Absolute Return Strategies 29 January 2008 A Pensions Perspective “Our Changing Future” Gareth...

13
Absolute Return Strategies 29 January 2008 A Pensions Perspective “Our Changing Future” Gareth Derbyshire

Transcript of Absolute Return Strategies 29 January 2008 A Pensions Perspective “Our Changing Future” Gareth...

Page 1: Absolute Return Strategies 29 January 2008 A Pensions Perspective “Our Changing Future” Gareth Derbyshire.

Absolute Return Strategies

29 January 2008

A Pensions Perspective

“Our Changing Future”

Gareth Derbyshire

Page 2: Absolute Return Strategies 29 January 2008 A Pensions Perspective “Our Changing Future” Gareth Derbyshire.

Agenda

Why absolute return? And why now?

Less β, more α

Sample asset allocation

1

Page 3: Absolute Return Strategies 29 January 2008 A Pensions Perspective “Our Changing Future” Gareth Derbyshire.

Absolute Return – Why Now?

(Fairly) static liability valuation bases:

– Low volatility

– Surplus increases if real asset return > assumptions

– Absolute return strategies fairly attractive, if they’d been recognised

– Equity vol disguised by asset valuation methods

1990

Liabilities marked-to-market

– Bond-like and volatile

– LDI hedging unusual

– Focus on asset performance relative to liabilities

– Absolute return strategies less attractive except as diversifier from traditional assets

2005(ish)

2

Page 4: Absolute Return Strategies 29 January 2008 A Pensions Perspective “Our Changing Future” Gareth Derbyshire.

Absolute Return – Why Now?

LDI mainstream:

– Liabilities marked-to-market, hedged back to LIBOR

– Absolute return well suited to LIBOR benchmark

For those funds not adopting the LDI approach:

– Absolute returns for diversification (smaller allocation)

2006 / 2007 / 2008

3

Page 5: Absolute Return Strategies 29 January 2008 A Pensions Perspective “Our Changing Future” Gareth Derbyshire.

RETURN

RISK

1st Generation

Efficient Frontier

2nd Generation

Efficient Frontier

1st Generation: Liability Hedging

2nd Generation: Efficient ‘alpha’

generationTraditional

Efficient Frontier

Traditional Asset

Allocation

2nd Generation: Risk-Managing

Assets

The Development of LDI

4

Page 6: Absolute Return Strategies 29 January 2008 A Pensions Perspective “Our Changing Future” Gareth Derbyshire.

Risk Management

Biggest risks usually real / nominal rates & equity β Manager α relatively small source of risk More α, less β would lead to better diversification of risk

budget… …but α is more expensive than β

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Real Rates NominalRates

Equity β Property β Manager α Diversification Total Risk

Risk Decomposition

5

Page 7: Absolute Return Strategies 29 January 2008 A Pensions Perspective “Our Changing Future” Gareth Derbyshire.

What Strategies?

‘Absolute Returns’ not uniquely defined, but generally less β, more α:

– Strategies benchmarked vs LIBOR e.g. hedge funds, long-short products (especially market-neutral)

– Some capital guaranteed structures e.g. credit-based CPPI, capital guaranteed commodities

– Short-duration structured credit (CDOs)

– Infrastructure / timber

Or, stretching the definition:

– ‘Low-volatility’ equity e.g. cash + call options

6

Page 8: Absolute Return Strategies 29 January 2008 A Pensions Perspective “Our Changing Future” Gareth Derbyshire.

UK Equity

Global Equity

UK Credit

UK Nominal Gilts

UK IL Gilts

HFoF

Sample Pension Fund Allocation

Asset Mix Expected Returns

7.5%

7.5%

5.25%

4.5%

4.25%

7.0%

– Projected Forward Funding Ratio in 10 years = 92%

– Downside Risk = 45%

– 1 Year VAR95 = £72m

– Probability of Hitting 105%

Target = 29%

25%

25%

15%

15%

15%

5%

%

7

Page 9: Absolute Return Strategies 29 January 2008 A Pensions Perspective “Our Changing Future” Gareth Derbyshire.

UK Equity

UK Credit

UK Nominal Gilts

UK IL Gilts

What About ‘Classical Derisking’?

Asset Mix Comments

Both nominal and real

rate risks hedged out on

fixed income assets

– Projected Forward Funding Ratio in 10 years = 78%

– Downside Risk = 70%

– 1 Year VAR95 = £18m

– Probability of Hitting 105%

Target = 0%

10%

30%

30%

30%

%

8

Page 10: Absolute Return Strategies 29 January 2008 A Pensions Perspective “Our Changing Future” Gareth Derbyshire.

UK Credit

UK Nominal Gilts

UK IL Gilts

HFoF

Risk Adjusted Equity (RAE)

Try A More Sophisticated Solution

Asset Mix

– Projected Forward Funding Ratio in 10 years = 93%

– Downside Risk = 59%

– 1 Year VAR95 = £51m

– Probability of Hitting 105%

Target = 27%

Comments

Both nominal and real rate risks hedged out

on fixed income assets

Structured equity delivering similar return to index but

with reduced volatility

15%

15%

15%

5%

50%

%

9

Page 11: Absolute Return Strategies 29 January 2008 A Pensions Perspective “Our Changing Future” Gareth Derbyshire.

Putting It All Together

Step 1

Step 2

Step 3

– Projected Forward Funding

Ratio in 10 years = 111%

– Downside Risk = 80%

– 1 Year VAR95 = £31m

– Probability of Hitting 105%

Target = 53%

LDI hedge – nominal and inflation swaps

Reduce concentration in equity β

Seek diversified α

Equity 15% traditional, 15% ‘low vol’

Bonds10% gilts, 10% investment grade corporates, 10% investment grade structured credit / 10%

high yield (possibly with CPPI wrapper)

Property

Alternatives10% hedge funds, 5% private equity, 5%

commodities, 10% infrastructure / timber / others

Asset Mix

30%

30%

10%

30%

%

10

Page 12: Absolute Return Strategies 29 January 2008 A Pensions Perspective “Our Changing Future” Gareth Derbyshire.

What’s Happening In Practice?

Gradually falling equity allocations (65%→60%→55%)

Greater use of LDI strategies (£35bn inflation swaps¹)

Diversification into alternatives

Pace is a function of market levels:- Resistance to LDI with 50yr index-linked gilt yields <0.7%- Reluctance to de-risk equities when less than fully funded

Shift is slower than many media reports________________1. Watson Wyatt

11

Page 13: Absolute Return Strategies 29 January 2008 A Pensions Perspective “Our Changing Future” Gareth Derbyshire.

Conclusions

Absolute return strategies fit better in an LDI world

Trend away from β towards α, but β is cheaper and still has a significant role to play

Diversification into broader range of alternatives

Trade-off between investment efficiency and complexity – most (smaller) funds unlikely to go all the way?

12