Direct and Convenient Method of Regioselective Benzylation of Methyl α‐ D ...
Transcript of Direct and Convenient Method of Regioselective Benzylation of Methyl α‐ D ...
This article was downloaded by: [University of Calgary]On: 28 February 2013, At: 22:15Publisher: Taylor & FrancisInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office:Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Synthetic Communications: An InternationalJournal for Rapid Communication ofSynthetic Organic ChemistryPublication details, including instructions for authors and subscriptioninformation:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lsyc20
Direct and Convenient Method ofRegioselective Benzylation of Methylα‐D‐GlucopyranosideXiaoliu Li a , Zhiwei Li a , Pingzhu Zhang a , Hua Chen a & Shiro Ikegami aa Department of Chemistry, Hebei University, Baoding, ChinaVersion of record first published: 03 Jul 2007.
To cite this article: Xiaoliu Li , Zhiwei Li , Pingzhu Zhang , Hua Chen & Shiro Ikegami (2007): Direct andConvenient Method of Regioselective Benzylation of Methyl α‐D‐Glucopyranoside, Synthetic Communications:An International Journal for Rapid Communication of Synthetic Organic Chemistry, 37:13, 2195-2202
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00397910701397326
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantialor systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, ordistribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.
The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that thecontents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae,and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall notbe liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever orhowsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of thismaterial.
Direct and Convenient Method ofRegioselective Benzylation of Methyl
a-D-Glucopyranoside
Xiaoliu Li, Zhiwei Li, Pingzhu Zhang, Hua Chen,
and Shiro Ikegami
Department of Chemistry, Hebei University, Baoding, China
Abstract: A facile and convenient method for the direct preparation of methyl
2,3,6-tri-O-benzyl-a-D-glucopyranoside (2) by the regioselective benzylation of
methyl a-D-glucopyranoside (1) with benzyl bromide in the presence of mild bases
K2CO3 and KOH (1:1) without solvents is reported.
Keywords: benzylation, glucopyranoside, regioselectivity, selective protection
INTRODUCTION
The syntheses of carbohydrate derivatives and mimics have attracted a great
attention because of their important biological significance and potential che-
motherapeutic value, and many methodologies for the syntheses have been
developed in recent years.[1] One of the most important jobs in carbohydrate
synthesis is to get a suitably protected intermediate that always involves the
protection of the hydroxyl group.[2] Among the variety of protecting
methods,[3,4] one of the most useful techniques is benzylation protection,
because the benzyl ether group has the advantages of good stability to a
wide range of acidic and basic conditions and easy removal under mild hydro-
genation conditions.
Benzylation has been readily achieved by the reaction of carbohydrate
and benzyl halides in the presence of a base such as potassium hydroxide[5]
Received June 28, 2006
Address correspondence to Xiaoliu Li, Department of Chemistry, Hebei University,
No. 180 Wusi East Road, Baoding, Hebei 071002, China. E-mail: [email protected]
Synthetic Communicationsw, 37: 2195–2202, 2007
Copyright # Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN 0039-7911 print/1532-2432 online
DOI: 10.1080/00397910701397326
2195
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alga
ry]
at 2
2:15
28
Febr
uary
201
3
or sodium hydride[6] in anhydrous DMF or potassium hydroxide in H2O-
CH2Cl2 solution using crown ether as the phase-transfer catalyst.[7] The
benzylation could also be completed under an acidic condition using benzyl
trichloroacetimidate in the presence of catalytic amounts of trifluoromethane-
sulfonic acid.[8] However, the selective benzyl protection of the hydroxyl
groups was not so easy to achieve because of the very slight difference of
reactivity between the hydroxyl groups. Conventionally, the selective protec-
tion could be realized by using multistep reactions,[9] including the application
of temporary protective groups such as trityl[10] or silyl ether[11] or by using
some special protocols, for instance, the selective activation of cyclic stanny-
lene acetal or stannyl ether intermediates[2,12] and the regioselective reductive
opening of O-benzylidene acetals.[2,13] Only a few achievements in the direct
and regioselective benzylations of some carbohydrate diols have been
reported using benzyl halides and a mild base of Ag2O[14] and very recently
by utilizing the adjacent azido group activation under the conventional benzy-
lation conditions (NaH/BnBr in DMF at rt).[15] To develop a simple and con-
venient method of direct and selective benzylation of the hydroxyl groups still
remains a great challenge.[2,4,16]
Solvent-free organic synthesis has been recently recognized as one of
the more promising green synthetic techniques because of its considerable
synthetic advantages in terms of yield, selectivity, and simplicity of the
reaction procedure.[17–22] In a solvent-free reaction, the interaction between
the dissimilar reactants under grinding becomes more sensitive and direct
than those in a solution because of the absence of solvation and associated
shielding by solvent molecules.[23] Consequently, a slightly difference of
the reactivity between similar functional groups, such as the hydroxyl
groups in carbohydrates, may result in good reaction selectivity in the
solvent-free state. With this point of view, we conceived that the application
to the solvent-free reaction may provide a certain possibility for the direct and
selective protection of the hydroxyl groups in carbohydrates. In this article, we
describe a new approach to the direct and selective multibenzylation of methyl
a-D-glucopyranoside with benzyl bromide in the presence of a mild base in a
solvent-free state, which provided a facile and convenient preparation of the
selectively protected methyl 2,3,6-tri-O-benzyl-a-D-glucopyranoside (2).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The reaction was performed by grinding a mixture of methyl a-D-glucopyra-
noside (1), benzyl bromide (8.0 eq.), and KOH (4.0 eq.)/K2CO3 (4.0 eq.) in a
mortar for 20 min. Then the mixture was transferred into a flask and kept in an
oil bath at 1208C for 1h. After workup and purification by silica-gel column
chromatography (petroleum ether–ethyl acetate ¼ 3:1), the partially benzy-
lated product of methyl 2,3,6-tri-O-benzyl-a-D-glucopyranoside (2) was
isolated in 58% yield as the main product, and the per-benzylated methyl
X. Li et al.2196
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alga
ry]
at 2
2:15
28
Febr
uary
201
3
a-D-glucopyranoside (3) (8%) and a mixture of the other partially benzyl
protected (such as 2,6-di-O-benzyl-, 3,6-di-O-benzyl-, and 6-O-benzyl-)
methyl a-D-glucopyranosides (in total 10%) were also obtained (Scheme 1)
(Table 1, entry 5).
As shown in Table 1, the reaction exhibited good regioselectivity and
afforded the partially protected product of methyl 2,3,6-tri-O-benzyl-a-D-
glucopyranoside (2) as the predominant product in all cases. The reaction
selectivity was remarkably influenced by the reaction temperature and base.
For instance, as the reaction temperature went up from 608C to 1208C, theregioselectivity in the ratio of 2:3 increased from 2.47 to 3.81 in the
presence of 4.0 equivalents of KOH (entries 1–3). However, the reaction
selectivity decreased when 6.0 equivalents of KOH were used under the
Table 1. Selective benzylation of methyl a-D-glucopyranoside (1)a
Entry Base
Temp. (8C)/time (h)
Yield (%)b
2 3 2:3
1 4.0 eq. KOH 60/1 28.6 11.6 2.47
2 4.0 eq. KOH 90/1 41.7 14.7 2.84
3 4.0 eq. KOH 120/1 52.6 13.8 3.81
4 6.0 eq. KOH 120/1 50.6 20.2 2.50
54.0 eq. KOH
120/1 57.9 7.7 7.524.0 eq. K2CO3
64.0 eq. KOH
120/2 56.8 18.6 3.054.0 eq. K2CO3
7c 6.0 eq. KOH 120/1 15.7 4.6 3.41
8c 8.0 eq. KOH 120/3 51.0 14.3 3.57
9c4.0 eq. KOH
120/3 36.8 8.5 4.334.0 eq. K2CO3
aThe reaction was carried out with 10.0 mmol of 1 and 80.0 mmol (8.0 eq.) of benzyl
bromide.bThe other partially protected (2,6-di-O-benzyl-, 3,6-di-O-benzyl-, and 6-O-benzyl-)
methyl a-D-glucopyranosides were also separated, and in the transformation of the
reaction mixture from mortar to flask, a small amount of the reaction mixture was lost.cUsing benzyl chloride as the benzylating reagent instead of benzyl bromide under
similar reaction conditions to entry1. The reactant (1) was partially recovered.
Scheme 1. Benzylation of 1.
Regioselective Benzylation of Methyl a-D-Glucopyranoside 2197
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alga
ry]
at 2
2:15
28
Febr
uary
201
3
same conditions (entry 4), which indicated that the amount of 6.0 equivalents
of KOH was too strong in the selective reaction. A combined mild base of
K2CO3 and KOH (4.0 equiv. in 1:1) was used in the reaction, and the
reaction regioselectivity was improved obviously with the ratio of 2:3 up to
7.5:1 (entry 5). However, heating was prolonged to 2 h, the yield of methyl
2,3,6-tri-O-benzyl-a-D-glucopyranoside (2) decreased and that of the per-ben-
zylated product (3) increased after heating for 2 h under the same conditions
(entry 6).
Similarly, the benzylation of methyl a-D-glucopyranoside (1) with benzyl
chloride was examined, which was supposed to give a better regioselectivity
because of its lower alkylating reactivity than benzyl bromide. However, as
shown in Table 1 (entries 7–9), the results were not so good as the case of
using benzyl bromide as the benzylating reagent under similar conditions.
Methyl 2,3,6-tri-O-benzyl-a-D-glucopyranoside (2) is a very important
intermediate in the synthesis of carbohydrate derivatives. It was commonly
prepared from methyl a-D-glucopyranoside by the successive three-step
reactions of 4,6-O-benzylidenation and 2,3-O-dibenzylation and the
selective reductive opening of the acetal moiety of 4,6-O-benzylidene-2,3-
di-O-benzyl-a-D-glucopyranoside with the combinations of NaCNBH3þHCl
(or AlCl3) or BH3.NMe3þAlCl3 in THF solution.[2] Although each reaction
in the three steps gave a good to excellent yield, the overall yield of the
preparation was moderate. This one-step tribenzylation of methyl a-D-gluco-
pyranoside provided a simple and convenient method of direct preparation of
methyl 2,3,6-tri-O-benzyl-a-D-glucopyranoside (2).
On the basis of this achievement of selective protection, the benzylation
of methyl 4,6-O-benzylidene-a-D-glucopyranoside (4) was further examined
under similar reaction conditions as shown in Scheme 2 and Table 2. The
monobenzylation of the diol (4) exhibited slight regioselectivity, which
preferred the 2-OH-benzylated product 6 to the 3-OH benzylated product 7.
The result was similar to that reported by Ye.[15] The products 2, 3, 5, 6,
and 7 were characterized by the 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and/or HH COSY
spectra or by comparing those with authentic samples.
The regioselectivity of tribenzylation of 1 may be attributed to the
different reactivities between the primary 6-OH and the secondary hydroxyl
groups, and the different acidities of the secondary hydroxyl groups (2-, 3-
and 4-OH), which may connect with the internal hydrogen bonding (IHB)
interaction (Scheme 3).[16,24] At first, the primary 6-OH in 1 was deprotonated
by a base to form the intermediate A, followed by benzylation to afford the
Scheme 2. Benzylation of 4.
X. Li et al.2198
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alga
ry]
at 2
2:15
28
Febr
uary
201
3
methyl 6-O-benzyl-a-D-glucopyranoside (B). In both A and B, the stronger
IHB will further decrease the acidity of the 4-OH (H4). On the other hand,
the steric factor of the 6-O-benzyl group may also influence the regioselectiv-
ity by blocking the base attacking 4-OH. The IHB and the steric effect
enhanced the reactive discrimination of the three secondary hydroxyl
groups and resulted in a high level of regioselectivity.
Similarly, the selectivity of the monobenzylation of 4 may also depend
upon the steric factor of the 4,6-O-benzylidene group and the different
acidities between 2- and 3-hydroxyl groups that may result from the IHB
(Scheme 4). The hydrogen atom H3 involved in the IHB became less acidic
than H2. Thus, the monobenzylation would preferably occur on 2-OH to
provide methyl 4,6-O-benzylidene-2-O-benzyl-a-D-glucopyranoside (6) as
the main monobenzylated product.
In summary, the benzylation of methyl a-D-glucopyranosides with benzyl
bromide and a base without solvent was investigated. In the presence of the
mild base of K2CO3 and KOH (1:1), the regioselective benzylation of
methyl a-D-glucopyranoside (1) was carried out and predominantly afforded
methyl 2,3,6-tri-O-benzyl-a-D-glucopyranoside (2), providing a facile and
convenient method for preparing 2 by a direct and simple benzylation.
Scheme 3. Internal hydrogen bonding (IHB) interaction in 1 and its benzylation
intermediate.
Table 2. Selective benzylation of methyl 4,6-O-benzylidene-a-D-glucopyranoside
(4)a
Entry Base BnBr
Yield (%)b
5 6 7
1 4.0 eq. KOHþ 8.0 eq. 48.5 19.1 4.8
4.0 eq. K2CO3
2 2.0 eq. KOHþ 4.0 eq. 6.8 21.3 13.0
2.0 eq. K2CO3
3 4.0 eq. KOHþ 4.0 eq. 26.2 39.6 16.5
4.0 eq. K2CO3
aThe reaction was carried out with 10.0 mmol of 4.bIn the transformation of the reaction mixture from mortar to flask, a small amount of
the reaction mixture, was lost.
Regioselective Benzylation of Methyl a-D-Glucopyranoside 2199
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alga
ry]
at 2
2:15
28
Febr
uary
201
3
EXPERIMENTAL
1H NMR, 13C NMR, and COSY spectra were measured on a FT-NMR
Bruker Avance 400 (400-MHz) NMR spectrometer using tetramethylsilane
(Me4Si) as an internal standard. Mass spectra (MS) were carried out on a
VG-7070E mass spectrometer with FAB (fast atomic bombardment) using
3-nitrobenzyl alcohol (NBA) as the matrix. Thin-layer chromatography
(TLC) was performed on precoated plates (Qingdao GF254) with detection
by UV light or with phosphomolybdic acid in EtOH/H2O followed by
heating. Column chromatography was performed using SiO2 (Qingdao
200–300 mesh).
General Procedure for Benzylation without Solvent
The mixture of methyl a-D-glucopyranoside (1) (1.94 g, 10.0 mmol), KOH
(40.0 mmol), K2CO3 (40.0 mmol), and new distillated benzyl bromide
(9.5 mL, 80.0 mmol) was ground in a mortar in N2 atmosphere for 20 min;
then the mixture was transferred into a flask and kept in an oil bath at
1208C for 1 h. The reaction mixture was separated with H2O and AcOEt.
The organic phase was dried over anhydrous MgSO4 and concentrated
under reduced pressure, and the residue was applied on silica-gel chromato-
graphy (petroleum ether–ethyl acetate ¼ 3:1, then 1:1) to get the per-benzy-
lated methyl a-D-glucopyranoside (3) (0.427 g, 7.7%), tribenzylated methyl
2,3,6-tri-O-benzyl-a-D-glucopyranoside (2) (2.69 g, 57.9%), and a mixture
of the dibenzyl-protected (such as 2,6-di-O-benzyl-, 3,6-di-O-benzyl-) and
the monobenzyl-protected methyl 6-O-benzyl-a-D-glucopyranosides.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China
(20472015), the Program of Science and Technology (S&T) of Hebei
(3276414), the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei (2005000106), and the
Open Research Fund Program of Key Laboratory of Marine Drugs of Ministry
of Education of China (KLMD[OUC]200407) are gratefully acknowledged.
Scheme 4. Internal hydrogen bonding (IHB) interaction in 4.
X. Li et al.2200
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alga
ry]
at 2
2:15
28
Febr
uary
201
3
REFERENCES
1. (a) Fraser-Reid, B. O.; Tatsuta, K.; Thiem, J. Glycoscience: Chemistry andChemical Biology; Springer: Berlin, 2001; (b) Ernst, B.; Hart, G. W.; Sinay, P.Carbohydrates in Chemistry and Biology; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2000;(c) Witczak, Z. J.; Nieforth, K. A. Carbohydrates in Drug Design; MarcelDekker: New York, 1997; (d) Carbohydrates and Glycobiology. Science 2001,291, 2337–2378 (special issue).
2. Hanessian, S. Preparative Carbohydrate Chemistry; Marcel Dekker: New York,1997.
3. Sartori, G.; Ballini, R.; Bigi, F.; Bosica, G.; Maggi, R.; Righi, P. Protection (anddeprotection) of functional groups in organic synthesis by heterogeneouscatalysis. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 199–250.
4. Greene, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. M. Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis, 3rd ed.;John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1999, pp. 76–86.
5. Fletcher, H. G., Jr. 1,6-Di-O-benzyl-2,4:3,5-di-O-methylene-L-iditol. In Methods
in Carbohydrate Chemistry; Whistler, R. L., Wolfrom, M. L., BeMiller, J. N.,Eds.; Academic Press: New York, 1963; Vol. 2, pp. 166–167.
6. Kanai, K.; Sakamoto, I.; Ogawa, S.; Suami, T. Synthesis of 1,4-diaminocyclitolantibiotics, III: Synthesis of 4-hydoxypurpurosamine B derivatives. Bull. Chem.Soc. Jpn. 1987, 60, 1529–1531.
7. Bessodes, M.; Shamsazar, J.; Antonakis, K. Crown ether catalyzed O-alkylation ofcarbohydrates and nucleosides. Synthesis 1988, 560–562.
8. Wessel, H. P.; Lersen, T.; Bundle, D. R. Acid-catalysed benzylation and allylationby alkyl trichloroacetimidates. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1985, 2247–2250.
9. (a) Crouch, R. D. Selective monodeprotection of bis-silyl ethers. Tetrahedron2004, 60, 5833–5871; (b) Gomez, A. M.; Danelon, G. O.; Valverde, S.;Lopez, J. C. Improved synthesis of 2,3:4, 6-di-O-isopropylidene-D-glucopyranoseand -D-galactopyranose. Carbohydr. Res. 1999, 320, 138–142; (c) Lehtila, R. L.;Lehtila, J. O.; Roslund, M. U.; Leino, R. Selectively protected galactose deriva-tives for the synthesis of branched oligosaccharides. Tetrahedron 2004, 60,3653–3661; (d) Kattnig, E.; Albert, M. Counterion-directed regioselective acety-lation of octyl b-D-glucopyranoside. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 945–948; (e) Barone, G.;Bedini, E.; Iadonisi, A.; Manzo, E.; Parrilli, M. Ceric ammonium nitrate/pyridine:A mild reagent for the selective deprotection of cyclic acetals and ketals in thepresence of acid labile protecting groups. Synlett 2002, 1645–1648.
10. (a) David, S.; Hanessian, S. Regioselective manipulation of hydroxyl groups viaorganotin derivatives. Tetrahedron 1985, 41, 643–663; (b) Simas, A. B. C.;Pais, K. C.; Dasilva, A. A. T. A more convenient and general procedure forO-monobenzylation of diols via stannylenes: a critical reevaluation ofthe Bu2SnO method. J. Org Chem. 2003, 68, 5426–5428; (c) Oikawa, M.;Liu, W.-C.; Nakai, Y.; Koshida, S.; Fukase, K.; Kusumoto, S. Regioselectivereductive opening of 4,6-O-benzylidene acetals of glucose or glucosamine deriva-tives by BH3
. Me2NH–BF3 . OEt2. Synlett 1996, 1179–1180.11. Alais, J.; Veyrieres, A. Synthesis of O-b-D-galactopyranosyl-(1!4)-O-2-
acetamido-2-deoxy-b-D-glucopyranosyl-(1!3)-D-mannose, a postulated trisac-charide of human erythrocyte membrane sialoglycoprotein. J. Chem. Soc.,Perkin Trans. 1 1981, 377–381.
12. (a) Grindley, T. B. Application of tin-containing intermediates to carbohydratechemistry. In Adv. Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biology; El Khadem, H. S.,Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, 1998; Vol. 53, 17–142; (b) Ogawa, T.;
Regioselective Benzylation of Methyl a-D-Glucopyranoside 2201
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alga
ry]
at 2
2:15
28
Febr
uary
201
3
Takahashi, Y.; Matsui, M. Regioselective alkylation via trialkystannylation:Methyl a-D-glucopyranoside. Carbohydr. Res. 1982, 102, 207–215.
13. (a) Garegg, P. J.; Hultberg, H. A novel reductive ring-opening of carbohydratebenzylidene acetals, with unusual regioselectivity. Carbohydr. Res. 1981, 93,Cl0–Cl1; (b) Wang, C.-C.; Luo, S.-Y.; Shie, C.-R.; Hung, S.-C. Metal trifluoro-methanesulfonate-catalyzed regioselective borane-reductive ring opening of ben-zylidene acetals: A concise synthesis of 1,4-dideoxy-1,4-imino-L-xylitol. Org.Lett. 2002, 4, 847–849; (c) Aravind, A.; Baskaran, S. 1,3:4,6-Di-O-benzylidene-D-mannitol as a source for novel chiral intermediates through regioselectivereductive cleavage. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 743–745; (d) Suzuki, K.;Nonaka, H.; Yamaura, M. Regioselectivity in the reductive ring-openingreaction of 1,2-O-benzylidene sugars. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 1975–1977.
14. Bouzide, A.; Sauve, G. Highly selective silver (I) oxide mediated monoprotectionof symmetrical diols. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 5945–5948.
15. Fan, Q. H.; Li, Q.; Zhang, L. H.; Ye, X. S. Regioselective benzylation of azido-containing monosaccharides. Synlett 2006, 1217–1220.
16. Wang, H. S.; She, J.; Zhang, L. H.; Ye, X. S. Silver (I) oxide mediated selectivemonoprotection of diols in pyranosides. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 5774–5777.
17. Tanaka, K. Solvent-Free Organic Synthesis; Wiley-VCH Weinheim, 2003.18. Bougrin, K.; Loupy, A. Soufiaoui, M. Microwave-assisted solvent-free hetero-
cyclic synthesis. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C: Photochem. Rev. 2005, 6, 139–167.19. Li, X. L.; Wang, Y. M.; Meng, J. B.; Du, C. P. New advances in the solid state
organic reactions. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 18, 20–28 (in Chinese).20. Lu, G.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, Y. J. New development of the solvent-free Michael
addition. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 24, 600–608 (in Chinese).21. Cho, B. T.; Kang, S. K.; Kim, M. S.; Ryu, S. R.; An, D. K. Solvent-free reduction
of aldehydes and ketones using solid acid-activated sodium borohydride. Tetrahe-dron 2006, 62, 8164–8168.
22. Bose, A. K.; Pednekar, S.; Ganguly, S. N.; Chakraborty, G.; Manhas, M. S. A sim-plified green chemistry approach to the Biginelli reaction using “grindstonechemistry.” Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 8351–8353.
23. Hiraoka, R.; Watanabe, H.; Senna, M. A solvent-free organic synthesis from solid-state reactants through autogenous fusion due to formation of molecularcomplexes and increasing alcohol nucleophilicity. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47,3111–3114.
24. Bouzide, A.; Sauve, G. Silver (I) oxide mediated highly selective monotosylationof symmetrical diols: Application to the synthesis of polysubstituted cyclic ethers.Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2329–2332.
X. Li et al.2202
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
alga
ry]
at 2
2:15
28
Febr
uary
201
3