Maulik Nariya DHEP (INO)amol/nuphy/... · Maulik Nariya DHEP (INO) 1. Outline ... Analogous to...

20
Maulik Nariya DHEP (INO) 1

Transcript of Maulik Nariya DHEP (INO)amol/nuphy/... · Maulik Nariya DHEP (INO) 1. Outline ... Analogous to...

  • Maulik Nariya

    DHEP (INO)

    1

  • Outline

    Density matrix formalism

    Use density matrix to describe a neutrino beam

    2 flavor case (νe-νμ)

    Evolution of S: analogous to spin precession in magnetic field

    Understanding oscillations with spin precession analogy

    2

  • Density Matrix Formalism Pure Ensemble: a collection of physical states characterized by

    the same ket

    Mixed Ensemble: a fraction of the members with relative

    population wi are characterized by ket

    The density matrix formalism helps in quantitative description

    of physical situations with mixed ensembles.

    Populations are constrained by

    the kets need not be orthogonal.

    )(i

    1i

    iw

    )(i

    3

  • Measurement of some observable A gives the expectation

    value:

    Probabilistic concepts enters twice

    - quantum mechanical probability

    - statistical wi weight for finding in the ensemble

    We define a density operator as

    4

    Ammmw

    AwA

    i

    i m

    i

    i

    i

    i

    i

    ofket Eigen : 2

    )(

    )()(

    2)()( ii A

    )(i

    )()( i

    i

    i

    iw

  • Some properties Matrix element looks like

    Expectation value of the observable A:

    is Hermitian.

    5

    nmwnm ii

    i

    i

    )()(

    )tr( A

    mAnnmAm n

    1

    )tr(

    )()(

    )()(

    ii

    i

    i

    i

    i m

    i

    i

    w

    mmw

  • 6

    ensemble mixedfor 1

    ensemble purefor 1

    )tr(

    2

    )()()()(22

    i

    i

    i

    iii

    m n

    i

    i

    w

    mnnmw

    The time evolution of the density matrix is given by

    ],[

    Ht

    i

  • Use density matrix to describe a ν beam A neutrino beam can be described by this density matrix

    operator

    Special case of one initial flavor β can be obtained by

    setting wα=δαβ

    Probability of detecting a νβ at a distance x is give by

    where ρF(x): density matrix in flavor basis

    7

    )()()( xwxx

    )()()( xxxP F

  • Evolution of ρ Evolution equation of ρF(x) is given by

    Recall

    UM: the effective mixing matrix in matter

    The density matrix in effective mass basis in matter is

    8

    FFF

    Hdx

    di

    ,

    2

    2

    0

    0

    M

    M

    MMFMm

    mHUHU

    M

    F

    M

    M UU

  • The evolution equation of ρM is

    For adiabatic case second term is negligible and can be ignored

    The diagonal elements of ρM remain constant and for k≠j

    9

    ΜMM

    M

    M

    M

    dx

    dUUiH

    dx

    di

    ,,

    MkjjjMkkMM

    kjHH

    dx

    di

    xdxHxHix

    x

    jjkk

    M

    kj

    M

    kj

    0

    )()()0()(

  • 2 flavor case (νe-νμ) A hermitian matrix X can be decomposed in terms of Pauli Spin

    matrices as

    Both HF and ρF are Hermitian. Tr(HF )=0, Tr(ρ

    F )=1.

    10

    k

    kkXXI

    X )Tr()(Tr2

    zSySxSS

    zByBxBB

    zyx

    SIBH

    zyx

    zyx

    zyx

    F

    F

    ˆˆˆ

    ˆˆˆ

    ˆˆˆ

    vectors,with the

    2

    1 ,

    2

    1

  • Components of B and S in flavor basis are:

    From the initial conditions for the density matrix, we have

    The probabilities of detection of a νe or a νμ at a distance x is

    11

    ,,Im2 ,Re22

    2cos

    2

    2sin

    ,2

    2cos,0 ,

    2

    2sin

    22

    22

    FF

    eez

    F

    ey

    F

    ex

    MMMM

    Czyx

    SSSE

    m

    E

    mE

    AmBB

    E

    mB

    wwSSS ezyx )0( ,0)0( ,0)0(

    zSSxxP

    zSSxxP

    z

    F

    z

    F

    eee

    ˆ12

    11

    2

    1)()(

    ˆ12

    11

    2

    1)()(

  • Evolution of the vector S

    The evolution equation of the vector S is

    Analogous to magnetic moment (with g=1), precessing around

    a magnetic field. The precession frequency is given by

    12

    BSdx

    Sd

    E

    mB M

    2

    2

  • Angle between S and B

    Precession becomes clear by rotating the reference frame by 2θM

    in 1-3 plane

    13

    MBS

    BS2cos

    )0(

    )0(

    zxz

    yy

    zxx

    MM

    MM

    ˆ2cosˆ2sinˆ

    ˆˆ

    ˆ2sinˆ2cosˆ

  • In this rotated frame B lies along zʹ

    14

    Em

    BBB

    BB

    BBB

    MzMxMz

    yy

    zMxx

    22cos2sin

    0

    02sin2cos

    2

    Fig(1):Precession of S around B with constant matter density Ne

  • The evolution equation of S thus becomes

    Using the initial conditions on S, the solution is

    15

    0, ,

    dx

    SdS

    dx

    SdS

    dx

    Sd zx

    y

    yx

    0,2

    2

    ,

    2

    yx

    yxS

    dx

    Sd

    )(2cos)(

    )sin()(2sin)(

    )cos()(2sin)(

    wwxS

    xwwxS

    xwwxS

    eMz

    eMy

    eMx

  • The third component of the S in flavor basis becomes

    The probabilities of detecting νe and νμ are

    16

    2sin2sin21)()(2cos)(2sin)( 22

    xwwxSxSxS MezMxMz

    2sin2sin

    2

    1)(

    2

    1)(

    2sin2sin

    2

    1)(

    2

    1)(

    22

    22

    xwwxP

    xwwxP

    Me

    Mee

  • Solar case (variable matter density) Initially pure νe beam

    Very large matter density (Ne>>NeR)

    θM ≈ π/2

    νe almost coincides with ν2M

    S describes the surface on a narrow

    cone around the negative zʹ axis

    When the ν passes through the resonance, Bx (and hence B)

    changes its value.

    17

  • If the resonance region is crossed adiabatically, the speed of

    rotation of S around B is much faster than the change in B.

    The cone swept by S is dragged by B and is finally rotated

    upside-down.

    Thus for small θ, the probability of νeνμ conversion is large

    18

  • References C. Giunti and C. W. Kim , Fundamentals of Neutrino Physics and

    Astrophysics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007, pp.329-326

    C. W. Kim, J. Kim, and W. K. Sze, Geometrical interpretations of

    neutrino oscillations in vacuum and matter, Phys. Rev. D37 (1988)

    Basudeb Dasgupta and Amol Dighe, Collective three-flavor

    oscillation of supernova neutrinos, Phy. Rev. D77, 113002(2008)

    19

  • Thank You

    20