Ablation percutanée et nouvelles stratégies ... -...
-
Author
duongthien -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Embed Size (px)
Transcript of Ablation percutanée et nouvelles stratégies ... -...
-
Ablation percutane et nouvelles stratgies thrapeutiques du CHC : lavnement des dispositifs micro-ondes de seconde gnration sonne til le glas de la radiofrquence ?
Olivier Seror Radiologie, Hpital Jean Verdier, Bondy, AP-HP/Paris XIII
-
Traitements chimiques : Dnaturation protique et micro thromboses chimiques
I OH
AA
Hot NaCl
Chx
I
-
Cryo
RF Mw
IEP
E
Traitements physiques : Dnaturation protique par dpt nergtique localis
USf E 0
+60
-40
C
-
Laser () 1064 nm
Multiapplicateurs
Cot/efficacit
0 d (cm)
T (C)
2 cm max
60
-
- 40
- 20
Cryothrapie Argon (-185C)/Hlium haute pression
Moins de dommage collatraux
Visibilit du glaon (US TDM IRM) Multi applicateurs Cot
Isothermes :
-20C : 20 x 40 mm Zone ltale
-40C : 14 x 32 mm
-
--
++
++
--
Mw 915/2450MHz
O H H
O H H
O H H
O H H
O H H
O H H
O H H
O H H
Rapide
Trs (trop) efficace Cot
M
-
++
--
IEP : Electroporation irrversible 90 pulses (?? kHz) x 20-100s de 100-3000v 50A
++
--
-
+
-
+ -
+
-
+ lvation brutale du
potentiel trans membranaire
Ce nest pas une thermothrapie !
Rapide
Insensible au . heat sink effect
AG
Cot
-
CHC : Indication princeps
Tumeur 3 cm
3 nodules Inoprable (cirrhose)
-
Randomized controlled trials
PEI/RF
Palliative treatments
New agents Sorafenib
BCLC (AASLD) 2005
Stades 0 et A
Child-Pugh A-B
-
Alcoolisation, Actisation ou RF ?
-
Randomized controlled trials
PEI/RF
Palliative treatments
RF New agents Sorafenib
BCLC (AASLD) 2011
Stades 0 et A
Child-Pugh A-B
-
RF ou MW ou Cryo ou EPI ou ?
Laparoscopic-assisted microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma : Safety and efficacy in comparison with radiofrequency ablation Simo KA, Sereika SE, Newton KN, Gerber DA.
RFA (n=27)
MWA (n=15) P
Volume dablation (cm3) 23 29 0,69
Temps dablation (min) 14935 11240 0,004
Ncrose complte (%) 100 100
Volume 104, December 2011
-
Randomized controlled trials
PEI/RF
Palliative treatments
RF New agents Sorafenib
BCLC (EASL) 2012
Stades 0 et A
Child-Pugh A-B
Ablation Ablation
-
MW vs RF: Some physical differences
RFA [300-400 KHz] Ionique agitation
Active heating (Impedance)
MWA [915 MHz or 2.45GHz] Water agitation
Active heating (Permittivity)
Heat
conduction
2.45GHz 915 MHz ?
of active heating
with RF 90 % of ablation relies on heat conduction
-
MWA is less controllable on lesion size Generates detrimental backward heating
MWA versus RFA: Some (potential) disadvantages
-
As many devices available on the market as much technological options !
2nd generation MWA technologies: Cornelian choice for operators
-
Sizes of ablation area Long & small axis
mm
10
20
30
40
50
60
2.45 GHz 180 W
915 MHz 32 W
2.45 GHz 130 W
Long axis Small axis
N = 24 N = 20 N = 29
Long axis along probes axis
Retraction (up to 40% !)
-
mm
10
20
30
40
50
60
2.45 GHz 180 W
915 MHz 32 W
2.45 GHz 130 W
Long axis Small axis
N = 24 N = 20 N = 29
Sizes of ablation area Long & small axis / Application time
2.45 GHz 180W
915 MHz 32W
2.45 GHz 130W
Average 3.71.9min 6.94min 7.25min
mm
10
20
30
40
50
60
2.45 GHz 180 W
915 MHz 32 W
2.45 GHz 130 W
Long axis/ Applicat time
Small axis/ Applicat time
N = 24 N = 20 N = 29
Sizes of ablation area Long & small axis
-
Sizes of ablation area Long & small axis / antenna repositioning
2.45 GHz 180W
915 MHz 32W
2.45 GHz 130W
Average 1.71 1.61 1.40.7
mm
10
20
30
40
50
60
2.45 GHz 180 W
915 MHz 32 W
2.45 GHz 130 W
Long axis Small axis
N = 24 N = 20 N = 29
mm
10
20
30
40
50
60
2.45 GHz 180 W
915 MHz 32 W
2.45 GHz 130 W
Long axis/ N positioning
Small axis/ N positioning
N = 24 N = 20 N = 29
Sizes of ablation area Long & small axis
-
Sizes of ablation area Long & small axis / forward power
mm
10
20
30
40
50
60
2.45 GHz 180 W
915 MHz 32 W
2.45 GHz 130 W
Long axis Small axis
N = 24 N = 20 N = 29
2.45 GHz 180W
915 MHz 32W
2.45 GHz 130W
Average 16030W 301,6W 6016W
mm.10-2
20 40
60
80
100
120
2.45 GHz 180 W
915 MHz 32 W
2.45 GHz 130 W
Long axis/ Forward power
Small axis/ Forward power
N = 24 N = 20 N = 29 140
Sizes of ablation area Long & small axis
-
Complications 43 patients, 75 tumors, 126 energy cycles
7 burns (16%, 9.3%, 5.5%) (Tract ablation systematically performed) 1 portal thrombosis (liver decompensation) 4 antenna breakings 1 pleural effusion (drainage) 1 bilioma (asymptomatic) 1 segmentary bile ducts dilatations (asymptomatic)
-
A worse safety profile than RFA
Complications : RF vs MW
Mortality Major Morbidity Minor
Morbidity Thermal damages
Mechanical damages
MWA N = 736 Livraghi, CVIR 2011
0% 2.9% 7.3% 3.8% 1.9%
RFA N = 2320 Livraghi, Radiology 2003
0.3% 2.4% 5% 0.3% 0.5%
3 main causal factors Induction of fast and less controlled ablation area no effective protective procedures inside the 2 cm active heating area!
Burns along transmission line due to backward energy Less protective effect of blood flow
-
Local tumor control
1 month
11 months Incomplete local control :
Incomplete primary
ablation or local recurrence
-
Taux de ncrose complte en anatomopathologie (analyse par nodule)
N Radiological (CT) Histological
Mazzaferro, Ann Surg, 2004 60 70 41.5
Brillet, AJR, 2006 22 75 37.5
RF monopolaire des CHC 3 cm : < 50% de ncrose complte Et aprs MWA ?
Qualit du contrle local en RF CHC 3 cm (RF monopolaire)
-
Annals of Surgery . Volume 245, Number 1, January 2007
Recurrence-free survival curves
for narrow and wide resection margin groups
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Recu
rren
ce F
ree S
urv
ival
0 20 40 60 80
Months after resection
Wide margin group (n=85)
Narrow margin group (n=84)
Overal survival curves for narrow and wide
resection margin groups
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Cu
mu
lati
ve S
urv
ival
0 20 40 60 80
Months after resection
Wide margin group (n=85)
Narrow margin group (n=84)
-
In your opinion what should be the best way to perform in situ thermal ablation of a malignant liver tumor? First option: from the center to the periphery
Second option: from the periphery to the center
Learn from liver oncologic surgery practice
-
Intra tumoral RFA
Technologie RF : mono vs multipolaire
Ablation margins Quite predicable Poorly predicable
Spread of heating Centripetal Centrifugal
No touch RFA
From single to multi applicators and
multipolar devices
-
Ablation planning according to tumor size (cm)
M&M : Procedures " Ultrasound guidance " General anesthesia " From two to four internaly cooled electrodes
4 3 2
Maximum distance between two adjacent electrodes 3 cm
-
Imagerie post no touch : fantme tumoral
Avant RF Apres RF
-
Histologie post no touch : Safety Margin
Avant RF Apres RF
-
RF no touch
RF monopolaire
-
BCLC (EASL) 2012
Randomized controlled trials Palliative treatments
New agents Sorafenib
Stades 0 et A
PEI/RF RF
Child-Pugh A-B
Ablation Ablation
RFA possible en technique no touch
Single
Oui Non
RFA no touch
1/ Transplantation
2/ Rsection
3/ Ablation (RFA, MW)
4/
Ablation possible
3 nodules
Oui Non
1/ MW
2/ RFA
3/
1/ Transplantation
2/
B ndy CLC 2012
-
CHC multifocal oligonodulaire: Avantage MW! 57 ans cirrhose thylique C-P B7 (TDM 11/09 : pas de CHC)
Octobre 2011 : 4 CHCs < 3 cm
Dcembre 2011 : 3 CHCs 1 cm
Mars 2012 : 1 CHC 1,5 cm
MW 1h45
MW 35
MW 1h15
TH
-
Traitements combine ?
N % 2-Years local Recurrence
TACE + RFA 46 17 RFA 43 14
Randomized trial of TACE + RFA compared with RFA alone
-
Combinaison des technologies dablation ? 71 ans cirrhose post HVC C-P B6
Nov. 11 : 3 CHCs < 3,5 cm Dec. 11 : reliquat prportal MW Mar. 12 : 0 CHC actif visible IEP
-
Et les gros CHC ?
Tumeur 5 cm
Tumeur infiltrante Extension portale (intra hpatique)
Inoprables +++
-
BCLC (EASL) 2012 : Gros CHC
+/- Ablations
!
Ablations
? ?????
-
RF monopolaire du gros CHC
N Size
[range] mean (cm)
Complete radiological response
(%)
Local recurrence
(%)
Incomplete local tumor
control (%)
Livraghi T et al. Radiology, 2000
RFA 114 [3-9,5] 5.4 47.6 5.5 58
Yin XY et al. Cancer, 2009
RFA 109 [3-7] 3.9 92.6 22 29.4
-
N Size
[range] mean (cm)
Complete radiological response
(%)
Local recurrence
(%)
Incomplete local tumor
control (%)
Livraghi T et al. Radiology, 2000
RFA 114 [3-9,5] 5.4 47.6 5.5 58
Yin XY et al. Cancer, 2009
RFA 109 [3-7] 3.9 92.6 22 29.4
Veltri A et al. Eur Radiol, 2006
TACE +
RFA 46 [3-8] 4.8 66.7 10 43.3
Lencioni R et al. J Hepatol, 2008
RFA +
DC beads 20 [3.3-7] 5 60 10 50
Et si on ajoutait la CEL
-
Monopolar Multipolar
Resort to overlapping ablations Limited Mandatory
Ablation margins Quite predicable Poorly predicable
Ablation volume Summation of all inter applicators ablation areas
Summation of all surrounding applicator ablation areas
Spread of heating Centripetal Centrifugal
Multi applicators devices
Technologie RF : mono vs multipolaire
-
Ablation planning according to tumor size
" Ultrasound guidance " General anesthesia " Up to six internaly cooled linear electrodes
3 cm as maximal distance between 2 adjacent electrodes
5 cm diameter 6 cm diameter
M&M : Procedures
-
" 87% de rponse complte (47/54)
" 6/7 des checs taient des formes infiltrantes
Rsultats: Rponse prcoce
-
Rponse complte en imagerie
Before RFA 1 month after RFA
4 months after RFA
Liver transplantation
59 years old, Child-Pugh A HCV cirrhosis, referred for MP RFA for a 55 mm nodular HCC located in segment VIII/IV
-
CHC infiltrants sur 1-3 segments ? 50 ans, CHC infiltrant V/VIII & VII + nodules mtastatiques bilobaires sur cirrhose thylique C-P A, rponse < 50% la CEL
Novembre 2010
-
Alcoolisation intra artrielle Cest pas cher et a peut rapporter gros ! Sous Echo et sous AG
Une aiguille Chiba 18G et un raccord flexible
5-50 cc dOH 90%
-
Mars 2012 Hpatectomie droite
-
Radiofrquence multipolare A tenter si AIA impossible ou en chec 83 ans, prsentant une quadruple rcidive de CHC dont une volumineuse lsion infiltrante du III 5 ans aprs une RFA initiale pour CHC bifocal (rupture de surveillance, cirrhose OH C-P B6)
Aout 2011
-
Janvier 2012
Plus de CHC actif visible mais dgradation de la fonction hpatique
-
Mthode 1
Technique ancienne = Technique obsolte ?
Spectre des indications en intention curative
Mthode 2 Mthode 3
Pas de mthode omnipotente Pas de substitution ad integratum
-
Mono-segmentaire
En pratique Bondy CHC " curable "
2
>5cm
MW
RF MP
CP>B6
Bi-segmentaire
AIA
RF MP
3cm
CEL & Co
AIA
CEL & Co
>5cm