LOLA Measurements vs. Beam Dynamics Simulations
-
Upload
claudia-mcintyre -
Category
Documents
-
view
19 -
download
0
description
Transcript of LOLA Measurements vs. Beam Dynamics Simulations
Slide 1
LOLA Measurements vs. Beam Dynamics SimulationsIgor Zagorodnov11.04.2011DESY
Shift on 23.03.2011 (~3 hours afternoon)ParameterQ0.35-0.4 nCE1150 MeV118oE2445 MeV24.58oE3665 MeVParameter110o131.5o2-8o3-4.5oOn-crest phases
On-crestks=0.9256kE =1.1570- an additional calibration of the measurement
C=2.2C1 =1.9C2 =1.1
C=3.2C1 =2.6C2 =1.2
C=3.2=2.6*1.2
LOLA resolution increase. New Calibration.ks=0.9256kE =1.1570- an additional calibration of the measurementC=3.2=2.6*1.2
New additional calibration.ks=0.9256kE =1.1570ks=0.83kE =1.71
C=4.5=3.2*1.4
C=4.5=3.2*1.4
C=5.4=3.7*1.5
Without CSRtrackWith CSRtrackC=5.4=3.7*1.5
Without CSRtrackWith CSRtrackC=7.6=4.44*1.71
Current profile?I [A]s [m]s [mm]I [A]shot1shot1measurementssimulationsat LOLAstart
s [mm]I [A]s [mm]I [A]simulationsat LOLAstartsimul.meas.at LOLA
C=7.6=4.44*1.71smooth currentnew current
V13=+0.9 MV
fi11=+0.3 degRF parameters?
fi11=+0.3 degfi11=0 deg
V13=+0.9MVRF parameters?On-crest simulations vs the measurement.17
V13=+1.1 MVfi11=-0.2 degC=9.4=4.9*1.9
C=32=7.5*4.3V13=+1.5 MVfi11=-0.2 deg