Mooring Design

16
2 019 D 2.019 Desi ign of Ocean S Systems fO t Lecture Lecture 14 14 Mooring D ynamics ( III) April 1, 2011

Transcript of Mooring Design

Page 1: Mooring Design

2 019 D 2.019 Desiign of Ocean SSystemsf O t

LectureLecture 1414

Mooringg yDynamics ((III))

April 1, 2011

Page 2: Mooring Design

1

Cable Load-Excursion Relation

X = l ls + x ³ ´ X = l − h

¡1 + 2TH

¢ 21

+ TH cosh−1 1 + wh wh w TH

Restoringg Coefficient: " #³ ´ −11

C11 = dTH = w ¡ −2 ¢1/2 + cosh−1 1 + wh

dX TH TH1+2 wh

ϕW

lls

h

x

XAnchor

Vessel Moored with One Anchor Line

X(m)T H

(kN

)

Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.

Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.

Page 3: Mooring Design

TZ

T

A B

TH

x

h

L

l

ls

Hor

izon

tal T

ensi

on, k

N

TH

1000

500

0+50m +50m

2δ∗

Line

ALi

ne B

Fm =

660

kN

= THA _ THB

kN

m δDisplacement

Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.

Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.

Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.

Page 4: Mooring Design

H =¢

³ ´³ ´

Catenary Solution ⎯⎯ Key Results (with Elasticity)

• Horizontal force for a given fairlead tension T: q¡ ¢2 T = AAEE T + 1 2wh TH

q¡ + 1AE − AE −− AAEE −

• Minimum line length required (or suspended length for a given fairlead tension) for gravity anchor: p

lmin = 1 T 2 − T 2 w H

•• Vertical force at the fairlead: Vertical force at the fairlead:

Tz = wlmin •• Horizontal scope (length in plan view from fairlead to touchdown point): Horizontal scope (length in plan view from fairlead to touchdown point):

x = TH sinh−1 wlmin + TH lmin w TH AE H

AE: stiffness of the cable

Page 5: Mooring Design

Analysis of Spread Mooring System

• Mean position of the body is determined by balancing force/moment between those due to environments and mooringthose due to environments and mooring lines

• Iterative solver is usually applied

(xi, yi)

THiy

x

ψi

Total mooring line force/moment:

F = ∑n

M1 THi cos ψ i

i=1n

F M2 = ∑ THi sin ψ i

i=1n

F M6 = ∑ THi [xi sin ψ i − yi cos ψ i ]

i=1

Total mooring line restoring coefficients:

C11 = ∑n

ki cos2 ψ ii=1

n

C ki in222 = ∑ s ψ i

i=1

C66 = ∑n

ki ( xi sin ψ i −− yi cos ψ i )2

i=1n

C26 = C62 = ∑ ki ( xi sin ψ i − yi cos ψ i ) sin ψ ii=1

Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.

Page 6: Mooring Design

Mooring Line Dynamics

m4

m5

m3

m2m1

THE FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD

Wave-frequency motionSlowly-varying motionMean drift motion

Current

Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.

Page 7: Mooring Design

Mooring Forces and Displacement vs. Mooring Stiffness

Thus as a general rule, as a system is made less stiff, the mooring forces will be smaller and the displacements will be larger.

Mooring force = steady force (independent of sstiffness)

+ slow drift mooringg force (∝ stiffness ) + wave freequency motion (∝ stiffness)

steady forceDisplacement = s

1 stiffness ttiffness ∝

slo 1 ww drift displacement stiffness ∝ wave frequency motion (independent of stiffness))

Page 8: Mooring Design

Load/Displacement Combinations and Extreme Values Tensions and excursions in a mooring system have three components:

(1) a static component known as Tstatic which arises from wind, wave drift, and current (2) a wave frequency component, which occurs in the range of 0.03 to 0.3 Hz and is caused by first order wave loads

(3) a low frequency component, which occurs in the range of 0 to 0.02 Hz and is caused by second order waves and wind dynamics

Significant wave frequency motion

Maximum wave frequency motion:

Significant low-frequency motion:

Maximum Maximum llowow-frequencyfrequency motion: motion:

:

xwfm a x = 2ln (T /Tzwf )σ wf

xlfsig = 2σ lf

xlfm a x

xwfsig = 2σ wf

exp

= 2ln (Texp /T lf )σ z lf

Texp ~ 3 to 6 hours; Tz: peak period

xdyn = max[(xwfmax + xlfsig),(xwfsig + xlfmax)]Maximum combined dynamic tension/excursion:

Page 9: Mooring Design

Mooring Analysis Flowchart

Design EnvironmentalCondition

Platform WaveFrequency Motion

Steady EnvironmentalLoads

Static MooringSystem Displacement

and Tensions

Slow VaryingMooring Line

Tension

Dynamic MooringLine Tension

Total Line TensionDamage Condition

(lnc. Transient)Analysed?

Analysis Completed

Critical MooringLine Removed

Yes

No

Platform LowFrequency Motion

Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.

Page 10: Mooring Design

Mooring Line Materials Chain:

– Studless or studded chain links – Heavy, highbreaking strength, high elastisity – No bending effect – Most popular, all chain in shallow water (< 100M) – Chain segments are used near fairlead and bottom (in deepwater)Chain segments are used near fairlead and bottom (in deepwater)

Wire: – Lighter than chain – Slight bending effect – U d i i li t i d t (t d ti l l dUsed as main mooring line segments in deep water (to reduce vertical loads))

High-Tech Fibre: – Light weight (almost neutrally buoyant) – Higg yhly extensible – Potentially useful for very deep water

© Centre for Marine and Petroleum Technology. All rights reserved. This content is excluded fromour Creative Commons license. For more information, see http://ocw.mit.edu/fairuse.

Page 11: Mooring Design

Chain

Weight and Stiffness:Submerged weight per unit length, w = 0.1875D2 N/M (D in mm)Axial stiffness per unit length, AE = 90000D2 N (D in mm)

Breaking Strength:

CBS or proof load = c(44 - 0.08D)D2 N (D in mm)Catalogue breaking strength

Values of c:

Grade (specification) Catalogue Break Strength Proof Load

ORQ 21.1 14.03 22.3 14.8

3S 24.9 18.04 27.4 21.6

Page 12: Mooring Design

Wire Rope

Construction Submerged weight/length, w Stiffness/length, AE

Six strand (IWRC) 0.034d2 N (d in mm) 45000d2 N (d in mm)Spiral strand 0.043d2 N (d in mm) 90000d2 N (d in mm)

Weight and Stiffness:

Construction Ultimate Tensile Stress (N/mm2) Breaking Strength (N)

Six strand (IWRC) 1770 525d2 (d in mm)Six strand (IWRC) 1860 600d2 (d in mm)

Spiral strand 1570 900d2 (d in mm)

Breaking Strength:

© Centre for Marine and Petroleum Technology. All rights reserved. This content is excludedfrom our Creative Commons license. For more information, see http://ocw.mit.edu/fairuse.

Page 13: Mooring Design

High Technology Fibre Rope

Weight and Stiffness:

Breaking Strength:

Fibre Rope Type Weight Per Unit Length (N/m)

Polyester 0.0067d2 (d in mm)Aramid 0.00565d2 (d in mm)HMPE 0.0062d2 (d in mm)

Fibre Rope Type Breaking Strength (N)

Polyester 250d2 (d in mm)Aramid 450d2 (d in mm)HMPE 575d2 (d in mm)

Page 14: Mooring Design

Properties of Typical SystemsExtreme Excursions as a Percentage of Water Depth

Water Depth (m) Mooring Type Semi-submersible Ship

30 Chain/wire 30-45% 40-55%

150 Chain 15-25% 30-40%

500 Chain/wire 25-30% 20-30%

1000 Fibre ropes 5-10% 5-15%

Typical Natural Periods of Mooring Systems

Water Depth (m) Mooring Type Semi-submersible (s) Ship (s)

30 Chain/wire 30 45

150 Chain 60-120 60-150

500 Chain/wire 120-180 150-250

1000 Fibre ropes 90-110 120-150

Page 15: Mooring Design

Guidance, Rules, and Regulations IACS (International Association of Classification Societies) safety factors:

for survival conditions

Condition Safety factor (= Break strength/Max.tension)

Intact 1.67One line removed 1.25Transient 1.05

Condition Safety factor (= Break strength/Max.tension)

Intact 1.8One line removed 1.25Transient 1.1

IACS (International Association of Classification Societies) safety factors: for survival conditions for operating conditions, these safety factors are increased by about 50%.

API RP 2SK Safety Factors:

Page 16: Mooring Design

MIT OpenCourseWarehttp://ocw.mit.edu

2.019 Design of Ocean Systems Spring 2011

For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms.