Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 20051 Double Beta Decay and Physics beyond the Standard Model...

22
Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 200 1 Double Beta Decay and Physics beyond the Standard Model Amand Faessler Tuebingen Accuracy of the Nuclear Matrix Elements. It determines the Error of the Majorana Neutrino Mass extracted

Transcript of Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 20051 Double Beta Decay and Physics beyond the Standard Model...

Page 1: Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 20051 Double Beta Decay and Physics beyond the Standard Model Amand Faessler Tuebingen Accuracy of the Nuclear Matrix.

Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 2005

1

Double Beta Decayand

Physics beyond the Standard ModelAmand Faessler

Tuebingen

Accuracy of the Nuclear Matrix Elements.

It determines the Error of the Majorana Neutrino Mass extracted

Page 2: Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 20051 Double Beta Decay and Physics beyond the Standard Model Amand Faessler Tuebingen Accuracy of the Nuclear Matrix.

Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 2005

4

Oνββ-Decay (forbidden)

only for Majorana Neutrinos ν = νc

P

P

n n

Left

Leftν

Phase Space

106 x 2νββ

Page 3: Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 20051 Double Beta Decay and Physics beyond the Standard Model Amand Faessler Tuebingen Accuracy of the Nuclear Matrix.

Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 2005

5

GRAND UNIFICATION

Left-right Symmetric Models SO(10)

Majorana Mass:

Page 4: Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 20051 Double Beta Decay and Physics beyond the Standard Model Amand Faessler Tuebingen Accuracy of the Nuclear Matrix.

Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 2005

6

P P

νν

n n

e-

e-

L/R l/r

Page 5: Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 20051 Double Beta Decay and Physics beyond the Standard Model Amand Faessler Tuebingen Accuracy of the Nuclear Matrix.

Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 2005

7

l/r

P

ν

P

l/r

n n

light ν

heavy N

Neutrinos

l/r

L/R

Page 6: Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 20051 Double Beta Decay and Physics beyond the Standard Model Amand Faessler Tuebingen Accuracy of the Nuclear Matrix.

Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 2005

8

Supersymmetry

Bosons ↔ Fermions--------------------------------------------------------------------

---

Neutralinos

Neutralinos

P P

e- e-

n n

u

u u

ud d

Proton Proton

Neutron Neutron

Page 7: Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 20051 Double Beta Decay and Physics beyond the Standard Model Amand Faessler Tuebingen Accuracy of the Nuclear Matrix.

Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 2005

9

Theoretical Description:Simkovic, Rodin, Benes, Vogel, Bilenky,

Salesh, Gutsche, Pacearescu, Haug, Kovalenko, Vergados, Kosmas, Schwieger,

Raduta, Kaminski, Stoica, Suhonen, Civitarese, Tomoda, Valle, Moya de Guerra,

Sarriguren et al.

0+

0+

0+

1+

2-

k

k

ke1

e2PP

ν Ek

Ein n

0νββ

Never in Tuebingen: Muto/Tokyo, Hirsch/Valencia

Page 8: Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 20051 Double Beta Decay and Physics beyond the Standard Model Amand Faessler Tuebingen Accuracy of the Nuclear Matrix.

Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 2005

10

Neutrinoless Double Beta-

Decay Probability

Page 9: Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 20051 Double Beta Decay and Physics beyond the Standard Model Amand Faessler Tuebingen Accuracy of the Nuclear Matrix.

Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 2005

11

Effective Majorana Neutrino-Mass

for the 0Decay

CP

Tranformation from Mass to Flavor Eigenstates

Page 10: Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 20051 Double Beta Decay and Physics beyond the Standard Model Amand Faessler Tuebingen Accuracy of the Nuclear Matrix.

Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 2005

15

Bilenky, Faessler, Simkovic:, Phys.Rev. D70:033003(2004) : hep-ph/0402250

Page 11: Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 20051 Double Beta Decay and Physics beyond the Standard Model Amand Faessler Tuebingen Accuracy of the Nuclear Matrix.

Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 2005

17

The best choice:

Quasi-Particle-

(a) Quasi-Boson-Approx.:

(b) Particle Number non-conserv.(important near closed shells)

(c) Unharmonicities(d) Proton-Neutron Pairing

Pairing

Page 12: Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 20051 Double Beta Decay and Physics beyond the Standard Model Amand Faessler Tuebingen Accuracy of the Nuclear Matrix.

Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 2005

21

g(A)**4 = 1.25**4 = 2.44 fit to 2

Rodin, Faessler, Simkovic, Vogel, Mar 2005 nucl-th/0503063

Page 13: Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 20051 Double Beta Decay and Physics beyond the Standard Model Amand Faessler Tuebingen Accuracy of the Nuclear Matrix.

Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 2005

27

2.76 (QRPA) 2.34 (RQRPA) Muto corrected

Page 14: Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 20051 Double Beta Decay and Physics beyond the Standard Model Amand Faessler Tuebingen Accuracy of the Nuclear Matrix.

Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 2005

28

M0ν (QRPA)

O. Civitarese, J. Suhonen, NPA 729 (2003) 867

Nucleus their(QRPA, 1.254) our(QRPA, 1.25)

76Ge 3.33 2.68(0.12) 100Mo 2.97 1.30(0.10) 130Te 3.49 1.56(0.47) 136Xe 4.64 0.90(0.20)

g(pp) fitted differently

Higher order terms of nucleon Current included differently with Gaussian form

factors based on a special quark model ( Kadkhikar, Suhonen, Faessler, Nucl. Phys. A29(1991)727). Does neglect pseudoscalar coupling (see eq. (19a)), which is an effect of 30%.

We: Higher order currents from Towner and Hardy.

What is the basis and the dependence on the size of the basis?

Short-range Brueckner Correlations not included. But finite size effects included.

We hope to understand the differences. But for that we need to know their input parameters ( g(pp), g(ph),basis, …)!

Page 15: Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 20051 Double Beta Decay and Physics beyond the Standard Model Amand Faessler Tuebingen Accuracy of the Nuclear Matrix.

Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 2005

33

Uncorrelated and Correlated Relative N-N-

Wavefunctionin the N-N-Potential

Short Range Correlations

Page 16: Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 20051 Double Beta Decay and Physics beyond the Standard Model Amand Faessler Tuebingen Accuracy of the Nuclear Matrix.

Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 2005

35

Influence of Short Range Correlations

(Parameters from Miller and Spencer, Ann. Phys 1976)

Page 17: Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 20051 Double Beta Decay and Physics beyond the Standard Model Amand Faessler Tuebingen Accuracy of the Nuclear Matrix.

Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 2005

37

Comparison of 2Half Lives with Shell model Results from Strassburg

Page 18: Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 20051 Double Beta Decay and Physics beyond the Standard Model Amand Faessler Tuebingen Accuracy of the Nuclear Matrix.

Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 2005

47

Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay and the Sensitivity to the Neutrino Mass

of planed Experiments

expt. T1/2

[y]

<mv>

[eV]DAMA (136Xe)

1.2 X 1024 2.3

MAJORANA (76Ge)

3 X 1027 0.044

EXO 10t (136Xe)

4 X 1028 0.012

GEM (76Ge)

7 X 1027 0.028

GERDA II(76Ge)

2 X 1026 0.11

CANDLES (48Ca)

1 X 1026 0.2

MOON (100Mo)

1 X 1027 0.058

Page 19: Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 20051 Double Beta Decay and Physics beyond the Standard Model Amand Faessler Tuebingen Accuracy of the Nuclear Matrix.

Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 2005

48

Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay and the Sensitivity to the Neutrino Mass

of planed Experiments

expt. T1/2

[y]

<mv>

[eV]XMASS (136Xe)

3 X 1026 0.10

CUORE (130Te)

2 X 1026 0.10

COBRA (116Cd)

1 X 1024 1

DCBA (100Mo)

2 X 1026 0.07

DCBA (82Se)

3 X 1026 0.04

CAMEO (116Cd)

1 X 1027 0.02

DCBA (150Nd)

1 X 1026 0.02

Page 20: Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 20051 Double Beta Decay and Physics beyond the Standard Model Amand Faessler Tuebingen Accuracy of the Nuclear Matrix.

Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 2005

55

Summary:Accuracy of Neutrino

Masses from 0

Fit the g(pp) by in front of the particle-particle NN matrixelement include exp. Error of .

Calculate with these g(pp) for three different forces (Bonn, Nijmegen, Argonne) and three different basis sets (small about 2 shells, intermediate 3 shells and large 5 shells) the

Use QRPA and R-QRPA (Pauli principle)

Use: g(A) = 1.25 and 1.00

Error of matrixelement 20 to 40 % (96Zr larger; largest errors from experim. values of T(1/2, 2))

Core overlap reduction by ~0.90 (preliminary)

Page 21: Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 20051 Double Beta Decay and Physics beyond the Standard Model Amand Faessler Tuebingen Accuracy of the Nuclear Matrix.

Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 2005

56

Summary:Results from

Klapdor et al. from Ge76 with R-QRPA (no error of theory included): 0.15 to 0.72 [eV].

<m()>(GeExp. Klapdor) 0.47 [eV] <M(heavy >[GeV]

<M(heavy Vector B)> > 5600 [GeV]

SUSY+R-Parity: ‘(1,1,1) < 1.1*10**(-4)

Mainz-Troisk, Triton Decay: m(2.2 [eV]

Astro Physics (SDSS): Sum{ m() } < ~0.5 to 2 [eV]

Do not take democratic averaged matrix elements !!!

Page 22: Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 20051 Double Beta Decay and Physics beyond the Standard Model Amand Faessler Tuebingen Accuracy of the Nuclear Matrix.

Amand Faessler, München, 24. November 2005

57

Open Problems:1. Overlapping but slightly different

Hilbert spaces in intermediate Nucleus

for QRPA from intial and from final nucleus.

2. Pairing does not conserve Nucleon number. Problem at closed shells. Particle projection. Lipkin-Nogami <N>, <N2>

3. Deformed nuclei? (e.g.: 150Nd ) THE END

β-

0+

0+

2-

1+

0+

pn-1

np-1