Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples...

56
Lecture 3: Power Law Models Fatih Guvenen February 20, 2019 University of Minnesota

Transcript of Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples...

Page 1: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Lecture 3: Power Law Models

Fatih GuvenenFebruary 20, 2019

University of Minnesota

Page 2: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

What is a Power Law?

▶ General definition: A power law (PL) is defined as a relationshipbetween two variables, x and y, where:

y = a× x−α, (1)

for some scaling constant k.

α : is the power law exponent, and is a key parameter.

▶ Eq. (1) implies:log y = −α× log x,

so a log-log plot of y and x should be a straight line with slopeα, which allows us to see a power law visually (without fittingequation (1)).

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 1 / 54

Page 3: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Pareto Distribution

▶ Let w be a random variable whose distribution obeys therelationship:

P(w > x) = a× x−α

where P(w > x) is the counter-CDF of w, for some a and apositive α.

→ w follows a PL or, alternatively, w has a Pareto distribution.

▶ Asymptotic Power Law:Sometimes the power law holds only above a threshold, x. In thatcase, w is said to be asymptotically PL.

▶ PLs are pervasive in nature, including in many distributionssocial scientists are interested in.

▶ Important property: a PL has finite moments only up to the αth

moment.If α = 1 (called Zipf’s law): mean does not exist.if α = 1.5, variance does not exist.

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 2 / 54

Page 4: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Size Distribution for Firms, α = 1.0495

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

S ≡ ln(employees)

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15y≡

ln(No.firm

swithS

ormrore

employees)

US Data, 2011

Linear regression line

y = 16.364− 1.0495× S, R2 = 0.9999

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 3 / 54

Page 5: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

US Wealth Distribution, α = 1.51

1M 10M 100M 1B 10B 100BWealth (Log scale)

-16

-14

-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0L

og

Co

un

ter-

-CD

F:

F(

w >

Wea

lth

)US Data, Forbes 400

US Data, Survey of Consumer Finances

Regression Line: 21.67 - 1.51 x log(wealth)

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 4 / 54

Page 6: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

US Cities Size Distribution, α = 1.0315

250K 500K 1M 5M 10MMSA Population

1

10

50

100

200M

SA

Ran

kUS Data, 2010

ln(Rank) = 18.147− 1.0315×ln(Pop.), R2 = 0.980

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 5 / 54

Page 7: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Annual Income Growth Distribution, US Males

-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6yt+1 − yt

-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2LogDen

sity

US Data, 1997–98

N (0, 0.512)

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 6 / 54

Page 8: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

A few more examples

▶ The average frequency of space debris (meteors and such)hitting the earth’s atmosphere, call y, is inversely proportionalto the surface area of the debris, or its squared diameter, call itx2.

The law holds remarkably well across 10 orders of magnitude:▶ micro particles (1 micron diameter) hitting the space shuttle at rate

1012 per year▶ meteors with 100+ meter diameter hitting earth every 10,000 years

(10−4 per year).▶ meteors of 10,000+ meters hitting every 100 million years.

▶ Per Krusell’s “discovery”:

Fraction of population with a Masters degree, 1Phd, 2Phds, 3Phds,4Phds, are all 1/10th of each other.

▶ Schroeder (1991)’s book “Fractals, Chaos, Power Laws,” is afascinating read on this.

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 7 / 54

Page 9: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Features of Power Laws

▶ Combining different distributions in a model can quicklycomplicate the analysis.

So, distributions that have convenient properties are very usefulin research.An important reason why Normal, Poisson, Frechet, etc. are verypopular.

▶ PL also has very convenient properties that makes it veryuseful.

e.g., the sum, product, min, max of PL distributions are all PL.In most combinations, the thickest PL (lowest α) dominates.

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 8 / 54

Page 10: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

PL Models

▶ What kinds of mechanisms can generate a power law?

▶ Which of these mechanisms are plausible or relevant for agiven PL distribution?

▶ For example:“In all places and all times, the distribution of income remainsthe same. Neither institutional change nor egalitarian taxationcan alter this fundamental constant of social sciences.”

▶ What forces are behind this law? and for wealth, firm sizes,income shocks, etc?

▶ Note: there are other thick-tailed distributions that don’t havethe PL structure, such as Cauchy, Levy, etc. We won’t talk aboutthem today but they are also used.

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 9 / 54

Page 11: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Simple(st) Framework

▶ Proportional random growth model:

st+1 = αtst (2)

where αt is a positive i.i.d random variable.

▶ Which yields:log st = log s0 +Σt−1

n=1αn

▶ Two results:1 Assuming αt has a well-behaved distribution so that the centrallimit theorem applies, 1

t st converges to a log-normal distribution.2 The distribution of st spreads without bound, so it has nostationary distribution (over time).

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 10 / 54

Page 12: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Power Law Models: Simple Mechanics

▶ Wit :wealth of individual i and Wt : average (per-capita) wealth.

▶ Since wealth grows over time, define: wit ≡Wit

Wt.

▶ Proportional random growth: wit+1 = Ait × wti , where Ait is i.i.dover t and i, with density f(A).

▶ Define: Gt(wt) := P(wt > x) as the counter-CDF, which evolves:

Gt+1(x) = P(wit+1 > x) = P(Aitwit > x) > P(wit >xAit)

=

∫ ∞

0

Gt(xA )f(A)dA.

▶ If there is a steady state: G(x) =∫∞0G( xA )f(A)dA.

▶ Guess Pareto distr.: G(x) = cxα and plugging in yields:

1 =

∫ ∞

0

Aαf(A)dA = E(Aα).

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 11 / 54

Page 13: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

A Full-Blown GE Model: Benhabib-Bisin-Zhu (2011, Ecma):

▶ OLG model. Each individual lives for T years. Replaced by singleoffspring.

▶ wn: initial wealth of generation n. After estate tax b :

wn+1(0) = (1− b)wn(T).

▶ “Warm glow” utility from bequests: ϕ (wn+1) , with ϕ′ > 0, wheren denotes generation number.

▶ Labor income (yn) and return on wealth (rn) are both stochasticacross generations.

▶ Incomplete markets. No aggregate uncertainty.

▶ Wealth accumulation: wn(τ) = rnwn(τ) + yn − cn(τ),for τ = 0 toT.

▶ Key point: rn has a multiplicative effect whereas yn only entersadditively.

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 12 / 54

Page 14: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Key Assumptions

▶ Assumption 1: Preferences satisfy u(c) = c1−σ

1−σ andϕ(w) = χw1−σ

1−σ �. Furthermore, σ ≥ 1, rn ≥ ρ and χ > 0.

▶ Assumption 2: The stochastic process(rn, yn) is a real,irreducible, aperiodic, stationary Markov chain with finite statespace and P(rn, yn|rn−1, yn−1) = P(rn, yn|rn−1). (Markovmodulated chain).

▶ Assumption 2 allows a certain degree of persistence butimplies that rn is independent of past yn−k’s.

▶ In other words: it assumes that one factor that drives rn to alsodrive yn but not vice versa.

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 13 / 54

Page 15: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Results

▶ One can derive a wealth evolution equation of this form:

wn+1 = αn (rn)wn + βn (rn, yn) ,

where αn (rn) and βn (rn, yn) are stochastic processes inducedby (rn, yn) *and* the solution of the household’s problem (sothey depend of the deep parameters of the model).

Theorem 1Consider wn+1 = αn (rn)wn + βn (rn, yn) ,and let (rn, yn) satisfyassumption 2 (and a regularity condition). Then, the tail of thestationary distribution of wn, P(wn > w) is asymptotic to a Paretolaw:

Pr (wn > w) ∼ kw−µ.

where µ > 1 satisfies

limN→∞

(EΠN−1

n=0 (α−n)µ)1/N

= 1.

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 14 / 54

Page 16: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Two More Results

▶ When αn is i.i.d. the previous condition in Theorem 1 reduces toE (α)

µ= 1 (Kesten 1973).

▶ Remark: Theorem 1 implies that the properties of income riskhas no effect on the tail of wealth distribution.

▶ Propositions 1-4: The tail index µ :

1 decreases with the size of rate of return risk.

2 decreases with the bequest motive χ�.

3 increases with the estate tax b and with the capital income tax ζ.

4 decreases with the persistence of αif it follows an AR(1) or MA(1).

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 15 / 54

Page 17: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

A Quantitative Model

Page 18: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Households

▶ OLG demographic structure.

▶ Mortality risk: ϕh is uncond. probability of survival to age h.

▶ Accidental bequests are inherited by (newborn) offspring.

▶ Preferences: E0

(∑Hh=1 β

h−1ϕhu(ch, ℓh))

▶ Individuals:

Two exogenous characteristics: yih (labor mkt productivity) andzih (entrepreneurial productivity)

Make three decisions:

1 consumption-savings

2 leisure vs. labor supply

3 whether to engage in entrepreneurial activity

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 17 / 54

Page 19: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

1. Labor Market Productivity

▶ Labor market efficiency of household i at age h is

log yih = κh︸︷︷︸life cycle

+ θi︸︷︷︸permanent

+ ηih︸︷︷︸AR(1)

▶ Individual-specific labor market efficiency θi is imperfectlyinherited from parents:

θchildi = ρθ × θparenti + εθ

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 18 / 54

Page 20: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

2. Entrepreneurial Productivity

▶ Key source of heterogeneity: entrepreneurial ability zih.

▶ Household i produces xih units of intermediate good i:

xih = zihkih,

where kih is capital.

▶ zih has a permanent and a stochastic component:

zih = f( zpi︸︷︷︸perm. comp.

, Iih︸︷︷︸stoch. comp.

)

▶ zpi is constant over the lifecycle and inherited imperfectly:

log(zpchild) = ρz log(zpparent) + εz.

▶ Iih is governed by transition matrix Πz, specified in a moment.Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 19 / 54

Page 21: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

3. Competitive Final Good Producer

▶ Efficiency-adjusted aggregate capital:

Q =

(∫(xih)µdidh

)1/µ

, µ < 1

▶ Efficiency-adjusted aggregate labor:

L =∫(yih(1− ℓih))didh

(individuals supply labor to the aggregate firm, not to produce xih)

▶ Final good production: Y = QαL1−α

▶ Price of intermediate good xi: pi (xi) = αxµ−1i × Qα−µL1−α

▶ Wage rate (per efficiency unit of labor): w = (1− α)QαL−α

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 20 / 54

Page 22: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Back to Entrepreneurial Productivity: Specifics

▶ The lifecycle pattern of wealth accumulation for the very richmatters greatly:

1 steady accumulation of wealth: the rich today have highexpected returns tomorrow.

▶ Larger % of wealthy prefer wealth taxation (rel. to capitalincome).

2 extremely fast growth that tapers off: rich today have lowexpected returns tomorrow.

▶ Smaller % of wealthy prefer wealth taxation.

▶ With µ < 1, returns fall as wealth increases, but not fast enoughif zih = zi for all h.

▶ So, we consider a process that allows for both scenarios.

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 21 / 54

Page 23: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Back to Entrepreneurial Productivity: Specifics

▶ Over the life cycle, entrepreneurial ability evolves as follows:Iih ∈ {H, L, 0}

zih = f(zpi , Iih) =

(zpi)λ if Iih = H where λ > 1

zpi if Iih = Lzmin if Iih = 0

with transition matrix:

Πzs =

1− p1 − p2 p1 p20 1− p2 p20 0 1

▶ λ : degree of superstar productivity.▶ p1: annual probability of losing superstar productivity▶ p2 : annual probability of losing entrepreneurial productivitycompletely→ become a passive saver.

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 22 / 54

Page 24: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

4. Bond Market & Entrepreneur’s Problem

▶ a : assets owned by individual. k : capital used in entrepr. prod.

▶ Individuals can borrow for production up to: k ≤ ϑ (z)× aIf ϑ(z) = 1 ⇒ cannot borrow or lend

Borrowing capacity is nondecreasing in ability: dϑ(z)/dz ≥ 0

▶ Individuals can lend, at interest rate r determined inequilibrium (zero net supply).

▶ Entrepreneur’s (static!) capital choice:

maxk≤ϑ(z)a

{[R× (zk)µ + (1− δ)k]− (1 + r)(k− a)}

= (1 + r)a+ π∗(a, z)

▶ After-production wealth:

Π(a, z) =a+ [ra+ π∗(a, z)]

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 23 / 54

Page 25: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Individual’s Budget Constraint

▶ During working life:

c+ a′ = Π(a, z) + wyhn

and a′ ≥ 0.

▶ During retirement:

c+ a′ = Π(a, z; τ) + yR(θ, η)

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 24 / 54

Page 26: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Functional Forms and Parameters

▶ Preferences:

u(c, ℓ) =(cγℓ1−γ

)1−σ

1− σ

▶ Pension system:yR(θ, η) = Φ(θ, η)× Y where Y is the average labor income ineconomy, and

Φ(θ, η) is a concave replacement rate function taken from SocialSecurity’s OASDI system.

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 25 / 54

Page 27: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Calibration Target

▶ Goal: Match the fraction of Forbes 400 wealthiest that areself-made (54%, we get 50%)

▶ Permanent z alone does not create enough self-made Forbes400 rich.

It takes too long (many generations) to get into Forbes 400.

▶ We set: λ = 5, p1 = 0.05, and p2 = 0.03.

Πzs =

0.92 0.05 0.03

0 0.97 0.03

0 0 1

▶ We also have robustness analysis with constant productivity:λ = 1, p1 = 0, and p2 = 0.

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 26 / 54

Page 28: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Parameters Set Outside the Model

Table 1: Benchmark Parameters

Parameter ValueCurvature of utility σ 4.0Curvature of CES aggregator of varieties µ 0.90Capital share in production α 0.40Depreciation rate of capital δ 0.05Interg. persistence of invest. ability ρzP 0.10Interg. persistence of labor efficiency ρθ 0.50Persistence of labor efficiency shock ρη 0.90Std. dev. of labor efficiency shock σεη 0.20

τk = 25%, τℓ = 22.4%, and τc = 7.5% (McDaniel, 2007)

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 27 / 54

Page 29: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Calibration Targets and Outcomes

▶ ρz = 0.1 is set based on Fagereng et al (2016) for Norway. (Wehave also experimented with values up to 0.5)

▶ We calibrate 4 remaining parameters (β, γ, σεzp , σεθ ) to match 4data moments:

Table 2: Benchmark Parameters Calibrated Jointly in EquilibriumParameter Value MomentDiscount factor β 00.948 Capital/Output 3.00∗Cons. share in U γ 0.46 Avg. Hours 0.40∗σ of entrepr. ability σεzp 0.072 Top 1% share 0.36∗σ of labor fix. eff. σεθ 0.305 σ(log(Earn)) 0.80∗

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 28 / 54

Page 30: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Moments

Table 3: Benchmark vs. Wealth Tax Economy

US Data Benchmark Wealth TaxTop 1% 0.36∗ 0.36Capital/Output 3.00∗ 3.00Bequest/Wealth 1–2%00 0 1.0%σ(log(Earnings)) 0.80∗ 0.80Avg. Hours 0.40∗ 0.40

▶ Calibrated model generates:total tax revenues

GDP : 25% vs. 24.8% in the datacapital tax revenuetotal tax revenue : 25% vs. 28% in the datacorporate debt

GDP : 1.29 vs. 1.26 in the data

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 29 / 54

Page 31: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

µ = 0.9 and Pareto Tail

1e+06 1e+07 1e+08 1e+09 1e+10 5e+10

Wealth (log scale)

-16

-14

-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

Lo

g C

ou

nte

r-C

DF

Pareto Tail Above $1000000

US DataRegression LineModelRegression Line

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 30 / 54

Page 32: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Wealth measured in Present Value

1e+06 1e+07 1e+08 1e+09 1e+10 5e+10

Wealth (log scale)

-16

-14

-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0Log C

ounte

r-C

DF

Pareto Tail Above $1000000

US DataRegression LineModelRegression Line

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 31 / 54

Page 33: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

µ = 0.8 and Pareto Tail

1e+06 1e+07 1e+08 1e+09 1e+10 5e+10

Wealth (log scale)

-16

-14

-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0Log C

ounte

r-C

DF

Pareto Tail Above $1000000

US DataRegression LineModel (µ=0.8)

Regression Line

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 32 / 54

Page 34: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Return Heterogeneity: Model vs. Data

Table 4: Deviation of percentiles of the distribution of lifetime returnsrelative to the median

p10 p25 p75 p90 p99 p99.9Norwegian Data -2.4% -1.3% 2.1% 4.1% 9.7% 19.9%Ages 25-65 -3.4% -2.9% 4.7% 8.0% 13.6% 19.9%Ages 20-24 -10.0% -5.6% 4.9% 13.3% 32.7% 55.4%

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 33 / 54

Page 35: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Two Tax Experiments

1 Tax reform: Calibrate to current US economy with capitalincome taxes.

Baseline: Replace capital income taxes with wealth taxes so as tokeep government revenue constant.

2 Optimal taxation: Government maximizes utilitarian socialwelfare choosing:

1 linear labor income and capital income taxes, or2 linear labor income and wealth taxes,

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 34 / 54

Page 36: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Tax Reform: Aggregate Variables

Table 5: Benchmark vs. Wealth Tax Economy

Benchmark Wealth Tax % Changeτk 0025.0% 000.00τa 0.00 1.13%k 19.4Q 24.8w 8.7Y 10.1L 1.3C 10.0

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 35 / 54

Page 37: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Reallocation of Wealth Across Agents

Table 6: Tax Reform from τk to τa: Change in Wealth Composition

Productivity group (Percentile)Top x% 0-40 40-80 80-90 90-99 99-99.9 99.9-99.99 99.99+

1 -12.0 -13.0 -10.8 10.5 11.2 9.8 6.95 -8.2 -3.3 1.6 8.3 8.9 8.1 6.210 -6.4 -1.3 2.9 6.4 6.9 6.3 5.050 -2.5 0.9 1.8 1.6 1.2 1.1 1.1

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 36 / 54

Page 38: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Welfare Analysis: Two Measures

Let s0 ≡ (θ, z,a0), and V0 and V0 be lifetime value functions inbenchmark (US) and counterfactual economies, respectively.

▶ Measure 1: Compute individual-specific consumptionequivalent welfare and integrate:

V0((1 + CE1(s0))c∗US(s0), ℓ∗US(s0)) = V0(c(s0), ℓ(s0))

CE1 ≡∑s0

ΓUS(s0)× CE(s0)

▶ Measure 2: Fixed proportional consumption transfer to allindividuals in the benchmark economy:∑s0

ΓUS(s0)×V0((1+CE2)c∗US(s0), ℓ∗US(s0)) =∑s0

Γ(s0)×V0(c(s0), ℓ(s0)).

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 37 / 54

Page 39: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Tax Reform: Average Welfare Change

Baseline Baseline + SSCE1 CE2 CE1 CE2

Average CE for newborns 7.40% 7.86% 5.58% 4.71%

Average CE 3.14% 5.14% 4.95 4.10%

% in favor of reform 67.8% 94.8%

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 38 / 54

Page 40: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Tax Reform: Who Gains? Who Loses?

Productivity group (Percentile)Age 0-40 40-80 80-90 90-99 99-99.9 99.9-99.99 99.99+20 7.0 7.3 7.9 8.9 10.6 11.6 12.4

21–34 6.5 6.3 6.3 6.6 7.0 6.9 5.735–49 5.1 4.4 3.9 3.3 1.7 0.4 -2.250–64 2.3 1.8 1.4 0.8 -0.6 -1.7 -3.565+ -0.2 -0.3 -0.4 -0.6 -1.2 -1.7 -2.7Note: Each cell reports the average of CE1(θ, z, a, h)× 100 within each ageand productivity group

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 39 / 54

Page 41: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Optimal Taxation

Page 42: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

2. Optimal Taxation

Page 43: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Two Optimal Tax Problems

Compare:

1 (linear) labor taxes and capital income taxes

2 (linear) labor taxes and wealth taxes.

The government maximizes ex ante (expected) lifetime utility ofnewborns.

Then analyze:

▶ Benchmark vs. Optimal tax (either capital income or wealth)

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 41 / 54

Page 44: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Optimal Tax Structure and Outcomes

τk τℓ τa k/Y Top 1%Benchmark 025% 22.4% – 3.0 0.36Tax reform – 22.4% 1.13% 3.25 0.46Opt. τk –34.4% 36.0% – 4.04 0.56Opt. τa – 14.1% 3.06% 2.90 0.47Opt. τa w/ threshold – 14.2% 3.30% 2.86 0.47

ThresholdE = 25% 63% of pop. taxed

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 42 / 54

Page 45: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Wealth Taxes – Distortions and Misallocation

-0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

Tax Revenue from K / Total Tax Revenue

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

PercentChange

k, τkk, τa

▶ Wealth tax reduces k less than capital income tax.Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 43 / 54

Page 46: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Wealth Taxes – Distortions and Misallocation

-0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

Tax Revenue from K / Total Tax Revenue

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

PercentChange

k, τkk, τaQ, τkQ, τa

▶ Q, declines less than k under wealth taxes. Opposite undercapital income taxes.

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 44 / 54

Page 47: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Optimal Taxes: Aggregate Variables

∆K ∆Q ∆L ∆Y ∆w ∆w ∆r ∆r% change (net) (net)Tax reform 19.37 24.79 1.28 10.10 8.70 8.70 –0.25 –0.90Opt. τk 68.97 79.57 –1.16 25.51 26.97 4.72 –1.51 –0.87Opt. τa 2.76 10.26 3.90 6.40 2.41 13.42 0.68 –1.92Opt. τa 0.41 8.12 3.67 5.42 1.70 12.48 0.78 –2.07Threshold

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 45 / 54

Page 48: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Optimal Taxes: Welfare

τk τℓ τa CE2 Vote

(%) (%)Benchmark 025% 22.4% – – –Tax reform – 22.4% 1.13% 7.86Opt. τk –34.4% 36.0% – 6.28Opt. τa – 14.1% 3.06% 9.61Opt. τa – 14.2% 3.30% 9.83Threshold Threshold

E = 25%

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 46 / 54

Page 49: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Welfare: Levels vs. Redistribution

Tax Reform Opt. τk.Opt. τaCE2 (NB) 7.86 6.28 9.61

ConsumptionTotal 8.27 5.90 11.02Level 10.01 21.04 8.28Dist. –1.58 –12.51 2.53

LeisureTotal –0.38 0.36 –1.27Level –0.66 0.73 –2.21Dist. 0.27 –0.38 0.76

Formula

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 47 / 54

Page 50: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Optimal Capital Income Tax: Welfare

Optimal Capital Income Tax - Welfare Gain by Age/ProductivityProductivity group (Percentile)

Age 0-40 40-80 80-90 90-99 99-99.9 99.9-99.99 99.99+20 4.0 5.6 7.2 9.5 13.0 14.8 16.1

21–34 3.7 5.0 6.2 7.9 10.4 11.4 11.235–49 2.7 3.3 3.8 4.0 3.5 2.7 0.750–64 1.1 1.4 1.6 1.5 0.6 -0.2 -1.965+ -0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 -0.2 -0.7 -1.6

Political Support

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 48 / 54

Page 51: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Optimal Wealth Tax: Welfare

Optimal Wealth Tax - Welfare Gain by Age/ProductivityProductivity group (Percentile)

Age 0-40 40-80 80-90 90-99 99-99.9 99.9-99.99 99.99+20 10.0 9.7 10.1 11.1 13.1 14.3 15.3

21–34 9.2 7.9 7.3 7.1 6.6 5.9 3.135–49 6.8 4.9 3.7 2.1 -1.3 -3.9 -8.850–64 2.7 1.4 0.6 -0.8 -3.7 -5.8 -9.365+ -0.6 -0.9 -1.2 -1.8 -3.2 -4.3 -6.3

Political Support Political Support + Threshold

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 49 / 54

Page 52: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Optimal Taxes: Welfare

Baseline

τk τℓ τa CE2 Vote

(%) (%)Benchmark 025% 22.4% – – –Tax reform – 22.4% 1.13% 7.86 67.8Opt. τk –34.4% 36.0% – 6.28 69.7Opt. τa – 14.1% 3.06% 9.61 60.7Opt. τa – 14.2% 3.30% 9.83 78.9Threshold

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 50 / 54

Page 53: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Power Law Models: Wrapping Up

Page 54: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Measuring the Tail

▶ Researchers do not always have access to micro data to plotthe log density vs log x graph and see linear relationship.

▶ A Pareto distribution can be verified and tail index estimated ina simpler way.

▶ First: If P(y > x) = k× x−α, the conditional mean of y above anyy is E(y|y > y) = y× α

1−α .

Two Implications:

1 E(y|y>y)y = α

1−α . LHS can be measured by IRS tabulations.

2 E(y|y>y1)E(y|y>y2

=y1y2. Ratio of top income (or wealth) share must be

constant.

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 52 / 54

Page 55: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Jones and Kim (2018, JPE) extending Saez (2001)

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 53 / 54

Page 56: Lecture3:PowerLawModels › 2019 › 02 › ... · 2019-02-21 · Afewmoreexamples Theaveragefrequencyofspacedebris(meteorsandsuch) hittingtheearth’satmosphere,cally,isinverselyproportional

Jones and Kim (2018, JPE), very top end

Fatih Guvenen Lecture 3: Power Law Models 54 / 54