INT 506/706: Total Quality Management Lec #6, Process Capability.

22
INT 506/706: Total Quality Management Lec #6, Process Capability

Transcript of INT 506/706: Total Quality Management Lec #6, Process Capability.

Page 1: INT 506/706: Total Quality Management Lec #6, Process Capability.

INT 506/706: Total Quality Management

Lec #6, Process Capability

Page 2: INT 506/706: Total Quality Management Lec #6, Process Capability.

Outline

• Individual values vs. averages• Control limits vs. Specs• 6σ spread versus specs• Calculating Process Capability Indices

2

Page 3: INT 506/706: Total Quality Management Lec #6, Process Capability.

Process Capability

Page 4: INT 506/706: Total Quality Management Lec #6, Process Capability.

Individual vs. averages

Page 5: INT 506/706: Total Quality Management Lec #6, Process Capability.

Individual vs. averages

nX

The ability of X-bar to approximate μ is measured by the following equation:

Page 6: INT 506/706: Total Quality Management Lec #6, Process Capability.

Individual vs. averages

24

ˆor ˆd

R

c

s

IF the process can be assumed to be normal, the population standard deviation can be estimated from either

the sample standard deviation (s) or the range (R).

Page 7: INT 506/706: Total Quality Management Lec #6, Process Capability.

Control limits vs Specifications

A process under control exhibits:

1. 2/3 of points near center

2. Few points close to the center

3. Points around centerline

4. Points balanced on both sides

5. No points beyond control limits

6. No patterns or trends

Page 8: INT 506/706: Total Quality Management Lec #6, Process Capability.

Control limits vs Specifications

Page 9: INT 506/706: Total Quality Management Lec #6, Process Capability.

6σ Spread versus Specs

24

ˆor ˆd

R

c

s

3 Possible CASES1) 6σ < USL – LSL2) 6σ = USL – LSL3) 6σ > USL - LSL

Page 10: INT 506/706: Total Quality Management Lec #6, Process Capability.

CASE #1 6σ < USL – LSL

Page 11: INT 506/706: Total Quality Management Lec #6, Process Capability.

CASE #2 6σ = USL – LSL

Page 12: INT 506/706: Total Quality Management Lec #6, Process Capability.

CASE #3 6σ > USL – LSL

Page 13: INT 506/706: Total Quality Management Lec #6, Process Capability.

Calculating 6σ

Assuming process is STABLE and IN CONTROL

1. 20 subgroups of n=4

2. Calculate sample std dev, si, for each sample

3. Calculate average sample std dev,

4. Calculate pop std dev

5. Multiply pop std dev *6

m

ss

m

ii

1

4

ˆc

s

Page 14: INT 506/706: Total Quality Management Lec #6, Process Capability.

Example

Page 15: INT 506/706: Total Quality Management Lec #6, Process Capability.

Example

126.0)021.0(6ˆ6

021.09400.0

02.0ˆ

02.021

414.021

015.0...029.0031.0

4

1

c

s

m

ss

m

ii

Page 16: INT 506/706: Total Quality Management Lec #6, Process Capability.

Capability Index Cp

6Cp

LSLUSL

Page 17: INT 506/706: Total Quality Management Lec #6, Process Capability.

Capability Index Cp

794.0126.0

95.1105.12ˆ6

Cp

LSLUSL

EXAMPLE

INTERPRETATION:Process NOT capable (case 3)

Page 18: INT 506/706: Total Quality Management Lec #6, Process Capability.

Capability Ratio, Cr

LSLUSL

6Cr

Inverse of Cp so larger the ratio, the LESS capable the process is of meeting specifications

Page 19: INT 506/706: Total Quality Management Lec #6, Process Capability.

Cpk

3

(min)Cpk

Z

Cp and Cr do not take into account the centering of the process

ˆ)(

ˆ)(Z

LSLXLSLZ

or

XUSLUSL

Where Z(min)=

Page 20: INT 506/706: Total Quality Management Lec #6, Process Capability.

Cpk

Page 21: INT 506/706: Total Quality Management Lec #6, Process Capability.

Cpk

Page 22: INT 506/706: Total Quality Management Lec #6, Process Capability.

Review

• Review pdf file in blackboard – “CapabilityCaseStudy”– Put into Minitab and run capability modules to see

what you come up with• Is it the same as the case study?• Do you understand the interpretation of the case study?