New trends in CdTe detectors for X and γ ray...

of 43 /43
New trends in New trends in CdTe CdTe detectors for detectors for X and X and γ - - ray applications ray applications Olivier Limousin CEA Saclay / DSM / DAPNIA Service d’Astrophysique France New developments in photodetection, Beaune 2002 / Solid state detectors session

Embed Size (px)

Transcript of New trends in CdTe detectors for X and γ ray...

  • New trends in New trends in CdTeCdTe detectors for detectors for X and X and --ray applicationsray applications

    Olivier LimousinCEA Saclay / DSM / DAPNIA

    Service dAstrophysiqueFrance

    New developments in photodetection, Beaune 2002 / Solid state detectors session

  • SummarySummary

    Bulk detectors

    Pixel arrays

    CdTe as sensitive medium for X and -rays detection

    Conclusions : New trends summary

  • Introduction Increasing demands for new semiconductor detectors for X and -rays (medical, space, nuclear and physics applications)Semiconductors are well suited for compactspectro-imaging devices with a good energy resolution between scintillators and cooledGermanium

    Development of integrated front-endelectronics technologies (ASIC)

    Progress in technology of producing CdTe and CdZnTe (stability and reproducibility)

  • CdTe : sensing medium for X and -rays par excellence

    High Z (Cd 48, Te 52) well suited forphotelectric effectHigh density (~ 6) well suited for systemcompactness Wide band- gap and High resistivity (109 to 1011 cm) at room temperature Simple detector geometry

    High potential for X and gamma raysspectroscopy Energy (keV)

    0 100 1000

    Prob

    abili

    ty

    0

    0,4

    1,0

    0,2

    0,8

    0,6

    Photoelectric

    Compton

  • CdTe versus other semiconductors

    Detection efficiency for 100 keV gamma-ray photon as a functionof detector thickness in CdTe, Si and Ge

    density Z Egap Eintrinsic[g cm-3] [eV] [eV/pair] [eV] at 100 ke

    2.33 14 1.12 3.6 4505.33 32 0.67 2.9 4005.85 48,52 1.44 4.43 620

    52 1.6 4.6 700

    Detection efficiency for 5 and 10 mm thick CdTe detectors as afunction of energy

    PE only(dashed)

    PE + Compton(solid line)

    Semi-conductor V

    SiGeCdTeCdZnTe 5.81 48,

    Data from Takahashi and Watanabe, IEEE TNS , 2001; VOL 48; PART 4; PART 1 , p 950

  • Two main CdTe families

    CdTe:Cl (THM) Cd1-xZnxTe (HPB)0.08 < x < 0.15

    gap around 1.5 eV 11010 cmp type crystalsex : 442 mm3

    10 nA at 100V, 20C

    holes 1 10-4 cm2 V-1 elect. 1 10-3 cm2 V-1

    Uniform charge propertiesUp to 50mm waferNo grain boundary in wafers

    gap around 1.6 eV = 11011 cmn type crystalsex : 442 mm3

    1.5 nA at 100V, 20C

    holes 210-5 cm2 V-1 elect. 0.5 to 5 10-3 cm2 V-1

    Very good resistivityPossible grain boundaries Bad Yield but detectors up to 1 cm3

  • Signal induction principle The signal formation is described by the Schockley-Ramo theoremThe signal is induced by charge carrier motion along the electric field lines This motion is seen by capacitive influenceon electrodes depending on their geometry

    I(t) = q0 E .EWE Applied field (stationnary regime)EW Weighting field (transient regime)

  • Lets talk about bulk detectors CdTe:Cl (THM) bulk detectorsEx : ISGRI (Lebrun et al.), Tokamak (Peysson et al.)CdZnTe (HPB) bulk detectorsEx : the PEGASE camera (Mestais et al .)CdTe:Cl Schottky detectorsEx : Takahashi et al.

    CdZnTe bulk detectors with capacitiveelectrodes

    CdZnTe bulk detectors with other electrodes configurationsEx : Luke et al., Parnham et al. (eV-Products)

    Ex. of application : next talk (Lebrun)

  • Signal induction in a coplanar device

    -Ray Photon

    e-h+

    -100 V

    2 mm

    t

    Q

    U0 Q0 E

  • Signal induction in a coplanar device Schockley-Ramo theorem gives the instantaneous induced current I(t)If the detector is uniform, no space charge

    E = V0/LE = 1/LW

    The induced charge is proportional to thecharge carrier motion and depends on the penetration depth of the photon

    The induced charge dQL at the anode is

    dQL = I(t) dt = q0 dx

    L

  • Charge loss and balistic deficit

    time

    Colle

    cted

    char

    ge

    Charge loss (trapping)

    15%1 s

    10s

    timeBalistic deficit

    (filtering)

    70%~2s

  • Charge loss and balistic deficit

    The collected charge is described bythe hecht relation which take into account physical trapping ie, charge transportproperties (, )

    The hole mobility drives the rise-time, ie the balistic deficit in CdTe:Cl

  • Biparametric diagram

    Energy (keV)0 50 100 150

    Puls

    eri

    se-t

    ime

    (s)

    0

    4

    8

    2

    6

  • Energy (keV)0 50 100 150 200

    0

    5000

    Coun

    ts

    P/V

    3

    Energy (keV)0 50 100 150

    Puls

    eri

    se-t

    ime

    (s)

    0

    4

    8

    2

    6

    Energy (keV)0 50 100 150 200

    0

    8000

    Coun

    ts

    P/V

    9

    Charge loss correction

  • ISGRI :In Beaune 1999,ISGRI :In Beaune 1999, we went with thiswe went with this

  • This time, here we are with ISGRI

  • with spectacular images

  • Calibration phase

    coded mask apertureshadowgram with ISGRI camera at 511 keV

    The eightmodules spectra with 22Na source

  • and spectra

    Rise

    -tim

    e (

    s)

    0

    4

    8

    2

    6

    0 50 100 150Energy (keV)

    LT ~12 keV

    7,5%

    0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140Energy (keV)

  • Spectral performances of ISGRI

    Energy (keV)

    CdTe

    Res

    olut

    ion

    FWH

    M (%

    )

    10 100 10001

    100

    10

    122 keV

    7,5 % (9 keV)

    14,4 keV

    25 % (3,6 keV)

  • An example of application in physics In the field of continuous thermonuclear reactions control in a Tokamak (TORE SUPRA)CdTe:Cl allows the design of compact cameras for hard X-ray tomography of the bremsstrahlung emission by electrons in tokamak fusion plamas

    Such electrons produce Hard X-raysbetween 20 and 200 keVAnalyse of these electrons providesinformation about current density profiles

    Example from Peysson et al., NIMA 458, 2001, p 269

  • An example of application in physics

    Two cameras with 24and 38 CdTe detectors(552 mm3)

    Detectors stayed stableeven under high fastneutrons flux and high magnetic field environment

    Example from Peysson et al., NIMA 458, 2001, p 269

  • PEGASE : a CZT camera for medecine Pegase is based onthick bulk CdZnTe crystals

    In this configurationhole signal is negligeable

    The associated electronics (ASIC)deals with electronpulse rise-time

    Example from Mestais et al., NIMA 458, 2001, p 62

  • PEGASE : electron loss correction

    All events in this windoware affected to the 140 keV line of 99mTc source

    140 keV line of 99mTc source

    70% efficiency at 122 keV in a 6.5 % window

    Window selection for the line

    Example from Mestais et al., NIMA 458, 2001, p 62

  • CdTe:Cl with Schottky In contact

    The basic idea is to reduce the dark current noise contribution with a Schottky anode contact For thin detectors, it provides very nice spectra, NO BALISTIC DEFICITThe main problem is due to polarization effect. This can be solved by :

    - High bias voltage values- Negative temperature down to 40C- Pusing the HV

  • CdTe:Cl close to Ge

    Needs a very low noise preamplifier !This often goes in the wrong direction ifwe must consider power consumption.

    220.5 mm3 Schottky CdTe diode, 1400V, -40C

    FWHM 830 eV !!

    Example from Takahashi et al., NIMA 1999 & IEEE TNS 2001

  • Modifying weighting potentiel on CZT

    The idea is to reduce the influence of the penetration depth in the signal inductionmodifying the weighting potential

    Another point is to forget the holes, ie to have a single carrier collection

    Then, it gives the opportunity to use thickCZT detectors

    - electrode configuration (ex : Parnham et al.,Luke et al.)

    - capacitive electrodes (ex : Montemont et al.)

  • Weighting potentiel in coplanar device

    Depth (mm)

    cathodeanode

    Radi

    us (m

    m)

    Depth (mm)

    cathodeanode

    Radi

    us (m

    m)

    CAPture geometry, Parnham et al. from eV-Products (USA)

    Scheme from Montemont, thesis universit J. Fourier, Grenoble, 2000

  • eV-Product Design : spectra

    CAPture geometry, Parnham et al. from eV-Products (USA)555 mm3 CZT detector

    Results with CAPture :

    -

  • CZT coplanar-grid array

    Data from Luke et al., NIMA 458, 2001, p 319

    Substracting the signals from the two grids removes the hole contribution

    Coplanar-grid electrode pattern with edge

    compensation

    1 cm3 coplanar-grid electrodeCZT coupled to its electronics

    A small voltage is applied between the two grids. Electrons are collected on one grid.

  • Capacitive electrodes CZT

    Capacitive electrode geometry, Montemomt et al. from CEA/LETI

    Depth (mm)

    anode cathode

    screenDielectric film

    Radi

    us (m

    m)

    Data from Montemont et al., IEEE TNS, 2001; VOL 48; PART 3; PART 1 , p 278

  • Capacitive electrodes CZT performances446 mm3 Schottky CdTe diode, 400V, 21C

    Energy (keV)

    NEWTREND !

    Performance should not depend on the detector thicness

  • Bulk detectors in two words

    detector FWHM FWHM Thicknesstype [keV] at 122 keV [keV] at 662 keV [mm]

    CdTe 5.5 23 2CdTe Schottky 1.5 NA 0.5CZT bulk 6 ? 6 CZT Capture 5 13 5CZT coplanar-grid 9 14 10CZT capacitive electrode 3.6 12 6

  • Lets talk about pixel arrays

    Fine pixel arraysEx : - CdTe Medipix evolution (Manach et al.)

    - Infocs (Stahle et al.)

    Medium size pixel arraysEx : HEFT (Ramsey, Bolotnikov, Cook et al.)

    Small pixel effect in CdTe arrays

    Thick CdZnTe pixel arraysEx : Simbol_X

  • Medipix arrays characteristics European collaboration with CERN The goal is to realize an highly integratedchip (CMOS 0.25 m) for high count rate X and -rays counting imagers with semiconductor detectorsFirst generation (Medipix 1) developpedfor GaAs detectors. Readout of the holesignalNew generation (Medipix 2) developped forelectron collection and allows the use ofCdTe semiconductor

    Data from Manach et al., CEA/DRT/LIST and Amendiola et al., NIMA 422, 1999, p 201

  • Medipix arrays design

    Semiconductor detector

    Indium bumpinterconnexions

    Readout cell55m55m

    Medipix2 readout chip (256256 pixels)

    Data from Manach et al., CEA/DRT/LIST and Amendiola et al., NIMA 422, 1999, p 201

  • Infocs CZT pixel arrays

    In the field of hard X-rays and -raysastronomyFocal plane for new focussing optics in therange of 10-100 keV with grazing incidence mirrorsThis technic allows a very high spatialresolution

    The detector is made of a 26.926.9 mm2CZT crystal, 2 mm thick. It is a 6464 pixels array.

    Data from Stahle et al., NIMA 436, 1999, p 138and http://lheawww.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/balloon/FOCUS.html

  • Infocs CZT pixel arrays

    2.3 keV FWHM

    Energy (keV)

    Coun

    ts

    109Cd source spectrum with Infocs CZT detector

    Infocs CZT detector assembly

    Data from Stahle et al., NIMA 436, 1999, p 138and http://lheawww.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/balloon/FOCUS.html

  • HEFT CZT pixel arrays

    In the field of hard X-rays and -raysastronomy againFocal plane for the High Energy Focussing TelescopeThe goal of this work is to achieve less than 1 keV at 60 keV (very low noise ASIC)

    The detector is made of an 88 pixels array (6.76.72 mm3) with 680650 m pixel size.

    Data from Ramsey, Bolotnikov, Cook et al.

  • HEFT CZT pixel arrays

    HEFT CZT detector assembly

    Energy (keV)241Am spectra (a) 0.9 keV FWHM at 60 keV, 5C

    (b) 1.1 keV FWHM at 60 keV, room temperature

  • Small pixel effect

    These nice results are possible because of the crystal quality, the ASIC performances and also the small pixel effect

    Small pixel effect is due to the weighting field distribution close the anode when the pixel size is less than a quarter of the thickness

    The nature works fine !

    Data from Eskin et al., Hage-Ali et al.

  • Thick CZT detectors arrays

    NEWTREND !

    64 pixels CZT arrays, 6 mm thick

  • Conclusions

    Thanks to CdTe detectors, it is now possible to dream of high spectral performances, high spatial resolution and high efficiency simultaneously

    The high spectral resolution obliges to think about new geometries and high performance electronicsAmong these new geometries, capacitive electrodes detectors for bulk detectors and thick pixel arrays appear as major new trends