LQT3 Final Presentation

14
LQT Syndrome 3 GROUP 4 Matthew Argentieri Michelle Hung Susan Mathew Sweta Roy Yarden Segal Dikesh Shrestha

Transcript of LQT3 Final Presentation

Page 1: LQT3 Final Presentation

LQT Syndrome 3

GROUP 4Matthew Argentieri

Michelle HungSusan Mathew

Sweta RoyYarden Segal

Dikesh Shrestha

Page 2: LQT3 Final Presentation

Background

• LQT3 is an autosomal dominant disease. – This mutation affects the inactivation gate of the

sodium channel and causes a gain of function of sodium current.

– Primary LQT3 mutation is ΔKPQ• ΔKPQ is the deletion of lysine, proline, and glutamine

between domains III and IV.

Page 3: LQT3 Final Presentation

Background

Page 4: LQT3 Final Presentation

• Arrhythmia

• Partial or total loss of consciousness

• Abdominal pain and GI complications

Symptoms

• Clinical features– Long ST

segments with a late appearing T wave

– Has QT >490+/-40 ms

Page 5: LQT3 Final Presentation

Factors

• There was no voltage shift, no change in channel conductance, and no change in ionic concentrations.

• Changes in gate kinetics (time constants) and a new sustained inward current were the only factors discerning LQT3 from wild-type cells.

Page 6: LQT3 Final Presentation

Time Constants

• Activation gate unaffected

• The time constants for the inactivation gates (fast and slow) changed.

– Wild Type• τ fast : 1.47 +/- 0.11 ms

• τ slow: 8.59 +/- 0.71 ms

– Mutant• τ fast : 0.98 +/- 0.07 ms

• τ slow: 5.40 +/- 0.55 ms

Page 7: LQT3 Final Presentation

Approach

• Multiplied time constants by a scaling factor

– τfast : 66.67% (2/3)

– τslow : 62.86% (540/859)

• Altered steady-state inactivation curves (minimum probability of inactivation)

– Fast : 1%

– Slow: 3%

Page 8: LQT3 Final Presentation

Modified Steady State Curves

BLUE CURVE: Modified fast inactivation steady state curve – levels out at 1% probability of being open (i.e. never reaches 0%)

RED CURVE: Modified slow inactivation steady state curve – levels out at 3% probability of being open (i.e. never reaches 0%)

Page 9: LQT3 Final Presentation

MATLAB CODE

h_ss(index) = alpha_h/(alpha_h+beta_h);if h_ss(index) <=0.01h_ss(index) = 0.01; end

j_ss(index) = alpha_j/(alpha_j+beta_j); if j_ss(index) <=0.03j_ss(index) = 0.03; end

tau_h = 1.0/(alpha_h+beta_h)*(2/3);

tau_j = 1.0/(alpha_j+beta_j)*(540/859);

Page 10: LQT3 Final Presentation

Preview of the GUI

Page 11: LQT3 Final Presentation

Preview of the GUI

Normal Cardiomyocyte Action Potential

ΔKPQ Mutant Cardiomyocyte Action Potential

Page 12: LQT3 Final Presentation

Conclusions

• Action potential duration is elongated due to longer repolarization – Increased time of repolarization due to

sustained inward sodium current– Diastolic Interval is reduced

• Time constants for LQT3 are smaller and cause faster inactivation

• Inactivation gates fail to remain inactivated– Leads to bursting mode current

Page 13: LQT3 Final Presentation

THANK YOU!

Visit our educational website at:

http://mysbfiles.stonybrook.edu/~margentieri

Page 14: LQT3 Final Presentation

References

• Baars, H. F., Smagt, J. J., & Doevendans, P. (2010). Clinical cardiogenetics. (1st ed., p. 149). Springer.

• Bankston, J., & Kass, R. (2010). Molecular determinants of local anesthetic action of beta-blocking drugs: Implications for therapeutic management of long qt syndrome variant 3. NIH Public Access

• Beinart, R., Michailidis, A., Gurevitz, O., & Gilkson, M. (2009). Is flecainide dangerous in long QT-3 patients? Journal compilation, 32, 143-145.

• Brisbane, J. (2006 (Updated 2009)). Acce review summary: The long qt-syndrome (lqts). Office of Population Health Genomics, Government of Western Australia, Department of Health.

• Moss, A., Windle , J., Hall, W., Zareba, W., Robinson, J., McNitt , S., Severski, P, Rosero, S, et al. (2005). Safety and efficacy of flecainide in subjects with long QT-3 syndrome (ΔKPQ mutation): A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology, 10(4), 59-66.

• Ruan, Y., Liu, N., Napolitano, C., & Priori, S. (2008). Therapeutic strategies for Long-QT syndrome: Does the molecular substrate matter?. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol, 1, 290-297.

• Schwartz, P., Priori, S., Locati, E., Napolitano, C., Cantù, F., Towbin, J., Keating, M., & Hammoude, H, et al. (1995). Long QT syndrome patients with mutations of the

• SCN5A and HERG genes have differential responses to Na channel blockade and• to increases in heart rate. Circulation, (92), 3381-3386.• Sovari, A. (2012, January 10). Long QT syndrome. Retrieved from

http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/157826-overview• Wang , H., Zheng, Y., Yang, Z., Li , C., & Liu, Y. (2003). Effect of mexiletine on long• QT syndrome model. Chinese Pharmacological Society, 4, 316-320.