electrical simulation of August09 counters

33
Diego González-Díaz

description

electrical simulation of August09 counters. Diego González-Díaz. Tsinghua 1m-long counter with walls. electrical scheme of the RPC in working conditions. FEE. w wall =1mm. w gap =4mm. w=25mm. ~∞. ~∞. insulator, h ins ~0. d=0.7mm ε r =7.5. 6 gaps (g=0.22mm, ε r =1). HV, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of electrical simulation of August09 counters

Page 1: electrical simulation  of August09 counters

Diego González-Díaz

Page 2: electrical simulation  of August09 counters

Tsinghua 1m-long counter with walls

Page 3: electrical simulation  of August09 counters

~∞..

.. 6 gaps (g=0.22mm, εr=1)

~∞grounded at FEE input grounded at RPC end

d=0.7mmεr=7.5

HV, hHV~0

insulator, hins~0

hpcb=1.5mmεr=4.7

w=25mm

~∞wgap =4mmwwall =1mm

electrical scheme of the RPC in working conditions

FEE

L=94 cm

transverse section

Page 4: electrical simulation  of August09 counters

....

grounded at LEMO cable

R=50Ω

floating

sourcevictims

electrical scheme used for validation of simulation

transverse section

Page 5: electrical simulation  of August09 counters

cathode 1anode 1

cathode 2anode 2 50

cathode 350 anode 3 50

cathode 4anode 4 50

cathode 5anode 5

cathode 5anode 5

50

Zdet~37.5

Page 6: electrical simulation  of August09 counters

USTC 0.5m-long counter without wallsand mirrored

Page 7: electrical simulation  of August09 counters

~∞..

.. 5 gaps (g=0.22mm, εr=1)

~∞

d=0.7mmεr=7.5

HV, hHV~0

insulator, hins~0

hpcb=0.8mmεr=4.7

w=25mm~∞

wgap =6mm

electrical scheme of the RPC in working conditions

FEE

L=52.5 cm transverse section

.... 5 gaps

grounded at FEE input

Page 8: electrical simulation  of August09 counters

cathode 1anode 1

cathode 2anode 2 50

cathode 350 anode 3 50

cathode 4anode 4 50

cathode 5anode 5

cathode 5anode 5

50

Zdet~20.5

Page 9: electrical simulation  of August09 counters

Preliminary results: only charge sharing

Tsinghua 1m-long counter with walls

Page 10: electrical simulation  of August09 counters

weighting field

Page 11: electrical simulation  of August09 counters

Efficiency profile (I)

Page 12: electrical simulation  of August09 counters

Efficiency profile (II)

Page 13: electrical simulation  of August09 counters

Efficiency profile with broad trigger (1cm) (I)

Page 14: electrical simulation  of August09 counters

Efficiency profile with broad trigger (1cm) (II)

Page 15: electrical simulation  of August09 counters

average charge (I)

Page 16: electrical simulation  of August09 counters

average charge with broad trigger (1 cm) (II)

Page 17: electrical simulation  of August09 counters

Not so preliminaryresults

Page 18: electrical simulation  of August09 counters

Scan in HV

Page 19: electrical simulation  of August09 counters

Free parameters:

Qth=30fC

reportedQth=[10-30fC]

P. Fonte's long counter

Page 20: electrical simulation  of August09 counters

Tsinghua's short counter

Free parameters:

Qth=150fC

Not reported! for slow electronics Qth=[50-150fC] are not strange (NINO).

Page 21: electrical simulation  of August09 counters

USTC 50-cm counter

Free parameters:

Qth=150fC

Page 22: electrical simulation  of August09 counters

Qth=60fC(measured)

Free parameters:

1kV effective drop in the appliedvoltage must be assumed (?)

Heidelberg counter

Page 23: electrical simulation  of August09 counters

Scan in transverse coordinate

(cross-talk is included from APLAC simulations in each particular configuration!)

Page 24: electrical simulation  of August09 counters

Free parameters:

•trigger region(2 cm – nominal)

•Cross-talk fuzzy factor x1.7

Tsinghua's short counter

Page 25: electrical simulation  of August09 counters

Tsinghua's short counter

Page 26: electrical simulation  of August09 counters

Free parameters:

•trigger region(2 cm – nominal)

•Cross-talk fuzzy factor x1.7

USTC 50-cm counter

Page 27: electrical simulation  of August09 counters

USTC 50-cm counter

Page 28: electrical simulation  of August09 counters

Free parameters:

•trigger region(2 cm – nominal)

•Cross-talk fuzzy factor x0.6

Page 29: electrical simulation  of August09 counters
Page 30: electrical simulation  of August09 counters
Page 31: electrical simulation  of August09 counters
Page 32: electrical simulation  of August09 counters

cross-talkfuzzy factor:0.4

P. Fonte's long counter

Page 33: electrical simulation  of August09 counters

Conclusions

A new RPC simulator is available:

•The simulator can approximate the behavior of a large range of systematic measurements for completely different detector geometries.

• A first quantitative description of charge-sharing has been attempted. Detectors with little inter-strip spacing and/or shielding can be reasonably described by the used analytical formulas. Accurate comparison in other cases requires to use different tools (work in progress).

• A first quantitative description of charge-sharing has been attempted by using APLAC to estimate the fraction of signal coupled to the neighbors. The data can not be described unless extra factors amounting to x0.4 (Fonte-large), x0.6 (Heidelberg) and x1.7 (Tsinghua/USTC) are introduced. The cross-talk simulation is very sensitive to the whole structure + electronics and it is still difficult to make safe predictions. The best practical approach seems to be to simulate the situation and ensure that the cross-talk is not a problem even for x2-3 more cross-talk than simulated (engineering approach). This is not yet my final word!.

• There are plenty of things that can be done with existing data still in order to help us understand what is going on and debugging the simulator.