LOLA Measurements vs. Beam Dynamics Simulations

19
LOLA Measurements vs. Beam Dynamics Simulations Igor Zagorodnov 11.04.2011 DESY

description

LOLA Measurements vs. Beam Dynamics Simulations. Igor Zagorodnov 11.04.2011 DESY. Shift on 23.03.2011 (~3 hours afternoon). On-crest phases. On-crest. k s =0.9256 k E =1.1570. - an additional calibration of the measurement. C=2.2 C 1 =1.9 C 2 = 1.1. C=3.2 C 1 =2.6 C 2 = 1.2. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of LOLA Measurements vs. Beam Dynamics Simulations

Slide 1

LOLA Measurements vs. Beam Dynamics SimulationsIgor Zagorodnov11.04.2011DESY

Shift on 23.03.2011 (~3 hours afternoon)ParameterQ0.35-0.4 nCE1150 MeV118oE2445 MeV24.58oE3665 MeVParameter110o131.5o2-8o3-4.5oOn-crest phases

On-crestks=0.9256kE =1.1570- an additional calibration of the measurement

C=2.2C1 =1.9C2 =1.1

C=3.2C1 =2.6C2 =1.2

C=3.2=2.6*1.2

LOLA resolution increase. New Calibration.ks=0.9256kE =1.1570- an additional calibration of the measurementC=3.2=2.6*1.2

New additional calibration.ks=0.9256kE =1.1570ks=0.83kE =1.71

C=4.5=3.2*1.4

C=4.5=3.2*1.4

C=5.4=3.7*1.5

Without CSRtrackWith CSRtrackC=5.4=3.7*1.5

Without CSRtrackWith CSRtrackC=7.6=4.44*1.71

Current profile?I [A]s [m]s [mm]I [A]shot1shot1measurementssimulationsat LOLAstart

s [mm]I [A]s [mm]I [A]simulationsat LOLAstartsimul.meas.at LOLA

C=7.6=4.44*1.71smooth currentnew current

V13=+0.9 MV

fi11=+0.3 degRF parameters?

fi11=+0.3 degfi11=0 deg

V13=+0.9MVRF parameters?On-crest simulations vs the measurement.17

V13=+1.1 MVfi11=-0.2 degC=9.4=4.9*1.9

C=32=7.5*4.3V13=+1.5 MVfi11=-0.2 deg