State Supervision of Mines_EUOAG_ER workshop_30 june 20161

ER responsibility matrix

(RACI)

&

Source Control ER Plan

(SCERP)

2

� ER review

� jointly ER exercises

� RACI and SCERP

� Piper-α recommendations

� shallow water blowouts

� yearly large scale ER exercise

State Supervision of Mines_EUOAG_ER workshop_30 june 2016

Context

3

� Dutch regulator initiatives

� worst case blowout scenario’s

� worldwide initiatives after Deepwater Horizon

� stakeholders

� ER responsibility matrix (RACI)

� source control ER plan (SCERP)

Content

State Supervision of Mines_EUOAG_ER workshop_30 june 2016

4

Self assessments carried out

by all Operators

adequate & improved

blowoutpreventativebarriers

mitigatingbarriers

notadequate

Well designconstructioncontrol

ER

Steering committeeregulator/industry

Shallow waterworst case

blowout scenarios

Dutch regulator initiatives

ER WG

State Supervision of Mines_EUOAG_ER workshop_30 june 2016

5

� ER capping equipment

� relief well drilling

� source control ER plan

� cooperation with contractors and authorities

� communication of information

� suppliers of emergency services or goods

Self Assessments / shortcomings ER readiness

State Supervision of Mines_EUOAG_ER workshop_30 june 2016

6

3 shallow water scenario's

subsea riser

rig BOP

lubricator BOP (well services)

State Supervision of Mines_EUOAG_ER workshop_30 june 2016

7

OSPRAG (Oil Spill Prevention & Response Advisory Group / UK)

- technical review group- oil spill and emergency response group- insurance & indemnity review group

GIRG (Global Industry Response Group / IOGP)

- prevention: improving well safety- intervention: capping & containment- oil spill response

MWCC (Marine Well Containment Company / oil companies )

- developing capping and containment systems

worldwide initiatives after Deepwater Horizon

� Most initiatives are equipment related and for deep water

� Only few initiatives on ER planning and the impact on an organisation

State Supervision of Mines_EUOAG_ER workshop_30 june 2016

8

• Coastguard • Interdepartmental government policy team • Maritime department • Dutch regulator / State Supervision of Mines• Ministry of Environment• Ministry of Economic Affairs • Oranje-Nassau Energy (Operator) • Drilling contractor• Other contractors• Etc.

Stakeholders (key)

State Supervision of Mines_EUOAG_ER workshop_30 june 2016

9

Stakeholders

10

1) rescuing people and bringing people to safety;

2) extinguishing fires;

3) cleaning-up oil in the sea, on beaches and/or in harbours;

4) securing the (offshore) installation;

5) well capping / killing;

6) well containment;

7) drilling a relief well.

For any blowout scenario, one or a combination of t he following 7 ER activities could be necessary

State Supervision of Mines_EUOAG_ER workshop_30 june 2016

11

R who is responsible the person who is assigned to do the work

A who is accountablethe person who makes the final decision and has the ultimate ownership

C who is consultedthe person who must be consulted before a decision or action is taken

I who is informedthe person who must be informed that a decision or action has been taken

Create clarity for who is responsible for what

State Supervision of Mines_EUOAG_ER workshop_30 june 2016

authority

12

1.1

1.2

1. ER activity "rescue of people"

1.1 : serious incident reporting

1.2 : determine incident phase

1.3 : ……

note 4: SSM informs regularly the Ministry of Economic Affairs

State Supervision of Mines_EUOAG_ER workshop_30 june 2016

13

A

14

5

15

16

SCERP themes

SCERP = Source Control ER Plan

• organization

• SIMOPS

• site survey

• BOP/wellhead intervention

• dispersants

• debris removal

• capping

• relief well

• well kill

• engineering services

• decontamination/demobilization

17

Content of a SCERP theme

SCERP = Source Control ER Plan

• overview and methodology

• organisation and staffing

• decision trees

• checklist

• procedures

• general safety data

• technical data

• special tools

18

19

Example of incident command system organisation str ucture

20

Source control decision tree

Well control event resolved

Capping stack installed

Well isolated

Well isolated

Completed relief well(s)

Initial indication of well control issue

State Supervision of Mines_EUOAG_ER workshop_30 june 2016

21

Debris removal / Checklist

Completed Task Contractor notes

State Supervision of Mines_EUOAG_ER workshop_30 june 2016

22

Debris removal / Generic procedure

State Supervision of Mines_EUOAG_ER workshop_30 june 2016

23

Debris removal / activities & resources

24

25

Heat radiation hazards

26

ER exercises - follow -up recommendations

� stimulate Operators to develop a source control ER plan� map out well control team for a blowout scenario� close gaps for ER organization when lasting > 1 day, from

parent organization and/or colleague Operators� companies to also include finance, contracting & legal in

ER organizations� organise workshops to improve communication matters

between government and industry, including social media aspect

State Supervision of Mines_EUOAG_ER workshop_30 june 2016

27

Lessons learned for ER in shallow waters

Shallow water ER readiness deserves more attention :

� Use experts to clearly define the risks and associated control measures for ‘worst case’ shallow water blowout scenario’s

� Work out mutual aid in large-scale offshore incidents (see OGP report 487) in the ER plans

� Evaluate if adequate tools are readily available to prepare and execute capping operations in shallow waters

� To ensure all parties involved in an emergency are aware of the feasibility to bring a well back under control, it is essential to exercise ER with all parties involved, including government agencies at all levels

State Supervision of Mines_EUOAG_ER workshop_30 june 2016