Exclusive π 0 e lectroproduction in the resonance region.
description
Transcript of Exclusive π 0 e lectroproduction in the resonance region.
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab
Exclusive π0 electroproductionin the resonance region.
Maurizio Ungaro, Kyungseon Joo, Nick Markov
University of ConnecticutJefferson Laboratory
for the CLAS collaboration
1M.Ungaro
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab 2
• Introduction• Experiment Overview• Preliminary Results• Summary
Outline
M.Ungaro
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab 3M.Ungaro
Map the gNN* electro-couplings as a function of photon virtuality with a combined analysis of electroproduction channels
Access active degrees of freedom at various distances
Explore the non-perturbative strong interactions responsible for nucleon formation and the origin of quark confinement
N* Program in CLAS
Example of non-perturbative approaches: LQCD, DSE, LCSR
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab Williamsburg, VA 4M.Ungaro
+ in the resonance region
Q2: 1.6 5.4 GeV2
W: 1.1 1.8 GeV58000 data points
electro-production
e
e’
γv N*, △*
+,
n, p’p
Single +, production in the Delta
Q2: 2 6.5 GeV2
W: 1.1 1.4 GeV7200 data points
1.1 W 2.0
0
Q2
6 M. Ungaro Phys.Rev.Lett.97:112003,2006
K. Park Phys.Rev.C77:015208,2008I.G. Aznauryan Phys.Rev.C78:045209,2008
Missing:0 in the resonance region
Q2: 2.0 6.5 GeV2
W: 1.1 2.0 GeV~75000 data points
Maurizio UngaroNick Markov, UCONN116000 Data Points
Q2: 0.4 1.0 GeV2
W: 1.1 1.8 GeV~40000 data points
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab Williamsburg, VA 5
Experiment Overview
N
= (s s W,Q2,cos(q*))
M.Ungaro
detect:Electron, Proton
extract:• Cross sections, Structure
Functions• Beam Spin Asymmetries• Helicity amplitudes and their
Q2 dependence
ds/dW* = sT + esL + esTTsin2qcos2f + √2 ( +1)e e sLTsinqcosf
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab Williamsburg, VA 6
Experiment Overview
M.Ungaro
October 2001 – January 2002 Beam Energy = 5.75 GeV Current Intensity = 10nA (1034cm-2s-1) 3.7 Billions triggers December 2002 – January 2003 Beam Energy = 2.036 GeV Current Intensity = 10nA (1034cm-2s-1) 1.5 Billions triggers
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab Williamsburg, VA 7M.Ungaro
B.H. Separation:The typical angle between the emitted photon and the electron in B.H. processes is θ m/E∼
Analysis Overview
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab Williamsburg, VA 8M.Ungaro
B.H. Separation:The typical angle between the emitted photon and the electron in B.H. processes is θ m/E∼
Analysis Overview
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab Williamsburg, VA 9M.Ungaro
Analysis Overview
24 f bins200M Generated Events
MAID2007AAO_RAD
Electron ID Proton ID Vertex Correction, Selections Electron Fiducial Cut Proton Fiducial Cut Timing Resolution Match Momentum Resolution Match Drift Chamber Efficiencies p0 selection
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab Williamsburg, VA 10M.Ungaro
Analysis Overview
96 f bins200M Generated Events
MAID2007AAO_RAD
Electron ID Proton ID Vertex Correction, Selections Electron Fiducial Cut Proton Fiducial Cut Timing Resolution Match Momentum Resolution Match Drift Chamber Efficiencies p0 selection
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab Williamsburg, VA 11M.Ungaro
exclurad (Afanasev, Akushevich, Burkert, Joo)
Input: Exclusive cross section
No peaking approximation No soft-hard photon discrimination Radiation of 4 SF with angular dependence of each one (exclusive electro-production)
Radiative Correction
W=1.29
Analysis Overview
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab Williamsburg, VA 12M.Ungaro
exclurad (Afanasev, Akushevich, Burkert, Joo)
Input: Exclusive cross section
No peaking approximation No soft-hard photon discrimination Radiation of 4 SF with angular dependence of each one (exclusive electro-production)
Radiative Correction
W=1.63
Analysis Overview
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab Williamsburg, VA 13M.Ungaro
Normalization check: Good electron PID, fiducial cut Good acceptance from simulation Vertex Correction, Cuts Kinematic Corrections Elastic Scattering Inclusive scattering
Data Keppel Brasse
Analysis Overview
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab Williamsburg, VA 14M.Ungaro
S1 S2
S3
S5 S6
S4
Normalization check: Good electron PID, fiducial cut Good acceptance from simulation Vertex Correction, Cuts Kinematic Corrections Elastic Scattering Inclusive scattering
Data Keppel Brasse
W [GeV]
W [GeV]
W [GeV]
W [GeV]
W [GeV]
W [GeV]
Analysis Overview
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab Williamsburg, VA 15M.Ungaro
Variable Bin size bins
W, GeV 0.025 28 1.1 1.8
Q2, GeV2 0.1 6 0.41.0
cosθ 0.2 10 -1 1
φ 15o 24 0o
360o
40320 points
Preliminary Results, Low Q2
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab Williamsburg, VA 16M.Ungaro
Preliminary Results, Low Q2
Q2 = 0.45 GeV2
CLAS P
relim
inary
Variable Bin size bins
W, GeV 0.025 28 1.11.8
Q2, GeV2 0.1 6 0.41.0
cosθ 0.2 10 -11
φ 15o 24 0o
360o
W = 1.5625 GeV
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab Williamsburg, VA 17M.Ungaro
Preliminary Results, Low Q2
Q2 = 0.55 GeV2
CLAS P
relim
inary
Variable Bin size bins
W, GeV 0.025 28 1.11.8
Q2, GeV2 0.1 6 0.41.0
cosθ 0.2 10 -11
φ 15o 24 0o
360o
W = 1.5625 GeV
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab Williamsburg, VA 18M.Ungaro
Preliminary Results, Low Q2
Q2 = 0.65 GeV2
CLAS P
relim
inary
Variable Bin size bins
W, GeV 0.025 28 1.11.8
Q2, GeV2 0.1 6 0.41.0
cosθ 0.2 10 -11
φ 15o 24 0o
360o
W = 1.5625 GeV
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab Williamsburg, VA 19M.Ungaro
Preliminary Results, Low Q2
Q2 = 0.75 GeV2
CLAS P
relim
inary
Variable Bin size bins
W, GeV 0.025 28 1.11.8
Q2, GeV2 0.1 6 0.41.0
cosθ 0.2 10 -11
φ 15o 24 0o
360o
W = 1.5625 GeV
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab Williamsburg, VA 20M.Ungaro
Preliminary Results, Low Q2
Q2 = 0.85 GeV2
CLAS P
relim
inary
Variable Bin size bins
W, GeV 0.025 28 1.11.8
Q2, GeV2 0.1 6 0.41.0
cosθ 0.2 10 -11
φ 15o 24 0o
360o
W = 1.5625 GeV
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab Williamsburg, VA 21M.Ungaro
Preliminary Results, Low Q2
Q2 = 0.95 GeV2
CLAS P
relim
inary
Variable Bin size bins
W, GeV 0.025 28 1.11.8
Q2, GeV2 0.1 6 0.41.0
cosθ 0.2 10 -11
φ 15o 24 0o
360o
W = 1.5625 GeV
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab 22M.Ungaro
45 bins in W, DW=20 MeV7 bins in Q2 DQ2/Q2 ~ 0.18
10 bins in cos(q*)24, 48, 96 bins in f*
W [GeV]
Q2
[GeV
2 ]
W=1.59 Q2=3.5
Total: 75600 CS points
f [de
g]Cos(q)
Preliminary Results, High Q2
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab Williamsburg, VA 23M.Ungaro
350 pointsout of 75K
m
b/sr
ad
€
dσ
dWdQ2dΩ*= Γγ
dσ
dΩ*
CLAS P
relim
inary
Q2 = 2.4 GeV2
= f 97.50 ± 7.50
Preliminary Results, High Q2
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab Williamsburg, VA 24M.Ungaro
350 pointsout of 75K
m
b/sr
ad
€
dσ
dWdQ2dΩ*= Γγ
dσ
dΩ*
CLAS P
relim
inary
Q2 = 3.0 GeV2
= f 97.50 ± 7.50
Preliminary Results, High Q2
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab Williamsburg, VA 25M.Ungaro
350 pointsout of 75K
m
b/sr
ad
€
dσ
dWdQ2dΩ*= Γγ
dσ
dΩ*
CLAS P
relim
inary
Q2 = 4.2 GeV2
= f 97.50 ± 7.50
Preliminary Results, High Q2
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab Williamsburg, VA 26M.Ungaro
aTL
€
LT =b
sinθ 2ε (ε +1)
TTT
c
2sin
240 pointsout of 75K
CLAS P
relim
inary
ds/dW* = sT + esL + esTTsin2qcos2f + √2 ( +1)e e sLTsinqcosf
W = 1.23 GeV2
Q2 = 3.0 GeV2
Preliminary Results, High Q2
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab Williamsburg, VA 27M.Ungaro
CLAS P
relim
inaryaTL
€
LT =b
sinθ 2ε (ε +1)
TTT
c
2sin
240 pointsout of 75K
W = 1.41 GeV2
Q2 = 3.0 GeV2
ds/dW* = sT + esL + esTTsin2qcos2f + √2 ( +1)e e sLTsinqcosf
Preliminary Results, High Q2
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab Williamsburg, VA 28M.Ungaro
CLAS P
relim
inaryaTL
€
LT =b
sinθ 2ε (ε +1)
TTT
c
2sin
240 pointsout of 75K
W = 1.63 GeV2
Q2 = 3.0 GeV2
ds/dW* = sT + esL + esTTsin2qcos2f + √2 ( +1)e e sLTsinqcosf
Preliminary Results, High Q2
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab Williamsburg, VA 29M.Ungaro
CLAS P
relim
inary
aTL
€
LT =b
sinθ 2ε (ε +1)
TTT
c
2sin
ds/dW* = sT + esL + esTTsin2qcos2f + √2 ( +1)e e sLTsinqcosf
Q2 = 2.4 GeV2
Preliminary Results, High Q2
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab Williamsburg, VA 30M.Ungaro
Preliminary Results
CLAS P
relim
inary
aTL
€
LT =b
sinθ 2ε (ε +1)
TTT
c
2sin
Q2 = 4.2 GeV2
ds/dW* = sT + esL + esTTsin2qcos2f + √2 ( +1)e e sLTsinqcosf
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab Williamsburg, VA 31M.Ungaro
CLAS P
relim
inary
aTL
€
LT =b
sinθ 2ε (ε +1)
TTT
c
2sin
ds/dW* = sT + esL + esTTsin2qcos2f + √2 ( +1)e e sLTsinqcosf
Q2 = 2.4 GeV2
Preliminary Results, High Q2
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab Williamsburg, VA 32M.Ungaro
CLAS P
relim
inary
aTL
€
LT =b
sinθ 2ε (ε +1)
TTT
c
2sin
ds/dW* = sT + esL + esTTsin2qcos2f + √2 ( +1)e e sLTsinqcosf
Q2 = 4.2 GeV2
Preliminary Results, High Q2
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab Williamsburg, VA 33M.Ungaro
CLAS P
relim
inary
aTL
€
LT =b
sinθ 2ε (ε +1)
TTT
c
2sin
ds/dW* = sT + esL + esTTsin2qcos2f + √2 ( +1)e e sLTsinqcosf
Q2 = 2.4 GeV2
Preliminary Results, High Q2
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab Williamsburg, VA 34M.Ungaro
CLAS P
relim
inary
aTL
€
LT =b
sinθ 2ε (ε +1)
TTT
c
2sin
ds/dW* = sT + esL + esTTsin2qcos2f + √2 ( +1)e e sLTsinqcosf
Q2 = 4.2 GeV2
Preliminary Results, High Q2
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab Williamsburg, VA 35M.Ungaro
MAID07Red: with S11Blue: w/o S11 CLAS Preliminary
A0: Contains E0+ , sensitive to S11
Preliminary Results, Low Q2
€
T +εσ L = Al Pl (cosθ )l=0
n
∑
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab Williamsburg, VA 36M.Ungaro
CLAS Preliminary
Preliminary Results, Low Q2
€
T +εσ L = Al Pl (cosθ )l=0
n
∑
€
TT = sin2θ Bl Pl (cosθ )l=0
n
∑
€
LT = sinθ Cl Pl (cosθ )l=0
n
∑
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab 37M.Ungaro
Single pseudoscalar meson production, e.g. Nπ, Nη
Unitary isobar model (UIM) non-resonant amplitudes incorporate nucleon and
meson Born terms, vector meson exchanges, Regge terms at high energy
resonant terms incorporate relativistic BW amplitude with energy-dependent widths
full amplitude unitarized in K-matrix approximation
Fixed-t dispersion relations (DR) resonance amplitudes constructed in same way as
in UIM non-resonant amplitudes from Born terms and
dispersion relation.
Analysis Tools
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab Williamsburg, VA 38M.Ungaro
Legendre Coefficients: Combined p0 and p+ analysis with DR model
CLAS PreliminaryQ2 = 3.5 GeV2
Preliminary Results, High Q2
ds/dW* = sT + esL + esTTsin2qcos2f + √2 ( +1)e e sLTsinqcosf
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab 39
not so distant future…
60 Days at 1035 cm-2s-1
M.Ungaro
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson LabM.Ungaro 40
Summary, Outlook
CLAS P
relim
inary
To do list:JANR, DR, SAID analysis
Analysis Review:p0 (by this summer, both low and high Q2)
Access active degrees of freedom at various distances
Explore the non-perturbative strong interactions responsible for nucleon formation and the origin of quark confinement
116,000 data points to be added spanning Q2 from 0.4 to 6 GeV2
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab 41M.Ungaro
LQCD
C. Alexanrou H.W. Lin
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab 42M.Ungaro
DSE
We can use high precision measurement of nucleon-resonance transition form factor to chart the momentum evolution of the dressed-quark mass.
JLAB 12
Cloet, Bentz and Thomas
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab 43M.Ungaro
Distribution Amplitudes Form Factors
LCSR
difference in wave functions at origin of ground and S11(1535) states was observed for the first time in LQCD calculations with pion mass 280 MeV
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab 44M.Ungaro
GPD, TPE
Large NC limit: ND GPD HM is related to isovector elastic GPD E(x,x, t)
2γ corrections for the same values of RS MPascalutsa, Carlson, Vanderhaeghen
NSTAR, May 17 2011, Jefferson Lab 45
Transverse Charge DensitiesL. Tiator, D. Drechsel, S.S. Kamalov, M. Vanderhaeghen arXiv:0909.2335 [nucl-th]
N Roper
N S11
N D13
M.Ungaro