Electro not-so-weak interactions Paolo Ciafaloni INFN – Sezione di Lecce.

21
Electro not-so-weak interactions Paolo Ciafaloni INFN – Sezione di Lecce

Transcript of Electro not-so-weak interactions Paolo Ciafaloni INFN – Sezione di Lecce.

Page 1: Electro not-so-weak interactions Paolo Ciafaloni INFN – Sezione di Lecce.

Electro not-so-weak interactions

Paolo CiafaloniINFN – Sezione di Lecce

Page 2: Electro not-so-weak interactions Paolo Ciafaloni INFN – Sezione di Lecce.

In this talk

What is the asymptotic behaviour of cross sections

What is the relevance for LHC, LC?

Standard Model of EW int. E>>Mw,Mz,mt~M~100 GeV

Only relevant scale for the process

Page 3: Electro not-so-weak interactions Paolo Ciafaloni INFN – Sezione di Lecce.

How the story beginsHow the story begins

on a day of last century......

Page 4: Electro not-so-weak interactions Paolo Ciafaloni INFN – Sezione di Lecce.

RGE

1 loop

• Why not RGE-driven?• ∆σ≈10 %@ TeV higher orders• LEP: leading terms in mtⁿ, (log E)ⁿ

Page 5: Electro not-so-weak interactions Paolo Ciafaloni INFN – Sezione di Lecce.
Page 6: Electro not-so-weak interactions Paolo Ciafaloni INFN – Sezione di Lecce.

At high energies Z,W similar to g, At high energies Z,W similar to g, P. Ciafaloni, D. Comelli ‘98

• Singularity for k → 0, k ~ p log2μ (EW: μ → M)• Asymptotic behaviour dictated by IR (not UV)• Emission probability ~ log2(E/M) (non )

p p+k

k

Page 7: Electro not-so-weak interactions Paolo Ciafaloni INFN – Sezione di Lecce.

Asymptotic expansion

IR UV

LHC, LC LEP

n loops:

• Unusual situation! QED, QCD (α log)ⁿ• Dependence on IR cutoff M for any E

LL NLL NNLL

Page 8: Electro not-so-weak interactions Paolo Ciafaloni INFN – Sezione di Lecce.

2 fermions→2 fermions B. JantzenV.A. Smirnovhep-ph/0603133

2 loops SU(2)

Page 9: Electro not-so-weak interactions Paolo Ciafaloni INFN – Sezione di Lecce.

productionttS. Moretti, M. Nolten, D. Ross, hep-ph/0603083

%20th

Page 10: Electro not-so-weak interactions Paolo Ciafaloni INFN – Sezione di Lecce.

Inclusive observables

P P 2 j + X W,Z X

“hard”: E > 1 TeV

“soft”: 100 GeV < E << 1 TeV

Page 11: Electro not-so-weak interactions Paolo Ciafaloni INFN – Sezione di Lecce.

BN: “IR safe” observables do not exist!

QED BN:

EW BN: all observables, even including W, Z emission depend on

P. CiafaloniM. CiafaloniD. Comelli

Page 12: Electro not-so-weak interactions Paolo Ciafaloni INFN – Sezione di Lecce.

Noncancellation mechanism

• QCD confines color average infrared safe !• EW: average over e , senseless• Symmetry breaking BN

M. Ciafaloni, P. Ciafaloni, D. Comelli 2000-2005

Page 13: Electro not-so-weak interactions Paolo Ciafaloni INFN – Sezione di Lecce.

E

)()( eee asymptotically

Page 14: Electro not-so-weak interactions Paolo Ciafaloni INFN – Sezione di Lecce.

A 1 TeV 14 % 8 %

P. CiafaloniM. CiafaloniD. Comelli ‘05

Page 15: Electro not-so-weak interactions Paolo Ciafaloni INFN – Sezione di Lecce.
Page 16: Electro not-so-weak interactions Paolo Ciafaloni INFN – Sezione di Lecce.

U. Baur (2006)

Page 17: Electro not-so-weak interactions Paolo Ciafaloni INFN – Sezione di Lecce.

as a function of “inclusivity” x

Page 18: Electro not-so-weak interactions Paolo Ciafaloni INFN – Sezione di Lecce.

Heavy quarks productionP. Ciafaloni, D. Comelli ’06

Page 19: Electro not-so-weak interactions Paolo Ciafaloni INFN – Sezione di Lecce.

Conclusions

Why don’t we begin taking seriously into account weak gauge bosons emissions at ILC, LHC?

Page 20: Electro not-so-weak interactions Paolo Ciafaloni INFN – Sezione di Lecce.

Conclusions

• High energy EW dominated by log^2(E) of IR origin

• W,Z emission HAVE to be considered for ILC but also for LHC

• Final prediction (sign) very much dependent on observable definition

Page 21: Electro not-so-weak interactions Paolo Ciafaloni INFN – Sezione di Lecce.

Correzioni elettrodeboli alla scala del TeV

• Precisione < 1%

higher orders• 1 loop, leading 2 loops,

risommazioni

predizioni sotto controllo

• Precisione inferiore• Non necessariamente

dominato da QCD• Osservabili inclusive

effetti spettacolari

- Dominate da struttura IR, non UV - O(20 %) a 1 TeV