EMMA injection & extraction Takeichiro Yokoi(Oxford University)
-
Upload
rafe-gibbs -
Category
Documents
-
view
225 -
download
0
Transcript of EMMA injection & extraction Takeichiro Yokoi(Oxford University)
EMMA injection & extraction
Takeichiro Yokoi(Oxford University)
Injection and extraction with linear model
Presumed conditions….
Kicker field :≤0.6kgauss(bipolar) Kicker length : 0.1m Beam emittance: 3πmm (normalized) Energy: 10~20MeV(1MeV step) 4 operation mode (latest lattice:parallel elements) 070221b,c,d,e Tracking code (ZGOUBI: sharp edge field) Septum boundary: +5mm from the outer-most beam envelope
Lattices …
∆xQF ∆xQD
B1QD
(T/m)
B1QF
(T/m)
∆xQD
(mm)
∆xQF
(mm)
070221b -4.704 6.695 34.048 7.514
070221c -4.126 6.108 39.195 8.171
070221d -3.597 5.230 46.532 9.535
070221e -3.764 6.553 40.797 7.684
Horizontal tune
Setup of tracking study
QF0 QF1 QF2
Beam
QD0 QD1 QD2
Kicker KickerSeptum
QF0QF1QF2 QD0QD1QD2
Kicker Kicker
Septum
injection
extraction
* Backtracking from CO
*Beam position was monitored at the center of each magnet and drift space
Beam distribution at septum (injection)
∆x’:270mrad
∆x:4mm70221b
Beam envelope at magnet center
QD1
QD2
QF1
QF2
70221b 70221b
70221b 70221b
70221c 70221c
70221c 70221c
70221d 70221d
70221d 70221d
70221e 70221e
70221e 70221e
xmax
xmin
Magnet centerQF requires large good field region (max 80mm)
Large orbit swing comes form 10MeV
QD1 requires a little larger good field region than that inscribed. (max 60mm)
±32mm
±56mm
*Beam position at the center of magnet is plotted for the orbit inside of target box
Beam envelope at magnet center (2)
QD1
QD2
QF1
QF2
70221b 70221b
70221b 70221b
70221c 70221c
70221c 70221c
70221d 70221d
70221d 70221d
70221e 70221e
70221e 70221e
xmax
xmin
Magnet center
±32mm
±56mm
10MeV of 70221b enlarges the target box…. Excluding it, orbit swing decreases.
Injection energy and GFR of QF
GFR 70221b 70221c 70221d 70221e
±32mm 15MeV~ 15MeV~ 14MeV~ 13MeV~
±35mm 15MeV~ 14MeV~ 13MeV~ 12MeV~
±40mm 13MeV~ 12MeV~ 11MeV~ 11MeV~
±45mm 12MeV~ 11MeV~ 10MeV~ 11MeV~
±50mm 11MeV~ 10MeV~ 10MeV~ 10MeV~
Beam distribution at septum (extraction)
∆x’:40mrad
∆x:2.5mm70221b
Beam envelope at magnet center
QD1
QD2
QF1
QF2
70221b 70221b
70221b 70221b
70221c 70221c
70221c 70221c
70221d 70221d
70221d 70221d
70221e 70221e
70221e 70221e
xmax
xmin
Magnet centerQF1 requires large good field region (max 49mm)
Large orbit swing comes form 10MeV
QD1 requires a little larger good field region than that inscribed. (max 60mm)
If larger target box size is accepted, except 10MeV of 70221c and d, extraction is possible with present good field region
±32mm
±56mm
Beam position at the center of magnet is plotted for the orbit inside of target box
Injection and extraction with TOSCA 3D field
Injection and extraction orbits are one-pass orbits. For such orbits, what is important is bending component, and requirement to quadrupole component might be released.
Magnet & cell modeling
QD Pole width:100mm Xt: 15mm
QF Pole width:73mm Xt: 11mm
•Aperture of clamp is 45° rotated square( side: 14cm:D, 10cm:F)
•Vertical symmetry is introduced
•Optimized mesh size obtained through individual magnet modeling is used
•As typical lattices, 4 lattices are modeled (070221b,c,d,e)
GFR:±36mm
GFR:±26mm
Parameterization of current
2.0cm
QF
QD
+
As a nominal focusing power, focusing power of region 2 was taken
Comparison with baseline design
Baseline (By. S. Berg)
Tracking
070221b: D 4680 AT, F 2960AT 070221c: D 4000AT, F 2640AT070221d: D3400AT, F 2080AT
Except the vertical tune of low energy, the results show so so good agreement with the design
Map geometry for injection study
QD
QF clamp
clamp
Insertion
insertion
Putting the map boundary at 5.5cm from the magnet end, field error caused by the map geometry is less than 0.2%
map
map
8.5714˚
±65mm
X
Y
55mm 55.76mm
8.5714˚
288mm
Map geometry(2)
Field map Mesh size X: 1mm,Y: 1mm, Z: 1mm
(rough optimization was carried out)
Drift space for adjustment51.891mm
54.589mm
Center of long drift
83mm 57mm 61mm 87mm
Beam distribution at septum (injection)
70221b
septum
5mm
140mrad
septum
For 10, 11MeV of 70221b, 10MeV of 70221c, there is no injection orbit
Beam envelope in magnet (injection)
QF1
Required GFR(±32mm)
70221b
70221c
QD2
70221b
70221c
70221d
QD1
Required GFR(±56mm)
XmaxXmin
70221b
70221c
70221d
QF2
70221b
70221c
70221d 70221d
Center of magnetInjection orbit outside GFR anyhow exists (matching problem remains)
Beam distribution at septum (extraction)
70221b
Septum septum
50mrad.
3mm
Beam envelope in magnet (extraction)
QF1
Required GFR(±32mm)
70221b
70221c
70221d
QD1
Required GFR(±56mm)
XmaxXmin
70221b
70221c
70221d
QF2
70221b
70221c
70221d
QD2
70221b
70221c
70221d
Center of magnet Extraction orbit outside GFR anyhow works
Remaining work ….
Optimize current setting
Include septum into tracking (matching)
Check the remaining 5 operation modes (70221e,f,g,h,l)
Confirm the result with final magnet design
Summary
Tracking study with the hard edge model indicates that orbit swing of injection and extraction orbit goes beyond the present required good field region of QF. Tracking with 3d model shows extraction and extraction orbits outside of good field region anyhow work, but threre are missing injection conditions ( 10,11MeV of 70221b, 10MeV of 70221c), and beam distribution at septum is broader than that of extraction.
Any possibilities to reverse the magnet sequence ??