture,” said Mary-Grace Maung, a member of the coun-cil. “We’re trying to give them opportunities to break out of that and explore not only what Canada can offer them, but other cultures as well.”

These cliques aren’t formed because international students don’t want to connect with Ca-nadians, said council member Andrew Dalgleish.

“From what we’ve talked to about with other international students, a lot of the time they’ll say, ‘You know, we make great friends here, but we don’t get to know the other Canadians,’” he said. “There is an actual desire from them to break out but when you are in another country that’s foreign to you, it’s sometimes hard to do that, even if you are a very extroverted person.”

The council’s aim is to hold monthly events that will bring international and domestic stu-dents together in one place.

The council has only orga-nized one event so far, East vs. West, in which a Canadian DJ with Dutch ancestry and a Ukrainian DJ had a friendly mu-sic battle with each other.

“Immediately following the event, we had people asking us to do more events like that,” Dalgleish said.

On Wednesday, Nov. 21, the council will be showing the Ger-man-language f ilm The Wave at 7 p.m. in the Alumni Theatre.

Council member Will George chose to ap-ply to volun-teer for the council based on his expe-riences as an exchange stu-dent in Fin-land.

“I was hop-ing to give back. When I was in Fin-land, there were groups there that were doing the same [type of ] events monthly, so I was hoping to be on the oth-er side of that and give back to the inter-national stu-

dents that are now coming back to Canada,” he said.

Dalgleish and Maung had dif-ferent reasons to join.

“I really appreciate the oppor-tunity to just interact with, for my own cultural interest, other cultures of the world,” Dalgleish said. “This is a great opportuni-ty to build up my own awareness and [learn] how I can improve myself through that.”

“I am interested in travelling and I’m interested in a whole bunch of different cultures,” Maung said. “I will basically pounce on any opportunity to learn about other people.”

While the council is new, Dal-gleish said he thought it was something that was needed on campus.

“It’s a very big task that were pulling, but it’s an extremely worthy aim to make ourselves more culturally sensitive and the campus more culturally sensi-tive too,” he said.

Ω News EditorDevan C. Tasa

New council to connect international, domestic students

“...it’s an extremely

worthy aim to make ourselves more culturally

sensitive...”

—Andrew Dalgleish

TRU Intercultural Council

Got a story idea? Get in touch with the

appropriate section editor (email addresses on page

3, left side) and we’ll explore it.

That’s what you saidFor this week’s issue, we patrolled the grounds looking for your answers to this question:

“They’re dirty. Especially the one in Old Main-Oh man, it stinks. Sometimes I avoid it.”

“I like it a lot better than last year. It’s cleaner. I don’t feel gross about using washrooms.”

“They’re fairly clean. I haven’t been disgusted so far. The worst I saw was a wasp.”

How do you find the cleanliness of the washrooms at TRU?

Post-Bacculaureatte BusinessIdriss Anchor

Second-year artsFonda Hodgson

Second-year B.A. (English)Dillon Stephens

November 21, 20126

Many people, myself includ-ed, complain about Canada be-ing too cold.

But do we really need to com-plain about something as trivial as colder weather?

Most of us live in houses that are heated and possess the basic necessities to survive.

I don’t want to suggest that poverty is not a serious issue in Canada.

However, Canada is in the top two per cent of wealthiest na-tions globally and there are far more resources for impover-ished people in Canada than in developing countries.

Furthermore, our government protects our basic human rights. We are blessed to live in Canada.

In Canada workers have guar-anteed rights.

For example, we have a f ixed minimum wage and are paid for overtime, coffee and meal breaks, parents have the right to parental leave and our laws protect our health and safety while on the job.

This is completely foreign to third world nations.

I lived in Kenya and some of

my friends worked long hours, six days a week with little pay.

Many of their bosses were un-reasonable, not allowing them to have time off.

A person could easily be f ired and replaced because workers are plentiful.

Moreover, my friends had lit-tle rights to protect their health and safety in work place. These infringements on workers’ rights and low levels of employ-ment contribute to the poverty in developing countries.

Canada also has an amazing education system.

Our government pays for qual-ity education from primary to secondary school.

In most Third World countries people have to pay for their chil-dren to go to school.

In Kenya there are public schools with free education but the education content is sub-standard. Thus people with little money are forced to pay for their children to attend qual-ity schools. As a result, lots of people don’t graduate and fail to get good paying jobs to support their families.

We are quick to criticize Can-ada’s education system but com-pared to others, we have it good.

Through our education we have many opportunities to progress in life and ladder in careers.

We should be thankful that in Canada we have access to clean water and sanitation.

In Kenya, we sometimes had to sanitize and boil water be-fore we could drink it. Without clean water and sanitation there are higher rates of death due to disease.

Have you ever heard of some-one dying from diarrhea in Can-ada? Yet deaths due to diarrhea are a very common plight in de-veloping countries. Evidently running water and f lushing toi-lets are luxuries in Third-World countries.

Clean water and sanitation should be available for all peo-ple; it’s a basic health issue.

People living in Canada are very fortunate.

We often lose sight of how much we have been given.

Whether it’s our workers’ rights, education system, or clean water and sanitation, we have a lot to be grateful for.

It wouldn’t hurt to be less af-f luent and more generous with all that we have received. Then others could be more fortunate, eh?

Ω ContributorGeordie Milne

Fortunate, eh?Open Letters

Up All Night plays Heroes as part of the Wednesday night concert series. A new wrinkle in the programming has the “opening act” of the Wednesday night shows opening the stage up to musicians who would like to perform in an “open mic”-type situation. Bring your own instruments if you’d like to take part starting at 6:30 p.m. —PHOTO BY BRENDAN KERGIN

It’s f ive in the evening and I’m heading to my three-hour class.

Two hours later, I f ind myself barely understanding the profes-sor’s lecture and instead of note taking, doodling on my note-book.

But I have the book and other printed notes; I even had coffee!

Why can’t I concentrate all of a sudden?

The ‘lost’ feeling wasn’t new; I had felt it before.

Until recently I presumed the variation in enthusiasm and at-tention for a three-hour class was seasonal: more in summer and less in winters.

I later thought maybe the time of the class made a difference.

However two semesters later, I believe there should be no three-hour classes at all.

I wouldn’t dare to undermine a professor’s lecture prepara-tion, regardless of the duration; however, I would argue the ac-tual benefits to students if any of such an arrangement.

Agreed, a three-hour, once-

a-week class would equal more time on other days, but is it worth it?

A student generally concen-trates heavily in the f irst half of the class.

The second half, however, is more or less a drag with focus spiraling down.

What about the material cov-ered in that class?

If a student were to fall sick, it would mean missing an enor-mous amount of material.

Is the disadvantage limited only to absentees?

Time paucity frequently leads to teachers rushing through as much material as possible.

What about the slow learners? Many introductory courses lay the foundation for other major courses; grasping concepts is vital.

Students f ind reviewing dis-cussed topics beneficial in pre-paring for the next class, pri-marily since it creates queries leading to doubt clarif ication later on.

However, in this case the stu-dent has no choice but to absorb everything being taught.

So what would be a feasible solution to this problem?

Splitting the class into two two-hour classes works well.

In my current semester, a cer-tain class follows this pattern.

This not only gives me time to absorb the material, but also al-lows reviewing.

If splitting the class is not possible, frequent 10-minute breaks every 45 minutes could help students unwind and bring back focus.

If possible, reducing the syl-labus could substantially reduce pressure on both teachers and learners.

My girlfriend says, “I appreci-ate my three-hour long [Chem-istry] lab sessions, but when it comes to lectures, nothing makes me happier than having short ones with spare time to re-view.”

I advocate discontinuing long classes and replacing them with the shorter arrangements.

I am certain that such an im-plementation would not only boost attention levels but also give time to ponder over the ma-terial covered.

Ω ContributorAbijah Gupta

No more three-hour classes!

The Canadian economy is a capitalistic one.

It is based on the principals that open competition encour-ages fair pricing and consumer benefits.

Competition drives the prices down — this was the promise of capitalism.

The principal was not quite applicable to telecommunication companies especially cell phone carriers in North America.

According to a study done by JD Power, consumer satisfaction for Canadian cell phone us-ers is a little over 60 per cent.

The report also said that average con-sumer spend-ing has in-creased over the years and is now almost $70 per month.

This makes Canada one of the most expensive countries in which to own a mobile phone.

While the cell phone compa-nies are making higher profits every year, the consumer satis-faction level is not up to the mark.

There could be several reasons for that, but the main one is car-rier oligopoly or lack of proper competition.

The whole telecommunication pipes in Canada are owned, oper-ated and controlled by just three corporations namely Bell Mobil-ity, Rogers Wireless and Telus Mobility. This number is even lower than the American sce-nario where there are fore major carriers.

Together these companies have more than 90 per cent of all cell phone customer shares of Cana-dian wireless subscribers, ac-cording to the Canadian Radio-

television Telecommunications Commission (CRTC).

To make matters worse, these companies have mutual non-competitive deals to keep the in-f lated price of a service that has no direct cost.

It’s high time for either the fed-eral government or the CRTC to intervene and clean up the mess these corporations have created.

Issuing more licenses and tax breaks to eager private players could be a good beginning.

Another step towards having economical plans is a certain price cap or a minimum plan for people who don’t want useless

features on their phones.

R e d u c i n g the contract term to 12 or 28 months instead of 36 would be welcomed as well.

Small carri-ers such as and Wind Mobile

should be encouraged to make their networks stronger and big-ger.

The cell phone companies demonstrate the current situation as perfectly normal and highly competitive.

The companies try to resist any change or restriction.

Excuses such as ‘high cost of installing cell phone towers’ are given but that is a one time fixed expense. Running costs of the cell phone companies is almost nothing.

The telephone industry is no different from any other, so it must not be given any special perks or benefits.

It should be exposed to free competition as every other.

Consumers should get the val-ue of service for which they’re paying for and if the steps writ-ten are undertaken they might help reach that final goal.

Ω ContributorAnum Sultan

Mobile phone carrier oligopoly in Canada

Average consumer spending on cell

phones has reached $70 per month

—JD Power study, 2012

Do you have something to say?If we keep getting open letters,

we can keep a letter section.Send them to editor@truomega.ca

(but be patient, please).

The Omega · Volume 22, Issue 12 7

Opening day is a special day for avid skiers and snowboard-ers.

It is the day they have anx-iously been waiting for since the end of the previous riding season, a day when skiers and boarders come together to cel-ebrate the new season and to re-connect with old friends.

“Opening weekend is more like a social reuniting,” said Christopher Nicolson, president of Tourism Sun Peaks.

“Many people have summer social networks and winter so-cial networks … your winter friends, in many cases you might see only once or twice through-out the summer,” Nicolson adds.

He continued to compare ski-ers and snowboarders to hiber-nating bears with the seasons reversed.

TRU students and Sun Peaks have a long history together as it is the closest mountain resort to Kamloops. Students are able to get away from the hustle and bustle of everyday student life to spend some time skiing or boarding at Sun Peaks.

“Certainly TRU is a big part of Sun Peaks throughout the year, both from people being hired from TRU to just coming up and enjoying skiing and sliding around the mountain,” Nicolson said.

In tune with tradition, open-ing day played host to a select few who eagerly showed up be-fore the rest in hopes of landing a spot on the coveted f irst chair of the season.

Among those eager few was TRU tourism management stu-dent David White. White and

the three others who secured a spot on the f irst chair up had been in line for more than two hours before the chair started running.

Despite the less than ideal weather conditions preceding opening weekend, Sun Peaks was able to open four runs.

Relying less on mother nature for the f luffy stuff and more on the combination of cold weather and snowmaking technology, Sun Peaks still managed to get a jump on the season.

The resort operated the Sun-burst Express and Elevation chairs to serve Cahilty, Lower 5 Mile and OSV.

Feeding into the village, Sun-beam and the Village Carpet lift were open providing resort goers with beginner terrain as a suitable learning grounds for f irst-timers before heading up the Sunburst Express on to big-ger and better things.

As for terrain park features, the resort afforded riders of all abilities with a short, wide f lat-box option along with a f lat tube that had the feel of a backyard set-up as a opposed to a resort feature. The features made for some fun sliding, whetting the appetite of the local park rats who ate up the features in the afternoon after spinning laps on the Sunburst Express and Eleva-tion lost its appeal.

Nearing the end of the after-noon, the weather took a turn for the worse in the village as it be-gan to rain heavily. The true die-hards were revealed as the open-ing-day crowd tapered off with the change in weather. For those that remained, not even being soaked through outerwear could wipe the smiles off their faces.

Besides, the true diehards know that rain in the village al-most always means snow at high-er elevations on the mountain.

Ω Contributors

Travis Persaud and Mason Buettner

Sun Peaks opens gates for winter season

TRU tourism mangement student David White (black jacket and ball cap) is one of the first four on the lift opening day at Sun Peaks this season. —PHOTO BY TRAVIS PERSAUD

Life & Community

Jeff McLaughlin speaks to the supporters who came out to the third-annual Philosophy, History and Politics beer con-ference Nov. 13 at the Frick and Frack Tap House. —PHOTO MASON BUETTNER

The third-annual Philosophy, His-tory and Politics (PHP) Beer Confer-ence was held on Tuesday, Nov. 13 at Frick and Frack Tap House. Ap-proximately 100 TRU faculty and students attended the fundraiser, raising money for the Philosophy, History, and Politics Undergraduate Conference in January 2013.

The topics of discussion for the night were the philosophy, history, and politics of beer. TRU professors Jeff McLaughlin, Ariane Magny and Nicholas Gammer provided entertainment for the evening with satirical presentations on the rela-tionship between beer and their re-spective departments.

Gammer began the presentations with his interpretation of the poli-tics of beer. As the American presi-dential election occurred one week prior, Gammer discussed how beer affected voting patterns.

“Heineken drinkers are strongly democratic,” Gammer said.

He switched to Canadian politics asking the question, “How do Ca-nadians define themselves through beer?”

Beer is the highest selling alco-holic beverage in Canada, according to Gammer.

“The beer industry in Canada does play a role in the Canadian identity crisis… Globalization of the brewing industry has seen ma-jor players in Canada acquired by or merged with foreign companies,” Gammer said.

Following the politics of beer, Magny presented the audience with her take on the history of beer, re-vealing some previously unknown insights into early historical leaders.

“Alexander the Great drank be-cause he was hot,” and, “Nero start-ed boozing when he was 16,” Magny said.

McLaughlin received many a laugh from the audience as he closed the evening’s presentations with his humourous take on the philosophy of beer.

He believes that “beer is essential for doing good philosophy.”

In typical philosophical fashion, he provided the listeners with deep truths about beer.

“We get the English word beer from the German word beer, and the German word for beer is beer,” McLaughlin joked.

He discussed the connection be-tween beer goggles and finding the truth.

“It’s easy to be drunk, but to be drunk at the right time, for the right reason, with the right person and the right intensity is what makes beer drinking brilliant,” McLaughlin said in closing his presentation.

Following the presentations, the winning 50-50 ticket was picked and Dylan Robinson, the fundrais-ing and events coordinator for the conference and TRUSU VP exter-nal, ended up with the winner and donated his money back to the con-ference fund.

The sixth-annual Philosophy, History and Politics Undergradu-ate Conference is scheduled to take place Jan. 17 to 19, 2013, at TRU.

Faculty and students come together over a pint Ω ContributorMason Buettner

ST. JOHN’S (CUP) — At 12:43 p.m. on Friday, Nov. 16, a mock protest took place in the vein of the Westboro Baptist Church at Memorial University (MUN). The demonstration re-enacted the protest that took place surround-ing the beating, and subsequent death, of Matthew Sheppard, a young gay man, in 1998.

Staged by Spectrum, a LGBTQ choir, and students from a perfor-mance and communications me-dia class at Memorial, the dem-onstration began with individuals holding up signs, while standing around one student who was act-ing as Fred Phelps, the head of the church.

They soon began chanting, “God hates fags. God hates fags,” which was quick to draw the at-tention of passerbys. Off to the side were others holding three signs stating that the following was a demonstration and re-en-actment, and should be viewed as such.

The Fred Phelps character be-gan a monologue, while another actor, off to the side, delivered a separate monologue, stating they

could not let such hate deter them.The demonstration concluded

with angels descending upon the steps of the University Centre, and began to surround the West-boro Baptist Church’s group, blocking them off from the public while circling them.

This re-enactment is a dramati-zation of what happened in 1998 when the protest occurred while Matthew Sheppard, a young gay man, was hospitalized after being beaten to near death by individu-als who were against his sexual orientation. Sheppard succumbed to his injuries in hospital.

“The Westboro Baptist Church came from another state to protest Matthew Sheppard’s funeral to say he was going to hell because he was gay,” Danielle Irvine, the Memorial instructor for the class, said regarding the protest.

“The angels and their wings are so big that they block [Phelps] out so that they don’t have to see him,” continued Irvine, explain-ing the significance of the event. “The angels were given earplugs so they didn’t have to hear him.

“We wanted to raise aware-ness of this problem and that hate is still happening today. People are still doing violent things to each other.”

Many students gathered to watch the re-enactment, with most of them reacting positively to the demonstration.

“I thought it was awesome,” said Emma Smith, a fourth year at MUN.

“I think what they are protest-ing and showing is a great mes-sage.”

Smith also says that the dem-onstration was effective.

“It got people’s attention. Peo-ple dressed as white angels, and I got worried they started chanting ‘God hates fags’ and thought ‘oh shoot, what’s going on?’ But then I started listening to the other girl’s monologue.”

Not all students understood the goal of the event, as to whether it was for promotion, protest, or for something else.

“I believe it had an effect, but I have no idea if they accom-plished their goal because I don’t even know what it is,” said Chris-tian Van Nostrand, a fourth-year student at MUN.

The class that helped organize the demonstration will be per-forming The Laramie Project, a play based on the death of Mat-thew Sheppard and the reactions of his fellow citizens later this month.

The Muse (Memorial)John Michael Bennett

Students organize mock Westboro Baptist Church protest at Memorial

November 21, 20128

Ron Sexsmith is a name any serious fan of music has heard of, but seems to languish outside any sort of popular recognition. While his music has never been very hook-y or full of whatever is popular at the time, his me-lodic style is bait of critics and regularly receives top comments from those who spend time lis-tening to it.

Filled with pianos, some string arrangements and slower rhythms, it’s easy to see why he’s never hit the top 40. The quiet, simple tracks may not be aggressive enough to garner

more notice.One positive for him though is

the recognition he does get from well respected and more famous artists who then cover his ma-terial, like k.d. lang, Feist and Rod Stewart. However, while he enjoys the respect, Sexsmith has vocalized the fact he would appreciate a little more main-stream success.

His strength as a songwriter isn’t just the music, he puts to-gether full packages of lyrics and music and couples them like wine and cheese.

For an example of this check out “Gold in Them Hills,” of which there are two versions, one with a fan, Chris Martin of Coldplay.

Firing off from Saskatoon, Sask., Gunner & Smith is a five-piece folk group created out of what was origi-nally a solo folk act in lead singer and guitar man Geoff Smith.

Formed in 2010, the group released Compromise is a Loaded Gun on Aug. 3, 2012, a six-song EP featuring “Strength of My Fathers.”

The sound projected by the band is a bluesy-folk fusion. That being said, Gunner & Smith still works in some electric guitar for a heavier sound on tracks such as “Send Me Out.”

“Send me out to find a way to prove my worth, show my strength,” cries Smith on the opening track,

“Take my name and set it free. Cry not for them, cry not for me, cry for yourself to be at peace.”

Prior to 2012’s Compromise is a Loaded Gun, the group released an earlier EP, Letter of Marque in No-vember 2011.

Gunner & Smith put on an energet-ic and lively stage performance, hav-ing just completed a short fall tour that featured the band’s first shows in Alberta. Apart from three shows in hometown Saskatoon, the Saskatch-ewan folksters also rocked stages in Edmonton, Calgary, Lethbridge and Moose Jaw.

For a classic folk sound, make sure you give “Two Gun Blues” a listen as Gunner & Smith incorporate the banjo, an always pleasant addition to any great folk track.

Ω Copy/Web EditorTaylor Rocca

Ω Arts & Entertainment EditorBrendan Kergin

Arts & Entertainment

Overwerk (Edmond Huszar), an up and coming DJ and producer from Lon-don, Ont., packed Cactus Jacks night-club Nov. 16 with heavy bass lines and enticing melodies. Playing both his and covering other artists’ tracks the show really got the crowd going with a two-hour set.

Before his show Overwerk sat down for an email interview with The Omega.

Ω: Can you describe your musical style?

O: Electro-computer music infused with whatever is inspiring me in the mo-ment. Usually pretty heavy but uplifting at the same time.

Ω: What kind of artists influence you?O: The kind of artists that influence

me are the ones that are honest and have integrity. Artists that are passionate about music, no matter the style, inspire me.

Ω: How did people pick up your mu-sic? Through a label or Soundcloud?

O: I just started releasing tunes on Soundcloud, that was it.

Ω: How often are you touring?O: I’ve been working on my new EP,

After Hours, so I’ve been more focused on production right now.

Ω: What is your setup like?O: An iMac, Genelec monitors. I

don’t use hardware, I don’t even use a midi keyboard.

Ω: What is your preferred plug-in?O: My preferred plug-in? I tend not to

stick to a single one, definitely not mas-

sive, I try and incorporate every new plug-in I find.

Ω: Top five tracks at the moment?O: I don’t even listen to that much

music. I don’t have a lot of time to ex-plore what’s out there, but right now I’m listening to Flume’s new album. Flume is awesome.

Ω: Do you have any side projects?O: When I have time, I work on other

genres of music on the side. Aside from

music, I do lots of design, 3D & editing.Ω: How long does it typically take you

to write a song?O: Sometimes I make a song in a

couple days and others are drawn out for months. I build songs in segments, be-cause I try to create diversity and make my songs a ride, rather than just looping sounds for the whole track. It depends how inspired I am/ if I have ideas before-hand.

Ω ContributorMatthew Pflugfelder

Overwerk works up Kamloops

—IMAGE COURTESY PARADIGM RECORDS

Canadian Music Corner

Precise and f luid movement and an eruption of beautiful music exploded on Nov. 16 at the Sagebrush Theatre as the Kamloops Symphony Orchestra (KSO) and their guest artists Jeans ‘N Classics took the stage and began to play the timeless music of Elton John.

The f irst set began with “Love Lies, Bleeding” and Jean Meil-leur, the vocalist of Jeans ‘N Classics, gave the audience no doubt that he had the talent and range to belt out some of Elton’s classic songs such as “Rocket Man” and “Your Song.”

Every track played could send shivers down your spine and bring forward feelings of nostal-gia.

The collection of big sound from the orchestra and the in-timidating vocals was enough to bring one to tears on the track “Daniel.”

The song choice didn’t include all of John’s biggest hits — the emphasis was on the heartfelt love songs — but each one of them was chosen for what would best be complimented by an or-chestra — and they were. Jeans ‘N Classics would’ve been excel-

lent regardless, but the addition of an orchestra, and in the sec-ond set, the Kamloops Chorus Singers, added to the experience and created a sense of wonder.

The chorus singers joined the stage at the beginning of the sec-ond set, where they opened with “Take Me to the Pilot,” which not only showed how much fun the audience was having, but how excited everyone on stage was — especially conductor Bruce Dunn who was clearly enjoying himself, dancing ever so slightly as his orchestra complimented the band so beautifully.

“Tiny Dancer” was the third song played in the set, and all around you could hear happy people singing along to this touching and exciting beat.

Being surrounded by the en-ergy and power of sound, it’s hard not to completely immerse oneself in the music. “Circle of Life,” the theme track for Dis-ney’s hit movie “The Lion King,” was arguably the highlight of the night.

The closing song was one of Elton John’s smash hits “Don’t Let the Sun Go Down on Me,” an excellent track to end on, and an excellent display of why, if you haven’t or have never had the op-portunity, go see the KSO.

Don’t let the sun go down on KSO

The most prolif ic member of Vancouver hip-hop collective the Sweatshop Union (which he left in 2011), Kyprios is back to the mike on a f ive-song solo EP, a taste of what to come as he works on a project out in 2013, according to an interview with CBC Music.

The winner of the 2010 Peak Performance Project has been quieter since his win, releasing only a couple of singles over the last couple of years, including the celebration of the Vancouver Canucks Stanley Cup run, “How the West Was Won.”

On the Lap Dog EP he’s intro-duced four songs and included the 2011 single, “Sweet City Woman.”

Over a decade into his career, the EP is a more mature series of songs than mainstream hip-hop.

The music is fairly middle-of-the-road; heavy on the keys, guitar and drums, light on elec-tronics, with some sampling.

It’s definitely got the more Canadian style of using sam-pling and instruments in place of computer based production.

Lyrically, the themes explored are all over the map.

The title track opens with Kyprios looking at his past and leadership. “Sweet City Women” is next, a revision of The Stam-peders hit of the same name.

A fairly straight forward song about a lady Kyprios is sweet on. Using the past hit as the hook creates a great patio track…if it were warmer out.

“We Get Right” is brings an entirely different attitude, open-ing with Will, a homeless man in East Vancouver, discussing his

heroin dependency. After Will, it gets more posi-

tive from there; “We Get Right” puts the serious subject of addic-tion in an urgent piece of music.

Wrapping up with social work-ers discussing their projects with the homeless makes this more a piece of activism than a marketable single.

The stripped down, beat heavy, synthy “Ain’t Gonna Get Me,” worries about a “she” and “they” going to get Kyprios.

It’s never made clear who they are, but he really seems certain they aren’t going to get him. It seems more of a place for some

word play and a more technical vocal track.

He closes with the fun, Sam-uel L. Jackson sampling “Bad Motherf*cker.”

More bombastic, aggressive and cheeky, Kyprios may be more mature, but it doesn’t mean he’s old.

A solid preview of what the experienced MC is going to be bringing in the new year, it shows there’s a sharp mind be-hind the mike, but he’s still hav-ing fun.

Kyprios will be touring Can-ada soon, with a date at Cactus Jacks on Nov. 29.

Ω Arts &Entertainment EditorBrendan Kergin

Album review: Lap Dog

Ω ContributorJess Buick

—IMAGE COURTESY CLASSICS AGENCY

The Omega · Volume 22, Issue 12 9

As much a stylistic audio-vi-sual piece as an action-packed homage to kung fu f ilms past, The Man With The Iron Fists walks the line between enjoyably over the top and just straight for-ward over the top.

RZA, of rap super-group the Wu Tang Clan, tries his hand at acting, scripting and directing in this period piece set in China during…the 19th century prob-ably?

It’s never entirely clear and the date isn’t entirely relevant. In fact, much of the f ilm relies not on logic, or common sense, or what should happen, but rather on what would be cool. It should be noted here that RZA and co-producer/co-writer Eli Roth, are friends and oft collaborators of Quentin Tarantino (who “pre-sented” the f ilm, which amounts to little direct involvement).

The setting is the Jungle Vil-lage, a rough town in China, where the majority of the char-acters are Asian but speak with American accents. The town is run by a variety of clans based on animals, the most powerful being the Lions, the central clan of the f ilm.

A shipment of gold is sent through the notorious locale to soldiers in the north and the sto-ry follows the plots and battles for said gold.

While the list of baddies and goodies is extensive, the cen-tral plot is straight forward with most of the build-up to the battles dealing with character’s back story.

The favourite son of an as-sassinated clan leader out for vengeance, the travelling secret government soldier, the greedy clan leaders, they all end up on one side of good or evil and f ight the other.

The strength of the f ilm lies in its aesthetic value.

So many of the visual details were planned out and designed by RZA and Roth. Costumes are intricate character repre-sentations with unique weapons matching their personalities and f ighting styles.

Of course, the super choreo-graphed f ight scenes are anoth-er highlight. While many f ilm fights can seem chaotic, uncer-tain messes, The Man With The Iron Fists hand-to-hand combat is easy to follow with great cam-era work.

Despite the great aesthetic value, the plot is f limsy.

While the characters are sup-posed to be one-dimensional caricatures to an extent, there isn’t one character to cheer.

The fact someone lives or dies lacks impact to an indifferent audience.

There are also some pretty big jumps in plot, though this could be due to the original version be-ing four hours long.

The editing could be stronger as well, with some odd choices at points, but it shouldn’t dis-tract theatre-goers too much since they are never fully drawn in.

Fans of f ilms from Hong Kong will enjoy this. The mash-up rap/kung fu/western is appeal-ing, but cinephiles will note it lacks any real grip.

Arts & Entertainment

The visual arts department at TRU recently posted an ad for a racy career opportunity.

Lloyd Bennett, chair of the visual and performing arts department, used to find male models at the gym. Three years ago, human resources made the visual arts department post job oppor-tunities formally on the school’s web-site.

“Last year, faculty had a list of five to seven models to choose from. This year when an instructor needed a mod-el, we had no one,” Bennett said.

Following an interview on CBC Radio regarding nude models, more people came looking for work.

Though the job posting indicates applicants should have at least three months of related experience, Bennett said anyone interested in modelling should “simply be personable.”

Models are not expected to be nude. Bennett has purchased costumes and allowed men he met at the gym to wear shorts.

Models pose for as little as five sec-onds, but could be there for up to three hours. Models are provided breaks and the department will bring in a heater if the model is chilly.

“Models are very important and well-respected by artists,” Bennett said. “It is an honourable profession.”

Drawing or painting nude models is considered basic training for visual arts students. Having a variety of body-types to choose from is important.

As far as Bennett is aware, no stu-dent has ever refused to draw someone nude. If this became an issue, faculty would accommodate the student’s wish.

Kate Beauchamp is a TRU alumni and a nude model for the visual arts department. She applied for the posi-tion when her mother came across a job posting and suggested that it would

be a good way for Beauchamp to earn some extra money.

She applied to model last year, how-ever, this is the first semester she has been specially requested by faculty to fill the role as a model on multiple oc-casions.

“It isn’t a complicated job, but it can be challenging to stay still for so long,” Beauchamp said. “It’s a neat experi-ence.”

Beauchamp said she chose to apply

to model because she wanted to try something that would “push the enve-lope.”

“North America is still closed mind-ed towards nudity,” Beauchamp said.

Many of the models are former arts students, according to Bennett.

“People who have backgrounds of drawing nude models are used to it.”

Bennett asked that those interested apply through career opportunities on the TRU website.

Ω Roving EditorCourtney Dickson

Visual arts seeks nude models Film review: The Man With the Iron FistsΩ Arts & Entertainment EditorBrendan Kergin

We’re still

looking for a

distribution/

adsales

manager.

Want a part-

time job with

incentives?

Got a car and

a license to

operate it?

Contact

editor@

truomega.ca for

details.

—IMAGE COURTESY RAPHAEL PEREZ/FLICKR CREATIVE COMMONS

—IMAGE COURTESY UNIVERSAL

The OmegaWould like to inform you that if you are looking here right now, and email editor@truomega.ca and put the phrase,

“I looked in the bottom corner of page 9”you win a prize.

November 21, 201210

Both the men’s and women’s Wolf-Pack volleyball teams fell at the hand of the University of Alberta (U of A) this past weekend. TRU was unable to win a single set, losing 3-0 in all four matches.

The U of A Pandas went into the week-end sitting in third place in Canada West. The WolfPack was mired in last place.

The first two sets of the women’s match were over quickly as the U of A took a 25-7 win and continued to domi-nate, winning 25-10 in the second.

The WolfPack pulled ahead for the first time in the match at the beginning of the third set. That didn’t last long as the Pandas quickly overtook TRU and didn’t look back, triumphing 28-26.

Already courting a small roster, the WolfPack women have three players out

with injury, a fact that has not helped the team through its early season struggles.

Hayley Hills, assistant coach of the WolfPack, said the women’s team was over-thinking during the first two sets.

“The U of A has a good squad,” Hills said. “Our girls were intimidated.”

Hills thought the women improved in the third set and she was hoping for the same focus Saturday evening.

Though the men had a slightly better match, they were also unable to defeat the Golden Bears. U of A came into the match as the number one seed in Canada West while the WolfPack sat in the bot-tom half of the conference.

The Golden Bears have been league leaders in kills and hitting percentage this season.

The match was a struggle for both teams, resulting in another three-set loss for the WolfPack.

Jared Mitchell who is red-shirted this

year, has been practicing with the team. Despite the losses, he noticed his team-mates putting to use what they have been learning at practice.

“As I see it, we can only improve from here,” Mitchell said.

Pat Hennelly, in his seventh season as head coach of the men’s team, was not pleased with the WolfPack’s mental game on Nov. 16.

“We didn’t play particularly well,” Hennelly said. “U of A wasn’t sharp, ei-ther.”

Hennelly also said the team will need to control their emotions and focus if they want to see an improvement on the court.

Both teams again lost all three sets on Saturday, wrapping up a weekend of dis-heartening defeat for the WolfPack vol-leyball program.

Next weekend both teams will head out on the road to face the University of Manitoba in Winnipeg.

Sports

WolfPack women grab fourth at soccer nationals

The WolfPack women’s soccer team came back from the Cana-dian Collegiate Athletic Associa-tion (CCAA) Nationals in Prince Edward Island with their second consecutive fourth place finish last week.

The WolfPack lost to the North-ern Alberta Institute of Technol-ogy (NAIT) Ooks of Edmonton, Alta. in the bronze medal final by a score of 1-0.

It was an up and down week for the WolfPack, who were forced to play under less than ideal circumstances. The team arrived in Charlottetown at 3:30 a.m. on Nov. 6, after almost 24 hours of travel, which involved three f lights and a two and a half hour bus ride. The team was un-derstandably tired when their first game against the Indiennes d’Ahuntsic kicked-off at 10:00 a.m on Nov. 7.

“We went out and played, did well for the first 60 minutes and then we started to fade,” said head coach Tom McManus. “At about 63 minutes we hit the wall and they scored three goals with-in nine minutes. So there was nothing we could do about that, I was putting fresh players in hop-ing to get fresh legs but it just

didn’t work.”The ‘Pack went on to lose by a

final score of 4-0 and had their hopes of a gold medal dashed. They later won in the bronze quarterfinal against the Mount Saint Vincent University Mystics by a score of 1-0 and defeated the Cégep Garneau Élans, the best team in the country, by a score of 4-0 in the bronze semifinal.

“The coach [of the Indiennes d’Ahuntsic] came up to me after we played Garneau, shook his head and said, ‘Boy, I’m glad we got you when you were tired, that was phenomenal,’” McManus said. “Like I said, I’ve never seen anyone play Garneau like that, or beat Garneau by that many goals. Every coach there was just amazed by how we did.”

Dreams of a podium finish were not to come true either, as the WolfPack were defeated in the bronze medal game by the NAIT Ooks on Nov. 10. NAIT scored just nine minutes into the game and spent the rest of the match sending the ball deep or out of bounds. The situation was made more difficult by winds blowing across the field, at times topping 80 kilometres per hour.

For Alanna Bekkering, it was disappointing to come home with another fourth-place finish this year, regardless of the individual honours she received. Bekkering

and teammate Blair MacKay were both named CCAA All-Canadian athletes. In a previous interview with The Omega, Bekkering cit-ed All-Canadian honours as one of the last individual accomplish-ments she hoped to achieve in her varsity career.

“It was really cool,” Bekkering said. “It’s an awesome honour, especially with the amount of tal-ent that’s on our team.”

Bekkering and MacKay are close friends off the field and sharing the experience of being named All-Canadians gave the award special significance.

“That was the most exciting moment, it was more exciting than me actually getting called up there,” Bekkering said. “[Blair] was so deserving of it and what an awesome way to go out in your fifth year.”

The season is now officially over for the WolfPack, but they will now begin their work off the field in preparation for next sea-son. The team will begin work-outs and a running program in mid-January and McManus will work to incorporate indoor prac-tices and exhibition matches as the year wears on.

“I’m looking to really get this program going 10 months of the year, 11 months of the year,” Mc-Manus said. “We want to contin-ue to pump and have our program

be one of the best around.”McManus is already in the

thick of recruiting players for the next season and says no roster spot is guaranteed. As was the case this year, players will earn their roster spots based on who comes to tryouts the most pre-pared and in the best shape, even veterans won’t be guaranteed to play.

The WolfPack will have a strong contingent of returning players. McManus will look to

replace the McAuley sisters and Blair MacKay, but in theory the team should continue their domi-nance of the PACWEST confer-ence. Bekkering and the rest of the returning squad hope to get another shot at a national cham-pionship moving forward and the sting of this year’s result is sure to keep them motivated.

“Fourth place in Canada is still awesome,” Bekkering said, “but I know that all of us were hoping for a medal.”

Ω Sports EditorAdam Williams

Another disappointing weekend for WolfPack volleyball

Ω Roving EditorCourtney Dickson

Kristen Giesbrecht #7 goes up for the attack against the U of A Pandas Nov. 16 at the TCC.

—PHOTO BY COURTNEY DICKSON

The WolfPack women’s soccer team wins the PACWEST two years in a row, but was hoping not to repeat their fourth-place finish nationally.

—PHOTO COURTESY TRU ATHLETICS

WolfPack ScoreboardVolleyballMen’s3-0 L vs University of Alberta Golden Bears3-0 L vs University of Alberta Golden Bears

Women’s3-0 L vs University of Alberta Pandas3-0 L vs University of Alberta Pandas

BasketballMen’s91-81 L vs Mount Royal University Royals89-80 W vs Mount Royal University Royals

Women’s77-54 W vs Mount Royal University Royals66-58 W vs Mount Royal University Royals

Hockey

8-2 W vs Eastern Washing-ton University Eagles4-3 OTL vs Eastern Wash-ington University Eagles

The Omega · Volume 22, Issue 12 11

Across

1. Italian beverage6. Black11. Calphalon product14. They were created in 191215. Mountaineer’s tool16. ___ Rancho (suburb of Albuquerque)17. Be in charge20. Go for21. Egg22. Faint23. Bass, e.g.24. Castle part25. Diminutive28. Turning chisel accompanier30. N.B.A.’s Unseld31. Be off base32. ___ physics36. Carbamide37. Fancy frocks41. Indian tourist site42. Annoying43. Debate position44. Ribosomal ___45. Dummkopf49. Six-line poem51. Achievement54. ___ power55. Cal. col.56. Ostrichlike birds57. Atlas section

58. “Calm down!”62. Brown, for one63. Adhesive64. Bait65. Pipe joint66. Gas additive67. Challenges

Down

1. Lite2. Interstice3. Afternoon service4. Cause for a lawsuit5. D.C. setting6. It doesn’t hold water7. Carry on8. Road shoulder9. ___-tzu10. Oozes11. Chief administrative officers12. Cause of inflation?13. Discouraging words18. Furrow maker19. Remain unused24. Set aside25. California’s San ___ Bay26. Elder, e.g.27. Pitching stats29. Maori war dance30. Rings up?33. ___ the town34. 100 kurus

35. Breed36. Drew on37. Beanies38. Beast39. Ocular problem40. Discharge44. Enter again46. Insect stage47. Idle48. Hamlet et al.50. Call on51. ___ Thieves52. Chart holder53. Old English character56. Corn dish57. Atlas stat58. Do-it-yourselfer’s purchase59. Party time, maybe60. Buttermilk morsel?61. Common contraction

Coffee Break

cros

swor

d3 6 1 75 8 69 5 2 82 8 94 2 7 5

5 6 74 5 7 85 8 33 7 6 4su

doku

easy

SUDOWEB.COM

last week’s answers

A1

I2

D3

E4

R5

S6

B7

R8

E9

D10

E11

A12

R13

R14

O O M I E R15

E N O U16

N C E

E17

U G E N E H E N D E R S O N

P18

E G W19

E E L20

U R E

S21

P22

A R S E23

R24

W25

A S26

E27

N S

H28

I D R29

O D30

R31

U M32

A33

N D E34

S35

I T E L36

A S37

S38

O39

H40

O L D E N C A U41

L42

F I E L D

S43

T E E P T44

R E A D L E D

N45

O G46

H47

I V E48

E L

A49

L50

P51

Y52

A K53

C54

O L55

I56

C K Y

B57

O A S58

L59

E V60

A61

N T

H62

U C K L63

E B E R R64

Y F I N65

N66

O67

P T I O N A L A68

E R O B E

R69

E S B70

A B A T71

R A N C E

“Wardrobe Basics”

hardeasy

5 3 9 75 4 2

7 36 3

7 49 4

9 82 6 1

4 7 1 8sudo

kuha

rd

SUDOWEB.COM

MYL

ES M

ELLO

R A

ND

SA

LLY

YORK

2 7 8 4 1 9 5 3 6

9 3 6 8 2 5 7 1 4

4 5 1 7 6 3 9 8 2

7 4 5 1 3 2 6 9 8

6 9 2 5 4 8 1 7 3

1 8 3 6 9 7 4 2 5

5 2 7 9 8 4 3 6 1

3 6 9 2 5 1 8 4 7

8 1 4 3 7 6 2 5 9

Notice anything wrong with The Omega? Bring it to our attention and win a prize. We may have done it on purpose just to keep you on your toes...or you might just be helping us get better. Either way...you win!

8 4 5 3 9 2 6 7 1

2 1 6 7 5 4 9 3 8

7 9 3 1 6 8 2 4 5

1 2 7 6 3 5 4 8 9

3 5 8 8 4 1 7 2 6

4 6 9 2 8 7 1 5 3

9 7 2 8 1 3 5 6 4

6 8 4 5 7 9 3 1 2

5 3 1 4 2 6 8 9 7

LAST

WEE

K’S

AN

SWER

S

November 21, 201212

TRUSU Membership Advisory

Advocacy | Services | Entertainment

Post-Secondary Education Fact:

Log on to trusu.ca and

get connected!• Subscribe

totheNewsletter

• Joinusonfacebook

• FollowusonTwitter

Average student debt at TRU is almost $4,000 more than the

Canadian averageCanadian University Survey Consortium

Done with your books this semester?

Post your used textbooks on the Book Exchange and save money!

Sign up at trusu.ca

Need a place to study?

Book study rooms in the Students’ Union Building

online at trusu.ca/bookaroom

Open 8am - 10pm | Mon -Fri

Heading home for the holidays?

Post your ride on the rideshare and save some money!