Analysis and interpretation of data - George Washington University · 2015. 4. 15. · Analysis and...

27
Analysis and interpretation of data E. Oset, J. Garzon, A. Martinez Torres, A. Ramos, S. Prelovsek, Wei Hong Liang π N scattering and the N*(1535), N*(1650), N*(1700) resonances Analysis of KD, KD* scattering from lattice QCD energy levels: The D 0s * (2317) and D s1 *(2460) B 0 and B 0 s J/ψ ππ and the f 0 (500), f 0 (980) resonances

Transcript of Analysis and interpretation of data - George Washington University · 2015. 4. 15. · Analysis and...

Page 1: Analysis and interpretation of data - George Washington University · 2015. 4. 15. · Analysis and interpretation of data E. Oset, J. Garzon, A. Martinez Torres, A. Ramos, S. Prelovsek,

Analysis and interpretation of data

E. Oset, J. Garzon, A. Martinez Torres, A. Ramos, S. Prelovsek, Wei Hong Liang

π N scattering and the N*(1535), N*(1650), N*(1700) resonances Analysis of KD, KD* scattering from lattice QCD energy levels: The D0s

*(2317) and Ds1*(2460) B0 and B0

s J/ψ ππ and the f0(500), f0(980) resonances

Page 2: Analysis and interpretation of data - George Washington University · 2015. 4. 15. · Analysis and interpretation of data E. Oset, J. Garzon, A. Martinez Torres, A. Ramos, S. Prelovsek,

One of the popular ways to analysize data lately has been the use of the chiral unitay approach: π N and pseudoscalar-baryon coupled channels are considered in a unitary scheme, via the Bethe Salpeter equation, and the interaction is taken from the chiral Lagrangians. Recently, the need to include vector-baryon channels has become compeling. The local hidden gauge approach allows the extrapolation of the chiral Lagrangians to the vector sector:

π N scattering and the N*(1535), N*(1650), N*(1700)

Page 3: Analysis and interpretation of data - George Washington University · 2015. 4. 15. · Analysis and interpretation of data E. Oset, J. Garzon, A. Martinez Torres, A. Ramos, S. Prelovsek,

Hidden gauge formalism for vector mesons, pseudoscalars and photons Bando et al. PRL, 112 (85); Phys. Rep. 164, 217 (88); U. G: Meissner Phys Rep 161 (88)

Page 4: Analysis and interpretation of data - George Washington University · 2015. 4. 15. · Analysis and interpretation of data E. Oset, J. Garzon, A. Martinez Torres, A. Ramos, S. Prelovsek,
Page 5: Analysis and interpretation of data - George Washington University · 2015. 4. 15. · Analysis and interpretation of data E. Oset, J. Garzon, A. Martinez Torres, A. Ramos, S. Prelovsek,
Page 6: Analysis and interpretation of data - George Washington University · 2015. 4. 15. · Analysis and interpretation of data E. Oset, J. Garzon, A. Martinez Torres, A. Ramos, S. Prelovsek,

I=1/2, JP=1/2- (d-wave) (s-wave)

Page 7: Analysis and interpretation of data - George Washington University · 2015. 4. 15. · Analysis and interpretation of data E. Oset, J. Garzon, A. Martinez Torres, A. Ramos, S. Prelovsek,

al are fit parameters

γi are fit parameters

For pseudoscalar-baryon -> pseudoscalar-baryon interaction

Page 8: Analysis and interpretation of data - George Washington University · 2015. 4. 15. · Analysis and interpretation of data E. Oset, J. Garzon, A. Martinez Torres, A. Ramos, S. Prelovsek,

Best fit with the new channels

Best fit with only pseudoscalar –baryon channels ( Inoue et al 2002)

Im

Re

Results

The N*(1650) appears now, which could not be obtained with the PB channels alone

Page 9: Analysis and interpretation of data - George Washington University · 2015. 4. 15. · Analysis and interpretation of data E. Oset, J. Garzon, A. Martinez Torres, A. Ramos, S. Prelovsek,

Subtracion contants in Inoue et al

The unnatural values of ai were interpreted by Hyodo et al. as a signal that relevant components are missing in the wave function. Hyodo, Jido, Hosaka 2012, Hyodo 2014, Sekihara, Jido, Hyodo 2014

Values of this work

Page 10: Analysis and interpretation of data - George Washington University · 2015. 4. 15. · Analysis and interpretation of data E. Oset, J. Garzon, A. Martinez Torres, A. Ramos, S. Prelovsek,
Page 11: Analysis and interpretation of data - George Washington University · 2015. 4. 15. · Analysis and interpretation of data E. Oset, J. Garzon, A. Martinez Torres, A. Ramos, S. Prelovsek,

JP=3/2- sector We get two resonances

Page 12: Analysis and interpretation of data - George Washington University · 2015. 4. 15. · Analysis and interpretation of data E. Oset, J. Garzon, A. Martinez Torres, A. Ramos, S. Prelovsek,

Mohler, Lang, Leskovek, Prolovsek, Woloshyn , PRL 2013, PRD 2014

Reanalysis of the work:

In that work, using KD and KD* interpolators in Nf=2+1 they obtain 3 energy levels

Page 13: Analysis and interpretation of data - George Washington University · 2015. 4. 15. · Analysis and interpretation of data E. Oset, J. Garzon, A. Martinez Torres, A. Ramos, S. Prelovsek,

One channel

Poles and couplings

Let us take an energy independent potential

In two channels

Gamermann, Nieves, E.O. , Ruiz-Arriola, PRD 2010

Page 14: Analysis and interpretation of data - George Washington University · 2015. 4. 15. · Analysis and interpretation of data E. Oset, J. Garzon, A. Martinez Torres, A. Ramos, S. Prelovsek,

Effect of missing channels. Assume two channels neglecting V22 for simplicity

Define Energy dependent

Probability to have the 1 channel Probability of the channel eliminated

Generalization of Weinberg compositeness condition, (Weinberg PR 65, Baru PLB 2004.) Different derivations and generalization , Jido, Hyodo, Hosaka 2008, Sekihara, Hyodo, Jido 2011, Hyodo, Jido, Hosaka 2012, Hyodo 2013, Sekihara, Hyodo, Jido 2014

Page 15: Analysis and interpretation of data - George Washington University · 2015. 4. 15. · Analysis and interpretation of data E. Oset, J. Garzon, A. Martinez Torres, A. Ramos, S. Prelovsek,

For example

T-matrix in a finite box

L

Momentum eigenstates in the box, periodical boundary conditions

Doering, Meissner, E.O., Rusetski, E P J A 2011

Page 16: Analysis and interpretation of data - George Washington University · 2015. 4. 15. · Analysis and interpretation of data E. Oset, J. Garzon, A. Martinez Torres, A. Ramos, S. Prelovsek,

One channel case

Eigenenergies of the box

This is Luescher formula in our formalism

Limitation: you only get the phase shifts for the energies which are eigenenergies of the box

Page 17: Analysis and interpretation of data - George Washington University · 2015. 4. 15. · Analysis and interpretation of data E. Oset, J. Garzon, A. Martinez Torres, A. Ramos, S. Prelovsek,

For KD For KD*

A best fit is conducted to the lattice energies to determine the parameters of V

A. Martinez-Torres, E. O., S. Prelovsek and A. Ramos, arXiv:1412.1706

Page 18: Analysis and interpretation of data - George Washington University · 2015. 4. 15. · Analysis and interpretation of data E. Oset, J. Garzon, A. Martinez Torres, A. Ramos, S. Prelovsek,

With the potential obtained we evaluate the T matrix in the continuum and determine scattering properties and a bound state

Page 19: Analysis and interpretation of data - George Washington University · 2015. 4. 15. · Analysis and interpretation of data E. Oset, J. Garzon, A. Martinez Torres, A. Ramos, S. Prelovsek,

Systematic uncertainties, Quoted numbers are for fits with central values of energies:

The message: Systematic uncertainties from this source are about 5 times smaller than the statistical. Uncertainties from extrapolating to mD and mD* physical masses are similar.

Page 20: Analysis and interpretation of data - George Washington University · 2015. 4. 15. · Analysis and interpretation of data E. Oset, J. Garzon, A. Martinez Torres, A. Ramos, S. Prelovsek,

W.H. Liang, EO PLB 2014

They study decay of B into J/ψ and π+π-

Page 21: Analysis and interpretation of data - George Washington University · 2015. 4. 15. · Analysis and interpretation of data E. Oset, J. Garzon, A. Martinez Torres, A. Ramos, S. Prelovsek,
Page 22: Analysis and interpretation of data - George Washington University · 2015. 4. 15. · Analysis and interpretation of data E. Oset, J. Garzon, A. Martinez Torres, A. Ramos, S. Prelovsek,

No trace of f0(500) One normalization is arbritary but the two decays share the same normalization

Exp: Aaij 2011, 2012, 2014 Li (Belle), Aaltonen (CDF), Abasov (D0)

Page 23: Analysis and interpretation of data - George Washington University · 2015. 4. 15. · Analysis and interpretation of data E. Oset, J. Garzon, A. Martinez Torres, A. Ramos, S. Prelovsek,

Our result

Exp:

Our result

Exp:

Note: all the ratios and the mass distributions are obtained with no free parameters, the only one has been fitted to scattering data.

Page 24: Analysis and interpretation of data - George Washington University · 2015. 4. 15. · Analysis and interpretation of data E. Oset, J. Garzon, A. Martinez Torres, A. Ramos, S. Prelovsek,

Conclusions: - The need to improve description of data has shown the relevance of vector baryon - components in states formely thought as made only from pseudoscalar-baryon. - An easy, even more accurate and technically easier reformulation of Luescher approach is done. Energy spectra in F V Scattering amplitude in continuum, but for all energies, not only for the eigenenergies of the box. - The use of recent QCD lattice simulation results on the KD and KD* interaction allowed us to determine the existence of bound states, associated to the D*s0(2317) and D*s1(2460) states, the scattering length and effective range, and the probability that these states contain KD and KD* respectively, showing the power of QCD lattice simulations to unravel the nature of resonances. - B, and also D weak decays are showing a great potential to improve our knowledge

on the nature of low lying scalar mesons and many other resonances.

Page 25: Analysis and interpretation of data - George Washington University · 2015. 4. 15. · Analysis and interpretation of data E. Oset, J. Garzon, A. Martinez Torres, A. Ramos, S. Prelovsek,
Page 26: Analysis and interpretation of data - George Washington University · 2015. 4. 15. · Analysis and interpretation of data E. Oset, J. Garzon, A. Martinez Torres, A. Ramos, S. Prelovsek,
Page 27: Analysis and interpretation of data - George Washington University · 2015. 4. 15. · Analysis and interpretation of data E. Oset, J. Garzon, A. Martinez Torres, A. Ramos, S. Prelovsek,