Controlled Release

32
1 Controlled Release Reservoir-Membrane Systems

description

Controlled Release. Reservoir-Membrane Systems. Overview. History Membrane devices with constant release rate Diffusion cell experiments with first order release Burst and lag effects in membrane systems Diffusion coefficients Membrane materials Applications of membrane systems. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Controlled Release

Page 1: Controlled Release

1

Controlled Release

Reservoir-Membrane Systems

Page 2: Controlled Release

2

Overview

History Membrane devices with constant release rate Diffusion cell experiments with first order

release Burst and lag effects in membrane systems Diffusion coefficients Membrane materials Applications of membrane systems

Page 3: Controlled Release

3

Components of membrane systems Mechanism: diffusion-controlled Driving force: ΔC across membrane Medium: polymer membrane or liquid-filled

pores Resistance: function of film thickness,

diffusivity of solute in medium Membrane usually interfaces with biological

site. Biocompatibility may be important.

Page 4: Controlled Release

4

History of Membrane Systems Folkman and Long (1966 patent) Folkman studied effect of thyroid hormone on heart

block Folkman needed non-inflammatory vehicle for

extended release of hormone Long performed a photographic study of turbulence

induced by artificial Si rubber heart valves Long noticed that certain dyes permeated Si rubber

Page 5: Controlled Release

5

History (continued)

Folkman and Long tested diffusion of dyes and drugs across Si tube walls. Observed that oil-soluble, low MW (<1000) dyes permeated

membrane Observed that water-soluble, high MW dyes did not.

This was the beginning of a research EXPLOSION! First CR device (late 1960s) was use of hormones

for contraception, which has now been widely studied.

Page 6: Controlled Release

6

Theory Fick’s First Law

Relate Cm1 and Cm2 to surrounding concentrations

Rewrite Flux

Body acts as a sink (C2≈0)

Constant rate can be achieved if C1 is kept constant.

hCCD

dxdCmDJ mm 12

hCCDKJ m

12

2

22 CCK m

m 1

11 CCK m

m

hCDKJ m

1

membrane

C1

C2h

Cm1

Cm2

C1<Cm1 the drug “prefers” the polymer

Page 7: Controlled Release

7

What if C1 is not constant?

Common situation in diffusion cell Drug is depleted from reservoir (1) Drug accumulates in receiver (2)

membrane

C1

C2h

Cm1

Cm2

www.permegear.com

Page 8: Controlled Release

8

Diffusion cell: Derivation of M1(t) Fick’s Law

USS Mass Balance

hCCDK

dxdCmDJ m

12

21

21

2211

11VV

AJdtCCd

dtdC

AV

dtdC

AVJ

Combine USSMB with Fick’s Law

Rearrange

2121

21 11VV

CCl

ADKdtCCd

dt

VVlADK

CCCCd

2121

21 11

Page 9: Controlled Release

9

Diffusion cell

Integrate with IC: C1-C2= C10-C2

0

Apply mass balance

Substitute

t

VVlADK

CCCC

210021 11ln21

0121 MMM

222

111

VCMVCM

Page 10: Controlled Release

10

Diffusion cell

Rearrange (see details)

Differentiate to find release rate

First Order Release Rate

121

212

21

01

1 exp VVlV

tVVADKVVV

MM

21

21

1

011 exp

VlVtVVADK

lVADKM

dtdM

Page 11: Controlled Release

11

Release profile for diffusion cell

Drug Release in Diffusion Cell

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

time (min)

mas

s of

dru

g in

rese

rvoi

r (m

g)

Page 12: Controlled Release

12

Data Analysis

Diffusion Cell Experiment provides data for C1 vs t Rearrange equation for M1

Taking natural log of both sides results in linearized eqn

21

21210

1

211 expVlV

tVVADKVVM

VVM

mxby

VlVtVVADKVV

MVVM

21

212

110

1

211 )ln(ln

Page 13: Controlled Release

13

Graphing diffusion cell data

Experiment: L=2.5x10-3 cm V1=V2=3 cm3

A = 2 cm2

K = 1 (water-filled pores) Analysis m = -0.000533s-1

m = Solve for D D=1.0 x 10-6 cm2/s

Caffeine Release through Microporous Membrane

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

time (min)

mas

s of

dru

g in

rese

rvoi

r (m

g)

Aqueous Diffusion Coefficient of Drugs

y = -0.000533x + 1.098612

-16-14-12-10

-8-6-4-202

0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000

time (s)

log(

(M1*

(V1+

V2)/M

10-V

1)

21

21

VlVVVADK

Page 14: Controlled Release

14

Burst and Lag Effects

Previous analysis was based on steady-state flux in membrane

hCCD

dxdCmDJ mm 12

membrane

C1

C2h

Cm1

Cm2

Page 15: Controlled Release

15

Burst and Lag Lag

membrane

C1

C2

h

Cm1

Cm2

Membrane exposed to reservoir at t=0

Initially no drug in membrane

Takes time to build up SS concentration gradient

Burstmembrane

C1

C2

h

Cm1

Cm2

Device stored before use

Initial concentration of drug in membrane = C1

Takes time for drug to desorb and achieve SS concentration gradient

Page 16: Controlled Release

16

Lag Time & Burst Effect

Equations for the amount of drug released after SS is attained in the membrane:

Lag

Burst

Equations result from solving transport eqns. (Fick’s 2nd Law) for USS diffusion with relevant ICs; then taking limit as t →∞

These equations are for C1=const; C2=0

Dlt

lADKCM SS

6

21

2

Dlt

lADKCM SS

3

21

2

Page 17: Controlled Release

17

Burst and Lag Effects

lagtD/ll

ADKCDlt

lADKCM

-6intercept-x

t vsM of slope

6

Lag

2

1

21

2

lADKCDlt

lADKCM

12

21

2

t vsM of slope

3

Burst

The lag time is the time required for the solute to appear on the receiver side. It is also the time required to attain a SS concentration profile in the membrane

Page 18: Controlled Release

18

Effect of lag and burst

Membrane thickness 100 microns D = 1 x 10 -7 cm2/s Calculate Lag time and Burst time Repeat for D = 1 x 10-9 cm2/s

D = 1 x 10 -7 cm2/s D = 1 x 10-9 cm2/stlag = 2.7 min tlag = 277 mintburst = 5.5 min tburst = 555 min

Page 19: Controlled Release

19

Diffusivity values for polymers Function of MW

Greater dependence for solute in polymers than for solute in liquids.

For drugs with <400 MW In water: 10-6 cm2/s<D<10-4 cm2/s

Weak dependence on MW In rubbery polymer: 10-11 cm2/s<D<10-4 cm2/s

MW is somewhat important In glassy polymer: 10-14 cm2/s<D<10-5 cm2/s

Polymer is very stiff and rigid. Strong dependence on MW

Page 20: Controlled Release

20

Diffusion through microporous membranes Molecules move through

liquid-filled pores Small molecules do not

experience hindered diffusion

Porosity 0 < ε <1 Tortuosity typically 1 < τ <5

pathlength is longer than membrane thickness

DDeff

Page 21: Controlled Release

21

Membrane materials

Silicone (Silastic – Dow Corning) EVA – Ethylene Vinyl Acetate

EVAc- Ethylene Vinyl Acetate copolymer Entrapped fluids

Hydrogels and microporous membranes

Page 22: Controlled Release

22

Silicone membranes

Biocompatible and sterilizible High permeability to many steroids Low permeability to ionized species Fick’s law is valid for many compounds D is on the order of 10-6

High compared to many polymers

Page 23: Controlled Release

23

Applications of Silicone membranes 5 year contraceptive Transderm Nitro patch: 0.843 mg/cm2/day

Page 24: Controlled Release

24

EVA Membrane Systems

Advantages over silicone Lower permeability to non-polar compounds offers

better rate control Easier processing and formation of thermoplastic

Extrusion, injection molding, film casting Co-polymers can effect big changes in properties

Flexibility, permeability, strength

Page 25: Controlled Release

25

Examples of EVA Systems Progestasert

Progesterone contraceptive by ALZA Intrauterine device, 65 mcg per day for 400

days Silicone T-shaped tube with 35 mg drug in

Si oil

Page 26: Controlled Release

26

Examples of EVA Systems Ocusert

Pilocarpine glaucoma treatment system by ALZA Thin, flexible “contacts” behind eyelid Use once a week; replaces drops 4 times per

day Releases 20 or 40 mcg per hour Contains 5-11 mg pilocarpine Sterilized by irradiation

1. Clear EVA membrane2. Opaque white sealing

ring3. Pilocarpine reservoir4. Clear EVA membrane

Oval shape, 6 mm x 13 mm x 0.5 mm

Thin EVA membranes 100 microns thick

Page 27: Controlled Release

27

Hydrogel systems

Hydrophilic monomers that make cross-linked networks which hold water Great ease of synthesis Wide range of properties D depends on cross-linking agent and water

content

Page 28: Controlled Release

28

Applications of hydrogels membrane systems Fluoride salts in the mough

0.2 – 1.0 mg/day for 6 months Narcotic agonist – cyclazocine

Prevents opiate effect and is used in rehabilitation Anticancer pouches for direct placement on

tumors

Page 29: Controlled Release

29

Applications of microporous membranes Microporous Membranes – used in many biomedical applications

Blood oxygenation, dialysis, wound dressings, drug delivery Drug Delivery Applications

Transderm Scop® (scopolamine) —Introduced in 1981 for motion-sickness. Microporous polypropylene membrane. (Alza-Ciba Geigy)

Transderm-Nitro® (nitroglycerin) — For angina patients. Alternative to the brief effects of sublingual nitroglycerin and the messiness of nitroglycerin ointment. Microporous EVA membrane. (Alza-Ciba Geigy)

Catapres-TTS® (clonidine) — Once-a week patch for hypertension replaces up to four daily oral doses. Uses microporous polypropylene membrane. (Alza-Boehringer/Ingelheim)

Estraderm® (estradiol) —Twice-weekly, convenient estrogen replacement therapy. Avoids first pass and therefore uses only a fraction of the drug used in the oral therapy. Uses microporous polypropylene membrane. (Alze-Ciba Geigy)

Duragesic® (fentanyl) —Introduced in 1991 for management of chronic pain via opioid analgesia. Uses microporous polyethylene membrane. (Alza)

NicoDerm® CQ® (nicotine)—smoking-cessation aid in multiple dosage strengths offering maximum control of the drug delivery rate. Uses microporous polypropylene membrane. (Alza-GSK)

Testoderm® and Testoderm® —Introduced in 1994 and 1998, respectively, for hormone replacement therapy in men with a deficiency or absence of testosterone. Microporous EVAc membrane. (Alza-Lederle)

Page 30: Controlled Release

30

ALZA’s Transderm ScopRemovable strip

Rate controlling microporous membrane with highly permeable liquid in pores

Foil backing, protective and impermeable

Adhesive gel layer with priming dose

Reservoir with solid drug in highly permeable matrix

Controlled release form maintains low conc of drug, reduces side effects

2.5 cm2 area 200 mcg priming dose 10 mcg/h for 72 h steady state delivery

Page 31: Controlled Release

31

Diffusion Cell Equations

Derivation of M1(t)

Page 32: Controlled Release

32

Burst and Lag effects

Ref. Kydonieus, A. Treatise on Controlled Drug Delivery