Figure 3-1: East Fork San Jacinto River Sampling Map

Table 3-1: East Fork San Jacinto River Sampling Results

Station Description Station Type

Station Mile

Sample Date

Sample Time

E. coli (cfu/100mL)

Flow Est. (cfs)

Flow* Severity

Temp (C)

Cond (μS/cm)

Total Cl2 (mg/L)

EFSJ02 Jenkins Rd main stem 64.1 1-Nov-07 16:40 230 < 0.1 2 17.6 275 n/a EFSJ01 FM 945 main stem 53.6 1-Nov-07 15:44 360 < 0.5 3 17.0 348 n/a 17431 SH 150 main stem 50.1 1-Nov-07 17:14 116 < 0.5 2 18.5 329 n/a 11237 FM 945 main stem 33.9 1-Nov-07 17:38 655 10 3 17.7 131 n/a

EFSJ04 SH 150 tributary 30.3 1-Nov-07 14:55 655 < 1 3 17.6 265 n/a EFSJ03 Shell Oil Rd tributary 30.3 1-Nov-07 14:20 991 12.9 3 17.6 94 n/a 11238 SH 105 main stem 25.2 1-Nov-07 17:20 727 27 3 19.0 129 n/a

EFSJ05 Cleveland WWTP 25.1 2-Nov-07 12:32 2 0.74 n/a 25.8 695 n/a 14242 US 59 main stem 21.5 1-Nov-07 16:55 460 30 3 19.2 144 n/a 11236 FM 2090 main stem 13.3 1-Nov-07 16:20 16 37 3 18.4 148 n/a 11235 FM 1485 main stem 6.5 1-Nov-07 15:40 1227 40 3 19.1 147 n/a

1123

5, F

M 1

485

1123

6, F

M 2

090

1424

2, U

S 59

EFSJ

05, C

leve

land

11

238,

SH

105

EFS

J03,

She

ll O

il R

dE

FSJ0

4, S

H 1

50

1123

7, F

M 9

45

1743

1, S

H 1

50EFS

J01,

FM

945

EFSJ

02, J

enki

ns R

d

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

0.010.020.030.040.050.060.070.0

River Station (mile)

E co

li (c

fu/1

00m

L)

Main StemTributaryWWTP

(Lk Houston)

Figure 3-2: East Fork San Jacinto River Bacteria Results Profile

EFSJ

02, J

enki

ns R

d

EFSJ

01, F

M 9

45

1743

1, S

H 1

50

1123

7, F

M 9

45

EFSJ

04, S

H 1

50

EFSJ

03, S

hell

Oil

Rd

1123

8, S

H 1

05EF

SJ05

, Cle

vela

nd

1424

2, U

S 59

1123

6, F

M 2

090

1123

5, F

M 1

485

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

0.010.020.030.040.050.060.070.0


Con

duct

ivity

(uS/

cm)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60Fl

ow (c

fs)

Main Stem ConductivityTributary ConductivityWWTP ConductivityMain Stem Flow

(Lk Houston)

Figure 3-3: East Fork San Jacinto River Conductivity and Flow Results Profile

Figure 4-1: West Fork San Jacinto River Sampling Map

Table 4-1: West Fork San Jacinto River Sampling Results Station Code Description Station Type Station

Mile Sample

Date Sample

Time E. coli

(cfu/100mL) Flow Est.

(cfs) Flow*

Severity Temp

(C) Cond

(μS/cm) Total Cl2 (mg/L)

11250 FM 2854 main stem 33.1 7-Nov-07 10:48 144 4.7 2 16.0 255 0 WFSJ03 Honea Egypt Rd Lake Crk 28.2 7-Nov-07 15:20 250 5.4 3 18.2 197 0 11245 IH 45 main stem 25.0 7-Nov-07 14:50 39 20 3 19.6 755 0.1 16626 SH 75 Stwts Crk 24.5 7-Nov-07 11:40 34 1 2 15.4 277 0 16624 SH 242 main stem 18.6 7-Nov-07 10:32 230 25 3 18.5 646 0 16635 SH 242 Crystal Crk 18.2 7-Nov-07 10:50 13 2.6 3 18.0 655 0

WFSJ01 Sleepy Hollow tributary 13.9 7-Nov-07 10:05 14 n/a 3 17.6 290 0 WFSJ02 Riley Fuzzel tributary 6.4 7-Nov-07 9:15 86 n/a 2 17.5 990 0 13611 McCoy Lane main stem 5.1 7-Nov-07 8:15 13 58 3 16.6 637 0

1125

0 , F

M 2

854

WFS

J03

, Hon

ea E

gypt

Rd

1124

5 , I

H 4

516

626

, SH

Loo

p 33

6

1662

4 , S

H 2

4216

635

, SH

242

WFS

J01

, Sle

epy

Hol

low

WFS

J02

, Rile

y Fu

zzel

1361

1 , P

orte

r Hei

ghts

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0.05.010.015.020.025.030.035.0River Station (mile)

E c

oli (

cfu/

100m

L)

Main StemTributary

(Lk Houston)

Figure 4-2: West Fork San Jacinto River Bacteria Results Profile

1361

1 , M

cCoy

Lan

e

WFS

J02

, Rile

y Fu

zzel

WFS

J01

, Sle

epy

Hol

low16

635

, SH

242

1662

4 , S

H 2

42

1662

6 , S

H L

oop

336

1124

5 , I

H 4

5

WFS

J03

, Hon

ea E

gypt

Rd

1125

0 , F

M 2

854

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

0.05.010.015.020.025.030.035.0


Con

duct

ivity

(uS/

cm)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60Fl

ow (c

fs)

Main Stem ConductivityTributary ConductivityMain Stem Flow

(Lk Houston)

Figure 4-3: West Fork San Jacinto River Conductivity and Flow Results Profile

Figure 4-4: Crystal Creek Sampling Map

Table 4-2: Crystal Creek Sampling Results Station Code Description Station Type Station

Mile Sample

Date Sample

Time E. coli


(cfs) Flow*

Severity Temp

(C) Cond


CRC03 SH 105 main stem 11.6 7-Nov-07 9:25 152 1.1 3 14.7 420 0.04 CRC02 FM 1484 main stem 8.2 7-Nov-07 12:20 27 1.3 2 15.2 383 0 15804 FM 3083 main stem 6.6 7-Nov-07 11:38 91 1.4 3 16.3 363 0 CRC01 SH 105 tributary 6.4 7-Nov-07 9:50 21 0 1 15.5 265 n/a 15805 FM 3083 tributary 6.4 7-Nov-07 11:50 86 0.9 3 15.0 2130 0.25 11181 FM 1314 main stem 2.9 7-Nov-07 11:12 107 2.5 3 16.5 660 0 16635 SH 242 main stem 0.7 7-Nov-07 10:50 13 2.6 3 18.0 655 0

CR

C03

, S

H 1

05

CR

C02

, FM

148

4

1580

4 , F

M 3

083

CR

C01

, S

H 1

0515

805

, FM

308

3

1118

1 , F

M 1

314

1663

5 , S

H 2

42

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160


E c

oli (

cfu/

100m

L)

Main StemTributary

(West Fork)

Figure 4-5: Crystal Creek Bacteria Results Profile

1663

5 , S

H 2

42

1118

1 , F

M 1

314

1580

5 , F

M 3

083

CR

C01

, SH

105

1580

4 , F

M 3

083

CR

C02

, FM

148

4

CR

C03

, SH

105

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

0.02.04.06.08.010.012.014.0


Con

duct

ivity

(uS/

cm)

0

1

2

3

4

5Fl

ow (c

fs)


(West Fork)

Figure 4-6: Crystal Creek Conductivity and Flow Results Profile

Figure 4-7: Stewarts Creek Sampling Map

Table 4-3: Stewarts Creek Sampling Results Station Code Description Station Type Station

Mile Sample

Date Sample

Time E. coli


(cfs) Flow*

Severity Temp

(C) Cond


STC04 SH 75 main stem 12.7 7-Nov-07 7:50 11 < 0.1 3 16.6 118 n/a STC03 FM 3083 main stem 9.5 7-Nov-07 8:15 93 0.2 3 14.2 148 0

STC03B FM 3083 main stem 9.5 7-Nov-07 8:25 24 0.2 3 14.2 148 n/a STC05 FM 3083 tributary 8.5 7-Nov-07 8:40 7 < 0.1 3 14.1 139 n/a STC02 N Loop 336 main stem 8.3 7-Nov-07 8:55 18 0.8 3 14.7 173 0 STC01 SH 105 main stem 6.3 7-Nov-07 10:16 67 1 3 15.2 196 n/a 11178 Silverdale Dr main stem 5.1 7-Nov-07 11:54 19 1 3 16.9 215 n/a 16626 S Loop 336 main stem 3.3 7-Nov-07 11:40 34 1 2 15.4 277 0

STC

04 ,

SH 7

5

STC

03 ,

FM 3

083

STC

03B

, FM

308

3

STC

05 ,

FM 3

083

STC

02 ,

N L

oop

336

STC

01 ,

SH 1

05

1117

8 , S

ilver

dale

Dr

1662

6 , S

Loo

p 33

6

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.02.04.06.08.010.012.014.0


E co

li (c

fu/1

00m

L)Main StemTributary

(West Fork)

Figure 4-8: Stewarts Creek Bacteria Results Profile

1662

6 , S

Loo

p 33

6

1117

8 , S

ilver

dale

Dr

STC

01 ,

SH 1

05

STC

02 ,

N L

oop

336

STC

05 ,

FM 3

083

STC

03 ,

FM 3

083

STC

04 ,

SH 7

5

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0.02.04.06.08.010.012.014.0


Con

duct

ivity

(uS/

cm)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4Fl

ow (c

fs)


(West Fork)

Figure 4-9: Stewarts Creek Conductivity and Flow Results Profile

Figure 5-1: Spring Creek Sampling Map

Table 5-1: Spring Creek Sampling Results Station Code Description Station

Type Station

Mile Sample

Date Sample

Time E. coli


(cfs) Flow*

Severity Temp

(C) Cond


SC01 Murrell Rd main stem 53.8 8-Nov-07 10:08 7 0.2 2 15.8 232 n/a SC07 Glenmont Estates tributary 48.6 8-Nov-07 9:34 43 0.5 3 14.8 295 n/a 11323 Decker Prairie Rd main stem 45.1 8-Nov-07 9:05 42 < 2 3 15.3 240 0 SC03 Cypress Rosehill tributary 43.6 8-Nov-07 8:45 18 0.3 2 14.4 607 0 11314 SH 249 main stem 39.6 8-Nov-07 12:46 2800 < 5 3 18.4 280 0.04 SC02 Neidigk Lake Outfall tributary 36.6 8-Nov-07 13:05 3 < 5 3 20.0 262 0 17489 Kuykendahl Rd main stem 28.8 8-Nov-07 10:33 53 14 3 16.8 360 n/a 11185 Gosling Rd Willow Crk 21.6 8-Nov-07 9:00 < 1 5.7 3 16.6 860 0.8 11313 IH 45 main stem 16.8 8-Nov-07 8:25 210 27 3 15.7 545 n/a 11312 Riley Fuzzel Rd main stem 13.1 8-Nov-07 7:55 330 30 3 16.5 575 n/a

1131

2, R

iley

Fuzz

el R

d

1131

3, IH

45

1118

5, G

oslin

g R

d

1748

9, K

uyke

ndah

l Rd

SC

02, N

eidg

t Lak

e O

utfa

ll

1131

4, S

H 2

49

SC

03, C

ypre

ss R

oseh

ill11

323,

Dec

ker P

rairi

e R

d

SC07

, Gle

nmon

t Est

ates

SC01

, Mur

rell

Rd

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

0.010.020.030.040.050.060.0River Station (mile)

E c

oli (

cfu/

100m

L)

Main StemTributary

2800 cfu/100mL

(Lk Houston)

Figure 5-2: Spring Creek Bacteria Results Profile

1131

3, IH

45

1131

3, IH

45

1118

5, G

oslin

g R

d

1748

9, K

uyke

ndah

l Rd

SC

02, N

eidg

t Lak

e O

utfa

ll

1131

4, S

H 2

49

SC

03, C

ypre

ss R

oseh

ill11

323,

Dec

ker P

rairi

e R

d

SC

07, G

lenm

ont E

stat

es

SC

01, M

urre

ll R

d

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

0.010.020.030.040.050.060.0


Con

duct

ivity

(uS

/cm

)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60Fl

ow (c

fs)


(Lk Houston)

Figure 5-3: Spring Creek Conductivity and Flow Results Profile

Figure 5-4: Upper Panther Branch Sampling Map

Table 5-2: Upper Panther Branch Sampling Results Station Code Description Station Type Station

Mile Sample

Date Sample

Time E. coli


(cfs) Flow*

Severity Temp

(C) Cond


UPB02 FM 1488 main stem 3.5 7-Nov-07 16:30 5 < 0.1 2 18.1 257 n/a UPB03 Green Bridge Dr main stem 1.9 7-Nov-07 16:15 64 0.1 2 16.9 280 n/a 16629 above WWTP main stem 0.3 7-Nov-07 15:35 171 0.1 1 17.7 327 0.04 UPB04 Woodlands WWTP 0.2 7-Nov-07 15:50 106 5.6 n/a 23.1 948 0.04 16630 below WWTP main stem 0.2 7-Nov-07 16:00 78 5.7 3 23.6 912 n/a UPB05 Old Egypt Center WWTP 0.0 7-Nov-07 15:55 < 1 0.09 n/a 21.5 1545 > 3.5 UPB01 Kuykendahl Rd Bear Branch 0.0 7-Nov-07 16:25 9 0.2 2 19.7 278 n/a 16631 Research Forest Bear Branch 0.0 7-Nov-07 15:05 79 0.2 3 18.5 353 0.04 16632 Gosling Rd main stem -0.4 7-Nov-07 14:40 66 6 3 23.4 847 0.06

UP

B02,

FM

148

8

UP

B03

, Gre

en B

ridge

Dr 16

629,

abo

ve W

WTP

UP

B04

, Woo

dlan

ds16

630,

bel

ow W

WTP

UP

B01,

Kuy

kend

ahl R

d16

631,

Res

earc

h Fo

rest

1663

2, G

oslin

g R

d

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

-1.0-0.50.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.0River Station (mile)

E c

oli (

cfu/

100m

L)


(Bear Branch)

Figure 5-5: Upper Panther Branch Bacteria Results Profile

UP

B02

, FM

148

8

UP

B03

, Gre

en B

ridge

Dr

1662

9, a

bove

WW

TPU

PB

04, W

oodl

ands

1663

0, b

elow

WW

TPU

PB

01, K

uyke

ndah

l Rd

1663

1, R

esea

rch

Fore

st

1663

2, G

oslin

g R

d

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

-1.0-0.50.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.0


Con

duct

ivity

(uS

/cm

)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12Fl

ow (c

fs)

Main Stem ConductivityTributary ConductivityWWTPMain Stem Flow

(Bear Branch)

Figure 5-6: Upper Panther Branch Conductivity and Flow Results Profile

Figure 5-7: Willow Creek Sampling Map

Table 5-3: Willow Creek Sampling Results

Station Code Description Station

Type Station

Mile Sample

Date Sample

Time E. coli


(cfs) Flow*

Severity Temp

(C) Cond


WC05 Cypress Rosehill main stem 17.8 8-Nov-07 10:36 < 1 0 1 16.2 192 n/a WC04 Telge Rd main stem 15.4 8-Nov-07 10:56 6 0 1 18.8 199 n/a WC03 SH 249 main stem 12.8 8-Nov-07 11:55 31 < 0.1 2 19.0 198 0.08 WC07 Tomball WWTP 11.8 8-Nov-07 12:12 1 1.1 3 23.4 856 0.08 16426 Huffsmith Kohrville main stem 10.5 8-Nov-07 13:34 4 2 3 20.1 810 0.04 WC02 FM 2920 main stem 7.8 8-Nov-07 11:50 18 2 3 17.5 840 0 WC09 Dowdell WWTP 6.7 8-Nov-07 11:30 1 0.38 n/a 24.0 1310 2 WC01 Kuykendahl Rd main stem 5.5 8-Nov-07 10:55 104 3.4 3 17.5 785 0.1 WC06 W Rayford Rd tributary 5.4 8-Nov-07 10:05 26 < 2 3 19.1 1040 n/a WC08 Northhampton WWTP 1.7 8-Nov-07 9:27 < 1 0.65 3 22.8 964 > 3.5 11185 Gosling Rd main stem 1.4 8-Nov-07 9:00 < 1 5.7 3 16.6 860 0.8

WC

05, C

ypre

ss R

oseh

ill

WC

04, T

elge

Rd W

C03

, SH

249

WC

07, T

omba

ll

1642

6, H

uffs

mith

Koh

rville

WC

02, F

M 2

920

WC

09, D

owde

ll

WC

01, K

uyke

ndah

l Rd

WC

06, W

Ray

ford

Rd

WC

08, N

orth

ham

pton

1118

5, G

oslin

g R

d

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0.02.04.06.08.010.012.014.016.018.020.0River Station (mile)

E c

oli (

cfu/

100m

L)


(Spring Crk)

Figure 5-8: Willow Creek Bacteria Results Profile

WC

05, C

ypre

ss R

oseh

ill

WC

04, T

elge

Rd

WC

03, S

H 2

49

WC

07, T

omba

ll

1642

6, H

uffs

mith

Koh

rville

WC

02, F

M 2

920

WC

09, D

owde

ll

WC

01, K

uyke

ndah

l Rd

WC

06, W

Ray

ford

Rd WC

08, N

orth

ham

pton

1118

5, G

oslin

g R

d

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

0.02.04.06.08.010.012.014.016.018.020.0


Con

duct

ivity

(uS/

cm)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14Fl

ow (c

fs)

Main Stem ConductivityWWTPTributaryMain Stem Flow

(Spring Crk)

Figure 5-9: Willow Creek Conductivity and Flow Results Profile

Figure 6-1: Cypress Creek Sampling Map

Table 6-1: Cypress Creek Sampling Results Station Code Description Station

Type Station

Mile Sample

Date Sample

Time E. coli


(cfs) Flow*

Severity Temp

(C) Cond


CYC04 Mathis Rd main stem 56.9 9-Nov-07 9:05 25 < 0.1 1 18.2 495 n/a CYC01 Mathis Rd tributary 51.4 9-Nov-07 9:15 56 < 0.1 1 19.1 144 n/a CYC02 Hebet Rd main stem 49.8 9-Nov-07 9:35 7 < 0.1 1 19.9 205 n/a CYC03 Katy Hockley main stem 41.4 9-Nov-07 9:55 21 < 0.1 1 19.9 283 n/a 11333 House Hahl Rd main stem 35.5 9-Nov-07 10:30 28 < 5 3 20.4 940 n/a 14159 Kluge Rd Little Cy Crk 27.8 9-Nov-07 14:45 1 3.2 3 23.8 830 0.35 11332 Grant Rd main stem 25.7 9-Nov-07 10:46 17 30 3 19.0 751 n/a 17496 Cypress Crk Dr Faulkey G 23.6 9-Nov-07 11:06 34 1.7 3 20.6 770 0.04 11331 SH 249 main stem 22.5 9-Nov-07 10:19 12 33 3 20.1 770 0.04 CYC0A Louetta Rd tributary 21.5 9-Nov-07 9:55 936 0.4 3 22.4 522 n/a 11330 Steubner-Airline main stem 17.3 9-Nov-07 9:30 154 36 3 19.5 830 n/a 17481 Spg Crk Oaks Dr Spring G 16.0 8-Nov-07 15:18 320 1 3 20.9 1060 n/a 11328 IH 45 main stem 9.9 9-Nov-07 8:08 85 42 3 19.3 841 0.04 11324 Cypresswood Dr main stem 2.0 9-Nov-07 8:47 49 48 3 19.3 808 n/a

1132

4, C

ypre

ssw

ood

Dr

1132

8, IH

45

1748

1, S

pg C

rk O

aks

Dr

1133

0, S

teub

ner-

Airli

ne

1133

1, S

H 2

4917

496,

Cyp

ress

Crk

Dr

1133

2, G

rant

Rd

1415

9, K

luge

Rd

1133

3, H

ouse

Hah

l Rd

CYC

03, K

aty

Hoc

kley

CYC

02, H

ebet

Rd

CYC

01, M

athi

s R

d

CYC

04, M

athi

s R

d

CYC

0A, L

ouet

ta R

d

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

0.010.020.030.040.050.060.0


E co

li (c

fu/1

00m

L)Main StemTributary

936

(Spring Crk)

Figure 6-2: Cypress Creek Bacteria Results Profile

1132

4, C

ypre

ssw

ood

Dr

1132

8, IH

4517

481,

Spg

Crk

Oak

s D

r

CYC

04, M

athi

s R

d

CYC

01, M

athi

s R

dC

YC02

, Heb

et R

d

CYC

03, K

aty

Hod

dey

1133

3, H

ouse

Hah

l Rd

1415

9, K

luge

Rd

1133

2, G

rant

Rd

1749

6, C

ypre

ss C

rk D

r11

331,

SH

249

CYC

0A, L

ouet

ta R

d

1133

0, S

teub

ner-

Airli

ne

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

0.010.020.030.040.050.060.0


Con

duct

ivity

(uS/

cm)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60Fl

ow (c

fs)


(Spring Crk)

Figure 6-3: Cypress Creek Conductivity and Flow Results Profile

Figure 6-4: Faulkey Gully Sampling Map

Table 6-2: Faulkey Gully Sampling Results Station Code Description Station

Type Station

Mile Sample

Date Sample

Time E. coli


(cfs) Flow*

Severity Temp

(C) Cond


FG01 Shaw Rd main stem 4.8 9-Nov-07 15:49 24 < 0.05 2 23.0 571 n/a FG06 NWHC MUD 15 WWTP 3.7 9-Nov-07 15:24 174 0.5 n/a 25.7 1199 0 FG02 Spring Cypress Rd main stem 3.1 9-Nov-07 15:05 125 1.2 3 22.0 975 n/a FG05 Faulkey G. MUD WWTP 1.7 9-Nov-07 12:12 300 0.94 n/a 23.5 1002 0.1 FG03 Louetta Rd main stem 1.5 9-Nov-07 11:38 8 2.2 3 22.5 740 0.04 FG0A Lkwood Forest Dr tributary 0.6 9-Nov-07 11:20 350 < 0.05 n/a 22.5 1049 0.1 17496 Lkwood Forest Dr main stem 0.5 9-Nov-07 11:06 34 n/a 3 20.6 770 0.04

1749

6, L

kwoo

d Fo

rest

Dr

FG0A

, Lkw

ood

Fore

st D

r

FG03

, Lou

etta

Rd

FG05

, Fau

lkey

G. M

UD

FG02

, Spr

ing

Cyp

ress

Rd

FG06

, NW

HC

MU

D 1

5

FG01

, Sha

w R

d

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

0.01.02.03.04.05.06.0


E co

li (c

fu/1

00m

L)Main StemTributaryWWTP

(Cypress Crk)

Figure 6-5: Faulkey Gully Bacteria Results Profile

1749

6, L

kwoo

d Fo

rest

Dr

FG0A

, Lkw

ood

Fore

st D

r

FG03

, Lou

etta

Rd

FG05

, Fau

lkey

G. M

UD

FG02

, Spr

ing

Cyp

ress

Rd

FG06

, NW

HC

MU

D 1

5

FG01

, Sha

w R

d

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

0.01.02.03.04.05.06.0


Con

duct

ivity

(uS/

cm)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6Fl

ow (c

fs)


(Cypress Crk)

Figure 6-6: Faulkey Gully Conductivity and Flow Results Profile

Figure 6-7: Spring Gully Sampling Map

Table 6-3: Spring Gully Sampling Results Station Code Description Station

Type Station

Mile Sample

Date Sample

Time E. coli


(cfs) Flow*

Severity Temp

(C) Cond


SG09 NWHC MUD 32 WWTP 4.6 8-Nov-07 15:55 718 0.64 n/a 20.8 990 0.04 SG05 Pine Lakes Blvd main stem 4.5 8-Nov-07 16:10 7 0.64 2 24.4 1155 n/a SG04 Spring Cypress Rd main stem 3.5 8-Nov-07 14:36 26 0.64 3 21.5 1102 0.08 SG06 Klein Cemetary Rd tributary 3.1 8-Nov-07 14:25 691 < 0.02 2 18.4 317 n/a SG03 Fairway Oaks Dr main stem 3.0 8-Nov-07 15:39 9 0.65 3 21.9 1050 n/a SG02 Spring Cypress Rd tributary 2.1 8-Nov-07 14:51 6 0.05 2 22.7 717 0.04 SG07 Bilma WWTP WWTP 2.1 8-Nov-07 15:11 1 0.37 n/a 23.9 1037 1.8 SG01 Jester Rd tributary 2.1 8-Nov-07 15:28 28 0.41 3 23.3 1027 0.7 17481 Spring Crk Oaks Dr main stem 2.0 8-Nov-07 15:18 320 1 3 20.9 1060 n/a

SG

01, J

este

r Rd

1748

1, S

prin

g C

rk O

aks

Dr

SG07

, Bilm

a W

WTP

SG

03, F

airw

ay O

aks

Dr

SG06

, Kle

in C

emet

ary

Rd

SG04

, Spr

ing

Cyp

ress

Rd

SG05

, Pin

e La

kes

Blvd

SG09

, NW

HC

MU

D 3

2

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0


E co

li (c

fu/1

00m

L)


(Cypress Crk)

Figure 6-8: Spring Gully Bacteria Results Profile

SG01

, Jes

ter R

d17

481,

Spr

ing

Crk

Oak

s D

r

SG07

, Bilm

a W

WTP

SG03

, Fai

rway

Oak

s D

r

SG06

, Kle

in C

emet

ary

RdSG

04, S

prin

g C

ypre

ss R

d

SG05

, Pin

e La

kes

Blvd

SG09

, NW

HC

MU

D 3

2

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0


Con

duct

ivity

(uS/

cm)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6Fl

ow (c

fs)


(Cypress Crk)

Figure 6-9: Spring Gully Conductivity and Flow Results Profile

Figure 6-10: Little Cypress Creek Sampling Map

Table 6-4: Little Cypress Creek Sampling Results Station Code Description Station

Type Station

Mile Sample

Date Sample

Time E. coli


(cfs) Flow*

Severity Temp

(C) Cond


LCC01 Bauer Rd main stem 14.4 9-Nov-07 11:10 27 0.31 2 20.0 741 0 LCC02 Mueschke Rd main stem 9.6 9-Nov-07 11:35 25 < 0.1 2 20.4 185 0 LCC03 Rosehill Rd main stem 7.3 9-Nov-07 12:00 14 0.5 2 20.2 147 n/a LCC04 Spring Cypress Rd main stem 3.5 9-Nov-07 12:15 32 1.9 3 21.5 431 n/a LCC05 NWHC MUD 5 WWTP 2.9 9-Nov-07 12:35 8 0.66 3 26.2 1050 1.7 LCC06 Grant Rd PUD WWTP 1.8 9-Nov-07 13:36 < 1 0.31 2 25.6 741 2 LCC07 HC MUD 36 WWTP 1.7 9-Nov-07 15:10 < 1 0.31 3 26.8 1275 > 3.5 14159 Kluge Rd main stem 1.4 9-Nov-07 14:45 1 3.2 3 23.8 830 0.35

LCC

07, H

C M

UD

36

1415

9, K

luge

Rd

LCC

06, G

rant

Rd

PUD

LCC

05, N

WH

C M

UD

5

LCC

04, S

prin

g C

ypre

ss R

d

LCC

03, R

oseh

ill R

d

LCC

02, M

uesc

hke

Rd

LCC

01, B

auer

Rd

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

0.02.04.06.08.010.012.014.016.0


E co

li (c

fu/1

00m

L)

Main StemWWTP

(Cypress Crk)

Figure 6-11: Little Cypress Creek Bacteria Results Profile

LCC

07, H

C M

UD

36

1415

9, K

luge

Rd

LCC

06, G

rant

Rd

PUD

LCC

05, N

WH

C M

UD

5

LCC

04, S

prin

g C

ypre

ss R

d

LCC

03, R

oseh

ill R

d

LCC

02, M

uesc

hke

Rd

LCC

01, B

auer

Rd

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

0.02.04.06.08.010.012.014.016.0


Con

duct

ivity

(uS/

cm)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7Fl

ow (c

fs)

Main Stem ConductivityWWTPMain Stem Flow

(Cypress Crk)

Figure 6-12: Little Cypress Creek Conductivity and Flow Results Profile

Figure 8-1: Caney Creek Sampling Map

Table 8-1: Caney Creek Sampling Results Station Code Description Station

Type Station

Mile Sample

Date Sample

Time E. coli


(cfs) Flow*

Severity Temp

(C) Cond


CC02 FM 1097 main stem 41.0 2-Nov-07 9:38 17 0.5 2 16.4 392 n/a 14241 SH 105 main stem 27.6 2-Nov-07 10:45 36 9.5 3 17.5 96 n/a 11335 FM 2090 main stem 20.2 2-Nov-07 13:10 18 11.5 3 18.6 98 n/a CC05 Conroe ISD WWTP 20.2 2-Nov-07 13:20 2500 0.12 n/a 22.0 925 0.200 CC03 SH 242 tributary 10.5 2-Nov-07 9:25 127 < 1 1 16.2 168 0.000 CC06 Lone Star Ranch WWTP 9.8 2-Nov-07 15:15 19 0.32 n/a 24.6 840 > 3.500 CC01 FM 1485 tributary 9.8 2-Nov-07 9:45 570 0.9 2 16.6 302 0.000 11334 FM 1485 main stem 6.2 2-Nov-07 10:30 99 17 3 17.2 123 0.150 CC0A New Caney MUD WWTP 4.9 2-Nov-07 16:10 25 0.72 n/a 23.2 640 0.415 CC04 SH 494 tributary 0.7 2-Nov-07 10:55 150 n/a 1 19.0 207 n/a

CC

02, F

M 1

097

1424

1, S

H 1

05

1133

5, F

M 2

090

CC

05, C

onro

e IS

D

CC

03, S

H 2

42

CC

06, L

one

Sta

r Ran

ch

CC

01, F

M 1

485

1133

4, F

M 1

485

CC

0A, N

ew C

aney

MU

D

CC

04, S

H 4

94

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

0.05.010.015.020.025.030.035.040.045.0River Station (mile)

E c

oli (

cfu/

100m

L)


2500 cfu/100mL

(Lk Houston)

Figure 8-2: Caney Creek Bacteria Results Profile

CC

04, S

H 4

94

CC

0A, N

ew C

aney

MU

D11

334,

FM

148

5CC

01, F

M 1

485

CC

06, L

one

Sta

r Ran

ch

CC

03, S

H 2

42

CC

05, C

onro

e IS

D11

335,

FM

209

0

1424

1, S

H 1

05CC

02, F

M 1

097

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

0.05.010.015.020.025.030.035.040.045.0


Con

duct

ivity

(uS

/cm

)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60Fl

ow (c

fs)

Main Stem ConductivityTributary ConductivityWWTP ConductivityMain Stem Flow

(Lk Houston)

Figure 8-3: Caney Creek Conductivity and Flow Results Profile

Figure 9-1: Peach Creek Sampling Map

Table 9-1: Peach Creek Sampling Results

Station Code Description Station

Type Station

Mile Sample

Date Sample

Time E. coli


(cfs) Flow*

Severity Temp

(C) Cond


PC01 FM 3081 main stem 33.1 2-Nov-07 10:11 191 9.4 3 16.9 47 n/a 11338 SH 105 main stem 19.4 2-Nov-07 11:05 240 12.8 3 16.2 46 n/a 16625 Old Hwy 105 main stem 18.1 2-Nov-07 11:35 132 13.4 3 16.9 47 n/a 11337 FM 2090 main stem 9.4 2-Nov-07 12:50 250 16 3 17.5 66 n/a PC02 MC MUD #16 WWTP 5.7 2-Nov-07 16:35 2 0.62 n/a 22.5 505 2.8 PC04 Woodbranch WWTP 4.3 2-Nov-07 17:15 > 20000 0.34 n/a 23.1 765 0.04 PC0A Roman Forest WWTP 4.0 2-Nov-07 17:20 1 0.25 n/a 24.0 786 2.5 11336 FM 1485 main stem 2.3 2-Nov-07 11:25 95 18 3 17.5 102 n/a 17746 Lk Houston Park main stem 1.6 2-Nov-07 12:10 117 18 3 18.3 106 n/a

PC

01, F

M 3

081

1133

8, S

H 1

05

1662

5, O

ld H

wy

105 11

337,

FM

209

0

PC

02, M

C M

UD

#16

PC04

, Woo

dbra

nch

PC

0A, R

oman

For

est

1133

6, F

M 1

485

1774

6, L

k H

oust

on P

ark

0

100

200

300

400

500


E c

oli (

cfu/

100m

L)

Main StemWWTP

>20,000 cfu/100mL

(Caney Crk)

Figure 9-2: Peach Creek Bacteria Results Profile

1774

6, L

k H

oust

on P

ark

1133

6, F

M 1

485

PC

0A, R

oman

For

est

PC

04, W

oodb

ranc

h

PC

02, M

C M

UD

#16

1133

7, F

M 2

090

1662

5, O

ld H

wy

105

1133

8, S

H 1

05

PC01

, FM

308

1

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200


Con

duct

ivity

(uS/

cm)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Flow

(cfs

)Main Stem ConductivityWWTP ConductivityMain Stem Flow

(Caney Crk)

Figure 9-3: Peach Creek Conductivity and Flow Results Profile

Figure 3-1: East Fork San Jacinto River Sampling Map · 2012. 4. 26. · Table 3-1: East Fork San...

Documents

Transcript of Figure 3-1: East Fork San Jacinto River Sampling Map · 2012. 4. 26. · Table 3-1: East Fork San...