Jeffrey Hwang Winning by Power Alland Chee, Elvis Lin, Joe Wong and Jeffrey H. Hwang Design a 100W...
-
Upload
sarah-drake -
Category
Documents
-
view
251 -
download
2
Transcript of Jeffrey Hwang Winning by Power Alland Chee, Elvis Lin, Joe Wong and Jeffrey H. Hwang Design a 100W...
Jeffrey HwangWinning by Power
Alland Chee, Elvis Lin, Joe Wong
and
Jeffrey H. Hwang
Design a 100WPFC Boost Inductor
Jeffrey HwangWinning by Power
Criteria of Selection
Size
Efficiency
Cost
Jeffrey HwangWinning by Power
• R=S: [ ] Magnetic Reluctance=The resistance of a material to a magnetic field
• Φ: [Weber] Magnetic Flux=A measure of quantity of magnetism.
• B: [Tesla]=[ Gauss] Magnetic Field=Flux Density=Magnetic Induction
• H: [ ] Magnetic Field Strength=Magnetic Force=MMF per length
Review Important Magnetic Variablesand
Important Magnetic Constants
• • 1[Tesla]=1[Weber/Meter2]=104
[Gauss]=1[Newton/(Ampere x Meter)]
• 1[Weber]=1[Wb]=108Maxwell• [L]=1[henry]=1[Volt x
Sec/Ampere]=1[Wb/Amp]• μ0=Air Permeability
Constant=4π x 10-7 [Tesla Meter/Ampere]
weber
turnampere
410
Meter
TurnAmpere
][0125.0][004.0 OeOeMeter
TurnAmpere
Jeffrey HwangWinning by Power
• R=mmf /ΦB=NI/ΦB=
ιm/(Ac μ)
• Re=Rl + Rair=
ιm/(Ac μ) + ιair/(Ac μair)=
• ΦB=
• L=N ΦB/I=N2/Re=
Important Magnetic Formula
• B=μ H= μ x mmf/leff=
ΦB/Ac= μ x N x I/leff=
L x I/(N x Aac)
)(1
air
airairA
mc
m
ceff AIN
cIN
NIL AB
m
ceff AN
2
Jeffrey HwangWinning by Power
Bmax= Constant @ given material
PC95:Bmax~350mTPC44:Bmax~300mTPC40:Bmax~270mT
Jeffrey HwangWinning by Power
NImax= Constant @ lair, air gap is fixed
Jeffrey HwangWinning by Power
Sundest, MPP, Ferrite…?
Experiment 1st:
Selecting the best Magnetic Material
Jeffrey HwangWinning by Power
Selecting Magnetic Materials
Taiwan AC Adaptor Measurement with different Inductor Materials
83.85%1.2117mH
83.67%0.888mH
83.72%1.31mH
85.91%0.62mH 85.55%
1.2182mH85.53%
1.8382mH84.55%3.08mH
85.89%1.08mH85.35%
0.637mH
85.60%0.533mH84.97%
1.274mH
86.01%1.112mH85.58%
0.988mH85.32%
0.861mH84.62%0.4645mH
85.12%0.4645mH
85.88%0.4645mH
84.86%0.625mH
85.62%0.4295mH
86.97%0.427mH
85.81%0.333mH
85.92%0.288mH
82.00
83.00
84.00
85.00
86.00
87.00
88.00
TF (S
unde
st, O
rigin
al)
TF (8
1 tur
ns w
/ AW
G22
gua
ge w
ire)
TF (1
04 tu
rns
w/ AW
G24 g
uage
wire
)M
PPM
PP
MPP
(0.6
2mH+1
.218
2mH)
Ferri
te (F
rom
ML6
800
Boar
d)
PC95
PC95
PC95 (1
.08m
H//1.0
8mH
)
PC95 (0
.637m
H+0.6
37mH)
PC95, 3
0mils
PC95, 3
0mils
PC95, 3
0mils
PC95, 3
0mils
PC95, 3
0mils
, rea
ch IL
IMIT
PC95, 3
0mils
PC95, R
M8,
36m
ils
PC95, R
M8,
44m
ils
PC95, R
M6,
20m
ils, M
ax P
ower
PC95, R
M6,
30m
ils, M
ax P
ower
PC95, R
M8,
30m
ils
Inductor Materials
Eff
icie
nc
y (
%)
Eff. (%)
Ferrite and MPP have the higher efficiency performance.Ferrite is our selection.
Jeffrey HwangWinning by Power
Ferrite is our selection for Po=100W
Ferrite is Cost Effectiveand
Ferrite Core Loss (AC Loss) is much less
DCR seems dominates the efficiency with Ferrite Core!Let us prove it here!
Jeffrey HwangWinning by Power
290uH or 1mH?
Experiment 2nd:
DCR and switching frequency is fixedWinding Factor is not optimal.
Jeffrey HwangWinning by Power
Eff. (%) vs L (mH)Constant Indcutor Resistance (DCR=0.46 ohm), fSW=67.5kHz
PC95, RM8, lg=30mils
86.01%
85.58%85.32%
84.62%84.50
85.00
85.50
86.00
86.50
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
L (mH)
Eff
icie
ncy
(%
)
Eff. (%)
With fixed DCR=0.46 ohm and fixed fsw=67.5Khz, Po=100 W and Vo=19V AC Adapter
Higher Efficiency with Higher Inductor?but
it is miss-leading!
Jeffrey HwangWinning by Power
We have learned:
Without the Space Limit,Higher inductance will have the higher efficiency.
Jeffrey HwangWinning by Power
Should we go higher frequency to solve the space issue?
Experiment 3th:
With RM8 and RM6, we fixed crest factor, r=0.95and
Winding Factor is Optimal with the giving bubbin.
Jeffrey HwangWinning by Power
Po=100W, PFC boost OnlyConstant r=crest factor=Ip-p/Irms=0.95
with Constant r=0.95
Higher Efficiency with Higher Inductance?Higher Efficiency with Lower Frequency?
Again, it is miss-leading! From above data, to improve efficiency, we only know that
we should reduce frequency to trade efficiency.
Efficiency (%) vs Freq (kHz)PC40, Crest Factor = 0.95
Efficiency Difference of RM6 = 0.74%Efficiency Difference of RM8 = 1.09%
93.39%
92.76%
92.65%
93.84%93.70%
93.04%92.75%
92.5
93
93.5
94
0 50 100 150 200 250
Freq (kHz)
Eff
icie
ncy
(%
)
RM6
RM8
L (mH) vs Freq (kHz)PC40, Crest Factor = 0.95
0.438
0.303
0.14
0.432
0.3017
0.198
0.141
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0 50 100 150 200 250
Freq (kHz)
L (
mH
)
RM6
RM8
Jeffrey HwangWinning by Power
We have learned:
With the given space, frequency should be as low as possible before the core is saturated.
The Lower Frequency provides the Higher Efficiency
Jeffrey HwangWinning by Power
What will happen with fixed switching frequency?
Experiment 4th:
Optimal Winding Factor for RM8 and fsw = 67.5Khz
Jeffrey HwangWinning by Power
fsw=67.5Khz with CM6800 100W demo board
Efficiency (%) vs L (mH)6800 Board
PC40, RM8, Constant fSW = 67.5kHz
93.75
93.21
92.14
92.75
93.14
92.7292.54
93.37
92.9
9292.2
92.492.6
92.893
93.2
93.493.6
93.894
0 0.5 1 1.5
L (m H)
Eff
icie
nc
y (
%) Pin ~ 110W
Adj Pin Compared toMeasurement on ACAdaptor Board
L=442uH is the Highest Efficiency one; Crest Factor, r~1
Jeffrey HwangWinning by Power
fsw=100Khz with CM6800 100W demo board
L=295uH is the Highest Efficiency one; Crest Factor, r~1
Efficiency (%) vs L (mH)6800 Board
PC40, RM8, Constant fSW = 100kHz
93.75
93.15
93.63
93.75
93.1
93.2
93.3
93.4
93.5
93.6
93.7
93.8
0 0.5 1 1.5
L (mH)
Eff
icie
ncy
(%
)
Pin ~ 109W
Jeffrey HwangWinning by Power
fsw=100Khz with CM6800 100W demo board
L=295uH is the Highest Efficiency one; Crest Factor, r~1
Efficiency (%) vs DCR (ohm)6800 Board
PC40, RM8, Constant fSW = 100kHz
93.15
93.75 93.75
93.63
93.1
93.2
93.3
93.4
93.5
93.6
93.7
93.8
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
DCR (ohm)
Eff
icie
ncy
(%
)
Pin ~ 109WEfficiency (%) vs L Gap (mils)6800 Board
PC40, RM8, Constant fSW = 100kHz
93.63
93.15
93.75 93.75
93.1
93.2
93.3
93.4
93.5
93.6
93.7
93.8
0 10 20 30 40 50
L Gap (mils)
Eff
icie
ncy
(%
)
Pin ~ 109W Efficiency (%) vs N (turns)6800 Board
PC40, RM8, Constant fSW = 100kHz
93.63
93.7593.75
93.1593.1
93.2
93.3
93.4
93.5
93.6
93.7
93.8
0 20 40 60 80 100
N (turns)
Eff
icie
ncy
(%
)Series1
Jeffrey HwangWinning by Power
fsw=67.5Khz with CM6805 100W AC Adapter
L=295uH is the Highest Efficiency one; Crest Factor, r~1.55
Efficiency (%) vs L (mH)AC Adaptor Board
PC40, RM8, Constant fSW = 67.5kHz
86.04
86.23
85.6185.57
84.88
86.0186.24
85.96
85.43
84.94
84.80
85.00
85.2085.40
85.60
85.80
86.0086.20
86.40
0 0.5 1 1.5
L (mH)
Eff
icie
ncy
(%
) Pin ~ 120W
Adj Pin Compared toMeasurement on6800 Board
Jeffrey HwangWinning by Power
We have learned:
Crest Factor, r~1 to 1.55L=442uH to 295uH for 67.5Khz and L=295uH for
100Khz gives the best efficiency;
It means without saturating the coreReducing DCR, Reducing lg , Reducing N, all will
improve the efficiency.
Jeffrey HwangWinning by Power
Conclusion:
Ferrite: PC95 RM8 (67.5Khz) --- > RM6 (100Khz)
295uHwith CM6805 (PFC+PWM combo IC)
Jeffrey HwangWinning by Power
442uH with fsw = 67.5Khz Vout = 220V, Po = 100W, RM8 and PC 95
• lg = 24 mil• N = 52.5 turns• Pin max = 146.56W• L = 400.58uH x 1.09• Al = 0.1584uH/turn^2
• Ipeak at Sat = 2.3A• DCR = 0.09 ohm
• P core loss ~ 0.39W at Pin max
• P copper loss ~ 0.228W at Pin max
• Total P loss ~ 0.62W at Pin max
• Wire Area = 0.44 mm^2 => AWG=21
Jeffrey HwangWinning by Power
295uH with fsw = 67.5Khz, Vout = 220V, Po = 100W, RM8 and PC 95
• lg = 20 mil• N = 40.5 turns• Pin max = 138.6W• L = 285uH• Al = 0.1738uH/turn^2
• Ipeak at Sat = 2.178A• DCR = 0.05 ohm
• P core loss ~ 0.39W at Pin max
• P copper loss ~ 0.12W at Pin max
• Total P loss ~ 0.51W at Pin max
• Wire Area = 0.57 mm^2 =>AWG=20
Jeffrey HwangWinning by Power
295uH with fsw > 100Khz, Vout = 220V, Po = 100W, RM6 and PC 95
• lg = 32 mil• N = 64.5 turns• Pin max = 118.93W• L = 229uH x 1.23• Al = 0.068uH/turn^2
• Ipeak at Sat = 1.87A• DCR = 0.19 ohm
• P core loss ~ 0.15W at Pin max
• P copper loss ~ 0.33W at Pin max
• Total P loss ~ 0.48W at Pin max
• Wire Area = 0.18 mm^2 =>AWG=25
Jeffrey HwangWinning by Power100W AC Adapter without SR
Efficiency vs. LoadWith 295uH(RM8), 442uH(RM8) and 303uH(RM6)
at fsw = 67.5KhzAC Adaptor Board
Efficiency (%) vs PO (W)
PC95, VIN=90VRMS, RVCC-IAC=25kohm
RM8, L=295uH, DCR=0.1ohm, lg=20mils, N=40RM8, L=442uH, DCR=0.15ohm, lg=20mils, N=50RM6, L=303uH, DCR=0.33ohm, lg=30mils, N=64
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
0 20 40 60 80 100
PO (W)
Eff
icie
nc
y (
%)
RM8, L=295uH, DCR=0.1ohm, lg=20mils, N=40
RM8, L=442uH, DCR=0.15ohm, lg=20mils, N=50
RM6, L=303uH, DCR=0.33ohm, lg=30mils, N=64
Jeffrey HwangWinning by Power
AC Adaptor BoardEfficiency (%) vs Line Voltage (VRMS)
PC95, RVCC-IAC=25kohm
RM8, L=295uH, DCR=0.1ohm, lg=20mils, N=40RM8, L=442uH, DCR=0.15ohm, lg=20mils, N=50
RM6, L=303uH, DCR=0.33ohm, lg=30mils, N=64
85.586
86.5
8787.5
8888.5
8989.5
89 139 189 239
VIN (VRMS)
Eff
icie
ncy
(%
)
RM8, L=295uH, DCR=0.1ohm, lg=20mils, N=40
RM8, L=442uH, DCR=0.15ohm, lg=20mils, N=50
RM6, L=303uH, DCR=0.33ohm, lg=30mils, N=64
100W AC Adapter without SREfficiency vs. Vin
With 295uH(RM8), 442uH(RM8) and 303uH(RM6)at fsw = 67.5Khz
Po=100WPo=66W
Jeffrey HwangWinning by Power100W AC Adapter with SR and without SR
Efficiency vs. VinWith 442uH(RM8)at fsw = 67.5Khz
100W AC AdapterEfficiency with and without SR
84
86
88
90
92
80 130 180 230
Vin (Vrms)
Effi
cien
cy (%
)
without SR
with SR
Measure the Efficiency Data at the end of cables.