Discovery of the Pentaquark: Experimental Status - … · Discovery of the Pentaquark: Experimental...
Transcript of Discovery of the Pentaquark: Experimental Status - … · Discovery of the Pentaquark: Experimental...
Discovery of the Pentaquark: Experimental Status
Moskov Amarian
(DESY-Zeuthen)
Pentaquark ForumDESY
November 25, 2003
Introduction
Experimental results (chronologically):
SPRING-8
DIANA
CLAS
SAPHIR
ITEP-2
Search for Θ+ → pKs at HERMES
... continued
New weird Ξ−− from NA49
Summary and Outlook
Moskov Amarian, Discovery of the Pentaquark : Experimental Status – p.1/22
Historical Lesson on S = +1 Baryon System
PDG 1986; Phys. Lett. B170, 289 wrote:The evidence for strangeness +1 baryon resonance was reviewedin our 1976 edition,1 and more recently by Kelly2 and by Oades.3
Two new partial-wave analyses4 have appeared since our 1984edition. Both claim that P13 and perhaps other waves resonate.
and then continued:However, the results permit no definite conclusion- the same storyheard for 15 years. The standards of proof must simply be muchmore severe here than in a channel in which many resonancesare already known to exist. The general prejudice against baryonsnot made of three quarks and the lack of any experimental activityin this area make it likely that it will be another 15 years before theissue is decided.
Moskov Amarian, Discovery of the Pentaquark : Experimental Status – p.2/22
Experimental Evidence from LEPS at SPRING-8
LEPS Collaboration at SPRING-8:(T.Nakano et al.,PRL 91,012002(2003))
Tagged photons → energy range (1.5– 2.4) GeV, (σ = 15 MeV) :(Compton back-scattering from 8 GeV electrons)
Targets:0.5 cm thick plastic scintillator(SC) (C:H ' 1 : 1)
5 cm thick liquid-hydrogen (LH2) 9.5 cm upstream of (SC) target
Particle Identification: Time-of-Flight
Search for resonance Θ+ → K+n in exclusive reaction:γn(12C) → K+K−n
Moskov Amarian, Discovery of the Pentaquark : Experimental Status – p.3/22
The Θ+ resonance from LEPS
a)
MMcγK
+ (GeV/c2)
Eve
nts/
(0.0
2 G
eV/c
2 )
b)
MMcγK
− (GeV/c2)E
vent
s/(0
.02
GeV
/c2 )
0
5
10
15
20
1.5 1.6 1.7 1.80
5
10
15
1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8
a) solid histogram: K−n missing mass (no res. expected)dashed histogram: K−p missing mass (Λ(1520) expected)
b) solid histogram: K+n missing mass (Θ+ expected ?)dashed histogram: LH2 spectrum of K+p (no res. expected)
Conclusion: M=1540 ± 10 MeV, Γ <25 MeV, σ = Ns√
Nb
= 4.6 ±1.
Moskov Amarian, Discovery of the Pentaquark : Experimental Status – p.4/22
Experimental Evidence from DIANA at ITEPDIANA collaboration at ITEP:Xenon bubble chamber
K+Xe → K0s pX (Pk+ ∼ 480MeV )
(Quasi-free K+n → K0p)
PID via ionization and momenta fromranges (no magnet)
a) solid histgram: K0p invariant masswithout cutsdashed histogram: background dueto charge-exchange K+Xe → K0Xe
b) solid histogram: K0p spectrumwith cuts imposed:K0 and p goingforward and back-to-backConclusion: (hep-ex/0303040)M = 1539±2 MeV, Γ ≤ 9 MeV, σ=4.4
Moskov Amarian, Discovery of the Pentaquark : Experimental Status – p.5/22
Experimental Evidence from CLAS at JLAB
d
γ Θ+n
K+
K-p
K-p
n
exclusive γd → pK+K−n
CLAS Collaboration (S.Stepanyan etal., hep-ex/0307018)
MM(pK+K-) [ GeV/c2 ]
Eve
nts
MM(pK+K-) [ GeV/c2 ]
Eve
nts
|∆tpK| ≤ 0.75 ns
0
100
200
300
400
500
0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 1 1.05 1.1 1.15 1.2 1.25
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0.8 0.9 1 1.1
Tagged photon beam fromEe = (2.5–3.1) GeV,with ∆Eγ = (3–5) MeV
Particle Identification with TOFMoskov Amarian, Discovery of the Pentaquark : Experimental Status – p.6/22
The Θ+ resonance from CLAS
M(K+K-) [GeV/c2]
Eve
nts
φ Nφ = 126Mφ = 1.02 GeV/c2
σφ = 0.004 GeV/c2
M(pK-) [GeV/c2]
Eve
nts
Λ(1520) NΛ = 212MΛ = 1.518 GeV/c2
σΛ = 0.011 GeV/c2
01020304050607080
0.9 0.95 1 1.05 1.1 1.15 1.2 1.25 1.3 1.35 1.4
010203040506070
1.4 1.45 1.5 1.55 1.6 1.65 1.7 1.75 1.8 1.85 1.9
Production of φ and Λ(1520) in thereaction γd → pK+K−n
They are removed in the analysis.
M(nK+) [ GeV/c2 ]
Eve
nts
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9
solid histogram: final M(nK+)solid line: arbitrary fit + bkgddashed histogram: Λ(1520) events
Conclusion: M=1542±5 MeV, FWHM=21 Mev, σ=5.3±0.5Moskov Amarian, Discovery of the Pentaquark : Experimental Status – p.7/22
Experimental Evidence from SAPHIR at ELSA
SAPHIR detector at ELSA : 1.–2.7 GeV tagged photon beam
π+, π−, K+ identified with TOF
Exclusive γp → K0Θ+ → K0K+n → π+π−K+n
�� �
��
�
� �
� ��
detect K0K+→ reconstruct K+n Missing Mass (hep-ex/0307083)
Moskov Amarian, Discovery of the Pentaquark : Experimental Status – p.8/22
The Θ+ resonance from SAPHIR
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
1.4 1.6 1.8mass(nK+)/GeV
Θ+ (1540)co
unts
a
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1.4 1.6 1.8mass(nπ+π-)/GeV
Λ (1520)coun
ts
b
a) K+n Missing Mass with the cut ΘcmKs
> 0.5
b) π+π−n Missing Mass with (lower histogram)without (upper histogram) Θcm
Ks> 0.5 cut
Conclusion: M=1540±4 ± 2MeV, Γ < 25MeV, σ=4.8
Moskov Amarian, Discovery of the Pentaquark : Experimental Status – p.9/22
The Θ+ Isospin from SAPHIR
0
20
40
60
80
100
1.45 1.5 1.55 1.6 1.65 1.7 1.75 1.8mass(pK+)/GeV
no Θ++
coun
ts
K+p Missing Mass
from Clebsh-Gordan and acceptance: expected 5000 Θ++
→ far above experimental value
Conclusion: Θ+ is an isoscalar
Moskov Amarian, Discovery of the Pentaquark : Experimental Status – p.10/22
Experimental Evidence from Neutrinos
1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.60
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
p) , GeVS0
m(K
Neon plus Deuterium
co
mb
. / 10 M
eV
1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.90
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18Chi2 / ndf = 22.33 / 21
0.004737 ±mass = 1.533 0.002043 ±sigma = 0.008379
6.417 ±excess = 25.56 0.5881 ±p3 = 1.214 4.732 ±p4 = 17.71
p) , GeVS0
m(K
co
mb
. / 10 M
eV
Chi2 / ndf = 22.33 / 21 0.004737 ±mass = 1.533
0.002043 ±sigma = 0.008379 6.417 ±excess = 25.56
0.5881 ±p3 = 1.214 4.732 ±p4 = 17.71
Reanalysis of existing bubblechamber data from CERN, FNAL
Inclusive K0p production by highenergy ν and ν, Eν,ν '(40–140) GeV, Neon plus Deuterium
Upper panel: dots depict random starbackground
Lower panel curve : Gaussian pluslinear, width consistent with resolution
Conclusion (A.E.Asratyan et al.,hep-ex/0309042):M = 1533±5MeV, Γ < 20MeV, σ=6.7
Moskov Amarian, Discovery of the Pentaquark : Experimental Status – p.11/22
The HERMES Spectrometer
1
0
2
-1
-2
� � � � �
� � � � �
� � � � �
� � � � �
� � � � �
� � � � �
� � � � �
� � � � �
� � � � �
� � � � �
� � � � �
� � � � �
� � � � �
� � � � �
m
LUMINOSITY
CHAMBERSDRIFT
FC 1/2
TARGETCELL
DVC
MC 1-3
HODOSCOPE H0
MONITOR
BC 1/2
BC 3/4 TRD
PROP.CHAMBERS
FIELD CLAMPS
PRESHOWER (H2)
STEEL PLATE CALORIMETER
DRIFT CHAMBERS
TRIGGER HODOSCOPE H1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
RICH270 mrad
270 mrad
MUON HODOSCOPEWIDE ANGLE
FRONTMUONHODO
MAGNET
m
IRON WALL
e+
27.5 GeV
140 mrad
170 mrad
170 mrad
140 mrad
MUON HODOSCOPES
SILICON
Resolution: δp/p = 1.4 . . . 2.5% , δΘ . 1 mrad
Particle Identification: TRD, Preshower, Calorimeter,RICH (dual radiator)
Moskov Amarian, Discovery of the Pentaquark : Experimental Status – p.12/22
The HERMES RICH
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20p [GeV]
ΘC [r
ad]
π
K
p
Particle Identification:cosΘ = 1
n
detection efficiencies
Moskov Amarian, Discovery of the Pentaquark : Experimental Status – p.13/22
The Θ+ Pentaquark Search at HERA-HERMES
e + D → Θ+ + X → Ksp + X (Ee+=27.5 GeV)
Protons and pions identified with RICH
Ks reconstructed using decay length
pπ− events from Λ(1116) ± σ range excluded
Moskov Amarian, Discovery of the Pentaquark : Experimental Status – p.14/22
The Θ+ from HERMES: Penta or not Penta ?
M(π+π-p) [GeV]
Eve
nts/
8 M
eV e+D → Ks + p + XNs/Nb = 71.7/163.6in 2σ intervalFit Gauss+P4Chi2=1.4
HERMES preliminary
M=1526 ± 2(stat) ±2(sys) MeVσ = 7.5 ± 2.4(stat) MeV
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1.45 1.5 1.55 1.6 1.65 1.7
Resonance is observed at1526 ± 2(stat.) ± 2(syst.)MeVin Ksp invariant mass distribution
the width:σ = 7.5 ± 2.4(stat.) MeVdominated by experimentalresolution
Moskov Amarian, Discovery of the Pentaquark : Experimental Status – p.15/22
The Θ+ Monte Carlo
14.90 / 11Constant 240.5 13.30Mean 1.540 0.2692E-03Sigma 0.6994E-02 0.2385E-03
Invariant Mass (π+π-p) (GeV)
0
50
100
150
200
250
1.4 1.45 1.5 1.55 1.6 1.65 1.7
The Θ+ generated with:M=1540MeV and σ = 2MeV
Reconstructed values:M=1540MeV and σ = 7MeV(due to resolution)
Moskov Amarian, Discovery of the Pentaquark : Experimental Status – p.16/22
PYTHIA6 and Mixed Event Background
1480
→ 1560
→
1580
→
1620
→
1660
→16
70→
M(π+π-p) [GeV]
Eve
nts
/ 8 M
eV
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1.5 1.6 1.7
Hatched histogram – PYTHIA6MC simulation (lumi normalized):No resonance structure fromreflections of known mesonic orbaryonic resonances
Solid histogram — mixed eventbackground normalized toPYTHIA6:well reproduces the shape ofPYTHIA6 simulation
Excited Σ∗ hyperons not includedin PYTHIA6 lie below 1500MeVand above 1550MeV
Moskov Amarian, Discovery of the Pentaquark : Experimental Status – p.17/22
Θ+ Isospin from HERMES (prelim.)
MΛ=1522±2.0(stat) MeVσΛ=9.4±2.0(stat) MeV
pk- →
pk+ →
M(pk-), M(pk+) [GeV]
Eve
nts/
(4 M
eV)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
1.45 1.5 1.55 1.6 1.65 1.7
Clear signal for Λ(1520)
No peak structure in pK+
Gell-Mann-Nishidjima relation:Q = I3 + Y/2, where Y=B+S
if no Θ++ then:
→ Θ+ is an isosinglet
Moskov Amarian, Discovery of the Pentaquark : Experimental Status – p.18/22
Hunting Other Members
uudds-
uussd-ddssu-
0pK or nK+
Ξ π0 + or Σ Κ0+Ξ (2070)
Θ+ (1530)
N(1710)
Σ(1890)
Ξ π- - or Σ Κ- -
PENTAQUARKS: hiding in the corners
Moskov Amarian, Discovery of the Pentaquark : Experimental Status – p.19/22
Exotic Ξ−− from NA49 at CERN
NA49 Coll.: evidence for exotic Ξ−−(dsdsu) in pp at√
s=17 GeVS = −2 and I = 3/2 with M = 1862 ± 2MeV and width < 18 MeV
Xi- pi- inv mass
0
10
20
30
40
1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8
Entri
es /
7.5
MeV
/c2
M(Ξπ) [GeV/c2]
a) Ξ-π-
Xi- pi- inv mass
0
5
10
15
1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8
b) Ξ-π+
Xi- pi- inv mass
0
5
10
15
1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8
c) Ξ– +π-
Xi- pi- inv mass
0
2
4
6
8
1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8
d) Ξ– +π+
Xi- pi- inv mass
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8
a)
Entr
ies
/ 7.5
MeV
/c2
M(Ξπ) [GeV/c2]
Xi- pi- inv mass
-10
0
10
20
30
1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8
b)
Moskov Amarian, Discovery of the Pentaquark : Experimental Status – p.20/22
Mass Values and Experimental Widths of Θ+
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1520 1540Mass value [MeV]
Sequ
ence
SPring-8
DIANA
CLAS
SAPHIR
ITEP (υ,s)
HERMES
FWHM [MeV]
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 25 50
Left panel: measured massesThe weighted average of allexperiments:M=1535±2.5MeV (hatchedband)
reduced χ2 a la PDGcorresponds to confidencelevel of 0.1
Right panel: measured widths
ZEUS →Welcome on Board
HERA-B: strong controversyor affordable result?
Moskov Amarian, Discovery of the Pentaquark : Experimental Status – p.21/22
Summary
Exotic baryon resonance Θ+ is observed in different experimentswith very narrow width and PENTAQUARK structure
Quantum numbers are undefined except of isospin → Θ+ is anISOSINGLET
New member of anti-decuplet Ξ−− is observed at NA49 (needsconfirmation)
Further theoretical and experimental work is needed to establishquantum numbers like SPIN and PARITY of observedresonances
Pentaquarks open NEW window for our understanding of quarksand hadrons in the extreme conditions and possibly also in thestellar objects
HERA experiments contribute to the world efforts on this subjectMoskov Amarian, Discovery of the Pentaquark : Experimental Status – p.22/22