Functional Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (fQSM)...olunteers were sc ed, which alterna tapping...
Transcript of Functional Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (fQSM)...olunteers were sc ed, which alterna tapping...
1HNotting
IntrodFunctiosusceptmore redependgradiensignificfunctioinduced
MateriTwo vpresentfinger-EPI dafollowithe slicspace dmoduluwas thein the tof iterappm. (viterativbetweederivat
ResultTemposubseqvariatiofor sucrelativeperformmaps ashows that ac|Δφ|-mnegativsimilara resulthighestphase c
ConcluQuantiextendeactivatichangepossibia basisusceptpulse-salgorithif phasthere imodific
RefereMRM Neuroi(2011) Panchu103:2547:344in pres46:662JCBFM(2005) (2009)
David Z BaHigh-Field MR Cen
gham, Nottingham
duction onal activation matibility) and imagieliable at the same
dent. Its measuremnt effects. Quantitcant development onal QSM (fQSM)d susceptibility-chials and Methods
volunteers were scted, which alternatapping with the l
ata (TE=25ms, TR=ing order for optimce direction were cdata as a nuisanceus data were motioen performed withtime-series [8], 8th ations set to 100 [viii) These maps s
ve deconvolution aen 1 and 30 TRs) tive, convolved wits oral stability was iquent spatial filterions and their appliccessful quantificate functional suscepmed and the dipoleand maps of the pthe estimated |Δφ
ctivation-induced Bmaps additionally sve susceptibility Srity, in spite of difft of the BOLD-cht BOLD changes changes in the pareusion tative susceptibied for use in funion-induced BO
es were mapped aility of BOLD-fMic physiological tibility), limiting sequence paramehm can be appliese information hass no need for harcations.
ences: 1. de Roc63:194; 2.Whartonimage 53:515; 3
Neuroimage 54uelo et al., (20544; 5. Pfeuffer e4; 6. Hagberg et al.s; 7. Hussein et al.
23; 8.Tomasi anM 27:33; 9. Ma
Concepts MR 25NeuroImage 47:5
alla1,2, Rosa M Sanntre, Max Planck Inm, United Kingdom
aps based on BOLing (e.g. TE) parame field strength, fa
ment requires the atative susceptibiliin recent years,
) as a quantitativehanges. s canned on a 7T Pated 12s blocks of left hand, somatos=3s) with 1mm iso
mal temporal stabilcorrected by rewine regressor [6]. (ivon-corrected usingh one of the follow
order polynomial1,2]. (vii) The resu
served as inputs diralgorithm [2] with in the time doma
ith a double-gamm
improved significaing step. After initication did not intrtion of baseline suptibility maps coue-fit reconstruction
phase change estim|-map overlaid on BOLD susceptibilserved for optimizSPMs overlaid onferences between T
hange in blood susin modulus, phaseenchyma (1o predi
ility mapping nctional imaging OLD susceptibiat 7T. This offers
MRI related directlyquantity (magnthe dependence
eters. The propod on any time-sers been collected, rdware or acquisi
chefort et al., (20n and Bowtell, (203. Schweser et 4:2789; 4. Sanch10) J Neurophyet al., (2002) M., (2011) Neuroima., (2007) Appl. Opd Caparelli, (20arques and BowB:65; 10. Feng et
540
Functionalnchez-Panchuelo2, Institute for Biologm, 3Physiology of C
Neuroimaging a
LD-fMRI provide meters. As an attest T2*-mapping caacquisition of twoty mapping (QSMpartly due to the
e approach for BO
Philips scanner duf task/stimulation wsensory stimulus: 6otropic resolution lity and statistical
nding the phase in v) Spatial unwrap
g 3dAllineate (AFNwing methods: hom background field ulting phase-imagrectly for the calcua maximum of 15
ain before uncorrema HRF and filtere
antly by correctingtial global filteringroduce temporal m
usceptibility maps.uld be produced wn method was usemated using forwathe filtered phase ity changes are no
zation of the reconn the negative QST2* (Fig.1) and neceptibility, but thie and susceptibiliticted by [10]) and
was and ility the
y to netic
on osed ries, and tion
010) 010)
al., hez-ysiol RM age,
ptics 007) wtell t al.,
l QuantitativeSam Wharton2, Gi
gical Cybernetics, Cognitive Processeand MR-Physics, U
qualitative topologmpt to relate BOLan serve as an alte
o echoes per repetiM) uses phase inf
emergence of adOLD-fMRI, and p
uring a multi-taskwith 18s blocks of60 Hz vibrotactile[4] spanning eithepower. (i) Phase k-space [5]. (iii) G
pping was performNI), and the resultimodyne Gaussian w
removal, SHARPges, except for the ulation of phase-SP5 iterations. Filterected activation mad in time with the
g for global intensg in the time domamodulation. Remo The relative phas
with this method. Fed. Filtered phase iard field calculatio
image. The measuot exclusively encnstruction process
SM. Comparison egative susceptibils negative changety were observed to quantify suscep
e Susceptibilityisela E Hagberg3, KTuebingen, Germaes, Max Planck InsUniversity of Tuebi
gies of task-relateLD changes to an ernative to T2*-weition, is sensitive formation from Mdvanced backgrouproposes a multi-s
k fMRI experimenf rest; visual stimu
e stimulation applier the visual or themaps were maske
Global temporal phmed using a fast 3ing correction matwith kernel size 12
P with a threshold orelative phase filt
PMs or for the QSed modulus and phaps (p<10-10) weresame parameters a
sity variations. Thain, all of the appving slow phase m
se filtering only retFigures 1-5 presentimages revealed fion [9], by replacinured |Δφ|-map is pcoded in the T2*-s. Fig.4 presents aof activation pattlity contrast (Fig.4e coexists with pos
around veins. Filtptibility changes w
y Mapping (fQKlaus Scheffler1,4,any, 2Sir Peter Mastitute for Biologicingen, Tuebingen,
ed modulus intensiabsolute quantity
eighted imaging. Hto unwanted dyna
MR images to calund field removal step filtering algor
nt. Paradigm: A vulus: a flickering ied to the fingertipe sensorimotor cored using binarised hase variations we
3D algorithm [7], trices were then ap2mm, relative phaof 0.1 and a kernetered data-sets, we
SM calculations. Suhase images and sue calculated with as the functional d
his was essential flied spatial filters
modulations of extetained informationted below result fr
fine structural braing susceptibility wpresented in Fig.3-weighted image ian SPM derived fterns in modulus 4). As expected, susitive modulation tering out this vas
with better spatial c
QSM) , Sue T Francis2, a
ansfield Magnetic Rcal Cybernetics, TuGermany
ity changes whichand to render the
However, T2* is anamic effects and tlculate local tissu
methods [1-3]. Trithm for the calc
visual, motor or scheckerboard ring
ps of the left handrtex. Analysis: Promodulus images. ere corrected by uand was followed
pplied to the phasease filtering by comel size of 2mm [3] ere then divided busceptibility mapsusceptibility mapsFSL. The GLM i
data. Pre-whitening
for efficient reducwere successful i
ternal origin from n about dynamic cfrom an fMRI-datain contrast (Fig.2).with the modulus . Significant differintensity. The comfrom the magnitud(Fig.1) and QSM
usceptibility decreain neighbouring vscular contributioncorrelation to neura
and Richard W BowResonance Centre
Tuebingen, German
h depend on physiocomparison of BO
n MR-specific parto static, but non-lue susceptibility. IThis study introduculation of maps s
somatosensory blog on a grey backgrd. Protocol: Zoomocessing steps wer(ii) Global intensi
using the phase at td by temporal unw
e data. (vi) High-pamplex division wior dipole-fit with
by γB0TE×10-6 to ys (QSM) were calcs were smoothed (bincluded the blockg of the data was n
ction of the backgrin removing low-fthe region of inte
changes in phase aaset where a finge. Activation induc%-change, were i
rences between Fimparison of estimade data along wit
M data (Fig.4-5) rases (-Δχ) up to 7%
voxels (Fig.5). Alsn will be necessaral activity.
wtell2 e, University of ny, 4Department of
ological (magneticOLD-fMRI studiesrameter and is fieldlocal susceptibilityIt has experienceduces time-resolvedshowing activation
ock-paradigm waround, motor tasked multi-slice GE
re performed in thety variations alongthe origin of the kwrapping. (v) Theass spatial filteringith the first volumemaximum numbe
yield field maps inculated by using anband-pass filteringk-paradigm and itnot performed.
round fields in thefrequency intensityerest was importanand, therefore, onlyer tapping task waced Δφ (%-changeinvestigated. Fig.2igs.2 and 3 suggesated and measuredth the positive andreveals remarkable% on activation ao, as expected, thery for detection o
f
c s d y d d n
s k: -e g -e g e r n n g s
e y t y s ) 2 t d d e s e f
325Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 20 (2012)