Inflation, Deflation, and the Phillips Curve Inflation Deflation 1.

28
Inflation, Deflation, and the Phillips Curve Inflation Deflation 1

Transcript of Inflation, Deflation, and the Phillips Curve Inflation Deflation 1.

Page 1: Inflation, Deflation, and the Phillips Curve Inflation Deflation 1.

Inflation, Deflation, and the Phillips Curve

Inflation

Deflation

1

Page 2: Inflation, Deflation, and the Phillips Curve Inflation Deflation 1.

Macroeconomics up to now

2

IS-MP

Y

Potential output = AF(K,L)

Ypot

u

i r

Page 3: Inflation, Deflation, and the Phillips Curve Inflation Deflation 1.

Now add inflation

3

IS-MP

Y

Potential output = AF(K,L)

Ypot

u

πe

π

i r

Page 4: Inflation, Deflation, and the Phillips Curve Inflation Deflation 1.

4

Inflation’s history in the US

50

100

150

200250

350

500

1000

15002000

00 25 50 75 00 25 50 75 00

CPI Price index of GDP

Pri

ce (

1865

-191

4 =

100

)

Gold-silverstandardperiod

Page 5: Inflation, Deflation, and the Phillips Curve Inflation Deflation 1.

5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

Core inflation and Fed inflation target rate

Inflation target = 2%

Page 6: Inflation, Deflation, and the Phillips Curve Inflation Deflation 1.

6

How do we measure price indexes?

Consumer price index:- Traditionally a Laspeyres price index (fixed weight

index using early prices)- BLS has introduced an experimental index – the

“chain CPI” – which is a superlative Törnqvist index.

- As with output index, Laspeyres overstates inflation:g(Paasche) < g(Tornqvist), g(Fisher) <

g(Laspeyres)National accounts price indexes

- These are Fisher (superlative) indexes- Fed target uses personal consumption expenditures

price index (Fisher)“Core Inflation”

- removes volatile food and energy and is central target for monetary policy (personal consumption core price index)

Page 7: Inflation, Deflation, and the Phillips Curve Inflation Deflation 1.

7

Paasche

Laspeyres

Superlative: Fisher, Tornqvist

Page 8: Inflation, Deflation, and the Phillips Curve Inflation Deflation 1.

Does it make any difference?Yes, 0.5% per year over 1970-2012

8

0.96

1.00

1.04

1.08

1.12

1.16

1.20

1.24

1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

CPI/Price of PCE[Laspeyres/Fisher]

Page 9: Inflation, Deflation, and the Phillips Curve Inflation Deflation 1.

9

Major topics

1. Why do we care about inflation?2. Modern inflation theory

Page 10: Inflation, Deflation, and the Phillips Curve Inflation Deflation 1.

Why do we care about inflation?

Like temperature, we care mainly about the extremes:

Hyperinflation (> 100% a month)

Deflation (< 0)

10

Page 11: Inflation, Deflation, and the Phillips Curve Inflation Deflation 1.

11

What are costs of inflation?

– Redistribution: inflation redistributes wealth from creditors to debtors (mortgages, pensions).

– Inefficiencies of inflation: shoe leather, menu costs, taxes,...

– Distinguish anticipated from unanticipated inflation (ex ante v. ex post real interest rates)

– Overall, costs appear relatively small at low inflation rates.

– Hyperinflation can destroy price mechanism– Deflation can produce low-level equilibrium

Page 12: Inflation, Deflation, and the Phillips Curve Inflation Deflation 1.

Now to inflation theory in the US

12

Page 13: Inflation, Deflation, and the Phillips Curve Inflation Deflation 1.

13

The Expectations -Augmented Phillips Curve

Fundamentals of theory:1. Unemployment rate (u) determined by interaction of

potential and actual Y by Okun’s Law2. Inflation determined by labor/product market

tightness (u relative to “natural rate of unemployment”*) and expected inflation (πe) – Phillips curve

3. Expected inflation (πe) determined by inflation history and forecasts of future inflation

*natural rate of unemployment (Jones); sometimes called the NAIRU = “non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment” = Goldilocks unemployment rate

Page 14: Inflation, Deflation, and the Phillips Curve Inflation Deflation 1.

14

The Expectations -Augmented Phillips Curve

In algebra:

u - u* = λ (Y – YP)/YP

π= πe - β (u - u*)πe determined by past inflation and expectations process

Page 15: Inflation, Deflation, and the Phillips Curve Inflation Deflation 1.

15

The short-run P.C.

Graph from Economic Report of the President 1969

This was relationship that led Keynesian to believe that P.C. was a good explanation for inflation (1960s)

1. (πe)

Page 16: Inflation, Deflation, and the Phillips Curve Inflation Deflation 1.

16

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Unemployment rate

CP

I in

flatio

n ra

te

1961

1969

Early Phillips Curve

Page 17: Inflation, Deflation, and the Phillips Curve Inflation Deflation 1.

17

Collapse of short-run P.C.

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

U

Pi

1961

1995

1980 This was relationship that led many new classical economists to conclude that Keynesian theories were “fatally flawed” (Lucas and Sargent. 1970s)

Page 18: Inflation, Deflation, and the Phillips Curve Inflation Deflation 1.

18

Mainstream 2-equation inflation model

(1)π(t) = πe(t) + β[u(t) - u*] + ε(t)

(2)πe(t) = π(t-1)

Endogenous variablesπ = rate of price inflationπe = expected rate of inflation (or similar concept)u* = natural rate

Exogenous variablesu = actual unemployment rate (determined by policy and shocks)ε(t) = wage and price shocks (oil prices, exchange rates, globalization, decline of unions, immigration, etc...)t = time

[Note: (2) is backward looking rather than rational expectations.]

Page 19: Inflation, Deflation, and the Phillips Curve Inflation Deflation 1.

19

Simplest 1-equation inflation modelSimplify by assuming no shocks and substituting:

(3) π(t) = π(t-1) - β[u(t) - u*]

(4) Δ π(t) = - β[u(t) - u*]

which is the linear expectations-augmented P.C. model.

Page 20: Inflation, Deflation, and the Phillips Curve Inflation Deflation 1.

20u* = natural rate

π1 = π1e

SRPC1

Short-run Phillips curve

1

Page 21: Inflation, Deflation, and the Phillips Curve Inflation Deflation 1.

21u* = natural rate

π1 = π1e

Moving up short-run Phillips curve

1

2

SRPC1,2

π2

Page 22: Inflation, Deflation, and the Phillips Curve Inflation Deflation 1.

22u* = natural rate

π1 = π1e

Short-run Phillips curve shifts upward with higher inflation expectations

1

2π3

e =π2

SRPC1,2

SRPC3

Page 23: Inflation, Deflation, and the Phillips Curve Inflation Deflation 1.

23u* = natural rate

π1 = π1e

SRPC1,2

SRPC3

1

2

3π3 = π3

e

Now unemployment rate back to the natural rate

Page 24: Inflation, Deflation, and the Phillips Curve Inflation Deflation 1.

24u* = natural rate

π1 = π1e

SRPC1,2

LRPC

SRPC3

1

2

3π3

e =π2

u equals the natural rate in both periods 1 and 3, but the expected and actual inflation rates are higher in period 3.

This diagram shows the way that the SRPC shifts as expected inflation adjusts to higher rate.

Page 25: Inflation, Deflation, and the Phillips Curve Inflation Deflation 1.

25

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Unemployment rate

Ch

an

ge

in c

ore

infla

tion

ra

te

2525

New synthesis of accelerationist PCRough estimate of natural rate for 1960-2012 = 6 percent

Δ π(t) = β[u(t) - u*]u* is u where Δ π(t) =0.

This was the new synthesis developed by Phelps and Friedman (1967-68). It now forms the basis of mainstream macro for large open economies.

Page 26: Inflation, Deflation, and the Phillips Curve Inflation Deflation 1.

Phillips curve at low inflation

26 26u* = natural rate

Does Phillips curve bend because of nominal rigidity at zero inflation?

Controversial, but probably yes.

1-2%

Page 27: Inflation, Deflation, and the Phillips Curve Inflation Deflation 1.

27

Summary onThe Expectations-Augmented Phillips Curve

• u and π are negatively related in short run • no relation between u and π in the long run • short-run PC adjusts up and down as economic agents

adjust their inflation expectations to reality (combination of backward and forward looking expectations).

• Natural rate is u at which inflation tends neither to rise nor fall

Page 28: Inflation, Deflation, and the Phillips Curve Inflation Deflation 1.

Deflation

Deflation = falling price levelThis seldom occurs in modern economy, but sometimes

have near-zero inflation (Japan for two decades, US today).

Problems:- If full-employment interest rate < 0, have liquidity trap- Unstable dynamics: since r = i – π, as π falls have higher real interest rate, lower I, lower Y, and “low-level trap”

Some of the issues involved are discussed in Bullard, Seven Faces. Very interesting discussion!

But this is uncharted territory in modern macro!

28