Field amplified sample stacking and focusing in nanochannels

Click here to load reader

  • date post

    22-Feb-2016
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    39
  • download

    0

Embed Size (px)

description

Field amplified sample stacking and focusing in nanochannels. Brian Storey (Olin College) Jess Sustarich (UCSB) Sumita Pennathur (UCSB). FASS in microchannels. V. High cond. fluid. High cond. fluid. Low cond. fluid. σ =1. +. σ =10. σ =10. E Electric field - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Field amplified sample stacking and focusing in nanochannels

Slide 1

Field amplified sample stacking and focusing in nanochannelsBrian Storey (Olin College)Jess Sustarich (UCSB)Sumita Pennathur (UCSB)1FASS in microchannelsLow cond. fluidHigh cond. fluidHigh cond. fluidV+Chien & Burgi, A. Chem 1992=10=10=1E=1E=10E Electric field Electrical conductivity2FASS in microchannels---------Low cond. fluidHigh cond. fluidHigh cond. fluidSample ionV+Chien & Burgi, A. Chem 1992-=10=10=1E=1n=1E=10E Electric field Electrical conductivityn Sample concentration3FASS in microchannelsV+Chien & Burgi, A. Chem 1992---------Low cond. fluidHigh cond. fluidHigh cond. fluidSample ion-E=1n=1n=10=10=10=1E=10E Electric field Electrical conductivityn Sample concentration4FASS in microchannels---------Low cond. fluidHigh cond. fluidHigh cond. fluidSample ionV+Chien & Burgi, A. Chem 1992-Maximum enhancement in sample concentration is equal to conductivity ratioE=10E=1n=10=10=10=1E Electric field Electrical conductivityn Sample concentration5FASS in microchannelsLow cond. fluidHigh cond. fluidHigh cond. fluidVE+Chien & Burgi, A. Chem 1992dP/dx----------------------------------------------------------------6FASS in microchannels

Low conductivity fluidSample ionsSimply calculate mean fluid velocity, and electrophoretic velocity.Diffusion/dispersion limits the peak enhancement.7FASS in nanochannelsSame idea, just a smaller channel.Differences between micro and nano are quite significant.8Experimental setup

2 Channels: 250 nm x7 microns 1x9 microns9Raw data 10:1 conductivity ratio

10Micro/nano comparison

1011ObservationsIn 250 nm channels, enhancement depends on:Background salt concentration Applied electric field Enhancement exceeds conductivity ratio.In 1 micron channels, Enhancement is constant.

12ModelPoisson-Nernst-Planck + Navier-StokesUse extreme aspect ratio to get 1D equations assuming local electrochemical equilibrium (aspect ratio is equivalent to a tunnel my height from Boston to NYC)Yields simple equations for propagation of the low conductivity region and sample. Model yields simple jump conditions for the propagation of interfaces

Flow is constant down the channelCurrent is constant down the channel.

Conservation of electrical conductivity.Conservation of sample species.u is velocity is charge density E is electric fieldb is mobility is electrical conductivity n is concentration of sampleBar denotes average taken across channel height

Characteristics

1 micronEnhancement =13Enhancement =125Low conductivity

250 nmLow conductivitySample ionsSample ions10:1 Conductivity ratio, 1:10mM concentration15Why is nanoscale different?

High cond.High cond.High cond.High cond.High cond.High cond.Low cond.Low cond.Low cond.X (mm)y/Hy/Hy/H16Focusing

--Low cond. bufferHigh cond. bufferHigh cond. bufferUUs,lowUs,highDebye length/Channel HeightUs,highUUs,low17Simple model to experiment

Simple model 1D, single channel, no PDE, no free parametersDebye length/Channel Height18Towards quantitative agreement

Add diffusive effects (solve a 1D PDE)All four channels and sequence of voltages is critical in setting the initial contents of channel, and time dependent electric field in measurement channel. 19Characteristics 4 channels

1 micron channel250 nmchannelRed location of sampleBlue location of low conductivity fluid20Model vs. experiment (16 kV/m)

ModelExp.250 nm1 micron21

Model vs. experiment (32 kV/m)ModelExp.250 nm1 micron22Untested predictions

Shocks in background concentration

Mani, Zangle, and Santiago. Langmuir, 2009ConclusionsNanochannel FASS shows dependence on electrolyte concentration, channel height, electric field, sample valence, etc not present in microchannels.Nanochannels outperform microchannels in terms of enhancement.Nanochannel FASS demonstrates a novel focusing mechanism.Double layer to channel height is key parameter.Model is very simple, yet predicts all the key trends with no fit parameters. Future workWhat is the upper limit?Can it be useful?More detailed model better quantitative agreement. 25Untested predictions

27