Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders · Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders Mike Seymour...

23
Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders Mike Seymour – CERN TH / University of Manchester

Transcript of Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders · Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders Mike Seymour...

Page 1: Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders · Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders Mike Seymour –CERN TH / University of Manchester. Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders 2. From

Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders

Mike Seymour – CERN TH / University of Manchester

Page 2: Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders · Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders Mike Seymour –CERN TH / University of Manchester. Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders 2. From

Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders

2. From Cross Sections to Events

Page 3: Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders · Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders Mike Seymour –CERN TH / University of Manchester. Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders 2. From

σ̂ ij(β)=α s

2

m2

(σ̂ ij

(0)(β)+ α s σ̂ ij

(1)(β)+ α s

2σ̂ ij

(2)(β)+ O(α s

3))

NNLO calculations

Partonic cross section:

Double Real (R-R) Real-Virtual (R-V) Double Virtual (V-V)➢ 2 extra emitted partons at

tree level

➢ Invention of a new subtraction scheme called STRIPPER Czakon `10` 11

➢ 1-loop virtual with one extra parton

➢ Code by Stefan Dittmaier

➢ New subtraction terms Bierenbaum, Czakon, Mitov ` 11

➢ One loop squared amplitudes Körner, Merebashvili, Rogal `07 gluon fusion: Anastasiou, Aybat `08 gluon fusion done from scratch

➢ 2-loop virtual corrections Czakon `07 (quark annihilation) Bärnreuther, Czakon, PF `13

(gluon fusion)

3 principal contributions:

Cross Sections

𝜎 =1

2𝑠න ℳ 2 d𝐿𝐼𝑃𝑆

e.g. 𝑝𝑝 → 𝑡 ҧ𝑡NNLO

𝑞

ത𝑞

Page 4: Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders · Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders Mike Seymour –CERN TH / University of Manchester. Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders 2. From

Cross Sections are not enough

𝑞

ത𝑞

Page 5: Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders · Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders Mike Seymour –CERN TH / University of Manchester. Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders 2. From

Need to describe event structure

• Hadrons (not quarks and gluons)

• Jets of hadrons

• Remnants of protons afterparton extracted

• Unstable particle decays

Page 6: Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders · Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders Mike Seymour –CERN TH / University of Manchester. Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders 2. From

Need Event Generators

1. Hard process

2. Parton shower

3. Hadronization

4. Underlying event

5. Unstable particle

decays

Page 7: Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders · Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders Mike Seymour –CERN TH / University of Manchester. Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders 2. From

Parton showers and colour

• Quantum field theory of strong nuclear force = Quantum ChromoDynamics, QCD

• Quarks carry colour

• Gluons couple to colour

• Gluons carry colour

Gluons couple to gluons

Page 8: Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders · Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders Mike Seymour –CERN TH / University of Manchester. Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders 2. From

Parton showers and colour

• Quantum field theory of strong nuclear force = Quantum ChromoDynamics, QCD

• Quarks carry colour

• Gluons couple to colour

• Gluons carry colour

Gluons couple to gluons

QED: accelerated charges radiate.

QCD identical: accelerated coloursradiate.

gluons also charged.

cascade of partons.

= parton shower.

Page 9: Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders · Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders Mike Seymour –CERN TH / University of Manchester. Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders 2. From

Gluon emission is universal

e.g. e+e– 3 partons:

Divergent in collinear limit 0, (for massless quarks)

and soft limit zg 0

Eg/Eg,maxe+e– 2

partons

“quark charge

squared”QCD running

coupling ~ 0.1

Page 10: Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders · Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders Mike Seymour –CERN TH / University of Manchester. Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders 2. From

Parton branching is universal

“Splitting function”: dependent on flavour and spin but not on how partonwas produced

Probability distribution for parton branching

Simulation

Page 11: Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders · Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders Mike Seymour –CERN TH / University of Manchester. Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders 2. From

Parton branching is universal

“Splitting function”: dependent on flavour and spin but not on how partonwas produced

Probability distribution for parton branching

Simulation

Iterative evolution

Page 12: Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders · Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders Mike Seymour –CERN TH / University of Manchester. Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders 2. From

Need Event Generators

1. Hard process

2. Parton shower

• Start from hard process

and work outwards

• Evolve downwards in

momentum scale

• Strong coupling gets

stronger

Page 13: Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders · Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders Mike Seymour –CERN TH / University of Manchester. Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders 2. From

Need Event Generators

1. Hard process

2. Parton shower

3. Hadronization

Page 14: Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders · Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders Mike Seymour –CERN TH / University of Manchester. Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders 2. From

ConfinementAsymptotic freedom: 𝑄 ത𝑄 becomes increasingly QED-like at short distances.

QED:

but at long distances, gluon self-interaction makes field lines attract each other:

QCD:

linear potential confinement

+–

+–

Page 15: Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders · Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders Mike Seymour –CERN TH / University of Manchester. Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders 2. From

Interquark potentialCan measure from quarkonia

spectra:or from lattice QCD:

String tension

Page 16: Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders · Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders Mike Seymour –CERN TH / University of Manchester. Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders 2. From

String Model of MesonsLight quarks connected by string.

L=0 mesons only have ‘yo-yo’ modes:

x

t

Page 17: Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders · Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders Mike Seymour –CERN TH / University of Manchester. Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders 2. From

The Lund String ModelStart by ignoring gluon radiation:

𝑒+𝑒− annihilation = pointlike source of 𝑞ത𝑞 pairs

Intense chromomagnetic field within string 𝑞ത𝑞 pairs created by tunnelling. Analogy with QED:

Expanding string breaks into mesons long before yo-yo point.

Page 18: Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders · Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders Mike Seymour –CERN TH / University of Manchester. Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders 2. From

Colour and confinement

• Hadronization happens in the space between partons

Page 19: Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders · Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders Mike Seymour –CERN TH / University of Manchester. Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders 2. From

Need Event Generators

1. Hard process

2. Parton shower

3. Hadronization

4. Underlying event

5. Unstable particle

decays

Page 20: Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders · Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders Mike Seymour –CERN TH / University of Manchester. Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders 2. From

The Underlying Event• Protons are extended objects

• After a parton has been scattered out of each, what happens to the remnants?

Multi-parton interactions:need model of parton distributions in protonscattering can then be calculated

Page 21: Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders · Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders Mike Seymour –CERN TH / University of Manchester. Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders 2. From

Need Event Generators

1. Hard process

2. Parton shower

3. Hadronization

4. Underlying event

5. Unstable particle

decays

Herwig, Pythia, Sherpa

Page 22: Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders · Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders Mike Seymour –CERN TH / University of Manchester. Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders 2. From

Phenomenology

Theoretical Physics Experimental Physics

Phenomenology

Page 23: Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders · Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders Mike Seymour –CERN TH / University of Manchester. Making Predictions for Hadron Colliders 2. From

Making your measurements futureproof – Rivet

• Flexible and powerful framework to implement generator-and experiment-independent analyses

• Check in your analysis and it is preserved forever

• Check in your (published) data and it can be compared with theory forever – even theories that haven’t been dreamt up yet!

Rivet

Rivet is an analysis system for M C events + lots of analyses

⇠ 430 built-in! ⇠ 50 are pure MC, and some double-counting

I Easy and powerful way to get physics

numbers & plots from any MC gen

I LHC standard for preserving data analyses:

standard in ATLAS& CMSSM

I Origins in SM, and particularly QCD for

MCs – extended for search preservation

since v2.5 by adding detector

transfer-function features

I C++ library with Python interface, analyses

are plugins, code is “ clean”

I “If you can’t write a Rivet analysis for it,

it’s probably unphysical”!

Andy Buckley 10/36