Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400...

37
Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays J.B. Rosenzweig UCLA Department of Physics and Astronomy 21 Ottobre, 2004

Transcript of Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400...

Page 1: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

Inverse Compton Scattering Sourcesfrom Soft X-rays to γ-rays

J.B. RosenzweigUCLA Department of Physics and Astronomy

21 Ottobre, 2004

Page 2: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

Introduction• Inverse Compton scattering provides a path to

4th generation x-ray source• Doppler upshifting of intense laser sources;

“monochromatic” source• Intense electron beam needed• Extremely diverse uses

– High energy density physics (shocks, etc.)– Material sciences

• Cool positron production– High energy physics

• Polarized positron sourcery• Gamma-gamma colliders

– Medicine• Diagnostics (dichromatic coronary angiography)• Enhanced dose therapy

electron beam

laser beam

scattered x-rays

!

!" # !L / 2 1+ cos $( )( )" 2

Page 3: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

Inverse Compton process

(Ultimate time scale limit)

Page 4: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

Choice of time structure

Page 5: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

The luminosity problem

• Photon creation as in HEP colliders• Very tight foci (σx2) needed for both laser and e-beam• Laser problems:

– Large “emittance” (λ/4π),• short Rayleigh range (depth of focus)• Large angles (initial condition variation)

– Final mirror damage; laser “exhaust” handling– Large Nl means high power, large field - nonlinear scattering

• Electron beam problems:– Achieving ultra-short beta-functions– Chromatic aberrations

!

N" =N

lN

e#

4$%x

2

&

' (

)

* + % th

Page 6: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

Shock physics

• Fundamental material studies for ICF, etc.• Pump-probe systems with high power lasers• EXAFS, Bragg, radiography in fsec time-scale.

Page 7: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

Pair Production

• Pair production forphoton energies abovethreshold

• Moderate positrons– produce ultra-cold beam, or– Use directly for probing

material defects

• Fast, intense sources• Threshold is 260 MeV for

SPARC (800 nm light)– Double the light=> 180 MeV

Positron moderation with standard source

Positron depth for defect profiling

Page 8: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

HEP 1: Gamma-Gamma collisions

• Start with an electron linearcollider

• Collide the electron buncheswith a laser pulse just beforethe IP to produce high energyphotons (100’s GeV)

• Requires:– Lasers

• Pulses of 1J / 1ps @ 11,000pulses / second

• Helical polarization– Optics

• Focus pulses inside the IRwithout interfering with theaccelerator or detector

Page 9: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

HEP 2: Polarized Positron Sourcery

• Start with an 2-7 GeV electron linac (dependent on photon choice)• Collide the electron bunches with a circularly polarized laser pulse to produce high

energy photons (100 MeV)• Convert gammas W target to obtain the positrons• Requires:

– Lasers• Pulses of 1J / 1ps @ 11,000 pulses / second

Page 10: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

Medical uses :Monochromaticcancer therapy

X-R

ay In

tens

ity

X-Ray EnergyTagged Agents Imaged byNoninvasive X-RayAbsorption or DiffractionSpectroscopy

Intensity Increased toDeliver LocalizedRadiation Dose

K-edge (~30 keV)

Time structure is certainly not an advantage…Also can use for dichromatic coronary angiography

Page 11: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

Storage ring-oscillator geometry• Laser oscillator• Compact 50-75 MeV storage ring

– Poor lifetime– Radiation damping with laser

• Low peak flux (1000 photons/pass)• ~100 MHz collision frequency: high average flux• Private company initiative in Palo Alto

High flux X-rays

Laser oscillator

Page 12: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

UCLA ICS activities

• PLEIADES at LLNL– Very mature experiment– Velocity bunching, ultra-short focal length PMQ FF– First physics: dynamic diffraction

• Neptune 10 micron experiment– nonlinear ICS, polarization

• Future activities– PEGASUS ICS for nanoscience– SPARC opportunities?– SLAC FFTB?

Page 13: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

The PLEIADES source

1013

1015

1017

1019

1021

1023

0.010.11101001000104

30 KeV X-ray source capabilities

Pea

k b

rig

htn

ess

( !/s

/(m

m-m

rad

)2/0

.1%

BW

)

Pulse width (ps)

LLNL Thomson Source

ANL-APS Undulators

3rd

gen. synchrotron

wigglers

Laser-plasmasources

LBNL ALS Thomson source

Higher brightness, shorter pulse

• Picosecond Laser-ElectronInterAction for DynamicEvaluation of Structures

• Joint project: LLNL and UCLA• High brightness photoinjector

linac source– 1 nC, 1-10 ps, 35-100 MeV

• FALCON laser– 10 TW, >50 fs, 800 nm source

• Up to 1E9 x-ray photons per pulse?– Not yet…

• Photon energy tunable > 30 kV!

"sc

="l

2# 2 1$ % cos&( )1+ a

l

2 + #'( )2[ ]

Brightness limited by energy?

Page 14: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

The FALCON laser

LLNL advanced technology

Page 15: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

RF Photoinjector and beamline

• UCLA responsibility• 1.6 cell high field S-band

(a la SPARC)– 2854.5 MHz(?!)– Run up to 5.2 MeV

• All magnets from UCLA– Solenoids– Bypass quads/dipoles– Final focus

• High field electromagnets• PMQ system!

Photoinjector and bypasss

Page 16: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

Electron linac

• 35 year old 120 MeVtravelling wave linac

• 4 linac sections– Adjustable phases

for velocity bunching

• Solenoid focusingaround each section

Page 17: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

Velocity bunching for shorter pulses…

• Enhanced photon brightness• Avoid problems of magnet

chicane bunching• Emittance control during

bunching using solenoids aroundlinacs

• Bunching effectively at lowerenergy– Lower final energy spread– Better final focus… still have

chromatic aberrations!Multi-slit phase space

measurement at Neptuneshowing bifurcation in chicane

Page 18: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

PARMELA simulations of velocity bunching

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

dp/p

gamma

!

z (cm)

"!/!

(%)

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

!z (

mm

)

z (cm) -240 -160 -80 0 80 160 240

Curr

ent

(A.U

.)

!z (µm)

Peak=1.1 kA

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

emittancesigma_x

z (cm)

!n (

mm

-mra

d),

"x (

mm

)

Page 19: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

Velocity bunching measurements

• Over factor of 15 bunching shown inCTR measurements

• Better than Neptune “thin-lens”performance

• Next measurements: emittance control

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0 2 4 6 8 10

Au

toco

rrel

atio

n s

ign

al

(no

rmal

ized

)

t (psec)

!t = 0.39 psec

from UCLA filter model analysis

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

Delay (ps)

NO

RM

AL

IZE

D S

IGN

AL

!t = 0.33 ps

Neptune measurements (PWT “thin lens”, no postacceleration)

Recent measurement of velocity bunchingat LLNL PLEIADES

Page 20: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

Start-to-end simulations with final focus…

How did it really work?

Page 21: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

ICS Collisions with velocity bunching:beam quality

0.5% energy spread

0

10

20

30

40

4 6 8 10 12 14

HorizontalVertical

No

rma

lize

d E

imtt

an

ce

(m

m m

rad

)

Compressor Solenoid Current (Amps)

Uncompressed Emittances

Transverse emittance compensation limited by x-y correlations

Page 22: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

Interaction region

Page 23: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

Timing and alignment

Alignment cubeFinal focus e-beam

Falcon laser

• Polished aluminum cube gives for laserand e-beam– Spatial alignment (CCD): few micron– Timing (streak camera): 1 ps

Page 24: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

Photon production

• W/O velocity bunching: 5E6 photons/pulse• With velocity bunching: 1.2E6 photons/pulse• Increase brightness by factor of >4!

W/O VB W/VB

Page 25: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

The problem of the final focus

• Luminosity demands small beams• Compression gives large energy spread

– Chromatic aberrations– Demagnification limit– Cannot remove chromatic aberrations with sextupoles,

etc. Transport too long, costly…• Quadrupole strength problem

– Cannot expand beam; space-charge “decompensation”(also with sextupoles)

– Solution: permanent magnet quadrupoles

!

" *

"0

=1+

#0

f( )2 2" $p

p( )2

1+#0

f( )2

1+2" $p

p( )2%

& ' ( ) *

+#0

f>> p

" $p{ }2"$pp

Page 26: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

Permanent magnet quadrupoles

• PMQs stronger thanEMQs– >600 T/m v. <25 T/m

• PMQs are quite difficultto tune– Need to tune system from

35 to 100 MeV!– Tradeoffs between

tunability, strength,centerline stability

• We decided to not adjuststrength of PMQs… onlychange longitudinal position

AdjustablePQM-10010X-50-2502550Y-50-2502550Z-50-2502550Y

Halbach ring-tuned quad for NLC (UCLA/FNAL/SLAC project), with field map

Page 27: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

UCLA PMQ Final Focus System

• Tunable through longitudinal positioning (like camera optics)• FODO lattice configuration• High precision stepper motor linear actuators• Beam pipe through the center axis of the final focus system

Page 28: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

B-field near bore surface 2D representation of magnetic fields

Magnetic center

PMQ (UCLA)

- 5- 2.502.55X- 505Y- 505Z- 505Z

- 202X- 505Y- 505Z- 505Z

00.511.52Y@mmD550560570580B'@T?mD

Magnetic remnant field: 1.2T

Permanent magnet material: NdFeB

Expected magnetic field gradient:570T/m

The magnetic easy-axis direction in each magnetblock 22.5°10mm in length, 2.5mm in bore

radius, 7.5mm in outer radius

PMQ Simulation (600T/m)

x40 improvementover 15T/m EMQ

Page 29: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

Final Focus System Project Stage

• Extremely challenging engineering• 16-piece Halbach PMQ designed at UCLA & manufactured at a local magnet vendor• PMQ magnetic properties measured with both Hall sensor (field gradient) & pulsed-wire

technique (center alignment & linearity)• Mover system designed to meet with LLNL experimental set-up criteria• The system assembled & installed in the facility in December, 03• Motion-VI control software enabling live-time control remotely in the linac control room

Page 30: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

Beam Transport SimulationElectron Beam energy 30MeV

Electron Beam energy 60MeV

TUNABILITY of PMQ final focus systemβx~1 mm, σx ~10µm spot size

Page 31: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

Beam Measurements

• CCD used to obtain beamimages at alignment cube

• Eelectron=74.1MeV,Q=300pC, εx,y=(9.24,10.9)mm-mrad, βx,y=(3.69,5.16)mm/mrad

• σrms≈15 x 20 µm electronbeam spot size obtained atI.P. for 59-79MeV

• Quad scan performed withPMQ → larger emittancemeasured: 25-30 mm-mrad

• Minimum spots 18x18 micron0.00E+00

5.00E-10

1.00E-09

1.50E-09

2.00E-09

2.50E-09

3.00E-09

3.50E-09

4.00E-09

4.50E-09

0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.009 0.01

z(meter)

rms

sig

ma

^2

Final focus e-beam

Falcon laser

z(m)

σ2 (

m2 )

Page 32: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

Inverse Compton X-rays with PMQ FinalFocus

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

0

50

100

150

200

Ph

oto

n c

ou

nts

(a

.u.)

Divergence angle (pixel)

4.4 x 106 photons (75 keV peak)ps pulse duration

divergence angle(a.u.)x-ray profile

Phot

on c

ount

s (a

.u.)

Page 33: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

Transmission X-ray Spectrometer

LiF bent crystal

Focal length calibrator

Camera electronics

CsI scintillator couple to CCD

Slit aperture

Page 34: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

ICS Positron Source Physics Issues• Need high Compton luminosity• Need very small electron/laser beams• Need very high charge/laser energy• Polarization has strong angular dependence• Polarization dictates avoiding harmonics

– Laser vector potential must be limited

– Do NOT use long λ (10 mm)– USE long λ for nonlinear physics

Page 35: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

Spectrometer for nonlinear ICS…

Transmission x-ray spectrometer

-Transmission spectrometer-Aiming also for LCLS work

Page 36: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

New directions: SAICS• Need higher brightness with short

pulse length• Specific problem SPARC is at too

high energy• Small Angle Inverse Compton

Scattering• Small angle gives

– Lower photon energy with highenergy e-beam; small angle x-rays!

– Luminosity challenges, but higherbrightness

– fs pulse lengths– Larger spectral width

Page 37: Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays · 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 50 100 150 200 x-ray profile Photon counts (a.u.) Divergence angle (pixel) 4.4

Example for SPARC

• “Medical” photons (33 keV)• Moderate energy is excellent regime

!

Ue" = 200 MeV

!

"L

= 800 nm

!

"L

=100 fs

!

"sc

=106 fs

!

" = 21.5 deg

!

UL

=1 J

!

Nsc

= 7 "107

!

dE /E( )sc

= 3.4%

!

"e# = 5 mm

!

"n

= 2 mm - mrad

!

Zr

= 0.4 mm

Input:Beam

Output

Very high brightness at this energy!

(not that small…)

Laser

!

"t

= 0.5 ps

Crossing angle