Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN)...

40
EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B 0 D 0 K + π - decays The LHCb collaboration Abstract The Dalitz plot distribution of B 0 D 0 K + π - decays is studied using a data sample corresponding to 3.0 fb -1 of pp collision data recorded by the LHCb experiment during 2011 and 2012. The data are described by an amplitude model that contains contributions from intermediate K * (892) 0 , K * (1410) 0 , K * 2 (1430) 0 and D * 2 (2460) - resonances. The model also contains components to describe broad structures, including the K * 0 (1430) 0 and D * 0 (2400) - resonances, in the S-wave and the S- and P-waves. The masses and widths of the D * 0 (2400) - and D * 2 (2460) - resonances are measured, as are the complex amplitudes and fit fractions for all components included in the amplitude model. The model obtained will be an integral part of a future determination of the angle γ of the CKM quark mixing matrix using B 0 DK + π - decays. Published in Phys. Rev. D c CERN on behalf of the LHCb collaboration, licence CC-BY-4.0. Authors are listed at the end of this paper. arXiv:1505.01505v2 [hep-ex] 3 Aug 2015

Transcript of Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN)...

Page 1: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN)

CERN-PH-EP-2015-107LHCb-PAPER-2015-017

3 August 2015

Amplitude analysis ofB0rarr D0K+πminus decays

The LHCb collaborationdagger

Abstract

The Dalitz plot distribution of B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays is studied using a data samplecorresponding to 30 fbminus1 of pp collision data recorded by the LHCb experimentduring 2011 and 2012 The data are described by an amplitude model that containscontributions from intermediate Klowast(892)0 Klowast(1410)0 Klowast2(1430)0 and Dlowast2(2460)minus

resonances The model also contains components to describe broad structuresincluding the Klowast0 (1430)0 and Dlowast0(2400)minus resonances in the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S-and P-waves The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonancesare measured as are the complex amplitudes and fit fractions for all componentsincluded in the amplitude model The model obtained will be an integral partof a future determination of the angle γ of the CKM quark mixing matrix usingB0 rarr DK+πminus decays

Published in Phys Rev D

ccopy CERN on behalf of the LHCb collaboration licence CC-BY-40

daggerAuthors are listed at the end of this paper

arX

iv1

505

0150

5v2

[he

p-ex

] 3

Aug

201

5

ii

1 Introduction

Dalitz plot (DP) analysis of B0 rarr DK+πminus decays has been proposed as a way to measurethe unitarity triangle angle γ [1 2] The sensitivity to γ equiv arg [minusVudV lowastub(VcdV lowastcb)] whereVxy are elements of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) quark mixing matrix [3 4]originates from the interference of b rarr cus and b rarr ucs amplitudes Such interferenceoccurs when the neutral D meson is reconstructed in a final state that is accessible to bothD0 and D0 decays and therefore corresponds to an admixture of the two states [5 6] Oneof the largest components of the B0 rarr DK+πminus final state is B0 rarr DKlowast(892)0 for whichboth brarr cus and brarr ucs amplitudes are colour suppressed making them comparablein magnitude and potentially enhancing CP violation effects [7] Decay diagrams for thequasi-two-body contributions from B0 rarr DKlowast(892)0 and B0 rarr Dlowast2(2460)minusK+ decaysare shown in Fig 1 Observables sensitive to γ have been measured by LHCb with aquasi-two-body approach [8] but a DP analysis is expected to be more sensitive becauseinterference between resonances provides the possibility to resolve ambiguities in thedetermination of γ

In order to determine γ with this method it is necessary to have an amplitude modelof the B0 rarr D0K+πminus decay that proceeds through the favoured brarr cus transition Thiscan be achieved by reconstructing the D0 meson through the K+πminus decay in this waythe contribution from the b rarr cus amplitude is dominant and effects due to b rarr ucsamplitudes can be neglected While the analysis of this decay chain is not itself sensitive toγ its outcome will be an integral part of a future analysis using for example D rarr K+Kminus

decays where CP violation effects are expected as the final state is common to both D0

and D0 decaysDalitz plot analyses of B meson decays to final states containing a charmed meson and

two charged particles (either pions or kaons) also provide opportunities for studies of thespectroscopy of charmed mesons Results in this area have recently been obtained from DPanalyses of B0

s rarr D0Kminusπ+ [9 10] B+ rarr DminusK+π+ [11] and B0 rarr D0π+πminus [12] decaysall from LHCb As the branching fraction for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays is smaller than thatfor B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays the analysis presented in this paper is not as sensitive to theparameters of charm resonances as that of Ref [12] However the much larger sample of B

0B

b

d0(892)K

s

d

0D

c

u+W

(a)

0Bb

d

-(2460)2Dc

d

+Ks

u+W

(b)

Figure 1 Decay diagrams for the quasi-two-body contributions to B0 rarr DK+πminus from (a)B0 rarr DKlowast(892)0 and (b) B0 rarr Dlowast2(2460)minusK+ decays

1

mesons available at LHCb compared to that used in the only other published DP analysisof B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays from the Belle collaboration [13] allows useful results on excitedcharm mesons to be obtained Moreover results on charm meson spectroscopy obtainedfrom DP analysis of B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays provide important independent cross-checksof results from studies of the B0 rarr D0π+πminus DP as possible biases due to other structuresin the Dalitz plots are different between the two modes

In this paper an amplitude analysis of the B0 rarr D0K+πminus decay is reported Theinclusion of charge-conjugate processes is implied throughout the paper The analysisis based on a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 30 fbminus1 of ppcollision data collected with the LHCb detector in 2011 and 2012 when the collisioncentre-of-mass energy was

radics = 7 TeV (10 fbminus1) and

radics = 8 TeV (20 fbminus1) respectively

Previously the branching fraction for the three-body decay has been measured [14 15]and the B0 rarr D0Klowast(892)0 [16 17] and B0 rarr Dlowast2(2460)minusK+ [14] contributions have beenmeasured using quasi-two-body approaches however this is the first DP analysis of theB0 rarr D0K+πminus decay

The paper is organised as follows A description of the LHCb detector reconstructionand simulation software is given in Sec 2 The selection of signal candidates is describedin Sec 3 and the determination of signal and background yields is presented in Sec 4An overview of the Dalitz plot analysis formalism is given in Sec 5 and details of theimplementation of the amplitude analysis are presented in Sec 6 The evaluation ofsystematic uncertainties is described in Sec 7 with results and a brief summary given inSec 8

2 LHCb detector and software

The LHCb detector [1819] is a single-arm forward spectrometer covering the pseudorapidityrange 2 lt η lt 5 designed for the study of particles containing b or c quarks The detectorincludes a high-precision tracking system consisting of a silicon-strip vertex detector [20]surrounding the pp interaction region a large-area silicon-strip detector located upstreamof a dipole magnet with a bending power of about 4 Tm and three stations of silicon-stripdetectors and straw drift tubes [21] placed downstream of the magnet The polarity ofthe dipole magnet is reversed periodically throughout data-taking The tracking systemprovides a measurement of momentum p of charged particles with a relative uncertaintythat varies from 05 at low momentum to 10 at 200 GeV (natural units with c = ~ = 1are used) The minimum distance of a track to a primary vertex the impact parameter(IP) is measured with a resolution of (15 + 29pT)microm where pT is the component ofthe momentum transverse to the beam in GeV Different types of charged hadronsare distinguished using information from two ring-imaging Cherenkov detectors [22]Photon electron and hadron candidates are identified by a calorimeter system consisting ofscintillating-pad and preshower detectors an electromagnetic calorimeter and a hadroniccalorimeter Muons are identified by a system composed of alternating layers of iron andmultiwire proportional chambers [23]

2

The trigger [24] consists of a hardware stage based on information from the calorimeterand muon systems followed by a software stage in which all tracks with pT gt 500 (300) MeVare reconstructed for data collected in 2011 (2012) The software trigger used in thisanalysis requires a two- three- or four-track secondary vertex with significant displacementfrom any primary pp interaction vertex (PV) At least one charged particle must havepT gt 17 GeV and be inconsistent with originating from a PV A multivariate algorithm [25]is used for the identification of secondary vertices consistent with the decay of a b hadron

In the offline selection the objects that prompted a positive trigger decision areassociated with reconstructed particles Selection requirements can therefore be made notonly on whether the hardware trigger decision was due to a signature in the calorimetersor in the muon system but on whether the decision was due to the signal candidate otherparticles produced in the pp collision or a combination of both Signal candidates areaccepted offline if at least one of the final-state particles created a cluster in the hadroniccalorimeter with sufficient transverse energy to fire the hardware trigger Events that aretriggered at the hardware level by another particle in the event are also retained Afterall selection requirements are imposed 67 of events in the sample were triggered bythe decay products of the signal candidate while the remainder were triggered only byanother particle in the event

Simulated events are used to characterise the detector response to signal and certaintypes of background events In the simulation pp collisions are generated using Pythia [26]with a specific LHCb configuration [27] Decays of hadronic particles are describedby EvtGen [28] in which final-state radiation is generated using Photos [29] Theinteraction of the generated particles with the detector and its response are implementedusing the Geant4 toolkit [30] as described in Ref [31]

3 Selection requirements

The selection requirements follow closely those used in Ref [10] The more copiousB0 rarr D0π+πminus decay is topologically and kinematically similar to the B0 rarr D0K+πminus

channel allowing it to be used as a control mode to optimise the selection requirementsLoose initial requirements are used to obtain a visible signal peak of D0π+πminus candidatesThe tracks are required to be of good quality and must be above thresholds in p pT andχ2

IP where χ2IP is defined as the difference in χ2 of a given PV reconstructed with and

without the considered particle The D0 rarr K+πminus candidate must satisfy criteria on itsvertex quality (χ2

vtx) and flight distance from any PV and from the B candidate vertexand must have invariant mass m(K+πminus) in the range 1814ndash1914 MeV A requirementon the output of a boosted decision tree that identifies D0 rarr K+πminus decays originatingfrom b hadron decays (D0 BDT) [32 33] is also applied Candidate B mesons are selectedwith requirements on invariant mass χ2

IP and on the cosine of the angle between the Bmomentum vector and the line from the PV under consideration to the B vertex (cos θdir)A requirement is placed on the χ2 of a kinematic fit [34] to the candidatersquos decay chain inwhich the D0 mass is constrained to its nominal value The four final-state tracks must

3

satisfy pion and kaon particle identification (PID) criteriaA neural network [35] is used to discriminate between signal decays and combinatorial

background The sPlot technique [36] with the B candidate mass as the discriminatingvariable is used to separate statistically B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays from background Thesignal and background weights returned by this method are applied to the candidateswhich are then used to train the network The network is trained using 16 variables Theyinclude the χ2

IP of the four final-state tracks and the following variables associated tothe D0 candidate χ2

IP χ2vtx the square of the flight distance from the PV divided by

its uncertainty squared (χ2flight) cos θdir and the output of the D0 BDT In addition the

following variables associated to the B candidate are included pT χ2IP χ2

vtx χ2flight and

cos θdir The pT asymmetry [10] and track multiplicity in a cone with half-angle of 15units of the plane of pseudorapidity and azimuthal angle (measured in radians) aroundthe B candidate flight direction which contain information about the isolation of the Bcandidate from the rest of the event are also used The input quantities to the neuralnetwork depend only weakly on the position of the candidate in the B decay Dalitz plotand therefore any requirement on the network output cannot appreciably bias the DPdistribution A requirement imposed on the network output reduces the combinatorialbackground remaining after the initial selection by a factor of five while retaining morethan 90 of the signal

The B0 rarr D0K+πminus candidates must satisfy the same selection as the B0 rarr D0π+πminus

decays except for the PID requirement on the positively charged track from the B decayvertex which is imposed to preferentially select kaons rather than pions The PID efficiencyis evaluated from calibration samples of D0 rarr Kminusπ+ decays from the Dlowast+ rarr D0π+ decaychain The kinematics of this decay chain can be exploited to obtain clean samples withoutusing the PID information [22] The PID efficiency of the requirements on the four tracksin the final state is around 50 and varies depending on the kinematics of the tracks asdescribed in detail in Sec 61

Candidates are vetoed when the difference between m(K+πminusπminus) and m(K+πminus) lieswithin plusmn25 MeV of the known Dlowast(2010)minusndashD0 mass difference [37] to remove backgroundcontaining Dlowastminus rarr D0πminus decays Candidates are also rejected if a similar mass differencecalculated with the pion mass hypothesis applied to the bachelor kaon satisfies the samecriterion To reject backgrounds from B0 rarr DminusK+ Dminus rarr K+πminusπminus decays it is requiredthat the combination of the pion from the D0 candidate together with the two bachelorparticles does not have an invariant mass in the range 1850ndash1890 MeV Additionallycandidates are removed if the pion and kaon originating directly from the B0 decaycombine to give an invariant mass consistent with that of the D0 meson (1835ndash1880 MeV)This removes candidates with the D0 wrongly reconstructed as well as potential backgroundfrom B0 rarr D0D0 decays Other incorrectly reconstructed candidates are removed byvetoing candidates where the pion from the D0 decay and the kaon originating directlyfrom the B0 decay give an invariant mass in the range 1850ndash1885 MeV At least one ofthe pion candidates is required to have no associated hits in the muon system to removepotential background from B0 rarr JψKlowast0 decays Charmless decays of b hadrons aresuppressed by the use of the D0 BDT and further reduced to a negligible level by requiring

4

that the D0 candidate vertex is separated from the B0 decay vertex by at least 1 mmSignal candidates are retained for further analysis if they have invariant mass in the

range 5100ndash5900 MeV After all selection requirements are applied fewer than 1 ofselected events also contain a second candidate Such multiple candidates are retained andtreated in the same manner as other candidates the associated systematic uncertainty isnegligible

4 Determination of signal and background yields

The signal and background yields are determined from an extended maximum likelihoodfit to the B candidate invariant mass distribution The fit allows for signal decayscombinatorial background and contributions from other b hadron decays The decay chainB0 rarr Dlowast0K+πminus with Dlowast0 rarr D0γ or D0π0 forms a partially reconstructed backgroundthat peaks at low B candidate mass as the neutral particle is not included in the candidateMisidentified B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus Λ0

b rarr D(lowast)0K+p and B0(s) rarr D(lowast)0K+Kminus decays are found

to contribute to the background A possible contribution from the highly suppressedB0s rarr D0K+πminus decay mode is also included in the fit

The signal peak is modelled with the sum of two Crystal Ball [38] functions whichhave tails on opposite sides and which share a common mean The tail parameters arefixed to the values found in fits to simulated signal decays The relative normalisationand the ratio of widths of the two functions are constrained within uncertainties tothe values determined in a fit to B0 rarr D0π+πminus data The B0

s rarr D0K+πminus shape ismodelled identically to the signal peak with the difference between the B0 and B0

s masspeak positions fixed to its known value [37] An exponential shape is used to model thecombinatorial background

Misidentified and partially reconstructed backgrounds are modelled with smoothednon-parametric functions Simulated samples are used to obtain the shape for B0 rarrDlowast0K+πminus decays with the Dlowast0 rarr D0γ and D0π0 contributions generated in the correctproportions [37] To account for differences between simulation and data for examplein the polarisation of the Dlowast0 meson the B candidate invariant mass distribution forpartially reconstructed B0 rarr Dlowast0K+πminus decays is allowed to be shifted by an offset thatis a free parameter of the fit The misidentified background shapes are also obtainedfrom simulated samples For B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays the D0 and Dlowast0 contributions arecombined according to their relative branching fractions [37] The backgrounds fromΛ0b rarr D(lowast)0K+p and B0

(s) rarr D(lowast)0K+Kminus decays are assumed to have equal branching

fractions for the decays with D0 and Dlowast0 mesons in the final state as the decays involvingDlowast0 mesons have not yet been measured The simulated samples are reweighted accordingto the relevant particle identification and misidentification probabilities and to match knownDP distributions [1239ndash41] The (mis)identification probabilities take account of trackkinematics and are calculated using calibration samples of Dlowast+ rarr D0π+ D0 rarr Kminusπ+

and Λrarr pπminus decays [1922] The yields of the misidentified backgrounds relative to thesignal are constrained within uncertainties to their expected values based on their known

5

Table 1 Yields from the fit to the D0K+πminus data sample The full mass range is 5100ndash5900 MeVand the signal region is 524855ndash530905 MeV

Component Full mass range Signal region

B0 rarr D0K+πminus 2576plusmn 72 2344plusmn 66B0s rarr D0K+πminus 55plusmn 27 1plusmn 1

comb bkgd 5540plusmn 187 684plusmn 23B0 rarr Dlowast0K+πminus 1750plusmn 99 6plusmn 1B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus 485plusmn 47 51plusmn 5Λ0b rarr D(lowast)0K+p 95plusmn 26 18plusmn 5

B0 rarr D(lowast)0K+Kminus 127plusmn 27 10plusmn 2B0s rarr D(lowast)0K+Kminus 54plusmn 18 14plusmn 5

) [MeV]-π+K0

D(m5200 5400 5600 5800

Can

dida

tes

8 M

eV

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700 LHCb (a)Data

Total fitminusπ+K

0D rarr (s)

0B

Combinatorial bkgminusπ+K 0D rarr 0Bminusπ+π( )0D rarr 0B

p+K( )0D rarr 0bΛ

minusK+K( )0D rarr (s)0B

) [MeV]-π+K0

D(m5200 5400 5600 5800

Can

dida

tes

8 M

eV

1

10

210

310(b)LHCb

Figure 2 Results of the fit to the B candidate invariant mass distribution with (a) linear and(b) logarithmic y-axis scales The components are as described in the legend

branching fractions [123940] and misidentification probabilitiesThere are 14 free parameters in the fit model the mean and width of the signal shape

the relative normalisation and relative width of the two Crystal Ball functions the slopeof the exponential function the offset of the B0 rarr Dlowast0K+πminus shape and the yields of theeight contributions The result of the fit is shown in Fig 2 and the yields are summarisedin Table 1 The yields are also reported within the signal region used in the Dalitz plotfit corresponding to plusmn25 widths of the B0 signal shape (524855ndash530905 MeV) Thedistribution of candidates in the signal region over the Dalitz plot is shown in Fig 3(a)Note that a B0 mass constraint is applied to calculate the variables that are used todescribe the Dalitz plot [42] improving the resolution of those variables and giving aunique kinematic boundary

6

]2) [GeVminusπ0D(2m

5 10 15 20

]2)

[GeV

minus π+K(2

m

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

(a)LHCb

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

091

(b)LHCb

Figure 3 Distribution of B0 rarr D0K+πminus candidates in the signal region over (a) the Dalitz plotand (b) the square Dalitz plot The definition of the square Dalitz plot is given in Sec 61

5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism

In B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays resonances are expected in the m2(D0πminus) and m2(K+πminus)combinations so the Dalitz plot shown in Fig 3(a) is defined in terms of these twoinvariant mass squared terms For a fixed B0 mass these two invariant mass squaredcombinations can be used to calculate all other relevant kinematic quantities

The isobar model [43ndash45] is used to describe the complex decay amplitude The totalamplitude is given by the coherent sum of amplitudes from resonant and nonresonantintermediate contributions and is given by

A(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)=

Nsumj=1

cjFj(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

) (1)

where cj are complex coefficients describing the relative contribution for each intermediateprocess The resonant dynamics are contained in the Fj

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)terms

that are normalised such that the integral of the squared magnitude over the DP is unityfor each term For a D0πminus resonance Fj

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)is given by

F(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)= R

(m(D0πminus)

)timesX(|~p | rBW)timesX(|~q | rBW)times T (~p ~q ) (2)

where ~p is the bachelor particle momentum and ~q is the momentum of one of the resonancedaughters both evaluated in the D0πminus rest frame The functions R X and T are describedbelow

The X(z) terms are BlattndashWeisskopf barrier factors [46] where z = |~q | rBW or |~p | rBW

and rBW is the barrier radius which is set to 40 GeVminus1 asymp 08 fm [10] for all resonances

7

The barrier factors are angular momentum dependent and are given by

L = 0 X(z) = 1

L = 1 X(z) =radic

1+z201+z2

L = 2 X(z) =radic

z40+3z20+9

z4+3z2+9

L = 3 X(z) =radic

z60+6z40+45z20+225

z6+6z4+45z2+225

(3)

where z0 is the value of z at the pole mass of the resonance and L is the orbital angularmomentum between the resonance and the bachelor particle Since the parent and daughterparticles all have zero spin L is also the spin of the resonance

The T (~p ~q) terms describe the angular distributions in the Zemach tensor formalism [4748] and are given by

L = 0 T (~p ~q) = 1 L = 1 T (~p ~q) = minus 2 ~p middot ~q L = 2 T (~p ~q) = 4

3[3(~p middot ~q )2 minus (|~p ||~q |)2]

L = 3 T (~p ~q) = minus 2415

[5(~p middot ~q )3 minus 3(~p middot ~q )(|~p ||~q |)2]

(4)

These expressions are proportional to the Legendre polynomials PL(x) where x is thecosine of the angle between ~p and ~q (referred to as the helicity angle)

The R(m(D0πminus)

)functions are the mass lineshapes Resonant contributions are

typically described by the relativistic BreitndashWigner (RBW) function

R(m) =1

(m20 minusm2)minus im0Γ(m)

(5)

where the mass-dependent decay width is

Γ(m) = Γ0

(q

q0

)2L+1 (m0

m

)X2(q rBW) (6)

where q0 is the value of q = |~q | when the invariant mass is equal to the pole mass of theresonance m0

The large phase space available in B decays allows for the presence of nonresonantamplitudes (ie contributions that do not proceed via a known resonance) that vary acrossthe Dalitz plot An exponential form factor (EFF) has been found to describe nonresonantcontributions well in several DP analyses of B decays [49]

R(m) = exp[minusαm2

] (7)

where α is a shape parameter that must be determined from the data and m is a two-bodyinvariant mass (m(D0πminus) in this example)

The RBW function is a good model for narrow resonances that are well separated fromany other resonant or nonresonant contribution of the same spin This approach is known

8

to break down in the Kπ S-wave because the Klowast0(1430) resonance interferes strongly witha slowly varying nonresonant term as described in Ref [50] The LASS lineshape [51] hasbeen developed to combine these two contributions

R(m) =m

q cot δB minus iq+ exp [2iδB]

m0Γ0m0

q0

(m20 minusm2)minus im0Γ0

qmm0

q0

(8)

where cot δB =1

aq+

1

2rq (9)

and where m0 and Γ0 are the pole mass and width of the Klowast0(1430) state and a and r areshape parameters

The Dπ S-wave nonresonant contribution can be described by the ldquodabbardquo line-shape [52] defined as

R(m) =Bprime(m2)(m2 minus sA)ρ

1minus β(m2 minusm2min)minus iBprime(m2)(m2 minus sA)ρ

(10)

whereBprime(m2) = b exp

[minusα(m2 minusm2

min)] (11)

Here mmin is the invariant mass at threshold sA = m2D minus 05m2

π is the Adler zero ρ isa phase-space factor and b α and β are parameters with values fixed to 2449 GeVminus201 GeVminus2 and 01 GeVminus2 respectively according to Ref [52]

Ignoring reconstruction and selection effects the DP probability density function wouldbe

Pphys

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)=

|A(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)|2intint

DP|A|2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)

(12)

where the dependence of A on the DP position has been suppressed in the denominator forbrevity The primary results of most Dalitz plot analyses are the complex coefficients asdefined in Eq (1) These however depend on the choice of phase convention amplitudeformalism and normalisation used in each analysis The convention-independent quantitiesof fit fractions and interference fit fractions provide a way to reliably compare resultsbetween different analyses Fit fractions are defined as the integral of the amplitude foreach intermediate component squared divided by that of the coherent matrix elementsquared for all intermediate contributions

FF j =

intintDP

∣∣cjFj (m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus))∣∣2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)intint

DP|A|2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)

(13)

The fit fractions need not sum to unity due to possible net constructive or destructiveinterference described by interference fit fractions defined (for i lt j only) by

FF ij =

intintDP

2Re[ciclowastjFiF

lowastj

]dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)intint

DP|A|2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)

(14)

where the dependence of F(lowast)i and A on the DP position has been omitted

9

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

Eff

icie

ncy

()

0

005

01

015

02

025(a)LHCb Simulation

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

Eff

icie

ncy

()

0

005

01

015

02

025(b)LHCb Simulation

Figure 4 Efficiency variation as a function of SDP position for candidates triggered by (a) signaldecay products and (b) by the rest of the event The vertical white stripe is due to the Dlowast vetoand the curved white band is due to the D0 veto

6 Dalitz plot fit

61 Signal efficiency

The variation of the efficiency across the phase space is studied in terms of the squareDalitz plot (SDP) The SDP is defined by variables mprime and θprime that range between 0 and 1and are given for the D0K+πminus case by

mprime equiv 1

πarccos

(2m(D0πminus)minusmmin

D0πminus

mmaxD0πminus minusmmin

D0πminus

minus 1

)and θprime equiv 1

πθ(D0πminus) (15)

where mmaxD0πminus = mB0 minusmK+ and mmin

D0πminus = mD0 + mπminus are the kinematic boundaries of

m(D0πminus) allowed in the B0 rarr D0K+πminus decay and θ(D0πminus) is the helicity angle of theD0πminus system (the angle between the K+ and the D0 meson in the D0πminus rest frame) Thedistribution of selected events across the SDP is shown in Fig 3(b)

Efficiency variation across the SDP is caused by the detector acceptance and bytrigger selection and PID requirements The efficiency is evaluated with simulated samplesgenerated uniformly over the SDP Data-driven corrections are applied to correct for knowndifferences between data and simulation in the tracking trigger and PID efficiencies usingidentical methods to those described in Ref [10] The efficiency functions are obtainedby fitting the corrected simulation with two-dimensional cubic splines Figure 4 showsthe histograms used to model the variation of the efficiency over the SDP for candidatestriggered by (a) signal decays and (b) by the rest of the event

62 Background studies

Among the background yields in the signal region given in Table 1 the only sizeablecomponents are due to combinatorial background and B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays The SDP

10

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

0

0002

0004

0006

0008

001

0012

0014

(a)LHCb

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

000020004000600080010012001400160018

(b)LHCb Simulation

Figure 5 SDP distributions of the background contributions from (a) combinatorial backgroundand (b) B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays

distributions of these backgrounds are described by the histograms shown in Fig 5Combinatorial background contributes 22 of candidates in the signal region The

shape of this contribution over the SDP is obtained from the high B mass sideband (5400ndash5900 MeV) As seen in Fig 2 this sideband is dominated by combinatorial backgroundwith a small contribution from B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays The SDP distribution of theB0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus contribution in the sideband region is modelled as described belowfor the signal region and is subtracted from the sideband sample To check that theSDP shape of the combinatorial background does not vary with the B candidate massa sample of doubly charged D0Kplusmnπplusmn candidates is investigated This confirms that theSDP distribution from the sideband is a reliable model for combinatorial background inthe signal region

The B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus contribution accounts for 16 of the candidates in the signalregion Its SDP distribution is obtained from a simulated sample with the B0 rarr D0π+πminus

and B0 rarr Dlowast0π+πminus contributions combined and reweighted as described in Sec 4 TheB0 rarr D0π+πminus decay mode is the dominant component of this background in the signalregion

Due to resolution effects B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ Dlowast(2010)minus rarr D0πminus decays are notentirely removed by the Dlowast veto Although this component corresponds to real B0 rarrD0πminusK+ decays it is treated as incoherent (ie as background) since its interference withthe remainder of the signal is negligible Its SDP distribution is modelled as a Gaussianpeak in m(D0πminus) with mean fixed to the known Dlowast(2010)minus mass and width and yielddetermined in the fit to data

11

Table 2 Signal contributions to the fit model where parameters and uncertainties are takenfrom Ref [37] The models are described in Sec 5

Resonance Spin DP axis Model Parameters

Klowast(892)0 1 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 89581plusmn 019 MeV Γ0 = 474plusmn 06 MeVKlowast(1410)0 1 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 1414plusmn 15 MeV Γ0 = 232plusmn 21 MeVKlowast0(1430)0 0 m2(K+πminus) LASS Determined from data (see text)Klowast2(1430)0 2 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 14324plusmn 13 MeV Γ0 = 109plusmn 5 MeVDlowast0(2400)minus 0 m2(D0πminus) RBW

Determined from data (see Table 3)Dlowast2(2460)minus 2 m2(D0πminus) RBW

Nonresonant 0 m2(D0πminus) dabba Fixed (see text)Nonresonant 1 m2(D0πminus) EFF Determined from data (see text)

63 Amplitude model for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays

The Dalitz plot fit is performed using the Laura++ [53] package The likelihood functionis given by

L =Ncprodi

[sumk

NkPk(m2i (D

0πminus)m2i (K

+πminus)) ]

(16)

where the index i runs over Nc candidates k runs over the signal and backgroundcomponents and Nk is the yield in each component The probability density function forthe signal component Psig is given by Eq (12) with the |A

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)|2

terms multiplied by the efficiency function described in Sec 61 As it is possible forthe minimisation procedure to find a local minimum of the negative log likelihood (NLL)profile the fit is repeated many times with randomised initial values to ensure the globalminimum is found

The nominal Dalitz plot fit model for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays is composed of severalresonant and nonresonant amplitudes Only those amplitudes that provide significantcontributions or that aid the fit stability are included Unnatural spin-parity states arenot considered as these do not decay to two pseudoscalars The eight amplitudes includedin this model are listed in Table 2 The width of the narrowest signal contribution tothe Dalitz plot (sim 50 MeV) is far larger than the mass resolution (sim 24 MeV) thereforeresolution effects are neglected

The real and imaginary parts of the complex coefficients cj defined in Eq (1) are freeparameters of the fit except for the coefficient of the Dlowast2(2460)minus component which is fixedto 1 as a reference The phases and magnitudes of the complex coefficients as well as fitfractions and interference fit fractions are derived from these free parameters In additionthe masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances are determined fromthe fit to data and are reported in Table 3 The statistical uncertainties on all parametersof interest are calculated using large samples of simulated pseudoexperiments Thesepseudoexperiments are also used to determine the correlations between the statisticaluncertainties on the parameters which are given in Appendix A The LASS parameters

12

Table 3 Masses and widths (MeV) determined in the fit to data with statistical uncertaintiesonly

Resonance Mass Width

Dlowast0(2400)minus 2360plusmn 15 255plusmn 26Dlowast2(2460)minus 24656plusmn 18 460plusmn 34

Table 4 Complex coefficients and fit fractions determined from the Dalitz plot fit Uncertaintiesare statistical only Note that the fit fractions magnitudes and phases are derived quantities

Resonance Fit fraction Isobar model coefficients() Real part Imaginary part Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 minus000plusmn 015 minus127plusmn 006 127plusmn 006 minus157plusmn 011Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 015plusmn 006 minus009plusmn 009 018plusmn 007 minus054plusmn 021Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 014plusmn 038 045plusmn 015 047plusmn 009 127plusmn 095LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 minus010plusmn 024 044plusmn 014 046plusmn 014 179plusmn 065

LASS total 67plusmn 27Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 minus032plusmn 009 minus047plusmn 007 057plusmn 005 minus216plusmn 019Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 minus080plusmn 008 minus044plusmn 014 091plusmn 007 minus264plusmn 015Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 100 000 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 minus039plusmn 009 036plusmn 017 053plusmn 007 240plusmn 027Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 minus062plusmn 006 minus003plusmn 006 062plusmn 006 minus309plusmn 010Total fit fraction 1134

are determined to be m0 = 1450plusmn 80 MeV Γ0 = 400plusmn 230 MeV a = 32plusmn 18 GeV andr = 09plusmn11 GeV while the parameter of the EFF lineshape of the Dπ P-wave nonresonantamplitude is determined to be α = 088plusmn 010 GeVminus2

The values of the fit fractions and complex coefficients obtained from the fit are shownin Table 4 while the values of the interference fit fractions are given in Appendix B Thesum of the fit fractions is seen to exceed unity mostly due to interference within the Dπ andKπ S-waves Note that in Table 4 and all results for fit fractions and derived quantitiesvalues are reported separately for both the Klowast0 (1430)0 and nonresonant components of theLASS lineshape as well as their coherent sum

Projections of the data and the nominal fit model onto m(K+πminus) m(D0πminus) andm(D0K+) are shown in Fig 6 Zooms are provided in the regions of the main resonantcontributions in Fig 7 Projections onto the cosine of the helicity angle of the D0πminus andK+πminus systems are shown in Figs 8 and 9 respectively These projections all show goodagreement between data and the fit model

Angular moments provide a useful method to investigate the helicity structure of thedecays The angular moments in m(D0πminus) and m(K+πminus) obtained as in Refs [1011]are shown in Figs 10 and 11 respectively The contributions due to the Klowast(892)0 andDlowast2(2460)minus resonances are seen as peaks in moments up to order 2 and order 4 respectivelyas expected for spin-1 and spin-2 resonances Reflections make the interpretation ofmoments at higher masses more difficult However the good agreement seen between data

13

and the fit model provides further support for the fit model being a good description ofthe data

The quality of the fit is evaluated by determining a two-dimensional χ2 value comparingthe data and fit model in 144 bins across the SDP that are defined adaptively to ensurethey are approximately equally populated The pull in each of these bins defined as thedifference between the data and the fit model divided by the uncertainty is shown inFig 12 The effective number of degrees of freedom of the χ2 is between Nbins minusNpars minus 1and Nbinsminus1 where Npars is the number of free parameters in the fit yielding a reduced χ2

in the range 099 ndash 122 Additional unbinned tests of fit quality [54] also show acceptableagreement between the data and the fit model

7 Systematic uncertainties

Systematic uncertainties are considered from sources that can be divided into two categoriesexperimental and model uncertainties Experimental uncertainties arise due to the signaland background yields in the signal region the distributions of the background componentsacross the SDP the variation of efficiency across the SDP and possible bias due to thefitting procedure Model uncertainties are considered due to the fixed parameters in thesignal model the addition or removal of marginal amplitudes and the choice of models forthe Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves The uncertainties due to all of these sourcesare combined in quadrature

The signal and background yields are determined from the fit to the B candidateinvariant mass distribution Systematic uncertainties are considered on the total yieldsdue to both statistical and systematic variations of these yields as evaluated in Ref [15]The yields in the signal region are varied appropriately and the effects of these variationson the parameters of interest are assigned as systematic uncertainties

The histograms describing the background distributions are each varied within statisticaluncertainties to establish the uncertainty due to the imperfect knowledge of the distributionof these backgrounds across the SDP The histograms describing the efficiency variationacross the SDP are also varied within their uncertainties prior to the spline fit Theefficiency histograms are also varied with local correlations to account for the effects ofany unknown correlations between neighbouring bins For each parameter the largeruncertainty is considered from the correlated and uncorrelated variations In addition thebinning scheme of the control sample used to evaluate PID performance is varied

An ensemble of pseudoexperiments is used to establish systematic uncertainties relatedto any potential fit bias Pseudoexperiments are generated using the parameters determinedin the fit to data and mean fitted values of the parameters are determined from Gaussianfits to the distributions of results obtained in the ensemble The differences between thegenerated and mean fitted values are found to be small Uncertainties are determined asthe sum in quadrature of the difference between the generated and mean fitted values andthe uncertainty on the mean fitted value from the Gaussian fit

Systematic uncertainties due to fixed parameters in the fit model are determined by

14

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310LHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350 LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310 LHCb (d)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

LHCb (e)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210LHCb (f)

Data Total fit 0(892)K 0(1410)K

S-wave (LASS)πK 0(1430)2Kminus

(2400)0Dminus

(2460)2D

S-wave (EFF)πD P-wave (EFF)πDminus

D Background

Figure 6 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) (c) m(K+πminus)and (e) m(D0K+) with the same projections shown in (b) (d) and (f) with a logarithmic y-axisscale Components are described in the legend

15

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

235 24 245 25 255

Can

dida

tes

4 M

eV

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m05 1 15

Can

dida

tes

13

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

LHCb (b)

Figure 7 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) in the Dlowast2(2460)minus

region and (b) the low m(K+πminus) region Components are as shown in Fig 6

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

) lt 235 GeVminusπ0D(m204 lt

LHCb(a)

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

) lt 255 GeVminusπ0D(m235 lt

LHCb(b)

Figure 8 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(D0πminus) in the mass ranges(a) 204 lt m(D0πminus) lt 235 GeV and (b) 235 lt m(D0πminus) lt 255 GeV Components are asshown in Fig 6

repeating the fit with these parameters varied The fixed masses and widths are variedwithin their uncertainties as shown in Table 2 while the BlattndashWeisskopf barrier radii rBWare varied independently for D0πminus and K+πminus resonances between 3 and 5 GeVminus1 [10]

The Klowast(1410)0 amplitude does not contribute significantly to the nominal fit modelso the fit is repeated with this component removed and the change in results is assignedas the associated systematic uncertainty In addition uncertainties are assigned fromthe changes in the results when an amplitude due to the Klowast(1680)0 resonance or from avirtual Blowast(5325)+ component as described in Ref [10] is included in the model

A Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D0Kminusπ+ observed both spin-1 and spin-3 resonances

at m(D0Kminus) sim 286 GeV [9 10] A spin-3 resonance has also been seen at m(D0πminus) sim276 GeV in B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] while an analysis of B+ rarr DminusK+π+ shows aspin-1 resonance at similar m(D+πminus) values [11] Uncertainties are assigned corresponding

16

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

) lt 08 GeVminusπ+K(m0 lt LHCb

(a)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 10 GeVminusπ+K(m08 lt LHCb

(b)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 13 GeVminusπ+K(m10 lt LHCb

(c)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

) lt 15 GeVminusπ+K(m14 lt LHCb

(d)

Figure 9 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(K+πminus) in the mass ranges(a) m(K+πminus) lt 08 GeV (b) 08 lt m(K+πminus) lt 10 GeV (c) 10 lt m(K+πminus) lt 13 GeV and(d) 14 lt m(K+πminus) lt 15 GeV Components are as shown in Fig 6

to the changes in results when either a spin-1 or spin-3 state at m(D0πminus) sim 276 GeV isadded to the nominal model

The LASS model used to describe the Kπ S-wave is replaced with a Flatte shape [55]which accounts for the Kηprime threshold near the Klowast0 (1430)0 mass and a resonant term witha modified mass dependent width [52] for the κ (also known as Klowast0(800)) state Thismodel gives an NLL that is worse by 44 units A model-independent description of theKπ S-wave is also used to fit the data with the uncertainty on each parameter takenas the larger of the two differences This alternative improves the NLL by 88 units butintroduces an additional four free parameters into the fit The dabba lineshape used todescribe the D0πminus S-wave is replaced with an EFF lineshape while a power-law model isintroduced as an alternative to the EFF lineshape that describes the D0πminus P-wave Thesealterations worsen the NLL by 30 units and improve it by 08 units respectively

The total systematic uncertainties due to experimental and model effects for fit fractionsand complex coefficients are given together with the results in Sec 8 The contributionsfrom different sources to the systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions masses and

17

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0002004006008

0101201401601802

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-30-25-20-15-10

-505

1015

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

310timesLHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

310timesLHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-8-6-4-202468

310timesLHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-8-6-4-20246

310timesLHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-6-4-202468

10

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 10 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(D0πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

18

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0

005

01

015

02

025

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

20

40

60

80

100310times

LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10-505

10152025

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25310times

LHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-20-15-10

-505

101520

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 11 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(K+πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

19

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Pull

-2

-1

0

1

2

LHCb

Figure 12 Differences between the data SDP distribution and the fit model across the SDP interms of the per-bin pull

Table 5 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths(MeV) Uncertainties given on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value SB fraction Efficiency Background SDP Fit bias Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 060 083 050 031 117Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 006 039 069 005 080Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 028 148 185 033 241LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 051 225 286 086 377

LASS total 67plusmn 27 026 186 160 102 267Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 023 072 053 054 107Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 021 139 143 040 204Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 070 070 049 015 111Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 003 081 059 057 115Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 086 191 052 038 219m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 46 81 70 37 122m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 001 037 022 029 051Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 28 131 139 48 199Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 05 09 09 05 14

widths are given in Tables 5 and 6 The dominant experimental systematic uncertaintyon most parameters is due to either the efficiency variation or background distributionsacross the SDP while the model uncertainties are generally dominated by the effects ofalternative descriptions of the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves For the parametersof broad components the model uncertainties dominate however for other parameters thestatistical experimental and model uncertainties are all of a similar magnitude

The stability of the fit results is confirmed by several cross-checks The data sample isdivided into subsamples according to the flavour of the B candidate the trigger decision

20

Table 6 Model uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths (MeV) Uncertaintiesgiven on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value Fixed parameters Addremove Alternative models Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 075 114 109 174Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 018 070 022 076Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 079 330 023 340LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 110 399 520 665

LASS total 67plusmn 27 053 142 521 543Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 036 187 056 198Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 055 195 711 740Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 018 073 099 124Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 027 140 346 374Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 031 199 215 295m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 61 93 256 279m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 009 105 048 115Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 40 180 435 472Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 14 05 24 29

the polarity of the magnet and the year of data taking Each subsample is fitted separatelyand all are seen to be consistent with the nominal fit results The fit is also repeatedwith additional resonance components to test the fit model Resonances up to spin-3 wereconsidered for all three pairs of daughters with the mass and width allowed to vary in thefit No additional significant contributions were observed

8 Results and summary

The results for the complex coefficients are reported in Table 7 with results for thefit fractions given in Table 8 The results for the interference fit fractions are givenin Appendix B Upper limits are determined on the fit fractions of the Klowast(1410)0 andDlowast3(2760)minus components which do not give significant contributions using the methoddescribed in Ref [10]

The fit fractions for resonant contributions are converted into quasi-two-body productbranching fractions by multiplying by B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus) = (92plusmn 06plusmn 07plusmn 06)times 10minus5which is obtained from the ratio of branching fractions B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus)B(B0 rarrD0π+πminus) [15] multiplied by the latest result for B(B0 rarr D0π+πminus) [12] accounting forthe different Dlowast(2010)minus veto windows used in the analyses and for the 37 residualbackground due to B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ decays The statistical correlation between theresults of Ref [15] and this analysis is found to be negligible The results for the productbranching fractions are shown in Table 9 For the K+πminus resonances where the branchingfractions to Kπ are known the product branching fractions are converted to the Bdecay branching fractions shown in Table 10 The results for B(B0 rarr D0Klowast(892)0) andB(B0 rarr Dlowast2(2460)minusK+)times B(Dlowast2(2460)minus rarr D0πminus) are consistent with and more precisethan previous measurements [14 1617]

21

Table 7 Results for the complex amplitudes and their uncertainties presented (top) in terms ofreal and imaginary parts and (bottom) in terms and magnitudes and phases The three quotederrors are statistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively

Resonance Real part Imaginary part

Klowast(892)0 minus000plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 034 minus127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 006Klowast(1410)0 015plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 009 minus009plusmn 009plusmn 018plusmn 018Klowast0(1430)0 014plusmn 038plusmn 048plusmn 038 045plusmn 015plusmn 037plusmn 017LASS nonresonant minus010plusmn 024plusmn 016plusmn 042 044plusmn 014plusmn 017plusmn 023Klowast2(1430)0 minus032plusmn 009plusmn 015plusmn 023 minus047plusmn 007plusmn 014plusmn 015Dlowast0(2400)minus minus080plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 022 minus044plusmn 014plusmn 012plusmn 018Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) minus039plusmn 009plusmn 009plusmn 014 036plusmn 017plusmn 014plusmn 023Dπ P-wave (EFF) minus062plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 011 minus003plusmn 006plusmn 005plusmn 010

Resonance Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 005 minus157plusmn 011plusmn 016plusmn 027Klowast(1410)0 018plusmn 007plusmn 010plusmn 011 minus054plusmn 021plusmn 055plusmn 104Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 009plusmn 010plusmn 014 127plusmn 095plusmn 104plusmn 081LASS nonresonant 046plusmn 014plusmn 016plusmn 029 179plusmn 065plusmn 035plusmn 069Klowast2(1430)0 057plusmn 005plusmn 004plusmn 008 minus216plusmn 019plusmn 043plusmn 043Dlowast0(2400)minus 091plusmn 007plusmn 006plusmn 017 minus264plusmn 015plusmn 014plusmn 023Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 053plusmn 007plusmn 004plusmn 014 240plusmn 027plusmn 024plusmn 044Dπ P-wave (EFF) 062plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 011 minus309plusmn 010plusmn 007plusmn 017

Table 8 Results for the fit fractions and their uncertainties () The three quoted errors arestatistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively Upper limits are givenat 90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Fit fraction Upper limitKlowast(892)0 374plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 17Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03plusmn 08plusmn 08 lt 32 (37)Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20plusmn 24plusmn 34LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38plusmn 38plusmn 67

LASS total 67plusmn 27plusmn 27plusmn 54Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17plusmn 11plusmn 20Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28plusmn 20plusmn 74Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12plusmn 11plusmn 12Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 10 (11)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14plusmn 12plusmn 37Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16plusmn 22plusmn 30

22

Table 9 Results for the product branching fractions The four quoted errors are statisticalexperimental systematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Product branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 342plusmn 013plusmn 010plusmn 016plusmn 040Klowast(1410)0 007plusmn 003plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 001 lt 029 (034)Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 018plusmn 022plusmn 031plusmn 005LASS nonresonant 044plusmn 034plusmn 034plusmn 061plusmn 005

LASS total 061plusmn 025plusmn 025plusmn 049plusmn 007Klowast2(1430)0 068plusmn 015plusmn 010plusmn 018plusmn 008Dlowast0(2400)minus 177plusmn 026plusmn 019plusmn 067plusmn 020Dlowast2(2460)minus 212plusmn 010plusmn 011plusmn 011plusmn 025Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 010 (011)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 060plusmn 013plusmn 011plusmn 034plusmn 007Dπ P-wave (EFF) 081plusmn 015plusmn 020plusmn 027plusmn 009

Table 10 Results for the branching fractions The four quoted errors are statistical experimentalsystematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at 90 (95 )confidence level

Resonance Branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 513plusmn 020plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 060Klowast(1410)0 159plusmn 068plusmn 181plusmn 159plusmn 036 lt 67 (78)Klowast0(1430)0 071plusmn 027plusmn 033plusmn 047plusmn 008LASS nonresonant 066plusmn 051plusmn 051plusmn 092plusmn 008

LASS total 092plusmn 038plusmn 038plusmn 074plusmn 011Klowast2(1430)0 204plusmn 045plusmn 030plusmn 054plusmn 025

The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus states are found to be

m(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (2360plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 28) MeV

Γ(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (255plusmn 26plusmn 20plusmn 47) MeV

m(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (24656plusmn 18plusmn 05plusmn 12) MeV

Γ(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (460plusmn 34plusmn 14plusmn 29) MeV

where the three uncertainties are statistical experimental systematic and model systematicrespectively These are consistent with though less precise than recent results from a DPanalysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] They also show good agreement with and havesimilar precision to earlier measurements of these quantities [1337]

In summary the first amplitude analysis of B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays has been presentedusing a data sample corresponding to 30 fbminus1 of pp collision data collected by the LHCbexperiment A good description of the data is obtained with a model containing contri-

23

butions from intermediate Klowast(892)0 Klowast(1410)0 Klowast2(1430)0 and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonanceswith additional components to describe broad structures in the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S-and P-waves The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances aremeasured as are the complex amplitudes and fit fractions for all components includedin the amplitude model The results can be used in conjunction with an analysis ofB0 rarr DK+πminus decays where the neutral D meson is reconstructed in final states such asK+Kminus to measure the CKM unitarity triangle parameter γ [1 2]

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to our colleagues in the CERN accelerator departments forthe excellent performance of the LHC We thank the technical and administrative staffat the LHCb institutes We acknowledge support from CERN and from the nationalagencies CAPES CNPq FAPERJ and FINEP (Brazil) NSFC (China) CNRSIN2P3(France) BMBF DFG HGF and MPG (Germany) INFN (Italy) FOM and NWO (TheNetherlands) MNiSW and NCN (Poland) MENIFA (Romania) MinES and FANO(Russia) MinECo (Spain) SNSF and SER (Switzerland) NASU (Ukraine) STFC (UnitedKingdom) NSF (USA) The Tier1 computing centres are supported by IN2P3 (France)KIT and BMBF (Germany) INFN (Italy) NWO and SURF (The Netherlands) PIC(Spain) GridPP (United Kingdom) We are indebted to the communities behind themultiple open source software packages on which we depend We are also thankful forthe computing resources and the access to software RampD tools provided by Yandex LLC(Russia) Individual groups or members have received support from EPLANET MarieSk lodowska-Curie Actions and ERC (European Union) Conseil general de Haute-SavoieLabex ENIGMASS and OCEVU Region Auvergne (France) RFBR (Russia) XuntaGaland GENCAT (Spain) Royal Society and Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851(United Kingdom)

24

Appendices

A Correlation matrices

The statistical correlations between the complex coefficients masses and widths determinedfrom the fit to data are given in terms of real and imaginary parts and in terms ofmagnitudes and phases in Tables 11 and 12 The correlations are determined using thesame sample of simulated pseudoexperiments used to calculate the statistical uncertaintieson fit parameters

B Results for interference fit fractions

The central values of the interference fit fractions are given in Table 13 The statisti-cal experimental systematic and model uncertainties on these quantities are given inTables 14 15 and 16

25

Tab

le11

Sta

tist

ical

corr

elat

ions

bet

wee

nth

ere

al(x

)an

dim

agin

ary

(y)

par

tsof

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

x0

y 0x

1y 1

x2

y 2x

3y 3

x4

y 4x

5y 5

x7

y 7x

8y 8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

x0

100

014

002

017minus

018

015minus

017

003

039minus

037

016minus

009minus

018minus

029

007minus

037minus

019

002

004

012

y 01

00minus

006minus

008

009minus

011minus

000

014

003

003

012

013minus

012minus

024

035minus

007

009

012

001minus

004

x1

100minus

009minus

008minus

014minus

004

029minus

001

003minus

020

018minus

021minus

031minus

017minus

036minus

008minus

017minus

023

002

y 11

000

050

340

09minus

001

060minus

039

002minus

003minus

003

007minus

002minus

004minus

016minus

002

007

002

x2

100minus

013

081

009

014minus

016minus

015

021

010

013

004minus

015minus

007

001minus

025

001

y 21

000

080

280

24minus

036minus

013

008minus

004minus

001minus

004

004minus

002minus

001minus

009minus

010

x3

100

020

013minus

034minus

010

033minus

008

008minus

004minus

005minus

007minus

003minus

033minus

009

y 31

00minus

012minus

012minus

051

029minus

034minus

053

009minus

012

009minus

014minus

036

001

x4

100minus

053

032minus

010minus

020

003

002minus

027minus

017minus

006

010minus

000

y 41

000

06minus

009

040

010

014

016

011minus

005

007minus

003

x5

100minus

029minus

003

022

002

004minus

008

002

045minus

006

y 51

00minus

031minus

034

006

003

024minus

014minus

072minus

033

x7

100

046

005

010minus

011minus

001

027

017

y 71

00minus

016

036minus

001

017

032

008

x8

100minus

003

001minus

006minus

009minus

014

y 81

000

290

020

15minus

002

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

26

Tab

le12

S

tati

stic

alco

rrel

atio

ns

bet

wee

nth

em

agnit

ud

es(a

)an

dp

has

es(∆

)of

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

a0

∆0

a1

∆1

a2

∆2

a3

∆3

a4

∆4

a5

∆5

a7

∆7

a8

∆8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

a0

100minus

011minus

008

005

024

003minus

014

004

004

001

021

002

022minus

022

038minus

000minus

004minus

009minus

001

004

∆0

100minus

010

012

003

020

014

014minus

001

045minus

005

010minus

008

035minus

007

005minus

022

006

007

009

a1

100minus

035minus

025

006

032

001minus

001minus

038

004minus

022minus

006

031

002

024

007minus

018minus

020

001

∆1

100

024

015

016

000

014

038minus

018minus

013

016

026

022minus

006minus

009minus

004minus

012

005

a2

100

004

011minus

028minus

007

039minus

009

007

027

010

001

001minus

015

004minus

003minus

013

∆2

100

015

077minus

020minus

010minus

001

024

009

013

003minus

009

005

001

023minus

010

a3

100minus

006

000minus

011

016minus

030minus

012

056

001

012

002minus

007minus

027minus

004

∆3

100minus

028minus

019

015

041minus

024minus

008minus

000minus

013

004

002

041

008

a4

100

013

005minus

017

014

018minus

000

006

000

014minus

019minus

009

∆4

100minus

016

016

017

012

000minus

002minus

019minus

003

003

001

a5

100

024minus

026minus

006

011

005minus

007

001

019

039

∆5

100minus

000minus

028minus

001minus

020minus

020

015

076

027

a7

100minus

001

017minus

006

004

013minus

005minus

024

∆7

100minus

012

037

003minus

000minus

027minus

012

a8

100minus

004minus

001

004

006

015

∆8

100minus

037minus

002minus

033minus

001

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

27

Table 13 Interference fit fractions () from the nominal DP fit The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 374 18 minus00 00 00 minus24 minus02 minus26 minus50A1 07 minus00 00 00 minus11 minus03 minus06 minus11A2 51 minus32 minus00 29 15 16 19A3 48 00 minus84 01 21 02A4 74 minus03 minus10 minus15 minus04A5 193 minus00 28 00A6 231 minus00 00A7 66 minus00A8 89

Table 14 Statistical uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes areall pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASSnonresonant (A4) Klowast2 (1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8)Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 15 07 00 00 00 09 04 04 05A1 03 00 00 00 07 03 04 05A2 20 26 00 11 05 15 05A3 38 00 32 04 34 08A4 17 06 01 06 05A5 28 00 31 00A6 12 00 00A7 14 00A8 16

28

Table 15 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () Theamplitudes are all pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0 (1430)0(A3) LASS nonresonant (A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave(dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fitfractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 12 05 00 00 00 23 02 04 05A1 08 00 00 00 04 08 07 09A2 24 31 00 14 20 26 11A3 38 00 36 02 26 03A4 11 22 02 05 10A5 20 00 40 00A6 11 00 00A7 12 00A8 22

Table 16 Model uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 17 08 00 00 00 26 07 08 14A1 08 00 00 00 08 06 08 11A2 34 29 00 58 17 36 27A3 66 00 83 03 35 07A4 20 17 02 12 10A5 74 00 45 00A6 12 00 00A7 37 00A8 29

29

References

[1] T Gershon On the measurement of the unitarity triangle angle γ from B0 rarr DKlowast0

decays Phys Rev D79 (2009) 051301(R) arXiv08102706

[2] T Gershon and M Williams Prospects for the measurement of the unitaritytriangle angle γ from B0 rarr DK+πminus decays Phys Rev D80 (2009) 092002arXiv09091495

[3] N Cabibbo Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays Phys Rev Lett 10 (1963) 531

[4] M Kobayashi and T Maskawa CP -violation in the renormalizable theory of weakinteraction Progress of Theoretical Physics 49 (1973) 652

[5] M Gronau and D London How to determine all the angles of the unitarity trianglefrom B0 rarr DK0

S and B0s rarr Dφ Phys Lett B253 (1991) 483

[6] M Gronau and D Wyler On determining a weak phase from CP asymmetries incharged B decays Phys Lett B265 (1991) 172

[7] I Dunietz CP violation with self-tagging Bd modes Phys Lett B270 (1991) 75

[8] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurement of CP violation parameters inB0 rarr DKlowast0 decays Phys Rev D90 (2014) 112002 arXiv14078136

[9] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of overlapping spin-1 and spin-

3 D0Kminus resonances at mass 286 GeVc2 Phys Rev Lett 113 (2014) 162001

arXiv14077574

[10] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ decays

Phys Rev D90 (2014) 072003 arXiv14077712

[11] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observation and amplitude analysis of theBminus rarr D+Kminusπminus decay Phys Rev D91 (2015) 092002 arXiv150302995

[12] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays

arXiv150501710 submitted to Phys Rev D

[13] Belle collaboration A Kuzmin et al Study of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays Phys RevD76 (2007) 012006 arXivhep-ex0611054

[14] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of branching fractions andresonance contributions for B0 rarr D0K+πminus and search for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decaysPhys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 011803 arXivhep-ex0509036

[15] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurements of the branching fractions of

the decays B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ and B0 rarr D

0K+πminus Phys Rev D87 (2013) 112009

arXiv13046317

30

[16] Belle collaboration P Krokovny et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K0 and B0 rarr D0Klowast0

decays Phys Rev Lett 90 (2003) 141802 arXivhep-ex0212066

[17] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of B0 rarr D(lowast)0K(lowast)0 branchingfractions Phys Rev D74 (2006) 031101 arXivhep-ex0604016

[18] LHCb collaboration A A Alves Jr et al The LHCb detector at the LHC JINST 3(2008) S08005

[19] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al LHCb detector performance Int J Mod PhysA30 (2015) 1530022 arXiv14126352

[20] R Aaij et al Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator JINST 9 (2014) P09007arXiv14057808

[21] R Arink et al Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker JINST 9 (2014) P01002arXiv13113893

[22] M Adinolfi et al Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Eur PhysJ C73 (2013) 2431 arXiv12116759

[23] A A Alves Jr et al Performance of the LHCb muon system JINST 8 (2013) P02022arXiv12111346

[24] R Aaij et al The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011 JINST 8 (2013) P04022arXiv12113055

[25] V V Gligorov and M Williams Efficient reliable and fast high-level triggering usinga bonsai boosted decision tree JINST 8 (2013) P02013 arXiv12106861

[26] T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P Skands PYTHIA 64 physics and manual JHEP05 (2006) 026 arXivhep-ph0603175 T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P SkandsA brief introduction to PYTHIA 81 Comput Phys Commun 178 (2008) 852arXiv07103820

[27] I Belyaev et al Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss the LHCbsimulation framework J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032047

[28] D J Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package Nucl Instrum MethA462 (2001) 152

[29] P Golonka and Z Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo A precision tool for QED correctionsin Z and W decays Eur Phys J C45 (2006) 97 arXivhep-ph0506026

[30] Geant4 collaboration J Allison et al Geant4 developments and applications IEEETrans Nucl Sci 53 (2006) 270 Geant4 collaboration S Agostinelli et al Geant4A simulation toolkit Nucl Instrum Meth A506 (2003) 250

31

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 2: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

ii

1 Introduction

Dalitz plot (DP) analysis of B0 rarr DK+πminus decays has been proposed as a way to measurethe unitarity triangle angle γ [1 2] The sensitivity to γ equiv arg [minusVudV lowastub(VcdV lowastcb)] whereVxy are elements of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) quark mixing matrix [3 4]originates from the interference of b rarr cus and b rarr ucs amplitudes Such interferenceoccurs when the neutral D meson is reconstructed in a final state that is accessible to bothD0 and D0 decays and therefore corresponds to an admixture of the two states [5 6] Oneof the largest components of the B0 rarr DK+πminus final state is B0 rarr DKlowast(892)0 for whichboth brarr cus and brarr ucs amplitudes are colour suppressed making them comparablein magnitude and potentially enhancing CP violation effects [7] Decay diagrams for thequasi-two-body contributions from B0 rarr DKlowast(892)0 and B0 rarr Dlowast2(2460)minusK+ decaysare shown in Fig 1 Observables sensitive to γ have been measured by LHCb with aquasi-two-body approach [8] but a DP analysis is expected to be more sensitive becauseinterference between resonances provides the possibility to resolve ambiguities in thedetermination of γ

In order to determine γ with this method it is necessary to have an amplitude modelof the B0 rarr D0K+πminus decay that proceeds through the favoured brarr cus transition Thiscan be achieved by reconstructing the D0 meson through the K+πminus decay in this waythe contribution from the b rarr cus amplitude is dominant and effects due to b rarr ucsamplitudes can be neglected While the analysis of this decay chain is not itself sensitive toγ its outcome will be an integral part of a future analysis using for example D rarr K+Kminus

decays where CP violation effects are expected as the final state is common to both D0

and D0 decaysDalitz plot analyses of B meson decays to final states containing a charmed meson and

two charged particles (either pions or kaons) also provide opportunities for studies of thespectroscopy of charmed mesons Results in this area have recently been obtained from DPanalyses of B0

s rarr D0Kminusπ+ [9 10] B+ rarr DminusK+π+ [11] and B0 rarr D0π+πminus [12] decaysall from LHCb As the branching fraction for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays is smaller than thatfor B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays the analysis presented in this paper is not as sensitive to theparameters of charm resonances as that of Ref [12] However the much larger sample of B

0B

b

d0(892)K

s

d

0D

c

u+W

(a)

0Bb

d

-(2460)2Dc

d

+Ks

u+W

(b)

Figure 1 Decay diagrams for the quasi-two-body contributions to B0 rarr DK+πminus from (a)B0 rarr DKlowast(892)0 and (b) B0 rarr Dlowast2(2460)minusK+ decays

1

mesons available at LHCb compared to that used in the only other published DP analysisof B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays from the Belle collaboration [13] allows useful results on excitedcharm mesons to be obtained Moreover results on charm meson spectroscopy obtainedfrom DP analysis of B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays provide important independent cross-checksof results from studies of the B0 rarr D0π+πminus DP as possible biases due to other structuresin the Dalitz plots are different between the two modes

In this paper an amplitude analysis of the B0 rarr D0K+πminus decay is reported Theinclusion of charge-conjugate processes is implied throughout the paper The analysisis based on a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 30 fbminus1 of ppcollision data collected with the LHCb detector in 2011 and 2012 when the collisioncentre-of-mass energy was

radics = 7 TeV (10 fbminus1) and

radics = 8 TeV (20 fbminus1) respectively

Previously the branching fraction for the three-body decay has been measured [14 15]and the B0 rarr D0Klowast(892)0 [16 17] and B0 rarr Dlowast2(2460)minusK+ [14] contributions have beenmeasured using quasi-two-body approaches however this is the first DP analysis of theB0 rarr D0K+πminus decay

The paper is organised as follows A description of the LHCb detector reconstructionand simulation software is given in Sec 2 The selection of signal candidates is describedin Sec 3 and the determination of signal and background yields is presented in Sec 4An overview of the Dalitz plot analysis formalism is given in Sec 5 and details of theimplementation of the amplitude analysis are presented in Sec 6 The evaluation ofsystematic uncertainties is described in Sec 7 with results and a brief summary given inSec 8

2 LHCb detector and software

The LHCb detector [1819] is a single-arm forward spectrometer covering the pseudorapidityrange 2 lt η lt 5 designed for the study of particles containing b or c quarks The detectorincludes a high-precision tracking system consisting of a silicon-strip vertex detector [20]surrounding the pp interaction region a large-area silicon-strip detector located upstreamof a dipole magnet with a bending power of about 4 Tm and three stations of silicon-stripdetectors and straw drift tubes [21] placed downstream of the magnet The polarity ofthe dipole magnet is reversed periodically throughout data-taking The tracking systemprovides a measurement of momentum p of charged particles with a relative uncertaintythat varies from 05 at low momentum to 10 at 200 GeV (natural units with c = ~ = 1are used) The minimum distance of a track to a primary vertex the impact parameter(IP) is measured with a resolution of (15 + 29pT)microm where pT is the component ofthe momentum transverse to the beam in GeV Different types of charged hadronsare distinguished using information from two ring-imaging Cherenkov detectors [22]Photon electron and hadron candidates are identified by a calorimeter system consisting ofscintillating-pad and preshower detectors an electromagnetic calorimeter and a hadroniccalorimeter Muons are identified by a system composed of alternating layers of iron andmultiwire proportional chambers [23]

2

The trigger [24] consists of a hardware stage based on information from the calorimeterand muon systems followed by a software stage in which all tracks with pT gt 500 (300) MeVare reconstructed for data collected in 2011 (2012) The software trigger used in thisanalysis requires a two- three- or four-track secondary vertex with significant displacementfrom any primary pp interaction vertex (PV) At least one charged particle must havepT gt 17 GeV and be inconsistent with originating from a PV A multivariate algorithm [25]is used for the identification of secondary vertices consistent with the decay of a b hadron

In the offline selection the objects that prompted a positive trigger decision areassociated with reconstructed particles Selection requirements can therefore be made notonly on whether the hardware trigger decision was due to a signature in the calorimetersor in the muon system but on whether the decision was due to the signal candidate otherparticles produced in the pp collision or a combination of both Signal candidates areaccepted offline if at least one of the final-state particles created a cluster in the hadroniccalorimeter with sufficient transverse energy to fire the hardware trigger Events that aretriggered at the hardware level by another particle in the event are also retained Afterall selection requirements are imposed 67 of events in the sample were triggered bythe decay products of the signal candidate while the remainder were triggered only byanother particle in the event

Simulated events are used to characterise the detector response to signal and certaintypes of background events In the simulation pp collisions are generated using Pythia [26]with a specific LHCb configuration [27] Decays of hadronic particles are describedby EvtGen [28] in which final-state radiation is generated using Photos [29] Theinteraction of the generated particles with the detector and its response are implementedusing the Geant4 toolkit [30] as described in Ref [31]

3 Selection requirements

The selection requirements follow closely those used in Ref [10] The more copiousB0 rarr D0π+πminus decay is topologically and kinematically similar to the B0 rarr D0K+πminus

channel allowing it to be used as a control mode to optimise the selection requirementsLoose initial requirements are used to obtain a visible signal peak of D0π+πminus candidatesThe tracks are required to be of good quality and must be above thresholds in p pT andχ2

IP where χ2IP is defined as the difference in χ2 of a given PV reconstructed with and

without the considered particle The D0 rarr K+πminus candidate must satisfy criteria on itsvertex quality (χ2

vtx) and flight distance from any PV and from the B candidate vertexand must have invariant mass m(K+πminus) in the range 1814ndash1914 MeV A requirementon the output of a boosted decision tree that identifies D0 rarr K+πminus decays originatingfrom b hadron decays (D0 BDT) [32 33] is also applied Candidate B mesons are selectedwith requirements on invariant mass χ2

IP and on the cosine of the angle between the Bmomentum vector and the line from the PV under consideration to the B vertex (cos θdir)A requirement is placed on the χ2 of a kinematic fit [34] to the candidatersquos decay chain inwhich the D0 mass is constrained to its nominal value The four final-state tracks must

3

satisfy pion and kaon particle identification (PID) criteriaA neural network [35] is used to discriminate between signal decays and combinatorial

background The sPlot technique [36] with the B candidate mass as the discriminatingvariable is used to separate statistically B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays from background Thesignal and background weights returned by this method are applied to the candidateswhich are then used to train the network The network is trained using 16 variables Theyinclude the χ2

IP of the four final-state tracks and the following variables associated tothe D0 candidate χ2

IP χ2vtx the square of the flight distance from the PV divided by

its uncertainty squared (χ2flight) cos θdir and the output of the D0 BDT In addition the

following variables associated to the B candidate are included pT χ2IP χ2

vtx χ2flight and

cos θdir The pT asymmetry [10] and track multiplicity in a cone with half-angle of 15units of the plane of pseudorapidity and azimuthal angle (measured in radians) aroundthe B candidate flight direction which contain information about the isolation of the Bcandidate from the rest of the event are also used The input quantities to the neuralnetwork depend only weakly on the position of the candidate in the B decay Dalitz plotand therefore any requirement on the network output cannot appreciably bias the DPdistribution A requirement imposed on the network output reduces the combinatorialbackground remaining after the initial selection by a factor of five while retaining morethan 90 of the signal

The B0 rarr D0K+πminus candidates must satisfy the same selection as the B0 rarr D0π+πminus

decays except for the PID requirement on the positively charged track from the B decayvertex which is imposed to preferentially select kaons rather than pions The PID efficiencyis evaluated from calibration samples of D0 rarr Kminusπ+ decays from the Dlowast+ rarr D0π+ decaychain The kinematics of this decay chain can be exploited to obtain clean samples withoutusing the PID information [22] The PID efficiency of the requirements on the four tracksin the final state is around 50 and varies depending on the kinematics of the tracks asdescribed in detail in Sec 61

Candidates are vetoed when the difference between m(K+πminusπminus) and m(K+πminus) lieswithin plusmn25 MeV of the known Dlowast(2010)minusndashD0 mass difference [37] to remove backgroundcontaining Dlowastminus rarr D0πminus decays Candidates are also rejected if a similar mass differencecalculated with the pion mass hypothesis applied to the bachelor kaon satisfies the samecriterion To reject backgrounds from B0 rarr DminusK+ Dminus rarr K+πminusπminus decays it is requiredthat the combination of the pion from the D0 candidate together with the two bachelorparticles does not have an invariant mass in the range 1850ndash1890 MeV Additionallycandidates are removed if the pion and kaon originating directly from the B0 decaycombine to give an invariant mass consistent with that of the D0 meson (1835ndash1880 MeV)This removes candidates with the D0 wrongly reconstructed as well as potential backgroundfrom B0 rarr D0D0 decays Other incorrectly reconstructed candidates are removed byvetoing candidates where the pion from the D0 decay and the kaon originating directlyfrom the B0 decay give an invariant mass in the range 1850ndash1885 MeV At least one ofthe pion candidates is required to have no associated hits in the muon system to removepotential background from B0 rarr JψKlowast0 decays Charmless decays of b hadrons aresuppressed by the use of the D0 BDT and further reduced to a negligible level by requiring

4

that the D0 candidate vertex is separated from the B0 decay vertex by at least 1 mmSignal candidates are retained for further analysis if they have invariant mass in the

range 5100ndash5900 MeV After all selection requirements are applied fewer than 1 ofselected events also contain a second candidate Such multiple candidates are retained andtreated in the same manner as other candidates the associated systematic uncertainty isnegligible

4 Determination of signal and background yields

The signal and background yields are determined from an extended maximum likelihoodfit to the B candidate invariant mass distribution The fit allows for signal decayscombinatorial background and contributions from other b hadron decays The decay chainB0 rarr Dlowast0K+πminus with Dlowast0 rarr D0γ or D0π0 forms a partially reconstructed backgroundthat peaks at low B candidate mass as the neutral particle is not included in the candidateMisidentified B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus Λ0

b rarr D(lowast)0K+p and B0(s) rarr D(lowast)0K+Kminus decays are found

to contribute to the background A possible contribution from the highly suppressedB0s rarr D0K+πminus decay mode is also included in the fit

The signal peak is modelled with the sum of two Crystal Ball [38] functions whichhave tails on opposite sides and which share a common mean The tail parameters arefixed to the values found in fits to simulated signal decays The relative normalisationand the ratio of widths of the two functions are constrained within uncertainties tothe values determined in a fit to B0 rarr D0π+πminus data The B0

s rarr D0K+πminus shape ismodelled identically to the signal peak with the difference between the B0 and B0

s masspeak positions fixed to its known value [37] An exponential shape is used to model thecombinatorial background

Misidentified and partially reconstructed backgrounds are modelled with smoothednon-parametric functions Simulated samples are used to obtain the shape for B0 rarrDlowast0K+πminus decays with the Dlowast0 rarr D0γ and D0π0 contributions generated in the correctproportions [37] To account for differences between simulation and data for examplein the polarisation of the Dlowast0 meson the B candidate invariant mass distribution forpartially reconstructed B0 rarr Dlowast0K+πminus decays is allowed to be shifted by an offset thatis a free parameter of the fit The misidentified background shapes are also obtainedfrom simulated samples For B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays the D0 and Dlowast0 contributions arecombined according to their relative branching fractions [37] The backgrounds fromΛ0b rarr D(lowast)0K+p and B0

(s) rarr D(lowast)0K+Kminus decays are assumed to have equal branching

fractions for the decays with D0 and Dlowast0 mesons in the final state as the decays involvingDlowast0 mesons have not yet been measured The simulated samples are reweighted accordingto the relevant particle identification and misidentification probabilities and to match knownDP distributions [1239ndash41] The (mis)identification probabilities take account of trackkinematics and are calculated using calibration samples of Dlowast+ rarr D0π+ D0 rarr Kminusπ+

and Λrarr pπminus decays [1922] The yields of the misidentified backgrounds relative to thesignal are constrained within uncertainties to their expected values based on their known

5

Table 1 Yields from the fit to the D0K+πminus data sample The full mass range is 5100ndash5900 MeVand the signal region is 524855ndash530905 MeV

Component Full mass range Signal region

B0 rarr D0K+πminus 2576plusmn 72 2344plusmn 66B0s rarr D0K+πminus 55plusmn 27 1plusmn 1

comb bkgd 5540plusmn 187 684plusmn 23B0 rarr Dlowast0K+πminus 1750plusmn 99 6plusmn 1B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus 485plusmn 47 51plusmn 5Λ0b rarr D(lowast)0K+p 95plusmn 26 18plusmn 5

B0 rarr D(lowast)0K+Kminus 127plusmn 27 10plusmn 2B0s rarr D(lowast)0K+Kminus 54plusmn 18 14plusmn 5

) [MeV]-π+K0

D(m5200 5400 5600 5800

Can

dida

tes

8 M

eV

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700 LHCb (a)Data

Total fitminusπ+K

0D rarr (s)

0B

Combinatorial bkgminusπ+K 0D rarr 0Bminusπ+π( )0D rarr 0B

p+K( )0D rarr 0bΛ

minusK+K( )0D rarr (s)0B

) [MeV]-π+K0

D(m5200 5400 5600 5800

Can

dida

tes

8 M

eV

1

10

210

310(b)LHCb

Figure 2 Results of the fit to the B candidate invariant mass distribution with (a) linear and(b) logarithmic y-axis scales The components are as described in the legend

branching fractions [123940] and misidentification probabilitiesThere are 14 free parameters in the fit model the mean and width of the signal shape

the relative normalisation and relative width of the two Crystal Ball functions the slopeof the exponential function the offset of the B0 rarr Dlowast0K+πminus shape and the yields of theeight contributions The result of the fit is shown in Fig 2 and the yields are summarisedin Table 1 The yields are also reported within the signal region used in the Dalitz plotfit corresponding to plusmn25 widths of the B0 signal shape (524855ndash530905 MeV) Thedistribution of candidates in the signal region over the Dalitz plot is shown in Fig 3(a)Note that a B0 mass constraint is applied to calculate the variables that are used todescribe the Dalitz plot [42] improving the resolution of those variables and giving aunique kinematic boundary

6

]2) [GeVminusπ0D(2m

5 10 15 20

]2)

[GeV

minus π+K(2

m

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

(a)LHCb

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

091

(b)LHCb

Figure 3 Distribution of B0 rarr D0K+πminus candidates in the signal region over (a) the Dalitz plotand (b) the square Dalitz plot The definition of the square Dalitz plot is given in Sec 61

5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism

In B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays resonances are expected in the m2(D0πminus) and m2(K+πminus)combinations so the Dalitz plot shown in Fig 3(a) is defined in terms of these twoinvariant mass squared terms For a fixed B0 mass these two invariant mass squaredcombinations can be used to calculate all other relevant kinematic quantities

The isobar model [43ndash45] is used to describe the complex decay amplitude The totalamplitude is given by the coherent sum of amplitudes from resonant and nonresonantintermediate contributions and is given by

A(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)=

Nsumj=1

cjFj(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

) (1)

where cj are complex coefficients describing the relative contribution for each intermediateprocess The resonant dynamics are contained in the Fj

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)terms

that are normalised such that the integral of the squared magnitude over the DP is unityfor each term For a D0πminus resonance Fj

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)is given by

F(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)= R

(m(D0πminus)

)timesX(|~p | rBW)timesX(|~q | rBW)times T (~p ~q ) (2)

where ~p is the bachelor particle momentum and ~q is the momentum of one of the resonancedaughters both evaluated in the D0πminus rest frame The functions R X and T are describedbelow

The X(z) terms are BlattndashWeisskopf barrier factors [46] where z = |~q | rBW or |~p | rBW

and rBW is the barrier radius which is set to 40 GeVminus1 asymp 08 fm [10] for all resonances

7

The barrier factors are angular momentum dependent and are given by

L = 0 X(z) = 1

L = 1 X(z) =radic

1+z201+z2

L = 2 X(z) =radic

z40+3z20+9

z4+3z2+9

L = 3 X(z) =radic

z60+6z40+45z20+225

z6+6z4+45z2+225

(3)

where z0 is the value of z at the pole mass of the resonance and L is the orbital angularmomentum between the resonance and the bachelor particle Since the parent and daughterparticles all have zero spin L is also the spin of the resonance

The T (~p ~q) terms describe the angular distributions in the Zemach tensor formalism [4748] and are given by

L = 0 T (~p ~q) = 1 L = 1 T (~p ~q) = minus 2 ~p middot ~q L = 2 T (~p ~q) = 4

3[3(~p middot ~q )2 minus (|~p ||~q |)2]

L = 3 T (~p ~q) = minus 2415

[5(~p middot ~q )3 minus 3(~p middot ~q )(|~p ||~q |)2]

(4)

These expressions are proportional to the Legendre polynomials PL(x) where x is thecosine of the angle between ~p and ~q (referred to as the helicity angle)

The R(m(D0πminus)

)functions are the mass lineshapes Resonant contributions are

typically described by the relativistic BreitndashWigner (RBW) function

R(m) =1

(m20 minusm2)minus im0Γ(m)

(5)

where the mass-dependent decay width is

Γ(m) = Γ0

(q

q0

)2L+1 (m0

m

)X2(q rBW) (6)

where q0 is the value of q = |~q | when the invariant mass is equal to the pole mass of theresonance m0

The large phase space available in B decays allows for the presence of nonresonantamplitudes (ie contributions that do not proceed via a known resonance) that vary acrossthe Dalitz plot An exponential form factor (EFF) has been found to describe nonresonantcontributions well in several DP analyses of B decays [49]

R(m) = exp[minusαm2

] (7)

where α is a shape parameter that must be determined from the data and m is a two-bodyinvariant mass (m(D0πminus) in this example)

The RBW function is a good model for narrow resonances that are well separated fromany other resonant or nonresonant contribution of the same spin This approach is known

8

to break down in the Kπ S-wave because the Klowast0(1430) resonance interferes strongly witha slowly varying nonresonant term as described in Ref [50] The LASS lineshape [51] hasbeen developed to combine these two contributions

R(m) =m

q cot δB minus iq+ exp [2iδB]

m0Γ0m0

q0

(m20 minusm2)minus im0Γ0

qmm0

q0

(8)

where cot δB =1

aq+

1

2rq (9)

and where m0 and Γ0 are the pole mass and width of the Klowast0(1430) state and a and r areshape parameters

The Dπ S-wave nonresonant contribution can be described by the ldquodabbardquo line-shape [52] defined as

R(m) =Bprime(m2)(m2 minus sA)ρ

1minus β(m2 minusm2min)minus iBprime(m2)(m2 minus sA)ρ

(10)

whereBprime(m2) = b exp

[minusα(m2 minusm2

min)] (11)

Here mmin is the invariant mass at threshold sA = m2D minus 05m2

π is the Adler zero ρ isa phase-space factor and b α and β are parameters with values fixed to 2449 GeVminus201 GeVminus2 and 01 GeVminus2 respectively according to Ref [52]

Ignoring reconstruction and selection effects the DP probability density function wouldbe

Pphys

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)=

|A(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)|2intint

DP|A|2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)

(12)

where the dependence of A on the DP position has been suppressed in the denominator forbrevity The primary results of most Dalitz plot analyses are the complex coefficients asdefined in Eq (1) These however depend on the choice of phase convention amplitudeformalism and normalisation used in each analysis The convention-independent quantitiesof fit fractions and interference fit fractions provide a way to reliably compare resultsbetween different analyses Fit fractions are defined as the integral of the amplitude foreach intermediate component squared divided by that of the coherent matrix elementsquared for all intermediate contributions

FF j =

intintDP

∣∣cjFj (m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus))∣∣2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)intint

DP|A|2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)

(13)

The fit fractions need not sum to unity due to possible net constructive or destructiveinterference described by interference fit fractions defined (for i lt j only) by

FF ij =

intintDP

2Re[ciclowastjFiF

lowastj

]dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)intint

DP|A|2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)

(14)

where the dependence of F(lowast)i and A on the DP position has been omitted

9

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

Eff

icie

ncy

()

0

005

01

015

02

025(a)LHCb Simulation

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

Eff

icie

ncy

()

0

005

01

015

02

025(b)LHCb Simulation

Figure 4 Efficiency variation as a function of SDP position for candidates triggered by (a) signaldecay products and (b) by the rest of the event The vertical white stripe is due to the Dlowast vetoand the curved white band is due to the D0 veto

6 Dalitz plot fit

61 Signal efficiency

The variation of the efficiency across the phase space is studied in terms of the squareDalitz plot (SDP) The SDP is defined by variables mprime and θprime that range between 0 and 1and are given for the D0K+πminus case by

mprime equiv 1

πarccos

(2m(D0πminus)minusmmin

D0πminus

mmaxD0πminus minusmmin

D0πminus

minus 1

)and θprime equiv 1

πθ(D0πminus) (15)

where mmaxD0πminus = mB0 minusmK+ and mmin

D0πminus = mD0 + mπminus are the kinematic boundaries of

m(D0πminus) allowed in the B0 rarr D0K+πminus decay and θ(D0πminus) is the helicity angle of theD0πminus system (the angle between the K+ and the D0 meson in the D0πminus rest frame) Thedistribution of selected events across the SDP is shown in Fig 3(b)

Efficiency variation across the SDP is caused by the detector acceptance and bytrigger selection and PID requirements The efficiency is evaluated with simulated samplesgenerated uniformly over the SDP Data-driven corrections are applied to correct for knowndifferences between data and simulation in the tracking trigger and PID efficiencies usingidentical methods to those described in Ref [10] The efficiency functions are obtainedby fitting the corrected simulation with two-dimensional cubic splines Figure 4 showsthe histograms used to model the variation of the efficiency over the SDP for candidatestriggered by (a) signal decays and (b) by the rest of the event

62 Background studies

Among the background yields in the signal region given in Table 1 the only sizeablecomponents are due to combinatorial background and B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays The SDP

10

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

0

0002

0004

0006

0008

001

0012

0014

(a)LHCb

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

000020004000600080010012001400160018

(b)LHCb Simulation

Figure 5 SDP distributions of the background contributions from (a) combinatorial backgroundand (b) B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays

distributions of these backgrounds are described by the histograms shown in Fig 5Combinatorial background contributes 22 of candidates in the signal region The

shape of this contribution over the SDP is obtained from the high B mass sideband (5400ndash5900 MeV) As seen in Fig 2 this sideband is dominated by combinatorial backgroundwith a small contribution from B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays The SDP distribution of theB0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus contribution in the sideband region is modelled as described belowfor the signal region and is subtracted from the sideband sample To check that theSDP shape of the combinatorial background does not vary with the B candidate massa sample of doubly charged D0Kplusmnπplusmn candidates is investigated This confirms that theSDP distribution from the sideband is a reliable model for combinatorial background inthe signal region

The B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus contribution accounts for 16 of the candidates in the signalregion Its SDP distribution is obtained from a simulated sample with the B0 rarr D0π+πminus

and B0 rarr Dlowast0π+πminus contributions combined and reweighted as described in Sec 4 TheB0 rarr D0π+πminus decay mode is the dominant component of this background in the signalregion

Due to resolution effects B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ Dlowast(2010)minus rarr D0πminus decays are notentirely removed by the Dlowast veto Although this component corresponds to real B0 rarrD0πminusK+ decays it is treated as incoherent (ie as background) since its interference withthe remainder of the signal is negligible Its SDP distribution is modelled as a Gaussianpeak in m(D0πminus) with mean fixed to the known Dlowast(2010)minus mass and width and yielddetermined in the fit to data

11

Table 2 Signal contributions to the fit model where parameters and uncertainties are takenfrom Ref [37] The models are described in Sec 5

Resonance Spin DP axis Model Parameters

Klowast(892)0 1 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 89581plusmn 019 MeV Γ0 = 474plusmn 06 MeVKlowast(1410)0 1 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 1414plusmn 15 MeV Γ0 = 232plusmn 21 MeVKlowast0(1430)0 0 m2(K+πminus) LASS Determined from data (see text)Klowast2(1430)0 2 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 14324plusmn 13 MeV Γ0 = 109plusmn 5 MeVDlowast0(2400)minus 0 m2(D0πminus) RBW

Determined from data (see Table 3)Dlowast2(2460)minus 2 m2(D0πminus) RBW

Nonresonant 0 m2(D0πminus) dabba Fixed (see text)Nonresonant 1 m2(D0πminus) EFF Determined from data (see text)

63 Amplitude model for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays

The Dalitz plot fit is performed using the Laura++ [53] package The likelihood functionis given by

L =Ncprodi

[sumk

NkPk(m2i (D

0πminus)m2i (K

+πminus)) ]

(16)

where the index i runs over Nc candidates k runs over the signal and backgroundcomponents and Nk is the yield in each component The probability density function forthe signal component Psig is given by Eq (12) with the |A

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)|2

terms multiplied by the efficiency function described in Sec 61 As it is possible forthe minimisation procedure to find a local minimum of the negative log likelihood (NLL)profile the fit is repeated many times with randomised initial values to ensure the globalminimum is found

The nominal Dalitz plot fit model for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays is composed of severalresonant and nonresonant amplitudes Only those amplitudes that provide significantcontributions or that aid the fit stability are included Unnatural spin-parity states arenot considered as these do not decay to two pseudoscalars The eight amplitudes includedin this model are listed in Table 2 The width of the narrowest signal contribution tothe Dalitz plot (sim 50 MeV) is far larger than the mass resolution (sim 24 MeV) thereforeresolution effects are neglected

The real and imaginary parts of the complex coefficients cj defined in Eq (1) are freeparameters of the fit except for the coefficient of the Dlowast2(2460)minus component which is fixedto 1 as a reference The phases and magnitudes of the complex coefficients as well as fitfractions and interference fit fractions are derived from these free parameters In additionthe masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances are determined fromthe fit to data and are reported in Table 3 The statistical uncertainties on all parametersof interest are calculated using large samples of simulated pseudoexperiments Thesepseudoexperiments are also used to determine the correlations between the statisticaluncertainties on the parameters which are given in Appendix A The LASS parameters

12

Table 3 Masses and widths (MeV) determined in the fit to data with statistical uncertaintiesonly

Resonance Mass Width

Dlowast0(2400)minus 2360plusmn 15 255plusmn 26Dlowast2(2460)minus 24656plusmn 18 460plusmn 34

Table 4 Complex coefficients and fit fractions determined from the Dalitz plot fit Uncertaintiesare statistical only Note that the fit fractions magnitudes and phases are derived quantities

Resonance Fit fraction Isobar model coefficients() Real part Imaginary part Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 minus000plusmn 015 minus127plusmn 006 127plusmn 006 minus157plusmn 011Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 015plusmn 006 minus009plusmn 009 018plusmn 007 minus054plusmn 021Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 014plusmn 038 045plusmn 015 047plusmn 009 127plusmn 095LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 minus010plusmn 024 044plusmn 014 046plusmn 014 179plusmn 065

LASS total 67plusmn 27Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 minus032plusmn 009 minus047plusmn 007 057plusmn 005 minus216plusmn 019Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 minus080plusmn 008 minus044plusmn 014 091plusmn 007 minus264plusmn 015Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 100 000 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 minus039plusmn 009 036plusmn 017 053plusmn 007 240plusmn 027Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 minus062plusmn 006 minus003plusmn 006 062plusmn 006 minus309plusmn 010Total fit fraction 1134

are determined to be m0 = 1450plusmn 80 MeV Γ0 = 400plusmn 230 MeV a = 32plusmn 18 GeV andr = 09plusmn11 GeV while the parameter of the EFF lineshape of the Dπ P-wave nonresonantamplitude is determined to be α = 088plusmn 010 GeVminus2

The values of the fit fractions and complex coefficients obtained from the fit are shownin Table 4 while the values of the interference fit fractions are given in Appendix B Thesum of the fit fractions is seen to exceed unity mostly due to interference within the Dπ andKπ S-waves Note that in Table 4 and all results for fit fractions and derived quantitiesvalues are reported separately for both the Klowast0 (1430)0 and nonresonant components of theLASS lineshape as well as their coherent sum

Projections of the data and the nominal fit model onto m(K+πminus) m(D0πminus) andm(D0K+) are shown in Fig 6 Zooms are provided in the regions of the main resonantcontributions in Fig 7 Projections onto the cosine of the helicity angle of the D0πminus andK+πminus systems are shown in Figs 8 and 9 respectively These projections all show goodagreement between data and the fit model

Angular moments provide a useful method to investigate the helicity structure of thedecays The angular moments in m(D0πminus) and m(K+πminus) obtained as in Refs [1011]are shown in Figs 10 and 11 respectively The contributions due to the Klowast(892)0 andDlowast2(2460)minus resonances are seen as peaks in moments up to order 2 and order 4 respectivelyas expected for spin-1 and spin-2 resonances Reflections make the interpretation ofmoments at higher masses more difficult However the good agreement seen between data

13

and the fit model provides further support for the fit model being a good description ofthe data

The quality of the fit is evaluated by determining a two-dimensional χ2 value comparingthe data and fit model in 144 bins across the SDP that are defined adaptively to ensurethey are approximately equally populated The pull in each of these bins defined as thedifference between the data and the fit model divided by the uncertainty is shown inFig 12 The effective number of degrees of freedom of the χ2 is between Nbins minusNpars minus 1and Nbinsminus1 where Npars is the number of free parameters in the fit yielding a reduced χ2

in the range 099 ndash 122 Additional unbinned tests of fit quality [54] also show acceptableagreement between the data and the fit model

7 Systematic uncertainties

Systematic uncertainties are considered from sources that can be divided into two categoriesexperimental and model uncertainties Experimental uncertainties arise due to the signaland background yields in the signal region the distributions of the background componentsacross the SDP the variation of efficiency across the SDP and possible bias due to thefitting procedure Model uncertainties are considered due to the fixed parameters in thesignal model the addition or removal of marginal amplitudes and the choice of models forthe Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves The uncertainties due to all of these sourcesare combined in quadrature

The signal and background yields are determined from the fit to the B candidateinvariant mass distribution Systematic uncertainties are considered on the total yieldsdue to both statistical and systematic variations of these yields as evaluated in Ref [15]The yields in the signal region are varied appropriately and the effects of these variationson the parameters of interest are assigned as systematic uncertainties

The histograms describing the background distributions are each varied within statisticaluncertainties to establish the uncertainty due to the imperfect knowledge of the distributionof these backgrounds across the SDP The histograms describing the efficiency variationacross the SDP are also varied within their uncertainties prior to the spline fit Theefficiency histograms are also varied with local correlations to account for the effects ofany unknown correlations between neighbouring bins For each parameter the largeruncertainty is considered from the correlated and uncorrelated variations In addition thebinning scheme of the control sample used to evaluate PID performance is varied

An ensemble of pseudoexperiments is used to establish systematic uncertainties relatedto any potential fit bias Pseudoexperiments are generated using the parameters determinedin the fit to data and mean fitted values of the parameters are determined from Gaussianfits to the distributions of results obtained in the ensemble The differences between thegenerated and mean fitted values are found to be small Uncertainties are determined asthe sum in quadrature of the difference between the generated and mean fitted values andthe uncertainty on the mean fitted value from the Gaussian fit

Systematic uncertainties due to fixed parameters in the fit model are determined by

14

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310LHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350 LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310 LHCb (d)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

LHCb (e)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210LHCb (f)

Data Total fit 0(892)K 0(1410)K

S-wave (LASS)πK 0(1430)2Kminus

(2400)0Dminus

(2460)2D

S-wave (EFF)πD P-wave (EFF)πDminus

D Background

Figure 6 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) (c) m(K+πminus)and (e) m(D0K+) with the same projections shown in (b) (d) and (f) with a logarithmic y-axisscale Components are described in the legend

15

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

235 24 245 25 255

Can

dida

tes

4 M

eV

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m05 1 15

Can

dida

tes

13

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

LHCb (b)

Figure 7 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) in the Dlowast2(2460)minus

region and (b) the low m(K+πminus) region Components are as shown in Fig 6

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

) lt 235 GeVminusπ0D(m204 lt

LHCb(a)

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

) lt 255 GeVminusπ0D(m235 lt

LHCb(b)

Figure 8 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(D0πminus) in the mass ranges(a) 204 lt m(D0πminus) lt 235 GeV and (b) 235 lt m(D0πminus) lt 255 GeV Components are asshown in Fig 6

repeating the fit with these parameters varied The fixed masses and widths are variedwithin their uncertainties as shown in Table 2 while the BlattndashWeisskopf barrier radii rBWare varied independently for D0πminus and K+πminus resonances between 3 and 5 GeVminus1 [10]

The Klowast(1410)0 amplitude does not contribute significantly to the nominal fit modelso the fit is repeated with this component removed and the change in results is assignedas the associated systematic uncertainty In addition uncertainties are assigned fromthe changes in the results when an amplitude due to the Klowast(1680)0 resonance or from avirtual Blowast(5325)+ component as described in Ref [10] is included in the model

A Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D0Kminusπ+ observed both spin-1 and spin-3 resonances

at m(D0Kminus) sim 286 GeV [9 10] A spin-3 resonance has also been seen at m(D0πminus) sim276 GeV in B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] while an analysis of B+ rarr DminusK+π+ shows aspin-1 resonance at similar m(D+πminus) values [11] Uncertainties are assigned corresponding

16

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

) lt 08 GeVminusπ+K(m0 lt LHCb

(a)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 10 GeVminusπ+K(m08 lt LHCb

(b)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 13 GeVminusπ+K(m10 lt LHCb

(c)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

) lt 15 GeVminusπ+K(m14 lt LHCb

(d)

Figure 9 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(K+πminus) in the mass ranges(a) m(K+πminus) lt 08 GeV (b) 08 lt m(K+πminus) lt 10 GeV (c) 10 lt m(K+πminus) lt 13 GeV and(d) 14 lt m(K+πminus) lt 15 GeV Components are as shown in Fig 6

to the changes in results when either a spin-1 or spin-3 state at m(D0πminus) sim 276 GeV isadded to the nominal model

The LASS model used to describe the Kπ S-wave is replaced with a Flatte shape [55]which accounts for the Kηprime threshold near the Klowast0 (1430)0 mass and a resonant term witha modified mass dependent width [52] for the κ (also known as Klowast0(800)) state Thismodel gives an NLL that is worse by 44 units A model-independent description of theKπ S-wave is also used to fit the data with the uncertainty on each parameter takenas the larger of the two differences This alternative improves the NLL by 88 units butintroduces an additional four free parameters into the fit The dabba lineshape used todescribe the D0πminus S-wave is replaced with an EFF lineshape while a power-law model isintroduced as an alternative to the EFF lineshape that describes the D0πminus P-wave Thesealterations worsen the NLL by 30 units and improve it by 08 units respectively

The total systematic uncertainties due to experimental and model effects for fit fractionsand complex coefficients are given together with the results in Sec 8 The contributionsfrom different sources to the systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions masses and

17

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0002004006008

0101201401601802

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-30-25-20-15-10

-505

1015

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

310timesLHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

310timesLHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-8-6-4-202468

310timesLHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-8-6-4-20246

310timesLHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-6-4-202468

10

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 10 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(D0πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

18

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0

005

01

015

02

025

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

20

40

60

80

100310times

LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10-505

10152025

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25310times

LHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-20-15-10

-505

101520

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 11 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(K+πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

19

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Pull

-2

-1

0

1

2

LHCb

Figure 12 Differences between the data SDP distribution and the fit model across the SDP interms of the per-bin pull

Table 5 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths(MeV) Uncertainties given on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value SB fraction Efficiency Background SDP Fit bias Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 060 083 050 031 117Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 006 039 069 005 080Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 028 148 185 033 241LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 051 225 286 086 377

LASS total 67plusmn 27 026 186 160 102 267Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 023 072 053 054 107Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 021 139 143 040 204Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 070 070 049 015 111Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 003 081 059 057 115Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 086 191 052 038 219m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 46 81 70 37 122m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 001 037 022 029 051Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 28 131 139 48 199Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 05 09 09 05 14

widths are given in Tables 5 and 6 The dominant experimental systematic uncertaintyon most parameters is due to either the efficiency variation or background distributionsacross the SDP while the model uncertainties are generally dominated by the effects ofalternative descriptions of the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves For the parametersof broad components the model uncertainties dominate however for other parameters thestatistical experimental and model uncertainties are all of a similar magnitude

The stability of the fit results is confirmed by several cross-checks The data sample isdivided into subsamples according to the flavour of the B candidate the trigger decision

20

Table 6 Model uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths (MeV) Uncertaintiesgiven on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value Fixed parameters Addremove Alternative models Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 075 114 109 174Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 018 070 022 076Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 079 330 023 340LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 110 399 520 665

LASS total 67plusmn 27 053 142 521 543Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 036 187 056 198Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 055 195 711 740Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 018 073 099 124Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 027 140 346 374Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 031 199 215 295m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 61 93 256 279m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 009 105 048 115Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 40 180 435 472Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 14 05 24 29

the polarity of the magnet and the year of data taking Each subsample is fitted separatelyand all are seen to be consistent with the nominal fit results The fit is also repeatedwith additional resonance components to test the fit model Resonances up to spin-3 wereconsidered for all three pairs of daughters with the mass and width allowed to vary in thefit No additional significant contributions were observed

8 Results and summary

The results for the complex coefficients are reported in Table 7 with results for thefit fractions given in Table 8 The results for the interference fit fractions are givenin Appendix B Upper limits are determined on the fit fractions of the Klowast(1410)0 andDlowast3(2760)minus components which do not give significant contributions using the methoddescribed in Ref [10]

The fit fractions for resonant contributions are converted into quasi-two-body productbranching fractions by multiplying by B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus) = (92plusmn 06plusmn 07plusmn 06)times 10minus5which is obtained from the ratio of branching fractions B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus)B(B0 rarrD0π+πminus) [15] multiplied by the latest result for B(B0 rarr D0π+πminus) [12] accounting forthe different Dlowast(2010)minus veto windows used in the analyses and for the 37 residualbackground due to B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ decays The statistical correlation between theresults of Ref [15] and this analysis is found to be negligible The results for the productbranching fractions are shown in Table 9 For the K+πminus resonances where the branchingfractions to Kπ are known the product branching fractions are converted to the Bdecay branching fractions shown in Table 10 The results for B(B0 rarr D0Klowast(892)0) andB(B0 rarr Dlowast2(2460)minusK+)times B(Dlowast2(2460)minus rarr D0πminus) are consistent with and more precisethan previous measurements [14 1617]

21

Table 7 Results for the complex amplitudes and their uncertainties presented (top) in terms ofreal and imaginary parts and (bottom) in terms and magnitudes and phases The three quotederrors are statistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively

Resonance Real part Imaginary part

Klowast(892)0 minus000plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 034 minus127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 006Klowast(1410)0 015plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 009 minus009plusmn 009plusmn 018plusmn 018Klowast0(1430)0 014plusmn 038plusmn 048plusmn 038 045plusmn 015plusmn 037plusmn 017LASS nonresonant minus010plusmn 024plusmn 016plusmn 042 044plusmn 014plusmn 017plusmn 023Klowast2(1430)0 minus032plusmn 009plusmn 015plusmn 023 minus047plusmn 007plusmn 014plusmn 015Dlowast0(2400)minus minus080plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 022 minus044plusmn 014plusmn 012plusmn 018Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) minus039plusmn 009plusmn 009plusmn 014 036plusmn 017plusmn 014plusmn 023Dπ P-wave (EFF) minus062plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 011 minus003plusmn 006plusmn 005plusmn 010

Resonance Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 005 minus157plusmn 011plusmn 016plusmn 027Klowast(1410)0 018plusmn 007plusmn 010plusmn 011 minus054plusmn 021plusmn 055plusmn 104Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 009plusmn 010plusmn 014 127plusmn 095plusmn 104plusmn 081LASS nonresonant 046plusmn 014plusmn 016plusmn 029 179plusmn 065plusmn 035plusmn 069Klowast2(1430)0 057plusmn 005plusmn 004plusmn 008 minus216plusmn 019plusmn 043plusmn 043Dlowast0(2400)minus 091plusmn 007plusmn 006plusmn 017 minus264plusmn 015plusmn 014plusmn 023Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 053plusmn 007plusmn 004plusmn 014 240plusmn 027plusmn 024plusmn 044Dπ P-wave (EFF) 062plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 011 minus309plusmn 010plusmn 007plusmn 017

Table 8 Results for the fit fractions and their uncertainties () The three quoted errors arestatistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively Upper limits are givenat 90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Fit fraction Upper limitKlowast(892)0 374plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 17Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03plusmn 08plusmn 08 lt 32 (37)Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20plusmn 24plusmn 34LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38plusmn 38plusmn 67

LASS total 67plusmn 27plusmn 27plusmn 54Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17plusmn 11plusmn 20Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28plusmn 20plusmn 74Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12plusmn 11plusmn 12Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 10 (11)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14plusmn 12plusmn 37Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16plusmn 22plusmn 30

22

Table 9 Results for the product branching fractions The four quoted errors are statisticalexperimental systematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Product branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 342plusmn 013plusmn 010plusmn 016plusmn 040Klowast(1410)0 007plusmn 003plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 001 lt 029 (034)Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 018plusmn 022plusmn 031plusmn 005LASS nonresonant 044plusmn 034plusmn 034plusmn 061plusmn 005

LASS total 061plusmn 025plusmn 025plusmn 049plusmn 007Klowast2(1430)0 068plusmn 015plusmn 010plusmn 018plusmn 008Dlowast0(2400)minus 177plusmn 026plusmn 019plusmn 067plusmn 020Dlowast2(2460)minus 212plusmn 010plusmn 011plusmn 011plusmn 025Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 010 (011)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 060plusmn 013plusmn 011plusmn 034plusmn 007Dπ P-wave (EFF) 081plusmn 015plusmn 020plusmn 027plusmn 009

Table 10 Results for the branching fractions The four quoted errors are statistical experimentalsystematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at 90 (95 )confidence level

Resonance Branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 513plusmn 020plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 060Klowast(1410)0 159plusmn 068plusmn 181plusmn 159plusmn 036 lt 67 (78)Klowast0(1430)0 071plusmn 027plusmn 033plusmn 047plusmn 008LASS nonresonant 066plusmn 051plusmn 051plusmn 092plusmn 008

LASS total 092plusmn 038plusmn 038plusmn 074plusmn 011Klowast2(1430)0 204plusmn 045plusmn 030plusmn 054plusmn 025

The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus states are found to be

m(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (2360plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 28) MeV

Γ(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (255plusmn 26plusmn 20plusmn 47) MeV

m(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (24656plusmn 18plusmn 05plusmn 12) MeV

Γ(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (460plusmn 34plusmn 14plusmn 29) MeV

where the three uncertainties are statistical experimental systematic and model systematicrespectively These are consistent with though less precise than recent results from a DPanalysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] They also show good agreement with and havesimilar precision to earlier measurements of these quantities [1337]

In summary the first amplitude analysis of B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays has been presentedusing a data sample corresponding to 30 fbminus1 of pp collision data collected by the LHCbexperiment A good description of the data is obtained with a model containing contri-

23

butions from intermediate Klowast(892)0 Klowast(1410)0 Klowast2(1430)0 and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonanceswith additional components to describe broad structures in the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S-and P-waves The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances aremeasured as are the complex amplitudes and fit fractions for all components includedin the amplitude model The results can be used in conjunction with an analysis ofB0 rarr DK+πminus decays where the neutral D meson is reconstructed in final states such asK+Kminus to measure the CKM unitarity triangle parameter γ [1 2]

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to our colleagues in the CERN accelerator departments forthe excellent performance of the LHC We thank the technical and administrative staffat the LHCb institutes We acknowledge support from CERN and from the nationalagencies CAPES CNPq FAPERJ and FINEP (Brazil) NSFC (China) CNRSIN2P3(France) BMBF DFG HGF and MPG (Germany) INFN (Italy) FOM and NWO (TheNetherlands) MNiSW and NCN (Poland) MENIFA (Romania) MinES and FANO(Russia) MinECo (Spain) SNSF and SER (Switzerland) NASU (Ukraine) STFC (UnitedKingdom) NSF (USA) The Tier1 computing centres are supported by IN2P3 (France)KIT and BMBF (Germany) INFN (Italy) NWO and SURF (The Netherlands) PIC(Spain) GridPP (United Kingdom) We are indebted to the communities behind themultiple open source software packages on which we depend We are also thankful forthe computing resources and the access to software RampD tools provided by Yandex LLC(Russia) Individual groups or members have received support from EPLANET MarieSk lodowska-Curie Actions and ERC (European Union) Conseil general de Haute-SavoieLabex ENIGMASS and OCEVU Region Auvergne (France) RFBR (Russia) XuntaGaland GENCAT (Spain) Royal Society and Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851(United Kingdom)

24

Appendices

A Correlation matrices

The statistical correlations between the complex coefficients masses and widths determinedfrom the fit to data are given in terms of real and imaginary parts and in terms ofmagnitudes and phases in Tables 11 and 12 The correlations are determined using thesame sample of simulated pseudoexperiments used to calculate the statistical uncertaintieson fit parameters

B Results for interference fit fractions

The central values of the interference fit fractions are given in Table 13 The statisti-cal experimental systematic and model uncertainties on these quantities are given inTables 14 15 and 16

25

Tab

le11

Sta

tist

ical

corr

elat

ions

bet

wee

nth

ere

al(x

)an

dim

agin

ary

(y)

par

tsof

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

x0

y 0x

1y 1

x2

y 2x

3y 3

x4

y 4x

5y 5

x7

y 7x

8y 8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

x0

100

014

002

017minus

018

015minus

017

003

039minus

037

016minus

009minus

018minus

029

007minus

037minus

019

002

004

012

y 01

00minus

006minus

008

009minus

011minus

000

014

003

003

012

013minus

012minus

024

035minus

007

009

012

001minus

004

x1

100minus

009minus

008minus

014minus

004

029minus

001

003minus

020

018minus

021minus

031minus

017minus

036minus

008minus

017minus

023

002

y 11

000

050

340

09minus

001

060minus

039

002minus

003minus

003

007minus

002minus

004minus

016minus

002

007

002

x2

100minus

013

081

009

014minus

016minus

015

021

010

013

004minus

015minus

007

001minus

025

001

y 21

000

080

280

24minus

036minus

013

008minus

004minus

001minus

004

004minus

002minus

001minus

009minus

010

x3

100

020

013minus

034minus

010

033minus

008

008minus

004minus

005minus

007minus

003minus

033minus

009

y 31

00minus

012minus

012minus

051

029minus

034minus

053

009minus

012

009minus

014minus

036

001

x4

100minus

053

032minus

010minus

020

003

002minus

027minus

017minus

006

010minus

000

y 41

000

06minus

009

040

010

014

016

011minus

005

007minus

003

x5

100minus

029minus

003

022

002

004minus

008

002

045minus

006

y 51

00minus

031minus

034

006

003

024minus

014minus

072minus

033

x7

100

046

005

010minus

011minus

001

027

017

y 71

00minus

016

036minus

001

017

032

008

x8

100minus

003

001minus

006minus

009minus

014

y 81

000

290

020

15minus

002

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

26

Tab

le12

S

tati

stic

alco

rrel

atio

ns

bet

wee

nth

em

agnit

ud

es(a

)an

dp

has

es(∆

)of

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

a0

∆0

a1

∆1

a2

∆2

a3

∆3

a4

∆4

a5

∆5

a7

∆7

a8

∆8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

a0

100minus

011minus

008

005

024

003minus

014

004

004

001

021

002

022minus

022

038minus

000minus

004minus

009minus

001

004

∆0

100minus

010

012

003

020

014

014minus

001

045minus

005

010minus

008

035minus

007

005minus

022

006

007

009

a1

100minus

035minus

025

006

032

001minus

001minus

038

004minus

022minus

006

031

002

024

007minus

018minus

020

001

∆1

100

024

015

016

000

014

038minus

018minus

013

016

026

022minus

006minus

009minus

004minus

012

005

a2

100

004

011minus

028minus

007

039minus

009

007

027

010

001

001minus

015

004minus

003minus

013

∆2

100

015

077minus

020minus

010minus

001

024

009

013

003minus

009

005

001

023minus

010

a3

100minus

006

000minus

011

016minus

030minus

012

056

001

012

002minus

007minus

027minus

004

∆3

100minus

028minus

019

015

041minus

024minus

008minus

000minus

013

004

002

041

008

a4

100

013

005minus

017

014

018minus

000

006

000

014minus

019minus

009

∆4

100minus

016

016

017

012

000minus

002minus

019minus

003

003

001

a5

100

024minus

026minus

006

011

005minus

007

001

019

039

∆5

100minus

000minus

028minus

001minus

020minus

020

015

076

027

a7

100minus

001

017minus

006

004

013minus

005minus

024

∆7

100minus

012

037

003minus

000minus

027minus

012

a8

100minus

004minus

001

004

006

015

∆8

100minus

037minus

002minus

033minus

001

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

27

Table 13 Interference fit fractions () from the nominal DP fit The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 374 18 minus00 00 00 minus24 minus02 minus26 minus50A1 07 minus00 00 00 minus11 minus03 minus06 minus11A2 51 minus32 minus00 29 15 16 19A3 48 00 minus84 01 21 02A4 74 minus03 minus10 minus15 minus04A5 193 minus00 28 00A6 231 minus00 00A7 66 minus00A8 89

Table 14 Statistical uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes areall pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASSnonresonant (A4) Klowast2 (1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8)Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 15 07 00 00 00 09 04 04 05A1 03 00 00 00 07 03 04 05A2 20 26 00 11 05 15 05A3 38 00 32 04 34 08A4 17 06 01 06 05A5 28 00 31 00A6 12 00 00A7 14 00A8 16

28

Table 15 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () Theamplitudes are all pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0 (1430)0(A3) LASS nonresonant (A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave(dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fitfractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 12 05 00 00 00 23 02 04 05A1 08 00 00 00 04 08 07 09A2 24 31 00 14 20 26 11A3 38 00 36 02 26 03A4 11 22 02 05 10A5 20 00 40 00A6 11 00 00A7 12 00A8 22

Table 16 Model uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 17 08 00 00 00 26 07 08 14A1 08 00 00 00 08 06 08 11A2 34 29 00 58 17 36 27A3 66 00 83 03 35 07A4 20 17 02 12 10A5 74 00 45 00A6 12 00 00A7 37 00A8 29

29

References

[1] T Gershon On the measurement of the unitarity triangle angle γ from B0 rarr DKlowast0

decays Phys Rev D79 (2009) 051301(R) arXiv08102706

[2] T Gershon and M Williams Prospects for the measurement of the unitaritytriangle angle γ from B0 rarr DK+πminus decays Phys Rev D80 (2009) 092002arXiv09091495

[3] N Cabibbo Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays Phys Rev Lett 10 (1963) 531

[4] M Kobayashi and T Maskawa CP -violation in the renormalizable theory of weakinteraction Progress of Theoretical Physics 49 (1973) 652

[5] M Gronau and D London How to determine all the angles of the unitarity trianglefrom B0 rarr DK0

S and B0s rarr Dφ Phys Lett B253 (1991) 483

[6] M Gronau and D Wyler On determining a weak phase from CP asymmetries incharged B decays Phys Lett B265 (1991) 172

[7] I Dunietz CP violation with self-tagging Bd modes Phys Lett B270 (1991) 75

[8] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurement of CP violation parameters inB0 rarr DKlowast0 decays Phys Rev D90 (2014) 112002 arXiv14078136

[9] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of overlapping spin-1 and spin-

3 D0Kminus resonances at mass 286 GeVc2 Phys Rev Lett 113 (2014) 162001

arXiv14077574

[10] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ decays

Phys Rev D90 (2014) 072003 arXiv14077712

[11] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observation and amplitude analysis of theBminus rarr D+Kminusπminus decay Phys Rev D91 (2015) 092002 arXiv150302995

[12] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays

arXiv150501710 submitted to Phys Rev D

[13] Belle collaboration A Kuzmin et al Study of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays Phys RevD76 (2007) 012006 arXivhep-ex0611054

[14] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of branching fractions andresonance contributions for B0 rarr D0K+πminus and search for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decaysPhys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 011803 arXivhep-ex0509036

[15] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurements of the branching fractions of

the decays B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ and B0 rarr D

0K+πminus Phys Rev D87 (2013) 112009

arXiv13046317

30

[16] Belle collaboration P Krokovny et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K0 and B0 rarr D0Klowast0

decays Phys Rev Lett 90 (2003) 141802 arXivhep-ex0212066

[17] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of B0 rarr D(lowast)0K(lowast)0 branchingfractions Phys Rev D74 (2006) 031101 arXivhep-ex0604016

[18] LHCb collaboration A A Alves Jr et al The LHCb detector at the LHC JINST 3(2008) S08005

[19] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al LHCb detector performance Int J Mod PhysA30 (2015) 1530022 arXiv14126352

[20] R Aaij et al Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator JINST 9 (2014) P09007arXiv14057808

[21] R Arink et al Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker JINST 9 (2014) P01002arXiv13113893

[22] M Adinolfi et al Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Eur PhysJ C73 (2013) 2431 arXiv12116759

[23] A A Alves Jr et al Performance of the LHCb muon system JINST 8 (2013) P02022arXiv12111346

[24] R Aaij et al The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011 JINST 8 (2013) P04022arXiv12113055

[25] V V Gligorov and M Williams Efficient reliable and fast high-level triggering usinga bonsai boosted decision tree JINST 8 (2013) P02013 arXiv12106861

[26] T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P Skands PYTHIA 64 physics and manual JHEP05 (2006) 026 arXivhep-ph0603175 T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P SkandsA brief introduction to PYTHIA 81 Comput Phys Commun 178 (2008) 852arXiv07103820

[27] I Belyaev et al Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss the LHCbsimulation framework J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032047

[28] D J Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package Nucl Instrum MethA462 (2001) 152

[29] P Golonka and Z Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo A precision tool for QED correctionsin Z and W decays Eur Phys J C45 (2006) 97 arXivhep-ph0506026

[30] Geant4 collaboration J Allison et al Geant4 developments and applications IEEETrans Nucl Sci 53 (2006) 270 Geant4 collaboration S Agostinelli et al Geant4A simulation toolkit Nucl Instrum Meth A506 (2003) 250

31

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 3: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

1 Introduction

Dalitz plot (DP) analysis of B0 rarr DK+πminus decays has been proposed as a way to measurethe unitarity triangle angle γ [1 2] The sensitivity to γ equiv arg [minusVudV lowastub(VcdV lowastcb)] whereVxy are elements of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) quark mixing matrix [3 4]originates from the interference of b rarr cus and b rarr ucs amplitudes Such interferenceoccurs when the neutral D meson is reconstructed in a final state that is accessible to bothD0 and D0 decays and therefore corresponds to an admixture of the two states [5 6] Oneof the largest components of the B0 rarr DK+πminus final state is B0 rarr DKlowast(892)0 for whichboth brarr cus and brarr ucs amplitudes are colour suppressed making them comparablein magnitude and potentially enhancing CP violation effects [7] Decay diagrams for thequasi-two-body contributions from B0 rarr DKlowast(892)0 and B0 rarr Dlowast2(2460)minusK+ decaysare shown in Fig 1 Observables sensitive to γ have been measured by LHCb with aquasi-two-body approach [8] but a DP analysis is expected to be more sensitive becauseinterference between resonances provides the possibility to resolve ambiguities in thedetermination of γ

In order to determine γ with this method it is necessary to have an amplitude modelof the B0 rarr D0K+πminus decay that proceeds through the favoured brarr cus transition Thiscan be achieved by reconstructing the D0 meson through the K+πminus decay in this waythe contribution from the b rarr cus amplitude is dominant and effects due to b rarr ucsamplitudes can be neglected While the analysis of this decay chain is not itself sensitive toγ its outcome will be an integral part of a future analysis using for example D rarr K+Kminus

decays where CP violation effects are expected as the final state is common to both D0

and D0 decaysDalitz plot analyses of B meson decays to final states containing a charmed meson and

two charged particles (either pions or kaons) also provide opportunities for studies of thespectroscopy of charmed mesons Results in this area have recently been obtained from DPanalyses of B0

s rarr D0Kminusπ+ [9 10] B+ rarr DminusK+π+ [11] and B0 rarr D0π+πminus [12] decaysall from LHCb As the branching fraction for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays is smaller than thatfor B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays the analysis presented in this paper is not as sensitive to theparameters of charm resonances as that of Ref [12] However the much larger sample of B

0B

b

d0(892)K

s

d

0D

c

u+W

(a)

0Bb

d

-(2460)2Dc

d

+Ks

u+W

(b)

Figure 1 Decay diagrams for the quasi-two-body contributions to B0 rarr DK+πminus from (a)B0 rarr DKlowast(892)0 and (b) B0 rarr Dlowast2(2460)minusK+ decays

1

mesons available at LHCb compared to that used in the only other published DP analysisof B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays from the Belle collaboration [13] allows useful results on excitedcharm mesons to be obtained Moreover results on charm meson spectroscopy obtainedfrom DP analysis of B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays provide important independent cross-checksof results from studies of the B0 rarr D0π+πminus DP as possible biases due to other structuresin the Dalitz plots are different between the two modes

In this paper an amplitude analysis of the B0 rarr D0K+πminus decay is reported Theinclusion of charge-conjugate processes is implied throughout the paper The analysisis based on a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 30 fbminus1 of ppcollision data collected with the LHCb detector in 2011 and 2012 when the collisioncentre-of-mass energy was

radics = 7 TeV (10 fbminus1) and

radics = 8 TeV (20 fbminus1) respectively

Previously the branching fraction for the three-body decay has been measured [14 15]and the B0 rarr D0Klowast(892)0 [16 17] and B0 rarr Dlowast2(2460)minusK+ [14] contributions have beenmeasured using quasi-two-body approaches however this is the first DP analysis of theB0 rarr D0K+πminus decay

The paper is organised as follows A description of the LHCb detector reconstructionand simulation software is given in Sec 2 The selection of signal candidates is describedin Sec 3 and the determination of signal and background yields is presented in Sec 4An overview of the Dalitz plot analysis formalism is given in Sec 5 and details of theimplementation of the amplitude analysis are presented in Sec 6 The evaluation ofsystematic uncertainties is described in Sec 7 with results and a brief summary given inSec 8

2 LHCb detector and software

The LHCb detector [1819] is a single-arm forward spectrometer covering the pseudorapidityrange 2 lt η lt 5 designed for the study of particles containing b or c quarks The detectorincludes a high-precision tracking system consisting of a silicon-strip vertex detector [20]surrounding the pp interaction region a large-area silicon-strip detector located upstreamof a dipole magnet with a bending power of about 4 Tm and three stations of silicon-stripdetectors and straw drift tubes [21] placed downstream of the magnet The polarity ofthe dipole magnet is reversed periodically throughout data-taking The tracking systemprovides a measurement of momentum p of charged particles with a relative uncertaintythat varies from 05 at low momentum to 10 at 200 GeV (natural units with c = ~ = 1are used) The minimum distance of a track to a primary vertex the impact parameter(IP) is measured with a resolution of (15 + 29pT)microm where pT is the component ofthe momentum transverse to the beam in GeV Different types of charged hadronsare distinguished using information from two ring-imaging Cherenkov detectors [22]Photon electron and hadron candidates are identified by a calorimeter system consisting ofscintillating-pad and preshower detectors an electromagnetic calorimeter and a hadroniccalorimeter Muons are identified by a system composed of alternating layers of iron andmultiwire proportional chambers [23]

2

The trigger [24] consists of a hardware stage based on information from the calorimeterand muon systems followed by a software stage in which all tracks with pT gt 500 (300) MeVare reconstructed for data collected in 2011 (2012) The software trigger used in thisanalysis requires a two- three- or four-track secondary vertex with significant displacementfrom any primary pp interaction vertex (PV) At least one charged particle must havepT gt 17 GeV and be inconsistent with originating from a PV A multivariate algorithm [25]is used for the identification of secondary vertices consistent with the decay of a b hadron

In the offline selection the objects that prompted a positive trigger decision areassociated with reconstructed particles Selection requirements can therefore be made notonly on whether the hardware trigger decision was due to a signature in the calorimetersor in the muon system but on whether the decision was due to the signal candidate otherparticles produced in the pp collision or a combination of both Signal candidates areaccepted offline if at least one of the final-state particles created a cluster in the hadroniccalorimeter with sufficient transverse energy to fire the hardware trigger Events that aretriggered at the hardware level by another particle in the event are also retained Afterall selection requirements are imposed 67 of events in the sample were triggered bythe decay products of the signal candidate while the remainder were triggered only byanother particle in the event

Simulated events are used to characterise the detector response to signal and certaintypes of background events In the simulation pp collisions are generated using Pythia [26]with a specific LHCb configuration [27] Decays of hadronic particles are describedby EvtGen [28] in which final-state radiation is generated using Photos [29] Theinteraction of the generated particles with the detector and its response are implementedusing the Geant4 toolkit [30] as described in Ref [31]

3 Selection requirements

The selection requirements follow closely those used in Ref [10] The more copiousB0 rarr D0π+πminus decay is topologically and kinematically similar to the B0 rarr D0K+πminus

channel allowing it to be used as a control mode to optimise the selection requirementsLoose initial requirements are used to obtain a visible signal peak of D0π+πminus candidatesThe tracks are required to be of good quality and must be above thresholds in p pT andχ2

IP where χ2IP is defined as the difference in χ2 of a given PV reconstructed with and

without the considered particle The D0 rarr K+πminus candidate must satisfy criteria on itsvertex quality (χ2

vtx) and flight distance from any PV and from the B candidate vertexand must have invariant mass m(K+πminus) in the range 1814ndash1914 MeV A requirementon the output of a boosted decision tree that identifies D0 rarr K+πminus decays originatingfrom b hadron decays (D0 BDT) [32 33] is also applied Candidate B mesons are selectedwith requirements on invariant mass χ2

IP and on the cosine of the angle between the Bmomentum vector and the line from the PV under consideration to the B vertex (cos θdir)A requirement is placed on the χ2 of a kinematic fit [34] to the candidatersquos decay chain inwhich the D0 mass is constrained to its nominal value The four final-state tracks must

3

satisfy pion and kaon particle identification (PID) criteriaA neural network [35] is used to discriminate between signal decays and combinatorial

background The sPlot technique [36] with the B candidate mass as the discriminatingvariable is used to separate statistically B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays from background Thesignal and background weights returned by this method are applied to the candidateswhich are then used to train the network The network is trained using 16 variables Theyinclude the χ2

IP of the four final-state tracks and the following variables associated tothe D0 candidate χ2

IP χ2vtx the square of the flight distance from the PV divided by

its uncertainty squared (χ2flight) cos θdir and the output of the D0 BDT In addition the

following variables associated to the B candidate are included pT χ2IP χ2

vtx χ2flight and

cos θdir The pT asymmetry [10] and track multiplicity in a cone with half-angle of 15units of the plane of pseudorapidity and azimuthal angle (measured in radians) aroundthe B candidate flight direction which contain information about the isolation of the Bcandidate from the rest of the event are also used The input quantities to the neuralnetwork depend only weakly on the position of the candidate in the B decay Dalitz plotand therefore any requirement on the network output cannot appreciably bias the DPdistribution A requirement imposed on the network output reduces the combinatorialbackground remaining after the initial selection by a factor of five while retaining morethan 90 of the signal

The B0 rarr D0K+πminus candidates must satisfy the same selection as the B0 rarr D0π+πminus

decays except for the PID requirement on the positively charged track from the B decayvertex which is imposed to preferentially select kaons rather than pions The PID efficiencyis evaluated from calibration samples of D0 rarr Kminusπ+ decays from the Dlowast+ rarr D0π+ decaychain The kinematics of this decay chain can be exploited to obtain clean samples withoutusing the PID information [22] The PID efficiency of the requirements on the four tracksin the final state is around 50 and varies depending on the kinematics of the tracks asdescribed in detail in Sec 61

Candidates are vetoed when the difference between m(K+πminusπminus) and m(K+πminus) lieswithin plusmn25 MeV of the known Dlowast(2010)minusndashD0 mass difference [37] to remove backgroundcontaining Dlowastminus rarr D0πminus decays Candidates are also rejected if a similar mass differencecalculated with the pion mass hypothesis applied to the bachelor kaon satisfies the samecriterion To reject backgrounds from B0 rarr DminusK+ Dminus rarr K+πminusπminus decays it is requiredthat the combination of the pion from the D0 candidate together with the two bachelorparticles does not have an invariant mass in the range 1850ndash1890 MeV Additionallycandidates are removed if the pion and kaon originating directly from the B0 decaycombine to give an invariant mass consistent with that of the D0 meson (1835ndash1880 MeV)This removes candidates with the D0 wrongly reconstructed as well as potential backgroundfrom B0 rarr D0D0 decays Other incorrectly reconstructed candidates are removed byvetoing candidates where the pion from the D0 decay and the kaon originating directlyfrom the B0 decay give an invariant mass in the range 1850ndash1885 MeV At least one ofthe pion candidates is required to have no associated hits in the muon system to removepotential background from B0 rarr JψKlowast0 decays Charmless decays of b hadrons aresuppressed by the use of the D0 BDT and further reduced to a negligible level by requiring

4

that the D0 candidate vertex is separated from the B0 decay vertex by at least 1 mmSignal candidates are retained for further analysis if they have invariant mass in the

range 5100ndash5900 MeV After all selection requirements are applied fewer than 1 ofselected events also contain a second candidate Such multiple candidates are retained andtreated in the same manner as other candidates the associated systematic uncertainty isnegligible

4 Determination of signal and background yields

The signal and background yields are determined from an extended maximum likelihoodfit to the B candidate invariant mass distribution The fit allows for signal decayscombinatorial background and contributions from other b hadron decays The decay chainB0 rarr Dlowast0K+πminus with Dlowast0 rarr D0γ or D0π0 forms a partially reconstructed backgroundthat peaks at low B candidate mass as the neutral particle is not included in the candidateMisidentified B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus Λ0

b rarr D(lowast)0K+p and B0(s) rarr D(lowast)0K+Kminus decays are found

to contribute to the background A possible contribution from the highly suppressedB0s rarr D0K+πminus decay mode is also included in the fit

The signal peak is modelled with the sum of two Crystal Ball [38] functions whichhave tails on opposite sides and which share a common mean The tail parameters arefixed to the values found in fits to simulated signal decays The relative normalisationand the ratio of widths of the two functions are constrained within uncertainties tothe values determined in a fit to B0 rarr D0π+πminus data The B0

s rarr D0K+πminus shape ismodelled identically to the signal peak with the difference between the B0 and B0

s masspeak positions fixed to its known value [37] An exponential shape is used to model thecombinatorial background

Misidentified and partially reconstructed backgrounds are modelled with smoothednon-parametric functions Simulated samples are used to obtain the shape for B0 rarrDlowast0K+πminus decays with the Dlowast0 rarr D0γ and D0π0 contributions generated in the correctproportions [37] To account for differences between simulation and data for examplein the polarisation of the Dlowast0 meson the B candidate invariant mass distribution forpartially reconstructed B0 rarr Dlowast0K+πminus decays is allowed to be shifted by an offset thatis a free parameter of the fit The misidentified background shapes are also obtainedfrom simulated samples For B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays the D0 and Dlowast0 contributions arecombined according to their relative branching fractions [37] The backgrounds fromΛ0b rarr D(lowast)0K+p and B0

(s) rarr D(lowast)0K+Kminus decays are assumed to have equal branching

fractions for the decays with D0 and Dlowast0 mesons in the final state as the decays involvingDlowast0 mesons have not yet been measured The simulated samples are reweighted accordingto the relevant particle identification and misidentification probabilities and to match knownDP distributions [1239ndash41] The (mis)identification probabilities take account of trackkinematics and are calculated using calibration samples of Dlowast+ rarr D0π+ D0 rarr Kminusπ+

and Λrarr pπminus decays [1922] The yields of the misidentified backgrounds relative to thesignal are constrained within uncertainties to their expected values based on their known

5

Table 1 Yields from the fit to the D0K+πminus data sample The full mass range is 5100ndash5900 MeVand the signal region is 524855ndash530905 MeV

Component Full mass range Signal region

B0 rarr D0K+πminus 2576plusmn 72 2344plusmn 66B0s rarr D0K+πminus 55plusmn 27 1plusmn 1

comb bkgd 5540plusmn 187 684plusmn 23B0 rarr Dlowast0K+πminus 1750plusmn 99 6plusmn 1B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus 485plusmn 47 51plusmn 5Λ0b rarr D(lowast)0K+p 95plusmn 26 18plusmn 5

B0 rarr D(lowast)0K+Kminus 127plusmn 27 10plusmn 2B0s rarr D(lowast)0K+Kminus 54plusmn 18 14plusmn 5

) [MeV]-π+K0

D(m5200 5400 5600 5800

Can

dida

tes

8 M

eV

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700 LHCb (a)Data

Total fitminusπ+K

0D rarr (s)

0B

Combinatorial bkgminusπ+K 0D rarr 0Bminusπ+π( )0D rarr 0B

p+K( )0D rarr 0bΛ

minusK+K( )0D rarr (s)0B

) [MeV]-π+K0

D(m5200 5400 5600 5800

Can

dida

tes

8 M

eV

1

10

210

310(b)LHCb

Figure 2 Results of the fit to the B candidate invariant mass distribution with (a) linear and(b) logarithmic y-axis scales The components are as described in the legend

branching fractions [123940] and misidentification probabilitiesThere are 14 free parameters in the fit model the mean and width of the signal shape

the relative normalisation and relative width of the two Crystal Ball functions the slopeof the exponential function the offset of the B0 rarr Dlowast0K+πminus shape and the yields of theeight contributions The result of the fit is shown in Fig 2 and the yields are summarisedin Table 1 The yields are also reported within the signal region used in the Dalitz plotfit corresponding to plusmn25 widths of the B0 signal shape (524855ndash530905 MeV) Thedistribution of candidates in the signal region over the Dalitz plot is shown in Fig 3(a)Note that a B0 mass constraint is applied to calculate the variables that are used todescribe the Dalitz plot [42] improving the resolution of those variables and giving aunique kinematic boundary

6

]2) [GeVminusπ0D(2m

5 10 15 20

]2)

[GeV

minus π+K(2

m

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

(a)LHCb

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

091

(b)LHCb

Figure 3 Distribution of B0 rarr D0K+πminus candidates in the signal region over (a) the Dalitz plotand (b) the square Dalitz plot The definition of the square Dalitz plot is given in Sec 61

5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism

In B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays resonances are expected in the m2(D0πminus) and m2(K+πminus)combinations so the Dalitz plot shown in Fig 3(a) is defined in terms of these twoinvariant mass squared terms For a fixed B0 mass these two invariant mass squaredcombinations can be used to calculate all other relevant kinematic quantities

The isobar model [43ndash45] is used to describe the complex decay amplitude The totalamplitude is given by the coherent sum of amplitudes from resonant and nonresonantintermediate contributions and is given by

A(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)=

Nsumj=1

cjFj(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

) (1)

where cj are complex coefficients describing the relative contribution for each intermediateprocess The resonant dynamics are contained in the Fj

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)terms

that are normalised such that the integral of the squared magnitude over the DP is unityfor each term For a D0πminus resonance Fj

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)is given by

F(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)= R

(m(D0πminus)

)timesX(|~p | rBW)timesX(|~q | rBW)times T (~p ~q ) (2)

where ~p is the bachelor particle momentum and ~q is the momentum of one of the resonancedaughters both evaluated in the D0πminus rest frame The functions R X and T are describedbelow

The X(z) terms are BlattndashWeisskopf barrier factors [46] where z = |~q | rBW or |~p | rBW

and rBW is the barrier radius which is set to 40 GeVminus1 asymp 08 fm [10] for all resonances

7

The barrier factors are angular momentum dependent and are given by

L = 0 X(z) = 1

L = 1 X(z) =radic

1+z201+z2

L = 2 X(z) =radic

z40+3z20+9

z4+3z2+9

L = 3 X(z) =radic

z60+6z40+45z20+225

z6+6z4+45z2+225

(3)

where z0 is the value of z at the pole mass of the resonance and L is the orbital angularmomentum between the resonance and the bachelor particle Since the parent and daughterparticles all have zero spin L is also the spin of the resonance

The T (~p ~q) terms describe the angular distributions in the Zemach tensor formalism [4748] and are given by

L = 0 T (~p ~q) = 1 L = 1 T (~p ~q) = minus 2 ~p middot ~q L = 2 T (~p ~q) = 4

3[3(~p middot ~q )2 minus (|~p ||~q |)2]

L = 3 T (~p ~q) = minus 2415

[5(~p middot ~q )3 minus 3(~p middot ~q )(|~p ||~q |)2]

(4)

These expressions are proportional to the Legendre polynomials PL(x) where x is thecosine of the angle between ~p and ~q (referred to as the helicity angle)

The R(m(D0πminus)

)functions are the mass lineshapes Resonant contributions are

typically described by the relativistic BreitndashWigner (RBW) function

R(m) =1

(m20 minusm2)minus im0Γ(m)

(5)

where the mass-dependent decay width is

Γ(m) = Γ0

(q

q0

)2L+1 (m0

m

)X2(q rBW) (6)

where q0 is the value of q = |~q | when the invariant mass is equal to the pole mass of theresonance m0

The large phase space available in B decays allows for the presence of nonresonantamplitudes (ie contributions that do not proceed via a known resonance) that vary acrossthe Dalitz plot An exponential form factor (EFF) has been found to describe nonresonantcontributions well in several DP analyses of B decays [49]

R(m) = exp[minusαm2

] (7)

where α is a shape parameter that must be determined from the data and m is a two-bodyinvariant mass (m(D0πminus) in this example)

The RBW function is a good model for narrow resonances that are well separated fromany other resonant or nonresonant contribution of the same spin This approach is known

8

to break down in the Kπ S-wave because the Klowast0(1430) resonance interferes strongly witha slowly varying nonresonant term as described in Ref [50] The LASS lineshape [51] hasbeen developed to combine these two contributions

R(m) =m

q cot δB minus iq+ exp [2iδB]

m0Γ0m0

q0

(m20 minusm2)minus im0Γ0

qmm0

q0

(8)

where cot δB =1

aq+

1

2rq (9)

and where m0 and Γ0 are the pole mass and width of the Klowast0(1430) state and a and r areshape parameters

The Dπ S-wave nonresonant contribution can be described by the ldquodabbardquo line-shape [52] defined as

R(m) =Bprime(m2)(m2 minus sA)ρ

1minus β(m2 minusm2min)minus iBprime(m2)(m2 minus sA)ρ

(10)

whereBprime(m2) = b exp

[minusα(m2 minusm2

min)] (11)

Here mmin is the invariant mass at threshold sA = m2D minus 05m2

π is the Adler zero ρ isa phase-space factor and b α and β are parameters with values fixed to 2449 GeVminus201 GeVminus2 and 01 GeVminus2 respectively according to Ref [52]

Ignoring reconstruction and selection effects the DP probability density function wouldbe

Pphys

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)=

|A(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)|2intint

DP|A|2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)

(12)

where the dependence of A on the DP position has been suppressed in the denominator forbrevity The primary results of most Dalitz plot analyses are the complex coefficients asdefined in Eq (1) These however depend on the choice of phase convention amplitudeformalism and normalisation used in each analysis The convention-independent quantitiesof fit fractions and interference fit fractions provide a way to reliably compare resultsbetween different analyses Fit fractions are defined as the integral of the amplitude foreach intermediate component squared divided by that of the coherent matrix elementsquared for all intermediate contributions

FF j =

intintDP

∣∣cjFj (m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus))∣∣2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)intint

DP|A|2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)

(13)

The fit fractions need not sum to unity due to possible net constructive or destructiveinterference described by interference fit fractions defined (for i lt j only) by

FF ij =

intintDP

2Re[ciclowastjFiF

lowastj

]dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)intint

DP|A|2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)

(14)

where the dependence of F(lowast)i and A on the DP position has been omitted

9

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

Eff

icie

ncy

()

0

005

01

015

02

025(a)LHCb Simulation

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

Eff

icie

ncy

()

0

005

01

015

02

025(b)LHCb Simulation

Figure 4 Efficiency variation as a function of SDP position for candidates triggered by (a) signaldecay products and (b) by the rest of the event The vertical white stripe is due to the Dlowast vetoand the curved white band is due to the D0 veto

6 Dalitz plot fit

61 Signal efficiency

The variation of the efficiency across the phase space is studied in terms of the squareDalitz plot (SDP) The SDP is defined by variables mprime and θprime that range between 0 and 1and are given for the D0K+πminus case by

mprime equiv 1

πarccos

(2m(D0πminus)minusmmin

D0πminus

mmaxD0πminus minusmmin

D0πminus

minus 1

)and θprime equiv 1

πθ(D0πminus) (15)

where mmaxD0πminus = mB0 minusmK+ and mmin

D0πminus = mD0 + mπminus are the kinematic boundaries of

m(D0πminus) allowed in the B0 rarr D0K+πminus decay and θ(D0πminus) is the helicity angle of theD0πminus system (the angle between the K+ and the D0 meson in the D0πminus rest frame) Thedistribution of selected events across the SDP is shown in Fig 3(b)

Efficiency variation across the SDP is caused by the detector acceptance and bytrigger selection and PID requirements The efficiency is evaluated with simulated samplesgenerated uniformly over the SDP Data-driven corrections are applied to correct for knowndifferences between data and simulation in the tracking trigger and PID efficiencies usingidentical methods to those described in Ref [10] The efficiency functions are obtainedby fitting the corrected simulation with two-dimensional cubic splines Figure 4 showsthe histograms used to model the variation of the efficiency over the SDP for candidatestriggered by (a) signal decays and (b) by the rest of the event

62 Background studies

Among the background yields in the signal region given in Table 1 the only sizeablecomponents are due to combinatorial background and B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays The SDP

10

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

0

0002

0004

0006

0008

001

0012

0014

(a)LHCb

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

000020004000600080010012001400160018

(b)LHCb Simulation

Figure 5 SDP distributions of the background contributions from (a) combinatorial backgroundand (b) B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays

distributions of these backgrounds are described by the histograms shown in Fig 5Combinatorial background contributes 22 of candidates in the signal region The

shape of this contribution over the SDP is obtained from the high B mass sideband (5400ndash5900 MeV) As seen in Fig 2 this sideband is dominated by combinatorial backgroundwith a small contribution from B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays The SDP distribution of theB0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus contribution in the sideband region is modelled as described belowfor the signal region and is subtracted from the sideband sample To check that theSDP shape of the combinatorial background does not vary with the B candidate massa sample of doubly charged D0Kplusmnπplusmn candidates is investigated This confirms that theSDP distribution from the sideband is a reliable model for combinatorial background inthe signal region

The B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus contribution accounts for 16 of the candidates in the signalregion Its SDP distribution is obtained from a simulated sample with the B0 rarr D0π+πminus

and B0 rarr Dlowast0π+πminus contributions combined and reweighted as described in Sec 4 TheB0 rarr D0π+πminus decay mode is the dominant component of this background in the signalregion

Due to resolution effects B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ Dlowast(2010)minus rarr D0πminus decays are notentirely removed by the Dlowast veto Although this component corresponds to real B0 rarrD0πminusK+ decays it is treated as incoherent (ie as background) since its interference withthe remainder of the signal is negligible Its SDP distribution is modelled as a Gaussianpeak in m(D0πminus) with mean fixed to the known Dlowast(2010)minus mass and width and yielddetermined in the fit to data

11

Table 2 Signal contributions to the fit model where parameters and uncertainties are takenfrom Ref [37] The models are described in Sec 5

Resonance Spin DP axis Model Parameters

Klowast(892)0 1 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 89581plusmn 019 MeV Γ0 = 474plusmn 06 MeVKlowast(1410)0 1 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 1414plusmn 15 MeV Γ0 = 232plusmn 21 MeVKlowast0(1430)0 0 m2(K+πminus) LASS Determined from data (see text)Klowast2(1430)0 2 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 14324plusmn 13 MeV Γ0 = 109plusmn 5 MeVDlowast0(2400)minus 0 m2(D0πminus) RBW

Determined from data (see Table 3)Dlowast2(2460)minus 2 m2(D0πminus) RBW

Nonresonant 0 m2(D0πminus) dabba Fixed (see text)Nonresonant 1 m2(D0πminus) EFF Determined from data (see text)

63 Amplitude model for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays

The Dalitz plot fit is performed using the Laura++ [53] package The likelihood functionis given by

L =Ncprodi

[sumk

NkPk(m2i (D

0πminus)m2i (K

+πminus)) ]

(16)

where the index i runs over Nc candidates k runs over the signal and backgroundcomponents and Nk is the yield in each component The probability density function forthe signal component Psig is given by Eq (12) with the |A

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)|2

terms multiplied by the efficiency function described in Sec 61 As it is possible forthe minimisation procedure to find a local minimum of the negative log likelihood (NLL)profile the fit is repeated many times with randomised initial values to ensure the globalminimum is found

The nominal Dalitz plot fit model for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays is composed of severalresonant and nonresonant amplitudes Only those amplitudes that provide significantcontributions or that aid the fit stability are included Unnatural spin-parity states arenot considered as these do not decay to two pseudoscalars The eight amplitudes includedin this model are listed in Table 2 The width of the narrowest signal contribution tothe Dalitz plot (sim 50 MeV) is far larger than the mass resolution (sim 24 MeV) thereforeresolution effects are neglected

The real and imaginary parts of the complex coefficients cj defined in Eq (1) are freeparameters of the fit except for the coefficient of the Dlowast2(2460)minus component which is fixedto 1 as a reference The phases and magnitudes of the complex coefficients as well as fitfractions and interference fit fractions are derived from these free parameters In additionthe masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances are determined fromthe fit to data and are reported in Table 3 The statistical uncertainties on all parametersof interest are calculated using large samples of simulated pseudoexperiments Thesepseudoexperiments are also used to determine the correlations between the statisticaluncertainties on the parameters which are given in Appendix A The LASS parameters

12

Table 3 Masses and widths (MeV) determined in the fit to data with statistical uncertaintiesonly

Resonance Mass Width

Dlowast0(2400)minus 2360plusmn 15 255plusmn 26Dlowast2(2460)minus 24656plusmn 18 460plusmn 34

Table 4 Complex coefficients and fit fractions determined from the Dalitz plot fit Uncertaintiesare statistical only Note that the fit fractions magnitudes and phases are derived quantities

Resonance Fit fraction Isobar model coefficients() Real part Imaginary part Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 minus000plusmn 015 minus127plusmn 006 127plusmn 006 minus157plusmn 011Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 015plusmn 006 minus009plusmn 009 018plusmn 007 minus054plusmn 021Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 014plusmn 038 045plusmn 015 047plusmn 009 127plusmn 095LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 minus010plusmn 024 044plusmn 014 046plusmn 014 179plusmn 065

LASS total 67plusmn 27Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 minus032plusmn 009 minus047plusmn 007 057plusmn 005 minus216plusmn 019Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 minus080plusmn 008 minus044plusmn 014 091plusmn 007 minus264plusmn 015Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 100 000 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 minus039plusmn 009 036plusmn 017 053plusmn 007 240plusmn 027Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 minus062plusmn 006 minus003plusmn 006 062plusmn 006 minus309plusmn 010Total fit fraction 1134

are determined to be m0 = 1450plusmn 80 MeV Γ0 = 400plusmn 230 MeV a = 32plusmn 18 GeV andr = 09plusmn11 GeV while the parameter of the EFF lineshape of the Dπ P-wave nonresonantamplitude is determined to be α = 088plusmn 010 GeVminus2

The values of the fit fractions and complex coefficients obtained from the fit are shownin Table 4 while the values of the interference fit fractions are given in Appendix B Thesum of the fit fractions is seen to exceed unity mostly due to interference within the Dπ andKπ S-waves Note that in Table 4 and all results for fit fractions and derived quantitiesvalues are reported separately for both the Klowast0 (1430)0 and nonresonant components of theLASS lineshape as well as their coherent sum

Projections of the data and the nominal fit model onto m(K+πminus) m(D0πminus) andm(D0K+) are shown in Fig 6 Zooms are provided in the regions of the main resonantcontributions in Fig 7 Projections onto the cosine of the helicity angle of the D0πminus andK+πminus systems are shown in Figs 8 and 9 respectively These projections all show goodagreement between data and the fit model

Angular moments provide a useful method to investigate the helicity structure of thedecays The angular moments in m(D0πminus) and m(K+πminus) obtained as in Refs [1011]are shown in Figs 10 and 11 respectively The contributions due to the Klowast(892)0 andDlowast2(2460)minus resonances are seen as peaks in moments up to order 2 and order 4 respectivelyas expected for spin-1 and spin-2 resonances Reflections make the interpretation ofmoments at higher masses more difficult However the good agreement seen between data

13

and the fit model provides further support for the fit model being a good description ofthe data

The quality of the fit is evaluated by determining a two-dimensional χ2 value comparingthe data and fit model in 144 bins across the SDP that are defined adaptively to ensurethey are approximately equally populated The pull in each of these bins defined as thedifference between the data and the fit model divided by the uncertainty is shown inFig 12 The effective number of degrees of freedom of the χ2 is between Nbins minusNpars minus 1and Nbinsminus1 where Npars is the number of free parameters in the fit yielding a reduced χ2

in the range 099 ndash 122 Additional unbinned tests of fit quality [54] also show acceptableagreement between the data and the fit model

7 Systematic uncertainties

Systematic uncertainties are considered from sources that can be divided into two categoriesexperimental and model uncertainties Experimental uncertainties arise due to the signaland background yields in the signal region the distributions of the background componentsacross the SDP the variation of efficiency across the SDP and possible bias due to thefitting procedure Model uncertainties are considered due to the fixed parameters in thesignal model the addition or removal of marginal amplitudes and the choice of models forthe Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves The uncertainties due to all of these sourcesare combined in quadrature

The signal and background yields are determined from the fit to the B candidateinvariant mass distribution Systematic uncertainties are considered on the total yieldsdue to both statistical and systematic variations of these yields as evaluated in Ref [15]The yields in the signal region are varied appropriately and the effects of these variationson the parameters of interest are assigned as systematic uncertainties

The histograms describing the background distributions are each varied within statisticaluncertainties to establish the uncertainty due to the imperfect knowledge of the distributionof these backgrounds across the SDP The histograms describing the efficiency variationacross the SDP are also varied within their uncertainties prior to the spline fit Theefficiency histograms are also varied with local correlations to account for the effects ofany unknown correlations between neighbouring bins For each parameter the largeruncertainty is considered from the correlated and uncorrelated variations In addition thebinning scheme of the control sample used to evaluate PID performance is varied

An ensemble of pseudoexperiments is used to establish systematic uncertainties relatedto any potential fit bias Pseudoexperiments are generated using the parameters determinedin the fit to data and mean fitted values of the parameters are determined from Gaussianfits to the distributions of results obtained in the ensemble The differences between thegenerated and mean fitted values are found to be small Uncertainties are determined asthe sum in quadrature of the difference between the generated and mean fitted values andthe uncertainty on the mean fitted value from the Gaussian fit

Systematic uncertainties due to fixed parameters in the fit model are determined by

14

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310LHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350 LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310 LHCb (d)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

LHCb (e)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210LHCb (f)

Data Total fit 0(892)K 0(1410)K

S-wave (LASS)πK 0(1430)2Kminus

(2400)0Dminus

(2460)2D

S-wave (EFF)πD P-wave (EFF)πDminus

D Background

Figure 6 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) (c) m(K+πminus)and (e) m(D0K+) with the same projections shown in (b) (d) and (f) with a logarithmic y-axisscale Components are described in the legend

15

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

235 24 245 25 255

Can

dida

tes

4 M

eV

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m05 1 15

Can

dida

tes

13

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

LHCb (b)

Figure 7 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) in the Dlowast2(2460)minus

region and (b) the low m(K+πminus) region Components are as shown in Fig 6

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

) lt 235 GeVminusπ0D(m204 lt

LHCb(a)

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

) lt 255 GeVminusπ0D(m235 lt

LHCb(b)

Figure 8 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(D0πminus) in the mass ranges(a) 204 lt m(D0πminus) lt 235 GeV and (b) 235 lt m(D0πminus) lt 255 GeV Components are asshown in Fig 6

repeating the fit with these parameters varied The fixed masses and widths are variedwithin their uncertainties as shown in Table 2 while the BlattndashWeisskopf barrier radii rBWare varied independently for D0πminus and K+πminus resonances between 3 and 5 GeVminus1 [10]

The Klowast(1410)0 amplitude does not contribute significantly to the nominal fit modelso the fit is repeated with this component removed and the change in results is assignedas the associated systematic uncertainty In addition uncertainties are assigned fromthe changes in the results when an amplitude due to the Klowast(1680)0 resonance or from avirtual Blowast(5325)+ component as described in Ref [10] is included in the model

A Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D0Kminusπ+ observed both spin-1 and spin-3 resonances

at m(D0Kminus) sim 286 GeV [9 10] A spin-3 resonance has also been seen at m(D0πminus) sim276 GeV in B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] while an analysis of B+ rarr DminusK+π+ shows aspin-1 resonance at similar m(D+πminus) values [11] Uncertainties are assigned corresponding

16

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

) lt 08 GeVminusπ+K(m0 lt LHCb

(a)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 10 GeVminusπ+K(m08 lt LHCb

(b)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 13 GeVminusπ+K(m10 lt LHCb

(c)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

) lt 15 GeVminusπ+K(m14 lt LHCb

(d)

Figure 9 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(K+πminus) in the mass ranges(a) m(K+πminus) lt 08 GeV (b) 08 lt m(K+πminus) lt 10 GeV (c) 10 lt m(K+πminus) lt 13 GeV and(d) 14 lt m(K+πminus) lt 15 GeV Components are as shown in Fig 6

to the changes in results when either a spin-1 or spin-3 state at m(D0πminus) sim 276 GeV isadded to the nominal model

The LASS model used to describe the Kπ S-wave is replaced with a Flatte shape [55]which accounts for the Kηprime threshold near the Klowast0 (1430)0 mass and a resonant term witha modified mass dependent width [52] for the κ (also known as Klowast0(800)) state Thismodel gives an NLL that is worse by 44 units A model-independent description of theKπ S-wave is also used to fit the data with the uncertainty on each parameter takenas the larger of the two differences This alternative improves the NLL by 88 units butintroduces an additional four free parameters into the fit The dabba lineshape used todescribe the D0πminus S-wave is replaced with an EFF lineshape while a power-law model isintroduced as an alternative to the EFF lineshape that describes the D0πminus P-wave Thesealterations worsen the NLL by 30 units and improve it by 08 units respectively

The total systematic uncertainties due to experimental and model effects for fit fractionsand complex coefficients are given together with the results in Sec 8 The contributionsfrom different sources to the systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions masses and

17

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0002004006008

0101201401601802

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-30-25-20-15-10

-505

1015

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

310timesLHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

310timesLHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-8-6-4-202468

310timesLHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-8-6-4-20246

310timesLHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-6-4-202468

10

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 10 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(D0πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

18

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0

005

01

015

02

025

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

20

40

60

80

100310times

LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10-505

10152025

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25310times

LHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-20-15-10

-505

101520

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 11 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(K+πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

19

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Pull

-2

-1

0

1

2

LHCb

Figure 12 Differences between the data SDP distribution and the fit model across the SDP interms of the per-bin pull

Table 5 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths(MeV) Uncertainties given on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value SB fraction Efficiency Background SDP Fit bias Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 060 083 050 031 117Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 006 039 069 005 080Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 028 148 185 033 241LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 051 225 286 086 377

LASS total 67plusmn 27 026 186 160 102 267Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 023 072 053 054 107Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 021 139 143 040 204Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 070 070 049 015 111Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 003 081 059 057 115Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 086 191 052 038 219m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 46 81 70 37 122m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 001 037 022 029 051Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 28 131 139 48 199Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 05 09 09 05 14

widths are given in Tables 5 and 6 The dominant experimental systematic uncertaintyon most parameters is due to either the efficiency variation or background distributionsacross the SDP while the model uncertainties are generally dominated by the effects ofalternative descriptions of the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves For the parametersof broad components the model uncertainties dominate however for other parameters thestatistical experimental and model uncertainties are all of a similar magnitude

The stability of the fit results is confirmed by several cross-checks The data sample isdivided into subsamples according to the flavour of the B candidate the trigger decision

20

Table 6 Model uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths (MeV) Uncertaintiesgiven on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value Fixed parameters Addremove Alternative models Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 075 114 109 174Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 018 070 022 076Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 079 330 023 340LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 110 399 520 665

LASS total 67plusmn 27 053 142 521 543Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 036 187 056 198Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 055 195 711 740Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 018 073 099 124Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 027 140 346 374Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 031 199 215 295m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 61 93 256 279m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 009 105 048 115Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 40 180 435 472Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 14 05 24 29

the polarity of the magnet and the year of data taking Each subsample is fitted separatelyand all are seen to be consistent with the nominal fit results The fit is also repeatedwith additional resonance components to test the fit model Resonances up to spin-3 wereconsidered for all three pairs of daughters with the mass and width allowed to vary in thefit No additional significant contributions were observed

8 Results and summary

The results for the complex coefficients are reported in Table 7 with results for thefit fractions given in Table 8 The results for the interference fit fractions are givenin Appendix B Upper limits are determined on the fit fractions of the Klowast(1410)0 andDlowast3(2760)minus components which do not give significant contributions using the methoddescribed in Ref [10]

The fit fractions for resonant contributions are converted into quasi-two-body productbranching fractions by multiplying by B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus) = (92plusmn 06plusmn 07plusmn 06)times 10minus5which is obtained from the ratio of branching fractions B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus)B(B0 rarrD0π+πminus) [15] multiplied by the latest result for B(B0 rarr D0π+πminus) [12] accounting forthe different Dlowast(2010)minus veto windows used in the analyses and for the 37 residualbackground due to B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ decays The statistical correlation between theresults of Ref [15] and this analysis is found to be negligible The results for the productbranching fractions are shown in Table 9 For the K+πminus resonances where the branchingfractions to Kπ are known the product branching fractions are converted to the Bdecay branching fractions shown in Table 10 The results for B(B0 rarr D0Klowast(892)0) andB(B0 rarr Dlowast2(2460)minusK+)times B(Dlowast2(2460)minus rarr D0πminus) are consistent with and more precisethan previous measurements [14 1617]

21

Table 7 Results for the complex amplitudes and their uncertainties presented (top) in terms ofreal and imaginary parts and (bottom) in terms and magnitudes and phases The three quotederrors are statistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively

Resonance Real part Imaginary part

Klowast(892)0 minus000plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 034 minus127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 006Klowast(1410)0 015plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 009 minus009plusmn 009plusmn 018plusmn 018Klowast0(1430)0 014plusmn 038plusmn 048plusmn 038 045plusmn 015plusmn 037plusmn 017LASS nonresonant minus010plusmn 024plusmn 016plusmn 042 044plusmn 014plusmn 017plusmn 023Klowast2(1430)0 minus032plusmn 009plusmn 015plusmn 023 minus047plusmn 007plusmn 014plusmn 015Dlowast0(2400)minus minus080plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 022 minus044plusmn 014plusmn 012plusmn 018Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) minus039plusmn 009plusmn 009plusmn 014 036plusmn 017plusmn 014plusmn 023Dπ P-wave (EFF) minus062plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 011 minus003plusmn 006plusmn 005plusmn 010

Resonance Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 005 minus157plusmn 011plusmn 016plusmn 027Klowast(1410)0 018plusmn 007plusmn 010plusmn 011 minus054plusmn 021plusmn 055plusmn 104Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 009plusmn 010plusmn 014 127plusmn 095plusmn 104plusmn 081LASS nonresonant 046plusmn 014plusmn 016plusmn 029 179plusmn 065plusmn 035plusmn 069Klowast2(1430)0 057plusmn 005plusmn 004plusmn 008 minus216plusmn 019plusmn 043plusmn 043Dlowast0(2400)minus 091plusmn 007plusmn 006plusmn 017 minus264plusmn 015plusmn 014plusmn 023Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 053plusmn 007plusmn 004plusmn 014 240plusmn 027plusmn 024plusmn 044Dπ P-wave (EFF) 062plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 011 minus309plusmn 010plusmn 007plusmn 017

Table 8 Results for the fit fractions and their uncertainties () The three quoted errors arestatistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively Upper limits are givenat 90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Fit fraction Upper limitKlowast(892)0 374plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 17Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03plusmn 08plusmn 08 lt 32 (37)Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20plusmn 24plusmn 34LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38plusmn 38plusmn 67

LASS total 67plusmn 27plusmn 27plusmn 54Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17plusmn 11plusmn 20Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28plusmn 20plusmn 74Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12plusmn 11plusmn 12Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 10 (11)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14plusmn 12plusmn 37Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16plusmn 22plusmn 30

22

Table 9 Results for the product branching fractions The four quoted errors are statisticalexperimental systematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Product branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 342plusmn 013plusmn 010plusmn 016plusmn 040Klowast(1410)0 007plusmn 003plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 001 lt 029 (034)Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 018plusmn 022plusmn 031plusmn 005LASS nonresonant 044plusmn 034plusmn 034plusmn 061plusmn 005

LASS total 061plusmn 025plusmn 025plusmn 049plusmn 007Klowast2(1430)0 068plusmn 015plusmn 010plusmn 018plusmn 008Dlowast0(2400)minus 177plusmn 026plusmn 019plusmn 067plusmn 020Dlowast2(2460)minus 212plusmn 010plusmn 011plusmn 011plusmn 025Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 010 (011)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 060plusmn 013plusmn 011plusmn 034plusmn 007Dπ P-wave (EFF) 081plusmn 015plusmn 020plusmn 027plusmn 009

Table 10 Results for the branching fractions The four quoted errors are statistical experimentalsystematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at 90 (95 )confidence level

Resonance Branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 513plusmn 020plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 060Klowast(1410)0 159plusmn 068plusmn 181plusmn 159plusmn 036 lt 67 (78)Klowast0(1430)0 071plusmn 027plusmn 033plusmn 047plusmn 008LASS nonresonant 066plusmn 051plusmn 051plusmn 092plusmn 008

LASS total 092plusmn 038plusmn 038plusmn 074plusmn 011Klowast2(1430)0 204plusmn 045plusmn 030plusmn 054plusmn 025

The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus states are found to be

m(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (2360plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 28) MeV

Γ(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (255plusmn 26plusmn 20plusmn 47) MeV

m(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (24656plusmn 18plusmn 05plusmn 12) MeV

Γ(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (460plusmn 34plusmn 14plusmn 29) MeV

where the three uncertainties are statistical experimental systematic and model systematicrespectively These are consistent with though less precise than recent results from a DPanalysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] They also show good agreement with and havesimilar precision to earlier measurements of these quantities [1337]

In summary the first amplitude analysis of B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays has been presentedusing a data sample corresponding to 30 fbminus1 of pp collision data collected by the LHCbexperiment A good description of the data is obtained with a model containing contri-

23

butions from intermediate Klowast(892)0 Klowast(1410)0 Klowast2(1430)0 and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonanceswith additional components to describe broad structures in the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S-and P-waves The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances aremeasured as are the complex amplitudes and fit fractions for all components includedin the amplitude model The results can be used in conjunction with an analysis ofB0 rarr DK+πminus decays where the neutral D meson is reconstructed in final states such asK+Kminus to measure the CKM unitarity triangle parameter γ [1 2]

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to our colleagues in the CERN accelerator departments forthe excellent performance of the LHC We thank the technical and administrative staffat the LHCb institutes We acknowledge support from CERN and from the nationalagencies CAPES CNPq FAPERJ and FINEP (Brazil) NSFC (China) CNRSIN2P3(France) BMBF DFG HGF and MPG (Germany) INFN (Italy) FOM and NWO (TheNetherlands) MNiSW and NCN (Poland) MENIFA (Romania) MinES and FANO(Russia) MinECo (Spain) SNSF and SER (Switzerland) NASU (Ukraine) STFC (UnitedKingdom) NSF (USA) The Tier1 computing centres are supported by IN2P3 (France)KIT and BMBF (Germany) INFN (Italy) NWO and SURF (The Netherlands) PIC(Spain) GridPP (United Kingdom) We are indebted to the communities behind themultiple open source software packages on which we depend We are also thankful forthe computing resources and the access to software RampD tools provided by Yandex LLC(Russia) Individual groups or members have received support from EPLANET MarieSk lodowska-Curie Actions and ERC (European Union) Conseil general de Haute-SavoieLabex ENIGMASS and OCEVU Region Auvergne (France) RFBR (Russia) XuntaGaland GENCAT (Spain) Royal Society and Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851(United Kingdom)

24

Appendices

A Correlation matrices

The statistical correlations between the complex coefficients masses and widths determinedfrom the fit to data are given in terms of real and imaginary parts and in terms ofmagnitudes and phases in Tables 11 and 12 The correlations are determined using thesame sample of simulated pseudoexperiments used to calculate the statistical uncertaintieson fit parameters

B Results for interference fit fractions

The central values of the interference fit fractions are given in Table 13 The statisti-cal experimental systematic and model uncertainties on these quantities are given inTables 14 15 and 16

25

Tab

le11

Sta

tist

ical

corr

elat

ions

bet

wee

nth

ere

al(x

)an

dim

agin

ary

(y)

par

tsof

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

x0

y 0x

1y 1

x2

y 2x

3y 3

x4

y 4x

5y 5

x7

y 7x

8y 8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

x0

100

014

002

017minus

018

015minus

017

003

039minus

037

016minus

009minus

018minus

029

007minus

037minus

019

002

004

012

y 01

00minus

006minus

008

009minus

011minus

000

014

003

003

012

013minus

012minus

024

035minus

007

009

012

001minus

004

x1

100minus

009minus

008minus

014minus

004

029minus

001

003minus

020

018minus

021minus

031minus

017minus

036minus

008minus

017minus

023

002

y 11

000

050

340

09minus

001

060minus

039

002minus

003minus

003

007minus

002minus

004minus

016minus

002

007

002

x2

100minus

013

081

009

014minus

016minus

015

021

010

013

004minus

015minus

007

001minus

025

001

y 21

000

080

280

24minus

036minus

013

008minus

004minus

001minus

004

004minus

002minus

001minus

009minus

010

x3

100

020

013minus

034minus

010

033minus

008

008minus

004minus

005minus

007minus

003minus

033minus

009

y 31

00minus

012minus

012minus

051

029minus

034minus

053

009minus

012

009minus

014minus

036

001

x4

100minus

053

032minus

010minus

020

003

002minus

027minus

017minus

006

010minus

000

y 41

000

06minus

009

040

010

014

016

011minus

005

007minus

003

x5

100minus

029minus

003

022

002

004minus

008

002

045minus

006

y 51

00minus

031minus

034

006

003

024minus

014minus

072minus

033

x7

100

046

005

010minus

011minus

001

027

017

y 71

00minus

016

036minus

001

017

032

008

x8

100minus

003

001minus

006minus

009minus

014

y 81

000

290

020

15minus

002

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

26

Tab

le12

S

tati

stic

alco

rrel

atio

ns

bet

wee

nth

em

agnit

ud

es(a

)an

dp

has

es(∆

)of

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

a0

∆0

a1

∆1

a2

∆2

a3

∆3

a4

∆4

a5

∆5

a7

∆7

a8

∆8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

a0

100minus

011minus

008

005

024

003minus

014

004

004

001

021

002

022minus

022

038minus

000minus

004minus

009minus

001

004

∆0

100minus

010

012

003

020

014

014minus

001

045minus

005

010minus

008

035minus

007

005minus

022

006

007

009

a1

100minus

035minus

025

006

032

001minus

001minus

038

004minus

022minus

006

031

002

024

007minus

018minus

020

001

∆1

100

024

015

016

000

014

038minus

018minus

013

016

026

022minus

006minus

009minus

004minus

012

005

a2

100

004

011minus

028minus

007

039minus

009

007

027

010

001

001minus

015

004minus

003minus

013

∆2

100

015

077minus

020minus

010minus

001

024

009

013

003minus

009

005

001

023minus

010

a3

100minus

006

000minus

011

016minus

030minus

012

056

001

012

002minus

007minus

027minus

004

∆3

100minus

028minus

019

015

041minus

024minus

008minus

000minus

013

004

002

041

008

a4

100

013

005minus

017

014

018minus

000

006

000

014minus

019minus

009

∆4

100minus

016

016

017

012

000minus

002minus

019minus

003

003

001

a5

100

024minus

026minus

006

011

005minus

007

001

019

039

∆5

100minus

000minus

028minus

001minus

020minus

020

015

076

027

a7

100minus

001

017minus

006

004

013minus

005minus

024

∆7

100minus

012

037

003minus

000minus

027minus

012

a8

100minus

004minus

001

004

006

015

∆8

100minus

037minus

002minus

033minus

001

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

27

Table 13 Interference fit fractions () from the nominal DP fit The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 374 18 minus00 00 00 minus24 minus02 minus26 minus50A1 07 minus00 00 00 minus11 minus03 minus06 minus11A2 51 minus32 minus00 29 15 16 19A3 48 00 minus84 01 21 02A4 74 minus03 minus10 minus15 minus04A5 193 minus00 28 00A6 231 minus00 00A7 66 minus00A8 89

Table 14 Statistical uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes areall pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASSnonresonant (A4) Klowast2 (1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8)Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 15 07 00 00 00 09 04 04 05A1 03 00 00 00 07 03 04 05A2 20 26 00 11 05 15 05A3 38 00 32 04 34 08A4 17 06 01 06 05A5 28 00 31 00A6 12 00 00A7 14 00A8 16

28

Table 15 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () Theamplitudes are all pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0 (1430)0(A3) LASS nonresonant (A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave(dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fitfractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 12 05 00 00 00 23 02 04 05A1 08 00 00 00 04 08 07 09A2 24 31 00 14 20 26 11A3 38 00 36 02 26 03A4 11 22 02 05 10A5 20 00 40 00A6 11 00 00A7 12 00A8 22

Table 16 Model uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 17 08 00 00 00 26 07 08 14A1 08 00 00 00 08 06 08 11A2 34 29 00 58 17 36 27A3 66 00 83 03 35 07A4 20 17 02 12 10A5 74 00 45 00A6 12 00 00A7 37 00A8 29

29

References

[1] T Gershon On the measurement of the unitarity triangle angle γ from B0 rarr DKlowast0

decays Phys Rev D79 (2009) 051301(R) arXiv08102706

[2] T Gershon and M Williams Prospects for the measurement of the unitaritytriangle angle γ from B0 rarr DK+πminus decays Phys Rev D80 (2009) 092002arXiv09091495

[3] N Cabibbo Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays Phys Rev Lett 10 (1963) 531

[4] M Kobayashi and T Maskawa CP -violation in the renormalizable theory of weakinteraction Progress of Theoretical Physics 49 (1973) 652

[5] M Gronau and D London How to determine all the angles of the unitarity trianglefrom B0 rarr DK0

S and B0s rarr Dφ Phys Lett B253 (1991) 483

[6] M Gronau and D Wyler On determining a weak phase from CP asymmetries incharged B decays Phys Lett B265 (1991) 172

[7] I Dunietz CP violation with self-tagging Bd modes Phys Lett B270 (1991) 75

[8] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurement of CP violation parameters inB0 rarr DKlowast0 decays Phys Rev D90 (2014) 112002 arXiv14078136

[9] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of overlapping spin-1 and spin-

3 D0Kminus resonances at mass 286 GeVc2 Phys Rev Lett 113 (2014) 162001

arXiv14077574

[10] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ decays

Phys Rev D90 (2014) 072003 arXiv14077712

[11] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observation and amplitude analysis of theBminus rarr D+Kminusπminus decay Phys Rev D91 (2015) 092002 arXiv150302995

[12] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays

arXiv150501710 submitted to Phys Rev D

[13] Belle collaboration A Kuzmin et al Study of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays Phys RevD76 (2007) 012006 arXivhep-ex0611054

[14] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of branching fractions andresonance contributions for B0 rarr D0K+πminus and search for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decaysPhys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 011803 arXivhep-ex0509036

[15] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurements of the branching fractions of

the decays B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ and B0 rarr D

0K+πminus Phys Rev D87 (2013) 112009

arXiv13046317

30

[16] Belle collaboration P Krokovny et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K0 and B0 rarr D0Klowast0

decays Phys Rev Lett 90 (2003) 141802 arXivhep-ex0212066

[17] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of B0 rarr D(lowast)0K(lowast)0 branchingfractions Phys Rev D74 (2006) 031101 arXivhep-ex0604016

[18] LHCb collaboration A A Alves Jr et al The LHCb detector at the LHC JINST 3(2008) S08005

[19] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al LHCb detector performance Int J Mod PhysA30 (2015) 1530022 arXiv14126352

[20] R Aaij et al Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator JINST 9 (2014) P09007arXiv14057808

[21] R Arink et al Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker JINST 9 (2014) P01002arXiv13113893

[22] M Adinolfi et al Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Eur PhysJ C73 (2013) 2431 arXiv12116759

[23] A A Alves Jr et al Performance of the LHCb muon system JINST 8 (2013) P02022arXiv12111346

[24] R Aaij et al The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011 JINST 8 (2013) P04022arXiv12113055

[25] V V Gligorov and M Williams Efficient reliable and fast high-level triggering usinga bonsai boosted decision tree JINST 8 (2013) P02013 arXiv12106861

[26] T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P Skands PYTHIA 64 physics and manual JHEP05 (2006) 026 arXivhep-ph0603175 T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P SkandsA brief introduction to PYTHIA 81 Comput Phys Commun 178 (2008) 852arXiv07103820

[27] I Belyaev et al Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss the LHCbsimulation framework J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032047

[28] D J Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package Nucl Instrum MethA462 (2001) 152

[29] P Golonka and Z Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo A precision tool for QED correctionsin Z and W decays Eur Phys J C45 (2006) 97 arXivhep-ph0506026

[30] Geant4 collaboration J Allison et al Geant4 developments and applications IEEETrans Nucl Sci 53 (2006) 270 Geant4 collaboration S Agostinelli et al Geant4A simulation toolkit Nucl Instrum Meth A506 (2003) 250

31

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 4: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

mesons available at LHCb compared to that used in the only other published DP analysisof B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays from the Belle collaboration [13] allows useful results on excitedcharm mesons to be obtained Moreover results on charm meson spectroscopy obtainedfrom DP analysis of B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays provide important independent cross-checksof results from studies of the B0 rarr D0π+πminus DP as possible biases due to other structuresin the Dalitz plots are different between the two modes

In this paper an amplitude analysis of the B0 rarr D0K+πminus decay is reported Theinclusion of charge-conjugate processes is implied throughout the paper The analysisis based on a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 30 fbminus1 of ppcollision data collected with the LHCb detector in 2011 and 2012 when the collisioncentre-of-mass energy was

radics = 7 TeV (10 fbminus1) and

radics = 8 TeV (20 fbminus1) respectively

Previously the branching fraction for the three-body decay has been measured [14 15]and the B0 rarr D0Klowast(892)0 [16 17] and B0 rarr Dlowast2(2460)minusK+ [14] contributions have beenmeasured using quasi-two-body approaches however this is the first DP analysis of theB0 rarr D0K+πminus decay

The paper is organised as follows A description of the LHCb detector reconstructionand simulation software is given in Sec 2 The selection of signal candidates is describedin Sec 3 and the determination of signal and background yields is presented in Sec 4An overview of the Dalitz plot analysis formalism is given in Sec 5 and details of theimplementation of the amplitude analysis are presented in Sec 6 The evaluation ofsystematic uncertainties is described in Sec 7 with results and a brief summary given inSec 8

2 LHCb detector and software

The LHCb detector [1819] is a single-arm forward spectrometer covering the pseudorapidityrange 2 lt η lt 5 designed for the study of particles containing b or c quarks The detectorincludes a high-precision tracking system consisting of a silicon-strip vertex detector [20]surrounding the pp interaction region a large-area silicon-strip detector located upstreamof a dipole magnet with a bending power of about 4 Tm and three stations of silicon-stripdetectors and straw drift tubes [21] placed downstream of the magnet The polarity ofthe dipole magnet is reversed periodically throughout data-taking The tracking systemprovides a measurement of momentum p of charged particles with a relative uncertaintythat varies from 05 at low momentum to 10 at 200 GeV (natural units with c = ~ = 1are used) The minimum distance of a track to a primary vertex the impact parameter(IP) is measured with a resolution of (15 + 29pT)microm where pT is the component ofthe momentum transverse to the beam in GeV Different types of charged hadronsare distinguished using information from two ring-imaging Cherenkov detectors [22]Photon electron and hadron candidates are identified by a calorimeter system consisting ofscintillating-pad and preshower detectors an electromagnetic calorimeter and a hadroniccalorimeter Muons are identified by a system composed of alternating layers of iron andmultiwire proportional chambers [23]

2

The trigger [24] consists of a hardware stage based on information from the calorimeterand muon systems followed by a software stage in which all tracks with pT gt 500 (300) MeVare reconstructed for data collected in 2011 (2012) The software trigger used in thisanalysis requires a two- three- or four-track secondary vertex with significant displacementfrom any primary pp interaction vertex (PV) At least one charged particle must havepT gt 17 GeV and be inconsistent with originating from a PV A multivariate algorithm [25]is used for the identification of secondary vertices consistent with the decay of a b hadron

In the offline selection the objects that prompted a positive trigger decision areassociated with reconstructed particles Selection requirements can therefore be made notonly on whether the hardware trigger decision was due to a signature in the calorimetersor in the muon system but on whether the decision was due to the signal candidate otherparticles produced in the pp collision or a combination of both Signal candidates areaccepted offline if at least one of the final-state particles created a cluster in the hadroniccalorimeter with sufficient transverse energy to fire the hardware trigger Events that aretriggered at the hardware level by another particle in the event are also retained Afterall selection requirements are imposed 67 of events in the sample were triggered bythe decay products of the signal candidate while the remainder were triggered only byanother particle in the event

Simulated events are used to characterise the detector response to signal and certaintypes of background events In the simulation pp collisions are generated using Pythia [26]with a specific LHCb configuration [27] Decays of hadronic particles are describedby EvtGen [28] in which final-state radiation is generated using Photos [29] Theinteraction of the generated particles with the detector and its response are implementedusing the Geant4 toolkit [30] as described in Ref [31]

3 Selection requirements

The selection requirements follow closely those used in Ref [10] The more copiousB0 rarr D0π+πminus decay is topologically and kinematically similar to the B0 rarr D0K+πminus

channel allowing it to be used as a control mode to optimise the selection requirementsLoose initial requirements are used to obtain a visible signal peak of D0π+πminus candidatesThe tracks are required to be of good quality and must be above thresholds in p pT andχ2

IP where χ2IP is defined as the difference in χ2 of a given PV reconstructed with and

without the considered particle The D0 rarr K+πminus candidate must satisfy criteria on itsvertex quality (χ2

vtx) and flight distance from any PV and from the B candidate vertexand must have invariant mass m(K+πminus) in the range 1814ndash1914 MeV A requirementon the output of a boosted decision tree that identifies D0 rarr K+πminus decays originatingfrom b hadron decays (D0 BDT) [32 33] is also applied Candidate B mesons are selectedwith requirements on invariant mass χ2

IP and on the cosine of the angle between the Bmomentum vector and the line from the PV under consideration to the B vertex (cos θdir)A requirement is placed on the χ2 of a kinematic fit [34] to the candidatersquos decay chain inwhich the D0 mass is constrained to its nominal value The four final-state tracks must

3

satisfy pion and kaon particle identification (PID) criteriaA neural network [35] is used to discriminate between signal decays and combinatorial

background The sPlot technique [36] with the B candidate mass as the discriminatingvariable is used to separate statistically B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays from background Thesignal and background weights returned by this method are applied to the candidateswhich are then used to train the network The network is trained using 16 variables Theyinclude the χ2

IP of the four final-state tracks and the following variables associated tothe D0 candidate χ2

IP χ2vtx the square of the flight distance from the PV divided by

its uncertainty squared (χ2flight) cos θdir and the output of the D0 BDT In addition the

following variables associated to the B candidate are included pT χ2IP χ2

vtx χ2flight and

cos θdir The pT asymmetry [10] and track multiplicity in a cone with half-angle of 15units of the plane of pseudorapidity and azimuthal angle (measured in radians) aroundthe B candidate flight direction which contain information about the isolation of the Bcandidate from the rest of the event are also used The input quantities to the neuralnetwork depend only weakly on the position of the candidate in the B decay Dalitz plotand therefore any requirement on the network output cannot appreciably bias the DPdistribution A requirement imposed on the network output reduces the combinatorialbackground remaining after the initial selection by a factor of five while retaining morethan 90 of the signal

The B0 rarr D0K+πminus candidates must satisfy the same selection as the B0 rarr D0π+πminus

decays except for the PID requirement on the positively charged track from the B decayvertex which is imposed to preferentially select kaons rather than pions The PID efficiencyis evaluated from calibration samples of D0 rarr Kminusπ+ decays from the Dlowast+ rarr D0π+ decaychain The kinematics of this decay chain can be exploited to obtain clean samples withoutusing the PID information [22] The PID efficiency of the requirements on the four tracksin the final state is around 50 and varies depending on the kinematics of the tracks asdescribed in detail in Sec 61

Candidates are vetoed when the difference between m(K+πminusπminus) and m(K+πminus) lieswithin plusmn25 MeV of the known Dlowast(2010)minusndashD0 mass difference [37] to remove backgroundcontaining Dlowastminus rarr D0πminus decays Candidates are also rejected if a similar mass differencecalculated with the pion mass hypothesis applied to the bachelor kaon satisfies the samecriterion To reject backgrounds from B0 rarr DminusK+ Dminus rarr K+πminusπminus decays it is requiredthat the combination of the pion from the D0 candidate together with the two bachelorparticles does not have an invariant mass in the range 1850ndash1890 MeV Additionallycandidates are removed if the pion and kaon originating directly from the B0 decaycombine to give an invariant mass consistent with that of the D0 meson (1835ndash1880 MeV)This removes candidates with the D0 wrongly reconstructed as well as potential backgroundfrom B0 rarr D0D0 decays Other incorrectly reconstructed candidates are removed byvetoing candidates where the pion from the D0 decay and the kaon originating directlyfrom the B0 decay give an invariant mass in the range 1850ndash1885 MeV At least one ofthe pion candidates is required to have no associated hits in the muon system to removepotential background from B0 rarr JψKlowast0 decays Charmless decays of b hadrons aresuppressed by the use of the D0 BDT and further reduced to a negligible level by requiring

4

that the D0 candidate vertex is separated from the B0 decay vertex by at least 1 mmSignal candidates are retained for further analysis if they have invariant mass in the

range 5100ndash5900 MeV After all selection requirements are applied fewer than 1 ofselected events also contain a second candidate Such multiple candidates are retained andtreated in the same manner as other candidates the associated systematic uncertainty isnegligible

4 Determination of signal and background yields

The signal and background yields are determined from an extended maximum likelihoodfit to the B candidate invariant mass distribution The fit allows for signal decayscombinatorial background and contributions from other b hadron decays The decay chainB0 rarr Dlowast0K+πminus with Dlowast0 rarr D0γ or D0π0 forms a partially reconstructed backgroundthat peaks at low B candidate mass as the neutral particle is not included in the candidateMisidentified B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus Λ0

b rarr D(lowast)0K+p and B0(s) rarr D(lowast)0K+Kminus decays are found

to contribute to the background A possible contribution from the highly suppressedB0s rarr D0K+πminus decay mode is also included in the fit

The signal peak is modelled with the sum of two Crystal Ball [38] functions whichhave tails on opposite sides and which share a common mean The tail parameters arefixed to the values found in fits to simulated signal decays The relative normalisationand the ratio of widths of the two functions are constrained within uncertainties tothe values determined in a fit to B0 rarr D0π+πminus data The B0

s rarr D0K+πminus shape ismodelled identically to the signal peak with the difference between the B0 and B0

s masspeak positions fixed to its known value [37] An exponential shape is used to model thecombinatorial background

Misidentified and partially reconstructed backgrounds are modelled with smoothednon-parametric functions Simulated samples are used to obtain the shape for B0 rarrDlowast0K+πminus decays with the Dlowast0 rarr D0γ and D0π0 contributions generated in the correctproportions [37] To account for differences between simulation and data for examplein the polarisation of the Dlowast0 meson the B candidate invariant mass distribution forpartially reconstructed B0 rarr Dlowast0K+πminus decays is allowed to be shifted by an offset thatis a free parameter of the fit The misidentified background shapes are also obtainedfrom simulated samples For B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays the D0 and Dlowast0 contributions arecombined according to their relative branching fractions [37] The backgrounds fromΛ0b rarr D(lowast)0K+p and B0

(s) rarr D(lowast)0K+Kminus decays are assumed to have equal branching

fractions for the decays with D0 and Dlowast0 mesons in the final state as the decays involvingDlowast0 mesons have not yet been measured The simulated samples are reweighted accordingto the relevant particle identification and misidentification probabilities and to match knownDP distributions [1239ndash41] The (mis)identification probabilities take account of trackkinematics and are calculated using calibration samples of Dlowast+ rarr D0π+ D0 rarr Kminusπ+

and Λrarr pπminus decays [1922] The yields of the misidentified backgrounds relative to thesignal are constrained within uncertainties to their expected values based on their known

5

Table 1 Yields from the fit to the D0K+πminus data sample The full mass range is 5100ndash5900 MeVand the signal region is 524855ndash530905 MeV

Component Full mass range Signal region

B0 rarr D0K+πminus 2576plusmn 72 2344plusmn 66B0s rarr D0K+πminus 55plusmn 27 1plusmn 1

comb bkgd 5540plusmn 187 684plusmn 23B0 rarr Dlowast0K+πminus 1750plusmn 99 6plusmn 1B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus 485plusmn 47 51plusmn 5Λ0b rarr D(lowast)0K+p 95plusmn 26 18plusmn 5

B0 rarr D(lowast)0K+Kminus 127plusmn 27 10plusmn 2B0s rarr D(lowast)0K+Kminus 54plusmn 18 14plusmn 5

) [MeV]-π+K0

D(m5200 5400 5600 5800

Can

dida

tes

8 M

eV

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700 LHCb (a)Data

Total fitminusπ+K

0D rarr (s)

0B

Combinatorial bkgminusπ+K 0D rarr 0Bminusπ+π( )0D rarr 0B

p+K( )0D rarr 0bΛ

minusK+K( )0D rarr (s)0B

) [MeV]-π+K0

D(m5200 5400 5600 5800

Can

dida

tes

8 M

eV

1

10

210

310(b)LHCb

Figure 2 Results of the fit to the B candidate invariant mass distribution with (a) linear and(b) logarithmic y-axis scales The components are as described in the legend

branching fractions [123940] and misidentification probabilitiesThere are 14 free parameters in the fit model the mean and width of the signal shape

the relative normalisation and relative width of the two Crystal Ball functions the slopeof the exponential function the offset of the B0 rarr Dlowast0K+πminus shape and the yields of theeight contributions The result of the fit is shown in Fig 2 and the yields are summarisedin Table 1 The yields are also reported within the signal region used in the Dalitz plotfit corresponding to plusmn25 widths of the B0 signal shape (524855ndash530905 MeV) Thedistribution of candidates in the signal region over the Dalitz plot is shown in Fig 3(a)Note that a B0 mass constraint is applied to calculate the variables that are used todescribe the Dalitz plot [42] improving the resolution of those variables and giving aunique kinematic boundary

6

]2) [GeVminusπ0D(2m

5 10 15 20

]2)

[GeV

minus π+K(2

m

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

(a)LHCb

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

091

(b)LHCb

Figure 3 Distribution of B0 rarr D0K+πminus candidates in the signal region over (a) the Dalitz plotand (b) the square Dalitz plot The definition of the square Dalitz plot is given in Sec 61

5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism

In B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays resonances are expected in the m2(D0πminus) and m2(K+πminus)combinations so the Dalitz plot shown in Fig 3(a) is defined in terms of these twoinvariant mass squared terms For a fixed B0 mass these two invariant mass squaredcombinations can be used to calculate all other relevant kinematic quantities

The isobar model [43ndash45] is used to describe the complex decay amplitude The totalamplitude is given by the coherent sum of amplitudes from resonant and nonresonantintermediate contributions and is given by

A(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)=

Nsumj=1

cjFj(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

) (1)

where cj are complex coefficients describing the relative contribution for each intermediateprocess The resonant dynamics are contained in the Fj

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)terms

that are normalised such that the integral of the squared magnitude over the DP is unityfor each term For a D0πminus resonance Fj

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)is given by

F(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)= R

(m(D0πminus)

)timesX(|~p | rBW)timesX(|~q | rBW)times T (~p ~q ) (2)

where ~p is the bachelor particle momentum and ~q is the momentum of one of the resonancedaughters both evaluated in the D0πminus rest frame The functions R X and T are describedbelow

The X(z) terms are BlattndashWeisskopf barrier factors [46] where z = |~q | rBW or |~p | rBW

and rBW is the barrier radius which is set to 40 GeVminus1 asymp 08 fm [10] for all resonances

7

The barrier factors are angular momentum dependent and are given by

L = 0 X(z) = 1

L = 1 X(z) =radic

1+z201+z2

L = 2 X(z) =radic

z40+3z20+9

z4+3z2+9

L = 3 X(z) =radic

z60+6z40+45z20+225

z6+6z4+45z2+225

(3)

where z0 is the value of z at the pole mass of the resonance and L is the orbital angularmomentum between the resonance and the bachelor particle Since the parent and daughterparticles all have zero spin L is also the spin of the resonance

The T (~p ~q) terms describe the angular distributions in the Zemach tensor formalism [4748] and are given by

L = 0 T (~p ~q) = 1 L = 1 T (~p ~q) = minus 2 ~p middot ~q L = 2 T (~p ~q) = 4

3[3(~p middot ~q )2 minus (|~p ||~q |)2]

L = 3 T (~p ~q) = minus 2415

[5(~p middot ~q )3 minus 3(~p middot ~q )(|~p ||~q |)2]

(4)

These expressions are proportional to the Legendre polynomials PL(x) where x is thecosine of the angle between ~p and ~q (referred to as the helicity angle)

The R(m(D0πminus)

)functions are the mass lineshapes Resonant contributions are

typically described by the relativistic BreitndashWigner (RBW) function

R(m) =1

(m20 minusm2)minus im0Γ(m)

(5)

where the mass-dependent decay width is

Γ(m) = Γ0

(q

q0

)2L+1 (m0

m

)X2(q rBW) (6)

where q0 is the value of q = |~q | when the invariant mass is equal to the pole mass of theresonance m0

The large phase space available in B decays allows for the presence of nonresonantamplitudes (ie contributions that do not proceed via a known resonance) that vary acrossthe Dalitz plot An exponential form factor (EFF) has been found to describe nonresonantcontributions well in several DP analyses of B decays [49]

R(m) = exp[minusαm2

] (7)

where α is a shape parameter that must be determined from the data and m is a two-bodyinvariant mass (m(D0πminus) in this example)

The RBW function is a good model for narrow resonances that are well separated fromany other resonant or nonresonant contribution of the same spin This approach is known

8

to break down in the Kπ S-wave because the Klowast0(1430) resonance interferes strongly witha slowly varying nonresonant term as described in Ref [50] The LASS lineshape [51] hasbeen developed to combine these two contributions

R(m) =m

q cot δB minus iq+ exp [2iδB]

m0Γ0m0

q0

(m20 minusm2)minus im0Γ0

qmm0

q0

(8)

where cot δB =1

aq+

1

2rq (9)

and where m0 and Γ0 are the pole mass and width of the Klowast0(1430) state and a and r areshape parameters

The Dπ S-wave nonresonant contribution can be described by the ldquodabbardquo line-shape [52] defined as

R(m) =Bprime(m2)(m2 minus sA)ρ

1minus β(m2 minusm2min)minus iBprime(m2)(m2 minus sA)ρ

(10)

whereBprime(m2) = b exp

[minusα(m2 minusm2

min)] (11)

Here mmin is the invariant mass at threshold sA = m2D minus 05m2

π is the Adler zero ρ isa phase-space factor and b α and β are parameters with values fixed to 2449 GeVminus201 GeVminus2 and 01 GeVminus2 respectively according to Ref [52]

Ignoring reconstruction and selection effects the DP probability density function wouldbe

Pphys

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)=

|A(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)|2intint

DP|A|2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)

(12)

where the dependence of A on the DP position has been suppressed in the denominator forbrevity The primary results of most Dalitz plot analyses are the complex coefficients asdefined in Eq (1) These however depend on the choice of phase convention amplitudeformalism and normalisation used in each analysis The convention-independent quantitiesof fit fractions and interference fit fractions provide a way to reliably compare resultsbetween different analyses Fit fractions are defined as the integral of the amplitude foreach intermediate component squared divided by that of the coherent matrix elementsquared for all intermediate contributions

FF j =

intintDP

∣∣cjFj (m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus))∣∣2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)intint

DP|A|2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)

(13)

The fit fractions need not sum to unity due to possible net constructive or destructiveinterference described by interference fit fractions defined (for i lt j only) by

FF ij =

intintDP

2Re[ciclowastjFiF

lowastj

]dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)intint

DP|A|2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)

(14)

where the dependence of F(lowast)i and A on the DP position has been omitted

9

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

Eff

icie

ncy

()

0

005

01

015

02

025(a)LHCb Simulation

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

Eff

icie

ncy

()

0

005

01

015

02

025(b)LHCb Simulation

Figure 4 Efficiency variation as a function of SDP position for candidates triggered by (a) signaldecay products and (b) by the rest of the event The vertical white stripe is due to the Dlowast vetoand the curved white band is due to the D0 veto

6 Dalitz plot fit

61 Signal efficiency

The variation of the efficiency across the phase space is studied in terms of the squareDalitz plot (SDP) The SDP is defined by variables mprime and θprime that range between 0 and 1and are given for the D0K+πminus case by

mprime equiv 1

πarccos

(2m(D0πminus)minusmmin

D0πminus

mmaxD0πminus minusmmin

D0πminus

minus 1

)and θprime equiv 1

πθ(D0πminus) (15)

where mmaxD0πminus = mB0 minusmK+ and mmin

D0πminus = mD0 + mπminus are the kinematic boundaries of

m(D0πminus) allowed in the B0 rarr D0K+πminus decay and θ(D0πminus) is the helicity angle of theD0πminus system (the angle between the K+ and the D0 meson in the D0πminus rest frame) Thedistribution of selected events across the SDP is shown in Fig 3(b)

Efficiency variation across the SDP is caused by the detector acceptance and bytrigger selection and PID requirements The efficiency is evaluated with simulated samplesgenerated uniformly over the SDP Data-driven corrections are applied to correct for knowndifferences between data and simulation in the tracking trigger and PID efficiencies usingidentical methods to those described in Ref [10] The efficiency functions are obtainedby fitting the corrected simulation with two-dimensional cubic splines Figure 4 showsthe histograms used to model the variation of the efficiency over the SDP for candidatestriggered by (a) signal decays and (b) by the rest of the event

62 Background studies

Among the background yields in the signal region given in Table 1 the only sizeablecomponents are due to combinatorial background and B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays The SDP

10

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

0

0002

0004

0006

0008

001

0012

0014

(a)LHCb

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

000020004000600080010012001400160018

(b)LHCb Simulation

Figure 5 SDP distributions of the background contributions from (a) combinatorial backgroundand (b) B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays

distributions of these backgrounds are described by the histograms shown in Fig 5Combinatorial background contributes 22 of candidates in the signal region The

shape of this contribution over the SDP is obtained from the high B mass sideband (5400ndash5900 MeV) As seen in Fig 2 this sideband is dominated by combinatorial backgroundwith a small contribution from B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays The SDP distribution of theB0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus contribution in the sideband region is modelled as described belowfor the signal region and is subtracted from the sideband sample To check that theSDP shape of the combinatorial background does not vary with the B candidate massa sample of doubly charged D0Kplusmnπplusmn candidates is investigated This confirms that theSDP distribution from the sideband is a reliable model for combinatorial background inthe signal region

The B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus contribution accounts for 16 of the candidates in the signalregion Its SDP distribution is obtained from a simulated sample with the B0 rarr D0π+πminus

and B0 rarr Dlowast0π+πminus contributions combined and reweighted as described in Sec 4 TheB0 rarr D0π+πminus decay mode is the dominant component of this background in the signalregion

Due to resolution effects B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ Dlowast(2010)minus rarr D0πminus decays are notentirely removed by the Dlowast veto Although this component corresponds to real B0 rarrD0πminusK+ decays it is treated as incoherent (ie as background) since its interference withthe remainder of the signal is negligible Its SDP distribution is modelled as a Gaussianpeak in m(D0πminus) with mean fixed to the known Dlowast(2010)minus mass and width and yielddetermined in the fit to data

11

Table 2 Signal contributions to the fit model where parameters and uncertainties are takenfrom Ref [37] The models are described in Sec 5

Resonance Spin DP axis Model Parameters

Klowast(892)0 1 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 89581plusmn 019 MeV Γ0 = 474plusmn 06 MeVKlowast(1410)0 1 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 1414plusmn 15 MeV Γ0 = 232plusmn 21 MeVKlowast0(1430)0 0 m2(K+πminus) LASS Determined from data (see text)Klowast2(1430)0 2 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 14324plusmn 13 MeV Γ0 = 109plusmn 5 MeVDlowast0(2400)minus 0 m2(D0πminus) RBW

Determined from data (see Table 3)Dlowast2(2460)minus 2 m2(D0πminus) RBW

Nonresonant 0 m2(D0πminus) dabba Fixed (see text)Nonresonant 1 m2(D0πminus) EFF Determined from data (see text)

63 Amplitude model for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays

The Dalitz plot fit is performed using the Laura++ [53] package The likelihood functionis given by

L =Ncprodi

[sumk

NkPk(m2i (D

0πminus)m2i (K

+πminus)) ]

(16)

where the index i runs over Nc candidates k runs over the signal and backgroundcomponents and Nk is the yield in each component The probability density function forthe signal component Psig is given by Eq (12) with the |A

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)|2

terms multiplied by the efficiency function described in Sec 61 As it is possible forthe minimisation procedure to find a local minimum of the negative log likelihood (NLL)profile the fit is repeated many times with randomised initial values to ensure the globalminimum is found

The nominal Dalitz plot fit model for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays is composed of severalresonant and nonresonant amplitudes Only those amplitudes that provide significantcontributions or that aid the fit stability are included Unnatural spin-parity states arenot considered as these do not decay to two pseudoscalars The eight amplitudes includedin this model are listed in Table 2 The width of the narrowest signal contribution tothe Dalitz plot (sim 50 MeV) is far larger than the mass resolution (sim 24 MeV) thereforeresolution effects are neglected

The real and imaginary parts of the complex coefficients cj defined in Eq (1) are freeparameters of the fit except for the coefficient of the Dlowast2(2460)minus component which is fixedto 1 as a reference The phases and magnitudes of the complex coefficients as well as fitfractions and interference fit fractions are derived from these free parameters In additionthe masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances are determined fromthe fit to data and are reported in Table 3 The statistical uncertainties on all parametersof interest are calculated using large samples of simulated pseudoexperiments Thesepseudoexperiments are also used to determine the correlations between the statisticaluncertainties on the parameters which are given in Appendix A The LASS parameters

12

Table 3 Masses and widths (MeV) determined in the fit to data with statistical uncertaintiesonly

Resonance Mass Width

Dlowast0(2400)minus 2360plusmn 15 255plusmn 26Dlowast2(2460)minus 24656plusmn 18 460plusmn 34

Table 4 Complex coefficients and fit fractions determined from the Dalitz plot fit Uncertaintiesare statistical only Note that the fit fractions magnitudes and phases are derived quantities

Resonance Fit fraction Isobar model coefficients() Real part Imaginary part Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 minus000plusmn 015 minus127plusmn 006 127plusmn 006 minus157plusmn 011Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 015plusmn 006 minus009plusmn 009 018plusmn 007 minus054plusmn 021Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 014plusmn 038 045plusmn 015 047plusmn 009 127plusmn 095LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 minus010plusmn 024 044plusmn 014 046plusmn 014 179plusmn 065

LASS total 67plusmn 27Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 minus032plusmn 009 minus047plusmn 007 057plusmn 005 minus216plusmn 019Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 minus080plusmn 008 minus044plusmn 014 091plusmn 007 minus264plusmn 015Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 100 000 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 minus039plusmn 009 036plusmn 017 053plusmn 007 240plusmn 027Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 minus062plusmn 006 minus003plusmn 006 062plusmn 006 minus309plusmn 010Total fit fraction 1134

are determined to be m0 = 1450plusmn 80 MeV Γ0 = 400plusmn 230 MeV a = 32plusmn 18 GeV andr = 09plusmn11 GeV while the parameter of the EFF lineshape of the Dπ P-wave nonresonantamplitude is determined to be α = 088plusmn 010 GeVminus2

The values of the fit fractions and complex coefficients obtained from the fit are shownin Table 4 while the values of the interference fit fractions are given in Appendix B Thesum of the fit fractions is seen to exceed unity mostly due to interference within the Dπ andKπ S-waves Note that in Table 4 and all results for fit fractions and derived quantitiesvalues are reported separately for both the Klowast0 (1430)0 and nonresonant components of theLASS lineshape as well as their coherent sum

Projections of the data and the nominal fit model onto m(K+πminus) m(D0πminus) andm(D0K+) are shown in Fig 6 Zooms are provided in the regions of the main resonantcontributions in Fig 7 Projections onto the cosine of the helicity angle of the D0πminus andK+πminus systems are shown in Figs 8 and 9 respectively These projections all show goodagreement between data and the fit model

Angular moments provide a useful method to investigate the helicity structure of thedecays The angular moments in m(D0πminus) and m(K+πminus) obtained as in Refs [1011]are shown in Figs 10 and 11 respectively The contributions due to the Klowast(892)0 andDlowast2(2460)minus resonances are seen as peaks in moments up to order 2 and order 4 respectivelyas expected for spin-1 and spin-2 resonances Reflections make the interpretation ofmoments at higher masses more difficult However the good agreement seen between data

13

and the fit model provides further support for the fit model being a good description ofthe data

The quality of the fit is evaluated by determining a two-dimensional χ2 value comparingthe data and fit model in 144 bins across the SDP that are defined adaptively to ensurethey are approximately equally populated The pull in each of these bins defined as thedifference between the data and the fit model divided by the uncertainty is shown inFig 12 The effective number of degrees of freedom of the χ2 is between Nbins minusNpars minus 1and Nbinsminus1 where Npars is the number of free parameters in the fit yielding a reduced χ2

in the range 099 ndash 122 Additional unbinned tests of fit quality [54] also show acceptableagreement between the data and the fit model

7 Systematic uncertainties

Systematic uncertainties are considered from sources that can be divided into two categoriesexperimental and model uncertainties Experimental uncertainties arise due to the signaland background yields in the signal region the distributions of the background componentsacross the SDP the variation of efficiency across the SDP and possible bias due to thefitting procedure Model uncertainties are considered due to the fixed parameters in thesignal model the addition or removal of marginal amplitudes and the choice of models forthe Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves The uncertainties due to all of these sourcesare combined in quadrature

The signal and background yields are determined from the fit to the B candidateinvariant mass distribution Systematic uncertainties are considered on the total yieldsdue to both statistical and systematic variations of these yields as evaluated in Ref [15]The yields in the signal region are varied appropriately and the effects of these variationson the parameters of interest are assigned as systematic uncertainties

The histograms describing the background distributions are each varied within statisticaluncertainties to establish the uncertainty due to the imperfect knowledge of the distributionof these backgrounds across the SDP The histograms describing the efficiency variationacross the SDP are also varied within their uncertainties prior to the spline fit Theefficiency histograms are also varied with local correlations to account for the effects ofany unknown correlations between neighbouring bins For each parameter the largeruncertainty is considered from the correlated and uncorrelated variations In addition thebinning scheme of the control sample used to evaluate PID performance is varied

An ensemble of pseudoexperiments is used to establish systematic uncertainties relatedto any potential fit bias Pseudoexperiments are generated using the parameters determinedin the fit to data and mean fitted values of the parameters are determined from Gaussianfits to the distributions of results obtained in the ensemble The differences between thegenerated and mean fitted values are found to be small Uncertainties are determined asthe sum in quadrature of the difference between the generated and mean fitted values andthe uncertainty on the mean fitted value from the Gaussian fit

Systematic uncertainties due to fixed parameters in the fit model are determined by

14

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310LHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350 LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310 LHCb (d)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

LHCb (e)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210LHCb (f)

Data Total fit 0(892)K 0(1410)K

S-wave (LASS)πK 0(1430)2Kminus

(2400)0Dminus

(2460)2D

S-wave (EFF)πD P-wave (EFF)πDminus

D Background

Figure 6 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) (c) m(K+πminus)and (e) m(D0K+) with the same projections shown in (b) (d) and (f) with a logarithmic y-axisscale Components are described in the legend

15

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

235 24 245 25 255

Can

dida

tes

4 M

eV

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m05 1 15

Can

dida

tes

13

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

LHCb (b)

Figure 7 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) in the Dlowast2(2460)minus

region and (b) the low m(K+πminus) region Components are as shown in Fig 6

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

) lt 235 GeVminusπ0D(m204 lt

LHCb(a)

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

) lt 255 GeVminusπ0D(m235 lt

LHCb(b)

Figure 8 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(D0πminus) in the mass ranges(a) 204 lt m(D0πminus) lt 235 GeV and (b) 235 lt m(D0πminus) lt 255 GeV Components are asshown in Fig 6

repeating the fit with these parameters varied The fixed masses and widths are variedwithin their uncertainties as shown in Table 2 while the BlattndashWeisskopf barrier radii rBWare varied independently for D0πminus and K+πminus resonances between 3 and 5 GeVminus1 [10]

The Klowast(1410)0 amplitude does not contribute significantly to the nominal fit modelso the fit is repeated with this component removed and the change in results is assignedas the associated systematic uncertainty In addition uncertainties are assigned fromthe changes in the results when an amplitude due to the Klowast(1680)0 resonance or from avirtual Blowast(5325)+ component as described in Ref [10] is included in the model

A Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D0Kminusπ+ observed both spin-1 and spin-3 resonances

at m(D0Kminus) sim 286 GeV [9 10] A spin-3 resonance has also been seen at m(D0πminus) sim276 GeV in B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] while an analysis of B+ rarr DminusK+π+ shows aspin-1 resonance at similar m(D+πminus) values [11] Uncertainties are assigned corresponding

16

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

) lt 08 GeVminusπ+K(m0 lt LHCb

(a)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 10 GeVminusπ+K(m08 lt LHCb

(b)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 13 GeVminusπ+K(m10 lt LHCb

(c)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

) lt 15 GeVminusπ+K(m14 lt LHCb

(d)

Figure 9 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(K+πminus) in the mass ranges(a) m(K+πminus) lt 08 GeV (b) 08 lt m(K+πminus) lt 10 GeV (c) 10 lt m(K+πminus) lt 13 GeV and(d) 14 lt m(K+πminus) lt 15 GeV Components are as shown in Fig 6

to the changes in results when either a spin-1 or spin-3 state at m(D0πminus) sim 276 GeV isadded to the nominal model

The LASS model used to describe the Kπ S-wave is replaced with a Flatte shape [55]which accounts for the Kηprime threshold near the Klowast0 (1430)0 mass and a resonant term witha modified mass dependent width [52] for the κ (also known as Klowast0(800)) state Thismodel gives an NLL that is worse by 44 units A model-independent description of theKπ S-wave is also used to fit the data with the uncertainty on each parameter takenas the larger of the two differences This alternative improves the NLL by 88 units butintroduces an additional four free parameters into the fit The dabba lineshape used todescribe the D0πminus S-wave is replaced with an EFF lineshape while a power-law model isintroduced as an alternative to the EFF lineshape that describes the D0πminus P-wave Thesealterations worsen the NLL by 30 units and improve it by 08 units respectively

The total systematic uncertainties due to experimental and model effects for fit fractionsand complex coefficients are given together with the results in Sec 8 The contributionsfrom different sources to the systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions masses and

17

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0002004006008

0101201401601802

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-30-25-20-15-10

-505

1015

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

310timesLHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

310timesLHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-8-6-4-202468

310timesLHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-8-6-4-20246

310timesLHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-6-4-202468

10

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 10 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(D0πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

18

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0

005

01

015

02

025

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

20

40

60

80

100310times

LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10-505

10152025

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25310times

LHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-20-15-10

-505

101520

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 11 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(K+πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

19

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Pull

-2

-1

0

1

2

LHCb

Figure 12 Differences between the data SDP distribution and the fit model across the SDP interms of the per-bin pull

Table 5 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths(MeV) Uncertainties given on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value SB fraction Efficiency Background SDP Fit bias Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 060 083 050 031 117Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 006 039 069 005 080Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 028 148 185 033 241LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 051 225 286 086 377

LASS total 67plusmn 27 026 186 160 102 267Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 023 072 053 054 107Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 021 139 143 040 204Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 070 070 049 015 111Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 003 081 059 057 115Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 086 191 052 038 219m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 46 81 70 37 122m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 001 037 022 029 051Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 28 131 139 48 199Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 05 09 09 05 14

widths are given in Tables 5 and 6 The dominant experimental systematic uncertaintyon most parameters is due to either the efficiency variation or background distributionsacross the SDP while the model uncertainties are generally dominated by the effects ofalternative descriptions of the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves For the parametersof broad components the model uncertainties dominate however for other parameters thestatistical experimental and model uncertainties are all of a similar magnitude

The stability of the fit results is confirmed by several cross-checks The data sample isdivided into subsamples according to the flavour of the B candidate the trigger decision

20

Table 6 Model uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths (MeV) Uncertaintiesgiven on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value Fixed parameters Addremove Alternative models Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 075 114 109 174Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 018 070 022 076Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 079 330 023 340LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 110 399 520 665

LASS total 67plusmn 27 053 142 521 543Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 036 187 056 198Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 055 195 711 740Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 018 073 099 124Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 027 140 346 374Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 031 199 215 295m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 61 93 256 279m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 009 105 048 115Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 40 180 435 472Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 14 05 24 29

the polarity of the magnet and the year of data taking Each subsample is fitted separatelyand all are seen to be consistent with the nominal fit results The fit is also repeatedwith additional resonance components to test the fit model Resonances up to spin-3 wereconsidered for all three pairs of daughters with the mass and width allowed to vary in thefit No additional significant contributions were observed

8 Results and summary

The results for the complex coefficients are reported in Table 7 with results for thefit fractions given in Table 8 The results for the interference fit fractions are givenin Appendix B Upper limits are determined on the fit fractions of the Klowast(1410)0 andDlowast3(2760)minus components which do not give significant contributions using the methoddescribed in Ref [10]

The fit fractions for resonant contributions are converted into quasi-two-body productbranching fractions by multiplying by B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus) = (92plusmn 06plusmn 07plusmn 06)times 10minus5which is obtained from the ratio of branching fractions B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus)B(B0 rarrD0π+πminus) [15] multiplied by the latest result for B(B0 rarr D0π+πminus) [12] accounting forthe different Dlowast(2010)minus veto windows used in the analyses and for the 37 residualbackground due to B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ decays The statistical correlation between theresults of Ref [15] and this analysis is found to be negligible The results for the productbranching fractions are shown in Table 9 For the K+πminus resonances where the branchingfractions to Kπ are known the product branching fractions are converted to the Bdecay branching fractions shown in Table 10 The results for B(B0 rarr D0Klowast(892)0) andB(B0 rarr Dlowast2(2460)minusK+)times B(Dlowast2(2460)minus rarr D0πminus) are consistent with and more precisethan previous measurements [14 1617]

21

Table 7 Results for the complex amplitudes and their uncertainties presented (top) in terms ofreal and imaginary parts and (bottom) in terms and magnitudes and phases The three quotederrors are statistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively

Resonance Real part Imaginary part

Klowast(892)0 minus000plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 034 minus127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 006Klowast(1410)0 015plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 009 minus009plusmn 009plusmn 018plusmn 018Klowast0(1430)0 014plusmn 038plusmn 048plusmn 038 045plusmn 015plusmn 037plusmn 017LASS nonresonant minus010plusmn 024plusmn 016plusmn 042 044plusmn 014plusmn 017plusmn 023Klowast2(1430)0 minus032plusmn 009plusmn 015plusmn 023 minus047plusmn 007plusmn 014plusmn 015Dlowast0(2400)minus minus080plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 022 minus044plusmn 014plusmn 012plusmn 018Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) minus039plusmn 009plusmn 009plusmn 014 036plusmn 017plusmn 014plusmn 023Dπ P-wave (EFF) minus062plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 011 minus003plusmn 006plusmn 005plusmn 010

Resonance Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 005 minus157plusmn 011plusmn 016plusmn 027Klowast(1410)0 018plusmn 007plusmn 010plusmn 011 minus054plusmn 021plusmn 055plusmn 104Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 009plusmn 010plusmn 014 127plusmn 095plusmn 104plusmn 081LASS nonresonant 046plusmn 014plusmn 016plusmn 029 179plusmn 065plusmn 035plusmn 069Klowast2(1430)0 057plusmn 005plusmn 004plusmn 008 minus216plusmn 019plusmn 043plusmn 043Dlowast0(2400)minus 091plusmn 007plusmn 006plusmn 017 minus264plusmn 015plusmn 014plusmn 023Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 053plusmn 007plusmn 004plusmn 014 240plusmn 027plusmn 024plusmn 044Dπ P-wave (EFF) 062plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 011 minus309plusmn 010plusmn 007plusmn 017

Table 8 Results for the fit fractions and their uncertainties () The three quoted errors arestatistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively Upper limits are givenat 90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Fit fraction Upper limitKlowast(892)0 374plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 17Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03plusmn 08plusmn 08 lt 32 (37)Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20plusmn 24plusmn 34LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38plusmn 38plusmn 67

LASS total 67plusmn 27plusmn 27plusmn 54Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17plusmn 11plusmn 20Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28plusmn 20plusmn 74Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12plusmn 11plusmn 12Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 10 (11)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14plusmn 12plusmn 37Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16plusmn 22plusmn 30

22

Table 9 Results for the product branching fractions The four quoted errors are statisticalexperimental systematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Product branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 342plusmn 013plusmn 010plusmn 016plusmn 040Klowast(1410)0 007plusmn 003plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 001 lt 029 (034)Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 018plusmn 022plusmn 031plusmn 005LASS nonresonant 044plusmn 034plusmn 034plusmn 061plusmn 005

LASS total 061plusmn 025plusmn 025plusmn 049plusmn 007Klowast2(1430)0 068plusmn 015plusmn 010plusmn 018plusmn 008Dlowast0(2400)minus 177plusmn 026plusmn 019plusmn 067plusmn 020Dlowast2(2460)minus 212plusmn 010plusmn 011plusmn 011plusmn 025Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 010 (011)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 060plusmn 013plusmn 011plusmn 034plusmn 007Dπ P-wave (EFF) 081plusmn 015plusmn 020plusmn 027plusmn 009

Table 10 Results for the branching fractions The four quoted errors are statistical experimentalsystematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at 90 (95 )confidence level

Resonance Branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 513plusmn 020plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 060Klowast(1410)0 159plusmn 068plusmn 181plusmn 159plusmn 036 lt 67 (78)Klowast0(1430)0 071plusmn 027plusmn 033plusmn 047plusmn 008LASS nonresonant 066plusmn 051plusmn 051plusmn 092plusmn 008

LASS total 092plusmn 038plusmn 038plusmn 074plusmn 011Klowast2(1430)0 204plusmn 045plusmn 030plusmn 054plusmn 025

The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus states are found to be

m(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (2360plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 28) MeV

Γ(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (255plusmn 26plusmn 20plusmn 47) MeV

m(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (24656plusmn 18plusmn 05plusmn 12) MeV

Γ(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (460plusmn 34plusmn 14plusmn 29) MeV

where the three uncertainties are statistical experimental systematic and model systematicrespectively These are consistent with though less precise than recent results from a DPanalysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] They also show good agreement with and havesimilar precision to earlier measurements of these quantities [1337]

In summary the first amplitude analysis of B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays has been presentedusing a data sample corresponding to 30 fbminus1 of pp collision data collected by the LHCbexperiment A good description of the data is obtained with a model containing contri-

23

butions from intermediate Klowast(892)0 Klowast(1410)0 Klowast2(1430)0 and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonanceswith additional components to describe broad structures in the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S-and P-waves The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances aremeasured as are the complex amplitudes and fit fractions for all components includedin the amplitude model The results can be used in conjunction with an analysis ofB0 rarr DK+πminus decays where the neutral D meson is reconstructed in final states such asK+Kminus to measure the CKM unitarity triangle parameter γ [1 2]

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to our colleagues in the CERN accelerator departments forthe excellent performance of the LHC We thank the technical and administrative staffat the LHCb institutes We acknowledge support from CERN and from the nationalagencies CAPES CNPq FAPERJ and FINEP (Brazil) NSFC (China) CNRSIN2P3(France) BMBF DFG HGF and MPG (Germany) INFN (Italy) FOM and NWO (TheNetherlands) MNiSW and NCN (Poland) MENIFA (Romania) MinES and FANO(Russia) MinECo (Spain) SNSF and SER (Switzerland) NASU (Ukraine) STFC (UnitedKingdom) NSF (USA) The Tier1 computing centres are supported by IN2P3 (France)KIT and BMBF (Germany) INFN (Italy) NWO and SURF (The Netherlands) PIC(Spain) GridPP (United Kingdom) We are indebted to the communities behind themultiple open source software packages on which we depend We are also thankful forthe computing resources and the access to software RampD tools provided by Yandex LLC(Russia) Individual groups or members have received support from EPLANET MarieSk lodowska-Curie Actions and ERC (European Union) Conseil general de Haute-SavoieLabex ENIGMASS and OCEVU Region Auvergne (France) RFBR (Russia) XuntaGaland GENCAT (Spain) Royal Society and Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851(United Kingdom)

24

Appendices

A Correlation matrices

The statistical correlations between the complex coefficients masses and widths determinedfrom the fit to data are given in terms of real and imaginary parts and in terms ofmagnitudes and phases in Tables 11 and 12 The correlations are determined using thesame sample of simulated pseudoexperiments used to calculate the statistical uncertaintieson fit parameters

B Results for interference fit fractions

The central values of the interference fit fractions are given in Table 13 The statisti-cal experimental systematic and model uncertainties on these quantities are given inTables 14 15 and 16

25

Tab

le11

Sta

tist

ical

corr

elat

ions

bet

wee

nth

ere

al(x

)an

dim

agin

ary

(y)

par

tsof

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

x0

y 0x

1y 1

x2

y 2x

3y 3

x4

y 4x

5y 5

x7

y 7x

8y 8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

x0

100

014

002

017minus

018

015minus

017

003

039minus

037

016minus

009minus

018minus

029

007minus

037minus

019

002

004

012

y 01

00minus

006minus

008

009minus

011minus

000

014

003

003

012

013minus

012minus

024

035minus

007

009

012

001minus

004

x1

100minus

009minus

008minus

014minus

004

029minus

001

003minus

020

018minus

021minus

031minus

017minus

036minus

008minus

017minus

023

002

y 11

000

050

340

09minus

001

060minus

039

002minus

003minus

003

007minus

002minus

004minus

016minus

002

007

002

x2

100minus

013

081

009

014minus

016minus

015

021

010

013

004minus

015minus

007

001minus

025

001

y 21

000

080

280

24minus

036minus

013

008minus

004minus

001minus

004

004minus

002minus

001minus

009minus

010

x3

100

020

013minus

034minus

010

033minus

008

008minus

004minus

005minus

007minus

003minus

033minus

009

y 31

00minus

012minus

012minus

051

029minus

034minus

053

009minus

012

009minus

014minus

036

001

x4

100minus

053

032minus

010minus

020

003

002minus

027minus

017minus

006

010minus

000

y 41

000

06minus

009

040

010

014

016

011minus

005

007minus

003

x5

100minus

029minus

003

022

002

004minus

008

002

045minus

006

y 51

00minus

031minus

034

006

003

024minus

014minus

072minus

033

x7

100

046

005

010minus

011minus

001

027

017

y 71

00minus

016

036minus

001

017

032

008

x8

100minus

003

001minus

006minus

009minus

014

y 81

000

290

020

15minus

002

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

26

Tab

le12

S

tati

stic

alco

rrel

atio

ns

bet

wee

nth

em

agnit

ud

es(a

)an

dp

has

es(∆

)of

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

a0

∆0

a1

∆1

a2

∆2

a3

∆3

a4

∆4

a5

∆5

a7

∆7

a8

∆8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

a0

100minus

011minus

008

005

024

003minus

014

004

004

001

021

002

022minus

022

038minus

000minus

004minus

009minus

001

004

∆0

100minus

010

012

003

020

014

014minus

001

045minus

005

010minus

008

035minus

007

005minus

022

006

007

009

a1

100minus

035minus

025

006

032

001minus

001minus

038

004minus

022minus

006

031

002

024

007minus

018minus

020

001

∆1

100

024

015

016

000

014

038minus

018minus

013

016

026

022minus

006minus

009minus

004minus

012

005

a2

100

004

011minus

028minus

007

039minus

009

007

027

010

001

001minus

015

004minus

003minus

013

∆2

100

015

077minus

020minus

010minus

001

024

009

013

003minus

009

005

001

023minus

010

a3

100minus

006

000minus

011

016minus

030minus

012

056

001

012

002minus

007minus

027minus

004

∆3

100minus

028minus

019

015

041minus

024minus

008minus

000minus

013

004

002

041

008

a4

100

013

005minus

017

014

018minus

000

006

000

014minus

019minus

009

∆4

100minus

016

016

017

012

000minus

002minus

019minus

003

003

001

a5

100

024minus

026minus

006

011

005minus

007

001

019

039

∆5

100minus

000minus

028minus

001minus

020minus

020

015

076

027

a7

100minus

001

017minus

006

004

013minus

005minus

024

∆7

100minus

012

037

003minus

000minus

027minus

012

a8

100minus

004minus

001

004

006

015

∆8

100minus

037minus

002minus

033minus

001

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

27

Table 13 Interference fit fractions () from the nominal DP fit The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 374 18 minus00 00 00 minus24 minus02 minus26 minus50A1 07 minus00 00 00 minus11 minus03 minus06 minus11A2 51 minus32 minus00 29 15 16 19A3 48 00 minus84 01 21 02A4 74 minus03 minus10 minus15 minus04A5 193 minus00 28 00A6 231 minus00 00A7 66 minus00A8 89

Table 14 Statistical uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes areall pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASSnonresonant (A4) Klowast2 (1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8)Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 15 07 00 00 00 09 04 04 05A1 03 00 00 00 07 03 04 05A2 20 26 00 11 05 15 05A3 38 00 32 04 34 08A4 17 06 01 06 05A5 28 00 31 00A6 12 00 00A7 14 00A8 16

28

Table 15 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () Theamplitudes are all pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0 (1430)0(A3) LASS nonresonant (A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave(dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fitfractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 12 05 00 00 00 23 02 04 05A1 08 00 00 00 04 08 07 09A2 24 31 00 14 20 26 11A3 38 00 36 02 26 03A4 11 22 02 05 10A5 20 00 40 00A6 11 00 00A7 12 00A8 22

Table 16 Model uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 17 08 00 00 00 26 07 08 14A1 08 00 00 00 08 06 08 11A2 34 29 00 58 17 36 27A3 66 00 83 03 35 07A4 20 17 02 12 10A5 74 00 45 00A6 12 00 00A7 37 00A8 29

29

References

[1] T Gershon On the measurement of the unitarity triangle angle γ from B0 rarr DKlowast0

decays Phys Rev D79 (2009) 051301(R) arXiv08102706

[2] T Gershon and M Williams Prospects for the measurement of the unitaritytriangle angle γ from B0 rarr DK+πminus decays Phys Rev D80 (2009) 092002arXiv09091495

[3] N Cabibbo Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays Phys Rev Lett 10 (1963) 531

[4] M Kobayashi and T Maskawa CP -violation in the renormalizable theory of weakinteraction Progress of Theoretical Physics 49 (1973) 652

[5] M Gronau and D London How to determine all the angles of the unitarity trianglefrom B0 rarr DK0

S and B0s rarr Dφ Phys Lett B253 (1991) 483

[6] M Gronau and D Wyler On determining a weak phase from CP asymmetries incharged B decays Phys Lett B265 (1991) 172

[7] I Dunietz CP violation with self-tagging Bd modes Phys Lett B270 (1991) 75

[8] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurement of CP violation parameters inB0 rarr DKlowast0 decays Phys Rev D90 (2014) 112002 arXiv14078136

[9] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of overlapping spin-1 and spin-

3 D0Kminus resonances at mass 286 GeVc2 Phys Rev Lett 113 (2014) 162001

arXiv14077574

[10] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ decays

Phys Rev D90 (2014) 072003 arXiv14077712

[11] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observation and amplitude analysis of theBminus rarr D+Kminusπminus decay Phys Rev D91 (2015) 092002 arXiv150302995

[12] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays

arXiv150501710 submitted to Phys Rev D

[13] Belle collaboration A Kuzmin et al Study of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays Phys RevD76 (2007) 012006 arXivhep-ex0611054

[14] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of branching fractions andresonance contributions for B0 rarr D0K+πminus and search for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decaysPhys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 011803 arXivhep-ex0509036

[15] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurements of the branching fractions of

the decays B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ and B0 rarr D

0K+πminus Phys Rev D87 (2013) 112009

arXiv13046317

30

[16] Belle collaboration P Krokovny et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K0 and B0 rarr D0Klowast0

decays Phys Rev Lett 90 (2003) 141802 arXivhep-ex0212066

[17] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of B0 rarr D(lowast)0K(lowast)0 branchingfractions Phys Rev D74 (2006) 031101 arXivhep-ex0604016

[18] LHCb collaboration A A Alves Jr et al The LHCb detector at the LHC JINST 3(2008) S08005

[19] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al LHCb detector performance Int J Mod PhysA30 (2015) 1530022 arXiv14126352

[20] R Aaij et al Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator JINST 9 (2014) P09007arXiv14057808

[21] R Arink et al Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker JINST 9 (2014) P01002arXiv13113893

[22] M Adinolfi et al Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Eur PhysJ C73 (2013) 2431 arXiv12116759

[23] A A Alves Jr et al Performance of the LHCb muon system JINST 8 (2013) P02022arXiv12111346

[24] R Aaij et al The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011 JINST 8 (2013) P04022arXiv12113055

[25] V V Gligorov and M Williams Efficient reliable and fast high-level triggering usinga bonsai boosted decision tree JINST 8 (2013) P02013 arXiv12106861

[26] T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P Skands PYTHIA 64 physics and manual JHEP05 (2006) 026 arXivhep-ph0603175 T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P SkandsA brief introduction to PYTHIA 81 Comput Phys Commun 178 (2008) 852arXiv07103820

[27] I Belyaev et al Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss the LHCbsimulation framework J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032047

[28] D J Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package Nucl Instrum MethA462 (2001) 152

[29] P Golonka and Z Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo A precision tool for QED correctionsin Z and W decays Eur Phys J C45 (2006) 97 arXivhep-ph0506026

[30] Geant4 collaboration J Allison et al Geant4 developments and applications IEEETrans Nucl Sci 53 (2006) 270 Geant4 collaboration S Agostinelli et al Geant4A simulation toolkit Nucl Instrum Meth A506 (2003) 250

31

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 5: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

The trigger [24] consists of a hardware stage based on information from the calorimeterand muon systems followed by a software stage in which all tracks with pT gt 500 (300) MeVare reconstructed for data collected in 2011 (2012) The software trigger used in thisanalysis requires a two- three- or four-track secondary vertex with significant displacementfrom any primary pp interaction vertex (PV) At least one charged particle must havepT gt 17 GeV and be inconsistent with originating from a PV A multivariate algorithm [25]is used for the identification of secondary vertices consistent with the decay of a b hadron

In the offline selection the objects that prompted a positive trigger decision areassociated with reconstructed particles Selection requirements can therefore be made notonly on whether the hardware trigger decision was due to a signature in the calorimetersor in the muon system but on whether the decision was due to the signal candidate otherparticles produced in the pp collision or a combination of both Signal candidates areaccepted offline if at least one of the final-state particles created a cluster in the hadroniccalorimeter with sufficient transverse energy to fire the hardware trigger Events that aretriggered at the hardware level by another particle in the event are also retained Afterall selection requirements are imposed 67 of events in the sample were triggered bythe decay products of the signal candidate while the remainder were triggered only byanother particle in the event

Simulated events are used to characterise the detector response to signal and certaintypes of background events In the simulation pp collisions are generated using Pythia [26]with a specific LHCb configuration [27] Decays of hadronic particles are describedby EvtGen [28] in which final-state radiation is generated using Photos [29] Theinteraction of the generated particles with the detector and its response are implementedusing the Geant4 toolkit [30] as described in Ref [31]

3 Selection requirements

The selection requirements follow closely those used in Ref [10] The more copiousB0 rarr D0π+πminus decay is topologically and kinematically similar to the B0 rarr D0K+πminus

channel allowing it to be used as a control mode to optimise the selection requirementsLoose initial requirements are used to obtain a visible signal peak of D0π+πminus candidatesThe tracks are required to be of good quality and must be above thresholds in p pT andχ2

IP where χ2IP is defined as the difference in χ2 of a given PV reconstructed with and

without the considered particle The D0 rarr K+πminus candidate must satisfy criteria on itsvertex quality (χ2

vtx) and flight distance from any PV and from the B candidate vertexand must have invariant mass m(K+πminus) in the range 1814ndash1914 MeV A requirementon the output of a boosted decision tree that identifies D0 rarr K+πminus decays originatingfrom b hadron decays (D0 BDT) [32 33] is also applied Candidate B mesons are selectedwith requirements on invariant mass χ2

IP and on the cosine of the angle between the Bmomentum vector and the line from the PV under consideration to the B vertex (cos θdir)A requirement is placed on the χ2 of a kinematic fit [34] to the candidatersquos decay chain inwhich the D0 mass is constrained to its nominal value The four final-state tracks must

3

satisfy pion and kaon particle identification (PID) criteriaA neural network [35] is used to discriminate between signal decays and combinatorial

background The sPlot technique [36] with the B candidate mass as the discriminatingvariable is used to separate statistically B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays from background Thesignal and background weights returned by this method are applied to the candidateswhich are then used to train the network The network is trained using 16 variables Theyinclude the χ2

IP of the four final-state tracks and the following variables associated tothe D0 candidate χ2

IP χ2vtx the square of the flight distance from the PV divided by

its uncertainty squared (χ2flight) cos θdir and the output of the D0 BDT In addition the

following variables associated to the B candidate are included pT χ2IP χ2

vtx χ2flight and

cos θdir The pT asymmetry [10] and track multiplicity in a cone with half-angle of 15units of the plane of pseudorapidity and azimuthal angle (measured in radians) aroundthe B candidate flight direction which contain information about the isolation of the Bcandidate from the rest of the event are also used The input quantities to the neuralnetwork depend only weakly on the position of the candidate in the B decay Dalitz plotand therefore any requirement on the network output cannot appreciably bias the DPdistribution A requirement imposed on the network output reduces the combinatorialbackground remaining after the initial selection by a factor of five while retaining morethan 90 of the signal

The B0 rarr D0K+πminus candidates must satisfy the same selection as the B0 rarr D0π+πminus

decays except for the PID requirement on the positively charged track from the B decayvertex which is imposed to preferentially select kaons rather than pions The PID efficiencyis evaluated from calibration samples of D0 rarr Kminusπ+ decays from the Dlowast+ rarr D0π+ decaychain The kinematics of this decay chain can be exploited to obtain clean samples withoutusing the PID information [22] The PID efficiency of the requirements on the four tracksin the final state is around 50 and varies depending on the kinematics of the tracks asdescribed in detail in Sec 61

Candidates are vetoed when the difference between m(K+πminusπminus) and m(K+πminus) lieswithin plusmn25 MeV of the known Dlowast(2010)minusndashD0 mass difference [37] to remove backgroundcontaining Dlowastminus rarr D0πminus decays Candidates are also rejected if a similar mass differencecalculated with the pion mass hypothesis applied to the bachelor kaon satisfies the samecriterion To reject backgrounds from B0 rarr DminusK+ Dminus rarr K+πminusπminus decays it is requiredthat the combination of the pion from the D0 candidate together with the two bachelorparticles does not have an invariant mass in the range 1850ndash1890 MeV Additionallycandidates are removed if the pion and kaon originating directly from the B0 decaycombine to give an invariant mass consistent with that of the D0 meson (1835ndash1880 MeV)This removes candidates with the D0 wrongly reconstructed as well as potential backgroundfrom B0 rarr D0D0 decays Other incorrectly reconstructed candidates are removed byvetoing candidates where the pion from the D0 decay and the kaon originating directlyfrom the B0 decay give an invariant mass in the range 1850ndash1885 MeV At least one ofthe pion candidates is required to have no associated hits in the muon system to removepotential background from B0 rarr JψKlowast0 decays Charmless decays of b hadrons aresuppressed by the use of the D0 BDT and further reduced to a negligible level by requiring

4

that the D0 candidate vertex is separated from the B0 decay vertex by at least 1 mmSignal candidates are retained for further analysis if they have invariant mass in the

range 5100ndash5900 MeV After all selection requirements are applied fewer than 1 ofselected events also contain a second candidate Such multiple candidates are retained andtreated in the same manner as other candidates the associated systematic uncertainty isnegligible

4 Determination of signal and background yields

The signal and background yields are determined from an extended maximum likelihoodfit to the B candidate invariant mass distribution The fit allows for signal decayscombinatorial background and contributions from other b hadron decays The decay chainB0 rarr Dlowast0K+πminus with Dlowast0 rarr D0γ or D0π0 forms a partially reconstructed backgroundthat peaks at low B candidate mass as the neutral particle is not included in the candidateMisidentified B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus Λ0

b rarr D(lowast)0K+p and B0(s) rarr D(lowast)0K+Kminus decays are found

to contribute to the background A possible contribution from the highly suppressedB0s rarr D0K+πminus decay mode is also included in the fit

The signal peak is modelled with the sum of two Crystal Ball [38] functions whichhave tails on opposite sides and which share a common mean The tail parameters arefixed to the values found in fits to simulated signal decays The relative normalisationand the ratio of widths of the two functions are constrained within uncertainties tothe values determined in a fit to B0 rarr D0π+πminus data The B0

s rarr D0K+πminus shape ismodelled identically to the signal peak with the difference between the B0 and B0

s masspeak positions fixed to its known value [37] An exponential shape is used to model thecombinatorial background

Misidentified and partially reconstructed backgrounds are modelled with smoothednon-parametric functions Simulated samples are used to obtain the shape for B0 rarrDlowast0K+πminus decays with the Dlowast0 rarr D0γ and D0π0 contributions generated in the correctproportions [37] To account for differences between simulation and data for examplein the polarisation of the Dlowast0 meson the B candidate invariant mass distribution forpartially reconstructed B0 rarr Dlowast0K+πminus decays is allowed to be shifted by an offset thatis a free parameter of the fit The misidentified background shapes are also obtainedfrom simulated samples For B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays the D0 and Dlowast0 contributions arecombined according to their relative branching fractions [37] The backgrounds fromΛ0b rarr D(lowast)0K+p and B0

(s) rarr D(lowast)0K+Kminus decays are assumed to have equal branching

fractions for the decays with D0 and Dlowast0 mesons in the final state as the decays involvingDlowast0 mesons have not yet been measured The simulated samples are reweighted accordingto the relevant particle identification and misidentification probabilities and to match knownDP distributions [1239ndash41] The (mis)identification probabilities take account of trackkinematics and are calculated using calibration samples of Dlowast+ rarr D0π+ D0 rarr Kminusπ+

and Λrarr pπminus decays [1922] The yields of the misidentified backgrounds relative to thesignal are constrained within uncertainties to their expected values based on their known

5

Table 1 Yields from the fit to the D0K+πminus data sample The full mass range is 5100ndash5900 MeVand the signal region is 524855ndash530905 MeV

Component Full mass range Signal region

B0 rarr D0K+πminus 2576plusmn 72 2344plusmn 66B0s rarr D0K+πminus 55plusmn 27 1plusmn 1

comb bkgd 5540plusmn 187 684plusmn 23B0 rarr Dlowast0K+πminus 1750plusmn 99 6plusmn 1B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus 485plusmn 47 51plusmn 5Λ0b rarr D(lowast)0K+p 95plusmn 26 18plusmn 5

B0 rarr D(lowast)0K+Kminus 127plusmn 27 10plusmn 2B0s rarr D(lowast)0K+Kminus 54plusmn 18 14plusmn 5

) [MeV]-π+K0

D(m5200 5400 5600 5800

Can

dida

tes

8 M

eV

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700 LHCb (a)Data

Total fitminusπ+K

0D rarr (s)

0B

Combinatorial bkgminusπ+K 0D rarr 0Bminusπ+π( )0D rarr 0B

p+K( )0D rarr 0bΛ

minusK+K( )0D rarr (s)0B

) [MeV]-π+K0

D(m5200 5400 5600 5800

Can

dida

tes

8 M

eV

1

10

210

310(b)LHCb

Figure 2 Results of the fit to the B candidate invariant mass distribution with (a) linear and(b) logarithmic y-axis scales The components are as described in the legend

branching fractions [123940] and misidentification probabilitiesThere are 14 free parameters in the fit model the mean and width of the signal shape

the relative normalisation and relative width of the two Crystal Ball functions the slopeof the exponential function the offset of the B0 rarr Dlowast0K+πminus shape and the yields of theeight contributions The result of the fit is shown in Fig 2 and the yields are summarisedin Table 1 The yields are also reported within the signal region used in the Dalitz plotfit corresponding to plusmn25 widths of the B0 signal shape (524855ndash530905 MeV) Thedistribution of candidates in the signal region over the Dalitz plot is shown in Fig 3(a)Note that a B0 mass constraint is applied to calculate the variables that are used todescribe the Dalitz plot [42] improving the resolution of those variables and giving aunique kinematic boundary

6

]2) [GeVminusπ0D(2m

5 10 15 20

]2)

[GeV

minus π+K(2

m

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

(a)LHCb

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

091

(b)LHCb

Figure 3 Distribution of B0 rarr D0K+πminus candidates in the signal region over (a) the Dalitz plotand (b) the square Dalitz plot The definition of the square Dalitz plot is given in Sec 61

5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism

In B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays resonances are expected in the m2(D0πminus) and m2(K+πminus)combinations so the Dalitz plot shown in Fig 3(a) is defined in terms of these twoinvariant mass squared terms For a fixed B0 mass these two invariant mass squaredcombinations can be used to calculate all other relevant kinematic quantities

The isobar model [43ndash45] is used to describe the complex decay amplitude The totalamplitude is given by the coherent sum of amplitudes from resonant and nonresonantintermediate contributions and is given by

A(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)=

Nsumj=1

cjFj(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

) (1)

where cj are complex coefficients describing the relative contribution for each intermediateprocess The resonant dynamics are contained in the Fj

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)terms

that are normalised such that the integral of the squared magnitude over the DP is unityfor each term For a D0πminus resonance Fj

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)is given by

F(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)= R

(m(D0πminus)

)timesX(|~p | rBW)timesX(|~q | rBW)times T (~p ~q ) (2)

where ~p is the bachelor particle momentum and ~q is the momentum of one of the resonancedaughters both evaluated in the D0πminus rest frame The functions R X and T are describedbelow

The X(z) terms are BlattndashWeisskopf barrier factors [46] where z = |~q | rBW or |~p | rBW

and rBW is the barrier radius which is set to 40 GeVminus1 asymp 08 fm [10] for all resonances

7

The barrier factors are angular momentum dependent and are given by

L = 0 X(z) = 1

L = 1 X(z) =radic

1+z201+z2

L = 2 X(z) =radic

z40+3z20+9

z4+3z2+9

L = 3 X(z) =radic

z60+6z40+45z20+225

z6+6z4+45z2+225

(3)

where z0 is the value of z at the pole mass of the resonance and L is the orbital angularmomentum between the resonance and the bachelor particle Since the parent and daughterparticles all have zero spin L is also the spin of the resonance

The T (~p ~q) terms describe the angular distributions in the Zemach tensor formalism [4748] and are given by

L = 0 T (~p ~q) = 1 L = 1 T (~p ~q) = minus 2 ~p middot ~q L = 2 T (~p ~q) = 4

3[3(~p middot ~q )2 minus (|~p ||~q |)2]

L = 3 T (~p ~q) = minus 2415

[5(~p middot ~q )3 minus 3(~p middot ~q )(|~p ||~q |)2]

(4)

These expressions are proportional to the Legendre polynomials PL(x) where x is thecosine of the angle between ~p and ~q (referred to as the helicity angle)

The R(m(D0πminus)

)functions are the mass lineshapes Resonant contributions are

typically described by the relativistic BreitndashWigner (RBW) function

R(m) =1

(m20 minusm2)minus im0Γ(m)

(5)

where the mass-dependent decay width is

Γ(m) = Γ0

(q

q0

)2L+1 (m0

m

)X2(q rBW) (6)

where q0 is the value of q = |~q | when the invariant mass is equal to the pole mass of theresonance m0

The large phase space available in B decays allows for the presence of nonresonantamplitudes (ie contributions that do not proceed via a known resonance) that vary acrossthe Dalitz plot An exponential form factor (EFF) has been found to describe nonresonantcontributions well in several DP analyses of B decays [49]

R(m) = exp[minusαm2

] (7)

where α is a shape parameter that must be determined from the data and m is a two-bodyinvariant mass (m(D0πminus) in this example)

The RBW function is a good model for narrow resonances that are well separated fromany other resonant or nonresonant contribution of the same spin This approach is known

8

to break down in the Kπ S-wave because the Klowast0(1430) resonance interferes strongly witha slowly varying nonresonant term as described in Ref [50] The LASS lineshape [51] hasbeen developed to combine these two contributions

R(m) =m

q cot δB minus iq+ exp [2iδB]

m0Γ0m0

q0

(m20 minusm2)minus im0Γ0

qmm0

q0

(8)

where cot δB =1

aq+

1

2rq (9)

and where m0 and Γ0 are the pole mass and width of the Klowast0(1430) state and a and r areshape parameters

The Dπ S-wave nonresonant contribution can be described by the ldquodabbardquo line-shape [52] defined as

R(m) =Bprime(m2)(m2 minus sA)ρ

1minus β(m2 minusm2min)minus iBprime(m2)(m2 minus sA)ρ

(10)

whereBprime(m2) = b exp

[minusα(m2 minusm2

min)] (11)

Here mmin is the invariant mass at threshold sA = m2D minus 05m2

π is the Adler zero ρ isa phase-space factor and b α and β are parameters with values fixed to 2449 GeVminus201 GeVminus2 and 01 GeVminus2 respectively according to Ref [52]

Ignoring reconstruction and selection effects the DP probability density function wouldbe

Pphys

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)=

|A(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)|2intint

DP|A|2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)

(12)

where the dependence of A on the DP position has been suppressed in the denominator forbrevity The primary results of most Dalitz plot analyses are the complex coefficients asdefined in Eq (1) These however depend on the choice of phase convention amplitudeformalism and normalisation used in each analysis The convention-independent quantitiesof fit fractions and interference fit fractions provide a way to reliably compare resultsbetween different analyses Fit fractions are defined as the integral of the amplitude foreach intermediate component squared divided by that of the coherent matrix elementsquared for all intermediate contributions

FF j =

intintDP

∣∣cjFj (m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus))∣∣2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)intint

DP|A|2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)

(13)

The fit fractions need not sum to unity due to possible net constructive or destructiveinterference described by interference fit fractions defined (for i lt j only) by

FF ij =

intintDP

2Re[ciclowastjFiF

lowastj

]dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)intint

DP|A|2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)

(14)

where the dependence of F(lowast)i and A on the DP position has been omitted

9

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

Eff

icie

ncy

()

0

005

01

015

02

025(a)LHCb Simulation

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

Eff

icie

ncy

()

0

005

01

015

02

025(b)LHCb Simulation

Figure 4 Efficiency variation as a function of SDP position for candidates triggered by (a) signaldecay products and (b) by the rest of the event The vertical white stripe is due to the Dlowast vetoand the curved white band is due to the D0 veto

6 Dalitz plot fit

61 Signal efficiency

The variation of the efficiency across the phase space is studied in terms of the squareDalitz plot (SDP) The SDP is defined by variables mprime and θprime that range between 0 and 1and are given for the D0K+πminus case by

mprime equiv 1

πarccos

(2m(D0πminus)minusmmin

D0πminus

mmaxD0πminus minusmmin

D0πminus

minus 1

)and θprime equiv 1

πθ(D0πminus) (15)

where mmaxD0πminus = mB0 minusmK+ and mmin

D0πminus = mD0 + mπminus are the kinematic boundaries of

m(D0πminus) allowed in the B0 rarr D0K+πminus decay and θ(D0πminus) is the helicity angle of theD0πminus system (the angle between the K+ and the D0 meson in the D0πminus rest frame) Thedistribution of selected events across the SDP is shown in Fig 3(b)

Efficiency variation across the SDP is caused by the detector acceptance and bytrigger selection and PID requirements The efficiency is evaluated with simulated samplesgenerated uniformly over the SDP Data-driven corrections are applied to correct for knowndifferences between data and simulation in the tracking trigger and PID efficiencies usingidentical methods to those described in Ref [10] The efficiency functions are obtainedby fitting the corrected simulation with two-dimensional cubic splines Figure 4 showsthe histograms used to model the variation of the efficiency over the SDP for candidatestriggered by (a) signal decays and (b) by the rest of the event

62 Background studies

Among the background yields in the signal region given in Table 1 the only sizeablecomponents are due to combinatorial background and B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays The SDP

10

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

0

0002

0004

0006

0008

001

0012

0014

(a)LHCb

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

000020004000600080010012001400160018

(b)LHCb Simulation

Figure 5 SDP distributions of the background contributions from (a) combinatorial backgroundand (b) B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays

distributions of these backgrounds are described by the histograms shown in Fig 5Combinatorial background contributes 22 of candidates in the signal region The

shape of this contribution over the SDP is obtained from the high B mass sideband (5400ndash5900 MeV) As seen in Fig 2 this sideband is dominated by combinatorial backgroundwith a small contribution from B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays The SDP distribution of theB0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus contribution in the sideband region is modelled as described belowfor the signal region and is subtracted from the sideband sample To check that theSDP shape of the combinatorial background does not vary with the B candidate massa sample of doubly charged D0Kplusmnπplusmn candidates is investigated This confirms that theSDP distribution from the sideband is a reliable model for combinatorial background inthe signal region

The B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus contribution accounts for 16 of the candidates in the signalregion Its SDP distribution is obtained from a simulated sample with the B0 rarr D0π+πminus

and B0 rarr Dlowast0π+πminus contributions combined and reweighted as described in Sec 4 TheB0 rarr D0π+πminus decay mode is the dominant component of this background in the signalregion

Due to resolution effects B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ Dlowast(2010)minus rarr D0πminus decays are notentirely removed by the Dlowast veto Although this component corresponds to real B0 rarrD0πminusK+ decays it is treated as incoherent (ie as background) since its interference withthe remainder of the signal is negligible Its SDP distribution is modelled as a Gaussianpeak in m(D0πminus) with mean fixed to the known Dlowast(2010)minus mass and width and yielddetermined in the fit to data

11

Table 2 Signal contributions to the fit model where parameters and uncertainties are takenfrom Ref [37] The models are described in Sec 5

Resonance Spin DP axis Model Parameters

Klowast(892)0 1 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 89581plusmn 019 MeV Γ0 = 474plusmn 06 MeVKlowast(1410)0 1 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 1414plusmn 15 MeV Γ0 = 232plusmn 21 MeVKlowast0(1430)0 0 m2(K+πminus) LASS Determined from data (see text)Klowast2(1430)0 2 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 14324plusmn 13 MeV Γ0 = 109plusmn 5 MeVDlowast0(2400)minus 0 m2(D0πminus) RBW

Determined from data (see Table 3)Dlowast2(2460)minus 2 m2(D0πminus) RBW

Nonresonant 0 m2(D0πminus) dabba Fixed (see text)Nonresonant 1 m2(D0πminus) EFF Determined from data (see text)

63 Amplitude model for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays

The Dalitz plot fit is performed using the Laura++ [53] package The likelihood functionis given by

L =Ncprodi

[sumk

NkPk(m2i (D

0πminus)m2i (K

+πminus)) ]

(16)

where the index i runs over Nc candidates k runs over the signal and backgroundcomponents and Nk is the yield in each component The probability density function forthe signal component Psig is given by Eq (12) with the |A

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)|2

terms multiplied by the efficiency function described in Sec 61 As it is possible forthe minimisation procedure to find a local minimum of the negative log likelihood (NLL)profile the fit is repeated many times with randomised initial values to ensure the globalminimum is found

The nominal Dalitz plot fit model for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays is composed of severalresonant and nonresonant amplitudes Only those amplitudes that provide significantcontributions or that aid the fit stability are included Unnatural spin-parity states arenot considered as these do not decay to two pseudoscalars The eight amplitudes includedin this model are listed in Table 2 The width of the narrowest signal contribution tothe Dalitz plot (sim 50 MeV) is far larger than the mass resolution (sim 24 MeV) thereforeresolution effects are neglected

The real and imaginary parts of the complex coefficients cj defined in Eq (1) are freeparameters of the fit except for the coefficient of the Dlowast2(2460)minus component which is fixedto 1 as a reference The phases and magnitudes of the complex coefficients as well as fitfractions and interference fit fractions are derived from these free parameters In additionthe masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances are determined fromthe fit to data and are reported in Table 3 The statistical uncertainties on all parametersof interest are calculated using large samples of simulated pseudoexperiments Thesepseudoexperiments are also used to determine the correlations between the statisticaluncertainties on the parameters which are given in Appendix A The LASS parameters

12

Table 3 Masses and widths (MeV) determined in the fit to data with statistical uncertaintiesonly

Resonance Mass Width

Dlowast0(2400)minus 2360plusmn 15 255plusmn 26Dlowast2(2460)minus 24656plusmn 18 460plusmn 34

Table 4 Complex coefficients and fit fractions determined from the Dalitz plot fit Uncertaintiesare statistical only Note that the fit fractions magnitudes and phases are derived quantities

Resonance Fit fraction Isobar model coefficients() Real part Imaginary part Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 minus000plusmn 015 minus127plusmn 006 127plusmn 006 minus157plusmn 011Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 015plusmn 006 minus009plusmn 009 018plusmn 007 minus054plusmn 021Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 014plusmn 038 045plusmn 015 047plusmn 009 127plusmn 095LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 minus010plusmn 024 044plusmn 014 046plusmn 014 179plusmn 065

LASS total 67plusmn 27Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 minus032plusmn 009 minus047plusmn 007 057plusmn 005 minus216plusmn 019Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 minus080plusmn 008 minus044plusmn 014 091plusmn 007 minus264plusmn 015Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 100 000 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 minus039plusmn 009 036plusmn 017 053plusmn 007 240plusmn 027Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 minus062plusmn 006 minus003plusmn 006 062plusmn 006 minus309plusmn 010Total fit fraction 1134

are determined to be m0 = 1450plusmn 80 MeV Γ0 = 400plusmn 230 MeV a = 32plusmn 18 GeV andr = 09plusmn11 GeV while the parameter of the EFF lineshape of the Dπ P-wave nonresonantamplitude is determined to be α = 088plusmn 010 GeVminus2

The values of the fit fractions and complex coefficients obtained from the fit are shownin Table 4 while the values of the interference fit fractions are given in Appendix B Thesum of the fit fractions is seen to exceed unity mostly due to interference within the Dπ andKπ S-waves Note that in Table 4 and all results for fit fractions and derived quantitiesvalues are reported separately for both the Klowast0 (1430)0 and nonresonant components of theLASS lineshape as well as their coherent sum

Projections of the data and the nominal fit model onto m(K+πminus) m(D0πminus) andm(D0K+) are shown in Fig 6 Zooms are provided in the regions of the main resonantcontributions in Fig 7 Projections onto the cosine of the helicity angle of the D0πminus andK+πminus systems are shown in Figs 8 and 9 respectively These projections all show goodagreement between data and the fit model

Angular moments provide a useful method to investigate the helicity structure of thedecays The angular moments in m(D0πminus) and m(K+πminus) obtained as in Refs [1011]are shown in Figs 10 and 11 respectively The contributions due to the Klowast(892)0 andDlowast2(2460)minus resonances are seen as peaks in moments up to order 2 and order 4 respectivelyas expected for spin-1 and spin-2 resonances Reflections make the interpretation ofmoments at higher masses more difficult However the good agreement seen between data

13

and the fit model provides further support for the fit model being a good description ofthe data

The quality of the fit is evaluated by determining a two-dimensional χ2 value comparingthe data and fit model in 144 bins across the SDP that are defined adaptively to ensurethey are approximately equally populated The pull in each of these bins defined as thedifference between the data and the fit model divided by the uncertainty is shown inFig 12 The effective number of degrees of freedom of the χ2 is between Nbins minusNpars minus 1and Nbinsminus1 where Npars is the number of free parameters in the fit yielding a reduced χ2

in the range 099 ndash 122 Additional unbinned tests of fit quality [54] also show acceptableagreement between the data and the fit model

7 Systematic uncertainties

Systematic uncertainties are considered from sources that can be divided into two categoriesexperimental and model uncertainties Experimental uncertainties arise due to the signaland background yields in the signal region the distributions of the background componentsacross the SDP the variation of efficiency across the SDP and possible bias due to thefitting procedure Model uncertainties are considered due to the fixed parameters in thesignal model the addition or removal of marginal amplitudes and the choice of models forthe Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves The uncertainties due to all of these sourcesare combined in quadrature

The signal and background yields are determined from the fit to the B candidateinvariant mass distribution Systematic uncertainties are considered on the total yieldsdue to both statistical and systematic variations of these yields as evaluated in Ref [15]The yields in the signal region are varied appropriately and the effects of these variationson the parameters of interest are assigned as systematic uncertainties

The histograms describing the background distributions are each varied within statisticaluncertainties to establish the uncertainty due to the imperfect knowledge of the distributionof these backgrounds across the SDP The histograms describing the efficiency variationacross the SDP are also varied within their uncertainties prior to the spline fit Theefficiency histograms are also varied with local correlations to account for the effects ofany unknown correlations between neighbouring bins For each parameter the largeruncertainty is considered from the correlated and uncorrelated variations In addition thebinning scheme of the control sample used to evaluate PID performance is varied

An ensemble of pseudoexperiments is used to establish systematic uncertainties relatedto any potential fit bias Pseudoexperiments are generated using the parameters determinedin the fit to data and mean fitted values of the parameters are determined from Gaussianfits to the distributions of results obtained in the ensemble The differences between thegenerated and mean fitted values are found to be small Uncertainties are determined asthe sum in quadrature of the difference between the generated and mean fitted values andthe uncertainty on the mean fitted value from the Gaussian fit

Systematic uncertainties due to fixed parameters in the fit model are determined by

14

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310LHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350 LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310 LHCb (d)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

LHCb (e)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210LHCb (f)

Data Total fit 0(892)K 0(1410)K

S-wave (LASS)πK 0(1430)2Kminus

(2400)0Dminus

(2460)2D

S-wave (EFF)πD P-wave (EFF)πDminus

D Background

Figure 6 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) (c) m(K+πminus)and (e) m(D0K+) with the same projections shown in (b) (d) and (f) with a logarithmic y-axisscale Components are described in the legend

15

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

235 24 245 25 255

Can

dida

tes

4 M

eV

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m05 1 15

Can

dida

tes

13

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

LHCb (b)

Figure 7 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) in the Dlowast2(2460)minus

region and (b) the low m(K+πminus) region Components are as shown in Fig 6

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

) lt 235 GeVminusπ0D(m204 lt

LHCb(a)

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

) lt 255 GeVminusπ0D(m235 lt

LHCb(b)

Figure 8 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(D0πminus) in the mass ranges(a) 204 lt m(D0πminus) lt 235 GeV and (b) 235 lt m(D0πminus) lt 255 GeV Components are asshown in Fig 6

repeating the fit with these parameters varied The fixed masses and widths are variedwithin their uncertainties as shown in Table 2 while the BlattndashWeisskopf barrier radii rBWare varied independently for D0πminus and K+πminus resonances between 3 and 5 GeVminus1 [10]

The Klowast(1410)0 amplitude does not contribute significantly to the nominal fit modelso the fit is repeated with this component removed and the change in results is assignedas the associated systematic uncertainty In addition uncertainties are assigned fromthe changes in the results when an amplitude due to the Klowast(1680)0 resonance or from avirtual Blowast(5325)+ component as described in Ref [10] is included in the model

A Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D0Kminusπ+ observed both spin-1 and spin-3 resonances

at m(D0Kminus) sim 286 GeV [9 10] A spin-3 resonance has also been seen at m(D0πminus) sim276 GeV in B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] while an analysis of B+ rarr DminusK+π+ shows aspin-1 resonance at similar m(D+πminus) values [11] Uncertainties are assigned corresponding

16

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

) lt 08 GeVminusπ+K(m0 lt LHCb

(a)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 10 GeVminusπ+K(m08 lt LHCb

(b)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 13 GeVminusπ+K(m10 lt LHCb

(c)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

) lt 15 GeVminusπ+K(m14 lt LHCb

(d)

Figure 9 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(K+πminus) in the mass ranges(a) m(K+πminus) lt 08 GeV (b) 08 lt m(K+πminus) lt 10 GeV (c) 10 lt m(K+πminus) lt 13 GeV and(d) 14 lt m(K+πminus) lt 15 GeV Components are as shown in Fig 6

to the changes in results when either a spin-1 or spin-3 state at m(D0πminus) sim 276 GeV isadded to the nominal model

The LASS model used to describe the Kπ S-wave is replaced with a Flatte shape [55]which accounts for the Kηprime threshold near the Klowast0 (1430)0 mass and a resonant term witha modified mass dependent width [52] for the κ (also known as Klowast0(800)) state Thismodel gives an NLL that is worse by 44 units A model-independent description of theKπ S-wave is also used to fit the data with the uncertainty on each parameter takenas the larger of the two differences This alternative improves the NLL by 88 units butintroduces an additional four free parameters into the fit The dabba lineshape used todescribe the D0πminus S-wave is replaced with an EFF lineshape while a power-law model isintroduced as an alternative to the EFF lineshape that describes the D0πminus P-wave Thesealterations worsen the NLL by 30 units and improve it by 08 units respectively

The total systematic uncertainties due to experimental and model effects for fit fractionsand complex coefficients are given together with the results in Sec 8 The contributionsfrom different sources to the systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions masses and

17

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0002004006008

0101201401601802

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-30-25-20-15-10

-505

1015

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

310timesLHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

310timesLHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-8-6-4-202468

310timesLHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-8-6-4-20246

310timesLHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-6-4-202468

10

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 10 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(D0πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

18

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0

005

01

015

02

025

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

20

40

60

80

100310times

LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10-505

10152025

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25310times

LHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-20-15-10

-505

101520

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 11 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(K+πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

19

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Pull

-2

-1

0

1

2

LHCb

Figure 12 Differences between the data SDP distribution and the fit model across the SDP interms of the per-bin pull

Table 5 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths(MeV) Uncertainties given on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value SB fraction Efficiency Background SDP Fit bias Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 060 083 050 031 117Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 006 039 069 005 080Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 028 148 185 033 241LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 051 225 286 086 377

LASS total 67plusmn 27 026 186 160 102 267Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 023 072 053 054 107Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 021 139 143 040 204Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 070 070 049 015 111Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 003 081 059 057 115Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 086 191 052 038 219m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 46 81 70 37 122m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 001 037 022 029 051Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 28 131 139 48 199Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 05 09 09 05 14

widths are given in Tables 5 and 6 The dominant experimental systematic uncertaintyon most parameters is due to either the efficiency variation or background distributionsacross the SDP while the model uncertainties are generally dominated by the effects ofalternative descriptions of the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves For the parametersof broad components the model uncertainties dominate however for other parameters thestatistical experimental and model uncertainties are all of a similar magnitude

The stability of the fit results is confirmed by several cross-checks The data sample isdivided into subsamples according to the flavour of the B candidate the trigger decision

20

Table 6 Model uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths (MeV) Uncertaintiesgiven on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value Fixed parameters Addremove Alternative models Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 075 114 109 174Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 018 070 022 076Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 079 330 023 340LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 110 399 520 665

LASS total 67plusmn 27 053 142 521 543Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 036 187 056 198Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 055 195 711 740Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 018 073 099 124Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 027 140 346 374Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 031 199 215 295m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 61 93 256 279m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 009 105 048 115Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 40 180 435 472Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 14 05 24 29

the polarity of the magnet and the year of data taking Each subsample is fitted separatelyand all are seen to be consistent with the nominal fit results The fit is also repeatedwith additional resonance components to test the fit model Resonances up to spin-3 wereconsidered for all three pairs of daughters with the mass and width allowed to vary in thefit No additional significant contributions were observed

8 Results and summary

The results for the complex coefficients are reported in Table 7 with results for thefit fractions given in Table 8 The results for the interference fit fractions are givenin Appendix B Upper limits are determined on the fit fractions of the Klowast(1410)0 andDlowast3(2760)minus components which do not give significant contributions using the methoddescribed in Ref [10]

The fit fractions for resonant contributions are converted into quasi-two-body productbranching fractions by multiplying by B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus) = (92plusmn 06plusmn 07plusmn 06)times 10minus5which is obtained from the ratio of branching fractions B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus)B(B0 rarrD0π+πminus) [15] multiplied by the latest result for B(B0 rarr D0π+πminus) [12] accounting forthe different Dlowast(2010)minus veto windows used in the analyses and for the 37 residualbackground due to B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ decays The statistical correlation between theresults of Ref [15] and this analysis is found to be negligible The results for the productbranching fractions are shown in Table 9 For the K+πminus resonances where the branchingfractions to Kπ are known the product branching fractions are converted to the Bdecay branching fractions shown in Table 10 The results for B(B0 rarr D0Klowast(892)0) andB(B0 rarr Dlowast2(2460)minusK+)times B(Dlowast2(2460)minus rarr D0πminus) are consistent with and more precisethan previous measurements [14 1617]

21

Table 7 Results for the complex amplitudes and their uncertainties presented (top) in terms ofreal and imaginary parts and (bottom) in terms and magnitudes and phases The three quotederrors are statistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively

Resonance Real part Imaginary part

Klowast(892)0 minus000plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 034 minus127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 006Klowast(1410)0 015plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 009 minus009plusmn 009plusmn 018plusmn 018Klowast0(1430)0 014plusmn 038plusmn 048plusmn 038 045plusmn 015plusmn 037plusmn 017LASS nonresonant minus010plusmn 024plusmn 016plusmn 042 044plusmn 014plusmn 017plusmn 023Klowast2(1430)0 minus032plusmn 009plusmn 015plusmn 023 minus047plusmn 007plusmn 014plusmn 015Dlowast0(2400)minus minus080plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 022 minus044plusmn 014plusmn 012plusmn 018Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) minus039plusmn 009plusmn 009plusmn 014 036plusmn 017plusmn 014plusmn 023Dπ P-wave (EFF) minus062plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 011 minus003plusmn 006plusmn 005plusmn 010

Resonance Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 005 minus157plusmn 011plusmn 016plusmn 027Klowast(1410)0 018plusmn 007plusmn 010plusmn 011 minus054plusmn 021plusmn 055plusmn 104Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 009plusmn 010plusmn 014 127plusmn 095plusmn 104plusmn 081LASS nonresonant 046plusmn 014plusmn 016plusmn 029 179plusmn 065plusmn 035plusmn 069Klowast2(1430)0 057plusmn 005plusmn 004plusmn 008 minus216plusmn 019plusmn 043plusmn 043Dlowast0(2400)minus 091plusmn 007plusmn 006plusmn 017 minus264plusmn 015plusmn 014plusmn 023Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 053plusmn 007plusmn 004plusmn 014 240plusmn 027plusmn 024plusmn 044Dπ P-wave (EFF) 062plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 011 minus309plusmn 010plusmn 007plusmn 017

Table 8 Results for the fit fractions and their uncertainties () The three quoted errors arestatistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively Upper limits are givenat 90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Fit fraction Upper limitKlowast(892)0 374plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 17Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03plusmn 08plusmn 08 lt 32 (37)Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20plusmn 24plusmn 34LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38plusmn 38plusmn 67

LASS total 67plusmn 27plusmn 27plusmn 54Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17plusmn 11plusmn 20Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28plusmn 20plusmn 74Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12plusmn 11plusmn 12Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 10 (11)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14plusmn 12plusmn 37Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16plusmn 22plusmn 30

22

Table 9 Results for the product branching fractions The four quoted errors are statisticalexperimental systematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Product branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 342plusmn 013plusmn 010plusmn 016plusmn 040Klowast(1410)0 007plusmn 003plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 001 lt 029 (034)Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 018plusmn 022plusmn 031plusmn 005LASS nonresonant 044plusmn 034plusmn 034plusmn 061plusmn 005

LASS total 061plusmn 025plusmn 025plusmn 049plusmn 007Klowast2(1430)0 068plusmn 015plusmn 010plusmn 018plusmn 008Dlowast0(2400)minus 177plusmn 026plusmn 019plusmn 067plusmn 020Dlowast2(2460)minus 212plusmn 010plusmn 011plusmn 011plusmn 025Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 010 (011)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 060plusmn 013plusmn 011plusmn 034plusmn 007Dπ P-wave (EFF) 081plusmn 015plusmn 020plusmn 027plusmn 009

Table 10 Results for the branching fractions The four quoted errors are statistical experimentalsystematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at 90 (95 )confidence level

Resonance Branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 513plusmn 020plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 060Klowast(1410)0 159plusmn 068plusmn 181plusmn 159plusmn 036 lt 67 (78)Klowast0(1430)0 071plusmn 027plusmn 033plusmn 047plusmn 008LASS nonresonant 066plusmn 051plusmn 051plusmn 092plusmn 008

LASS total 092plusmn 038plusmn 038plusmn 074plusmn 011Klowast2(1430)0 204plusmn 045plusmn 030plusmn 054plusmn 025

The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus states are found to be

m(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (2360plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 28) MeV

Γ(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (255plusmn 26plusmn 20plusmn 47) MeV

m(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (24656plusmn 18plusmn 05plusmn 12) MeV

Γ(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (460plusmn 34plusmn 14plusmn 29) MeV

where the three uncertainties are statistical experimental systematic and model systematicrespectively These are consistent with though less precise than recent results from a DPanalysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] They also show good agreement with and havesimilar precision to earlier measurements of these quantities [1337]

In summary the first amplitude analysis of B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays has been presentedusing a data sample corresponding to 30 fbminus1 of pp collision data collected by the LHCbexperiment A good description of the data is obtained with a model containing contri-

23

butions from intermediate Klowast(892)0 Klowast(1410)0 Klowast2(1430)0 and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonanceswith additional components to describe broad structures in the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S-and P-waves The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances aremeasured as are the complex amplitudes and fit fractions for all components includedin the amplitude model The results can be used in conjunction with an analysis ofB0 rarr DK+πminus decays where the neutral D meson is reconstructed in final states such asK+Kminus to measure the CKM unitarity triangle parameter γ [1 2]

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to our colleagues in the CERN accelerator departments forthe excellent performance of the LHC We thank the technical and administrative staffat the LHCb institutes We acknowledge support from CERN and from the nationalagencies CAPES CNPq FAPERJ and FINEP (Brazil) NSFC (China) CNRSIN2P3(France) BMBF DFG HGF and MPG (Germany) INFN (Italy) FOM and NWO (TheNetherlands) MNiSW and NCN (Poland) MENIFA (Romania) MinES and FANO(Russia) MinECo (Spain) SNSF and SER (Switzerland) NASU (Ukraine) STFC (UnitedKingdom) NSF (USA) The Tier1 computing centres are supported by IN2P3 (France)KIT and BMBF (Germany) INFN (Italy) NWO and SURF (The Netherlands) PIC(Spain) GridPP (United Kingdom) We are indebted to the communities behind themultiple open source software packages on which we depend We are also thankful forthe computing resources and the access to software RampD tools provided by Yandex LLC(Russia) Individual groups or members have received support from EPLANET MarieSk lodowska-Curie Actions and ERC (European Union) Conseil general de Haute-SavoieLabex ENIGMASS and OCEVU Region Auvergne (France) RFBR (Russia) XuntaGaland GENCAT (Spain) Royal Society and Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851(United Kingdom)

24

Appendices

A Correlation matrices

The statistical correlations between the complex coefficients masses and widths determinedfrom the fit to data are given in terms of real and imaginary parts and in terms ofmagnitudes and phases in Tables 11 and 12 The correlations are determined using thesame sample of simulated pseudoexperiments used to calculate the statistical uncertaintieson fit parameters

B Results for interference fit fractions

The central values of the interference fit fractions are given in Table 13 The statisti-cal experimental systematic and model uncertainties on these quantities are given inTables 14 15 and 16

25

Tab

le11

Sta

tist

ical

corr

elat

ions

bet

wee

nth

ere

al(x

)an

dim

agin

ary

(y)

par

tsof

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

x0

y 0x

1y 1

x2

y 2x

3y 3

x4

y 4x

5y 5

x7

y 7x

8y 8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

x0

100

014

002

017minus

018

015minus

017

003

039minus

037

016minus

009minus

018minus

029

007minus

037minus

019

002

004

012

y 01

00minus

006minus

008

009minus

011minus

000

014

003

003

012

013minus

012minus

024

035minus

007

009

012

001minus

004

x1

100minus

009minus

008minus

014minus

004

029minus

001

003minus

020

018minus

021minus

031minus

017minus

036minus

008minus

017minus

023

002

y 11

000

050

340

09minus

001

060minus

039

002minus

003minus

003

007minus

002minus

004minus

016minus

002

007

002

x2

100minus

013

081

009

014minus

016minus

015

021

010

013

004minus

015minus

007

001minus

025

001

y 21

000

080

280

24minus

036minus

013

008minus

004minus

001minus

004

004minus

002minus

001minus

009minus

010

x3

100

020

013minus

034minus

010

033minus

008

008minus

004minus

005minus

007minus

003minus

033minus

009

y 31

00minus

012minus

012minus

051

029minus

034minus

053

009minus

012

009minus

014minus

036

001

x4

100minus

053

032minus

010minus

020

003

002minus

027minus

017minus

006

010minus

000

y 41

000

06minus

009

040

010

014

016

011minus

005

007minus

003

x5

100minus

029minus

003

022

002

004minus

008

002

045minus

006

y 51

00minus

031minus

034

006

003

024minus

014minus

072minus

033

x7

100

046

005

010minus

011minus

001

027

017

y 71

00minus

016

036minus

001

017

032

008

x8

100minus

003

001minus

006minus

009minus

014

y 81

000

290

020

15minus

002

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

26

Tab

le12

S

tati

stic

alco

rrel

atio

ns

bet

wee

nth

em

agnit

ud

es(a

)an

dp

has

es(∆

)of

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

a0

∆0

a1

∆1

a2

∆2

a3

∆3

a4

∆4

a5

∆5

a7

∆7

a8

∆8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

a0

100minus

011minus

008

005

024

003minus

014

004

004

001

021

002

022minus

022

038minus

000minus

004minus

009minus

001

004

∆0

100minus

010

012

003

020

014

014minus

001

045minus

005

010minus

008

035minus

007

005minus

022

006

007

009

a1

100minus

035minus

025

006

032

001minus

001minus

038

004minus

022minus

006

031

002

024

007minus

018minus

020

001

∆1

100

024

015

016

000

014

038minus

018minus

013

016

026

022minus

006minus

009minus

004minus

012

005

a2

100

004

011minus

028minus

007

039minus

009

007

027

010

001

001minus

015

004minus

003minus

013

∆2

100

015

077minus

020minus

010minus

001

024

009

013

003minus

009

005

001

023minus

010

a3

100minus

006

000minus

011

016minus

030minus

012

056

001

012

002minus

007minus

027minus

004

∆3

100minus

028minus

019

015

041minus

024minus

008minus

000minus

013

004

002

041

008

a4

100

013

005minus

017

014

018minus

000

006

000

014minus

019minus

009

∆4

100minus

016

016

017

012

000minus

002minus

019minus

003

003

001

a5

100

024minus

026minus

006

011

005minus

007

001

019

039

∆5

100minus

000minus

028minus

001minus

020minus

020

015

076

027

a7

100minus

001

017minus

006

004

013minus

005minus

024

∆7

100minus

012

037

003minus

000minus

027minus

012

a8

100minus

004minus

001

004

006

015

∆8

100minus

037minus

002minus

033minus

001

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

27

Table 13 Interference fit fractions () from the nominal DP fit The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 374 18 minus00 00 00 minus24 minus02 minus26 minus50A1 07 minus00 00 00 minus11 minus03 minus06 minus11A2 51 minus32 minus00 29 15 16 19A3 48 00 minus84 01 21 02A4 74 minus03 minus10 minus15 minus04A5 193 minus00 28 00A6 231 minus00 00A7 66 minus00A8 89

Table 14 Statistical uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes areall pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASSnonresonant (A4) Klowast2 (1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8)Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 15 07 00 00 00 09 04 04 05A1 03 00 00 00 07 03 04 05A2 20 26 00 11 05 15 05A3 38 00 32 04 34 08A4 17 06 01 06 05A5 28 00 31 00A6 12 00 00A7 14 00A8 16

28

Table 15 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () Theamplitudes are all pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0 (1430)0(A3) LASS nonresonant (A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave(dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fitfractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 12 05 00 00 00 23 02 04 05A1 08 00 00 00 04 08 07 09A2 24 31 00 14 20 26 11A3 38 00 36 02 26 03A4 11 22 02 05 10A5 20 00 40 00A6 11 00 00A7 12 00A8 22

Table 16 Model uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 17 08 00 00 00 26 07 08 14A1 08 00 00 00 08 06 08 11A2 34 29 00 58 17 36 27A3 66 00 83 03 35 07A4 20 17 02 12 10A5 74 00 45 00A6 12 00 00A7 37 00A8 29

29

References

[1] T Gershon On the measurement of the unitarity triangle angle γ from B0 rarr DKlowast0

decays Phys Rev D79 (2009) 051301(R) arXiv08102706

[2] T Gershon and M Williams Prospects for the measurement of the unitaritytriangle angle γ from B0 rarr DK+πminus decays Phys Rev D80 (2009) 092002arXiv09091495

[3] N Cabibbo Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays Phys Rev Lett 10 (1963) 531

[4] M Kobayashi and T Maskawa CP -violation in the renormalizable theory of weakinteraction Progress of Theoretical Physics 49 (1973) 652

[5] M Gronau and D London How to determine all the angles of the unitarity trianglefrom B0 rarr DK0

S and B0s rarr Dφ Phys Lett B253 (1991) 483

[6] M Gronau and D Wyler On determining a weak phase from CP asymmetries incharged B decays Phys Lett B265 (1991) 172

[7] I Dunietz CP violation with self-tagging Bd modes Phys Lett B270 (1991) 75

[8] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurement of CP violation parameters inB0 rarr DKlowast0 decays Phys Rev D90 (2014) 112002 arXiv14078136

[9] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of overlapping spin-1 and spin-

3 D0Kminus resonances at mass 286 GeVc2 Phys Rev Lett 113 (2014) 162001

arXiv14077574

[10] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ decays

Phys Rev D90 (2014) 072003 arXiv14077712

[11] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observation and amplitude analysis of theBminus rarr D+Kminusπminus decay Phys Rev D91 (2015) 092002 arXiv150302995

[12] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays

arXiv150501710 submitted to Phys Rev D

[13] Belle collaboration A Kuzmin et al Study of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays Phys RevD76 (2007) 012006 arXivhep-ex0611054

[14] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of branching fractions andresonance contributions for B0 rarr D0K+πminus and search for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decaysPhys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 011803 arXivhep-ex0509036

[15] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurements of the branching fractions of

the decays B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ and B0 rarr D

0K+πminus Phys Rev D87 (2013) 112009

arXiv13046317

30

[16] Belle collaboration P Krokovny et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K0 and B0 rarr D0Klowast0

decays Phys Rev Lett 90 (2003) 141802 arXivhep-ex0212066

[17] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of B0 rarr D(lowast)0K(lowast)0 branchingfractions Phys Rev D74 (2006) 031101 arXivhep-ex0604016

[18] LHCb collaboration A A Alves Jr et al The LHCb detector at the LHC JINST 3(2008) S08005

[19] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al LHCb detector performance Int J Mod PhysA30 (2015) 1530022 arXiv14126352

[20] R Aaij et al Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator JINST 9 (2014) P09007arXiv14057808

[21] R Arink et al Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker JINST 9 (2014) P01002arXiv13113893

[22] M Adinolfi et al Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Eur PhysJ C73 (2013) 2431 arXiv12116759

[23] A A Alves Jr et al Performance of the LHCb muon system JINST 8 (2013) P02022arXiv12111346

[24] R Aaij et al The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011 JINST 8 (2013) P04022arXiv12113055

[25] V V Gligorov and M Williams Efficient reliable and fast high-level triggering usinga bonsai boosted decision tree JINST 8 (2013) P02013 arXiv12106861

[26] T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P Skands PYTHIA 64 physics and manual JHEP05 (2006) 026 arXivhep-ph0603175 T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P SkandsA brief introduction to PYTHIA 81 Comput Phys Commun 178 (2008) 852arXiv07103820

[27] I Belyaev et al Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss the LHCbsimulation framework J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032047

[28] D J Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package Nucl Instrum MethA462 (2001) 152

[29] P Golonka and Z Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo A precision tool for QED correctionsin Z and W decays Eur Phys J C45 (2006) 97 arXivhep-ph0506026

[30] Geant4 collaboration J Allison et al Geant4 developments and applications IEEETrans Nucl Sci 53 (2006) 270 Geant4 collaboration S Agostinelli et al Geant4A simulation toolkit Nucl Instrum Meth A506 (2003) 250

31

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 6: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

satisfy pion and kaon particle identification (PID) criteriaA neural network [35] is used to discriminate between signal decays and combinatorial

background The sPlot technique [36] with the B candidate mass as the discriminatingvariable is used to separate statistically B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays from background Thesignal and background weights returned by this method are applied to the candidateswhich are then used to train the network The network is trained using 16 variables Theyinclude the χ2

IP of the four final-state tracks and the following variables associated tothe D0 candidate χ2

IP χ2vtx the square of the flight distance from the PV divided by

its uncertainty squared (χ2flight) cos θdir and the output of the D0 BDT In addition the

following variables associated to the B candidate are included pT χ2IP χ2

vtx χ2flight and

cos θdir The pT asymmetry [10] and track multiplicity in a cone with half-angle of 15units of the plane of pseudorapidity and azimuthal angle (measured in radians) aroundthe B candidate flight direction which contain information about the isolation of the Bcandidate from the rest of the event are also used The input quantities to the neuralnetwork depend only weakly on the position of the candidate in the B decay Dalitz plotand therefore any requirement on the network output cannot appreciably bias the DPdistribution A requirement imposed on the network output reduces the combinatorialbackground remaining after the initial selection by a factor of five while retaining morethan 90 of the signal

The B0 rarr D0K+πminus candidates must satisfy the same selection as the B0 rarr D0π+πminus

decays except for the PID requirement on the positively charged track from the B decayvertex which is imposed to preferentially select kaons rather than pions The PID efficiencyis evaluated from calibration samples of D0 rarr Kminusπ+ decays from the Dlowast+ rarr D0π+ decaychain The kinematics of this decay chain can be exploited to obtain clean samples withoutusing the PID information [22] The PID efficiency of the requirements on the four tracksin the final state is around 50 and varies depending on the kinematics of the tracks asdescribed in detail in Sec 61

Candidates are vetoed when the difference between m(K+πminusπminus) and m(K+πminus) lieswithin plusmn25 MeV of the known Dlowast(2010)minusndashD0 mass difference [37] to remove backgroundcontaining Dlowastminus rarr D0πminus decays Candidates are also rejected if a similar mass differencecalculated with the pion mass hypothesis applied to the bachelor kaon satisfies the samecriterion To reject backgrounds from B0 rarr DminusK+ Dminus rarr K+πminusπminus decays it is requiredthat the combination of the pion from the D0 candidate together with the two bachelorparticles does not have an invariant mass in the range 1850ndash1890 MeV Additionallycandidates are removed if the pion and kaon originating directly from the B0 decaycombine to give an invariant mass consistent with that of the D0 meson (1835ndash1880 MeV)This removes candidates with the D0 wrongly reconstructed as well as potential backgroundfrom B0 rarr D0D0 decays Other incorrectly reconstructed candidates are removed byvetoing candidates where the pion from the D0 decay and the kaon originating directlyfrom the B0 decay give an invariant mass in the range 1850ndash1885 MeV At least one ofthe pion candidates is required to have no associated hits in the muon system to removepotential background from B0 rarr JψKlowast0 decays Charmless decays of b hadrons aresuppressed by the use of the D0 BDT and further reduced to a negligible level by requiring

4

that the D0 candidate vertex is separated from the B0 decay vertex by at least 1 mmSignal candidates are retained for further analysis if they have invariant mass in the

range 5100ndash5900 MeV After all selection requirements are applied fewer than 1 ofselected events also contain a second candidate Such multiple candidates are retained andtreated in the same manner as other candidates the associated systematic uncertainty isnegligible

4 Determination of signal and background yields

The signal and background yields are determined from an extended maximum likelihoodfit to the B candidate invariant mass distribution The fit allows for signal decayscombinatorial background and contributions from other b hadron decays The decay chainB0 rarr Dlowast0K+πminus with Dlowast0 rarr D0γ or D0π0 forms a partially reconstructed backgroundthat peaks at low B candidate mass as the neutral particle is not included in the candidateMisidentified B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus Λ0

b rarr D(lowast)0K+p and B0(s) rarr D(lowast)0K+Kminus decays are found

to contribute to the background A possible contribution from the highly suppressedB0s rarr D0K+πminus decay mode is also included in the fit

The signal peak is modelled with the sum of two Crystal Ball [38] functions whichhave tails on opposite sides and which share a common mean The tail parameters arefixed to the values found in fits to simulated signal decays The relative normalisationand the ratio of widths of the two functions are constrained within uncertainties tothe values determined in a fit to B0 rarr D0π+πminus data The B0

s rarr D0K+πminus shape ismodelled identically to the signal peak with the difference between the B0 and B0

s masspeak positions fixed to its known value [37] An exponential shape is used to model thecombinatorial background

Misidentified and partially reconstructed backgrounds are modelled with smoothednon-parametric functions Simulated samples are used to obtain the shape for B0 rarrDlowast0K+πminus decays with the Dlowast0 rarr D0γ and D0π0 contributions generated in the correctproportions [37] To account for differences between simulation and data for examplein the polarisation of the Dlowast0 meson the B candidate invariant mass distribution forpartially reconstructed B0 rarr Dlowast0K+πminus decays is allowed to be shifted by an offset thatis a free parameter of the fit The misidentified background shapes are also obtainedfrom simulated samples For B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays the D0 and Dlowast0 contributions arecombined according to their relative branching fractions [37] The backgrounds fromΛ0b rarr D(lowast)0K+p and B0

(s) rarr D(lowast)0K+Kminus decays are assumed to have equal branching

fractions for the decays with D0 and Dlowast0 mesons in the final state as the decays involvingDlowast0 mesons have not yet been measured The simulated samples are reweighted accordingto the relevant particle identification and misidentification probabilities and to match knownDP distributions [1239ndash41] The (mis)identification probabilities take account of trackkinematics and are calculated using calibration samples of Dlowast+ rarr D0π+ D0 rarr Kminusπ+

and Λrarr pπminus decays [1922] The yields of the misidentified backgrounds relative to thesignal are constrained within uncertainties to their expected values based on their known

5

Table 1 Yields from the fit to the D0K+πminus data sample The full mass range is 5100ndash5900 MeVand the signal region is 524855ndash530905 MeV

Component Full mass range Signal region

B0 rarr D0K+πminus 2576plusmn 72 2344plusmn 66B0s rarr D0K+πminus 55plusmn 27 1plusmn 1

comb bkgd 5540plusmn 187 684plusmn 23B0 rarr Dlowast0K+πminus 1750plusmn 99 6plusmn 1B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus 485plusmn 47 51plusmn 5Λ0b rarr D(lowast)0K+p 95plusmn 26 18plusmn 5

B0 rarr D(lowast)0K+Kminus 127plusmn 27 10plusmn 2B0s rarr D(lowast)0K+Kminus 54plusmn 18 14plusmn 5

) [MeV]-π+K0

D(m5200 5400 5600 5800

Can

dida

tes

8 M

eV

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700 LHCb (a)Data

Total fitminusπ+K

0D rarr (s)

0B

Combinatorial bkgminusπ+K 0D rarr 0Bminusπ+π( )0D rarr 0B

p+K( )0D rarr 0bΛ

minusK+K( )0D rarr (s)0B

) [MeV]-π+K0

D(m5200 5400 5600 5800

Can

dida

tes

8 M

eV

1

10

210

310(b)LHCb

Figure 2 Results of the fit to the B candidate invariant mass distribution with (a) linear and(b) logarithmic y-axis scales The components are as described in the legend

branching fractions [123940] and misidentification probabilitiesThere are 14 free parameters in the fit model the mean and width of the signal shape

the relative normalisation and relative width of the two Crystal Ball functions the slopeof the exponential function the offset of the B0 rarr Dlowast0K+πminus shape and the yields of theeight contributions The result of the fit is shown in Fig 2 and the yields are summarisedin Table 1 The yields are also reported within the signal region used in the Dalitz plotfit corresponding to plusmn25 widths of the B0 signal shape (524855ndash530905 MeV) Thedistribution of candidates in the signal region over the Dalitz plot is shown in Fig 3(a)Note that a B0 mass constraint is applied to calculate the variables that are used todescribe the Dalitz plot [42] improving the resolution of those variables and giving aunique kinematic boundary

6

]2) [GeVminusπ0D(2m

5 10 15 20

]2)

[GeV

minus π+K(2

m

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

(a)LHCb

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

091

(b)LHCb

Figure 3 Distribution of B0 rarr D0K+πminus candidates in the signal region over (a) the Dalitz plotand (b) the square Dalitz plot The definition of the square Dalitz plot is given in Sec 61

5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism

In B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays resonances are expected in the m2(D0πminus) and m2(K+πminus)combinations so the Dalitz plot shown in Fig 3(a) is defined in terms of these twoinvariant mass squared terms For a fixed B0 mass these two invariant mass squaredcombinations can be used to calculate all other relevant kinematic quantities

The isobar model [43ndash45] is used to describe the complex decay amplitude The totalamplitude is given by the coherent sum of amplitudes from resonant and nonresonantintermediate contributions and is given by

A(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)=

Nsumj=1

cjFj(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

) (1)

where cj are complex coefficients describing the relative contribution for each intermediateprocess The resonant dynamics are contained in the Fj

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)terms

that are normalised such that the integral of the squared magnitude over the DP is unityfor each term For a D0πminus resonance Fj

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)is given by

F(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)= R

(m(D0πminus)

)timesX(|~p | rBW)timesX(|~q | rBW)times T (~p ~q ) (2)

where ~p is the bachelor particle momentum and ~q is the momentum of one of the resonancedaughters both evaluated in the D0πminus rest frame The functions R X and T are describedbelow

The X(z) terms are BlattndashWeisskopf barrier factors [46] where z = |~q | rBW or |~p | rBW

and rBW is the barrier radius which is set to 40 GeVminus1 asymp 08 fm [10] for all resonances

7

The barrier factors are angular momentum dependent and are given by

L = 0 X(z) = 1

L = 1 X(z) =radic

1+z201+z2

L = 2 X(z) =radic

z40+3z20+9

z4+3z2+9

L = 3 X(z) =radic

z60+6z40+45z20+225

z6+6z4+45z2+225

(3)

where z0 is the value of z at the pole mass of the resonance and L is the orbital angularmomentum between the resonance and the bachelor particle Since the parent and daughterparticles all have zero spin L is also the spin of the resonance

The T (~p ~q) terms describe the angular distributions in the Zemach tensor formalism [4748] and are given by

L = 0 T (~p ~q) = 1 L = 1 T (~p ~q) = minus 2 ~p middot ~q L = 2 T (~p ~q) = 4

3[3(~p middot ~q )2 minus (|~p ||~q |)2]

L = 3 T (~p ~q) = minus 2415

[5(~p middot ~q )3 minus 3(~p middot ~q )(|~p ||~q |)2]

(4)

These expressions are proportional to the Legendre polynomials PL(x) where x is thecosine of the angle between ~p and ~q (referred to as the helicity angle)

The R(m(D0πminus)

)functions are the mass lineshapes Resonant contributions are

typically described by the relativistic BreitndashWigner (RBW) function

R(m) =1

(m20 minusm2)minus im0Γ(m)

(5)

where the mass-dependent decay width is

Γ(m) = Γ0

(q

q0

)2L+1 (m0

m

)X2(q rBW) (6)

where q0 is the value of q = |~q | when the invariant mass is equal to the pole mass of theresonance m0

The large phase space available in B decays allows for the presence of nonresonantamplitudes (ie contributions that do not proceed via a known resonance) that vary acrossthe Dalitz plot An exponential form factor (EFF) has been found to describe nonresonantcontributions well in several DP analyses of B decays [49]

R(m) = exp[minusαm2

] (7)

where α is a shape parameter that must be determined from the data and m is a two-bodyinvariant mass (m(D0πminus) in this example)

The RBW function is a good model for narrow resonances that are well separated fromany other resonant or nonresonant contribution of the same spin This approach is known

8

to break down in the Kπ S-wave because the Klowast0(1430) resonance interferes strongly witha slowly varying nonresonant term as described in Ref [50] The LASS lineshape [51] hasbeen developed to combine these two contributions

R(m) =m

q cot δB minus iq+ exp [2iδB]

m0Γ0m0

q0

(m20 minusm2)minus im0Γ0

qmm0

q0

(8)

where cot δB =1

aq+

1

2rq (9)

and where m0 and Γ0 are the pole mass and width of the Klowast0(1430) state and a and r areshape parameters

The Dπ S-wave nonresonant contribution can be described by the ldquodabbardquo line-shape [52] defined as

R(m) =Bprime(m2)(m2 minus sA)ρ

1minus β(m2 minusm2min)minus iBprime(m2)(m2 minus sA)ρ

(10)

whereBprime(m2) = b exp

[minusα(m2 minusm2

min)] (11)

Here mmin is the invariant mass at threshold sA = m2D minus 05m2

π is the Adler zero ρ isa phase-space factor and b α and β are parameters with values fixed to 2449 GeVminus201 GeVminus2 and 01 GeVminus2 respectively according to Ref [52]

Ignoring reconstruction and selection effects the DP probability density function wouldbe

Pphys

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)=

|A(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)|2intint

DP|A|2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)

(12)

where the dependence of A on the DP position has been suppressed in the denominator forbrevity The primary results of most Dalitz plot analyses are the complex coefficients asdefined in Eq (1) These however depend on the choice of phase convention amplitudeformalism and normalisation used in each analysis The convention-independent quantitiesof fit fractions and interference fit fractions provide a way to reliably compare resultsbetween different analyses Fit fractions are defined as the integral of the amplitude foreach intermediate component squared divided by that of the coherent matrix elementsquared for all intermediate contributions

FF j =

intintDP

∣∣cjFj (m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus))∣∣2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)intint

DP|A|2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)

(13)

The fit fractions need not sum to unity due to possible net constructive or destructiveinterference described by interference fit fractions defined (for i lt j only) by

FF ij =

intintDP

2Re[ciclowastjFiF

lowastj

]dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)intint

DP|A|2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)

(14)

where the dependence of F(lowast)i and A on the DP position has been omitted

9

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

Eff

icie

ncy

()

0

005

01

015

02

025(a)LHCb Simulation

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

Eff

icie

ncy

()

0

005

01

015

02

025(b)LHCb Simulation

Figure 4 Efficiency variation as a function of SDP position for candidates triggered by (a) signaldecay products and (b) by the rest of the event The vertical white stripe is due to the Dlowast vetoand the curved white band is due to the D0 veto

6 Dalitz plot fit

61 Signal efficiency

The variation of the efficiency across the phase space is studied in terms of the squareDalitz plot (SDP) The SDP is defined by variables mprime and θprime that range between 0 and 1and are given for the D0K+πminus case by

mprime equiv 1

πarccos

(2m(D0πminus)minusmmin

D0πminus

mmaxD0πminus minusmmin

D0πminus

minus 1

)and θprime equiv 1

πθ(D0πminus) (15)

where mmaxD0πminus = mB0 minusmK+ and mmin

D0πminus = mD0 + mπminus are the kinematic boundaries of

m(D0πminus) allowed in the B0 rarr D0K+πminus decay and θ(D0πminus) is the helicity angle of theD0πminus system (the angle between the K+ and the D0 meson in the D0πminus rest frame) Thedistribution of selected events across the SDP is shown in Fig 3(b)

Efficiency variation across the SDP is caused by the detector acceptance and bytrigger selection and PID requirements The efficiency is evaluated with simulated samplesgenerated uniformly over the SDP Data-driven corrections are applied to correct for knowndifferences between data and simulation in the tracking trigger and PID efficiencies usingidentical methods to those described in Ref [10] The efficiency functions are obtainedby fitting the corrected simulation with two-dimensional cubic splines Figure 4 showsthe histograms used to model the variation of the efficiency over the SDP for candidatestriggered by (a) signal decays and (b) by the rest of the event

62 Background studies

Among the background yields in the signal region given in Table 1 the only sizeablecomponents are due to combinatorial background and B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays The SDP

10

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

0

0002

0004

0006

0008

001

0012

0014

(a)LHCb

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

000020004000600080010012001400160018

(b)LHCb Simulation

Figure 5 SDP distributions of the background contributions from (a) combinatorial backgroundand (b) B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays

distributions of these backgrounds are described by the histograms shown in Fig 5Combinatorial background contributes 22 of candidates in the signal region The

shape of this contribution over the SDP is obtained from the high B mass sideband (5400ndash5900 MeV) As seen in Fig 2 this sideband is dominated by combinatorial backgroundwith a small contribution from B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays The SDP distribution of theB0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus contribution in the sideband region is modelled as described belowfor the signal region and is subtracted from the sideband sample To check that theSDP shape of the combinatorial background does not vary with the B candidate massa sample of doubly charged D0Kplusmnπplusmn candidates is investigated This confirms that theSDP distribution from the sideband is a reliable model for combinatorial background inthe signal region

The B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus contribution accounts for 16 of the candidates in the signalregion Its SDP distribution is obtained from a simulated sample with the B0 rarr D0π+πminus

and B0 rarr Dlowast0π+πminus contributions combined and reweighted as described in Sec 4 TheB0 rarr D0π+πminus decay mode is the dominant component of this background in the signalregion

Due to resolution effects B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ Dlowast(2010)minus rarr D0πminus decays are notentirely removed by the Dlowast veto Although this component corresponds to real B0 rarrD0πminusK+ decays it is treated as incoherent (ie as background) since its interference withthe remainder of the signal is negligible Its SDP distribution is modelled as a Gaussianpeak in m(D0πminus) with mean fixed to the known Dlowast(2010)minus mass and width and yielddetermined in the fit to data

11

Table 2 Signal contributions to the fit model where parameters and uncertainties are takenfrom Ref [37] The models are described in Sec 5

Resonance Spin DP axis Model Parameters

Klowast(892)0 1 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 89581plusmn 019 MeV Γ0 = 474plusmn 06 MeVKlowast(1410)0 1 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 1414plusmn 15 MeV Γ0 = 232plusmn 21 MeVKlowast0(1430)0 0 m2(K+πminus) LASS Determined from data (see text)Klowast2(1430)0 2 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 14324plusmn 13 MeV Γ0 = 109plusmn 5 MeVDlowast0(2400)minus 0 m2(D0πminus) RBW

Determined from data (see Table 3)Dlowast2(2460)minus 2 m2(D0πminus) RBW

Nonresonant 0 m2(D0πminus) dabba Fixed (see text)Nonresonant 1 m2(D0πminus) EFF Determined from data (see text)

63 Amplitude model for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays

The Dalitz plot fit is performed using the Laura++ [53] package The likelihood functionis given by

L =Ncprodi

[sumk

NkPk(m2i (D

0πminus)m2i (K

+πminus)) ]

(16)

where the index i runs over Nc candidates k runs over the signal and backgroundcomponents and Nk is the yield in each component The probability density function forthe signal component Psig is given by Eq (12) with the |A

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)|2

terms multiplied by the efficiency function described in Sec 61 As it is possible forthe minimisation procedure to find a local minimum of the negative log likelihood (NLL)profile the fit is repeated many times with randomised initial values to ensure the globalminimum is found

The nominal Dalitz plot fit model for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays is composed of severalresonant and nonresonant amplitudes Only those amplitudes that provide significantcontributions or that aid the fit stability are included Unnatural spin-parity states arenot considered as these do not decay to two pseudoscalars The eight amplitudes includedin this model are listed in Table 2 The width of the narrowest signal contribution tothe Dalitz plot (sim 50 MeV) is far larger than the mass resolution (sim 24 MeV) thereforeresolution effects are neglected

The real and imaginary parts of the complex coefficients cj defined in Eq (1) are freeparameters of the fit except for the coefficient of the Dlowast2(2460)minus component which is fixedto 1 as a reference The phases and magnitudes of the complex coefficients as well as fitfractions and interference fit fractions are derived from these free parameters In additionthe masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances are determined fromthe fit to data and are reported in Table 3 The statistical uncertainties on all parametersof interest are calculated using large samples of simulated pseudoexperiments Thesepseudoexperiments are also used to determine the correlations between the statisticaluncertainties on the parameters which are given in Appendix A The LASS parameters

12

Table 3 Masses and widths (MeV) determined in the fit to data with statistical uncertaintiesonly

Resonance Mass Width

Dlowast0(2400)minus 2360plusmn 15 255plusmn 26Dlowast2(2460)minus 24656plusmn 18 460plusmn 34

Table 4 Complex coefficients and fit fractions determined from the Dalitz plot fit Uncertaintiesare statistical only Note that the fit fractions magnitudes and phases are derived quantities

Resonance Fit fraction Isobar model coefficients() Real part Imaginary part Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 minus000plusmn 015 minus127plusmn 006 127plusmn 006 minus157plusmn 011Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 015plusmn 006 minus009plusmn 009 018plusmn 007 minus054plusmn 021Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 014plusmn 038 045plusmn 015 047plusmn 009 127plusmn 095LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 minus010plusmn 024 044plusmn 014 046plusmn 014 179plusmn 065

LASS total 67plusmn 27Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 minus032plusmn 009 minus047plusmn 007 057plusmn 005 minus216plusmn 019Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 minus080plusmn 008 minus044plusmn 014 091plusmn 007 minus264plusmn 015Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 100 000 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 minus039plusmn 009 036plusmn 017 053plusmn 007 240plusmn 027Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 minus062plusmn 006 minus003plusmn 006 062plusmn 006 minus309plusmn 010Total fit fraction 1134

are determined to be m0 = 1450plusmn 80 MeV Γ0 = 400plusmn 230 MeV a = 32plusmn 18 GeV andr = 09plusmn11 GeV while the parameter of the EFF lineshape of the Dπ P-wave nonresonantamplitude is determined to be α = 088plusmn 010 GeVminus2

The values of the fit fractions and complex coefficients obtained from the fit are shownin Table 4 while the values of the interference fit fractions are given in Appendix B Thesum of the fit fractions is seen to exceed unity mostly due to interference within the Dπ andKπ S-waves Note that in Table 4 and all results for fit fractions and derived quantitiesvalues are reported separately for both the Klowast0 (1430)0 and nonresonant components of theLASS lineshape as well as their coherent sum

Projections of the data and the nominal fit model onto m(K+πminus) m(D0πminus) andm(D0K+) are shown in Fig 6 Zooms are provided in the regions of the main resonantcontributions in Fig 7 Projections onto the cosine of the helicity angle of the D0πminus andK+πminus systems are shown in Figs 8 and 9 respectively These projections all show goodagreement between data and the fit model

Angular moments provide a useful method to investigate the helicity structure of thedecays The angular moments in m(D0πminus) and m(K+πminus) obtained as in Refs [1011]are shown in Figs 10 and 11 respectively The contributions due to the Klowast(892)0 andDlowast2(2460)minus resonances are seen as peaks in moments up to order 2 and order 4 respectivelyas expected for spin-1 and spin-2 resonances Reflections make the interpretation ofmoments at higher masses more difficult However the good agreement seen between data

13

and the fit model provides further support for the fit model being a good description ofthe data

The quality of the fit is evaluated by determining a two-dimensional χ2 value comparingthe data and fit model in 144 bins across the SDP that are defined adaptively to ensurethey are approximately equally populated The pull in each of these bins defined as thedifference between the data and the fit model divided by the uncertainty is shown inFig 12 The effective number of degrees of freedom of the χ2 is between Nbins minusNpars minus 1and Nbinsminus1 where Npars is the number of free parameters in the fit yielding a reduced χ2

in the range 099 ndash 122 Additional unbinned tests of fit quality [54] also show acceptableagreement between the data and the fit model

7 Systematic uncertainties

Systematic uncertainties are considered from sources that can be divided into two categoriesexperimental and model uncertainties Experimental uncertainties arise due to the signaland background yields in the signal region the distributions of the background componentsacross the SDP the variation of efficiency across the SDP and possible bias due to thefitting procedure Model uncertainties are considered due to the fixed parameters in thesignal model the addition or removal of marginal amplitudes and the choice of models forthe Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves The uncertainties due to all of these sourcesare combined in quadrature

The signal and background yields are determined from the fit to the B candidateinvariant mass distribution Systematic uncertainties are considered on the total yieldsdue to both statistical and systematic variations of these yields as evaluated in Ref [15]The yields in the signal region are varied appropriately and the effects of these variationson the parameters of interest are assigned as systematic uncertainties

The histograms describing the background distributions are each varied within statisticaluncertainties to establish the uncertainty due to the imperfect knowledge of the distributionof these backgrounds across the SDP The histograms describing the efficiency variationacross the SDP are also varied within their uncertainties prior to the spline fit Theefficiency histograms are also varied with local correlations to account for the effects ofany unknown correlations between neighbouring bins For each parameter the largeruncertainty is considered from the correlated and uncorrelated variations In addition thebinning scheme of the control sample used to evaluate PID performance is varied

An ensemble of pseudoexperiments is used to establish systematic uncertainties relatedto any potential fit bias Pseudoexperiments are generated using the parameters determinedin the fit to data and mean fitted values of the parameters are determined from Gaussianfits to the distributions of results obtained in the ensemble The differences between thegenerated and mean fitted values are found to be small Uncertainties are determined asthe sum in quadrature of the difference between the generated and mean fitted values andthe uncertainty on the mean fitted value from the Gaussian fit

Systematic uncertainties due to fixed parameters in the fit model are determined by

14

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310LHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350 LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310 LHCb (d)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

LHCb (e)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210LHCb (f)

Data Total fit 0(892)K 0(1410)K

S-wave (LASS)πK 0(1430)2Kminus

(2400)0Dminus

(2460)2D

S-wave (EFF)πD P-wave (EFF)πDminus

D Background

Figure 6 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) (c) m(K+πminus)and (e) m(D0K+) with the same projections shown in (b) (d) and (f) with a logarithmic y-axisscale Components are described in the legend

15

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

235 24 245 25 255

Can

dida

tes

4 M

eV

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m05 1 15

Can

dida

tes

13

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

LHCb (b)

Figure 7 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) in the Dlowast2(2460)minus

region and (b) the low m(K+πminus) region Components are as shown in Fig 6

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

) lt 235 GeVminusπ0D(m204 lt

LHCb(a)

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

) lt 255 GeVminusπ0D(m235 lt

LHCb(b)

Figure 8 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(D0πminus) in the mass ranges(a) 204 lt m(D0πminus) lt 235 GeV and (b) 235 lt m(D0πminus) lt 255 GeV Components are asshown in Fig 6

repeating the fit with these parameters varied The fixed masses and widths are variedwithin their uncertainties as shown in Table 2 while the BlattndashWeisskopf barrier radii rBWare varied independently for D0πminus and K+πminus resonances between 3 and 5 GeVminus1 [10]

The Klowast(1410)0 amplitude does not contribute significantly to the nominal fit modelso the fit is repeated with this component removed and the change in results is assignedas the associated systematic uncertainty In addition uncertainties are assigned fromthe changes in the results when an amplitude due to the Klowast(1680)0 resonance or from avirtual Blowast(5325)+ component as described in Ref [10] is included in the model

A Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D0Kminusπ+ observed both spin-1 and spin-3 resonances

at m(D0Kminus) sim 286 GeV [9 10] A spin-3 resonance has also been seen at m(D0πminus) sim276 GeV in B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] while an analysis of B+ rarr DminusK+π+ shows aspin-1 resonance at similar m(D+πminus) values [11] Uncertainties are assigned corresponding

16

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

) lt 08 GeVminusπ+K(m0 lt LHCb

(a)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 10 GeVminusπ+K(m08 lt LHCb

(b)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 13 GeVminusπ+K(m10 lt LHCb

(c)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

) lt 15 GeVminusπ+K(m14 lt LHCb

(d)

Figure 9 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(K+πminus) in the mass ranges(a) m(K+πminus) lt 08 GeV (b) 08 lt m(K+πminus) lt 10 GeV (c) 10 lt m(K+πminus) lt 13 GeV and(d) 14 lt m(K+πminus) lt 15 GeV Components are as shown in Fig 6

to the changes in results when either a spin-1 or spin-3 state at m(D0πminus) sim 276 GeV isadded to the nominal model

The LASS model used to describe the Kπ S-wave is replaced with a Flatte shape [55]which accounts for the Kηprime threshold near the Klowast0 (1430)0 mass and a resonant term witha modified mass dependent width [52] for the κ (also known as Klowast0(800)) state Thismodel gives an NLL that is worse by 44 units A model-independent description of theKπ S-wave is also used to fit the data with the uncertainty on each parameter takenas the larger of the two differences This alternative improves the NLL by 88 units butintroduces an additional four free parameters into the fit The dabba lineshape used todescribe the D0πminus S-wave is replaced with an EFF lineshape while a power-law model isintroduced as an alternative to the EFF lineshape that describes the D0πminus P-wave Thesealterations worsen the NLL by 30 units and improve it by 08 units respectively

The total systematic uncertainties due to experimental and model effects for fit fractionsand complex coefficients are given together with the results in Sec 8 The contributionsfrom different sources to the systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions masses and

17

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0002004006008

0101201401601802

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-30-25-20-15-10

-505

1015

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

310timesLHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

310timesLHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-8-6-4-202468

310timesLHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-8-6-4-20246

310timesLHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-6-4-202468

10

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 10 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(D0πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

18

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0

005

01

015

02

025

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

20

40

60

80

100310times

LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10-505

10152025

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25310times

LHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-20-15-10

-505

101520

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 11 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(K+πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

19

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Pull

-2

-1

0

1

2

LHCb

Figure 12 Differences between the data SDP distribution and the fit model across the SDP interms of the per-bin pull

Table 5 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths(MeV) Uncertainties given on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value SB fraction Efficiency Background SDP Fit bias Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 060 083 050 031 117Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 006 039 069 005 080Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 028 148 185 033 241LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 051 225 286 086 377

LASS total 67plusmn 27 026 186 160 102 267Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 023 072 053 054 107Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 021 139 143 040 204Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 070 070 049 015 111Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 003 081 059 057 115Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 086 191 052 038 219m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 46 81 70 37 122m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 001 037 022 029 051Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 28 131 139 48 199Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 05 09 09 05 14

widths are given in Tables 5 and 6 The dominant experimental systematic uncertaintyon most parameters is due to either the efficiency variation or background distributionsacross the SDP while the model uncertainties are generally dominated by the effects ofalternative descriptions of the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves For the parametersof broad components the model uncertainties dominate however for other parameters thestatistical experimental and model uncertainties are all of a similar magnitude

The stability of the fit results is confirmed by several cross-checks The data sample isdivided into subsamples according to the flavour of the B candidate the trigger decision

20

Table 6 Model uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths (MeV) Uncertaintiesgiven on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value Fixed parameters Addremove Alternative models Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 075 114 109 174Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 018 070 022 076Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 079 330 023 340LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 110 399 520 665

LASS total 67plusmn 27 053 142 521 543Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 036 187 056 198Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 055 195 711 740Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 018 073 099 124Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 027 140 346 374Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 031 199 215 295m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 61 93 256 279m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 009 105 048 115Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 40 180 435 472Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 14 05 24 29

the polarity of the magnet and the year of data taking Each subsample is fitted separatelyand all are seen to be consistent with the nominal fit results The fit is also repeatedwith additional resonance components to test the fit model Resonances up to spin-3 wereconsidered for all three pairs of daughters with the mass and width allowed to vary in thefit No additional significant contributions were observed

8 Results and summary

The results for the complex coefficients are reported in Table 7 with results for thefit fractions given in Table 8 The results for the interference fit fractions are givenin Appendix B Upper limits are determined on the fit fractions of the Klowast(1410)0 andDlowast3(2760)minus components which do not give significant contributions using the methoddescribed in Ref [10]

The fit fractions for resonant contributions are converted into quasi-two-body productbranching fractions by multiplying by B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus) = (92plusmn 06plusmn 07plusmn 06)times 10minus5which is obtained from the ratio of branching fractions B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus)B(B0 rarrD0π+πminus) [15] multiplied by the latest result for B(B0 rarr D0π+πminus) [12] accounting forthe different Dlowast(2010)minus veto windows used in the analyses and for the 37 residualbackground due to B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ decays The statistical correlation between theresults of Ref [15] and this analysis is found to be negligible The results for the productbranching fractions are shown in Table 9 For the K+πminus resonances where the branchingfractions to Kπ are known the product branching fractions are converted to the Bdecay branching fractions shown in Table 10 The results for B(B0 rarr D0Klowast(892)0) andB(B0 rarr Dlowast2(2460)minusK+)times B(Dlowast2(2460)minus rarr D0πminus) are consistent with and more precisethan previous measurements [14 1617]

21

Table 7 Results for the complex amplitudes and their uncertainties presented (top) in terms ofreal and imaginary parts and (bottom) in terms and magnitudes and phases The three quotederrors are statistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively

Resonance Real part Imaginary part

Klowast(892)0 minus000plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 034 minus127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 006Klowast(1410)0 015plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 009 minus009plusmn 009plusmn 018plusmn 018Klowast0(1430)0 014plusmn 038plusmn 048plusmn 038 045plusmn 015plusmn 037plusmn 017LASS nonresonant minus010plusmn 024plusmn 016plusmn 042 044plusmn 014plusmn 017plusmn 023Klowast2(1430)0 minus032plusmn 009plusmn 015plusmn 023 minus047plusmn 007plusmn 014plusmn 015Dlowast0(2400)minus minus080plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 022 minus044plusmn 014plusmn 012plusmn 018Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) minus039plusmn 009plusmn 009plusmn 014 036plusmn 017plusmn 014plusmn 023Dπ P-wave (EFF) minus062plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 011 minus003plusmn 006plusmn 005plusmn 010

Resonance Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 005 minus157plusmn 011plusmn 016plusmn 027Klowast(1410)0 018plusmn 007plusmn 010plusmn 011 minus054plusmn 021plusmn 055plusmn 104Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 009plusmn 010plusmn 014 127plusmn 095plusmn 104plusmn 081LASS nonresonant 046plusmn 014plusmn 016plusmn 029 179plusmn 065plusmn 035plusmn 069Klowast2(1430)0 057plusmn 005plusmn 004plusmn 008 minus216plusmn 019plusmn 043plusmn 043Dlowast0(2400)minus 091plusmn 007plusmn 006plusmn 017 minus264plusmn 015plusmn 014plusmn 023Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 053plusmn 007plusmn 004plusmn 014 240plusmn 027plusmn 024plusmn 044Dπ P-wave (EFF) 062plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 011 minus309plusmn 010plusmn 007plusmn 017

Table 8 Results for the fit fractions and their uncertainties () The three quoted errors arestatistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively Upper limits are givenat 90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Fit fraction Upper limitKlowast(892)0 374plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 17Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03plusmn 08plusmn 08 lt 32 (37)Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20plusmn 24plusmn 34LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38plusmn 38plusmn 67

LASS total 67plusmn 27plusmn 27plusmn 54Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17plusmn 11plusmn 20Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28plusmn 20plusmn 74Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12plusmn 11plusmn 12Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 10 (11)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14plusmn 12plusmn 37Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16plusmn 22plusmn 30

22

Table 9 Results for the product branching fractions The four quoted errors are statisticalexperimental systematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Product branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 342plusmn 013plusmn 010plusmn 016plusmn 040Klowast(1410)0 007plusmn 003plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 001 lt 029 (034)Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 018plusmn 022plusmn 031plusmn 005LASS nonresonant 044plusmn 034plusmn 034plusmn 061plusmn 005

LASS total 061plusmn 025plusmn 025plusmn 049plusmn 007Klowast2(1430)0 068plusmn 015plusmn 010plusmn 018plusmn 008Dlowast0(2400)minus 177plusmn 026plusmn 019plusmn 067plusmn 020Dlowast2(2460)minus 212plusmn 010plusmn 011plusmn 011plusmn 025Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 010 (011)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 060plusmn 013plusmn 011plusmn 034plusmn 007Dπ P-wave (EFF) 081plusmn 015plusmn 020plusmn 027plusmn 009

Table 10 Results for the branching fractions The four quoted errors are statistical experimentalsystematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at 90 (95 )confidence level

Resonance Branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 513plusmn 020plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 060Klowast(1410)0 159plusmn 068plusmn 181plusmn 159plusmn 036 lt 67 (78)Klowast0(1430)0 071plusmn 027plusmn 033plusmn 047plusmn 008LASS nonresonant 066plusmn 051plusmn 051plusmn 092plusmn 008

LASS total 092plusmn 038plusmn 038plusmn 074plusmn 011Klowast2(1430)0 204plusmn 045plusmn 030plusmn 054plusmn 025

The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus states are found to be

m(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (2360plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 28) MeV

Γ(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (255plusmn 26plusmn 20plusmn 47) MeV

m(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (24656plusmn 18plusmn 05plusmn 12) MeV

Γ(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (460plusmn 34plusmn 14plusmn 29) MeV

where the three uncertainties are statistical experimental systematic and model systematicrespectively These are consistent with though less precise than recent results from a DPanalysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] They also show good agreement with and havesimilar precision to earlier measurements of these quantities [1337]

In summary the first amplitude analysis of B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays has been presentedusing a data sample corresponding to 30 fbminus1 of pp collision data collected by the LHCbexperiment A good description of the data is obtained with a model containing contri-

23

butions from intermediate Klowast(892)0 Klowast(1410)0 Klowast2(1430)0 and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonanceswith additional components to describe broad structures in the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S-and P-waves The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances aremeasured as are the complex amplitudes and fit fractions for all components includedin the amplitude model The results can be used in conjunction with an analysis ofB0 rarr DK+πminus decays where the neutral D meson is reconstructed in final states such asK+Kminus to measure the CKM unitarity triangle parameter γ [1 2]

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to our colleagues in the CERN accelerator departments forthe excellent performance of the LHC We thank the technical and administrative staffat the LHCb institutes We acknowledge support from CERN and from the nationalagencies CAPES CNPq FAPERJ and FINEP (Brazil) NSFC (China) CNRSIN2P3(France) BMBF DFG HGF and MPG (Germany) INFN (Italy) FOM and NWO (TheNetherlands) MNiSW and NCN (Poland) MENIFA (Romania) MinES and FANO(Russia) MinECo (Spain) SNSF and SER (Switzerland) NASU (Ukraine) STFC (UnitedKingdom) NSF (USA) The Tier1 computing centres are supported by IN2P3 (France)KIT and BMBF (Germany) INFN (Italy) NWO and SURF (The Netherlands) PIC(Spain) GridPP (United Kingdom) We are indebted to the communities behind themultiple open source software packages on which we depend We are also thankful forthe computing resources and the access to software RampD tools provided by Yandex LLC(Russia) Individual groups or members have received support from EPLANET MarieSk lodowska-Curie Actions and ERC (European Union) Conseil general de Haute-SavoieLabex ENIGMASS and OCEVU Region Auvergne (France) RFBR (Russia) XuntaGaland GENCAT (Spain) Royal Society and Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851(United Kingdom)

24

Appendices

A Correlation matrices

The statistical correlations between the complex coefficients masses and widths determinedfrom the fit to data are given in terms of real and imaginary parts and in terms ofmagnitudes and phases in Tables 11 and 12 The correlations are determined using thesame sample of simulated pseudoexperiments used to calculate the statistical uncertaintieson fit parameters

B Results for interference fit fractions

The central values of the interference fit fractions are given in Table 13 The statisti-cal experimental systematic and model uncertainties on these quantities are given inTables 14 15 and 16

25

Tab

le11

Sta

tist

ical

corr

elat

ions

bet

wee

nth

ere

al(x

)an

dim

agin

ary

(y)

par

tsof

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

x0

y 0x

1y 1

x2

y 2x

3y 3

x4

y 4x

5y 5

x7

y 7x

8y 8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

x0

100

014

002

017minus

018

015minus

017

003

039minus

037

016minus

009minus

018minus

029

007minus

037minus

019

002

004

012

y 01

00minus

006minus

008

009minus

011minus

000

014

003

003

012

013minus

012minus

024

035minus

007

009

012

001minus

004

x1

100minus

009minus

008minus

014minus

004

029minus

001

003minus

020

018minus

021minus

031minus

017minus

036minus

008minus

017minus

023

002

y 11

000

050

340

09minus

001

060minus

039

002minus

003minus

003

007minus

002minus

004minus

016minus

002

007

002

x2

100minus

013

081

009

014minus

016minus

015

021

010

013

004minus

015minus

007

001minus

025

001

y 21

000

080

280

24minus

036minus

013

008minus

004minus

001minus

004

004minus

002minus

001minus

009minus

010

x3

100

020

013minus

034minus

010

033minus

008

008minus

004minus

005minus

007minus

003minus

033minus

009

y 31

00minus

012minus

012minus

051

029minus

034minus

053

009minus

012

009minus

014minus

036

001

x4

100minus

053

032minus

010minus

020

003

002minus

027minus

017minus

006

010minus

000

y 41

000

06minus

009

040

010

014

016

011minus

005

007minus

003

x5

100minus

029minus

003

022

002

004minus

008

002

045minus

006

y 51

00minus

031minus

034

006

003

024minus

014minus

072minus

033

x7

100

046

005

010minus

011minus

001

027

017

y 71

00minus

016

036minus

001

017

032

008

x8

100minus

003

001minus

006minus

009minus

014

y 81

000

290

020

15minus

002

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

26

Tab

le12

S

tati

stic

alco

rrel

atio

ns

bet

wee

nth

em

agnit

ud

es(a

)an

dp

has

es(∆

)of

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

a0

∆0

a1

∆1

a2

∆2

a3

∆3

a4

∆4

a5

∆5

a7

∆7

a8

∆8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

a0

100minus

011minus

008

005

024

003minus

014

004

004

001

021

002

022minus

022

038minus

000minus

004minus

009minus

001

004

∆0

100minus

010

012

003

020

014

014minus

001

045minus

005

010minus

008

035minus

007

005minus

022

006

007

009

a1

100minus

035minus

025

006

032

001minus

001minus

038

004minus

022minus

006

031

002

024

007minus

018minus

020

001

∆1

100

024

015

016

000

014

038minus

018minus

013

016

026

022minus

006minus

009minus

004minus

012

005

a2

100

004

011minus

028minus

007

039minus

009

007

027

010

001

001minus

015

004minus

003minus

013

∆2

100

015

077minus

020minus

010minus

001

024

009

013

003minus

009

005

001

023minus

010

a3

100minus

006

000minus

011

016minus

030minus

012

056

001

012

002minus

007minus

027minus

004

∆3

100minus

028minus

019

015

041minus

024minus

008minus

000minus

013

004

002

041

008

a4

100

013

005minus

017

014

018minus

000

006

000

014minus

019minus

009

∆4

100minus

016

016

017

012

000minus

002minus

019minus

003

003

001

a5

100

024minus

026minus

006

011

005minus

007

001

019

039

∆5

100minus

000minus

028minus

001minus

020minus

020

015

076

027

a7

100minus

001

017minus

006

004

013minus

005minus

024

∆7

100minus

012

037

003minus

000minus

027minus

012

a8

100minus

004minus

001

004

006

015

∆8

100minus

037minus

002minus

033minus

001

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

27

Table 13 Interference fit fractions () from the nominal DP fit The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 374 18 minus00 00 00 minus24 minus02 minus26 minus50A1 07 minus00 00 00 minus11 minus03 minus06 minus11A2 51 minus32 minus00 29 15 16 19A3 48 00 minus84 01 21 02A4 74 minus03 minus10 minus15 minus04A5 193 minus00 28 00A6 231 minus00 00A7 66 minus00A8 89

Table 14 Statistical uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes areall pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASSnonresonant (A4) Klowast2 (1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8)Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 15 07 00 00 00 09 04 04 05A1 03 00 00 00 07 03 04 05A2 20 26 00 11 05 15 05A3 38 00 32 04 34 08A4 17 06 01 06 05A5 28 00 31 00A6 12 00 00A7 14 00A8 16

28

Table 15 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () Theamplitudes are all pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0 (1430)0(A3) LASS nonresonant (A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave(dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fitfractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 12 05 00 00 00 23 02 04 05A1 08 00 00 00 04 08 07 09A2 24 31 00 14 20 26 11A3 38 00 36 02 26 03A4 11 22 02 05 10A5 20 00 40 00A6 11 00 00A7 12 00A8 22

Table 16 Model uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 17 08 00 00 00 26 07 08 14A1 08 00 00 00 08 06 08 11A2 34 29 00 58 17 36 27A3 66 00 83 03 35 07A4 20 17 02 12 10A5 74 00 45 00A6 12 00 00A7 37 00A8 29

29

References

[1] T Gershon On the measurement of the unitarity triangle angle γ from B0 rarr DKlowast0

decays Phys Rev D79 (2009) 051301(R) arXiv08102706

[2] T Gershon and M Williams Prospects for the measurement of the unitaritytriangle angle γ from B0 rarr DK+πminus decays Phys Rev D80 (2009) 092002arXiv09091495

[3] N Cabibbo Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays Phys Rev Lett 10 (1963) 531

[4] M Kobayashi and T Maskawa CP -violation in the renormalizable theory of weakinteraction Progress of Theoretical Physics 49 (1973) 652

[5] M Gronau and D London How to determine all the angles of the unitarity trianglefrom B0 rarr DK0

S and B0s rarr Dφ Phys Lett B253 (1991) 483

[6] M Gronau and D Wyler On determining a weak phase from CP asymmetries incharged B decays Phys Lett B265 (1991) 172

[7] I Dunietz CP violation with self-tagging Bd modes Phys Lett B270 (1991) 75

[8] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurement of CP violation parameters inB0 rarr DKlowast0 decays Phys Rev D90 (2014) 112002 arXiv14078136

[9] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of overlapping spin-1 and spin-

3 D0Kminus resonances at mass 286 GeVc2 Phys Rev Lett 113 (2014) 162001

arXiv14077574

[10] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ decays

Phys Rev D90 (2014) 072003 arXiv14077712

[11] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observation and amplitude analysis of theBminus rarr D+Kminusπminus decay Phys Rev D91 (2015) 092002 arXiv150302995

[12] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays

arXiv150501710 submitted to Phys Rev D

[13] Belle collaboration A Kuzmin et al Study of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays Phys RevD76 (2007) 012006 arXivhep-ex0611054

[14] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of branching fractions andresonance contributions for B0 rarr D0K+πminus and search for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decaysPhys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 011803 arXivhep-ex0509036

[15] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurements of the branching fractions of

the decays B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ and B0 rarr D

0K+πminus Phys Rev D87 (2013) 112009

arXiv13046317

30

[16] Belle collaboration P Krokovny et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K0 and B0 rarr D0Klowast0

decays Phys Rev Lett 90 (2003) 141802 arXivhep-ex0212066

[17] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of B0 rarr D(lowast)0K(lowast)0 branchingfractions Phys Rev D74 (2006) 031101 arXivhep-ex0604016

[18] LHCb collaboration A A Alves Jr et al The LHCb detector at the LHC JINST 3(2008) S08005

[19] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al LHCb detector performance Int J Mod PhysA30 (2015) 1530022 arXiv14126352

[20] R Aaij et al Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator JINST 9 (2014) P09007arXiv14057808

[21] R Arink et al Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker JINST 9 (2014) P01002arXiv13113893

[22] M Adinolfi et al Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Eur PhysJ C73 (2013) 2431 arXiv12116759

[23] A A Alves Jr et al Performance of the LHCb muon system JINST 8 (2013) P02022arXiv12111346

[24] R Aaij et al The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011 JINST 8 (2013) P04022arXiv12113055

[25] V V Gligorov and M Williams Efficient reliable and fast high-level triggering usinga bonsai boosted decision tree JINST 8 (2013) P02013 arXiv12106861

[26] T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P Skands PYTHIA 64 physics and manual JHEP05 (2006) 026 arXivhep-ph0603175 T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P SkandsA brief introduction to PYTHIA 81 Comput Phys Commun 178 (2008) 852arXiv07103820

[27] I Belyaev et al Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss the LHCbsimulation framework J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032047

[28] D J Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package Nucl Instrum MethA462 (2001) 152

[29] P Golonka and Z Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo A precision tool for QED correctionsin Z and W decays Eur Phys J C45 (2006) 97 arXivhep-ph0506026

[30] Geant4 collaboration J Allison et al Geant4 developments and applications IEEETrans Nucl Sci 53 (2006) 270 Geant4 collaboration S Agostinelli et al Geant4A simulation toolkit Nucl Instrum Meth A506 (2003) 250

31

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 7: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

that the D0 candidate vertex is separated from the B0 decay vertex by at least 1 mmSignal candidates are retained for further analysis if they have invariant mass in the

range 5100ndash5900 MeV After all selection requirements are applied fewer than 1 ofselected events also contain a second candidate Such multiple candidates are retained andtreated in the same manner as other candidates the associated systematic uncertainty isnegligible

4 Determination of signal and background yields

The signal and background yields are determined from an extended maximum likelihoodfit to the B candidate invariant mass distribution The fit allows for signal decayscombinatorial background and contributions from other b hadron decays The decay chainB0 rarr Dlowast0K+πminus with Dlowast0 rarr D0γ or D0π0 forms a partially reconstructed backgroundthat peaks at low B candidate mass as the neutral particle is not included in the candidateMisidentified B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus Λ0

b rarr D(lowast)0K+p and B0(s) rarr D(lowast)0K+Kminus decays are found

to contribute to the background A possible contribution from the highly suppressedB0s rarr D0K+πminus decay mode is also included in the fit

The signal peak is modelled with the sum of two Crystal Ball [38] functions whichhave tails on opposite sides and which share a common mean The tail parameters arefixed to the values found in fits to simulated signal decays The relative normalisationand the ratio of widths of the two functions are constrained within uncertainties tothe values determined in a fit to B0 rarr D0π+πminus data The B0

s rarr D0K+πminus shape ismodelled identically to the signal peak with the difference between the B0 and B0

s masspeak positions fixed to its known value [37] An exponential shape is used to model thecombinatorial background

Misidentified and partially reconstructed backgrounds are modelled with smoothednon-parametric functions Simulated samples are used to obtain the shape for B0 rarrDlowast0K+πminus decays with the Dlowast0 rarr D0γ and D0π0 contributions generated in the correctproportions [37] To account for differences between simulation and data for examplein the polarisation of the Dlowast0 meson the B candidate invariant mass distribution forpartially reconstructed B0 rarr Dlowast0K+πminus decays is allowed to be shifted by an offset thatis a free parameter of the fit The misidentified background shapes are also obtainedfrom simulated samples For B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays the D0 and Dlowast0 contributions arecombined according to their relative branching fractions [37] The backgrounds fromΛ0b rarr D(lowast)0K+p and B0

(s) rarr D(lowast)0K+Kminus decays are assumed to have equal branching

fractions for the decays with D0 and Dlowast0 mesons in the final state as the decays involvingDlowast0 mesons have not yet been measured The simulated samples are reweighted accordingto the relevant particle identification and misidentification probabilities and to match knownDP distributions [1239ndash41] The (mis)identification probabilities take account of trackkinematics and are calculated using calibration samples of Dlowast+ rarr D0π+ D0 rarr Kminusπ+

and Λrarr pπminus decays [1922] The yields of the misidentified backgrounds relative to thesignal are constrained within uncertainties to their expected values based on their known

5

Table 1 Yields from the fit to the D0K+πminus data sample The full mass range is 5100ndash5900 MeVand the signal region is 524855ndash530905 MeV

Component Full mass range Signal region

B0 rarr D0K+πminus 2576plusmn 72 2344plusmn 66B0s rarr D0K+πminus 55plusmn 27 1plusmn 1

comb bkgd 5540plusmn 187 684plusmn 23B0 rarr Dlowast0K+πminus 1750plusmn 99 6plusmn 1B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus 485plusmn 47 51plusmn 5Λ0b rarr D(lowast)0K+p 95plusmn 26 18plusmn 5

B0 rarr D(lowast)0K+Kminus 127plusmn 27 10plusmn 2B0s rarr D(lowast)0K+Kminus 54plusmn 18 14plusmn 5

) [MeV]-π+K0

D(m5200 5400 5600 5800

Can

dida

tes

8 M

eV

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700 LHCb (a)Data

Total fitminusπ+K

0D rarr (s)

0B

Combinatorial bkgminusπ+K 0D rarr 0Bminusπ+π( )0D rarr 0B

p+K( )0D rarr 0bΛ

minusK+K( )0D rarr (s)0B

) [MeV]-π+K0

D(m5200 5400 5600 5800

Can

dida

tes

8 M

eV

1

10

210

310(b)LHCb

Figure 2 Results of the fit to the B candidate invariant mass distribution with (a) linear and(b) logarithmic y-axis scales The components are as described in the legend

branching fractions [123940] and misidentification probabilitiesThere are 14 free parameters in the fit model the mean and width of the signal shape

the relative normalisation and relative width of the two Crystal Ball functions the slopeof the exponential function the offset of the B0 rarr Dlowast0K+πminus shape and the yields of theeight contributions The result of the fit is shown in Fig 2 and the yields are summarisedin Table 1 The yields are also reported within the signal region used in the Dalitz plotfit corresponding to plusmn25 widths of the B0 signal shape (524855ndash530905 MeV) Thedistribution of candidates in the signal region over the Dalitz plot is shown in Fig 3(a)Note that a B0 mass constraint is applied to calculate the variables that are used todescribe the Dalitz plot [42] improving the resolution of those variables and giving aunique kinematic boundary

6

]2) [GeVminusπ0D(2m

5 10 15 20

]2)

[GeV

minus π+K(2

m

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

(a)LHCb

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

091

(b)LHCb

Figure 3 Distribution of B0 rarr D0K+πminus candidates in the signal region over (a) the Dalitz plotand (b) the square Dalitz plot The definition of the square Dalitz plot is given in Sec 61

5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism

In B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays resonances are expected in the m2(D0πminus) and m2(K+πminus)combinations so the Dalitz plot shown in Fig 3(a) is defined in terms of these twoinvariant mass squared terms For a fixed B0 mass these two invariant mass squaredcombinations can be used to calculate all other relevant kinematic quantities

The isobar model [43ndash45] is used to describe the complex decay amplitude The totalamplitude is given by the coherent sum of amplitudes from resonant and nonresonantintermediate contributions and is given by

A(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)=

Nsumj=1

cjFj(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

) (1)

where cj are complex coefficients describing the relative contribution for each intermediateprocess The resonant dynamics are contained in the Fj

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)terms

that are normalised such that the integral of the squared magnitude over the DP is unityfor each term For a D0πminus resonance Fj

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)is given by

F(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)= R

(m(D0πminus)

)timesX(|~p | rBW)timesX(|~q | rBW)times T (~p ~q ) (2)

where ~p is the bachelor particle momentum and ~q is the momentum of one of the resonancedaughters both evaluated in the D0πminus rest frame The functions R X and T are describedbelow

The X(z) terms are BlattndashWeisskopf barrier factors [46] where z = |~q | rBW or |~p | rBW

and rBW is the barrier radius which is set to 40 GeVminus1 asymp 08 fm [10] for all resonances

7

The barrier factors are angular momentum dependent and are given by

L = 0 X(z) = 1

L = 1 X(z) =radic

1+z201+z2

L = 2 X(z) =radic

z40+3z20+9

z4+3z2+9

L = 3 X(z) =radic

z60+6z40+45z20+225

z6+6z4+45z2+225

(3)

where z0 is the value of z at the pole mass of the resonance and L is the orbital angularmomentum between the resonance and the bachelor particle Since the parent and daughterparticles all have zero spin L is also the spin of the resonance

The T (~p ~q) terms describe the angular distributions in the Zemach tensor formalism [4748] and are given by

L = 0 T (~p ~q) = 1 L = 1 T (~p ~q) = minus 2 ~p middot ~q L = 2 T (~p ~q) = 4

3[3(~p middot ~q )2 minus (|~p ||~q |)2]

L = 3 T (~p ~q) = minus 2415

[5(~p middot ~q )3 minus 3(~p middot ~q )(|~p ||~q |)2]

(4)

These expressions are proportional to the Legendre polynomials PL(x) where x is thecosine of the angle between ~p and ~q (referred to as the helicity angle)

The R(m(D0πminus)

)functions are the mass lineshapes Resonant contributions are

typically described by the relativistic BreitndashWigner (RBW) function

R(m) =1

(m20 minusm2)minus im0Γ(m)

(5)

where the mass-dependent decay width is

Γ(m) = Γ0

(q

q0

)2L+1 (m0

m

)X2(q rBW) (6)

where q0 is the value of q = |~q | when the invariant mass is equal to the pole mass of theresonance m0

The large phase space available in B decays allows for the presence of nonresonantamplitudes (ie contributions that do not proceed via a known resonance) that vary acrossthe Dalitz plot An exponential form factor (EFF) has been found to describe nonresonantcontributions well in several DP analyses of B decays [49]

R(m) = exp[minusαm2

] (7)

where α is a shape parameter that must be determined from the data and m is a two-bodyinvariant mass (m(D0πminus) in this example)

The RBW function is a good model for narrow resonances that are well separated fromany other resonant or nonresonant contribution of the same spin This approach is known

8

to break down in the Kπ S-wave because the Klowast0(1430) resonance interferes strongly witha slowly varying nonresonant term as described in Ref [50] The LASS lineshape [51] hasbeen developed to combine these two contributions

R(m) =m

q cot δB minus iq+ exp [2iδB]

m0Γ0m0

q0

(m20 minusm2)minus im0Γ0

qmm0

q0

(8)

where cot δB =1

aq+

1

2rq (9)

and where m0 and Γ0 are the pole mass and width of the Klowast0(1430) state and a and r areshape parameters

The Dπ S-wave nonresonant contribution can be described by the ldquodabbardquo line-shape [52] defined as

R(m) =Bprime(m2)(m2 minus sA)ρ

1minus β(m2 minusm2min)minus iBprime(m2)(m2 minus sA)ρ

(10)

whereBprime(m2) = b exp

[minusα(m2 minusm2

min)] (11)

Here mmin is the invariant mass at threshold sA = m2D minus 05m2

π is the Adler zero ρ isa phase-space factor and b α and β are parameters with values fixed to 2449 GeVminus201 GeVminus2 and 01 GeVminus2 respectively according to Ref [52]

Ignoring reconstruction and selection effects the DP probability density function wouldbe

Pphys

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)=

|A(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)|2intint

DP|A|2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)

(12)

where the dependence of A on the DP position has been suppressed in the denominator forbrevity The primary results of most Dalitz plot analyses are the complex coefficients asdefined in Eq (1) These however depend on the choice of phase convention amplitudeformalism and normalisation used in each analysis The convention-independent quantitiesof fit fractions and interference fit fractions provide a way to reliably compare resultsbetween different analyses Fit fractions are defined as the integral of the amplitude foreach intermediate component squared divided by that of the coherent matrix elementsquared for all intermediate contributions

FF j =

intintDP

∣∣cjFj (m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus))∣∣2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)intint

DP|A|2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)

(13)

The fit fractions need not sum to unity due to possible net constructive or destructiveinterference described by interference fit fractions defined (for i lt j only) by

FF ij =

intintDP

2Re[ciclowastjFiF

lowastj

]dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)intint

DP|A|2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)

(14)

where the dependence of F(lowast)i and A on the DP position has been omitted

9

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

Eff

icie

ncy

()

0

005

01

015

02

025(a)LHCb Simulation

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

Eff

icie

ncy

()

0

005

01

015

02

025(b)LHCb Simulation

Figure 4 Efficiency variation as a function of SDP position for candidates triggered by (a) signaldecay products and (b) by the rest of the event The vertical white stripe is due to the Dlowast vetoand the curved white band is due to the D0 veto

6 Dalitz plot fit

61 Signal efficiency

The variation of the efficiency across the phase space is studied in terms of the squareDalitz plot (SDP) The SDP is defined by variables mprime and θprime that range between 0 and 1and are given for the D0K+πminus case by

mprime equiv 1

πarccos

(2m(D0πminus)minusmmin

D0πminus

mmaxD0πminus minusmmin

D0πminus

minus 1

)and θprime equiv 1

πθ(D0πminus) (15)

where mmaxD0πminus = mB0 minusmK+ and mmin

D0πminus = mD0 + mπminus are the kinematic boundaries of

m(D0πminus) allowed in the B0 rarr D0K+πminus decay and θ(D0πminus) is the helicity angle of theD0πminus system (the angle between the K+ and the D0 meson in the D0πminus rest frame) Thedistribution of selected events across the SDP is shown in Fig 3(b)

Efficiency variation across the SDP is caused by the detector acceptance and bytrigger selection and PID requirements The efficiency is evaluated with simulated samplesgenerated uniformly over the SDP Data-driven corrections are applied to correct for knowndifferences between data and simulation in the tracking trigger and PID efficiencies usingidentical methods to those described in Ref [10] The efficiency functions are obtainedby fitting the corrected simulation with two-dimensional cubic splines Figure 4 showsthe histograms used to model the variation of the efficiency over the SDP for candidatestriggered by (a) signal decays and (b) by the rest of the event

62 Background studies

Among the background yields in the signal region given in Table 1 the only sizeablecomponents are due to combinatorial background and B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays The SDP

10

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

0

0002

0004

0006

0008

001

0012

0014

(a)LHCb

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

000020004000600080010012001400160018

(b)LHCb Simulation

Figure 5 SDP distributions of the background contributions from (a) combinatorial backgroundand (b) B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays

distributions of these backgrounds are described by the histograms shown in Fig 5Combinatorial background contributes 22 of candidates in the signal region The

shape of this contribution over the SDP is obtained from the high B mass sideband (5400ndash5900 MeV) As seen in Fig 2 this sideband is dominated by combinatorial backgroundwith a small contribution from B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays The SDP distribution of theB0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus contribution in the sideband region is modelled as described belowfor the signal region and is subtracted from the sideband sample To check that theSDP shape of the combinatorial background does not vary with the B candidate massa sample of doubly charged D0Kplusmnπplusmn candidates is investigated This confirms that theSDP distribution from the sideband is a reliable model for combinatorial background inthe signal region

The B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus contribution accounts for 16 of the candidates in the signalregion Its SDP distribution is obtained from a simulated sample with the B0 rarr D0π+πminus

and B0 rarr Dlowast0π+πminus contributions combined and reweighted as described in Sec 4 TheB0 rarr D0π+πminus decay mode is the dominant component of this background in the signalregion

Due to resolution effects B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ Dlowast(2010)minus rarr D0πminus decays are notentirely removed by the Dlowast veto Although this component corresponds to real B0 rarrD0πminusK+ decays it is treated as incoherent (ie as background) since its interference withthe remainder of the signal is negligible Its SDP distribution is modelled as a Gaussianpeak in m(D0πminus) with mean fixed to the known Dlowast(2010)minus mass and width and yielddetermined in the fit to data

11

Table 2 Signal contributions to the fit model where parameters and uncertainties are takenfrom Ref [37] The models are described in Sec 5

Resonance Spin DP axis Model Parameters

Klowast(892)0 1 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 89581plusmn 019 MeV Γ0 = 474plusmn 06 MeVKlowast(1410)0 1 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 1414plusmn 15 MeV Γ0 = 232plusmn 21 MeVKlowast0(1430)0 0 m2(K+πminus) LASS Determined from data (see text)Klowast2(1430)0 2 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 14324plusmn 13 MeV Γ0 = 109plusmn 5 MeVDlowast0(2400)minus 0 m2(D0πminus) RBW

Determined from data (see Table 3)Dlowast2(2460)minus 2 m2(D0πminus) RBW

Nonresonant 0 m2(D0πminus) dabba Fixed (see text)Nonresonant 1 m2(D0πminus) EFF Determined from data (see text)

63 Amplitude model for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays

The Dalitz plot fit is performed using the Laura++ [53] package The likelihood functionis given by

L =Ncprodi

[sumk

NkPk(m2i (D

0πminus)m2i (K

+πminus)) ]

(16)

where the index i runs over Nc candidates k runs over the signal and backgroundcomponents and Nk is the yield in each component The probability density function forthe signal component Psig is given by Eq (12) with the |A

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)|2

terms multiplied by the efficiency function described in Sec 61 As it is possible forthe minimisation procedure to find a local minimum of the negative log likelihood (NLL)profile the fit is repeated many times with randomised initial values to ensure the globalminimum is found

The nominal Dalitz plot fit model for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays is composed of severalresonant and nonresonant amplitudes Only those amplitudes that provide significantcontributions or that aid the fit stability are included Unnatural spin-parity states arenot considered as these do not decay to two pseudoscalars The eight amplitudes includedin this model are listed in Table 2 The width of the narrowest signal contribution tothe Dalitz plot (sim 50 MeV) is far larger than the mass resolution (sim 24 MeV) thereforeresolution effects are neglected

The real and imaginary parts of the complex coefficients cj defined in Eq (1) are freeparameters of the fit except for the coefficient of the Dlowast2(2460)minus component which is fixedto 1 as a reference The phases and magnitudes of the complex coefficients as well as fitfractions and interference fit fractions are derived from these free parameters In additionthe masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances are determined fromthe fit to data and are reported in Table 3 The statistical uncertainties on all parametersof interest are calculated using large samples of simulated pseudoexperiments Thesepseudoexperiments are also used to determine the correlations between the statisticaluncertainties on the parameters which are given in Appendix A The LASS parameters

12

Table 3 Masses and widths (MeV) determined in the fit to data with statistical uncertaintiesonly

Resonance Mass Width

Dlowast0(2400)minus 2360plusmn 15 255plusmn 26Dlowast2(2460)minus 24656plusmn 18 460plusmn 34

Table 4 Complex coefficients and fit fractions determined from the Dalitz plot fit Uncertaintiesare statistical only Note that the fit fractions magnitudes and phases are derived quantities

Resonance Fit fraction Isobar model coefficients() Real part Imaginary part Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 minus000plusmn 015 minus127plusmn 006 127plusmn 006 minus157plusmn 011Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 015plusmn 006 minus009plusmn 009 018plusmn 007 minus054plusmn 021Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 014plusmn 038 045plusmn 015 047plusmn 009 127plusmn 095LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 minus010plusmn 024 044plusmn 014 046plusmn 014 179plusmn 065

LASS total 67plusmn 27Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 minus032plusmn 009 minus047plusmn 007 057plusmn 005 minus216plusmn 019Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 minus080plusmn 008 minus044plusmn 014 091plusmn 007 minus264plusmn 015Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 100 000 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 minus039plusmn 009 036plusmn 017 053plusmn 007 240plusmn 027Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 minus062plusmn 006 minus003plusmn 006 062plusmn 006 minus309plusmn 010Total fit fraction 1134

are determined to be m0 = 1450plusmn 80 MeV Γ0 = 400plusmn 230 MeV a = 32plusmn 18 GeV andr = 09plusmn11 GeV while the parameter of the EFF lineshape of the Dπ P-wave nonresonantamplitude is determined to be α = 088plusmn 010 GeVminus2

The values of the fit fractions and complex coefficients obtained from the fit are shownin Table 4 while the values of the interference fit fractions are given in Appendix B Thesum of the fit fractions is seen to exceed unity mostly due to interference within the Dπ andKπ S-waves Note that in Table 4 and all results for fit fractions and derived quantitiesvalues are reported separately for both the Klowast0 (1430)0 and nonresonant components of theLASS lineshape as well as their coherent sum

Projections of the data and the nominal fit model onto m(K+πminus) m(D0πminus) andm(D0K+) are shown in Fig 6 Zooms are provided in the regions of the main resonantcontributions in Fig 7 Projections onto the cosine of the helicity angle of the D0πminus andK+πminus systems are shown in Figs 8 and 9 respectively These projections all show goodagreement between data and the fit model

Angular moments provide a useful method to investigate the helicity structure of thedecays The angular moments in m(D0πminus) and m(K+πminus) obtained as in Refs [1011]are shown in Figs 10 and 11 respectively The contributions due to the Klowast(892)0 andDlowast2(2460)minus resonances are seen as peaks in moments up to order 2 and order 4 respectivelyas expected for spin-1 and spin-2 resonances Reflections make the interpretation ofmoments at higher masses more difficult However the good agreement seen between data

13

and the fit model provides further support for the fit model being a good description ofthe data

The quality of the fit is evaluated by determining a two-dimensional χ2 value comparingthe data and fit model in 144 bins across the SDP that are defined adaptively to ensurethey are approximately equally populated The pull in each of these bins defined as thedifference between the data and the fit model divided by the uncertainty is shown inFig 12 The effective number of degrees of freedom of the χ2 is between Nbins minusNpars minus 1and Nbinsminus1 where Npars is the number of free parameters in the fit yielding a reduced χ2

in the range 099 ndash 122 Additional unbinned tests of fit quality [54] also show acceptableagreement between the data and the fit model

7 Systematic uncertainties

Systematic uncertainties are considered from sources that can be divided into two categoriesexperimental and model uncertainties Experimental uncertainties arise due to the signaland background yields in the signal region the distributions of the background componentsacross the SDP the variation of efficiency across the SDP and possible bias due to thefitting procedure Model uncertainties are considered due to the fixed parameters in thesignal model the addition or removal of marginal amplitudes and the choice of models forthe Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves The uncertainties due to all of these sourcesare combined in quadrature

The signal and background yields are determined from the fit to the B candidateinvariant mass distribution Systematic uncertainties are considered on the total yieldsdue to both statistical and systematic variations of these yields as evaluated in Ref [15]The yields in the signal region are varied appropriately and the effects of these variationson the parameters of interest are assigned as systematic uncertainties

The histograms describing the background distributions are each varied within statisticaluncertainties to establish the uncertainty due to the imperfect knowledge of the distributionof these backgrounds across the SDP The histograms describing the efficiency variationacross the SDP are also varied within their uncertainties prior to the spline fit Theefficiency histograms are also varied with local correlations to account for the effects ofany unknown correlations between neighbouring bins For each parameter the largeruncertainty is considered from the correlated and uncorrelated variations In addition thebinning scheme of the control sample used to evaluate PID performance is varied

An ensemble of pseudoexperiments is used to establish systematic uncertainties relatedto any potential fit bias Pseudoexperiments are generated using the parameters determinedin the fit to data and mean fitted values of the parameters are determined from Gaussianfits to the distributions of results obtained in the ensemble The differences between thegenerated and mean fitted values are found to be small Uncertainties are determined asthe sum in quadrature of the difference between the generated and mean fitted values andthe uncertainty on the mean fitted value from the Gaussian fit

Systematic uncertainties due to fixed parameters in the fit model are determined by

14

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310LHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350 LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310 LHCb (d)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

LHCb (e)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210LHCb (f)

Data Total fit 0(892)K 0(1410)K

S-wave (LASS)πK 0(1430)2Kminus

(2400)0Dminus

(2460)2D

S-wave (EFF)πD P-wave (EFF)πDminus

D Background

Figure 6 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) (c) m(K+πminus)and (e) m(D0K+) with the same projections shown in (b) (d) and (f) with a logarithmic y-axisscale Components are described in the legend

15

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

235 24 245 25 255

Can

dida

tes

4 M

eV

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m05 1 15

Can

dida

tes

13

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

LHCb (b)

Figure 7 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) in the Dlowast2(2460)minus

region and (b) the low m(K+πminus) region Components are as shown in Fig 6

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

) lt 235 GeVminusπ0D(m204 lt

LHCb(a)

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

) lt 255 GeVminusπ0D(m235 lt

LHCb(b)

Figure 8 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(D0πminus) in the mass ranges(a) 204 lt m(D0πminus) lt 235 GeV and (b) 235 lt m(D0πminus) lt 255 GeV Components are asshown in Fig 6

repeating the fit with these parameters varied The fixed masses and widths are variedwithin their uncertainties as shown in Table 2 while the BlattndashWeisskopf barrier radii rBWare varied independently for D0πminus and K+πminus resonances between 3 and 5 GeVminus1 [10]

The Klowast(1410)0 amplitude does not contribute significantly to the nominal fit modelso the fit is repeated with this component removed and the change in results is assignedas the associated systematic uncertainty In addition uncertainties are assigned fromthe changes in the results when an amplitude due to the Klowast(1680)0 resonance or from avirtual Blowast(5325)+ component as described in Ref [10] is included in the model

A Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D0Kminusπ+ observed both spin-1 and spin-3 resonances

at m(D0Kminus) sim 286 GeV [9 10] A spin-3 resonance has also been seen at m(D0πminus) sim276 GeV in B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] while an analysis of B+ rarr DminusK+π+ shows aspin-1 resonance at similar m(D+πminus) values [11] Uncertainties are assigned corresponding

16

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

) lt 08 GeVminusπ+K(m0 lt LHCb

(a)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 10 GeVminusπ+K(m08 lt LHCb

(b)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 13 GeVminusπ+K(m10 lt LHCb

(c)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

) lt 15 GeVminusπ+K(m14 lt LHCb

(d)

Figure 9 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(K+πminus) in the mass ranges(a) m(K+πminus) lt 08 GeV (b) 08 lt m(K+πminus) lt 10 GeV (c) 10 lt m(K+πminus) lt 13 GeV and(d) 14 lt m(K+πminus) lt 15 GeV Components are as shown in Fig 6

to the changes in results when either a spin-1 or spin-3 state at m(D0πminus) sim 276 GeV isadded to the nominal model

The LASS model used to describe the Kπ S-wave is replaced with a Flatte shape [55]which accounts for the Kηprime threshold near the Klowast0 (1430)0 mass and a resonant term witha modified mass dependent width [52] for the κ (also known as Klowast0(800)) state Thismodel gives an NLL that is worse by 44 units A model-independent description of theKπ S-wave is also used to fit the data with the uncertainty on each parameter takenas the larger of the two differences This alternative improves the NLL by 88 units butintroduces an additional four free parameters into the fit The dabba lineshape used todescribe the D0πminus S-wave is replaced with an EFF lineshape while a power-law model isintroduced as an alternative to the EFF lineshape that describes the D0πminus P-wave Thesealterations worsen the NLL by 30 units and improve it by 08 units respectively

The total systematic uncertainties due to experimental and model effects for fit fractionsand complex coefficients are given together with the results in Sec 8 The contributionsfrom different sources to the systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions masses and

17

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0002004006008

0101201401601802

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-30-25-20-15-10

-505

1015

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

310timesLHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

310timesLHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-8-6-4-202468

310timesLHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-8-6-4-20246

310timesLHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-6-4-202468

10

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 10 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(D0πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

18

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0

005

01

015

02

025

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

20

40

60

80

100310times

LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10-505

10152025

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25310times

LHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-20-15-10

-505

101520

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 11 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(K+πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

19

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Pull

-2

-1

0

1

2

LHCb

Figure 12 Differences between the data SDP distribution and the fit model across the SDP interms of the per-bin pull

Table 5 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths(MeV) Uncertainties given on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value SB fraction Efficiency Background SDP Fit bias Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 060 083 050 031 117Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 006 039 069 005 080Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 028 148 185 033 241LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 051 225 286 086 377

LASS total 67plusmn 27 026 186 160 102 267Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 023 072 053 054 107Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 021 139 143 040 204Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 070 070 049 015 111Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 003 081 059 057 115Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 086 191 052 038 219m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 46 81 70 37 122m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 001 037 022 029 051Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 28 131 139 48 199Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 05 09 09 05 14

widths are given in Tables 5 and 6 The dominant experimental systematic uncertaintyon most parameters is due to either the efficiency variation or background distributionsacross the SDP while the model uncertainties are generally dominated by the effects ofalternative descriptions of the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves For the parametersof broad components the model uncertainties dominate however for other parameters thestatistical experimental and model uncertainties are all of a similar magnitude

The stability of the fit results is confirmed by several cross-checks The data sample isdivided into subsamples according to the flavour of the B candidate the trigger decision

20

Table 6 Model uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths (MeV) Uncertaintiesgiven on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value Fixed parameters Addremove Alternative models Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 075 114 109 174Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 018 070 022 076Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 079 330 023 340LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 110 399 520 665

LASS total 67plusmn 27 053 142 521 543Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 036 187 056 198Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 055 195 711 740Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 018 073 099 124Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 027 140 346 374Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 031 199 215 295m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 61 93 256 279m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 009 105 048 115Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 40 180 435 472Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 14 05 24 29

the polarity of the magnet and the year of data taking Each subsample is fitted separatelyand all are seen to be consistent with the nominal fit results The fit is also repeatedwith additional resonance components to test the fit model Resonances up to spin-3 wereconsidered for all three pairs of daughters with the mass and width allowed to vary in thefit No additional significant contributions were observed

8 Results and summary

The results for the complex coefficients are reported in Table 7 with results for thefit fractions given in Table 8 The results for the interference fit fractions are givenin Appendix B Upper limits are determined on the fit fractions of the Klowast(1410)0 andDlowast3(2760)minus components which do not give significant contributions using the methoddescribed in Ref [10]

The fit fractions for resonant contributions are converted into quasi-two-body productbranching fractions by multiplying by B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus) = (92plusmn 06plusmn 07plusmn 06)times 10minus5which is obtained from the ratio of branching fractions B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus)B(B0 rarrD0π+πminus) [15] multiplied by the latest result for B(B0 rarr D0π+πminus) [12] accounting forthe different Dlowast(2010)minus veto windows used in the analyses and for the 37 residualbackground due to B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ decays The statistical correlation between theresults of Ref [15] and this analysis is found to be negligible The results for the productbranching fractions are shown in Table 9 For the K+πminus resonances where the branchingfractions to Kπ are known the product branching fractions are converted to the Bdecay branching fractions shown in Table 10 The results for B(B0 rarr D0Klowast(892)0) andB(B0 rarr Dlowast2(2460)minusK+)times B(Dlowast2(2460)minus rarr D0πminus) are consistent with and more precisethan previous measurements [14 1617]

21

Table 7 Results for the complex amplitudes and their uncertainties presented (top) in terms ofreal and imaginary parts and (bottom) in terms and magnitudes and phases The three quotederrors are statistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively

Resonance Real part Imaginary part

Klowast(892)0 minus000plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 034 minus127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 006Klowast(1410)0 015plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 009 minus009plusmn 009plusmn 018plusmn 018Klowast0(1430)0 014plusmn 038plusmn 048plusmn 038 045plusmn 015plusmn 037plusmn 017LASS nonresonant minus010plusmn 024plusmn 016plusmn 042 044plusmn 014plusmn 017plusmn 023Klowast2(1430)0 minus032plusmn 009plusmn 015plusmn 023 minus047plusmn 007plusmn 014plusmn 015Dlowast0(2400)minus minus080plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 022 minus044plusmn 014plusmn 012plusmn 018Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) minus039plusmn 009plusmn 009plusmn 014 036plusmn 017plusmn 014plusmn 023Dπ P-wave (EFF) minus062plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 011 minus003plusmn 006plusmn 005plusmn 010

Resonance Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 005 minus157plusmn 011plusmn 016plusmn 027Klowast(1410)0 018plusmn 007plusmn 010plusmn 011 minus054plusmn 021plusmn 055plusmn 104Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 009plusmn 010plusmn 014 127plusmn 095plusmn 104plusmn 081LASS nonresonant 046plusmn 014plusmn 016plusmn 029 179plusmn 065plusmn 035plusmn 069Klowast2(1430)0 057plusmn 005plusmn 004plusmn 008 minus216plusmn 019plusmn 043plusmn 043Dlowast0(2400)minus 091plusmn 007plusmn 006plusmn 017 minus264plusmn 015plusmn 014plusmn 023Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 053plusmn 007plusmn 004plusmn 014 240plusmn 027plusmn 024plusmn 044Dπ P-wave (EFF) 062plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 011 minus309plusmn 010plusmn 007plusmn 017

Table 8 Results for the fit fractions and their uncertainties () The three quoted errors arestatistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively Upper limits are givenat 90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Fit fraction Upper limitKlowast(892)0 374plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 17Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03plusmn 08plusmn 08 lt 32 (37)Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20plusmn 24plusmn 34LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38plusmn 38plusmn 67

LASS total 67plusmn 27plusmn 27plusmn 54Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17plusmn 11plusmn 20Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28plusmn 20plusmn 74Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12plusmn 11plusmn 12Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 10 (11)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14plusmn 12plusmn 37Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16plusmn 22plusmn 30

22

Table 9 Results for the product branching fractions The four quoted errors are statisticalexperimental systematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Product branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 342plusmn 013plusmn 010plusmn 016plusmn 040Klowast(1410)0 007plusmn 003plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 001 lt 029 (034)Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 018plusmn 022plusmn 031plusmn 005LASS nonresonant 044plusmn 034plusmn 034plusmn 061plusmn 005

LASS total 061plusmn 025plusmn 025plusmn 049plusmn 007Klowast2(1430)0 068plusmn 015plusmn 010plusmn 018plusmn 008Dlowast0(2400)minus 177plusmn 026plusmn 019plusmn 067plusmn 020Dlowast2(2460)minus 212plusmn 010plusmn 011plusmn 011plusmn 025Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 010 (011)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 060plusmn 013plusmn 011plusmn 034plusmn 007Dπ P-wave (EFF) 081plusmn 015plusmn 020plusmn 027plusmn 009

Table 10 Results for the branching fractions The four quoted errors are statistical experimentalsystematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at 90 (95 )confidence level

Resonance Branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 513plusmn 020plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 060Klowast(1410)0 159plusmn 068plusmn 181plusmn 159plusmn 036 lt 67 (78)Klowast0(1430)0 071plusmn 027plusmn 033plusmn 047plusmn 008LASS nonresonant 066plusmn 051plusmn 051plusmn 092plusmn 008

LASS total 092plusmn 038plusmn 038plusmn 074plusmn 011Klowast2(1430)0 204plusmn 045plusmn 030plusmn 054plusmn 025

The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus states are found to be

m(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (2360plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 28) MeV

Γ(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (255plusmn 26plusmn 20plusmn 47) MeV

m(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (24656plusmn 18plusmn 05plusmn 12) MeV

Γ(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (460plusmn 34plusmn 14plusmn 29) MeV

where the three uncertainties are statistical experimental systematic and model systematicrespectively These are consistent with though less precise than recent results from a DPanalysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] They also show good agreement with and havesimilar precision to earlier measurements of these quantities [1337]

In summary the first amplitude analysis of B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays has been presentedusing a data sample corresponding to 30 fbminus1 of pp collision data collected by the LHCbexperiment A good description of the data is obtained with a model containing contri-

23

butions from intermediate Klowast(892)0 Klowast(1410)0 Klowast2(1430)0 and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonanceswith additional components to describe broad structures in the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S-and P-waves The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances aremeasured as are the complex amplitudes and fit fractions for all components includedin the amplitude model The results can be used in conjunction with an analysis ofB0 rarr DK+πminus decays where the neutral D meson is reconstructed in final states such asK+Kminus to measure the CKM unitarity triangle parameter γ [1 2]

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to our colleagues in the CERN accelerator departments forthe excellent performance of the LHC We thank the technical and administrative staffat the LHCb institutes We acknowledge support from CERN and from the nationalagencies CAPES CNPq FAPERJ and FINEP (Brazil) NSFC (China) CNRSIN2P3(France) BMBF DFG HGF and MPG (Germany) INFN (Italy) FOM and NWO (TheNetherlands) MNiSW and NCN (Poland) MENIFA (Romania) MinES and FANO(Russia) MinECo (Spain) SNSF and SER (Switzerland) NASU (Ukraine) STFC (UnitedKingdom) NSF (USA) The Tier1 computing centres are supported by IN2P3 (France)KIT and BMBF (Germany) INFN (Italy) NWO and SURF (The Netherlands) PIC(Spain) GridPP (United Kingdom) We are indebted to the communities behind themultiple open source software packages on which we depend We are also thankful forthe computing resources and the access to software RampD tools provided by Yandex LLC(Russia) Individual groups or members have received support from EPLANET MarieSk lodowska-Curie Actions and ERC (European Union) Conseil general de Haute-SavoieLabex ENIGMASS and OCEVU Region Auvergne (France) RFBR (Russia) XuntaGaland GENCAT (Spain) Royal Society and Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851(United Kingdom)

24

Appendices

A Correlation matrices

The statistical correlations between the complex coefficients masses and widths determinedfrom the fit to data are given in terms of real and imaginary parts and in terms ofmagnitudes and phases in Tables 11 and 12 The correlations are determined using thesame sample of simulated pseudoexperiments used to calculate the statistical uncertaintieson fit parameters

B Results for interference fit fractions

The central values of the interference fit fractions are given in Table 13 The statisti-cal experimental systematic and model uncertainties on these quantities are given inTables 14 15 and 16

25

Tab

le11

Sta

tist

ical

corr

elat

ions

bet

wee

nth

ere

al(x

)an

dim

agin

ary

(y)

par

tsof

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

x0

y 0x

1y 1

x2

y 2x

3y 3

x4

y 4x

5y 5

x7

y 7x

8y 8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

x0

100

014

002

017minus

018

015minus

017

003

039minus

037

016minus

009minus

018minus

029

007minus

037minus

019

002

004

012

y 01

00minus

006minus

008

009minus

011minus

000

014

003

003

012

013minus

012minus

024

035minus

007

009

012

001minus

004

x1

100minus

009minus

008minus

014minus

004

029minus

001

003minus

020

018minus

021minus

031minus

017minus

036minus

008minus

017minus

023

002

y 11

000

050

340

09minus

001

060minus

039

002minus

003minus

003

007minus

002minus

004minus

016minus

002

007

002

x2

100minus

013

081

009

014minus

016minus

015

021

010

013

004minus

015minus

007

001minus

025

001

y 21

000

080

280

24minus

036minus

013

008minus

004minus

001minus

004

004minus

002minus

001minus

009minus

010

x3

100

020

013minus

034minus

010

033minus

008

008minus

004minus

005minus

007minus

003minus

033minus

009

y 31

00minus

012minus

012minus

051

029minus

034minus

053

009minus

012

009minus

014minus

036

001

x4

100minus

053

032minus

010minus

020

003

002minus

027minus

017minus

006

010minus

000

y 41

000

06minus

009

040

010

014

016

011minus

005

007minus

003

x5

100minus

029minus

003

022

002

004minus

008

002

045minus

006

y 51

00minus

031minus

034

006

003

024minus

014minus

072minus

033

x7

100

046

005

010minus

011minus

001

027

017

y 71

00minus

016

036minus

001

017

032

008

x8

100minus

003

001minus

006minus

009minus

014

y 81

000

290

020

15minus

002

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

26

Tab

le12

S

tati

stic

alco

rrel

atio

ns

bet

wee

nth

em

agnit

ud

es(a

)an

dp

has

es(∆

)of

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

a0

∆0

a1

∆1

a2

∆2

a3

∆3

a4

∆4

a5

∆5

a7

∆7

a8

∆8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

a0

100minus

011minus

008

005

024

003minus

014

004

004

001

021

002

022minus

022

038minus

000minus

004minus

009minus

001

004

∆0

100minus

010

012

003

020

014

014minus

001

045minus

005

010minus

008

035minus

007

005minus

022

006

007

009

a1

100minus

035minus

025

006

032

001minus

001minus

038

004minus

022minus

006

031

002

024

007minus

018minus

020

001

∆1

100

024

015

016

000

014

038minus

018minus

013

016

026

022minus

006minus

009minus

004minus

012

005

a2

100

004

011minus

028minus

007

039minus

009

007

027

010

001

001minus

015

004minus

003minus

013

∆2

100

015

077minus

020minus

010minus

001

024

009

013

003minus

009

005

001

023minus

010

a3

100minus

006

000minus

011

016minus

030minus

012

056

001

012

002minus

007minus

027minus

004

∆3

100minus

028minus

019

015

041minus

024minus

008minus

000minus

013

004

002

041

008

a4

100

013

005minus

017

014

018minus

000

006

000

014minus

019minus

009

∆4

100minus

016

016

017

012

000minus

002minus

019minus

003

003

001

a5

100

024minus

026minus

006

011

005minus

007

001

019

039

∆5

100minus

000minus

028minus

001minus

020minus

020

015

076

027

a7

100minus

001

017minus

006

004

013minus

005minus

024

∆7

100minus

012

037

003minus

000minus

027minus

012

a8

100minus

004minus

001

004

006

015

∆8

100minus

037minus

002minus

033minus

001

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

27

Table 13 Interference fit fractions () from the nominal DP fit The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 374 18 minus00 00 00 minus24 minus02 minus26 minus50A1 07 minus00 00 00 minus11 minus03 minus06 minus11A2 51 minus32 minus00 29 15 16 19A3 48 00 minus84 01 21 02A4 74 minus03 minus10 minus15 minus04A5 193 minus00 28 00A6 231 minus00 00A7 66 minus00A8 89

Table 14 Statistical uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes areall pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASSnonresonant (A4) Klowast2 (1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8)Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 15 07 00 00 00 09 04 04 05A1 03 00 00 00 07 03 04 05A2 20 26 00 11 05 15 05A3 38 00 32 04 34 08A4 17 06 01 06 05A5 28 00 31 00A6 12 00 00A7 14 00A8 16

28

Table 15 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () Theamplitudes are all pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0 (1430)0(A3) LASS nonresonant (A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave(dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fitfractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 12 05 00 00 00 23 02 04 05A1 08 00 00 00 04 08 07 09A2 24 31 00 14 20 26 11A3 38 00 36 02 26 03A4 11 22 02 05 10A5 20 00 40 00A6 11 00 00A7 12 00A8 22

Table 16 Model uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 17 08 00 00 00 26 07 08 14A1 08 00 00 00 08 06 08 11A2 34 29 00 58 17 36 27A3 66 00 83 03 35 07A4 20 17 02 12 10A5 74 00 45 00A6 12 00 00A7 37 00A8 29

29

References

[1] T Gershon On the measurement of the unitarity triangle angle γ from B0 rarr DKlowast0

decays Phys Rev D79 (2009) 051301(R) arXiv08102706

[2] T Gershon and M Williams Prospects for the measurement of the unitaritytriangle angle γ from B0 rarr DK+πminus decays Phys Rev D80 (2009) 092002arXiv09091495

[3] N Cabibbo Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays Phys Rev Lett 10 (1963) 531

[4] M Kobayashi and T Maskawa CP -violation in the renormalizable theory of weakinteraction Progress of Theoretical Physics 49 (1973) 652

[5] M Gronau and D London How to determine all the angles of the unitarity trianglefrom B0 rarr DK0

S and B0s rarr Dφ Phys Lett B253 (1991) 483

[6] M Gronau and D Wyler On determining a weak phase from CP asymmetries incharged B decays Phys Lett B265 (1991) 172

[7] I Dunietz CP violation with self-tagging Bd modes Phys Lett B270 (1991) 75

[8] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurement of CP violation parameters inB0 rarr DKlowast0 decays Phys Rev D90 (2014) 112002 arXiv14078136

[9] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of overlapping spin-1 and spin-

3 D0Kminus resonances at mass 286 GeVc2 Phys Rev Lett 113 (2014) 162001

arXiv14077574

[10] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ decays

Phys Rev D90 (2014) 072003 arXiv14077712

[11] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observation and amplitude analysis of theBminus rarr D+Kminusπminus decay Phys Rev D91 (2015) 092002 arXiv150302995

[12] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays

arXiv150501710 submitted to Phys Rev D

[13] Belle collaboration A Kuzmin et al Study of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays Phys RevD76 (2007) 012006 arXivhep-ex0611054

[14] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of branching fractions andresonance contributions for B0 rarr D0K+πminus and search for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decaysPhys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 011803 arXivhep-ex0509036

[15] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurements of the branching fractions of

the decays B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ and B0 rarr D

0K+πminus Phys Rev D87 (2013) 112009

arXiv13046317

30

[16] Belle collaboration P Krokovny et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K0 and B0 rarr D0Klowast0

decays Phys Rev Lett 90 (2003) 141802 arXivhep-ex0212066

[17] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of B0 rarr D(lowast)0K(lowast)0 branchingfractions Phys Rev D74 (2006) 031101 arXivhep-ex0604016

[18] LHCb collaboration A A Alves Jr et al The LHCb detector at the LHC JINST 3(2008) S08005

[19] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al LHCb detector performance Int J Mod PhysA30 (2015) 1530022 arXiv14126352

[20] R Aaij et al Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator JINST 9 (2014) P09007arXiv14057808

[21] R Arink et al Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker JINST 9 (2014) P01002arXiv13113893

[22] M Adinolfi et al Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Eur PhysJ C73 (2013) 2431 arXiv12116759

[23] A A Alves Jr et al Performance of the LHCb muon system JINST 8 (2013) P02022arXiv12111346

[24] R Aaij et al The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011 JINST 8 (2013) P04022arXiv12113055

[25] V V Gligorov and M Williams Efficient reliable and fast high-level triggering usinga bonsai boosted decision tree JINST 8 (2013) P02013 arXiv12106861

[26] T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P Skands PYTHIA 64 physics and manual JHEP05 (2006) 026 arXivhep-ph0603175 T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P SkandsA brief introduction to PYTHIA 81 Comput Phys Commun 178 (2008) 852arXiv07103820

[27] I Belyaev et al Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss the LHCbsimulation framework J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032047

[28] D J Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package Nucl Instrum MethA462 (2001) 152

[29] P Golonka and Z Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo A precision tool for QED correctionsin Z and W decays Eur Phys J C45 (2006) 97 arXivhep-ph0506026

[30] Geant4 collaboration J Allison et al Geant4 developments and applications IEEETrans Nucl Sci 53 (2006) 270 Geant4 collaboration S Agostinelli et al Geant4A simulation toolkit Nucl Instrum Meth A506 (2003) 250

31

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 8: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

Table 1 Yields from the fit to the D0K+πminus data sample The full mass range is 5100ndash5900 MeVand the signal region is 524855ndash530905 MeV

Component Full mass range Signal region

B0 rarr D0K+πminus 2576plusmn 72 2344plusmn 66B0s rarr D0K+πminus 55plusmn 27 1plusmn 1

comb bkgd 5540plusmn 187 684plusmn 23B0 rarr Dlowast0K+πminus 1750plusmn 99 6plusmn 1B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus 485plusmn 47 51plusmn 5Λ0b rarr D(lowast)0K+p 95plusmn 26 18plusmn 5

B0 rarr D(lowast)0K+Kminus 127plusmn 27 10plusmn 2B0s rarr D(lowast)0K+Kminus 54plusmn 18 14plusmn 5

) [MeV]-π+K0

D(m5200 5400 5600 5800

Can

dida

tes

8 M

eV

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700 LHCb (a)Data

Total fitminusπ+K

0D rarr (s)

0B

Combinatorial bkgminusπ+K 0D rarr 0Bminusπ+π( )0D rarr 0B

p+K( )0D rarr 0bΛ

minusK+K( )0D rarr (s)0B

) [MeV]-π+K0

D(m5200 5400 5600 5800

Can

dida

tes

8 M

eV

1

10

210

310(b)LHCb

Figure 2 Results of the fit to the B candidate invariant mass distribution with (a) linear and(b) logarithmic y-axis scales The components are as described in the legend

branching fractions [123940] and misidentification probabilitiesThere are 14 free parameters in the fit model the mean and width of the signal shape

the relative normalisation and relative width of the two Crystal Ball functions the slopeof the exponential function the offset of the B0 rarr Dlowast0K+πminus shape and the yields of theeight contributions The result of the fit is shown in Fig 2 and the yields are summarisedin Table 1 The yields are also reported within the signal region used in the Dalitz plotfit corresponding to plusmn25 widths of the B0 signal shape (524855ndash530905 MeV) Thedistribution of candidates in the signal region over the Dalitz plot is shown in Fig 3(a)Note that a B0 mass constraint is applied to calculate the variables that are used todescribe the Dalitz plot [42] improving the resolution of those variables and giving aunique kinematic boundary

6

]2) [GeVminusπ0D(2m

5 10 15 20

]2)

[GeV

minus π+K(2

m

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

(a)LHCb

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

091

(b)LHCb

Figure 3 Distribution of B0 rarr D0K+πminus candidates in the signal region over (a) the Dalitz plotand (b) the square Dalitz plot The definition of the square Dalitz plot is given in Sec 61

5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism

In B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays resonances are expected in the m2(D0πminus) and m2(K+πminus)combinations so the Dalitz plot shown in Fig 3(a) is defined in terms of these twoinvariant mass squared terms For a fixed B0 mass these two invariant mass squaredcombinations can be used to calculate all other relevant kinematic quantities

The isobar model [43ndash45] is used to describe the complex decay amplitude The totalamplitude is given by the coherent sum of amplitudes from resonant and nonresonantintermediate contributions and is given by

A(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)=

Nsumj=1

cjFj(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

) (1)

where cj are complex coefficients describing the relative contribution for each intermediateprocess The resonant dynamics are contained in the Fj

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)terms

that are normalised such that the integral of the squared magnitude over the DP is unityfor each term For a D0πminus resonance Fj

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)is given by

F(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)= R

(m(D0πminus)

)timesX(|~p | rBW)timesX(|~q | rBW)times T (~p ~q ) (2)

where ~p is the bachelor particle momentum and ~q is the momentum of one of the resonancedaughters both evaluated in the D0πminus rest frame The functions R X and T are describedbelow

The X(z) terms are BlattndashWeisskopf barrier factors [46] where z = |~q | rBW or |~p | rBW

and rBW is the barrier radius which is set to 40 GeVminus1 asymp 08 fm [10] for all resonances

7

The barrier factors are angular momentum dependent and are given by

L = 0 X(z) = 1

L = 1 X(z) =radic

1+z201+z2

L = 2 X(z) =radic

z40+3z20+9

z4+3z2+9

L = 3 X(z) =radic

z60+6z40+45z20+225

z6+6z4+45z2+225

(3)

where z0 is the value of z at the pole mass of the resonance and L is the orbital angularmomentum between the resonance and the bachelor particle Since the parent and daughterparticles all have zero spin L is also the spin of the resonance

The T (~p ~q) terms describe the angular distributions in the Zemach tensor formalism [4748] and are given by

L = 0 T (~p ~q) = 1 L = 1 T (~p ~q) = minus 2 ~p middot ~q L = 2 T (~p ~q) = 4

3[3(~p middot ~q )2 minus (|~p ||~q |)2]

L = 3 T (~p ~q) = minus 2415

[5(~p middot ~q )3 minus 3(~p middot ~q )(|~p ||~q |)2]

(4)

These expressions are proportional to the Legendre polynomials PL(x) where x is thecosine of the angle between ~p and ~q (referred to as the helicity angle)

The R(m(D0πminus)

)functions are the mass lineshapes Resonant contributions are

typically described by the relativistic BreitndashWigner (RBW) function

R(m) =1

(m20 minusm2)minus im0Γ(m)

(5)

where the mass-dependent decay width is

Γ(m) = Γ0

(q

q0

)2L+1 (m0

m

)X2(q rBW) (6)

where q0 is the value of q = |~q | when the invariant mass is equal to the pole mass of theresonance m0

The large phase space available in B decays allows for the presence of nonresonantamplitudes (ie contributions that do not proceed via a known resonance) that vary acrossthe Dalitz plot An exponential form factor (EFF) has been found to describe nonresonantcontributions well in several DP analyses of B decays [49]

R(m) = exp[minusαm2

] (7)

where α is a shape parameter that must be determined from the data and m is a two-bodyinvariant mass (m(D0πminus) in this example)

The RBW function is a good model for narrow resonances that are well separated fromany other resonant or nonresonant contribution of the same spin This approach is known

8

to break down in the Kπ S-wave because the Klowast0(1430) resonance interferes strongly witha slowly varying nonresonant term as described in Ref [50] The LASS lineshape [51] hasbeen developed to combine these two contributions

R(m) =m

q cot δB minus iq+ exp [2iδB]

m0Γ0m0

q0

(m20 minusm2)minus im0Γ0

qmm0

q0

(8)

where cot δB =1

aq+

1

2rq (9)

and where m0 and Γ0 are the pole mass and width of the Klowast0(1430) state and a and r areshape parameters

The Dπ S-wave nonresonant contribution can be described by the ldquodabbardquo line-shape [52] defined as

R(m) =Bprime(m2)(m2 minus sA)ρ

1minus β(m2 minusm2min)minus iBprime(m2)(m2 minus sA)ρ

(10)

whereBprime(m2) = b exp

[minusα(m2 minusm2

min)] (11)

Here mmin is the invariant mass at threshold sA = m2D minus 05m2

π is the Adler zero ρ isa phase-space factor and b α and β are parameters with values fixed to 2449 GeVminus201 GeVminus2 and 01 GeVminus2 respectively according to Ref [52]

Ignoring reconstruction and selection effects the DP probability density function wouldbe

Pphys

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)=

|A(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)|2intint

DP|A|2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)

(12)

where the dependence of A on the DP position has been suppressed in the denominator forbrevity The primary results of most Dalitz plot analyses are the complex coefficients asdefined in Eq (1) These however depend on the choice of phase convention amplitudeformalism and normalisation used in each analysis The convention-independent quantitiesof fit fractions and interference fit fractions provide a way to reliably compare resultsbetween different analyses Fit fractions are defined as the integral of the amplitude foreach intermediate component squared divided by that of the coherent matrix elementsquared for all intermediate contributions

FF j =

intintDP

∣∣cjFj (m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus))∣∣2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)intint

DP|A|2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)

(13)

The fit fractions need not sum to unity due to possible net constructive or destructiveinterference described by interference fit fractions defined (for i lt j only) by

FF ij =

intintDP

2Re[ciclowastjFiF

lowastj

]dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)intint

DP|A|2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)

(14)

where the dependence of F(lowast)i and A on the DP position has been omitted

9

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

Eff

icie

ncy

()

0

005

01

015

02

025(a)LHCb Simulation

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

Eff

icie

ncy

()

0

005

01

015

02

025(b)LHCb Simulation

Figure 4 Efficiency variation as a function of SDP position for candidates triggered by (a) signaldecay products and (b) by the rest of the event The vertical white stripe is due to the Dlowast vetoand the curved white band is due to the D0 veto

6 Dalitz plot fit

61 Signal efficiency

The variation of the efficiency across the phase space is studied in terms of the squareDalitz plot (SDP) The SDP is defined by variables mprime and θprime that range between 0 and 1and are given for the D0K+πminus case by

mprime equiv 1

πarccos

(2m(D0πminus)minusmmin

D0πminus

mmaxD0πminus minusmmin

D0πminus

minus 1

)and θprime equiv 1

πθ(D0πminus) (15)

where mmaxD0πminus = mB0 minusmK+ and mmin

D0πminus = mD0 + mπminus are the kinematic boundaries of

m(D0πminus) allowed in the B0 rarr D0K+πminus decay and θ(D0πminus) is the helicity angle of theD0πminus system (the angle between the K+ and the D0 meson in the D0πminus rest frame) Thedistribution of selected events across the SDP is shown in Fig 3(b)

Efficiency variation across the SDP is caused by the detector acceptance and bytrigger selection and PID requirements The efficiency is evaluated with simulated samplesgenerated uniformly over the SDP Data-driven corrections are applied to correct for knowndifferences between data and simulation in the tracking trigger and PID efficiencies usingidentical methods to those described in Ref [10] The efficiency functions are obtainedby fitting the corrected simulation with two-dimensional cubic splines Figure 4 showsthe histograms used to model the variation of the efficiency over the SDP for candidatestriggered by (a) signal decays and (b) by the rest of the event

62 Background studies

Among the background yields in the signal region given in Table 1 the only sizeablecomponents are due to combinatorial background and B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays The SDP

10

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

0

0002

0004

0006

0008

001

0012

0014

(a)LHCb

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

000020004000600080010012001400160018

(b)LHCb Simulation

Figure 5 SDP distributions of the background contributions from (a) combinatorial backgroundand (b) B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays

distributions of these backgrounds are described by the histograms shown in Fig 5Combinatorial background contributes 22 of candidates in the signal region The

shape of this contribution over the SDP is obtained from the high B mass sideband (5400ndash5900 MeV) As seen in Fig 2 this sideband is dominated by combinatorial backgroundwith a small contribution from B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays The SDP distribution of theB0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus contribution in the sideband region is modelled as described belowfor the signal region and is subtracted from the sideband sample To check that theSDP shape of the combinatorial background does not vary with the B candidate massa sample of doubly charged D0Kplusmnπplusmn candidates is investigated This confirms that theSDP distribution from the sideband is a reliable model for combinatorial background inthe signal region

The B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus contribution accounts for 16 of the candidates in the signalregion Its SDP distribution is obtained from a simulated sample with the B0 rarr D0π+πminus

and B0 rarr Dlowast0π+πminus contributions combined and reweighted as described in Sec 4 TheB0 rarr D0π+πminus decay mode is the dominant component of this background in the signalregion

Due to resolution effects B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ Dlowast(2010)minus rarr D0πminus decays are notentirely removed by the Dlowast veto Although this component corresponds to real B0 rarrD0πminusK+ decays it is treated as incoherent (ie as background) since its interference withthe remainder of the signal is negligible Its SDP distribution is modelled as a Gaussianpeak in m(D0πminus) with mean fixed to the known Dlowast(2010)minus mass and width and yielddetermined in the fit to data

11

Table 2 Signal contributions to the fit model where parameters and uncertainties are takenfrom Ref [37] The models are described in Sec 5

Resonance Spin DP axis Model Parameters

Klowast(892)0 1 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 89581plusmn 019 MeV Γ0 = 474plusmn 06 MeVKlowast(1410)0 1 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 1414plusmn 15 MeV Γ0 = 232plusmn 21 MeVKlowast0(1430)0 0 m2(K+πminus) LASS Determined from data (see text)Klowast2(1430)0 2 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 14324plusmn 13 MeV Γ0 = 109plusmn 5 MeVDlowast0(2400)minus 0 m2(D0πminus) RBW

Determined from data (see Table 3)Dlowast2(2460)minus 2 m2(D0πminus) RBW

Nonresonant 0 m2(D0πminus) dabba Fixed (see text)Nonresonant 1 m2(D0πminus) EFF Determined from data (see text)

63 Amplitude model for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays

The Dalitz plot fit is performed using the Laura++ [53] package The likelihood functionis given by

L =Ncprodi

[sumk

NkPk(m2i (D

0πminus)m2i (K

+πminus)) ]

(16)

where the index i runs over Nc candidates k runs over the signal and backgroundcomponents and Nk is the yield in each component The probability density function forthe signal component Psig is given by Eq (12) with the |A

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)|2

terms multiplied by the efficiency function described in Sec 61 As it is possible forthe minimisation procedure to find a local minimum of the negative log likelihood (NLL)profile the fit is repeated many times with randomised initial values to ensure the globalminimum is found

The nominal Dalitz plot fit model for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays is composed of severalresonant and nonresonant amplitudes Only those amplitudes that provide significantcontributions or that aid the fit stability are included Unnatural spin-parity states arenot considered as these do not decay to two pseudoscalars The eight amplitudes includedin this model are listed in Table 2 The width of the narrowest signal contribution tothe Dalitz plot (sim 50 MeV) is far larger than the mass resolution (sim 24 MeV) thereforeresolution effects are neglected

The real and imaginary parts of the complex coefficients cj defined in Eq (1) are freeparameters of the fit except for the coefficient of the Dlowast2(2460)minus component which is fixedto 1 as a reference The phases and magnitudes of the complex coefficients as well as fitfractions and interference fit fractions are derived from these free parameters In additionthe masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances are determined fromthe fit to data and are reported in Table 3 The statistical uncertainties on all parametersof interest are calculated using large samples of simulated pseudoexperiments Thesepseudoexperiments are also used to determine the correlations between the statisticaluncertainties on the parameters which are given in Appendix A The LASS parameters

12

Table 3 Masses and widths (MeV) determined in the fit to data with statistical uncertaintiesonly

Resonance Mass Width

Dlowast0(2400)minus 2360plusmn 15 255plusmn 26Dlowast2(2460)minus 24656plusmn 18 460plusmn 34

Table 4 Complex coefficients and fit fractions determined from the Dalitz plot fit Uncertaintiesare statistical only Note that the fit fractions magnitudes and phases are derived quantities

Resonance Fit fraction Isobar model coefficients() Real part Imaginary part Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 minus000plusmn 015 minus127plusmn 006 127plusmn 006 minus157plusmn 011Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 015plusmn 006 minus009plusmn 009 018plusmn 007 minus054plusmn 021Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 014plusmn 038 045plusmn 015 047plusmn 009 127plusmn 095LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 minus010plusmn 024 044plusmn 014 046plusmn 014 179plusmn 065

LASS total 67plusmn 27Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 minus032plusmn 009 minus047plusmn 007 057plusmn 005 minus216plusmn 019Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 minus080plusmn 008 minus044plusmn 014 091plusmn 007 minus264plusmn 015Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 100 000 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 minus039plusmn 009 036plusmn 017 053plusmn 007 240plusmn 027Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 minus062plusmn 006 minus003plusmn 006 062plusmn 006 minus309plusmn 010Total fit fraction 1134

are determined to be m0 = 1450plusmn 80 MeV Γ0 = 400plusmn 230 MeV a = 32plusmn 18 GeV andr = 09plusmn11 GeV while the parameter of the EFF lineshape of the Dπ P-wave nonresonantamplitude is determined to be α = 088plusmn 010 GeVminus2

The values of the fit fractions and complex coefficients obtained from the fit are shownin Table 4 while the values of the interference fit fractions are given in Appendix B Thesum of the fit fractions is seen to exceed unity mostly due to interference within the Dπ andKπ S-waves Note that in Table 4 and all results for fit fractions and derived quantitiesvalues are reported separately for both the Klowast0 (1430)0 and nonresonant components of theLASS lineshape as well as their coherent sum

Projections of the data and the nominal fit model onto m(K+πminus) m(D0πminus) andm(D0K+) are shown in Fig 6 Zooms are provided in the regions of the main resonantcontributions in Fig 7 Projections onto the cosine of the helicity angle of the D0πminus andK+πminus systems are shown in Figs 8 and 9 respectively These projections all show goodagreement between data and the fit model

Angular moments provide a useful method to investigate the helicity structure of thedecays The angular moments in m(D0πminus) and m(K+πminus) obtained as in Refs [1011]are shown in Figs 10 and 11 respectively The contributions due to the Klowast(892)0 andDlowast2(2460)minus resonances are seen as peaks in moments up to order 2 and order 4 respectivelyas expected for spin-1 and spin-2 resonances Reflections make the interpretation ofmoments at higher masses more difficult However the good agreement seen between data

13

and the fit model provides further support for the fit model being a good description ofthe data

The quality of the fit is evaluated by determining a two-dimensional χ2 value comparingthe data and fit model in 144 bins across the SDP that are defined adaptively to ensurethey are approximately equally populated The pull in each of these bins defined as thedifference between the data and the fit model divided by the uncertainty is shown inFig 12 The effective number of degrees of freedom of the χ2 is between Nbins minusNpars minus 1and Nbinsminus1 where Npars is the number of free parameters in the fit yielding a reduced χ2

in the range 099 ndash 122 Additional unbinned tests of fit quality [54] also show acceptableagreement between the data and the fit model

7 Systematic uncertainties

Systematic uncertainties are considered from sources that can be divided into two categoriesexperimental and model uncertainties Experimental uncertainties arise due to the signaland background yields in the signal region the distributions of the background componentsacross the SDP the variation of efficiency across the SDP and possible bias due to thefitting procedure Model uncertainties are considered due to the fixed parameters in thesignal model the addition or removal of marginal amplitudes and the choice of models forthe Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves The uncertainties due to all of these sourcesare combined in quadrature

The signal and background yields are determined from the fit to the B candidateinvariant mass distribution Systematic uncertainties are considered on the total yieldsdue to both statistical and systematic variations of these yields as evaluated in Ref [15]The yields in the signal region are varied appropriately and the effects of these variationson the parameters of interest are assigned as systematic uncertainties

The histograms describing the background distributions are each varied within statisticaluncertainties to establish the uncertainty due to the imperfect knowledge of the distributionof these backgrounds across the SDP The histograms describing the efficiency variationacross the SDP are also varied within their uncertainties prior to the spline fit Theefficiency histograms are also varied with local correlations to account for the effects ofany unknown correlations between neighbouring bins For each parameter the largeruncertainty is considered from the correlated and uncorrelated variations In addition thebinning scheme of the control sample used to evaluate PID performance is varied

An ensemble of pseudoexperiments is used to establish systematic uncertainties relatedto any potential fit bias Pseudoexperiments are generated using the parameters determinedin the fit to data and mean fitted values of the parameters are determined from Gaussianfits to the distributions of results obtained in the ensemble The differences between thegenerated and mean fitted values are found to be small Uncertainties are determined asthe sum in quadrature of the difference between the generated and mean fitted values andthe uncertainty on the mean fitted value from the Gaussian fit

Systematic uncertainties due to fixed parameters in the fit model are determined by

14

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310LHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350 LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310 LHCb (d)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

LHCb (e)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210LHCb (f)

Data Total fit 0(892)K 0(1410)K

S-wave (LASS)πK 0(1430)2Kminus

(2400)0Dminus

(2460)2D

S-wave (EFF)πD P-wave (EFF)πDminus

D Background

Figure 6 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) (c) m(K+πminus)and (e) m(D0K+) with the same projections shown in (b) (d) and (f) with a logarithmic y-axisscale Components are described in the legend

15

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

235 24 245 25 255

Can

dida

tes

4 M

eV

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m05 1 15

Can

dida

tes

13

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

LHCb (b)

Figure 7 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) in the Dlowast2(2460)minus

region and (b) the low m(K+πminus) region Components are as shown in Fig 6

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

) lt 235 GeVminusπ0D(m204 lt

LHCb(a)

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

) lt 255 GeVminusπ0D(m235 lt

LHCb(b)

Figure 8 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(D0πminus) in the mass ranges(a) 204 lt m(D0πminus) lt 235 GeV and (b) 235 lt m(D0πminus) lt 255 GeV Components are asshown in Fig 6

repeating the fit with these parameters varied The fixed masses and widths are variedwithin their uncertainties as shown in Table 2 while the BlattndashWeisskopf barrier radii rBWare varied independently for D0πminus and K+πminus resonances between 3 and 5 GeVminus1 [10]

The Klowast(1410)0 amplitude does not contribute significantly to the nominal fit modelso the fit is repeated with this component removed and the change in results is assignedas the associated systematic uncertainty In addition uncertainties are assigned fromthe changes in the results when an amplitude due to the Klowast(1680)0 resonance or from avirtual Blowast(5325)+ component as described in Ref [10] is included in the model

A Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D0Kminusπ+ observed both spin-1 and spin-3 resonances

at m(D0Kminus) sim 286 GeV [9 10] A spin-3 resonance has also been seen at m(D0πminus) sim276 GeV in B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] while an analysis of B+ rarr DminusK+π+ shows aspin-1 resonance at similar m(D+πminus) values [11] Uncertainties are assigned corresponding

16

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

) lt 08 GeVminusπ+K(m0 lt LHCb

(a)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 10 GeVminusπ+K(m08 lt LHCb

(b)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 13 GeVminusπ+K(m10 lt LHCb

(c)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

) lt 15 GeVminusπ+K(m14 lt LHCb

(d)

Figure 9 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(K+πminus) in the mass ranges(a) m(K+πminus) lt 08 GeV (b) 08 lt m(K+πminus) lt 10 GeV (c) 10 lt m(K+πminus) lt 13 GeV and(d) 14 lt m(K+πminus) lt 15 GeV Components are as shown in Fig 6

to the changes in results when either a spin-1 or spin-3 state at m(D0πminus) sim 276 GeV isadded to the nominal model

The LASS model used to describe the Kπ S-wave is replaced with a Flatte shape [55]which accounts for the Kηprime threshold near the Klowast0 (1430)0 mass and a resonant term witha modified mass dependent width [52] for the κ (also known as Klowast0(800)) state Thismodel gives an NLL that is worse by 44 units A model-independent description of theKπ S-wave is also used to fit the data with the uncertainty on each parameter takenas the larger of the two differences This alternative improves the NLL by 88 units butintroduces an additional four free parameters into the fit The dabba lineshape used todescribe the D0πminus S-wave is replaced with an EFF lineshape while a power-law model isintroduced as an alternative to the EFF lineshape that describes the D0πminus P-wave Thesealterations worsen the NLL by 30 units and improve it by 08 units respectively

The total systematic uncertainties due to experimental and model effects for fit fractionsand complex coefficients are given together with the results in Sec 8 The contributionsfrom different sources to the systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions masses and

17

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0002004006008

0101201401601802

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-30-25-20-15-10

-505

1015

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

310timesLHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

310timesLHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-8-6-4-202468

310timesLHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-8-6-4-20246

310timesLHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-6-4-202468

10

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 10 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(D0πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

18

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0

005

01

015

02

025

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

20

40

60

80

100310times

LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10-505

10152025

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25310times

LHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-20-15-10

-505

101520

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 11 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(K+πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

19

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Pull

-2

-1

0

1

2

LHCb

Figure 12 Differences between the data SDP distribution and the fit model across the SDP interms of the per-bin pull

Table 5 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths(MeV) Uncertainties given on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value SB fraction Efficiency Background SDP Fit bias Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 060 083 050 031 117Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 006 039 069 005 080Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 028 148 185 033 241LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 051 225 286 086 377

LASS total 67plusmn 27 026 186 160 102 267Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 023 072 053 054 107Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 021 139 143 040 204Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 070 070 049 015 111Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 003 081 059 057 115Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 086 191 052 038 219m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 46 81 70 37 122m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 001 037 022 029 051Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 28 131 139 48 199Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 05 09 09 05 14

widths are given in Tables 5 and 6 The dominant experimental systematic uncertaintyon most parameters is due to either the efficiency variation or background distributionsacross the SDP while the model uncertainties are generally dominated by the effects ofalternative descriptions of the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves For the parametersof broad components the model uncertainties dominate however for other parameters thestatistical experimental and model uncertainties are all of a similar magnitude

The stability of the fit results is confirmed by several cross-checks The data sample isdivided into subsamples according to the flavour of the B candidate the trigger decision

20

Table 6 Model uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths (MeV) Uncertaintiesgiven on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value Fixed parameters Addremove Alternative models Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 075 114 109 174Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 018 070 022 076Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 079 330 023 340LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 110 399 520 665

LASS total 67plusmn 27 053 142 521 543Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 036 187 056 198Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 055 195 711 740Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 018 073 099 124Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 027 140 346 374Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 031 199 215 295m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 61 93 256 279m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 009 105 048 115Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 40 180 435 472Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 14 05 24 29

the polarity of the magnet and the year of data taking Each subsample is fitted separatelyand all are seen to be consistent with the nominal fit results The fit is also repeatedwith additional resonance components to test the fit model Resonances up to spin-3 wereconsidered for all three pairs of daughters with the mass and width allowed to vary in thefit No additional significant contributions were observed

8 Results and summary

The results for the complex coefficients are reported in Table 7 with results for thefit fractions given in Table 8 The results for the interference fit fractions are givenin Appendix B Upper limits are determined on the fit fractions of the Klowast(1410)0 andDlowast3(2760)minus components which do not give significant contributions using the methoddescribed in Ref [10]

The fit fractions for resonant contributions are converted into quasi-two-body productbranching fractions by multiplying by B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus) = (92plusmn 06plusmn 07plusmn 06)times 10minus5which is obtained from the ratio of branching fractions B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus)B(B0 rarrD0π+πminus) [15] multiplied by the latest result for B(B0 rarr D0π+πminus) [12] accounting forthe different Dlowast(2010)minus veto windows used in the analyses and for the 37 residualbackground due to B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ decays The statistical correlation between theresults of Ref [15] and this analysis is found to be negligible The results for the productbranching fractions are shown in Table 9 For the K+πminus resonances where the branchingfractions to Kπ are known the product branching fractions are converted to the Bdecay branching fractions shown in Table 10 The results for B(B0 rarr D0Klowast(892)0) andB(B0 rarr Dlowast2(2460)minusK+)times B(Dlowast2(2460)minus rarr D0πminus) are consistent with and more precisethan previous measurements [14 1617]

21

Table 7 Results for the complex amplitudes and their uncertainties presented (top) in terms ofreal and imaginary parts and (bottom) in terms and magnitudes and phases The three quotederrors are statistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively

Resonance Real part Imaginary part

Klowast(892)0 minus000plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 034 minus127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 006Klowast(1410)0 015plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 009 minus009plusmn 009plusmn 018plusmn 018Klowast0(1430)0 014plusmn 038plusmn 048plusmn 038 045plusmn 015plusmn 037plusmn 017LASS nonresonant minus010plusmn 024plusmn 016plusmn 042 044plusmn 014plusmn 017plusmn 023Klowast2(1430)0 minus032plusmn 009plusmn 015plusmn 023 minus047plusmn 007plusmn 014plusmn 015Dlowast0(2400)minus minus080plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 022 minus044plusmn 014plusmn 012plusmn 018Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) minus039plusmn 009plusmn 009plusmn 014 036plusmn 017plusmn 014plusmn 023Dπ P-wave (EFF) minus062plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 011 minus003plusmn 006plusmn 005plusmn 010

Resonance Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 005 minus157plusmn 011plusmn 016plusmn 027Klowast(1410)0 018plusmn 007plusmn 010plusmn 011 minus054plusmn 021plusmn 055plusmn 104Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 009plusmn 010plusmn 014 127plusmn 095plusmn 104plusmn 081LASS nonresonant 046plusmn 014plusmn 016plusmn 029 179plusmn 065plusmn 035plusmn 069Klowast2(1430)0 057plusmn 005plusmn 004plusmn 008 minus216plusmn 019plusmn 043plusmn 043Dlowast0(2400)minus 091plusmn 007plusmn 006plusmn 017 minus264plusmn 015plusmn 014plusmn 023Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 053plusmn 007plusmn 004plusmn 014 240plusmn 027plusmn 024plusmn 044Dπ P-wave (EFF) 062plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 011 minus309plusmn 010plusmn 007plusmn 017

Table 8 Results for the fit fractions and their uncertainties () The three quoted errors arestatistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively Upper limits are givenat 90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Fit fraction Upper limitKlowast(892)0 374plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 17Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03plusmn 08plusmn 08 lt 32 (37)Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20plusmn 24plusmn 34LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38plusmn 38plusmn 67

LASS total 67plusmn 27plusmn 27plusmn 54Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17plusmn 11plusmn 20Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28plusmn 20plusmn 74Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12plusmn 11plusmn 12Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 10 (11)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14plusmn 12plusmn 37Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16plusmn 22plusmn 30

22

Table 9 Results for the product branching fractions The four quoted errors are statisticalexperimental systematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Product branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 342plusmn 013plusmn 010plusmn 016plusmn 040Klowast(1410)0 007plusmn 003plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 001 lt 029 (034)Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 018plusmn 022plusmn 031plusmn 005LASS nonresonant 044plusmn 034plusmn 034plusmn 061plusmn 005

LASS total 061plusmn 025plusmn 025plusmn 049plusmn 007Klowast2(1430)0 068plusmn 015plusmn 010plusmn 018plusmn 008Dlowast0(2400)minus 177plusmn 026plusmn 019plusmn 067plusmn 020Dlowast2(2460)minus 212plusmn 010plusmn 011plusmn 011plusmn 025Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 010 (011)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 060plusmn 013plusmn 011plusmn 034plusmn 007Dπ P-wave (EFF) 081plusmn 015plusmn 020plusmn 027plusmn 009

Table 10 Results for the branching fractions The four quoted errors are statistical experimentalsystematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at 90 (95 )confidence level

Resonance Branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 513plusmn 020plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 060Klowast(1410)0 159plusmn 068plusmn 181plusmn 159plusmn 036 lt 67 (78)Klowast0(1430)0 071plusmn 027plusmn 033plusmn 047plusmn 008LASS nonresonant 066plusmn 051plusmn 051plusmn 092plusmn 008

LASS total 092plusmn 038plusmn 038plusmn 074plusmn 011Klowast2(1430)0 204plusmn 045plusmn 030plusmn 054plusmn 025

The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus states are found to be

m(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (2360plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 28) MeV

Γ(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (255plusmn 26plusmn 20plusmn 47) MeV

m(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (24656plusmn 18plusmn 05plusmn 12) MeV

Γ(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (460plusmn 34plusmn 14plusmn 29) MeV

where the three uncertainties are statistical experimental systematic and model systematicrespectively These are consistent with though less precise than recent results from a DPanalysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] They also show good agreement with and havesimilar precision to earlier measurements of these quantities [1337]

In summary the first amplitude analysis of B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays has been presentedusing a data sample corresponding to 30 fbminus1 of pp collision data collected by the LHCbexperiment A good description of the data is obtained with a model containing contri-

23

butions from intermediate Klowast(892)0 Klowast(1410)0 Klowast2(1430)0 and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonanceswith additional components to describe broad structures in the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S-and P-waves The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances aremeasured as are the complex amplitudes and fit fractions for all components includedin the amplitude model The results can be used in conjunction with an analysis ofB0 rarr DK+πminus decays where the neutral D meson is reconstructed in final states such asK+Kminus to measure the CKM unitarity triangle parameter γ [1 2]

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to our colleagues in the CERN accelerator departments forthe excellent performance of the LHC We thank the technical and administrative staffat the LHCb institutes We acknowledge support from CERN and from the nationalagencies CAPES CNPq FAPERJ and FINEP (Brazil) NSFC (China) CNRSIN2P3(France) BMBF DFG HGF and MPG (Germany) INFN (Italy) FOM and NWO (TheNetherlands) MNiSW and NCN (Poland) MENIFA (Romania) MinES and FANO(Russia) MinECo (Spain) SNSF and SER (Switzerland) NASU (Ukraine) STFC (UnitedKingdom) NSF (USA) The Tier1 computing centres are supported by IN2P3 (France)KIT and BMBF (Germany) INFN (Italy) NWO and SURF (The Netherlands) PIC(Spain) GridPP (United Kingdom) We are indebted to the communities behind themultiple open source software packages on which we depend We are also thankful forthe computing resources and the access to software RampD tools provided by Yandex LLC(Russia) Individual groups or members have received support from EPLANET MarieSk lodowska-Curie Actions and ERC (European Union) Conseil general de Haute-SavoieLabex ENIGMASS and OCEVU Region Auvergne (France) RFBR (Russia) XuntaGaland GENCAT (Spain) Royal Society and Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851(United Kingdom)

24

Appendices

A Correlation matrices

The statistical correlations between the complex coefficients masses and widths determinedfrom the fit to data are given in terms of real and imaginary parts and in terms ofmagnitudes and phases in Tables 11 and 12 The correlations are determined using thesame sample of simulated pseudoexperiments used to calculate the statistical uncertaintieson fit parameters

B Results for interference fit fractions

The central values of the interference fit fractions are given in Table 13 The statisti-cal experimental systematic and model uncertainties on these quantities are given inTables 14 15 and 16

25

Tab

le11

Sta

tist

ical

corr

elat

ions

bet

wee

nth

ere

al(x

)an

dim

agin

ary

(y)

par

tsof

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

x0

y 0x

1y 1

x2

y 2x

3y 3

x4

y 4x

5y 5

x7

y 7x

8y 8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

x0

100

014

002

017minus

018

015minus

017

003

039minus

037

016minus

009minus

018minus

029

007minus

037minus

019

002

004

012

y 01

00minus

006minus

008

009minus

011minus

000

014

003

003

012

013minus

012minus

024

035minus

007

009

012

001minus

004

x1

100minus

009minus

008minus

014minus

004

029minus

001

003minus

020

018minus

021minus

031minus

017minus

036minus

008minus

017minus

023

002

y 11

000

050

340

09minus

001

060minus

039

002minus

003minus

003

007minus

002minus

004minus

016minus

002

007

002

x2

100minus

013

081

009

014minus

016minus

015

021

010

013

004minus

015minus

007

001minus

025

001

y 21

000

080

280

24minus

036minus

013

008minus

004minus

001minus

004

004minus

002minus

001minus

009minus

010

x3

100

020

013minus

034minus

010

033minus

008

008minus

004minus

005minus

007minus

003minus

033minus

009

y 31

00minus

012minus

012minus

051

029minus

034minus

053

009minus

012

009minus

014minus

036

001

x4

100minus

053

032minus

010minus

020

003

002minus

027minus

017minus

006

010minus

000

y 41

000

06minus

009

040

010

014

016

011minus

005

007minus

003

x5

100minus

029minus

003

022

002

004minus

008

002

045minus

006

y 51

00minus

031minus

034

006

003

024minus

014minus

072minus

033

x7

100

046

005

010minus

011minus

001

027

017

y 71

00minus

016

036minus

001

017

032

008

x8

100minus

003

001minus

006minus

009minus

014

y 81

000

290

020

15minus

002

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

26

Tab

le12

S

tati

stic

alco

rrel

atio

ns

bet

wee

nth

em

agnit

ud

es(a

)an

dp

has

es(∆

)of

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

a0

∆0

a1

∆1

a2

∆2

a3

∆3

a4

∆4

a5

∆5

a7

∆7

a8

∆8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

a0

100minus

011minus

008

005

024

003minus

014

004

004

001

021

002

022minus

022

038minus

000minus

004minus

009minus

001

004

∆0

100minus

010

012

003

020

014

014minus

001

045minus

005

010minus

008

035minus

007

005minus

022

006

007

009

a1

100minus

035minus

025

006

032

001minus

001minus

038

004minus

022minus

006

031

002

024

007minus

018minus

020

001

∆1

100

024

015

016

000

014

038minus

018minus

013

016

026

022minus

006minus

009minus

004minus

012

005

a2

100

004

011minus

028minus

007

039minus

009

007

027

010

001

001minus

015

004minus

003minus

013

∆2

100

015

077minus

020minus

010minus

001

024

009

013

003minus

009

005

001

023minus

010

a3

100minus

006

000minus

011

016minus

030minus

012

056

001

012

002minus

007minus

027minus

004

∆3

100minus

028minus

019

015

041minus

024minus

008minus

000minus

013

004

002

041

008

a4

100

013

005minus

017

014

018minus

000

006

000

014minus

019minus

009

∆4

100minus

016

016

017

012

000minus

002minus

019minus

003

003

001

a5

100

024minus

026minus

006

011

005minus

007

001

019

039

∆5

100minus

000minus

028minus

001minus

020minus

020

015

076

027

a7

100minus

001

017minus

006

004

013minus

005minus

024

∆7

100minus

012

037

003minus

000minus

027minus

012

a8

100minus

004minus

001

004

006

015

∆8

100minus

037minus

002minus

033minus

001

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

27

Table 13 Interference fit fractions () from the nominal DP fit The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 374 18 minus00 00 00 minus24 minus02 minus26 minus50A1 07 minus00 00 00 minus11 minus03 minus06 minus11A2 51 minus32 minus00 29 15 16 19A3 48 00 minus84 01 21 02A4 74 minus03 minus10 minus15 minus04A5 193 minus00 28 00A6 231 minus00 00A7 66 minus00A8 89

Table 14 Statistical uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes areall pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASSnonresonant (A4) Klowast2 (1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8)Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 15 07 00 00 00 09 04 04 05A1 03 00 00 00 07 03 04 05A2 20 26 00 11 05 15 05A3 38 00 32 04 34 08A4 17 06 01 06 05A5 28 00 31 00A6 12 00 00A7 14 00A8 16

28

Table 15 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () Theamplitudes are all pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0 (1430)0(A3) LASS nonresonant (A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave(dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fitfractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 12 05 00 00 00 23 02 04 05A1 08 00 00 00 04 08 07 09A2 24 31 00 14 20 26 11A3 38 00 36 02 26 03A4 11 22 02 05 10A5 20 00 40 00A6 11 00 00A7 12 00A8 22

Table 16 Model uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 17 08 00 00 00 26 07 08 14A1 08 00 00 00 08 06 08 11A2 34 29 00 58 17 36 27A3 66 00 83 03 35 07A4 20 17 02 12 10A5 74 00 45 00A6 12 00 00A7 37 00A8 29

29

References

[1] T Gershon On the measurement of the unitarity triangle angle γ from B0 rarr DKlowast0

decays Phys Rev D79 (2009) 051301(R) arXiv08102706

[2] T Gershon and M Williams Prospects for the measurement of the unitaritytriangle angle γ from B0 rarr DK+πminus decays Phys Rev D80 (2009) 092002arXiv09091495

[3] N Cabibbo Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays Phys Rev Lett 10 (1963) 531

[4] M Kobayashi and T Maskawa CP -violation in the renormalizable theory of weakinteraction Progress of Theoretical Physics 49 (1973) 652

[5] M Gronau and D London How to determine all the angles of the unitarity trianglefrom B0 rarr DK0

S and B0s rarr Dφ Phys Lett B253 (1991) 483

[6] M Gronau and D Wyler On determining a weak phase from CP asymmetries incharged B decays Phys Lett B265 (1991) 172

[7] I Dunietz CP violation with self-tagging Bd modes Phys Lett B270 (1991) 75

[8] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurement of CP violation parameters inB0 rarr DKlowast0 decays Phys Rev D90 (2014) 112002 arXiv14078136

[9] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of overlapping spin-1 and spin-

3 D0Kminus resonances at mass 286 GeVc2 Phys Rev Lett 113 (2014) 162001

arXiv14077574

[10] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ decays

Phys Rev D90 (2014) 072003 arXiv14077712

[11] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observation and amplitude analysis of theBminus rarr D+Kminusπminus decay Phys Rev D91 (2015) 092002 arXiv150302995

[12] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays

arXiv150501710 submitted to Phys Rev D

[13] Belle collaboration A Kuzmin et al Study of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays Phys RevD76 (2007) 012006 arXivhep-ex0611054

[14] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of branching fractions andresonance contributions for B0 rarr D0K+πminus and search for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decaysPhys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 011803 arXivhep-ex0509036

[15] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurements of the branching fractions of

the decays B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ and B0 rarr D

0K+πminus Phys Rev D87 (2013) 112009

arXiv13046317

30

[16] Belle collaboration P Krokovny et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K0 and B0 rarr D0Klowast0

decays Phys Rev Lett 90 (2003) 141802 arXivhep-ex0212066

[17] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of B0 rarr D(lowast)0K(lowast)0 branchingfractions Phys Rev D74 (2006) 031101 arXivhep-ex0604016

[18] LHCb collaboration A A Alves Jr et al The LHCb detector at the LHC JINST 3(2008) S08005

[19] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al LHCb detector performance Int J Mod PhysA30 (2015) 1530022 arXiv14126352

[20] R Aaij et al Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator JINST 9 (2014) P09007arXiv14057808

[21] R Arink et al Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker JINST 9 (2014) P01002arXiv13113893

[22] M Adinolfi et al Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Eur PhysJ C73 (2013) 2431 arXiv12116759

[23] A A Alves Jr et al Performance of the LHCb muon system JINST 8 (2013) P02022arXiv12111346

[24] R Aaij et al The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011 JINST 8 (2013) P04022arXiv12113055

[25] V V Gligorov and M Williams Efficient reliable and fast high-level triggering usinga bonsai boosted decision tree JINST 8 (2013) P02013 arXiv12106861

[26] T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P Skands PYTHIA 64 physics and manual JHEP05 (2006) 026 arXivhep-ph0603175 T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P SkandsA brief introduction to PYTHIA 81 Comput Phys Commun 178 (2008) 852arXiv07103820

[27] I Belyaev et al Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss the LHCbsimulation framework J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032047

[28] D J Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package Nucl Instrum MethA462 (2001) 152

[29] P Golonka and Z Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo A precision tool for QED correctionsin Z and W decays Eur Phys J C45 (2006) 97 arXivhep-ph0506026

[30] Geant4 collaboration J Allison et al Geant4 developments and applications IEEETrans Nucl Sci 53 (2006) 270 Geant4 collaboration S Agostinelli et al Geant4A simulation toolkit Nucl Instrum Meth A506 (2003) 250

31

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 9: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

]2) [GeVminusπ0D(2m

5 10 15 20

]2)

[GeV

minus π+K(2

m

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

(a)LHCb

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

091

(b)LHCb

Figure 3 Distribution of B0 rarr D0K+πminus candidates in the signal region over (a) the Dalitz plotand (b) the square Dalitz plot The definition of the square Dalitz plot is given in Sec 61

5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism

In B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays resonances are expected in the m2(D0πminus) and m2(K+πminus)combinations so the Dalitz plot shown in Fig 3(a) is defined in terms of these twoinvariant mass squared terms For a fixed B0 mass these two invariant mass squaredcombinations can be used to calculate all other relevant kinematic quantities

The isobar model [43ndash45] is used to describe the complex decay amplitude The totalamplitude is given by the coherent sum of amplitudes from resonant and nonresonantintermediate contributions and is given by

A(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)=

Nsumj=1

cjFj(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

) (1)

where cj are complex coefficients describing the relative contribution for each intermediateprocess The resonant dynamics are contained in the Fj

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)terms

that are normalised such that the integral of the squared magnitude over the DP is unityfor each term For a D0πminus resonance Fj

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)is given by

F(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)= R

(m(D0πminus)

)timesX(|~p | rBW)timesX(|~q | rBW)times T (~p ~q ) (2)

where ~p is the bachelor particle momentum and ~q is the momentum of one of the resonancedaughters both evaluated in the D0πminus rest frame The functions R X and T are describedbelow

The X(z) terms are BlattndashWeisskopf barrier factors [46] where z = |~q | rBW or |~p | rBW

and rBW is the barrier radius which is set to 40 GeVminus1 asymp 08 fm [10] for all resonances

7

The barrier factors are angular momentum dependent and are given by

L = 0 X(z) = 1

L = 1 X(z) =radic

1+z201+z2

L = 2 X(z) =radic

z40+3z20+9

z4+3z2+9

L = 3 X(z) =radic

z60+6z40+45z20+225

z6+6z4+45z2+225

(3)

where z0 is the value of z at the pole mass of the resonance and L is the orbital angularmomentum between the resonance and the bachelor particle Since the parent and daughterparticles all have zero spin L is also the spin of the resonance

The T (~p ~q) terms describe the angular distributions in the Zemach tensor formalism [4748] and are given by

L = 0 T (~p ~q) = 1 L = 1 T (~p ~q) = minus 2 ~p middot ~q L = 2 T (~p ~q) = 4

3[3(~p middot ~q )2 minus (|~p ||~q |)2]

L = 3 T (~p ~q) = minus 2415

[5(~p middot ~q )3 minus 3(~p middot ~q )(|~p ||~q |)2]

(4)

These expressions are proportional to the Legendre polynomials PL(x) where x is thecosine of the angle between ~p and ~q (referred to as the helicity angle)

The R(m(D0πminus)

)functions are the mass lineshapes Resonant contributions are

typically described by the relativistic BreitndashWigner (RBW) function

R(m) =1

(m20 minusm2)minus im0Γ(m)

(5)

where the mass-dependent decay width is

Γ(m) = Γ0

(q

q0

)2L+1 (m0

m

)X2(q rBW) (6)

where q0 is the value of q = |~q | when the invariant mass is equal to the pole mass of theresonance m0

The large phase space available in B decays allows for the presence of nonresonantamplitudes (ie contributions that do not proceed via a known resonance) that vary acrossthe Dalitz plot An exponential form factor (EFF) has been found to describe nonresonantcontributions well in several DP analyses of B decays [49]

R(m) = exp[minusαm2

] (7)

where α is a shape parameter that must be determined from the data and m is a two-bodyinvariant mass (m(D0πminus) in this example)

The RBW function is a good model for narrow resonances that are well separated fromany other resonant or nonresonant contribution of the same spin This approach is known

8

to break down in the Kπ S-wave because the Klowast0(1430) resonance interferes strongly witha slowly varying nonresonant term as described in Ref [50] The LASS lineshape [51] hasbeen developed to combine these two contributions

R(m) =m

q cot δB minus iq+ exp [2iδB]

m0Γ0m0

q0

(m20 minusm2)minus im0Γ0

qmm0

q0

(8)

where cot δB =1

aq+

1

2rq (9)

and where m0 and Γ0 are the pole mass and width of the Klowast0(1430) state and a and r areshape parameters

The Dπ S-wave nonresonant contribution can be described by the ldquodabbardquo line-shape [52] defined as

R(m) =Bprime(m2)(m2 minus sA)ρ

1minus β(m2 minusm2min)minus iBprime(m2)(m2 minus sA)ρ

(10)

whereBprime(m2) = b exp

[minusα(m2 minusm2

min)] (11)

Here mmin is the invariant mass at threshold sA = m2D minus 05m2

π is the Adler zero ρ isa phase-space factor and b α and β are parameters with values fixed to 2449 GeVminus201 GeVminus2 and 01 GeVminus2 respectively according to Ref [52]

Ignoring reconstruction and selection effects the DP probability density function wouldbe

Pphys

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)=

|A(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)|2intint

DP|A|2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)

(12)

where the dependence of A on the DP position has been suppressed in the denominator forbrevity The primary results of most Dalitz plot analyses are the complex coefficients asdefined in Eq (1) These however depend on the choice of phase convention amplitudeformalism and normalisation used in each analysis The convention-independent quantitiesof fit fractions and interference fit fractions provide a way to reliably compare resultsbetween different analyses Fit fractions are defined as the integral of the amplitude foreach intermediate component squared divided by that of the coherent matrix elementsquared for all intermediate contributions

FF j =

intintDP

∣∣cjFj (m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus))∣∣2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)intint

DP|A|2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)

(13)

The fit fractions need not sum to unity due to possible net constructive or destructiveinterference described by interference fit fractions defined (for i lt j only) by

FF ij =

intintDP

2Re[ciclowastjFiF

lowastj

]dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)intint

DP|A|2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)

(14)

where the dependence of F(lowast)i and A on the DP position has been omitted

9

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

Eff

icie

ncy

()

0

005

01

015

02

025(a)LHCb Simulation

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

Eff

icie

ncy

()

0

005

01

015

02

025(b)LHCb Simulation

Figure 4 Efficiency variation as a function of SDP position for candidates triggered by (a) signaldecay products and (b) by the rest of the event The vertical white stripe is due to the Dlowast vetoand the curved white band is due to the D0 veto

6 Dalitz plot fit

61 Signal efficiency

The variation of the efficiency across the phase space is studied in terms of the squareDalitz plot (SDP) The SDP is defined by variables mprime and θprime that range between 0 and 1and are given for the D0K+πminus case by

mprime equiv 1

πarccos

(2m(D0πminus)minusmmin

D0πminus

mmaxD0πminus minusmmin

D0πminus

minus 1

)and θprime equiv 1

πθ(D0πminus) (15)

where mmaxD0πminus = mB0 minusmK+ and mmin

D0πminus = mD0 + mπminus are the kinematic boundaries of

m(D0πminus) allowed in the B0 rarr D0K+πminus decay and θ(D0πminus) is the helicity angle of theD0πminus system (the angle between the K+ and the D0 meson in the D0πminus rest frame) Thedistribution of selected events across the SDP is shown in Fig 3(b)

Efficiency variation across the SDP is caused by the detector acceptance and bytrigger selection and PID requirements The efficiency is evaluated with simulated samplesgenerated uniformly over the SDP Data-driven corrections are applied to correct for knowndifferences between data and simulation in the tracking trigger and PID efficiencies usingidentical methods to those described in Ref [10] The efficiency functions are obtainedby fitting the corrected simulation with two-dimensional cubic splines Figure 4 showsthe histograms used to model the variation of the efficiency over the SDP for candidatestriggered by (a) signal decays and (b) by the rest of the event

62 Background studies

Among the background yields in the signal region given in Table 1 the only sizeablecomponents are due to combinatorial background and B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays The SDP

10

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

0

0002

0004

0006

0008

001

0012

0014

(a)LHCb

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

000020004000600080010012001400160018

(b)LHCb Simulation

Figure 5 SDP distributions of the background contributions from (a) combinatorial backgroundand (b) B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays

distributions of these backgrounds are described by the histograms shown in Fig 5Combinatorial background contributes 22 of candidates in the signal region The

shape of this contribution over the SDP is obtained from the high B mass sideband (5400ndash5900 MeV) As seen in Fig 2 this sideband is dominated by combinatorial backgroundwith a small contribution from B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays The SDP distribution of theB0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus contribution in the sideband region is modelled as described belowfor the signal region and is subtracted from the sideband sample To check that theSDP shape of the combinatorial background does not vary with the B candidate massa sample of doubly charged D0Kplusmnπplusmn candidates is investigated This confirms that theSDP distribution from the sideband is a reliable model for combinatorial background inthe signal region

The B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus contribution accounts for 16 of the candidates in the signalregion Its SDP distribution is obtained from a simulated sample with the B0 rarr D0π+πminus

and B0 rarr Dlowast0π+πminus contributions combined and reweighted as described in Sec 4 TheB0 rarr D0π+πminus decay mode is the dominant component of this background in the signalregion

Due to resolution effects B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ Dlowast(2010)minus rarr D0πminus decays are notentirely removed by the Dlowast veto Although this component corresponds to real B0 rarrD0πminusK+ decays it is treated as incoherent (ie as background) since its interference withthe remainder of the signal is negligible Its SDP distribution is modelled as a Gaussianpeak in m(D0πminus) with mean fixed to the known Dlowast(2010)minus mass and width and yielddetermined in the fit to data

11

Table 2 Signal contributions to the fit model where parameters and uncertainties are takenfrom Ref [37] The models are described in Sec 5

Resonance Spin DP axis Model Parameters

Klowast(892)0 1 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 89581plusmn 019 MeV Γ0 = 474plusmn 06 MeVKlowast(1410)0 1 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 1414plusmn 15 MeV Γ0 = 232plusmn 21 MeVKlowast0(1430)0 0 m2(K+πminus) LASS Determined from data (see text)Klowast2(1430)0 2 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 14324plusmn 13 MeV Γ0 = 109plusmn 5 MeVDlowast0(2400)minus 0 m2(D0πminus) RBW

Determined from data (see Table 3)Dlowast2(2460)minus 2 m2(D0πminus) RBW

Nonresonant 0 m2(D0πminus) dabba Fixed (see text)Nonresonant 1 m2(D0πminus) EFF Determined from data (see text)

63 Amplitude model for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays

The Dalitz plot fit is performed using the Laura++ [53] package The likelihood functionis given by

L =Ncprodi

[sumk

NkPk(m2i (D

0πminus)m2i (K

+πminus)) ]

(16)

where the index i runs over Nc candidates k runs over the signal and backgroundcomponents and Nk is the yield in each component The probability density function forthe signal component Psig is given by Eq (12) with the |A

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)|2

terms multiplied by the efficiency function described in Sec 61 As it is possible forthe minimisation procedure to find a local minimum of the negative log likelihood (NLL)profile the fit is repeated many times with randomised initial values to ensure the globalminimum is found

The nominal Dalitz plot fit model for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays is composed of severalresonant and nonresonant amplitudes Only those amplitudes that provide significantcontributions or that aid the fit stability are included Unnatural spin-parity states arenot considered as these do not decay to two pseudoscalars The eight amplitudes includedin this model are listed in Table 2 The width of the narrowest signal contribution tothe Dalitz plot (sim 50 MeV) is far larger than the mass resolution (sim 24 MeV) thereforeresolution effects are neglected

The real and imaginary parts of the complex coefficients cj defined in Eq (1) are freeparameters of the fit except for the coefficient of the Dlowast2(2460)minus component which is fixedto 1 as a reference The phases and magnitudes of the complex coefficients as well as fitfractions and interference fit fractions are derived from these free parameters In additionthe masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances are determined fromthe fit to data and are reported in Table 3 The statistical uncertainties on all parametersof interest are calculated using large samples of simulated pseudoexperiments Thesepseudoexperiments are also used to determine the correlations between the statisticaluncertainties on the parameters which are given in Appendix A The LASS parameters

12

Table 3 Masses and widths (MeV) determined in the fit to data with statistical uncertaintiesonly

Resonance Mass Width

Dlowast0(2400)minus 2360plusmn 15 255plusmn 26Dlowast2(2460)minus 24656plusmn 18 460plusmn 34

Table 4 Complex coefficients and fit fractions determined from the Dalitz plot fit Uncertaintiesare statistical only Note that the fit fractions magnitudes and phases are derived quantities

Resonance Fit fraction Isobar model coefficients() Real part Imaginary part Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 minus000plusmn 015 minus127plusmn 006 127plusmn 006 minus157plusmn 011Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 015plusmn 006 minus009plusmn 009 018plusmn 007 minus054plusmn 021Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 014plusmn 038 045plusmn 015 047plusmn 009 127plusmn 095LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 minus010plusmn 024 044plusmn 014 046plusmn 014 179plusmn 065

LASS total 67plusmn 27Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 minus032plusmn 009 minus047plusmn 007 057plusmn 005 minus216plusmn 019Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 minus080plusmn 008 minus044plusmn 014 091plusmn 007 minus264plusmn 015Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 100 000 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 minus039plusmn 009 036plusmn 017 053plusmn 007 240plusmn 027Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 minus062plusmn 006 minus003plusmn 006 062plusmn 006 minus309plusmn 010Total fit fraction 1134

are determined to be m0 = 1450plusmn 80 MeV Γ0 = 400plusmn 230 MeV a = 32plusmn 18 GeV andr = 09plusmn11 GeV while the parameter of the EFF lineshape of the Dπ P-wave nonresonantamplitude is determined to be α = 088plusmn 010 GeVminus2

The values of the fit fractions and complex coefficients obtained from the fit are shownin Table 4 while the values of the interference fit fractions are given in Appendix B Thesum of the fit fractions is seen to exceed unity mostly due to interference within the Dπ andKπ S-waves Note that in Table 4 and all results for fit fractions and derived quantitiesvalues are reported separately for both the Klowast0 (1430)0 and nonresonant components of theLASS lineshape as well as their coherent sum

Projections of the data and the nominal fit model onto m(K+πminus) m(D0πminus) andm(D0K+) are shown in Fig 6 Zooms are provided in the regions of the main resonantcontributions in Fig 7 Projections onto the cosine of the helicity angle of the D0πminus andK+πminus systems are shown in Figs 8 and 9 respectively These projections all show goodagreement between data and the fit model

Angular moments provide a useful method to investigate the helicity structure of thedecays The angular moments in m(D0πminus) and m(K+πminus) obtained as in Refs [1011]are shown in Figs 10 and 11 respectively The contributions due to the Klowast(892)0 andDlowast2(2460)minus resonances are seen as peaks in moments up to order 2 and order 4 respectivelyas expected for spin-1 and spin-2 resonances Reflections make the interpretation ofmoments at higher masses more difficult However the good agreement seen between data

13

and the fit model provides further support for the fit model being a good description ofthe data

The quality of the fit is evaluated by determining a two-dimensional χ2 value comparingthe data and fit model in 144 bins across the SDP that are defined adaptively to ensurethey are approximately equally populated The pull in each of these bins defined as thedifference between the data and the fit model divided by the uncertainty is shown inFig 12 The effective number of degrees of freedom of the χ2 is between Nbins minusNpars minus 1and Nbinsminus1 where Npars is the number of free parameters in the fit yielding a reduced χ2

in the range 099 ndash 122 Additional unbinned tests of fit quality [54] also show acceptableagreement between the data and the fit model

7 Systematic uncertainties

Systematic uncertainties are considered from sources that can be divided into two categoriesexperimental and model uncertainties Experimental uncertainties arise due to the signaland background yields in the signal region the distributions of the background componentsacross the SDP the variation of efficiency across the SDP and possible bias due to thefitting procedure Model uncertainties are considered due to the fixed parameters in thesignal model the addition or removal of marginal amplitudes and the choice of models forthe Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves The uncertainties due to all of these sourcesare combined in quadrature

The signal and background yields are determined from the fit to the B candidateinvariant mass distribution Systematic uncertainties are considered on the total yieldsdue to both statistical and systematic variations of these yields as evaluated in Ref [15]The yields in the signal region are varied appropriately and the effects of these variationson the parameters of interest are assigned as systematic uncertainties

The histograms describing the background distributions are each varied within statisticaluncertainties to establish the uncertainty due to the imperfect knowledge of the distributionof these backgrounds across the SDP The histograms describing the efficiency variationacross the SDP are also varied within their uncertainties prior to the spline fit Theefficiency histograms are also varied with local correlations to account for the effects ofany unknown correlations between neighbouring bins For each parameter the largeruncertainty is considered from the correlated and uncorrelated variations In addition thebinning scheme of the control sample used to evaluate PID performance is varied

An ensemble of pseudoexperiments is used to establish systematic uncertainties relatedto any potential fit bias Pseudoexperiments are generated using the parameters determinedin the fit to data and mean fitted values of the parameters are determined from Gaussianfits to the distributions of results obtained in the ensemble The differences between thegenerated and mean fitted values are found to be small Uncertainties are determined asthe sum in quadrature of the difference between the generated and mean fitted values andthe uncertainty on the mean fitted value from the Gaussian fit

Systematic uncertainties due to fixed parameters in the fit model are determined by

14

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310LHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350 LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310 LHCb (d)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

LHCb (e)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210LHCb (f)

Data Total fit 0(892)K 0(1410)K

S-wave (LASS)πK 0(1430)2Kminus

(2400)0Dminus

(2460)2D

S-wave (EFF)πD P-wave (EFF)πDminus

D Background

Figure 6 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) (c) m(K+πminus)and (e) m(D0K+) with the same projections shown in (b) (d) and (f) with a logarithmic y-axisscale Components are described in the legend

15

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

235 24 245 25 255

Can

dida

tes

4 M

eV

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m05 1 15

Can

dida

tes

13

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

LHCb (b)

Figure 7 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) in the Dlowast2(2460)minus

region and (b) the low m(K+πminus) region Components are as shown in Fig 6

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

) lt 235 GeVminusπ0D(m204 lt

LHCb(a)

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

) lt 255 GeVminusπ0D(m235 lt

LHCb(b)

Figure 8 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(D0πminus) in the mass ranges(a) 204 lt m(D0πminus) lt 235 GeV and (b) 235 lt m(D0πminus) lt 255 GeV Components are asshown in Fig 6

repeating the fit with these parameters varied The fixed masses and widths are variedwithin their uncertainties as shown in Table 2 while the BlattndashWeisskopf barrier radii rBWare varied independently for D0πminus and K+πminus resonances between 3 and 5 GeVminus1 [10]

The Klowast(1410)0 amplitude does not contribute significantly to the nominal fit modelso the fit is repeated with this component removed and the change in results is assignedas the associated systematic uncertainty In addition uncertainties are assigned fromthe changes in the results when an amplitude due to the Klowast(1680)0 resonance or from avirtual Blowast(5325)+ component as described in Ref [10] is included in the model

A Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D0Kminusπ+ observed both spin-1 and spin-3 resonances

at m(D0Kminus) sim 286 GeV [9 10] A spin-3 resonance has also been seen at m(D0πminus) sim276 GeV in B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] while an analysis of B+ rarr DminusK+π+ shows aspin-1 resonance at similar m(D+πminus) values [11] Uncertainties are assigned corresponding

16

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

) lt 08 GeVminusπ+K(m0 lt LHCb

(a)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 10 GeVminusπ+K(m08 lt LHCb

(b)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 13 GeVminusπ+K(m10 lt LHCb

(c)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

) lt 15 GeVminusπ+K(m14 lt LHCb

(d)

Figure 9 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(K+πminus) in the mass ranges(a) m(K+πminus) lt 08 GeV (b) 08 lt m(K+πminus) lt 10 GeV (c) 10 lt m(K+πminus) lt 13 GeV and(d) 14 lt m(K+πminus) lt 15 GeV Components are as shown in Fig 6

to the changes in results when either a spin-1 or spin-3 state at m(D0πminus) sim 276 GeV isadded to the nominal model

The LASS model used to describe the Kπ S-wave is replaced with a Flatte shape [55]which accounts for the Kηprime threshold near the Klowast0 (1430)0 mass and a resonant term witha modified mass dependent width [52] for the κ (also known as Klowast0(800)) state Thismodel gives an NLL that is worse by 44 units A model-independent description of theKπ S-wave is also used to fit the data with the uncertainty on each parameter takenas the larger of the two differences This alternative improves the NLL by 88 units butintroduces an additional four free parameters into the fit The dabba lineshape used todescribe the D0πminus S-wave is replaced with an EFF lineshape while a power-law model isintroduced as an alternative to the EFF lineshape that describes the D0πminus P-wave Thesealterations worsen the NLL by 30 units and improve it by 08 units respectively

The total systematic uncertainties due to experimental and model effects for fit fractionsand complex coefficients are given together with the results in Sec 8 The contributionsfrom different sources to the systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions masses and

17

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0002004006008

0101201401601802

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-30-25-20-15-10

-505

1015

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

310timesLHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

310timesLHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-8-6-4-202468

310timesLHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-8-6-4-20246

310timesLHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-6-4-202468

10

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 10 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(D0πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

18

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0

005

01

015

02

025

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

20

40

60

80

100310times

LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10-505

10152025

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25310times

LHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-20-15-10

-505

101520

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 11 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(K+πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

19

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Pull

-2

-1

0

1

2

LHCb

Figure 12 Differences between the data SDP distribution and the fit model across the SDP interms of the per-bin pull

Table 5 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths(MeV) Uncertainties given on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value SB fraction Efficiency Background SDP Fit bias Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 060 083 050 031 117Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 006 039 069 005 080Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 028 148 185 033 241LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 051 225 286 086 377

LASS total 67plusmn 27 026 186 160 102 267Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 023 072 053 054 107Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 021 139 143 040 204Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 070 070 049 015 111Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 003 081 059 057 115Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 086 191 052 038 219m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 46 81 70 37 122m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 001 037 022 029 051Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 28 131 139 48 199Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 05 09 09 05 14

widths are given in Tables 5 and 6 The dominant experimental systematic uncertaintyon most parameters is due to either the efficiency variation or background distributionsacross the SDP while the model uncertainties are generally dominated by the effects ofalternative descriptions of the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves For the parametersof broad components the model uncertainties dominate however for other parameters thestatistical experimental and model uncertainties are all of a similar magnitude

The stability of the fit results is confirmed by several cross-checks The data sample isdivided into subsamples according to the flavour of the B candidate the trigger decision

20

Table 6 Model uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths (MeV) Uncertaintiesgiven on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value Fixed parameters Addremove Alternative models Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 075 114 109 174Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 018 070 022 076Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 079 330 023 340LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 110 399 520 665

LASS total 67plusmn 27 053 142 521 543Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 036 187 056 198Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 055 195 711 740Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 018 073 099 124Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 027 140 346 374Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 031 199 215 295m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 61 93 256 279m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 009 105 048 115Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 40 180 435 472Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 14 05 24 29

the polarity of the magnet and the year of data taking Each subsample is fitted separatelyand all are seen to be consistent with the nominal fit results The fit is also repeatedwith additional resonance components to test the fit model Resonances up to spin-3 wereconsidered for all three pairs of daughters with the mass and width allowed to vary in thefit No additional significant contributions were observed

8 Results and summary

The results for the complex coefficients are reported in Table 7 with results for thefit fractions given in Table 8 The results for the interference fit fractions are givenin Appendix B Upper limits are determined on the fit fractions of the Klowast(1410)0 andDlowast3(2760)minus components which do not give significant contributions using the methoddescribed in Ref [10]

The fit fractions for resonant contributions are converted into quasi-two-body productbranching fractions by multiplying by B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus) = (92plusmn 06plusmn 07plusmn 06)times 10minus5which is obtained from the ratio of branching fractions B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus)B(B0 rarrD0π+πminus) [15] multiplied by the latest result for B(B0 rarr D0π+πminus) [12] accounting forthe different Dlowast(2010)minus veto windows used in the analyses and for the 37 residualbackground due to B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ decays The statistical correlation between theresults of Ref [15] and this analysis is found to be negligible The results for the productbranching fractions are shown in Table 9 For the K+πminus resonances where the branchingfractions to Kπ are known the product branching fractions are converted to the Bdecay branching fractions shown in Table 10 The results for B(B0 rarr D0Klowast(892)0) andB(B0 rarr Dlowast2(2460)minusK+)times B(Dlowast2(2460)minus rarr D0πminus) are consistent with and more precisethan previous measurements [14 1617]

21

Table 7 Results for the complex amplitudes and their uncertainties presented (top) in terms ofreal and imaginary parts and (bottom) in terms and magnitudes and phases The three quotederrors are statistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively

Resonance Real part Imaginary part

Klowast(892)0 minus000plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 034 minus127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 006Klowast(1410)0 015plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 009 minus009plusmn 009plusmn 018plusmn 018Klowast0(1430)0 014plusmn 038plusmn 048plusmn 038 045plusmn 015plusmn 037plusmn 017LASS nonresonant minus010plusmn 024plusmn 016plusmn 042 044plusmn 014plusmn 017plusmn 023Klowast2(1430)0 minus032plusmn 009plusmn 015plusmn 023 minus047plusmn 007plusmn 014plusmn 015Dlowast0(2400)minus minus080plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 022 minus044plusmn 014plusmn 012plusmn 018Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) minus039plusmn 009plusmn 009plusmn 014 036plusmn 017plusmn 014plusmn 023Dπ P-wave (EFF) minus062plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 011 minus003plusmn 006plusmn 005plusmn 010

Resonance Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 005 minus157plusmn 011plusmn 016plusmn 027Klowast(1410)0 018plusmn 007plusmn 010plusmn 011 minus054plusmn 021plusmn 055plusmn 104Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 009plusmn 010plusmn 014 127plusmn 095plusmn 104plusmn 081LASS nonresonant 046plusmn 014plusmn 016plusmn 029 179plusmn 065plusmn 035plusmn 069Klowast2(1430)0 057plusmn 005plusmn 004plusmn 008 minus216plusmn 019plusmn 043plusmn 043Dlowast0(2400)minus 091plusmn 007plusmn 006plusmn 017 minus264plusmn 015plusmn 014plusmn 023Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 053plusmn 007plusmn 004plusmn 014 240plusmn 027plusmn 024plusmn 044Dπ P-wave (EFF) 062plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 011 minus309plusmn 010plusmn 007plusmn 017

Table 8 Results for the fit fractions and their uncertainties () The three quoted errors arestatistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively Upper limits are givenat 90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Fit fraction Upper limitKlowast(892)0 374plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 17Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03plusmn 08plusmn 08 lt 32 (37)Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20plusmn 24plusmn 34LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38plusmn 38plusmn 67

LASS total 67plusmn 27plusmn 27plusmn 54Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17plusmn 11plusmn 20Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28plusmn 20plusmn 74Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12plusmn 11plusmn 12Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 10 (11)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14plusmn 12plusmn 37Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16plusmn 22plusmn 30

22

Table 9 Results for the product branching fractions The four quoted errors are statisticalexperimental systematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Product branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 342plusmn 013plusmn 010plusmn 016plusmn 040Klowast(1410)0 007plusmn 003plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 001 lt 029 (034)Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 018plusmn 022plusmn 031plusmn 005LASS nonresonant 044plusmn 034plusmn 034plusmn 061plusmn 005

LASS total 061plusmn 025plusmn 025plusmn 049plusmn 007Klowast2(1430)0 068plusmn 015plusmn 010plusmn 018plusmn 008Dlowast0(2400)minus 177plusmn 026plusmn 019plusmn 067plusmn 020Dlowast2(2460)minus 212plusmn 010plusmn 011plusmn 011plusmn 025Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 010 (011)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 060plusmn 013plusmn 011plusmn 034plusmn 007Dπ P-wave (EFF) 081plusmn 015plusmn 020plusmn 027plusmn 009

Table 10 Results for the branching fractions The four quoted errors are statistical experimentalsystematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at 90 (95 )confidence level

Resonance Branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 513plusmn 020plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 060Klowast(1410)0 159plusmn 068plusmn 181plusmn 159plusmn 036 lt 67 (78)Klowast0(1430)0 071plusmn 027plusmn 033plusmn 047plusmn 008LASS nonresonant 066plusmn 051plusmn 051plusmn 092plusmn 008

LASS total 092plusmn 038plusmn 038plusmn 074plusmn 011Klowast2(1430)0 204plusmn 045plusmn 030plusmn 054plusmn 025

The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus states are found to be

m(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (2360plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 28) MeV

Γ(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (255plusmn 26plusmn 20plusmn 47) MeV

m(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (24656plusmn 18plusmn 05plusmn 12) MeV

Γ(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (460plusmn 34plusmn 14plusmn 29) MeV

where the three uncertainties are statistical experimental systematic and model systematicrespectively These are consistent with though less precise than recent results from a DPanalysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] They also show good agreement with and havesimilar precision to earlier measurements of these quantities [1337]

In summary the first amplitude analysis of B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays has been presentedusing a data sample corresponding to 30 fbminus1 of pp collision data collected by the LHCbexperiment A good description of the data is obtained with a model containing contri-

23

butions from intermediate Klowast(892)0 Klowast(1410)0 Klowast2(1430)0 and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonanceswith additional components to describe broad structures in the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S-and P-waves The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances aremeasured as are the complex amplitudes and fit fractions for all components includedin the amplitude model The results can be used in conjunction with an analysis ofB0 rarr DK+πminus decays where the neutral D meson is reconstructed in final states such asK+Kminus to measure the CKM unitarity triangle parameter γ [1 2]

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to our colleagues in the CERN accelerator departments forthe excellent performance of the LHC We thank the technical and administrative staffat the LHCb institutes We acknowledge support from CERN and from the nationalagencies CAPES CNPq FAPERJ and FINEP (Brazil) NSFC (China) CNRSIN2P3(France) BMBF DFG HGF and MPG (Germany) INFN (Italy) FOM and NWO (TheNetherlands) MNiSW and NCN (Poland) MENIFA (Romania) MinES and FANO(Russia) MinECo (Spain) SNSF and SER (Switzerland) NASU (Ukraine) STFC (UnitedKingdom) NSF (USA) The Tier1 computing centres are supported by IN2P3 (France)KIT and BMBF (Germany) INFN (Italy) NWO and SURF (The Netherlands) PIC(Spain) GridPP (United Kingdom) We are indebted to the communities behind themultiple open source software packages on which we depend We are also thankful forthe computing resources and the access to software RampD tools provided by Yandex LLC(Russia) Individual groups or members have received support from EPLANET MarieSk lodowska-Curie Actions and ERC (European Union) Conseil general de Haute-SavoieLabex ENIGMASS and OCEVU Region Auvergne (France) RFBR (Russia) XuntaGaland GENCAT (Spain) Royal Society and Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851(United Kingdom)

24

Appendices

A Correlation matrices

The statistical correlations between the complex coefficients masses and widths determinedfrom the fit to data are given in terms of real and imaginary parts and in terms ofmagnitudes and phases in Tables 11 and 12 The correlations are determined using thesame sample of simulated pseudoexperiments used to calculate the statistical uncertaintieson fit parameters

B Results for interference fit fractions

The central values of the interference fit fractions are given in Table 13 The statisti-cal experimental systematic and model uncertainties on these quantities are given inTables 14 15 and 16

25

Tab

le11

Sta

tist

ical

corr

elat

ions

bet

wee

nth

ere

al(x

)an

dim

agin

ary

(y)

par

tsof

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

x0

y 0x

1y 1

x2

y 2x

3y 3

x4

y 4x

5y 5

x7

y 7x

8y 8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

x0

100

014

002

017minus

018

015minus

017

003

039minus

037

016minus

009minus

018minus

029

007minus

037minus

019

002

004

012

y 01

00minus

006minus

008

009minus

011minus

000

014

003

003

012

013minus

012minus

024

035minus

007

009

012

001minus

004

x1

100minus

009minus

008minus

014minus

004

029minus

001

003minus

020

018minus

021minus

031minus

017minus

036minus

008minus

017minus

023

002

y 11

000

050

340

09minus

001

060minus

039

002minus

003minus

003

007minus

002minus

004minus

016minus

002

007

002

x2

100minus

013

081

009

014minus

016minus

015

021

010

013

004minus

015minus

007

001minus

025

001

y 21

000

080

280

24minus

036minus

013

008minus

004minus

001minus

004

004minus

002minus

001minus

009minus

010

x3

100

020

013minus

034minus

010

033minus

008

008minus

004minus

005minus

007minus

003minus

033minus

009

y 31

00minus

012minus

012minus

051

029minus

034minus

053

009minus

012

009minus

014minus

036

001

x4

100minus

053

032minus

010minus

020

003

002minus

027minus

017minus

006

010minus

000

y 41

000

06minus

009

040

010

014

016

011minus

005

007minus

003

x5

100minus

029minus

003

022

002

004minus

008

002

045minus

006

y 51

00minus

031minus

034

006

003

024minus

014minus

072minus

033

x7

100

046

005

010minus

011minus

001

027

017

y 71

00minus

016

036minus

001

017

032

008

x8

100minus

003

001minus

006minus

009minus

014

y 81

000

290

020

15minus

002

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

26

Tab

le12

S

tati

stic

alco

rrel

atio

ns

bet

wee

nth

em

agnit

ud

es(a

)an

dp

has

es(∆

)of

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

a0

∆0

a1

∆1

a2

∆2

a3

∆3

a4

∆4

a5

∆5

a7

∆7

a8

∆8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

a0

100minus

011minus

008

005

024

003minus

014

004

004

001

021

002

022minus

022

038minus

000minus

004minus

009minus

001

004

∆0

100minus

010

012

003

020

014

014minus

001

045minus

005

010minus

008

035minus

007

005minus

022

006

007

009

a1

100minus

035minus

025

006

032

001minus

001minus

038

004minus

022minus

006

031

002

024

007minus

018minus

020

001

∆1

100

024

015

016

000

014

038minus

018minus

013

016

026

022minus

006minus

009minus

004minus

012

005

a2

100

004

011minus

028minus

007

039minus

009

007

027

010

001

001minus

015

004minus

003minus

013

∆2

100

015

077minus

020minus

010minus

001

024

009

013

003minus

009

005

001

023minus

010

a3

100minus

006

000minus

011

016minus

030minus

012

056

001

012

002minus

007minus

027minus

004

∆3

100minus

028minus

019

015

041minus

024minus

008minus

000minus

013

004

002

041

008

a4

100

013

005minus

017

014

018minus

000

006

000

014minus

019minus

009

∆4

100minus

016

016

017

012

000minus

002minus

019minus

003

003

001

a5

100

024minus

026minus

006

011

005minus

007

001

019

039

∆5

100minus

000minus

028minus

001minus

020minus

020

015

076

027

a7

100minus

001

017minus

006

004

013minus

005minus

024

∆7

100minus

012

037

003minus

000minus

027minus

012

a8

100minus

004minus

001

004

006

015

∆8

100minus

037minus

002minus

033minus

001

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

27

Table 13 Interference fit fractions () from the nominal DP fit The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 374 18 minus00 00 00 minus24 minus02 minus26 minus50A1 07 minus00 00 00 minus11 minus03 minus06 minus11A2 51 minus32 minus00 29 15 16 19A3 48 00 minus84 01 21 02A4 74 minus03 minus10 minus15 minus04A5 193 minus00 28 00A6 231 minus00 00A7 66 minus00A8 89

Table 14 Statistical uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes areall pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASSnonresonant (A4) Klowast2 (1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8)Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 15 07 00 00 00 09 04 04 05A1 03 00 00 00 07 03 04 05A2 20 26 00 11 05 15 05A3 38 00 32 04 34 08A4 17 06 01 06 05A5 28 00 31 00A6 12 00 00A7 14 00A8 16

28

Table 15 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () Theamplitudes are all pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0 (1430)0(A3) LASS nonresonant (A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave(dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fitfractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 12 05 00 00 00 23 02 04 05A1 08 00 00 00 04 08 07 09A2 24 31 00 14 20 26 11A3 38 00 36 02 26 03A4 11 22 02 05 10A5 20 00 40 00A6 11 00 00A7 12 00A8 22

Table 16 Model uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 17 08 00 00 00 26 07 08 14A1 08 00 00 00 08 06 08 11A2 34 29 00 58 17 36 27A3 66 00 83 03 35 07A4 20 17 02 12 10A5 74 00 45 00A6 12 00 00A7 37 00A8 29

29

References

[1] T Gershon On the measurement of the unitarity triangle angle γ from B0 rarr DKlowast0

decays Phys Rev D79 (2009) 051301(R) arXiv08102706

[2] T Gershon and M Williams Prospects for the measurement of the unitaritytriangle angle γ from B0 rarr DK+πminus decays Phys Rev D80 (2009) 092002arXiv09091495

[3] N Cabibbo Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays Phys Rev Lett 10 (1963) 531

[4] M Kobayashi and T Maskawa CP -violation in the renormalizable theory of weakinteraction Progress of Theoretical Physics 49 (1973) 652

[5] M Gronau and D London How to determine all the angles of the unitarity trianglefrom B0 rarr DK0

S and B0s rarr Dφ Phys Lett B253 (1991) 483

[6] M Gronau and D Wyler On determining a weak phase from CP asymmetries incharged B decays Phys Lett B265 (1991) 172

[7] I Dunietz CP violation with self-tagging Bd modes Phys Lett B270 (1991) 75

[8] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurement of CP violation parameters inB0 rarr DKlowast0 decays Phys Rev D90 (2014) 112002 arXiv14078136

[9] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of overlapping spin-1 and spin-

3 D0Kminus resonances at mass 286 GeVc2 Phys Rev Lett 113 (2014) 162001

arXiv14077574

[10] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ decays

Phys Rev D90 (2014) 072003 arXiv14077712

[11] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observation and amplitude analysis of theBminus rarr D+Kminusπminus decay Phys Rev D91 (2015) 092002 arXiv150302995

[12] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays

arXiv150501710 submitted to Phys Rev D

[13] Belle collaboration A Kuzmin et al Study of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays Phys RevD76 (2007) 012006 arXivhep-ex0611054

[14] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of branching fractions andresonance contributions for B0 rarr D0K+πminus and search for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decaysPhys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 011803 arXivhep-ex0509036

[15] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurements of the branching fractions of

the decays B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ and B0 rarr D

0K+πminus Phys Rev D87 (2013) 112009

arXiv13046317

30

[16] Belle collaboration P Krokovny et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K0 and B0 rarr D0Klowast0

decays Phys Rev Lett 90 (2003) 141802 arXivhep-ex0212066

[17] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of B0 rarr D(lowast)0K(lowast)0 branchingfractions Phys Rev D74 (2006) 031101 arXivhep-ex0604016

[18] LHCb collaboration A A Alves Jr et al The LHCb detector at the LHC JINST 3(2008) S08005

[19] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al LHCb detector performance Int J Mod PhysA30 (2015) 1530022 arXiv14126352

[20] R Aaij et al Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator JINST 9 (2014) P09007arXiv14057808

[21] R Arink et al Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker JINST 9 (2014) P01002arXiv13113893

[22] M Adinolfi et al Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Eur PhysJ C73 (2013) 2431 arXiv12116759

[23] A A Alves Jr et al Performance of the LHCb muon system JINST 8 (2013) P02022arXiv12111346

[24] R Aaij et al The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011 JINST 8 (2013) P04022arXiv12113055

[25] V V Gligorov and M Williams Efficient reliable and fast high-level triggering usinga bonsai boosted decision tree JINST 8 (2013) P02013 arXiv12106861

[26] T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P Skands PYTHIA 64 physics and manual JHEP05 (2006) 026 arXivhep-ph0603175 T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P SkandsA brief introduction to PYTHIA 81 Comput Phys Commun 178 (2008) 852arXiv07103820

[27] I Belyaev et al Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss the LHCbsimulation framework J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032047

[28] D J Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package Nucl Instrum MethA462 (2001) 152

[29] P Golonka and Z Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo A precision tool for QED correctionsin Z and W decays Eur Phys J C45 (2006) 97 arXivhep-ph0506026

[30] Geant4 collaboration J Allison et al Geant4 developments and applications IEEETrans Nucl Sci 53 (2006) 270 Geant4 collaboration S Agostinelli et al Geant4A simulation toolkit Nucl Instrum Meth A506 (2003) 250

31

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 10: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

The barrier factors are angular momentum dependent and are given by

L = 0 X(z) = 1

L = 1 X(z) =radic

1+z201+z2

L = 2 X(z) =radic

z40+3z20+9

z4+3z2+9

L = 3 X(z) =radic

z60+6z40+45z20+225

z6+6z4+45z2+225

(3)

where z0 is the value of z at the pole mass of the resonance and L is the orbital angularmomentum between the resonance and the bachelor particle Since the parent and daughterparticles all have zero spin L is also the spin of the resonance

The T (~p ~q) terms describe the angular distributions in the Zemach tensor formalism [4748] and are given by

L = 0 T (~p ~q) = 1 L = 1 T (~p ~q) = minus 2 ~p middot ~q L = 2 T (~p ~q) = 4

3[3(~p middot ~q )2 minus (|~p ||~q |)2]

L = 3 T (~p ~q) = minus 2415

[5(~p middot ~q )3 minus 3(~p middot ~q )(|~p ||~q |)2]

(4)

These expressions are proportional to the Legendre polynomials PL(x) where x is thecosine of the angle between ~p and ~q (referred to as the helicity angle)

The R(m(D0πminus)

)functions are the mass lineshapes Resonant contributions are

typically described by the relativistic BreitndashWigner (RBW) function

R(m) =1

(m20 minusm2)minus im0Γ(m)

(5)

where the mass-dependent decay width is

Γ(m) = Γ0

(q

q0

)2L+1 (m0

m

)X2(q rBW) (6)

where q0 is the value of q = |~q | when the invariant mass is equal to the pole mass of theresonance m0

The large phase space available in B decays allows for the presence of nonresonantamplitudes (ie contributions that do not proceed via a known resonance) that vary acrossthe Dalitz plot An exponential form factor (EFF) has been found to describe nonresonantcontributions well in several DP analyses of B decays [49]

R(m) = exp[minusαm2

] (7)

where α is a shape parameter that must be determined from the data and m is a two-bodyinvariant mass (m(D0πminus) in this example)

The RBW function is a good model for narrow resonances that are well separated fromany other resonant or nonresonant contribution of the same spin This approach is known

8

to break down in the Kπ S-wave because the Klowast0(1430) resonance interferes strongly witha slowly varying nonresonant term as described in Ref [50] The LASS lineshape [51] hasbeen developed to combine these two contributions

R(m) =m

q cot δB minus iq+ exp [2iδB]

m0Γ0m0

q0

(m20 minusm2)minus im0Γ0

qmm0

q0

(8)

where cot δB =1

aq+

1

2rq (9)

and where m0 and Γ0 are the pole mass and width of the Klowast0(1430) state and a and r areshape parameters

The Dπ S-wave nonresonant contribution can be described by the ldquodabbardquo line-shape [52] defined as

R(m) =Bprime(m2)(m2 minus sA)ρ

1minus β(m2 minusm2min)minus iBprime(m2)(m2 minus sA)ρ

(10)

whereBprime(m2) = b exp

[minusα(m2 minusm2

min)] (11)

Here mmin is the invariant mass at threshold sA = m2D minus 05m2

π is the Adler zero ρ isa phase-space factor and b α and β are parameters with values fixed to 2449 GeVminus201 GeVminus2 and 01 GeVminus2 respectively according to Ref [52]

Ignoring reconstruction and selection effects the DP probability density function wouldbe

Pphys

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)=

|A(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)|2intint

DP|A|2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)

(12)

where the dependence of A on the DP position has been suppressed in the denominator forbrevity The primary results of most Dalitz plot analyses are the complex coefficients asdefined in Eq (1) These however depend on the choice of phase convention amplitudeformalism and normalisation used in each analysis The convention-independent quantitiesof fit fractions and interference fit fractions provide a way to reliably compare resultsbetween different analyses Fit fractions are defined as the integral of the amplitude foreach intermediate component squared divided by that of the coherent matrix elementsquared for all intermediate contributions

FF j =

intintDP

∣∣cjFj (m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus))∣∣2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)intint

DP|A|2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)

(13)

The fit fractions need not sum to unity due to possible net constructive or destructiveinterference described by interference fit fractions defined (for i lt j only) by

FF ij =

intintDP

2Re[ciclowastjFiF

lowastj

]dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)intint

DP|A|2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)

(14)

where the dependence of F(lowast)i and A on the DP position has been omitted

9

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

Eff

icie

ncy

()

0

005

01

015

02

025(a)LHCb Simulation

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

Eff

icie

ncy

()

0

005

01

015

02

025(b)LHCb Simulation

Figure 4 Efficiency variation as a function of SDP position for candidates triggered by (a) signaldecay products and (b) by the rest of the event The vertical white stripe is due to the Dlowast vetoand the curved white band is due to the D0 veto

6 Dalitz plot fit

61 Signal efficiency

The variation of the efficiency across the phase space is studied in terms of the squareDalitz plot (SDP) The SDP is defined by variables mprime and θprime that range between 0 and 1and are given for the D0K+πminus case by

mprime equiv 1

πarccos

(2m(D0πminus)minusmmin

D0πminus

mmaxD0πminus minusmmin

D0πminus

minus 1

)and θprime equiv 1

πθ(D0πminus) (15)

where mmaxD0πminus = mB0 minusmK+ and mmin

D0πminus = mD0 + mπminus are the kinematic boundaries of

m(D0πminus) allowed in the B0 rarr D0K+πminus decay and θ(D0πminus) is the helicity angle of theD0πminus system (the angle between the K+ and the D0 meson in the D0πminus rest frame) Thedistribution of selected events across the SDP is shown in Fig 3(b)

Efficiency variation across the SDP is caused by the detector acceptance and bytrigger selection and PID requirements The efficiency is evaluated with simulated samplesgenerated uniformly over the SDP Data-driven corrections are applied to correct for knowndifferences between data and simulation in the tracking trigger and PID efficiencies usingidentical methods to those described in Ref [10] The efficiency functions are obtainedby fitting the corrected simulation with two-dimensional cubic splines Figure 4 showsthe histograms used to model the variation of the efficiency over the SDP for candidatestriggered by (a) signal decays and (b) by the rest of the event

62 Background studies

Among the background yields in the signal region given in Table 1 the only sizeablecomponents are due to combinatorial background and B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays The SDP

10

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

0

0002

0004

0006

0008

001

0012

0014

(a)LHCb

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

000020004000600080010012001400160018

(b)LHCb Simulation

Figure 5 SDP distributions of the background contributions from (a) combinatorial backgroundand (b) B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays

distributions of these backgrounds are described by the histograms shown in Fig 5Combinatorial background contributes 22 of candidates in the signal region The

shape of this contribution over the SDP is obtained from the high B mass sideband (5400ndash5900 MeV) As seen in Fig 2 this sideband is dominated by combinatorial backgroundwith a small contribution from B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays The SDP distribution of theB0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus contribution in the sideband region is modelled as described belowfor the signal region and is subtracted from the sideband sample To check that theSDP shape of the combinatorial background does not vary with the B candidate massa sample of doubly charged D0Kplusmnπplusmn candidates is investigated This confirms that theSDP distribution from the sideband is a reliable model for combinatorial background inthe signal region

The B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus contribution accounts for 16 of the candidates in the signalregion Its SDP distribution is obtained from a simulated sample with the B0 rarr D0π+πminus

and B0 rarr Dlowast0π+πminus contributions combined and reweighted as described in Sec 4 TheB0 rarr D0π+πminus decay mode is the dominant component of this background in the signalregion

Due to resolution effects B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ Dlowast(2010)minus rarr D0πminus decays are notentirely removed by the Dlowast veto Although this component corresponds to real B0 rarrD0πminusK+ decays it is treated as incoherent (ie as background) since its interference withthe remainder of the signal is negligible Its SDP distribution is modelled as a Gaussianpeak in m(D0πminus) with mean fixed to the known Dlowast(2010)minus mass and width and yielddetermined in the fit to data

11

Table 2 Signal contributions to the fit model where parameters and uncertainties are takenfrom Ref [37] The models are described in Sec 5

Resonance Spin DP axis Model Parameters

Klowast(892)0 1 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 89581plusmn 019 MeV Γ0 = 474plusmn 06 MeVKlowast(1410)0 1 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 1414plusmn 15 MeV Γ0 = 232plusmn 21 MeVKlowast0(1430)0 0 m2(K+πminus) LASS Determined from data (see text)Klowast2(1430)0 2 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 14324plusmn 13 MeV Γ0 = 109plusmn 5 MeVDlowast0(2400)minus 0 m2(D0πminus) RBW

Determined from data (see Table 3)Dlowast2(2460)minus 2 m2(D0πminus) RBW

Nonresonant 0 m2(D0πminus) dabba Fixed (see text)Nonresonant 1 m2(D0πminus) EFF Determined from data (see text)

63 Amplitude model for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays

The Dalitz plot fit is performed using the Laura++ [53] package The likelihood functionis given by

L =Ncprodi

[sumk

NkPk(m2i (D

0πminus)m2i (K

+πminus)) ]

(16)

where the index i runs over Nc candidates k runs over the signal and backgroundcomponents and Nk is the yield in each component The probability density function forthe signal component Psig is given by Eq (12) with the |A

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)|2

terms multiplied by the efficiency function described in Sec 61 As it is possible forthe minimisation procedure to find a local minimum of the negative log likelihood (NLL)profile the fit is repeated many times with randomised initial values to ensure the globalminimum is found

The nominal Dalitz plot fit model for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays is composed of severalresonant and nonresonant amplitudes Only those amplitudes that provide significantcontributions or that aid the fit stability are included Unnatural spin-parity states arenot considered as these do not decay to two pseudoscalars The eight amplitudes includedin this model are listed in Table 2 The width of the narrowest signal contribution tothe Dalitz plot (sim 50 MeV) is far larger than the mass resolution (sim 24 MeV) thereforeresolution effects are neglected

The real and imaginary parts of the complex coefficients cj defined in Eq (1) are freeparameters of the fit except for the coefficient of the Dlowast2(2460)minus component which is fixedto 1 as a reference The phases and magnitudes of the complex coefficients as well as fitfractions and interference fit fractions are derived from these free parameters In additionthe masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances are determined fromthe fit to data and are reported in Table 3 The statistical uncertainties on all parametersof interest are calculated using large samples of simulated pseudoexperiments Thesepseudoexperiments are also used to determine the correlations between the statisticaluncertainties on the parameters which are given in Appendix A The LASS parameters

12

Table 3 Masses and widths (MeV) determined in the fit to data with statistical uncertaintiesonly

Resonance Mass Width

Dlowast0(2400)minus 2360plusmn 15 255plusmn 26Dlowast2(2460)minus 24656plusmn 18 460plusmn 34

Table 4 Complex coefficients and fit fractions determined from the Dalitz plot fit Uncertaintiesare statistical only Note that the fit fractions magnitudes and phases are derived quantities

Resonance Fit fraction Isobar model coefficients() Real part Imaginary part Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 minus000plusmn 015 minus127plusmn 006 127plusmn 006 minus157plusmn 011Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 015plusmn 006 minus009plusmn 009 018plusmn 007 minus054plusmn 021Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 014plusmn 038 045plusmn 015 047plusmn 009 127plusmn 095LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 minus010plusmn 024 044plusmn 014 046plusmn 014 179plusmn 065

LASS total 67plusmn 27Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 minus032plusmn 009 minus047plusmn 007 057plusmn 005 minus216plusmn 019Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 minus080plusmn 008 minus044plusmn 014 091plusmn 007 minus264plusmn 015Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 100 000 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 minus039plusmn 009 036plusmn 017 053plusmn 007 240plusmn 027Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 minus062plusmn 006 minus003plusmn 006 062plusmn 006 minus309plusmn 010Total fit fraction 1134

are determined to be m0 = 1450plusmn 80 MeV Γ0 = 400plusmn 230 MeV a = 32plusmn 18 GeV andr = 09plusmn11 GeV while the parameter of the EFF lineshape of the Dπ P-wave nonresonantamplitude is determined to be α = 088plusmn 010 GeVminus2

The values of the fit fractions and complex coefficients obtained from the fit are shownin Table 4 while the values of the interference fit fractions are given in Appendix B Thesum of the fit fractions is seen to exceed unity mostly due to interference within the Dπ andKπ S-waves Note that in Table 4 and all results for fit fractions and derived quantitiesvalues are reported separately for both the Klowast0 (1430)0 and nonresonant components of theLASS lineshape as well as their coherent sum

Projections of the data and the nominal fit model onto m(K+πminus) m(D0πminus) andm(D0K+) are shown in Fig 6 Zooms are provided in the regions of the main resonantcontributions in Fig 7 Projections onto the cosine of the helicity angle of the D0πminus andK+πminus systems are shown in Figs 8 and 9 respectively These projections all show goodagreement between data and the fit model

Angular moments provide a useful method to investigate the helicity structure of thedecays The angular moments in m(D0πminus) and m(K+πminus) obtained as in Refs [1011]are shown in Figs 10 and 11 respectively The contributions due to the Klowast(892)0 andDlowast2(2460)minus resonances are seen as peaks in moments up to order 2 and order 4 respectivelyas expected for spin-1 and spin-2 resonances Reflections make the interpretation ofmoments at higher masses more difficult However the good agreement seen between data

13

and the fit model provides further support for the fit model being a good description ofthe data

The quality of the fit is evaluated by determining a two-dimensional χ2 value comparingthe data and fit model in 144 bins across the SDP that are defined adaptively to ensurethey are approximately equally populated The pull in each of these bins defined as thedifference between the data and the fit model divided by the uncertainty is shown inFig 12 The effective number of degrees of freedom of the χ2 is between Nbins minusNpars minus 1and Nbinsminus1 where Npars is the number of free parameters in the fit yielding a reduced χ2

in the range 099 ndash 122 Additional unbinned tests of fit quality [54] also show acceptableagreement between the data and the fit model

7 Systematic uncertainties

Systematic uncertainties are considered from sources that can be divided into two categoriesexperimental and model uncertainties Experimental uncertainties arise due to the signaland background yields in the signal region the distributions of the background componentsacross the SDP the variation of efficiency across the SDP and possible bias due to thefitting procedure Model uncertainties are considered due to the fixed parameters in thesignal model the addition or removal of marginal amplitudes and the choice of models forthe Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves The uncertainties due to all of these sourcesare combined in quadrature

The signal and background yields are determined from the fit to the B candidateinvariant mass distribution Systematic uncertainties are considered on the total yieldsdue to both statistical and systematic variations of these yields as evaluated in Ref [15]The yields in the signal region are varied appropriately and the effects of these variationson the parameters of interest are assigned as systematic uncertainties

The histograms describing the background distributions are each varied within statisticaluncertainties to establish the uncertainty due to the imperfect knowledge of the distributionof these backgrounds across the SDP The histograms describing the efficiency variationacross the SDP are also varied within their uncertainties prior to the spline fit Theefficiency histograms are also varied with local correlations to account for the effects ofany unknown correlations between neighbouring bins For each parameter the largeruncertainty is considered from the correlated and uncorrelated variations In addition thebinning scheme of the control sample used to evaluate PID performance is varied

An ensemble of pseudoexperiments is used to establish systematic uncertainties relatedto any potential fit bias Pseudoexperiments are generated using the parameters determinedin the fit to data and mean fitted values of the parameters are determined from Gaussianfits to the distributions of results obtained in the ensemble The differences between thegenerated and mean fitted values are found to be small Uncertainties are determined asthe sum in quadrature of the difference between the generated and mean fitted values andthe uncertainty on the mean fitted value from the Gaussian fit

Systematic uncertainties due to fixed parameters in the fit model are determined by

14

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310LHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350 LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310 LHCb (d)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

LHCb (e)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210LHCb (f)

Data Total fit 0(892)K 0(1410)K

S-wave (LASS)πK 0(1430)2Kminus

(2400)0Dminus

(2460)2D

S-wave (EFF)πD P-wave (EFF)πDminus

D Background

Figure 6 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) (c) m(K+πminus)and (e) m(D0K+) with the same projections shown in (b) (d) and (f) with a logarithmic y-axisscale Components are described in the legend

15

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

235 24 245 25 255

Can

dida

tes

4 M

eV

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m05 1 15

Can

dida

tes

13

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

LHCb (b)

Figure 7 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) in the Dlowast2(2460)minus

region and (b) the low m(K+πminus) region Components are as shown in Fig 6

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

) lt 235 GeVminusπ0D(m204 lt

LHCb(a)

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

) lt 255 GeVminusπ0D(m235 lt

LHCb(b)

Figure 8 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(D0πminus) in the mass ranges(a) 204 lt m(D0πminus) lt 235 GeV and (b) 235 lt m(D0πminus) lt 255 GeV Components are asshown in Fig 6

repeating the fit with these parameters varied The fixed masses and widths are variedwithin their uncertainties as shown in Table 2 while the BlattndashWeisskopf barrier radii rBWare varied independently for D0πminus and K+πminus resonances between 3 and 5 GeVminus1 [10]

The Klowast(1410)0 amplitude does not contribute significantly to the nominal fit modelso the fit is repeated with this component removed and the change in results is assignedas the associated systematic uncertainty In addition uncertainties are assigned fromthe changes in the results when an amplitude due to the Klowast(1680)0 resonance or from avirtual Blowast(5325)+ component as described in Ref [10] is included in the model

A Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D0Kminusπ+ observed both spin-1 and spin-3 resonances

at m(D0Kminus) sim 286 GeV [9 10] A spin-3 resonance has also been seen at m(D0πminus) sim276 GeV in B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] while an analysis of B+ rarr DminusK+π+ shows aspin-1 resonance at similar m(D+πminus) values [11] Uncertainties are assigned corresponding

16

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

) lt 08 GeVminusπ+K(m0 lt LHCb

(a)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 10 GeVminusπ+K(m08 lt LHCb

(b)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 13 GeVminusπ+K(m10 lt LHCb

(c)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

) lt 15 GeVminusπ+K(m14 lt LHCb

(d)

Figure 9 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(K+πminus) in the mass ranges(a) m(K+πminus) lt 08 GeV (b) 08 lt m(K+πminus) lt 10 GeV (c) 10 lt m(K+πminus) lt 13 GeV and(d) 14 lt m(K+πminus) lt 15 GeV Components are as shown in Fig 6

to the changes in results when either a spin-1 or spin-3 state at m(D0πminus) sim 276 GeV isadded to the nominal model

The LASS model used to describe the Kπ S-wave is replaced with a Flatte shape [55]which accounts for the Kηprime threshold near the Klowast0 (1430)0 mass and a resonant term witha modified mass dependent width [52] for the κ (also known as Klowast0(800)) state Thismodel gives an NLL that is worse by 44 units A model-independent description of theKπ S-wave is also used to fit the data with the uncertainty on each parameter takenas the larger of the two differences This alternative improves the NLL by 88 units butintroduces an additional four free parameters into the fit The dabba lineshape used todescribe the D0πminus S-wave is replaced with an EFF lineshape while a power-law model isintroduced as an alternative to the EFF lineshape that describes the D0πminus P-wave Thesealterations worsen the NLL by 30 units and improve it by 08 units respectively

The total systematic uncertainties due to experimental and model effects for fit fractionsand complex coefficients are given together with the results in Sec 8 The contributionsfrom different sources to the systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions masses and

17

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0002004006008

0101201401601802

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-30-25-20-15-10

-505

1015

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

310timesLHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

310timesLHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-8-6-4-202468

310timesLHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-8-6-4-20246

310timesLHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-6-4-202468

10

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 10 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(D0πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

18

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0

005

01

015

02

025

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

20

40

60

80

100310times

LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10-505

10152025

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25310times

LHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-20-15-10

-505

101520

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 11 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(K+πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

19

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Pull

-2

-1

0

1

2

LHCb

Figure 12 Differences between the data SDP distribution and the fit model across the SDP interms of the per-bin pull

Table 5 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths(MeV) Uncertainties given on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value SB fraction Efficiency Background SDP Fit bias Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 060 083 050 031 117Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 006 039 069 005 080Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 028 148 185 033 241LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 051 225 286 086 377

LASS total 67plusmn 27 026 186 160 102 267Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 023 072 053 054 107Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 021 139 143 040 204Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 070 070 049 015 111Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 003 081 059 057 115Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 086 191 052 038 219m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 46 81 70 37 122m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 001 037 022 029 051Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 28 131 139 48 199Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 05 09 09 05 14

widths are given in Tables 5 and 6 The dominant experimental systematic uncertaintyon most parameters is due to either the efficiency variation or background distributionsacross the SDP while the model uncertainties are generally dominated by the effects ofalternative descriptions of the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves For the parametersof broad components the model uncertainties dominate however for other parameters thestatistical experimental and model uncertainties are all of a similar magnitude

The stability of the fit results is confirmed by several cross-checks The data sample isdivided into subsamples according to the flavour of the B candidate the trigger decision

20

Table 6 Model uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths (MeV) Uncertaintiesgiven on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value Fixed parameters Addremove Alternative models Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 075 114 109 174Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 018 070 022 076Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 079 330 023 340LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 110 399 520 665

LASS total 67plusmn 27 053 142 521 543Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 036 187 056 198Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 055 195 711 740Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 018 073 099 124Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 027 140 346 374Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 031 199 215 295m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 61 93 256 279m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 009 105 048 115Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 40 180 435 472Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 14 05 24 29

the polarity of the magnet and the year of data taking Each subsample is fitted separatelyand all are seen to be consistent with the nominal fit results The fit is also repeatedwith additional resonance components to test the fit model Resonances up to spin-3 wereconsidered for all three pairs of daughters with the mass and width allowed to vary in thefit No additional significant contributions were observed

8 Results and summary

The results for the complex coefficients are reported in Table 7 with results for thefit fractions given in Table 8 The results for the interference fit fractions are givenin Appendix B Upper limits are determined on the fit fractions of the Klowast(1410)0 andDlowast3(2760)minus components which do not give significant contributions using the methoddescribed in Ref [10]

The fit fractions for resonant contributions are converted into quasi-two-body productbranching fractions by multiplying by B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus) = (92plusmn 06plusmn 07plusmn 06)times 10minus5which is obtained from the ratio of branching fractions B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus)B(B0 rarrD0π+πminus) [15] multiplied by the latest result for B(B0 rarr D0π+πminus) [12] accounting forthe different Dlowast(2010)minus veto windows used in the analyses and for the 37 residualbackground due to B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ decays The statistical correlation between theresults of Ref [15] and this analysis is found to be negligible The results for the productbranching fractions are shown in Table 9 For the K+πminus resonances where the branchingfractions to Kπ are known the product branching fractions are converted to the Bdecay branching fractions shown in Table 10 The results for B(B0 rarr D0Klowast(892)0) andB(B0 rarr Dlowast2(2460)minusK+)times B(Dlowast2(2460)minus rarr D0πminus) are consistent with and more precisethan previous measurements [14 1617]

21

Table 7 Results for the complex amplitudes and their uncertainties presented (top) in terms ofreal and imaginary parts and (bottom) in terms and magnitudes and phases The three quotederrors are statistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively

Resonance Real part Imaginary part

Klowast(892)0 minus000plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 034 minus127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 006Klowast(1410)0 015plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 009 minus009plusmn 009plusmn 018plusmn 018Klowast0(1430)0 014plusmn 038plusmn 048plusmn 038 045plusmn 015plusmn 037plusmn 017LASS nonresonant minus010plusmn 024plusmn 016plusmn 042 044plusmn 014plusmn 017plusmn 023Klowast2(1430)0 minus032plusmn 009plusmn 015plusmn 023 minus047plusmn 007plusmn 014plusmn 015Dlowast0(2400)minus minus080plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 022 minus044plusmn 014plusmn 012plusmn 018Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) minus039plusmn 009plusmn 009plusmn 014 036plusmn 017plusmn 014plusmn 023Dπ P-wave (EFF) minus062plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 011 minus003plusmn 006plusmn 005plusmn 010

Resonance Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 005 minus157plusmn 011plusmn 016plusmn 027Klowast(1410)0 018plusmn 007plusmn 010plusmn 011 minus054plusmn 021plusmn 055plusmn 104Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 009plusmn 010plusmn 014 127plusmn 095plusmn 104plusmn 081LASS nonresonant 046plusmn 014plusmn 016plusmn 029 179plusmn 065plusmn 035plusmn 069Klowast2(1430)0 057plusmn 005plusmn 004plusmn 008 minus216plusmn 019plusmn 043plusmn 043Dlowast0(2400)minus 091plusmn 007plusmn 006plusmn 017 minus264plusmn 015plusmn 014plusmn 023Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 053plusmn 007plusmn 004plusmn 014 240plusmn 027plusmn 024plusmn 044Dπ P-wave (EFF) 062plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 011 minus309plusmn 010plusmn 007plusmn 017

Table 8 Results for the fit fractions and their uncertainties () The three quoted errors arestatistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively Upper limits are givenat 90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Fit fraction Upper limitKlowast(892)0 374plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 17Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03plusmn 08plusmn 08 lt 32 (37)Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20plusmn 24plusmn 34LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38plusmn 38plusmn 67

LASS total 67plusmn 27plusmn 27plusmn 54Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17plusmn 11plusmn 20Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28plusmn 20plusmn 74Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12plusmn 11plusmn 12Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 10 (11)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14plusmn 12plusmn 37Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16plusmn 22plusmn 30

22

Table 9 Results for the product branching fractions The four quoted errors are statisticalexperimental systematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Product branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 342plusmn 013plusmn 010plusmn 016plusmn 040Klowast(1410)0 007plusmn 003plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 001 lt 029 (034)Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 018plusmn 022plusmn 031plusmn 005LASS nonresonant 044plusmn 034plusmn 034plusmn 061plusmn 005

LASS total 061plusmn 025plusmn 025plusmn 049plusmn 007Klowast2(1430)0 068plusmn 015plusmn 010plusmn 018plusmn 008Dlowast0(2400)minus 177plusmn 026plusmn 019plusmn 067plusmn 020Dlowast2(2460)minus 212plusmn 010plusmn 011plusmn 011plusmn 025Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 010 (011)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 060plusmn 013plusmn 011plusmn 034plusmn 007Dπ P-wave (EFF) 081plusmn 015plusmn 020plusmn 027plusmn 009

Table 10 Results for the branching fractions The four quoted errors are statistical experimentalsystematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at 90 (95 )confidence level

Resonance Branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 513plusmn 020plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 060Klowast(1410)0 159plusmn 068plusmn 181plusmn 159plusmn 036 lt 67 (78)Klowast0(1430)0 071plusmn 027plusmn 033plusmn 047plusmn 008LASS nonresonant 066plusmn 051plusmn 051plusmn 092plusmn 008

LASS total 092plusmn 038plusmn 038plusmn 074plusmn 011Klowast2(1430)0 204plusmn 045plusmn 030plusmn 054plusmn 025

The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus states are found to be

m(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (2360plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 28) MeV

Γ(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (255plusmn 26plusmn 20plusmn 47) MeV

m(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (24656plusmn 18plusmn 05plusmn 12) MeV

Γ(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (460plusmn 34plusmn 14plusmn 29) MeV

where the three uncertainties are statistical experimental systematic and model systematicrespectively These are consistent with though less precise than recent results from a DPanalysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] They also show good agreement with and havesimilar precision to earlier measurements of these quantities [1337]

In summary the first amplitude analysis of B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays has been presentedusing a data sample corresponding to 30 fbminus1 of pp collision data collected by the LHCbexperiment A good description of the data is obtained with a model containing contri-

23

butions from intermediate Klowast(892)0 Klowast(1410)0 Klowast2(1430)0 and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonanceswith additional components to describe broad structures in the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S-and P-waves The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances aremeasured as are the complex amplitudes and fit fractions for all components includedin the amplitude model The results can be used in conjunction with an analysis ofB0 rarr DK+πminus decays where the neutral D meson is reconstructed in final states such asK+Kminus to measure the CKM unitarity triangle parameter γ [1 2]

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to our colleagues in the CERN accelerator departments forthe excellent performance of the LHC We thank the technical and administrative staffat the LHCb institutes We acknowledge support from CERN and from the nationalagencies CAPES CNPq FAPERJ and FINEP (Brazil) NSFC (China) CNRSIN2P3(France) BMBF DFG HGF and MPG (Germany) INFN (Italy) FOM and NWO (TheNetherlands) MNiSW and NCN (Poland) MENIFA (Romania) MinES and FANO(Russia) MinECo (Spain) SNSF and SER (Switzerland) NASU (Ukraine) STFC (UnitedKingdom) NSF (USA) The Tier1 computing centres are supported by IN2P3 (France)KIT and BMBF (Germany) INFN (Italy) NWO and SURF (The Netherlands) PIC(Spain) GridPP (United Kingdom) We are indebted to the communities behind themultiple open source software packages on which we depend We are also thankful forthe computing resources and the access to software RampD tools provided by Yandex LLC(Russia) Individual groups or members have received support from EPLANET MarieSk lodowska-Curie Actions and ERC (European Union) Conseil general de Haute-SavoieLabex ENIGMASS and OCEVU Region Auvergne (France) RFBR (Russia) XuntaGaland GENCAT (Spain) Royal Society and Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851(United Kingdom)

24

Appendices

A Correlation matrices

The statistical correlations between the complex coefficients masses and widths determinedfrom the fit to data are given in terms of real and imaginary parts and in terms ofmagnitudes and phases in Tables 11 and 12 The correlations are determined using thesame sample of simulated pseudoexperiments used to calculate the statistical uncertaintieson fit parameters

B Results for interference fit fractions

The central values of the interference fit fractions are given in Table 13 The statisti-cal experimental systematic and model uncertainties on these quantities are given inTables 14 15 and 16

25

Tab

le11

Sta

tist

ical

corr

elat

ions

bet

wee

nth

ere

al(x

)an

dim

agin

ary

(y)

par

tsof

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

x0

y 0x

1y 1

x2

y 2x

3y 3

x4

y 4x

5y 5

x7

y 7x

8y 8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

x0

100

014

002

017minus

018

015minus

017

003

039minus

037

016minus

009minus

018minus

029

007minus

037minus

019

002

004

012

y 01

00minus

006minus

008

009minus

011minus

000

014

003

003

012

013minus

012minus

024

035minus

007

009

012

001minus

004

x1

100minus

009minus

008minus

014minus

004

029minus

001

003minus

020

018minus

021minus

031minus

017minus

036minus

008minus

017minus

023

002

y 11

000

050

340

09minus

001

060minus

039

002minus

003minus

003

007minus

002minus

004minus

016minus

002

007

002

x2

100minus

013

081

009

014minus

016minus

015

021

010

013

004minus

015minus

007

001minus

025

001

y 21

000

080

280

24minus

036minus

013

008minus

004minus

001minus

004

004minus

002minus

001minus

009minus

010

x3

100

020

013minus

034minus

010

033minus

008

008minus

004minus

005minus

007minus

003minus

033minus

009

y 31

00minus

012minus

012minus

051

029minus

034minus

053

009minus

012

009minus

014minus

036

001

x4

100minus

053

032minus

010minus

020

003

002minus

027minus

017minus

006

010minus

000

y 41

000

06minus

009

040

010

014

016

011minus

005

007minus

003

x5

100minus

029minus

003

022

002

004minus

008

002

045minus

006

y 51

00minus

031minus

034

006

003

024minus

014minus

072minus

033

x7

100

046

005

010minus

011minus

001

027

017

y 71

00minus

016

036minus

001

017

032

008

x8

100minus

003

001minus

006minus

009minus

014

y 81

000

290

020

15minus

002

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

26

Tab

le12

S

tati

stic

alco

rrel

atio

ns

bet

wee

nth

em

agnit

ud

es(a

)an

dp

has

es(∆

)of

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

a0

∆0

a1

∆1

a2

∆2

a3

∆3

a4

∆4

a5

∆5

a7

∆7

a8

∆8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

a0

100minus

011minus

008

005

024

003minus

014

004

004

001

021

002

022minus

022

038minus

000minus

004minus

009minus

001

004

∆0

100minus

010

012

003

020

014

014minus

001

045minus

005

010minus

008

035minus

007

005minus

022

006

007

009

a1

100minus

035minus

025

006

032

001minus

001minus

038

004minus

022minus

006

031

002

024

007minus

018minus

020

001

∆1

100

024

015

016

000

014

038minus

018minus

013

016

026

022minus

006minus

009minus

004minus

012

005

a2

100

004

011minus

028minus

007

039minus

009

007

027

010

001

001minus

015

004minus

003minus

013

∆2

100

015

077minus

020minus

010minus

001

024

009

013

003minus

009

005

001

023minus

010

a3

100minus

006

000minus

011

016minus

030minus

012

056

001

012

002minus

007minus

027minus

004

∆3

100minus

028minus

019

015

041minus

024minus

008minus

000minus

013

004

002

041

008

a4

100

013

005minus

017

014

018minus

000

006

000

014minus

019minus

009

∆4

100minus

016

016

017

012

000minus

002minus

019minus

003

003

001

a5

100

024minus

026minus

006

011

005minus

007

001

019

039

∆5

100minus

000minus

028minus

001minus

020minus

020

015

076

027

a7

100minus

001

017minus

006

004

013minus

005minus

024

∆7

100minus

012

037

003minus

000minus

027minus

012

a8

100minus

004minus

001

004

006

015

∆8

100minus

037minus

002minus

033minus

001

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

27

Table 13 Interference fit fractions () from the nominal DP fit The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 374 18 minus00 00 00 minus24 minus02 minus26 minus50A1 07 minus00 00 00 minus11 minus03 minus06 minus11A2 51 minus32 minus00 29 15 16 19A3 48 00 minus84 01 21 02A4 74 minus03 minus10 minus15 minus04A5 193 minus00 28 00A6 231 minus00 00A7 66 minus00A8 89

Table 14 Statistical uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes areall pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASSnonresonant (A4) Klowast2 (1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8)Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 15 07 00 00 00 09 04 04 05A1 03 00 00 00 07 03 04 05A2 20 26 00 11 05 15 05A3 38 00 32 04 34 08A4 17 06 01 06 05A5 28 00 31 00A6 12 00 00A7 14 00A8 16

28

Table 15 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () Theamplitudes are all pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0 (1430)0(A3) LASS nonresonant (A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave(dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fitfractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 12 05 00 00 00 23 02 04 05A1 08 00 00 00 04 08 07 09A2 24 31 00 14 20 26 11A3 38 00 36 02 26 03A4 11 22 02 05 10A5 20 00 40 00A6 11 00 00A7 12 00A8 22

Table 16 Model uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 17 08 00 00 00 26 07 08 14A1 08 00 00 00 08 06 08 11A2 34 29 00 58 17 36 27A3 66 00 83 03 35 07A4 20 17 02 12 10A5 74 00 45 00A6 12 00 00A7 37 00A8 29

29

References

[1] T Gershon On the measurement of the unitarity triangle angle γ from B0 rarr DKlowast0

decays Phys Rev D79 (2009) 051301(R) arXiv08102706

[2] T Gershon and M Williams Prospects for the measurement of the unitaritytriangle angle γ from B0 rarr DK+πminus decays Phys Rev D80 (2009) 092002arXiv09091495

[3] N Cabibbo Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays Phys Rev Lett 10 (1963) 531

[4] M Kobayashi and T Maskawa CP -violation in the renormalizable theory of weakinteraction Progress of Theoretical Physics 49 (1973) 652

[5] M Gronau and D London How to determine all the angles of the unitarity trianglefrom B0 rarr DK0

S and B0s rarr Dφ Phys Lett B253 (1991) 483

[6] M Gronau and D Wyler On determining a weak phase from CP asymmetries incharged B decays Phys Lett B265 (1991) 172

[7] I Dunietz CP violation with self-tagging Bd modes Phys Lett B270 (1991) 75

[8] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurement of CP violation parameters inB0 rarr DKlowast0 decays Phys Rev D90 (2014) 112002 arXiv14078136

[9] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of overlapping spin-1 and spin-

3 D0Kminus resonances at mass 286 GeVc2 Phys Rev Lett 113 (2014) 162001

arXiv14077574

[10] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ decays

Phys Rev D90 (2014) 072003 arXiv14077712

[11] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observation and amplitude analysis of theBminus rarr D+Kminusπminus decay Phys Rev D91 (2015) 092002 arXiv150302995

[12] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays

arXiv150501710 submitted to Phys Rev D

[13] Belle collaboration A Kuzmin et al Study of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays Phys RevD76 (2007) 012006 arXivhep-ex0611054

[14] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of branching fractions andresonance contributions for B0 rarr D0K+πminus and search for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decaysPhys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 011803 arXivhep-ex0509036

[15] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurements of the branching fractions of

the decays B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ and B0 rarr D

0K+πminus Phys Rev D87 (2013) 112009

arXiv13046317

30

[16] Belle collaboration P Krokovny et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K0 and B0 rarr D0Klowast0

decays Phys Rev Lett 90 (2003) 141802 arXivhep-ex0212066

[17] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of B0 rarr D(lowast)0K(lowast)0 branchingfractions Phys Rev D74 (2006) 031101 arXivhep-ex0604016

[18] LHCb collaboration A A Alves Jr et al The LHCb detector at the LHC JINST 3(2008) S08005

[19] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al LHCb detector performance Int J Mod PhysA30 (2015) 1530022 arXiv14126352

[20] R Aaij et al Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator JINST 9 (2014) P09007arXiv14057808

[21] R Arink et al Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker JINST 9 (2014) P01002arXiv13113893

[22] M Adinolfi et al Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Eur PhysJ C73 (2013) 2431 arXiv12116759

[23] A A Alves Jr et al Performance of the LHCb muon system JINST 8 (2013) P02022arXiv12111346

[24] R Aaij et al The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011 JINST 8 (2013) P04022arXiv12113055

[25] V V Gligorov and M Williams Efficient reliable and fast high-level triggering usinga bonsai boosted decision tree JINST 8 (2013) P02013 arXiv12106861

[26] T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P Skands PYTHIA 64 physics and manual JHEP05 (2006) 026 arXivhep-ph0603175 T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P SkandsA brief introduction to PYTHIA 81 Comput Phys Commun 178 (2008) 852arXiv07103820

[27] I Belyaev et al Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss the LHCbsimulation framework J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032047

[28] D J Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package Nucl Instrum MethA462 (2001) 152

[29] P Golonka and Z Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo A precision tool for QED correctionsin Z and W decays Eur Phys J C45 (2006) 97 arXivhep-ph0506026

[30] Geant4 collaboration J Allison et al Geant4 developments and applications IEEETrans Nucl Sci 53 (2006) 270 Geant4 collaboration S Agostinelli et al Geant4A simulation toolkit Nucl Instrum Meth A506 (2003) 250

31

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 11: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

to break down in the Kπ S-wave because the Klowast0(1430) resonance interferes strongly witha slowly varying nonresonant term as described in Ref [50] The LASS lineshape [51] hasbeen developed to combine these two contributions

R(m) =m

q cot δB minus iq+ exp [2iδB]

m0Γ0m0

q0

(m20 minusm2)minus im0Γ0

qmm0

q0

(8)

where cot δB =1

aq+

1

2rq (9)

and where m0 and Γ0 are the pole mass and width of the Klowast0(1430) state and a and r areshape parameters

The Dπ S-wave nonresonant contribution can be described by the ldquodabbardquo line-shape [52] defined as

R(m) =Bprime(m2)(m2 minus sA)ρ

1minus β(m2 minusm2min)minus iBprime(m2)(m2 minus sA)ρ

(10)

whereBprime(m2) = b exp

[minusα(m2 minusm2

min)] (11)

Here mmin is the invariant mass at threshold sA = m2D minus 05m2

π is the Adler zero ρ isa phase-space factor and b α and β are parameters with values fixed to 2449 GeVminus201 GeVminus2 and 01 GeVminus2 respectively according to Ref [52]

Ignoring reconstruction and selection effects the DP probability density function wouldbe

Pphys

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)=

|A(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)|2intint

DP|A|2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)

(12)

where the dependence of A on the DP position has been suppressed in the denominator forbrevity The primary results of most Dalitz plot analyses are the complex coefficients asdefined in Eq (1) These however depend on the choice of phase convention amplitudeformalism and normalisation used in each analysis The convention-independent quantitiesof fit fractions and interference fit fractions provide a way to reliably compare resultsbetween different analyses Fit fractions are defined as the integral of the amplitude foreach intermediate component squared divided by that of the coherent matrix elementsquared for all intermediate contributions

FF j =

intintDP

∣∣cjFj (m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus))∣∣2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)intint

DP|A|2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)

(13)

The fit fractions need not sum to unity due to possible net constructive or destructiveinterference described by interference fit fractions defined (for i lt j only) by

FF ij =

intintDP

2Re[ciclowastjFiF

lowastj

]dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)intint

DP|A|2 dm2(D0πminus) dm2(K+πminus)

(14)

where the dependence of F(lowast)i and A on the DP position has been omitted

9

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

Eff

icie

ncy

()

0

005

01

015

02

025(a)LHCb Simulation

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

Eff

icie

ncy

()

0

005

01

015

02

025(b)LHCb Simulation

Figure 4 Efficiency variation as a function of SDP position for candidates triggered by (a) signaldecay products and (b) by the rest of the event The vertical white stripe is due to the Dlowast vetoand the curved white band is due to the D0 veto

6 Dalitz plot fit

61 Signal efficiency

The variation of the efficiency across the phase space is studied in terms of the squareDalitz plot (SDP) The SDP is defined by variables mprime and θprime that range between 0 and 1and are given for the D0K+πminus case by

mprime equiv 1

πarccos

(2m(D0πminus)minusmmin

D0πminus

mmaxD0πminus minusmmin

D0πminus

minus 1

)and θprime equiv 1

πθ(D0πminus) (15)

where mmaxD0πminus = mB0 minusmK+ and mmin

D0πminus = mD0 + mπminus are the kinematic boundaries of

m(D0πminus) allowed in the B0 rarr D0K+πminus decay and θ(D0πminus) is the helicity angle of theD0πminus system (the angle between the K+ and the D0 meson in the D0πminus rest frame) Thedistribution of selected events across the SDP is shown in Fig 3(b)

Efficiency variation across the SDP is caused by the detector acceptance and bytrigger selection and PID requirements The efficiency is evaluated with simulated samplesgenerated uniformly over the SDP Data-driven corrections are applied to correct for knowndifferences between data and simulation in the tracking trigger and PID efficiencies usingidentical methods to those described in Ref [10] The efficiency functions are obtainedby fitting the corrected simulation with two-dimensional cubic splines Figure 4 showsthe histograms used to model the variation of the efficiency over the SDP for candidatestriggered by (a) signal decays and (b) by the rest of the event

62 Background studies

Among the background yields in the signal region given in Table 1 the only sizeablecomponents are due to combinatorial background and B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays The SDP

10

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

0

0002

0004

0006

0008

001

0012

0014

(a)LHCb

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

000020004000600080010012001400160018

(b)LHCb Simulation

Figure 5 SDP distributions of the background contributions from (a) combinatorial backgroundand (b) B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays

distributions of these backgrounds are described by the histograms shown in Fig 5Combinatorial background contributes 22 of candidates in the signal region The

shape of this contribution over the SDP is obtained from the high B mass sideband (5400ndash5900 MeV) As seen in Fig 2 this sideband is dominated by combinatorial backgroundwith a small contribution from B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays The SDP distribution of theB0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus contribution in the sideband region is modelled as described belowfor the signal region and is subtracted from the sideband sample To check that theSDP shape of the combinatorial background does not vary with the B candidate massa sample of doubly charged D0Kplusmnπplusmn candidates is investigated This confirms that theSDP distribution from the sideband is a reliable model for combinatorial background inthe signal region

The B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus contribution accounts for 16 of the candidates in the signalregion Its SDP distribution is obtained from a simulated sample with the B0 rarr D0π+πminus

and B0 rarr Dlowast0π+πminus contributions combined and reweighted as described in Sec 4 TheB0 rarr D0π+πminus decay mode is the dominant component of this background in the signalregion

Due to resolution effects B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ Dlowast(2010)minus rarr D0πminus decays are notentirely removed by the Dlowast veto Although this component corresponds to real B0 rarrD0πminusK+ decays it is treated as incoherent (ie as background) since its interference withthe remainder of the signal is negligible Its SDP distribution is modelled as a Gaussianpeak in m(D0πminus) with mean fixed to the known Dlowast(2010)minus mass and width and yielddetermined in the fit to data

11

Table 2 Signal contributions to the fit model where parameters and uncertainties are takenfrom Ref [37] The models are described in Sec 5

Resonance Spin DP axis Model Parameters

Klowast(892)0 1 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 89581plusmn 019 MeV Γ0 = 474plusmn 06 MeVKlowast(1410)0 1 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 1414plusmn 15 MeV Γ0 = 232plusmn 21 MeVKlowast0(1430)0 0 m2(K+πminus) LASS Determined from data (see text)Klowast2(1430)0 2 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 14324plusmn 13 MeV Γ0 = 109plusmn 5 MeVDlowast0(2400)minus 0 m2(D0πminus) RBW

Determined from data (see Table 3)Dlowast2(2460)minus 2 m2(D0πminus) RBW

Nonresonant 0 m2(D0πminus) dabba Fixed (see text)Nonresonant 1 m2(D0πminus) EFF Determined from data (see text)

63 Amplitude model for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays

The Dalitz plot fit is performed using the Laura++ [53] package The likelihood functionis given by

L =Ncprodi

[sumk

NkPk(m2i (D

0πminus)m2i (K

+πminus)) ]

(16)

where the index i runs over Nc candidates k runs over the signal and backgroundcomponents and Nk is the yield in each component The probability density function forthe signal component Psig is given by Eq (12) with the |A

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)|2

terms multiplied by the efficiency function described in Sec 61 As it is possible forthe minimisation procedure to find a local minimum of the negative log likelihood (NLL)profile the fit is repeated many times with randomised initial values to ensure the globalminimum is found

The nominal Dalitz plot fit model for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays is composed of severalresonant and nonresonant amplitudes Only those amplitudes that provide significantcontributions or that aid the fit stability are included Unnatural spin-parity states arenot considered as these do not decay to two pseudoscalars The eight amplitudes includedin this model are listed in Table 2 The width of the narrowest signal contribution tothe Dalitz plot (sim 50 MeV) is far larger than the mass resolution (sim 24 MeV) thereforeresolution effects are neglected

The real and imaginary parts of the complex coefficients cj defined in Eq (1) are freeparameters of the fit except for the coefficient of the Dlowast2(2460)minus component which is fixedto 1 as a reference The phases and magnitudes of the complex coefficients as well as fitfractions and interference fit fractions are derived from these free parameters In additionthe masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances are determined fromthe fit to data and are reported in Table 3 The statistical uncertainties on all parametersof interest are calculated using large samples of simulated pseudoexperiments Thesepseudoexperiments are also used to determine the correlations between the statisticaluncertainties on the parameters which are given in Appendix A The LASS parameters

12

Table 3 Masses and widths (MeV) determined in the fit to data with statistical uncertaintiesonly

Resonance Mass Width

Dlowast0(2400)minus 2360plusmn 15 255plusmn 26Dlowast2(2460)minus 24656plusmn 18 460plusmn 34

Table 4 Complex coefficients and fit fractions determined from the Dalitz plot fit Uncertaintiesare statistical only Note that the fit fractions magnitudes and phases are derived quantities

Resonance Fit fraction Isobar model coefficients() Real part Imaginary part Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 minus000plusmn 015 minus127plusmn 006 127plusmn 006 minus157plusmn 011Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 015plusmn 006 minus009plusmn 009 018plusmn 007 minus054plusmn 021Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 014plusmn 038 045plusmn 015 047plusmn 009 127plusmn 095LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 minus010plusmn 024 044plusmn 014 046plusmn 014 179plusmn 065

LASS total 67plusmn 27Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 minus032plusmn 009 minus047plusmn 007 057plusmn 005 minus216plusmn 019Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 minus080plusmn 008 minus044plusmn 014 091plusmn 007 minus264plusmn 015Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 100 000 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 minus039plusmn 009 036plusmn 017 053plusmn 007 240plusmn 027Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 minus062plusmn 006 minus003plusmn 006 062plusmn 006 minus309plusmn 010Total fit fraction 1134

are determined to be m0 = 1450plusmn 80 MeV Γ0 = 400plusmn 230 MeV a = 32plusmn 18 GeV andr = 09plusmn11 GeV while the parameter of the EFF lineshape of the Dπ P-wave nonresonantamplitude is determined to be α = 088plusmn 010 GeVminus2

The values of the fit fractions and complex coefficients obtained from the fit are shownin Table 4 while the values of the interference fit fractions are given in Appendix B Thesum of the fit fractions is seen to exceed unity mostly due to interference within the Dπ andKπ S-waves Note that in Table 4 and all results for fit fractions and derived quantitiesvalues are reported separately for both the Klowast0 (1430)0 and nonresonant components of theLASS lineshape as well as their coherent sum

Projections of the data and the nominal fit model onto m(K+πminus) m(D0πminus) andm(D0K+) are shown in Fig 6 Zooms are provided in the regions of the main resonantcontributions in Fig 7 Projections onto the cosine of the helicity angle of the D0πminus andK+πminus systems are shown in Figs 8 and 9 respectively These projections all show goodagreement between data and the fit model

Angular moments provide a useful method to investigate the helicity structure of thedecays The angular moments in m(D0πminus) and m(K+πminus) obtained as in Refs [1011]are shown in Figs 10 and 11 respectively The contributions due to the Klowast(892)0 andDlowast2(2460)minus resonances are seen as peaks in moments up to order 2 and order 4 respectivelyas expected for spin-1 and spin-2 resonances Reflections make the interpretation ofmoments at higher masses more difficult However the good agreement seen between data

13

and the fit model provides further support for the fit model being a good description ofthe data

The quality of the fit is evaluated by determining a two-dimensional χ2 value comparingthe data and fit model in 144 bins across the SDP that are defined adaptively to ensurethey are approximately equally populated The pull in each of these bins defined as thedifference between the data and the fit model divided by the uncertainty is shown inFig 12 The effective number of degrees of freedom of the χ2 is between Nbins minusNpars minus 1and Nbinsminus1 where Npars is the number of free parameters in the fit yielding a reduced χ2

in the range 099 ndash 122 Additional unbinned tests of fit quality [54] also show acceptableagreement between the data and the fit model

7 Systematic uncertainties

Systematic uncertainties are considered from sources that can be divided into two categoriesexperimental and model uncertainties Experimental uncertainties arise due to the signaland background yields in the signal region the distributions of the background componentsacross the SDP the variation of efficiency across the SDP and possible bias due to thefitting procedure Model uncertainties are considered due to the fixed parameters in thesignal model the addition or removal of marginal amplitudes and the choice of models forthe Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves The uncertainties due to all of these sourcesare combined in quadrature

The signal and background yields are determined from the fit to the B candidateinvariant mass distribution Systematic uncertainties are considered on the total yieldsdue to both statistical and systematic variations of these yields as evaluated in Ref [15]The yields in the signal region are varied appropriately and the effects of these variationson the parameters of interest are assigned as systematic uncertainties

The histograms describing the background distributions are each varied within statisticaluncertainties to establish the uncertainty due to the imperfect knowledge of the distributionof these backgrounds across the SDP The histograms describing the efficiency variationacross the SDP are also varied within their uncertainties prior to the spline fit Theefficiency histograms are also varied with local correlations to account for the effects ofany unknown correlations between neighbouring bins For each parameter the largeruncertainty is considered from the correlated and uncorrelated variations In addition thebinning scheme of the control sample used to evaluate PID performance is varied

An ensemble of pseudoexperiments is used to establish systematic uncertainties relatedto any potential fit bias Pseudoexperiments are generated using the parameters determinedin the fit to data and mean fitted values of the parameters are determined from Gaussianfits to the distributions of results obtained in the ensemble The differences between thegenerated and mean fitted values are found to be small Uncertainties are determined asthe sum in quadrature of the difference between the generated and mean fitted values andthe uncertainty on the mean fitted value from the Gaussian fit

Systematic uncertainties due to fixed parameters in the fit model are determined by

14

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310LHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350 LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310 LHCb (d)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

LHCb (e)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210LHCb (f)

Data Total fit 0(892)K 0(1410)K

S-wave (LASS)πK 0(1430)2Kminus

(2400)0Dminus

(2460)2D

S-wave (EFF)πD P-wave (EFF)πDminus

D Background

Figure 6 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) (c) m(K+πminus)and (e) m(D0K+) with the same projections shown in (b) (d) and (f) with a logarithmic y-axisscale Components are described in the legend

15

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

235 24 245 25 255

Can

dida

tes

4 M

eV

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m05 1 15

Can

dida

tes

13

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

LHCb (b)

Figure 7 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) in the Dlowast2(2460)minus

region and (b) the low m(K+πminus) region Components are as shown in Fig 6

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

) lt 235 GeVminusπ0D(m204 lt

LHCb(a)

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

) lt 255 GeVminusπ0D(m235 lt

LHCb(b)

Figure 8 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(D0πminus) in the mass ranges(a) 204 lt m(D0πminus) lt 235 GeV and (b) 235 lt m(D0πminus) lt 255 GeV Components are asshown in Fig 6

repeating the fit with these parameters varied The fixed masses and widths are variedwithin their uncertainties as shown in Table 2 while the BlattndashWeisskopf barrier radii rBWare varied independently for D0πminus and K+πminus resonances between 3 and 5 GeVminus1 [10]

The Klowast(1410)0 amplitude does not contribute significantly to the nominal fit modelso the fit is repeated with this component removed and the change in results is assignedas the associated systematic uncertainty In addition uncertainties are assigned fromthe changes in the results when an amplitude due to the Klowast(1680)0 resonance or from avirtual Blowast(5325)+ component as described in Ref [10] is included in the model

A Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D0Kminusπ+ observed both spin-1 and spin-3 resonances

at m(D0Kminus) sim 286 GeV [9 10] A spin-3 resonance has also been seen at m(D0πminus) sim276 GeV in B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] while an analysis of B+ rarr DminusK+π+ shows aspin-1 resonance at similar m(D+πminus) values [11] Uncertainties are assigned corresponding

16

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

) lt 08 GeVminusπ+K(m0 lt LHCb

(a)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 10 GeVminusπ+K(m08 lt LHCb

(b)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 13 GeVminusπ+K(m10 lt LHCb

(c)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

) lt 15 GeVminusπ+K(m14 lt LHCb

(d)

Figure 9 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(K+πminus) in the mass ranges(a) m(K+πminus) lt 08 GeV (b) 08 lt m(K+πminus) lt 10 GeV (c) 10 lt m(K+πminus) lt 13 GeV and(d) 14 lt m(K+πminus) lt 15 GeV Components are as shown in Fig 6

to the changes in results when either a spin-1 or spin-3 state at m(D0πminus) sim 276 GeV isadded to the nominal model

The LASS model used to describe the Kπ S-wave is replaced with a Flatte shape [55]which accounts for the Kηprime threshold near the Klowast0 (1430)0 mass and a resonant term witha modified mass dependent width [52] for the κ (also known as Klowast0(800)) state Thismodel gives an NLL that is worse by 44 units A model-independent description of theKπ S-wave is also used to fit the data with the uncertainty on each parameter takenas the larger of the two differences This alternative improves the NLL by 88 units butintroduces an additional four free parameters into the fit The dabba lineshape used todescribe the D0πminus S-wave is replaced with an EFF lineshape while a power-law model isintroduced as an alternative to the EFF lineshape that describes the D0πminus P-wave Thesealterations worsen the NLL by 30 units and improve it by 08 units respectively

The total systematic uncertainties due to experimental and model effects for fit fractionsand complex coefficients are given together with the results in Sec 8 The contributionsfrom different sources to the systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions masses and

17

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0002004006008

0101201401601802

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-30-25-20-15-10

-505

1015

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

310timesLHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

310timesLHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-8-6-4-202468

310timesLHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-8-6-4-20246

310timesLHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-6-4-202468

10

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 10 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(D0πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

18

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0

005

01

015

02

025

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

20

40

60

80

100310times

LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10-505

10152025

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25310times

LHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-20-15-10

-505

101520

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 11 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(K+πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

19

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Pull

-2

-1

0

1

2

LHCb

Figure 12 Differences between the data SDP distribution and the fit model across the SDP interms of the per-bin pull

Table 5 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths(MeV) Uncertainties given on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value SB fraction Efficiency Background SDP Fit bias Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 060 083 050 031 117Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 006 039 069 005 080Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 028 148 185 033 241LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 051 225 286 086 377

LASS total 67plusmn 27 026 186 160 102 267Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 023 072 053 054 107Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 021 139 143 040 204Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 070 070 049 015 111Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 003 081 059 057 115Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 086 191 052 038 219m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 46 81 70 37 122m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 001 037 022 029 051Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 28 131 139 48 199Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 05 09 09 05 14

widths are given in Tables 5 and 6 The dominant experimental systematic uncertaintyon most parameters is due to either the efficiency variation or background distributionsacross the SDP while the model uncertainties are generally dominated by the effects ofalternative descriptions of the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves For the parametersof broad components the model uncertainties dominate however for other parameters thestatistical experimental and model uncertainties are all of a similar magnitude

The stability of the fit results is confirmed by several cross-checks The data sample isdivided into subsamples according to the flavour of the B candidate the trigger decision

20

Table 6 Model uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths (MeV) Uncertaintiesgiven on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value Fixed parameters Addremove Alternative models Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 075 114 109 174Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 018 070 022 076Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 079 330 023 340LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 110 399 520 665

LASS total 67plusmn 27 053 142 521 543Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 036 187 056 198Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 055 195 711 740Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 018 073 099 124Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 027 140 346 374Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 031 199 215 295m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 61 93 256 279m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 009 105 048 115Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 40 180 435 472Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 14 05 24 29

the polarity of the magnet and the year of data taking Each subsample is fitted separatelyand all are seen to be consistent with the nominal fit results The fit is also repeatedwith additional resonance components to test the fit model Resonances up to spin-3 wereconsidered for all three pairs of daughters with the mass and width allowed to vary in thefit No additional significant contributions were observed

8 Results and summary

The results for the complex coefficients are reported in Table 7 with results for thefit fractions given in Table 8 The results for the interference fit fractions are givenin Appendix B Upper limits are determined on the fit fractions of the Klowast(1410)0 andDlowast3(2760)minus components which do not give significant contributions using the methoddescribed in Ref [10]

The fit fractions for resonant contributions are converted into quasi-two-body productbranching fractions by multiplying by B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus) = (92plusmn 06plusmn 07plusmn 06)times 10minus5which is obtained from the ratio of branching fractions B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus)B(B0 rarrD0π+πminus) [15] multiplied by the latest result for B(B0 rarr D0π+πminus) [12] accounting forthe different Dlowast(2010)minus veto windows used in the analyses and for the 37 residualbackground due to B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ decays The statistical correlation between theresults of Ref [15] and this analysis is found to be negligible The results for the productbranching fractions are shown in Table 9 For the K+πminus resonances where the branchingfractions to Kπ are known the product branching fractions are converted to the Bdecay branching fractions shown in Table 10 The results for B(B0 rarr D0Klowast(892)0) andB(B0 rarr Dlowast2(2460)minusK+)times B(Dlowast2(2460)minus rarr D0πminus) are consistent with and more precisethan previous measurements [14 1617]

21

Table 7 Results for the complex amplitudes and their uncertainties presented (top) in terms ofreal and imaginary parts and (bottom) in terms and magnitudes and phases The three quotederrors are statistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively

Resonance Real part Imaginary part

Klowast(892)0 minus000plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 034 minus127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 006Klowast(1410)0 015plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 009 minus009plusmn 009plusmn 018plusmn 018Klowast0(1430)0 014plusmn 038plusmn 048plusmn 038 045plusmn 015plusmn 037plusmn 017LASS nonresonant minus010plusmn 024plusmn 016plusmn 042 044plusmn 014plusmn 017plusmn 023Klowast2(1430)0 minus032plusmn 009plusmn 015plusmn 023 minus047plusmn 007plusmn 014plusmn 015Dlowast0(2400)minus minus080plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 022 minus044plusmn 014plusmn 012plusmn 018Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) minus039plusmn 009plusmn 009plusmn 014 036plusmn 017plusmn 014plusmn 023Dπ P-wave (EFF) minus062plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 011 minus003plusmn 006plusmn 005plusmn 010

Resonance Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 005 minus157plusmn 011plusmn 016plusmn 027Klowast(1410)0 018plusmn 007plusmn 010plusmn 011 minus054plusmn 021plusmn 055plusmn 104Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 009plusmn 010plusmn 014 127plusmn 095plusmn 104plusmn 081LASS nonresonant 046plusmn 014plusmn 016plusmn 029 179plusmn 065plusmn 035plusmn 069Klowast2(1430)0 057plusmn 005plusmn 004plusmn 008 minus216plusmn 019plusmn 043plusmn 043Dlowast0(2400)minus 091plusmn 007plusmn 006plusmn 017 minus264plusmn 015plusmn 014plusmn 023Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 053plusmn 007plusmn 004plusmn 014 240plusmn 027plusmn 024plusmn 044Dπ P-wave (EFF) 062plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 011 minus309plusmn 010plusmn 007plusmn 017

Table 8 Results for the fit fractions and their uncertainties () The three quoted errors arestatistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively Upper limits are givenat 90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Fit fraction Upper limitKlowast(892)0 374plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 17Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03plusmn 08plusmn 08 lt 32 (37)Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20plusmn 24plusmn 34LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38plusmn 38plusmn 67

LASS total 67plusmn 27plusmn 27plusmn 54Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17plusmn 11plusmn 20Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28plusmn 20plusmn 74Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12plusmn 11plusmn 12Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 10 (11)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14plusmn 12plusmn 37Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16plusmn 22plusmn 30

22

Table 9 Results for the product branching fractions The four quoted errors are statisticalexperimental systematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Product branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 342plusmn 013plusmn 010plusmn 016plusmn 040Klowast(1410)0 007plusmn 003plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 001 lt 029 (034)Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 018plusmn 022plusmn 031plusmn 005LASS nonresonant 044plusmn 034plusmn 034plusmn 061plusmn 005

LASS total 061plusmn 025plusmn 025plusmn 049plusmn 007Klowast2(1430)0 068plusmn 015plusmn 010plusmn 018plusmn 008Dlowast0(2400)minus 177plusmn 026plusmn 019plusmn 067plusmn 020Dlowast2(2460)minus 212plusmn 010plusmn 011plusmn 011plusmn 025Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 010 (011)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 060plusmn 013plusmn 011plusmn 034plusmn 007Dπ P-wave (EFF) 081plusmn 015plusmn 020plusmn 027plusmn 009

Table 10 Results for the branching fractions The four quoted errors are statistical experimentalsystematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at 90 (95 )confidence level

Resonance Branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 513plusmn 020plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 060Klowast(1410)0 159plusmn 068plusmn 181plusmn 159plusmn 036 lt 67 (78)Klowast0(1430)0 071plusmn 027plusmn 033plusmn 047plusmn 008LASS nonresonant 066plusmn 051plusmn 051plusmn 092plusmn 008

LASS total 092plusmn 038plusmn 038plusmn 074plusmn 011Klowast2(1430)0 204plusmn 045plusmn 030plusmn 054plusmn 025

The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus states are found to be

m(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (2360plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 28) MeV

Γ(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (255plusmn 26plusmn 20plusmn 47) MeV

m(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (24656plusmn 18plusmn 05plusmn 12) MeV

Γ(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (460plusmn 34plusmn 14plusmn 29) MeV

where the three uncertainties are statistical experimental systematic and model systematicrespectively These are consistent with though less precise than recent results from a DPanalysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] They also show good agreement with and havesimilar precision to earlier measurements of these quantities [1337]

In summary the first amplitude analysis of B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays has been presentedusing a data sample corresponding to 30 fbminus1 of pp collision data collected by the LHCbexperiment A good description of the data is obtained with a model containing contri-

23

butions from intermediate Klowast(892)0 Klowast(1410)0 Klowast2(1430)0 and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonanceswith additional components to describe broad structures in the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S-and P-waves The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances aremeasured as are the complex amplitudes and fit fractions for all components includedin the amplitude model The results can be used in conjunction with an analysis ofB0 rarr DK+πminus decays where the neutral D meson is reconstructed in final states such asK+Kminus to measure the CKM unitarity triangle parameter γ [1 2]

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to our colleagues in the CERN accelerator departments forthe excellent performance of the LHC We thank the technical and administrative staffat the LHCb institutes We acknowledge support from CERN and from the nationalagencies CAPES CNPq FAPERJ and FINEP (Brazil) NSFC (China) CNRSIN2P3(France) BMBF DFG HGF and MPG (Germany) INFN (Italy) FOM and NWO (TheNetherlands) MNiSW and NCN (Poland) MENIFA (Romania) MinES and FANO(Russia) MinECo (Spain) SNSF and SER (Switzerland) NASU (Ukraine) STFC (UnitedKingdom) NSF (USA) The Tier1 computing centres are supported by IN2P3 (France)KIT and BMBF (Germany) INFN (Italy) NWO and SURF (The Netherlands) PIC(Spain) GridPP (United Kingdom) We are indebted to the communities behind themultiple open source software packages on which we depend We are also thankful forthe computing resources and the access to software RampD tools provided by Yandex LLC(Russia) Individual groups or members have received support from EPLANET MarieSk lodowska-Curie Actions and ERC (European Union) Conseil general de Haute-SavoieLabex ENIGMASS and OCEVU Region Auvergne (France) RFBR (Russia) XuntaGaland GENCAT (Spain) Royal Society and Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851(United Kingdom)

24

Appendices

A Correlation matrices

The statistical correlations between the complex coefficients masses and widths determinedfrom the fit to data are given in terms of real and imaginary parts and in terms ofmagnitudes and phases in Tables 11 and 12 The correlations are determined using thesame sample of simulated pseudoexperiments used to calculate the statistical uncertaintieson fit parameters

B Results for interference fit fractions

The central values of the interference fit fractions are given in Table 13 The statisti-cal experimental systematic and model uncertainties on these quantities are given inTables 14 15 and 16

25

Tab

le11

Sta

tist

ical

corr

elat

ions

bet

wee

nth

ere

al(x

)an

dim

agin

ary

(y)

par

tsof

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

x0

y 0x

1y 1

x2

y 2x

3y 3

x4

y 4x

5y 5

x7

y 7x

8y 8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

x0

100

014

002

017minus

018

015minus

017

003

039minus

037

016minus

009minus

018minus

029

007minus

037minus

019

002

004

012

y 01

00minus

006minus

008

009minus

011minus

000

014

003

003

012

013minus

012minus

024

035minus

007

009

012

001minus

004

x1

100minus

009minus

008minus

014minus

004

029minus

001

003minus

020

018minus

021minus

031minus

017minus

036minus

008minus

017minus

023

002

y 11

000

050

340

09minus

001

060minus

039

002minus

003minus

003

007minus

002minus

004minus

016minus

002

007

002

x2

100minus

013

081

009

014minus

016minus

015

021

010

013

004minus

015minus

007

001minus

025

001

y 21

000

080

280

24minus

036minus

013

008minus

004minus

001minus

004

004minus

002minus

001minus

009minus

010

x3

100

020

013minus

034minus

010

033minus

008

008minus

004minus

005minus

007minus

003minus

033minus

009

y 31

00minus

012minus

012minus

051

029minus

034minus

053

009minus

012

009minus

014minus

036

001

x4

100minus

053

032minus

010minus

020

003

002minus

027minus

017minus

006

010minus

000

y 41

000

06minus

009

040

010

014

016

011minus

005

007minus

003

x5

100minus

029minus

003

022

002

004minus

008

002

045minus

006

y 51

00minus

031minus

034

006

003

024minus

014minus

072minus

033

x7

100

046

005

010minus

011minus

001

027

017

y 71

00minus

016

036minus

001

017

032

008

x8

100minus

003

001minus

006minus

009minus

014

y 81

000

290

020

15minus

002

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

26

Tab

le12

S

tati

stic

alco

rrel

atio

ns

bet

wee

nth

em

agnit

ud

es(a

)an

dp

has

es(∆

)of

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

a0

∆0

a1

∆1

a2

∆2

a3

∆3

a4

∆4

a5

∆5

a7

∆7

a8

∆8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

a0

100minus

011minus

008

005

024

003minus

014

004

004

001

021

002

022minus

022

038minus

000minus

004minus

009minus

001

004

∆0

100minus

010

012

003

020

014

014minus

001

045minus

005

010minus

008

035minus

007

005minus

022

006

007

009

a1

100minus

035minus

025

006

032

001minus

001minus

038

004minus

022minus

006

031

002

024

007minus

018minus

020

001

∆1

100

024

015

016

000

014

038minus

018minus

013

016

026

022minus

006minus

009minus

004minus

012

005

a2

100

004

011minus

028minus

007

039minus

009

007

027

010

001

001minus

015

004minus

003minus

013

∆2

100

015

077minus

020minus

010minus

001

024

009

013

003minus

009

005

001

023minus

010

a3

100minus

006

000minus

011

016minus

030minus

012

056

001

012

002minus

007minus

027minus

004

∆3

100minus

028minus

019

015

041minus

024minus

008minus

000minus

013

004

002

041

008

a4

100

013

005minus

017

014

018minus

000

006

000

014minus

019minus

009

∆4

100minus

016

016

017

012

000minus

002minus

019minus

003

003

001

a5

100

024minus

026minus

006

011

005minus

007

001

019

039

∆5

100minus

000minus

028minus

001minus

020minus

020

015

076

027

a7

100minus

001

017minus

006

004

013minus

005minus

024

∆7

100minus

012

037

003minus

000minus

027minus

012

a8

100minus

004minus

001

004

006

015

∆8

100minus

037minus

002minus

033minus

001

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

27

Table 13 Interference fit fractions () from the nominal DP fit The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 374 18 minus00 00 00 minus24 minus02 minus26 minus50A1 07 minus00 00 00 minus11 minus03 minus06 minus11A2 51 minus32 minus00 29 15 16 19A3 48 00 minus84 01 21 02A4 74 minus03 minus10 minus15 minus04A5 193 minus00 28 00A6 231 minus00 00A7 66 minus00A8 89

Table 14 Statistical uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes areall pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASSnonresonant (A4) Klowast2 (1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8)Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 15 07 00 00 00 09 04 04 05A1 03 00 00 00 07 03 04 05A2 20 26 00 11 05 15 05A3 38 00 32 04 34 08A4 17 06 01 06 05A5 28 00 31 00A6 12 00 00A7 14 00A8 16

28

Table 15 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () Theamplitudes are all pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0 (1430)0(A3) LASS nonresonant (A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave(dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fitfractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 12 05 00 00 00 23 02 04 05A1 08 00 00 00 04 08 07 09A2 24 31 00 14 20 26 11A3 38 00 36 02 26 03A4 11 22 02 05 10A5 20 00 40 00A6 11 00 00A7 12 00A8 22

Table 16 Model uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 17 08 00 00 00 26 07 08 14A1 08 00 00 00 08 06 08 11A2 34 29 00 58 17 36 27A3 66 00 83 03 35 07A4 20 17 02 12 10A5 74 00 45 00A6 12 00 00A7 37 00A8 29

29

References

[1] T Gershon On the measurement of the unitarity triangle angle γ from B0 rarr DKlowast0

decays Phys Rev D79 (2009) 051301(R) arXiv08102706

[2] T Gershon and M Williams Prospects for the measurement of the unitaritytriangle angle γ from B0 rarr DK+πminus decays Phys Rev D80 (2009) 092002arXiv09091495

[3] N Cabibbo Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays Phys Rev Lett 10 (1963) 531

[4] M Kobayashi and T Maskawa CP -violation in the renormalizable theory of weakinteraction Progress of Theoretical Physics 49 (1973) 652

[5] M Gronau and D London How to determine all the angles of the unitarity trianglefrom B0 rarr DK0

S and B0s rarr Dφ Phys Lett B253 (1991) 483

[6] M Gronau and D Wyler On determining a weak phase from CP asymmetries incharged B decays Phys Lett B265 (1991) 172

[7] I Dunietz CP violation with self-tagging Bd modes Phys Lett B270 (1991) 75

[8] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurement of CP violation parameters inB0 rarr DKlowast0 decays Phys Rev D90 (2014) 112002 arXiv14078136

[9] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of overlapping spin-1 and spin-

3 D0Kminus resonances at mass 286 GeVc2 Phys Rev Lett 113 (2014) 162001

arXiv14077574

[10] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ decays

Phys Rev D90 (2014) 072003 arXiv14077712

[11] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observation and amplitude analysis of theBminus rarr D+Kminusπminus decay Phys Rev D91 (2015) 092002 arXiv150302995

[12] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays

arXiv150501710 submitted to Phys Rev D

[13] Belle collaboration A Kuzmin et al Study of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays Phys RevD76 (2007) 012006 arXivhep-ex0611054

[14] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of branching fractions andresonance contributions for B0 rarr D0K+πminus and search for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decaysPhys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 011803 arXivhep-ex0509036

[15] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurements of the branching fractions of

the decays B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ and B0 rarr D

0K+πminus Phys Rev D87 (2013) 112009

arXiv13046317

30

[16] Belle collaboration P Krokovny et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K0 and B0 rarr D0Klowast0

decays Phys Rev Lett 90 (2003) 141802 arXivhep-ex0212066

[17] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of B0 rarr D(lowast)0K(lowast)0 branchingfractions Phys Rev D74 (2006) 031101 arXivhep-ex0604016

[18] LHCb collaboration A A Alves Jr et al The LHCb detector at the LHC JINST 3(2008) S08005

[19] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al LHCb detector performance Int J Mod PhysA30 (2015) 1530022 arXiv14126352

[20] R Aaij et al Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator JINST 9 (2014) P09007arXiv14057808

[21] R Arink et al Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker JINST 9 (2014) P01002arXiv13113893

[22] M Adinolfi et al Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Eur PhysJ C73 (2013) 2431 arXiv12116759

[23] A A Alves Jr et al Performance of the LHCb muon system JINST 8 (2013) P02022arXiv12111346

[24] R Aaij et al The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011 JINST 8 (2013) P04022arXiv12113055

[25] V V Gligorov and M Williams Efficient reliable and fast high-level triggering usinga bonsai boosted decision tree JINST 8 (2013) P02013 arXiv12106861

[26] T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P Skands PYTHIA 64 physics and manual JHEP05 (2006) 026 arXivhep-ph0603175 T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P SkandsA brief introduction to PYTHIA 81 Comput Phys Commun 178 (2008) 852arXiv07103820

[27] I Belyaev et al Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss the LHCbsimulation framework J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032047

[28] D J Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package Nucl Instrum MethA462 (2001) 152

[29] P Golonka and Z Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo A precision tool for QED correctionsin Z and W decays Eur Phys J C45 (2006) 97 arXivhep-ph0506026

[30] Geant4 collaboration J Allison et al Geant4 developments and applications IEEETrans Nucl Sci 53 (2006) 270 Geant4 collaboration S Agostinelli et al Geant4A simulation toolkit Nucl Instrum Meth A506 (2003) 250

31

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 12: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

Eff

icie

ncy

()

0

005

01

015

02

025(a)LHCb Simulation

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

Eff

icie

ncy

()

0

005

01

015

02

025(b)LHCb Simulation

Figure 4 Efficiency variation as a function of SDP position for candidates triggered by (a) signaldecay products and (b) by the rest of the event The vertical white stripe is due to the Dlowast vetoand the curved white band is due to the D0 veto

6 Dalitz plot fit

61 Signal efficiency

The variation of the efficiency across the phase space is studied in terms of the squareDalitz plot (SDP) The SDP is defined by variables mprime and θprime that range between 0 and 1and are given for the D0K+πminus case by

mprime equiv 1

πarccos

(2m(D0πminus)minusmmin

D0πminus

mmaxD0πminus minusmmin

D0πminus

minus 1

)and θprime equiv 1

πθ(D0πminus) (15)

where mmaxD0πminus = mB0 minusmK+ and mmin

D0πminus = mD0 + mπminus are the kinematic boundaries of

m(D0πminus) allowed in the B0 rarr D0K+πminus decay and θ(D0πminus) is the helicity angle of theD0πminus system (the angle between the K+ and the D0 meson in the D0πminus rest frame) Thedistribution of selected events across the SDP is shown in Fig 3(b)

Efficiency variation across the SDP is caused by the detector acceptance and bytrigger selection and PID requirements The efficiency is evaluated with simulated samplesgenerated uniformly over the SDP Data-driven corrections are applied to correct for knowndifferences between data and simulation in the tracking trigger and PID efficiencies usingidentical methods to those described in Ref [10] The efficiency functions are obtainedby fitting the corrected simulation with two-dimensional cubic splines Figure 4 showsthe histograms used to model the variation of the efficiency over the SDP for candidatestriggered by (a) signal decays and (b) by the rest of the event

62 Background studies

Among the background yields in the signal region given in Table 1 the only sizeablecomponents are due to combinatorial background and B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays The SDP

10

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

0

0002

0004

0006

0008

001

0012

0014

(a)LHCb

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

000020004000600080010012001400160018

(b)LHCb Simulation

Figure 5 SDP distributions of the background contributions from (a) combinatorial backgroundand (b) B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays

distributions of these backgrounds are described by the histograms shown in Fig 5Combinatorial background contributes 22 of candidates in the signal region The

shape of this contribution over the SDP is obtained from the high B mass sideband (5400ndash5900 MeV) As seen in Fig 2 this sideband is dominated by combinatorial backgroundwith a small contribution from B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays The SDP distribution of theB0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus contribution in the sideband region is modelled as described belowfor the signal region and is subtracted from the sideband sample To check that theSDP shape of the combinatorial background does not vary with the B candidate massa sample of doubly charged D0Kplusmnπplusmn candidates is investigated This confirms that theSDP distribution from the sideband is a reliable model for combinatorial background inthe signal region

The B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus contribution accounts for 16 of the candidates in the signalregion Its SDP distribution is obtained from a simulated sample with the B0 rarr D0π+πminus

and B0 rarr Dlowast0π+πminus contributions combined and reweighted as described in Sec 4 TheB0 rarr D0π+πminus decay mode is the dominant component of this background in the signalregion

Due to resolution effects B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ Dlowast(2010)minus rarr D0πminus decays are notentirely removed by the Dlowast veto Although this component corresponds to real B0 rarrD0πminusK+ decays it is treated as incoherent (ie as background) since its interference withthe remainder of the signal is negligible Its SDP distribution is modelled as a Gaussianpeak in m(D0πminus) with mean fixed to the known Dlowast(2010)minus mass and width and yielddetermined in the fit to data

11

Table 2 Signal contributions to the fit model where parameters and uncertainties are takenfrom Ref [37] The models are described in Sec 5

Resonance Spin DP axis Model Parameters

Klowast(892)0 1 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 89581plusmn 019 MeV Γ0 = 474plusmn 06 MeVKlowast(1410)0 1 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 1414plusmn 15 MeV Γ0 = 232plusmn 21 MeVKlowast0(1430)0 0 m2(K+πminus) LASS Determined from data (see text)Klowast2(1430)0 2 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 14324plusmn 13 MeV Γ0 = 109plusmn 5 MeVDlowast0(2400)minus 0 m2(D0πminus) RBW

Determined from data (see Table 3)Dlowast2(2460)minus 2 m2(D0πminus) RBW

Nonresonant 0 m2(D0πminus) dabba Fixed (see text)Nonresonant 1 m2(D0πminus) EFF Determined from data (see text)

63 Amplitude model for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays

The Dalitz plot fit is performed using the Laura++ [53] package The likelihood functionis given by

L =Ncprodi

[sumk

NkPk(m2i (D

0πminus)m2i (K

+πminus)) ]

(16)

where the index i runs over Nc candidates k runs over the signal and backgroundcomponents and Nk is the yield in each component The probability density function forthe signal component Psig is given by Eq (12) with the |A

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)|2

terms multiplied by the efficiency function described in Sec 61 As it is possible forthe minimisation procedure to find a local minimum of the negative log likelihood (NLL)profile the fit is repeated many times with randomised initial values to ensure the globalminimum is found

The nominal Dalitz plot fit model for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays is composed of severalresonant and nonresonant amplitudes Only those amplitudes that provide significantcontributions or that aid the fit stability are included Unnatural spin-parity states arenot considered as these do not decay to two pseudoscalars The eight amplitudes includedin this model are listed in Table 2 The width of the narrowest signal contribution tothe Dalitz plot (sim 50 MeV) is far larger than the mass resolution (sim 24 MeV) thereforeresolution effects are neglected

The real and imaginary parts of the complex coefficients cj defined in Eq (1) are freeparameters of the fit except for the coefficient of the Dlowast2(2460)minus component which is fixedto 1 as a reference The phases and magnitudes of the complex coefficients as well as fitfractions and interference fit fractions are derived from these free parameters In additionthe masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances are determined fromthe fit to data and are reported in Table 3 The statistical uncertainties on all parametersof interest are calculated using large samples of simulated pseudoexperiments Thesepseudoexperiments are also used to determine the correlations between the statisticaluncertainties on the parameters which are given in Appendix A The LASS parameters

12

Table 3 Masses and widths (MeV) determined in the fit to data with statistical uncertaintiesonly

Resonance Mass Width

Dlowast0(2400)minus 2360plusmn 15 255plusmn 26Dlowast2(2460)minus 24656plusmn 18 460plusmn 34

Table 4 Complex coefficients and fit fractions determined from the Dalitz plot fit Uncertaintiesare statistical only Note that the fit fractions magnitudes and phases are derived quantities

Resonance Fit fraction Isobar model coefficients() Real part Imaginary part Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 minus000plusmn 015 minus127plusmn 006 127plusmn 006 minus157plusmn 011Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 015plusmn 006 minus009plusmn 009 018plusmn 007 minus054plusmn 021Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 014plusmn 038 045plusmn 015 047plusmn 009 127plusmn 095LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 minus010plusmn 024 044plusmn 014 046plusmn 014 179plusmn 065

LASS total 67plusmn 27Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 minus032plusmn 009 minus047plusmn 007 057plusmn 005 minus216plusmn 019Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 minus080plusmn 008 minus044plusmn 014 091plusmn 007 minus264plusmn 015Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 100 000 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 minus039plusmn 009 036plusmn 017 053plusmn 007 240plusmn 027Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 minus062plusmn 006 minus003plusmn 006 062plusmn 006 minus309plusmn 010Total fit fraction 1134

are determined to be m0 = 1450plusmn 80 MeV Γ0 = 400plusmn 230 MeV a = 32plusmn 18 GeV andr = 09plusmn11 GeV while the parameter of the EFF lineshape of the Dπ P-wave nonresonantamplitude is determined to be α = 088plusmn 010 GeVminus2

The values of the fit fractions and complex coefficients obtained from the fit are shownin Table 4 while the values of the interference fit fractions are given in Appendix B Thesum of the fit fractions is seen to exceed unity mostly due to interference within the Dπ andKπ S-waves Note that in Table 4 and all results for fit fractions and derived quantitiesvalues are reported separately for both the Klowast0 (1430)0 and nonresonant components of theLASS lineshape as well as their coherent sum

Projections of the data and the nominal fit model onto m(K+πminus) m(D0πminus) andm(D0K+) are shown in Fig 6 Zooms are provided in the regions of the main resonantcontributions in Fig 7 Projections onto the cosine of the helicity angle of the D0πminus andK+πminus systems are shown in Figs 8 and 9 respectively These projections all show goodagreement between data and the fit model

Angular moments provide a useful method to investigate the helicity structure of thedecays The angular moments in m(D0πminus) and m(K+πminus) obtained as in Refs [1011]are shown in Figs 10 and 11 respectively The contributions due to the Klowast(892)0 andDlowast2(2460)minus resonances are seen as peaks in moments up to order 2 and order 4 respectivelyas expected for spin-1 and spin-2 resonances Reflections make the interpretation ofmoments at higher masses more difficult However the good agreement seen between data

13

and the fit model provides further support for the fit model being a good description ofthe data

The quality of the fit is evaluated by determining a two-dimensional χ2 value comparingthe data and fit model in 144 bins across the SDP that are defined adaptively to ensurethey are approximately equally populated The pull in each of these bins defined as thedifference between the data and the fit model divided by the uncertainty is shown inFig 12 The effective number of degrees of freedom of the χ2 is between Nbins minusNpars minus 1and Nbinsminus1 where Npars is the number of free parameters in the fit yielding a reduced χ2

in the range 099 ndash 122 Additional unbinned tests of fit quality [54] also show acceptableagreement between the data and the fit model

7 Systematic uncertainties

Systematic uncertainties are considered from sources that can be divided into two categoriesexperimental and model uncertainties Experimental uncertainties arise due to the signaland background yields in the signal region the distributions of the background componentsacross the SDP the variation of efficiency across the SDP and possible bias due to thefitting procedure Model uncertainties are considered due to the fixed parameters in thesignal model the addition or removal of marginal amplitudes and the choice of models forthe Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves The uncertainties due to all of these sourcesare combined in quadrature

The signal and background yields are determined from the fit to the B candidateinvariant mass distribution Systematic uncertainties are considered on the total yieldsdue to both statistical and systematic variations of these yields as evaluated in Ref [15]The yields in the signal region are varied appropriately and the effects of these variationson the parameters of interest are assigned as systematic uncertainties

The histograms describing the background distributions are each varied within statisticaluncertainties to establish the uncertainty due to the imperfect knowledge of the distributionof these backgrounds across the SDP The histograms describing the efficiency variationacross the SDP are also varied within their uncertainties prior to the spline fit Theefficiency histograms are also varied with local correlations to account for the effects ofany unknown correlations between neighbouring bins For each parameter the largeruncertainty is considered from the correlated and uncorrelated variations In addition thebinning scheme of the control sample used to evaluate PID performance is varied

An ensemble of pseudoexperiments is used to establish systematic uncertainties relatedto any potential fit bias Pseudoexperiments are generated using the parameters determinedin the fit to data and mean fitted values of the parameters are determined from Gaussianfits to the distributions of results obtained in the ensemble The differences between thegenerated and mean fitted values are found to be small Uncertainties are determined asthe sum in quadrature of the difference between the generated and mean fitted values andthe uncertainty on the mean fitted value from the Gaussian fit

Systematic uncertainties due to fixed parameters in the fit model are determined by

14

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310LHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350 LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310 LHCb (d)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

LHCb (e)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210LHCb (f)

Data Total fit 0(892)K 0(1410)K

S-wave (LASS)πK 0(1430)2Kminus

(2400)0Dminus

(2460)2D

S-wave (EFF)πD P-wave (EFF)πDminus

D Background

Figure 6 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) (c) m(K+πminus)and (e) m(D0K+) with the same projections shown in (b) (d) and (f) with a logarithmic y-axisscale Components are described in the legend

15

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

235 24 245 25 255

Can

dida

tes

4 M

eV

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m05 1 15

Can

dida

tes

13

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

LHCb (b)

Figure 7 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) in the Dlowast2(2460)minus

region and (b) the low m(K+πminus) region Components are as shown in Fig 6

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

) lt 235 GeVminusπ0D(m204 lt

LHCb(a)

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

) lt 255 GeVminusπ0D(m235 lt

LHCb(b)

Figure 8 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(D0πminus) in the mass ranges(a) 204 lt m(D0πminus) lt 235 GeV and (b) 235 lt m(D0πminus) lt 255 GeV Components are asshown in Fig 6

repeating the fit with these parameters varied The fixed masses and widths are variedwithin their uncertainties as shown in Table 2 while the BlattndashWeisskopf barrier radii rBWare varied independently for D0πminus and K+πminus resonances between 3 and 5 GeVminus1 [10]

The Klowast(1410)0 amplitude does not contribute significantly to the nominal fit modelso the fit is repeated with this component removed and the change in results is assignedas the associated systematic uncertainty In addition uncertainties are assigned fromthe changes in the results when an amplitude due to the Klowast(1680)0 resonance or from avirtual Blowast(5325)+ component as described in Ref [10] is included in the model

A Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D0Kminusπ+ observed both spin-1 and spin-3 resonances

at m(D0Kminus) sim 286 GeV [9 10] A spin-3 resonance has also been seen at m(D0πminus) sim276 GeV in B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] while an analysis of B+ rarr DminusK+π+ shows aspin-1 resonance at similar m(D+πminus) values [11] Uncertainties are assigned corresponding

16

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

) lt 08 GeVminusπ+K(m0 lt LHCb

(a)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 10 GeVminusπ+K(m08 lt LHCb

(b)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 13 GeVminusπ+K(m10 lt LHCb

(c)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

) lt 15 GeVminusπ+K(m14 lt LHCb

(d)

Figure 9 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(K+πminus) in the mass ranges(a) m(K+πminus) lt 08 GeV (b) 08 lt m(K+πminus) lt 10 GeV (c) 10 lt m(K+πminus) lt 13 GeV and(d) 14 lt m(K+πminus) lt 15 GeV Components are as shown in Fig 6

to the changes in results when either a spin-1 or spin-3 state at m(D0πminus) sim 276 GeV isadded to the nominal model

The LASS model used to describe the Kπ S-wave is replaced with a Flatte shape [55]which accounts for the Kηprime threshold near the Klowast0 (1430)0 mass and a resonant term witha modified mass dependent width [52] for the κ (also known as Klowast0(800)) state Thismodel gives an NLL that is worse by 44 units A model-independent description of theKπ S-wave is also used to fit the data with the uncertainty on each parameter takenas the larger of the two differences This alternative improves the NLL by 88 units butintroduces an additional four free parameters into the fit The dabba lineshape used todescribe the D0πminus S-wave is replaced with an EFF lineshape while a power-law model isintroduced as an alternative to the EFF lineshape that describes the D0πminus P-wave Thesealterations worsen the NLL by 30 units and improve it by 08 units respectively

The total systematic uncertainties due to experimental and model effects for fit fractionsand complex coefficients are given together with the results in Sec 8 The contributionsfrom different sources to the systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions masses and

17

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0002004006008

0101201401601802

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-30-25-20-15-10

-505

1015

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

310timesLHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

310timesLHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-8-6-4-202468

310timesLHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-8-6-4-20246

310timesLHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-6-4-202468

10

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 10 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(D0πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

18

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0

005

01

015

02

025

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

20

40

60

80

100310times

LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10-505

10152025

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25310times

LHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-20-15-10

-505

101520

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 11 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(K+πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

19

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Pull

-2

-1

0

1

2

LHCb

Figure 12 Differences between the data SDP distribution and the fit model across the SDP interms of the per-bin pull

Table 5 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths(MeV) Uncertainties given on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value SB fraction Efficiency Background SDP Fit bias Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 060 083 050 031 117Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 006 039 069 005 080Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 028 148 185 033 241LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 051 225 286 086 377

LASS total 67plusmn 27 026 186 160 102 267Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 023 072 053 054 107Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 021 139 143 040 204Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 070 070 049 015 111Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 003 081 059 057 115Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 086 191 052 038 219m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 46 81 70 37 122m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 001 037 022 029 051Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 28 131 139 48 199Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 05 09 09 05 14

widths are given in Tables 5 and 6 The dominant experimental systematic uncertaintyon most parameters is due to either the efficiency variation or background distributionsacross the SDP while the model uncertainties are generally dominated by the effects ofalternative descriptions of the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves For the parametersof broad components the model uncertainties dominate however for other parameters thestatistical experimental and model uncertainties are all of a similar magnitude

The stability of the fit results is confirmed by several cross-checks The data sample isdivided into subsamples according to the flavour of the B candidate the trigger decision

20

Table 6 Model uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths (MeV) Uncertaintiesgiven on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value Fixed parameters Addremove Alternative models Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 075 114 109 174Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 018 070 022 076Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 079 330 023 340LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 110 399 520 665

LASS total 67plusmn 27 053 142 521 543Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 036 187 056 198Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 055 195 711 740Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 018 073 099 124Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 027 140 346 374Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 031 199 215 295m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 61 93 256 279m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 009 105 048 115Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 40 180 435 472Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 14 05 24 29

the polarity of the magnet and the year of data taking Each subsample is fitted separatelyand all are seen to be consistent with the nominal fit results The fit is also repeatedwith additional resonance components to test the fit model Resonances up to spin-3 wereconsidered for all three pairs of daughters with the mass and width allowed to vary in thefit No additional significant contributions were observed

8 Results and summary

The results for the complex coefficients are reported in Table 7 with results for thefit fractions given in Table 8 The results for the interference fit fractions are givenin Appendix B Upper limits are determined on the fit fractions of the Klowast(1410)0 andDlowast3(2760)minus components which do not give significant contributions using the methoddescribed in Ref [10]

The fit fractions for resonant contributions are converted into quasi-two-body productbranching fractions by multiplying by B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus) = (92plusmn 06plusmn 07plusmn 06)times 10minus5which is obtained from the ratio of branching fractions B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus)B(B0 rarrD0π+πminus) [15] multiplied by the latest result for B(B0 rarr D0π+πminus) [12] accounting forthe different Dlowast(2010)minus veto windows used in the analyses and for the 37 residualbackground due to B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ decays The statistical correlation between theresults of Ref [15] and this analysis is found to be negligible The results for the productbranching fractions are shown in Table 9 For the K+πminus resonances where the branchingfractions to Kπ are known the product branching fractions are converted to the Bdecay branching fractions shown in Table 10 The results for B(B0 rarr D0Klowast(892)0) andB(B0 rarr Dlowast2(2460)minusK+)times B(Dlowast2(2460)minus rarr D0πminus) are consistent with and more precisethan previous measurements [14 1617]

21

Table 7 Results for the complex amplitudes and their uncertainties presented (top) in terms ofreal and imaginary parts and (bottom) in terms and magnitudes and phases The three quotederrors are statistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively

Resonance Real part Imaginary part

Klowast(892)0 minus000plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 034 minus127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 006Klowast(1410)0 015plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 009 minus009plusmn 009plusmn 018plusmn 018Klowast0(1430)0 014plusmn 038plusmn 048plusmn 038 045plusmn 015plusmn 037plusmn 017LASS nonresonant minus010plusmn 024plusmn 016plusmn 042 044plusmn 014plusmn 017plusmn 023Klowast2(1430)0 minus032plusmn 009plusmn 015plusmn 023 minus047plusmn 007plusmn 014plusmn 015Dlowast0(2400)minus minus080plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 022 minus044plusmn 014plusmn 012plusmn 018Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) minus039plusmn 009plusmn 009plusmn 014 036plusmn 017plusmn 014plusmn 023Dπ P-wave (EFF) minus062plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 011 minus003plusmn 006plusmn 005plusmn 010

Resonance Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 005 minus157plusmn 011plusmn 016plusmn 027Klowast(1410)0 018plusmn 007plusmn 010plusmn 011 minus054plusmn 021plusmn 055plusmn 104Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 009plusmn 010plusmn 014 127plusmn 095plusmn 104plusmn 081LASS nonresonant 046plusmn 014plusmn 016plusmn 029 179plusmn 065plusmn 035plusmn 069Klowast2(1430)0 057plusmn 005plusmn 004plusmn 008 minus216plusmn 019plusmn 043plusmn 043Dlowast0(2400)minus 091plusmn 007plusmn 006plusmn 017 minus264plusmn 015plusmn 014plusmn 023Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 053plusmn 007plusmn 004plusmn 014 240plusmn 027plusmn 024plusmn 044Dπ P-wave (EFF) 062plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 011 minus309plusmn 010plusmn 007plusmn 017

Table 8 Results for the fit fractions and their uncertainties () The three quoted errors arestatistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively Upper limits are givenat 90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Fit fraction Upper limitKlowast(892)0 374plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 17Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03plusmn 08plusmn 08 lt 32 (37)Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20plusmn 24plusmn 34LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38plusmn 38plusmn 67

LASS total 67plusmn 27plusmn 27plusmn 54Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17plusmn 11plusmn 20Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28plusmn 20plusmn 74Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12plusmn 11plusmn 12Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 10 (11)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14plusmn 12plusmn 37Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16plusmn 22plusmn 30

22

Table 9 Results for the product branching fractions The four quoted errors are statisticalexperimental systematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Product branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 342plusmn 013plusmn 010plusmn 016plusmn 040Klowast(1410)0 007plusmn 003plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 001 lt 029 (034)Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 018plusmn 022plusmn 031plusmn 005LASS nonresonant 044plusmn 034plusmn 034plusmn 061plusmn 005

LASS total 061plusmn 025plusmn 025plusmn 049plusmn 007Klowast2(1430)0 068plusmn 015plusmn 010plusmn 018plusmn 008Dlowast0(2400)minus 177plusmn 026plusmn 019plusmn 067plusmn 020Dlowast2(2460)minus 212plusmn 010plusmn 011plusmn 011plusmn 025Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 010 (011)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 060plusmn 013plusmn 011plusmn 034plusmn 007Dπ P-wave (EFF) 081plusmn 015plusmn 020plusmn 027plusmn 009

Table 10 Results for the branching fractions The four quoted errors are statistical experimentalsystematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at 90 (95 )confidence level

Resonance Branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 513plusmn 020plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 060Klowast(1410)0 159plusmn 068plusmn 181plusmn 159plusmn 036 lt 67 (78)Klowast0(1430)0 071plusmn 027plusmn 033plusmn 047plusmn 008LASS nonresonant 066plusmn 051plusmn 051plusmn 092plusmn 008

LASS total 092plusmn 038plusmn 038plusmn 074plusmn 011Klowast2(1430)0 204plusmn 045plusmn 030plusmn 054plusmn 025

The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus states are found to be

m(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (2360plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 28) MeV

Γ(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (255plusmn 26plusmn 20plusmn 47) MeV

m(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (24656plusmn 18plusmn 05plusmn 12) MeV

Γ(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (460plusmn 34plusmn 14plusmn 29) MeV

where the three uncertainties are statistical experimental systematic and model systematicrespectively These are consistent with though less precise than recent results from a DPanalysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] They also show good agreement with and havesimilar precision to earlier measurements of these quantities [1337]

In summary the first amplitude analysis of B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays has been presentedusing a data sample corresponding to 30 fbminus1 of pp collision data collected by the LHCbexperiment A good description of the data is obtained with a model containing contri-

23

butions from intermediate Klowast(892)0 Klowast(1410)0 Klowast2(1430)0 and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonanceswith additional components to describe broad structures in the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S-and P-waves The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances aremeasured as are the complex amplitudes and fit fractions for all components includedin the amplitude model The results can be used in conjunction with an analysis ofB0 rarr DK+πminus decays where the neutral D meson is reconstructed in final states such asK+Kminus to measure the CKM unitarity triangle parameter γ [1 2]

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to our colleagues in the CERN accelerator departments forthe excellent performance of the LHC We thank the technical and administrative staffat the LHCb institutes We acknowledge support from CERN and from the nationalagencies CAPES CNPq FAPERJ and FINEP (Brazil) NSFC (China) CNRSIN2P3(France) BMBF DFG HGF and MPG (Germany) INFN (Italy) FOM and NWO (TheNetherlands) MNiSW and NCN (Poland) MENIFA (Romania) MinES and FANO(Russia) MinECo (Spain) SNSF and SER (Switzerland) NASU (Ukraine) STFC (UnitedKingdom) NSF (USA) The Tier1 computing centres are supported by IN2P3 (France)KIT and BMBF (Germany) INFN (Italy) NWO and SURF (The Netherlands) PIC(Spain) GridPP (United Kingdom) We are indebted to the communities behind themultiple open source software packages on which we depend We are also thankful forthe computing resources and the access to software RampD tools provided by Yandex LLC(Russia) Individual groups or members have received support from EPLANET MarieSk lodowska-Curie Actions and ERC (European Union) Conseil general de Haute-SavoieLabex ENIGMASS and OCEVU Region Auvergne (France) RFBR (Russia) XuntaGaland GENCAT (Spain) Royal Society and Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851(United Kingdom)

24

Appendices

A Correlation matrices

The statistical correlations between the complex coefficients masses and widths determinedfrom the fit to data are given in terms of real and imaginary parts and in terms ofmagnitudes and phases in Tables 11 and 12 The correlations are determined using thesame sample of simulated pseudoexperiments used to calculate the statistical uncertaintieson fit parameters

B Results for interference fit fractions

The central values of the interference fit fractions are given in Table 13 The statisti-cal experimental systematic and model uncertainties on these quantities are given inTables 14 15 and 16

25

Tab

le11

Sta

tist

ical

corr

elat

ions

bet

wee

nth

ere

al(x

)an

dim

agin

ary

(y)

par

tsof

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

x0

y 0x

1y 1

x2

y 2x

3y 3

x4

y 4x

5y 5

x7

y 7x

8y 8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

x0

100

014

002

017minus

018

015minus

017

003

039minus

037

016minus

009minus

018minus

029

007minus

037minus

019

002

004

012

y 01

00minus

006minus

008

009minus

011minus

000

014

003

003

012

013minus

012minus

024

035minus

007

009

012

001minus

004

x1

100minus

009minus

008minus

014minus

004

029minus

001

003minus

020

018minus

021minus

031minus

017minus

036minus

008minus

017minus

023

002

y 11

000

050

340

09minus

001

060minus

039

002minus

003minus

003

007minus

002minus

004minus

016minus

002

007

002

x2

100minus

013

081

009

014minus

016minus

015

021

010

013

004minus

015minus

007

001minus

025

001

y 21

000

080

280

24minus

036minus

013

008minus

004minus

001minus

004

004minus

002minus

001minus

009minus

010

x3

100

020

013minus

034minus

010

033minus

008

008minus

004minus

005minus

007minus

003minus

033minus

009

y 31

00minus

012minus

012minus

051

029minus

034minus

053

009minus

012

009minus

014minus

036

001

x4

100minus

053

032minus

010minus

020

003

002minus

027minus

017minus

006

010minus

000

y 41

000

06minus

009

040

010

014

016

011minus

005

007minus

003

x5

100minus

029minus

003

022

002

004minus

008

002

045minus

006

y 51

00minus

031minus

034

006

003

024minus

014minus

072minus

033

x7

100

046

005

010minus

011minus

001

027

017

y 71

00minus

016

036minus

001

017

032

008

x8

100minus

003

001minus

006minus

009minus

014

y 81

000

290

020

15minus

002

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

26

Tab

le12

S

tati

stic

alco

rrel

atio

ns

bet

wee

nth

em

agnit

ud

es(a

)an

dp

has

es(∆

)of

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

a0

∆0

a1

∆1

a2

∆2

a3

∆3

a4

∆4

a5

∆5

a7

∆7

a8

∆8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

a0

100minus

011minus

008

005

024

003minus

014

004

004

001

021

002

022minus

022

038minus

000minus

004minus

009minus

001

004

∆0

100minus

010

012

003

020

014

014minus

001

045minus

005

010minus

008

035minus

007

005minus

022

006

007

009

a1

100minus

035minus

025

006

032

001minus

001minus

038

004minus

022minus

006

031

002

024

007minus

018minus

020

001

∆1

100

024

015

016

000

014

038minus

018minus

013

016

026

022minus

006minus

009minus

004minus

012

005

a2

100

004

011minus

028minus

007

039minus

009

007

027

010

001

001minus

015

004minus

003minus

013

∆2

100

015

077minus

020minus

010minus

001

024

009

013

003minus

009

005

001

023minus

010

a3

100minus

006

000minus

011

016minus

030minus

012

056

001

012

002minus

007minus

027minus

004

∆3

100minus

028minus

019

015

041minus

024minus

008minus

000minus

013

004

002

041

008

a4

100

013

005minus

017

014

018minus

000

006

000

014minus

019minus

009

∆4

100minus

016

016

017

012

000minus

002minus

019minus

003

003

001

a5

100

024minus

026minus

006

011

005minus

007

001

019

039

∆5

100minus

000minus

028minus

001minus

020minus

020

015

076

027

a7

100minus

001

017minus

006

004

013minus

005minus

024

∆7

100minus

012

037

003minus

000minus

027minus

012

a8

100minus

004minus

001

004

006

015

∆8

100minus

037minus

002minus

033minus

001

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

27

Table 13 Interference fit fractions () from the nominal DP fit The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 374 18 minus00 00 00 minus24 minus02 minus26 minus50A1 07 minus00 00 00 minus11 minus03 minus06 minus11A2 51 minus32 minus00 29 15 16 19A3 48 00 minus84 01 21 02A4 74 minus03 minus10 minus15 minus04A5 193 minus00 28 00A6 231 minus00 00A7 66 minus00A8 89

Table 14 Statistical uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes areall pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASSnonresonant (A4) Klowast2 (1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8)Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 15 07 00 00 00 09 04 04 05A1 03 00 00 00 07 03 04 05A2 20 26 00 11 05 15 05A3 38 00 32 04 34 08A4 17 06 01 06 05A5 28 00 31 00A6 12 00 00A7 14 00A8 16

28

Table 15 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () Theamplitudes are all pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0 (1430)0(A3) LASS nonresonant (A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave(dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fitfractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 12 05 00 00 00 23 02 04 05A1 08 00 00 00 04 08 07 09A2 24 31 00 14 20 26 11A3 38 00 36 02 26 03A4 11 22 02 05 10A5 20 00 40 00A6 11 00 00A7 12 00A8 22

Table 16 Model uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 17 08 00 00 00 26 07 08 14A1 08 00 00 00 08 06 08 11A2 34 29 00 58 17 36 27A3 66 00 83 03 35 07A4 20 17 02 12 10A5 74 00 45 00A6 12 00 00A7 37 00A8 29

29

References

[1] T Gershon On the measurement of the unitarity triangle angle γ from B0 rarr DKlowast0

decays Phys Rev D79 (2009) 051301(R) arXiv08102706

[2] T Gershon and M Williams Prospects for the measurement of the unitaritytriangle angle γ from B0 rarr DK+πminus decays Phys Rev D80 (2009) 092002arXiv09091495

[3] N Cabibbo Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays Phys Rev Lett 10 (1963) 531

[4] M Kobayashi and T Maskawa CP -violation in the renormalizable theory of weakinteraction Progress of Theoretical Physics 49 (1973) 652

[5] M Gronau and D London How to determine all the angles of the unitarity trianglefrom B0 rarr DK0

S and B0s rarr Dφ Phys Lett B253 (1991) 483

[6] M Gronau and D Wyler On determining a weak phase from CP asymmetries incharged B decays Phys Lett B265 (1991) 172

[7] I Dunietz CP violation with self-tagging Bd modes Phys Lett B270 (1991) 75

[8] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurement of CP violation parameters inB0 rarr DKlowast0 decays Phys Rev D90 (2014) 112002 arXiv14078136

[9] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of overlapping spin-1 and spin-

3 D0Kminus resonances at mass 286 GeVc2 Phys Rev Lett 113 (2014) 162001

arXiv14077574

[10] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ decays

Phys Rev D90 (2014) 072003 arXiv14077712

[11] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observation and amplitude analysis of theBminus rarr D+Kminusπminus decay Phys Rev D91 (2015) 092002 arXiv150302995

[12] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays

arXiv150501710 submitted to Phys Rev D

[13] Belle collaboration A Kuzmin et al Study of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays Phys RevD76 (2007) 012006 arXivhep-ex0611054

[14] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of branching fractions andresonance contributions for B0 rarr D0K+πminus and search for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decaysPhys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 011803 arXivhep-ex0509036

[15] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurements of the branching fractions of

the decays B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ and B0 rarr D

0K+πminus Phys Rev D87 (2013) 112009

arXiv13046317

30

[16] Belle collaboration P Krokovny et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K0 and B0 rarr D0Klowast0

decays Phys Rev Lett 90 (2003) 141802 arXivhep-ex0212066

[17] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of B0 rarr D(lowast)0K(lowast)0 branchingfractions Phys Rev D74 (2006) 031101 arXivhep-ex0604016

[18] LHCb collaboration A A Alves Jr et al The LHCb detector at the LHC JINST 3(2008) S08005

[19] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al LHCb detector performance Int J Mod PhysA30 (2015) 1530022 arXiv14126352

[20] R Aaij et al Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator JINST 9 (2014) P09007arXiv14057808

[21] R Arink et al Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker JINST 9 (2014) P01002arXiv13113893

[22] M Adinolfi et al Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Eur PhysJ C73 (2013) 2431 arXiv12116759

[23] A A Alves Jr et al Performance of the LHCb muon system JINST 8 (2013) P02022arXiv12111346

[24] R Aaij et al The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011 JINST 8 (2013) P04022arXiv12113055

[25] V V Gligorov and M Williams Efficient reliable and fast high-level triggering usinga bonsai boosted decision tree JINST 8 (2013) P02013 arXiv12106861

[26] T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P Skands PYTHIA 64 physics and manual JHEP05 (2006) 026 arXivhep-ph0603175 T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P SkandsA brief introduction to PYTHIA 81 Comput Phys Commun 178 (2008) 852arXiv07103820

[27] I Belyaev et al Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss the LHCbsimulation framework J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032047

[28] D J Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package Nucl Instrum MethA462 (2001) 152

[29] P Golonka and Z Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo A precision tool for QED correctionsin Z and W decays Eur Phys J C45 (2006) 97 arXivhep-ph0506026

[30] Geant4 collaboration J Allison et al Geant4 developments and applications IEEETrans Nucl Sci 53 (2006) 270 Geant4 collaboration S Agostinelli et al Geant4A simulation toolkit Nucl Instrum Meth A506 (2003) 250

31

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 13: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

0

0002

0004

0006

0008

001

0012

0014

(a)LHCb

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0010203040506070809

1

000020004000600080010012001400160018

(b)LHCb Simulation

Figure 5 SDP distributions of the background contributions from (a) combinatorial backgroundand (b) B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays

distributions of these backgrounds are described by the histograms shown in Fig 5Combinatorial background contributes 22 of candidates in the signal region The

shape of this contribution over the SDP is obtained from the high B mass sideband (5400ndash5900 MeV) As seen in Fig 2 this sideband is dominated by combinatorial backgroundwith a small contribution from B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decays The SDP distribution of theB0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus contribution in the sideband region is modelled as described belowfor the signal region and is subtracted from the sideband sample To check that theSDP shape of the combinatorial background does not vary with the B candidate massa sample of doubly charged D0Kplusmnπplusmn candidates is investigated This confirms that theSDP distribution from the sideband is a reliable model for combinatorial background inthe signal region

The B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus contribution accounts for 16 of the candidates in the signalregion Its SDP distribution is obtained from a simulated sample with the B0 rarr D0π+πminus

and B0 rarr Dlowast0π+πminus contributions combined and reweighted as described in Sec 4 TheB0 rarr D0π+πminus decay mode is the dominant component of this background in the signalregion

Due to resolution effects B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ Dlowast(2010)minus rarr D0πminus decays are notentirely removed by the Dlowast veto Although this component corresponds to real B0 rarrD0πminusK+ decays it is treated as incoherent (ie as background) since its interference withthe remainder of the signal is negligible Its SDP distribution is modelled as a Gaussianpeak in m(D0πminus) with mean fixed to the known Dlowast(2010)minus mass and width and yielddetermined in the fit to data

11

Table 2 Signal contributions to the fit model where parameters and uncertainties are takenfrom Ref [37] The models are described in Sec 5

Resonance Spin DP axis Model Parameters

Klowast(892)0 1 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 89581plusmn 019 MeV Γ0 = 474plusmn 06 MeVKlowast(1410)0 1 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 1414plusmn 15 MeV Γ0 = 232plusmn 21 MeVKlowast0(1430)0 0 m2(K+πminus) LASS Determined from data (see text)Klowast2(1430)0 2 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 14324plusmn 13 MeV Γ0 = 109plusmn 5 MeVDlowast0(2400)minus 0 m2(D0πminus) RBW

Determined from data (see Table 3)Dlowast2(2460)minus 2 m2(D0πminus) RBW

Nonresonant 0 m2(D0πminus) dabba Fixed (see text)Nonresonant 1 m2(D0πminus) EFF Determined from data (see text)

63 Amplitude model for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays

The Dalitz plot fit is performed using the Laura++ [53] package The likelihood functionis given by

L =Ncprodi

[sumk

NkPk(m2i (D

0πminus)m2i (K

+πminus)) ]

(16)

where the index i runs over Nc candidates k runs over the signal and backgroundcomponents and Nk is the yield in each component The probability density function forthe signal component Psig is given by Eq (12) with the |A

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)|2

terms multiplied by the efficiency function described in Sec 61 As it is possible forthe minimisation procedure to find a local minimum of the negative log likelihood (NLL)profile the fit is repeated many times with randomised initial values to ensure the globalminimum is found

The nominal Dalitz plot fit model for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays is composed of severalresonant and nonresonant amplitudes Only those amplitudes that provide significantcontributions or that aid the fit stability are included Unnatural spin-parity states arenot considered as these do not decay to two pseudoscalars The eight amplitudes includedin this model are listed in Table 2 The width of the narrowest signal contribution tothe Dalitz plot (sim 50 MeV) is far larger than the mass resolution (sim 24 MeV) thereforeresolution effects are neglected

The real and imaginary parts of the complex coefficients cj defined in Eq (1) are freeparameters of the fit except for the coefficient of the Dlowast2(2460)minus component which is fixedto 1 as a reference The phases and magnitudes of the complex coefficients as well as fitfractions and interference fit fractions are derived from these free parameters In additionthe masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances are determined fromthe fit to data and are reported in Table 3 The statistical uncertainties on all parametersof interest are calculated using large samples of simulated pseudoexperiments Thesepseudoexperiments are also used to determine the correlations between the statisticaluncertainties on the parameters which are given in Appendix A The LASS parameters

12

Table 3 Masses and widths (MeV) determined in the fit to data with statistical uncertaintiesonly

Resonance Mass Width

Dlowast0(2400)minus 2360plusmn 15 255plusmn 26Dlowast2(2460)minus 24656plusmn 18 460plusmn 34

Table 4 Complex coefficients and fit fractions determined from the Dalitz plot fit Uncertaintiesare statistical only Note that the fit fractions magnitudes and phases are derived quantities

Resonance Fit fraction Isobar model coefficients() Real part Imaginary part Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 minus000plusmn 015 minus127plusmn 006 127plusmn 006 minus157plusmn 011Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 015plusmn 006 minus009plusmn 009 018plusmn 007 minus054plusmn 021Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 014plusmn 038 045plusmn 015 047plusmn 009 127plusmn 095LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 minus010plusmn 024 044plusmn 014 046plusmn 014 179plusmn 065

LASS total 67plusmn 27Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 minus032plusmn 009 minus047plusmn 007 057plusmn 005 minus216plusmn 019Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 minus080plusmn 008 minus044plusmn 014 091plusmn 007 minus264plusmn 015Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 100 000 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 minus039plusmn 009 036plusmn 017 053plusmn 007 240plusmn 027Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 minus062plusmn 006 minus003plusmn 006 062plusmn 006 minus309plusmn 010Total fit fraction 1134

are determined to be m0 = 1450plusmn 80 MeV Γ0 = 400plusmn 230 MeV a = 32plusmn 18 GeV andr = 09plusmn11 GeV while the parameter of the EFF lineshape of the Dπ P-wave nonresonantamplitude is determined to be α = 088plusmn 010 GeVminus2

The values of the fit fractions and complex coefficients obtained from the fit are shownin Table 4 while the values of the interference fit fractions are given in Appendix B Thesum of the fit fractions is seen to exceed unity mostly due to interference within the Dπ andKπ S-waves Note that in Table 4 and all results for fit fractions and derived quantitiesvalues are reported separately for both the Klowast0 (1430)0 and nonresonant components of theLASS lineshape as well as their coherent sum

Projections of the data and the nominal fit model onto m(K+πminus) m(D0πminus) andm(D0K+) are shown in Fig 6 Zooms are provided in the regions of the main resonantcontributions in Fig 7 Projections onto the cosine of the helicity angle of the D0πminus andK+πminus systems are shown in Figs 8 and 9 respectively These projections all show goodagreement between data and the fit model

Angular moments provide a useful method to investigate the helicity structure of thedecays The angular moments in m(D0πminus) and m(K+πminus) obtained as in Refs [1011]are shown in Figs 10 and 11 respectively The contributions due to the Klowast(892)0 andDlowast2(2460)minus resonances are seen as peaks in moments up to order 2 and order 4 respectivelyas expected for spin-1 and spin-2 resonances Reflections make the interpretation ofmoments at higher masses more difficult However the good agreement seen between data

13

and the fit model provides further support for the fit model being a good description ofthe data

The quality of the fit is evaluated by determining a two-dimensional χ2 value comparingthe data and fit model in 144 bins across the SDP that are defined adaptively to ensurethey are approximately equally populated The pull in each of these bins defined as thedifference between the data and the fit model divided by the uncertainty is shown inFig 12 The effective number of degrees of freedom of the χ2 is between Nbins minusNpars minus 1and Nbinsminus1 where Npars is the number of free parameters in the fit yielding a reduced χ2

in the range 099 ndash 122 Additional unbinned tests of fit quality [54] also show acceptableagreement between the data and the fit model

7 Systematic uncertainties

Systematic uncertainties are considered from sources that can be divided into two categoriesexperimental and model uncertainties Experimental uncertainties arise due to the signaland background yields in the signal region the distributions of the background componentsacross the SDP the variation of efficiency across the SDP and possible bias due to thefitting procedure Model uncertainties are considered due to the fixed parameters in thesignal model the addition or removal of marginal amplitudes and the choice of models forthe Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves The uncertainties due to all of these sourcesare combined in quadrature

The signal and background yields are determined from the fit to the B candidateinvariant mass distribution Systematic uncertainties are considered on the total yieldsdue to both statistical and systematic variations of these yields as evaluated in Ref [15]The yields in the signal region are varied appropriately and the effects of these variationson the parameters of interest are assigned as systematic uncertainties

The histograms describing the background distributions are each varied within statisticaluncertainties to establish the uncertainty due to the imperfect knowledge of the distributionof these backgrounds across the SDP The histograms describing the efficiency variationacross the SDP are also varied within their uncertainties prior to the spline fit Theefficiency histograms are also varied with local correlations to account for the effects ofany unknown correlations between neighbouring bins For each parameter the largeruncertainty is considered from the correlated and uncorrelated variations In addition thebinning scheme of the control sample used to evaluate PID performance is varied

An ensemble of pseudoexperiments is used to establish systematic uncertainties relatedto any potential fit bias Pseudoexperiments are generated using the parameters determinedin the fit to data and mean fitted values of the parameters are determined from Gaussianfits to the distributions of results obtained in the ensemble The differences between thegenerated and mean fitted values are found to be small Uncertainties are determined asthe sum in quadrature of the difference between the generated and mean fitted values andthe uncertainty on the mean fitted value from the Gaussian fit

Systematic uncertainties due to fixed parameters in the fit model are determined by

14

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310LHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350 LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310 LHCb (d)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

LHCb (e)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210LHCb (f)

Data Total fit 0(892)K 0(1410)K

S-wave (LASS)πK 0(1430)2Kminus

(2400)0Dminus

(2460)2D

S-wave (EFF)πD P-wave (EFF)πDminus

D Background

Figure 6 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) (c) m(K+πminus)and (e) m(D0K+) with the same projections shown in (b) (d) and (f) with a logarithmic y-axisscale Components are described in the legend

15

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

235 24 245 25 255

Can

dida

tes

4 M

eV

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m05 1 15

Can

dida

tes

13

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

LHCb (b)

Figure 7 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) in the Dlowast2(2460)minus

region and (b) the low m(K+πminus) region Components are as shown in Fig 6

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

) lt 235 GeVminusπ0D(m204 lt

LHCb(a)

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

) lt 255 GeVminusπ0D(m235 lt

LHCb(b)

Figure 8 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(D0πminus) in the mass ranges(a) 204 lt m(D0πminus) lt 235 GeV and (b) 235 lt m(D0πminus) lt 255 GeV Components are asshown in Fig 6

repeating the fit with these parameters varied The fixed masses and widths are variedwithin their uncertainties as shown in Table 2 while the BlattndashWeisskopf barrier radii rBWare varied independently for D0πminus and K+πminus resonances between 3 and 5 GeVminus1 [10]

The Klowast(1410)0 amplitude does not contribute significantly to the nominal fit modelso the fit is repeated with this component removed and the change in results is assignedas the associated systematic uncertainty In addition uncertainties are assigned fromthe changes in the results when an amplitude due to the Klowast(1680)0 resonance or from avirtual Blowast(5325)+ component as described in Ref [10] is included in the model

A Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D0Kminusπ+ observed both spin-1 and spin-3 resonances

at m(D0Kminus) sim 286 GeV [9 10] A spin-3 resonance has also been seen at m(D0πminus) sim276 GeV in B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] while an analysis of B+ rarr DminusK+π+ shows aspin-1 resonance at similar m(D+πminus) values [11] Uncertainties are assigned corresponding

16

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

) lt 08 GeVminusπ+K(m0 lt LHCb

(a)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 10 GeVminusπ+K(m08 lt LHCb

(b)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 13 GeVminusπ+K(m10 lt LHCb

(c)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

) lt 15 GeVminusπ+K(m14 lt LHCb

(d)

Figure 9 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(K+πminus) in the mass ranges(a) m(K+πminus) lt 08 GeV (b) 08 lt m(K+πminus) lt 10 GeV (c) 10 lt m(K+πminus) lt 13 GeV and(d) 14 lt m(K+πminus) lt 15 GeV Components are as shown in Fig 6

to the changes in results when either a spin-1 or spin-3 state at m(D0πminus) sim 276 GeV isadded to the nominal model

The LASS model used to describe the Kπ S-wave is replaced with a Flatte shape [55]which accounts for the Kηprime threshold near the Klowast0 (1430)0 mass and a resonant term witha modified mass dependent width [52] for the κ (also known as Klowast0(800)) state Thismodel gives an NLL that is worse by 44 units A model-independent description of theKπ S-wave is also used to fit the data with the uncertainty on each parameter takenas the larger of the two differences This alternative improves the NLL by 88 units butintroduces an additional four free parameters into the fit The dabba lineshape used todescribe the D0πminus S-wave is replaced with an EFF lineshape while a power-law model isintroduced as an alternative to the EFF lineshape that describes the D0πminus P-wave Thesealterations worsen the NLL by 30 units and improve it by 08 units respectively

The total systematic uncertainties due to experimental and model effects for fit fractionsand complex coefficients are given together with the results in Sec 8 The contributionsfrom different sources to the systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions masses and

17

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0002004006008

0101201401601802

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-30-25-20-15-10

-505

1015

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

310timesLHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

310timesLHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-8-6-4-202468

310timesLHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-8-6-4-20246

310timesLHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-6-4-202468

10

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 10 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(D0πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

18

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0

005

01

015

02

025

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

20

40

60

80

100310times

LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10-505

10152025

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25310times

LHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-20-15-10

-505

101520

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 11 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(K+πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

19

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Pull

-2

-1

0

1

2

LHCb

Figure 12 Differences between the data SDP distribution and the fit model across the SDP interms of the per-bin pull

Table 5 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths(MeV) Uncertainties given on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value SB fraction Efficiency Background SDP Fit bias Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 060 083 050 031 117Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 006 039 069 005 080Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 028 148 185 033 241LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 051 225 286 086 377

LASS total 67plusmn 27 026 186 160 102 267Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 023 072 053 054 107Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 021 139 143 040 204Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 070 070 049 015 111Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 003 081 059 057 115Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 086 191 052 038 219m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 46 81 70 37 122m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 001 037 022 029 051Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 28 131 139 48 199Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 05 09 09 05 14

widths are given in Tables 5 and 6 The dominant experimental systematic uncertaintyon most parameters is due to either the efficiency variation or background distributionsacross the SDP while the model uncertainties are generally dominated by the effects ofalternative descriptions of the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves For the parametersof broad components the model uncertainties dominate however for other parameters thestatistical experimental and model uncertainties are all of a similar magnitude

The stability of the fit results is confirmed by several cross-checks The data sample isdivided into subsamples according to the flavour of the B candidate the trigger decision

20

Table 6 Model uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths (MeV) Uncertaintiesgiven on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value Fixed parameters Addremove Alternative models Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 075 114 109 174Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 018 070 022 076Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 079 330 023 340LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 110 399 520 665

LASS total 67plusmn 27 053 142 521 543Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 036 187 056 198Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 055 195 711 740Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 018 073 099 124Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 027 140 346 374Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 031 199 215 295m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 61 93 256 279m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 009 105 048 115Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 40 180 435 472Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 14 05 24 29

the polarity of the magnet and the year of data taking Each subsample is fitted separatelyand all are seen to be consistent with the nominal fit results The fit is also repeatedwith additional resonance components to test the fit model Resonances up to spin-3 wereconsidered for all three pairs of daughters with the mass and width allowed to vary in thefit No additional significant contributions were observed

8 Results and summary

The results for the complex coefficients are reported in Table 7 with results for thefit fractions given in Table 8 The results for the interference fit fractions are givenin Appendix B Upper limits are determined on the fit fractions of the Klowast(1410)0 andDlowast3(2760)minus components which do not give significant contributions using the methoddescribed in Ref [10]

The fit fractions for resonant contributions are converted into quasi-two-body productbranching fractions by multiplying by B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus) = (92plusmn 06plusmn 07plusmn 06)times 10minus5which is obtained from the ratio of branching fractions B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus)B(B0 rarrD0π+πminus) [15] multiplied by the latest result for B(B0 rarr D0π+πminus) [12] accounting forthe different Dlowast(2010)minus veto windows used in the analyses and for the 37 residualbackground due to B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ decays The statistical correlation between theresults of Ref [15] and this analysis is found to be negligible The results for the productbranching fractions are shown in Table 9 For the K+πminus resonances where the branchingfractions to Kπ are known the product branching fractions are converted to the Bdecay branching fractions shown in Table 10 The results for B(B0 rarr D0Klowast(892)0) andB(B0 rarr Dlowast2(2460)minusK+)times B(Dlowast2(2460)minus rarr D0πminus) are consistent with and more precisethan previous measurements [14 1617]

21

Table 7 Results for the complex amplitudes and their uncertainties presented (top) in terms ofreal and imaginary parts and (bottom) in terms and magnitudes and phases The three quotederrors are statistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively

Resonance Real part Imaginary part

Klowast(892)0 minus000plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 034 minus127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 006Klowast(1410)0 015plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 009 minus009plusmn 009plusmn 018plusmn 018Klowast0(1430)0 014plusmn 038plusmn 048plusmn 038 045plusmn 015plusmn 037plusmn 017LASS nonresonant minus010plusmn 024plusmn 016plusmn 042 044plusmn 014plusmn 017plusmn 023Klowast2(1430)0 minus032plusmn 009plusmn 015plusmn 023 minus047plusmn 007plusmn 014plusmn 015Dlowast0(2400)minus minus080plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 022 minus044plusmn 014plusmn 012plusmn 018Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) minus039plusmn 009plusmn 009plusmn 014 036plusmn 017plusmn 014plusmn 023Dπ P-wave (EFF) minus062plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 011 minus003plusmn 006plusmn 005plusmn 010

Resonance Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 005 minus157plusmn 011plusmn 016plusmn 027Klowast(1410)0 018plusmn 007plusmn 010plusmn 011 minus054plusmn 021plusmn 055plusmn 104Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 009plusmn 010plusmn 014 127plusmn 095plusmn 104plusmn 081LASS nonresonant 046plusmn 014plusmn 016plusmn 029 179plusmn 065plusmn 035plusmn 069Klowast2(1430)0 057plusmn 005plusmn 004plusmn 008 minus216plusmn 019plusmn 043plusmn 043Dlowast0(2400)minus 091plusmn 007plusmn 006plusmn 017 minus264plusmn 015plusmn 014plusmn 023Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 053plusmn 007plusmn 004plusmn 014 240plusmn 027plusmn 024plusmn 044Dπ P-wave (EFF) 062plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 011 minus309plusmn 010plusmn 007plusmn 017

Table 8 Results for the fit fractions and their uncertainties () The three quoted errors arestatistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively Upper limits are givenat 90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Fit fraction Upper limitKlowast(892)0 374plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 17Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03plusmn 08plusmn 08 lt 32 (37)Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20plusmn 24plusmn 34LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38plusmn 38plusmn 67

LASS total 67plusmn 27plusmn 27plusmn 54Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17plusmn 11plusmn 20Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28plusmn 20plusmn 74Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12plusmn 11plusmn 12Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 10 (11)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14plusmn 12plusmn 37Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16plusmn 22plusmn 30

22

Table 9 Results for the product branching fractions The four quoted errors are statisticalexperimental systematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Product branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 342plusmn 013plusmn 010plusmn 016plusmn 040Klowast(1410)0 007plusmn 003plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 001 lt 029 (034)Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 018plusmn 022plusmn 031plusmn 005LASS nonresonant 044plusmn 034plusmn 034plusmn 061plusmn 005

LASS total 061plusmn 025plusmn 025plusmn 049plusmn 007Klowast2(1430)0 068plusmn 015plusmn 010plusmn 018plusmn 008Dlowast0(2400)minus 177plusmn 026plusmn 019plusmn 067plusmn 020Dlowast2(2460)minus 212plusmn 010plusmn 011plusmn 011plusmn 025Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 010 (011)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 060plusmn 013plusmn 011plusmn 034plusmn 007Dπ P-wave (EFF) 081plusmn 015plusmn 020plusmn 027plusmn 009

Table 10 Results for the branching fractions The four quoted errors are statistical experimentalsystematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at 90 (95 )confidence level

Resonance Branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 513plusmn 020plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 060Klowast(1410)0 159plusmn 068plusmn 181plusmn 159plusmn 036 lt 67 (78)Klowast0(1430)0 071plusmn 027plusmn 033plusmn 047plusmn 008LASS nonresonant 066plusmn 051plusmn 051plusmn 092plusmn 008

LASS total 092plusmn 038plusmn 038plusmn 074plusmn 011Klowast2(1430)0 204plusmn 045plusmn 030plusmn 054plusmn 025

The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus states are found to be

m(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (2360plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 28) MeV

Γ(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (255plusmn 26plusmn 20plusmn 47) MeV

m(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (24656plusmn 18plusmn 05plusmn 12) MeV

Γ(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (460plusmn 34plusmn 14plusmn 29) MeV

where the three uncertainties are statistical experimental systematic and model systematicrespectively These are consistent with though less precise than recent results from a DPanalysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] They also show good agreement with and havesimilar precision to earlier measurements of these quantities [1337]

In summary the first amplitude analysis of B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays has been presentedusing a data sample corresponding to 30 fbminus1 of pp collision data collected by the LHCbexperiment A good description of the data is obtained with a model containing contri-

23

butions from intermediate Klowast(892)0 Klowast(1410)0 Klowast2(1430)0 and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonanceswith additional components to describe broad structures in the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S-and P-waves The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances aremeasured as are the complex amplitudes and fit fractions for all components includedin the amplitude model The results can be used in conjunction with an analysis ofB0 rarr DK+πminus decays where the neutral D meson is reconstructed in final states such asK+Kminus to measure the CKM unitarity triangle parameter γ [1 2]

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to our colleagues in the CERN accelerator departments forthe excellent performance of the LHC We thank the technical and administrative staffat the LHCb institutes We acknowledge support from CERN and from the nationalagencies CAPES CNPq FAPERJ and FINEP (Brazil) NSFC (China) CNRSIN2P3(France) BMBF DFG HGF and MPG (Germany) INFN (Italy) FOM and NWO (TheNetherlands) MNiSW and NCN (Poland) MENIFA (Romania) MinES and FANO(Russia) MinECo (Spain) SNSF and SER (Switzerland) NASU (Ukraine) STFC (UnitedKingdom) NSF (USA) The Tier1 computing centres are supported by IN2P3 (France)KIT and BMBF (Germany) INFN (Italy) NWO and SURF (The Netherlands) PIC(Spain) GridPP (United Kingdom) We are indebted to the communities behind themultiple open source software packages on which we depend We are also thankful forthe computing resources and the access to software RampD tools provided by Yandex LLC(Russia) Individual groups or members have received support from EPLANET MarieSk lodowska-Curie Actions and ERC (European Union) Conseil general de Haute-SavoieLabex ENIGMASS and OCEVU Region Auvergne (France) RFBR (Russia) XuntaGaland GENCAT (Spain) Royal Society and Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851(United Kingdom)

24

Appendices

A Correlation matrices

The statistical correlations between the complex coefficients masses and widths determinedfrom the fit to data are given in terms of real and imaginary parts and in terms ofmagnitudes and phases in Tables 11 and 12 The correlations are determined using thesame sample of simulated pseudoexperiments used to calculate the statistical uncertaintieson fit parameters

B Results for interference fit fractions

The central values of the interference fit fractions are given in Table 13 The statisti-cal experimental systematic and model uncertainties on these quantities are given inTables 14 15 and 16

25

Tab

le11

Sta

tist

ical

corr

elat

ions

bet

wee

nth

ere

al(x

)an

dim

agin

ary

(y)

par

tsof

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

x0

y 0x

1y 1

x2

y 2x

3y 3

x4

y 4x

5y 5

x7

y 7x

8y 8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

x0

100

014

002

017minus

018

015minus

017

003

039minus

037

016minus

009minus

018minus

029

007minus

037minus

019

002

004

012

y 01

00minus

006minus

008

009minus

011minus

000

014

003

003

012

013minus

012minus

024

035minus

007

009

012

001minus

004

x1

100minus

009minus

008minus

014minus

004

029minus

001

003minus

020

018minus

021minus

031minus

017minus

036minus

008minus

017minus

023

002

y 11

000

050

340

09minus

001

060minus

039

002minus

003minus

003

007minus

002minus

004minus

016minus

002

007

002

x2

100minus

013

081

009

014minus

016minus

015

021

010

013

004minus

015minus

007

001minus

025

001

y 21

000

080

280

24minus

036minus

013

008minus

004minus

001minus

004

004minus

002minus

001minus

009minus

010

x3

100

020

013minus

034minus

010

033minus

008

008minus

004minus

005minus

007minus

003minus

033minus

009

y 31

00minus

012minus

012minus

051

029minus

034minus

053

009minus

012

009minus

014minus

036

001

x4

100minus

053

032minus

010minus

020

003

002minus

027minus

017minus

006

010minus

000

y 41

000

06minus

009

040

010

014

016

011minus

005

007minus

003

x5

100minus

029minus

003

022

002

004minus

008

002

045minus

006

y 51

00minus

031minus

034

006

003

024minus

014minus

072minus

033

x7

100

046

005

010minus

011minus

001

027

017

y 71

00minus

016

036minus

001

017

032

008

x8

100minus

003

001minus

006minus

009minus

014

y 81

000

290

020

15minus

002

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

26

Tab

le12

S

tati

stic

alco

rrel

atio

ns

bet

wee

nth

em

agnit

ud

es(a

)an

dp

has

es(∆

)of

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

a0

∆0

a1

∆1

a2

∆2

a3

∆3

a4

∆4

a5

∆5

a7

∆7

a8

∆8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

a0

100minus

011minus

008

005

024

003minus

014

004

004

001

021

002

022minus

022

038minus

000minus

004minus

009minus

001

004

∆0

100minus

010

012

003

020

014

014minus

001

045minus

005

010minus

008

035minus

007

005minus

022

006

007

009

a1

100minus

035minus

025

006

032

001minus

001minus

038

004minus

022minus

006

031

002

024

007minus

018minus

020

001

∆1

100

024

015

016

000

014

038minus

018minus

013

016

026

022minus

006minus

009minus

004minus

012

005

a2

100

004

011minus

028minus

007

039minus

009

007

027

010

001

001minus

015

004minus

003minus

013

∆2

100

015

077minus

020minus

010minus

001

024

009

013

003minus

009

005

001

023minus

010

a3

100minus

006

000minus

011

016minus

030minus

012

056

001

012

002minus

007minus

027minus

004

∆3

100minus

028minus

019

015

041minus

024minus

008minus

000minus

013

004

002

041

008

a4

100

013

005minus

017

014

018minus

000

006

000

014minus

019minus

009

∆4

100minus

016

016

017

012

000minus

002minus

019minus

003

003

001

a5

100

024minus

026minus

006

011

005minus

007

001

019

039

∆5

100minus

000minus

028minus

001minus

020minus

020

015

076

027

a7

100minus

001

017minus

006

004

013minus

005minus

024

∆7

100minus

012

037

003minus

000minus

027minus

012

a8

100minus

004minus

001

004

006

015

∆8

100minus

037minus

002minus

033minus

001

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

27

Table 13 Interference fit fractions () from the nominal DP fit The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 374 18 minus00 00 00 minus24 minus02 minus26 minus50A1 07 minus00 00 00 minus11 minus03 minus06 minus11A2 51 minus32 minus00 29 15 16 19A3 48 00 minus84 01 21 02A4 74 minus03 minus10 minus15 minus04A5 193 minus00 28 00A6 231 minus00 00A7 66 minus00A8 89

Table 14 Statistical uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes areall pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASSnonresonant (A4) Klowast2 (1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8)Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 15 07 00 00 00 09 04 04 05A1 03 00 00 00 07 03 04 05A2 20 26 00 11 05 15 05A3 38 00 32 04 34 08A4 17 06 01 06 05A5 28 00 31 00A6 12 00 00A7 14 00A8 16

28

Table 15 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () Theamplitudes are all pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0 (1430)0(A3) LASS nonresonant (A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave(dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fitfractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 12 05 00 00 00 23 02 04 05A1 08 00 00 00 04 08 07 09A2 24 31 00 14 20 26 11A3 38 00 36 02 26 03A4 11 22 02 05 10A5 20 00 40 00A6 11 00 00A7 12 00A8 22

Table 16 Model uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 17 08 00 00 00 26 07 08 14A1 08 00 00 00 08 06 08 11A2 34 29 00 58 17 36 27A3 66 00 83 03 35 07A4 20 17 02 12 10A5 74 00 45 00A6 12 00 00A7 37 00A8 29

29

References

[1] T Gershon On the measurement of the unitarity triangle angle γ from B0 rarr DKlowast0

decays Phys Rev D79 (2009) 051301(R) arXiv08102706

[2] T Gershon and M Williams Prospects for the measurement of the unitaritytriangle angle γ from B0 rarr DK+πminus decays Phys Rev D80 (2009) 092002arXiv09091495

[3] N Cabibbo Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays Phys Rev Lett 10 (1963) 531

[4] M Kobayashi and T Maskawa CP -violation in the renormalizable theory of weakinteraction Progress of Theoretical Physics 49 (1973) 652

[5] M Gronau and D London How to determine all the angles of the unitarity trianglefrom B0 rarr DK0

S and B0s rarr Dφ Phys Lett B253 (1991) 483

[6] M Gronau and D Wyler On determining a weak phase from CP asymmetries incharged B decays Phys Lett B265 (1991) 172

[7] I Dunietz CP violation with self-tagging Bd modes Phys Lett B270 (1991) 75

[8] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurement of CP violation parameters inB0 rarr DKlowast0 decays Phys Rev D90 (2014) 112002 arXiv14078136

[9] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of overlapping spin-1 and spin-

3 D0Kminus resonances at mass 286 GeVc2 Phys Rev Lett 113 (2014) 162001

arXiv14077574

[10] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ decays

Phys Rev D90 (2014) 072003 arXiv14077712

[11] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observation and amplitude analysis of theBminus rarr D+Kminusπminus decay Phys Rev D91 (2015) 092002 arXiv150302995

[12] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays

arXiv150501710 submitted to Phys Rev D

[13] Belle collaboration A Kuzmin et al Study of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays Phys RevD76 (2007) 012006 arXivhep-ex0611054

[14] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of branching fractions andresonance contributions for B0 rarr D0K+πminus and search for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decaysPhys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 011803 arXivhep-ex0509036

[15] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurements of the branching fractions of

the decays B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ and B0 rarr D

0K+πminus Phys Rev D87 (2013) 112009

arXiv13046317

30

[16] Belle collaboration P Krokovny et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K0 and B0 rarr D0Klowast0

decays Phys Rev Lett 90 (2003) 141802 arXivhep-ex0212066

[17] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of B0 rarr D(lowast)0K(lowast)0 branchingfractions Phys Rev D74 (2006) 031101 arXivhep-ex0604016

[18] LHCb collaboration A A Alves Jr et al The LHCb detector at the LHC JINST 3(2008) S08005

[19] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al LHCb detector performance Int J Mod PhysA30 (2015) 1530022 arXiv14126352

[20] R Aaij et al Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator JINST 9 (2014) P09007arXiv14057808

[21] R Arink et al Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker JINST 9 (2014) P01002arXiv13113893

[22] M Adinolfi et al Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Eur PhysJ C73 (2013) 2431 arXiv12116759

[23] A A Alves Jr et al Performance of the LHCb muon system JINST 8 (2013) P02022arXiv12111346

[24] R Aaij et al The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011 JINST 8 (2013) P04022arXiv12113055

[25] V V Gligorov and M Williams Efficient reliable and fast high-level triggering usinga bonsai boosted decision tree JINST 8 (2013) P02013 arXiv12106861

[26] T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P Skands PYTHIA 64 physics and manual JHEP05 (2006) 026 arXivhep-ph0603175 T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P SkandsA brief introduction to PYTHIA 81 Comput Phys Commun 178 (2008) 852arXiv07103820

[27] I Belyaev et al Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss the LHCbsimulation framework J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032047

[28] D J Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package Nucl Instrum MethA462 (2001) 152

[29] P Golonka and Z Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo A precision tool for QED correctionsin Z and W decays Eur Phys J C45 (2006) 97 arXivhep-ph0506026

[30] Geant4 collaboration J Allison et al Geant4 developments and applications IEEETrans Nucl Sci 53 (2006) 270 Geant4 collaboration S Agostinelli et al Geant4A simulation toolkit Nucl Instrum Meth A506 (2003) 250

31

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 14: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

Table 2 Signal contributions to the fit model where parameters and uncertainties are takenfrom Ref [37] The models are described in Sec 5

Resonance Spin DP axis Model Parameters

Klowast(892)0 1 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 89581plusmn 019 MeV Γ0 = 474plusmn 06 MeVKlowast(1410)0 1 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 1414plusmn 15 MeV Γ0 = 232plusmn 21 MeVKlowast0(1430)0 0 m2(K+πminus) LASS Determined from data (see text)Klowast2(1430)0 2 m2(K+πminus) RBW m0 = 14324plusmn 13 MeV Γ0 = 109plusmn 5 MeVDlowast0(2400)minus 0 m2(D0πminus) RBW

Determined from data (see Table 3)Dlowast2(2460)minus 2 m2(D0πminus) RBW

Nonresonant 0 m2(D0πminus) dabba Fixed (see text)Nonresonant 1 m2(D0πminus) EFF Determined from data (see text)

63 Amplitude model for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays

The Dalitz plot fit is performed using the Laura++ [53] package The likelihood functionis given by

L =Ncprodi

[sumk

NkPk(m2i (D

0πminus)m2i (K

+πminus)) ]

(16)

where the index i runs over Nc candidates k runs over the signal and backgroundcomponents and Nk is the yield in each component The probability density function forthe signal component Psig is given by Eq (12) with the |A

(m2(D0πminus)m2(K+πminus)

)|2

terms multiplied by the efficiency function described in Sec 61 As it is possible forthe minimisation procedure to find a local minimum of the negative log likelihood (NLL)profile the fit is repeated many times with randomised initial values to ensure the globalminimum is found

The nominal Dalitz plot fit model for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays is composed of severalresonant and nonresonant amplitudes Only those amplitudes that provide significantcontributions or that aid the fit stability are included Unnatural spin-parity states arenot considered as these do not decay to two pseudoscalars The eight amplitudes includedin this model are listed in Table 2 The width of the narrowest signal contribution tothe Dalitz plot (sim 50 MeV) is far larger than the mass resolution (sim 24 MeV) thereforeresolution effects are neglected

The real and imaginary parts of the complex coefficients cj defined in Eq (1) are freeparameters of the fit except for the coefficient of the Dlowast2(2460)minus component which is fixedto 1 as a reference The phases and magnitudes of the complex coefficients as well as fitfractions and interference fit fractions are derived from these free parameters In additionthe masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances are determined fromthe fit to data and are reported in Table 3 The statistical uncertainties on all parametersof interest are calculated using large samples of simulated pseudoexperiments Thesepseudoexperiments are also used to determine the correlations between the statisticaluncertainties on the parameters which are given in Appendix A The LASS parameters

12

Table 3 Masses and widths (MeV) determined in the fit to data with statistical uncertaintiesonly

Resonance Mass Width

Dlowast0(2400)minus 2360plusmn 15 255plusmn 26Dlowast2(2460)minus 24656plusmn 18 460plusmn 34

Table 4 Complex coefficients and fit fractions determined from the Dalitz plot fit Uncertaintiesare statistical only Note that the fit fractions magnitudes and phases are derived quantities

Resonance Fit fraction Isobar model coefficients() Real part Imaginary part Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 minus000plusmn 015 minus127plusmn 006 127plusmn 006 minus157plusmn 011Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 015plusmn 006 minus009plusmn 009 018plusmn 007 minus054plusmn 021Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 014plusmn 038 045plusmn 015 047plusmn 009 127plusmn 095LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 minus010plusmn 024 044plusmn 014 046plusmn 014 179plusmn 065

LASS total 67plusmn 27Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 minus032plusmn 009 minus047plusmn 007 057plusmn 005 minus216plusmn 019Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 minus080plusmn 008 minus044plusmn 014 091plusmn 007 minus264plusmn 015Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 100 000 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 minus039plusmn 009 036plusmn 017 053plusmn 007 240plusmn 027Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 minus062plusmn 006 minus003plusmn 006 062plusmn 006 minus309plusmn 010Total fit fraction 1134

are determined to be m0 = 1450plusmn 80 MeV Γ0 = 400plusmn 230 MeV a = 32plusmn 18 GeV andr = 09plusmn11 GeV while the parameter of the EFF lineshape of the Dπ P-wave nonresonantamplitude is determined to be α = 088plusmn 010 GeVminus2

The values of the fit fractions and complex coefficients obtained from the fit are shownin Table 4 while the values of the interference fit fractions are given in Appendix B Thesum of the fit fractions is seen to exceed unity mostly due to interference within the Dπ andKπ S-waves Note that in Table 4 and all results for fit fractions and derived quantitiesvalues are reported separately for both the Klowast0 (1430)0 and nonresonant components of theLASS lineshape as well as their coherent sum

Projections of the data and the nominal fit model onto m(K+πminus) m(D0πminus) andm(D0K+) are shown in Fig 6 Zooms are provided in the regions of the main resonantcontributions in Fig 7 Projections onto the cosine of the helicity angle of the D0πminus andK+πminus systems are shown in Figs 8 and 9 respectively These projections all show goodagreement between data and the fit model

Angular moments provide a useful method to investigate the helicity structure of thedecays The angular moments in m(D0πminus) and m(K+πminus) obtained as in Refs [1011]are shown in Figs 10 and 11 respectively The contributions due to the Klowast(892)0 andDlowast2(2460)minus resonances are seen as peaks in moments up to order 2 and order 4 respectivelyas expected for spin-1 and spin-2 resonances Reflections make the interpretation ofmoments at higher masses more difficult However the good agreement seen between data

13

and the fit model provides further support for the fit model being a good description ofthe data

The quality of the fit is evaluated by determining a two-dimensional χ2 value comparingthe data and fit model in 144 bins across the SDP that are defined adaptively to ensurethey are approximately equally populated The pull in each of these bins defined as thedifference between the data and the fit model divided by the uncertainty is shown inFig 12 The effective number of degrees of freedom of the χ2 is between Nbins minusNpars minus 1and Nbinsminus1 where Npars is the number of free parameters in the fit yielding a reduced χ2

in the range 099 ndash 122 Additional unbinned tests of fit quality [54] also show acceptableagreement between the data and the fit model

7 Systematic uncertainties

Systematic uncertainties are considered from sources that can be divided into two categoriesexperimental and model uncertainties Experimental uncertainties arise due to the signaland background yields in the signal region the distributions of the background componentsacross the SDP the variation of efficiency across the SDP and possible bias due to thefitting procedure Model uncertainties are considered due to the fixed parameters in thesignal model the addition or removal of marginal amplitudes and the choice of models forthe Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves The uncertainties due to all of these sourcesare combined in quadrature

The signal and background yields are determined from the fit to the B candidateinvariant mass distribution Systematic uncertainties are considered on the total yieldsdue to both statistical and systematic variations of these yields as evaluated in Ref [15]The yields in the signal region are varied appropriately and the effects of these variationson the parameters of interest are assigned as systematic uncertainties

The histograms describing the background distributions are each varied within statisticaluncertainties to establish the uncertainty due to the imperfect knowledge of the distributionof these backgrounds across the SDP The histograms describing the efficiency variationacross the SDP are also varied within their uncertainties prior to the spline fit Theefficiency histograms are also varied with local correlations to account for the effects ofany unknown correlations between neighbouring bins For each parameter the largeruncertainty is considered from the correlated and uncorrelated variations In addition thebinning scheme of the control sample used to evaluate PID performance is varied

An ensemble of pseudoexperiments is used to establish systematic uncertainties relatedto any potential fit bias Pseudoexperiments are generated using the parameters determinedin the fit to data and mean fitted values of the parameters are determined from Gaussianfits to the distributions of results obtained in the ensemble The differences between thegenerated and mean fitted values are found to be small Uncertainties are determined asthe sum in quadrature of the difference between the generated and mean fitted values andthe uncertainty on the mean fitted value from the Gaussian fit

Systematic uncertainties due to fixed parameters in the fit model are determined by

14

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310LHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350 LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310 LHCb (d)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

LHCb (e)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210LHCb (f)

Data Total fit 0(892)K 0(1410)K

S-wave (LASS)πK 0(1430)2Kminus

(2400)0Dminus

(2460)2D

S-wave (EFF)πD P-wave (EFF)πDminus

D Background

Figure 6 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) (c) m(K+πminus)and (e) m(D0K+) with the same projections shown in (b) (d) and (f) with a logarithmic y-axisscale Components are described in the legend

15

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

235 24 245 25 255

Can

dida

tes

4 M

eV

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m05 1 15

Can

dida

tes

13

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

LHCb (b)

Figure 7 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) in the Dlowast2(2460)minus

region and (b) the low m(K+πminus) region Components are as shown in Fig 6

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

) lt 235 GeVminusπ0D(m204 lt

LHCb(a)

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

) lt 255 GeVminusπ0D(m235 lt

LHCb(b)

Figure 8 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(D0πminus) in the mass ranges(a) 204 lt m(D0πminus) lt 235 GeV and (b) 235 lt m(D0πminus) lt 255 GeV Components are asshown in Fig 6

repeating the fit with these parameters varied The fixed masses and widths are variedwithin their uncertainties as shown in Table 2 while the BlattndashWeisskopf barrier radii rBWare varied independently for D0πminus and K+πminus resonances between 3 and 5 GeVminus1 [10]

The Klowast(1410)0 amplitude does not contribute significantly to the nominal fit modelso the fit is repeated with this component removed and the change in results is assignedas the associated systematic uncertainty In addition uncertainties are assigned fromthe changes in the results when an amplitude due to the Klowast(1680)0 resonance or from avirtual Blowast(5325)+ component as described in Ref [10] is included in the model

A Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D0Kminusπ+ observed both spin-1 and spin-3 resonances

at m(D0Kminus) sim 286 GeV [9 10] A spin-3 resonance has also been seen at m(D0πminus) sim276 GeV in B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] while an analysis of B+ rarr DminusK+π+ shows aspin-1 resonance at similar m(D+πminus) values [11] Uncertainties are assigned corresponding

16

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

) lt 08 GeVminusπ+K(m0 lt LHCb

(a)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 10 GeVminusπ+K(m08 lt LHCb

(b)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 13 GeVminusπ+K(m10 lt LHCb

(c)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

) lt 15 GeVminusπ+K(m14 lt LHCb

(d)

Figure 9 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(K+πminus) in the mass ranges(a) m(K+πminus) lt 08 GeV (b) 08 lt m(K+πminus) lt 10 GeV (c) 10 lt m(K+πminus) lt 13 GeV and(d) 14 lt m(K+πminus) lt 15 GeV Components are as shown in Fig 6

to the changes in results when either a spin-1 or spin-3 state at m(D0πminus) sim 276 GeV isadded to the nominal model

The LASS model used to describe the Kπ S-wave is replaced with a Flatte shape [55]which accounts for the Kηprime threshold near the Klowast0 (1430)0 mass and a resonant term witha modified mass dependent width [52] for the κ (also known as Klowast0(800)) state Thismodel gives an NLL that is worse by 44 units A model-independent description of theKπ S-wave is also used to fit the data with the uncertainty on each parameter takenas the larger of the two differences This alternative improves the NLL by 88 units butintroduces an additional four free parameters into the fit The dabba lineshape used todescribe the D0πminus S-wave is replaced with an EFF lineshape while a power-law model isintroduced as an alternative to the EFF lineshape that describes the D0πminus P-wave Thesealterations worsen the NLL by 30 units and improve it by 08 units respectively

The total systematic uncertainties due to experimental and model effects for fit fractionsand complex coefficients are given together with the results in Sec 8 The contributionsfrom different sources to the systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions masses and

17

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0002004006008

0101201401601802

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-30-25-20-15-10

-505

1015

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

310timesLHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

310timesLHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-8-6-4-202468

310timesLHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-8-6-4-20246

310timesLHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-6-4-202468

10

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 10 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(D0πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

18

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0

005

01

015

02

025

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

20

40

60

80

100310times

LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10-505

10152025

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25310times

LHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-20-15-10

-505

101520

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 11 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(K+πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

19

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Pull

-2

-1

0

1

2

LHCb

Figure 12 Differences between the data SDP distribution and the fit model across the SDP interms of the per-bin pull

Table 5 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths(MeV) Uncertainties given on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value SB fraction Efficiency Background SDP Fit bias Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 060 083 050 031 117Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 006 039 069 005 080Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 028 148 185 033 241LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 051 225 286 086 377

LASS total 67plusmn 27 026 186 160 102 267Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 023 072 053 054 107Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 021 139 143 040 204Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 070 070 049 015 111Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 003 081 059 057 115Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 086 191 052 038 219m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 46 81 70 37 122m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 001 037 022 029 051Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 28 131 139 48 199Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 05 09 09 05 14

widths are given in Tables 5 and 6 The dominant experimental systematic uncertaintyon most parameters is due to either the efficiency variation or background distributionsacross the SDP while the model uncertainties are generally dominated by the effects ofalternative descriptions of the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves For the parametersof broad components the model uncertainties dominate however for other parameters thestatistical experimental and model uncertainties are all of a similar magnitude

The stability of the fit results is confirmed by several cross-checks The data sample isdivided into subsamples according to the flavour of the B candidate the trigger decision

20

Table 6 Model uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths (MeV) Uncertaintiesgiven on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value Fixed parameters Addremove Alternative models Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 075 114 109 174Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 018 070 022 076Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 079 330 023 340LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 110 399 520 665

LASS total 67plusmn 27 053 142 521 543Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 036 187 056 198Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 055 195 711 740Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 018 073 099 124Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 027 140 346 374Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 031 199 215 295m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 61 93 256 279m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 009 105 048 115Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 40 180 435 472Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 14 05 24 29

the polarity of the magnet and the year of data taking Each subsample is fitted separatelyand all are seen to be consistent with the nominal fit results The fit is also repeatedwith additional resonance components to test the fit model Resonances up to spin-3 wereconsidered for all three pairs of daughters with the mass and width allowed to vary in thefit No additional significant contributions were observed

8 Results and summary

The results for the complex coefficients are reported in Table 7 with results for thefit fractions given in Table 8 The results for the interference fit fractions are givenin Appendix B Upper limits are determined on the fit fractions of the Klowast(1410)0 andDlowast3(2760)minus components which do not give significant contributions using the methoddescribed in Ref [10]

The fit fractions for resonant contributions are converted into quasi-two-body productbranching fractions by multiplying by B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus) = (92plusmn 06plusmn 07plusmn 06)times 10minus5which is obtained from the ratio of branching fractions B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus)B(B0 rarrD0π+πminus) [15] multiplied by the latest result for B(B0 rarr D0π+πminus) [12] accounting forthe different Dlowast(2010)minus veto windows used in the analyses and for the 37 residualbackground due to B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ decays The statistical correlation between theresults of Ref [15] and this analysis is found to be negligible The results for the productbranching fractions are shown in Table 9 For the K+πminus resonances where the branchingfractions to Kπ are known the product branching fractions are converted to the Bdecay branching fractions shown in Table 10 The results for B(B0 rarr D0Klowast(892)0) andB(B0 rarr Dlowast2(2460)minusK+)times B(Dlowast2(2460)minus rarr D0πminus) are consistent with and more precisethan previous measurements [14 1617]

21

Table 7 Results for the complex amplitudes and their uncertainties presented (top) in terms ofreal and imaginary parts and (bottom) in terms and magnitudes and phases The three quotederrors are statistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively

Resonance Real part Imaginary part

Klowast(892)0 minus000plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 034 minus127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 006Klowast(1410)0 015plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 009 minus009plusmn 009plusmn 018plusmn 018Klowast0(1430)0 014plusmn 038plusmn 048plusmn 038 045plusmn 015plusmn 037plusmn 017LASS nonresonant minus010plusmn 024plusmn 016plusmn 042 044plusmn 014plusmn 017plusmn 023Klowast2(1430)0 minus032plusmn 009plusmn 015plusmn 023 minus047plusmn 007plusmn 014plusmn 015Dlowast0(2400)minus minus080plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 022 minus044plusmn 014plusmn 012plusmn 018Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) minus039plusmn 009plusmn 009plusmn 014 036plusmn 017plusmn 014plusmn 023Dπ P-wave (EFF) minus062plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 011 minus003plusmn 006plusmn 005plusmn 010

Resonance Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 005 minus157plusmn 011plusmn 016plusmn 027Klowast(1410)0 018plusmn 007plusmn 010plusmn 011 minus054plusmn 021plusmn 055plusmn 104Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 009plusmn 010plusmn 014 127plusmn 095plusmn 104plusmn 081LASS nonresonant 046plusmn 014plusmn 016plusmn 029 179plusmn 065plusmn 035plusmn 069Klowast2(1430)0 057plusmn 005plusmn 004plusmn 008 minus216plusmn 019plusmn 043plusmn 043Dlowast0(2400)minus 091plusmn 007plusmn 006plusmn 017 minus264plusmn 015plusmn 014plusmn 023Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 053plusmn 007plusmn 004plusmn 014 240plusmn 027plusmn 024plusmn 044Dπ P-wave (EFF) 062plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 011 minus309plusmn 010plusmn 007plusmn 017

Table 8 Results for the fit fractions and their uncertainties () The three quoted errors arestatistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively Upper limits are givenat 90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Fit fraction Upper limitKlowast(892)0 374plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 17Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03plusmn 08plusmn 08 lt 32 (37)Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20plusmn 24plusmn 34LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38plusmn 38plusmn 67

LASS total 67plusmn 27plusmn 27plusmn 54Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17plusmn 11plusmn 20Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28plusmn 20plusmn 74Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12plusmn 11plusmn 12Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 10 (11)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14plusmn 12plusmn 37Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16plusmn 22plusmn 30

22

Table 9 Results for the product branching fractions The four quoted errors are statisticalexperimental systematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Product branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 342plusmn 013plusmn 010plusmn 016plusmn 040Klowast(1410)0 007plusmn 003plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 001 lt 029 (034)Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 018plusmn 022plusmn 031plusmn 005LASS nonresonant 044plusmn 034plusmn 034plusmn 061plusmn 005

LASS total 061plusmn 025plusmn 025plusmn 049plusmn 007Klowast2(1430)0 068plusmn 015plusmn 010plusmn 018plusmn 008Dlowast0(2400)minus 177plusmn 026plusmn 019plusmn 067plusmn 020Dlowast2(2460)minus 212plusmn 010plusmn 011plusmn 011plusmn 025Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 010 (011)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 060plusmn 013plusmn 011plusmn 034plusmn 007Dπ P-wave (EFF) 081plusmn 015plusmn 020plusmn 027plusmn 009

Table 10 Results for the branching fractions The four quoted errors are statistical experimentalsystematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at 90 (95 )confidence level

Resonance Branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 513plusmn 020plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 060Klowast(1410)0 159plusmn 068plusmn 181plusmn 159plusmn 036 lt 67 (78)Klowast0(1430)0 071plusmn 027plusmn 033plusmn 047plusmn 008LASS nonresonant 066plusmn 051plusmn 051plusmn 092plusmn 008

LASS total 092plusmn 038plusmn 038plusmn 074plusmn 011Klowast2(1430)0 204plusmn 045plusmn 030plusmn 054plusmn 025

The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus states are found to be

m(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (2360plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 28) MeV

Γ(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (255plusmn 26plusmn 20plusmn 47) MeV

m(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (24656plusmn 18plusmn 05plusmn 12) MeV

Γ(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (460plusmn 34plusmn 14plusmn 29) MeV

where the three uncertainties are statistical experimental systematic and model systematicrespectively These are consistent with though less precise than recent results from a DPanalysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] They also show good agreement with and havesimilar precision to earlier measurements of these quantities [1337]

In summary the first amplitude analysis of B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays has been presentedusing a data sample corresponding to 30 fbminus1 of pp collision data collected by the LHCbexperiment A good description of the data is obtained with a model containing contri-

23

butions from intermediate Klowast(892)0 Klowast(1410)0 Klowast2(1430)0 and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonanceswith additional components to describe broad structures in the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S-and P-waves The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances aremeasured as are the complex amplitudes and fit fractions for all components includedin the amplitude model The results can be used in conjunction with an analysis ofB0 rarr DK+πminus decays where the neutral D meson is reconstructed in final states such asK+Kminus to measure the CKM unitarity triangle parameter γ [1 2]

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to our colleagues in the CERN accelerator departments forthe excellent performance of the LHC We thank the technical and administrative staffat the LHCb institutes We acknowledge support from CERN and from the nationalagencies CAPES CNPq FAPERJ and FINEP (Brazil) NSFC (China) CNRSIN2P3(France) BMBF DFG HGF and MPG (Germany) INFN (Italy) FOM and NWO (TheNetherlands) MNiSW and NCN (Poland) MENIFA (Romania) MinES and FANO(Russia) MinECo (Spain) SNSF and SER (Switzerland) NASU (Ukraine) STFC (UnitedKingdom) NSF (USA) The Tier1 computing centres are supported by IN2P3 (France)KIT and BMBF (Germany) INFN (Italy) NWO and SURF (The Netherlands) PIC(Spain) GridPP (United Kingdom) We are indebted to the communities behind themultiple open source software packages on which we depend We are also thankful forthe computing resources and the access to software RampD tools provided by Yandex LLC(Russia) Individual groups or members have received support from EPLANET MarieSk lodowska-Curie Actions and ERC (European Union) Conseil general de Haute-SavoieLabex ENIGMASS and OCEVU Region Auvergne (France) RFBR (Russia) XuntaGaland GENCAT (Spain) Royal Society and Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851(United Kingdom)

24

Appendices

A Correlation matrices

The statistical correlations between the complex coefficients masses and widths determinedfrom the fit to data are given in terms of real and imaginary parts and in terms ofmagnitudes and phases in Tables 11 and 12 The correlations are determined using thesame sample of simulated pseudoexperiments used to calculate the statistical uncertaintieson fit parameters

B Results for interference fit fractions

The central values of the interference fit fractions are given in Table 13 The statisti-cal experimental systematic and model uncertainties on these quantities are given inTables 14 15 and 16

25

Tab

le11

Sta

tist

ical

corr

elat

ions

bet

wee

nth

ere

al(x

)an

dim

agin

ary

(y)

par

tsof

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

x0

y 0x

1y 1

x2

y 2x

3y 3

x4

y 4x

5y 5

x7

y 7x

8y 8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

x0

100

014

002

017minus

018

015minus

017

003

039minus

037

016minus

009minus

018minus

029

007minus

037minus

019

002

004

012

y 01

00minus

006minus

008

009minus

011minus

000

014

003

003

012

013minus

012minus

024

035minus

007

009

012

001minus

004

x1

100minus

009minus

008minus

014minus

004

029minus

001

003minus

020

018minus

021minus

031minus

017minus

036minus

008minus

017minus

023

002

y 11

000

050

340

09minus

001

060minus

039

002minus

003minus

003

007minus

002minus

004minus

016minus

002

007

002

x2

100minus

013

081

009

014minus

016minus

015

021

010

013

004minus

015minus

007

001minus

025

001

y 21

000

080

280

24minus

036minus

013

008minus

004minus

001minus

004

004minus

002minus

001minus

009minus

010

x3

100

020

013minus

034minus

010

033minus

008

008minus

004minus

005minus

007minus

003minus

033minus

009

y 31

00minus

012minus

012minus

051

029minus

034minus

053

009minus

012

009minus

014minus

036

001

x4

100minus

053

032minus

010minus

020

003

002minus

027minus

017minus

006

010minus

000

y 41

000

06minus

009

040

010

014

016

011minus

005

007minus

003

x5

100minus

029minus

003

022

002

004minus

008

002

045minus

006

y 51

00minus

031minus

034

006

003

024minus

014minus

072minus

033

x7

100

046

005

010minus

011minus

001

027

017

y 71

00minus

016

036minus

001

017

032

008

x8

100minus

003

001minus

006minus

009minus

014

y 81

000

290

020

15minus

002

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

26

Tab

le12

S

tati

stic

alco

rrel

atio

ns

bet

wee

nth

em

agnit

ud

es(a

)an

dp

has

es(∆

)of

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

a0

∆0

a1

∆1

a2

∆2

a3

∆3

a4

∆4

a5

∆5

a7

∆7

a8

∆8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

a0

100minus

011minus

008

005

024

003minus

014

004

004

001

021

002

022minus

022

038minus

000minus

004minus

009minus

001

004

∆0

100minus

010

012

003

020

014

014minus

001

045minus

005

010minus

008

035minus

007

005minus

022

006

007

009

a1

100minus

035minus

025

006

032

001minus

001minus

038

004minus

022minus

006

031

002

024

007minus

018minus

020

001

∆1

100

024

015

016

000

014

038minus

018minus

013

016

026

022minus

006minus

009minus

004minus

012

005

a2

100

004

011minus

028minus

007

039minus

009

007

027

010

001

001minus

015

004minus

003minus

013

∆2

100

015

077minus

020minus

010minus

001

024

009

013

003minus

009

005

001

023minus

010

a3

100minus

006

000minus

011

016minus

030minus

012

056

001

012

002minus

007minus

027minus

004

∆3

100minus

028minus

019

015

041minus

024minus

008minus

000minus

013

004

002

041

008

a4

100

013

005minus

017

014

018minus

000

006

000

014minus

019minus

009

∆4

100minus

016

016

017

012

000minus

002minus

019minus

003

003

001

a5

100

024minus

026minus

006

011

005minus

007

001

019

039

∆5

100minus

000minus

028minus

001minus

020minus

020

015

076

027

a7

100minus

001

017minus

006

004

013minus

005minus

024

∆7

100minus

012

037

003minus

000minus

027minus

012

a8

100minus

004minus

001

004

006

015

∆8

100minus

037minus

002minus

033minus

001

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

27

Table 13 Interference fit fractions () from the nominal DP fit The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 374 18 minus00 00 00 minus24 minus02 minus26 minus50A1 07 minus00 00 00 minus11 minus03 minus06 minus11A2 51 minus32 minus00 29 15 16 19A3 48 00 minus84 01 21 02A4 74 minus03 minus10 minus15 minus04A5 193 minus00 28 00A6 231 minus00 00A7 66 minus00A8 89

Table 14 Statistical uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes areall pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASSnonresonant (A4) Klowast2 (1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8)Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 15 07 00 00 00 09 04 04 05A1 03 00 00 00 07 03 04 05A2 20 26 00 11 05 15 05A3 38 00 32 04 34 08A4 17 06 01 06 05A5 28 00 31 00A6 12 00 00A7 14 00A8 16

28

Table 15 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () Theamplitudes are all pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0 (1430)0(A3) LASS nonresonant (A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave(dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fitfractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 12 05 00 00 00 23 02 04 05A1 08 00 00 00 04 08 07 09A2 24 31 00 14 20 26 11A3 38 00 36 02 26 03A4 11 22 02 05 10A5 20 00 40 00A6 11 00 00A7 12 00A8 22

Table 16 Model uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 17 08 00 00 00 26 07 08 14A1 08 00 00 00 08 06 08 11A2 34 29 00 58 17 36 27A3 66 00 83 03 35 07A4 20 17 02 12 10A5 74 00 45 00A6 12 00 00A7 37 00A8 29

29

References

[1] T Gershon On the measurement of the unitarity triangle angle γ from B0 rarr DKlowast0

decays Phys Rev D79 (2009) 051301(R) arXiv08102706

[2] T Gershon and M Williams Prospects for the measurement of the unitaritytriangle angle γ from B0 rarr DK+πminus decays Phys Rev D80 (2009) 092002arXiv09091495

[3] N Cabibbo Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays Phys Rev Lett 10 (1963) 531

[4] M Kobayashi and T Maskawa CP -violation in the renormalizable theory of weakinteraction Progress of Theoretical Physics 49 (1973) 652

[5] M Gronau and D London How to determine all the angles of the unitarity trianglefrom B0 rarr DK0

S and B0s rarr Dφ Phys Lett B253 (1991) 483

[6] M Gronau and D Wyler On determining a weak phase from CP asymmetries incharged B decays Phys Lett B265 (1991) 172

[7] I Dunietz CP violation with self-tagging Bd modes Phys Lett B270 (1991) 75

[8] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurement of CP violation parameters inB0 rarr DKlowast0 decays Phys Rev D90 (2014) 112002 arXiv14078136

[9] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of overlapping spin-1 and spin-

3 D0Kminus resonances at mass 286 GeVc2 Phys Rev Lett 113 (2014) 162001

arXiv14077574

[10] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ decays

Phys Rev D90 (2014) 072003 arXiv14077712

[11] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observation and amplitude analysis of theBminus rarr D+Kminusπminus decay Phys Rev D91 (2015) 092002 arXiv150302995

[12] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays

arXiv150501710 submitted to Phys Rev D

[13] Belle collaboration A Kuzmin et al Study of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays Phys RevD76 (2007) 012006 arXivhep-ex0611054

[14] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of branching fractions andresonance contributions for B0 rarr D0K+πminus and search for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decaysPhys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 011803 arXivhep-ex0509036

[15] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurements of the branching fractions of

the decays B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ and B0 rarr D

0K+πminus Phys Rev D87 (2013) 112009

arXiv13046317

30

[16] Belle collaboration P Krokovny et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K0 and B0 rarr D0Klowast0

decays Phys Rev Lett 90 (2003) 141802 arXivhep-ex0212066

[17] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of B0 rarr D(lowast)0K(lowast)0 branchingfractions Phys Rev D74 (2006) 031101 arXivhep-ex0604016

[18] LHCb collaboration A A Alves Jr et al The LHCb detector at the LHC JINST 3(2008) S08005

[19] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al LHCb detector performance Int J Mod PhysA30 (2015) 1530022 arXiv14126352

[20] R Aaij et al Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator JINST 9 (2014) P09007arXiv14057808

[21] R Arink et al Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker JINST 9 (2014) P01002arXiv13113893

[22] M Adinolfi et al Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Eur PhysJ C73 (2013) 2431 arXiv12116759

[23] A A Alves Jr et al Performance of the LHCb muon system JINST 8 (2013) P02022arXiv12111346

[24] R Aaij et al The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011 JINST 8 (2013) P04022arXiv12113055

[25] V V Gligorov and M Williams Efficient reliable and fast high-level triggering usinga bonsai boosted decision tree JINST 8 (2013) P02013 arXiv12106861

[26] T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P Skands PYTHIA 64 physics and manual JHEP05 (2006) 026 arXivhep-ph0603175 T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P SkandsA brief introduction to PYTHIA 81 Comput Phys Commun 178 (2008) 852arXiv07103820

[27] I Belyaev et al Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss the LHCbsimulation framework J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032047

[28] D J Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package Nucl Instrum MethA462 (2001) 152

[29] P Golonka and Z Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo A precision tool for QED correctionsin Z and W decays Eur Phys J C45 (2006) 97 arXivhep-ph0506026

[30] Geant4 collaboration J Allison et al Geant4 developments and applications IEEETrans Nucl Sci 53 (2006) 270 Geant4 collaboration S Agostinelli et al Geant4A simulation toolkit Nucl Instrum Meth A506 (2003) 250

31

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 15: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

Table 3 Masses and widths (MeV) determined in the fit to data with statistical uncertaintiesonly

Resonance Mass Width

Dlowast0(2400)minus 2360plusmn 15 255plusmn 26Dlowast2(2460)minus 24656plusmn 18 460plusmn 34

Table 4 Complex coefficients and fit fractions determined from the Dalitz plot fit Uncertaintiesare statistical only Note that the fit fractions magnitudes and phases are derived quantities

Resonance Fit fraction Isobar model coefficients() Real part Imaginary part Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 minus000plusmn 015 minus127plusmn 006 127plusmn 006 minus157plusmn 011Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 015plusmn 006 minus009plusmn 009 018plusmn 007 minus054plusmn 021Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 014plusmn 038 045plusmn 015 047plusmn 009 127plusmn 095LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 minus010plusmn 024 044plusmn 014 046plusmn 014 179plusmn 065

LASS total 67plusmn 27Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 minus032plusmn 009 minus047plusmn 007 057plusmn 005 minus216plusmn 019Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 minus080plusmn 008 minus044plusmn 014 091plusmn 007 minus264plusmn 015Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 100 000 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 minus039plusmn 009 036plusmn 017 053plusmn 007 240plusmn 027Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 minus062plusmn 006 minus003plusmn 006 062plusmn 006 minus309plusmn 010Total fit fraction 1134

are determined to be m0 = 1450plusmn 80 MeV Γ0 = 400plusmn 230 MeV a = 32plusmn 18 GeV andr = 09plusmn11 GeV while the parameter of the EFF lineshape of the Dπ P-wave nonresonantamplitude is determined to be α = 088plusmn 010 GeVminus2

The values of the fit fractions and complex coefficients obtained from the fit are shownin Table 4 while the values of the interference fit fractions are given in Appendix B Thesum of the fit fractions is seen to exceed unity mostly due to interference within the Dπ andKπ S-waves Note that in Table 4 and all results for fit fractions and derived quantitiesvalues are reported separately for both the Klowast0 (1430)0 and nonresonant components of theLASS lineshape as well as their coherent sum

Projections of the data and the nominal fit model onto m(K+πminus) m(D0πminus) andm(D0K+) are shown in Fig 6 Zooms are provided in the regions of the main resonantcontributions in Fig 7 Projections onto the cosine of the helicity angle of the D0πminus andK+πminus systems are shown in Figs 8 and 9 respectively These projections all show goodagreement between data and the fit model

Angular moments provide a useful method to investigate the helicity structure of thedecays The angular moments in m(D0πminus) and m(K+πminus) obtained as in Refs [1011]are shown in Figs 10 and 11 respectively The contributions due to the Klowast(892)0 andDlowast2(2460)minus resonances are seen as peaks in moments up to order 2 and order 4 respectivelyas expected for spin-1 and spin-2 resonances Reflections make the interpretation ofmoments at higher masses more difficult However the good agreement seen between data

13

and the fit model provides further support for the fit model being a good description ofthe data

The quality of the fit is evaluated by determining a two-dimensional χ2 value comparingthe data and fit model in 144 bins across the SDP that are defined adaptively to ensurethey are approximately equally populated The pull in each of these bins defined as thedifference between the data and the fit model divided by the uncertainty is shown inFig 12 The effective number of degrees of freedom of the χ2 is between Nbins minusNpars minus 1and Nbinsminus1 where Npars is the number of free parameters in the fit yielding a reduced χ2

in the range 099 ndash 122 Additional unbinned tests of fit quality [54] also show acceptableagreement between the data and the fit model

7 Systematic uncertainties

Systematic uncertainties are considered from sources that can be divided into two categoriesexperimental and model uncertainties Experimental uncertainties arise due to the signaland background yields in the signal region the distributions of the background componentsacross the SDP the variation of efficiency across the SDP and possible bias due to thefitting procedure Model uncertainties are considered due to the fixed parameters in thesignal model the addition or removal of marginal amplitudes and the choice of models forthe Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves The uncertainties due to all of these sourcesare combined in quadrature

The signal and background yields are determined from the fit to the B candidateinvariant mass distribution Systematic uncertainties are considered on the total yieldsdue to both statistical and systematic variations of these yields as evaluated in Ref [15]The yields in the signal region are varied appropriately and the effects of these variationson the parameters of interest are assigned as systematic uncertainties

The histograms describing the background distributions are each varied within statisticaluncertainties to establish the uncertainty due to the imperfect knowledge of the distributionof these backgrounds across the SDP The histograms describing the efficiency variationacross the SDP are also varied within their uncertainties prior to the spline fit Theefficiency histograms are also varied with local correlations to account for the effects ofany unknown correlations between neighbouring bins For each parameter the largeruncertainty is considered from the correlated and uncorrelated variations In addition thebinning scheme of the control sample used to evaluate PID performance is varied

An ensemble of pseudoexperiments is used to establish systematic uncertainties relatedto any potential fit bias Pseudoexperiments are generated using the parameters determinedin the fit to data and mean fitted values of the parameters are determined from Gaussianfits to the distributions of results obtained in the ensemble The differences between thegenerated and mean fitted values are found to be small Uncertainties are determined asthe sum in quadrature of the difference between the generated and mean fitted values andthe uncertainty on the mean fitted value from the Gaussian fit

Systematic uncertainties due to fixed parameters in the fit model are determined by

14

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310LHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350 LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310 LHCb (d)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

LHCb (e)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210LHCb (f)

Data Total fit 0(892)K 0(1410)K

S-wave (LASS)πK 0(1430)2Kminus

(2400)0Dminus

(2460)2D

S-wave (EFF)πD P-wave (EFF)πDminus

D Background

Figure 6 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) (c) m(K+πminus)and (e) m(D0K+) with the same projections shown in (b) (d) and (f) with a logarithmic y-axisscale Components are described in the legend

15

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

235 24 245 25 255

Can

dida

tes

4 M

eV

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m05 1 15

Can

dida

tes

13

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

LHCb (b)

Figure 7 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) in the Dlowast2(2460)minus

region and (b) the low m(K+πminus) region Components are as shown in Fig 6

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

) lt 235 GeVminusπ0D(m204 lt

LHCb(a)

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

) lt 255 GeVminusπ0D(m235 lt

LHCb(b)

Figure 8 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(D0πminus) in the mass ranges(a) 204 lt m(D0πminus) lt 235 GeV and (b) 235 lt m(D0πminus) lt 255 GeV Components are asshown in Fig 6

repeating the fit with these parameters varied The fixed masses and widths are variedwithin their uncertainties as shown in Table 2 while the BlattndashWeisskopf barrier radii rBWare varied independently for D0πminus and K+πminus resonances between 3 and 5 GeVminus1 [10]

The Klowast(1410)0 amplitude does not contribute significantly to the nominal fit modelso the fit is repeated with this component removed and the change in results is assignedas the associated systematic uncertainty In addition uncertainties are assigned fromthe changes in the results when an amplitude due to the Klowast(1680)0 resonance or from avirtual Blowast(5325)+ component as described in Ref [10] is included in the model

A Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D0Kminusπ+ observed both spin-1 and spin-3 resonances

at m(D0Kminus) sim 286 GeV [9 10] A spin-3 resonance has also been seen at m(D0πminus) sim276 GeV in B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] while an analysis of B+ rarr DminusK+π+ shows aspin-1 resonance at similar m(D+πminus) values [11] Uncertainties are assigned corresponding

16

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

) lt 08 GeVminusπ+K(m0 lt LHCb

(a)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 10 GeVminusπ+K(m08 lt LHCb

(b)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 13 GeVminusπ+K(m10 lt LHCb

(c)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

) lt 15 GeVminusπ+K(m14 lt LHCb

(d)

Figure 9 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(K+πminus) in the mass ranges(a) m(K+πminus) lt 08 GeV (b) 08 lt m(K+πminus) lt 10 GeV (c) 10 lt m(K+πminus) lt 13 GeV and(d) 14 lt m(K+πminus) lt 15 GeV Components are as shown in Fig 6

to the changes in results when either a spin-1 or spin-3 state at m(D0πminus) sim 276 GeV isadded to the nominal model

The LASS model used to describe the Kπ S-wave is replaced with a Flatte shape [55]which accounts for the Kηprime threshold near the Klowast0 (1430)0 mass and a resonant term witha modified mass dependent width [52] for the κ (also known as Klowast0(800)) state Thismodel gives an NLL that is worse by 44 units A model-independent description of theKπ S-wave is also used to fit the data with the uncertainty on each parameter takenas the larger of the two differences This alternative improves the NLL by 88 units butintroduces an additional four free parameters into the fit The dabba lineshape used todescribe the D0πminus S-wave is replaced with an EFF lineshape while a power-law model isintroduced as an alternative to the EFF lineshape that describes the D0πminus P-wave Thesealterations worsen the NLL by 30 units and improve it by 08 units respectively

The total systematic uncertainties due to experimental and model effects for fit fractionsand complex coefficients are given together with the results in Sec 8 The contributionsfrom different sources to the systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions masses and

17

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0002004006008

0101201401601802

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-30-25-20-15-10

-505

1015

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

310timesLHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

310timesLHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-8-6-4-202468

310timesLHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-8-6-4-20246

310timesLHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-6-4-202468

10

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 10 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(D0πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

18

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0

005

01

015

02

025

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

20

40

60

80

100310times

LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10-505

10152025

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25310times

LHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-20-15-10

-505

101520

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 11 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(K+πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

19

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Pull

-2

-1

0

1

2

LHCb

Figure 12 Differences between the data SDP distribution and the fit model across the SDP interms of the per-bin pull

Table 5 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths(MeV) Uncertainties given on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value SB fraction Efficiency Background SDP Fit bias Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 060 083 050 031 117Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 006 039 069 005 080Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 028 148 185 033 241LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 051 225 286 086 377

LASS total 67plusmn 27 026 186 160 102 267Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 023 072 053 054 107Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 021 139 143 040 204Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 070 070 049 015 111Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 003 081 059 057 115Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 086 191 052 038 219m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 46 81 70 37 122m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 001 037 022 029 051Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 28 131 139 48 199Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 05 09 09 05 14

widths are given in Tables 5 and 6 The dominant experimental systematic uncertaintyon most parameters is due to either the efficiency variation or background distributionsacross the SDP while the model uncertainties are generally dominated by the effects ofalternative descriptions of the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves For the parametersof broad components the model uncertainties dominate however for other parameters thestatistical experimental and model uncertainties are all of a similar magnitude

The stability of the fit results is confirmed by several cross-checks The data sample isdivided into subsamples according to the flavour of the B candidate the trigger decision

20

Table 6 Model uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths (MeV) Uncertaintiesgiven on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value Fixed parameters Addremove Alternative models Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 075 114 109 174Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 018 070 022 076Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 079 330 023 340LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 110 399 520 665

LASS total 67plusmn 27 053 142 521 543Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 036 187 056 198Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 055 195 711 740Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 018 073 099 124Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 027 140 346 374Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 031 199 215 295m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 61 93 256 279m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 009 105 048 115Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 40 180 435 472Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 14 05 24 29

the polarity of the magnet and the year of data taking Each subsample is fitted separatelyand all are seen to be consistent with the nominal fit results The fit is also repeatedwith additional resonance components to test the fit model Resonances up to spin-3 wereconsidered for all three pairs of daughters with the mass and width allowed to vary in thefit No additional significant contributions were observed

8 Results and summary

The results for the complex coefficients are reported in Table 7 with results for thefit fractions given in Table 8 The results for the interference fit fractions are givenin Appendix B Upper limits are determined on the fit fractions of the Klowast(1410)0 andDlowast3(2760)minus components which do not give significant contributions using the methoddescribed in Ref [10]

The fit fractions for resonant contributions are converted into quasi-two-body productbranching fractions by multiplying by B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus) = (92plusmn 06plusmn 07plusmn 06)times 10minus5which is obtained from the ratio of branching fractions B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus)B(B0 rarrD0π+πminus) [15] multiplied by the latest result for B(B0 rarr D0π+πminus) [12] accounting forthe different Dlowast(2010)minus veto windows used in the analyses and for the 37 residualbackground due to B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ decays The statistical correlation between theresults of Ref [15] and this analysis is found to be negligible The results for the productbranching fractions are shown in Table 9 For the K+πminus resonances where the branchingfractions to Kπ are known the product branching fractions are converted to the Bdecay branching fractions shown in Table 10 The results for B(B0 rarr D0Klowast(892)0) andB(B0 rarr Dlowast2(2460)minusK+)times B(Dlowast2(2460)minus rarr D0πminus) are consistent with and more precisethan previous measurements [14 1617]

21

Table 7 Results for the complex amplitudes and their uncertainties presented (top) in terms ofreal and imaginary parts and (bottom) in terms and magnitudes and phases The three quotederrors are statistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively

Resonance Real part Imaginary part

Klowast(892)0 minus000plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 034 minus127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 006Klowast(1410)0 015plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 009 minus009plusmn 009plusmn 018plusmn 018Klowast0(1430)0 014plusmn 038plusmn 048plusmn 038 045plusmn 015plusmn 037plusmn 017LASS nonresonant minus010plusmn 024plusmn 016plusmn 042 044plusmn 014plusmn 017plusmn 023Klowast2(1430)0 minus032plusmn 009plusmn 015plusmn 023 minus047plusmn 007plusmn 014plusmn 015Dlowast0(2400)minus minus080plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 022 minus044plusmn 014plusmn 012plusmn 018Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) minus039plusmn 009plusmn 009plusmn 014 036plusmn 017plusmn 014plusmn 023Dπ P-wave (EFF) minus062plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 011 minus003plusmn 006plusmn 005plusmn 010

Resonance Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 005 minus157plusmn 011plusmn 016plusmn 027Klowast(1410)0 018plusmn 007plusmn 010plusmn 011 minus054plusmn 021plusmn 055plusmn 104Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 009plusmn 010plusmn 014 127plusmn 095plusmn 104plusmn 081LASS nonresonant 046plusmn 014plusmn 016plusmn 029 179plusmn 065plusmn 035plusmn 069Klowast2(1430)0 057plusmn 005plusmn 004plusmn 008 minus216plusmn 019plusmn 043plusmn 043Dlowast0(2400)minus 091plusmn 007plusmn 006plusmn 017 minus264plusmn 015plusmn 014plusmn 023Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 053plusmn 007plusmn 004plusmn 014 240plusmn 027plusmn 024plusmn 044Dπ P-wave (EFF) 062plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 011 minus309plusmn 010plusmn 007plusmn 017

Table 8 Results for the fit fractions and their uncertainties () The three quoted errors arestatistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively Upper limits are givenat 90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Fit fraction Upper limitKlowast(892)0 374plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 17Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03plusmn 08plusmn 08 lt 32 (37)Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20plusmn 24plusmn 34LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38plusmn 38plusmn 67

LASS total 67plusmn 27plusmn 27plusmn 54Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17plusmn 11plusmn 20Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28plusmn 20plusmn 74Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12plusmn 11plusmn 12Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 10 (11)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14plusmn 12plusmn 37Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16plusmn 22plusmn 30

22

Table 9 Results for the product branching fractions The four quoted errors are statisticalexperimental systematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Product branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 342plusmn 013plusmn 010plusmn 016plusmn 040Klowast(1410)0 007plusmn 003plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 001 lt 029 (034)Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 018plusmn 022plusmn 031plusmn 005LASS nonresonant 044plusmn 034plusmn 034plusmn 061plusmn 005

LASS total 061plusmn 025plusmn 025plusmn 049plusmn 007Klowast2(1430)0 068plusmn 015plusmn 010plusmn 018plusmn 008Dlowast0(2400)minus 177plusmn 026plusmn 019plusmn 067plusmn 020Dlowast2(2460)minus 212plusmn 010plusmn 011plusmn 011plusmn 025Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 010 (011)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 060plusmn 013plusmn 011plusmn 034plusmn 007Dπ P-wave (EFF) 081plusmn 015plusmn 020plusmn 027plusmn 009

Table 10 Results for the branching fractions The four quoted errors are statistical experimentalsystematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at 90 (95 )confidence level

Resonance Branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 513plusmn 020plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 060Klowast(1410)0 159plusmn 068plusmn 181plusmn 159plusmn 036 lt 67 (78)Klowast0(1430)0 071plusmn 027plusmn 033plusmn 047plusmn 008LASS nonresonant 066plusmn 051plusmn 051plusmn 092plusmn 008

LASS total 092plusmn 038plusmn 038plusmn 074plusmn 011Klowast2(1430)0 204plusmn 045plusmn 030plusmn 054plusmn 025

The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus states are found to be

m(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (2360plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 28) MeV

Γ(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (255plusmn 26plusmn 20plusmn 47) MeV

m(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (24656plusmn 18plusmn 05plusmn 12) MeV

Γ(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (460plusmn 34plusmn 14plusmn 29) MeV

where the three uncertainties are statistical experimental systematic and model systematicrespectively These are consistent with though less precise than recent results from a DPanalysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] They also show good agreement with and havesimilar precision to earlier measurements of these quantities [1337]

In summary the first amplitude analysis of B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays has been presentedusing a data sample corresponding to 30 fbminus1 of pp collision data collected by the LHCbexperiment A good description of the data is obtained with a model containing contri-

23

butions from intermediate Klowast(892)0 Klowast(1410)0 Klowast2(1430)0 and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonanceswith additional components to describe broad structures in the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S-and P-waves The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances aremeasured as are the complex amplitudes and fit fractions for all components includedin the amplitude model The results can be used in conjunction with an analysis ofB0 rarr DK+πminus decays where the neutral D meson is reconstructed in final states such asK+Kminus to measure the CKM unitarity triangle parameter γ [1 2]

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to our colleagues in the CERN accelerator departments forthe excellent performance of the LHC We thank the technical and administrative staffat the LHCb institutes We acknowledge support from CERN and from the nationalagencies CAPES CNPq FAPERJ and FINEP (Brazil) NSFC (China) CNRSIN2P3(France) BMBF DFG HGF and MPG (Germany) INFN (Italy) FOM and NWO (TheNetherlands) MNiSW and NCN (Poland) MENIFA (Romania) MinES and FANO(Russia) MinECo (Spain) SNSF and SER (Switzerland) NASU (Ukraine) STFC (UnitedKingdom) NSF (USA) The Tier1 computing centres are supported by IN2P3 (France)KIT and BMBF (Germany) INFN (Italy) NWO and SURF (The Netherlands) PIC(Spain) GridPP (United Kingdom) We are indebted to the communities behind themultiple open source software packages on which we depend We are also thankful forthe computing resources and the access to software RampD tools provided by Yandex LLC(Russia) Individual groups or members have received support from EPLANET MarieSk lodowska-Curie Actions and ERC (European Union) Conseil general de Haute-SavoieLabex ENIGMASS and OCEVU Region Auvergne (France) RFBR (Russia) XuntaGaland GENCAT (Spain) Royal Society and Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851(United Kingdom)

24

Appendices

A Correlation matrices

The statistical correlations between the complex coefficients masses and widths determinedfrom the fit to data are given in terms of real and imaginary parts and in terms ofmagnitudes and phases in Tables 11 and 12 The correlations are determined using thesame sample of simulated pseudoexperiments used to calculate the statistical uncertaintieson fit parameters

B Results for interference fit fractions

The central values of the interference fit fractions are given in Table 13 The statisti-cal experimental systematic and model uncertainties on these quantities are given inTables 14 15 and 16

25

Tab

le11

Sta

tist

ical

corr

elat

ions

bet

wee

nth

ere

al(x

)an

dim

agin

ary

(y)

par

tsof

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

x0

y 0x

1y 1

x2

y 2x

3y 3

x4

y 4x

5y 5

x7

y 7x

8y 8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

x0

100

014

002

017minus

018

015minus

017

003

039minus

037

016minus

009minus

018minus

029

007minus

037minus

019

002

004

012

y 01

00minus

006minus

008

009minus

011minus

000

014

003

003

012

013minus

012minus

024

035minus

007

009

012

001minus

004

x1

100minus

009minus

008minus

014minus

004

029minus

001

003minus

020

018minus

021minus

031minus

017minus

036minus

008minus

017minus

023

002

y 11

000

050

340

09minus

001

060minus

039

002minus

003minus

003

007minus

002minus

004minus

016minus

002

007

002

x2

100minus

013

081

009

014minus

016minus

015

021

010

013

004minus

015minus

007

001minus

025

001

y 21

000

080

280

24minus

036minus

013

008minus

004minus

001minus

004

004minus

002minus

001minus

009minus

010

x3

100

020

013minus

034minus

010

033minus

008

008minus

004minus

005minus

007minus

003minus

033minus

009

y 31

00minus

012minus

012minus

051

029minus

034minus

053

009minus

012

009minus

014minus

036

001

x4

100minus

053

032minus

010minus

020

003

002minus

027minus

017minus

006

010minus

000

y 41

000

06minus

009

040

010

014

016

011minus

005

007minus

003

x5

100minus

029minus

003

022

002

004minus

008

002

045minus

006

y 51

00minus

031minus

034

006

003

024minus

014minus

072minus

033

x7

100

046

005

010minus

011minus

001

027

017

y 71

00minus

016

036minus

001

017

032

008

x8

100minus

003

001minus

006minus

009minus

014

y 81

000

290

020

15minus

002

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

26

Tab

le12

S

tati

stic

alco

rrel

atio

ns

bet

wee

nth

em

agnit

ud

es(a

)an

dp

has

es(∆

)of

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

a0

∆0

a1

∆1

a2

∆2

a3

∆3

a4

∆4

a5

∆5

a7

∆7

a8

∆8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

a0

100minus

011minus

008

005

024

003minus

014

004

004

001

021

002

022minus

022

038minus

000minus

004minus

009minus

001

004

∆0

100minus

010

012

003

020

014

014minus

001

045minus

005

010minus

008

035minus

007

005minus

022

006

007

009

a1

100minus

035minus

025

006

032

001minus

001minus

038

004minus

022minus

006

031

002

024

007minus

018minus

020

001

∆1

100

024

015

016

000

014

038minus

018minus

013

016

026

022minus

006minus

009minus

004minus

012

005

a2

100

004

011minus

028minus

007

039minus

009

007

027

010

001

001minus

015

004minus

003minus

013

∆2

100

015

077minus

020minus

010minus

001

024

009

013

003minus

009

005

001

023minus

010

a3

100minus

006

000minus

011

016minus

030minus

012

056

001

012

002minus

007minus

027minus

004

∆3

100minus

028minus

019

015

041minus

024minus

008minus

000minus

013

004

002

041

008

a4

100

013

005minus

017

014

018minus

000

006

000

014minus

019minus

009

∆4

100minus

016

016

017

012

000minus

002minus

019minus

003

003

001

a5

100

024minus

026minus

006

011

005minus

007

001

019

039

∆5

100minus

000minus

028minus

001minus

020minus

020

015

076

027

a7

100minus

001

017minus

006

004

013minus

005minus

024

∆7

100minus

012

037

003minus

000minus

027minus

012

a8

100minus

004minus

001

004

006

015

∆8

100minus

037minus

002minus

033minus

001

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

27

Table 13 Interference fit fractions () from the nominal DP fit The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 374 18 minus00 00 00 minus24 minus02 minus26 minus50A1 07 minus00 00 00 minus11 minus03 minus06 minus11A2 51 minus32 minus00 29 15 16 19A3 48 00 minus84 01 21 02A4 74 minus03 minus10 minus15 minus04A5 193 minus00 28 00A6 231 minus00 00A7 66 minus00A8 89

Table 14 Statistical uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes areall pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASSnonresonant (A4) Klowast2 (1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8)Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 15 07 00 00 00 09 04 04 05A1 03 00 00 00 07 03 04 05A2 20 26 00 11 05 15 05A3 38 00 32 04 34 08A4 17 06 01 06 05A5 28 00 31 00A6 12 00 00A7 14 00A8 16

28

Table 15 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () Theamplitudes are all pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0 (1430)0(A3) LASS nonresonant (A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave(dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fitfractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 12 05 00 00 00 23 02 04 05A1 08 00 00 00 04 08 07 09A2 24 31 00 14 20 26 11A3 38 00 36 02 26 03A4 11 22 02 05 10A5 20 00 40 00A6 11 00 00A7 12 00A8 22

Table 16 Model uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 17 08 00 00 00 26 07 08 14A1 08 00 00 00 08 06 08 11A2 34 29 00 58 17 36 27A3 66 00 83 03 35 07A4 20 17 02 12 10A5 74 00 45 00A6 12 00 00A7 37 00A8 29

29

References

[1] T Gershon On the measurement of the unitarity triangle angle γ from B0 rarr DKlowast0

decays Phys Rev D79 (2009) 051301(R) arXiv08102706

[2] T Gershon and M Williams Prospects for the measurement of the unitaritytriangle angle γ from B0 rarr DK+πminus decays Phys Rev D80 (2009) 092002arXiv09091495

[3] N Cabibbo Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays Phys Rev Lett 10 (1963) 531

[4] M Kobayashi and T Maskawa CP -violation in the renormalizable theory of weakinteraction Progress of Theoretical Physics 49 (1973) 652

[5] M Gronau and D London How to determine all the angles of the unitarity trianglefrom B0 rarr DK0

S and B0s rarr Dφ Phys Lett B253 (1991) 483

[6] M Gronau and D Wyler On determining a weak phase from CP asymmetries incharged B decays Phys Lett B265 (1991) 172

[7] I Dunietz CP violation with self-tagging Bd modes Phys Lett B270 (1991) 75

[8] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurement of CP violation parameters inB0 rarr DKlowast0 decays Phys Rev D90 (2014) 112002 arXiv14078136

[9] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of overlapping spin-1 and spin-

3 D0Kminus resonances at mass 286 GeVc2 Phys Rev Lett 113 (2014) 162001

arXiv14077574

[10] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ decays

Phys Rev D90 (2014) 072003 arXiv14077712

[11] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observation and amplitude analysis of theBminus rarr D+Kminusπminus decay Phys Rev D91 (2015) 092002 arXiv150302995

[12] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays

arXiv150501710 submitted to Phys Rev D

[13] Belle collaboration A Kuzmin et al Study of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays Phys RevD76 (2007) 012006 arXivhep-ex0611054

[14] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of branching fractions andresonance contributions for B0 rarr D0K+πminus and search for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decaysPhys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 011803 arXivhep-ex0509036

[15] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurements of the branching fractions of

the decays B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ and B0 rarr D

0K+πminus Phys Rev D87 (2013) 112009

arXiv13046317

30

[16] Belle collaboration P Krokovny et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K0 and B0 rarr D0Klowast0

decays Phys Rev Lett 90 (2003) 141802 arXivhep-ex0212066

[17] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of B0 rarr D(lowast)0K(lowast)0 branchingfractions Phys Rev D74 (2006) 031101 arXivhep-ex0604016

[18] LHCb collaboration A A Alves Jr et al The LHCb detector at the LHC JINST 3(2008) S08005

[19] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al LHCb detector performance Int J Mod PhysA30 (2015) 1530022 arXiv14126352

[20] R Aaij et al Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator JINST 9 (2014) P09007arXiv14057808

[21] R Arink et al Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker JINST 9 (2014) P01002arXiv13113893

[22] M Adinolfi et al Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Eur PhysJ C73 (2013) 2431 arXiv12116759

[23] A A Alves Jr et al Performance of the LHCb muon system JINST 8 (2013) P02022arXiv12111346

[24] R Aaij et al The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011 JINST 8 (2013) P04022arXiv12113055

[25] V V Gligorov and M Williams Efficient reliable and fast high-level triggering usinga bonsai boosted decision tree JINST 8 (2013) P02013 arXiv12106861

[26] T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P Skands PYTHIA 64 physics and manual JHEP05 (2006) 026 arXivhep-ph0603175 T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P SkandsA brief introduction to PYTHIA 81 Comput Phys Commun 178 (2008) 852arXiv07103820

[27] I Belyaev et al Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss the LHCbsimulation framework J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032047

[28] D J Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package Nucl Instrum MethA462 (2001) 152

[29] P Golonka and Z Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo A precision tool for QED correctionsin Z and W decays Eur Phys J C45 (2006) 97 arXivhep-ph0506026

[30] Geant4 collaboration J Allison et al Geant4 developments and applications IEEETrans Nucl Sci 53 (2006) 270 Geant4 collaboration S Agostinelli et al Geant4A simulation toolkit Nucl Instrum Meth A506 (2003) 250

31

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 16: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

and the fit model provides further support for the fit model being a good description ofthe data

The quality of the fit is evaluated by determining a two-dimensional χ2 value comparingthe data and fit model in 144 bins across the SDP that are defined adaptively to ensurethey are approximately equally populated The pull in each of these bins defined as thedifference between the data and the fit model divided by the uncertainty is shown inFig 12 The effective number of degrees of freedom of the χ2 is between Nbins minusNpars minus 1and Nbinsminus1 where Npars is the number of free parameters in the fit yielding a reduced χ2

in the range 099 ndash 122 Additional unbinned tests of fit quality [54] also show acceptableagreement between the data and the fit model

7 Systematic uncertainties

Systematic uncertainties are considered from sources that can be divided into two categoriesexperimental and model uncertainties Experimental uncertainties arise due to the signaland background yields in the signal region the distributions of the background componentsacross the SDP the variation of efficiency across the SDP and possible bias due to thefitting procedure Model uncertainties are considered due to the fixed parameters in thesignal model the addition or removal of marginal amplitudes and the choice of models forthe Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves The uncertainties due to all of these sourcesare combined in quadrature

The signal and background yields are determined from the fit to the B candidateinvariant mass distribution Systematic uncertainties are considered on the total yieldsdue to both statistical and systematic variations of these yields as evaluated in Ref [15]The yields in the signal region are varied appropriately and the effects of these variationson the parameters of interest are assigned as systematic uncertainties

The histograms describing the background distributions are each varied within statisticaluncertainties to establish the uncertainty due to the imperfect knowledge of the distributionof these backgrounds across the SDP The histograms describing the efficiency variationacross the SDP are also varied within their uncertainties prior to the spline fit Theefficiency histograms are also varied with local correlations to account for the effects ofany unknown correlations between neighbouring bins For each parameter the largeruncertainty is considered from the correlated and uncorrelated variations In addition thebinning scheme of the control sample used to evaluate PID performance is varied

An ensemble of pseudoexperiments is used to establish systematic uncertainties relatedto any potential fit bias Pseudoexperiments are generated using the parameters determinedin the fit to data and mean fitted values of the parameters are determined from Gaussianfits to the distributions of results obtained in the ensemble The differences between thegenerated and mean fitted values are found to be small Uncertainties are determined asthe sum in quadrature of the difference between the generated and mean fitted values andthe uncertainty on the mean fitted value from the Gaussian fit

Systematic uncertainties due to fixed parameters in the fit model are determined by

14

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310LHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350 LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310 LHCb (d)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

LHCb (e)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210LHCb (f)

Data Total fit 0(892)K 0(1410)K

S-wave (LASS)πK 0(1430)2Kminus

(2400)0Dminus

(2460)2D

S-wave (EFF)πD P-wave (EFF)πDminus

D Background

Figure 6 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) (c) m(K+πminus)and (e) m(D0K+) with the same projections shown in (b) (d) and (f) with a logarithmic y-axisscale Components are described in the legend

15

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

235 24 245 25 255

Can

dida

tes

4 M

eV

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m05 1 15

Can

dida

tes

13

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

LHCb (b)

Figure 7 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) in the Dlowast2(2460)minus

region and (b) the low m(K+πminus) region Components are as shown in Fig 6

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

) lt 235 GeVminusπ0D(m204 lt

LHCb(a)

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

) lt 255 GeVminusπ0D(m235 lt

LHCb(b)

Figure 8 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(D0πminus) in the mass ranges(a) 204 lt m(D0πminus) lt 235 GeV and (b) 235 lt m(D0πminus) lt 255 GeV Components are asshown in Fig 6

repeating the fit with these parameters varied The fixed masses and widths are variedwithin their uncertainties as shown in Table 2 while the BlattndashWeisskopf barrier radii rBWare varied independently for D0πminus and K+πminus resonances between 3 and 5 GeVminus1 [10]

The Klowast(1410)0 amplitude does not contribute significantly to the nominal fit modelso the fit is repeated with this component removed and the change in results is assignedas the associated systematic uncertainty In addition uncertainties are assigned fromthe changes in the results when an amplitude due to the Klowast(1680)0 resonance or from avirtual Blowast(5325)+ component as described in Ref [10] is included in the model

A Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D0Kminusπ+ observed both spin-1 and spin-3 resonances

at m(D0Kminus) sim 286 GeV [9 10] A spin-3 resonance has also been seen at m(D0πminus) sim276 GeV in B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] while an analysis of B+ rarr DminusK+π+ shows aspin-1 resonance at similar m(D+πminus) values [11] Uncertainties are assigned corresponding

16

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

) lt 08 GeVminusπ+K(m0 lt LHCb

(a)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 10 GeVminusπ+K(m08 lt LHCb

(b)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 13 GeVminusπ+K(m10 lt LHCb

(c)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

) lt 15 GeVminusπ+K(m14 lt LHCb

(d)

Figure 9 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(K+πminus) in the mass ranges(a) m(K+πminus) lt 08 GeV (b) 08 lt m(K+πminus) lt 10 GeV (c) 10 lt m(K+πminus) lt 13 GeV and(d) 14 lt m(K+πminus) lt 15 GeV Components are as shown in Fig 6

to the changes in results when either a spin-1 or spin-3 state at m(D0πminus) sim 276 GeV isadded to the nominal model

The LASS model used to describe the Kπ S-wave is replaced with a Flatte shape [55]which accounts for the Kηprime threshold near the Klowast0 (1430)0 mass and a resonant term witha modified mass dependent width [52] for the κ (also known as Klowast0(800)) state Thismodel gives an NLL that is worse by 44 units A model-independent description of theKπ S-wave is also used to fit the data with the uncertainty on each parameter takenas the larger of the two differences This alternative improves the NLL by 88 units butintroduces an additional four free parameters into the fit The dabba lineshape used todescribe the D0πminus S-wave is replaced with an EFF lineshape while a power-law model isintroduced as an alternative to the EFF lineshape that describes the D0πminus P-wave Thesealterations worsen the NLL by 30 units and improve it by 08 units respectively

The total systematic uncertainties due to experimental and model effects for fit fractionsand complex coefficients are given together with the results in Sec 8 The contributionsfrom different sources to the systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions masses and

17

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0002004006008

0101201401601802

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-30-25-20-15-10

-505

1015

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

310timesLHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

310timesLHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-8-6-4-202468

310timesLHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-8-6-4-20246

310timesLHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-6-4-202468

10

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 10 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(D0πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

18

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0

005

01

015

02

025

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

20

40

60

80

100310times

LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10-505

10152025

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25310times

LHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-20-15-10

-505

101520

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 11 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(K+πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

19

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Pull

-2

-1

0

1

2

LHCb

Figure 12 Differences between the data SDP distribution and the fit model across the SDP interms of the per-bin pull

Table 5 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths(MeV) Uncertainties given on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value SB fraction Efficiency Background SDP Fit bias Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 060 083 050 031 117Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 006 039 069 005 080Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 028 148 185 033 241LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 051 225 286 086 377

LASS total 67plusmn 27 026 186 160 102 267Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 023 072 053 054 107Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 021 139 143 040 204Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 070 070 049 015 111Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 003 081 059 057 115Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 086 191 052 038 219m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 46 81 70 37 122m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 001 037 022 029 051Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 28 131 139 48 199Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 05 09 09 05 14

widths are given in Tables 5 and 6 The dominant experimental systematic uncertaintyon most parameters is due to either the efficiency variation or background distributionsacross the SDP while the model uncertainties are generally dominated by the effects ofalternative descriptions of the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves For the parametersof broad components the model uncertainties dominate however for other parameters thestatistical experimental and model uncertainties are all of a similar magnitude

The stability of the fit results is confirmed by several cross-checks The data sample isdivided into subsamples according to the flavour of the B candidate the trigger decision

20

Table 6 Model uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths (MeV) Uncertaintiesgiven on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value Fixed parameters Addremove Alternative models Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 075 114 109 174Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 018 070 022 076Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 079 330 023 340LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 110 399 520 665

LASS total 67plusmn 27 053 142 521 543Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 036 187 056 198Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 055 195 711 740Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 018 073 099 124Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 027 140 346 374Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 031 199 215 295m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 61 93 256 279m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 009 105 048 115Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 40 180 435 472Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 14 05 24 29

the polarity of the magnet and the year of data taking Each subsample is fitted separatelyand all are seen to be consistent with the nominal fit results The fit is also repeatedwith additional resonance components to test the fit model Resonances up to spin-3 wereconsidered for all three pairs of daughters with the mass and width allowed to vary in thefit No additional significant contributions were observed

8 Results and summary

The results for the complex coefficients are reported in Table 7 with results for thefit fractions given in Table 8 The results for the interference fit fractions are givenin Appendix B Upper limits are determined on the fit fractions of the Klowast(1410)0 andDlowast3(2760)minus components which do not give significant contributions using the methoddescribed in Ref [10]

The fit fractions for resonant contributions are converted into quasi-two-body productbranching fractions by multiplying by B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus) = (92plusmn 06plusmn 07plusmn 06)times 10minus5which is obtained from the ratio of branching fractions B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus)B(B0 rarrD0π+πminus) [15] multiplied by the latest result for B(B0 rarr D0π+πminus) [12] accounting forthe different Dlowast(2010)minus veto windows used in the analyses and for the 37 residualbackground due to B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ decays The statistical correlation between theresults of Ref [15] and this analysis is found to be negligible The results for the productbranching fractions are shown in Table 9 For the K+πminus resonances where the branchingfractions to Kπ are known the product branching fractions are converted to the Bdecay branching fractions shown in Table 10 The results for B(B0 rarr D0Klowast(892)0) andB(B0 rarr Dlowast2(2460)minusK+)times B(Dlowast2(2460)minus rarr D0πminus) are consistent with and more precisethan previous measurements [14 1617]

21

Table 7 Results for the complex amplitudes and their uncertainties presented (top) in terms ofreal and imaginary parts and (bottom) in terms and magnitudes and phases The three quotederrors are statistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively

Resonance Real part Imaginary part

Klowast(892)0 minus000plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 034 minus127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 006Klowast(1410)0 015plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 009 minus009plusmn 009plusmn 018plusmn 018Klowast0(1430)0 014plusmn 038plusmn 048plusmn 038 045plusmn 015plusmn 037plusmn 017LASS nonresonant minus010plusmn 024plusmn 016plusmn 042 044plusmn 014plusmn 017plusmn 023Klowast2(1430)0 minus032plusmn 009plusmn 015plusmn 023 minus047plusmn 007plusmn 014plusmn 015Dlowast0(2400)minus minus080plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 022 minus044plusmn 014plusmn 012plusmn 018Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) minus039plusmn 009plusmn 009plusmn 014 036plusmn 017plusmn 014plusmn 023Dπ P-wave (EFF) minus062plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 011 minus003plusmn 006plusmn 005plusmn 010

Resonance Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 005 minus157plusmn 011plusmn 016plusmn 027Klowast(1410)0 018plusmn 007plusmn 010plusmn 011 minus054plusmn 021plusmn 055plusmn 104Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 009plusmn 010plusmn 014 127plusmn 095plusmn 104plusmn 081LASS nonresonant 046plusmn 014plusmn 016plusmn 029 179plusmn 065plusmn 035plusmn 069Klowast2(1430)0 057plusmn 005plusmn 004plusmn 008 minus216plusmn 019plusmn 043plusmn 043Dlowast0(2400)minus 091plusmn 007plusmn 006plusmn 017 minus264plusmn 015plusmn 014plusmn 023Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 053plusmn 007plusmn 004plusmn 014 240plusmn 027plusmn 024plusmn 044Dπ P-wave (EFF) 062plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 011 minus309plusmn 010plusmn 007plusmn 017

Table 8 Results for the fit fractions and their uncertainties () The three quoted errors arestatistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively Upper limits are givenat 90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Fit fraction Upper limitKlowast(892)0 374plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 17Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03plusmn 08plusmn 08 lt 32 (37)Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20plusmn 24plusmn 34LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38plusmn 38plusmn 67

LASS total 67plusmn 27plusmn 27plusmn 54Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17plusmn 11plusmn 20Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28plusmn 20plusmn 74Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12plusmn 11plusmn 12Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 10 (11)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14plusmn 12plusmn 37Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16plusmn 22plusmn 30

22

Table 9 Results for the product branching fractions The four quoted errors are statisticalexperimental systematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Product branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 342plusmn 013plusmn 010plusmn 016plusmn 040Klowast(1410)0 007plusmn 003plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 001 lt 029 (034)Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 018plusmn 022plusmn 031plusmn 005LASS nonresonant 044plusmn 034plusmn 034plusmn 061plusmn 005

LASS total 061plusmn 025plusmn 025plusmn 049plusmn 007Klowast2(1430)0 068plusmn 015plusmn 010plusmn 018plusmn 008Dlowast0(2400)minus 177plusmn 026plusmn 019plusmn 067plusmn 020Dlowast2(2460)minus 212plusmn 010plusmn 011plusmn 011plusmn 025Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 010 (011)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 060plusmn 013plusmn 011plusmn 034plusmn 007Dπ P-wave (EFF) 081plusmn 015plusmn 020plusmn 027plusmn 009

Table 10 Results for the branching fractions The four quoted errors are statistical experimentalsystematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at 90 (95 )confidence level

Resonance Branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 513plusmn 020plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 060Klowast(1410)0 159plusmn 068plusmn 181plusmn 159plusmn 036 lt 67 (78)Klowast0(1430)0 071plusmn 027plusmn 033plusmn 047plusmn 008LASS nonresonant 066plusmn 051plusmn 051plusmn 092plusmn 008

LASS total 092plusmn 038plusmn 038plusmn 074plusmn 011Klowast2(1430)0 204plusmn 045plusmn 030plusmn 054plusmn 025

The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus states are found to be

m(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (2360plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 28) MeV

Γ(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (255plusmn 26plusmn 20plusmn 47) MeV

m(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (24656plusmn 18plusmn 05plusmn 12) MeV

Γ(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (460plusmn 34plusmn 14plusmn 29) MeV

where the three uncertainties are statistical experimental systematic and model systematicrespectively These are consistent with though less precise than recent results from a DPanalysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] They also show good agreement with and havesimilar precision to earlier measurements of these quantities [1337]

In summary the first amplitude analysis of B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays has been presentedusing a data sample corresponding to 30 fbminus1 of pp collision data collected by the LHCbexperiment A good description of the data is obtained with a model containing contri-

23

butions from intermediate Klowast(892)0 Klowast(1410)0 Klowast2(1430)0 and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonanceswith additional components to describe broad structures in the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S-and P-waves The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances aremeasured as are the complex amplitudes and fit fractions for all components includedin the amplitude model The results can be used in conjunction with an analysis ofB0 rarr DK+πminus decays where the neutral D meson is reconstructed in final states such asK+Kminus to measure the CKM unitarity triangle parameter γ [1 2]

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to our colleagues in the CERN accelerator departments forthe excellent performance of the LHC We thank the technical and administrative staffat the LHCb institutes We acknowledge support from CERN and from the nationalagencies CAPES CNPq FAPERJ and FINEP (Brazil) NSFC (China) CNRSIN2P3(France) BMBF DFG HGF and MPG (Germany) INFN (Italy) FOM and NWO (TheNetherlands) MNiSW and NCN (Poland) MENIFA (Romania) MinES and FANO(Russia) MinECo (Spain) SNSF and SER (Switzerland) NASU (Ukraine) STFC (UnitedKingdom) NSF (USA) The Tier1 computing centres are supported by IN2P3 (France)KIT and BMBF (Germany) INFN (Italy) NWO and SURF (The Netherlands) PIC(Spain) GridPP (United Kingdom) We are indebted to the communities behind themultiple open source software packages on which we depend We are also thankful forthe computing resources and the access to software RampD tools provided by Yandex LLC(Russia) Individual groups or members have received support from EPLANET MarieSk lodowska-Curie Actions and ERC (European Union) Conseil general de Haute-SavoieLabex ENIGMASS and OCEVU Region Auvergne (France) RFBR (Russia) XuntaGaland GENCAT (Spain) Royal Society and Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851(United Kingdom)

24

Appendices

A Correlation matrices

The statistical correlations between the complex coefficients masses and widths determinedfrom the fit to data are given in terms of real and imaginary parts and in terms ofmagnitudes and phases in Tables 11 and 12 The correlations are determined using thesame sample of simulated pseudoexperiments used to calculate the statistical uncertaintieson fit parameters

B Results for interference fit fractions

The central values of the interference fit fractions are given in Table 13 The statisti-cal experimental systematic and model uncertainties on these quantities are given inTables 14 15 and 16

25

Tab

le11

Sta

tist

ical

corr

elat

ions

bet

wee

nth

ere

al(x

)an

dim

agin

ary

(y)

par

tsof

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

x0

y 0x

1y 1

x2

y 2x

3y 3

x4

y 4x

5y 5

x7

y 7x

8y 8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

x0

100

014

002

017minus

018

015minus

017

003

039minus

037

016minus

009minus

018minus

029

007minus

037minus

019

002

004

012

y 01

00minus

006minus

008

009minus

011minus

000

014

003

003

012

013minus

012minus

024

035minus

007

009

012

001minus

004

x1

100minus

009minus

008minus

014minus

004

029minus

001

003minus

020

018minus

021minus

031minus

017minus

036minus

008minus

017minus

023

002

y 11

000

050

340

09minus

001

060minus

039

002minus

003minus

003

007minus

002minus

004minus

016minus

002

007

002

x2

100minus

013

081

009

014minus

016minus

015

021

010

013

004minus

015minus

007

001minus

025

001

y 21

000

080

280

24minus

036minus

013

008minus

004minus

001minus

004

004minus

002minus

001minus

009minus

010

x3

100

020

013minus

034minus

010

033minus

008

008minus

004minus

005minus

007minus

003minus

033minus

009

y 31

00minus

012minus

012minus

051

029minus

034minus

053

009minus

012

009minus

014minus

036

001

x4

100minus

053

032minus

010minus

020

003

002minus

027minus

017minus

006

010minus

000

y 41

000

06minus

009

040

010

014

016

011minus

005

007minus

003

x5

100minus

029minus

003

022

002

004minus

008

002

045minus

006

y 51

00minus

031minus

034

006

003

024minus

014minus

072minus

033

x7

100

046

005

010minus

011minus

001

027

017

y 71

00minus

016

036minus

001

017

032

008

x8

100minus

003

001minus

006minus

009minus

014

y 81

000

290

020

15minus

002

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

26

Tab

le12

S

tati

stic

alco

rrel

atio

ns

bet

wee

nth

em

agnit

ud

es(a

)an

dp

has

es(∆

)of

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

a0

∆0

a1

∆1

a2

∆2

a3

∆3

a4

∆4

a5

∆5

a7

∆7

a8

∆8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

a0

100minus

011minus

008

005

024

003minus

014

004

004

001

021

002

022minus

022

038minus

000minus

004minus

009minus

001

004

∆0

100minus

010

012

003

020

014

014minus

001

045minus

005

010minus

008

035minus

007

005minus

022

006

007

009

a1

100minus

035minus

025

006

032

001minus

001minus

038

004minus

022minus

006

031

002

024

007minus

018minus

020

001

∆1

100

024

015

016

000

014

038minus

018minus

013

016

026

022minus

006minus

009minus

004minus

012

005

a2

100

004

011minus

028minus

007

039minus

009

007

027

010

001

001minus

015

004minus

003minus

013

∆2

100

015

077minus

020minus

010minus

001

024

009

013

003minus

009

005

001

023minus

010

a3

100minus

006

000minus

011

016minus

030minus

012

056

001

012

002minus

007minus

027minus

004

∆3

100minus

028minus

019

015

041minus

024minus

008minus

000minus

013

004

002

041

008

a4

100

013

005minus

017

014

018minus

000

006

000

014minus

019minus

009

∆4

100minus

016

016

017

012

000minus

002minus

019minus

003

003

001

a5

100

024minus

026minus

006

011

005minus

007

001

019

039

∆5

100minus

000minus

028minus

001minus

020minus

020

015

076

027

a7

100minus

001

017minus

006

004

013minus

005minus

024

∆7

100minus

012

037

003minus

000minus

027minus

012

a8

100minus

004minus

001

004

006

015

∆8

100minus

037minus

002minus

033minus

001

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

27

Table 13 Interference fit fractions () from the nominal DP fit The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 374 18 minus00 00 00 minus24 minus02 minus26 minus50A1 07 minus00 00 00 minus11 minus03 minus06 minus11A2 51 minus32 minus00 29 15 16 19A3 48 00 minus84 01 21 02A4 74 minus03 minus10 minus15 minus04A5 193 minus00 28 00A6 231 minus00 00A7 66 minus00A8 89

Table 14 Statistical uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes areall pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASSnonresonant (A4) Klowast2 (1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8)Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 15 07 00 00 00 09 04 04 05A1 03 00 00 00 07 03 04 05A2 20 26 00 11 05 15 05A3 38 00 32 04 34 08A4 17 06 01 06 05A5 28 00 31 00A6 12 00 00A7 14 00A8 16

28

Table 15 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () Theamplitudes are all pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0 (1430)0(A3) LASS nonresonant (A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave(dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fitfractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 12 05 00 00 00 23 02 04 05A1 08 00 00 00 04 08 07 09A2 24 31 00 14 20 26 11A3 38 00 36 02 26 03A4 11 22 02 05 10A5 20 00 40 00A6 11 00 00A7 12 00A8 22

Table 16 Model uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 17 08 00 00 00 26 07 08 14A1 08 00 00 00 08 06 08 11A2 34 29 00 58 17 36 27A3 66 00 83 03 35 07A4 20 17 02 12 10A5 74 00 45 00A6 12 00 00A7 37 00A8 29

29

References

[1] T Gershon On the measurement of the unitarity triangle angle γ from B0 rarr DKlowast0

decays Phys Rev D79 (2009) 051301(R) arXiv08102706

[2] T Gershon and M Williams Prospects for the measurement of the unitaritytriangle angle γ from B0 rarr DK+πminus decays Phys Rev D80 (2009) 092002arXiv09091495

[3] N Cabibbo Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays Phys Rev Lett 10 (1963) 531

[4] M Kobayashi and T Maskawa CP -violation in the renormalizable theory of weakinteraction Progress of Theoretical Physics 49 (1973) 652

[5] M Gronau and D London How to determine all the angles of the unitarity trianglefrom B0 rarr DK0

S and B0s rarr Dφ Phys Lett B253 (1991) 483

[6] M Gronau and D Wyler On determining a weak phase from CP asymmetries incharged B decays Phys Lett B265 (1991) 172

[7] I Dunietz CP violation with self-tagging Bd modes Phys Lett B270 (1991) 75

[8] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurement of CP violation parameters inB0 rarr DKlowast0 decays Phys Rev D90 (2014) 112002 arXiv14078136

[9] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of overlapping spin-1 and spin-

3 D0Kminus resonances at mass 286 GeVc2 Phys Rev Lett 113 (2014) 162001

arXiv14077574

[10] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ decays

Phys Rev D90 (2014) 072003 arXiv14077712

[11] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observation and amplitude analysis of theBminus rarr D+Kminusπminus decay Phys Rev D91 (2015) 092002 arXiv150302995

[12] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays

arXiv150501710 submitted to Phys Rev D

[13] Belle collaboration A Kuzmin et al Study of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays Phys RevD76 (2007) 012006 arXivhep-ex0611054

[14] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of branching fractions andresonance contributions for B0 rarr D0K+πminus and search for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decaysPhys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 011803 arXivhep-ex0509036

[15] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurements of the branching fractions of

the decays B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ and B0 rarr D

0K+πminus Phys Rev D87 (2013) 112009

arXiv13046317

30

[16] Belle collaboration P Krokovny et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K0 and B0 rarr D0Klowast0

decays Phys Rev Lett 90 (2003) 141802 arXivhep-ex0212066

[17] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of B0 rarr D(lowast)0K(lowast)0 branchingfractions Phys Rev D74 (2006) 031101 arXivhep-ex0604016

[18] LHCb collaboration A A Alves Jr et al The LHCb detector at the LHC JINST 3(2008) S08005

[19] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al LHCb detector performance Int J Mod PhysA30 (2015) 1530022 arXiv14126352

[20] R Aaij et al Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator JINST 9 (2014) P09007arXiv14057808

[21] R Arink et al Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker JINST 9 (2014) P01002arXiv13113893

[22] M Adinolfi et al Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Eur PhysJ C73 (2013) 2431 arXiv12116759

[23] A A Alves Jr et al Performance of the LHCb muon system JINST 8 (2013) P02022arXiv12111346

[24] R Aaij et al The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011 JINST 8 (2013) P04022arXiv12113055

[25] V V Gligorov and M Williams Efficient reliable and fast high-level triggering usinga bonsai boosted decision tree JINST 8 (2013) P02013 arXiv12106861

[26] T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P Skands PYTHIA 64 physics and manual JHEP05 (2006) 026 arXivhep-ph0603175 T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P SkandsA brief introduction to PYTHIA 81 Comput Phys Commun 178 (2008) 852arXiv07103820

[27] I Belyaev et al Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss the LHCbsimulation framework J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032047

[28] D J Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package Nucl Instrum MethA462 (2001) 152

[29] P Golonka and Z Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo A precision tool for QED correctionsin Z and W decays Eur Phys J C45 (2006) 97 arXivhep-ph0506026

[30] Geant4 collaboration J Allison et al Geant4 developments and applications IEEETrans Nucl Sci 53 (2006) 270 Geant4 collaboration S Agostinelli et al Geant4A simulation toolkit Nucl Instrum Meth A506 (2003) 250

31

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 17: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

2 3 4

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310LHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350 LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m1 2 3

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210

310 LHCb (d)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

LHCb (e)

) [GeV]+K0

D(m3 4 5

Can

dida

tes

30

MeV

-110

1

10

210LHCb (f)

Data Total fit 0(892)K 0(1410)K

S-wave (LASS)πK 0(1430)2Kminus

(2400)0Dminus

(2460)2D

S-wave (EFF)πD P-wave (EFF)πDminus

D Background

Figure 6 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) (c) m(K+πminus)and (e) m(D0K+) with the same projections shown in (b) (d) and (f) with a logarithmic y-axisscale Components are described in the legend

15

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

235 24 245 25 255

Can

dida

tes

4 M

eV

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m05 1 15

Can

dida

tes

13

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

LHCb (b)

Figure 7 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) in the Dlowast2(2460)minus

region and (b) the low m(K+πminus) region Components are as shown in Fig 6

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

) lt 235 GeVminusπ0D(m204 lt

LHCb(a)

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

) lt 255 GeVminusπ0D(m235 lt

LHCb(b)

Figure 8 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(D0πminus) in the mass ranges(a) 204 lt m(D0πminus) lt 235 GeV and (b) 235 lt m(D0πminus) lt 255 GeV Components are asshown in Fig 6

repeating the fit with these parameters varied The fixed masses and widths are variedwithin their uncertainties as shown in Table 2 while the BlattndashWeisskopf barrier radii rBWare varied independently for D0πminus and K+πminus resonances between 3 and 5 GeVminus1 [10]

The Klowast(1410)0 amplitude does not contribute significantly to the nominal fit modelso the fit is repeated with this component removed and the change in results is assignedas the associated systematic uncertainty In addition uncertainties are assigned fromthe changes in the results when an amplitude due to the Klowast(1680)0 resonance or from avirtual Blowast(5325)+ component as described in Ref [10] is included in the model

A Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D0Kminusπ+ observed both spin-1 and spin-3 resonances

at m(D0Kminus) sim 286 GeV [9 10] A spin-3 resonance has also been seen at m(D0πminus) sim276 GeV in B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] while an analysis of B+ rarr DminusK+π+ shows aspin-1 resonance at similar m(D+πminus) values [11] Uncertainties are assigned corresponding

16

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

) lt 08 GeVminusπ+K(m0 lt LHCb

(a)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 10 GeVminusπ+K(m08 lt LHCb

(b)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 13 GeVminusπ+K(m10 lt LHCb

(c)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

) lt 15 GeVminusπ+K(m14 lt LHCb

(d)

Figure 9 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(K+πminus) in the mass ranges(a) m(K+πminus) lt 08 GeV (b) 08 lt m(K+πminus) lt 10 GeV (c) 10 lt m(K+πminus) lt 13 GeV and(d) 14 lt m(K+πminus) lt 15 GeV Components are as shown in Fig 6

to the changes in results when either a spin-1 or spin-3 state at m(D0πminus) sim 276 GeV isadded to the nominal model

The LASS model used to describe the Kπ S-wave is replaced with a Flatte shape [55]which accounts for the Kηprime threshold near the Klowast0 (1430)0 mass and a resonant term witha modified mass dependent width [52] for the κ (also known as Klowast0(800)) state Thismodel gives an NLL that is worse by 44 units A model-independent description of theKπ S-wave is also used to fit the data with the uncertainty on each parameter takenas the larger of the two differences This alternative improves the NLL by 88 units butintroduces an additional four free parameters into the fit The dabba lineshape used todescribe the D0πminus S-wave is replaced with an EFF lineshape while a power-law model isintroduced as an alternative to the EFF lineshape that describes the D0πminus P-wave Thesealterations worsen the NLL by 30 units and improve it by 08 units respectively

The total systematic uncertainties due to experimental and model effects for fit fractionsand complex coefficients are given together with the results in Sec 8 The contributionsfrom different sources to the systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions masses and

17

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0002004006008

0101201401601802

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-30-25-20-15-10

-505

1015

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

310timesLHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

310timesLHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-8-6-4-202468

310timesLHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-8-6-4-20246

310timesLHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-6-4-202468

10

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 10 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(D0πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

18

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0

005

01

015

02

025

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

20

40

60

80

100310times

LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10-505

10152025

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25310times

LHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-20-15-10

-505

101520

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 11 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(K+πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

19

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Pull

-2

-1

0

1

2

LHCb

Figure 12 Differences between the data SDP distribution and the fit model across the SDP interms of the per-bin pull

Table 5 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths(MeV) Uncertainties given on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value SB fraction Efficiency Background SDP Fit bias Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 060 083 050 031 117Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 006 039 069 005 080Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 028 148 185 033 241LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 051 225 286 086 377

LASS total 67plusmn 27 026 186 160 102 267Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 023 072 053 054 107Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 021 139 143 040 204Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 070 070 049 015 111Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 003 081 059 057 115Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 086 191 052 038 219m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 46 81 70 37 122m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 001 037 022 029 051Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 28 131 139 48 199Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 05 09 09 05 14

widths are given in Tables 5 and 6 The dominant experimental systematic uncertaintyon most parameters is due to either the efficiency variation or background distributionsacross the SDP while the model uncertainties are generally dominated by the effects ofalternative descriptions of the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves For the parametersof broad components the model uncertainties dominate however for other parameters thestatistical experimental and model uncertainties are all of a similar magnitude

The stability of the fit results is confirmed by several cross-checks The data sample isdivided into subsamples according to the flavour of the B candidate the trigger decision

20

Table 6 Model uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths (MeV) Uncertaintiesgiven on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value Fixed parameters Addremove Alternative models Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 075 114 109 174Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 018 070 022 076Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 079 330 023 340LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 110 399 520 665

LASS total 67plusmn 27 053 142 521 543Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 036 187 056 198Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 055 195 711 740Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 018 073 099 124Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 027 140 346 374Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 031 199 215 295m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 61 93 256 279m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 009 105 048 115Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 40 180 435 472Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 14 05 24 29

the polarity of the magnet and the year of data taking Each subsample is fitted separatelyand all are seen to be consistent with the nominal fit results The fit is also repeatedwith additional resonance components to test the fit model Resonances up to spin-3 wereconsidered for all three pairs of daughters with the mass and width allowed to vary in thefit No additional significant contributions were observed

8 Results and summary

The results for the complex coefficients are reported in Table 7 with results for thefit fractions given in Table 8 The results for the interference fit fractions are givenin Appendix B Upper limits are determined on the fit fractions of the Klowast(1410)0 andDlowast3(2760)minus components which do not give significant contributions using the methoddescribed in Ref [10]

The fit fractions for resonant contributions are converted into quasi-two-body productbranching fractions by multiplying by B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus) = (92plusmn 06plusmn 07plusmn 06)times 10minus5which is obtained from the ratio of branching fractions B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus)B(B0 rarrD0π+πminus) [15] multiplied by the latest result for B(B0 rarr D0π+πminus) [12] accounting forthe different Dlowast(2010)minus veto windows used in the analyses and for the 37 residualbackground due to B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ decays The statistical correlation between theresults of Ref [15] and this analysis is found to be negligible The results for the productbranching fractions are shown in Table 9 For the K+πminus resonances where the branchingfractions to Kπ are known the product branching fractions are converted to the Bdecay branching fractions shown in Table 10 The results for B(B0 rarr D0Klowast(892)0) andB(B0 rarr Dlowast2(2460)minusK+)times B(Dlowast2(2460)minus rarr D0πminus) are consistent with and more precisethan previous measurements [14 1617]

21

Table 7 Results for the complex amplitudes and their uncertainties presented (top) in terms ofreal and imaginary parts and (bottom) in terms and magnitudes and phases The three quotederrors are statistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively

Resonance Real part Imaginary part

Klowast(892)0 minus000plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 034 minus127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 006Klowast(1410)0 015plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 009 minus009plusmn 009plusmn 018plusmn 018Klowast0(1430)0 014plusmn 038plusmn 048plusmn 038 045plusmn 015plusmn 037plusmn 017LASS nonresonant minus010plusmn 024plusmn 016plusmn 042 044plusmn 014plusmn 017plusmn 023Klowast2(1430)0 minus032plusmn 009plusmn 015plusmn 023 minus047plusmn 007plusmn 014plusmn 015Dlowast0(2400)minus minus080plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 022 minus044plusmn 014plusmn 012plusmn 018Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) minus039plusmn 009plusmn 009plusmn 014 036plusmn 017plusmn 014plusmn 023Dπ P-wave (EFF) minus062plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 011 minus003plusmn 006plusmn 005plusmn 010

Resonance Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 005 minus157plusmn 011plusmn 016plusmn 027Klowast(1410)0 018plusmn 007plusmn 010plusmn 011 minus054plusmn 021plusmn 055plusmn 104Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 009plusmn 010plusmn 014 127plusmn 095plusmn 104plusmn 081LASS nonresonant 046plusmn 014plusmn 016plusmn 029 179plusmn 065plusmn 035plusmn 069Klowast2(1430)0 057plusmn 005plusmn 004plusmn 008 minus216plusmn 019plusmn 043plusmn 043Dlowast0(2400)minus 091plusmn 007plusmn 006plusmn 017 minus264plusmn 015plusmn 014plusmn 023Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 053plusmn 007plusmn 004plusmn 014 240plusmn 027plusmn 024plusmn 044Dπ P-wave (EFF) 062plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 011 minus309plusmn 010plusmn 007plusmn 017

Table 8 Results for the fit fractions and their uncertainties () The three quoted errors arestatistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively Upper limits are givenat 90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Fit fraction Upper limitKlowast(892)0 374plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 17Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03plusmn 08plusmn 08 lt 32 (37)Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20plusmn 24plusmn 34LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38plusmn 38plusmn 67

LASS total 67plusmn 27plusmn 27plusmn 54Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17plusmn 11plusmn 20Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28plusmn 20plusmn 74Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12plusmn 11plusmn 12Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 10 (11)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14plusmn 12plusmn 37Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16plusmn 22plusmn 30

22

Table 9 Results for the product branching fractions The four quoted errors are statisticalexperimental systematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Product branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 342plusmn 013plusmn 010plusmn 016plusmn 040Klowast(1410)0 007plusmn 003plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 001 lt 029 (034)Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 018plusmn 022plusmn 031plusmn 005LASS nonresonant 044plusmn 034plusmn 034plusmn 061plusmn 005

LASS total 061plusmn 025plusmn 025plusmn 049plusmn 007Klowast2(1430)0 068plusmn 015plusmn 010plusmn 018plusmn 008Dlowast0(2400)minus 177plusmn 026plusmn 019plusmn 067plusmn 020Dlowast2(2460)minus 212plusmn 010plusmn 011plusmn 011plusmn 025Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 010 (011)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 060plusmn 013plusmn 011plusmn 034plusmn 007Dπ P-wave (EFF) 081plusmn 015plusmn 020plusmn 027plusmn 009

Table 10 Results for the branching fractions The four quoted errors are statistical experimentalsystematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at 90 (95 )confidence level

Resonance Branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 513plusmn 020plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 060Klowast(1410)0 159plusmn 068plusmn 181plusmn 159plusmn 036 lt 67 (78)Klowast0(1430)0 071plusmn 027plusmn 033plusmn 047plusmn 008LASS nonresonant 066plusmn 051plusmn 051plusmn 092plusmn 008

LASS total 092plusmn 038plusmn 038plusmn 074plusmn 011Klowast2(1430)0 204plusmn 045plusmn 030plusmn 054plusmn 025

The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus states are found to be

m(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (2360plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 28) MeV

Γ(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (255plusmn 26plusmn 20plusmn 47) MeV

m(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (24656plusmn 18plusmn 05plusmn 12) MeV

Γ(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (460plusmn 34plusmn 14plusmn 29) MeV

where the three uncertainties are statistical experimental systematic and model systematicrespectively These are consistent with though less precise than recent results from a DPanalysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] They also show good agreement with and havesimilar precision to earlier measurements of these quantities [1337]

In summary the first amplitude analysis of B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays has been presentedusing a data sample corresponding to 30 fbminus1 of pp collision data collected by the LHCbexperiment A good description of the data is obtained with a model containing contri-

23

butions from intermediate Klowast(892)0 Klowast(1410)0 Klowast2(1430)0 and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonanceswith additional components to describe broad structures in the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S-and P-waves The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances aremeasured as are the complex amplitudes and fit fractions for all components includedin the amplitude model The results can be used in conjunction with an analysis ofB0 rarr DK+πminus decays where the neutral D meson is reconstructed in final states such asK+Kminus to measure the CKM unitarity triangle parameter γ [1 2]

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to our colleagues in the CERN accelerator departments forthe excellent performance of the LHC We thank the technical and administrative staffat the LHCb institutes We acknowledge support from CERN and from the nationalagencies CAPES CNPq FAPERJ and FINEP (Brazil) NSFC (China) CNRSIN2P3(France) BMBF DFG HGF and MPG (Germany) INFN (Italy) FOM and NWO (TheNetherlands) MNiSW and NCN (Poland) MENIFA (Romania) MinES and FANO(Russia) MinECo (Spain) SNSF and SER (Switzerland) NASU (Ukraine) STFC (UnitedKingdom) NSF (USA) The Tier1 computing centres are supported by IN2P3 (France)KIT and BMBF (Germany) INFN (Italy) NWO and SURF (The Netherlands) PIC(Spain) GridPP (United Kingdom) We are indebted to the communities behind themultiple open source software packages on which we depend We are also thankful forthe computing resources and the access to software RampD tools provided by Yandex LLC(Russia) Individual groups or members have received support from EPLANET MarieSk lodowska-Curie Actions and ERC (European Union) Conseil general de Haute-SavoieLabex ENIGMASS and OCEVU Region Auvergne (France) RFBR (Russia) XuntaGaland GENCAT (Spain) Royal Society and Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851(United Kingdom)

24

Appendices

A Correlation matrices

The statistical correlations between the complex coefficients masses and widths determinedfrom the fit to data are given in terms of real and imaginary parts and in terms ofmagnitudes and phases in Tables 11 and 12 The correlations are determined using thesame sample of simulated pseudoexperiments used to calculate the statistical uncertaintieson fit parameters

B Results for interference fit fractions

The central values of the interference fit fractions are given in Table 13 The statisti-cal experimental systematic and model uncertainties on these quantities are given inTables 14 15 and 16

25

Tab

le11

Sta

tist

ical

corr

elat

ions

bet

wee

nth

ere

al(x

)an

dim

agin

ary

(y)

par

tsof

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

x0

y 0x

1y 1

x2

y 2x

3y 3

x4

y 4x

5y 5

x7

y 7x

8y 8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

x0

100

014

002

017minus

018

015minus

017

003

039minus

037

016minus

009minus

018minus

029

007minus

037minus

019

002

004

012

y 01

00minus

006minus

008

009minus

011minus

000

014

003

003

012

013minus

012minus

024

035minus

007

009

012

001minus

004

x1

100minus

009minus

008minus

014minus

004

029minus

001

003minus

020

018minus

021minus

031minus

017minus

036minus

008minus

017minus

023

002

y 11

000

050

340

09minus

001

060minus

039

002minus

003minus

003

007minus

002minus

004minus

016minus

002

007

002

x2

100minus

013

081

009

014minus

016minus

015

021

010

013

004minus

015minus

007

001minus

025

001

y 21

000

080

280

24minus

036minus

013

008minus

004minus

001minus

004

004minus

002minus

001minus

009minus

010

x3

100

020

013minus

034minus

010

033minus

008

008minus

004minus

005minus

007minus

003minus

033minus

009

y 31

00minus

012minus

012minus

051

029minus

034minus

053

009minus

012

009minus

014minus

036

001

x4

100minus

053

032minus

010minus

020

003

002minus

027minus

017minus

006

010minus

000

y 41

000

06minus

009

040

010

014

016

011minus

005

007minus

003

x5

100minus

029minus

003

022

002

004minus

008

002

045minus

006

y 51

00minus

031minus

034

006

003

024minus

014minus

072minus

033

x7

100

046

005

010minus

011minus

001

027

017

y 71

00minus

016

036minus

001

017

032

008

x8

100minus

003

001minus

006minus

009minus

014

y 81

000

290

020

15minus

002

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

26

Tab

le12

S

tati

stic

alco

rrel

atio

ns

bet

wee

nth

em

agnit

ud

es(a

)an

dp

has

es(∆

)of

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

a0

∆0

a1

∆1

a2

∆2

a3

∆3

a4

∆4

a5

∆5

a7

∆7

a8

∆8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

a0

100minus

011minus

008

005

024

003minus

014

004

004

001

021

002

022minus

022

038minus

000minus

004minus

009minus

001

004

∆0

100minus

010

012

003

020

014

014minus

001

045minus

005

010minus

008

035minus

007

005minus

022

006

007

009

a1

100minus

035minus

025

006

032

001minus

001minus

038

004minus

022minus

006

031

002

024

007minus

018minus

020

001

∆1

100

024

015

016

000

014

038minus

018minus

013

016

026

022minus

006minus

009minus

004minus

012

005

a2

100

004

011minus

028minus

007

039minus

009

007

027

010

001

001minus

015

004minus

003minus

013

∆2

100

015

077minus

020minus

010minus

001

024

009

013

003minus

009

005

001

023minus

010

a3

100minus

006

000minus

011

016minus

030minus

012

056

001

012

002minus

007minus

027minus

004

∆3

100minus

028minus

019

015

041minus

024minus

008minus

000minus

013

004

002

041

008

a4

100

013

005minus

017

014

018minus

000

006

000

014minus

019minus

009

∆4

100minus

016

016

017

012

000minus

002minus

019minus

003

003

001

a5

100

024minus

026minus

006

011

005minus

007

001

019

039

∆5

100minus

000minus

028minus

001minus

020minus

020

015

076

027

a7

100minus

001

017minus

006

004

013minus

005minus

024

∆7

100minus

012

037

003minus

000minus

027minus

012

a8

100minus

004minus

001

004

006

015

∆8

100minus

037minus

002minus

033minus

001

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

27

Table 13 Interference fit fractions () from the nominal DP fit The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 374 18 minus00 00 00 minus24 minus02 minus26 minus50A1 07 minus00 00 00 minus11 minus03 minus06 minus11A2 51 minus32 minus00 29 15 16 19A3 48 00 minus84 01 21 02A4 74 minus03 minus10 minus15 minus04A5 193 minus00 28 00A6 231 minus00 00A7 66 minus00A8 89

Table 14 Statistical uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes areall pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASSnonresonant (A4) Klowast2 (1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8)Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 15 07 00 00 00 09 04 04 05A1 03 00 00 00 07 03 04 05A2 20 26 00 11 05 15 05A3 38 00 32 04 34 08A4 17 06 01 06 05A5 28 00 31 00A6 12 00 00A7 14 00A8 16

28

Table 15 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () Theamplitudes are all pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0 (1430)0(A3) LASS nonresonant (A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave(dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fitfractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 12 05 00 00 00 23 02 04 05A1 08 00 00 00 04 08 07 09A2 24 31 00 14 20 26 11A3 38 00 36 02 26 03A4 11 22 02 05 10A5 20 00 40 00A6 11 00 00A7 12 00A8 22

Table 16 Model uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 17 08 00 00 00 26 07 08 14A1 08 00 00 00 08 06 08 11A2 34 29 00 58 17 36 27A3 66 00 83 03 35 07A4 20 17 02 12 10A5 74 00 45 00A6 12 00 00A7 37 00A8 29

29

References

[1] T Gershon On the measurement of the unitarity triangle angle γ from B0 rarr DKlowast0

decays Phys Rev D79 (2009) 051301(R) arXiv08102706

[2] T Gershon and M Williams Prospects for the measurement of the unitaritytriangle angle γ from B0 rarr DK+πminus decays Phys Rev D80 (2009) 092002arXiv09091495

[3] N Cabibbo Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays Phys Rev Lett 10 (1963) 531

[4] M Kobayashi and T Maskawa CP -violation in the renormalizable theory of weakinteraction Progress of Theoretical Physics 49 (1973) 652

[5] M Gronau and D London How to determine all the angles of the unitarity trianglefrom B0 rarr DK0

S and B0s rarr Dφ Phys Lett B253 (1991) 483

[6] M Gronau and D Wyler On determining a weak phase from CP asymmetries incharged B decays Phys Lett B265 (1991) 172

[7] I Dunietz CP violation with self-tagging Bd modes Phys Lett B270 (1991) 75

[8] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurement of CP violation parameters inB0 rarr DKlowast0 decays Phys Rev D90 (2014) 112002 arXiv14078136

[9] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of overlapping spin-1 and spin-

3 D0Kminus resonances at mass 286 GeVc2 Phys Rev Lett 113 (2014) 162001

arXiv14077574

[10] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ decays

Phys Rev D90 (2014) 072003 arXiv14077712

[11] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observation and amplitude analysis of theBminus rarr D+Kminusπminus decay Phys Rev D91 (2015) 092002 arXiv150302995

[12] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays

arXiv150501710 submitted to Phys Rev D

[13] Belle collaboration A Kuzmin et al Study of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays Phys RevD76 (2007) 012006 arXivhep-ex0611054

[14] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of branching fractions andresonance contributions for B0 rarr D0K+πminus and search for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decaysPhys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 011803 arXivhep-ex0509036

[15] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurements of the branching fractions of

the decays B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ and B0 rarr D

0K+πminus Phys Rev D87 (2013) 112009

arXiv13046317

30

[16] Belle collaboration P Krokovny et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K0 and B0 rarr D0Klowast0

decays Phys Rev Lett 90 (2003) 141802 arXivhep-ex0212066

[17] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of B0 rarr D(lowast)0K(lowast)0 branchingfractions Phys Rev D74 (2006) 031101 arXivhep-ex0604016

[18] LHCb collaboration A A Alves Jr et al The LHCb detector at the LHC JINST 3(2008) S08005

[19] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al LHCb detector performance Int J Mod PhysA30 (2015) 1530022 arXiv14126352

[20] R Aaij et al Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator JINST 9 (2014) P09007arXiv14057808

[21] R Arink et al Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker JINST 9 (2014) P01002arXiv13113893

[22] M Adinolfi et al Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Eur PhysJ C73 (2013) 2431 arXiv12116759

[23] A A Alves Jr et al Performance of the LHCb muon system JINST 8 (2013) P02022arXiv12111346

[24] R Aaij et al The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011 JINST 8 (2013) P04022arXiv12113055

[25] V V Gligorov and M Williams Efficient reliable and fast high-level triggering usinga bonsai boosted decision tree JINST 8 (2013) P02013 arXiv12106861

[26] T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P Skands PYTHIA 64 physics and manual JHEP05 (2006) 026 arXivhep-ph0603175 T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P SkandsA brief introduction to PYTHIA 81 Comput Phys Commun 178 (2008) 852arXiv07103820

[27] I Belyaev et al Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss the LHCbsimulation framework J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032047

[28] D J Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package Nucl Instrum MethA462 (2001) 152

[29] P Golonka and Z Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo A precision tool for QED correctionsin Z and W decays Eur Phys J C45 (2006) 97 arXivhep-ph0506026

[30] Geant4 collaboration J Allison et al Geant4 developments and applications IEEETrans Nucl Sci 53 (2006) 270 Geant4 collaboration S Agostinelli et al Geant4A simulation toolkit Nucl Instrum Meth A506 (2003) 250

31

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 18: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

235 24 245 25 255

Can

dida

tes

4 M

eV

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

LHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m05 1 15

Can

dida

tes

13

MeV

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

LHCb (b)

Figure 7 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto (a) m(D0πminus) in the Dlowast2(2460)minus

region and (b) the low m(K+πminus) region Components are as shown in Fig 6

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

) lt 235 GeVminusπ0D(m204 lt

LHCb(a)

)minusπ0D(θcos

-1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

) lt 255 GeVminusπ0D(m235 lt

LHCb(b)

Figure 8 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(D0πminus) in the mass ranges(a) 204 lt m(D0πminus) lt 235 GeV and (b) 235 lt m(D0πminus) lt 255 GeV Components are asshown in Fig 6

repeating the fit with these parameters varied The fixed masses and widths are variedwithin their uncertainties as shown in Table 2 while the BlattndashWeisskopf barrier radii rBWare varied independently for D0πminus and K+πminus resonances between 3 and 5 GeVminus1 [10]

The Klowast(1410)0 amplitude does not contribute significantly to the nominal fit modelso the fit is repeated with this component removed and the change in results is assignedas the associated systematic uncertainty In addition uncertainties are assigned fromthe changes in the results when an amplitude due to the Klowast(1680)0 resonance or from avirtual Blowast(5325)+ component as described in Ref [10] is included in the model

A Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D0Kminusπ+ observed both spin-1 and spin-3 resonances

at m(D0Kminus) sim 286 GeV [9 10] A spin-3 resonance has also been seen at m(D0πminus) sim276 GeV in B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] while an analysis of B+ rarr DminusK+π+ shows aspin-1 resonance at similar m(D+πminus) values [11] Uncertainties are assigned corresponding

16

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

) lt 08 GeVminusπ+K(m0 lt LHCb

(a)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 10 GeVminusπ+K(m08 lt LHCb

(b)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 13 GeVminusπ+K(m10 lt LHCb

(c)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

) lt 15 GeVminusπ+K(m14 lt LHCb

(d)

Figure 9 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(K+πminus) in the mass ranges(a) m(K+πminus) lt 08 GeV (b) 08 lt m(K+πminus) lt 10 GeV (c) 10 lt m(K+πminus) lt 13 GeV and(d) 14 lt m(K+πminus) lt 15 GeV Components are as shown in Fig 6

to the changes in results when either a spin-1 or spin-3 state at m(D0πminus) sim 276 GeV isadded to the nominal model

The LASS model used to describe the Kπ S-wave is replaced with a Flatte shape [55]which accounts for the Kηprime threshold near the Klowast0 (1430)0 mass and a resonant term witha modified mass dependent width [52] for the κ (also known as Klowast0(800)) state Thismodel gives an NLL that is worse by 44 units A model-independent description of theKπ S-wave is also used to fit the data with the uncertainty on each parameter takenas the larger of the two differences This alternative improves the NLL by 88 units butintroduces an additional four free parameters into the fit The dabba lineshape used todescribe the D0πminus S-wave is replaced with an EFF lineshape while a power-law model isintroduced as an alternative to the EFF lineshape that describes the D0πminus P-wave Thesealterations worsen the NLL by 30 units and improve it by 08 units respectively

The total systematic uncertainties due to experimental and model effects for fit fractionsand complex coefficients are given together with the results in Sec 8 The contributionsfrom different sources to the systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions masses and

17

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0002004006008

0101201401601802

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-30-25-20-15-10

-505

1015

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

310timesLHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

310timesLHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-8-6-4-202468

310timesLHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-8-6-4-20246

310timesLHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-6-4-202468

10

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 10 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(D0πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

18

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0

005

01

015

02

025

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

20

40

60

80

100310times

LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10-505

10152025

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25310times

LHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-20-15-10

-505

101520

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 11 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(K+πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

19

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Pull

-2

-1

0

1

2

LHCb

Figure 12 Differences between the data SDP distribution and the fit model across the SDP interms of the per-bin pull

Table 5 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths(MeV) Uncertainties given on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value SB fraction Efficiency Background SDP Fit bias Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 060 083 050 031 117Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 006 039 069 005 080Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 028 148 185 033 241LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 051 225 286 086 377

LASS total 67plusmn 27 026 186 160 102 267Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 023 072 053 054 107Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 021 139 143 040 204Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 070 070 049 015 111Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 003 081 059 057 115Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 086 191 052 038 219m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 46 81 70 37 122m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 001 037 022 029 051Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 28 131 139 48 199Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 05 09 09 05 14

widths are given in Tables 5 and 6 The dominant experimental systematic uncertaintyon most parameters is due to either the efficiency variation or background distributionsacross the SDP while the model uncertainties are generally dominated by the effects ofalternative descriptions of the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves For the parametersof broad components the model uncertainties dominate however for other parameters thestatistical experimental and model uncertainties are all of a similar magnitude

The stability of the fit results is confirmed by several cross-checks The data sample isdivided into subsamples according to the flavour of the B candidate the trigger decision

20

Table 6 Model uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths (MeV) Uncertaintiesgiven on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value Fixed parameters Addremove Alternative models Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 075 114 109 174Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 018 070 022 076Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 079 330 023 340LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 110 399 520 665

LASS total 67plusmn 27 053 142 521 543Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 036 187 056 198Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 055 195 711 740Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 018 073 099 124Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 027 140 346 374Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 031 199 215 295m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 61 93 256 279m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 009 105 048 115Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 40 180 435 472Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 14 05 24 29

the polarity of the magnet and the year of data taking Each subsample is fitted separatelyand all are seen to be consistent with the nominal fit results The fit is also repeatedwith additional resonance components to test the fit model Resonances up to spin-3 wereconsidered for all three pairs of daughters with the mass and width allowed to vary in thefit No additional significant contributions were observed

8 Results and summary

The results for the complex coefficients are reported in Table 7 with results for thefit fractions given in Table 8 The results for the interference fit fractions are givenin Appendix B Upper limits are determined on the fit fractions of the Klowast(1410)0 andDlowast3(2760)minus components which do not give significant contributions using the methoddescribed in Ref [10]

The fit fractions for resonant contributions are converted into quasi-two-body productbranching fractions by multiplying by B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus) = (92plusmn 06plusmn 07plusmn 06)times 10minus5which is obtained from the ratio of branching fractions B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus)B(B0 rarrD0π+πminus) [15] multiplied by the latest result for B(B0 rarr D0π+πminus) [12] accounting forthe different Dlowast(2010)minus veto windows used in the analyses and for the 37 residualbackground due to B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ decays The statistical correlation between theresults of Ref [15] and this analysis is found to be negligible The results for the productbranching fractions are shown in Table 9 For the K+πminus resonances where the branchingfractions to Kπ are known the product branching fractions are converted to the Bdecay branching fractions shown in Table 10 The results for B(B0 rarr D0Klowast(892)0) andB(B0 rarr Dlowast2(2460)minusK+)times B(Dlowast2(2460)minus rarr D0πminus) are consistent with and more precisethan previous measurements [14 1617]

21

Table 7 Results for the complex amplitudes and their uncertainties presented (top) in terms ofreal and imaginary parts and (bottom) in terms and magnitudes and phases The three quotederrors are statistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively

Resonance Real part Imaginary part

Klowast(892)0 minus000plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 034 minus127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 006Klowast(1410)0 015plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 009 minus009plusmn 009plusmn 018plusmn 018Klowast0(1430)0 014plusmn 038plusmn 048plusmn 038 045plusmn 015plusmn 037plusmn 017LASS nonresonant minus010plusmn 024plusmn 016plusmn 042 044plusmn 014plusmn 017plusmn 023Klowast2(1430)0 minus032plusmn 009plusmn 015plusmn 023 minus047plusmn 007plusmn 014plusmn 015Dlowast0(2400)minus minus080plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 022 minus044plusmn 014plusmn 012plusmn 018Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) minus039plusmn 009plusmn 009plusmn 014 036plusmn 017plusmn 014plusmn 023Dπ P-wave (EFF) minus062plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 011 minus003plusmn 006plusmn 005plusmn 010

Resonance Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 005 minus157plusmn 011plusmn 016plusmn 027Klowast(1410)0 018plusmn 007plusmn 010plusmn 011 minus054plusmn 021plusmn 055plusmn 104Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 009plusmn 010plusmn 014 127plusmn 095plusmn 104plusmn 081LASS nonresonant 046plusmn 014plusmn 016plusmn 029 179plusmn 065plusmn 035plusmn 069Klowast2(1430)0 057plusmn 005plusmn 004plusmn 008 minus216plusmn 019plusmn 043plusmn 043Dlowast0(2400)minus 091plusmn 007plusmn 006plusmn 017 minus264plusmn 015plusmn 014plusmn 023Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 053plusmn 007plusmn 004plusmn 014 240plusmn 027plusmn 024plusmn 044Dπ P-wave (EFF) 062plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 011 minus309plusmn 010plusmn 007plusmn 017

Table 8 Results for the fit fractions and their uncertainties () The three quoted errors arestatistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively Upper limits are givenat 90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Fit fraction Upper limitKlowast(892)0 374plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 17Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03plusmn 08plusmn 08 lt 32 (37)Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20plusmn 24plusmn 34LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38plusmn 38plusmn 67

LASS total 67plusmn 27plusmn 27plusmn 54Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17plusmn 11plusmn 20Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28plusmn 20plusmn 74Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12plusmn 11plusmn 12Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 10 (11)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14plusmn 12plusmn 37Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16plusmn 22plusmn 30

22

Table 9 Results for the product branching fractions The four quoted errors are statisticalexperimental systematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Product branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 342plusmn 013plusmn 010plusmn 016plusmn 040Klowast(1410)0 007plusmn 003plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 001 lt 029 (034)Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 018plusmn 022plusmn 031plusmn 005LASS nonresonant 044plusmn 034plusmn 034plusmn 061plusmn 005

LASS total 061plusmn 025plusmn 025plusmn 049plusmn 007Klowast2(1430)0 068plusmn 015plusmn 010plusmn 018plusmn 008Dlowast0(2400)minus 177plusmn 026plusmn 019plusmn 067plusmn 020Dlowast2(2460)minus 212plusmn 010plusmn 011plusmn 011plusmn 025Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 010 (011)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 060plusmn 013plusmn 011plusmn 034plusmn 007Dπ P-wave (EFF) 081plusmn 015plusmn 020plusmn 027plusmn 009

Table 10 Results for the branching fractions The four quoted errors are statistical experimentalsystematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at 90 (95 )confidence level

Resonance Branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 513plusmn 020plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 060Klowast(1410)0 159plusmn 068plusmn 181plusmn 159plusmn 036 lt 67 (78)Klowast0(1430)0 071plusmn 027plusmn 033plusmn 047plusmn 008LASS nonresonant 066plusmn 051plusmn 051plusmn 092plusmn 008

LASS total 092plusmn 038plusmn 038plusmn 074plusmn 011Klowast2(1430)0 204plusmn 045plusmn 030plusmn 054plusmn 025

The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus states are found to be

m(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (2360plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 28) MeV

Γ(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (255plusmn 26plusmn 20plusmn 47) MeV

m(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (24656plusmn 18plusmn 05plusmn 12) MeV

Γ(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (460plusmn 34plusmn 14plusmn 29) MeV

where the three uncertainties are statistical experimental systematic and model systematicrespectively These are consistent with though less precise than recent results from a DPanalysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] They also show good agreement with and havesimilar precision to earlier measurements of these quantities [1337]

In summary the first amplitude analysis of B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays has been presentedusing a data sample corresponding to 30 fbminus1 of pp collision data collected by the LHCbexperiment A good description of the data is obtained with a model containing contri-

23

butions from intermediate Klowast(892)0 Klowast(1410)0 Klowast2(1430)0 and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonanceswith additional components to describe broad structures in the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S-and P-waves The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances aremeasured as are the complex amplitudes and fit fractions for all components includedin the amplitude model The results can be used in conjunction with an analysis ofB0 rarr DK+πminus decays where the neutral D meson is reconstructed in final states such asK+Kminus to measure the CKM unitarity triangle parameter γ [1 2]

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to our colleagues in the CERN accelerator departments forthe excellent performance of the LHC We thank the technical and administrative staffat the LHCb institutes We acknowledge support from CERN and from the nationalagencies CAPES CNPq FAPERJ and FINEP (Brazil) NSFC (China) CNRSIN2P3(France) BMBF DFG HGF and MPG (Germany) INFN (Italy) FOM and NWO (TheNetherlands) MNiSW and NCN (Poland) MENIFA (Romania) MinES and FANO(Russia) MinECo (Spain) SNSF and SER (Switzerland) NASU (Ukraine) STFC (UnitedKingdom) NSF (USA) The Tier1 computing centres are supported by IN2P3 (France)KIT and BMBF (Germany) INFN (Italy) NWO and SURF (The Netherlands) PIC(Spain) GridPP (United Kingdom) We are indebted to the communities behind themultiple open source software packages on which we depend We are also thankful forthe computing resources and the access to software RampD tools provided by Yandex LLC(Russia) Individual groups or members have received support from EPLANET MarieSk lodowska-Curie Actions and ERC (European Union) Conseil general de Haute-SavoieLabex ENIGMASS and OCEVU Region Auvergne (France) RFBR (Russia) XuntaGaland GENCAT (Spain) Royal Society and Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851(United Kingdom)

24

Appendices

A Correlation matrices

The statistical correlations between the complex coefficients masses and widths determinedfrom the fit to data are given in terms of real and imaginary parts and in terms ofmagnitudes and phases in Tables 11 and 12 The correlations are determined using thesame sample of simulated pseudoexperiments used to calculate the statistical uncertaintieson fit parameters

B Results for interference fit fractions

The central values of the interference fit fractions are given in Table 13 The statisti-cal experimental systematic and model uncertainties on these quantities are given inTables 14 15 and 16

25

Tab

le11

Sta

tist

ical

corr

elat

ions

bet

wee

nth

ere

al(x

)an

dim

agin

ary

(y)

par

tsof

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

x0

y 0x

1y 1

x2

y 2x

3y 3

x4

y 4x

5y 5

x7

y 7x

8y 8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

x0

100

014

002

017minus

018

015minus

017

003

039minus

037

016minus

009minus

018minus

029

007minus

037minus

019

002

004

012

y 01

00minus

006minus

008

009minus

011minus

000

014

003

003

012

013minus

012minus

024

035minus

007

009

012

001minus

004

x1

100minus

009minus

008minus

014minus

004

029minus

001

003minus

020

018minus

021minus

031minus

017minus

036minus

008minus

017minus

023

002

y 11

000

050

340

09minus

001

060minus

039

002minus

003minus

003

007minus

002minus

004minus

016minus

002

007

002

x2

100minus

013

081

009

014minus

016minus

015

021

010

013

004minus

015minus

007

001minus

025

001

y 21

000

080

280

24minus

036minus

013

008minus

004minus

001minus

004

004minus

002minus

001minus

009minus

010

x3

100

020

013minus

034minus

010

033minus

008

008minus

004minus

005minus

007minus

003minus

033minus

009

y 31

00minus

012minus

012minus

051

029minus

034minus

053

009minus

012

009minus

014minus

036

001

x4

100minus

053

032minus

010minus

020

003

002minus

027minus

017minus

006

010minus

000

y 41

000

06minus

009

040

010

014

016

011minus

005

007minus

003

x5

100minus

029minus

003

022

002

004minus

008

002

045minus

006

y 51

00minus

031minus

034

006

003

024minus

014minus

072minus

033

x7

100

046

005

010minus

011minus

001

027

017

y 71

00minus

016

036minus

001

017

032

008

x8

100minus

003

001minus

006minus

009minus

014

y 81

000

290

020

15minus

002

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

26

Tab

le12

S

tati

stic

alco

rrel

atio

ns

bet

wee

nth

em

agnit

ud

es(a

)an

dp

has

es(∆

)of

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

a0

∆0

a1

∆1

a2

∆2

a3

∆3

a4

∆4

a5

∆5

a7

∆7

a8

∆8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

a0

100minus

011minus

008

005

024

003minus

014

004

004

001

021

002

022minus

022

038minus

000minus

004minus

009minus

001

004

∆0

100minus

010

012

003

020

014

014minus

001

045minus

005

010minus

008

035minus

007

005minus

022

006

007

009

a1

100minus

035minus

025

006

032

001minus

001minus

038

004minus

022minus

006

031

002

024

007minus

018minus

020

001

∆1

100

024

015

016

000

014

038minus

018minus

013

016

026

022minus

006minus

009minus

004minus

012

005

a2

100

004

011minus

028minus

007

039minus

009

007

027

010

001

001minus

015

004minus

003minus

013

∆2

100

015

077minus

020minus

010minus

001

024

009

013

003minus

009

005

001

023minus

010

a3

100minus

006

000minus

011

016minus

030minus

012

056

001

012

002minus

007minus

027minus

004

∆3

100minus

028minus

019

015

041minus

024minus

008minus

000minus

013

004

002

041

008

a4

100

013

005minus

017

014

018minus

000

006

000

014minus

019minus

009

∆4

100minus

016

016

017

012

000minus

002minus

019minus

003

003

001

a5

100

024minus

026minus

006

011

005minus

007

001

019

039

∆5

100minus

000minus

028minus

001minus

020minus

020

015

076

027

a7

100minus

001

017minus

006

004

013minus

005minus

024

∆7

100minus

012

037

003minus

000minus

027minus

012

a8

100minus

004minus

001

004

006

015

∆8

100minus

037minus

002minus

033minus

001

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

27

Table 13 Interference fit fractions () from the nominal DP fit The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 374 18 minus00 00 00 minus24 minus02 minus26 minus50A1 07 minus00 00 00 minus11 minus03 minus06 minus11A2 51 minus32 minus00 29 15 16 19A3 48 00 minus84 01 21 02A4 74 minus03 minus10 minus15 minus04A5 193 minus00 28 00A6 231 minus00 00A7 66 minus00A8 89

Table 14 Statistical uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes areall pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASSnonresonant (A4) Klowast2 (1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8)Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 15 07 00 00 00 09 04 04 05A1 03 00 00 00 07 03 04 05A2 20 26 00 11 05 15 05A3 38 00 32 04 34 08A4 17 06 01 06 05A5 28 00 31 00A6 12 00 00A7 14 00A8 16

28

Table 15 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () Theamplitudes are all pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0 (1430)0(A3) LASS nonresonant (A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave(dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fitfractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 12 05 00 00 00 23 02 04 05A1 08 00 00 00 04 08 07 09A2 24 31 00 14 20 26 11A3 38 00 36 02 26 03A4 11 22 02 05 10A5 20 00 40 00A6 11 00 00A7 12 00A8 22

Table 16 Model uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 17 08 00 00 00 26 07 08 14A1 08 00 00 00 08 06 08 11A2 34 29 00 58 17 36 27A3 66 00 83 03 35 07A4 20 17 02 12 10A5 74 00 45 00A6 12 00 00A7 37 00A8 29

29

References

[1] T Gershon On the measurement of the unitarity triangle angle γ from B0 rarr DKlowast0

decays Phys Rev D79 (2009) 051301(R) arXiv08102706

[2] T Gershon and M Williams Prospects for the measurement of the unitaritytriangle angle γ from B0 rarr DK+πminus decays Phys Rev D80 (2009) 092002arXiv09091495

[3] N Cabibbo Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays Phys Rev Lett 10 (1963) 531

[4] M Kobayashi and T Maskawa CP -violation in the renormalizable theory of weakinteraction Progress of Theoretical Physics 49 (1973) 652

[5] M Gronau and D London How to determine all the angles of the unitarity trianglefrom B0 rarr DK0

S and B0s rarr Dφ Phys Lett B253 (1991) 483

[6] M Gronau and D Wyler On determining a weak phase from CP asymmetries incharged B decays Phys Lett B265 (1991) 172

[7] I Dunietz CP violation with self-tagging Bd modes Phys Lett B270 (1991) 75

[8] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurement of CP violation parameters inB0 rarr DKlowast0 decays Phys Rev D90 (2014) 112002 arXiv14078136

[9] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of overlapping spin-1 and spin-

3 D0Kminus resonances at mass 286 GeVc2 Phys Rev Lett 113 (2014) 162001

arXiv14077574

[10] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ decays

Phys Rev D90 (2014) 072003 arXiv14077712

[11] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observation and amplitude analysis of theBminus rarr D+Kminusπminus decay Phys Rev D91 (2015) 092002 arXiv150302995

[12] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays

arXiv150501710 submitted to Phys Rev D

[13] Belle collaboration A Kuzmin et al Study of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays Phys RevD76 (2007) 012006 arXivhep-ex0611054

[14] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of branching fractions andresonance contributions for B0 rarr D0K+πminus and search for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decaysPhys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 011803 arXivhep-ex0509036

[15] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurements of the branching fractions of

the decays B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ and B0 rarr D

0K+πminus Phys Rev D87 (2013) 112009

arXiv13046317

30

[16] Belle collaboration P Krokovny et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K0 and B0 rarr D0Klowast0

decays Phys Rev Lett 90 (2003) 141802 arXivhep-ex0212066

[17] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of B0 rarr D(lowast)0K(lowast)0 branchingfractions Phys Rev D74 (2006) 031101 arXivhep-ex0604016

[18] LHCb collaboration A A Alves Jr et al The LHCb detector at the LHC JINST 3(2008) S08005

[19] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al LHCb detector performance Int J Mod PhysA30 (2015) 1530022 arXiv14126352

[20] R Aaij et al Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator JINST 9 (2014) P09007arXiv14057808

[21] R Arink et al Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker JINST 9 (2014) P01002arXiv13113893

[22] M Adinolfi et al Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Eur PhysJ C73 (2013) 2431 arXiv12116759

[23] A A Alves Jr et al Performance of the LHCb muon system JINST 8 (2013) P02022arXiv12111346

[24] R Aaij et al The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011 JINST 8 (2013) P04022arXiv12113055

[25] V V Gligorov and M Williams Efficient reliable and fast high-level triggering usinga bonsai boosted decision tree JINST 8 (2013) P02013 arXiv12106861

[26] T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P Skands PYTHIA 64 physics and manual JHEP05 (2006) 026 arXivhep-ph0603175 T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P SkandsA brief introduction to PYTHIA 81 Comput Phys Commun 178 (2008) 852arXiv07103820

[27] I Belyaev et al Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss the LHCbsimulation framework J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032047

[28] D J Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package Nucl Instrum MethA462 (2001) 152

[29] P Golonka and Z Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo A precision tool for QED correctionsin Z and W decays Eur Phys J C45 (2006) 97 arXivhep-ph0506026

[30] Geant4 collaboration J Allison et al Geant4 developments and applications IEEETrans Nucl Sci 53 (2006) 270 Geant4 collaboration S Agostinelli et al Geant4A simulation toolkit Nucl Instrum Meth A506 (2003) 250

31

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 19: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

) lt 08 GeVminusπ+K(m0 lt LHCb

(a)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 10 GeVminusπ+K(m08 lt LHCb

(b)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

) lt 13 GeVminusπ+K(m10 lt LHCb

(c)

)minusπ+K(θcos -1 -05 0 05 1

Can

dida

tes

00

2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

) lt 15 GeVminusπ+K(m14 lt LHCb

(d)

Figure 9 Projections of the data and amplitude fit results onto cos θ(K+πminus) in the mass ranges(a) m(K+πminus) lt 08 GeV (b) 08 lt m(K+πminus) lt 10 GeV (c) 10 lt m(K+πminus) lt 13 GeV and(d) 14 lt m(K+πminus) lt 15 GeV Components are as shown in Fig 6

to the changes in results when either a spin-1 or spin-3 state at m(D0πminus) sim 276 GeV isadded to the nominal model

The LASS model used to describe the Kπ S-wave is replaced with a Flatte shape [55]which accounts for the Kηprime threshold near the Klowast0 (1430)0 mass and a resonant term witha modified mass dependent width [52] for the κ (also known as Klowast0(800)) state Thismodel gives an NLL that is worse by 44 units A model-independent description of theKπ S-wave is also used to fit the data with the uncertainty on each parameter takenas the larger of the two differences This alternative improves the NLL by 88 units butintroduces an additional four free parameters into the fit The dabba lineshape used todescribe the D0πminus S-wave is replaced with an EFF lineshape while a power-law model isintroduced as an alternative to the EFF lineshape that describes the D0πminus P-wave Thesealterations worsen the NLL by 30 units and improve it by 08 units respectively

The total systematic uncertainties due to experimental and model effects for fit fractionsand complex coefficients are given together with the results in Sec 8 The contributionsfrom different sources to the systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions masses and

17

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0002004006008

0101201401601802

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-30-25-20-15-10

-505

1015

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

310timesLHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

310timesLHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-8-6-4-202468

310timesLHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-8-6-4-20246

310timesLHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-6-4-202468

10

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 10 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(D0πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

18

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0

005

01

015

02

025

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

20

40

60

80

100310times

LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10-505

10152025

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25310times

LHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-20-15-10

-505

101520

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 11 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(K+πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

19

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Pull

-2

-1

0

1

2

LHCb

Figure 12 Differences between the data SDP distribution and the fit model across the SDP interms of the per-bin pull

Table 5 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths(MeV) Uncertainties given on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value SB fraction Efficiency Background SDP Fit bias Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 060 083 050 031 117Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 006 039 069 005 080Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 028 148 185 033 241LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 051 225 286 086 377

LASS total 67plusmn 27 026 186 160 102 267Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 023 072 053 054 107Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 021 139 143 040 204Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 070 070 049 015 111Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 003 081 059 057 115Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 086 191 052 038 219m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 46 81 70 37 122m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 001 037 022 029 051Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 28 131 139 48 199Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 05 09 09 05 14

widths are given in Tables 5 and 6 The dominant experimental systematic uncertaintyon most parameters is due to either the efficiency variation or background distributionsacross the SDP while the model uncertainties are generally dominated by the effects ofalternative descriptions of the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves For the parametersof broad components the model uncertainties dominate however for other parameters thestatistical experimental and model uncertainties are all of a similar magnitude

The stability of the fit results is confirmed by several cross-checks The data sample isdivided into subsamples according to the flavour of the B candidate the trigger decision

20

Table 6 Model uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths (MeV) Uncertaintiesgiven on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value Fixed parameters Addremove Alternative models Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 075 114 109 174Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 018 070 022 076Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 079 330 023 340LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 110 399 520 665

LASS total 67plusmn 27 053 142 521 543Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 036 187 056 198Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 055 195 711 740Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 018 073 099 124Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 027 140 346 374Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 031 199 215 295m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 61 93 256 279m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 009 105 048 115Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 40 180 435 472Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 14 05 24 29

the polarity of the magnet and the year of data taking Each subsample is fitted separatelyand all are seen to be consistent with the nominal fit results The fit is also repeatedwith additional resonance components to test the fit model Resonances up to spin-3 wereconsidered for all three pairs of daughters with the mass and width allowed to vary in thefit No additional significant contributions were observed

8 Results and summary

The results for the complex coefficients are reported in Table 7 with results for thefit fractions given in Table 8 The results for the interference fit fractions are givenin Appendix B Upper limits are determined on the fit fractions of the Klowast(1410)0 andDlowast3(2760)minus components which do not give significant contributions using the methoddescribed in Ref [10]

The fit fractions for resonant contributions are converted into quasi-two-body productbranching fractions by multiplying by B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus) = (92plusmn 06plusmn 07plusmn 06)times 10minus5which is obtained from the ratio of branching fractions B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus)B(B0 rarrD0π+πminus) [15] multiplied by the latest result for B(B0 rarr D0π+πminus) [12] accounting forthe different Dlowast(2010)minus veto windows used in the analyses and for the 37 residualbackground due to B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ decays The statistical correlation between theresults of Ref [15] and this analysis is found to be negligible The results for the productbranching fractions are shown in Table 9 For the K+πminus resonances where the branchingfractions to Kπ are known the product branching fractions are converted to the Bdecay branching fractions shown in Table 10 The results for B(B0 rarr D0Klowast(892)0) andB(B0 rarr Dlowast2(2460)minusK+)times B(Dlowast2(2460)minus rarr D0πminus) are consistent with and more precisethan previous measurements [14 1617]

21

Table 7 Results for the complex amplitudes and their uncertainties presented (top) in terms ofreal and imaginary parts and (bottom) in terms and magnitudes and phases The three quotederrors are statistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively

Resonance Real part Imaginary part

Klowast(892)0 minus000plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 034 minus127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 006Klowast(1410)0 015plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 009 minus009plusmn 009plusmn 018plusmn 018Klowast0(1430)0 014plusmn 038plusmn 048plusmn 038 045plusmn 015plusmn 037plusmn 017LASS nonresonant minus010plusmn 024plusmn 016plusmn 042 044plusmn 014plusmn 017plusmn 023Klowast2(1430)0 minus032plusmn 009plusmn 015plusmn 023 minus047plusmn 007plusmn 014plusmn 015Dlowast0(2400)minus minus080plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 022 minus044plusmn 014plusmn 012plusmn 018Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) minus039plusmn 009plusmn 009plusmn 014 036plusmn 017plusmn 014plusmn 023Dπ P-wave (EFF) minus062plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 011 minus003plusmn 006plusmn 005plusmn 010

Resonance Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 005 minus157plusmn 011plusmn 016plusmn 027Klowast(1410)0 018plusmn 007plusmn 010plusmn 011 minus054plusmn 021plusmn 055plusmn 104Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 009plusmn 010plusmn 014 127plusmn 095plusmn 104plusmn 081LASS nonresonant 046plusmn 014plusmn 016plusmn 029 179plusmn 065plusmn 035plusmn 069Klowast2(1430)0 057plusmn 005plusmn 004plusmn 008 minus216plusmn 019plusmn 043plusmn 043Dlowast0(2400)minus 091plusmn 007plusmn 006plusmn 017 minus264plusmn 015plusmn 014plusmn 023Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 053plusmn 007plusmn 004plusmn 014 240plusmn 027plusmn 024plusmn 044Dπ P-wave (EFF) 062plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 011 minus309plusmn 010plusmn 007plusmn 017

Table 8 Results for the fit fractions and their uncertainties () The three quoted errors arestatistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively Upper limits are givenat 90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Fit fraction Upper limitKlowast(892)0 374plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 17Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03plusmn 08plusmn 08 lt 32 (37)Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20plusmn 24plusmn 34LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38plusmn 38plusmn 67

LASS total 67plusmn 27plusmn 27plusmn 54Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17plusmn 11plusmn 20Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28plusmn 20plusmn 74Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12plusmn 11plusmn 12Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 10 (11)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14plusmn 12plusmn 37Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16plusmn 22plusmn 30

22

Table 9 Results for the product branching fractions The four quoted errors are statisticalexperimental systematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Product branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 342plusmn 013plusmn 010plusmn 016plusmn 040Klowast(1410)0 007plusmn 003plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 001 lt 029 (034)Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 018plusmn 022plusmn 031plusmn 005LASS nonresonant 044plusmn 034plusmn 034plusmn 061plusmn 005

LASS total 061plusmn 025plusmn 025plusmn 049plusmn 007Klowast2(1430)0 068plusmn 015plusmn 010plusmn 018plusmn 008Dlowast0(2400)minus 177plusmn 026plusmn 019plusmn 067plusmn 020Dlowast2(2460)minus 212plusmn 010plusmn 011plusmn 011plusmn 025Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 010 (011)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 060plusmn 013plusmn 011plusmn 034plusmn 007Dπ P-wave (EFF) 081plusmn 015plusmn 020plusmn 027plusmn 009

Table 10 Results for the branching fractions The four quoted errors are statistical experimentalsystematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at 90 (95 )confidence level

Resonance Branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 513plusmn 020plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 060Klowast(1410)0 159plusmn 068plusmn 181plusmn 159plusmn 036 lt 67 (78)Klowast0(1430)0 071plusmn 027plusmn 033plusmn 047plusmn 008LASS nonresonant 066plusmn 051plusmn 051plusmn 092plusmn 008

LASS total 092plusmn 038plusmn 038plusmn 074plusmn 011Klowast2(1430)0 204plusmn 045plusmn 030plusmn 054plusmn 025

The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus states are found to be

m(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (2360plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 28) MeV

Γ(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (255plusmn 26plusmn 20plusmn 47) MeV

m(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (24656plusmn 18plusmn 05plusmn 12) MeV

Γ(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (460plusmn 34plusmn 14plusmn 29) MeV

where the three uncertainties are statistical experimental systematic and model systematicrespectively These are consistent with though less precise than recent results from a DPanalysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] They also show good agreement with and havesimilar precision to earlier measurements of these quantities [1337]

In summary the first amplitude analysis of B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays has been presentedusing a data sample corresponding to 30 fbminus1 of pp collision data collected by the LHCbexperiment A good description of the data is obtained with a model containing contri-

23

butions from intermediate Klowast(892)0 Klowast(1410)0 Klowast2(1430)0 and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonanceswith additional components to describe broad structures in the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S-and P-waves The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances aremeasured as are the complex amplitudes and fit fractions for all components includedin the amplitude model The results can be used in conjunction with an analysis ofB0 rarr DK+πminus decays where the neutral D meson is reconstructed in final states such asK+Kminus to measure the CKM unitarity triangle parameter γ [1 2]

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to our colleagues in the CERN accelerator departments forthe excellent performance of the LHC We thank the technical and administrative staffat the LHCb institutes We acknowledge support from CERN and from the nationalagencies CAPES CNPq FAPERJ and FINEP (Brazil) NSFC (China) CNRSIN2P3(France) BMBF DFG HGF and MPG (Germany) INFN (Italy) FOM and NWO (TheNetherlands) MNiSW and NCN (Poland) MENIFA (Romania) MinES and FANO(Russia) MinECo (Spain) SNSF and SER (Switzerland) NASU (Ukraine) STFC (UnitedKingdom) NSF (USA) The Tier1 computing centres are supported by IN2P3 (France)KIT and BMBF (Germany) INFN (Italy) NWO and SURF (The Netherlands) PIC(Spain) GridPP (United Kingdom) We are indebted to the communities behind themultiple open source software packages on which we depend We are also thankful forthe computing resources and the access to software RampD tools provided by Yandex LLC(Russia) Individual groups or members have received support from EPLANET MarieSk lodowska-Curie Actions and ERC (European Union) Conseil general de Haute-SavoieLabex ENIGMASS and OCEVU Region Auvergne (France) RFBR (Russia) XuntaGaland GENCAT (Spain) Royal Society and Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851(United Kingdom)

24

Appendices

A Correlation matrices

The statistical correlations between the complex coefficients masses and widths determinedfrom the fit to data are given in terms of real and imaginary parts and in terms ofmagnitudes and phases in Tables 11 and 12 The correlations are determined using thesame sample of simulated pseudoexperiments used to calculate the statistical uncertaintieson fit parameters

B Results for interference fit fractions

The central values of the interference fit fractions are given in Table 13 The statisti-cal experimental systematic and model uncertainties on these quantities are given inTables 14 15 and 16

25

Tab

le11

Sta

tist

ical

corr

elat

ions

bet

wee

nth

ere

al(x

)an

dim

agin

ary

(y)

par

tsof

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

x0

y 0x

1y 1

x2

y 2x

3y 3

x4

y 4x

5y 5

x7

y 7x

8y 8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

x0

100

014

002

017minus

018

015minus

017

003

039minus

037

016minus

009minus

018minus

029

007minus

037minus

019

002

004

012

y 01

00minus

006minus

008

009minus

011minus

000

014

003

003

012

013minus

012minus

024

035minus

007

009

012

001minus

004

x1

100minus

009minus

008minus

014minus

004

029minus

001

003minus

020

018minus

021minus

031minus

017minus

036minus

008minus

017minus

023

002

y 11

000

050

340

09minus

001

060minus

039

002minus

003minus

003

007minus

002minus

004minus

016minus

002

007

002

x2

100minus

013

081

009

014minus

016minus

015

021

010

013

004minus

015minus

007

001minus

025

001

y 21

000

080

280

24minus

036minus

013

008minus

004minus

001minus

004

004minus

002minus

001minus

009minus

010

x3

100

020

013minus

034minus

010

033minus

008

008minus

004minus

005minus

007minus

003minus

033minus

009

y 31

00minus

012minus

012minus

051

029minus

034minus

053

009minus

012

009minus

014minus

036

001

x4

100minus

053

032minus

010minus

020

003

002minus

027minus

017minus

006

010minus

000

y 41

000

06minus

009

040

010

014

016

011minus

005

007minus

003

x5

100minus

029minus

003

022

002

004minus

008

002

045minus

006

y 51

00minus

031minus

034

006

003

024minus

014minus

072minus

033

x7

100

046

005

010minus

011minus

001

027

017

y 71

00minus

016

036minus

001

017

032

008

x8

100minus

003

001minus

006minus

009minus

014

y 81

000

290

020

15minus

002

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

26

Tab

le12

S

tati

stic

alco

rrel

atio

ns

bet

wee

nth

em

agnit

ud

es(a

)an

dp

has

es(∆

)of

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

a0

∆0

a1

∆1

a2

∆2

a3

∆3

a4

∆4

a5

∆5

a7

∆7

a8

∆8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

a0

100minus

011minus

008

005

024

003minus

014

004

004

001

021

002

022minus

022

038minus

000minus

004minus

009minus

001

004

∆0

100minus

010

012

003

020

014

014minus

001

045minus

005

010minus

008

035minus

007

005minus

022

006

007

009

a1

100minus

035minus

025

006

032

001minus

001minus

038

004minus

022minus

006

031

002

024

007minus

018minus

020

001

∆1

100

024

015

016

000

014

038minus

018minus

013

016

026

022minus

006minus

009minus

004minus

012

005

a2

100

004

011minus

028minus

007

039minus

009

007

027

010

001

001minus

015

004minus

003minus

013

∆2

100

015

077minus

020minus

010minus

001

024

009

013

003minus

009

005

001

023minus

010

a3

100minus

006

000minus

011

016minus

030minus

012

056

001

012

002minus

007minus

027minus

004

∆3

100minus

028minus

019

015

041minus

024minus

008minus

000minus

013

004

002

041

008

a4

100

013

005minus

017

014

018minus

000

006

000

014minus

019minus

009

∆4

100minus

016

016

017

012

000minus

002minus

019minus

003

003

001

a5

100

024minus

026minus

006

011

005minus

007

001

019

039

∆5

100minus

000minus

028minus

001minus

020minus

020

015

076

027

a7

100minus

001

017minus

006

004

013minus

005minus

024

∆7

100minus

012

037

003minus

000minus

027minus

012

a8

100minus

004minus

001

004

006

015

∆8

100minus

037minus

002minus

033minus

001

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

27

Table 13 Interference fit fractions () from the nominal DP fit The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 374 18 minus00 00 00 minus24 minus02 minus26 minus50A1 07 minus00 00 00 minus11 minus03 minus06 minus11A2 51 minus32 minus00 29 15 16 19A3 48 00 minus84 01 21 02A4 74 minus03 minus10 minus15 minus04A5 193 minus00 28 00A6 231 minus00 00A7 66 minus00A8 89

Table 14 Statistical uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes areall pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASSnonresonant (A4) Klowast2 (1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8)Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 15 07 00 00 00 09 04 04 05A1 03 00 00 00 07 03 04 05A2 20 26 00 11 05 15 05A3 38 00 32 04 34 08A4 17 06 01 06 05A5 28 00 31 00A6 12 00 00A7 14 00A8 16

28

Table 15 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () Theamplitudes are all pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0 (1430)0(A3) LASS nonresonant (A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave(dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fitfractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 12 05 00 00 00 23 02 04 05A1 08 00 00 00 04 08 07 09A2 24 31 00 14 20 26 11A3 38 00 36 02 26 03A4 11 22 02 05 10A5 20 00 40 00A6 11 00 00A7 12 00A8 22

Table 16 Model uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 17 08 00 00 00 26 07 08 14A1 08 00 00 00 08 06 08 11A2 34 29 00 58 17 36 27A3 66 00 83 03 35 07A4 20 17 02 12 10A5 74 00 45 00A6 12 00 00A7 37 00A8 29

29

References

[1] T Gershon On the measurement of the unitarity triangle angle γ from B0 rarr DKlowast0

decays Phys Rev D79 (2009) 051301(R) arXiv08102706

[2] T Gershon and M Williams Prospects for the measurement of the unitaritytriangle angle γ from B0 rarr DK+πminus decays Phys Rev D80 (2009) 092002arXiv09091495

[3] N Cabibbo Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays Phys Rev Lett 10 (1963) 531

[4] M Kobayashi and T Maskawa CP -violation in the renormalizable theory of weakinteraction Progress of Theoretical Physics 49 (1973) 652

[5] M Gronau and D London How to determine all the angles of the unitarity trianglefrom B0 rarr DK0

S and B0s rarr Dφ Phys Lett B253 (1991) 483

[6] M Gronau and D Wyler On determining a weak phase from CP asymmetries incharged B decays Phys Lett B265 (1991) 172

[7] I Dunietz CP violation with self-tagging Bd modes Phys Lett B270 (1991) 75

[8] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurement of CP violation parameters inB0 rarr DKlowast0 decays Phys Rev D90 (2014) 112002 arXiv14078136

[9] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of overlapping spin-1 and spin-

3 D0Kminus resonances at mass 286 GeVc2 Phys Rev Lett 113 (2014) 162001

arXiv14077574

[10] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ decays

Phys Rev D90 (2014) 072003 arXiv14077712

[11] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observation and amplitude analysis of theBminus rarr D+Kminusπminus decay Phys Rev D91 (2015) 092002 arXiv150302995

[12] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays

arXiv150501710 submitted to Phys Rev D

[13] Belle collaboration A Kuzmin et al Study of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays Phys RevD76 (2007) 012006 arXivhep-ex0611054

[14] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of branching fractions andresonance contributions for B0 rarr D0K+πminus and search for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decaysPhys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 011803 arXivhep-ex0509036

[15] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurements of the branching fractions of

the decays B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ and B0 rarr D

0K+πminus Phys Rev D87 (2013) 112009

arXiv13046317

30

[16] Belle collaboration P Krokovny et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K0 and B0 rarr D0Klowast0

decays Phys Rev Lett 90 (2003) 141802 arXivhep-ex0212066

[17] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of B0 rarr D(lowast)0K(lowast)0 branchingfractions Phys Rev D74 (2006) 031101 arXivhep-ex0604016

[18] LHCb collaboration A A Alves Jr et al The LHCb detector at the LHC JINST 3(2008) S08005

[19] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al LHCb detector performance Int J Mod PhysA30 (2015) 1530022 arXiv14126352

[20] R Aaij et al Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator JINST 9 (2014) P09007arXiv14057808

[21] R Arink et al Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker JINST 9 (2014) P01002arXiv13113893

[22] M Adinolfi et al Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Eur PhysJ C73 (2013) 2431 arXiv12116759

[23] A A Alves Jr et al Performance of the LHCb muon system JINST 8 (2013) P02022arXiv12111346

[24] R Aaij et al The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011 JINST 8 (2013) P04022arXiv12113055

[25] V V Gligorov and M Williams Efficient reliable and fast high-level triggering usinga bonsai boosted decision tree JINST 8 (2013) P02013 arXiv12106861

[26] T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P Skands PYTHIA 64 physics and manual JHEP05 (2006) 026 arXivhep-ph0603175 T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P SkandsA brief introduction to PYTHIA 81 Comput Phys Commun 178 (2008) 852arXiv07103820

[27] I Belyaev et al Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss the LHCbsimulation framework J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032047

[28] D J Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package Nucl Instrum MethA462 (2001) 152

[29] P Golonka and Z Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo A precision tool for QED correctionsin Z and W decays Eur Phys J C45 (2006) 97 arXivhep-ph0506026

[30] Geant4 collaboration J Allison et al Geant4 developments and applications IEEETrans Nucl Sci 53 (2006) 270 Geant4 collaboration S Agostinelli et al Geant4A simulation toolkit Nucl Instrum Meth A506 (2003) 250

31

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 20: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0002004006008

0101201401601802

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-30-25-20-15-10

-505

1015

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

310timesLHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

310timesLHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-8-6-4-202468

310timesLHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-8-6-4-20246

310timesLHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ0D(m

22 24 26 28 3

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-6-4-202468

10

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 10 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(D0πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

18

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0

005

01

015

02

025

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

20

40

60

80

100310times

LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10-505

10152025

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25310times

LHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-20-15-10

-505

101520

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 11 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(K+πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

19

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Pull

-2

-1

0

1

2

LHCb

Figure 12 Differences between the data SDP distribution and the fit model across the SDP interms of the per-bin pull

Table 5 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths(MeV) Uncertainties given on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value SB fraction Efficiency Background SDP Fit bias Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 060 083 050 031 117Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 006 039 069 005 080Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 028 148 185 033 241LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 051 225 286 086 377

LASS total 67plusmn 27 026 186 160 102 267Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 023 072 053 054 107Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 021 139 143 040 204Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 070 070 049 015 111Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 003 081 059 057 115Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 086 191 052 038 219m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 46 81 70 37 122m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 001 037 022 029 051Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 28 131 139 48 199Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 05 09 09 05 14

widths are given in Tables 5 and 6 The dominant experimental systematic uncertaintyon most parameters is due to either the efficiency variation or background distributionsacross the SDP while the model uncertainties are generally dominated by the effects ofalternative descriptions of the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves For the parametersof broad components the model uncertainties dominate however for other parameters thestatistical experimental and model uncertainties are all of a similar magnitude

The stability of the fit results is confirmed by several cross-checks The data sample isdivided into subsamples according to the flavour of the B candidate the trigger decision

20

Table 6 Model uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths (MeV) Uncertaintiesgiven on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value Fixed parameters Addremove Alternative models Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 075 114 109 174Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 018 070 022 076Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 079 330 023 340LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 110 399 520 665

LASS total 67plusmn 27 053 142 521 543Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 036 187 056 198Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 055 195 711 740Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 018 073 099 124Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 027 140 346 374Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 031 199 215 295m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 61 93 256 279m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 009 105 048 115Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 40 180 435 472Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 14 05 24 29

the polarity of the magnet and the year of data taking Each subsample is fitted separatelyand all are seen to be consistent with the nominal fit results The fit is also repeatedwith additional resonance components to test the fit model Resonances up to spin-3 wereconsidered for all three pairs of daughters with the mass and width allowed to vary in thefit No additional significant contributions were observed

8 Results and summary

The results for the complex coefficients are reported in Table 7 with results for thefit fractions given in Table 8 The results for the interference fit fractions are givenin Appendix B Upper limits are determined on the fit fractions of the Klowast(1410)0 andDlowast3(2760)minus components which do not give significant contributions using the methoddescribed in Ref [10]

The fit fractions for resonant contributions are converted into quasi-two-body productbranching fractions by multiplying by B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus) = (92plusmn 06plusmn 07plusmn 06)times 10minus5which is obtained from the ratio of branching fractions B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus)B(B0 rarrD0π+πminus) [15] multiplied by the latest result for B(B0 rarr D0π+πminus) [12] accounting forthe different Dlowast(2010)minus veto windows used in the analyses and for the 37 residualbackground due to B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ decays The statistical correlation between theresults of Ref [15] and this analysis is found to be negligible The results for the productbranching fractions are shown in Table 9 For the K+πminus resonances where the branchingfractions to Kπ are known the product branching fractions are converted to the Bdecay branching fractions shown in Table 10 The results for B(B0 rarr D0Klowast(892)0) andB(B0 rarr Dlowast2(2460)minusK+)times B(Dlowast2(2460)minus rarr D0πminus) are consistent with and more precisethan previous measurements [14 1617]

21

Table 7 Results for the complex amplitudes and their uncertainties presented (top) in terms ofreal and imaginary parts and (bottom) in terms and magnitudes and phases The three quotederrors are statistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively

Resonance Real part Imaginary part

Klowast(892)0 minus000plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 034 minus127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 006Klowast(1410)0 015plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 009 minus009plusmn 009plusmn 018plusmn 018Klowast0(1430)0 014plusmn 038plusmn 048plusmn 038 045plusmn 015plusmn 037plusmn 017LASS nonresonant minus010plusmn 024plusmn 016plusmn 042 044plusmn 014plusmn 017plusmn 023Klowast2(1430)0 minus032plusmn 009plusmn 015plusmn 023 minus047plusmn 007plusmn 014plusmn 015Dlowast0(2400)minus minus080plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 022 minus044plusmn 014plusmn 012plusmn 018Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) minus039plusmn 009plusmn 009plusmn 014 036plusmn 017plusmn 014plusmn 023Dπ P-wave (EFF) minus062plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 011 minus003plusmn 006plusmn 005plusmn 010

Resonance Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 005 minus157plusmn 011plusmn 016plusmn 027Klowast(1410)0 018plusmn 007plusmn 010plusmn 011 minus054plusmn 021plusmn 055plusmn 104Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 009plusmn 010plusmn 014 127plusmn 095plusmn 104plusmn 081LASS nonresonant 046plusmn 014plusmn 016plusmn 029 179plusmn 065plusmn 035plusmn 069Klowast2(1430)0 057plusmn 005plusmn 004plusmn 008 minus216plusmn 019plusmn 043plusmn 043Dlowast0(2400)minus 091plusmn 007plusmn 006plusmn 017 minus264plusmn 015plusmn 014plusmn 023Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 053plusmn 007plusmn 004plusmn 014 240plusmn 027plusmn 024plusmn 044Dπ P-wave (EFF) 062plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 011 minus309plusmn 010plusmn 007plusmn 017

Table 8 Results for the fit fractions and their uncertainties () The three quoted errors arestatistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively Upper limits are givenat 90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Fit fraction Upper limitKlowast(892)0 374plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 17Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03plusmn 08plusmn 08 lt 32 (37)Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20plusmn 24plusmn 34LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38plusmn 38plusmn 67

LASS total 67plusmn 27plusmn 27plusmn 54Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17plusmn 11plusmn 20Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28plusmn 20plusmn 74Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12plusmn 11plusmn 12Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 10 (11)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14plusmn 12plusmn 37Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16plusmn 22plusmn 30

22

Table 9 Results for the product branching fractions The four quoted errors are statisticalexperimental systematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Product branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 342plusmn 013plusmn 010plusmn 016plusmn 040Klowast(1410)0 007plusmn 003plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 001 lt 029 (034)Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 018plusmn 022plusmn 031plusmn 005LASS nonresonant 044plusmn 034plusmn 034plusmn 061plusmn 005

LASS total 061plusmn 025plusmn 025plusmn 049plusmn 007Klowast2(1430)0 068plusmn 015plusmn 010plusmn 018plusmn 008Dlowast0(2400)minus 177plusmn 026plusmn 019plusmn 067plusmn 020Dlowast2(2460)minus 212plusmn 010plusmn 011plusmn 011plusmn 025Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 010 (011)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 060plusmn 013plusmn 011plusmn 034plusmn 007Dπ P-wave (EFF) 081plusmn 015plusmn 020plusmn 027plusmn 009

Table 10 Results for the branching fractions The four quoted errors are statistical experimentalsystematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at 90 (95 )confidence level

Resonance Branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 513plusmn 020plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 060Klowast(1410)0 159plusmn 068plusmn 181plusmn 159plusmn 036 lt 67 (78)Klowast0(1430)0 071plusmn 027plusmn 033plusmn 047plusmn 008LASS nonresonant 066plusmn 051plusmn 051plusmn 092plusmn 008

LASS total 092plusmn 038plusmn 038plusmn 074plusmn 011Klowast2(1430)0 204plusmn 045plusmn 030plusmn 054plusmn 025

The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus states are found to be

m(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (2360plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 28) MeV

Γ(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (255plusmn 26plusmn 20plusmn 47) MeV

m(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (24656plusmn 18plusmn 05plusmn 12) MeV

Γ(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (460plusmn 34plusmn 14plusmn 29) MeV

where the three uncertainties are statistical experimental systematic and model systematicrespectively These are consistent with though less precise than recent results from a DPanalysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] They also show good agreement with and havesimilar precision to earlier measurements of these quantities [1337]

In summary the first amplitude analysis of B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays has been presentedusing a data sample corresponding to 30 fbminus1 of pp collision data collected by the LHCbexperiment A good description of the data is obtained with a model containing contri-

23

butions from intermediate Klowast(892)0 Klowast(1410)0 Klowast2(1430)0 and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonanceswith additional components to describe broad structures in the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S-and P-waves The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances aremeasured as are the complex amplitudes and fit fractions for all components includedin the amplitude model The results can be used in conjunction with an analysis ofB0 rarr DK+πminus decays where the neutral D meson is reconstructed in final states such asK+Kminus to measure the CKM unitarity triangle parameter γ [1 2]

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to our colleagues in the CERN accelerator departments forthe excellent performance of the LHC We thank the technical and administrative staffat the LHCb institutes We acknowledge support from CERN and from the nationalagencies CAPES CNPq FAPERJ and FINEP (Brazil) NSFC (China) CNRSIN2P3(France) BMBF DFG HGF and MPG (Germany) INFN (Italy) FOM and NWO (TheNetherlands) MNiSW and NCN (Poland) MENIFA (Romania) MinES and FANO(Russia) MinECo (Spain) SNSF and SER (Switzerland) NASU (Ukraine) STFC (UnitedKingdom) NSF (USA) The Tier1 computing centres are supported by IN2P3 (France)KIT and BMBF (Germany) INFN (Italy) NWO and SURF (The Netherlands) PIC(Spain) GridPP (United Kingdom) We are indebted to the communities behind themultiple open source software packages on which we depend We are also thankful forthe computing resources and the access to software RampD tools provided by Yandex LLC(Russia) Individual groups or members have received support from EPLANET MarieSk lodowska-Curie Actions and ERC (European Union) Conseil general de Haute-SavoieLabex ENIGMASS and OCEVU Region Auvergne (France) RFBR (Russia) XuntaGaland GENCAT (Spain) Royal Society and Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851(United Kingdom)

24

Appendices

A Correlation matrices

The statistical correlations between the complex coefficients masses and widths determinedfrom the fit to data are given in terms of real and imaginary parts and in terms ofmagnitudes and phases in Tables 11 and 12 The correlations are determined using thesame sample of simulated pseudoexperiments used to calculate the statistical uncertaintieson fit parameters

B Results for interference fit fractions

The central values of the interference fit fractions are given in Table 13 The statisti-cal experimental systematic and model uncertainties on these quantities are given inTables 14 15 and 16

25

Tab

le11

Sta

tist

ical

corr

elat

ions

bet

wee

nth

ere

al(x

)an

dim

agin

ary

(y)

par

tsof

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

x0

y 0x

1y 1

x2

y 2x

3y 3

x4

y 4x

5y 5

x7

y 7x

8y 8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

x0

100

014

002

017minus

018

015minus

017

003

039minus

037

016minus

009minus

018minus

029

007minus

037minus

019

002

004

012

y 01

00minus

006minus

008

009minus

011minus

000

014

003

003

012

013minus

012minus

024

035minus

007

009

012

001minus

004

x1

100minus

009minus

008minus

014minus

004

029minus

001

003minus

020

018minus

021minus

031minus

017minus

036minus

008minus

017minus

023

002

y 11

000

050

340

09minus

001

060minus

039

002minus

003minus

003

007minus

002minus

004minus

016minus

002

007

002

x2

100minus

013

081

009

014minus

016minus

015

021

010

013

004minus

015minus

007

001minus

025

001

y 21

000

080

280

24minus

036minus

013

008minus

004minus

001minus

004

004minus

002minus

001minus

009minus

010

x3

100

020

013minus

034minus

010

033minus

008

008minus

004minus

005minus

007minus

003minus

033minus

009

y 31

00minus

012minus

012minus

051

029minus

034minus

053

009minus

012

009minus

014minus

036

001

x4

100minus

053

032minus

010minus

020

003

002minus

027minus

017minus

006

010minus

000

y 41

000

06minus

009

040

010

014

016

011minus

005

007minus

003

x5

100minus

029minus

003

022

002

004minus

008

002

045minus

006

y 51

00minus

031minus

034

006

003

024minus

014minus

072minus

033

x7

100

046

005

010minus

011minus

001

027

017

y 71

00minus

016

036minus

001

017

032

008

x8

100minus

003

001minus

006minus

009minus

014

y 81

000

290

020

15minus

002

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

26

Tab

le12

S

tati

stic

alco

rrel

atio

ns

bet

wee

nth

em

agnit

ud

es(a

)an

dp

has

es(∆

)of

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

a0

∆0

a1

∆1

a2

∆2

a3

∆3

a4

∆4

a5

∆5

a7

∆7

a8

∆8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

a0

100minus

011minus

008

005

024

003minus

014

004

004

001

021

002

022minus

022

038minus

000minus

004minus

009minus

001

004

∆0

100minus

010

012

003

020

014

014minus

001

045minus

005

010minus

008

035minus

007

005minus

022

006

007

009

a1

100minus

035minus

025

006

032

001minus

001minus

038

004minus

022minus

006

031

002

024

007minus

018minus

020

001

∆1

100

024

015

016

000

014

038minus

018minus

013

016

026

022minus

006minus

009minus

004minus

012

005

a2

100

004

011minus

028minus

007

039minus

009

007

027

010

001

001minus

015

004minus

003minus

013

∆2

100

015

077minus

020minus

010minus

001

024

009

013

003minus

009

005

001

023minus

010

a3

100minus

006

000minus

011

016minus

030minus

012

056

001

012

002minus

007minus

027minus

004

∆3

100minus

028minus

019

015

041minus

024minus

008minus

000minus

013

004

002

041

008

a4

100

013

005minus

017

014

018minus

000

006

000

014minus

019minus

009

∆4

100minus

016

016

017

012

000minus

002minus

019minus

003

003

001

a5

100

024minus

026minus

006

011

005minus

007

001

019

039

∆5

100minus

000minus

028minus

001minus

020minus

020

015

076

027

a7

100minus

001

017minus

006

004

013minus

005minus

024

∆7

100minus

012

037

003minus

000minus

027minus

012

a8

100minus

004minus

001

004

006

015

∆8

100minus

037minus

002minus

033minus

001

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

27

Table 13 Interference fit fractions () from the nominal DP fit The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 374 18 minus00 00 00 minus24 minus02 minus26 minus50A1 07 minus00 00 00 minus11 minus03 minus06 minus11A2 51 minus32 minus00 29 15 16 19A3 48 00 minus84 01 21 02A4 74 minus03 minus10 minus15 minus04A5 193 minus00 28 00A6 231 minus00 00A7 66 minus00A8 89

Table 14 Statistical uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes areall pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASSnonresonant (A4) Klowast2 (1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8)Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 15 07 00 00 00 09 04 04 05A1 03 00 00 00 07 03 04 05A2 20 26 00 11 05 15 05A3 38 00 32 04 34 08A4 17 06 01 06 05A5 28 00 31 00A6 12 00 00A7 14 00A8 16

28

Table 15 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () Theamplitudes are all pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0 (1430)0(A3) LASS nonresonant (A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave(dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fitfractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 12 05 00 00 00 23 02 04 05A1 08 00 00 00 04 08 07 09A2 24 31 00 14 20 26 11A3 38 00 36 02 26 03A4 11 22 02 05 10A5 20 00 40 00A6 11 00 00A7 12 00A8 22

Table 16 Model uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 17 08 00 00 00 26 07 08 14A1 08 00 00 00 08 06 08 11A2 34 29 00 58 17 36 27A3 66 00 83 03 35 07A4 20 17 02 12 10A5 74 00 45 00A6 12 00 00A7 37 00A8 29

29

References

[1] T Gershon On the measurement of the unitarity triangle angle γ from B0 rarr DKlowast0

decays Phys Rev D79 (2009) 051301(R) arXiv08102706

[2] T Gershon and M Williams Prospects for the measurement of the unitaritytriangle angle γ from B0 rarr DK+πminus decays Phys Rev D80 (2009) 092002arXiv09091495

[3] N Cabibbo Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays Phys Rev Lett 10 (1963) 531

[4] M Kobayashi and T Maskawa CP -violation in the renormalizable theory of weakinteraction Progress of Theoretical Physics 49 (1973) 652

[5] M Gronau and D London How to determine all the angles of the unitarity trianglefrom B0 rarr DK0

S and B0s rarr Dφ Phys Lett B253 (1991) 483

[6] M Gronau and D Wyler On determining a weak phase from CP asymmetries incharged B decays Phys Lett B265 (1991) 172

[7] I Dunietz CP violation with self-tagging Bd modes Phys Lett B270 (1991) 75

[8] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurement of CP violation parameters inB0 rarr DKlowast0 decays Phys Rev D90 (2014) 112002 arXiv14078136

[9] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of overlapping spin-1 and spin-

3 D0Kminus resonances at mass 286 GeVc2 Phys Rev Lett 113 (2014) 162001

arXiv14077574

[10] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ decays

Phys Rev D90 (2014) 072003 arXiv14077712

[11] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observation and amplitude analysis of theBminus rarr D+Kminusπminus decay Phys Rev D91 (2015) 092002 arXiv150302995

[12] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays

arXiv150501710 submitted to Phys Rev D

[13] Belle collaboration A Kuzmin et al Study of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays Phys RevD76 (2007) 012006 arXivhep-ex0611054

[14] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of branching fractions andresonance contributions for B0 rarr D0K+πminus and search for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decaysPhys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 011803 arXivhep-ex0509036

[15] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurements of the branching fractions of

the decays B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ and B0 rarr D

0K+πminus Phys Rev D87 (2013) 112009

arXiv13046317

30

[16] Belle collaboration P Krokovny et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K0 and B0 rarr D0Klowast0

decays Phys Rev Lett 90 (2003) 141802 arXivhep-ex0212066

[17] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of B0 rarr D(lowast)0K(lowast)0 branchingfractions Phys Rev D74 (2006) 031101 arXivhep-ex0604016

[18] LHCb collaboration A A Alves Jr et al The LHCb detector at the LHC JINST 3(2008) S08005

[19] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al LHCb detector performance Int J Mod PhysA30 (2015) 1530022 arXiv14126352

[20] R Aaij et al Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator JINST 9 (2014) P09007arXiv14057808

[21] R Arink et al Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker JINST 9 (2014) P01002arXiv13113893

[22] M Adinolfi et al Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Eur PhysJ C73 (2013) 2431 arXiv12116759

[23] A A Alves Jr et al Performance of the LHCb muon system JINST 8 (2013) P02022arXiv12111346

[24] R Aaij et al The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011 JINST 8 (2013) P04022arXiv12113055

[25] V V Gligorov and M Williams Efficient reliable and fast high-level triggering usinga bonsai boosted decision tree JINST 8 (2013) P02013 arXiv12106861

[26] T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P Skands PYTHIA 64 physics and manual JHEP05 (2006) 026 arXivhep-ph0603175 T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P SkandsA brief introduction to PYTHIA 81 Comput Phys Commun 178 (2008) 852arXiv07103820

[27] I Belyaev et al Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss the LHCbsimulation framework J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032047

[28] D J Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package Nucl Instrum MethA462 (2001) 152

[29] P Golonka and Z Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo A precision tool for QED correctionsin Z and W decays Eur Phys J C45 (2006) 97 arXivhep-ph0506026

[30] Geant4 collaboration J Allison et al Geant4 developments and applications IEEETrans Nucl Sci 53 (2006) 270 Geant4 collaboration S Agostinelli et al Geant4A simulation toolkit Nucl Instrum Meth A506 (2003) 250

31

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 21: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 0Plang

0

005

01

015

02

025

610timesLHCb (a)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 1Plang

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

310timesLHCb (b)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 2Plang

0

20

40

60

80

100310times

LHCb (c)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 3Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (d)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 4Plang

-10-505

10152025

310timesLHCb (e)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 5Plang

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30310times

LHCb (f)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 6Plang

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25310times

LHCb (g)

) [GeV]minusπ+K(m06 08 1 12 14 16

0

04 G

eVrang 7Plang

-20-15-10

-505

101520

310timesLHCb (h)

Figure 11 Background-subtracted and efficiency-corrected Legendre moments up to order 7calculated as a function of m(K+πminus) for data (black data points) and the fit result (solid bluecurve)

19

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Pull

-2

-1

0

1

2

LHCb

Figure 12 Differences between the data SDP distribution and the fit model across the SDP interms of the per-bin pull

Table 5 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths(MeV) Uncertainties given on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value SB fraction Efficiency Background SDP Fit bias Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 060 083 050 031 117Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 006 039 069 005 080Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 028 148 185 033 241LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 051 225 286 086 377

LASS total 67plusmn 27 026 186 160 102 267Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 023 072 053 054 107Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 021 139 143 040 204Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 070 070 049 015 111Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 003 081 059 057 115Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 086 191 052 038 219m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 46 81 70 37 122m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 001 037 022 029 051Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 28 131 139 48 199Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 05 09 09 05 14

widths are given in Tables 5 and 6 The dominant experimental systematic uncertaintyon most parameters is due to either the efficiency variation or background distributionsacross the SDP while the model uncertainties are generally dominated by the effects ofalternative descriptions of the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves For the parametersof broad components the model uncertainties dominate however for other parameters thestatistical experimental and model uncertainties are all of a similar magnitude

The stability of the fit results is confirmed by several cross-checks The data sample isdivided into subsamples according to the flavour of the B candidate the trigger decision

20

Table 6 Model uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths (MeV) Uncertaintiesgiven on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value Fixed parameters Addremove Alternative models Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 075 114 109 174Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 018 070 022 076Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 079 330 023 340LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 110 399 520 665

LASS total 67plusmn 27 053 142 521 543Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 036 187 056 198Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 055 195 711 740Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 018 073 099 124Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 027 140 346 374Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 031 199 215 295m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 61 93 256 279m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 009 105 048 115Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 40 180 435 472Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 14 05 24 29

the polarity of the magnet and the year of data taking Each subsample is fitted separatelyand all are seen to be consistent with the nominal fit results The fit is also repeatedwith additional resonance components to test the fit model Resonances up to spin-3 wereconsidered for all three pairs of daughters with the mass and width allowed to vary in thefit No additional significant contributions were observed

8 Results and summary

The results for the complex coefficients are reported in Table 7 with results for thefit fractions given in Table 8 The results for the interference fit fractions are givenin Appendix B Upper limits are determined on the fit fractions of the Klowast(1410)0 andDlowast3(2760)minus components which do not give significant contributions using the methoddescribed in Ref [10]

The fit fractions for resonant contributions are converted into quasi-two-body productbranching fractions by multiplying by B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus) = (92plusmn 06plusmn 07plusmn 06)times 10minus5which is obtained from the ratio of branching fractions B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus)B(B0 rarrD0π+πminus) [15] multiplied by the latest result for B(B0 rarr D0π+πminus) [12] accounting forthe different Dlowast(2010)minus veto windows used in the analyses and for the 37 residualbackground due to B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ decays The statistical correlation between theresults of Ref [15] and this analysis is found to be negligible The results for the productbranching fractions are shown in Table 9 For the K+πminus resonances where the branchingfractions to Kπ are known the product branching fractions are converted to the Bdecay branching fractions shown in Table 10 The results for B(B0 rarr D0Klowast(892)0) andB(B0 rarr Dlowast2(2460)minusK+)times B(Dlowast2(2460)minus rarr D0πminus) are consistent with and more precisethan previous measurements [14 1617]

21

Table 7 Results for the complex amplitudes and their uncertainties presented (top) in terms ofreal and imaginary parts and (bottom) in terms and magnitudes and phases The three quotederrors are statistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively

Resonance Real part Imaginary part

Klowast(892)0 minus000plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 034 minus127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 006Klowast(1410)0 015plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 009 minus009plusmn 009plusmn 018plusmn 018Klowast0(1430)0 014plusmn 038plusmn 048plusmn 038 045plusmn 015plusmn 037plusmn 017LASS nonresonant minus010plusmn 024plusmn 016plusmn 042 044plusmn 014plusmn 017plusmn 023Klowast2(1430)0 minus032plusmn 009plusmn 015plusmn 023 minus047plusmn 007plusmn 014plusmn 015Dlowast0(2400)minus minus080plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 022 minus044plusmn 014plusmn 012plusmn 018Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) minus039plusmn 009plusmn 009plusmn 014 036plusmn 017plusmn 014plusmn 023Dπ P-wave (EFF) minus062plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 011 minus003plusmn 006plusmn 005plusmn 010

Resonance Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 005 minus157plusmn 011plusmn 016plusmn 027Klowast(1410)0 018plusmn 007plusmn 010plusmn 011 minus054plusmn 021plusmn 055plusmn 104Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 009plusmn 010plusmn 014 127plusmn 095plusmn 104plusmn 081LASS nonresonant 046plusmn 014plusmn 016plusmn 029 179plusmn 065plusmn 035plusmn 069Klowast2(1430)0 057plusmn 005plusmn 004plusmn 008 minus216plusmn 019plusmn 043plusmn 043Dlowast0(2400)minus 091plusmn 007plusmn 006plusmn 017 minus264plusmn 015plusmn 014plusmn 023Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 053plusmn 007plusmn 004plusmn 014 240plusmn 027plusmn 024plusmn 044Dπ P-wave (EFF) 062plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 011 minus309plusmn 010plusmn 007plusmn 017

Table 8 Results for the fit fractions and their uncertainties () The three quoted errors arestatistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively Upper limits are givenat 90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Fit fraction Upper limitKlowast(892)0 374plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 17Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03plusmn 08plusmn 08 lt 32 (37)Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20plusmn 24plusmn 34LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38plusmn 38plusmn 67

LASS total 67plusmn 27plusmn 27plusmn 54Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17plusmn 11plusmn 20Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28plusmn 20plusmn 74Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12plusmn 11plusmn 12Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 10 (11)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14plusmn 12plusmn 37Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16plusmn 22plusmn 30

22

Table 9 Results for the product branching fractions The four quoted errors are statisticalexperimental systematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Product branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 342plusmn 013plusmn 010plusmn 016plusmn 040Klowast(1410)0 007plusmn 003plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 001 lt 029 (034)Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 018plusmn 022plusmn 031plusmn 005LASS nonresonant 044plusmn 034plusmn 034plusmn 061plusmn 005

LASS total 061plusmn 025plusmn 025plusmn 049plusmn 007Klowast2(1430)0 068plusmn 015plusmn 010plusmn 018plusmn 008Dlowast0(2400)minus 177plusmn 026plusmn 019plusmn 067plusmn 020Dlowast2(2460)minus 212plusmn 010plusmn 011plusmn 011plusmn 025Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 010 (011)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 060plusmn 013plusmn 011plusmn 034plusmn 007Dπ P-wave (EFF) 081plusmn 015plusmn 020plusmn 027plusmn 009

Table 10 Results for the branching fractions The four quoted errors are statistical experimentalsystematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at 90 (95 )confidence level

Resonance Branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 513plusmn 020plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 060Klowast(1410)0 159plusmn 068plusmn 181plusmn 159plusmn 036 lt 67 (78)Klowast0(1430)0 071plusmn 027plusmn 033plusmn 047plusmn 008LASS nonresonant 066plusmn 051plusmn 051plusmn 092plusmn 008

LASS total 092plusmn 038plusmn 038plusmn 074plusmn 011Klowast2(1430)0 204plusmn 045plusmn 030plusmn 054plusmn 025

The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus states are found to be

m(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (2360plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 28) MeV

Γ(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (255plusmn 26plusmn 20plusmn 47) MeV

m(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (24656plusmn 18plusmn 05plusmn 12) MeV

Γ(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (460plusmn 34plusmn 14plusmn 29) MeV

where the three uncertainties are statistical experimental systematic and model systematicrespectively These are consistent with though less precise than recent results from a DPanalysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] They also show good agreement with and havesimilar precision to earlier measurements of these quantities [1337]

In summary the first amplitude analysis of B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays has been presentedusing a data sample corresponding to 30 fbminus1 of pp collision data collected by the LHCbexperiment A good description of the data is obtained with a model containing contri-

23

butions from intermediate Klowast(892)0 Klowast(1410)0 Klowast2(1430)0 and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonanceswith additional components to describe broad structures in the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S-and P-waves The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances aremeasured as are the complex amplitudes and fit fractions for all components includedin the amplitude model The results can be used in conjunction with an analysis ofB0 rarr DK+πminus decays where the neutral D meson is reconstructed in final states such asK+Kminus to measure the CKM unitarity triangle parameter γ [1 2]

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to our colleagues in the CERN accelerator departments forthe excellent performance of the LHC We thank the technical and administrative staffat the LHCb institutes We acknowledge support from CERN and from the nationalagencies CAPES CNPq FAPERJ and FINEP (Brazil) NSFC (China) CNRSIN2P3(France) BMBF DFG HGF and MPG (Germany) INFN (Italy) FOM and NWO (TheNetherlands) MNiSW and NCN (Poland) MENIFA (Romania) MinES and FANO(Russia) MinECo (Spain) SNSF and SER (Switzerland) NASU (Ukraine) STFC (UnitedKingdom) NSF (USA) The Tier1 computing centres are supported by IN2P3 (France)KIT and BMBF (Germany) INFN (Italy) NWO and SURF (The Netherlands) PIC(Spain) GridPP (United Kingdom) We are indebted to the communities behind themultiple open source software packages on which we depend We are also thankful forthe computing resources and the access to software RampD tools provided by Yandex LLC(Russia) Individual groups or members have received support from EPLANET MarieSk lodowska-Curie Actions and ERC (European Union) Conseil general de Haute-SavoieLabex ENIGMASS and OCEVU Region Auvergne (France) RFBR (Russia) XuntaGaland GENCAT (Spain) Royal Society and Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851(United Kingdom)

24

Appendices

A Correlation matrices

The statistical correlations between the complex coefficients masses and widths determinedfrom the fit to data are given in terms of real and imaginary parts and in terms ofmagnitudes and phases in Tables 11 and 12 The correlations are determined using thesame sample of simulated pseudoexperiments used to calculate the statistical uncertaintieson fit parameters

B Results for interference fit fractions

The central values of the interference fit fractions are given in Table 13 The statisti-cal experimental systematic and model uncertainties on these quantities are given inTables 14 15 and 16

25

Tab

le11

Sta

tist

ical

corr

elat

ions

bet

wee

nth

ere

al(x

)an

dim

agin

ary

(y)

par

tsof

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

x0

y 0x

1y 1

x2

y 2x

3y 3

x4

y 4x

5y 5

x7

y 7x

8y 8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

x0

100

014

002

017minus

018

015minus

017

003

039minus

037

016minus

009minus

018minus

029

007minus

037minus

019

002

004

012

y 01

00minus

006minus

008

009minus

011minus

000

014

003

003

012

013minus

012minus

024

035minus

007

009

012

001minus

004

x1

100minus

009minus

008minus

014minus

004

029minus

001

003minus

020

018minus

021minus

031minus

017minus

036minus

008minus

017minus

023

002

y 11

000

050

340

09minus

001

060minus

039

002minus

003minus

003

007minus

002minus

004minus

016minus

002

007

002

x2

100minus

013

081

009

014minus

016minus

015

021

010

013

004minus

015minus

007

001minus

025

001

y 21

000

080

280

24minus

036minus

013

008minus

004minus

001minus

004

004minus

002minus

001minus

009minus

010

x3

100

020

013minus

034minus

010

033minus

008

008minus

004minus

005minus

007minus

003minus

033minus

009

y 31

00minus

012minus

012minus

051

029minus

034minus

053

009minus

012

009minus

014minus

036

001

x4

100minus

053

032minus

010minus

020

003

002minus

027minus

017minus

006

010minus

000

y 41

000

06minus

009

040

010

014

016

011minus

005

007minus

003

x5

100minus

029minus

003

022

002

004minus

008

002

045minus

006

y 51

00minus

031minus

034

006

003

024minus

014minus

072minus

033

x7

100

046

005

010minus

011minus

001

027

017

y 71

00minus

016

036minus

001

017

032

008

x8

100minus

003

001minus

006minus

009minus

014

y 81

000

290

020

15minus

002

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

26

Tab

le12

S

tati

stic

alco

rrel

atio

ns

bet

wee

nth

em

agnit

ud

es(a

)an

dp

has

es(∆

)of

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

a0

∆0

a1

∆1

a2

∆2

a3

∆3

a4

∆4

a5

∆5

a7

∆7

a8

∆8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

a0

100minus

011minus

008

005

024

003minus

014

004

004

001

021

002

022minus

022

038minus

000minus

004minus

009minus

001

004

∆0

100minus

010

012

003

020

014

014minus

001

045minus

005

010minus

008

035minus

007

005minus

022

006

007

009

a1

100minus

035minus

025

006

032

001minus

001minus

038

004minus

022minus

006

031

002

024

007minus

018minus

020

001

∆1

100

024

015

016

000

014

038minus

018minus

013

016

026

022minus

006minus

009minus

004minus

012

005

a2

100

004

011minus

028minus

007

039minus

009

007

027

010

001

001minus

015

004minus

003minus

013

∆2

100

015

077minus

020minus

010minus

001

024

009

013

003minus

009

005

001

023minus

010

a3

100minus

006

000minus

011

016minus

030minus

012

056

001

012

002minus

007minus

027minus

004

∆3

100minus

028minus

019

015

041minus

024minus

008minus

000minus

013

004

002

041

008

a4

100

013

005minus

017

014

018minus

000

006

000

014minus

019minus

009

∆4

100minus

016

016

017

012

000minus

002minus

019minus

003

003

001

a5

100

024minus

026minus

006

011

005minus

007

001

019

039

∆5

100minus

000minus

028minus

001minus

020minus

020

015

076

027

a7

100minus

001

017minus

006

004

013minus

005minus

024

∆7

100minus

012

037

003minus

000minus

027minus

012

a8

100minus

004minus

001

004

006

015

∆8

100minus

037minus

002minus

033minus

001

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

27

Table 13 Interference fit fractions () from the nominal DP fit The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 374 18 minus00 00 00 minus24 minus02 minus26 minus50A1 07 minus00 00 00 minus11 minus03 minus06 minus11A2 51 minus32 minus00 29 15 16 19A3 48 00 minus84 01 21 02A4 74 minus03 minus10 minus15 minus04A5 193 minus00 28 00A6 231 minus00 00A7 66 minus00A8 89

Table 14 Statistical uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes areall pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASSnonresonant (A4) Klowast2 (1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8)Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 15 07 00 00 00 09 04 04 05A1 03 00 00 00 07 03 04 05A2 20 26 00 11 05 15 05A3 38 00 32 04 34 08A4 17 06 01 06 05A5 28 00 31 00A6 12 00 00A7 14 00A8 16

28

Table 15 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () Theamplitudes are all pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0 (1430)0(A3) LASS nonresonant (A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave(dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fitfractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 12 05 00 00 00 23 02 04 05A1 08 00 00 00 04 08 07 09A2 24 31 00 14 20 26 11A3 38 00 36 02 26 03A4 11 22 02 05 10A5 20 00 40 00A6 11 00 00A7 12 00A8 22

Table 16 Model uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 17 08 00 00 00 26 07 08 14A1 08 00 00 00 08 06 08 11A2 34 29 00 58 17 36 27A3 66 00 83 03 35 07A4 20 17 02 12 10A5 74 00 45 00A6 12 00 00A7 37 00A8 29

29

References

[1] T Gershon On the measurement of the unitarity triangle angle γ from B0 rarr DKlowast0

decays Phys Rev D79 (2009) 051301(R) arXiv08102706

[2] T Gershon and M Williams Prospects for the measurement of the unitaritytriangle angle γ from B0 rarr DK+πminus decays Phys Rev D80 (2009) 092002arXiv09091495

[3] N Cabibbo Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays Phys Rev Lett 10 (1963) 531

[4] M Kobayashi and T Maskawa CP -violation in the renormalizable theory of weakinteraction Progress of Theoretical Physics 49 (1973) 652

[5] M Gronau and D London How to determine all the angles of the unitarity trianglefrom B0 rarr DK0

S and B0s rarr Dφ Phys Lett B253 (1991) 483

[6] M Gronau and D Wyler On determining a weak phase from CP asymmetries incharged B decays Phys Lett B265 (1991) 172

[7] I Dunietz CP violation with self-tagging Bd modes Phys Lett B270 (1991) 75

[8] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurement of CP violation parameters inB0 rarr DKlowast0 decays Phys Rev D90 (2014) 112002 arXiv14078136

[9] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of overlapping spin-1 and spin-

3 D0Kminus resonances at mass 286 GeVc2 Phys Rev Lett 113 (2014) 162001

arXiv14077574

[10] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ decays

Phys Rev D90 (2014) 072003 arXiv14077712

[11] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observation and amplitude analysis of theBminus rarr D+Kminusπminus decay Phys Rev D91 (2015) 092002 arXiv150302995

[12] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays

arXiv150501710 submitted to Phys Rev D

[13] Belle collaboration A Kuzmin et al Study of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays Phys RevD76 (2007) 012006 arXivhep-ex0611054

[14] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of branching fractions andresonance contributions for B0 rarr D0K+πminus and search for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decaysPhys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 011803 arXivhep-ex0509036

[15] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurements of the branching fractions of

the decays B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ and B0 rarr D

0K+πminus Phys Rev D87 (2013) 112009

arXiv13046317

30

[16] Belle collaboration P Krokovny et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K0 and B0 rarr D0Klowast0

decays Phys Rev Lett 90 (2003) 141802 arXivhep-ex0212066

[17] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of B0 rarr D(lowast)0K(lowast)0 branchingfractions Phys Rev D74 (2006) 031101 arXivhep-ex0604016

[18] LHCb collaboration A A Alves Jr et al The LHCb detector at the LHC JINST 3(2008) S08005

[19] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al LHCb detector performance Int J Mod PhysA30 (2015) 1530022 arXiv14126352

[20] R Aaij et al Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator JINST 9 (2014) P09007arXiv14057808

[21] R Arink et al Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker JINST 9 (2014) P01002arXiv13113893

[22] M Adinolfi et al Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Eur PhysJ C73 (2013) 2431 arXiv12116759

[23] A A Alves Jr et al Performance of the LHCb muon system JINST 8 (2013) P02022arXiv12111346

[24] R Aaij et al The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011 JINST 8 (2013) P04022arXiv12113055

[25] V V Gligorov and M Williams Efficient reliable and fast high-level triggering usinga bonsai boosted decision tree JINST 8 (2013) P02013 arXiv12106861

[26] T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P Skands PYTHIA 64 physics and manual JHEP05 (2006) 026 arXivhep-ph0603175 T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P SkandsA brief introduction to PYTHIA 81 Comput Phys Commun 178 (2008) 852arXiv07103820

[27] I Belyaev et al Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss the LHCbsimulation framework J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032047

[28] D J Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package Nucl Instrum MethA462 (2001) 152

[29] P Golonka and Z Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo A precision tool for QED correctionsin Z and W decays Eur Phys J C45 (2006) 97 arXivhep-ph0506026

[30] Geant4 collaboration J Allison et al Geant4 developments and applications IEEETrans Nucl Sci 53 (2006) 270 Geant4 collaboration S Agostinelli et al Geant4A simulation toolkit Nucl Instrum Meth A506 (2003) 250

31

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 22: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

m0 02 04 06 08 1

θ

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Pull

-2

-1

0

1

2

LHCb

Figure 12 Differences between the data SDP distribution and the fit model across the SDP interms of the per-bin pull

Table 5 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths(MeV) Uncertainties given on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value SB fraction Efficiency Background SDP Fit bias Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 060 083 050 031 117Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 006 039 069 005 080Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 028 148 185 033 241LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 051 225 286 086 377

LASS total 67plusmn 27 026 186 160 102 267Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 023 072 053 054 107Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 021 139 143 040 204Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 070 070 049 015 111Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 003 081 059 057 115Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 086 191 052 038 219m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 46 81 70 37 122m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 001 037 022 029 051Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 28 131 139 48 199Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 05 09 09 05 14

widths are given in Tables 5 and 6 The dominant experimental systematic uncertaintyon most parameters is due to either the efficiency variation or background distributionsacross the SDP while the model uncertainties are generally dominated by the effects ofalternative descriptions of the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S- and P-waves For the parametersof broad components the model uncertainties dominate however for other parameters thestatistical experimental and model uncertainties are all of a similar magnitude

The stability of the fit results is confirmed by several cross-checks The data sample isdivided into subsamples according to the flavour of the B candidate the trigger decision

20

Table 6 Model uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths (MeV) Uncertaintiesgiven on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value Fixed parameters Addremove Alternative models Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 075 114 109 174Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 018 070 022 076Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 079 330 023 340LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 110 399 520 665

LASS total 67plusmn 27 053 142 521 543Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 036 187 056 198Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 055 195 711 740Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 018 073 099 124Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 027 140 346 374Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 031 199 215 295m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 61 93 256 279m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 009 105 048 115Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 40 180 435 472Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 14 05 24 29

the polarity of the magnet and the year of data taking Each subsample is fitted separatelyand all are seen to be consistent with the nominal fit results The fit is also repeatedwith additional resonance components to test the fit model Resonances up to spin-3 wereconsidered for all three pairs of daughters with the mass and width allowed to vary in thefit No additional significant contributions were observed

8 Results and summary

The results for the complex coefficients are reported in Table 7 with results for thefit fractions given in Table 8 The results for the interference fit fractions are givenin Appendix B Upper limits are determined on the fit fractions of the Klowast(1410)0 andDlowast3(2760)minus components which do not give significant contributions using the methoddescribed in Ref [10]

The fit fractions for resonant contributions are converted into quasi-two-body productbranching fractions by multiplying by B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus) = (92plusmn 06plusmn 07plusmn 06)times 10minus5which is obtained from the ratio of branching fractions B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus)B(B0 rarrD0π+πminus) [15] multiplied by the latest result for B(B0 rarr D0π+πminus) [12] accounting forthe different Dlowast(2010)minus veto windows used in the analyses and for the 37 residualbackground due to B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ decays The statistical correlation between theresults of Ref [15] and this analysis is found to be negligible The results for the productbranching fractions are shown in Table 9 For the K+πminus resonances where the branchingfractions to Kπ are known the product branching fractions are converted to the Bdecay branching fractions shown in Table 10 The results for B(B0 rarr D0Klowast(892)0) andB(B0 rarr Dlowast2(2460)minusK+)times B(Dlowast2(2460)minus rarr D0πminus) are consistent with and more precisethan previous measurements [14 1617]

21

Table 7 Results for the complex amplitudes and their uncertainties presented (top) in terms ofreal and imaginary parts and (bottom) in terms and magnitudes and phases The three quotederrors are statistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively

Resonance Real part Imaginary part

Klowast(892)0 minus000plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 034 minus127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 006Klowast(1410)0 015plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 009 minus009plusmn 009plusmn 018plusmn 018Klowast0(1430)0 014plusmn 038plusmn 048plusmn 038 045plusmn 015plusmn 037plusmn 017LASS nonresonant minus010plusmn 024plusmn 016plusmn 042 044plusmn 014plusmn 017plusmn 023Klowast2(1430)0 minus032plusmn 009plusmn 015plusmn 023 minus047plusmn 007plusmn 014plusmn 015Dlowast0(2400)minus minus080plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 022 minus044plusmn 014plusmn 012plusmn 018Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) minus039plusmn 009plusmn 009plusmn 014 036plusmn 017plusmn 014plusmn 023Dπ P-wave (EFF) minus062plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 011 minus003plusmn 006plusmn 005plusmn 010

Resonance Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 005 minus157plusmn 011plusmn 016plusmn 027Klowast(1410)0 018plusmn 007plusmn 010plusmn 011 minus054plusmn 021plusmn 055plusmn 104Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 009plusmn 010plusmn 014 127plusmn 095plusmn 104plusmn 081LASS nonresonant 046plusmn 014plusmn 016plusmn 029 179plusmn 065plusmn 035plusmn 069Klowast2(1430)0 057plusmn 005plusmn 004plusmn 008 minus216plusmn 019plusmn 043plusmn 043Dlowast0(2400)minus 091plusmn 007plusmn 006plusmn 017 minus264plusmn 015plusmn 014plusmn 023Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 053plusmn 007plusmn 004plusmn 014 240plusmn 027plusmn 024plusmn 044Dπ P-wave (EFF) 062plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 011 minus309plusmn 010plusmn 007plusmn 017

Table 8 Results for the fit fractions and their uncertainties () The three quoted errors arestatistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively Upper limits are givenat 90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Fit fraction Upper limitKlowast(892)0 374plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 17Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03plusmn 08plusmn 08 lt 32 (37)Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20plusmn 24plusmn 34LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38plusmn 38plusmn 67

LASS total 67plusmn 27plusmn 27plusmn 54Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17plusmn 11plusmn 20Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28plusmn 20plusmn 74Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12plusmn 11plusmn 12Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 10 (11)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14plusmn 12plusmn 37Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16plusmn 22plusmn 30

22

Table 9 Results for the product branching fractions The four quoted errors are statisticalexperimental systematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Product branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 342plusmn 013plusmn 010plusmn 016plusmn 040Klowast(1410)0 007plusmn 003plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 001 lt 029 (034)Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 018plusmn 022plusmn 031plusmn 005LASS nonresonant 044plusmn 034plusmn 034plusmn 061plusmn 005

LASS total 061plusmn 025plusmn 025plusmn 049plusmn 007Klowast2(1430)0 068plusmn 015plusmn 010plusmn 018plusmn 008Dlowast0(2400)minus 177plusmn 026plusmn 019plusmn 067plusmn 020Dlowast2(2460)minus 212plusmn 010plusmn 011plusmn 011plusmn 025Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 010 (011)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 060plusmn 013plusmn 011plusmn 034plusmn 007Dπ P-wave (EFF) 081plusmn 015plusmn 020plusmn 027plusmn 009

Table 10 Results for the branching fractions The four quoted errors are statistical experimentalsystematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at 90 (95 )confidence level

Resonance Branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 513plusmn 020plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 060Klowast(1410)0 159plusmn 068plusmn 181plusmn 159plusmn 036 lt 67 (78)Klowast0(1430)0 071plusmn 027plusmn 033plusmn 047plusmn 008LASS nonresonant 066plusmn 051plusmn 051plusmn 092plusmn 008

LASS total 092plusmn 038plusmn 038plusmn 074plusmn 011Klowast2(1430)0 204plusmn 045plusmn 030plusmn 054plusmn 025

The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus states are found to be

m(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (2360plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 28) MeV

Γ(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (255plusmn 26plusmn 20plusmn 47) MeV

m(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (24656plusmn 18plusmn 05plusmn 12) MeV

Γ(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (460plusmn 34plusmn 14plusmn 29) MeV

where the three uncertainties are statistical experimental systematic and model systematicrespectively These are consistent with though less precise than recent results from a DPanalysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] They also show good agreement with and havesimilar precision to earlier measurements of these quantities [1337]

In summary the first amplitude analysis of B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays has been presentedusing a data sample corresponding to 30 fbminus1 of pp collision data collected by the LHCbexperiment A good description of the data is obtained with a model containing contri-

23

butions from intermediate Klowast(892)0 Klowast(1410)0 Klowast2(1430)0 and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonanceswith additional components to describe broad structures in the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S-and P-waves The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances aremeasured as are the complex amplitudes and fit fractions for all components includedin the amplitude model The results can be used in conjunction with an analysis ofB0 rarr DK+πminus decays where the neutral D meson is reconstructed in final states such asK+Kminus to measure the CKM unitarity triangle parameter γ [1 2]

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to our colleagues in the CERN accelerator departments forthe excellent performance of the LHC We thank the technical and administrative staffat the LHCb institutes We acknowledge support from CERN and from the nationalagencies CAPES CNPq FAPERJ and FINEP (Brazil) NSFC (China) CNRSIN2P3(France) BMBF DFG HGF and MPG (Germany) INFN (Italy) FOM and NWO (TheNetherlands) MNiSW and NCN (Poland) MENIFA (Romania) MinES and FANO(Russia) MinECo (Spain) SNSF and SER (Switzerland) NASU (Ukraine) STFC (UnitedKingdom) NSF (USA) The Tier1 computing centres are supported by IN2P3 (France)KIT and BMBF (Germany) INFN (Italy) NWO and SURF (The Netherlands) PIC(Spain) GridPP (United Kingdom) We are indebted to the communities behind themultiple open source software packages on which we depend We are also thankful forthe computing resources and the access to software RampD tools provided by Yandex LLC(Russia) Individual groups or members have received support from EPLANET MarieSk lodowska-Curie Actions and ERC (European Union) Conseil general de Haute-SavoieLabex ENIGMASS and OCEVU Region Auvergne (France) RFBR (Russia) XuntaGaland GENCAT (Spain) Royal Society and Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851(United Kingdom)

24

Appendices

A Correlation matrices

The statistical correlations between the complex coefficients masses and widths determinedfrom the fit to data are given in terms of real and imaginary parts and in terms ofmagnitudes and phases in Tables 11 and 12 The correlations are determined using thesame sample of simulated pseudoexperiments used to calculate the statistical uncertaintieson fit parameters

B Results for interference fit fractions

The central values of the interference fit fractions are given in Table 13 The statisti-cal experimental systematic and model uncertainties on these quantities are given inTables 14 15 and 16

25

Tab

le11

Sta

tist

ical

corr

elat

ions

bet

wee

nth

ere

al(x

)an

dim

agin

ary

(y)

par

tsof

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

x0

y 0x

1y 1

x2

y 2x

3y 3

x4

y 4x

5y 5

x7

y 7x

8y 8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

x0

100

014

002

017minus

018

015minus

017

003

039minus

037

016minus

009minus

018minus

029

007minus

037minus

019

002

004

012

y 01

00minus

006minus

008

009minus

011minus

000

014

003

003

012

013minus

012minus

024

035minus

007

009

012

001minus

004

x1

100minus

009minus

008minus

014minus

004

029minus

001

003minus

020

018minus

021minus

031minus

017minus

036minus

008minus

017minus

023

002

y 11

000

050

340

09minus

001

060minus

039

002minus

003minus

003

007minus

002minus

004minus

016minus

002

007

002

x2

100minus

013

081

009

014minus

016minus

015

021

010

013

004minus

015minus

007

001minus

025

001

y 21

000

080

280

24minus

036minus

013

008minus

004minus

001minus

004

004minus

002minus

001minus

009minus

010

x3

100

020

013minus

034minus

010

033minus

008

008minus

004minus

005minus

007minus

003minus

033minus

009

y 31

00minus

012minus

012minus

051

029minus

034minus

053

009minus

012

009minus

014minus

036

001

x4

100minus

053

032minus

010minus

020

003

002minus

027minus

017minus

006

010minus

000

y 41

000

06minus

009

040

010

014

016

011minus

005

007minus

003

x5

100minus

029minus

003

022

002

004minus

008

002

045minus

006

y 51

00minus

031minus

034

006

003

024minus

014minus

072minus

033

x7

100

046

005

010minus

011minus

001

027

017

y 71

00minus

016

036minus

001

017

032

008

x8

100minus

003

001minus

006minus

009minus

014

y 81

000

290

020

15minus

002

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

26

Tab

le12

S

tati

stic

alco

rrel

atio

ns

bet

wee

nth

em

agnit

ud

es(a

)an

dp

has

es(∆

)of

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

a0

∆0

a1

∆1

a2

∆2

a3

∆3

a4

∆4

a5

∆5

a7

∆7

a8

∆8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

a0

100minus

011minus

008

005

024

003minus

014

004

004

001

021

002

022minus

022

038minus

000minus

004minus

009minus

001

004

∆0

100minus

010

012

003

020

014

014minus

001

045minus

005

010minus

008

035minus

007

005minus

022

006

007

009

a1

100minus

035minus

025

006

032

001minus

001minus

038

004minus

022minus

006

031

002

024

007minus

018minus

020

001

∆1

100

024

015

016

000

014

038minus

018minus

013

016

026

022minus

006minus

009minus

004minus

012

005

a2

100

004

011minus

028minus

007

039minus

009

007

027

010

001

001minus

015

004minus

003minus

013

∆2

100

015

077minus

020minus

010minus

001

024

009

013

003minus

009

005

001

023minus

010

a3

100minus

006

000minus

011

016minus

030minus

012

056

001

012

002minus

007minus

027minus

004

∆3

100minus

028minus

019

015

041minus

024minus

008minus

000minus

013

004

002

041

008

a4

100

013

005minus

017

014

018minus

000

006

000

014minus

019minus

009

∆4

100minus

016

016

017

012

000minus

002minus

019minus

003

003

001

a5

100

024minus

026minus

006

011

005minus

007

001

019

039

∆5

100minus

000minus

028minus

001minus

020minus

020

015

076

027

a7

100minus

001

017minus

006

004

013minus

005minus

024

∆7

100minus

012

037

003minus

000minus

027minus

012

a8

100minus

004minus

001

004

006

015

∆8

100minus

037minus

002minus

033minus

001

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

27

Table 13 Interference fit fractions () from the nominal DP fit The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 374 18 minus00 00 00 minus24 minus02 minus26 minus50A1 07 minus00 00 00 minus11 minus03 minus06 minus11A2 51 minus32 minus00 29 15 16 19A3 48 00 minus84 01 21 02A4 74 minus03 minus10 minus15 minus04A5 193 minus00 28 00A6 231 minus00 00A7 66 minus00A8 89

Table 14 Statistical uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes areall pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASSnonresonant (A4) Klowast2 (1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8)Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 15 07 00 00 00 09 04 04 05A1 03 00 00 00 07 03 04 05A2 20 26 00 11 05 15 05A3 38 00 32 04 34 08A4 17 06 01 06 05A5 28 00 31 00A6 12 00 00A7 14 00A8 16

28

Table 15 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () Theamplitudes are all pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0 (1430)0(A3) LASS nonresonant (A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave(dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fitfractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 12 05 00 00 00 23 02 04 05A1 08 00 00 00 04 08 07 09A2 24 31 00 14 20 26 11A3 38 00 36 02 26 03A4 11 22 02 05 10A5 20 00 40 00A6 11 00 00A7 12 00A8 22

Table 16 Model uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 17 08 00 00 00 26 07 08 14A1 08 00 00 00 08 06 08 11A2 34 29 00 58 17 36 27A3 66 00 83 03 35 07A4 20 17 02 12 10A5 74 00 45 00A6 12 00 00A7 37 00A8 29

29

References

[1] T Gershon On the measurement of the unitarity triangle angle γ from B0 rarr DKlowast0

decays Phys Rev D79 (2009) 051301(R) arXiv08102706

[2] T Gershon and M Williams Prospects for the measurement of the unitaritytriangle angle γ from B0 rarr DK+πminus decays Phys Rev D80 (2009) 092002arXiv09091495

[3] N Cabibbo Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays Phys Rev Lett 10 (1963) 531

[4] M Kobayashi and T Maskawa CP -violation in the renormalizable theory of weakinteraction Progress of Theoretical Physics 49 (1973) 652

[5] M Gronau and D London How to determine all the angles of the unitarity trianglefrom B0 rarr DK0

S and B0s rarr Dφ Phys Lett B253 (1991) 483

[6] M Gronau and D Wyler On determining a weak phase from CP asymmetries incharged B decays Phys Lett B265 (1991) 172

[7] I Dunietz CP violation with self-tagging Bd modes Phys Lett B270 (1991) 75

[8] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurement of CP violation parameters inB0 rarr DKlowast0 decays Phys Rev D90 (2014) 112002 arXiv14078136

[9] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of overlapping spin-1 and spin-

3 D0Kminus resonances at mass 286 GeVc2 Phys Rev Lett 113 (2014) 162001

arXiv14077574

[10] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ decays

Phys Rev D90 (2014) 072003 arXiv14077712

[11] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observation and amplitude analysis of theBminus rarr D+Kminusπminus decay Phys Rev D91 (2015) 092002 arXiv150302995

[12] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays

arXiv150501710 submitted to Phys Rev D

[13] Belle collaboration A Kuzmin et al Study of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays Phys RevD76 (2007) 012006 arXivhep-ex0611054

[14] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of branching fractions andresonance contributions for B0 rarr D0K+πminus and search for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decaysPhys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 011803 arXivhep-ex0509036

[15] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurements of the branching fractions of

the decays B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ and B0 rarr D

0K+πminus Phys Rev D87 (2013) 112009

arXiv13046317

30

[16] Belle collaboration P Krokovny et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K0 and B0 rarr D0Klowast0

decays Phys Rev Lett 90 (2003) 141802 arXivhep-ex0212066

[17] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of B0 rarr D(lowast)0K(lowast)0 branchingfractions Phys Rev D74 (2006) 031101 arXivhep-ex0604016

[18] LHCb collaboration A A Alves Jr et al The LHCb detector at the LHC JINST 3(2008) S08005

[19] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al LHCb detector performance Int J Mod PhysA30 (2015) 1530022 arXiv14126352

[20] R Aaij et al Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator JINST 9 (2014) P09007arXiv14057808

[21] R Arink et al Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker JINST 9 (2014) P01002arXiv13113893

[22] M Adinolfi et al Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Eur PhysJ C73 (2013) 2431 arXiv12116759

[23] A A Alves Jr et al Performance of the LHCb muon system JINST 8 (2013) P02022arXiv12111346

[24] R Aaij et al The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011 JINST 8 (2013) P04022arXiv12113055

[25] V V Gligorov and M Williams Efficient reliable and fast high-level triggering usinga bonsai boosted decision tree JINST 8 (2013) P02013 arXiv12106861

[26] T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P Skands PYTHIA 64 physics and manual JHEP05 (2006) 026 arXivhep-ph0603175 T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P SkandsA brief introduction to PYTHIA 81 Comput Phys Commun 178 (2008) 852arXiv07103820

[27] I Belyaev et al Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss the LHCbsimulation framework J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032047

[28] D J Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package Nucl Instrum MethA462 (2001) 152

[29] P Golonka and Z Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo A precision tool for QED correctionsin Z and W decays Eur Phys J C45 (2006) 97 arXivhep-ph0506026

[30] Geant4 collaboration J Allison et al Geant4 developments and applications IEEETrans Nucl Sci 53 (2006) 270 Geant4 collaboration S Agostinelli et al Geant4A simulation toolkit Nucl Instrum Meth A506 (2003) 250

31

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 23: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

Table 6 Model uncertainties on the fit fractions () and masses and widths (MeV) Uncertaintiesgiven on the central values are statistical only

Resonance Central value Fixed parameters Addremove Alternative models Total

Klowast(892)0 374plusmn 15 075 114 109 174Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03 018 070 022 076Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20 079 330 023 340LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38 110 399 520 665

LASS total 67plusmn 27 053 142 521 543Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17 036 187 056 198Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28 055 195 711 740Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12 018 073 099 124Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14 027 140 346 374Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16 031 199 215 295m (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 2360plusmn 15 61 93 256 279m (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 24656plusmn 18 009 105 048 115Γ (Dlowast0(2400)minus) 255plusmn 26 40 180 435 472Γ (Dlowast2(2460)minus) 460plusmn 34 14 05 24 29

the polarity of the magnet and the year of data taking Each subsample is fitted separatelyand all are seen to be consistent with the nominal fit results The fit is also repeatedwith additional resonance components to test the fit model Resonances up to spin-3 wereconsidered for all three pairs of daughters with the mass and width allowed to vary in thefit No additional significant contributions were observed

8 Results and summary

The results for the complex coefficients are reported in Table 7 with results for thefit fractions given in Table 8 The results for the interference fit fractions are givenin Appendix B Upper limits are determined on the fit fractions of the Klowast(1410)0 andDlowast3(2760)minus components which do not give significant contributions using the methoddescribed in Ref [10]

The fit fractions for resonant contributions are converted into quasi-two-body productbranching fractions by multiplying by B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus) = (92plusmn 06plusmn 07plusmn 06)times 10minus5which is obtained from the ratio of branching fractions B(B0 rarr D0K+πminus)B(B0 rarrD0π+πminus) [15] multiplied by the latest result for B(B0 rarr D0π+πminus) [12] accounting forthe different Dlowast(2010)minus veto windows used in the analyses and for the 37 residualbackground due to B0 rarr Dlowast(2010)minusK+ decays The statistical correlation between theresults of Ref [15] and this analysis is found to be negligible The results for the productbranching fractions are shown in Table 9 For the K+πminus resonances where the branchingfractions to Kπ are known the product branching fractions are converted to the Bdecay branching fractions shown in Table 10 The results for B(B0 rarr D0Klowast(892)0) andB(B0 rarr Dlowast2(2460)minusK+)times B(Dlowast2(2460)minus rarr D0πminus) are consistent with and more precisethan previous measurements [14 1617]

21

Table 7 Results for the complex amplitudes and their uncertainties presented (top) in terms ofreal and imaginary parts and (bottom) in terms and magnitudes and phases The three quotederrors are statistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively

Resonance Real part Imaginary part

Klowast(892)0 minus000plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 034 minus127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 006Klowast(1410)0 015plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 009 minus009plusmn 009plusmn 018plusmn 018Klowast0(1430)0 014plusmn 038plusmn 048plusmn 038 045plusmn 015plusmn 037plusmn 017LASS nonresonant minus010plusmn 024plusmn 016plusmn 042 044plusmn 014plusmn 017plusmn 023Klowast2(1430)0 minus032plusmn 009plusmn 015plusmn 023 minus047plusmn 007plusmn 014plusmn 015Dlowast0(2400)minus minus080plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 022 minus044plusmn 014plusmn 012plusmn 018Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) minus039plusmn 009plusmn 009plusmn 014 036plusmn 017plusmn 014plusmn 023Dπ P-wave (EFF) minus062plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 011 minus003plusmn 006plusmn 005plusmn 010

Resonance Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 005 minus157plusmn 011plusmn 016plusmn 027Klowast(1410)0 018plusmn 007plusmn 010plusmn 011 minus054plusmn 021plusmn 055plusmn 104Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 009plusmn 010plusmn 014 127plusmn 095plusmn 104plusmn 081LASS nonresonant 046plusmn 014plusmn 016plusmn 029 179plusmn 065plusmn 035plusmn 069Klowast2(1430)0 057plusmn 005plusmn 004plusmn 008 minus216plusmn 019plusmn 043plusmn 043Dlowast0(2400)minus 091plusmn 007plusmn 006plusmn 017 minus264plusmn 015plusmn 014plusmn 023Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 053plusmn 007plusmn 004plusmn 014 240plusmn 027plusmn 024plusmn 044Dπ P-wave (EFF) 062plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 011 minus309plusmn 010plusmn 007plusmn 017

Table 8 Results for the fit fractions and their uncertainties () The three quoted errors arestatistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively Upper limits are givenat 90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Fit fraction Upper limitKlowast(892)0 374plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 17Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03plusmn 08plusmn 08 lt 32 (37)Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20plusmn 24plusmn 34LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38plusmn 38plusmn 67

LASS total 67plusmn 27plusmn 27plusmn 54Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17plusmn 11plusmn 20Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28plusmn 20plusmn 74Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12plusmn 11plusmn 12Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 10 (11)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14plusmn 12plusmn 37Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16plusmn 22plusmn 30

22

Table 9 Results for the product branching fractions The four quoted errors are statisticalexperimental systematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Product branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 342plusmn 013plusmn 010plusmn 016plusmn 040Klowast(1410)0 007plusmn 003plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 001 lt 029 (034)Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 018plusmn 022plusmn 031plusmn 005LASS nonresonant 044plusmn 034plusmn 034plusmn 061plusmn 005

LASS total 061plusmn 025plusmn 025plusmn 049plusmn 007Klowast2(1430)0 068plusmn 015plusmn 010plusmn 018plusmn 008Dlowast0(2400)minus 177plusmn 026plusmn 019plusmn 067plusmn 020Dlowast2(2460)minus 212plusmn 010plusmn 011plusmn 011plusmn 025Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 010 (011)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 060plusmn 013plusmn 011plusmn 034plusmn 007Dπ P-wave (EFF) 081plusmn 015plusmn 020plusmn 027plusmn 009

Table 10 Results for the branching fractions The four quoted errors are statistical experimentalsystematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at 90 (95 )confidence level

Resonance Branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 513plusmn 020plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 060Klowast(1410)0 159plusmn 068plusmn 181plusmn 159plusmn 036 lt 67 (78)Klowast0(1430)0 071plusmn 027plusmn 033plusmn 047plusmn 008LASS nonresonant 066plusmn 051plusmn 051plusmn 092plusmn 008

LASS total 092plusmn 038plusmn 038plusmn 074plusmn 011Klowast2(1430)0 204plusmn 045plusmn 030plusmn 054plusmn 025

The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus states are found to be

m(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (2360plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 28) MeV

Γ(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (255plusmn 26plusmn 20plusmn 47) MeV

m(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (24656plusmn 18plusmn 05plusmn 12) MeV

Γ(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (460plusmn 34plusmn 14plusmn 29) MeV

where the three uncertainties are statistical experimental systematic and model systematicrespectively These are consistent with though less precise than recent results from a DPanalysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] They also show good agreement with and havesimilar precision to earlier measurements of these quantities [1337]

In summary the first amplitude analysis of B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays has been presentedusing a data sample corresponding to 30 fbminus1 of pp collision data collected by the LHCbexperiment A good description of the data is obtained with a model containing contri-

23

butions from intermediate Klowast(892)0 Klowast(1410)0 Klowast2(1430)0 and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonanceswith additional components to describe broad structures in the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S-and P-waves The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances aremeasured as are the complex amplitudes and fit fractions for all components includedin the amplitude model The results can be used in conjunction with an analysis ofB0 rarr DK+πminus decays where the neutral D meson is reconstructed in final states such asK+Kminus to measure the CKM unitarity triangle parameter γ [1 2]

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to our colleagues in the CERN accelerator departments forthe excellent performance of the LHC We thank the technical and administrative staffat the LHCb institutes We acknowledge support from CERN and from the nationalagencies CAPES CNPq FAPERJ and FINEP (Brazil) NSFC (China) CNRSIN2P3(France) BMBF DFG HGF and MPG (Germany) INFN (Italy) FOM and NWO (TheNetherlands) MNiSW and NCN (Poland) MENIFA (Romania) MinES and FANO(Russia) MinECo (Spain) SNSF and SER (Switzerland) NASU (Ukraine) STFC (UnitedKingdom) NSF (USA) The Tier1 computing centres are supported by IN2P3 (France)KIT and BMBF (Germany) INFN (Italy) NWO and SURF (The Netherlands) PIC(Spain) GridPP (United Kingdom) We are indebted to the communities behind themultiple open source software packages on which we depend We are also thankful forthe computing resources and the access to software RampD tools provided by Yandex LLC(Russia) Individual groups or members have received support from EPLANET MarieSk lodowska-Curie Actions and ERC (European Union) Conseil general de Haute-SavoieLabex ENIGMASS and OCEVU Region Auvergne (France) RFBR (Russia) XuntaGaland GENCAT (Spain) Royal Society and Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851(United Kingdom)

24

Appendices

A Correlation matrices

The statistical correlations between the complex coefficients masses and widths determinedfrom the fit to data are given in terms of real and imaginary parts and in terms ofmagnitudes and phases in Tables 11 and 12 The correlations are determined using thesame sample of simulated pseudoexperiments used to calculate the statistical uncertaintieson fit parameters

B Results for interference fit fractions

The central values of the interference fit fractions are given in Table 13 The statisti-cal experimental systematic and model uncertainties on these quantities are given inTables 14 15 and 16

25

Tab

le11

Sta

tist

ical

corr

elat

ions

bet

wee

nth

ere

al(x

)an

dim

agin

ary

(y)

par

tsof

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

x0

y 0x

1y 1

x2

y 2x

3y 3

x4

y 4x

5y 5

x7

y 7x

8y 8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

x0

100

014

002

017minus

018

015minus

017

003

039minus

037

016minus

009minus

018minus

029

007minus

037minus

019

002

004

012

y 01

00minus

006minus

008

009minus

011minus

000

014

003

003

012

013minus

012minus

024

035minus

007

009

012

001minus

004

x1

100minus

009minus

008minus

014minus

004

029minus

001

003minus

020

018minus

021minus

031minus

017minus

036minus

008minus

017minus

023

002

y 11

000

050

340

09minus

001

060minus

039

002minus

003minus

003

007minus

002minus

004minus

016minus

002

007

002

x2

100minus

013

081

009

014minus

016minus

015

021

010

013

004minus

015minus

007

001minus

025

001

y 21

000

080

280

24minus

036minus

013

008minus

004minus

001minus

004

004minus

002minus

001minus

009minus

010

x3

100

020

013minus

034minus

010

033minus

008

008minus

004minus

005minus

007minus

003minus

033minus

009

y 31

00minus

012minus

012minus

051

029minus

034minus

053

009minus

012

009minus

014minus

036

001

x4

100minus

053

032minus

010minus

020

003

002minus

027minus

017minus

006

010minus

000

y 41

000

06minus

009

040

010

014

016

011minus

005

007minus

003

x5

100minus

029minus

003

022

002

004minus

008

002

045minus

006

y 51

00minus

031minus

034

006

003

024minus

014minus

072minus

033

x7

100

046

005

010minus

011minus

001

027

017

y 71

00minus

016

036minus

001

017

032

008

x8

100minus

003

001minus

006minus

009minus

014

y 81

000

290

020

15minus

002

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

26

Tab

le12

S

tati

stic

alco

rrel

atio

ns

bet

wee

nth

em

agnit

ud

es(a

)an

dp

has

es(∆

)of

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

a0

∆0

a1

∆1

a2

∆2

a3

∆3

a4

∆4

a5

∆5

a7

∆7

a8

∆8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

a0

100minus

011minus

008

005

024

003minus

014

004

004

001

021

002

022minus

022

038minus

000minus

004minus

009minus

001

004

∆0

100minus

010

012

003

020

014

014minus

001

045minus

005

010minus

008

035minus

007

005minus

022

006

007

009

a1

100minus

035minus

025

006

032

001minus

001minus

038

004minus

022minus

006

031

002

024

007minus

018minus

020

001

∆1

100

024

015

016

000

014

038minus

018minus

013

016

026

022minus

006minus

009minus

004minus

012

005

a2

100

004

011minus

028minus

007

039minus

009

007

027

010

001

001minus

015

004minus

003minus

013

∆2

100

015

077minus

020minus

010minus

001

024

009

013

003minus

009

005

001

023minus

010

a3

100minus

006

000minus

011

016minus

030minus

012

056

001

012

002minus

007minus

027minus

004

∆3

100minus

028minus

019

015

041minus

024minus

008minus

000minus

013

004

002

041

008

a4

100

013

005minus

017

014

018minus

000

006

000

014minus

019minus

009

∆4

100minus

016

016

017

012

000minus

002minus

019minus

003

003

001

a5

100

024minus

026minus

006

011

005minus

007

001

019

039

∆5

100minus

000minus

028minus

001minus

020minus

020

015

076

027

a7

100minus

001

017minus

006

004

013minus

005minus

024

∆7

100minus

012

037

003minus

000minus

027minus

012

a8

100minus

004minus

001

004

006

015

∆8

100minus

037minus

002minus

033minus

001

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

27

Table 13 Interference fit fractions () from the nominal DP fit The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 374 18 minus00 00 00 minus24 minus02 minus26 minus50A1 07 minus00 00 00 minus11 minus03 minus06 minus11A2 51 minus32 minus00 29 15 16 19A3 48 00 minus84 01 21 02A4 74 minus03 minus10 minus15 minus04A5 193 minus00 28 00A6 231 minus00 00A7 66 minus00A8 89

Table 14 Statistical uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes areall pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASSnonresonant (A4) Klowast2 (1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8)Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 15 07 00 00 00 09 04 04 05A1 03 00 00 00 07 03 04 05A2 20 26 00 11 05 15 05A3 38 00 32 04 34 08A4 17 06 01 06 05A5 28 00 31 00A6 12 00 00A7 14 00A8 16

28

Table 15 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () Theamplitudes are all pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0 (1430)0(A3) LASS nonresonant (A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave(dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fitfractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 12 05 00 00 00 23 02 04 05A1 08 00 00 00 04 08 07 09A2 24 31 00 14 20 26 11A3 38 00 36 02 26 03A4 11 22 02 05 10A5 20 00 40 00A6 11 00 00A7 12 00A8 22

Table 16 Model uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 17 08 00 00 00 26 07 08 14A1 08 00 00 00 08 06 08 11A2 34 29 00 58 17 36 27A3 66 00 83 03 35 07A4 20 17 02 12 10A5 74 00 45 00A6 12 00 00A7 37 00A8 29

29

References

[1] T Gershon On the measurement of the unitarity triangle angle γ from B0 rarr DKlowast0

decays Phys Rev D79 (2009) 051301(R) arXiv08102706

[2] T Gershon and M Williams Prospects for the measurement of the unitaritytriangle angle γ from B0 rarr DK+πminus decays Phys Rev D80 (2009) 092002arXiv09091495

[3] N Cabibbo Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays Phys Rev Lett 10 (1963) 531

[4] M Kobayashi and T Maskawa CP -violation in the renormalizable theory of weakinteraction Progress of Theoretical Physics 49 (1973) 652

[5] M Gronau and D London How to determine all the angles of the unitarity trianglefrom B0 rarr DK0

S and B0s rarr Dφ Phys Lett B253 (1991) 483

[6] M Gronau and D Wyler On determining a weak phase from CP asymmetries incharged B decays Phys Lett B265 (1991) 172

[7] I Dunietz CP violation with self-tagging Bd modes Phys Lett B270 (1991) 75

[8] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurement of CP violation parameters inB0 rarr DKlowast0 decays Phys Rev D90 (2014) 112002 arXiv14078136

[9] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of overlapping spin-1 and spin-

3 D0Kminus resonances at mass 286 GeVc2 Phys Rev Lett 113 (2014) 162001

arXiv14077574

[10] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ decays

Phys Rev D90 (2014) 072003 arXiv14077712

[11] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observation and amplitude analysis of theBminus rarr D+Kminusπminus decay Phys Rev D91 (2015) 092002 arXiv150302995

[12] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays

arXiv150501710 submitted to Phys Rev D

[13] Belle collaboration A Kuzmin et al Study of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays Phys RevD76 (2007) 012006 arXivhep-ex0611054

[14] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of branching fractions andresonance contributions for B0 rarr D0K+πminus and search for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decaysPhys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 011803 arXivhep-ex0509036

[15] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurements of the branching fractions of

the decays B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ and B0 rarr D

0K+πminus Phys Rev D87 (2013) 112009

arXiv13046317

30

[16] Belle collaboration P Krokovny et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K0 and B0 rarr D0Klowast0

decays Phys Rev Lett 90 (2003) 141802 arXivhep-ex0212066

[17] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of B0 rarr D(lowast)0K(lowast)0 branchingfractions Phys Rev D74 (2006) 031101 arXivhep-ex0604016

[18] LHCb collaboration A A Alves Jr et al The LHCb detector at the LHC JINST 3(2008) S08005

[19] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al LHCb detector performance Int J Mod PhysA30 (2015) 1530022 arXiv14126352

[20] R Aaij et al Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator JINST 9 (2014) P09007arXiv14057808

[21] R Arink et al Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker JINST 9 (2014) P01002arXiv13113893

[22] M Adinolfi et al Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Eur PhysJ C73 (2013) 2431 arXiv12116759

[23] A A Alves Jr et al Performance of the LHCb muon system JINST 8 (2013) P02022arXiv12111346

[24] R Aaij et al The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011 JINST 8 (2013) P04022arXiv12113055

[25] V V Gligorov and M Williams Efficient reliable and fast high-level triggering usinga bonsai boosted decision tree JINST 8 (2013) P02013 arXiv12106861

[26] T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P Skands PYTHIA 64 physics and manual JHEP05 (2006) 026 arXivhep-ph0603175 T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P SkandsA brief introduction to PYTHIA 81 Comput Phys Commun 178 (2008) 852arXiv07103820

[27] I Belyaev et al Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss the LHCbsimulation framework J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032047

[28] D J Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package Nucl Instrum MethA462 (2001) 152

[29] P Golonka and Z Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo A precision tool for QED correctionsin Z and W decays Eur Phys J C45 (2006) 97 arXivhep-ph0506026

[30] Geant4 collaboration J Allison et al Geant4 developments and applications IEEETrans Nucl Sci 53 (2006) 270 Geant4 collaboration S Agostinelli et al Geant4A simulation toolkit Nucl Instrum Meth A506 (2003) 250

31

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 24: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

Table 7 Results for the complex amplitudes and their uncertainties presented (top) in terms ofreal and imaginary parts and (bottom) in terms and magnitudes and phases The three quotederrors are statistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively

Resonance Real part Imaginary part

Klowast(892)0 minus000plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 034 minus127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 006Klowast(1410)0 015plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 009 minus009plusmn 009plusmn 018plusmn 018Klowast0(1430)0 014plusmn 038plusmn 048plusmn 038 045plusmn 015plusmn 037plusmn 017LASS nonresonant minus010plusmn 024plusmn 016plusmn 042 044plusmn 014plusmn 017plusmn 023Klowast2(1430)0 minus032plusmn 009plusmn 015plusmn 023 minus047plusmn 007plusmn 014plusmn 015Dlowast0(2400)minus minus080plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 022 minus044plusmn 014plusmn 012plusmn 018Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) minus039plusmn 009plusmn 009plusmn 014 036plusmn 017plusmn 014plusmn 023Dπ P-wave (EFF) minus062plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 011 minus003plusmn 006plusmn 005plusmn 010

Resonance Magnitude Phase

Klowast(892)0 127plusmn 006plusmn 003plusmn 005 minus157plusmn 011plusmn 016plusmn 027Klowast(1410)0 018plusmn 007plusmn 010plusmn 011 minus054plusmn 021plusmn 055plusmn 104Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 009plusmn 010plusmn 014 127plusmn 095plusmn 104plusmn 081LASS nonresonant 046plusmn 014plusmn 016plusmn 029 179plusmn 065plusmn 035plusmn 069Klowast2(1430)0 057plusmn 005plusmn 004plusmn 008 minus216plusmn 019plusmn 043plusmn 043Dlowast0(2400)minus 091plusmn 007plusmn 006plusmn 017 minus264plusmn 015plusmn 014plusmn 023Dlowast2(2460)minus 100 000Dπ S-wave (dabba) 053plusmn 007plusmn 004plusmn 014 240plusmn 027plusmn 024plusmn 044Dπ P-wave (EFF) 062plusmn 006plusmn 004plusmn 011 minus309plusmn 010plusmn 007plusmn 017

Table 8 Results for the fit fractions and their uncertainties () The three quoted errors arestatistical experimental systematic and model uncertainties respectively Upper limits are givenat 90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Fit fraction Upper limitKlowast(892)0 374plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 17Klowast(1410)0 07plusmn 03plusmn 08plusmn 08 lt 32 (37)Klowast0(1430)0 51plusmn 20plusmn 24plusmn 34LASS nonresonant 48plusmn 38plusmn 38plusmn 67

LASS total 67plusmn 27plusmn 27plusmn 54Klowast2(1430)0 74plusmn 17plusmn 11plusmn 20Dlowast0(2400)minus 193plusmn 28plusmn 20plusmn 74Dlowast2(2460)minus 231plusmn 12plusmn 11plusmn 12Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 10 (11)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 66plusmn 14plusmn 12plusmn 37Dπ P-wave (EFF) 89plusmn 16plusmn 22plusmn 30

22

Table 9 Results for the product branching fractions The four quoted errors are statisticalexperimental systematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Product branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 342plusmn 013plusmn 010plusmn 016plusmn 040Klowast(1410)0 007plusmn 003plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 001 lt 029 (034)Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 018plusmn 022plusmn 031plusmn 005LASS nonresonant 044plusmn 034plusmn 034plusmn 061plusmn 005

LASS total 061plusmn 025plusmn 025plusmn 049plusmn 007Klowast2(1430)0 068plusmn 015plusmn 010plusmn 018plusmn 008Dlowast0(2400)minus 177plusmn 026plusmn 019plusmn 067plusmn 020Dlowast2(2460)minus 212plusmn 010plusmn 011plusmn 011plusmn 025Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 010 (011)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 060plusmn 013plusmn 011plusmn 034plusmn 007Dπ P-wave (EFF) 081plusmn 015plusmn 020plusmn 027plusmn 009

Table 10 Results for the branching fractions The four quoted errors are statistical experimentalsystematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at 90 (95 )confidence level

Resonance Branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 513plusmn 020plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 060Klowast(1410)0 159plusmn 068plusmn 181plusmn 159plusmn 036 lt 67 (78)Klowast0(1430)0 071plusmn 027plusmn 033plusmn 047plusmn 008LASS nonresonant 066plusmn 051plusmn 051plusmn 092plusmn 008

LASS total 092plusmn 038plusmn 038plusmn 074plusmn 011Klowast2(1430)0 204plusmn 045plusmn 030plusmn 054plusmn 025

The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus states are found to be

m(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (2360plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 28) MeV

Γ(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (255plusmn 26plusmn 20plusmn 47) MeV

m(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (24656plusmn 18plusmn 05plusmn 12) MeV

Γ(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (460plusmn 34plusmn 14plusmn 29) MeV

where the three uncertainties are statistical experimental systematic and model systematicrespectively These are consistent with though less precise than recent results from a DPanalysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] They also show good agreement with and havesimilar precision to earlier measurements of these quantities [1337]

In summary the first amplitude analysis of B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays has been presentedusing a data sample corresponding to 30 fbminus1 of pp collision data collected by the LHCbexperiment A good description of the data is obtained with a model containing contri-

23

butions from intermediate Klowast(892)0 Klowast(1410)0 Klowast2(1430)0 and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonanceswith additional components to describe broad structures in the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S-and P-waves The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances aremeasured as are the complex amplitudes and fit fractions for all components includedin the amplitude model The results can be used in conjunction with an analysis ofB0 rarr DK+πminus decays where the neutral D meson is reconstructed in final states such asK+Kminus to measure the CKM unitarity triangle parameter γ [1 2]

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to our colleagues in the CERN accelerator departments forthe excellent performance of the LHC We thank the technical and administrative staffat the LHCb institutes We acknowledge support from CERN and from the nationalagencies CAPES CNPq FAPERJ and FINEP (Brazil) NSFC (China) CNRSIN2P3(France) BMBF DFG HGF and MPG (Germany) INFN (Italy) FOM and NWO (TheNetherlands) MNiSW and NCN (Poland) MENIFA (Romania) MinES and FANO(Russia) MinECo (Spain) SNSF and SER (Switzerland) NASU (Ukraine) STFC (UnitedKingdom) NSF (USA) The Tier1 computing centres are supported by IN2P3 (France)KIT and BMBF (Germany) INFN (Italy) NWO and SURF (The Netherlands) PIC(Spain) GridPP (United Kingdom) We are indebted to the communities behind themultiple open source software packages on which we depend We are also thankful forthe computing resources and the access to software RampD tools provided by Yandex LLC(Russia) Individual groups or members have received support from EPLANET MarieSk lodowska-Curie Actions and ERC (European Union) Conseil general de Haute-SavoieLabex ENIGMASS and OCEVU Region Auvergne (France) RFBR (Russia) XuntaGaland GENCAT (Spain) Royal Society and Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851(United Kingdom)

24

Appendices

A Correlation matrices

The statistical correlations between the complex coefficients masses and widths determinedfrom the fit to data are given in terms of real and imaginary parts and in terms ofmagnitudes and phases in Tables 11 and 12 The correlations are determined using thesame sample of simulated pseudoexperiments used to calculate the statistical uncertaintieson fit parameters

B Results for interference fit fractions

The central values of the interference fit fractions are given in Table 13 The statisti-cal experimental systematic and model uncertainties on these quantities are given inTables 14 15 and 16

25

Tab

le11

Sta

tist

ical

corr

elat

ions

bet

wee

nth

ere

al(x

)an

dim

agin

ary

(y)

par

tsof

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

x0

y 0x

1y 1

x2

y 2x

3y 3

x4

y 4x

5y 5

x7

y 7x

8y 8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

x0

100

014

002

017minus

018

015minus

017

003

039minus

037

016minus

009minus

018minus

029

007minus

037minus

019

002

004

012

y 01

00minus

006minus

008

009minus

011minus

000

014

003

003

012

013minus

012minus

024

035minus

007

009

012

001minus

004

x1

100minus

009minus

008minus

014minus

004

029minus

001

003minus

020

018minus

021minus

031minus

017minus

036minus

008minus

017minus

023

002

y 11

000

050

340

09minus

001

060minus

039

002minus

003minus

003

007minus

002minus

004minus

016minus

002

007

002

x2

100minus

013

081

009

014minus

016minus

015

021

010

013

004minus

015minus

007

001minus

025

001

y 21

000

080

280

24minus

036minus

013

008minus

004minus

001minus

004

004minus

002minus

001minus

009minus

010

x3

100

020

013minus

034minus

010

033minus

008

008minus

004minus

005minus

007minus

003minus

033minus

009

y 31

00minus

012minus

012minus

051

029minus

034minus

053

009minus

012

009minus

014minus

036

001

x4

100minus

053

032minus

010minus

020

003

002minus

027minus

017minus

006

010minus

000

y 41

000

06minus

009

040

010

014

016

011minus

005

007minus

003

x5

100minus

029minus

003

022

002

004minus

008

002

045minus

006

y 51

00minus

031minus

034

006

003

024minus

014minus

072minus

033

x7

100

046

005

010minus

011minus

001

027

017

y 71

00minus

016

036minus

001

017

032

008

x8

100minus

003

001minus

006minus

009minus

014

y 81

000

290

020

15minus

002

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

26

Tab

le12

S

tati

stic

alco

rrel

atio

ns

bet

wee

nth

em

agnit

ud

es(a

)an

dp

has

es(∆

)of

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

a0

∆0

a1

∆1

a2

∆2

a3

∆3

a4

∆4

a5

∆5

a7

∆7

a8

∆8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

a0

100minus

011minus

008

005

024

003minus

014

004

004

001

021

002

022minus

022

038minus

000minus

004minus

009minus

001

004

∆0

100minus

010

012

003

020

014

014minus

001

045minus

005

010minus

008

035minus

007

005minus

022

006

007

009

a1

100minus

035minus

025

006

032

001minus

001minus

038

004minus

022minus

006

031

002

024

007minus

018minus

020

001

∆1

100

024

015

016

000

014

038minus

018minus

013

016

026

022minus

006minus

009minus

004minus

012

005

a2

100

004

011minus

028minus

007

039minus

009

007

027

010

001

001minus

015

004minus

003minus

013

∆2

100

015

077minus

020minus

010minus

001

024

009

013

003minus

009

005

001

023minus

010

a3

100minus

006

000minus

011

016minus

030minus

012

056

001

012

002minus

007minus

027minus

004

∆3

100minus

028minus

019

015

041minus

024minus

008minus

000minus

013

004

002

041

008

a4

100

013

005minus

017

014

018minus

000

006

000

014minus

019minus

009

∆4

100minus

016

016

017

012

000minus

002minus

019minus

003

003

001

a5

100

024minus

026minus

006

011

005minus

007

001

019

039

∆5

100minus

000minus

028minus

001minus

020minus

020

015

076

027

a7

100minus

001

017minus

006

004

013minus

005minus

024

∆7

100minus

012

037

003minus

000minus

027minus

012

a8

100minus

004minus

001

004

006

015

∆8

100minus

037minus

002minus

033minus

001

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

27

Table 13 Interference fit fractions () from the nominal DP fit The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 374 18 minus00 00 00 minus24 minus02 minus26 minus50A1 07 minus00 00 00 minus11 minus03 minus06 minus11A2 51 minus32 minus00 29 15 16 19A3 48 00 minus84 01 21 02A4 74 minus03 minus10 minus15 minus04A5 193 minus00 28 00A6 231 minus00 00A7 66 minus00A8 89

Table 14 Statistical uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes areall pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASSnonresonant (A4) Klowast2 (1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8)Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 15 07 00 00 00 09 04 04 05A1 03 00 00 00 07 03 04 05A2 20 26 00 11 05 15 05A3 38 00 32 04 34 08A4 17 06 01 06 05A5 28 00 31 00A6 12 00 00A7 14 00A8 16

28

Table 15 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () Theamplitudes are all pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0 (1430)0(A3) LASS nonresonant (A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave(dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fitfractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 12 05 00 00 00 23 02 04 05A1 08 00 00 00 04 08 07 09A2 24 31 00 14 20 26 11A3 38 00 36 02 26 03A4 11 22 02 05 10A5 20 00 40 00A6 11 00 00A7 12 00A8 22

Table 16 Model uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 17 08 00 00 00 26 07 08 14A1 08 00 00 00 08 06 08 11A2 34 29 00 58 17 36 27A3 66 00 83 03 35 07A4 20 17 02 12 10A5 74 00 45 00A6 12 00 00A7 37 00A8 29

29

References

[1] T Gershon On the measurement of the unitarity triangle angle γ from B0 rarr DKlowast0

decays Phys Rev D79 (2009) 051301(R) arXiv08102706

[2] T Gershon and M Williams Prospects for the measurement of the unitaritytriangle angle γ from B0 rarr DK+πminus decays Phys Rev D80 (2009) 092002arXiv09091495

[3] N Cabibbo Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays Phys Rev Lett 10 (1963) 531

[4] M Kobayashi and T Maskawa CP -violation in the renormalizable theory of weakinteraction Progress of Theoretical Physics 49 (1973) 652

[5] M Gronau and D London How to determine all the angles of the unitarity trianglefrom B0 rarr DK0

S and B0s rarr Dφ Phys Lett B253 (1991) 483

[6] M Gronau and D Wyler On determining a weak phase from CP asymmetries incharged B decays Phys Lett B265 (1991) 172

[7] I Dunietz CP violation with self-tagging Bd modes Phys Lett B270 (1991) 75

[8] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurement of CP violation parameters inB0 rarr DKlowast0 decays Phys Rev D90 (2014) 112002 arXiv14078136

[9] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of overlapping spin-1 and spin-

3 D0Kminus resonances at mass 286 GeVc2 Phys Rev Lett 113 (2014) 162001

arXiv14077574

[10] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ decays

Phys Rev D90 (2014) 072003 arXiv14077712

[11] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observation and amplitude analysis of theBminus rarr D+Kminusπminus decay Phys Rev D91 (2015) 092002 arXiv150302995

[12] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays

arXiv150501710 submitted to Phys Rev D

[13] Belle collaboration A Kuzmin et al Study of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays Phys RevD76 (2007) 012006 arXivhep-ex0611054

[14] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of branching fractions andresonance contributions for B0 rarr D0K+πminus and search for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decaysPhys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 011803 arXivhep-ex0509036

[15] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurements of the branching fractions of

the decays B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ and B0 rarr D

0K+πminus Phys Rev D87 (2013) 112009

arXiv13046317

30

[16] Belle collaboration P Krokovny et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K0 and B0 rarr D0Klowast0

decays Phys Rev Lett 90 (2003) 141802 arXivhep-ex0212066

[17] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of B0 rarr D(lowast)0K(lowast)0 branchingfractions Phys Rev D74 (2006) 031101 arXivhep-ex0604016

[18] LHCb collaboration A A Alves Jr et al The LHCb detector at the LHC JINST 3(2008) S08005

[19] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al LHCb detector performance Int J Mod PhysA30 (2015) 1530022 arXiv14126352

[20] R Aaij et al Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator JINST 9 (2014) P09007arXiv14057808

[21] R Arink et al Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker JINST 9 (2014) P01002arXiv13113893

[22] M Adinolfi et al Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Eur PhysJ C73 (2013) 2431 arXiv12116759

[23] A A Alves Jr et al Performance of the LHCb muon system JINST 8 (2013) P02022arXiv12111346

[24] R Aaij et al The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011 JINST 8 (2013) P04022arXiv12113055

[25] V V Gligorov and M Williams Efficient reliable and fast high-level triggering usinga bonsai boosted decision tree JINST 8 (2013) P02013 arXiv12106861

[26] T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P Skands PYTHIA 64 physics and manual JHEP05 (2006) 026 arXivhep-ph0603175 T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P SkandsA brief introduction to PYTHIA 81 Comput Phys Commun 178 (2008) 852arXiv07103820

[27] I Belyaev et al Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss the LHCbsimulation framework J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032047

[28] D J Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package Nucl Instrum MethA462 (2001) 152

[29] P Golonka and Z Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo A precision tool for QED correctionsin Z and W decays Eur Phys J C45 (2006) 97 arXivhep-ph0506026

[30] Geant4 collaboration J Allison et al Geant4 developments and applications IEEETrans Nucl Sci 53 (2006) 270 Geant4 collaboration S Agostinelli et al Geant4A simulation toolkit Nucl Instrum Meth A506 (2003) 250

31

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 25: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

Table 9 Results for the product branching fractions The four quoted errors are statisticalexperimental systematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at90 (95 ) confidence level

Resonance Product branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 342plusmn 013plusmn 010plusmn 016plusmn 040Klowast(1410)0 007plusmn 003plusmn 008plusmn 007plusmn 001 lt 029 (034)Klowast0(1430)0 047plusmn 018plusmn 022plusmn 031plusmn 005LASS nonresonant 044plusmn 034plusmn 034plusmn 061plusmn 005

LASS total 061plusmn 025plusmn 025plusmn 049plusmn 007Klowast2(1430)0 068plusmn 015plusmn 010plusmn 018plusmn 008Dlowast0(2400)minus 177plusmn 026plusmn 019plusmn 067plusmn 020Dlowast2(2460)minus 212plusmn 010plusmn 011plusmn 011plusmn 025Dlowast3(2760)minus lt 010 (011)Dπ S-wave (dabba) 060plusmn 013plusmn 011plusmn 034plusmn 007Dπ P-wave (EFF) 081plusmn 015plusmn 020plusmn 027plusmn 009

Table 10 Results for the branching fractions The four quoted errors are statistical experimentalsystematic model and PDG uncertainties respectively Upper limits are given at 90 (95 )confidence level

Resonance Branching fraction (10minus5) Upper limit (10minus5)Klowast(892)0 513plusmn 020plusmn 015plusmn 024plusmn 060Klowast(1410)0 159plusmn 068plusmn 181plusmn 159plusmn 036 lt 67 (78)Klowast0(1430)0 071plusmn 027plusmn 033plusmn 047plusmn 008LASS nonresonant 066plusmn 051plusmn 051plusmn 092plusmn 008

LASS total 092plusmn 038plusmn 038plusmn 074plusmn 011Klowast2(1430)0 204plusmn 045plusmn 030plusmn 054plusmn 025

The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus states are found to be

m(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (2360plusmn 15plusmn 12plusmn 28) MeV

Γ(Dlowast0(2400)minus) = (255plusmn 26plusmn 20plusmn 47) MeV

m(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (24656plusmn 18plusmn 05plusmn 12) MeV

Γ(Dlowast2(2460)minus) = (460plusmn 34plusmn 14plusmn 29) MeV

where the three uncertainties are statistical experimental systematic and model systematicrespectively These are consistent with though less precise than recent results from a DPanalysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays [12] They also show good agreement with and havesimilar precision to earlier measurements of these quantities [1337]

In summary the first amplitude analysis of B0 rarr D0K+πminus decays has been presentedusing a data sample corresponding to 30 fbminus1 of pp collision data collected by the LHCbexperiment A good description of the data is obtained with a model containing contri-

23

butions from intermediate Klowast(892)0 Klowast(1410)0 Klowast2(1430)0 and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonanceswith additional components to describe broad structures in the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S-and P-waves The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances aremeasured as are the complex amplitudes and fit fractions for all components includedin the amplitude model The results can be used in conjunction with an analysis ofB0 rarr DK+πminus decays where the neutral D meson is reconstructed in final states such asK+Kminus to measure the CKM unitarity triangle parameter γ [1 2]

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to our colleagues in the CERN accelerator departments forthe excellent performance of the LHC We thank the technical and administrative staffat the LHCb institutes We acknowledge support from CERN and from the nationalagencies CAPES CNPq FAPERJ and FINEP (Brazil) NSFC (China) CNRSIN2P3(France) BMBF DFG HGF and MPG (Germany) INFN (Italy) FOM and NWO (TheNetherlands) MNiSW and NCN (Poland) MENIFA (Romania) MinES and FANO(Russia) MinECo (Spain) SNSF and SER (Switzerland) NASU (Ukraine) STFC (UnitedKingdom) NSF (USA) The Tier1 computing centres are supported by IN2P3 (France)KIT and BMBF (Germany) INFN (Italy) NWO and SURF (The Netherlands) PIC(Spain) GridPP (United Kingdom) We are indebted to the communities behind themultiple open source software packages on which we depend We are also thankful forthe computing resources and the access to software RampD tools provided by Yandex LLC(Russia) Individual groups or members have received support from EPLANET MarieSk lodowska-Curie Actions and ERC (European Union) Conseil general de Haute-SavoieLabex ENIGMASS and OCEVU Region Auvergne (France) RFBR (Russia) XuntaGaland GENCAT (Spain) Royal Society and Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851(United Kingdom)

24

Appendices

A Correlation matrices

The statistical correlations between the complex coefficients masses and widths determinedfrom the fit to data are given in terms of real and imaginary parts and in terms ofmagnitudes and phases in Tables 11 and 12 The correlations are determined using thesame sample of simulated pseudoexperiments used to calculate the statistical uncertaintieson fit parameters

B Results for interference fit fractions

The central values of the interference fit fractions are given in Table 13 The statisti-cal experimental systematic and model uncertainties on these quantities are given inTables 14 15 and 16

25

Tab

le11

Sta

tist

ical

corr

elat

ions

bet

wee

nth

ere

al(x

)an

dim

agin

ary

(y)

par

tsof

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

x0

y 0x

1y 1

x2

y 2x

3y 3

x4

y 4x

5y 5

x7

y 7x

8y 8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

x0

100

014

002

017minus

018

015minus

017

003

039minus

037

016minus

009minus

018minus

029

007minus

037minus

019

002

004

012

y 01

00minus

006minus

008

009minus

011minus

000

014

003

003

012

013minus

012minus

024

035minus

007

009

012

001minus

004

x1

100minus

009minus

008minus

014minus

004

029minus

001

003minus

020

018minus

021minus

031minus

017minus

036minus

008minus

017minus

023

002

y 11

000

050

340

09minus

001

060minus

039

002minus

003minus

003

007minus

002minus

004minus

016minus

002

007

002

x2

100minus

013

081

009

014minus

016minus

015

021

010

013

004minus

015minus

007

001minus

025

001

y 21

000

080

280

24minus

036minus

013

008minus

004minus

001minus

004

004minus

002minus

001minus

009minus

010

x3

100

020

013minus

034minus

010

033minus

008

008minus

004minus

005minus

007minus

003minus

033minus

009

y 31

00minus

012minus

012minus

051

029minus

034minus

053

009minus

012

009minus

014minus

036

001

x4

100minus

053

032minus

010minus

020

003

002minus

027minus

017minus

006

010minus

000

y 41

000

06minus

009

040

010

014

016

011minus

005

007minus

003

x5

100minus

029minus

003

022

002

004minus

008

002

045minus

006

y 51

00minus

031minus

034

006

003

024minus

014minus

072minus

033

x7

100

046

005

010minus

011minus

001

027

017

y 71

00minus

016

036minus

001

017

032

008

x8

100minus

003

001minus

006minus

009minus

014

y 81

000

290

020

15minus

002

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

26

Tab

le12

S

tati

stic

alco

rrel

atio

ns

bet

wee

nth

em

agnit

ud

es(a

)an

dp

has

es(∆

)of

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

a0

∆0

a1

∆1

a2

∆2

a3

∆3

a4

∆4

a5

∆5

a7

∆7

a8

∆8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

a0

100minus

011minus

008

005

024

003minus

014

004

004

001

021

002

022minus

022

038minus

000minus

004minus

009minus

001

004

∆0

100minus

010

012

003

020

014

014minus

001

045minus

005

010minus

008

035minus

007

005minus

022

006

007

009

a1

100minus

035minus

025

006

032

001minus

001minus

038

004minus

022minus

006

031

002

024

007minus

018minus

020

001

∆1

100

024

015

016

000

014

038minus

018minus

013

016

026

022minus

006minus

009minus

004minus

012

005

a2

100

004

011minus

028minus

007

039minus

009

007

027

010

001

001minus

015

004minus

003minus

013

∆2

100

015

077minus

020minus

010minus

001

024

009

013

003minus

009

005

001

023minus

010

a3

100minus

006

000minus

011

016minus

030minus

012

056

001

012

002minus

007minus

027minus

004

∆3

100minus

028minus

019

015

041minus

024minus

008minus

000minus

013

004

002

041

008

a4

100

013

005minus

017

014

018minus

000

006

000

014minus

019minus

009

∆4

100minus

016

016

017

012

000minus

002minus

019minus

003

003

001

a5

100

024minus

026minus

006

011

005minus

007

001

019

039

∆5

100minus

000minus

028minus

001minus

020minus

020

015

076

027

a7

100minus

001

017minus

006

004

013minus

005minus

024

∆7

100minus

012

037

003minus

000minus

027minus

012

a8

100minus

004minus

001

004

006

015

∆8

100minus

037minus

002minus

033minus

001

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

27

Table 13 Interference fit fractions () from the nominal DP fit The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 374 18 minus00 00 00 minus24 minus02 minus26 minus50A1 07 minus00 00 00 minus11 minus03 minus06 minus11A2 51 minus32 minus00 29 15 16 19A3 48 00 minus84 01 21 02A4 74 minus03 minus10 minus15 minus04A5 193 minus00 28 00A6 231 minus00 00A7 66 minus00A8 89

Table 14 Statistical uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes areall pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASSnonresonant (A4) Klowast2 (1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8)Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 15 07 00 00 00 09 04 04 05A1 03 00 00 00 07 03 04 05A2 20 26 00 11 05 15 05A3 38 00 32 04 34 08A4 17 06 01 06 05A5 28 00 31 00A6 12 00 00A7 14 00A8 16

28

Table 15 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () Theamplitudes are all pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0 (1430)0(A3) LASS nonresonant (A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave(dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fitfractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 12 05 00 00 00 23 02 04 05A1 08 00 00 00 04 08 07 09A2 24 31 00 14 20 26 11A3 38 00 36 02 26 03A4 11 22 02 05 10A5 20 00 40 00A6 11 00 00A7 12 00A8 22

Table 16 Model uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 17 08 00 00 00 26 07 08 14A1 08 00 00 00 08 06 08 11A2 34 29 00 58 17 36 27A3 66 00 83 03 35 07A4 20 17 02 12 10A5 74 00 45 00A6 12 00 00A7 37 00A8 29

29

References

[1] T Gershon On the measurement of the unitarity triangle angle γ from B0 rarr DKlowast0

decays Phys Rev D79 (2009) 051301(R) arXiv08102706

[2] T Gershon and M Williams Prospects for the measurement of the unitaritytriangle angle γ from B0 rarr DK+πminus decays Phys Rev D80 (2009) 092002arXiv09091495

[3] N Cabibbo Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays Phys Rev Lett 10 (1963) 531

[4] M Kobayashi and T Maskawa CP -violation in the renormalizable theory of weakinteraction Progress of Theoretical Physics 49 (1973) 652

[5] M Gronau and D London How to determine all the angles of the unitarity trianglefrom B0 rarr DK0

S and B0s rarr Dφ Phys Lett B253 (1991) 483

[6] M Gronau and D Wyler On determining a weak phase from CP asymmetries incharged B decays Phys Lett B265 (1991) 172

[7] I Dunietz CP violation with self-tagging Bd modes Phys Lett B270 (1991) 75

[8] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurement of CP violation parameters inB0 rarr DKlowast0 decays Phys Rev D90 (2014) 112002 arXiv14078136

[9] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of overlapping spin-1 and spin-

3 D0Kminus resonances at mass 286 GeVc2 Phys Rev Lett 113 (2014) 162001

arXiv14077574

[10] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ decays

Phys Rev D90 (2014) 072003 arXiv14077712

[11] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observation and amplitude analysis of theBminus rarr D+Kminusπminus decay Phys Rev D91 (2015) 092002 arXiv150302995

[12] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays

arXiv150501710 submitted to Phys Rev D

[13] Belle collaboration A Kuzmin et al Study of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays Phys RevD76 (2007) 012006 arXivhep-ex0611054

[14] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of branching fractions andresonance contributions for B0 rarr D0K+πminus and search for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decaysPhys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 011803 arXivhep-ex0509036

[15] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurements of the branching fractions of

the decays B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ and B0 rarr D

0K+πminus Phys Rev D87 (2013) 112009

arXiv13046317

30

[16] Belle collaboration P Krokovny et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K0 and B0 rarr D0Klowast0

decays Phys Rev Lett 90 (2003) 141802 arXivhep-ex0212066

[17] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of B0 rarr D(lowast)0K(lowast)0 branchingfractions Phys Rev D74 (2006) 031101 arXivhep-ex0604016

[18] LHCb collaboration A A Alves Jr et al The LHCb detector at the LHC JINST 3(2008) S08005

[19] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al LHCb detector performance Int J Mod PhysA30 (2015) 1530022 arXiv14126352

[20] R Aaij et al Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator JINST 9 (2014) P09007arXiv14057808

[21] R Arink et al Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker JINST 9 (2014) P01002arXiv13113893

[22] M Adinolfi et al Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Eur PhysJ C73 (2013) 2431 arXiv12116759

[23] A A Alves Jr et al Performance of the LHCb muon system JINST 8 (2013) P02022arXiv12111346

[24] R Aaij et al The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011 JINST 8 (2013) P04022arXiv12113055

[25] V V Gligorov and M Williams Efficient reliable and fast high-level triggering usinga bonsai boosted decision tree JINST 8 (2013) P02013 arXiv12106861

[26] T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P Skands PYTHIA 64 physics and manual JHEP05 (2006) 026 arXivhep-ph0603175 T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P SkandsA brief introduction to PYTHIA 81 Comput Phys Commun 178 (2008) 852arXiv07103820

[27] I Belyaev et al Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss the LHCbsimulation framework J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032047

[28] D J Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package Nucl Instrum MethA462 (2001) 152

[29] P Golonka and Z Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo A precision tool for QED correctionsin Z and W decays Eur Phys J C45 (2006) 97 arXivhep-ph0506026

[30] Geant4 collaboration J Allison et al Geant4 developments and applications IEEETrans Nucl Sci 53 (2006) 270 Geant4 collaboration S Agostinelli et al Geant4A simulation toolkit Nucl Instrum Meth A506 (2003) 250

31

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 26: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

butions from intermediate Klowast(892)0 Klowast(1410)0 Klowast2(1430)0 and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonanceswith additional components to describe broad structures in the Kπ S-wave and the Dπ S-and P-waves The masses and widths of the Dlowast0(2400)minus and Dlowast2(2460)minus resonances aremeasured as are the complex amplitudes and fit fractions for all components includedin the amplitude model The results can be used in conjunction with an analysis ofB0 rarr DK+πminus decays where the neutral D meson is reconstructed in final states such asK+Kminus to measure the CKM unitarity triangle parameter γ [1 2]

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to our colleagues in the CERN accelerator departments forthe excellent performance of the LHC We thank the technical and administrative staffat the LHCb institutes We acknowledge support from CERN and from the nationalagencies CAPES CNPq FAPERJ and FINEP (Brazil) NSFC (China) CNRSIN2P3(France) BMBF DFG HGF and MPG (Germany) INFN (Italy) FOM and NWO (TheNetherlands) MNiSW and NCN (Poland) MENIFA (Romania) MinES and FANO(Russia) MinECo (Spain) SNSF and SER (Switzerland) NASU (Ukraine) STFC (UnitedKingdom) NSF (USA) The Tier1 computing centres are supported by IN2P3 (France)KIT and BMBF (Germany) INFN (Italy) NWO and SURF (The Netherlands) PIC(Spain) GridPP (United Kingdom) We are indebted to the communities behind themultiple open source software packages on which we depend We are also thankful forthe computing resources and the access to software RampD tools provided by Yandex LLC(Russia) Individual groups or members have received support from EPLANET MarieSk lodowska-Curie Actions and ERC (European Union) Conseil general de Haute-SavoieLabex ENIGMASS and OCEVU Region Auvergne (France) RFBR (Russia) XuntaGaland GENCAT (Spain) Royal Society and Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851(United Kingdom)

24

Appendices

A Correlation matrices

The statistical correlations between the complex coefficients masses and widths determinedfrom the fit to data are given in terms of real and imaginary parts and in terms ofmagnitudes and phases in Tables 11 and 12 The correlations are determined using thesame sample of simulated pseudoexperiments used to calculate the statistical uncertaintieson fit parameters

B Results for interference fit fractions

The central values of the interference fit fractions are given in Table 13 The statisti-cal experimental systematic and model uncertainties on these quantities are given inTables 14 15 and 16

25

Tab

le11

Sta

tist

ical

corr

elat

ions

bet

wee

nth

ere

al(x

)an

dim

agin

ary

(y)

par

tsof

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

x0

y 0x

1y 1

x2

y 2x

3y 3

x4

y 4x

5y 5

x7

y 7x

8y 8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

x0

100

014

002

017minus

018

015minus

017

003

039minus

037

016minus

009minus

018minus

029

007minus

037minus

019

002

004

012

y 01

00minus

006minus

008

009minus

011minus

000

014

003

003

012

013minus

012minus

024

035minus

007

009

012

001minus

004

x1

100minus

009minus

008minus

014minus

004

029minus

001

003minus

020

018minus

021minus

031minus

017minus

036minus

008minus

017minus

023

002

y 11

000

050

340

09minus

001

060minus

039

002minus

003minus

003

007minus

002minus

004minus

016minus

002

007

002

x2

100minus

013

081

009

014minus

016minus

015

021

010

013

004minus

015minus

007

001minus

025

001

y 21

000

080

280

24minus

036minus

013

008minus

004minus

001minus

004

004minus

002minus

001minus

009minus

010

x3

100

020

013minus

034minus

010

033minus

008

008minus

004minus

005minus

007minus

003minus

033minus

009

y 31

00minus

012minus

012minus

051

029minus

034minus

053

009minus

012

009minus

014minus

036

001

x4

100minus

053

032minus

010minus

020

003

002minus

027minus

017minus

006

010minus

000

y 41

000

06minus

009

040

010

014

016

011minus

005

007minus

003

x5

100minus

029minus

003

022

002

004minus

008

002

045minus

006

y 51

00minus

031minus

034

006

003

024minus

014minus

072minus

033

x7

100

046

005

010minus

011minus

001

027

017

y 71

00minus

016

036minus

001

017

032

008

x8

100minus

003

001minus

006minus

009minus

014

y 81

000

290

020

15minus

002

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

26

Tab

le12

S

tati

stic

alco

rrel

atio

ns

bet

wee

nth

em

agnit

ud

es(a

)an

dp

has

es(∆

)of

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

a0

∆0

a1

∆1

a2

∆2

a3

∆3

a4

∆4

a5

∆5

a7

∆7

a8

∆8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

a0

100minus

011minus

008

005

024

003minus

014

004

004

001

021

002

022minus

022

038minus

000minus

004minus

009minus

001

004

∆0

100minus

010

012

003

020

014

014minus

001

045minus

005

010minus

008

035minus

007

005minus

022

006

007

009

a1

100minus

035minus

025

006

032

001minus

001minus

038

004minus

022minus

006

031

002

024

007minus

018minus

020

001

∆1

100

024

015

016

000

014

038minus

018minus

013

016

026

022minus

006minus

009minus

004minus

012

005

a2

100

004

011minus

028minus

007

039minus

009

007

027

010

001

001minus

015

004minus

003minus

013

∆2

100

015

077minus

020minus

010minus

001

024

009

013

003minus

009

005

001

023minus

010

a3

100minus

006

000minus

011

016minus

030minus

012

056

001

012

002minus

007minus

027minus

004

∆3

100minus

028minus

019

015

041minus

024minus

008minus

000minus

013

004

002

041

008

a4

100

013

005minus

017

014

018minus

000

006

000

014minus

019minus

009

∆4

100minus

016

016

017

012

000minus

002minus

019minus

003

003

001

a5

100

024minus

026minus

006

011

005minus

007

001

019

039

∆5

100minus

000minus

028minus

001minus

020minus

020

015

076

027

a7

100minus

001

017minus

006

004

013minus

005minus

024

∆7

100minus

012

037

003minus

000minus

027minus

012

a8

100minus

004minus

001

004

006

015

∆8

100minus

037minus

002minus

033minus

001

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

27

Table 13 Interference fit fractions () from the nominal DP fit The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 374 18 minus00 00 00 minus24 minus02 minus26 minus50A1 07 minus00 00 00 minus11 minus03 minus06 minus11A2 51 minus32 minus00 29 15 16 19A3 48 00 minus84 01 21 02A4 74 minus03 minus10 minus15 minus04A5 193 minus00 28 00A6 231 minus00 00A7 66 minus00A8 89

Table 14 Statistical uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes areall pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASSnonresonant (A4) Klowast2 (1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8)Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 15 07 00 00 00 09 04 04 05A1 03 00 00 00 07 03 04 05A2 20 26 00 11 05 15 05A3 38 00 32 04 34 08A4 17 06 01 06 05A5 28 00 31 00A6 12 00 00A7 14 00A8 16

28

Table 15 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () Theamplitudes are all pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0 (1430)0(A3) LASS nonresonant (A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave(dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fitfractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 12 05 00 00 00 23 02 04 05A1 08 00 00 00 04 08 07 09A2 24 31 00 14 20 26 11A3 38 00 36 02 26 03A4 11 22 02 05 10A5 20 00 40 00A6 11 00 00A7 12 00A8 22

Table 16 Model uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 17 08 00 00 00 26 07 08 14A1 08 00 00 00 08 06 08 11A2 34 29 00 58 17 36 27A3 66 00 83 03 35 07A4 20 17 02 12 10A5 74 00 45 00A6 12 00 00A7 37 00A8 29

29

References

[1] T Gershon On the measurement of the unitarity triangle angle γ from B0 rarr DKlowast0

decays Phys Rev D79 (2009) 051301(R) arXiv08102706

[2] T Gershon and M Williams Prospects for the measurement of the unitaritytriangle angle γ from B0 rarr DK+πminus decays Phys Rev D80 (2009) 092002arXiv09091495

[3] N Cabibbo Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays Phys Rev Lett 10 (1963) 531

[4] M Kobayashi and T Maskawa CP -violation in the renormalizable theory of weakinteraction Progress of Theoretical Physics 49 (1973) 652

[5] M Gronau and D London How to determine all the angles of the unitarity trianglefrom B0 rarr DK0

S and B0s rarr Dφ Phys Lett B253 (1991) 483

[6] M Gronau and D Wyler On determining a weak phase from CP asymmetries incharged B decays Phys Lett B265 (1991) 172

[7] I Dunietz CP violation with self-tagging Bd modes Phys Lett B270 (1991) 75

[8] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurement of CP violation parameters inB0 rarr DKlowast0 decays Phys Rev D90 (2014) 112002 arXiv14078136

[9] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of overlapping spin-1 and spin-

3 D0Kminus resonances at mass 286 GeVc2 Phys Rev Lett 113 (2014) 162001

arXiv14077574

[10] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ decays

Phys Rev D90 (2014) 072003 arXiv14077712

[11] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observation and amplitude analysis of theBminus rarr D+Kminusπminus decay Phys Rev D91 (2015) 092002 arXiv150302995

[12] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays

arXiv150501710 submitted to Phys Rev D

[13] Belle collaboration A Kuzmin et al Study of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays Phys RevD76 (2007) 012006 arXivhep-ex0611054

[14] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of branching fractions andresonance contributions for B0 rarr D0K+πminus and search for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decaysPhys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 011803 arXivhep-ex0509036

[15] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurements of the branching fractions of

the decays B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ and B0 rarr D

0K+πminus Phys Rev D87 (2013) 112009

arXiv13046317

30

[16] Belle collaboration P Krokovny et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K0 and B0 rarr D0Klowast0

decays Phys Rev Lett 90 (2003) 141802 arXivhep-ex0212066

[17] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of B0 rarr D(lowast)0K(lowast)0 branchingfractions Phys Rev D74 (2006) 031101 arXivhep-ex0604016

[18] LHCb collaboration A A Alves Jr et al The LHCb detector at the LHC JINST 3(2008) S08005

[19] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al LHCb detector performance Int J Mod PhysA30 (2015) 1530022 arXiv14126352

[20] R Aaij et al Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator JINST 9 (2014) P09007arXiv14057808

[21] R Arink et al Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker JINST 9 (2014) P01002arXiv13113893

[22] M Adinolfi et al Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Eur PhysJ C73 (2013) 2431 arXiv12116759

[23] A A Alves Jr et al Performance of the LHCb muon system JINST 8 (2013) P02022arXiv12111346

[24] R Aaij et al The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011 JINST 8 (2013) P04022arXiv12113055

[25] V V Gligorov and M Williams Efficient reliable and fast high-level triggering usinga bonsai boosted decision tree JINST 8 (2013) P02013 arXiv12106861

[26] T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P Skands PYTHIA 64 physics and manual JHEP05 (2006) 026 arXivhep-ph0603175 T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P SkandsA brief introduction to PYTHIA 81 Comput Phys Commun 178 (2008) 852arXiv07103820

[27] I Belyaev et al Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss the LHCbsimulation framework J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032047

[28] D J Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package Nucl Instrum MethA462 (2001) 152

[29] P Golonka and Z Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo A precision tool for QED correctionsin Z and W decays Eur Phys J C45 (2006) 97 arXivhep-ph0506026

[30] Geant4 collaboration J Allison et al Geant4 developments and applications IEEETrans Nucl Sci 53 (2006) 270 Geant4 collaboration S Agostinelli et al Geant4A simulation toolkit Nucl Instrum Meth A506 (2003) 250

31

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 27: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

Appendices

A Correlation matrices

The statistical correlations between the complex coefficients masses and widths determinedfrom the fit to data are given in terms of real and imaginary parts and in terms ofmagnitudes and phases in Tables 11 and 12 The correlations are determined using thesame sample of simulated pseudoexperiments used to calculate the statistical uncertaintieson fit parameters

B Results for interference fit fractions

The central values of the interference fit fractions are given in Table 13 The statisti-cal experimental systematic and model uncertainties on these quantities are given inTables 14 15 and 16

25

Tab

le11

Sta

tist

ical

corr

elat

ions

bet

wee

nth

ere

al(x

)an

dim

agin

ary

(y)

par

tsof

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

x0

y 0x

1y 1

x2

y 2x

3y 3

x4

y 4x

5y 5

x7

y 7x

8y 8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

x0

100

014

002

017minus

018

015minus

017

003

039minus

037

016minus

009minus

018minus

029

007minus

037minus

019

002

004

012

y 01

00minus

006minus

008

009minus

011minus

000

014

003

003

012

013minus

012minus

024

035minus

007

009

012

001minus

004

x1

100minus

009minus

008minus

014minus

004

029minus

001

003minus

020

018minus

021minus

031minus

017minus

036minus

008minus

017minus

023

002

y 11

000

050

340

09minus

001

060minus

039

002minus

003minus

003

007minus

002minus

004minus

016minus

002

007

002

x2

100minus

013

081

009

014minus

016minus

015

021

010

013

004minus

015minus

007

001minus

025

001

y 21

000

080

280

24minus

036minus

013

008minus

004minus

001minus

004

004minus

002minus

001minus

009minus

010

x3

100

020

013minus

034minus

010

033minus

008

008minus

004minus

005minus

007minus

003minus

033minus

009

y 31

00minus

012minus

012minus

051

029minus

034minus

053

009minus

012

009minus

014minus

036

001

x4

100minus

053

032minus

010minus

020

003

002minus

027minus

017minus

006

010minus

000

y 41

000

06minus

009

040

010

014

016

011minus

005

007minus

003

x5

100minus

029minus

003

022

002

004minus

008

002

045minus

006

y 51

00minus

031minus

034

006

003

024minus

014minus

072minus

033

x7

100

046

005

010minus

011minus

001

027

017

y 71

00minus

016

036minus

001

017

032

008

x8

100minus

003

001minus

006minus

009minus

014

y 81

000

290

020

15minus

002

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

26

Tab

le12

S

tati

stic

alco

rrel

atio

ns

bet

wee

nth

em

agnit

ud

es(a

)an

dp

has

es(∆

)of

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

a0

∆0

a1

∆1

a2

∆2

a3

∆3

a4

∆4

a5

∆5

a7

∆7

a8

∆8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

a0

100minus

011minus

008

005

024

003minus

014

004

004

001

021

002

022minus

022

038minus

000minus

004minus

009minus

001

004

∆0

100minus

010

012

003

020

014

014minus

001

045minus

005

010minus

008

035minus

007

005minus

022

006

007

009

a1

100minus

035minus

025

006

032

001minus

001minus

038

004minus

022minus

006

031

002

024

007minus

018minus

020

001

∆1

100

024

015

016

000

014

038minus

018minus

013

016

026

022minus

006minus

009minus

004minus

012

005

a2

100

004

011minus

028minus

007

039minus

009

007

027

010

001

001minus

015

004minus

003minus

013

∆2

100

015

077minus

020minus

010minus

001

024

009

013

003minus

009

005

001

023minus

010

a3

100minus

006

000minus

011

016minus

030minus

012

056

001

012

002minus

007minus

027minus

004

∆3

100minus

028minus

019

015

041minus

024minus

008minus

000minus

013

004

002

041

008

a4

100

013

005minus

017

014

018minus

000

006

000

014minus

019minus

009

∆4

100minus

016

016

017

012

000minus

002minus

019minus

003

003

001

a5

100

024minus

026minus

006

011

005minus

007

001

019

039

∆5

100minus

000minus

028minus

001minus

020minus

020

015

076

027

a7

100minus

001

017minus

006

004

013minus

005minus

024

∆7

100minus

012

037

003minus

000minus

027minus

012

a8

100minus

004minus

001

004

006

015

∆8

100minus

037minus

002minus

033minus

001

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

27

Table 13 Interference fit fractions () from the nominal DP fit The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 374 18 minus00 00 00 minus24 minus02 minus26 minus50A1 07 minus00 00 00 minus11 minus03 minus06 minus11A2 51 minus32 minus00 29 15 16 19A3 48 00 minus84 01 21 02A4 74 minus03 minus10 minus15 minus04A5 193 minus00 28 00A6 231 minus00 00A7 66 minus00A8 89

Table 14 Statistical uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes areall pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASSnonresonant (A4) Klowast2 (1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8)Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 15 07 00 00 00 09 04 04 05A1 03 00 00 00 07 03 04 05A2 20 26 00 11 05 15 05A3 38 00 32 04 34 08A4 17 06 01 06 05A5 28 00 31 00A6 12 00 00A7 14 00A8 16

28

Table 15 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () Theamplitudes are all pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0 (1430)0(A3) LASS nonresonant (A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave(dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fitfractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 12 05 00 00 00 23 02 04 05A1 08 00 00 00 04 08 07 09A2 24 31 00 14 20 26 11A3 38 00 36 02 26 03A4 11 22 02 05 10A5 20 00 40 00A6 11 00 00A7 12 00A8 22

Table 16 Model uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 17 08 00 00 00 26 07 08 14A1 08 00 00 00 08 06 08 11A2 34 29 00 58 17 36 27A3 66 00 83 03 35 07A4 20 17 02 12 10A5 74 00 45 00A6 12 00 00A7 37 00A8 29

29

References

[1] T Gershon On the measurement of the unitarity triangle angle γ from B0 rarr DKlowast0

decays Phys Rev D79 (2009) 051301(R) arXiv08102706

[2] T Gershon and M Williams Prospects for the measurement of the unitaritytriangle angle γ from B0 rarr DK+πminus decays Phys Rev D80 (2009) 092002arXiv09091495

[3] N Cabibbo Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays Phys Rev Lett 10 (1963) 531

[4] M Kobayashi and T Maskawa CP -violation in the renormalizable theory of weakinteraction Progress of Theoretical Physics 49 (1973) 652

[5] M Gronau and D London How to determine all the angles of the unitarity trianglefrom B0 rarr DK0

S and B0s rarr Dφ Phys Lett B253 (1991) 483

[6] M Gronau and D Wyler On determining a weak phase from CP asymmetries incharged B decays Phys Lett B265 (1991) 172

[7] I Dunietz CP violation with self-tagging Bd modes Phys Lett B270 (1991) 75

[8] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurement of CP violation parameters inB0 rarr DKlowast0 decays Phys Rev D90 (2014) 112002 arXiv14078136

[9] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of overlapping spin-1 and spin-

3 D0Kminus resonances at mass 286 GeVc2 Phys Rev Lett 113 (2014) 162001

arXiv14077574

[10] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ decays

Phys Rev D90 (2014) 072003 arXiv14077712

[11] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observation and amplitude analysis of theBminus rarr D+Kminusπminus decay Phys Rev D91 (2015) 092002 arXiv150302995

[12] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays

arXiv150501710 submitted to Phys Rev D

[13] Belle collaboration A Kuzmin et al Study of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays Phys RevD76 (2007) 012006 arXivhep-ex0611054

[14] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of branching fractions andresonance contributions for B0 rarr D0K+πminus and search for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decaysPhys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 011803 arXivhep-ex0509036

[15] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurements of the branching fractions of

the decays B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ and B0 rarr D

0K+πminus Phys Rev D87 (2013) 112009

arXiv13046317

30

[16] Belle collaboration P Krokovny et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K0 and B0 rarr D0Klowast0

decays Phys Rev Lett 90 (2003) 141802 arXivhep-ex0212066

[17] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of B0 rarr D(lowast)0K(lowast)0 branchingfractions Phys Rev D74 (2006) 031101 arXivhep-ex0604016

[18] LHCb collaboration A A Alves Jr et al The LHCb detector at the LHC JINST 3(2008) S08005

[19] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al LHCb detector performance Int J Mod PhysA30 (2015) 1530022 arXiv14126352

[20] R Aaij et al Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator JINST 9 (2014) P09007arXiv14057808

[21] R Arink et al Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker JINST 9 (2014) P01002arXiv13113893

[22] M Adinolfi et al Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Eur PhysJ C73 (2013) 2431 arXiv12116759

[23] A A Alves Jr et al Performance of the LHCb muon system JINST 8 (2013) P02022arXiv12111346

[24] R Aaij et al The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011 JINST 8 (2013) P04022arXiv12113055

[25] V V Gligorov and M Williams Efficient reliable and fast high-level triggering usinga bonsai boosted decision tree JINST 8 (2013) P02013 arXiv12106861

[26] T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P Skands PYTHIA 64 physics and manual JHEP05 (2006) 026 arXivhep-ph0603175 T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P SkandsA brief introduction to PYTHIA 81 Comput Phys Commun 178 (2008) 852arXiv07103820

[27] I Belyaev et al Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss the LHCbsimulation framework J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032047

[28] D J Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package Nucl Instrum MethA462 (2001) 152

[29] P Golonka and Z Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo A precision tool for QED correctionsin Z and W decays Eur Phys J C45 (2006) 97 arXivhep-ph0506026

[30] Geant4 collaboration J Allison et al Geant4 developments and applications IEEETrans Nucl Sci 53 (2006) 270 Geant4 collaboration S Agostinelli et al Geant4A simulation toolkit Nucl Instrum Meth A506 (2003) 250

31

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 28: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

Tab

le11

Sta

tist

ical

corr

elat

ions

bet

wee

nth

ere

al(x

)an

dim

agin

ary

(y)

par

tsof

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

x0

y 0x

1y 1

x2

y 2x

3y 3

x4

y 4x

5y 5

x7

y 7x

8y 8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

x0

100

014

002

017minus

018

015minus

017

003

039minus

037

016minus

009minus

018minus

029

007minus

037minus

019

002

004

012

y 01

00minus

006minus

008

009minus

011minus

000

014

003

003

012

013minus

012minus

024

035minus

007

009

012

001minus

004

x1

100minus

009minus

008minus

014minus

004

029minus

001

003minus

020

018minus

021minus

031minus

017minus

036minus

008minus

017minus

023

002

y 11

000

050

340

09minus

001

060minus

039

002minus

003minus

003

007minus

002minus

004minus

016minus

002

007

002

x2

100minus

013

081

009

014minus

016minus

015

021

010

013

004minus

015minus

007

001minus

025

001

y 21

000

080

280

24minus

036minus

013

008minus

004minus

001minus

004

004minus

002minus

001minus

009minus

010

x3

100

020

013minus

034minus

010

033minus

008

008minus

004minus

005minus

007minus

003minus

033minus

009

y 31

00minus

012minus

012minus

051

029minus

034minus

053

009minus

012

009minus

014minus

036

001

x4

100minus

053

032minus

010minus

020

003

002minus

027minus

017minus

006

010minus

000

y 41

000

06minus

009

040

010

014

016

011minus

005

007minus

003

x5

100minus

029minus

003

022

002

004minus

008

002

045minus

006

y 51

00minus

031minus

034

006

003

024minus

014minus

072minus

033

x7

100

046

005

010minus

011minus

001

027

017

y 71

00minus

016

036minus

001

017

032

008

x8

100minus

003

001minus

006minus

009minus

014

y 81

000

290

020

15minus

002

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

26

Tab

le12

S

tati

stic

alco

rrel

atio

ns

bet

wee

nth

em

agnit

ud

es(a

)an

dp

has

es(∆

)of

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

a0

∆0

a1

∆1

a2

∆2

a3

∆3

a4

∆4

a5

∆5

a7

∆7

a8

∆8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

a0

100minus

011minus

008

005

024

003minus

014

004

004

001

021

002

022minus

022

038minus

000minus

004minus

009minus

001

004

∆0

100minus

010

012

003

020

014

014minus

001

045minus

005

010minus

008

035minus

007

005minus

022

006

007

009

a1

100minus

035minus

025

006

032

001minus

001minus

038

004minus

022minus

006

031

002

024

007minus

018minus

020

001

∆1

100

024

015

016

000

014

038minus

018minus

013

016

026

022minus

006minus

009minus

004minus

012

005

a2

100

004

011minus

028minus

007

039minus

009

007

027

010

001

001minus

015

004minus

003minus

013

∆2

100

015

077minus

020minus

010minus

001

024

009

013

003minus

009

005

001

023minus

010

a3

100minus

006

000minus

011

016minus

030minus

012

056

001

012

002minus

007minus

027minus

004

∆3

100minus

028minus

019

015

041minus

024minus

008minus

000minus

013

004

002

041

008

a4

100

013

005minus

017

014

018minus

000

006

000

014minus

019minus

009

∆4

100minus

016

016

017

012

000minus

002minus

019minus

003

003

001

a5

100

024minus

026minus

006

011

005minus

007

001

019

039

∆5

100minus

000minus

028minus

001minus

020minus

020

015

076

027

a7

100minus

001

017minus

006

004

013minus

005minus

024

∆7

100minus

012

037

003minus

000minus

027minus

012

a8

100minus

004minus

001

004

006

015

∆8

100minus

037minus

002minus

033minus

001

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

27

Table 13 Interference fit fractions () from the nominal DP fit The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 374 18 minus00 00 00 minus24 minus02 minus26 minus50A1 07 minus00 00 00 minus11 minus03 minus06 minus11A2 51 minus32 minus00 29 15 16 19A3 48 00 minus84 01 21 02A4 74 minus03 minus10 minus15 minus04A5 193 minus00 28 00A6 231 minus00 00A7 66 minus00A8 89

Table 14 Statistical uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes areall pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASSnonresonant (A4) Klowast2 (1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8)Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 15 07 00 00 00 09 04 04 05A1 03 00 00 00 07 03 04 05A2 20 26 00 11 05 15 05A3 38 00 32 04 34 08A4 17 06 01 06 05A5 28 00 31 00A6 12 00 00A7 14 00A8 16

28

Table 15 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () Theamplitudes are all pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0 (1430)0(A3) LASS nonresonant (A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave(dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fitfractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 12 05 00 00 00 23 02 04 05A1 08 00 00 00 04 08 07 09A2 24 31 00 14 20 26 11A3 38 00 36 02 26 03A4 11 22 02 05 10A5 20 00 40 00A6 11 00 00A7 12 00A8 22

Table 16 Model uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 17 08 00 00 00 26 07 08 14A1 08 00 00 00 08 06 08 11A2 34 29 00 58 17 36 27A3 66 00 83 03 35 07A4 20 17 02 12 10A5 74 00 45 00A6 12 00 00A7 37 00A8 29

29

References

[1] T Gershon On the measurement of the unitarity triangle angle γ from B0 rarr DKlowast0

decays Phys Rev D79 (2009) 051301(R) arXiv08102706

[2] T Gershon and M Williams Prospects for the measurement of the unitaritytriangle angle γ from B0 rarr DK+πminus decays Phys Rev D80 (2009) 092002arXiv09091495

[3] N Cabibbo Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays Phys Rev Lett 10 (1963) 531

[4] M Kobayashi and T Maskawa CP -violation in the renormalizable theory of weakinteraction Progress of Theoretical Physics 49 (1973) 652

[5] M Gronau and D London How to determine all the angles of the unitarity trianglefrom B0 rarr DK0

S and B0s rarr Dφ Phys Lett B253 (1991) 483

[6] M Gronau and D Wyler On determining a weak phase from CP asymmetries incharged B decays Phys Lett B265 (1991) 172

[7] I Dunietz CP violation with self-tagging Bd modes Phys Lett B270 (1991) 75

[8] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurement of CP violation parameters inB0 rarr DKlowast0 decays Phys Rev D90 (2014) 112002 arXiv14078136

[9] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of overlapping spin-1 and spin-

3 D0Kminus resonances at mass 286 GeVc2 Phys Rev Lett 113 (2014) 162001

arXiv14077574

[10] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ decays

Phys Rev D90 (2014) 072003 arXiv14077712

[11] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observation and amplitude analysis of theBminus rarr D+Kminusπminus decay Phys Rev D91 (2015) 092002 arXiv150302995

[12] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays

arXiv150501710 submitted to Phys Rev D

[13] Belle collaboration A Kuzmin et al Study of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays Phys RevD76 (2007) 012006 arXivhep-ex0611054

[14] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of branching fractions andresonance contributions for B0 rarr D0K+πminus and search for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decaysPhys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 011803 arXivhep-ex0509036

[15] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurements of the branching fractions of

the decays B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ and B0 rarr D

0K+πminus Phys Rev D87 (2013) 112009

arXiv13046317

30

[16] Belle collaboration P Krokovny et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K0 and B0 rarr D0Klowast0

decays Phys Rev Lett 90 (2003) 141802 arXivhep-ex0212066

[17] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of B0 rarr D(lowast)0K(lowast)0 branchingfractions Phys Rev D74 (2006) 031101 arXivhep-ex0604016

[18] LHCb collaboration A A Alves Jr et al The LHCb detector at the LHC JINST 3(2008) S08005

[19] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al LHCb detector performance Int J Mod PhysA30 (2015) 1530022 arXiv14126352

[20] R Aaij et al Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator JINST 9 (2014) P09007arXiv14057808

[21] R Arink et al Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker JINST 9 (2014) P01002arXiv13113893

[22] M Adinolfi et al Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Eur PhysJ C73 (2013) 2431 arXiv12116759

[23] A A Alves Jr et al Performance of the LHCb muon system JINST 8 (2013) P02022arXiv12111346

[24] R Aaij et al The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011 JINST 8 (2013) P04022arXiv12113055

[25] V V Gligorov and M Williams Efficient reliable and fast high-level triggering usinga bonsai boosted decision tree JINST 8 (2013) P02013 arXiv12106861

[26] T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P Skands PYTHIA 64 physics and manual JHEP05 (2006) 026 arXivhep-ph0603175 T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P SkandsA brief introduction to PYTHIA 81 Comput Phys Commun 178 (2008) 852arXiv07103820

[27] I Belyaev et al Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss the LHCbsimulation framework J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032047

[28] D J Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package Nucl Instrum MethA462 (2001) 152

[29] P Golonka and Z Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo A precision tool for QED correctionsin Z and W decays Eur Phys J C45 (2006) 97 arXivhep-ph0506026

[30] Geant4 collaboration J Allison et al Geant4 developments and applications IEEETrans Nucl Sci 53 (2006) 270 Geant4 collaboration S Agostinelli et al Geant4A simulation toolkit Nucl Instrum Meth A506 (2003) 250

31

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 29: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

Tab

le12

S

tati

stic

alco

rrel

atio

ns

bet

wee

nth

em

agnit

ud

es(a

)an

dp

has

es(∆

)of

the

com

ple

xco

effici

ents

that

are

free

par

amet

ers

ofth

efit

Corr

elati

ons

wit

hth

em

ass

es(m

)and

wid

ths

(Γ)

that

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

fit

are

als

oin

cluded

T

he

corr

elati

ons

are

det

erm

ined

from

the

sam

esa

mp

leof

sim

ula

ted

pse

ud

oex

per

imen

tsu

sed

toev

alu

ate

syst

emat

icu

nce

rtai

nti

es

Th

ela

bel

sco

rres

pon

dto

(0

)Klowast (

892)0

(1

)Klowast (

1410)0

(2

)Klowast 0(1

430)0

(3

)L

AS

Sn

on

reso

nant

(4)Klowast 2(1

430)0

(5

)Dlowast 0(2

400)minus

(6

)Dlowast 2(2

460)minus

(7

)Dπ

S-w

ave

(dab

ba)

(8)Dπ

P-w

ave

(EF

F)

a0

∆0

a1

∆1

a2

∆2

a3

∆3

a4

∆4

a5

∆5

a7

∆7

a8

∆8

m6

Γ6

m5

Γ5

a0

100minus

011minus

008

005

024

003minus

014

004

004

001

021

002

022minus

022

038minus

000minus

004minus

009minus

001

004

∆0

100minus

010

012

003

020

014

014minus

001

045minus

005

010minus

008

035minus

007

005minus

022

006

007

009

a1

100minus

035minus

025

006

032

001minus

001minus

038

004minus

022minus

006

031

002

024

007minus

018minus

020

001

∆1

100

024

015

016

000

014

038minus

018minus

013

016

026

022minus

006minus

009minus

004minus

012

005

a2

100

004

011minus

028minus

007

039minus

009

007

027

010

001

001minus

015

004minus

003minus

013

∆2

100

015

077minus

020minus

010minus

001

024

009

013

003minus

009

005

001

023minus

010

a3

100minus

006

000minus

011

016minus

030minus

012

056

001

012

002minus

007minus

027minus

004

∆3

100minus

028minus

019

015

041minus

024minus

008minus

000minus

013

004

002

041

008

a4

100

013

005minus

017

014

018minus

000

006

000

014minus

019minus

009

∆4

100minus

016

016

017

012

000minus

002minus

019minus

003

003

001

a5

100

024minus

026minus

006

011

005minus

007

001

019

039

∆5

100minus

000minus

028minus

001minus

020minus

020

015

076

027

a7

100minus

001

017minus

006

004

013minus

005minus

024

∆7

100minus

012

037

003minus

000minus

027minus

012

a8

100minus

004minus

001

004

006

015

∆8

100minus

037minus

002minus

033minus

001

m6

100

009

001minus

004

Γ6

100minus

003

000

m5

100

027

Γ5

100

27

Table 13 Interference fit fractions () from the nominal DP fit The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 374 18 minus00 00 00 minus24 minus02 minus26 minus50A1 07 minus00 00 00 minus11 minus03 minus06 minus11A2 51 minus32 minus00 29 15 16 19A3 48 00 minus84 01 21 02A4 74 minus03 minus10 minus15 minus04A5 193 minus00 28 00A6 231 minus00 00A7 66 minus00A8 89

Table 14 Statistical uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes areall pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASSnonresonant (A4) Klowast2 (1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8)Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 15 07 00 00 00 09 04 04 05A1 03 00 00 00 07 03 04 05A2 20 26 00 11 05 15 05A3 38 00 32 04 34 08A4 17 06 01 06 05A5 28 00 31 00A6 12 00 00A7 14 00A8 16

28

Table 15 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () Theamplitudes are all pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0 (1430)0(A3) LASS nonresonant (A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave(dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fitfractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 12 05 00 00 00 23 02 04 05A1 08 00 00 00 04 08 07 09A2 24 31 00 14 20 26 11A3 38 00 36 02 26 03A4 11 22 02 05 10A5 20 00 40 00A6 11 00 00A7 12 00A8 22

Table 16 Model uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 17 08 00 00 00 26 07 08 14A1 08 00 00 00 08 06 08 11A2 34 29 00 58 17 36 27A3 66 00 83 03 35 07A4 20 17 02 12 10A5 74 00 45 00A6 12 00 00A7 37 00A8 29

29

References

[1] T Gershon On the measurement of the unitarity triangle angle γ from B0 rarr DKlowast0

decays Phys Rev D79 (2009) 051301(R) arXiv08102706

[2] T Gershon and M Williams Prospects for the measurement of the unitaritytriangle angle γ from B0 rarr DK+πminus decays Phys Rev D80 (2009) 092002arXiv09091495

[3] N Cabibbo Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays Phys Rev Lett 10 (1963) 531

[4] M Kobayashi and T Maskawa CP -violation in the renormalizable theory of weakinteraction Progress of Theoretical Physics 49 (1973) 652

[5] M Gronau and D London How to determine all the angles of the unitarity trianglefrom B0 rarr DK0

S and B0s rarr Dφ Phys Lett B253 (1991) 483

[6] M Gronau and D Wyler On determining a weak phase from CP asymmetries incharged B decays Phys Lett B265 (1991) 172

[7] I Dunietz CP violation with self-tagging Bd modes Phys Lett B270 (1991) 75

[8] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurement of CP violation parameters inB0 rarr DKlowast0 decays Phys Rev D90 (2014) 112002 arXiv14078136

[9] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of overlapping spin-1 and spin-

3 D0Kminus resonances at mass 286 GeVc2 Phys Rev Lett 113 (2014) 162001

arXiv14077574

[10] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ decays

Phys Rev D90 (2014) 072003 arXiv14077712

[11] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observation and amplitude analysis of theBminus rarr D+Kminusπminus decay Phys Rev D91 (2015) 092002 arXiv150302995

[12] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays

arXiv150501710 submitted to Phys Rev D

[13] Belle collaboration A Kuzmin et al Study of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays Phys RevD76 (2007) 012006 arXivhep-ex0611054

[14] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of branching fractions andresonance contributions for B0 rarr D0K+πminus and search for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decaysPhys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 011803 arXivhep-ex0509036

[15] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurements of the branching fractions of

the decays B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ and B0 rarr D

0K+πminus Phys Rev D87 (2013) 112009

arXiv13046317

30

[16] Belle collaboration P Krokovny et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K0 and B0 rarr D0Klowast0

decays Phys Rev Lett 90 (2003) 141802 arXivhep-ex0212066

[17] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of B0 rarr D(lowast)0K(lowast)0 branchingfractions Phys Rev D74 (2006) 031101 arXivhep-ex0604016

[18] LHCb collaboration A A Alves Jr et al The LHCb detector at the LHC JINST 3(2008) S08005

[19] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al LHCb detector performance Int J Mod PhysA30 (2015) 1530022 arXiv14126352

[20] R Aaij et al Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator JINST 9 (2014) P09007arXiv14057808

[21] R Arink et al Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker JINST 9 (2014) P01002arXiv13113893

[22] M Adinolfi et al Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Eur PhysJ C73 (2013) 2431 arXiv12116759

[23] A A Alves Jr et al Performance of the LHCb muon system JINST 8 (2013) P02022arXiv12111346

[24] R Aaij et al The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011 JINST 8 (2013) P04022arXiv12113055

[25] V V Gligorov and M Williams Efficient reliable and fast high-level triggering usinga bonsai boosted decision tree JINST 8 (2013) P02013 arXiv12106861

[26] T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P Skands PYTHIA 64 physics and manual JHEP05 (2006) 026 arXivhep-ph0603175 T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P SkandsA brief introduction to PYTHIA 81 Comput Phys Commun 178 (2008) 852arXiv07103820

[27] I Belyaev et al Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss the LHCbsimulation framework J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032047

[28] D J Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package Nucl Instrum MethA462 (2001) 152

[29] P Golonka and Z Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo A precision tool for QED correctionsin Z and W decays Eur Phys J C45 (2006) 97 arXivhep-ph0506026

[30] Geant4 collaboration J Allison et al Geant4 developments and applications IEEETrans Nucl Sci 53 (2006) 270 Geant4 collaboration S Agostinelli et al Geant4A simulation toolkit Nucl Instrum Meth A506 (2003) 250

31

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 30: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

Table 13 Interference fit fractions () from the nominal DP fit The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 374 18 minus00 00 00 minus24 minus02 minus26 minus50A1 07 minus00 00 00 minus11 minus03 minus06 minus11A2 51 minus32 minus00 29 15 16 19A3 48 00 minus84 01 21 02A4 74 minus03 minus10 minus15 minus04A5 193 minus00 28 00A6 231 minus00 00A7 66 minus00A8 89

Table 14 Statistical uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes areall pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASSnonresonant (A4) Klowast2 (1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8)Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 15 07 00 00 00 09 04 04 05A1 03 00 00 00 07 03 04 05A2 20 26 00 11 05 15 05A3 38 00 32 04 34 08A4 17 06 01 06 05A5 28 00 31 00A6 12 00 00A7 14 00A8 16

28

Table 15 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () Theamplitudes are all pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0 (1430)0(A3) LASS nonresonant (A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave(dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fitfractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 12 05 00 00 00 23 02 04 05A1 08 00 00 00 04 08 07 09A2 24 31 00 14 20 26 11A3 38 00 36 02 26 03A4 11 22 02 05 10A5 20 00 40 00A6 11 00 00A7 12 00A8 22

Table 16 Model uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 17 08 00 00 00 26 07 08 14A1 08 00 00 00 08 06 08 11A2 34 29 00 58 17 36 27A3 66 00 83 03 35 07A4 20 17 02 12 10A5 74 00 45 00A6 12 00 00A7 37 00A8 29

29

References

[1] T Gershon On the measurement of the unitarity triangle angle γ from B0 rarr DKlowast0

decays Phys Rev D79 (2009) 051301(R) arXiv08102706

[2] T Gershon and M Williams Prospects for the measurement of the unitaritytriangle angle γ from B0 rarr DK+πminus decays Phys Rev D80 (2009) 092002arXiv09091495

[3] N Cabibbo Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays Phys Rev Lett 10 (1963) 531

[4] M Kobayashi and T Maskawa CP -violation in the renormalizable theory of weakinteraction Progress of Theoretical Physics 49 (1973) 652

[5] M Gronau and D London How to determine all the angles of the unitarity trianglefrom B0 rarr DK0

S and B0s rarr Dφ Phys Lett B253 (1991) 483

[6] M Gronau and D Wyler On determining a weak phase from CP asymmetries incharged B decays Phys Lett B265 (1991) 172

[7] I Dunietz CP violation with self-tagging Bd modes Phys Lett B270 (1991) 75

[8] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurement of CP violation parameters inB0 rarr DKlowast0 decays Phys Rev D90 (2014) 112002 arXiv14078136

[9] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of overlapping spin-1 and spin-

3 D0Kminus resonances at mass 286 GeVc2 Phys Rev Lett 113 (2014) 162001

arXiv14077574

[10] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ decays

Phys Rev D90 (2014) 072003 arXiv14077712

[11] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observation and amplitude analysis of theBminus rarr D+Kminusπminus decay Phys Rev D91 (2015) 092002 arXiv150302995

[12] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays

arXiv150501710 submitted to Phys Rev D

[13] Belle collaboration A Kuzmin et al Study of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays Phys RevD76 (2007) 012006 arXivhep-ex0611054

[14] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of branching fractions andresonance contributions for B0 rarr D0K+πminus and search for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decaysPhys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 011803 arXivhep-ex0509036

[15] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurements of the branching fractions of

the decays B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ and B0 rarr D

0K+πminus Phys Rev D87 (2013) 112009

arXiv13046317

30

[16] Belle collaboration P Krokovny et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K0 and B0 rarr D0Klowast0

decays Phys Rev Lett 90 (2003) 141802 arXivhep-ex0212066

[17] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of B0 rarr D(lowast)0K(lowast)0 branchingfractions Phys Rev D74 (2006) 031101 arXivhep-ex0604016

[18] LHCb collaboration A A Alves Jr et al The LHCb detector at the LHC JINST 3(2008) S08005

[19] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al LHCb detector performance Int J Mod PhysA30 (2015) 1530022 arXiv14126352

[20] R Aaij et al Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator JINST 9 (2014) P09007arXiv14057808

[21] R Arink et al Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker JINST 9 (2014) P01002arXiv13113893

[22] M Adinolfi et al Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Eur PhysJ C73 (2013) 2431 arXiv12116759

[23] A A Alves Jr et al Performance of the LHCb muon system JINST 8 (2013) P02022arXiv12111346

[24] R Aaij et al The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011 JINST 8 (2013) P04022arXiv12113055

[25] V V Gligorov and M Williams Efficient reliable and fast high-level triggering usinga bonsai boosted decision tree JINST 8 (2013) P02013 arXiv12106861

[26] T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P Skands PYTHIA 64 physics and manual JHEP05 (2006) 026 arXivhep-ph0603175 T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P SkandsA brief introduction to PYTHIA 81 Comput Phys Commun 178 (2008) 852arXiv07103820

[27] I Belyaev et al Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss the LHCbsimulation framework J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032047

[28] D J Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package Nucl Instrum MethA462 (2001) 152

[29] P Golonka and Z Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo A precision tool for QED correctionsin Z and W decays Eur Phys J C45 (2006) 97 arXivhep-ph0506026

[30] Geant4 collaboration J Allison et al Geant4 developments and applications IEEETrans Nucl Sci 53 (2006) 270 Geant4 collaboration S Agostinelli et al Geant4A simulation toolkit Nucl Instrum Meth A506 (2003) 250

31

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 31: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

Table 15 Experimental systematic uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () Theamplitudes are all pairwise products involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0 (1430)0(A3) LASS nonresonant (A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave(dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave (EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fitfractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 12 05 00 00 00 23 02 04 05A1 08 00 00 00 04 08 07 09A2 24 31 00 14 20 26 11A3 38 00 36 02 26 03A4 11 22 02 05 10A5 20 00 40 00A6 11 00 00A7 12 00A8 22

Table 16 Model uncertainties on the interference fit fractions () The amplitudes are all pairwiseproducts involving (A0) Klowast(892)0 (A1) Klowast(1410)0 (A2) Klowast0(1430)0 (A3) LASS nonresonant(A4) Klowast2(1430)0 (A5) Dlowast0(2400)minus (A6) Dlowast2(2460)minus (A7) Dπ S-wave (dabba) (A8) Dπ P-wave(EFF) The diagonal elements are the same as the conventional fit fractions

A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A0 17 08 00 00 00 26 07 08 14A1 08 00 00 00 08 06 08 11A2 34 29 00 58 17 36 27A3 66 00 83 03 35 07A4 20 17 02 12 10A5 74 00 45 00A6 12 00 00A7 37 00A8 29

29

References

[1] T Gershon On the measurement of the unitarity triangle angle γ from B0 rarr DKlowast0

decays Phys Rev D79 (2009) 051301(R) arXiv08102706

[2] T Gershon and M Williams Prospects for the measurement of the unitaritytriangle angle γ from B0 rarr DK+πminus decays Phys Rev D80 (2009) 092002arXiv09091495

[3] N Cabibbo Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays Phys Rev Lett 10 (1963) 531

[4] M Kobayashi and T Maskawa CP -violation in the renormalizable theory of weakinteraction Progress of Theoretical Physics 49 (1973) 652

[5] M Gronau and D London How to determine all the angles of the unitarity trianglefrom B0 rarr DK0

S and B0s rarr Dφ Phys Lett B253 (1991) 483

[6] M Gronau and D Wyler On determining a weak phase from CP asymmetries incharged B decays Phys Lett B265 (1991) 172

[7] I Dunietz CP violation with self-tagging Bd modes Phys Lett B270 (1991) 75

[8] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurement of CP violation parameters inB0 rarr DKlowast0 decays Phys Rev D90 (2014) 112002 arXiv14078136

[9] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of overlapping spin-1 and spin-

3 D0Kminus resonances at mass 286 GeVc2 Phys Rev Lett 113 (2014) 162001

arXiv14077574

[10] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ decays

Phys Rev D90 (2014) 072003 arXiv14077712

[11] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observation and amplitude analysis of theBminus rarr D+Kminusπminus decay Phys Rev D91 (2015) 092002 arXiv150302995

[12] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays

arXiv150501710 submitted to Phys Rev D

[13] Belle collaboration A Kuzmin et al Study of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays Phys RevD76 (2007) 012006 arXivhep-ex0611054

[14] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of branching fractions andresonance contributions for B0 rarr D0K+πminus and search for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decaysPhys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 011803 arXivhep-ex0509036

[15] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurements of the branching fractions of

the decays B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ and B0 rarr D

0K+πminus Phys Rev D87 (2013) 112009

arXiv13046317

30

[16] Belle collaboration P Krokovny et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K0 and B0 rarr D0Klowast0

decays Phys Rev Lett 90 (2003) 141802 arXivhep-ex0212066

[17] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of B0 rarr D(lowast)0K(lowast)0 branchingfractions Phys Rev D74 (2006) 031101 arXivhep-ex0604016

[18] LHCb collaboration A A Alves Jr et al The LHCb detector at the LHC JINST 3(2008) S08005

[19] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al LHCb detector performance Int J Mod PhysA30 (2015) 1530022 arXiv14126352

[20] R Aaij et al Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator JINST 9 (2014) P09007arXiv14057808

[21] R Arink et al Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker JINST 9 (2014) P01002arXiv13113893

[22] M Adinolfi et al Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Eur PhysJ C73 (2013) 2431 arXiv12116759

[23] A A Alves Jr et al Performance of the LHCb muon system JINST 8 (2013) P02022arXiv12111346

[24] R Aaij et al The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011 JINST 8 (2013) P04022arXiv12113055

[25] V V Gligorov and M Williams Efficient reliable and fast high-level triggering usinga bonsai boosted decision tree JINST 8 (2013) P02013 arXiv12106861

[26] T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P Skands PYTHIA 64 physics and manual JHEP05 (2006) 026 arXivhep-ph0603175 T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P SkandsA brief introduction to PYTHIA 81 Comput Phys Commun 178 (2008) 852arXiv07103820

[27] I Belyaev et al Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss the LHCbsimulation framework J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032047

[28] D J Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package Nucl Instrum MethA462 (2001) 152

[29] P Golonka and Z Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo A precision tool for QED correctionsin Z and W decays Eur Phys J C45 (2006) 97 arXivhep-ph0506026

[30] Geant4 collaboration J Allison et al Geant4 developments and applications IEEETrans Nucl Sci 53 (2006) 270 Geant4 collaboration S Agostinelli et al Geant4A simulation toolkit Nucl Instrum Meth A506 (2003) 250

31

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 32: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

References

[1] T Gershon On the measurement of the unitarity triangle angle γ from B0 rarr DKlowast0

decays Phys Rev D79 (2009) 051301(R) arXiv08102706

[2] T Gershon and M Williams Prospects for the measurement of the unitaritytriangle angle γ from B0 rarr DK+πminus decays Phys Rev D80 (2009) 092002arXiv09091495

[3] N Cabibbo Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays Phys Rev Lett 10 (1963) 531

[4] M Kobayashi and T Maskawa CP -violation in the renormalizable theory of weakinteraction Progress of Theoretical Physics 49 (1973) 652

[5] M Gronau and D London How to determine all the angles of the unitarity trianglefrom B0 rarr DK0

S and B0s rarr Dφ Phys Lett B253 (1991) 483

[6] M Gronau and D Wyler On determining a weak phase from CP asymmetries incharged B decays Phys Lett B265 (1991) 172

[7] I Dunietz CP violation with self-tagging Bd modes Phys Lett B270 (1991) 75

[8] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurement of CP violation parameters inB0 rarr DKlowast0 decays Phys Rev D90 (2014) 112002 arXiv14078136

[9] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of overlapping spin-1 and spin-

3 D0Kminus resonances at mass 286 GeVc2 Phys Rev Lett 113 (2014) 162001

arXiv14077574

[10] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ decays

Phys Rev D90 (2014) 072003 arXiv14077712

[11] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observation and amplitude analysis of theBminus rarr D+Kminusπminus decay Phys Rev D91 (2015) 092002 arXiv150302995

[12] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays

arXiv150501710 submitted to Phys Rev D

[13] Belle collaboration A Kuzmin et al Study of B0 rarr D0π+πminus decays Phys RevD76 (2007) 012006 arXivhep-ex0611054

[14] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of branching fractions andresonance contributions for B0 rarr D0K+πminus and search for B0 rarr D0K+πminus decaysPhys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 011803 arXivhep-ex0509036

[15] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Measurements of the branching fractions of

the decays B0s rarr D

0Kminusπ+ and B0 rarr D

0K+πminus Phys Rev D87 (2013) 112009

arXiv13046317

30

[16] Belle collaboration P Krokovny et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K0 and B0 rarr D0Klowast0

decays Phys Rev Lett 90 (2003) 141802 arXivhep-ex0212066

[17] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of B0 rarr D(lowast)0K(lowast)0 branchingfractions Phys Rev D74 (2006) 031101 arXivhep-ex0604016

[18] LHCb collaboration A A Alves Jr et al The LHCb detector at the LHC JINST 3(2008) S08005

[19] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al LHCb detector performance Int J Mod PhysA30 (2015) 1530022 arXiv14126352

[20] R Aaij et al Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator JINST 9 (2014) P09007arXiv14057808

[21] R Arink et al Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker JINST 9 (2014) P01002arXiv13113893

[22] M Adinolfi et al Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Eur PhysJ C73 (2013) 2431 arXiv12116759

[23] A A Alves Jr et al Performance of the LHCb muon system JINST 8 (2013) P02022arXiv12111346

[24] R Aaij et al The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011 JINST 8 (2013) P04022arXiv12113055

[25] V V Gligorov and M Williams Efficient reliable and fast high-level triggering usinga bonsai boosted decision tree JINST 8 (2013) P02013 arXiv12106861

[26] T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P Skands PYTHIA 64 physics and manual JHEP05 (2006) 026 arXivhep-ph0603175 T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P SkandsA brief introduction to PYTHIA 81 Comput Phys Commun 178 (2008) 852arXiv07103820

[27] I Belyaev et al Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss the LHCbsimulation framework J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032047

[28] D J Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package Nucl Instrum MethA462 (2001) 152

[29] P Golonka and Z Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo A precision tool for QED correctionsin Z and W decays Eur Phys J C45 (2006) 97 arXivhep-ph0506026

[30] Geant4 collaboration J Allison et al Geant4 developments and applications IEEETrans Nucl Sci 53 (2006) 270 Geant4 collaboration S Agostinelli et al Geant4A simulation toolkit Nucl Instrum Meth A506 (2003) 250

31

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 33: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

[16] Belle collaboration P Krokovny et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K0 and B0 rarr D0Klowast0

decays Phys Rev Lett 90 (2003) 141802 arXivhep-ex0212066

[17] BaBar collaboration B Aubert et al Measurement of B0 rarr D(lowast)0K(lowast)0 branchingfractions Phys Rev D74 (2006) 031101 arXivhep-ex0604016

[18] LHCb collaboration A A Alves Jr et al The LHCb detector at the LHC JINST 3(2008) S08005

[19] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al LHCb detector performance Int J Mod PhysA30 (2015) 1530022 arXiv14126352

[20] R Aaij et al Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator JINST 9 (2014) P09007arXiv14057808

[21] R Arink et al Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker JINST 9 (2014) P01002arXiv13113893

[22] M Adinolfi et al Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Eur PhysJ C73 (2013) 2431 arXiv12116759

[23] A A Alves Jr et al Performance of the LHCb muon system JINST 8 (2013) P02022arXiv12111346

[24] R Aaij et al The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011 JINST 8 (2013) P04022arXiv12113055

[25] V V Gligorov and M Williams Efficient reliable and fast high-level triggering usinga bonsai boosted decision tree JINST 8 (2013) P02013 arXiv12106861

[26] T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P Skands PYTHIA 64 physics and manual JHEP05 (2006) 026 arXivhep-ph0603175 T Sjostrand S Mrenna and P SkandsA brief introduction to PYTHIA 81 Comput Phys Commun 178 (2008) 852arXiv07103820

[27] I Belyaev et al Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss the LHCbsimulation framework J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032047

[28] D J Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package Nucl Instrum MethA462 (2001) 152

[29] P Golonka and Z Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo A precision tool for QED correctionsin Z and W decays Eur Phys J C45 (2006) 97 arXivhep-ph0506026

[30] Geant4 collaboration J Allison et al Geant4 developments and applications IEEETrans Nucl Sci 53 (2006) 270 Geant4 collaboration S Agostinelli et al Geant4A simulation toolkit Nucl Instrum Meth A506 (2003) 250

31

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 34: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

[31] M Clemencic et al The LHCb simulation application Gauss Design evolution andexperience J Phys Conf Ser 331 (2011) 032023

[32] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First evidence for the annihilation decay modeB+ rarr D+

s φ JHEP 02 (2013) 043 arXiv12101089

[33] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al First observations of B0

s rarr D+Dminus D+s D

minus and

D0D0

decays Phys Rev D87 (2013) 092007 arXiv13025854

[34] W D Hulsbergen Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter Nucl Instrum MethA552 (2005) 566 arXivphysics0503191

[35] M Feindt and U Kerzel The NeuroBayes neural network package Nucl InstrumMeth A 559 (2006) 190

[36] M Pivk and F R Le Diberder sPlot A statistical tool to unfold data distributionsNucl Instrum Meth A555 (2005) 356 arXivphysics0402083

[37] Particle Data Group K A Olive et al Review of particle physics Chin Phys C38(2014) 090001

[38] T Skwarnicki A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-primeand Upsilon resonances PhD thesis Institute of Nuclear Physics Krakow 1986DESY-F31-86-02

[39] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Observation of B0 rarr D0K+Kminus and evidence for

B0s rarr D

0K+Kminus Phys Rev Lett 109 (2012) 131801 arXiv12075991

[40] LHCb collaboration R Aaij et al Study of beauty baryon decays to D0phminus and Λ+c hminus

final states Phys Rev D89 (2014) 032001 arXiv13114823

[41] Belle collaboration K Abe et al Study of B0 rarr D(lowast)0π+πminus decaysarXivhep-ex0412072

[42] R H Dalitz On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-mesonPhil Mag 44 (1953) 1068

[43] G N Fleming Recoupling effects in the isobar model 1 General formalism forthree-pion scattering Phys Rev 135 (1964) B551

[44] D Morgan Phenomenological analysis of I = 12

single-pion production processes inthe energy range 500 to 700 MeV Phys Rev 166 (1968) 1731

[45] D Herndon P Soding and R J Cashmore A generalised isobar model formalismPhys Rev D11 (1975) 3165

[46] J Blatt and V E Weisskopf Theoretical nuclear physics J Wiley (New York) 1952

32

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 35: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

[47] C Zemach Three pion decays of unstable particles Phys Rev 133 (1964) B1201

[48] C Zemach Use of angular-momentum tensors Phys Rev 140 (1965) B97

[49] Belle collaboration A Garmash et al Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmlessdecays B+ rarr K+π+πminus and B+ rarr K+K+Kminus Phys Rev D71 (2005) 092003arXivhep-ex0412066

[50] B Meadows Low mass S-wave Kπ and ππ systems eConf C070805 (2007) 27arXiv07121605

[51] LASS collaboration D Aston et al A study of Kminusπ+ scattering in the reactionKminusprarr Kminusπ+n at 11GeVc Nucl Phys B296 (1988) 493

[52] D V Bugg The Dπ S-wave J Phys G36 (2009) 075003 arXiv09012217

[53] Laura++ Dalitz plot fitting package httplaurahepforgenet

[54] M Williams How good are your fits Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests inhigh energy physics JINST 5 (2010) P09004 arXiv10063019

[55] S M Flatte Coupled-channel analysis of the πη and KK systems near KK thresholdPhys Lett B63 (1976) 224

33

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 36: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

LHCb collaboration

R Aaij38 B Adeva37 M Adinolfi46 A Affolder52 Z Ajaltouni5 S Akar6 J Albrecht9F Alessio38 M Alexander51 S Ali41 G Alkhazov30 P Alvarez Cartelle53 AA Alves Jr57S Amato2 S Amerio22 Y Amhis7 L An3 L Anderlini17g J Anderson40 M Andreotti16f JE Andrews58 RB Appleby54 O Aquines Gutierrez10 F Archilli38 P drsquoArgent11A Artamonov35 M Artuso59 E Aslanides6 G Auriemma25n M Baalouch5 S Bachmann11JJ Back48 A Badalov36 C Baesso60 W Baldini1638 RJ Barlow54 C Barschel38S Barsuk7 W Barter38 V Batozskaya28 V Battista39 A Bay39 L Beaucourt4 J Beddow51F Bedeschi23 I Bediaga1 LJ Bel41 I Belyaev31 E Ben-Haim8 G Bencivenni18 S Benson38J Benton46 A Berezhnoy32 R Bernet40 A Bertolin22 M-O Bettler38 M van Beuzekom41A Bien11 S Bifani45 T Bird54 A Birnkraut9 A Bizzeti17i T Blake48 F Blanc39J Blouw10 S Blusk59 V Bocci25 A Bondar34 N Bondar3038 W Bonivento15 S Borghi54M Borsato7 TJV Bowcock52 E Bowen40 C Bozzi16 S Braun11 D Brett54 M Britsch10T Britton59 J Brodzicka54 NH Brook46 A Bursche40 J Buytaert38 S Cadeddu15R Calabrese16f M Calvi20k M Calvo Gomez36p P Campana18 D Campora Perez38L Capriotti54 A Carbone14d G Carboni24l R Cardinale19j A Cardini15 P Carniti20L Carson50 K Carvalho Akiba238 R Casanova Mohr36 G Casse52 L Cassina20kL Castillo Garcia38 M Cattaneo38 Ch Cauet9 G Cavallero19 R Cenci23t M Charles8Ph Charpentier38 M Chefdeville4 S Chen54 S-F Cheung55 N Chiapolini40 M Chrzaszcz40X Cid Vidal38 G Ciezarek41 PEL Clarke50 M Clemencic38 HV Cliff47 J Closier38V Coco38 J Cogan6 E Cogneras5 V Cogoni15e L Cojocariu29 G Collazuol22 P Collins38A Comerma-Montells11 A Contu1538 A Cook46 M Coombes46 S Coquereau8 G Corti38M Corvo16f B Couturier38 GA Cowan50 DC Craik48 A Crocombe48 M Cruz Torres60S Cunliffe53 R Currie53 C DrsquoAmbrosio38 J Dalseno46 PNY David41 A Davis57K De Bruyn41 S De Capua54 M De Cian11 JM De Miranda1 L De Paula2 W De Silva57P De Simone18 C-T Dean51 D Decamp4 M Deckenhoff9 L Del Buono8 N Deleage4D Derkach55 O Deschamps5 F Dettori38 B Dey40 A Di Canto38 F Di Ruscio24H Dijkstra38 S Donleavy52 F Dordei11 M Dorigo39 A Dosil Suarez37 D Dossett48A Dovbnya43 K Dreimanis52 L Dufour41 G Dujany54 F Dupertuis39 P Durante38R Dzhelyadin35 A Dziurda26 A Dzyuba30 S Easo4938 U Egede53 V Egorychev31S Eidelman34 S Eisenhardt50 U Eitschberger9 R Ekelhof9 L Eklund51 I El Rifai5Ch Elsasser40 S Ely59 S Esen11 HM Evans47 T Evans55 A Falabella14 C Farber11C Farinelli41 N Farley45 S Farry52 R Fay52 D Ferguson50 V Fernandez Albor37F Ferrari14 F Ferreira Rodrigues1 M Ferro-Luzzi38 S Filippov33 M Fiore1638f M Fiorini16f M Firlej27 C Fitzpatrick39 T Fiutowski27 K Fohl38 P Fol53 M Fontana10F Fontanelli19j R Forty38 O Francisco2 M Frank38 C Frei38 M Frosini17 J Fu21E Furfaro24l A Gallas Torreira37 D Galli14d S Gallorini2238 S Gambetta50M Gandelman2 P Gandini55 Y Gao3 J Garcıa Pardinas37 J Garofoli59 J Garra Tico47L Garrido36 D Gascon36 C Gaspar38 U Gastaldi16 R Gauld55 L Gavardi9 G Gazzoni5A Geraci21v D Gerick11 E Gersabeck11 M Gersabeck54 T Gershon48 Ph Ghez4A Gianelle22 S Gianı39 V Gibson47 O G Girard39 L Giubega29 VV Gligorov38C Gobel60 D Golubkov31 A Golutvin533138 A Gomes1a C Gotti20kM Grabalosa Gandara5 R Graciani Diaz36 LA Granado Cardoso38 E Grauges36E Graverini40 G Graziani17 A Grecu29 E Greening55 S Gregson47 P Griffith45 L Grillo11O Grunberg63 B Gui59 E Gushchin33 Yu Guz3538 T Gys38 C Hadjivasiliou59

34

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 37: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

G Haefeli39 C Haen38 SC Haines47 S Hall53 B Hamilton58 T Hampson46 X Han11S Hansmann-Menzemer11 N Harnew55 ST Harnew46 J Harrison54 J He38 T Head39V Heijne41 K Hennessy52 P Henrard5 L Henry8 JA Hernando Morata37E van Herwijnen38 M Heszlig63 A Hicheur2 D Hill55 M Hoballah5 C Hombach54W Hulsbergen41 T Humair53 N Hussain55 D Hutchcroft52 D Hynds51 M Idzik27P Ilten56 R Jacobsson38 A Jaeger11 J Jalocha55 E Jans41 A Jawahery58 F Jing3M John55 D Johnson38 CR Jones47 C Joram38 B Jost38 N Jurik59 S Kandybei43W Kanso6 M Karacson38 TM Karbach38dagger S Karodia51 M Kelsey59 IR Kenyon45M Kenzie38 T Ketel42 B Khanji2038k C Khurewathanakul39 S Klaver54K Klimaszewski28 O Kochebina7 M Kolpin11 I Komarov39 RF Koopman42P Koppenburg4138 M Korolev32 L Kravchuk33 K Kreplin11 M Kreps48 G Krocker11P Krokovny34 F Kruse9 W Kucewicz26o M Kucharczyk26 V Kudryavtsev34 AK Kuonen39 K Kurek28 T Kvaratskheliya31 VN La Thi39 D Lacarrere38 G Lafferty54A Lai15 D Lambert50 RW Lambert42 G Lanfranchi18 C Langenbruch48 B Langhans38T Latham48 C Lazzeroni45 R Le Gac6 J van Leerdam41 J-P Lees4 R Lefevre5A Leflat3238 J Lefrancois7 O Leroy6 T Lesiak26 B Leverington11 Y Li7T Likhomanenko6564 M Liles52 R Lindner38 C Linn38 F Lionetto40 B Liu15 X Liu3S Lohn38 I Longstaff51 JH Lopes2 D Lucchesi22r M Lucio Martinez37 H Luo50A Lupato22 E Luppi16f O Lupton55 F Machefert7 F Maciuc29 O Maev30 K Maguire54S Malde55 A Malinin64 G Manca7 G Mancinelli6 P Manning59 A Mapelli38 J Maratas5JF Marchand4 U Marconi14 C Marin Benito36 P Marino2338t R Marki39 J Marks11G Martellotti25 M Martinelli39 D Martinez Santos42 F Martinez Vidal66D Martins Tostes2 A Massafferri1 R Matev38 A Mathad48 Z Mathe38 C Matteuzzi20K Matthieu11 A Mauri40 B Maurin39 A Mazurov45 M McCann53 J McCarthy45A McNab54 R McNulty12 B Meadows57 F Meier9 M Meissner11 M Merk41DA Milanes62 M-N Minard4 DS Mitzel11 J Molina Rodriguez60 S Monteil5M Morandin22 P Morawski27 A Morda6 MJ Morello23t J Moron27 AB Morris50R Mountain59 F Muheim50 J Muller9 K Muller40 V Muller9 M Mussini14 B Muster39P Naik46 T Nakada39 R Nandakumar49 I Nasteva2 M Needham50 N Neri21 S Neubert11N Neufeld38 M Neuner11 AD Nguyen39 TD Nguyen39 C Nguyen-Mau39q V Niess5R Niet9 N Nikitin32 T Nikodem11 D Ninci23 A Novoselov35 DP OrsquoHanlon48A Oblakowska-Mucha27 V Obraztsov35 S Ogilvy51 O Okhrimenko44 R Oldeman15eCJG Onderwater67 B Osorio Rodrigues1 JM Otalora Goicochea2 A Otto38 P Owen53A Oyanguren66 A Palano13c F Palombo21u M Palutan18 J Panman38 A Papanestis49M Pappagallo51 LL Pappalardo16f C Parkes54 G Passaleva17 GD Patel52 M Patel53C Patrignani19j A Pearce5449 A Pellegrino41 G Penso25m M Pepe Altarelli38S Perazzini14d P Perret5 L Pescatore45 K Petridis46 A Petrolini19j M Petruzzo21E Picatoste Olloqui36 B Pietrzyk4 T Pilar48 D Pinci25 A Pistone19 A Piucci11S Playfer50 M Plo Casasus37 T Poikela38 F Polci8 A Poluektov4834 I Polyakov31E Polycarpo2 A Popov35 D Popov1038 B Popovici29 C Potterat2 E Price46 JD Price52J Prisciandaro39 A Pritchard52 C Prouve46 V Pugatch44 A Puig Navarro39 G Punzi23sW Qian4 R Quagliani746 B Rachwal26 JH Rademacker46 B Rakotomiaramanana39M Rama23 MS Rangel2 I Raniuk43 N Rauschmayr38 G Raven42 F Redi53 S Reichert54MM Reid48 AC dos Reis1 S Ricciardi49 S Richards46 M Rihl38 K Rinnert52V Rives Molina36 P Robbe738 AB Rodrigues1 E Rodrigues54 JA Rodriguez Lopez62P Rodriguez Perez54 S Roiser38 V Romanovsky35 A Romero Vidal37 M Rotondo22

35

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 38: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

J Rouvinet39 T Ruf38 H Ruiz36 P Ruiz Valls66 JJ Saborido Silva37 N Sagidova30P Sail51 B Saitta15e V Salustino Guimaraes2 C Sanchez Mayordomo66B Sanmartin Sedes37 R Santacesaria25 C Santamarina Rios37 M Santimaria18E Santovetti24l A Sarti18m C Satriano25n A Satta24 DM Saunders46 D Savrina3132M Schiller38 H Schindler38 M Schlupp9 M Schmelling10 T Schmelzer9 B Schmidt38O Schneider39 A Schopper38 M Schubiger39 M-H Schune7 R Schwemmer38 B Sciascia18A Sciubba25m A Semennikov31 I Sepp53 N Serra40 J Serrano6 L Sestini22 P Seyfert11M Shapkin35 I Shapoval1643f Y Shcheglov30 T Shears52 L Shekhtman34 V Shevchenko64A Shires9 R Silva Coutinho48 G Simi22 M Sirendi47 N Skidmore46 I Skillicorn51T Skwarnicki59 E Smith5549 E Smith53 I T Smith50 J Smith47 M Smith54 H Snoek41MD Sokoloff5738 FJP Soler51 F Soomro39 D Souza46 B Souza De Paula2 B Spaan9P Spradlin51 S Sridharan38 F Stagni38 M Stahl11 S Stahl38 O Steinkamp40O Stenyakin35 F Sterpka59 S Stevenson55 S Stoica29 S Stone59 B Storaci40 S Stracka23tM Straticiuc29 U Straumann40 L Sun57 W Sutcliffe53 K Swientek27 S Swientek9V Syropoulos42 M Szczekowski28 P Szczypka3938 T Szumlak27 S TrsquoJampens4T Tekampe9 M Teklishyn7 G Tellarini16f F Teubert38 C Thomas55 E Thomas38J van Tilburg41 V Tisserand4 M Tobin39 J Todd57 S Tolk42 L Tomassetti16f D Tonelli38 S Topp-Joergensen55 N Torr55 E Tournefier4 S Tourneur39 K Trabelsi39MT Tran39 M Tresch40 A Trisovic38 A Tsaregorodtsev6 P Tsopelas41 N Tuning4138A Ukleja28 A Ustyuzhanin6564 U Uwer11 C Vacca15e V Vagnoni14 G Valenti14A Vallier7 R Vazquez Gomez18 P Vazquez Regueiro37 C Vazquez Sierra37 S Vecchi16JJ Velthuis46 M Veltri17h G Veneziano39 M Vesterinen11 B Viaud7 D Vieira2M Vieites Diaz37 X Vilasis-Cardona36p A Vollhardt40 D Volyanskyy10 D Voong46A Vorobyev30 V Vorobyev34 C Voszlig63 JA de Vries41 R Waldi63 C Wallace48 R Wallace12J Walsh23 S Wandernoth11 J Wang59 DR Ward47 NK Watson45 D Websdale53A Weiden40 M Whitehead48 D Wiedner11 G Wilkinson5538 M Wilkinson59 M Williams38MP Williams45 M Williams56 T Williams45 FF Wilson49 J Wimberley58 J Wishahi9W Wislicki28 M Witek26 G Wormser7 SA Wotton47 S Wright47 K Wyllie38 Y Xie61Z Xu39 Z Yang3 J Yu61 X Yuan34 O Yushchenko35 M Zangoli14 M Zavertyaev10bL Zhang3 Y Zhang3 A Zhelezov11 A Zhokhov31 L Zhong3

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fısicas (CBPF) Rio de Janeiro Brazil2Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil3Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China4LAPP Universite Savoie Mont-Blanc CNRSIN2P3 Annecy-Le-Vieux France5Clermont Universite Universite Blaise Pascal CNRSIN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France6CPPM Aix-Marseille Universite CNRSIN2P3 Marseille France7LAL Universite Paris-Sud CNRSIN2P3 Orsay France8LPNHE Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris Diderot CNRSIN2P3 Paris France9Fakultat Physik Technische Universitat Dortmund Dortmund Germany10Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik (MPIK) Heidelberg Germany11Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany12School of Physics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland13Sezione INFN di Bari Bari Italy14Sezione INFN di Bologna Bologna Italy15Sezione INFN di Cagliari Cagliari Italy16Sezione INFN di Ferrara Ferrara Italy17Sezione INFN di Firenze Firenze Italy

36

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 39: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

18Laboratori Nazionali dellrsquoINFN di Frascati Frascati Italy19Sezione INFN di Genova Genova Italy20Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca Milano Italy21Sezione INFN di Milano Milano Italy22Sezione INFN di Padova Padova Italy23Sezione INFN di Pisa Pisa Italy24Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy25Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy26Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow Poland27AGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer ScienceKrakow Poland28National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ) Warsaw Poland29Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest-Magurele Romania30Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI) Gatchina Russia31Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP) Moscow Russia32Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University (SINP MSU) Moscow Russia33Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN) Moscow Russia34Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia35Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP) Protvino Russia36Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain37Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain38European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland39Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland40Physik-Institut Universitat Zurich Zurich Switzerland41Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam The Netherlands42Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam TheNetherlands43NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT) Kharkiv Ukraine44Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR) Kyiv Ukraine45University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom46HH Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom47Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom48Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom49STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot United Kingdom50School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom51School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom52Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom53Imperial College London London United Kingdom54School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom55Department of Physics University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom56Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States57University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH United States58University of Maryland College Park MD United States59Syracuse University Syracuse NY United States60Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil associated to 2

61Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan Hubei China associated to 3

62Departamento de Fisica Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia associated to 8

63Institut fur Physik Universitat Rostock Rostock Germany associated to 11

64National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Moscow Russia associated to 31

65Yandex School of Data Analysis Moscow Russia associated to 31

66Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC) Universitat de Valencia-CSIC Valencia Spain associated to 36

67Van Swinderen Institute University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands associated to 41

37

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions
Page 40: Amplitude analysis of 0 D0K ˇ decays - arXivEUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2015-107 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 3 August 2015 Amplitude analysis of B0!D0K+ˇ

aUniversidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM) Uberaba-MG BrazilbPN Lebedev Physical Institute Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS) Moscow RussiacUniversita di Bari Bari ItalydUniversita di Bologna Bologna ItalyeUniversita di Cagliari Cagliari ItalyfUniversita di Ferrara Ferrara ItalygUniversita di Firenze Firenze ItalyhUniversita di Urbino Urbino ItalyiUniversita di Modena e Reggio Emilia Modena ItalyjUniversita di Genova Genova ItalykUniversita di Milano Bicocca Milano ItalylUniversita di Roma Tor Vergata Roma ItalymUniversita di Roma La Sapienza Roma ItalynUniversita della Basilicata Potenza ItalyoAGH - University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics andTelecommunications Krakow PolandpLIFAELS La Salle Universitat Ramon Llull Barcelona SpainqHanoi University of Science Hanoi Viet NamrUniversita di Padova Padova ItalysUniversita di Pisa Pisa ItalytScuola Normale Superiore Pisa ItalyuUniversita degli Studi di Milano Milano ItalyvPolitecnico di Milano Milano Italy

daggerDeceased

38

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 LHCb detector and software
  • 3 Selection requirements
  • 4 Determination of signal and background yields
  • 5 Dalitz plot analysis formalism
  • 6 Dalitz plot fit
    • 61 Signal efficiency
    • 62 Background studies
    • 63 Amplitude model for B 0 D0K +- decays
      • 7 Systematic uncertainties
      • 8 Results and summary
      • A Correlation matrices
      • B Results for interference fit fractions