Analysis of Motion

12
CS332 Visual Processing Department of Computer Science Wellesley College Analysis of Motion Measuring motion in biological vision systems

description

Analysis of Motion. Measuring motion in biological vision systems. Smoothness assumption:. Compute a velocity field that: is consistent with local measurements of image motion (perpendicular components) has the least amount of variation possible. Computing the smoothest velocity field. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Analysis of Motion

Page 1: Analysis of Motion

CS332 Visual ProcessingDepartment of Computer ScienceWellesley College

Analysis of Motion

Measuring motion in biological vision

systems

Page 2: Analysis of Motion

1-2

Smoothness assumption:

Compute a velocity field that:

(1)is consistent with local measurements of image motion (perpendicular components)

(2)has the least amount of variation possible

Page 3: Analysis of Motion

1-3

Computing the smoothest velocity field

(Vxi-1, Vyi-1)

(Vxi, Vyi)

(Vxi+1, Vyi+1)ii+1

i-1

motion components:

Vxiuxi + Vyi uyi= vi

change in velocity:

(Vxi+1-Vxi, Vyi+1-Vyi)

Find (Vxi, Vyi) that minimize:

Σ(Vxiuxi + Vyiuyi - v

i)2 + [(Vxi+1-Vxi)

2 + (Vyi+1-

Vyi)2]

Page 4: Analysis of Motion

1-4

When is the smoothest velocity field correct?

When is it wrong?

motion illusions

Page 5: Analysis of Motion

1-5

Two-stage motion measurement

motion components 2D image motion

Movshon, Adelson, Gizzi & NewsomeV1: high % of cells selective for direction of motion (especially in layer that projects to MT)

MT: high % of cells selective for direction and speed of motion

lesions in MT behavioral deficits in motion tasks

Page 6: Analysis of Motion

1-6

Testing with sine-wave “plaids”

moving plaid

Movshon et al. recorded responses of neurons in area MT to moving plaids with different component gratings

Page 7: Analysis of Motion

1-7

The logic behind the experiments…

Component cells measure perpendicular components of motion

e.g. selective for vertical features moving right

predicted responses: (1) (2) (3)

Pattern cells integrate motion components

e.g. selective for rightward motion of pattern

predicted responses: (1) (2) (3)

(1) (2) (3)

Page 8: Analysis of Motion

1-8

Movshon et al. observations:

Cortical area V1:

all neurons behaved like component cells

Cortical area MT:

layers 4 & 6: component cells

layers 2, 3, 5: pattern cells

Perceptually, two components are not integrated if:

large difference in spatial frequency

large difference in speed

components have different stereo disparity

Evidence for two-stage motion measurement!

Page 9: Analysis of Motion

1-9

Integrating motion over the image

integration along contours vs. over 2D areas:

Nakayama & Silverman

true motio

n perceived motion

contour features can be far away

area features must be

close

Page 10: Analysis of Motion

1-10

Recovering 3D structure from motion

Page 11: Analysis of Motion

1-11

Ambiguity of 3D recovery

birds’ eye views

We need additional constraint to recover 3D

structure uniquely“rigidity constraint”

Page 12: Analysis of Motion

1-12

Image projections

Z

X

perspective projection

image

plane

Z

X

orthographic projection

image plane

(X, Y, Z) (X, Y)

3D 2D(X, Y, Z) (X/Z, Y/Z)

3D 2D