Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering … · Note that the pressure coefficient, C p is the...

of 54 /54
Job No. Sheet No. Rev. Job Title XX EC5 Ref Structural Description Timber Material Properties Timber Name or Strength Class Mean Density, ρ mean 600 kg/m 3 Material Safety Factor, γ m (1.30Solid; 1.25Glulam; 1.20LVL) 1.30 Service Class k mod k def k mod k def k mod k def Class 1 0.60 0.60 0.80 0.25 0.90 0.00 Class 2 0.60 0.80 0.80 0.25 0.90 0.00 Class 3 0.50 2.00 0.65 0.75 0.70 0.30 Permanent Action - ULS Factored (DL+SDL) and SLS Unfactored (DL+SDL) Modification Factor for Temp, Moisture, Load Duration, k mod,pt 0.50 Modification Factor for Creep and Moisture, k def,pt 2.00 Medium Term Action - ULS Factored (DL+SDL+LL) Modification Factor for Temp, Moisture, Load Duration, k mod,mt 0.65 Modification Factor for Creep and Moisture, k def,mt 0.75 Factor for the Quasi-Permanent Value, ψ 2,mt 0.30 Medium Term Action - SLS Unfactored (DL+SDL+LL) For the (DL+SDL) component, the above permanent action values, whilst for the LL component, the above ULS medium term values. Short Term Action - ULS Factored (DL+SDL+LL+WIND+SNOW) Modification Factor for Temp, Moisture, Load Duration, k mod,st 0.70 Modification Factor for Creep and Moisture, k def,st 0.30 Factor for the Quasi-Permanent Value, ψ 2,st 0.30 Short Term Action - SLS Unfactored (DL+SDL+WIND+SNOW) For the (DL+SDL) component, the above permanent action values, whilst for the (LL+WIND+SNOW) component, the above ULS short term values. Note where the particular effect on a particular structural element is due to both medium and short term actions, the more critical medium term action parameters are adopted; Young's Modulus (Mean) Parallel, E 0,mean 11.000 GPa Young's Modulus (5%) Parallel, E 0.05 7.600 GPa Shear Modulus (Mean), G mean 2.190 GPa Shear Modulus (5%), G 0.05 1.513 GPa Characteristic Density, ρ k 510 kg/m 3 CONSULTING E N G I N E E R S Engineering Calculation Sheet Consulting Engineers jXXX 1 Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame EC5 v2015.01. Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame 20/08/2015 The four pinned portal truss frame (truss frame without a finite depth at eaves) is stable in its plane due to the roof diaphragm or wind girder spanning onto walls or bracing in the plane of the frame. Lateral stability in the orthogonal direction is also provided by the roof diaphragm or wind girder spanning onto orthogonal walls or bracing. Permanent Short Term Medium Term Made by Date Chd. Drg. Ref. Member/Location

Embed Size (px)

Transcript of Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering … · Note that the pressure coefficient, C p is the...

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    Structural Description

    Timber Material Properties

    Timber Name or Strength Class

    Mean Density, mean 600 kg/m3

    Material Safety Factor, m (1.30Solid; 1.25Glulam; 1.20LVL) 1.30

    Service Class

    kmod kdef kmod kdef kmod kdef

    Class 1 0.60 0.60 0.80 0.25 0.90 0.00

    Class 2 0.60 0.80 0.80 0.25 0.90 0.00

    Class 3 0.50 2.00 0.65 0.75 0.70 0.30

    Permanent Action - ULS Factored (DL+SDL) and SLS Unfactored (DL+SDL)

    Modification Factor for Temp, Moisture, Load Duration, kmod,pt 0.50

    Modification Factor for Creep and Moisture, kdef,pt 2.00

    Medium Term Action - ULS Factored (DL+SDL+LL)

    Modification Factor for Temp, Moisture, Load Duration, kmod,mt 0.65

    Modification Factor for Creep and Moisture, kdef,mt 0.75

    Factor for the Quasi-Permanent Value, 2,mt 0.30

    Medium Term Action - SLS Unfactored (DL+SDL+LL)

    For the (DL+SDL) component, the above permanent action values,

    whilst for the LL component, the above ULS medium term values.

    Short Term Action - ULS Factored (DL+SDL+LL+WIND+SNOW)

    Modification Factor for Temp, Moisture, Load Duration, kmod,st 0.70

    Modification Factor for Creep and Moisture, kdef,st 0.30

    Factor for the Quasi-Permanent Value, 2,st 0.30

    Short Term Action - SLS Unfactored (DL+SDL+WIND+SNOW)

    For the (DL+SDL) component, the above permanent action values,

    whilst for the (LL+WIND+SNOW) component, the above ULS short term values.

    Note where the particular effect on a particular structural element is due to both medium

    and short term actions, the more critical medium term action parameters are adopted;

    Young's Modulus (Mean) Parallel, E0,mean 11.000 GPa

    Young's Modulus (5%) Parallel, E0.05 7.600 GPa

    Shear Modulus (Mean), Gmean 2.190 GPa

    Shear Modulus (5%), G0.05 1.513 GPa

    Characteristic Density, k 510 kg/m3

    CONSULTING

    E N G I N E E R S

    Engineering Calculation Sheet Consulting Engineers jXXX 1

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame EC5 v2015.01.xlsm

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame 20/08/2015

    The four pinned portal truss frame (truss frame without a finite depth at eaves) is stable in itsplane due to the roof diaphragm or wind girder spanning onto walls or bracing in the plane of theframe. Lateral stability in the orthogonal direction is also provided by the roof diaphragm or windgirder spanning onto orthogonal walls or bracing.

    Permanent Short TermMedium Term

    Made by Date Chd.

    Drg. Ref.

    Member/Location

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    Modification Factors

    Modification Factor for Bending Stress Redistribution, km 0.7

    Modification Factor for Bending Depth, kh Variable

    Solid Timber Glulam LVL

    where s 0.2

    Modification Factor for System Strength (Load Sharing System), ksys 1.1

    Note modification factor for notched end beams, k v taken as 1.0, modification factor for bearing,

    k c,90 taken as 1.0, the bearing lengths taken as 20% of span and the h and b modifiers h mod%

    and b mod% taken as 100.0%, these effectively precluding the notched end beam shear and end

    bearing checks from being critical; Thus notched shear and end bearing are to be checked separately;

    Spaced Column Section Properties (Where Relevant)

    Torsion Constant Modification

    Packs or Gussets

    Pack or Gusset Connector Type for Factor

    Permanent / Long Term Factor, 4.0

    Medium / Short Term Factor, 3.0

    Note spaced columns generally considered as compression members;

    Note a nominal length / eccentricity of 1000 assumed for the local shaft major plane curvature;

    Note unconservatively, the pack or gusset bending, pack or gusset shear and connector slip

    have been ignored in the h-plane shear area modification formula;

    CONSULTING

    E N G I N E E R S jXXX 2

    20/08/2015

    Engineering Calculation Sheet Consulting Engineers

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame EC5 v2015.01.xlsm

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame Made by Date Chd.

    Drg. Ref.

    Member/Location

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    Roof Loading (On Slope Where Relevant)

    Ballast (Flat Slope), pSDL 0.00 kPa

    Covering, pSDL 0.16 kPa

    Battens (Pitched Slope), pSDL 0.04 kPa

    Waterproofing (Flat Slope), pSDL 0.00 kPa

    Counter Battens (Pitched Slope), pSDL 0.00 kPa

    Underlay (Pitched Slope), pSDL 0.01 kPa

    Sarking Decking, pSDL 0.00 kPa

    Thermal Insulation, pSDL 100.0 mm 0.00 kPa

    Services, pSDL 0.00 kPa

    Ceiling, pSDL 0.11 kPa

    Total Super Dead Load, pSDL 0.32 kPa

    Live Load, pLL 0.25 kPa

    Wind Net Drag Pressure, pWIND,u/d = qs.Cp,u/d.Ca 0.67 Cp,u/d kPa

    Site (Mean) Wind Speed (10m Mean Hourly or Gust / 1.62), Vs 21.0 m/s

    Terrain Factor, Sb 1.57

    Effective Height, He 5.000 m

    Effective (3s-Gust) Wind Speed, Ve = Vs.Sb 33.0 m/s

    Dynamic Wind Pressure, qs = 0.613Ve2 0.67 kPa BS6399-2

    Size Effect Factor for External and Internal Pressures, Ca (= 1.000 Conservatively)1.000 cl.2.1.3.4

    Snow Load, pSNOW (Usually 0.60kPa 0.75kPa) 0.00 kPa cl.2.6.1, cl.2.6.2

    Note for the design of the roof (and only the roof) the greater of the live load and snow load is adopted,

    with the lesser value put to zero in view of the fact that design live and snow loads are not simultaneous;

    Roof Space Floor Loading (Where Relevant)

    Live Load, pLL,FLR (Including Partitions) 0.25 kPa

    (Usually 1.50kPa Domestic Floor or 0.25kPa Domestic Ceiling)

    Note dedicated beams supporting partitions should be specifically designed;

    Total Super Dead Load, pSDL,FLR 0.25 kPa

    Connection Properties

    Fastener Type Fastener Diameter, d 12 mm

    Fastener Tensile Strength, fu or fu,k 400 N/mm2

    Information and Analysis Assumption

    Information

    Note that the maximum effects (axial, bending and shear) are accounted for as if acting

    concurrently in the same location, although in reality (and indeed in theory) they do not;

    Note that out of roof plane connection eccentricity (which induces out of plane moments

    into the member) has been ignored, unconservatively;

    Note that precamber of zero assumed for SLS effects where relevant;

    Note although connections have been assumed to consist of individual fasteners, overall

    connection design forces are also quoted for pressed metal fasteners where appropriate;

    For simplicity, and conservatism, fastener rope effect ignored;

    CONSULTING

    E N G I N E E R S

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame 20/08/2015

    3

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame EC5 v2015.01.xlsm

    Engineering Calculation Sheet Consulting Engineers jXXX

    Information

    Pitched Slope1. Covering2. Battens3. Counter Battens (Warm Roof / Sarking Decking)4. Underlay5. Thermal Insulation With VCL Above Ceiling (Warm Roof)6. Optional Sarking Decking7. Rafters 8. Thermal Insulation With Optional VCL Above Ceiling (Cold Roof)9. Services

    10. Ceiling

    Flat Slope1. Ballast (Inverted Warm Roof)2. Thermal Insulation Without VCL Under (Inverted Warm Roof)3. Optional Covering4. Waterproofing5. Thermal Insulation With VCL Under (Warm Roof)6. Sarking Decking7. Firring 8. Joists 9. Thermal Insulation With VCL Under (Cold Roof) 10. Services 11. Ceiling

    Note that Vs=Vb.Sa.Sd.Ss.Sp, Vb=basic (mean) wind speed (London 21m/s) [BS6399-2];Note that Vs=(VS/Sb).Md.Mz,cat.Ms.Mh, VS=station (3s-gust) wind speed (KL 33.5m/s) [MS1553];

    Made by Date Chd.

    Drg. Ref.

    Member/Location

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    Flat Traditional Roof

    Span, L 4.500 m

    Spacing, s (Usually 400mm, 450mm or 600mm) 0.650 m

    Enclosed Building or Building With Dominant Openings ? T.16, T.17

    Case A: No Dominant Openings

    Internal Pressure as Max Positive or Min Negative ? T.16

    Case B: With Dominant Openings

    Wall With Dominant Opening BS6399-2

    Ratio of Dominant Opening Area to Remaining Openings (Where Applicable) T.17

    Downward Wind Pressure Coefficient, Cp,d for Flat Roof -0.64 BS6399-2

    Upward Wind Pressure Coefficient, Cp,u for Flat Roof -1.34 T.8

    Note that the pressure coefficient, C p is the net pressure coefficient, C p =C pe -C pi where C pe BS6399-2

    is the external and C pi the internal pressure coefficients, respectively; T.16, T.17

    Note ve C p indicates uplift;

    Perform Design

    Overall Utilisation 96%

    Total Mass = Mass of (Joists) 25 kg

    Dead Load UDL, DL = Total Mass . g / L 0.1 kN/m

    Dead Load Pressure, pDL = DL / s 0.09 kPa

    Joist Concentrated Live Load, CPLL (BS5268-7.2:1989) 1.8 kN

    [Note CP LL effects considered for ULS, but ignored for SLS effects;]

    Joist Section (Permanent and Short Term Action)

    cl.2.6.1, cl.2.6.2 Joist Length, Ljoist = L 4.500 m

    Joist LTB Length, Ljoist,LTB = L / (1 + Struttings) 4.500 m

    Joist Buckling Length (h-Plane), Ljoist,euler,h = %.L 0.900 m

    Joist Buckling Length (b-Plane), Ljoist,euler,b = %.L 0.900 m

    Joist Width, bjoist 47 mm

    Joist Depth, hjoist 200 mm

    Mass of Joist Members = Ljoist.bjoist.hjoist.mean 25 kg

    Modification Factor for Bending Depth, kh 1.0

    Line LL UDL on Support = (pLL+pSNOW+pWIND,d).L/2 -0.39 kN/m

    Line DL+SDL UDL on Support = (pSDL+pDL).L/2 0.91 kN/m

    [Note uplift wind conditions have been ignored for this foundation load take down purpose;]

    [Note CP LL features not in these foundation effects as CP LL is localised to a particular joist at a time;]

    Engineering Calculation Sheet Consulting Engineers jXXX 4

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame EC5 v2015.01.xlsm

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame 20/08/2015

    CONSULTING

    E N G I N E E R S

    Perform Design

    Made by Date Chd.

    Drg. Ref.

    Member/Location

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    Effects Equations

    Vertical Reaction, R V = MAX ( .L/2, BEREFT of pLL .L/2 + P/2);

    Note ve loading indicates net uplift; Note ve R v indicates downward force due to net uplift;

    Joist Axial Force = 0.0;

    Joist Shear Force = MAX ( .L/2, BEREFT of pLL .L/2 + P/2);

    Joist Bending Moment = MAX ( .L 2 /8, BEREFT of pLL .L2 /8 + P.L/4);

    ULS Permanent Loading Combinations, ULS,PT

    Combination A (ULS,PT,A) (Downward Critical)

    ULS,PT,A = [1.4pDL+1.4pSDL+0.0pLL+0.0pSNOW+0.0pWIND,d].s 0.4 kN/m

    ULS,PT,A,BEREFT of pLL = ULS,PT,A 0.0pLL.s 0.4 kN/m

    PULS,PT,A = 0.0CPLL 0.0 kN

    Vertical Reaction, RV 0.8 kN

    Vertical Max Downdrag Reaction, RV = RV >= 0.0 0.8 kN

    Vertical Max Uplift Reaction, RV = ABS (RV

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    ULS Short Term Loading Combinations, ULS,ST

    Combination A (ULS,ST,A) (Downward Critical)

    ULS,ST,A = [1.4pDL+1.4pSDL+1.6pLL+1.6pSNOW+0.0pWIND,d].s 0.6 kN/m

    Combination B (ULS,ST,B) (Downward Critical)

    ULS,ST,B = [1.4pDL+1.4pSDL+0.0pLL+0.0pSNOW+1.4pWIND,d].s 0.0 kN/m

    Combination D (ULS,ST,D) (Downward Critical)

    ULS,ST,D = [1.2pDL+1.2pSDL+1.2pLL+1.2pSNOW+1.2pWIND,d].s 0.2 kN/m

    Combination A, B, D (ULS,ST,MAX[A,B,D]) (Downward Critical)

    ULS,ST,MAX[A,B,D] = MAX [ULS,ST,A, ULS,ST,B, ULS,ST,D] 0.6 kN/m

    ULS,ST,MAX[A,B,D],BEREFT of pLL = ULS,ST,MAX[A,B,D] (1.6, 0.0 or 1.2).pLL.s 0.4 kN/m

    PULS,ST,MAX[A,B,D] = (1.6, 0.0 or 1.2).CPLL 2.9 kN

    Vertical Reaction, RV 2.3 kN

    Vertical Max Downdrag Reaction, RV = RV >= 0.0 2.3 kN

    Vertical Max Uplift Reaction, RV = ABS (RV

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    Lean to Traditional Roof

    Span, L 5.000 m

    Depth, H 4.000 m

    Span L / Depth H 1.3

    Spacing, s (Usually 400mm, 450mm or 600mm) 0.400 m

    Length of Slope, q = (L2 + H2) 6.403 m

    Enclosed Building or Building With Dominant Openings ? T.16, T.17

    Case A: No Dominant Openings

    Internal Pressure as Max Positive or Min Negative ? T.16

    Case B: With Dominant Openings

    Wall With Dominant Opening BS6399-2

    Ratio of Dominant Opening Area to Remaining Openings (Where Applicable) T.17

    BS6399-2

    (degrees) Cp,d Cp,u Cp,d Cp,u T.9

    5 -0.64 -1.24 -1.44 -1.44 BS6399-2

    15 -0.44 -1.04 -1.54 -1.54 T.16, T.17

    30 -0.24 -0.84 -1.54 -1.54

    45 0.06 -0.64 -1.54 -1.54

    60 0.16 0.16 -1.34 -1.34

    75 0.16 0.16 -1.34 -1.34

    Note that the pressure coefficient, C p is the net pressure coefficient, C p =C pe -C pi

    where C pe is the external and C pi the internal pressure coefficients, respectively;

    Note ve C p indicates uplift;

    Pitch Angle, = arctan (H/L) 38.7 degrees

    Windward Downward Wind Pressure Coefficient, Cp,d,windward -0.06

    Windward Upward Wind Pressure Coefficient, Cp,u,windward -0.72

    Leeward Downward Wind Pressure Coefficient, Cp,d,leeward -1.54

    Leeward Upward Wind Pressure Coefficient, Cp,u,leeward -1.54

    jXXX

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame EC5 v2015.01.xlsm

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame 20/08/2015

    Windward Leeward

    7

    CONSULTING

    E N G I N E E R S

    Engineering Calculation Sheet Consulting Engineers

    Made by Date Chd.

    Drg. Ref.

    Member/Location

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    Perform Design

    Overall Utilisation 117%

    Total Mass = Mass of (Joists) 41 kg

    Dead Load UDL, DL = Total Mass . g / q 0.1 kN/m

    Dead Load Pressure, pDL = DL / s 0.16 kPa

    Joist Section (Permanent and Short Term Action)

    Joist Length, Ljoist = q 6.403 m

    Joist LTB Length, Ljoist,LTB = q 6.403 m

    Joist Buckling Length (h-Plane), Ljoist,euler,h = %.q 6.403 m

    Joist Buckling Length (b-Plane), Ljoist,euler,b = %.q 1.281 m

    Joist Width, bjoist 47 mm

    Joist Depth, hjoist 225 mm

    Mass of Joist Members = Ljoist.bjoist.hjoist.mean 41 kg

    Modification Factor for Bending Depth, kh 1.0

    Line LL UDL on Support = (pLL+pSNOW).q/2+pWIND,d.L/2 0.69 kN/m

    Line DL+SDL UDL on Support = (pSDL+pDL).q/2 1.52 kN/m

    [Note uplift wind conditions have been ignored for this foundation load take down purpose;]

    [Note the horizontal reaction has been ignored for this foundation load take down purpose;]

    Effects Equations

    Note ve loading indicates net uplift; Note ve R v indicates downward force due to net uplift;

    Note tension is +ve and compression is ve;

    Vertical Reaction, R V = vertical .q/2+ orthogonal .L/2;

    Horizontal Reaction, R H = orthogonal .H/2;

    Note horizontal restraint assumed at both ends;

    Joist Axial Force = vertical .H/2;

    Joist Shear Force = vertical .L/2+ orthogonal .q/2;

    Joist Bending Moment = vertical .q.L/8+ orthogonal .q2 /8;

    Joist Support Angled Bearing Connection Shear Force = If (R V

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    ULS Permanent Loading Combinations, ULS,PT

    Combination A (ULS,PT,A) (Downward Critical)

    Vertical [1.4pDL+1.4pSDL+0.0pLL+0.0pSNOW].s 0.3 kN/m

    Orthogonal [0.0pWIND,d].s 0.0 kN/m

    Vertical Reaction, RV 0.9 kN

    Vertical Max Downdrag Reaction, RV = RV >= 0.0 0.9 kN

    Vertical Max Uplift Reaction, RV = ABS (RV = 0.0 1.4 kN

    Vertical Max Uplift Reaction, RV = ABS (RV

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    Combination B (ULS,ST,B) (Downward Critical)

    Vertical [1.4pDL+1.4pSDL+0.0pLL+0.0pSNOW].s 0.3 kN/m

    Orthogonal [1.4pWIND,d].s 0.0 kN/m

    Vertical Reaction, RV 0.8 kN

    Vertical Max Downdrag Reaction, RV = RV >= 0.0 0.8 kN

    Vertical Max Uplift Reaction, RV = ABS (RV = 0.0 0.0 kN

    Vertical Max Uplift Reaction, RV = ABS (RV = 0.0 1.1 kN

    Vertical Max Uplift Reaction, RV = ABS (RV

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    Pitched Traditional Rafter Roof

    11

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame EC5 v2015.01.xlsm

    Engineering Calculation Sheet Consulting Engineers jXXX

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame 20/08/2015

    CONSULTING

    E N G I N E E R S

    Note that the rafter must bear directly onto the wall plate in order to transfer vertical forcesdirectly into the support. If the horizontal member only acts as a tie, then it is okay if it is at aslightly higher elevation to the rafter bearing elevation. If the horizontal member is a tie-beam,then it must be exactly at the same elevation so as to avoid the tie-beam reaction from having totransfer into the rafter before bearing onto the support.

    3.5m Max Span

    Rafters 100x38 Typical

    5.5m Max Span

    32mm Ridge Board

    Rafters 100x38 Typical

    Ceiling Joists 220x50 Typical For Max Span 5.5m Without Intermediate Support

    Collars fixed up to 1/3 up the height of the roof is not as effective as standard ties at the foot ofthe rafters. The purpose of this arrangement is to extend top floor rooms into the roof space andso limit the largely unused roof space. A disadvantage is that the head of the windows formed in awall will be some distance below the ceiling and give less light penetration. To provide normalheight windows a form of half dormer window is often used with the window partly built into thewall and partly as a dormer window in the roof.

    4.5m Max Span

    Rafters 125x44Typical

    Collars 125x44Typical

    Rafters 125x50Typical

    Purlins 175x75 Typical

    Ceiling Joists 125x50 Typical

    Rafters 150x50Typical

    Ceiling Joists125x50 Typical

    Purlins 150x50Typical

    Struts 75x75Typical

    Collars 125x50Typical

    Made by Date Chd.

    Drg. Ref.

    Member/Location

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    20/08/2015Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame

    Engineering Calculation Sheet Consulting Engineers jXXX 12

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame EC5 v2015.01.xlsm

    CONSULTING

    E N G I N E E R S

    Purlins are provided to economise on rafter timber as the span of the rafter is reduced. Purlins can be comparatively substantial in size. Timber purlins are supported on masonry corbels built to project from separating walls, on metal joist hangers fixed into walls or on struts which bear on an internal wall. Collar and strut normally provided every 4th rafter (1.6m centres).

    7.5m Max Span

    Hip Rafters 200x38to 250x38 TypicalHip rafters tend to spread and displace wall

    junction because of its considerable load. Henceangle ties cut from 100x75 timber are bolted towall plate some 600mm from corner.

    Valley rafter to be the same size as hip rafter.

    Made by Date Chd.

    Drg. Ref.

    Member/Location

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    Span, L 5.000 m

    [Note L usually

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    Perform Design

    Overall Utilisation 510%

    Section Scheme

    [Note where relevant, the post and collar schemes follow that of the tie-beam;]

    Total Mass RAFTER = Mass of (Rafters) 21 kg

    Dead Load of Rafters UDL, DL,RAFTER = Total Mass RAFTER . g / (2.q) 0.0 kN/m

    Dead Load Pressure of Rafters, pDL,RAFTER = DL,RAFTER / s 0.09 kPa

    Total Mass TIE-BEAM = Mass of (Tie-Beams) 18 kg

    Dead Load of Tie-Beams UDL, DL,TIE-BEAM = Total Mass TIE-BEAM . g / L 0.0 kN/m

    Dead Load Pressure of Tie-Beams, pDL,TIE-BEAM = DL,TIE-BEAM / s 0.09 kPa

    Total Mass STEEL BEAM = Mass of (Steel Beams) 156 kg

    Dead Load of Steel Beams UDL, DL,STEEL BEAM = Total Mass STEEL BEAM . g / Lsteelbeam 0.3 kN/m

    Tie-Beam Additional Concentrated Live Load, CPLL (BS5268-7.3:1989) 0.9 kN

    [Note CP LL effects considered for ULS, but ignored for SLS effects;]

    [CP LL only features when the tie-beam is ceiling loaded, not when floor loaded;]

    Steel Beam Additional Dead and Super Dead Load UDL, sb,add,dl+sdl 3.0 kN/m

    Steel Beam Additional Live Load UDL, sb,add,ll 2.0 kN/m

    [Note steel beam additional udl are to account for added timber floors spanning to it;]

    Rafter Section (Permanent and Short Term Action)

    Rafter Length, Lrafter = q 3.023 m

    Rafter LTB Length, Lrafter,LTB = q 3.023 m

    Rafter Buckling Length (h-Plane), Lrafter,euler,h 3.023 m

    Closed Couple Roof %.q

    Canted Purlin Roof %.q/2

    Attic Roof %.MAX(q.H 0 /H, q.H 1 /H q.H 0 /H,q q.H 1 /H)

    Rafter Buckling Length (b-Plane), Lrafter,euler,b = %.q 0.605 m

    (a) Single Shaft

    Rafter Width, brafter 47 mm

    Rafter Depth, hrafter 125 mm

    Mass of Rafter Members = 2.Lrafter.brafter.hrafter.mean 21 kg

    Modification Factor for Bending Depth, kh 1.0

    (b) Multiple Shaft

    Shaft Width, hlocal 47 mm

    Shaft Depth, blocal 120 mm

    Number of Shafts, n 1

    Mass of Rafter Members = 2.Lrafter.n.blocal.hlocal.mean 20 kg

    Modification Factor for Bending Depth, kh = 1.0 Conservatively1.0

    Free Distance Between Shafts, a 47 mm

    Pack or Gusset Length, l2 300 mm

    Number of Packs or Gussets, NP,G 3

    Rafter Width, brafter = blocal 120 mm

    Rafter Depth, hrafter = n.hlocal + (n1).a 47 mm

    Area Modification = n.hlocal.blocal / (brafter.hrafter) N/A

    Shear Area (hPlane) Modification = [Lrafter2.G0.05/(n.(1+N N/A

    Shear Area (bPlane) Modification = 5/6.n.hlocal.blocal / (5/6.b N/A

    Inertia (hPlane) Modification = [n.1/12.hlocal3.blocal + (n-1).h N/A

    Inertia (bPlane) Modification = n.1/12.hlocal.blocal3 / (1/12.b N/A

    Torsion Constant Modification = [[(Lrafter/2/(1+NP,G))2.G/(3/2.((n-1).(a+hN/A

    jXXX 14

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame 20/08/2015

    CONSULTING

    E N G I N E E R S

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame EC5 v2015.01.xlsm

    Engineering Calculation Sheet Consulting Engineers

    Perform Design

    h

    b

    h

    b

    Made by Date Chd.

    Drg. Ref.

    Member/Location

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    Purlin Section (Permanent and Short Term Action)

    Note dead load of the purlin section ignored;

    Note it is assumed that the purlins are infinitely stiff compared to the rafters such

    that the loads are indeed transmitted into the purlins instead of being resisted by

    the rafters. In reality the proportion of load that is transfered into the purlins from

    the rafters depends on the relative stiffness of the purlins with respect to the rafters.

    The stiffness of the purlin at a hipped end will be further reduced due to the flexibility

    of the hip rafter where the purlin spans into and even further due to the flexibility of

    the end closed couple system. These additional flexibilities can be numerically quantified

    as stiffnesses in series (1/k = 1/k 1 + 1/k 2 + 1/k 3 ) as the load path has to travel all the

    stiffnesses to reach the final support; Further only the major axis of the purlin is assumed

    with the stiffness as above, the minor axis is assumed to have zero stiffness;

    Purlin Length, Lpurlin 5.000 m

    Purlin LTB Length, Lpurlin,LTB = Lpurlin / (1 + LTB Restraints) 2.500 m

    Purlin Buckling Length (h-Plane), Lpurlin,euler,h = %.Lpurlin 1.000 m

    Purlin Buckling Length (b-Plane), Lpurlin,euler,b = %.Lpurlin 1.000 m

    Purlin Width, bpurlin 50 mm

    Purlin Depth, hpurlin 220 mm

    Mass of Purlin Members = 2.s.bpurlin.hpurlin.mean 5 kg

    Modification Factor for Bending Depth, kh 1.0

    Post Section (Permanent and Short Term Action)

    Note dead load of the post section ignored;

    Post Length, Lpost = H0 0.833 m

    Post LTB Length, Lpost,LTB = H0 0.833 m

    Post Buckling Length (h-Plane), Lpost,euler,h = %.H0 0.833 m

    Post Buckling Length (b-Plane), Lpost,euler,b = %.H0 0.833 m

    (a) Single Shaft

    Post Width, bpost 47 mm

    Post Depth, hpost 120 mm

    Mass of Post Members = 2.Lpost.bpost.hpost.mean 6 kg

    Modification Factor for Bending Depth, kh 1.0

    (b) Multiple Shaft

    Shaft Width, hlocal 50 mm

    Shaft Depth, blocal 170 mm

    Number of Shafts, n 1

    Mass of Post Members = 2.Lpost.n.blocal.hlocal.mean 9 kg

    Modification Factor for Bending Depth, kh = 1.0 Conservatively1.0

    Free Distance Between Shafts, a 50 mm

    Pack or Gusset Length, l2 300 mm

    Number of Packs or Gussets, NP,G 2

    Post Width, bpost = blocal 170 mm

    Post Depth, hpost = n.hlocal + (n1).a 50 mm

    Area Modification = n.hlocal.blocal / (bpost.hpost) N/A

    Shear Area (hPlane) Modification = [Lpost2.G0.05/(n.(1+N N/A

    Shear Area (bPlane) Modification = 5/6.n.hlocal.blocal / (5/6.b N/A

    Inertia (hPlane) Modification = [n.1/12.hlocal3.blocal + (n-1).h N/A

    Inertia (bPlane) Modification = n.1/12.hlocal.blocal3 / (1/12.b N/A

    Torsion Constant Modification = [[(Lpost/2/(1+NP,G))2.G/(3/2.((n-1).(a+hN/A

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame EC5 v2015.01.xlsm

    15

    Engineering Calculation Sheet Consulting Engineers jXXX

    20/08/2015Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame

    CONSULTING

    E N G I N E E R S

    h

    b

    h

    b

    h

    b

    Made by Date Chd.

    Drg. Ref.

    Member/Location

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    Collar Section (Permanent and Short Term Action)

    Note dead load of the collar section ignored;

    Collar Length, Lcollar = L.(1H1/H) 1.667 m

    Collar LTB Length, Lcollar,LTB = L.(1-H1/H) 1.667 m

    Collar Buckling Length (h-Plane), Lcollar,euler,h = %.L.(1H1/H) 1.667 m

    Collar Buckling Length (b-Plane), Lcollar,euler,b = %.L.(1H1/H) 1.667 m

    (a) Single Shaft

    Collar Width, bcollar 44 mm

    Collar Depth, hcollar 220 mm

    Mass of Collar Members = Lcollar.bcollar.hcollar.mean 10 kg

    Modification Factor for Bending Depth, kh 1.0

    (b) Multiple Shaft

    Shaft Width, hlocal 63 mm

    Shaft Depth, blocal 97 mm

    Number of Shafts, n 1

    Mass of Collar Members = Lcollar.n.blocal.hlocal.mean 6 kg

    Modification Factor for Bending Depth, kh = 1.0 Conservatively1.0

    Free Distance Between Shafts, a 63 mm

    Pack or Gusset Length, l2 300 mm

    Number of Packs or Gussets, NP,G 2

    Collar Width, bcollar = blocal 97 mm

    Collar Depth, hcollar = n.hlocal + (n1).a 63 mm

    Area Modification = n.hlocal.blocal / (bcollar.hcollar) N/A

    Shear Area (hPlane) Modification = [Lcollar2.G0.05/(n.(1+N N/A

    Shear Area (bPlane) Modification = 5/6.n.hlocal.blocal / (5/6.b N/A

    Inertia (hPlane) Modification = [n.1/12.hlocal3.blocal + (n-1).h N/A

    Inertia (bPlane) Modification = n.1/12.hlocal.blocal3 / (1/12.b N/A

    Torsion Constant Modification = [[(Lcollar/2/(1+NP,G))2.G/(3/2.((n-1).(a+hN/A

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame EC5 v2015.01.xlsm

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame 20/08/2015

    16

    Engineering Calculation Sheet Consulting Engineers jXXX

    CONSULTING

    E N G I N E E R S

    h

    b

    h

    b

    Made by Date Chd.

    Drg. Ref.

    Member/Location

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    Tie-Beam Section (Permanent and Medium Term Action)

    Tie-Beam Length, Ltie-beam = L 5.000 m

    Tie-Beam LTB Length, Ltie-beam,LTB = L / (1 + Struttings) 2.500 m

    Tie-Beam Buckling Length (h-Plane), Ltie-beam,euler,h = %.L 5.000 m

    Tie-Beam Buckling Length (b-Plane), Ltie-beam,euler,b = %.L 1.000 m

    (a) Single Shaft

    Tie-Beam Width, btie-beam 47 mm

    Tie-Beam Depth, htie-beam 125 mm

    Mass of Tie-Beam Members = Ltie-beam.btie-beam.htie-beam. 18 kg

    Modification Factor for Bending Depth, kh 1.0

    (b) Multiple Shaft

    Shaft Width, hlocal 47 mm

    Shaft Depth, blocal 145 mm

    Number of Shafts, n 1

    Mass of Tie-Beam Members = Ltie-beam.n.blocal.hlocal.mean 20 kg

    Modification Factor for Bending Depth, kh = 1.0 Conservatively1.0

    Free Distance Between Shafts, a 47 mm

    Pack or Gusset Length, l2 300 mm

    Number of Packs or Gussets, NP,G 2

    Tie-Beam Width, btie-beam = blocal 145 mm

    Tie-Beam Depth, htie-beam = n.hlocal + (n1).a 47 mm

    Area Modification = n.hlocal.blocal / (btie-beam.htie-beam) N/A

    Shear Area (hPlane) Modification = [Ltie-beam2.G0.05/(n.(1+N N/A

    Shear Area (bPlane) Modification = 5/6.n.hlocal.blocal / (5/6.b N/A

    Inertia (hPlane) Modification = [n.1/12.hlocal3.blocal + (n-1).h N/A

    Inertia (bPlane) Modification = n.1/12.hlocal.blocal3 / (1/12.b N/A

    Torsion Constant Modification = [[(Ltie-beam/2/(1+NP,G)) N/A

    Binder Section (Permanent and Medium Term Action)

    Note dead load of the binder section ignored;

    Note it is assumed that the binders are infinitely stiff compared to the tie-beams such

    that the loads are indeed transmitted into the binders instead of being resisted by the

    tie-beams. In reality the proportion of load that is transfered into the binders from the

    tie-beams depends on the relative stiffness of the binders with respect to the tie-beams;

    Binder Length, Lbinder 3.000 m

    Binder LTB Length, Lbinder,LTB = Lbinder / (1 + LTB Restraints) 1.500 m

    Binder Buckling Length (h-Plane), Lbinder,euler,h = %.Lbinder 0.600 m

    Binder Buckling Length (b-Plane), Lbinder,euler,b = %.Lbinder 0.600 m

    Binder Width, bbinder 50 mm

    Binder Depth, hbinder 195 mm

    Mass of Binder Members = NBIND.s.bbinder.hbinder.mean 2 kg

    Modification Factor for Bending Depth, kh 1.0

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame EC5 v2015.01.xlsm

    20/08/2015

    Engineering Calculation Sheet Consulting Engineers jXXX 17

    CONSULTING

    E N G I N E E R S

    h

    b

    h

    b

    h

    b

    Made by Date Chd.

    Drg. Ref.

    Member/Location

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    Rafter to Tie-Beam Connection (Permanent and Short Term Action)

    Rafter to Tie-Beam Connection Number of Shear Planes, NSP,1 1

    Single Rafter Single Tie-Beam 1 Single Shear Plane(s)

    Single Rafter Double Tie-Beam 2 Double Shear Plane(s)

    Double Rafter Single Tie-Beam 2 Double Shear Plane(s)

    Double Rafter Double Tie-Beam 2 Single Shear Plane(s)

    Double Rafter Triple Tie-Beam 4 Double Shear Plane(s)

    Triple Rafter Double Tie-Beam 4 Double Shear Plane(s)

    Triple Rafter Triple Tie-Beam 3 Single Shear Plane(s)

    Outer Member 1 Tie-Beam

    Inner Member 2 Rafter

    No. of Rows of Fastener Perpendicular to Tie-Beam Grain, mfas 1

    No. of Fasteners In a Line Parallel to Tie-Beam Grain, nfas 1

    a1 a2 a4,t a4,c

    Outer Member 1 70 50 50 50 mm

    Inner Member 2 60 50 70 50 mm

    Width, h Thk, t

    Outer Member 1 125 47 mm

    Inner Member 2 125 47 mm

    Rafter to Post Connection (Permanent and Short Term Action)

    Rafter to Post Connection Number of Shear Planes, NSP,2 1

    Single Rafter Single Tie-Beam 1 Single Shear Plane(s)

    Single Rafter Double Tie-Beam 2 Double Shear Plane(s)

    Double Rafter Single Tie-Beam 2 Double Shear Plane(s)

    Double Rafter Double Tie-Beam 2 Single Shear Plane(s)

    Double Rafter Triple Tie-Beam 4 Double Shear Plane(s)

    Triple Rafter Double Tie-Beam 4 Double Shear Plane(s)

    Triple Rafter Triple Tie-Beam 3 Single Shear Plane(s)

    Outer Member 1 Post

    Inner Member 2 Rafter

    No. of Rows of Fastener Perpendicular to Post Grain, mfas 1

    No. of Fasteners In a Line Parallel to Post Grain, nfas 1

    a1 a2 a4,t a4,c

    Outer Member 1 70 50 50 50 mm

    Inner Member 2 60 50 70 50 mm

    Width, h Thk, t

    Outer Member 1 120 47 mm

    Inner Member 2 125 47 mm

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame 20/08/2015

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame EC5 v2015.01.xlsm

    jXXX 18

    Engineering Calculation Sheet Consulting Engineers

    CONSULTING

    E N G I N E E R S

    Made by Date Chd.

    Drg. Ref.

    Member/Location

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    Rafter to Collar Connection (Permanent and Short Term Action)

    Rafter to Collar Connection Number of Shear Planes, NSP,3 1

    Single Rafter Single Tie-Beam 1 Single Shear Plane(s)

    Single Rafter Double Tie-Beam 2 Double Shear Plane(s)

    Double Rafter Single Tie-Beam 2 Double Shear Plane(s)

    Double Rafter Double Tie-Beam 2 Single Shear Plane(s)

    Double Rafter Triple Tie-Beam 4 Double Shear Plane(s)

    Triple Rafter Double Tie-Beam 4 Double Shear Plane(s)

    Triple Rafter Triple Tie-Beam 3 Single Shear Plane(s)

    Outer Member 1 Collar

    Inner Member 2 Rafter

    No. of Rows of Fastener Perpendicular to Collar Grain, mfas 1

    No. of Fasteners In a Line Parallel to Collar Grain, nfas 1

    a1 a2 a4,t a4,c

    Outer Member 1 70 50 50 50 mm

    Inner Member 2 60 50 70 50 mm

    Width, h Thk, t

    Outer Member 1 220 44 mm

    Inner Member 2 125 47 mm

    Steel Beam Section

    Steel Beam Length, Lsteelbeam 5.000 m

    Steel Beam LTB Length, Lsteelbeam,LTB = 1.4Lsteelbeam+2Dsteelbeam 7.503 m

    [Note loading on steel beam is destabilizing since loading and beam both laterally

    unrestrained and loading applied on top flange;]

    Steel Beam Buckling Length (D-Plane), Lsteelbeam,euler,D = Lsteelbeam 5.000 m

    Steel Beam Buckling Length (B-Plane), Lsteelbeam,euler,B = Lsteelbeam 5.000 m

    [Note maximum slenderness of 180.0 specified for beam;]

    Steel Beam Section UB254x146x31

    Steel Beam Depth, Dsteelbeam 251 mm

    Mass Per Metre, m 31.1 kg/m

    Mass of Steel Beam Members = Lsteelbeam.m 155.5 kg

    Hip Rafter Section (Permanent and Short Term Action)

    Note dead load of the hip rafter section ignored;

    Hip Rafter Length, Lhiprafter = H/sin 3.923 m

    Hip Rafter LTB Length, Lhiprafter,LTB = (q2+L2/4) 3.923 m

    Hip Rafter Buckling Length (h-plane), Lhiprafter,euler,h = %.(q2+L2/4) 0.785 m

    Hip Rafter Buckling Length (b-plane), Lhiprafter,euler,b = %.(q2+L2/4) 0.785 m

    Hip Rafter Width, bhiprafter 50 mm

    Hip Rafter Depth, hhiprafter 260 mm

    Mass of Hip Rafter Members = Lhiprafter.bhipafter.hhipafter.mean 31 kg

    Modification Factor for Bending Depth, kh 1.0

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame 20/08/2015

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame EC5 v2015.01.xlsm

    19

    Engineering Calculation Sheet Consulting Engineers jXXX

    CONSULTING

    E N G I N E E R S

    D

    B

    h

    b

    Made by Date Chd.

    Drg. Ref.

    Member/Location

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    Last Closed Couple Rafter Section (Permanent and Short Term Action)

    All parameters as Rafter Section (Permanent and Short Term Action) except those redefined below;

    Note mass of Rafter Section (Permanent and Short Term Action) assumed;

    (a) Single Shaft

    Rafter Width, brafter 47 mm

    Rafter Depth, hrafter 150 mm

    Modification Factor for Bending Depth, kh 1.0

    (b) Multiple Shaft

    Shaft Width, hlocal 47 mm

    Shaft Depth, blocal 120 mm

    Rafter Width, brafter = blocal 120 mm

    Rafter Depth, hrafter = n.hlocal + (n1).a 47 mm

    Area Modification = n.hlocal.blocal / (brafter.hrafter) N/A

    Shear Area (hPlane) Modification = [Lrafter2.G0.05/(n.(1+N N/A

    Shear Area (bPlane) Modification = 5/6.n.hlocal.blocal / (5/6.b N/A

    Inertia (hPlane) Modification = [n.1/12.hlocal3.blocal + (n-1).h N/A

    Inertia (bPlane) Modification = n.1/12.hlocal.blocal3 / (1/12.b N/A

    Torsion Constant Modification = [[(Lrafter/2/(1+NP,G))2.G/(3/2.((n-1).(a+hN/A

    Last Closed Couple Tie-Beam Section (Permanent and Medium Term Action)

    All parameters as Tie-Beam Section (Permanent and Medium Term Action) except those redefined below;

    Note mass of Tie-Beam Section (Permanent and Medium Term Action) assumed;

    (a) Single Shaft

    Tie-Beam Width, btie-beam 47 mm

    Tie-Beam Depth, htie-beam 145 mm

    Modification Factor for Bending Depth, kh 1.0

    (b) Multiple Shaft

    Shaft Width, hlocal 47 mm

    Shaft Depth, blocal 150 mm

    Tie-Beam Width, btie-beam = blocal 150 mm

    Tie-Beam Depth, htie-beam = n.hlocal + (n1).a 47 mm

    Area Modification = n.hlocal.blocal / (btie-beam.htie-beam) N/A

    Shear Area (hPlane) Modification = [Ltie-beam2.G0.05/(n.(1+N N/A

    Shear Area (bPlane) Modification = 5/6.n.hlocal.blocal / (5/6.b N/A

    Inertia (hPlane) Modification = [n.1/12.hlocal3.blocal + (n-1).h N/A

    Inertia (bPlane) Modification = n.1/12.hlocal.blocal3 / (1/12.b N/A

    Torsion Constant Modification = [[(Ltie-beam/2/(1+NP,G)) N/A

    Line LL UDL on Support = (pLL+pSNOW).q + max wind + pLL,FLR.L/2 0.56 kN/m

    Line DL+SDL UDL on Support = (pDL,RAFTER+pSDL).q + (pSDL,FLR+pDL,TIE-BEAM).L/2 2.07 kN/m

    [Note max wind = MAX (p WIND,d,windward .L/2 p WIND,d,windward .q2 /(2L)+p WIND,d,leeward .q

    2 /(2L),

    p WIND,d,leeward .L/2 p WIND,d,leeward .q2 /(2L)+p WIND,d,windward .q

    2 /(2L));]

    [Note the existence of purlins have been ignored for this foundation load take down purpose;]

    [Note the existence of posts and collars have been ignored for this foundation load take down purpose;]

    [Note the existence of binders have been ignored for this foundation load take down purpose;]

    [Note the existence of steel beams have been ignored for this foundation load take down purpose;]

    [Note uplift wind conditions have been ignored for this foundation load take down purpose;]

    [Note the horizontal reaction has been ignored for this foundation load take down purpose;]

    [Note CP LL features not in these foundation effects as CP LL is localised to a particular tie-beam at a time;]

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame EC5 v2015.01.xlsm

    20

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame

    Engineering Calculation Sheet Consulting Engineers jXXX

    20/08/2015

    CONSULTING

    E N G I N E E R S

    h

    b

    h

    b

    h

    b

    h

    b

    Made by Date Chd.

    Drg. Ref.

    Member/Location

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    Effects Equations (Closed Couple Roof)

    All parameters as Rafter Section (Permanent and Short Term Action) except those redefined below;

    All parameters as Tie-Beam Section (Permanent and Medium Term Action) except those redefined below;

    Engineering Calculation Sheet Consulting Engineers jXXX 21

    20/08/2015Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame EC5 v2015.01.xlsm

    CONSULTING

    E N G I N E E R S

    Axial Force Diagram

    .q.L/(4H).H.L2/(8H)

    .L2/(8H)

    Shear Force Diagram

    .L/4

    .L/4

    Bending Moment Diagram

    .q.L/16

    Reaction Diagram

    .q .q

    0

    Effects Equations From Vertical Forces

    .L/2.q2/(2L) .q2/(2L)

    .H

    .q2/8

    Shear Force Diagram

    .q/2

    .q/2

    Axial Force Diagram

    .q3/(2H.L)

    .q2/(4H)

    .q.(H2L2/4)/(2H.L)

    Effects Equations From Wind Forces (Windward Pressure)

    Wind

    Made by Date Chd.

    Drg. Ref.

    Member/Location

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    In the above diagrams, the horizontal support reaction is only applied on one end, the windward

    or leeward sides for windward and leeward pressures, respectively. In reality, the horizontal support

    will be provided at both ends but only after the vertical load is in place and the tie force has been

    mobilised for dead and super dead loads (note however live loads and snow loads would not have

    been in place). Thereafter, with wind loads, it is assumed that only the support end closer to the

    wind pressure will be effective.

    Note ve loading indicates net uplift; Note ve R v indicates downward force due to net uplift;

    Note tension is +ve and compression is ve;

    Tie-Beam Vertical Reaction = (L/(1+N BIND ))/2+P/2 where and P are defined within the loading combination;

    Tie-Beam Shear Force = (L/(1+N BIND ))/2+P/2 where and P are defined within the loading combination;

    Tie-Beam Bending Moment = (L/(1+N BIND ))2 /8+P(L/(1+N BIND ))/4 where and P are defined within the loading combination;

    Binder Axial Force = 0.0;

    Binder Shear Force = If (N BIND =0, 0.0, ( /s).L/(1+N BIND ).L binder /2) where is defined within the loading combination;

    Binder Bending Moment = If (N BIND =0, 0.0, ( /s).L/(1+N BIND ).L binder2 /8) where is defined within the loading combination;

    Note CP LL features not in the binder effects as CP LL is localised to a particular tie-beam at a time;

    Rafter to Tie-Beam Connection Force, F con,tie-beam = F tie-beam ; Note ve indicates bearing;

    Rafter to Tie-Beam Angled Bearing Connection Shear Force = If (F con,tie-beam >=0, "N/A", ABS(F con,tie-beam ).L/(2q));

    Rafter to Tie-Beam Connection Force Per Fastener Per Shear Plane = (ABS(F con,tie-beam )/N SP,1 )/(m fas .n fas );

    Angle of Rafter to Tie-Beam Connection Force to the Grain Direction of Tie-Beam Member = 0.0 degrees;

    Angle of Rafter to Tie-Beam Connection Force to the Grain Direction of Rafter Member = degrees;

    Note for SLS effects, binders break tie-beam span to L/(1+N BIND );

    Note jack rafters should be designed as Lean to Traditional Roof;

    For hipped rafter analysis, see Effects Equations (Attic Roof);

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame EC5 v2015.01.xlsm

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame 20/08/2015

    Engineering Calculation Sheet Consulting Engineers jXXX

    CONSULTING

    E N G I N E E R S 22

    Effects Equations From Wind Forces (Leeward Pressure)

    Reaction DiagramBending Moment Diagram

    Shear Force DiagramAxial Force Diagram

    Wind

    Effects Due to Leeward Pressure Equal But Opposite to Effects Due to Windward Pressure. For Clarity, Effects Not Shown;

    Made by Date Chd.

    Drg. Ref.

    Member/Location

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    Effects Equations (Canted Purlin Roof)

    and P are defined within the loading combination;

    and P are defined within the loading combination;

    is defined within the loading combination;

    is defined within the loading combination;

    ).L/(2q));

    jXXX

    Engineering Calculation Sheet Consulting Engineers

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame EC5 v2015.01.xlsm

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame 20/08/2015

    CONSULTING

    E N G I N E E R S 23

    Effects Equations From Vertical Forces

    Reaction Diagram

    .q.L2/(8q)

    .L/4

    .L/4

    .q.L2/(8q)

    Axial Force Diagram

    1/(16H).(6.q.L.L3/q)

    .H+.L2.H/(8q2)L/(32H.q).(6.q.L.L3/q)

    .L2.H/(8q2)L/(32H.q).(6.q.L.L3/q)

    Bending Moment Diagram

    .q.L/64

    .q.L/64

    Shear Force Diagram

    .L/8

    .L/8

    .L/8

    0

    .L/4.q2/(4L) .q2/(4L)

    .q/2.q2/32

    Shear Force Diagram

    .q/4

    .q/4

    Axial Force Diagram

    .q3/(4H.L)

    .H/23.q2/(8H)+L2/(8H)

    .q/H.(L/8q2/(4L))

    Effects Equations From Wind Forces (Windward Pressure)

    Wind

    0.H/2

    .q2/32

    .q/4

    Made by Date Chd.

    Drg. Ref.

    Member/Location

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    All notes within Effects Equations (Closed Couple Roof) applicable;

    Note only canted purlins are considered due to the fact that vertically orientated purlins require

    the notching of rafters where hogging moments are greatest, and hence not recommended;

    Note rafters are assumed pinned at the purlin supports although in reality hogging moments are

    greatest, this consistent with TRADA assumptions, done primarily to reduce the indeterminate

    system from two to zero degree indeterminate, i.e. determinate;

    Purlin Axial Force = 0.0;

    Purlin Shear Force = [MAX( vertical .L/4+ windward .q/2, vertical .L/4+ leeward .q/2)]/s.L purlin /2;

    Purlin Bending Moment = [MAX( vertical .L/4+ windward .q/2, vertical .L/4+ leeward .q/2)]/s.L purlin2 /8;

    For hipped rafter analysis, see Effects Equations (Attic Roof);

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame EC5 v2015.01.xlsm

    Engineering Calculation Sheet Consulting Engineers

    20/08/2015Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame

    CONSULTING

    E N G I N E E R S 24jXXX

    Effects Equations From Wind Forces (Leeward Pressure)

    Reaction DiagramBending Moment Diagram

    Shear Force DiagramAxial Force Diagram

    Wind

    Effects Due to Leeward Pressure Equal But Opposite to Effects Due to Windward Pressure. For Clarity, Effects Not Shown;

    .H/2

    .H.L2.(1

    .q2.(1(1H

    .q2/4/H.(1H0/H).(2HH0H1)2+X1/2.H.[1

    .q.L/(2H)+H0/H)+.q.L.H

    /L.(HH1)/(H

    .q.L/(2H)+H0/H)+.q.L.H

    +X1.2q/L.(1H

    .q.L/(2H)+H0/H)+

    +X1.(2q/L.(1

    Made by Date Chd.

    Drg. Ref.

    Member/Location

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    Effects Equations (Attic Roof)

    Engineering Calculation Sheet Consulting Engineers jXXX 25

    20/08/2015

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame EC5 v2015.01.xlsm

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame

    CONSULTING

    E N G I N E E R S

    Effects Equations From Vertical Forces

    Reaction Diagram

    Axial Force Diagram

    Bending Moment Diagram

    Shear Force Diagram

    .q.L.(1H0/H)/(4H)+X1.(H1/H1)/(1H0/H)

    .q/2X1.(2/L).(HH1)/(1H0/H)

    0

    .q/2+X1.(2/L).(HH1)/(1H0/H)

    .L.(1H0/H)/4X1/q.(HH1)/(1H0/H)

    .H0.L./(4H) .H0.L./(4H)

    .H0.L./(4H)+X1.H/q.[1(1H1/H)/(1H0/H)]

    2.L.(1H0/H)/4.(H1H0)/(HH0).L.(1H0/H)/4+X1.H/q.[1(1H1/H)/(1H0/H)]

    2.L.(1H0/H)/4.(H1H0)/(HH0).L.(1H0/H)/4X1/q.(HH1)/(1H0/H)

    .q.L.H02/(16H2)

    .q.L/4.(1H0/H).(1H1/H).q.L/4.(1H1/H)2+X1.H.[1(1H1/H)/(1H0/H)].(1H1/H)

    .q.L.H02/(16H2)

    .q.L/8.(1H0/H).(H1/HH0/H).q.L/16.(H1/HH0/H)2+X1/(2H).(HH1).(H1H0)/(1H0/H)

    .H/2.L2.(1H0/H)/(8H)+X1.2q/L.(HH1)/(HH0)

    .H/2.L2.(1H0/H)/(8H)+.H0+X1.2q/L.(HH1)/(HH0)

    H0/H)/(8H)+.H0+X1.2q/L.(1H2/q2).(HH1)/(HH0)

    .L2.(1H0/H)/(8H)+X1.(2q/L.(1H2/q2).(HH1)/(HH0)L/(2q))

    X1,vertical

    Shear Force DiagramAxial Force Diagram

    Effects Equations From Wind Forces (Windward Pressure)

    Wind.q/2.(1H0/H)+X1.H/q.[1

    (1H1/H)/(1H0/H)]

    .q/2.(1H0/H).q.(1H1/H)+X1.H/q.[1(1H1/H)/(1H0/H)]

    .q/2.(1H0/H).q.(1H1/H)X1/q.(HH1)/(1H0/H)

    .q/2.(1H0/H)X1/q.(HH1)/(1H0/H)

    .q.H0/(2H) 0

    X1.H/q.[1(1H1/H)/(1H0/H)]

    X1.H/q.[1(1H1/H)/(1H0/H)]

    X1/q.(HH1)/(1H0/H)

    .q2.H02/(8H2)

    X1.H.[1(1H1/H)/(1H0/H)].(1H1/H)

    X1.H.[1(1H1/H)/(1H0/H)].(1H1/H)/2

    H1/H).(H1H0)/(2H)+X1.H.[1H1/H)/(1H0/H)].(1H1/H)

    0

    /H).(2HH0H1).q2/8/H2.(2H(1H1/H)/(1H0/H)].(1H1/H)

    .H

    .q2/L+X1.(2/L).(HH1)/(1H0/H)

    X1.(2/L).(HH1)/(1H0/H)

    .q2/(2L).(1H0/H)X1.(2/L).(HH1)/(1H0/H)

    .L/2.q2/(2L).(3H0/H)X1.(2/L).(HH1)/(1H0/H)

    .q2.(1H0/H)/(4H) +X1.(H1/H1)/(1H0/H)

    X1,wind,ww

    .q3.(1H0/H)/(2H.L) +X1.2q/L.(HH1)/(HH0)

    .q3.(1H0/H)/(2H.L)+X1.2q/L.(1H2/q2).(HH1)/(HH0)

    .q3.(1H0/H)/(2H.L) +X1.(2q/L.(1H2/q2).(H

    H1)/(HH0)L/(2q))

    .q3/(2H.L).(30/(4H2)+X1.2q)/(HH0)

    .q.L/(2H)+.q3/(2H.L).(3.q.L.H0/(4H2).q.H/L

    H2/q2).(HH1)/(HH0)

    .q.L/(2H)+.q3/(2H.L).(3.q.L.H0/(4H2).q.H/L

    .(2q/L.(1H2/q2).(HH1)/(HH0)L/(2q))

    Made by Date Chd.

    Drg. Ref.

    Member/Location

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    All notes within Effects Equations (Closed Couple Roof) applicable;

    Note rafters are assumed pinned at the post supports although in reality hogging moments are

    greatest, this consistent with TRADA assumptions, done primarily to reduce the indeterminate

    system from three to one degree indeterminate;

    Note the structural system is one degree indeterminate. Hence one compatibility equation required;

    The compatibility equation is f 10 +X 1 .f 11 =0, i.e. X 1 = f 10 /f 11 ; However, if only the bending

    deformations are accounted for (the shear and axial deformations being ignored) and if only one

    member size exhibits bending deformations (i.e. here the rafters), the effects become independent

    of the bending stiffness EI and as such does not feature in the above effects equations; The release

    X 1 is taken as the collar axial force for both vertical and wind loadings;

    For the vertical loading, the release X 1,vertical is

    For the wind loading, the release X 1,wind is

    Note that for the bending moment and shear force effects, effects due to vertical and wind loading

    are combined according to a sign convention at the various locations, following which the absolute

    ABS is taken and the maximum value from the various locations presented;

    20/08/2015

    jXXX 26

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame EC5 v2015.01.xlsm

    Engineering Calculation Sheet Consulting Engineers

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame

    CONSULTING

    E N G I N E E R S

    X1,vertical=(.L.(q.(1H1/H))3/12/q.(H1H0).L.(q.(1H1/H))4/16/q2.H.(1(1H1/H)/(1H0/H))+.L/12/q.(HH1).(q/H.(H1H0))3L..(q/H.(H1H0))4/16/q2.(HH1)/(1H0/H))/(1/3.q.(1H1/H).H.(1(1H1/H)/(1H0/H)).(1H1/H).H.(1(1H1/H)/(1H0/H)).(1H1/H)+1/3.q/H.(H1H0).H.(1(1H1/H)/(1H0/H)).(1H1/H).H.(1(1H1/H)/(1H0/H)).(1H1/H));

    X1,wind=(.(q.(1H1/H))3/6.(H1H0).H.(q.(1H1/H))4/8/q.(1(1H1/H)/(1H0/H))+.(q/H.(H1H0))3/6.(HH1)/8/q.(q/H.(H1H0))4.(HH1)/(1H0/H))/(2.(1/3.q.(1H1/H).H.(1(1H1/H)/(1H0/H)).(1H1/H).H.(1(1H1/H)/(1H0/H)).(1H1/H)+1/3.q/H.(H1H0).H.(1(1H1/H)/(1H0/H)).(1H1/H).H.(1(1H1/H)/(1H0/H)).(1H1/H)));

    Effects Equations From Wind Forces (Leeward Pressure)

    Reaction DiagramBending Moment Diagram

    Shear Force DiagramAxial Force Diagram

    Wind

    Effects Due to Leeward Pressure Equal But Opposite to Effects Due to Windward Pressure. For Clarity, Effects Not Shown;

    Made by Date Chd.

    Drg. Ref.

    Member/Location

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    Rafter to Post Connection Force, F con,post = SgnMaxAbs(F post,windward , F post,leeward ); Note ve indicates bearing;

    Rafter to Post Angled Bearing Connection Shear Force = If (F con,post >=0, "N/A", ABS(F con,post ).H/q);

    Rafter to Post Connection Force Per Fastener Per Shear Plane = (ABS(F con,post )/N SP,2 )/(m fas .n fas );

    Angle of Rafter to Post Connection Force to the Grain Direction of Post Member = 0.0 degrees;

    Angle of Rafter to Post Connection Force to the Grain Direction of Rafter Member = 90 degrees;

    Rafter to Collar Connection Force, F con,collar = F collar ; Note ve indicates bearing;

    Rafter to Collar Angled Bearing Connection Shear Force = If (F con,collar >=0, "N/A", ABS(F con,collar ).L/(2q));

    Rafter to Collar Connection Force Per Fastener Per Shear Plane = (ABS(F con,collar )/N SP,3 )/(m fas .n fas );

    Angle of Rafter to Collar Connection Force to the Grain Direction of Collar Member = 0.0 degrees;

    Angle of Rafter to Collar Connection Force to the Grain Direction of Rafter Member = degrees;

    Steel Beam Axial Force = 0.0;

    Steel Beam Shear Force = .L steelbeam /2 where is defined within the loading combination;

    Steel Beam Bending Moment = .L steelbeam2 /8 where is defined within the loading combination;

    Purlin Vertical Reaction On Hip Rafter, R p,hip = ( vertical .L/4+ windward/leeward .q/2)/s.(L purlin /2 L HIPEND /2).L/(2q);

    Hip Rafter Top End Axial Force = 2/3.1/2.( vertical .q+ windward/leeward .L/2)/s.H+R p,hip .H/2/L hiprafter ;

    Hip Rafter Bottom End Axial Force = 1/3.1/2.( vertical .q+ windward/leeward .L/2)/s.H R p,hip .H/2/L hiprafter ;

    Hip Rafter Shear Force = 2/3.1/2.( vertical .q+ windward/leeward .L/2)/s.H/tan +R p,hip .H.tan /2/L hiprafter ;

    Hip Rafter Bending Moment = 2/(9.3).1/2.( vertical .q+ windward/leeward .L/2)/s.H/tan .L hiprafter +R p,hip .H.tan /4;

    Hip Rafter Top Support Connection Force, F con,top,hiprafter = 2/3.1/2.( vertical .q+ windward/leeward .L/2)/s.L hiprafter +R

    Hip Rafter Bottom Support Connection Force, F con,bottom,hiprafter = 1/3.1/2.( vertical .q+ windward/leeward .L/2)/s.L hiprafter

    Hip Rafter Bottom Support Angled Bearing Connection Shear Force = If (F con,bottom,hiprafter

  • Cell References

    Covering 11

    None 0.00

    Cotswold Slate 0.98

    Welsh / Cornish Slate Thick 0.49

    Welsh / Cornish Slate Thin 0.29

    Fibre Cement Slate 0.22

    Plain (Double Lap) Clay Tiles 0.74

    Plain (Double Lap) Concrete Tiles 0.79

    Interlocking (Single Lap) Concrete Tiles 0.54

    Thatching 300mm 0.39

    Aluminium Sheeting 1.2mm 0.04

    Asbestos Cement Sheeting 6.3mm Corrugated 0.16

    Asbestos Cement Sheeting 6.3mm Flat 0.11

    Copper Sheeting 0.6mm 0.03

    Lead Sheeting 1.32mm (Code 3) 0.15

    Lead Sheeting 1.8mm (Code 4) 0.20

    Lead Sheeting 2.24mm (Code 5) 0.25

    Lead Sheeting 2.5mm (Code 6) 0.28

    Lead Sheeting 3.15mm (Code 7) 0.36

    Steel Sheeting 0.7mm 0.07

    Steel Sheeting 1.2mm 0.12

    Euler Buckling Length

    100% 1.0

    20% 0.2

    Timber Name/Strength Class 32

    Partial Safety Factor 1

    Solid Timber

    Glulam

    LVL

    Service Class 3

    Class 1

    Class 2

    Class 3

    Cases for Factor Sb 3

    Country 100km

    Town 2km

    Town 10km

    Town >= 100km

    Factor Sb 1.57

    Effective Height 5.000

    Case 3

    Eff Height Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6 Case 7

    2 1.48 1.40 1.35 1.26 1.18 1.15 1.07

    5 1.65 1.62 1.57 1.45 1.50 1.45 1.36

    10 1.78 1.78 1.73 1.62 1.73 1.69 1.58

    15 1.85 1.85 1.82 1.71 1.85 1.82 1.71

    20 1.90 1.90 1.89 1.77 1.90 1.89 1.77

    30 1.96 1.96 1.96 1.85 1.96 1.96 1.85

  • Link Cells

    Pitched Traditional Rafter Roof

    Link1 3.923 1.667 0.833 5.000 3.000 5.000 3.023

    Link2 3.923 1.667 0.833 2.500 1.500 2.500 3.023

    Link3 0.785 1.667 0.833 1.000 0.600 5.000 3.023

    Link4 0.785 1.667 0.833 1.000 0.600 1.000 0.605

    Link5 50 44 47 50 50 47 47

    Link6 260 220 120 220 195 125 125

    Link7 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000

    Link8 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000

    Link9 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000

    Link10 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000

    Link11 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000

    Link12 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000

    Link13 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

    Link14 N/A 63 50 N/A N/A 47 47

    Link15 N/A 63 50 N/A N/A 47 47

    Link16 N/A 300 300 N/A N/A 300 300

    Link17 N/A 1 1 N/A N/A 1 2

    Link18 N/A FALSE FALSE N/A N/A FALSE FALSE

    Link19 0.0 0.3 0.1 -0.4 -0.2

    Link20 -0.5 0.0 -0.3 -1.0 -0.6

    Link21 0.2 -0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1

    Link22 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1

    Link23 0.23 0.07 0.19 0.22 0.20

    Link24 0.29 0.10 0.23 0.30 0.27

    Link25 1 2 1 1 2 2 1

    Link26 N/A N/A N/A 2 2 2 N/A

    Link27 -0.1 0.2 0.0 -0.4 -0.2

    Link28 -0.7 -0.1 -0.4 -1.0 -0.6

    Link29 -0.1 -0.2 -0.2 0.2 0.1

    Link30 0.0 -0.1 -0.1 0.1 0.1

    Link31 0.18 0.05 0.13 0.22 0.20

    Link32 0.24 0.08 0.18 0.30 0.27

    Link33 0.3 -0.2 0.1 0.7 0.4

    Link34 Void Void Void Void Void

    Link35 0.9 0.2 0.2 1.2 0.2

    Link36 0.9 0.1 0.1 1.2 0.1

    Link37 0.69 0.09 0.13 0.90 0.17

    Link38 Void Void Void Void Void

    Link39 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

    Link40 2.6 1.3 1.8 3.3 1.8

    Link41 2.0 0.9 1.3 2.4 1.3

    Link42 0.54 0.25 0.35 0.68 0.46

    Link43 70 50 50 50

    Link44 60 50 70 50

    Link45 47

    Link46 47

    Link47 125

    Link48 125

    Link49 1

    Link50 1

    Link51 1

    Link52 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

    Link53 34.2 34.2 34.2 34.2 34.2

    Link54 OK OK OK OK OK

    Link55 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 1.8

    Link56 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 1.8

    Link57 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 1.8

    Link58 0.1 0.1 0.26 0.25

    Link59 1

  • Link Cells

    Flat Traditional Roof

    Link1 4.500

    Link2 4.500

    Link3 0.900

    Link4 0.900

    Link5 47

    Link6 200

    Link7 1.000

    Link8 1.000

    Link9 1.000

    Link10 1.000

    Link11 1.000

    Link12 1.000

    Link13 1.0

    Link14 0.0 0.0 0.0

    Link15 1.2 2.3 0.8

    Link16 1.4 4.2 0.9

    Link17 0.16 0.81 0.29

    Link18 2

    Link19 1

    Link20 0.3 -0.1 0.96 0.64

    Lean to Traditional Roof

    Link1 6.403

    Link2 6.403

    Link3 6.403

    Link4 1.281

    Link5 47

    Link6 225

    Link7 1.000

    Link8 1.000

    Link9 1.000

    Link10 1.000

    Link11 1.000

    Link12 1.000

    Link13 1.0

    Link14 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.9 0.5

    Link15 -0.7 -0.4 -0.5 -0.9 -0.5

    Link16 0.8 -1.4 0.6 1.1 0.7

    Link17 1.3 -2.2 0.9 1.7 1.1

    Link18 1.15 0.05 0.98 1.06 0.97

    Link19 1.17 0.06 1.00 1.09 1.00

    Link20 1

    Link21 N/A

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    ULS Permanent Loading Combinations, ULS,PT

    Combination A (ULS,PT,A) (Downward Critical)

    Vertical [1.4pDL,RAFTER+1.4pSDL+0.0pLL+0.0pSNOW].s 0.2 kN/m

    Windward [0.0pWIND,d,windward].s 0.0 kN/m

    Leeward [0.0pWIND,d,leeward].s 0.0 kN/m

    ULS,PT,A [1.4pDL,TIE-BEAM+1.4pSDL,FLR+0.0pLL,FLR].s 0.2 kN/m

    PULS,PT,A 0.0CPLL 0.0 kN

    Steel Beam ULS,A,1 SgnMaxAbs(Fpost,windward, Fpost,leeward)/s+1.4 4.6 kN/m

    Rafter Vertical Reaction Windward, RV,windward,rafter 0.5 kN

    Rafter Vertical Reaction Leeward, RV,leeward,rafter 0.5 kN

    Rafter Vertical Max Downdrag Reaction, RV = MAX (RV,windward,rafter, R 0.5 kN

    Rafter Vertical Max Uplift Reaction, RV = ABS (MIN (RV,windward,rafter, R 0.0 kN

    Rafter Horizontal Reaction Windward, RH,windward,rafter 0.0 kN

    Rafter Horizontal Reaction Leeward, RH,leeward,rafter 0.0 kN

    Rafter Horizontal Max Reaction, RH = MAX (ABS(RH,windward,rafter), ABS(R 0.0 kN

    Tie-Beam Vertical Reaction, RV,tie-beam 0.2 kN

    Windward Rafter Axial Force At SectionsN/A N/A N/A N/A kN

    Windward Rafter Min Axial Force, Frafter,windward,min -0.2 kN

    Windward Rafter Max Axial Force, Frafter,windward,max -0.6 kN

    Windward Rafter Shear Force At SectionsN/A N/A N/A N/A N/A kN

    Windward Rafter Shear Force, Vrafter,windward 0.1 kN

    Windward Rafter Bending Moment At Sections N/A N/A N/A kNm

    Windward Rafter Bending Moment, Mrafter,windward 0.1 kNm

    Windward Rafter Utilisation 27%

    [Presented above are effect values at various sections along the member (Attic Roof);]

    Leeward Rafter Axial Force At SectionsN/A N/A N/A N/A kN

    Leeward Rafter Min Axial Force, Frafter,leeward,min -0.2 kN

    Leeward Rafter Max Axial Force, Frafter,leeward,max -0.6 kN

    Leeward Rafter Shear Force At SectionsN/A N/A N/A N/A N/A kN

    Leeward Rafter Shear Force, Vrafter,leeward 0.1 kN

    Leeward Rafter Bending Moment At Sections N/A N/A N/A kNm

    Leeward Rafter Bending Moment, Mrafter,leeward 0.1 kNm

    Leeward Rafter Utilisation 27%

    [Presented above are effect values at various sections along the member (Attic Roof);]

    Purlin Axial Force, Fpurlin 0.0 kN

    Purlin Shear Force, Vpurlin 1.8 kN

    Purlin Bending Moment, Mpurlin 2.2 kNm

    Purlin Utilisation 219%

    Windward Post Axial Force, Fpost,windward 0.0 kN

    Leeward Post Axial Force, Fpost,leeward 0.0 kN

    Post Shear Force, Vpost 0.0 kN

    Post Bending Moment, Mpost 0.0 kNm

    Post Utilisation 0%

    Rafter ULS,PT,A

    jXXX 28

    Tie-Beam

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame EC5 v2015.01.xlsm

    20/08/2015

    Engineering Calculation Sheet Consulting Engineers

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame

    CONSULTING

    E N G I N E E R S

    Design Section

    Design Section

    Design Section

    Design Section

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    Collar Axial Force Components (Attic Roof) N/A N/A N/A kN

    [Presented above are components due to vertical, windward and leeward loads (Attic Roof);]

    Collar Axial Force, Fcollar 0.0 kN

    Collar Shear Force, Vcollar 0.0 kN

    Collar Bending Moment, Mcollar 0.0 kNm

    Collar Utilisation 0%

    Tie-Beam Axial Force, Ftie-beam 0.4 kN

    Tie-Beam Shear Force, Vtie-beam 0.2 kN

    Tie-Beam Bending Moment, Mtie-beam 0.1 kNm

    Tie-Beam Utilisation 17%

    Binder Axial Force, Fbinder 0.0 kN

    Binder Shear Force, Vbinder 1.8 kN

    Binder Bending Moment, Mbinder 1.3 kNm

    Binder Utilisation 46%

    Rafter to Tie-Beam Connection Force, Fcon,tie-beam 0.4 kN

    Rafter to Tie-Beam Angled Bearing Connection Shear Force N/A kN

    Rafter to Tie-Beam Connection Force Per Fastener Per Shear Plane 0.4 kN

    Angle of Rafter to Tie-Beam Connection Force to the Grain Direction Outer Member, 0.0 degrees

    Angle of Rafter to Tie-Beam Connection Force to the Grain Direction Inner Member, 34.2 degrees

    Check If All Minimum Spacing Requirements Met ? OK

    Design Capacity 1 Shear Plane Without Splitting 1.8 kN

    Design Capacity 1 Shear Plane With Splitting 1.8 kN

    Design Capacity 1 Fastener With Splitting 1.8 kN

    Rafter to Tie-Beam Connection Utilisation 23%

    Rafter to Post Connection Force, Fcon,post 0.0 kN

    Rafter to Post Angled Bearing Connection Shear Force N/A kN

    Rafter to Post Connection Force Per Fastener Per Shear Plane 0.0 kN

    Angle of Rafter to Post Connection Force to the Grain Direction Outer Member, 0.0 degrees

    Angle of Rafter to Post Connection Force to the Grain Direction Inner Member, 55.8 degrees

    Check If All Minimum Spacing Requirements Met ? OK

    Design Capacity 1 Shear Plane Without Splitting 1.6 kN

    Design Capacity 1 Shear Plane With Splitting 1.6 kN

    Design Capacity 1 Fastener With Splitting 1.6 kN

    Rafter to Post Connection Utilisation 0%

    Rafter to Collar Connection Force, Fcon,collar 0.0 kN

    Rafter to Collar Angled Bearing Connection Shear Force N/A kN

    Rafter to Collar Connection Force Per Fastener Per Shear Plane 0.0 kN

    Angle of Rafter to Collar Connection Force to the Grain Direction Outer Member, 0.0 degrees

    Angle of Rafter to Collar Connection Force to the Grain Direction Inner Member, 34.2 degrees

    Check If All Minimum Spacing Requirements Met ? OK

    Design Capacity 1 Shear Plane Without Splitting 1.7 kN

    Design Capacity 1 Shear Plane With Splitting 1.7 kN

    Design Capacity 1 Fastener With Splitting 1.7 kN

    Rafter to Collar Connection Utilisation 0%

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame 20/08/2015

    jXXX 29

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame EC5 v2015.01.xlsm

    Engineering Calculation Sheet Consulting Engineers

    CONSULTING

    E N G I N E E R S

    Design Section

    Design Section

    Design Connection

    Design Section

    Design Connection

    Design Connection

    Made by Date Chd.

    Drg. Ref.

    Member/Location

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    Steel Beam Axial Force, Fsteelbeam 0.0 kN

    Steel Beam Shear Force, Vsteelbeam 0.0 kN

    Steel Beam Bending Moment, Msteelbeam 0.0 kNm

    Steel Beam Utilisation 0%

    Purlin Vertical Reaction On Windward Hip Rafter, Rp,hip,windward 0.7 kN

    Windward Hip Rafter Top End Axial Force, Fhiprafter,top,windward 1.1 kN

    Windward Hip Rafter Bottom End Axial Force, Fhiprafter,bottom,windward -0.6 kN

    Windward Hip Rafter Shear Force, Vhiprafter,windward 2.1 kN

    Windward Hip Rafter Bending Moment, Mhiprafter,windward 1.7 kNm

    Windward Hip Rafter Utilisation 124%

    Windward Hip Rafter Top Support Connection Force, Fcon,top,hiprafter,windward 2.6 kN

    Windward Hip Rafter Bottom Support Connection Force, Fcon,bottom,hiprafter,windward1.5 kN

    Windward Hip Rafter Bottom Support Angled Bearing Connection Shear Force0.6 kN

    Purlin Vertical Reaction On Leeward Hip Rafter, Rp,hip,leeward 0.7 kN

    Leeward Hip Rafter Top End Axial Force, Fhiprafter,top,leeward 1.1 kN

    Leeward Hip Rafter Bottom End Axial Force, Fhiprafter,bottom,leeward -0.6 kN

    Leeward Hip Rafter Shear Force, Vhiprafter,leeward 2.1 kN

    Leeward Hip Rafter Bending Moment, Mhiprafter,leeward 1.7 kNm

    Leeward Hip Rafter Utilisation 124%

    Leeward Hip Rafter Top Support Connection Force, Fcon,top,hiprafter,leeward 2.6 kN

    Leeward Hip Rafter Bottom Support Connection Force, Fcon,bottom,hiprafter,leeward1.5 kN

    Leeward Hip Rafter Bottom Support Angled Bearing Connection Shear Force0.6 kN

    Last Closed Couple Wind/Leeward Rafter Additional Axial Force -4.7 kN

    Last Closed Couple Windward Rafter Total Axial Force -5.3 kN

    Last Closed Couple Leeward Rafter Total Axial Force -5.3 kN

    Last Closed Couple Windward Rafter Utilisation 66%

    Last Closed Couple Leeward Rafter Utilisation 66%

    Last Closed Couple Tie-Beam Additional Axial Force 3.8 kN

    Last Closed Couple Tie-Beam Total Axial Force 4.3 kN

    Last Closed Couple Tie-Beam Utilisation 50%

    Last Closed Couple Rafter to Tie-Beam Connection Enhancement Ratio 10.3

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame EC5 v2015.01.xlsm

    20/08/2015

    Engineering Calculation Sheet Consulting Engineers jXXX 30

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame

    CONSULTING

    E N G I N E E R S

    Design Section

    Design Section

    Design Section

    Design Section

    Design Section

    Made by Date Chd.

    Drg. Ref.

    Member/Location

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    ULS Medium / Short Term Loading Combinations, ULS,MT/ST

    Combination A (ULS,MT/ST,A) (Downward Critical)

    Vertical [1.4pDL,RAFTER+1.4pSDL+1.6pLL+1.6pSNOW].s 0.4 kN/m

    Windward [0.0pWIND,d,windward].s 0.0 kN/m

    Leeward [0.0pWIND,d,leeward].s 0.0 kN/m

    ULS,MT,A [1.4pDL,TIE-BEAM+1.4pSDL,FLR+1.6pLL,FLR].s 0.3 kN/m

    PULS,MT,A 1.6CPLL 1.4 kN

    Steel Beam ULS,A,2 SgnMaxAbs(Fpost,windward, Fpost,leeward)/s+1.4 7.8 kN/m

    Rafter Vertical Reaction Windward, RV,windward,rafter 0.8 kN

    Rafter Vertical Reaction Leeward, RV,leeward,rafter 0.8 kN

    Rafter Vertical Max Downdrag Reaction, RV = MAX (RV,windward,rafter, R 0.8 kN

    Rafter Vertical Max Uplift Reaction, RV = ABS (MIN (RV,windward,rafter, R 0.0 kN

    Rafter Horizontal Reaction Windward, RH,windward,rafter 0.0 kN

    Rafter Horizontal Reaction Leeward, RH,leeward,rafter 0.0 kN

    Rafter Horizontal Max Reaction, RH = MAX (ABS(RH,windward,rafter), ABS(R 0.0 kN

    Tie-Beam Vertical Reaction, RV,tie-beam 1.2 kN

    Windward Rafter Axial Force At SectionsN/A N/A N/A N/A kN

    Windward Rafter Min Axial Force, Frafter,windward,min -0.4 kN

    Windward Rafter Max Axial Force, Frafter,windward,max -1.0 kN

    Windward Rafter Shear Force At SectionsN/A N/A N/A N/A N/A kN

    Windward Rafter Shear Force, Vrafter,windward 0.2 kN

    Windward Rafter Bending Moment At Sections N/A N/A N/A kNm

    Windward Rafter Bending Moment, Mrafter,windward 0.1 kNm

    Windward Rafter Utilisation 30%

    [Presented above are effect values at various sections along the member (Attic Roof);]

    Leeward Rafter Axial Force At SectionsN/A N/A N/A N/A kN

    Leeward Rafter Min Axial Force, Frafter,leeward,min -0.4 kN

    Leeward Rafter Max Axial Force, Frafter,leeward,max -1.0 kN

    Leeward Rafter Shear Force At SectionsN/A N/A N/A N/A N/A kN

    Leeward Rafter Shear Force, Vrafter,leeward 0.2 kN

    Leeward Rafter Bending Moment At Sections N/A N/A N/A kNm

    Leeward Rafter Bending Moment, Mrafter,leeward 0.1 kNm

    Leeward Rafter Utilisation 30%

    [Presented above are effect values at various sections along the member (Attic Roof);]

    Purlin Axial Force, Fpurlin 0.0 kN

    Purlin Shear Force, Vpurlin 3.0 kN

    Purlin Bending Moment, Mpurlin 3.8 kNm

    Purlin Utilisation 241%

    Windward Post Axial Force, Fpost,windward 0.0 kN

    Leeward Post Axial Force, Fpost,leeward 0.0 kN

    Post Shear Force, Vpost 0.0 kN

    Post Bending Moment, Mpost 0.0 kNm

    Post Utilisation 0%

    Rafter ULS,ST,A

    Engineering Calculation Sheet Consulting Engineers

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame

    jXXX 31

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame EC5 v2015.01.xlsm

    Tie-Beam

    20/08/2015

    CONSULTING

    E N G I N E E R S

    Design Section

    Design Section

    Design Section

    Design Section

    Made by Date Chd.

    Drg. Ref.

    Member/Location

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    Collar Axial Force Components (Attic Roof) N/A N/A N/A kN

    [Presented above are components due to vertical, windward and leeward loads (Attic Roof);]

    Collar Axial Force, Fcollar 0.0 kN

    Collar Shear Force, Vcollar 0.0 kN

    Collar Bending Moment, Mcollar 0.0 kNm

    Collar Utilisation 0%

    Tie-Beam Axial Force, Ftie-beam 0.7 kN

    Tie-Beam Shear Force, Vtie-beam 1.2 kN

    Tie-Beam Bending Moment, Mtie-beam 1.2 kNm

    Tie-Beam Utilisation 90%

    Binder Axial Force, Fbinder 0.0 kN

    Binder Shear Force, Vbinder 3.3 kN

    Binder Bending Moment, Mbinder 2.4 kNm

    Binder Utilisation 68%

    Rafter to Tie-Beam Connection Force, Fcon,tie-beam 0.7 kN

    Rafter to Tie-Beam Angled Bearing Connection Shear Force N/A kN

    Rafter to Tie-Beam Connection Force Per Fastener Per Shear Plane 0.7 kN

    Angle of Rafter to Tie-Beam Connection Force to the Grain Direction Outer Member, 0.0 degrees

    Angle of Rafter to Tie-Beam Connection Force to the Grain Direction Inner Member, 34.2 degrees

    Check If All Minimum Spacing Requirements Met ? OK

    Design Capacity 1 Shear Plane Without Splitting 2.6 kN

    Design Capacity 1 Shear Plane With Splitting 2.6 kN

    Design Capacity 1 Fastener With Splitting 2.6 kN

    Rafter to Tie-Beam Connection Utilisation 27%

    Rafter to Post Connection Force, Fcon,post 0.0 kN

    Rafter to Post Angled Bearing Connection Shear Force N/A kN

    Rafter to Post Connection Force Per Fastener Per Shear Plane 0.0 kN

    Angle of Rafter to Post Connection Force to the Grain Direction Outer Member, 0.0 degrees

    Angle of Rafter to Post Connection Force to the Grain Direction Inner Member, 55.8 degrees

    Check If All Minimum Spacing Requirements Met ? OK

    Design Capacity 1 Shear Plane Without Splitting 2.5 kN

    Design Capacity 1 Shear Plane With Splitting 2.5 kN

    Design Capacity 1 Fastener With Splitting 2.5 kN

    Rafter to Post Connection Utilisation 0%

    Rafter to Collar Connection Force, Fcon,collar 0.0 kN

    Rafter to Collar Angled Bearing Connection Shear Force N/A kN

    Rafter to Collar Connection Force Per Fastener Per Shear Plane 0.0 kN

    Angle of Rafter to Collar Connection Force to the Grain Direction Outer Member, 0.0 degrees

    Angle of Rafter to Collar Connection Force to the Grain Direction Inner Member, 34.2 degrees

    Check If All Minimum Spacing Requirements Met ? OK

    Design Capacity 1 Shear Plane Without Splitting 2.5 kN

    Design Capacity 1 Shear Plane With Splitting 2.5 kN

    Design Capacity 1 Fastener With Splitting 2.5 kN

    Rafter to Collar Connection Utilisation 0%

    Engineering Calculation Sheet Consulting Engineers jXXX 32

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame EC5 v2015.01.xlsm

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame 20/08/2015

    CONSULTING

    E N G I N E E R S

    Design Section

    Design Section

    Design Connection

    Design Section

    Design Connection

    Design Connection

    Made by Date Chd.

    Drg. Ref.

    Member/Location

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    Steel Beam Axial Force, Fsteelbeam 0.0 kN

    Steel Beam Shear Force, Vsteelbeam 0.0 kN

    Steel Beam Bending Moment, Msteelbeam 0.0 kNm

    Steel Beam Utilisation 0%

    Purlin Vertical Reaction On Windward Hip Rafter, Rp,hip,windward 1.3 kN

    Windward Hip Rafter Top End Axial Force, Fhiprafter,top,windward 1.9 kN

    Windward Hip Rafter Bottom End Axial Force, Fhiprafter,bottom,windward -1.1 kN

    Windward Hip Rafter Shear Force, Vhiprafter,windward 3.6 kN

    Windward Hip Rafter Bending Moment, Mhiprafter,windward 2.9 kNm

    Windward Hip Rafter Utilisation 137%

    Windward Hip Rafter Top Support Connection Force, Fcon,top,hiprafter,windward 4.5 kN

    Windward Hip Rafter Bottom Support Connection Force, Fcon,bottom,hiprafter,windward2.5 kN

    Windward Hip Rafter Bottom Support Angled Bearing Connection Shear Force1.1 kN

    Purlin Vertical Reaction On Leeward Hip Rafter, Rp,hip,leeward 1.3 kN

    Leeward Hip Rafter Top End Axial Force, Fhiprafter,top,leeward 1.9 kN

    Leeward Hip Rafter Bottom End Axial Force, Fhiprafter,bottom,leeward -1.1 kN

    Leeward Hip Rafter Shear Force, Vhiprafter,leeward 3.6 kN

    Leeward Hip Rafter Bending Moment, Mhiprafter,leeward 2.9 kNm

    Leeward Hip Rafter Utilisation 137%

    Leeward Hip Rafter Top Support Connection Force, Fcon,top,hiprafter,leeward 4.5 kN

    Leeward Hip Rafter Bottom Support Connection Force, Fcon,bottom,hiprafter,leeward2.5 kN

    Leeward Hip Rafter Bottom Support Angled Bearing Connection Shear Force1.1 kN

    Last Closed Couple Wind/Leeward Rafter Additional Axial Force -7.9 kN

    Last Closed Couple Windward Rafter Total Axial Force -8.9 kN

    Last Closed Couple Leeward Rafter Total Axial Force -8.9 kN

    Last Closed Couple Windward Rafter Utilisation 73%

    Last Closed Couple Leeward Rafter Utilisation 73%

    Last Closed Couple Tie-Beam Additional Axial Force 6.6 kN

    Last Closed Couple Tie-Beam Total Axial Force 7.3 kN

    Last Closed Couple Tie-Beam Utilisation 114%

    Last Closed Couple Rafter to Tie-Beam Connection Enhancement Ratio 10.3

    Engineering Calculation Sheet Consulting Engineers jXXX 33

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame EC5 v2015.01.xlsm

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame 20/08/2015

    CONSULTING

    E N G I N E E R S

    Design Section

    Design Section

    Design Section

    Design Section

    Design Section

    Made by Date Chd.

    Drg. Ref.

    Member/Location

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    Combination B (ULS,MT/ST,B) (Downward Critical)

    Vertical [1.4pDL,RAFTER+1.4pSDL+0.0pLL+0.0pSNOW].s 0.2 kN/m

    Windward [1.4pWIND,d,windward].s -0.1 kN/m

    Leeward [1.4pWIND,d,leeward].s -0.4 kN/m

    ULS,MT,B [1.4pDL,TIE-BEAM+1.4pSDL,FLR+0.0pLL,FLR].s 0.2 kN/m

    PULS,MT,B 0.0CPLL 0.0 kN

    Steel Beam ULS,B SgnMaxAbs(Fpost,windward, Fpost,leeward)/s+1.4 4.6 kN/m

    Rafter Vertical Reaction Windward, RV,windward,rafter 0.2 kN

    Rafter Vertical Reaction Leeward, RV,leeward,rafter 0.1 kN

    Rafter Vertical Max Downdrag Reaction, RV = MAX (RV,windward,rafter, R 0.2 kN

    Rafter Vertical Max Uplift Reaction, RV = ABS (MIN (RV,windward,rafter, R 0.0 kN

    Rafter Horizontal Reaction Windward, RH,windward,rafter 0.0 kN

    Rafter Horizontal Reaction Leeward, RH,leeward,rafter -0.3 kN

    Rafter Horizontal Max Reaction, RH = MAX (ABS(RH,windward,rafter), ABS(R 0.3 kN

    Tie-Beam Vertical Reaction, RV,tie-beam 0.2 kN

    Windward Rafter Axial Force At SectionsN/A N/A N/A N/A kN

    Windward Rafter Min Axial Force, Frafter,windward,min 0.1 kN

    Windward Rafter Max Axial Force, Frafter,windward,max -0.3 kN

    Windward Rafter Shear Force At SectionsN/A N/A N/A N/A N/A kN

    Windward Rafter Shear Force, Vrafter,windward 0.1 kN

    Windward Rafter Bending Moment At Sections N/A N/A N/A kNm

    Windward Rafter Bending Moment, Mrafter,windward 0.0 kNm

    Windward Rafter Utilisation 23%

    [Presented above are effect values at various sections along the member (Attic Roof);]

    Leeward Rafter Axial Force At SectionsN/A N/A N/A N/A kN

    Leeward Rafter Min Axial Force, Frafter,leeward,min 0.0 kN

    Leeward Rafter Max Axial Force, Frafter,leeward,max -0.4 kN

    Leeward Rafter Shear Force At SectionsN/A N/A N/A N/A N/A kN

    Leeward Rafter Shear Force, Vrafter,leeward -0.2 kN

    Leeward Rafter Bending Moment At Sections N/A N/A N/A kNm

    Leeward Rafter Bending Moment, Mrafter,leeward -0.1 kNm

    Leeward Rafter Utilisation 18%

    [Presented above are effect values at various sections along the member (Attic Roof);]

    Purlin Axial Force, Fpurlin 0.0 kN

    Purlin Shear Force, Vpurlin 1.2 kN

    Purlin Bending Moment, Mpurlin 1.5 kNm

    Purlin Utilisation 213%

    Windward Post Axial Force, Fpost,windward 0.0 kN

    Leeward Post Axial Force, Fpost,leeward 0.0 kN

    Post Shear Force, Vpost 0.0 kN

    Post Bending Moment, Mpost 0.0 kNm

    Post Utilisation 0%

    20/08/2015Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame

    Engineering Calculation Sheet Consulting Engineers

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame EC5 v2015.01.xlsm

    jXXX

    Rafter ULS,ST,B

    Tie-Beam

    34

    CONSULTING

    E N G I N E E R S

    Design Section

    Design Section

    Design Section

    Design Section

    Made by Date Chd.

    Drg. Ref.

    Member/Location

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    Collar Axial Force Components (Attic Roof) N/A N/A N/A kN

    [Presented above are components due to vertical, windward and leeward loads (Attic Roof);]

    Collar Axial Force, Fcollar 0.0 kN

    Collar Shear Force, Vcollar 0.0 kN

    Collar Bending Moment, Mcollar 0.0 kNm

    Collar Utilisation 0%

    Tie-Beam Axial Force, Ftie-beam 0.1 kN

    Tie-Beam Shear Force, Vtie-beam 0.2 kN

    Tie-Beam Bending Moment, Mtie-beam 0.1 kNm

    Tie-Beam Utilisation 13%

    Binder Axial Force, Fbinder 0.0 kN

    Binder Shear Force, Vbinder 1.8 kN

    Binder Bending Moment, Mbinder 1.3 kNm

    Binder Utilisation 35%

    Rafter to Tie-Beam Connection Force, Fcon,tie-beam 0.1 kN

    Rafter to Tie-Beam Angled Bearing Connection Shear Force N/A kN

    Rafter to Tie-Beam Connection Force Per Fastener Per Shear Plane 0.1 kN

    Angle of Rafter to Tie-Beam Connection Force to the Grain Direction Outer Member, 0.0 degrees

    Angle of Rafter to Tie-Beam Connection Force to the Grain Direction Inner Member, 34.2 degrees

    Check If All Minimum Spacing Requirements Met ? OK

    Design Capacity 1 Shear Plane Without Splitting 2.6 kN

    Design Capacity 1 Shear Plane With Splitting 2.6 kN

    Design Capacity 1 Fastener With Splitting 2.6 kN

    Rafter to Tie-Beam Connection Utilisation 4%

    Rafter to Post Connection Force, Fcon,post 0.0 kN

    Rafter to Post Angled Bearing Connection Shear Force N/A kN

    Rafter to Post Connection Force Per Fastener Per Shear Plane 0.0 kN

    Angle of Rafter to Post Connection Force to the Grain Direction Outer Member, 0.0 degrees

    Angle of Rafter to Post Connection Force to the Grain Direction Inner Member, 55.8 degrees

    Check If All Minimum Spacing Requirements Met ? OK

    Design Capacity 1 Shear Plane Without Splitting 2.5 kN

    Design Capacity 1 Shear Plane With Splitting 2.5 kN

    Design Capacity 1 Fastener With Splitting 2.5 kN

    Rafter to Post Connection Utilisation 0%

    Rafter to Collar Connection Force, Fcon,collar 0.0 kN

    Rafter to Collar Angled Bearing Connection Shear Force N/A kN

    Rafter to Collar Connection Force Per Fastener Per Shear Plane 0.0 kN

    Angle of Rafter to Collar Connection Force to the Grain Direction Outer Member, 0.0 degrees

    Angle of Rafter to Collar Connection Force to the Grain Direction Inner Member, 34.2 degrees

    Check If All Minimum Spacing Requirements Met ? OK

    Design Capacity 1 Shear Plane Without Splitting 2.5 kN

    Design Capacity 1 Shear Plane With Splitting 2.5 kN

    Design Capacity 1 Fastener With Splitting 2.5 kN

    Rafter to Collar Connection Utilisation 0%

    Engineering Calculation Sheet Consulting Engineers jXXX 35

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame EC5 v2015.01.xlsm

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame 20/08/2015

    CONSULTING

    E N G I N E E R S

    Design Section

    Design Section

    Design Connection

    Design Section

    Design Connection

    Design Connection

    Made by Date Chd.

    Drg. Ref.

    Member/Location

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    Steel Beam Axial Force, Fsteelbeam 0.0 kN

    Steel Beam Shear Force, Vsteelbeam 0.0 kN

    Steel Beam Bending Moment, Msteelbeam 0.0 kNm

    Steel Beam Utilisation 0%

    Purlin Vertical Reaction On Windward Hip Rafter, Rp,hip,windward 0.5 kN

    Windward Hip Rafter Top End Axial Force, Fhiprafter,top,windward 0.9 kN

    Windward Hip Rafter Bottom End Axial Force, Fhiprafter,bottom,windward -0.5 kN

    Windward Hip Rafter Shear Force, Vhiprafter,windward 1.7 kN

    Windward Hip Rafter Bending Moment, Mhiprafter,windward 1.3 kNm

    Windward Hip Rafter Utilisation 110%

    Windward Hip Rafter Top Support Connection Force, Fcon,top,hiprafter,windward 2.0 kN

    Windward Hip Rafter Bottom Support Connection Force, Fcon,bottom,hiprafter,windward1.1 kN

    Windward Hip Rafter Bottom Support Angled Bearing Connection Shear Force0.5 kN

    Purlin Vertical Reaction On Leeward Hip Rafter, Rp,hip,leeward -0.8 kN

    Leeward Hip Rafter Top End Axial Force, Fhiprafter,top,leeward -0.6 kN

    Leeward Hip Rafter Bottom End Axial Force, Fhiprafter,bottom,leeward 0.4 kN

    Leeward Hip Rafter Shear Force, Vhiprafter,leeward -1.0 kN

    Leeward Hip Rafter Bending Moment, Mhiprafter,leeward -0.9 kNm

    Leeward Hip Rafter Utilisation 78%

    Leeward Hip Rafter Top Support Connection Force, Fcon,top,hiprafter,leeward -1.5 kN

    Leeward Hip Rafter Bottom Support Connection Force, Fcon,bottom,hiprafter,leeward-0.9 kN

    Leeward Hip Rafter Bottom Support Angled Bearing Connection Shear ForceN/A kN

    Last Closed Couple Wind/Leeward Rafter Additional Axial Force -0.5 kN

    Last Closed Couple Windward Rafter Total Axial Force -0.8 kN

    Last Closed Couple Leeward Rafter Total Axial Force -0.9 kN

    Last Closed Couple Windward Rafter Utilisation 52%

    Last Closed Couple Leeward Rafter Utilisation 48%

    Last Closed Couple Tie-Beam Additional Axial Force 0.4 kN

    Last Closed Couple Tie-Beam Total Axial Force 0.5 kN

    Last Closed Couple Tie-Beam Utilisation 41%

    Last Closed Couple Rafter to Tie-Beam Connection Enhancement Ratio 5.1

    36

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame 20/08/2015

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame EC5 v2015.01.xlsm

    Engineering Calculation Sheet Consulting Engineers jXXX

    CONSULTING

    E N G I N E E R S

    Design Section

    Design Section

    Design Section

    Design Section

    Design Section

    Made by Date Chd.

    Drg. Ref.

    Member/Location

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    Combination C (ULS,MT/ST,C) (Upward Critical)

    Vertical [1.0pDL,RAFTER+1.0pSDL+0.0pLL+0.0pSNOW].s 0.2 kN/m

    Windward [1.4pWIND,u,windward].s -0.3 kN/m

    Leeward [1.4pWIND,u,leeward].s -0.4 kN/m

    ULS,MT,C [1.0pDL,TIE-BEAM+1.0pSDL,FLR+0.0pLL,FLR].s 0.1 kN/m

    PULS,MT,C 0.0CPLL 0.0 kN

    Steel Beam ULS,C SgnMaxAbs(Fpost,windward, Fpost,leeward)/s+1.0 3.3 kN/m

    Rafter Vertical Reaction Windward, RV,windward,rafter -0.1 kN

    Rafter Vertical Reaction Leeward, RV,leeward,rafter -0.1 kN

    Rafter Vertical Max Downdrag Reaction, RV = MAX (RV,windward,rafter, R 0.0 kN

    Rafter Vertical Max Uplift Reaction, RV = ABS (MIN (RV,windward,rafter, R 0.1 kN

    Rafter Horizontal Reaction Windward, RH,windward,rafter -0.2 kN

    Rafter Horizontal Reaction Leeward, RH,leeward,rafter -0.3 kN

    Rafter Horizontal Max Reaction, RH = MAX (ABS(RH,windward,rafter), ABS(R 0.3 kN

    Tie-Beam Vertical Reaction, RV,tie-beam 0.2 kN

    Windward Rafter Axial Force At SectionsN/A N/A N/A N/A kN

    Windward Rafter Min Axial Force, Frafter,windward,min 0.3 kN

    Windward Rafter Max Axial Force, Frafter,windward,max 0.0 kN

    Windward Rafter Shear Force At SectionsN/A N/A N/A N/A N/A kN

    Windward Rafter Shear Force, Vrafter,windward -0.1 kN

    Windward Rafter Bending Moment At Sections N/A N/A N/A kNm

    Windward Rafter Bending Moment, Mrafter,windward 0.0 kNm

    Windward Rafter Utilisation 10%

    [Presented above are effect values at various sections along the member (Attic Roof);]

    Leeward Rafter Axial Force At SectionsN/A N/A N/A N/A kN

    Leeward Rafter Min Axial Force, Frafter,leeward,min 0.2 kN

    Leeward Rafter Max Axial Force, Frafter,leeward,max -0.1 kN

    Leeward Rafter Shear Force At SectionsN/A N/A N/A N/A N/A kN

    Leeward Rafter Shear Force, Vrafter,leeward -0.2 kN

    Leeward Rafter Bending Moment At Sections N/A N/A N/A kNm

    Leeward Rafter Bending Moment, Mrafter,leeward -0.1 kNm

    Leeward Rafter Utilisation 8%

    [Presented above are effect values at various sections along the member (Attic Roof);]

    Purlin Axial Force, Fpurlin 0.0 kN

    Purlin Shear Force, Vpurlin -1.5 kN

    Purlin Bending Moment, Mpurlin -1.9 kNm

    Purlin Utilisation 75%

    Windward Post Axial Force, Fpost,windward 0.0 kN

    Leeward Post Axial Force, Fpost,leeward 0.0 kN

    Post Shear Force, Vpost 0.0 kN

    Post Bending Moment, Mpost 0.0 kNm

    Post Utilisation 0%

    37

    Engineering Calculation Sheet Consulting Engineers jXXX

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame EC5 v2015.01.xlsm

    Structure Design - Timber Portal Frame 20/08/2015

    Tie-Beam

    Rafter ULS,ST,C

    CONSULTING

    E N G I N E E R S

    Design Section

    Design Section

    Design Section

    Design Section

    Made by Date Chd.

    Drg. Ref.

    Member/Location

  • Job No. Sheet No. Rev.

    Job Title

    XX

    EC5 Ref

    Collar Axial Force Components (Attic Roof) N/A N/A N/A kN

    [Presented above are components due to vertical, windward and leeward loads (Att