Fractional hot deck imputation - Jae Kim

Fractional hot deck imputation for multivariatemissing data in survey sampling

Jae Kwang Kim 1

Iowa State University

March 18, 2015

1Joint work with Jongho Im and Wayne Fuller

IntroductionBasic Setup

Assume simple random sampling, for simplicity.

Under complete response, suppose that

η̂n,g = n−1n∑

i=1

g(yi )

is an unbiased estimator of ηg = E{g(Y )}, for known g(·).

δi = 1 if yi is observed and δi = 0 otherwise.

y∗i : imputed value for yi for unit i with δi = 0.

Imputed estimator of ηg

η̂I ,g = n−1n∑

i=1

{δig(yi ) + (1− δi )g(y∗i )}

Need E {g(y∗i ) | δi = 0} = E {g(yi ) | δi = 0}.Kim (ISU) Fractional Imputation March 18, 2015 2 / 35

IntroductionML estimation under missing data setup

Often, find x (always observed) such that

Missing at random (MAR) holds: f (y | x , δ = 0) = f (y | x)Imputed values are created from f (y | x).

Computing the conditional expectation can be a challenging problem.1 Do not know the true parameter θ in f (y | x) = f (y | x ; θ):

E {g (y) | x} = E {g (yi ) | xi ; θ} .

2 Even if we know θ, computing the conditional expectation can benumerically difficult.

Kim (ISU) Fractional Imputation March 18, 2015 3 / 35

IntroductionImputation

Imputation: Monte Carlo approximation of the conditionalexpectation (given the observed data).

E {g (yi ) | xi} ∼=1

m

m∑j=1

g(y∗(j)i

)

1 Bayesian approach: generate y∗i from

f (yi | xi , yobs) =

∫f (yi | xi , θ) p(θ | xi , yobs)dθ

2 Frequentist approach: generate y∗i from f(yi | xi ; θ̂

), where θ̂ is a

consistent estimator.


IntroductionBasic Setup (Cont’d)

Thus, imputation is a computational tool for computing theconditional expectation E{g(yi ) | xi} for missing unit i .

To compute the conditional expectation, we need to specify a modelf (y | x ; θ) evaluated at θ = θ̂.

Thus, we can write η̂I ,g = η̂I ,g (θ̂).

To estimate the variance of η̂I ,g , we need to take into account of the

sampling variability of θ̂ in η̂I ,g = θ̂I ,g (θ̂).


IntroductionBasic Setup (Cont’d)

Three approaches

Bayesian approach: multiple imputation by Rubin (1978, 1987),Rubin and Schenker (1986), etc.

Resampling approach: Rao and Shao (1992), Efron (1994), Rao andSitter (1995), Shao and Sitter (1996), Kim and Fuller (2004), Fullerand Kim (2005).

Linearization approach: Clayton et al (1998), Shao and Steel (1999),Robins and Wang (2000), Kim and Rao (2009).


Comparison

Bayesian Frequentist

Model Posterior distribution Prediction modelf (latent, θ | data) f (latent | data, θ)

Computation Data augmentation EM algorithmPrediction I-step E-step

Parameter update P-step M-step

Parameter est’n Posterior mode ML estimation

Imputation Multiple imputation Fractional imputation

Variance estimation Rubin’s formula Linearizationor Bootstrap


Multiple imputation

The multiple imputation estimator of η, denoted by η̂MI , is

η̂MI =1

m

m∑j=1

η̂(j)I

Rubin’s variance estimator is

V̂MI (η̂MI ) = Wm +

(1 +

1

m

)Bm,

where WM = m−1∑m

j=1 V̂(j) and Bm = (m− 1)−1

∑mj=1(η̂

(j)I − η̂MI )

2.


Multiple imputation

Rubin’s variance estimator is based on the following decomposition,

var(η̂MI ) = var(η̂n) + var(η̂MI ,∞ − η̂n) + var(η̂MI − η̂MI ,∞), (1)

where η̂n is the complete-sample estimator of η and η̂MI ,∞ is theprobability limit of η̂MI for m→∞.

Under some regularity conditions, Wm term estimates the first term,the Bm term estimates the second term, and the m−1Bm termestimates the last term of (1), respectively.


Multiple imputation

In particular, Kim et al (2006, JRSSB) proved that the bias ofRubin’s variance estimator is

Bias(V̂MI ) ∼= −2cov(η̂MI − η̂n, η̂n). (2)

The decomposition (1) is equivalent to assuming thatcov(η̂MI − η̂n, η̂n) ∼= 0, which is called the congeniality condition byMeng (1994).

The congeniality condition holds when η̂n is the MLE of η. In suchcases, Rubin’s variance estimator is asymptotically unbiased.


Multiple imputation

Theorem (Yang and Kim, 2015)

Let η̂n = n−1∑n

i=1 g(yi ) be used to estimate η = E{g(Y )} undercomplete response. Then, under some regularity conditions, the bias ofRubin’s variance estimator is

Bias(V̂MI ) ∼= 2n−1(1− p)E0

[var{g(Y )− Bg (X )TS(θ) | X

}]≥ 0,

with equality if and only if g(Y ) is a linear function of S(θ), wherep = E (δ), S(θ) is the score function of θ in f (y | x ; θ),

Bg (X ) = [var{S(θ) | X}]−1cov{S(θ), g(Y ) | X},

and E0(·) = E (· | δ = 0).


Multiple imputation

Example

Suppose that you are interested in estimating η = P(Y ≤ 3).

Assume a normal model for f (y | x ; θ) for multiple imputation.

Two choices for η̂n:1 Method-of-moment estimator: η̂n1 = n−1

∑ni=1 I (yi ≤ 3).

2 Maximum-likelihood estimator:

η̂n2 = n−1n∑

i=1

P(Y ≤ 3 | xi ; θ̂),

where P(Y ≤ 3 | xi ; θ̂) =∫ 3

−∞ f (y | xi ; θ)dy .

Rubin’s variance estimator is nearly unbiased for η̂n2, but provideconservative variance estimation for η̂n1 (30-50% overestimation ofthe variances in most cases).


Fractional Imputation

Idea (parametric model approach)

Approximate E{g(yi ) | xi} by

E{g(yi ) | xi} ∼=Mi∑j=1

w∗ij g(y∗(j)i )

where w∗ij is the fractional weight assigned to the j-th imputed valueof yi .

If yi is a categorical variable, we can use

y∗(j)i = the j-th possible value of yi

w∗(j)ij = P(yi = y

∗(j)i | xi ; θ̂),

where θ̂ is the (pseudo) MLE of θ.


Fractional imputation

Features

Split the record with missing item into m(> 1) imputed values

Assign fractional weights

The final product is a single data file with size ≤ nm.

For variance estimation, the fractional weights are replicated.


Fractional imputation

Example (n = 10)ID Weight y1 y21 w1 y1,1 y1,22 w2 y2,1 ?3 w3 ? y3,24 w4 y4,1 y4,25 w5 y5,1 y5,26 w6 y6,1 y6,27 w7 ? y7,28 w8 ? ?9 w9 y9,1 y9,2

10 w10 y10,2 y10,2?: Missing


Fractional imputation (categorical case)

Fractional Imputation IdeaIf both y1 and y2 are categorical, then fractional imputation is easy toapply.

We have only finite number of possible values.

Imputed values = possible values

The fractional weights are the conditional probabilities of the possiblevalues given the observations.

Can use “EM by weighting” method of Ibrahim (1990) to computethe fractional weights.



Example (y1, y2: dichotomous, taking 0 or 1)ID Weight y1 y21 w1 y1,1 y1,22 w2w

∗2,1 y2,1 0

w2w∗2,2 y2,1 1

3 w3w∗3,1 0 y3,2

w3w∗3,2 1 y3,2

4 w4 y4,1 y4,25 w5 y5,1 y5,2



Example (y1, y2: dichotomous, taking 0 or 1)ID Weight y1 y26 w6 y6,1 y6,27 w7w

∗7,1 0 y7,2

w7w∗7,2 1 y7,2

8 w8w∗8,1 0 0

w8w∗8,2 0 1

w8w∗8,3 1 0

w8w∗8,4 1 1

9 w9 y9,1 y9,210 w10 y10,1 y10,2



Example (Cont’d)

E-step: Fractional weights are the conditional probabilities of theimputed values given the observations.

w∗ij = P̂(y∗(j)i ,mis | yi ,obs)

=π̂(yi ,obs , y

∗(j)i ,mis)∑Mi

l=1 π̂(yi ,obs , y∗(l)i ,mis)

where (yi ,obs , yi ,mis) is the (observed, missing) part ofyi = (yi1, · · · , yi ,p).

M-step: Update the joint probability using the fractional weights.

π̂ab =1

N̂

n∑i=1

Mi∑j=1

wiw∗ij I (y

∗(j)i ,1 = a, y

∗(j)i ,2 = b)

with N̂ =∑n

i=1 wi .



Example (Cont’d) Variance estimation

Recompute the fractional weights for each replication

Apply the same EM algorithm using the replicated weights.

E-step: Fractional weights are the conditional probabilities of theimputed values given the observations.

w∗(k)ij =

π̂(k)(yi,obs , y∗(j)i,mis)∑Mi

l=1 π̂(k)(yi,obs , y

∗(l)i,mis)

M-step: Update the joint probability using the fractional weights.

π̂(k)ab =

1

N̂(k)

n∑i=1

Mi∑j=1

w(k)i w

∗(k)ij I (y

∗(j)i,1 = a, y

∗(j)i,2 = b)

where N̂(k) =∑n

i=1 w(k)i .



Example (Cont’d) Final ProductReplication Weights

Weight x y1 y2 Rep 1 Rep 2 · · · Rep L

w1 x1 y1,1 y1,2 w(1)1 w

(2)1 · · · w

(L)1

w2w∗2,1 x2 y2,2 0 w

(1)2 w

∗(1)2,1 w

(2)2 w

∗(2)2,1 · · · w

(L)2 w

∗(L)2,1

w2w∗2,2 x2 y2,2 1 w

(1)2 w

∗(1)2,2 w

(2)2 w

∗(2)2,1 · · · w

(L)2 w

∗(L)2,2

w3w∗3,1 x3 0 y3,2 w

(1)3 w

∗(1)3,1 w

(2)3 w

∗(2)3,1 · · · w

(L)3 w

∗(L)3,1

w3w∗3,2 x3 1 y3,2 w

(1)3 w

∗(1)3,2 w

(2)3 w

∗(2)3,2 · · · w

(L)3 w

∗(L)3,2

w4 x4 y4,1 y4,2 w(1)4 w

(2)4 · · · w

(L)4

w5 x5 y5,1 y5,2 w(1)5 w

(2)5 · · · w

(L)5

w6 x6 y6,1 y6,2 w(1)6 w

(2)6 · · · w

(L)6



Example (Cont’d) Final ProductReplication Weights

Weight x y1 y2 Rep 1 Rep 2 Rep L

w7w∗7,1 x7 0 y7,2 w

(1)7 w

∗(1)7,1 w

(2)7 w

∗(2)7,1 w

(L)7 w

∗(L)7,1

w7w∗7,2 x7 1 y7,2 w

(1)7 w

∗(1)7,2 w

(2)7 w

∗(2)7,2 w

(L)7 w

∗(L)7,2

w8w∗8,1 x8 0 0 w

(1)8 w

∗(1)8,1 w

(2)8 w

∗(2)8,1 w

(L)8 w

∗(L)8,1

w8w∗8,2 x8 0 1 w

(1)8 w

∗(1)8,2 w

(2)8 w

∗(2)8,2 w

(L)8 w

∗(L)8,2

w8w∗8,3 x8 1 0 w

(1)8 w

∗(1)8,3 w

(2)8 w

∗(2)8,3 w

(L)8 w

∗(L)8,3

w8w∗8,4 x8 1 1 w

(1)8 w

∗(1)8,4 w

(2)8 w

∗(2)8,4 w

(L)8 w

∗(L)8,4

w9 x9 y9,1 y9,2 w(1)9 w

(2)9 · · · w

(L)9

w10 x10 y10,1 y10,2 w(1)10 w

(2)10 · · · w

(L)10


Fractional hot deck imputation (general case)

Goals

Fractional hot deck imputation of size m. The final product is asingle data file with size ≤ n ·m.

Preserves correlation structure

Variance estimation relatively easy

Can handle domain estimation (but we do not know which domainswill be used.)


Fractional hot deck imputation

Idea

In hot deck imputation, we can make a nonparametric approximationof f (·) using a finite mixture model

f (yi ,mis | yi ,obs) =G∑

g=1

πg (yi ,obs)fg (yi ,mis), (3)

where πg (yi ,obs) = P(zi = g | yi ,obs), fg (yi ,mis) = f (yi ,mis | z = g)and z is the latent variable associated with imputation cell.

To satisfy the above approximation, we need to find z such that

f (yi ,mis | zi , yi ,obs) = f (yi ,mis | zi ).



Imputation cell

Assume p-dimensional survey items: Y = (Y1, · · · ,Yp)

For each item k, create a transformation of Yk into Zk , a discreteversion of Yk based on the sample quantiles among respondents.

If yi ,k is missing, then zi ,k is also missing.

Imputation cells are created based on the observed value ofzi = (zi ,1, · · · , zi ,p).

Expression (3) can be written as

f (yi ,mis | yi ,obs) =∑zmis

P(zi ,mis = zmis | zi ,obs)f (yi ,mis | zmis), (4)

where zi = (zi ,obs , zi ,mis) similarly to yi = (yi ,obs , yi ,mis).



Estimation of cell probability

Let {z1, · · · , zG} be the support z , which is the same as the samplesupport of z from the full respondents.

Cell probability πg = P(z = zg ).

For each unit i , we only observe zi ,obs .

Use EM algorithm for categorical missing data to estimate πg .



Two-step method for fractional hot deck imputation

1 Given zi ,obs , identify possible values of zi ,mis from the estimatedconditional probability P(zi ,mis | zi ,obs).

2 For each cell z∗i = (zi ,obs , z∗i ,mis), we select mg ≥ 2 imputed values for

yi ,mis randomly from the full respondents in the same cell. (Joint hotdeck within imputation cell)

It is essentially two-phase stratified sampling. In phase one, stratification(=cell identification) is made. In phase two, random sampling (=hot deckimputation) is made within imputation cell.



Example

For example, consider trivariate Y = (Y1,Y2,Y3).

23 = 8 missing patterns are possible.

Imputation cells are created using Z = (Z1,Z2,Z3), where Zk is acategorization of Yk .

If 3 categories are used for Zk , then 33 = 27 possible cells are created.

Two-phase imputation1 For example, if unit i has missingness in Y1 and Y2, we use the

observed value of Z3i to identify possible cells. ( possible cells ≤ 9 )2 For each cell with Zi = (Z∗1i ,Z

∗2i ,Z3i ), mg = 2 imputed values are

chosen at random from the set of full respondents with the same cell.3 For final fractional weights assigned to y

∗(j)i = (y

∗(j)1i , y

∗(j)2i , y3i ) is

w∗ij = P̂(z∗(j)1i , z

∗(j)2i | z3i ) · (1/mg ).


Variance estimation

The final fractional hot deck imputation estimator can be written,

η̂FHDI = η̂FEFI + (η̂FHDI − η̂FEFI ), (5)

where η̂FHDI is a proposed fractional hot deck imputation estimatorand η̂FEFI is also fractional hot deck imputation estimator but use allpossible donors in each imputation cell (Kim and Fuller, 2004).

From the decomposition (5), the variance of fractional hot deckimputation estimator can be estimated with two components,

var(η̂FHDI ) = var(η̂FEFI ) + var(η̂FHDI − η̂FEFI ). (6)


Variance estimation (Cont’d)

Need two replication estimator (weights) to account for (6).

First replication fractional weights w∗(k)1,ij , k = 1, . . . , L:

w∗(k)1,ij = w∗ij + R

(k)ij , where R

(k)ij is a regression adjusted term that

depends on imputation cells of the recipient i and guarantees

η̂(k)FHDI ,1 − η̂FHDI = η̂

(k)FEFI − η̂FEFI ,

that is,

L∑k=1

ck(η̂(k)FHDI ,1 − η̂FHDI )

2 =L∑

k=1

ck(η̂(k)FEFI − η̂FEFI )

2,

where η̂(k)FHDI ,1 is the first replication estimator and ck is a factor

associated with k-th replication.



Variance estimation (Cont’d)

Second replication fractional weights w∗(s)2,ij , s = 1, . . . ,G :

var(η̂FHDI − η̂FEFI ) is essentially about sampling variance due toimputation.Represent the sampling variance in each imputation cell (G replicates).

w∗(s)2,ij = w∗ij + A

(s)ij , where A

(s)ij is an adjusted term that depends on

imputation cells of the recipient i and guarantees

E

{G∑

s=1

(η̂(s)FHDI ,1 − η̂FHDI )

2

}= var(η̂FHDI − η̂FEFI ).

Note that two replication weights are non-negative and their sum overimputed values in each recipient is one.



Simulation

Trivariate data,

Y1 ∼ U(0, 2),

Y2 = 1 + Y1 + e2, e2 ∼ N(0, 1/2)

Y3 = 2 + Y1 + 0.5Y2 + e3, e3 ∼ N(0, 1)

The response are determined by the Bernoulli with p = (0.5, 0.7, 0.9)for (Y1,Y2,Y3), respectively.

Multivariate fractional hot deck imputation was used with mg = 2fractional imputation within each cell.

Categorical transformation (basically with 3 categories) was used toeach of Y1, Y2, and Y3.

Within imputation cell, joint hot deck imputation was used.

B = 2, 000 simulation samples with size of n = 500.



Simulation results: point estimation

Table 1 Point estimationParameter Method Mean Std Var.

Complete Data 1.00 100E(Y1) FHDI 1.00 167



Complete Data 0.40 100E(Y1 < 1,Y2 < 2) FHDI 0.40 154



Simulation results: variance estimation

Table 2 Variance estimation for FHDIParameter Relative Bias (%)

V (θ̂1) -1.7

V (θ̂2) 0.5

V (θ̂3) 3.4

V (θ̂4) -3.4

θ1 = E (Y1), θ2 = E (Y2) and θ3 = E (Y3)

θ4 = E (Y1 < 1,Y2 < 2).


Conclusion

Fractional hot deck imputation is considered.

Categorical data transformation was used for approximation.

Does not rely on parametric model assumptions.Two-step imputation

1 Step 1: Allocation of Imputation of cells2 Step 2: Joint hot deck imputation within imputation cell.

Replication-based approach for imputation variance estimation.

To be implemented in SAS: Proc SurveyImpute


Fractional hot deck imputation - Jae Kim

Education

Transcript of Fractional hot deck imputation - Jae Kim