Michael Gold's homepage Michael S. Gold · Modern Physics 330 February 6, 2020 The geometry gives...

12

Transcript of Michael Gold's homepage Michael S. Gold · Modern Physics 330 February 6, 2020 The geometry gives...

Page 1: Michael Gold's homepage Michael S. Gold · Modern Physics 330 February 6, 2020 The geometry gives the di erence in path length , = 2 ‘= 2dcos 2! Figure 2: Illustration of di raction
Page 2: Michael Gold's homepage Michael S. Gold · Modern Physics 330 February 6, 2020 The geometry gives the di erence in path length , = 2 ‘= 2dcos 2! Figure 2: Illustration of di raction
Page 3: Michael Gold's homepage Michael S. Gold · Modern Physics 330 February 6, 2020 The geometry gives the di erence in path length , = 2 ‘= 2dcos 2! Figure 2: Illustration of di raction
Page 4: Michael Gold's homepage Michael S. Gold · Modern Physics 330 February 6, 2020 The geometry gives the di erence in path length , = 2 ‘= 2dcos 2! Figure 2: Illustration of di raction
Page 5: Michael Gold's homepage Michael S. Gold · Modern Physics 330 February 6, 2020 The geometry gives the di erence in path length , = 2 ‘= 2dcos 2! Figure 2: Illustration of di raction
Page 6: Michael Gold's homepage Michael S. Gold · Modern Physics 330 February 6, 2020 The geometry gives the di erence in path length , = 2 ‘= 2dcos 2! Figure 2: Illustration of di raction
Page 7: Michael Gold's homepage Michael S. Gold · Modern Physics 330 February 6, 2020 The geometry gives the di erence in path length , = 2 ‘= 2dcos 2! Figure 2: Illustration of di raction
Page 8: Michael Gold's homepage Michael S. Gold · Modern Physics 330 February 6, 2020 The geometry gives the di erence in path length , = 2 ‘= 2dcos 2! Figure 2: Illustration of di raction
Page 9: Michael Gold's homepage Michael S. Gold · Modern Physics 330 February 6, 2020 The geometry gives the di erence in path length , = 2 ‘= 2dcos 2! Figure 2: Illustration of di raction
Page 10: Michael Gold's homepage Michael S. Gold · Modern Physics 330 February 6, 2020 The geometry gives the di erence in path length , = 2 ‘= 2dcos 2! Figure 2: Illustration of di raction

Modern Physics 330 February 6, 2020

de Broglie (1925) and Davisson, Germer (1928)

De Broglie hypothesized a matter wavelength according to, λ = h/p,with h Planck’s constant. This formula is true relativistically!

Davisson and Germer measured the diffraction of electrons from nickelcrystal. The also measured the diffraction with γ-rays and found the spacingd = 0.091 nm.

Figure 1: Data of Davisson and Germer for electrons with Ek = 54 eV.From Eisberg and Resnick

Page 11: Michael Gold's homepage Michael S. Gold · Modern Physics 330 February 6, 2020 The geometry gives the di erence in path length , = 2 ‘= 2dcos 2! Figure 2: Illustration of di raction

Modern Physics 330 February 6, 2020

The geometry gives the difference in path length ∆,

∆ = 2` = 2d cos

2

)

Figure 2: Illustration of diffraction geometry. From Eisberg and Resnick

Ek =p2

2m=

(h

λ

)2

At an accelerating potential of 1 Volt,

λ =1240 eV · nm√

2(1 eV)(5× 105 eV)= 1.23 nm

Theory predicts λ ∝ V −1/2 with slope 1.23 nm.

Page 12: Michael Gold's homepage Michael S. Gold · Modern Physics 330 February 6, 2020 The geometry gives the di erence in path length , = 2 ‘= 2dcos 2! Figure 2: Illustration of di raction

Modern Physics 330 February 6, 2020

Figure 3: Fit of λ versus V −1/2 has slope 1.23 nm.

So light is both wave and particle, and now an electron is bothwave and particle. This known as wave-particle duality.