Follow the cosmic roar and chirp: Gravitaonal wave (GW)...
Transcript of Follow the cosmic roar and chirp: Gravitaonal wave (GW)...
Followthecosmicroarandchirp:Gravita5onalwave(GW)astrophysicsandSKA
SamayaNissankeRadboudUniversity,Nijmegen
Wasitaroarorchirp?
NewYorkTimes,Feb2016
Credit: LIGO Labs/Caltech
Today:firstGWdetec5ons
SeptembereventSNR∼23.7,>5.3σ
BoxingdayeventSNR∼13.0,>5.3σ
OctobercandidateSNR∼9.7,1.7σ
LIGOHanford LIGOLivingston
GW122615LVT151012GW150914
1
Credit: LIGO Labs/Caltech
NeutronStars(NS)
NSorBlackHole(BH)
Gravita5onalWave(GW)emission:1056ergs/s(finalorbits)10minspre-merger
~Solarluminosity×1023
~thevisibleUniverse’sgalac5cluminosity×50
Credit: NASA
2
Neutronstarbinarymergeristhenextdiscoveryandmustbedoneinreal-5me
EMemission??10spre-merger
10mspost-merger
NS
NSorBH
Credit: NASA
Electromagne5c(EM)radia5onprobesthemicrophysicsatplayinextremedynamical
space5mes
2
Recentchange:wenowhavethepoten5altodetectGWandEMradia5on
Gravita5onalradia5on EMradia5on
LIGO MeerKAT
LIGO MeerKATLearnaboutsources’dynamicandfundamentalproper5es
Learnaboutsources’environmentand
energe5cs
BlackGEMLSST BlackGEM
Meerkat3
SKAMeerKAT
EMcounterpartsofGWsources
Credit: NASA
SupermassiveBlackHoleBinaryMergers
withgas
AMCVn(mass-transferring
WhiteDwarfs)Credit: NASA
Credit: Bode, GIT
LowFrequencyGWs HighFrequencyGWs
Credit: CIT
NeutronStar(NS)BinaryMergers
Supernova
Credit: NASA
Credit: NASA
Pulsar
HeavyBINARYBLACKHOLES(BBH)??
4
1. Strongfieldgravityastrophysics Physicalprocessesinstronglycurvedspace-5mes
2. StellarEvolu5on Understandingthefateofcompactbinarystellar systems?
3. CosmicEnrichment Sitesofr-processnucleosynthesis
4. CosmologicalProbes MeasuringtheexpansionhistoryoftheUniverse
WhyshouldwecareaboutEMcounterparts?(somemo5va5on)
5
PlanofTalk
Part1:Introduc5ontoGWs
whatwelearnfromGWsalone?
Part2:Electromagne5c(EM)counterparts
whatwecanlearnfromGWsandEMtogether?
Part3:Howtodetectandiden5fytheradiocounterpartwithSKAI/II?
PartI:Introduc5onto
Gravita5onalWaves
Coherent,weaklyinterac5ng,bulkdynamicproper5esofmaierObservableGWstrainh(t)~1/distance
GWsareperturba5onsinthefabricofspace5meAccelera5ngquadrupolemaiersources
7
Credit: LIGO Labs/Caltech
Coherent,weak,bulkdynamicproper5esofmaier
GWsaretransverse5dalfields
8
LIGOLivingston
AdvancedkHzGWdetectorsprobestellar-massbinaryinspirals&/ormergers
h ⇠ �L
L⇠ 10�21
L=4km
fGW
⇠ 2forb
⇠ 1�
sGM
r3
12
advancedLIGO,Livingston
9
www.ligo.org
2015-16(O1)
2019(design)
Step-by-stepincreaseinsensi5vity(hencevolume)
2022(op5calsqueezing)
2010
10
GWdetectornetworkin2019
★★
LIGOL
LIGOH★
Virgo
11[seeroadmapinLSCandVirgocollabora5on--arXiv:1304.0670]
★
KAGRA(not@design)
z~1.4(BBH)~30BBHyr-1(mean)
z~0.1-0.2(NSbinaries)1-10NSNS/BHyr-1(mean)
SKAera:expandingtheGWdetectornetworkforEMfollowupin2022
★
KAGRA
★★
★
LIGOIndia
LIGOL
LIGOH★
Virgo
[seeroadmapinLSCandVirgocollabora5on—arXiv:1304.0670;Schutz2011,Nissankeetal.2013]
z~1.4(BBH)~30BBHyr-1(mean)
z~0.1-0.2(NSbinaries)1-10NSNS/BHyr-1(mean)
11
SKAera:GWdetectornetworkin2030(?)
★KAGRA
★★
★
LIGOIndia
LIGOL
LIGOH
★
Virgo
★EinsteinTelescope???
★
CosmicExplorer???
z~20(BBH)~1e5BBHyr-1(mean)z~2(NSNS/BH)>1e4NSNS/BHyr-1(mean)z~5(IMRI)0-10yr-1 11
[Scien5ficObjec5vesoftheEinsteinTelescope,arXiv:1206.0331]
Gravita5onalwavesopensanen5relynewwindowontotheUniverse
12[Mooreetal.,hip://rhcole.com/apps/GWploier/;]
[seeGemmaJanssen’sandVikramRavi’stalk]
Gravita5onalwavesopensanen5relynewwindowontotheUniverse
[Mooreetal.,hip://rhcole.com/apps/GWploier/;Jaffe,2004,arXiv:0409637]
[seeGemmaJanssen’sandVikramRavi’stalk]
AstrometrywithQSOsandSKA???
12
TheGWwaveformencapsulatesBinaryEvolu5on
[LVC,arXiv:1602.03837,PRL116,061102,2016] 135me(s)
0.30 0.40 0.450.35
[LVC,arXiv:1602.03837,PRL116,061102,2016]
5me(s)
Chirpmassdrivesinspiralwaveform
Inspiral∼Chirp
drivenbythechirpmass
Ringdown
…remnantmass&spin
chirpmass: 0.30 0.40 0.45
13
TheGWwaveformencodessourceparameters
Zoomin
5me(s)
spinmodula5on
h +(t)
[courtesyofPatriciaSchmidt]
�GW(t) ⇒chirpmass,reducedmass(1PN),spin-orbit(1.5PN),…
14
h(t):9-16dimensions+ Masses
+ Spins
+ NSequa5onofstate
+ Geometricproper5es:-Inclina5onangle-SourcePosi5on-Luminositydistance
[seee.g.CutlerandFlanagan1994,PoissonandWill1996…]
Extractsourceinforma5onfromGWs
15
[seee.g.Veitchetal.2015;LVC,arXiv:1602.03840,PRL116,241102,2016]
Likelihood
parameter2
Modelh(t)
Detectoroutput
Explicitlymapout:
Extractsourceinforma5onfromGWs
usingBayesianMarkovChainMonteCarloandNestedSamplingTechniques
h(t):9-16dimensions
15
parameter1
+ Masses
+ Spins
+ NSequa5onofstate
+ Geometricproper5es:-Inclina5onangle-SourcePosi5on-Luminositydistance
RetrievalofBHparametersm1∼36.2+5.2-3.8M⊙
m2∼29.1+3.7-4.4M⊙
m1∼14.2+8.3-3.7M⊙
m2∼7.5+2.3-2.3M⊙
[LVC,arXiv:1606.04856,PRX6,041015,2016]
[seeFransPretorius,AlviseRaccanelli,JoeSilk,LinjingShao’stalks]
16
…lengthofthechirp/roarsignal
longestinspiral
17[LVC,arXiv:1606.04856,PRX6,041015,2016]
Howwellcanwelocalisethesourceonthesky?
18[LVC,arXiv:1606.04856,PRX6,041015,2016]
[Imagecredit:LIGO/L.Singer/A.Messinger]
590[230]sq.deg.(90%c.r.)
1000[850]sq.deg.(90%c.r.)
1600sq.deg.(90%c.r.)
Howwellcanwelocalisethesourceonthesky?
[LVC,arXiv:1606.04856,PRX6,041015,2016]
[Imagecredit:LIGO/L.Singer/A.Messinger]
590[230]sq.deg.(90%c.r.)
1000[850]sq.deg.(90%c.r.)
1600sq.deg.(90%c.r.)
105-107galaxiesinthesevolumes 18
ExpandingtheGWnetwork
[LVC,arXiv:1606.09619,2016]
[Imagecredit:LIGO/L.Singer/A.Messinger]600->10-20sq.deg.(90%c.r.)
19
2015-2016 2019
[LVC,arXiv:1606.04856,PRX6,041015,2016]
SKAera:GWerrorsshrinkin2020s
[KasliwalandNissanke2014,ApJLei]
Twodetectors@designsensi5vity
Fivedetectors
GW150914:25EMfacili5espar5cipatedinfollow-up
19ordersofmagnitudeinfrequencyspace
21[LVC,APJL,826,1,L13,2016]
PartII:EMcounterparts
EMfromTwoTypesofMaierOu{lows
Credit: NASA
1.TidalTails+DiskWindsMej≈10-4-0.01M☉E≈1049-1050ergsv≈0.1-0.3c
(cf.Supernova:1051ergs)
[seee.g.,Rezollaetal.2010,2014,Stephensetal,2011,Eastetal.2011,Hotokezakaetal.,2012,2014,Rosswogetal.2012,Piranetal.2013,Bausweinetal.2013,Foucartetal.2014,Nagakuraetal.,2014,Kyutokuetal.2014,Fernandezetal.2014,Kiuchietal.2015,Lovelaceetal.inprep…]
2.Ultra-rela5vis5cJetMej≈10-6M☉E≈1049-1051ergsΓ≈100
[Fernandez & Metzger 2013]
22
[Foucart et el. 2014]
[Paschalidisetal.2015][Paschalidisetal.2016]
Sample BH/NS merger 2
rest mass density r
Newtonian e~1, rp = 7.0 M MNS0=1.35 M๏ (R=15.2km,M/R=0.13); MBH0=5.40 M๏disk mass ~ 0.41 M๏unbound material ~ 0.20 M๏~ 0.0043M energy emitted in GW’s
initially non-spinning BH, final BH spin a~0.33
2H EOS (Mmax=2.83 M๏)
(geometric time units, again duration~ 20 ms)
(slidecourtesyofFransPretorius)
[Stephensetal.2011,Eastetal.2011]
TwoTypesofMaierOu{lows
Credit: NASA
1.TidalTails+DiskWindsMej≈10-4-0.01M☉E≈1049-1050ergsv≈0.1-0.3c
2.Ultra-rela5vis5cJetMej≈10-6M☉E≈1049-1051ergsΓ≈100
[Fernandez & Metzger 2013]
[Rosswog 2012, 2013, 2015]
Ou{lows’kine5cenergyisconvertedintointernalenergy.Expands,coolsandheatedbyshocksorradioac5vity.
[Rezzolla et al. 2011]
24
1.PromptRadioEmission 2.ShortGammaRayBurst(SGRB)
3.Op5cal-nearIRkilo/macronova
4.SlowRadioRemnant
NS
BH
TwoTypesofOu{lows⇒FourEMcounterparts
[e.g., prompt radio emission: Hansen & Lyu5kov(2001),MoortgatandKuipjers (2002,5,6),Postnovand Pshirkov (2010), Lai (2012); kilonova: Li andPaczynski1998,Kulkarni2005,Metzgeretal.2010,Metzger & Berger 2012,…Barnes et al. 2013,Grossmanetal.2013,Tanakaetal.2013,Tanviretal.2013,Bergeretal.2013,… ;slowradio:NakarandPiran2011,Hotokezakaetal.,2015] 25
1.PromptRadioEmission 2.SGRB
3.OIRkilo/macronova4.SlowRadioRemnant
NS
BH
1/3:DifferentEMobservable5mescales
tmerger+secs tmerger+2s
tmerger+hours/daystmerger+month/yrs
25
1.PromptRadioEmission 2.SGRB
4.SlowRadioRemnant
NS
BH
2/3:EMemissiongeometry
semi-isotropic? beamed
semi-isotropic?isotropic?
3.OIRkilo/macronova
25
1.PromptRadioEmission 2.SGRB
4.SlowRadioRemnant
NS
BH
3/3:EMcounterpartsalreadyobserved?
maybe?observedbutaretheyNSmergers?
twocandidatesnotyetobserved[e.g., fast radio bursts: Thornton et al. (2013),Spitler et al. (2013); kilonova: Tanvir et al. 2013,Bergeretal.2013]
3.OIRkilo/macronova
25
+ Masses(severaltotens%)
+ Spins(tensof%)
+ NSradii
+ Geometricproper5es:(tensof%)-Inclina5onangle-SourcePosi5on-Luminositydistance
Fƛ(t):5-10dimensions
Nextstep:combine&interpretGW+EM
+ Energe5csandbeaming+ R-processnucleosynthesis+ Massejectaandvelocity+ Environment+ Redshi~,AccuratePosi5on(1”)+ Stellarpopula5ons+ Magne5cfieldstrength+ Previousbinaryevolu5on&massloss
(tensof%)
h(t):9-16dimensions
26
+ Masses(1%toseveral%)
+ Spins(severaltotensof%)
+ NSradii
+ Geometricproper5es:(tensof%)-Inclina5onangle-SourcePosi5on-Luminositydistance
fromEMsignature
Nextstep:combineandinterpretGW+EM
Popula5on:Demographics,ecologyandcensus
Strongsignalbinary:Characteriza5on
(tensof%)
fromtheGWchirp
26
+ Massejectaandvelocity+ Magne5cfieldstrength+ Energe5csandBeaming+ Redshi~,AccuratePosi5on
+ NuclearPhysics->Opaci5es
+ Stellarpopula5ons+ Previousbinaryevolu5on&massloss
JointGW+EMimprovescharacteriza5on
Nissankeetal.(2010)
27
Similarreasoningappliesdetec5ngBHmemory,tes5ngGRandneutronstarequa5onofstates…
H0error:3.4%
H0(km/s/Mpc)
Normalised
pdf 30binaries
GWenableafew%errorinHubbleconstant…importanceofpopula5ons!!!
[delPozzo,2012]
[Nissankeetal.,2010,13]
28[e.g.,Laskyetal.2016,Yunesetal.2013,Meidametal.2014,Lackay&Wade2014,Agathosetal.2014,15]
[seealsoSchutz1986,Dalaletal.2006,Sathyaprakash et al. 2010,
Messengeretal.2012,Tayloretal.2012,…]
NoEMcounterpart
PartIII:Howtofindandiden5fy
radiocounterpartswithSKA?
[withKentaHotokezaka(CCA->Princeton),GreggHallinan(CIT),JoeLazio(JPL),UdiNakar(TelAviv),TsviPiran(HU),arXiv1605.09395,ApJ]
PartIII:Howtofindandiden5fy
radiocounterpartswithSKA?
- unknown5meofemissionrela5vetothemerger- impossibleto5letheskywithsmallFoV- circumburstdensi5esmaybetoolow- toomanybubblingAGNfalseposi5ves MetzgerandBerger(2012)
BasicsofRadioA~erglowandRemnant
1.Kine5cEnergyisdissipatedattheShock
29
-Ejectacollideswiththeinterstellarmediumanddecelerates
-ShockamplifiesBandacceleratese-s
-Synchrotronradia5on
2.Brightness:energe5csoftheejecta
-Fastultra-rela5vis5cradioa~erglowSGRBs-Slowradioremnant
[NakarandPiran2011,Hotozekaka&Piran2015,Hotokezaka,Nissankeetal.2016]
Predictedradioremnantlightcurves
Credit: NASA
29
Highenergyejecta(1051erg,0.3c)
Lowenergy(1050erg,0.2c)
Medium
Highenergyjet20o,1049erg
Canonical20o,1048erg
[Hotokezaka,Nissankeetal,2016,arXiv1605.09395,ApJ]
Predictedradioremnantlightcurves
Credit: NASA
Highenergyejecta(1051erg,0.3c)
Lowenergy(1050erg,0.2c)
Medium
Highenergyjet20o,1049erg
Canonical20o,1048erg
[Hotokezaka,Nissankeetal,2016,arXiv1605.09395,ApJ] 29
5me(days)
Cri5caldependenceoncircumburstdensi5es
n=1/cm3
n=0.1/cm3
n=0.01/cm3
[Hotokezaka,Nissankeetal,2016,arXiv1605.09395,ApJ] 30
NSmergersdetectablewithSKA-1andSKA-2
31[Hotokezaka,Nissankeetal,2016,arXiv1605.09395,ApJ]
NSmergersdetectablewithSKA-1andSKA-2
[Hotokezaka,Nissankeetal,2016,arXiv1605.09395,ApJ] 31
1000AGN&starforminggalaxies
fewdozensofSNe(0.3-10years)
fewLGRBs(fewyears)
fewTDEs(fewyears)
unknowns
op5calcounterpart,>1Gpc
e.g.,ASKAP@3mJy,50deg2,1750sources
Howtopulltheneedlefromthehaystackintheradio?
32
[seeVikramRavi’stalk]
1000AGN&starforminggalaxies
fewdozensofSNe(0.3-10years)
fewLGRBs(fewyears)
fewTDEs(fewyears)
unknowns
op5calcounterpart,>1Gpc
Howtopulltheneedlefromthehaystackintheradio?
32
Developaprobabilis5capproachusing:- galaxycatalogs,- distancetomerger,- spa5aldistribu5onofAGNvs.NS-NSmergerwithrespecttothecenterofthegalaxies,- pre-exis5ngsurveys
e.g.,ASKAP@3mJy,50deg2,1750sources
Strategiestopulltheneedlefromthehaystackintheradio
32[Hotokezaka,Nissankeetal,2016,arXiv1605.09395,ApJ]
41.5 135.9 2.41
SNR: 9.3 SNR: 10.8
SNR: 8.8SNR: 10.4
6.1 16.7 46.8
[Nissanke,Kasliwal,Georgieva2013]
[LIGO,Virgo,advanceddesignsensi5vitynoisecurves]
[Singeretal.,arXiv:1603.07333,2016]
33
Reducefalse-posi5veratewithGWvolumes
41.5 135.9 2.41
SNR: 9.3 SNR: 10.8
SNR: 8.8SNR: 10.4
6.1 16.7 26.8
brightestgalaxiesthatproduce50%ofthelight
N_satura5on~25galaxies
Reduceastrophysicalfalseposi5vebyfactorof10-100s
[Gehrels,Canizzaro,…Nissanke+2015][Rahman,Nissanke+inprep]
SDSSGWgalaxycatalogseehips://astro.ru.nl/catalogs/sdss_gwgalcat/index.html
20152016
2017
Reducefalse-posi5veratewithGWvolumes&H-IgalaxycatalogfromSKA
34
Sta5s5calhostgalaxydemographicswithnocounterpart
[Rahman,Nissankeetal.,inprep] 35
SDSSGWgalaxycatalogseehips://astro.ru.nl/catalogs/
sdss_gwgalcat/index.html
HundredsofresolvableBHBbyspace-basedGWdetectorsbeforetheyenter
LIGO-Virgoband[Sesana2016;seealsoBreviketal.2016,Kleinetal.2016,Vitale2016]
36
November30,2016—March232017approximately48daysofHanford-Livingstoncoincidentsciencedata.
Distancereach:70Mpcfor1.4+1.4Msun,300Mpcfor10+10Msun700Mpcfor30+30Msun.
6eventcandidates,iden5fiedbyonlineanalysisusingaloosefalse-alarm-ratethresholdofonepermonth,
havebeeniden5fiedandsharedwithastronomersforEMfollowup.
Seemoreat:hip://www.ligo.org/news/index.php#O2Apr2017update
StatusofLVCsecondScienceRun
37
Immediately->SKAIera:GWdetectorsensi5vity&networkincreases=>TensofBBHmergersyr-1andfirstEM-GWdetec5ons
SKAIIera:Poten5allythousandsofcompactobjectmergersperyearatfurtherdistancewithsmallerskyerrors
Astrophysicalimplica5onsfromEM+GWcharacteriza5on:1) Constraintsfromratesandspin/massra5os:binarystellarevolu5on&BHs
throughcosmichistory;2) Natureandenvironments(circumstellar,etc…),neutronstarequa5onofstate,
internalstructure;3) CosmologicalconstraintsH0;geometryanddynamicsoflargescalestructure.4) NuclearAstrophysics:sitesofr-processelements.
Whatneedstobedoneurgently:EM+GWjointcharacteriza5on&sta5s5caltoolsrequirednow(tomakedetec5on!)Characterisa5onoftransientskiesinallwavelengths
BeyondLIGO,Virgoera:Witnesstheopeningoftheen5reGWspectrumwithCMB,PTAs,eLISA,newgenera5ongroundbaseddetectors……togetherwithnextgenera5onofwide-fieldsynop5csurveysLSST,SKA…andE-ELTs…
Theimmediatefutureisloudandbright!