Nasser Alkhomashi Dept. of Physics, University of Surrey Gu€¦ · Nasser Alkhomashi Dept. of...

33
Nasser Alkhomashi Dept. of Physics, University of Surrey Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK β - Decays from 188, 190,192 Ta: Shape Evolution in Neutron-Rich Tungsten Isotopes

Transcript of Nasser Alkhomashi Dept. of Physics, University of Surrey Gu€¦ · Nasser Alkhomashi Dept. of...

  • Nasser Alkhomashi

    Dept. of Physics, University of SurreyGuildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK

    β- Decays from 188, 190,192 Ta: Shape

    Evolution

    in Neutron-Rich Tungsten Isotopes

  • 2

    Relativistic beams at GSIaccelerators:

    UNILAC (injector) – E=11.4 MeV/n

    SIS - E < 1 GeV/nucleon

    beams:

    All ion species up to 238U

    Current:

    208Pb - ~2* 109 pps

  • primary beam

    Pb @ 1GeV/u

    Production target

    Central focus, S2Final focus, S4

    E(Z2)

    cu

    eB

    Q

    A

    FTO

    catcher

    degrader

    degrader

    dipole, B

    scintscint

    MW=x,y

    scint

    (veto)

    In-Flight Technique Using Projectile Fragmentation

    Ion-by-ion identification using the FRS

    Time Of Flight (TOF) through FRS: ~300ns

  • 4

    RISING

    Rare ISotope INvestigation at GSI15 high-efficiency

    Cluster germaniums

    ~14% at 661 keV

    MUSIC MUSIC

    Sci4

    1

    MW

    41

    MW

    42

    deg

    rad

    er

    beam

    S. Pietri, et al., Acta Phys. Pol. B38, 1255 (2007)

  • 5

    5 cm x 5 cm DSSSD (16 strips by 16 strips = 256 pixels)3 DSSSDs= 3 positions across focal plane.

  • Detectors Configuration

  • - Correlate implanted ions (mother) with -decay using the active, position sensitive, pixellaed

    stopper.

    - Measure rays (internal structure) from decays of

    • ns-ms isomeric states in original implanted ion,

    and / or

    • excited states in -daughter nucleus.

    Experiment Aim

  • 190Ta192Ta188Ta

  • 190Ta+ 192Ta -

    settings

    Charge states

  • Particle Identification

  • previous isomeric study by M. Caamano et al., Eur. Phys. J. A23 (2005) 201

    191W190W

    189Ta

    193Re192Re

    188Ta

    Decays from known and new isomeric states

    ‘prove’ correctness of particle ID

  • 192Re → 192Os adopted value T1/2=16(1) s see Nucl. Data Sheets 84 (1998) p717

  • Two-neutron Transfer Reactions 186W(18O,16O)

    T. Shizuma et al. ,Eur. Phys. J. A 30, 391396 (2006).

    188W

  • NO Isomer

  • Greg Lane et al. , ANU

    τ= 290 ns

    184

    Preliminary

  • Beta delayed spectroscopy of 188Ta → 188W

    Correlation time=120 (s)

  • Zs. Podolyak, et al., Phys. Letts. B, 491, 225 (2000).

    G. F. Farrelly, et al., Acta Phys. Pol. B 40 (2009) 885.

    Isomeric decay of 190W

  • Beta delayed spectroscopy of 190Ta → 190W

    Correlation time=30 (s)

  • Isomer gating on 190W

  • 190Ta (I=3-)

    207 2+

    564 4+

    (454) (2+2)

    0 0+

    (247)357

    207 454

    190W

    Possible level scheme for

    190W by beta decay

  • The classic O(6)

    (-soft) nucleus.

    What about 190W ?

  • Ex 2nd 2+ States (gamma bandhead?)

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    100 105 110 115 120

    Neutron Number N

    Excit

    ati

    on

    en

    erg

    y (

    keV

    )

    Hf (Z=72)

    W (Z=74)

    Os (Z=76)

    Pt (Z=78)

    190W ? 196Pt, O(6)

  • Beta delayed spectroscopy of 192Ta → 192W

    Correlation time=15 (s)

  • E(2+): 190W = 192Os

    E(2+): 192W = 194Os

  • Population of the 188W Isomeric state (7-) following the

    beta decay of the mother nucleus 188Ta.

    The measurement of the first excited states in 188W and190W confirmed the previous level schemes proposed for

    these nuclei.

    Evidence of 22+ state in 190W confirm the suggestion of

    the gamma-soft rotor for this nucleus.

    The 2+ state in 192W has been identified for the first time.

    Conclusion

  • N. Alkhomashia , P.H. Regana , Zs. Podolyaka , S.B. Pietria , A.B. Garnsworthya , S.J. Steera , J. Benlliureb , E. Caserejosb

    , J. Gerlc , H.J. Wollersheimc , J. Greboszd , G. Farrellya , M. G´rskac , I. Kojouharovc , H. Schaffnerc , A. Algorae , G.

    Benzonif , A. Blazhevg , P. Boutachkovc , A.M. Bruceh , A. M. Denish , I.J. Cullena , M.E. Estevezb , Y. Fujitai , W. Gelletlya ,

    R. Hoischenj , R. Kumark , S. Lalkovskih , Z. Liul , C. Mihaim , F. Molinae , D. Mucherg, P. D. Stevensona , E. Sucklinga , B.

    Tamiin , S. Tashenovc , J.J. Valiente-Dobano , P.M. Walkera , P.J. Woodsl .

    Acknowledgement

    a Department of Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK.b Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain

    c GSI, Plankstrasse 1, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germanyd The H. Niewodniczaski Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Krakw

    e IFIC Valencia, Spainf INFN, Universit degli Studi di Milano, I-20133 Milano, Italyg IKP, University of Cologne, D-50937 Cologne, Germany

    h School of Engineering, University of Brighton, Brighton BN2 4GJ, UKi Department of Physics, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan

    j Department of Physics, Lund University, S-22100 Lund, Swedenk UAC, New Delhi, India

    l University of Edinburgh, UKm NIPNE, Bucharest, Romania

    n Research Center for Nuclear Physics (RCNP), Osaka University, Japano INFN-Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, Padova, Italy

  • 188W192W190W

  • E(2)2+/E(2)

    1+

  • E(2)2+ - E(4)

    1+

  • 1/E(21+)

    R.B. Cakirli and R.F. Casten, Phys. Rev. C78 (2008) 041301(R).