Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department

34

description

Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department University of California Berkeley, CA [email protected] www.stat.berkeley.edu/~brill 2 π 1 ISI2007Lisbon. Introduction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department

Page 1: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department
Page 2: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department

Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes

David R. Brillinger

Statistics Department

University of California

Berkeley, CA

[email protected]

www.stat.berkeley.edu/~brill

2 π 1

ISI2007Lisbon

Page 3: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department
Page 4: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department

Introduction

Is there a useful extension of the concept of volatility to point processes?

A number of data analyses will be presented

Page 5: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department

Why bother with an extension to point processes?

a) Perhaps will learn more about time series case

b) Pps are an interesting data type

c) Pps are building blocks

d) Volatility often considered risk measure for time series.

27 July Guardian.

“Down nearly 60 points at one stage, the FTSE recovered and put on the same amount again. But by the close it had slipped

back, down 36.0 points.”

“inject billions into the banking system”

Page 6: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department

Volatility

When is something volatile?

When values shifting/changing a lot

Vague concept

Can be formalized in various ways

There are empirical formulas as well as models

Page 7: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department

Merrill Lynch.

“Volatility.

A measure of the fluctuation in the market price of the underlying security.

Mathematically, volatility is the annualized standard deviation of returns.

A - Low; B - Medium; and C - High.”

Page 8: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department

Financial time series.

Pt price at time t

“Return” data, Yt = (Pt - Pt-1)/Pt-1

Empirical formula

Realized volatility

mean{[Ys – Ys-1]p | s near t}, p = 1 or 2

Page 9: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department

Model based formula. GARCH

Yt = μt + σtεt, ε zero mean, unit variance, t discrete

σt2 = α0 + ∑ αi[Yt-i – μt-i]2 + ∑ βjσt-j

2 α’s, β’s > 0

Volatility σt2

For μs, σs smooth

mean{[Ys – Ys-1]2 | s near t} ~ σt2(εt - εt-1)2

Page 10: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department

Crossings based.

E{[Y(t) – Y(t-h)] 2} = 2[c(0) – c(h)] ≈ -2c"(0)h2

Recognize as

2c(0) π2 [E(#{crossings of mean})]2

for stationary normal

Consider

s #{crossings of mean | near t}

as volatility measure

Page 11: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department

Example. Standard & Poors 500.

Weighted average of prices of 500 large companies in US stock market

Events

Great Crash Nov 1929

Asian Flu (Black Monday) Oct 1997

Other “crashes”: 1932, 1937, 1940, 1962, 1974, 1987

Page 12: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department

Zero crossings

Page 13: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department

S&P 500: realized volatility, model based, crossing based

Tsay (2002)

n= 792

Page 14: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department

Point process case.

locations along line: τ1 < τ2 < τ3 < τ4 < …

N(t) = #{τj t}

Intervals/interarrivals Xj = τj+1 - τj

Stochastic point process.

Probabilities defined

Characteristics: rate, autointensity, covariance density, conditional intensity, …

E.g. Poisson, doubly stochastic Poisson

Page 15: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department

0-1 valued time series.

Zt = 0 or 1

Realized volatility

ave{ [Zs – Zs-1]2 | s near t }

Connection to zero crossings.

Zt= sgn(Yt), {Yt} ordinary t.s.

Σ [Zs – Zs-1]2 = #{zero crossings}

Page 16: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department

Connecting pp and 0-1 series. Algebra

Tj = <τj/h> <.> nearest integer, embed in 0’s

h small enough so no ties

Y(t) = N(t+h) – N(t) = tt+hdN(u)

Stationary case

E{Y(t)} = pN h

cov{Y(t+u),Y(t)} = t+ut+u+h t

t+hcov{dN(r),dN(s)}

~ pNδ{u}h + qNN(u)h2

as cov{dN(r),dN(s)} = [pN δ(r-s) + qNN(r-s)]dr ds,

rate, pN, covariance density, qNN(∙), Dirac delta, δ(∙)

Page 17: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department

Parametric models.

Bernoulli ARCH. Cox (1970)

Prob{Zt = 1|Ht} = πt

logit πt = Σ αi Zt-i

Ht history before t

Fitting, assessment, prediction, … via glm()

Bernoulli GARCH.

logit πt = Σ αi Zt-i + Σ βj logit πt-j

Volatility πt or πt(1 - πt)?

Page 18: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department

Convento do Carmo

Page 19: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department

“California” earthquakes magnitude 4, 1969-2003

N=1805

Page 20: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department

Results of 0-1 analysis

Page 21: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department

P.p. analysis.

Rate as estimate of volatility

Consider var{dN(t)}

var{N(t)-N(t-h)} ≈ pNh + qNN(0)h2

Estimate of rate at time t.

k(t-u)dN(u) / k(t-u)du

k(.) kernel

Variance, stationary case, k(.) narrow

pN k(t-u)2du / [ k(t-u)du]2 + qNN(0)

Page 22: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department
Page 23: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department

Example. Euro-USA exchange rate

Page 24: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department

Interval analysis.

Xj = τj – τj-1

Also stationary

Page 25: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department

California earthquakes

Page 26: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department

Risk analysis. Time series case.

Assets Yt and probability p

VaR is the p-th quantile

Prob{Yt+1 – Yt VaR } = p

left tail

If approxmate distribution of Yt+1 – Yt by

Normal(0,σt)

volatility, σt, appears

Sometimes predictive model is built and fit to estimate VaR

Page 27: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department

Point process case.

Pulses arriving close together can damage

Number of oscillations to break object (Ang & Tang)

Suppose all points have the same value (mark), e.g. spike train.

Consider VaR of

Prob{N(t+u) – N(t) > VaR} = 1-p

Righthand tail

Page 28: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department

Examples.

S&P500: p=.05 method of moments quantile

VaR = $.0815

CA earthquakes: u = 7 days, p=.95 mom quantile

VaR = 28 events

Page 29: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department

Case with seasonality – US Forest Fires 1970 - 2005

n=8481

Page 30: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department

Dashed line ~ seasonal

Page 31: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department

Example. Volatility, simulate Poisson, recover volatility

Page 32: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department

Conclusion.

Returning to the question, “Why bother with extension?

a) Perhaps will learn more about time series case

b) Pps are an interesting data type

c) Pps are building blocks

d) Volatility often considered risk measure for time series.”

The volatility can be the basic phenomenon

Page 33: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department

Another question.

“Is there a useful extension of the concept of volatility to point processes?”

The running rate

Gets at local behavior (prediction)

Page 34: Extending the VolatilityConcept to Point Processes David R. Brillinger Statistics Department

Some references.

Bouchard, J-P. and Potters, M. (2000). Theory of Financial Risk and Derivative Pricing. Cambridge

Dettling, M. and Buhlmann, P. “Volatility and risk estimation with linear and nonlinear methods based on high frequency data”

Tsay, R. S. (2002). Analysis of Financial Time Series. Wiley