G z t l o h m l e H M Momentum dependence of the Φ-meson …cmarkert/workshop/Agenda... · 2012....

27
``` March 5-7 th 2012, Michael Hartmann on behalf of the ANKE collaboration Momentum dependence of the Φ-meson nuclear transparency plus new results on pp→ppΦ Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Resonance Workshop at UT Austin

Transcript of G z t l o h m l e H M Momentum dependence of the Φ-meson …cmarkert/workshop/Agenda... · 2012....

Page 1: G z t l o h m l e H M Momentum dependence of the Φ-meson …cmarkert/workshop/Agenda... · 2012. 3. 19. · March 5-7th 2012, Michael Hartmann on behalf of the ANKE collaboration

```

March 5-7th 2012 Michael Hartmann on behalf of the ANKE collaboration

Momentum dependence of the Φ-meson nuclear

transparency ―

plus new results on pprarrppΦ

Mit

glie

d d

er

Helm

holt

z-G

em

ein

schaft

Resonance Workshop at UT Austin

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

2

Scope of the talk

pArarrФ (K+K-) X Tp=283 GeV

COSY facilities and some advertisement

pprarrppФ (K+K-) Tp=283 GeV (76 MeV excess energy)

MH etal nucl-ex12013517 (acc in PRC)

QJ Ye etal nucl-ex12025451

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

3

Circumference ~ 184m

Polarized protons and deuterons

max momentum ~ 37 GeVc

Electron and stochastic cooling

Hadron physics with hadronic probes

COSY ndash experimental facilities

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

4

Advertisement KKΦ production at COSY

(wwwfz-juelichdeikp orMH PoS 057 (2011))

DISTO

COSYKK amp Φ production in pp pd amp dd (world data)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

5

Φ(rarrK+K-) production in pp

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

6

ppppФ total cross sections

ANKE DISTO

only tot

76 MeV (new)

ldquoSsrdquo + pp-FSI

higher PWno pp-FSI

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

7

ppppФ (differential cross sections) at ε= 185 MeV

close to threshold the angular decay

distribution must display a sin2θΦK+

_____________________________

Φ in relative S-wave

transition from 3P1 (pp)-entrance

channel to 1S0 (pp) final-state

clear effect of pp-FSI

MH etal PRL 96 (2006) 242301

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

8

Non-Ф res ppK+K- production at ε= 76 MeV (new)

ldquooutside Φrdquo

no acceptance correction

M (K minus pp)

M (K + pp)F=F pp(q pp) times

F Kp(qKp1)times

F Kp (qKp2)times

F K K

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

9

ratio of exp K+K- inv mass to MC (without KK interaction)

KK production amplitudes (I=01)

pp rarr ppK+K- (total cross section)

+ K-p-FSI+ pp -FSI phase space

ldquoallrdquo

11 ANKE (COSY) DISTO

185 MeV 76 MeV

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

10

ppppФ production at ε= 76 MeV (new)

ldquoinside Φrdquo

no acceptance correction

spin-averaged squared transition matrix element

multiplied by pp-FSI (Jost function)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

11

hellip and final differential distributions at 76 MeV

angular distributions (symmetric about cos θ = 0)

polar decay angle

ANKE DISTO (83 MeV)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

12

hellip and final differential distributions at 76 MeV

185 MeV (for comparison)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

13

hellip and ppФ total cross section dilemma

full

Ps

Pp

SpSs

76 MeV

Simplest way out A Φp threshold enhancement leads to a significant energy dependence of some of the AL l coefficients

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

14

Φ(rarrK+K-) production in pA

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

15

Meson spectral function

Φ is a long-lived meson

λdec

= ħcΓ0= 44 fm gtgt R(Au)

Ф in free space

(PDG 2008)

M0 ndash pole mass Γ

0 ndash meson width

M0 = 10195 GeV

Γ0 = 426 MeV

S (M )=1π

Γ02

(MminusM 0)2+(Γ02)

2

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

16

Φ in nuclear matter

A general picture of numerous studies in different approaches eg effective Lagrangians and QCD sum rules

- mass modification is small

- main medium effect on the Ф is a significant increase of its width by up to an order of magnitude

Meson spectral function

SlowastM =

1

0minus2ImU opt 2

MminusM 0ReU opt20minus2ImUopt 2

2

Γlowast

lowast

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

17

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Study of the meson spectral function - measure low momentum Φs via leptonic decays Not really done yet

- Φrarre+e- (BR = 310-4)

- ΦrarrK+K- (BR = 049 K- FSI hadronic potential)

KEK-PS pA 12 GeV Γ asymp 15 MeV m asymp -34)

RMuto et al PRL 98 (2007) 042501

Φrarre+e-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

18

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

19

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment COSY experiment at ANKE

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

Reaction pA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayp-Energy 283 GeV ( ε free NNasymp 76MeV )Targets C Cu Ag Au

Momentum and (06 ― 16) GeVcangular range 0ole Θ

Φle 8o

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

20

ANKE ndash forward angle magnetic spectrometer at internal target position of COSY

Fd

Pd

Nd

Pd ndash positive detector system Fd ndash forward detector system Nd ndash negative detector system(STT ndash silicon tracking telescope)

STT

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

21

Ф K+K- selection

all

delayed

7000ndash10000 Φs for each target (C Cu Ag Au)

all K+

K+K-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

22

T A=

A

A

N

Normalization of Φ production cross section

A

C=N

A

N

C

N

C

N

A

A

C

R=T A

T C

=12A

A

C nuclear transparency ratio

To normalize the Φ production cross section we use the known pion data

We present the A-dependence of the Φ production in the following form

A

C= A12 π+ p = 05 GeVc Θ ~ 00

απ = 038 plusmn 002 ( 283GeV)

The Φ-meson yield (production cross section) follows a target mass

dependence of A056 plusmn 003

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

23

Transparency ratios experiment

ANKE

Any interpretation of the transparency ratio has to rely on a detailed theoretical treatment

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

24

Transparency ratios experiment and models

ANKE

VMagas et al PRC 71 (2005) 065202LRoca (private communication)

ValenciaEOset et alMC amp Chiral Unitary Approach

EParyev JPhys G 36 (2009) 015103

MoscowEParyevNuclear Spectral Function Approach

HSchade BKaumlmpfer (private communication) cf PRC 81 (2010) 034902

RossendorfBKaumlmpfer et alBUU

Relevant features for models

bull forward acceptance

bull two-step production processes

bull σpnrarrpnΦσ

pprarrppΦasymp 4

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

25

In-medium width ΓΦ and σ

ΦN cross section

ΓΦlab

(ρ0)=pΦ

EσΦ N

ρ0LDA

APolyanskiy et al PLB 695 (2011) 74

ΓΦ

lab asymp 33-50 MeV ( ltpΦgt = 11 GeVc ρ

0= 016 fm-3 )

Model dependent analysis of the ANKE

MoscowPParyevRossendorfBKaempfer etalValenciaEOset et al

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x1

201

3517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

26

Double differential cross section of Φ production

+ common systematics ~ 20

Excess in low momentum part

ANKEBUUNSP appr

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

27

Sum up

model dependent ANKE data analysis suggest

large in-medium Φ-meson width absorption (high momentum part) increasing with momentum

supported by Spring-8 amp JLAB results differential cross sections are not completely reproduced by model calculations (excess at lower momenta) results differ from the Valencia predictions (Φ in-medium self-energy)

pA

pp

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

QJ

Y

e et

al

n

ucl

-ex

1202

545

1

Thank you

truncated PW description of ppΦ shows that the contribution from purely S-wave final states represents only a small fraction of the total cross section at ε=76 MeV

explains why there is no S-wave pp-FSI in ANKE amp DISTO data

however in order to explain the energy dependence of the ppΦ total cross section seems to require a low mass Φp enhancement

Page 2: G z t l o h m l e H M Momentum dependence of the Φ-meson …cmarkert/workshop/Agenda... · 2012. 3. 19. · March 5-7th 2012, Michael Hartmann on behalf of the ANKE collaboration

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

2

Scope of the talk

pArarrФ (K+K-) X Tp=283 GeV

COSY facilities and some advertisement

pprarrppФ (K+K-) Tp=283 GeV (76 MeV excess energy)

MH etal nucl-ex12013517 (acc in PRC)

QJ Ye etal nucl-ex12025451

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

3

Circumference ~ 184m

Polarized protons and deuterons

max momentum ~ 37 GeVc

Electron and stochastic cooling

Hadron physics with hadronic probes

COSY ndash experimental facilities

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

4

Advertisement KKΦ production at COSY

(wwwfz-juelichdeikp orMH PoS 057 (2011))

DISTO

COSYKK amp Φ production in pp pd amp dd (world data)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

5

Φ(rarrK+K-) production in pp

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

6

ppppФ total cross sections

ANKE DISTO

only tot

76 MeV (new)

ldquoSsrdquo + pp-FSI

higher PWno pp-FSI

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

7

ppppФ (differential cross sections) at ε= 185 MeV

close to threshold the angular decay

distribution must display a sin2θΦK+

_____________________________

Φ in relative S-wave

transition from 3P1 (pp)-entrance

channel to 1S0 (pp) final-state

clear effect of pp-FSI

MH etal PRL 96 (2006) 242301

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

8

Non-Ф res ppK+K- production at ε= 76 MeV (new)

ldquooutside Φrdquo

no acceptance correction

M (K minus pp)

M (K + pp)F=F pp(q pp) times

F Kp(qKp1)times

F Kp (qKp2)times

F K K

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

9

ratio of exp K+K- inv mass to MC (without KK interaction)

KK production amplitudes (I=01)

pp rarr ppK+K- (total cross section)

+ K-p-FSI+ pp -FSI phase space

ldquoallrdquo

11 ANKE (COSY) DISTO

185 MeV 76 MeV

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

10

ppppФ production at ε= 76 MeV (new)

ldquoinside Φrdquo

no acceptance correction

spin-averaged squared transition matrix element

multiplied by pp-FSI (Jost function)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

11

hellip and final differential distributions at 76 MeV

angular distributions (symmetric about cos θ = 0)

polar decay angle

ANKE DISTO (83 MeV)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

12

hellip and final differential distributions at 76 MeV

185 MeV (for comparison)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

13

hellip and ppФ total cross section dilemma

full

Ps

Pp

SpSs

76 MeV

Simplest way out A Φp threshold enhancement leads to a significant energy dependence of some of the AL l coefficients

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

14

Φ(rarrK+K-) production in pA

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

15

Meson spectral function

Φ is a long-lived meson

λdec

= ħcΓ0= 44 fm gtgt R(Au)

Ф in free space

(PDG 2008)

M0 ndash pole mass Γ

0 ndash meson width

M0 = 10195 GeV

Γ0 = 426 MeV

S (M )=1π

Γ02

(MminusM 0)2+(Γ02)

2

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

16

Φ in nuclear matter

A general picture of numerous studies in different approaches eg effective Lagrangians and QCD sum rules

- mass modification is small

- main medium effect on the Ф is a significant increase of its width by up to an order of magnitude

Meson spectral function

SlowastM =

1

0minus2ImU opt 2

MminusM 0ReU opt20minus2ImUopt 2

2

Γlowast

lowast

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

17

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Study of the meson spectral function - measure low momentum Φs via leptonic decays Not really done yet

- Φrarre+e- (BR = 310-4)

- ΦrarrK+K- (BR = 049 K- FSI hadronic potential)

KEK-PS pA 12 GeV Γ asymp 15 MeV m asymp -34)

RMuto et al PRL 98 (2007) 042501

Φrarre+e-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

18

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

19

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment COSY experiment at ANKE

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

Reaction pA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayp-Energy 283 GeV ( ε free NNasymp 76MeV )Targets C Cu Ag Au

Momentum and (06 ― 16) GeVcangular range 0ole Θ

Φle 8o

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

20

ANKE ndash forward angle magnetic spectrometer at internal target position of COSY

Fd

Pd

Nd

Pd ndash positive detector system Fd ndash forward detector system Nd ndash negative detector system(STT ndash silicon tracking telescope)

STT

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

21

Ф K+K- selection

all

delayed

7000ndash10000 Φs for each target (C Cu Ag Au)

all K+

K+K-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

22

T A=

A

A

N

Normalization of Φ production cross section

A

C=N

A

N

C

N

C

N

A

A

C

R=T A

T C

=12A

A

C nuclear transparency ratio

To normalize the Φ production cross section we use the known pion data

We present the A-dependence of the Φ production in the following form

A

C= A12 π+ p = 05 GeVc Θ ~ 00

απ = 038 plusmn 002 ( 283GeV)

The Φ-meson yield (production cross section) follows a target mass

dependence of A056 plusmn 003

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

23

Transparency ratios experiment

ANKE

Any interpretation of the transparency ratio has to rely on a detailed theoretical treatment

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

24

Transparency ratios experiment and models

ANKE

VMagas et al PRC 71 (2005) 065202LRoca (private communication)

ValenciaEOset et alMC amp Chiral Unitary Approach

EParyev JPhys G 36 (2009) 015103

MoscowEParyevNuclear Spectral Function Approach

HSchade BKaumlmpfer (private communication) cf PRC 81 (2010) 034902

RossendorfBKaumlmpfer et alBUU

Relevant features for models

bull forward acceptance

bull two-step production processes

bull σpnrarrpnΦσ

pprarrppΦasymp 4

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

25

In-medium width ΓΦ and σ

ΦN cross section

ΓΦlab

(ρ0)=pΦ

EσΦ N

ρ0LDA

APolyanskiy et al PLB 695 (2011) 74

ΓΦ

lab asymp 33-50 MeV ( ltpΦgt = 11 GeVc ρ

0= 016 fm-3 )

Model dependent analysis of the ANKE

MoscowPParyevRossendorfBKaempfer etalValenciaEOset et al

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x1

201

3517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

26

Double differential cross section of Φ production

+ common systematics ~ 20

Excess in low momentum part

ANKEBUUNSP appr

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

27

Sum up

model dependent ANKE data analysis suggest

large in-medium Φ-meson width absorption (high momentum part) increasing with momentum

supported by Spring-8 amp JLAB results differential cross sections are not completely reproduced by model calculations (excess at lower momenta) results differ from the Valencia predictions (Φ in-medium self-energy)

pA

pp

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

QJ

Y

e et

al

n

ucl

-ex

1202

545

1

Thank you

truncated PW description of ppΦ shows that the contribution from purely S-wave final states represents only a small fraction of the total cross section at ε=76 MeV

explains why there is no S-wave pp-FSI in ANKE amp DISTO data

however in order to explain the energy dependence of the ppΦ total cross section seems to require a low mass Φp enhancement

Page 3: G z t l o h m l e H M Momentum dependence of the Φ-meson …cmarkert/workshop/Agenda... · 2012. 3. 19. · March 5-7th 2012, Michael Hartmann on behalf of the ANKE collaboration

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

3

Circumference ~ 184m

Polarized protons and deuterons

max momentum ~ 37 GeVc

Electron and stochastic cooling

Hadron physics with hadronic probes

COSY ndash experimental facilities

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

4

Advertisement KKΦ production at COSY

(wwwfz-juelichdeikp orMH PoS 057 (2011))

DISTO

COSYKK amp Φ production in pp pd amp dd (world data)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

5

Φ(rarrK+K-) production in pp

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

6

ppppФ total cross sections

ANKE DISTO

only tot

76 MeV (new)

ldquoSsrdquo + pp-FSI

higher PWno pp-FSI

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

7

ppppФ (differential cross sections) at ε= 185 MeV

close to threshold the angular decay

distribution must display a sin2θΦK+

_____________________________

Φ in relative S-wave

transition from 3P1 (pp)-entrance

channel to 1S0 (pp) final-state

clear effect of pp-FSI

MH etal PRL 96 (2006) 242301

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

8

Non-Ф res ppK+K- production at ε= 76 MeV (new)

ldquooutside Φrdquo

no acceptance correction

M (K minus pp)

M (K + pp)F=F pp(q pp) times

F Kp(qKp1)times

F Kp (qKp2)times

F K K

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

9

ratio of exp K+K- inv mass to MC (without KK interaction)

KK production amplitudes (I=01)

pp rarr ppK+K- (total cross section)

+ K-p-FSI+ pp -FSI phase space

ldquoallrdquo

11 ANKE (COSY) DISTO

185 MeV 76 MeV

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

10

ppppФ production at ε= 76 MeV (new)

ldquoinside Φrdquo

no acceptance correction

spin-averaged squared transition matrix element

multiplied by pp-FSI (Jost function)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

11

hellip and final differential distributions at 76 MeV

angular distributions (symmetric about cos θ = 0)

polar decay angle

ANKE DISTO (83 MeV)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

12

hellip and final differential distributions at 76 MeV

185 MeV (for comparison)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

13

hellip and ppФ total cross section dilemma

full

Ps

Pp

SpSs

76 MeV

Simplest way out A Φp threshold enhancement leads to a significant energy dependence of some of the AL l coefficients

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

14

Φ(rarrK+K-) production in pA

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

15

Meson spectral function

Φ is a long-lived meson

λdec

= ħcΓ0= 44 fm gtgt R(Au)

Ф in free space

(PDG 2008)

M0 ndash pole mass Γ

0 ndash meson width

M0 = 10195 GeV

Γ0 = 426 MeV

S (M )=1π

Γ02

(MminusM 0)2+(Γ02)

2

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

16

Φ in nuclear matter

A general picture of numerous studies in different approaches eg effective Lagrangians and QCD sum rules

- mass modification is small

- main medium effect on the Ф is a significant increase of its width by up to an order of magnitude

Meson spectral function

SlowastM =

1

0minus2ImU opt 2

MminusM 0ReU opt20minus2ImUopt 2

2

Γlowast

lowast

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

17

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Study of the meson spectral function - measure low momentum Φs via leptonic decays Not really done yet

- Φrarre+e- (BR = 310-4)

- ΦrarrK+K- (BR = 049 K- FSI hadronic potential)

KEK-PS pA 12 GeV Γ asymp 15 MeV m asymp -34)

RMuto et al PRL 98 (2007) 042501

Φrarre+e-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

18

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

19

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment COSY experiment at ANKE

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

Reaction pA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayp-Energy 283 GeV ( ε free NNasymp 76MeV )Targets C Cu Ag Au

Momentum and (06 ― 16) GeVcangular range 0ole Θ

Φle 8o

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

20

ANKE ndash forward angle magnetic spectrometer at internal target position of COSY

Fd

Pd

Nd

Pd ndash positive detector system Fd ndash forward detector system Nd ndash negative detector system(STT ndash silicon tracking telescope)

STT

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

21

Ф K+K- selection

all

delayed

7000ndash10000 Φs for each target (C Cu Ag Au)

all K+

K+K-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

22

T A=

A

A

N

Normalization of Φ production cross section

A

C=N

A

N

C

N

C

N

A

A

C

R=T A

T C

=12A

A

C nuclear transparency ratio

To normalize the Φ production cross section we use the known pion data

We present the A-dependence of the Φ production in the following form

A

C= A12 π+ p = 05 GeVc Θ ~ 00

απ = 038 plusmn 002 ( 283GeV)

The Φ-meson yield (production cross section) follows a target mass

dependence of A056 plusmn 003

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

23

Transparency ratios experiment

ANKE

Any interpretation of the transparency ratio has to rely on a detailed theoretical treatment

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

24

Transparency ratios experiment and models

ANKE

VMagas et al PRC 71 (2005) 065202LRoca (private communication)

ValenciaEOset et alMC amp Chiral Unitary Approach

EParyev JPhys G 36 (2009) 015103

MoscowEParyevNuclear Spectral Function Approach

HSchade BKaumlmpfer (private communication) cf PRC 81 (2010) 034902

RossendorfBKaumlmpfer et alBUU

Relevant features for models

bull forward acceptance

bull two-step production processes

bull σpnrarrpnΦσ

pprarrppΦasymp 4

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

25

In-medium width ΓΦ and σ

ΦN cross section

ΓΦlab

(ρ0)=pΦ

EσΦ N

ρ0LDA

APolyanskiy et al PLB 695 (2011) 74

ΓΦ

lab asymp 33-50 MeV ( ltpΦgt = 11 GeVc ρ

0= 016 fm-3 )

Model dependent analysis of the ANKE

MoscowPParyevRossendorfBKaempfer etalValenciaEOset et al

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x1

201

3517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

26

Double differential cross section of Φ production

+ common systematics ~ 20

Excess in low momentum part

ANKEBUUNSP appr

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

27

Sum up

model dependent ANKE data analysis suggest

large in-medium Φ-meson width absorption (high momentum part) increasing with momentum

supported by Spring-8 amp JLAB results differential cross sections are not completely reproduced by model calculations (excess at lower momenta) results differ from the Valencia predictions (Φ in-medium self-energy)

pA

pp

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

QJ

Y

e et

al

n

ucl

-ex

1202

545

1

Thank you

truncated PW description of ppΦ shows that the contribution from purely S-wave final states represents only a small fraction of the total cross section at ε=76 MeV

explains why there is no S-wave pp-FSI in ANKE amp DISTO data

however in order to explain the energy dependence of the ppΦ total cross section seems to require a low mass Φp enhancement

Page 4: G z t l o h m l e H M Momentum dependence of the Φ-meson …cmarkert/workshop/Agenda... · 2012. 3. 19. · March 5-7th 2012, Michael Hartmann on behalf of the ANKE collaboration

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

4

Advertisement KKΦ production at COSY

(wwwfz-juelichdeikp orMH PoS 057 (2011))

DISTO

COSYKK amp Φ production in pp pd amp dd (world data)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

5

Φ(rarrK+K-) production in pp

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

6

ppppФ total cross sections

ANKE DISTO

only tot

76 MeV (new)

ldquoSsrdquo + pp-FSI

higher PWno pp-FSI

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

7

ppppФ (differential cross sections) at ε= 185 MeV

close to threshold the angular decay

distribution must display a sin2θΦK+

_____________________________

Φ in relative S-wave

transition from 3P1 (pp)-entrance

channel to 1S0 (pp) final-state

clear effect of pp-FSI

MH etal PRL 96 (2006) 242301

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

8

Non-Ф res ppK+K- production at ε= 76 MeV (new)

ldquooutside Φrdquo

no acceptance correction

M (K minus pp)

M (K + pp)F=F pp(q pp) times

F Kp(qKp1)times

F Kp (qKp2)times

F K K

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

9

ratio of exp K+K- inv mass to MC (without KK interaction)

KK production amplitudes (I=01)

pp rarr ppK+K- (total cross section)

+ K-p-FSI+ pp -FSI phase space

ldquoallrdquo

11 ANKE (COSY) DISTO

185 MeV 76 MeV

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

10

ppppФ production at ε= 76 MeV (new)

ldquoinside Φrdquo

no acceptance correction

spin-averaged squared transition matrix element

multiplied by pp-FSI (Jost function)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

11

hellip and final differential distributions at 76 MeV

angular distributions (symmetric about cos θ = 0)

polar decay angle

ANKE DISTO (83 MeV)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

12

hellip and final differential distributions at 76 MeV

185 MeV (for comparison)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

13

hellip and ppФ total cross section dilemma

full

Ps

Pp

SpSs

76 MeV

Simplest way out A Φp threshold enhancement leads to a significant energy dependence of some of the AL l coefficients

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

14

Φ(rarrK+K-) production in pA

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

15

Meson spectral function

Φ is a long-lived meson

λdec

= ħcΓ0= 44 fm gtgt R(Au)

Ф in free space

(PDG 2008)

M0 ndash pole mass Γ

0 ndash meson width

M0 = 10195 GeV

Γ0 = 426 MeV

S (M )=1π

Γ02

(MminusM 0)2+(Γ02)

2

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

16

Φ in nuclear matter

A general picture of numerous studies in different approaches eg effective Lagrangians and QCD sum rules

- mass modification is small

- main medium effect on the Ф is a significant increase of its width by up to an order of magnitude

Meson spectral function

SlowastM =

1

0minus2ImU opt 2

MminusM 0ReU opt20minus2ImUopt 2

2

Γlowast

lowast

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

17

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Study of the meson spectral function - measure low momentum Φs via leptonic decays Not really done yet

- Φrarre+e- (BR = 310-4)

- ΦrarrK+K- (BR = 049 K- FSI hadronic potential)

KEK-PS pA 12 GeV Γ asymp 15 MeV m asymp -34)

RMuto et al PRL 98 (2007) 042501

Φrarre+e-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

18

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

19

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment COSY experiment at ANKE

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

Reaction pA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayp-Energy 283 GeV ( ε free NNasymp 76MeV )Targets C Cu Ag Au

Momentum and (06 ― 16) GeVcangular range 0ole Θ

Φle 8o

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

20

ANKE ndash forward angle magnetic spectrometer at internal target position of COSY

Fd

Pd

Nd

Pd ndash positive detector system Fd ndash forward detector system Nd ndash negative detector system(STT ndash silicon tracking telescope)

STT

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

21

Ф K+K- selection

all

delayed

7000ndash10000 Φs for each target (C Cu Ag Au)

all K+

K+K-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

22

T A=

A

A

N

Normalization of Φ production cross section

A

C=N

A

N

C

N

C

N

A

A

C

R=T A

T C

=12A

A

C nuclear transparency ratio

To normalize the Φ production cross section we use the known pion data

We present the A-dependence of the Φ production in the following form

A

C= A12 π+ p = 05 GeVc Θ ~ 00

απ = 038 plusmn 002 ( 283GeV)

The Φ-meson yield (production cross section) follows a target mass

dependence of A056 plusmn 003

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

23

Transparency ratios experiment

ANKE

Any interpretation of the transparency ratio has to rely on a detailed theoretical treatment

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

24

Transparency ratios experiment and models

ANKE

VMagas et al PRC 71 (2005) 065202LRoca (private communication)

ValenciaEOset et alMC amp Chiral Unitary Approach

EParyev JPhys G 36 (2009) 015103

MoscowEParyevNuclear Spectral Function Approach

HSchade BKaumlmpfer (private communication) cf PRC 81 (2010) 034902

RossendorfBKaumlmpfer et alBUU

Relevant features for models

bull forward acceptance

bull two-step production processes

bull σpnrarrpnΦσ

pprarrppΦasymp 4

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

25

In-medium width ΓΦ and σ

ΦN cross section

ΓΦlab

(ρ0)=pΦ

EσΦ N

ρ0LDA

APolyanskiy et al PLB 695 (2011) 74

ΓΦ

lab asymp 33-50 MeV ( ltpΦgt = 11 GeVc ρ

0= 016 fm-3 )

Model dependent analysis of the ANKE

MoscowPParyevRossendorfBKaempfer etalValenciaEOset et al

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x1

201

3517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

26

Double differential cross section of Φ production

+ common systematics ~ 20

Excess in low momentum part

ANKEBUUNSP appr

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

27

Sum up

model dependent ANKE data analysis suggest

large in-medium Φ-meson width absorption (high momentum part) increasing with momentum

supported by Spring-8 amp JLAB results differential cross sections are not completely reproduced by model calculations (excess at lower momenta) results differ from the Valencia predictions (Φ in-medium self-energy)

pA

pp

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

QJ

Y

e et

al

n

ucl

-ex

1202

545

1

Thank you

truncated PW description of ppΦ shows that the contribution from purely S-wave final states represents only a small fraction of the total cross section at ε=76 MeV

explains why there is no S-wave pp-FSI in ANKE amp DISTO data

however in order to explain the energy dependence of the ppΦ total cross section seems to require a low mass Φp enhancement

Page 5: G z t l o h m l e H M Momentum dependence of the Φ-meson …cmarkert/workshop/Agenda... · 2012. 3. 19. · March 5-7th 2012, Michael Hartmann on behalf of the ANKE collaboration

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

5

Φ(rarrK+K-) production in pp

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

6

ppppФ total cross sections

ANKE DISTO

only tot

76 MeV (new)

ldquoSsrdquo + pp-FSI

higher PWno pp-FSI

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

7

ppppФ (differential cross sections) at ε= 185 MeV

close to threshold the angular decay

distribution must display a sin2θΦK+

_____________________________

Φ in relative S-wave

transition from 3P1 (pp)-entrance

channel to 1S0 (pp) final-state

clear effect of pp-FSI

MH etal PRL 96 (2006) 242301

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

8

Non-Ф res ppK+K- production at ε= 76 MeV (new)

ldquooutside Φrdquo

no acceptance correction

M (K minus pp)

M (K + pp)F=F pp(q pp) times

F Kp(qKp1)times

F Kp (qKp2)times

F K K

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

9

ratio of exp K+K- inv mass to MC (without KK interaction)

KK production amplitudes (I=01)

pp rarr ppK+K- (total cross section)

+ K-p-FSI+ pp -FSI phase space

ldquoallrdquo

11 ANKE (COSY) DISTO

185 MeV 76 MeV

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

10

ppppФ production at ε= 76 MeV (new)

ldquoinside Φrdquo

no acceptance correction

spin-averaged squared transition matrix element

multiplied by pp-FSI (Jost function)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

11

hellip and final differential distributions at 76 MeV

angular distributions (symmetric about cos θ = 0)

polar decay angle

ANKE DISTO (83 MeV)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

12

hellip and final differential distributions at 76 MeV

185 MeV (for comparison)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

13

hellip and ppФ total cross section dilemma

full

Ps

Pp

SpSs

76 MeV

Simplest way out A Φp threshold enhancement leads to a significant energy dependence of some of the AL l coefficients

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

14

Φ(rarrK+K-) production in pA

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

15

Meson spectral function

Φ is a long-lived meson

λdec

= ħcΓ0= 44 fm gtgt R(Au)

Ф in free space

(PDG 2008)

M0 ndash pole mass Γ

0 ndash meson width

M0 = 10195 GeV

Γ0 = 426 MeV

S (M )=1π

Γ02

(MminusM 0)2+(Γ02)

2

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

16

Φ in nuclear matter

A general picture of numerous studies in different approaches eg effective Lagrangians and QCD sum rules

- mass modification is small

- main medium effect on the Ф is a significant increase of its width by up to an order of magnitude

Meson spectral function

SlowastM =

1

0minus2ImU opt 2

MminusM 0ReU opt20minus2ImUopt 2

2

Γlowast

lowast

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

17

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Study of the meson spectral function - measure low momentum Φs via leptonic decays Not really done yet

- Φrarre+e- (BR = 310-4)

- ΦrarrK+K- (BR = 049 K- FSI hadronic potential)

KEK-PS pA 12 GeV Γ asymp 15 MeV m asymp -34)

RMuto et al PRL 98 (2007) 042501

Φrarre+e-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

18

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

19

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment COSY experiment at ANKE

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

Reaction pA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayp-Energy 283 GeV ( ε free NNasymp 76MeV )Targets C Cu Ag Au

Momentum and (06 ― 16) GeVcangular range 0ole Θ

Φle 8o

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

20

ANKE ndash forward angle magnetic spectrometer at internal target position of COSY

Fd

Pd

Nd

Pd ndash positive detector system Fd ndash forward detector system Nd ndash negative detector system(STT ndash silicon tracking telescope)

STT

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

21

Ф K+K- selection

all

delayed

7000ndash10000 Φs for each target (C Cu Ag Au)

all K+

K+K-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

22

T A=

A

A

N

Normalization of Φ production cross section

A

C=N

A

N

C

N

C

N

A

A

C

R=T A

T C

=12A

A

C nuclear transparency ratio

To normalize the Φ production cross section we use the known pion data

We present the A-dependence of the Φ production in the following form

A

C= A12 π+ p = 05 GeVc Θ ~ 00

απ = 038 plusmn 002 ( 283GeV)

The Φ-meson yield (production cross section) follows a target mass

dependence of A056 plusmn 003

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

23

Transparency ratios experiment

ANKE

Any interpretation of the transparency ratio has to rely on a detailed theoretical treatment

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

24

Transparency ratios experiment and models

ANKE

VMagas et al PRC 71 (2005) 065202LRoca (private communication)

ValenciaEOset et alMC amp Chiral Unitary Approach

EParyev JPhys G 36 (2009) 015103

MoscowEParyevNuclear Spectral Function Approach

HSchade BKaumlmpfer (private communication) cf PRC 81 (2010) 034902

RossendorfBKaumlmpfer et alBUU

Relevant features for models

bull forward acceptance

bull two-step production processes

bull σpnrarrpnΦσ

pprarrppΦasymp 4

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

25

In-medium width ΓΦ and σ

ΦN cross section

ΓΦlab

(ρ0)=pΦ

EσΦ N

ρ0LDA

APolyanskiy et al PLB 695 (2011) 74

ΓΦ

lab asymp 33-50 MeV ( ltpΦgt = 11 GeVc ρ

0= 016 fm-3 )

Model dependent analysis of the ANKE

MoscowPParyevRossendorfBKaempfer etalValenciaEOset et al

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x1

201

3517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

26

Double differential cross section of Φ production

+ common systematics ~ 20

Excess in low momentum part

ANKEBUUNSP appr

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

27

Sum up

model dependent ANKE data analysis suggest

large in-medium Φ-meson width absorption (high momentum part) increasing with momentum

supported by Spring-8 amp JLAB results differential cross sections are not completely reproduced by model calculations (excess at lower momenta) results differ from the Valencia predictions (Φ in-medium self-energy)

pA

pp

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

QJ

Y

e et

al

n

ucl

-ex

1202

545

1

Thank you

truncated PW description of ppΦ shows that the contribution from purely S-wave final states represents only a small fraction of the total cross section at ε=76 MeV

explains why there is no S-wave pp-FSI in ANKE amp DISTO data

however in order to explain the energy dependence of the ppΦ total cross section seems to require a low mass Φp enhancement

Page 6: G z t l o h m l e H M Momentum dependence of the Φ-meson …cmarkert/workshop/Agenda... · 2012. 3. 19. · March 5-7th 2012, Michael Hartmann on behalf of the ANKE collaboration

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

6

ppppФ total cross sections

ANKE DISTO

only tot

76 MeV (new)

ldquoSsrdquo + pp-FSI

higher PWno pp-FSI

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

7

ppppФ (differential cross sections) at ε= 185 MeV

close to threshold the angular decay

distribution must display a sin2θΦK+

_____________________________

Φ in relative S-wave

transition from 3P1 (pp)-entrance

channel to 1S0 (pp) final-state

clear effect of pp-FSI

MH etal PRL 96 (2006) 242301

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

8

Non-Ф res ppK+K- production at ε= 76 MeV (new)

ldquooutside Φrdquo

no acceptance correction

M (K minus pp)

M (K + pp)F=F pp(q pp) times

F Kp(qKp1)times

F Kp (qKp2)times

F K K

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

9

ratio of exp K+K- inv mass to MC (without KK interaction)

KK production amplitudes (I=01)

pp rarr ppK+K- (total cross section)

+ K-p-FSI+ pp -FSI phase space

ldquoallrdquo

11 ANKE (COSY) DISTO

185 MeV 76 MeV

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

10

ppppФ production at ε= 76 MeV (new)

ldquoinside Φrdquo

no acceptance correction

spin-averaged squared transition matrix element

multiplied by pp-FSI (Jost function)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

11

hellip and final differential distributions at 76 MeV

angular distributions (symmetric about cos θ = 0)

polar decay angle

ANKE DISTO (83 MeV)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

12

hellip and final differential distributions at 76 MeV

185 MeV (for comparison)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

13

hellip and ppФ total cross section dilemma

full

Ps

Pp

SpSs

76 MeV

Simplest way out A Φp threshold enhancement leads to a significant energy dependence of some of the AL l coefficients

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

14

Φ(rarrK+K-) production in pA

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

15

Meson spectral function

Φ is a long-lived meson

λdec

= ħcΓ0= 44 fm gtgt R(Au)

Ф in free space

(PDG 2008)

M0 ndash pole mass Γ

0 ndash meson width

M0 = 10195 GeV

Γ0 = 426 MeV

S (M )=1π

Γ02

(MminusM 0)2+(Γ02)

2

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

16

Φ in nuclear matter

A general picture of numerous studies in different approaches eg effective Lagrangians and QCD sum rules

- mass modification is small

- main medium effect on the Ф is a significant increase of its width by up to an order of magnitude

Meson spectral function

SlowastM =

1

0minus2ImU opt 2

MminusM 0ReU opt20minus2ImUopt 2

2

Γlowast

lowast

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

17

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Study of the meson spectral function - measure low momentum Φs via leptonic decays Not really done yet

- Φrarre+e- (BR = 310-4)

- ΦrarrK+K- (BR = 049 K- FSI hadronic potential)

KEK-PS pA 12 GeV Γ asymp 15 MeV m asymp -34)

RMuto et al PRL 98 (2007) 042501

Φrarre+e-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

18

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

19

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment COSY experiment at ANKE

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

Reaction pA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayp-Energy 283 GeV ( ε free NNasymp 76MeV )Targets C Cu Ag Au

Momentum and (06 ― 16) GeVcangular range 0ole Θ

Φle 8o

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

20

ANKE ndash forward angle magnetic spectrometer at internal target position of COSY

Fd

Pd

Nd

Pd ndash positive detector system Fd ndash forward detector system Nd ndash negative detector system(STT ndash silicon tracking telescope)

STT

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

21

Ф K+K- selection

all

delayed

7000ndash10000 Φs for each target (C Cu Ag Au)

all K+

K+K-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

22

T A=

A

A

N

Normalization of Φ production cross section

A

C=N

A

N

C

N

C

N

A

A

C

R=T A

T C

=12A

A

C nuclear transparency ratio

To normalize the Φ production cross section we use the known pion data

We present the A-dependence of the Φ production in the following form

A

C= A12 π+ p = 05 GeVc Θ ~ 00

απ = 038 plusmn 002 ( 283GeV)

The Φ-meson yield (production cross section) follows a target mass

dependence of A056 plusmn 003

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

23

Transparency ratios experiment

ANKE

Any interpretation of the transparency ratio has to rely on a detailed theoretical treatment

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

24

Transparency ratios experiment and models

ANKE

VMagas et al PRC 71 (2005) 065202LRoca (private communication)

ValenciaEOset et alMC amp Chiral Unitary Approach

EParyev JPhys G 36 (2009) 015103

MoscowEParyevNuclear Spectral Function Approach

HSchade BKaumlmpfer (private communication) cf PRC 81 (2010) 034902

RossendorfBKaumlmpfer et alBUU

Relevant features for models

bull forward acceptance

bull two-step production processes

bull σpnrarrpnΦσ

pprarrppΦasymp 4

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

25

In-medium width ΓΦ and σ

ΦN cross section

ΓΦlab

(ρ0)=pΦ

EσΦ N

ρ0LDA

APolyanskiy et al PLB 695 (2011) 74

ΓΦ

lab asymp 33-50 MeV ( ltpΦgt = 11 GeVc ρ

0= 016 fm-3 )

Model dependent analysis of the ANKE

MoscowPParyevRossendorfBKaempfer etalValenciaEOset et al

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x1

201

3517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

26

Double differential cross section of Φ production

+ common systematics ~ 20

Excess in low momentum part

ANKEBUUNSP appr

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

27

Sum up

model dependent ANKE data analysis suggest

large in-medium Φ-meson width absorption (high momentum part) increasing with momentum

supported by Spring-8 amp JLAB results differential cross sections are not completely reproduced by model calculations (excess at lower momenta) results differ from the Valencia predictions (Φ in-medium self-energy)

pA

pp

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

QJ

Y

e et

al

n

ucl

-ex

1202

545

1

Thank you

truncated PW description of ppΦ shows that the contribution from purely S-wave final states represents only a small fraction of the total cross section at ε=76 MeV

explains why there is no S-wave pp-FSI in ANKE amp DISTO data

however in order to explain the energy dependence of the ppΦ total cross section seems to require a low mass Φp enhancement

Page 7: G z t l o h m l e H M Momentum dependence of the Φ-meson …cmarkert/workshop/Agenda... · 2012. 3. 19. · March 5-7th 2012, Michael Hartmann on behalf of the ANKE collaboration

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

7

ppppФ (differential cross sections) at ε= 185 MeV

close to threshold the angular decay

distribution must display a sin2θΦK+

_____________________________

Φ in relative S-wave

transition from 3P1 (pp)-entrance

channel to 1S0 (pp) final-state

clear effect of pp-FSI

MH etal PRL 96 (2006) 242301

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

8

Non-Ф res ppK+K- production at ε= 76 MeV (new)

ldquooutside Φrdquo

no acceptance correction

M (K minus pp)

M (K + pp)F=F pp(q pp) times

F Kp(qKp1)times

F Kp (qKp2)times

F K K

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

9

ratio of exp K+K- inv mass to MC (without KK interaction)

KK production amplitudes (I=01)

pp rarr ppK+K- (total cross section)

+ K-p-FSI+ pp -FSI phase space

ldquoallrdquo

11 ANKE (COSY) DISTO

185 MeV 76 MeV

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

10

ppppФ production at ε= 76 MeV (new)

ldquoinside Φrdquo

no acceptance correction

spin-averaged squared transition matrix element

multiplied by pp-FSI (Jost function)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

11

hellip and final differential distributions at 76 MeV

angular distributions (symmetric about cos θ = 0)

polar decay angle

ANKE DISTO (83 MeV)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

12

hellip and final differential distributions at 76 MeV

185 MeV (for comparison)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

13

hellip and ppФ total cross section dilemma

full

Ps

Pp

SpSs

76 MeV

Simplest way out A Φp threshold enhancement leads to a significant energy dependence of some of the AL l coefficients

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

14

Φ(rarrK+K-) production in pA

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

15

Meson spectral function

Φ is a long-lived meson

λdec

= ħcΓ0= 44 fm gtgt R(Au)

Ф in free space

(PDG 2008)

M0 ndash pole mass Γ

0 ndash meson width

M0 = 10195 GeV

Γ0 = 426 MeV

S (M )=1π

Γ02

(MminusM 0)2+(Γ02)

2

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

16

Φ in nuclear matter

A general picture of numerous studies in different approaches eg effective Lagrangians and QCD sum rules

- mass modification is small

- main medium effect on the Ф is a significant increase of its width by up to an order of magnitude

Meson spectral function

SlowastM =

1

0minus2ImU opt 2

MminusM 0ReU opt20minus2ImUopt 2

2

Γlowast

lowast

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

17

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Study of the meson spectral function - measure low momentum Φs via leptonic decays Not really done yet

- Φrarre+e- (BR = 310-4)

- ΦrarrK+K- (BR = 049 K- FSI hadronic potential)

KEK-PS pA 12 GeV Γ asymp 15 MeV m asymp -34)

RMuto et al PRL 98 (2007) 042501

Φrarre+e-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

18

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

19

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment COSY experiment at ANKE

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

Reaction pA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayp-Energy 283 GeV ( ε free NNasymp 76MeV )Targets C Cu Ag Au

Momentum and (06 ― 16) GeVcangular range 0ole Θ

Φle 8o

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

20

ANKE ndash forward angle magnetic spectrometer at internal target position of COSY

Fd

Pd

Nd

Pd ndash positive detector system Fd ndash forward detector system Nd ndash negative detector system(STT ndash silicon tracking telescope)

STT

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

21

Ф K+K- selection

all

delayed

7000ndash10000 Φs for each target (C Cu Ag Au)

all K+

K+K-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

22

T A=

A

A

N

Normalization of Φ production cross section

A

C=N

A

N

C

N

C

N

A

A

C

R=T A

T C

=12A

A

C nuclear transparency ratio

To normalize the Φ production cross section we use the known pion data

We present the A-dependence of the Φ production in the following form

A

C= A12 π+ p = 05 GeVc Θ ~ 00

απ = 038 plusmn 002 ( 283GeV)

The Φ-meson yield (production cross section) follows a target mass

dependence of A056 plusmn 003

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

23

Transparency ratios experiment

ANKE

Any interpretation of the transparency ratio has to rely on a detailed theoretical treatment

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

24

Transparency ratios experiment and models

ANKE

VMagas et al PRC 71 (2005) 065202LRoca (private communication)

ValenciaEOset et alMC amp Chiral Unitary Approach

EParyev JPhys G 36 (2009) 015103

MoscowEParyevNuclear Spectral Function Approach

HSchade BKaumlmpfer (private communication) cf PRC 81 (2010) 034902

RossendorfBKaumlmpfer et alBUU

Relevant features for models

bull forward acceptance

bull two-step production processes

bull σpnrarrpnΦσ

pprarrppΦasymp 4

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

25

In-medium width ΓΦ and σ

ΦN cross section

ΓΦlab

(ρ0)=pΦ

EσΦ N

ρ0LDA

APolyanskiy et al PLB 695 (2011) 74

ΓΦ

lab asymp 33-50 MeV ( ltpΦgt = 11 GeVc ρ

0= 016 fm-3 )

Model dependent analysis of the ANKE

MoscowPParyevRossendorfBKaempfer etalValenciaEOset et al

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x1

201

3517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

26

Double differential cross section of Φ production

+ common systematics ~ 20

Excess in low momentum part

ANKEBUUNSP appr

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

27

Sum up

model dependent ANKE data analysis suggest

large in-medium Φ-meson width absorption (high momentum part) increasing with momentum

supported by Spring-8 amp JLAB results differential cross sections are not completely reproduced by model calculations (excess at lower momenta) results differ from the Valencia predictions (Φ in-medium self-energy)

pA

pp

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

QJ

Y

e et

al

n

ucl

-ex

1202

545

1

Thank you

truncated PW description of ppΦ shows that the contribution from purely S-wave final states represents only a small fraction of the total cross section at ε=76 MeV

explains why there is no S-wave pp-FSI in ANKE amp DISTO data

however in order to explain the energy dependence of the ppΦ total cross section seems to require a low mass Φp enhancement

Page 8: G z t l o h m l e H M Momentum dependence of the Φ-meson …cmarkert/workshop/Agenda... · 2012. 3. 19. · March 5-7th 2012, Michael Hartmann on behalf of the ANKE collaboration

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

8

Non-Ф res ppK+K- production at ε= 76 MeV (new)

ldquooutside Φrdquo

no acceptance correction

M (K minus pp)

M (K + pp)F=F pp(q pp) times

F Kp(qKp1)times

F Kp (qKp2)times

F K K

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

9

ratio of exp K+K- inv mass to MC (without KK interaction)

KK production amplitudes (I=01)

pp rarr ppK+K- (total cross section)

+ K-p-FSI+ pp -FSI phase space

ldquoallrdquo

11 ANKE (COSY) DISTO

185 MeV 76 MeV

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

10

ppppФ production at ε= 76 MeV (new)

ldquoinside Φrdquo

no acceptance correction

spin-averaged squared transition matrix element

multiplied by pp-FSI (Jost function)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

11

hellip and final differential distributions at 76 MeV

angular distributions (symmetric about cos θ = 0)

polar decay angle

ANKE DISTO (83 MeV)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

12

hellip and final differential distributions at 76 MeV

185 MeV (for comparison)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

13

hellip and ppФ total cross section dilemma

full

Ps

Pp

SpSs

76 MeV

Simplest way out A Φp threshold enhancement leads to a significant energy dependence of some of the AL l coefficients

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

14

Φ(rarrK+K-) production in pA

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

15

Meson spectral function

Φ is a long-lived meson

λdec

= ħcΓ0= 44 fm gtgt R(Au)

Ф in free space

(PDG 2008)

M0 ndash pole mass Γ

0 ndash meson width

M0 = 10195 GeV

Γ0 = 426 MeV

S (M )=1π

Γ02

(MminusM 0)2+(Γ02)

2

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

16

Φ in nuclear matter

A general picture of numerous studies in different approaches eg effective Lagrangians and QCD sum rules

- mass modification is small

- main medium effect on the Ф is a significant increase of its width by up to an order of magnitude

Meson spectral function

SlowastM =

1

0minus2ImU opt 2

MminusM 0ReU opt20minus2ImUopt 2

2

Γlowast

lowast

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

17

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Study of the meson spectral function - measure low momentum Φs via leptonic decays Not really done yet

- Φrarre+e- (BR = 310-4)

- ΦrarrK+K- (BR = 049 K- FSI hadronic potential)

KEK-PS pA 12 GeV Γ asymp 15 MeV m asymp -34)

RMuto et al PRL 98 (2007) 042501

Φrarre+e-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

18

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

19

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment COSY experiment at ANKE

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

Reaction pA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayp-Energy 283 GeV ( ε free NNasymp 76MeV )Targets C Cu Ag Au

Momentum and (06 ― 16) GeVcangular range 0ole Θ

Φle 8o

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

20

ANKE ndash forward angle magnetic spectrometer at internal target position of COSY

Fd

Pd

Nd

Pd ndash positive detector system Fd ndash forward detector system Nd ndash negative detector system(STT ndash silicon tracking telescope)

STT

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

21

Ф K+K- selection

all

delayed

7000ndash10000 Φs for each target (C Cu Ag Au)

all K+

K+K-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

22

T A=

A

A

N

Normalization of Φ production cross section

A

C=N

A

N

C

N

C

N

A

A

C

R=T A

T C

=12A

A

C nuclear transparency ratio

To normalize the Φ production cross section we use the known pion data

We present the A-dependence of the Φ production in the following form

A

C= A12 π+ p = 05 GeVc Θ ~ 00

απ = 038 plusmn 002 ( 283GeV)

The Φ-meson yield (production cross section) follows a target mass

dependence of A056 plusmn 003

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

23

Transparency ratios experiment

ANKE

Any interpretation of the transparency ratio has to rely on a detailed theoretical treatment

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

24

Transparency ratios experiment and models

ANKE

VMagas et al PRC 71 (2005) 065202LRoca (private communication)

ValenciaEOset et alMC amp Chiral Unitary Approach

EParyev JPhys G 36 (2009) 015103

MoscowEParyevNuclear Spectral Function Approach

HSchade BKaumlmpfer (private communication) cf PRC 81 (2010) 034902

RossendorfBKaumlmpfer et alBUU

Relevant features for models

bull forward acceptance

bull two-step production processes

bull σpnrarrpnΦσ

pprarrppΦasymp 4

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

25

In-medium width ΓΦ and σ

ΦN cross section

ΓΦlab

(ρ0)=pΦ

EσΦ N

ρ0LDA

APolyanskiy et al PLB 695 (2011) 74

ΓΦ

lab asymp 33-50 MeV ( ltpΦgt = 11 GeVc ρ

0= 016 fm-3 )

Model dependent analysis of the ANKE

MoscowPParyevRossendorfBKaempfer etalValenciaEOset et al

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x1

201

3517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

26

Double differential cross section of Φ production

+ common systematics ~ 20

Excess in low momentum part

ANKEBUUNSP appr

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

27

Sum up

model dependent ANKE data analysis suggest

large in-medium Φ-meson width absorption (high momentum part) increasing with momentum

supported by Spring-8 amp JLAB results differential cross sections are not completely reproduced by model calculations (excess at lower momenta) results differ from the Valencia predictions (Φ in-medium self-energy)

pA

pp

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

QJ

Y

e et

al

n

ucl

-ex

1202

545

1

Thank you

truncated PW description of ppΦ shows that the contribution from purely S-wave final states represents only a small fraction of the total cross section at ε=76 MeV

explains why there is no S-wave pp-FSI in ANKE amp DISTO data

however in order to explain the energy dependence of the ppΦ total cross section seems to require a low mass Φp enhancement

Page 9: G z t l o h m l e H M Momentum dependence of the Φ-meson …cmarkert/workshop/Agenda... · 2012. 3. 19. · March 5-7th 2012, Michael Hartmann on behalf of the ANKE collaboration

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

9

ratio of exp K+K- inv mass to MC (without KK interaction)

KK production amplitudes (I=01)

pp rarr ppK+K- (total cross section)

+ K-p-FSI+ pp -FSI phase space

ldquoallrdquo

11 ANKE (COSY) DISTO

185 MeV 76 MeV

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

10

ppppФ production at ε= 76 MeV (new)

ldquoinside Φrdquo

no acceptance correction

spin-averaged squared transition matrix element

multiplied by pp-FSI (Jost function)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

11

hellip and final differential distributions at 76 MeV

angular distributions (symmetric about cos θ = 0)

polar decay angle

ANKE DISTO (83 MeV)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

12

hellip and final differential distributions at 76 MeV

185 MeV (for comparison)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

13

hellip and ppФ total cross section dilemma

full

Ps

Pp

SpSs

76 MeV

Simplest way out A Φp threshold enhancement leads to a significant energy dependence of some of the AL l coefficients

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

14

Φ(rarrK+K-) production in pA

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

15

Meson spectral function

Φ is a long-lived meson

λdec

= ħcΓ0= 44 fm gtgt R(Au)

Ф in free space

(PDG 2008)

M0 ndash pole mass Γ

0 ndash meson width

M0 = 10195 GeV

Γ0 = 426 MeV

S (M )=1π

Γ02

(MminusM 0)2+(Γ02)

2

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

16

Φ in nuclear matter

A general picture of numerous studies in different approaches eg effective Lagrangians and QCD sum rules

- mass modification is small

- main medium effect on the Ф is a significant increase of its width by up to an order of magnitude

Meson spectral function

SlowastM =

1

0minus2ImU opt 2

MminusM 0ReU opt20minus2ImUopt 2

2

Γlowast

lowast

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

17

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Study of the meson spectral function - measure low momentum Φs via leptonic decays Not really done yet

- Φrarre+e- (BR = 310-4)

- ΦrarrK+K- (BR = 049 K- FSI hadronic potential)

KEK-PS pA 12 GeV Γ asymp 15 MeV m asymp -34)

RMuto et al PRL 98 (2007) 042501

Φrarre+e-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

18

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

19

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment COSY experiment at ANKE

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

Reaction pA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayp-Energy 283 GeV ( ε free NNasymp 76MeV )Targets C Cu Ag Au

Momentum and (06 ― 16) GeVcangular range 0ole Θ

Φle 8o

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

20

ANKE ndash forward angle magnetic spectrometer at internal target position of COSY

Fd

Pd

Nd

Pd ndash positive detector system Fd ndash forward detector system Nd ndash negative detector system(STT ndash silicon tracking telescope)

STT

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

21

Ф K+K- selection

all

delayed

7000ndash10000 Φs for each target (C Cu Ag Au)

all K+

K+K-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

22

T A=

A

A

N

Normalization of Φ production cross section

A

C=N

A

N

C

N

C

N

A

A

C

R=T A

T C

=12A

A

C nuclear transparency ratio

To normalize the Φ production cross section we use the known pion data

We present the A-dependence of the Φ production in the following form

A

C= A12 π+ p = 05 GeVc Θ ~ 00

απ = 038 plusmn 002 ( 283GeV)

The Φ-meson yield (production cross section) follows a target mass

dependence of A056 plusmn 003

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

23

Transparency ratios experiment

ANKE

Any interpretation of the transparency ratio has to rely on a detailed theoretical treatment

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

24

Transparency ratios experiment and models

ANKE

VMagas et al PRC 71 (2005) 065202LRoca (private communication)

ValenciaEOset et alMC amp Chiral Unitary Approach

EParyev JPhys G 36 (2009) 015103

MoscowEParyevNuclear Spectral Function Approach

HSchade BKaumlmpfer (private communication) cf PRC 81 (2010) 034902

RossendorfBKaumlmpfer et alBUU

Relevant features for models

bull forward acceptance

bull two-step production processes

bull σpnrarrpnΦσ

pprarrppΦasymp 4

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

25

In-medium width ΓΦ and σ

ΦN cross section

ΓΦlab

(ρ0)=pΦ

EσΦ N

ρ0LDA

APolyanskiy et al PLB 695 (2011) 74

ΓΦ

lab asymp 33-50 MeV ( ltpΦgt = 11 GeVc ρ

0= 016 fm-3 )

Model dependent analysis of the ANKE

MoscowPParyevRossendorfBKaempfer etalValenciaEOset et al

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x1

201

3517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

26

Double differential cross section of Φ production

+ common systematics ~ 20

Excess in low momentum part

ANKEBUUNSP appr

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

27

Sum up

model dependent ANKE data analysis suggest

large in-medium Φ-meson width absorption (high momentum part) increasing with momentum

supported by Spring-8 amp JLAB results differential cross sections are not completely reproduced by model calculations (excess at lower momenta) results differ from the Valencia predictions (Φ in-medium self-energy)

pA

pp

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

QJ

Y

e et

al

n

ucl

-ex

1202

545

1

Thank you

truncated PW description of ppΦ shows that the contribution from purely S-wave final states represents only a small fraction of the total cross section at ε=76 MeV

explains why there is no S-wave pp-FSI in ANKE amp DISTO data

however in order to explain the energy dependence of the ppΦ total cross section seems to require a low mass Φp enhancement

Page 10: G z t l o h m l e H M Momentum dependence of the Φ-meson …cmarkert/workshop/Agenda... · 2012. 3. 19. · March 5-7th 2012, Michael Hartmann on behalf of the ANKE collaboration

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

10

ppppФ production at ε= 76 MeV (new)

ldquoinside Φrdquo

no acceptance correction

spin-averaged squared transition matrix element

multiplied by pp-FSI (Jost function)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

11

hellip and final differential distributions at 76 MeV

angular distributions (symmetric about cos θ = 0)

polar decay angle

ANKE DISTO (83 MeV)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

12

hellip and final differential distributions at 76 MeV

185 MeV (for comparison)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

13

hellip and ppФ total cross section dilemma

full

Ps

Pp

SpSs

76 MeV

Simplest way out A Φp threshold enhancement leads to a significant energy dependence of some of the AL l coefficients

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

14

Φ(rarrK+K-) production in pA

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

15

Meson spectral function

Φ is a long-lived meson

λdec

= ħcΓ0= 44 fm gtgt R(Au)

Ф in free space

(PDG 2008)

M0 ndash pole mass Γ

0 ndash meson width

M0 = 10195 GeV

Γ0 = 426 MeV

S (M )=1π

Γ02

(MminusM 0)2+(Γ02)

2

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

16

Φ in nuclear matter

A general picture of numerous studies in different approaches eg effective Lagrangians and QCD sum rules

- mass modification is small

- main medium effect on the Ф is a significant increase of its width by up to an order of magnitude

Meson spectral function

SlowastM =

1

0minus2ImU opt 2

MminusM 0ReU opt20minus2ImUopt 2

2

Γlowast

lowast

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

17

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Study of the meson spectral function - measure low momentum Φs via leptonic decays Not really done yet

- Φrarre+e- (BR = 310-4)

- ΦrarrK+K- (BR = 049 K- FSI hadronic potential)

KEK-PS pA 12 GeV Γ asymp 15 MeV m asymp -34)

RMuto et al PRL 98 (2007) 042501

Φrarre+e-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

18

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

19

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment COSY experiment at ANKE

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

Reaction pA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayp-Energy 283 GeV ( ε free NNasymp 76MeV )Targets C Cu Ag Au

Momentum and (06 ― 16) GeVcangular range 0ole Θ

Φle 8o

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

20

ANKE ndash forward angle magnetic spectrometer at internal target position of COSY

Fd

Pd

Nd

Pd ndash positive detector system Fd ndash forward detector system Nd ndash negative detector system(STT ndash silicon tracking telescope)

STT

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

21

Ф K+K- selection

all

delayed

7000ndash10000 Φs for each target (C Cu Ag Au)

all K+

K+K-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

22

T A=

A

A

N

Normalization of Φ production cross section

A

C=N

A

N

C

N

C

N

A

A

C

R=T A

T C

=12A

A

C nuclear transparency ratio

To normalize the Φ production cross section we use the known pion data

We present the A-dependence of the Φ production in the following form

A

C= A12 π+ p = 05 GeVc Θ ~ 00

απ = 038 plusmn 002 ( 283GeV)

The Φ-meson yield (production cross section) follows a target mass

dependence of A056 plusmn 003

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

23

Transparency ratios experiment

ANKE

Any interpretation of the transparency ratio has to rely on a detailed theoretical treatment

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

24

Transparency ratios experiment and models

ANKE

VMagas et al PRC 71 (2005) 065202LRoca (private communication)

ValenciaEOset et alMC amp Chiral Unitary Approach

EParyev JPhys G 36 (2009) 015103

MoscowEParyevNuclear Spectral Function Approach

HSchade BKaumlmpfer (private communication) cf PRC 81 (2010) 034902

RossendorfBKaumlmpfer et alBUU

Relevant features for models

bull forward acceptance

bull two-step production processes

bull σpnrarrpnΦσ

pprarrppΦasymp 4

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

25

In-medium width ΓΦ and σ

ΦN cross section

ΓΦlab

(ρ0)=pΦ

EσΦ N

ρ0LDA

APolyanskiy et al PLB 695 (2011) 74

ΓΦ

lab asymp 33-50 MeV ( ltpΦgt = 11 GeVc ρ

0= 016 fm-3 )

Model dependent analysis of the ANKE

MoscowPParyevRossendorfBKaempfer etalValenciaEOset et al

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x1

201

3517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

26

Double differential cross section of Φ production

+ common systematics ~ 20

Excess in low momentum part

ANKEBUUNSP appr

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

27

Sum up

model dependent ANKE data analysis suggest

large in-medium Φ-meson width absorption (high momentum part) increasing with momentum

supported by Spring-8 amp JLAB results differential cross sections are not completely reproduced by model calculations (excess at lower momenta) results differ from the Valencia predictions (Φ in-medium self-energy)

pA

pp

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

QJ

Y

e et

al

n

ucl

-ex

1202

545

1

Thank you

truncated PW description of ppΦ shows that the contribution from purely S-wave final states represents only a small fraction of the total cross section at ε=76 MeV

explains why there is no S-wave pp-FSI in ANKE amp DISTO data

however in order to explain the energy dependence of the ppΦ total cross section seems to require a low mass Φp enhancement

Page 11: G z t l o h m l e H M Momentum dependence of the Φ-meson …cmarkert/workshop/Agenda... · 2012. 3. 19. · March 5-7th 2012, Michael Hartmann on behalf of the ANKE collaboration

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

11

hellip and final differential distributions at 76 MeV

angular distributions (symmetric about cos θ = 0)

polar decay angle

ANKE DISTO (83 MeV)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

12

hellip and final differential distributions at 76 MeV

185 MeV (for comparison)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

13

hellip and ppФ total cross section dilemma

full

Ps

Pp

SpSs

76 MeV

Simplest way out A Φp threshold enhancement leads to a significant energy dependence of some of the AL l coefficients

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

14

Φ(rarrK+K-) production in pA

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

15

Meson spectral function

Φ is a long-lived meson

λdec

= ħcΓ0= 44 fm gtgt R(Au)

Ф in free space

(PDG 2008)

M0 ndash pole mass Γ

0 ndash meson width

M0 = 10195 GeV

Γ0 = 426 MeV

S (M )=1π

Γ02

(MminusM 0)2+(Γ02)

2

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

16

Φ in nuclear matter

A general picture of numerous studies in different approaches eg effective Lagrangians and QCD sum rules

- mass modification is small

- main medium effect on the Ф is a significant increase of its width by up to an order of magnitude

Meson spectral function

SlowastM =

1

0minus2ImU opt 2

MminusM 0ReU opt20minus2ImUopt 2

2

Γlowast

lowast

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

17

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Study of the meson spectral function - measure low momentum Φs via leptonic decays Not really done yet

- Φrarre+e- (BR = 310-4)

- ΦrarrK+K- (BR = 049 K- FSI hadronic potential)

KEK-PS pA 12 GeV Γ asymp 15 MeV m asymp -34)

RMuto et al PRL 98 (2007) 042501

Φrarre+e-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

18

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

19

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment COSY experiment at ANKE

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

Reaction pA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayp-Energy 283 GeV ( ε free NNasymp 76MeV )Targets C Cu Ag Au

Momentum and (06 ― 16) GeVcangular range 0ole Θ

Φle 8o

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

20

ANKE ndash forward angle magnetic spectrometer at internal target position of COSY

Fd

Pd

Nd

Pd ndash positive detector system Fd ndash forward detector system Nd ndash negative detector system(STT ndash silicon tracking telescope)

STT

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

21

Ф K+K- selection

all

delayed

7000ndash10000 Φs for each target (C Cu Ag Au)

all K+

K+K-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

22

T A=

A

A

N

Normalization of Φ production cross section

A

C=N

A

N

C

N

C

N

A

A

C

R=T A

T C

=12A

A

C nuclear transparency ratio

To normalize the Φ production cross section we use the known pion data

We present the A-dependence of the Φ production in the following form

A

C= A12 π+ p = 05 GeVc Θ ~ 00

απ = 038 plusmn 002 ( 283GeV)

The Φ-meson yield (production cross section) follows a target mass

dependence of A056 plusmn 003

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

23

Transparency ratios experiment

ANKE

Any interpretation of the transparency ratio has to rely on a detailed theoretical treatment

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

24

Transparency ratios experiment and models

ANKE

VMagas et al PRC 71 (2005) 065202LRoca (private communication)

ValenciaEOset et alMC amp Chiral Unitary Approach

EParyev JPhys G 36 (2009) 015103

MoscowEParyevNuclear Spectral Function Approach

HSchade BKaumlmpfer (private communication) cf PRC 81 (2010) 034902

RossendorfBKaumlmpfer et alBUU

Relevant features for models

bull forward acceptance

bull two-step production processes

bull σpnrarrpnΦσ

pprarrppΦasymp 4

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

25

In-medium width ΓΦ and σ

ΦN cross section

ΓΦlab

(ρ0)=pΦ

EσΦ N

ρ0LDA

APolyanskiy et al PLB 695 (2011) 74

ΓΦ

lab asymp 33-50 MeV ( ltpΦgt = 11 GeVc ρ

0= 016 fm-3 )

Model dependent analysis of the ANKE

MoscowPParyevRossendorfBKaempfer etalValenciaEOset et al

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x1

201

3517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

26

Double differential cross section of Φ production

+ common systematics ~ 20

Excess in low momentum part

ANKEBUUNSP appr

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

27

Sum up

model dependent ANKE data analysis suggest

large in-medium Φ-meson width absorption (high momentum part) increasing with momentum

supported by Spring-8 amp JLAB results differential cross sections are not completely reproduced by model calculations (excess at lower momenta) results differ from the Valencia predictions (Φ in-medium self-energy)

pA

pp

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

QJ

Y

e et

al

n

ucl

-ex

1202

545

1

Thank you

truncated PW description of ppΦ shows that the contribution from purely S-wave final states represents only a small fraction of the total cross section at ε=76 MeV

explains why there is no S-wave pp-FSI in ANKE amp DISTO data

however in order to explain the energy dependence of the ppΦ total cross section seems to require a low mass Φp enhancement

Page 12: G z t l o h m l e H M Momentum dependence of the Φ-meson …cmarkert/workshop/Agenda... · 2012. 3. 19. · March 5-7th 2012, Michael Hartmann on behalf of the ANKE collaboration

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

12

hellip and final differential distributions at 76 MeV

185 MeV (for comparison)

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

13

hellip and ppФ total cross section dilemma

full

Ps

Pp

SpSs

76 MeV

Simplest way out A Φp threshold enhancement leads to a significant energy dependence of some of the AL l coefficients

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

14

Φ(rarrK+K-) production in pA

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

15

Meson spectral function

Φ is a long-lived meson

λdec

= ħcΓ0= 44 fm gtgt R(Au)

Ф in free space

(PDG 2008)

M0 ndash pole mass Γ

0 ndash meson width

M0 = 10195 GeV

Γ0 = 426 MeV

S (M )=1π

Γ02

(MminusM 0)2+(Γ02)

2

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

16

Φ in nuclear matter

A general picture of numerous studies in different approaches eg effective Lagrangians and QCD sum rules

- mass modification is small

- main medium effect on the Ф is a significant increase of its width by up to an order of magnitude

Meson spectral function

SlowastM =

1

0minus2ImU opt 2

MminusM 0ReU opt20minus2ImUopt 2

2

Γlowast

lowast

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

17

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Study of the meson spectral function - measure low momentum Φs via leptonic decays Not really done yet

- Φrarre+e- (BR = 310-4)

- ΦrarrK+K- (BR = 049 K- FSI hadronic potential)

KEK-PS pA 12 GeV Γ asymp 15 MeV m asymp -34)

RMuto et al PRL 98 (2007) 042501

Φrarre+e-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

18

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

19

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment COSY experiment at ANKE

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

Reaction pA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayp-Energy 283 GeV ( ε free NNasymp 76MeV )Targets C Cu Ag Au

Momentum and (06 ― 16) GeVcangular range 0ole Θ

Φle 8o

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

20

ANKE ndash forward angle magnetic spectrometer at internal target position of COSY

Fd

Pd

Nd

Pd ndash positive detector system Fd ndash forward detector system Nd ndash negative detector system(STT ndash silicon tracking telescope)

STT

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

21

Ф K+K- selection

all

delayed

7000ndash10000 Φs for each target (C Cu Ag Au)

all K+

K+K-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

22

T A=

A

A

N

Normalization of Φ production cross section

A

C=N

A

N

C

N

C

N

A

A

C

R=T A

T C

=12A

A

C nuclear transparency ratio

To normalize the Φ production cross section we use the known pion data

We present the A-dependence of the Φ production in the following form

A

C= A12 π+ p = 05 GeVc Θ ~ 00

απ = 038 plusmn 002 ( 283GeV)

The Φ-meson yield (production cross section) follows a target mass

dependence of A056 plusmn 003

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

23

Transparency ratios experiment

ANKE

Any interpretation of the transparency ratio has to rely on a detailed theoretical treatment

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

24

Transparency ratios experiment and models

ANKE

VMagas et al PRC 71 (2005) 065202LRoca (private communication)

ValenciaEOset et alMC amp Chiral Unitary Approach

EParyev JPhys G 36 (2009) 015103

MoscowEParyevNuclear Spectral Function Approach

HSchade BKaumlmpfer (private communication) cf PRC 81 (2010) 034902

RossendorfBKaumlmpfer et alBUU

Relevant features for models

bull forward acceptance

bull two-step production processes

bull σpnrarrpnΦσ

pprarrppΦasymp 4

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

25

In-medium width ΓΦ and σ

ΦN cross section

ΓΦlab

(ρ0)=pΦ

EσΦ N

ρ0LDA

APolyanskiy et al PLB 695 (2011) 74

ΓΦ

lab asymp 33-50 MeV ( ltpΦgt = 11 GeVc ρ

0= 016 fm-3 )

Model dependent analysis of the ANKE

MoscowPParyevRossendorfBKaempfer etalValenciaEOset et al

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x1

201

3517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

26

Double differential cross section of Φ production

+ common systematics ~ 20

Excess in low momentum part

ANKEBUUNSP appr

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

27

Sum up

model dependent ANKE data analysis suggest

large in-medium Φ-meson width absorption (high momentum part) increasing with momentum

supported by Spring-8 amp JLAB results differential cross sections are not completely reproduced by model calculations (excess at lower momenta) results differ from the Valencia predictions (Φ in-medium self-energy)

pA

pp

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

QJ

Y

e et

al

n

ucl

-ex

1202

545

1

Thank you

truncated PW description of ppΦ shows that the contribution from purely S-wave final states represents only a small fraction of the total cross section at ε=76 MeV

explains why there is no S-wave pp-FSI in ANKE amp DISTO data

however in order to explain the energy dependence of the ppΦ total cross section seems to require a low mass Φp enhancement

Page 13: G z t l o h m l e H M Momentum dependence of the Φ-meson …cmarkert/workshop/Agenda... · 2012. 3. 19. · March 5-7th 2012, Michael Hartmann on behalf of the ANKE collaboration

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

13

hellip and ppФ total cross section dilemma

full

Ps

Pp

SpSs

76 MeV

Simplest way out A Φp threshold enhancement leads to a significant energy dependence of some of the AL l coefficients

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

14

Φ(rarrK+K-) production in pA

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

15

Meson spectral function

Φ is a long-lived meson

λdec

= ħcΓ0= 44 fm gtgt R(Au)

Ф in free space

(PDG 2008)

M0 ndash pole mass Γ

0 ndash meson width

M0 = 10195 GeV

Γ0 = 426 MeV

S (M )=1π

Γ02

(MminusM 0)2+(Γ02)

2

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

16

Φ in nuclear matter

A general picture of numerous studies in different approaches eg effective Lagrangians and QCD sum rules

- mass modification is small

- main medium effect on the Ф is a significant increase of its width by up to an order of magnitude

Meson spectral function

SlowastM =

1

0minus2ImU opt 2

MminusM 0ReU opt20minus2ImUopt 2

2

Γlowast

lowast

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

17

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Study of the meson spectral function - measure low momentum Φs via leptonic decays Not really done yet

- Φrarre+e- (BR = 310-4)

- ΦrarrK+K- (BR = 049 K- FSI hadronic potential)

KEK-PS pA 12 GeV Γ asymp 15 MeV m asymp -34)

RMuto et al PRL 98 (2007) 042501

Φrarre+e-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

18

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

19

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment COSY experiment at ANKE

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

Reaction pA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayp-Energy 283 GeV ( ε free NNasymp 76MeV )Targets C Cu Ag Au

Momentum and (06 ― 16) GeVcangular range 0ole Θ

Φle 8o

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

20

ANKE ndash forward angle magnetic spectrometer at internal target position of COSY

Fd

Pd

Nd

Pd ndash positive detector system Fd ndash forward detector system Nd ndash negative detector system(STT ndash silicon tracking telescope)

STT

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

21

Ф K+K- selection

all

delayed

7000ndash10000 Φs for each target (C Cu Ag Au)

all K+

K+K-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

22

T A=

A

A

N

Normalization of Φ production cross section

A

C=N

A

N

C

N

C

N

A

A

C

R=T A

T C

=12A

A

C nuclear transparency ratio

To normalize the Φ production cross section we use the known pion data

We present the A-dependence of the Φ production in the following form

A

C= A12 π+ p = 05 GeVc Θ ~ 00

απ = 038 plusmn 002 ( 283GeV)

The Φ-meson yield (production cross section) follows a target mass

dependence of A056 plusmn 003

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

23

Transparency ratios experiment

ANKE

Any interpretation of the transparency ratio has to rely on a detailed theoretical treatment

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

24

Transparency ratios experiment and models

ANKE

VMagas et al PRC 71 (2005) 065202LRoca (private communication)

ValenciaEOset et alMC amp Chiral Unitary Approach

EParyev JPhys G 36 (2009) 015103

MoscowEParyevNuclear Spectral Function Approach

HSchade BKaumlmpfer (private communication) cf PRC 81 (2010) 034902

RossendorfBKaumlmpfer et alBUU

Relevant features for models

bull forward acceptance

bull two-step production processes

bull σpnrarrpnΦσ

pprarrppΦasymp 4

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

25

In-medium width ΓΦ and σ

ΦN cross section

ΓΦlab

(ρ0)=pΦ

EσΦ N

ρ0LDA

APolyanskiy et al PLB 695 (2011) 74

ΓΦ

lab asymp 33-50 MeV ( ltpΦgt = 11 GeVc ρ

0= 016 fm-3 )

Model dependent analysis of the ANKE

MoscowPParyevRossendorfBKaempfer etalValenciaEOset et al

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x1

201

3517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

26

Double differential cross section of Φ production

+ common systematics ~ 20

Excess in low momentum part

ANKEBUUNSP appr

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

27

Sum up

model dependent ANKE data analysis suggest

large in-medium Φ-meson width absorption (high momentum part) increasing with momentum

supported by Spring-8 amp JLAB results differential cross sections are not completely reproduced by model calculations (excess at lower momenta) results differ from the Valencia predictions (Φ in-medium self-energy)

pA

pp

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

QJ

Y

e et

al

n

ucl

-ex

1202

545

1

Thank you

truncated PW description of ppΦ shows that the contribution from purely S-wave final states represents only a small fraction of the total cross section at ε=76 MeV

explains why there is no S-wave pp-FSI in ANKE amp DISTO data

however in order to explain the energy dependence of the ppΦ total cross section seems to require a low mass Φp enhancement

Page 14: G z t l o h m l e H M Momentum dependence of the Φ-meson …cmarkert/workshop/Agenda... · 2012. 3. 19. · March 5-7th 2012, Michael Hartmann on behalf of the ANKE collaboration

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

14

Φ(rarrK+K-) production in pA

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

15

Meson spectral function

Φ is a long-lived meson

λdec

= ħcΓ0= 44 fm gtgt R(Au)

Ф in free space

(PDG 2008)

M0 ndash pole mass Γ

0 ndash meson width

M0 = 10195 GeV

Γ0 = 426 MeV

S (M )=1π

Γ02

(MminusM 0)2+(Γ02)

2

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

16

Φ in nuclear matter

A general picture of numerous studies in different approaches eg effective Lagrangians and QCD sum rules

- mass modification is small

- main medium effect on the Ф is a significant increase of its width by up to an order of magnitude

Meson spectral function

SlowastM =

1

0minus2ImU opt 2

MminusM 0ReU opt20minus2ImUopt 2

2

Γlowast

lowast

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

17

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Study of the meson spectral function - measure low momentum Φs via leptonic decays Not really done yet

- Φrarre+e- (BR = 310-4)

- ΦrarrK+K- (BR = 049 K- FSI hadronic potential)

KEK-PS pA 12 GeV Γ asymp 15 MeV m asymp -34)

RMuto et al PRL 98 (2007) 042501

Φrarre+e-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

18

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

19

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment COSY experiment at ANKE

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

Reaction pA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayp-Energy 283 GeV ( ε free NNasymp 76MeV )Targets C Cu Ag Au

Momentum and (06 ― 16) GeVcangular range 0ole Θ

Φle 8o

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

20

ANKE ndash forward angle magnetic spectrometer at internal target position of COSY

Fd

Pd

Nd

Pd ndash positive detector system Fd ndash forward detector system Nd ndash negative detector system(STT ndash silicon tracking telescope)

STT

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

21

Ф K+K- selection

all

delayed

7000ndash10000 Φs for each target (C Cu Ag Au)

all K+

K+K-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

22

T A=

A

A

N

Normalization of Φ production cross section

A

C=N

A

N

C

N

C

N

A

A

C

R=T A

T C

=12A

A

C nuclear transparency ratio

To normalize the Φ production cross section we use the known pion data

We present the A-dependence of the Φ production in the following form

A

C= A12 π+ p = 05 GeVc Θ ~ 00

απ = 038 plusmn 002 ( 283GeV)

The Φ-meson yield (production cross section) follows a target mass

dependence of A056 plusmn 003

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

23

Transparency ratios experiment

ANKE

Any interpretation of the transparency ratio has to rely on a detailed theoretical treatment

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

24

Transparency ratios experiment and models

ANKE

VMagas et al PRC 71 (2005) 065202LRoca (private communication)

ValenciaEOset et alMC amp Chiral Unitary Approach

EParyev JPhys G 36 (2009) 015103

MoscowEParyevNuclear Spectral Function Approach

HSchade BKaumlmpfer (private communication) cf PRC 81 (2010) 034902

RossendorfBKaumlmpfer et alBUU

Relevant features for models

bull forward acceptance

bull two-step production processes

bull σpnrarrpnΦσ

pprarrppΦasymp 4

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

25

In-medium width ΓΦ and σ

ΦN cross section

ΓΦlab

(ρ0)=pΦ

EσΦ N

ρ0LDA

APolyanskiy et al PLB 695 (2011) 74

ΓΦ

lab asymp 33-50 MeV ( ltpΦgt = 11 GeVc ρ

0= 016 fm-3 )

Model dependent analysis of the ANKE

MoscowPParyevRossendorfBKaempfer etalValenciaEOset et al

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x1

201

3517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

26

Double differential cross section of Φ production

+ common systematics ~ 20

Excess in low momentum part

ANKEBUUNSP appr

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

27

Sum up

model dependent ANKE data analysis suggest

large in-medium Φ-meson width absorption (high momentum part) increasing with momentum

supported by Spring-8 amp JLAB results differential cross sections are not completely reproduced by model calculations (excess at lower momenta) results differ from the Valencia predictions (Φ in-medium self-energy)

pA

pp

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

QJ

Y

e et

al

n

ucl

-ex

1202

545

1

Thank you

truncated PW description of ppΦ shows that the contribution from purely S-wave final states represents only a small fraction of the total cross section at ε=76 MeV

explains why there is no S-wave pp-FSI in ANKE amp DISTO data

however in order to explain the energy dependence of the ppΦ total cross section seems to require a low mass Φp enhancement

Page 15: G z t l o h m l e H M Momentum dependence of the Φ-meson …cmarkert/workshop/Agenda... · 2012. 3. 19. · March 5-7th 2012, Michael Hartmann on behalf of the ANKE collaboration

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

15

Meson spectral function

Φ is a long-lived meson

λdec

= ħcΓ0= 44 fm gtgt R(Au)

Ф in free space

(PDG 2008)

M0 ndash pole mass Γ

0 ndash meson width

M0 = 10195 GeV

Γ0 = 426 MeV

S (M )=1π

Γ02

(MminusM 0)2+(Γ02)

2

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

16

Φ in nuclear matter

A general picture of numerous studies in different approaches eg effective Lagrangians and QCD sum rules

- mass modification is small

- main medium effect on the Ф is a significant increase of its width by up to an order of magnitude

Meson spectral function

SlowastM =

1

0minus2ImU opt 2

MminusM 0ReU opt20minus2ImUopt 2

2

Γlowast

lowast

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

17

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Study of the meson spectral function - measure low momentum Φs via leptonic decays Not really done yet

- Φrarre+e- (BR = 310-4)

- ΦrarrK+K- (BR = 049 K- FSI hadronic potential)

KEK-PS pA 12 GeV Γ asymp 15 MeV m asymp -34)

RMuto et al PRL 98 (2007) 042501

Φrarre+e-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

18

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

19

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment COSY experiment at ANKE

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

Reaction pA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayp-Energy 283 GeV ( ε free NNasymp 76MeV )Targets C Cu Ag Au

Momentum and (06 ― 16) GeVcangular range 0ole Θ

Φle 8o

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

20

ANKE ndash forward angle magnetic spectrometer at internal target position of COSY

Fd

Pd

Nd

Pd ndash positive detector system Fd ndash forward detector system Nd ndash negative detector system(STT ndash silicon tracking telescope)

STT

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

21

Ф K+K- selection

all

delayed

7000ndash10000 Φs for each target (C Cu Ag Au)

all K+

K+K-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

22

T A=

A

A

N

Normalization of Φ production cross section

A

C=N

A

N

C

N

C

N

A

A

C

R=T A

T C

=12A

A

C nuclear transparency ratio

To normalize the Φ production cross section we use the known pion data

We present the A-dependence of the Φ production in the following form

A

C= A12 π+ p = 05 GeVc Θ ~ 00

απ = 038 plusmn 002 ( 283GeV)

The Φ-meson yield (production cross section) follows a target mass

dependence of A056 plusmn 003

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

23

Transparency ratios experiment

ANKE

Any interpretation of the transparency ratio has to rely on a detailed theoretical treatment

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

24

Transparency ratios experiment and models

ANKE

VMagas et al PRC 71 (2005) 065202LRoca (private communication)

ValenciaEOset et alMC amp Chiral Unitary Approach

EParyev JPhys G 36 (2009) 015103

MoscowEParyevNuclear Spectral Function Approach

HSchade BKaumlmpfer (private communication) cf PRC 81 (2010) 034902

RossendorfBKaumlmpfer et alBUU

Relevant features for models

bull forward acceptance

bull two-step production processes

bull σpnrarrpnΦσ

pprarrppΦasymp 4

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

25

In-medium width ΓΦ and σ

ΦN cross section

ΓΦlab

(ρ0)=pΦ

EσΦ N

ρ0LDA

APolyanskiy et al PLB 695 (2011) 74

ΓΦ

lab asymp 33-50 MeV ( ltpΦgt = 11 GeVc ρ

0= 016 fm-3 )

Model dependent analysis of the ANKE

MoscowPParyevRossendorfBKaempfer etalValenciaEOset et al

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x1

201

3517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

26

Double differential cross section of Φ production

+ common systematics ~ 20

Excess in low momentum part

ANKEBUUNSP appr

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

27

Sum up

model dependent ANKE data analysis suggest

large in-medium Φ-meson width absorption (high momentum part) increasing with momentum

supported by Spring-8 amp JLAB results differential cross sections are not completely reproduced by model calculations (excess at lower momenta) results differ from the Valencia predictions (Φ in-medium self-energy)

pA

pp

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

QJ

Y

e et

al

n

ucl

-ex

1202

545

1

Thank you

truncated PW description of ppΦ shows that the contribution from purely S-wave final states represents only a small fraction of the total cross section at ε=76 MeV

explains why there is no S-wave pp-FSI in ANKE amp DISTO data

however in order to explain the energy dependence of the ppΦ total cross section seems to require a low mass Φp enhancement

Page 16: G z t l o h m l e H M Momentum dependence of the Φ-meson …cmarkert/workshop/Agenda... · 2012. 3. 19. · March 5-7th 2012, Michael Hartmann on behalf of the ANKE collaboration

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

16

Φ in nuclear matter

A general picture of numerous studies in different approaches eg effective Lagrangians and QCD sum rules

- mass modification is small

- main medium effect on the Ф is a significant increase of its width by up to an order of magnitude

Meson spectral function

SlowastM =

1

0minus2ImU opt 2

MminusM 0ReU opt20minus2ImUopt 2

2

Γlowast

lowast

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

17

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Study of the meson spectral function - measure low momentum Φs via leptonic decays Not really done yet

- Φrarre+e- (BR = 310-4)

- ΦrarrK+K- (BR = 049 K- FSI hadronic potential)

KEK-PS pA 12 GeV Γ asymp 15 MeV m asymp -34)

RMuto et al PRL 98 (2007) 042501

Φrarre+e-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

18

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

19

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment COSY experiment at ANKE

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

Reaction pA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayp-Energy 283 GeV ( ε free NNasymp 76MeV )Targets C Cu Ag Au

Momentum and (06 ― 16) GeVcangular range 0ole Θ

Φle 8o

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

20

ANKE ndash forward angle magnetic spectrometer at internal target position of COSY

Fd

Pd

Nd

Pd ndash positive detector system Fd ndash forward detector system Nd ndash negative detector system(STT ndash silicon tracking telescope)

STT

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

21

Ф K+K- selection

all

delayed

7000ndash10000 Φs for each target (C Cu Ag Au)

all K+

K+K-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

22

T A=

A

A

N

Normalization of Φ production cross section

A

C=N

A

N

C

N

C

N

A

A

C

R=T A

T C

=12A

A

C nuclear transparency ratio

To normalize the Φ production cross section we use the known pion data

We present the A-dependence of the Φ production in the following form

A

C= A12 π+ p = 05 GeVc Θ ~ 00

απ = 038 plusmn 002 ( 283GeV)

The Φ-meson yield (production cross section) follows a target mass

dependence of A056 plusmn 003

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

23

Transparency ratios experiment

ANKE

Any interpretation of the transparency ratio has to rely on a detailed theoretical treatment

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

24

Transparency ratios experiment and models

ANKE

VMagas et al PRC 71 (2005) 065202LRoca (private communication)

ValenciaEOset et alMC amp Chiral Unitary Approach

EParyev JPhys G 36 (2009) 015103

MoscowEParyevNuclear Spectral Function Approach

HSchade BKaumlmpfer (private communication) cf PRC 81 (2010) 034902

RossendorfBKaumlmpfer et alBUU

Relevant features for models

bull forward acceptance

bull two-step production processes

bull σpnrarrpnΦσ

pprarrppΦasymp 4

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

25

In-medium width ΓΦ and σ

ΦN cross section

ΓΦlab

(ρ0)=pΦ

EσΦ N

ρ0LDA

APolyanskiy et al PLB 695 (2011) 74

ΓΦ

lab asymp 33-50 MeV ( ltpΦgt = 11 GeVc ρ

0= 016 fm-3 )

Model dependent analysis of the ANKE

MoscowPParyevRossendorfBKaempfer etalValenciaEOset et al

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x1

201

3517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

26

Double differential cross section of Φ production

+ common systematics ~ 20

Excess in low momentum part

ANKEBUUNSP appr

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

27

Sum up

model dependent ANKE data analysis suggest

large in-medium Φ-meson width absorption (high momentum part) increasing with momentum

supported by Spring-8 amp JLAB results differential cross sections are not completely reproduced by model calculations (excess at lower momenta) results differ from the Valencia predictions (Φ in-medium self-energy)

pA

pp

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

QJ

Y

e et

al

n

ucl

-ex

1202

545

1

Thank you

truncated PW description of ppΦ shows that the contribution from purely S-wave final states represents only a small fraction of the total cross section at ε=76 MeV

explains why there is no S-wave pp-FSI in ANKE amp DISTO data

however in order to explain the energy dependence of the ppΦ total cross section seems to require a low mass Φp enhancement

Page 17: G z t l o h m l e H M Momentum dependence of the Φ-meson …cmarkert/workshop/Agenda... · 2012. 3. 19. · March 5-7th 2012, Michael Hartmann on behalf of the ANKE collaboration

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

17

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Study of the meson spectral function - measure low momentum Φs via leptonic decays Not really done yet

- Φrarre+e- (BR = 310-4)

- ΦrarrK+K- (BR = 049 K- FSI hadronic potential)

KEK-PS pA 12 GeV Γ asymp 15 MeV m asymp -34)

RMuto et al PRL 98 (2007) 042501

Φrarre+e-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

18

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

19

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment COSY experiment at ANKE

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

Reaction pA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayp-Energy 283 GeV ( ε free NNasymp 76MeV )Targets C Cu Ag Au

Momentum and (06 ― 16) GeVcangular range 0ole Θ

Φle 8o

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

20

ANKE ndash forward angle magnetic spectrometer at internal target position of COSY

Fd

Pd

Nd

Pd ndash positive detector system Fd ndash forward detector system Nd ndash negative detector system(STT ndash silicon tracking telescope)

STT

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

21

Ф K+K- selection

all

delayed

7000ndash10000 Φs for each target (C Cu Ag Au)

all K+

K+K-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

22

T A=

A

A

N

Normalization of Φ production cross section

A

C=N

A

N

C

N

C

N

A

A

C

R=T A

T C

=12A

A

C nuclear transparency ratio

To normalize the Φ production cross section we use the known pion data

We present the A-dependence of the Φ production in the following form

A

C= A12 π+ p = 05 GeVc Θ ~ 00

απ = 038 plusmn 002 ( 283GeV)

The Φ-meson yield (production cross section) follows a target mass

dependence of A056 plusmn 003

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

23

Transparency ratios experiment

ANKE

Any interpretation of the transparency ratio has to rely on a detailed theoretical treatment

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

24

Transparency ratios experiment and models

ANKE

VMagas et al PRC 71 (2005) 065202LRoca (private communication)

ValenciaEOset et alMC amp Chiral Unitary Approach

EParyev JPhys G 36 (2009) 015103

MoscowEParyevNuclear Spectral Function Approach

HSchade BKaumlmpfer (private communication) cf PRC 81 (2010) 034902

RossendorfBKaumlmpfer et alBUU

Relevant features for models

bull forward acceptance

bull two-step production processes

bull σpnrarrpnΦσ

pprarrppΦasymp 4

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

25

In-medium width ΓΦ and σ

ΦN cross section

ΓΦlab

(ρ0)=pΦ

EσΦ N

ρ0LDA

APolyanskiy et al PLB 695 (2011) 74

ΓΦ

lab asymp 33-50 MeV ( ltpΦgt = 11 GeVc ρ

0= 016 fm-3 )

Model dependent analysis of the ANKE

MoscowPParyevRossendorfBKaempfer etalValenciaEOset et al

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x1

201

3517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

26

Double differential cross section of Φ production

+ common systematics ~ 20

Excess in low momentum part

ANKEBUUNSP appr

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

27

Sum up

model dependent ANKE data analysis suggest

large in-medium Φ-meson width absorption (high momentum part) increasing with momentum

supported by Spring-8 amp JLAB results differential cross sections are not completely reproduced by model calculations (excess at lower momenta) results differ from the Valencia predictions (Φ in-medium self-energy)

pA

pp

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

QJ

Y

e et

al

n

ucl

-ex

1202

545

1

Thank you

truncated PW description of ppΦ shows that the contribution from purely S-wave final states represents only a small fraction of the total cross section at ε=76 MeV

explains why there is no S-wave pp-FSI in ANKE amp DISTO data

however in order to explain the energy dependence of the ppΦ total cross section seems to require a low mass Φp enhancement

Page 18: G z t l o h m l e H M Momentum dependence of the Φ-meson …cmarkert/workshop/Agenda... · 2012. 3. 19. · March 5-7th 2012, Michael Hartmann on behalf of the ANKE collaboration

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

18

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

19

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment COSY experiment at ANKE

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

Reaction pA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayp-Energy 283 GeV ( ε free NNasymp 76MeV )Targets C Cu Ag Au

Momentum and (06 ― 16) GeVcangular range 0ole Θ

Φle 8o

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

20

ANKE ndash forward angle magnetic spectrometer at internal target position of COSY

Fd

Pd

Nd

Pd ndash positive detector system Fd ndash forward detector system Nd ndash negative detector system(STT ndash silicon tracking telescope)

STT

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

21

Ф K+K- selection

all

delayed

7000ndash10000 Φs for each target (C Cu Ag Au)

all K+

K+K-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

22

T A=

A

A

N

Normalization of Φ production cross section

A

C=N

A

N

C

N

C

N

A

A

C

R=T A

T C

=12A

A

C nuclear transparency ratio

To normalize the Φ production cross section we use the known pion data

We present the A-dependence of the Φ production in the following form

A

C= A12 π+ p = 05 GeVc Θ ~ 00

απ = 038 plusmn 002 ( 283GeV)

The Φ-meson yield (production cross section) follows a target mass

dependence of A056 plusmn 003

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

23

Transparency ratios experiment

ANKE

Any interpretation of the transparency ratio has to rely on a detailed theoretical treatment

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

24

Transparency ratios experiment and models

ANKE

VMagas et al PRC 71 (2005) 065202LRoca (private communication)

ValenciaEOset et alMC amp Chiral Unitary Approach

EParyev JPhys G 36 (2009) 015103

MoscowEParyevNuclear Spectral Function Approach

HSchade BKaumlmpfer (private communication) cf PRC 81 (2010) 034902

RossendorfBKaumlmpfer et alBUU

Relevant features for models

bull forward acceptance

bull two-step production processes

bull σpnrarrpnΦσ

pprarrppΦasymp 4

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

25

In-medium width ΓΦ and σ

ΦN cross section

ΓΦlab

(ρ0)=pΦ

EσΦ N

ρ0LDA

APolyanskiy et al PLB 695 (2011) 74

ΓΦ

lab asymp 33-50 MeV ( ltpΦgt = 11 GeVc ρ

0= 016 fm-3 )

Model dependent analysis of the ANKE

MoscowPParyevRossendorfBKaempfer etalValenciaEOset et al

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x1

201

3517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

26

Double differential cross section of Φ production

+ common systematics ~ 20

Excess in low momentum part

ANKEBUUNSP appr

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

27

Sum up

model dependent ANKE data analysis suggest

large in-medium Φ-meson width absorption (high momentum part) increasing with momentum

supported by Spring-8 amp JLAB results differential cross sections are not completely reproduced by model calculations (excess at lower momenta) results differ from the Valencia predictions (Φ in-medium self-energy)

pA

pp

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

QJ

Y

e et

al

n

ucl

-ex

1202

545

1

Thank you

truncated PW description of ppΦ shows that the contribution from purely S-wave final states represents only a small fraction of the total cross section at ε=76 MeV

explains why there is no S-wave pp-FSI in ANKE amp DISTO data

however in order to explain the energy dependence of the ppΦ total cross section seems to require a low mass Φp enhancement

Page 19: G z t l o h m l e H M Momentum dependence of the Φ-meson …cmarkert/workshop/Agenda... · 2012. 3. 19. · March 5-7th 2012, Michael Hartmann on behalf of the ANKE collaboration

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

19

Methods of Φ-width measurement

Attenuation measurements of the Φ flux SPring-8 photo-production up-coming CLAS results

Φ survival probability in the nucleus matter rest frame In-medium width deduced from the target mass dependence

D=exp (minusintz

infin

dlΓlowast(ρ(r ))M 0

pΦ) ρ(r )minuslocal nuclear density

SPring-8 LEPS experiment COSY experiment at ANKE

Reaction γA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayγ-Energy 15 ― 24 GeV Targets Li C Al Cu

Result large σФN = 35+17 mb using Glauber-type multi-scatt theory (free σФN asymp 8-10 mb)

T Ishikawa et al PLB 608 (2005) 215

Reaction pA rarr Φ Χ via K+K- decayp-Energy 283 GeV ( ε free NNasymp 76MeV )Targets C Cu Ag Au

Momentum and (06 ― 16) GeVcangular range 0ole Θ

Φle 8o

-11

dominate K+K- BR =049

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

20

ANKE ndash forward angle magnetic spectrometer at internal target position of COSY

Fd

Pd

Nd

Pd ndash positive detector system Fd ndash forward detector system Nd ndash negative detector system(STT ndash silicon tracking telescope)

STT

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

21

Ф K+K- selection

all

delayed

7000ndash10000 Φs for each target (C Cu Ag Au)

all K+

K+K-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

22

T A=

A

A

N

Normalization of Φ production cross section

A

C=N

A

N

C

N

C

N

A

A

C

R=T A

T C

=12A

A

C nuclear transparency ratio

To normalize the Φ production cross section we use the known pion data

We present the A-dependence of the Φ production in the following form

A

C= A12 π+ p = 05 GeVc Θ ~ 00

απ = 038 plusmn 002 ( 283GeV)

The Φ-meson yield (production cross section) follows a target mass

dependence of A056 plusmn 003

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

23

Transparency ratios experiment

ANKE

Any interpretation of the transparency ratio has to rely on a detailed theoretical treatment

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

24

Transparency ratios experiment and models

ANKE

VMagas et al PRC 71 (2005) 065202LRoca (private communication)

ValenciaEOset et alMC amp Chiral Unitary Approach

EParyev JPhys G 36 (2009) 015103

MoscowEParyevNuclear Spectral Function Approach

HSchade BKaumlmpfer (private communication) cf PRC 81 (2010) 034902

RossendorfBKaumlmpfer et alBUU

Relevant features for models

bull forward acceptance

bull two-step production processes

bull σpnrarrpnΦσ

pprarrppΦasymp 4

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

25

In-medium width ΓΦ and σ

ΦN cross section

ΓΦlab

(ρ0)=pΦ

EσΦ N

ρ0LDA

APolyanskiy et al PLB 695 (2011) 74

ΓΦ

lab asymp 33-50 MeV ( ltpΦgt = 11 GeVc ρ

0= 016 fm-3 )

Model dependent analysis of the ANKE

MoscowPParyevRossendorfBKaempfer etalValenciaEOset et al

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x1

201

3517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

26

Double differential cross section of Φ production

+ common systematics ~ 20

Excess in low momentum part

ANKEBUUNSP appr

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

27

Sum up

model dependent ANKE data analysis suggest

large in-medium Φ-meson width absorption (high momentum part) increasing with momentum

supported by Spring-8 amp JLAB results differential cross sections are not completely reproduced by model calculations (excess at lower momenta) results differ from the Valencia predictions (Φ in-medium self-energy)

pA

pp

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

QJ

Y

e et

al

n

ucl

-ex

1202

545

1

Thank you

truncated PW description of ppΦ shows that the contribution from purely S-wave final states represents only a small fraction of the total cross section at ε=76 MeV

explains why there is no S-wave pp-FSI in ANKE amp DISTO data

however in order to explain the energy dependence of the ppΦ total cross section seems to require a low mass Φp enhancement

Page 20: G z t l o h m l e H M Momentum dependence of the Φ-meson …cmarkert/workshop/Agenda... · 2012. 3. 19. · March 5-7th 2012, Michael Hartmann on behalf of the ANKE collaboration

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

20

ANKE ndash forward angle magnetic spectrometer at internal target position of COSY

Fd

Pd

Nd

Pd ndash positive detector system Fd ndash forward detector system Nd ndash negative detector system(STT ndash silicon tracking telescope)

STT

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

21

Ф K+K- selection

all

delayed

7000ndash10000 Φs for each target (C Cu Ag Au)

all K+

K+K-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

22

T A=

A

A

N

Normalization of Φ production cross section

A

C=N

A

N

C

N

C

N

A

A

C

R=T A

T C

=12A

A

C nuclear transparency ratio

To normalize the Φ production cross section we use the known pion data

We present the A-dependence of the Φ production in the following form

A

C= A12 π+ p = 05 GeVc Θ ~ 00

απ = 038 plusmn 002 ( 283GeV)

The Φ-meson yield (production cross section) follows a target mass

dependence of A056 plusmn 003

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

23

Transparency ratios experiment

ANKE

Any interpretation of the transparency ratio has to rely on a detailed theoretical treatment

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

24

Transparency ratios experiment and models

ANKE

VMagas et al PRC 71 (2005) 065202LRoca (private communication)

ValenciaEOset et alMC amp Chiral Unitary Approach

EParyev JPhys G 36 (2009) 015103

MoscowEParyevNuclear Spectral Function Approach

HSchade BKaumlmpfer (private communication) cf PRC 81 (2010) 034902

RossendorfBKaumlmpfer et alBUU

Relevant features for models

bull forward acceptance

bull two-step production processes

bull σpnrarrpnΦσ

pprarrppΦasymp 4

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

25

In-medium width ΓΦ and σ

ΦN cross section

ΓΦlab

(ρ0)=pΦ

EσΦ N

ρ0LDA

APolyanskiy et al PLB 695 (2011) 74

ΓΦ

lab asymp 33-50 MeV ( ltpΦgt = 11 GeVc ρ

0= 016 fm-3 )

Model dependent analysis of the ANKE

MoscowPParyevRossendorfBKaempfer etalValenciaEOset et al

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x1

201

3517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

26

Double differential cross section of Φ production

+ common systematics ~ 20

Excess in low momentum part

ANKEBUUNSP appr

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

27

Sum up

model dependent ANKE data analysis suggest

large in-medium Φ-meson width absorption (high momentum part) increasing with momentum

supported by Spring-8 amp JLAB results differential cross sections are not completely reproduced by model calculations (excess at lower momenta) results differ from the Valencia predictions (Φ in-medium self-energy)

pA

pp

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

QJ

Y

e et

al

n

ucl

-ex

1202

545

1

Thank you

truncated PW description of ppΦ shows that the contribution from purely S-wave final states represents only a small fraction of the total cross section at ε=76 MeV

explains why there is no S-wave pp-FSI in ANKE amp DISTO data

however in order to explain the energy dependence of the ppΦ total cross section seems to require a low mass Φp enhancement

Page 21: G z t l o h m l e H M Momentum dependence of the Φ-meson …cmarkert/workshop/Agenda... · 2012. 3. 19. · March 5-7th 2012, Michael Hartmann on behalf of the ANKE collaboration

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

21

Ф K+K- selection

all

delayed

7000ndash10000 Φs for each target (C Cu Ag Au)

all K+

K+K-

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

22

T A=

A

A

N

Normalization of Φ production cross section

A

C=N

A

N

C

N

C

N

A

A

C

R=T A

T C

=12A

A

C nuclear transparency ratio

To normalize the Φ production cross section we use the known pion data

We present the A-dependence of the Φ production in the following form

A

C= A12 π+ p = 05 GeVc Θ ~ 00

απ = 038 plusmn 002 ( 283GeV)

The Φ-meson yield (production cross section) follows a target mass

dependence of A056 plusmn 003

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

23

Transparency ratios experiment

ANKE

Any interpretation of the transparency ratio has to rely on a detailed theoretical treatment

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

24

Transparency ratios experiment and models

ANKE

VMagas et al PRC 71 (2005) 065202LRoca (private communication)

ValenciaEOset et alMC amp Chiral Unitary Approach

EParyev JPhys G 36 (2009) 015103

MoscowEParyevNuclear Spectral Function Approach

HSchade BKaumlmpfer (private communication) cf PRC 81 (2010) 034902

RossendorfBKaumlmpfer et alBUU

Relevant features for models

bull forward acceptance

bull two-step production processes

bull σpnrarrpnΦσ

pprarrppΦasymp 4

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

25

In-medium width ΓΦ and σ

ΦN cross section

ΓΦlab

(ρ0)=pΦ

EσΦ N

ρ0LDA

APolyanskiy et al PLB 695 (2011) 74

ΓΦ

lab asymp 33-50 MeV ( ltpΦgt = 11 GeVc ρ

0= 016 fm-3 )

Model dependent analysis of the ANKE

MoscowPParyevRossendorfBKaempfer etalValenciaEOset et al

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x1

201

3517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

26

Double differential cross section of Φ production

+ common systematics ~ 20

Excess in low momentum part

ANKEBUUNSP appr

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

27

Sum up

model dependent ANKE data analysis suggest

large in-medium Φ-meson width absorption (high momentum part) increasing with momentum

supported by Spring-8 amp JLAB results differential cross sections are not completely reproduced by model calculations (excess at lower momenta) results differ from the Valencia predictions (Φ in-medium self-energy)

pA

pp

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

QJ

Y

e et

al

n

ucl

-ex

1202

545

1

Thank you

truncated PW description of ppΦ shows that the contribution from purely S-wave final states represents only a small fraction of the total cross section at ε=76 MeV

explains why there is no S-wave pp-FSI in ANKE amp DISTO data

however in order to explain the energy dependence of the ppΦ total cross section seems to require a low mass Φp enhancement

Page 22: G z t l o h m l e H M Momentum dependence of the Φ-meson …cmarkert/workshop/Agenda... · 2012. 3. 19. · March 5-7th 2012, Michael Hartmann on behalf of the ANKE collaboration

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

22

T A=

A

A

N

Normalization of Φ production cross section

A

C=N

A

N

C

N

C

N

A

A

C

R=T A

T C

=12A

A

C nuclear transparency ratio

To normalize the Φ production cross section we use the known pion data

We present the A-dependence of the Φ production in the following form

A

C= A12 π+ p = 05 GeVc Θ ~ 00

απ = 038 plusmn 002 ( 283GeV)

The Φ-meson yield (production cross section) follows a target mass

dependence of A056 plusmn 003

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

23

Transparency ratios experiment

ANKE

Any interpretation of the transparency ratio has to rely on a detailed theoretical treatment

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

24

Transparency ratios experiment and models

ANKE

VMagas et al PRC 71 (2005) 065202LRoca (private communication)

ValenciaEOset et alMC amp Chiral Unitary Approach

EParyev JPhys G 36 (2009) 015103

MoscowEParyevNuclear Spectral Function Approach

HSchade BKaumlmpfer (private communication) cf PRC 81 (2010) 034902

RossendorfBKaumlmpfer et alBUU

Relevant features for models

bull forward acceptance

bull two-step production processes

bull σpnrarrpnΦσ

pprarrppΦasymp 4

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

25

In-medium width ΓΦ and σ

ΦN cross section

ΓΦlab

(ρ0)=pΦ

EσΦ N

ρ0LDA

APolyanskiy et al PLB 695 (2011) 74

ΓΦ

lab asymp 33-50 MeV ( ltpΦgt = 11 GeVc ρ

0= 016 fm-3 )

Model dependent analysis of the ANKE

MoscowPParyevRossendorfBKaempfer etalValenciaEOset et al

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x1

201

3517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

26

Double differential cross section of Φ production

+ common systematics ~ 20

Excess in low momentum part

ANKEBUUNSP appr

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

27

Sum up

model dependent ANKE data analysis suggest

large in-medium Φ-meson width absorption (high momentum part) increasing with momentum

supported by Spring-8 amp JLAB results differential cross sections are not completely reproduced by model calculations (excess at lower momenta) results differ from the Valencia predictions (Φ in-medium self-energy)

pA

pp

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

QJ

Y

e et

al

n

ucl

-ex

1202

545

1

Thank you

truncated PW description of ppΦ shows that the contribution from purely S-wave final states represents only a small fraction of the total cross section at ε=76 MeV

explains why there is no S-wave pp-FSI in ANKE amp DISTO data

however in order to explain the energy dependence of the ppΦ total cross section seems to require a low mass Φp enhancement

Page 23: G z t l o h m l e H M Momentum dependence of the Φ-meson …cmarkert/workshop/Agenda... · 2012. 3. 19. · March 5-7th 2012, Michael Hartmann on behalf of the ANKE collaboration

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

23

Transparency ratios experiment

ANKE

Any interpretation of the transparency ratio has to rely on a detailed theoretical treatment

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

24

Transparency ratios experiment and models

ANKE

VMagas et al PRC 71 (2005) 065202LRoca (private communication)

ValenciaEOset et alMC amp Chiral Unitary Approach

EParyev JPhys G 36 (2009) 015103

MoscowEParyevNuclear Spectral Function Approach

HSchade BKaumlmpfer (private communication) cf PRC 81 (2010) 034902

RossendorfBKaumlmpfer et alBUU

Relevant features for models

bull forward acceptance

bull two-step production processes

bull σpnrarrpnΦσ

pprarrppΦasymp 4

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

25

In-medium width ΓΦ and σ

ΦN cross section

ΓΦlab

(ρ0)=pΦ

EσΦ N

ρ0LDA

APolyanskiy et al PLB 695 (2011) 74

ΓΦ

lab asymp 33-50 MeV ( ltpΦgt = 11 GeVc ρ

0= 016 fm-3 )

Model dependent analysis of the ANKE

MoscowPParyevRossendorfBKaempfer etalValenciaEOset et al

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x1

201

3517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

26

Double differential cross section of Φ production

+ common systematics ~ 20

Excess in low momentum part

ANKEBUUNSP appr

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

27

Sum up

model dependent ANKE data analysis suggest

large in-medium Φ-meson width absorption (high momentum part) increasing with momentum

supported by Spring-8 amp JLAB results differential cross sections are not completely reproduced by model calculations (excess at lower momenta) results differ from the Valencia predictions (Φ in-medium self-energy)

pA

pp

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

QJ

Y

e et

al

n

ucl

-ex

1202

545

1

Thank you

truncated PW description of ppΦ shows that the contribution from purely S-wave final states represents only a small fraction of the total cross section at ε=76 MeV

explains why there is no S-wave pp-FSI in ANKE amp DISTO data

however in order to explain the energy dependence of the ppΦ total cross section seems to require a low mass Φp enhancement

Page 24: G z t l o h m l e H M Momentum dependence of the Φ-meson …cmarkert/workshop/Agenda... · 2012. 3. 19. · March 5-7th 2012, Michael Hartmann on behalf of the ANKE collaboration

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

24

Transparency ratios experiment and models

ANKE

VMagas et al PRC 71 (2005) 065202LRoca (private communication)

ValenciaEOset et alMC amp Chiral Unitary Approach

EParyev JPhys G 36 (2009) 015103

MoscowEParyevNuclear Spectral Function Approach

HSchade BKaumlmpfer (private communication) cf PRC 81 (2010) 034902

RossendorfBKaumlmpfer et alBUU

Relevant features for models

bull forward acceptance

bull two-step production processes

bull σpnrarrpnΦσ

pprarrppΦasymp 4

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

25

In-medium width ΓΦ and σ

ΦN cross section

ΓΦlab

(ρ0)=pΦ

EσΦ N

ρ0LDA

APolyanskiy et al PLB 695 (2011) 74

ΓΦ

lab asymp 33-50 MeV ( ltpΦgt = 11 GeVc ρ

0= 016 fm-3 )

Model dependent analysis of the ANKE

MoscowPParyevRossendorfBKaempfer etalValenciaEOset et al

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x1

201

3517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

26

Double differential cross section of Φ production

+ common systematics ~ 20

Excess in low momentum part

ANKEBUUNSP appr

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

27

Sum up

model dependent ANKE data analysis suggest

large in-medium Φ-meson width absorption (high momentum part) increasing with momentum

supported by Spring-8 amp JLAB results differential cross sections are not completely reproduced by model calculations (excess at lower momenta) results differ from the Valencia predictions (Φ in-medium self-energy)

pA

pp

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

QJ

Y

e et

al

n

ucl

-ex

1202

545

1

Thank you

truncated PW description of ppΦ shows that the contribution from purely S-wave final states represents only a small fraction of the total cross section at ε=76 MeV

explains why there is no S-wave pp-FSI in ANKE amp DISTO data

however in order to explain the energy dependence of the ppΦ total cross section seems to require a low mass Φp enhancement

Page 25: G z t l o h m l e H M Momentum dependence of the Φ-meson …cmarkert/workshop/Agenda... · 2012. 3. 19. · March 5-7th 2012, Michael Hartmann on behalf of the ANKE collaboration

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

25

In-medium width ΓΦ and σ

ΦN cross section

ΓΦlab

(ρ0)=pΦ

EσΦ N

ρ0LDA

APolyanskiy et al PLB 695 (2011) 74

ΓΦ

lab asymp 33-50 MeV ( ltpΦgt = 11 GeVc ρ

0= 016 fm-3 )

Model dependent analysis of the ANKE

MoscowPParyevRossendorfBKaempfer etalValenciaEOset et al

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x1

201

3517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

26

Double differential cross section of Φ production

+ common systematics ~ 20

Excess in low momentum part

ANKEBUUNSP appr

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

27

Sum up

model dependent ANKE data analysis suggest

large in-medium Φ-meson width absorption (high momentum part) increasing with momentum

supported by Spring-8 amp JLAB results differential cross sections are not completely reproduced by model calculations (excess at lower momenta) results differ from the Valencia predictions (Φ in-medium self-energy)

pA

pp

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

QJ

Y

e et

al

n

ucl

-ex

1202

545

1

Thank you

truncated PW description of ppΦ shows that the contribution from purely S-wave final states represents only a small fraction of the total cross section at ε=76 MeV

explains why there is no S-wave pp-FSI in ANKE amp DISTO data

however in order to explain the energy dependence of the ppΦ total cross section seems to require a low mass Φp enhancement

Page 26: G z t l o h m l e H M Momentum dependence of the Φ-meson …cmarkert/workshop/Agenda... · 2012. 3. 19. · March 5-7th 2012, Michael Hartmann on behalf of the ANKE collaboration

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

26

Double differential cross section of Φ production

+ common systematics ~ 20

Excess in low momentum part

ANKEBUUNSP appr

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

27

Sum up

model dependent ANKE data analysis suggest

large in-medium Φ-meson width absorption (high momentum part) increasing with momentum

supported by Spring-8 amp JLAB results differential cross sections are not completely reproduced by model calculations (excess at lower momenta) results differ from the Valencia predictions (Φ in-medium self-energy)

pA

pp

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

QJ

Y

e et

al

n

ucl

-ex

1202

545

1

Thank you

truncated PW description of ppΦ shows that the contribution from purely S-wave final states represents only a small fraction of the total cross section at ε=76 MeV

explains why there is no S-wave pp-FSI in ANKE amp DISTO data

however in order to explain the energy dependence of the ppΦ total cross section seems to require a low mass Φp enhancement

Page 27: G z t l o h m l e H M Momentum dependence of the Φ-meson …cmarkert/workshop/Agenda... · 2012. 3. 19. · March 5-7th 2012, Michael Hartmann on behalf of the ANKE collaboration

UT Austin March 5-7th 2012

27

Sum up

model dependent ANKE data analysis suggest

large in-medium Φ-meson width absorption (high momentum part) increasing with momentum

supported by Spring-8 amp JLAB results differential cross sections are not completely reproduced by model calculations (excess at lower momenta) results differ from the Valencia predictions (Φ in-medium self-energy)

pA

pp

MH

et

al

nu

cl-e

x12

013

517

QJ

Y

e et

al

n

ucl

-ex

1202

545

1

Thank you

truncated PW description of ppΦ shows that the contribution from purely S-wave final states represents only a small fraction of the total cross section at ε=76 MeV

explains why there is no S-wave pp-FSI in ANKE amp DISTO data

however in order to explain the energy dependence of the ppΦ total cross section seems to require a low mass Φp enhancement