Lecture #3 3 - 1web.mit.edu/course/5/5.73/oldwww/Fall03/2003/Lec.3.pdf · 5.73 Lecture #3 3 - 1...

12
3 - 1 5.73 Lecture #3 revised 9/15/03 4:21 PM 1. 1-D infinite box continuity of confinement quantization 2. δ–function well one bound level Reading Chapter 1, CTDL, pages 9-39, 50-56, 60-85 E n = n 2 h 2 8mL 2 ψ n = (2/L) 1/2 sin(nπx) Last time: Why do we know there is only one bound level? What do we know about ? How does this depend on a ? ψ(x), dψ dx , d 2 ψ dx 2 E = ma 2 2h 2 ψ=± ma h 2 1/2 e ma|x|/h 2 ψ(p) TODAY and WEDNESDAY : 1. motion time dependent Schr. Eq. 2. motion of constant phase point on Ψ(x,t) -- phase velocity 3. motion of |Ψ(x,t)| 2 requires non-sharp E 4. encode Ψ(x,t) for x 0 , ∆x, p 0 , p 5. p 0 , ∆p from |g(k)| 6. x 0 , ∆x from stationary phase argument 7. moving, spreading wavepacket |Ψ(x,t)| 2 8. group velocity ≠ phase velocity -- see CTDL, pages 28-31 (what happens to ψ as a increases?) what about <p>?

Transcript of Lecture #3 3 - 1web.mit.edu/course/5/5.73/oldwww/Fall03/2003/Lec.3.pdf · 5.73 Lecture #3 3 - 1...

Page 1: Lecture #3 3 - 1web.mit.edu/course/5/5.73/oldwww/Fall03/2003/Lec.3.pdf · 5.73 Lecture #3 3 - 1 revised 9/15/03 4:21 PM 1. 1-D infinite box continuity of confinement → quantization

3 - 15.73 Lecture #3

revised 9/15/03 4:21 PM

1. 1-D infinite box

continuity of

confinement → quantization

2. δ–function well

one bound level

Reading Chapter 1, CTDL, pages 9-39, 50-56, 60-85

En = n2 h2

8mL2

ψn = (2 / L)1/2 sin(nπx)Last time:

Why do we know there is only one bound level?

What do we know about ? How does this depend on a ?

ψ(x),

dψdx

,d2ψdx2

E = −ma2

2h2

ψ = ± mah2

1/2e−ma|x|/h2

ψ(p)

TODAY and WEDNESDAY:

1. motion → time dependent Schr. Eq.

2. motion of constant phase point on Ψ(x,t) -- phase velocity

3. motion of |Ψ(x,t)|2 requires non-sharp E

4. encode Ψ(x,t) for x0, ∆x, p0, ∆p

5. p0, ∆p from |g(k)|

6. x0, ∆x from stationary phase argument

7. moving, spreading wavepacket |Ψ(x,t)|2

8. group velocity ≠ phase velocity -- see CTDL, pages 28-31

(what happens to ψ as a increases?)

what about <p>?

Page 2: Lecture #3 3 - 1web.mit.edu/course/5/5.73/oldwww/Fall03/2003/Lec.3.pdf · 5.73 Lecture #3 3 - 1 revised 9/15/03 4:21 PM 1. 1-D infinite box continuity of confinement → quantization

3 - 25.73 Lecture #3

revised 9/15/03 4:21 PM

1. Motion

time dependent Schr. Eq.

if V(x) is time independent, then i

th

∂∂

=Ψ ΨH

Ψn (x, t) = ψn (x)e− iEnt/hcan use this form of Ψ todescribe time dependence ofany non-eigenstate initialpreparation: e.g. wavepackets

Ψ

Ψ

( , ) ( )

( , ) ( )

x a x

x t a x e

n n

n ni tn

0 =

=

∑∑ −

ψ

ψ ω

go back to free particle to really see motion of QM systems

ψ

η

| |

| |/

( )

( , )

kikx ikx

k

k k

ki t ikx ikx iE t

i kx t i kx t

x Ae Be

E Vkm

pm

E Vkm

x t e Ae Be e

Ae Be e

k

k k

= +

− = =

= −( ) = ≥

= +[ ]= +

− − −

−( ) − +( )

0

2 2 2

0

22 2

20

0

h

hh

ω

ω

ω ω

add a phase factor which expresses the arbitrariness of the zero of energy:

Ψ

−−iE t0 /h

argumentphase

2. How does point of constant move?

const = kxφ − ωkt

xφ (t) = + ωktk

+ xφ (0)

WHAT ABOUTARBITRARYZERO OF E?

CALL IT E0

TDSE

satisifies TDSE?

superposition of eigenstates

ωn = En/h

moves in +xdirection if k > 0

Page 3: Lecture #3 3 - 1web.mit.edu/course/5/5.73/oldwww/Fall03/2003/Lec.3.pdf · 5.73 Lecture #3 3 - 1 revised 9/15/03 4:21 PM 1. 1-D infinite box continuity of confinement → quantization

3 - 35.73 Lecture #3

revised 9/15/03 4:21 PM

vdx

dt kk

φφ ω

= = phase velocity vφ = = =hk

m

p

m

v

2 2 2 ←

hk 2

2m

first term in Ψ(x,t) moves to +x (right), second to –x (left).

P(x, t) = Ψ * (x, t)Ψ(x, t) =|A|2 +|B|2 +2 Re(A * B)cos2kx

+2 Im(A * B)sin 2kx

What is the expectation value of p < p >=* p dx

* dx?ˆ

ˆΨ Ψ

Ψ Ψ

∫∫

3. But what about the probability distribution, P(x,t)?

?

no time dependence! lose all t-dependence because cross terms (+k,–k) still belong to same Ek! The wiggles in Ψ* Ψ are standing waves,not traveling waves. No ambiguity about V0 either?

SO HOW DO WE ENCODE Ψ(x,t) for both spatial localization andtemporal motion? need several k components, not just +k, –k

(half as fast as wenaively expect)

But if we treat the term explicitly,

we get ! Any velocity we want! IS THIS A PROBLEM? WHY NOT?

e e

vk

iV t i t

k

− −=

=+

0 0

0

/h ω

φω ω

(compare vφ for a +k, –k pair offree particle states)

p kA BA B

=−+

h| | | || | | |

2 2

2 2

This is an interesting result that suggests something that is always trueand a very useful inspection tool. Whenever the wavefunction is pure realor pure imaginary, ⟨p⟩ = 0.

Page 4: Lecture #3 3 - 1web.mit.edu/course/5/5.73/oldwww/Fall03/2003/Lec.3.pdf · 5.73 Lecture #3 3 - 1 revised 9/15/03 4:21 PM 1. 1-D infinite box continuity of confinement → quantization

3 - 45.73 Lecture #3

revised 9/15/03 4:21 PM

G is normalized G(x; x0 , ∆x)dx = 1−∞

∫x x

x x x x

x x x

=

= ∆ + ∆

−[ ] ≡ ∆

0

2 202 2

2 2 1 2

( ) ( )/

is called the variance in x

Ψ(x, 0) = a1/2

(2π)3/4 e− a2 /4( ) k−k0( )2

eikxdk−∞

∫THIS IS GOING TOBE SHOWN TO BEthe Ψ that yieldsGaussian prob. distrib.in x and p

g(k)FT of aGaussian

*form of aGaussian in k

* superposition ofmany eikx

G x;x0 ,∆x( ) ≡ 2π( )−1/2 1∆x

e− x−x0( )2 2(∆x)2[ ]

ASIDE

see Gaussian Handout

a Gaussianprob.distrib. in x

Ψ Ψ* as a

WHAT KIND OFFUNCTION IS THESQUARE OF AGAUSSIAN? WHATIS ITS WIDTH?

Start with Ψ(x,0) and later build in correct dependence for eachk component.

e− iωkt

**4. Recipe for encoding Gaussian Wavepacket for x0, ∆x, p0, ∆p

Page 5: Lecture #3 3 - 1web.mit.edu/course/5/5.73/oldwww/Fall03/2003/Lec.3.pdf · 5.73 Lecture #3 3 - 1 revised 9/15/03 4:21 PM 1. 1-D infinite box continuity of confinement → quantization

3 - 55.73 Lecture #3

revised 9/15/03 4:21 PM

G k; k0 , ∆k( ) = (2π)−1/2 a

21/2

g(k)

g k e

G x x xx

e

a k k

x x x

( )

( ; , ) ( )

( / )( )

/ ( )

=

∆ = π∆

− −

− − −( ) ∆[ ]

20

2

02 2

4

01 2 22

1compared to

a2

4← → 1

2(∆x)2

∴ a

21/2 ← → 1∆x

∴ k = k0

∆k = 21/2 a( ) you can verifyby doingrelevantintegrals

4A. k0, ∆k.

Now what can we say about g(k) in Ψ(x,0) above?

So we already know, by inspection (rather than integration), the k0, ∆kparts for ψ(x,0).

Page 6: Lecture #3 3 - 1web.mit.edu/course/5/5.73/oldwww/Fall03/2003/Lec.3.pdf · 5.73 Lecture #3 3 - 1 revised 9/15/03 4:21 PM 1. 1-D infinite box continuity of confinement → quantization

3 - 65.73 Lecture #3

revised 9/15/03 4:21 PM

Ψ(x,0) = 2πa2

1/4eik0xe−x2 /a2

result FT of a Gaussian is aGaussian!

x x

x a

x k

= =

∆ =

∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ =

−0

1 2

0

2

1 2

/

, / )(for * , x = a / 2, k = and 1aΨ Ψ

∆x ∆k = 1 ∆x ∆p = h minimum uncertainty!

21/2 a( ) ALL OF THE k0, ∆kINFORMATION ISHIDDEN

Ψ(x,0) = a1/2

(2π)3/4 e− a2 4( ) k−k0( )2 +ikx

dk−∞∞∫

complete the squares in the exponent (because Gaussian integrals areeasy)

−( ) − + = − − −

+ −a k k ikxa

k kix

aik x

x

a2

02

2

0 2

2

0

2

244

2/ ( ) ( )

k-dependent → changevariables and evaluateGaussian integral

k-independent — take outside integral

4B. What about x0, ∆x for G(k;k0,∆k)?

To do this, perform the FT implicit in defn. of Ψ(x,0) [CTDL, pages 61-62]

Page 7: Lecture #3 3 - 1web.mit.edu/course/5/5.73/oldwww/Fall03/2003/Lec.3.pdf · 5.73 Lecture #3 3 - 1 revised 9/15/03 4:21 PM 1. 1-D infinite box continuity of confinement → quantization

3 - 75.73 Lecture #3

revised 9/15/03 4:21 PM

let g(k) be sharply peaked near k = k0. [It could be e−(a2 /4)(k−k0 )2

and then we already know k0 and ∆k = 21 / 2 / a . ]5.

6. Thus we really only need to look at α(k) near k0 in order to find infoabout x and ∆x . This is a very important simplification (orfocussing of attention)!

Expand in α(k) in power series in (k-k0)

α(k) ≅ α(k0 ) + (k − k0 )

dαdk k=k0

α0

Stationary phaseargument **

5,6. How to build a w.p. (not necessarily Gaussian) centered at arbitrary x0

with arbitrary ∆x?

* Start again with a new g(k)

Ψ(x, 0) = a1/2

(2π)3/4 g(k) eiα(k)eikxdk−∞

complex g(k) writtenin amplitude,argument form

This wavepacket: 1. minimum uncertainty2. centered at x0 = 0

Page 8: Lecture #3 3 - 1web.mit.edu/course/5/5.73/oldwww/Fall03/2003/Lec.3.pdf · 5.73 Lecture #3 3 - 1 revised 9/15/03 4:21 PM 1. 1-D infinite box continuity of confinement → quantization

3 - 85.73 Lecture #3

revised 9/15/03 4:21 PM

Thus the exponential in integral becomes

eiα0 ei k−k0( )dα

dk+kx

very wiggly function of x except at a special regionof x

Now what we want to know is the value of x (for k near k0) where thephase factor becomes independent of k. This is because, when weintegrate over k, if the wiggly factor in the integrand stops wiggling,the integral accumulates to its final value near this value of k!

plot I(k) vs. k

I k( ) = integrand( )dk−∞k∫

The value of the integral evaluated at this special value of x (that we donot yet know) x = x0(t) is ~g(k0)δk where δk is the change in k required tocause the phase factor to change by π.

MOSTIMPORTANTIDEA IN THEENTIRELECTURE!

Solve

k kddk

kx

phase factor

for value of x where the phase factor stops changing, i.e.take derivative with respect to k to find extremum.

d

dk−( ) +

=0 0α

1 2444 3444

stationary phase requirement

∴ want dαdk

+ x = 0

Page 9: Lecture #3 3 - 1web.mit.edu/course/5/5.73/oldwww/Fall03/2003/Lec.3.pdf · 5.73 Lecture #3 3 - 1 revised 9/15/03 4:21 PM 1. 1-D infinite box continuity of confinement → quantization

3 - 95.73 Lecture #3

revised 9/15/03 4:21 PM

If we let dαdk k=k0

≡ −x0 , then the phase factor is stationary when x is near x0

Ψ(x,0) = a1/2

(2π)3/4 e− a2 /4( ) k−k0( )2

e− i k−k0( )x0 eikxdk−∞

∫= e− ik x−x0( )eik0x0

δ x,x0( )shifts Ψ to be sharplypeaked at any x0

This |Ψ|2 is localized at x0, k0, and has widths ∆x, ∆k,

∆k = ? (easy: by inspection)

∆x = ? (must perform Fourier transform)

This prescription does not permit free specification of ∆x. ∆x must stillbe ∆x = 2–1/2a if |g(k)| is a Gaussian [shortcut: ∆x∆k = 1].

[N.B. We are talking about the shape of Ψ(x,0), not the QM ∆x and ∆p

associated with a particular Ψ.]

Page 10: Lecture #3 3 - 1web.mit.edu/course/5/5.73/oldwww/Fall03/2003/Lec.3.pdf · 5.73 Lecture #3 3 - 1 revised 9/15/03 4:21 PM 1. 1-D infinite box continuity of confinement → quantization

3 - 105.73 Lecture #3

revised 9/15/03 4:21 PM

0

0

0

I(k)

g k0( )

I(k)

x = x0 + δx

x = x0

x = x0 − δx

g(k)

k0 k

Integral accumulates near k = k0 but only when x ≈ x0.

Page 11: Lecture #3 3 - 1web.mit.edu/course/5/5.73/oldwww/Fall03/2003/Lec.3.pdf · 5.73 Lecture #3 3 - 1 revised 9/15/03 4:21 PM 1. 1-D infinite box continuity of confinement → quantization

3 - 115.73 Lecture #3

revised 9/15/03 4:21 PM

7. Now we are ready to let Ψ (x,t) evolve in time

Ψ(x, t) = a1/2

(2π)3/4 |g(k)|e−i k−k0( )x0−∞∞∫ eikxe−iωktdk

ωk = Ekh

= h2k2

2mh= hk2

2m

See CTDL, page 64 for evaluation of dk∫ integral and simplification

of Ψ(x,t) and Ψ(x, t) 2 . Arbitrary choice of zero of E drops out of|Ψ(x, t ) |2 .

Complicated: * ∆x depends on t, reaching minimum value when t = 0* x0t, the center of the wavepacket, moves as

x0t = hk0m{

t

vgroup ≠ vphase = hk0

2m!

Ψ x, t( ) 2 = 2πa2( )1/2

1 + 4h2t2

m2a4

−1/2

t-dependentnormalizationfactor

1 24444 34444exp−

2a2 x − hk0m

t

x0t678

2

a4 + 4h2t2

m2

spreading1 2444 3444

SPECIALCHOICE OFZERO OF E,V0 = 0

Page 12: Lecture #3 3 - 1web.mit.edu/course/5/5.73/oldwww/Fall03/2003/Lec.3.pdf · 5.73 Lecture #3 3 - 1 revised 9/15/03 4:21 PM 1. 1-D infinite box continuity of confinement → quantization

3 - 125.73 Lecture #3

revised 9/15/03 4:21 PM

Summary

We know how to encode a wavepacket for p0, ∆p, x0 (and since ∆x is anexplicit function of time, we can let Ψ(x,t) evolve until it has the desired ∆xand then shift x0t back to the desired location where ∆x has the nowspecified value).

We also know how to inspect an arbitrary Gaussian Ψ(x,t) to reveal its x0t,∆x, p0t, ∆p without evaluating any integrals.

*|g(k)|, which is independent of time, contains all info about p0, ∆p.

Therefore these quantities do not evolve in time for a free wavepacket.They do evolve if V(x) is not constant.

Think about chopping up the Fourier transform of |Ψ(x,t)|2 into piecescorresponding to different values of p. If there is no force acting on thewavepacket, the <p> for each piece of the original |Ψ(x,t)|2 remainsconstant.