Jan 17, 2007 Measuring Mass Difference using soft τ P T Slope 1 Measuring Mass Difference at LHC...

26
Jan 17, 2007 Measuring Mass Difference using soft τ P T Slope 1 0 1 1 ~ - ~ Measuring Mass Difference at LHC using soft τ P T Slope 1 1 ~ - ~ Alfredo Gurrola in collaboration with Richard Arnowitt, Bhaskar Dutta, Teruki Kamon, David Toback, Abram Krislock, Nikolay Kolev (Regina, Canada)
  • date post

    20-Dec-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    219
  • download

    0

Transcript of Jan 17, 2007 Measuring Mass Difference using soft τ P T Slope 1 Measuring Mass Difference at LHC...

Jan 17, 2007

Measuring Mass Difference using soft τ PT Slope 1

011

~ - ~

Measuring Mass Difference

at LHC using soft τ PT Slope

11~ - ~

Alfredo Gurrolain collaboration with

Richard Arnowitt, Bhaskar Dutta, Teruki Kamon,

David Toback, Abram Krislock,

Nikolay Kolev (Regina, Canada)

Jan 17, 2007

Measuring Mass Difference using soft τ PT Slope 2

011

~ - ~

Outline

SUSY Signature at the LHC

Analysis Methods in 2& 3 Papers

Gaugino Universality

Measuring M in a Non-Universal SUGRA model

Simultaneous measurement of model parameters to test Universality

Jan 17, 2007

Measuring Mass Difference using soft τ PT Slope 3

011

~ - ~

SUSY at LHC 1. , Production is dominant SUSY process at LHC ( )

2. Interested in events with or pairs

3. & Branching Ratios are ~ 97%

4. In Coannihilation Region of SUSY Parameter Space: GeV

g~ q~

Soft

Soft

p p p

g~

q~

01

~

02

~

~

q

q~q

q

~ 01

~

02

~

p

g~

q~

01

~

02

~

~

1

~

q

q~q

q

~ 01

~

Soft

Hard Hard

Hard

ggqqgqpp ~~ ,~~ ,~~02

02

021

02

01

~~ ,~~ ,~~

15 - 5 ~~~ 011

11102

~~ ~~

Jan 17, 2007

Measuring Mass Difference using soft τ PT Slope 4

011

~ - ~

Looking Back at 2 & 3 Papers 1. Use Hadronically Decaying ’s

2. Sort τ’s by ET (ET1 > ET2 > …) & use OS-LS

method to extract pairs from the decays

on a statistical basis

3. Use Counting Method (NOS-LS) & Ditau

Invariant Mass (M) to measure

mass difference

4.

5.

2~

2~

2~

2~

~

1

01

02

102

11

M

M

M

MMM end

),,( 02

~~ MMMfN gLSOS

),(

),(

0.8m~M & 2.8m~M

tyUniversali Gaugino Assume

~

~

1/2χ~1/2g~ 02

MMgM

MMfN

gend

gLSOS

hep-ph/0603128

hep-ph/0608193

02

~

Jan 17, 2007

Measuring Mass Difference using soft τ PT Slope 5

011

~ - ~

Non-Universal SUGRA

g~q~

02

~

01

~~

1

~

g~

g~

02

~

02

~

Non-Universal SUGRA

Methods used in 2 & 3 papers

depend on Gaugino Unification

Those methods can’t be used in

a Non-Universal SUGRA model

without using another observable!

How can we measure M?

SUSY Mass Hierarchy

M ~ 5 – 15 GeV

Jan 17, 2007

Measuring Mass Difference using soft τ PT Slope 6

011

~ - ~

PT STUDY

Slope of the soft PT distribution has a M dependence

hep-ph/0603128

01

~~

Slope of PT distribution contains ΔM Information.

Jan 17, 2007

Measuring Mass Difference using soft τ PT Slope 7

011

~ - ~

EVENTS WITH CORRECT FINAL STATE (2 OR 3) - 2 + 2j + ETmiss

APPLY CUTS TO REDUCE SM BACKGROUND (W+jets, …)

ETmiss > 180 GeV, ET

j1 > 100 GeV, ETj2 > 100 GeV, ET

miss + ETj1 + ET

j2 > 600 GeV

ORDER TAUS BY PT & APPLY CUTS ON TAUS: WE EXPECT A SOFT AND A HARD

PTall > 20 GeV, PT

1 > 40 GeV

LOOK AT PAIRS AND CATEGORIZE THEM AS OPPOSITE SIGN (OS) OR LIKE SIGN (LS)

OS: FILL LOW OS PT HISTOGRAM WITH PT OF SOFTER

FILL HIGH OS PT HISTOGRAM WITH PT OF HARDER

LS: FILL LOW LS PT HISTOGRAM WITH PT OF SOFTER

FILL HIGH LS PT HISTOGRAM WITH PT OF HARDER

LOW OS

HIGH OS

LOW LS

HIGH LS

LOW OS-LS

HIGH OS-LS

Extracting Pairs from Decays02

~

Jan 17, 2007

Measuring Mass Difference using soft τ PT Slope 8

011

~ - ~

PT STUDY ISAJET 7.64 to simulate our model of SUSY production

TAUOLA to re-decay the ’s

Run generated particles through detector simulator, PGS4 (author:

John Conway) using CMS parameter file

Used reconstructed jets

Used generator level ’s after being re-decayed by TAUOLA

- “visible” values of momentum and energy were used

Separate Monte Carlo routine in ROOT to simulate the effects of

identification efficiency and jet to fake rate

Jan 17, 2007

Measuring Mass Difference using soft τ PT Slope 9

011

~ - ~

OS

OS-LS

LS

GeVM

GeVM

g 831

6.10

~

ETmiss + 2j + 2Analysis: PT

soft

[1] ETmiss , at least 2 jets, at least 2 ’s with PT

vis > 20, 40 GeV

[2] = 50% , fake rate 1%

[3] Cuts: ETjet1 > 100 GeV, ET

jet2 > 100 GeV, ETmiss > 180 GeV

ETjet1 + ET

jet2 + ETmiss > 600 GeV

Jan 17, 2007

Measuring Mass Difference using soft τ PT Slope 10

011

~ - ~

Can we still see the dependence of the PT slope on M using OS-LS Method?

PT STUDY

GeVM

GeVM

GeVM

GeVM

GeVM g

0.15

6.10

7.5

286.260

831

02

~

~

Jan 17, 2007

Measuring Mass Difference using soft τ PT Slope 11

011

~ - ~

PT STUDY: ETmiss + 2j + 2

What is the dependence of PT slope on mass & mass?02

~g~

Luminosity = 40 fb-1

GeVM

GeVM

g 831

6.10

~

GeVM

GeVM

286.260

6.10

02

~

PT Slope is insensitive to mass & mass!!02

~g~

What is the dependence on M?

Jan 17, 2007

Measuring Mass Difference using soft τ PT Slope 12

011

~ - ~

Measuring M from the PT Slope

PT STUDY: ETmiss + 2j + 2

Luminosity = 40 fb-1

Jan 17, 2007

Measuring Mass Difference using soft τ PT Slope 13

011

~ - ~

How accurately can M be measured for our reference point?

Considering only the statistical uncertainty:

We can measure M to ~ 6% accuracy at 40 fb-1 & ~ 12% accuracy at 10 fb-1 for mass

of 831 GeV.

g~

PT STUDY: ETmiss + 2j + 2

Jan 17, 2007

Measuring Mass Difference using soft τ PT Slope 14

011

~ - ~

Can parameterize the our observables as functions of M, , &

NOS-LS , to first order, does not depend on mass. A large increase or decrease

in mass is needed to obtain a point that lies outside the error bars Cross-Section is dominated by the gluino mass

02

~02

~

Simultaneous Measurement of Model Parameters

gM ~ 02

~M

Jan 17, 2007

Measuring Mass Difference using soft τ PT Slope 15

011

~ - ~

Simultaneous Measurement of Model Parameters

2~

2~

2~

2~

~

1

01

02

102

11

M

M

M

MMM end

Jan 17, 2007

Measuring Mass Difference using soft τ PT Slope 16

011

~ - ~

Testing Gaugino Unification

CONTOURS OF CONSTANT VALUES ( L = 40 fb-1 )

• Intersection of the central contours

provides the measurement of M,

, &

• Auxilary lines determine the 1

region

• 1st order test on Universality

gM ~ 02

~M

Jan 17, 2007

Measuring Mass Difference using soft τ PT Slope 17

011

~ - ~

SUMMARY

Soft PT distribution is sensitive to M

PT slope is independent of gluino mass and neutralino mass

M can measured to ~ 12% accuracy at 10 fb-1 for our reference point

Methods used in 2 and 3 papers can’t be used in a Non-Universal

SUGRA model

We can combine counting method, ditau invariant mass measurement

and PT slope to test the idea of gaugino unification to first order

Jan 17, 2007

Measuring Mass Difference using soft τ PT Slope 18

011

~ - ~

PROBLEM: OS-LS method does NOT give the “true” slope

PT STUDY

Jan 17, 2007

Measuring Mass Difference using soft τ PT Slope 19

011

~ - ~

PT STUDY – Method I How accurately can we measure M with this method? Assuming the theoretical dependence (‘True’ Fit) of M on Slope:

We can measure M to ~ 8-9% accuracy at 40 fb-1 for mass of 831 GeV.g~

Slope does NOT change

with ~ 10% change in

gluino mass, but the

uncertainty changes due

to change in NOS-LS

Jan 17, 2007

Measuring Mass Difference using soft τ PT Slope 20

011

~ - ~

PT STUDY

BACKGROUND: SM, SUSY, soft ’sfrom the ’s from the is the dominant background!

How can the slope be corrected?

02

~

GeV 22002

~ M

02

~

What causes this difference?

GeV 26002

~ M

Jan 17, 2007

Measuring Mass Difference using soft τ PT Slope 21

011

~ - ~

Correcting the Slope: Method I Defining the measured PT slope by and the theoretical (“true” identification) PT slope by ,

the mean statistical uncertainty on the slope is with the mean

statistical uncertainty of . The shift S due to background effects is given by the mean difference

of the theoretical slope and the measured slope:

The root-mean-square uncertainty is

With these definitions, the CORRECTED measured Slope is

Mim T

im

N

iN 1

Mi

Mstat m

1m

Mim

Mim

N

iN 1

Mi

Ti )m(m

1S

N

iNS

1

2Mi

Ti S)m(m

1

)m( S)(m m Mi

Mi

correctedi S

Jan 17, 2007

Measuring Mass Difference using soft τ PT Slope 22

011

~ - ~

.003166

S .008900

.002032

Mstatm

S

A plot of the distribution of the

shift S between theoretical and

measured values. The shift S is

fairly close to being constant.

A summary of the calculated uncertainties

and shift in GeV.

Correcting the Slope: Method I

Jan 17, 2007

Measuring Mass Difference using soft τ PT Slope 23

011

~ - ~

Correcting the Slope: Method II Soft ’s from is the dominant background By increasing the second PT cut, this source of background can be reduced Other Background (SM & other SUSY Background) is reduced

02

~

GeV 40

GeV 201

T

allT

P

P

GeV 80

GeV 201

T

allT

P

P

GeV 22002

~ M

Jan 17, 2007

Measuring Mass Difference using soft τ PT Slope 24

011

~ - ~

Correcting the Slope: Method II

Jan 17, 2007

Measuring Mass Difference using soft τ PT Slope 25

011

~ - ~

Optimizing PT Cut

Optimized Cut would be ~ 70 – 80 GeV for M = 10.6 GeV

Jan 17, 2007

Measuring Mass Difference using soft τ PT Slope 26

011

~ - ~

GeV 20702

~ M

GeV 27402

~ M