A VMD Estimate of the Muon g-2 A HLS based approach
Embed Size (px)
description
Transcript of A VMD Estimate of the Muon g-2 A HLS based approach

A VMD Estimate of the Muon g-2 A HLS based approach
M. Benayoun LPNHE Paris 6/7
1M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates

OUTLINE
Model & Method Symmetry Breaking : BKY & (ρ,ω,φ) mixingGlobal Fit : vs e+ e-
Global Fit : e+e- → π π /KKbar /π γ /η γ /π π π ππ contribution to g-2 VMD estimate of HVP and g-2Conclusions
M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates 2

HLS : A VMD Model (I)
• The Hidden Local Symmetry model is :
A unified VMD framework including e+e- → π π /KKbar /π γ /η γ /π π π & τ→ππ ντ&
PVγ couplings & η/η’ γπ π/γγ & ……Few basic parameters : e, fπ ,Vud,Vus, a (≈2), g ,…Present Limits : Up to the ≈ φ mass region ( 1.05 GeV) No scalars mesons, no ρ’, no ρ’’ ……
3M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates
M. Harada & K. Yamawaki Phys. Rep. 381 (2003) 1
M.Bando et al. Phys. Rep. 164 (1988) 217

NSK2:: Breaking the HLS Model
HLS not enough Flexible to really account for data Need breaking schemes to become operating: BKY mechanism
vector meson mixing
4M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates
M.Bando et al. Nucl. Phys. B259 (1985) 493
M.Benayoun et al. EPJ C55 (2008) 199
M.Benayoun et al. Phys. Rev. D58 (1998) 074006
Breaking the HLS Model
A. Bramon et al. Phys. Lett. B345 (1995) 263
M.Benayoun et al. EPJ C65 (2010) 211

HLS and the BKY Mechanism
• Define
• Then • Standard HLS Lagrangians • BKY breaking :
Full HLS Lagrangian :BKY Breaking Matrix : Diag
/
/e
f
R
Pi
L
†/ // L R L RL R D
/ /
22{ }
4A V A V
fL Tr L R X
'FKTUYHL t oV Ho ftS AL L a LLL
PS field matrix
M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates
/A VX , , // / A VA V A Vq y zM. Hashimoto, Phys. Rev. D54 (1996) 5611
M. Benayoun et al, arXiv:1106.1315
/
2 2
4A V
fL Tr L R

Isospin Breaking : Vector Field Mixing I
• tree level:: ideal vector fields ≡ mass eigenstates• Vector Mass Term Diagonalization:
• one loop:: s-dependent transitions among R1 fields
6M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates
11
1 1(1 )
RR
R
I
I R
V
V
V
hh
C. Wolfe&K. Maltman, Phys. Rev. D80 (2009)114024
1&
I R ( )
V V Vq y
F. Jegerlehner & R. Szafron EPJ C71 (2011) 1632

Isospin Breaking : Vector Field Mixing II
• At one loop, the HLS Lagrangian piece
induces s-dependent transitions among R1 fields
isospin symmetry breaking :
7
1 1 10 0
1 1 12 2R R R VR RV RK K Kz z K ��
0K Km m
M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates

Transitions at one loop
• Define the loops : = K+ K- , = K0 K0
Then, beside self-masses : → + ~ ε2(s) ≠ 0 always
→ - ≠ 0 by isospin brk
→ - ~ ε1(s)
( )s
( )s
( )s
VVP Lagrangian K*K loops // Yang-Mills K*K*loops
8
f(s)
M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates

The Mass Matrix Eigen System At one loop:
As :
Solve perturbatively
9
12
2( ) (, ) )(m s s s
2
2 21 1
1
1 222
2
2 2
2
( ) ( )
( ) ((
( ) (
)
( ) ( )
)
)
( )
) (
V
s s
s
s s
s
s
m
M s m
z sm
s
s
2 2 20( ) ( ) ( )M s M s M s
M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates

From Ideal To Physical Fields
( ) ( ) 1R s i R s i
2( )i
O
0 01
1
1
1
1
1
R
R
R
22
1
2
22
2
2
( )
( ( )2
1
)
( )( )
( )
(
2
(1 ) 2
2
(1 ) (1 2 )
( )
( )
( )
( ))
V
V V
V
V V
s
ss
s
z
z z
z
s
s
sz z
s
m
m
s
s
s
10M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates
R1 Fields
Physical Fields

Analysis Method
GLOBAL FIT to the largest possible data setWhy ? Check VMD constraints well accepted by DATA?
(correct lineshapes & yields with Proba. OK)
IF YES ↔ theoretical correlations fulfilled by DATA →→ improved parameters
HLS form factors & fit parameters values & errors & covariance matrix → contributions to g-2 Procedure fully blind to g-2
M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates 11

Channels Considered• Non-Anomalous annihilations : e+e- → π π /
or decays : τ→ππ ντ (plays as constraint only!)
• Anomalous Processes : e+e- → π γ/ηγ/π π π (Anomalous FKTUY Effective Lagrangian pieces)
• Radiative decays widths (VPγ, η/η’→ππγ)
OVERCONSTRAINED MODEL & Breaking Scheme
K K
12M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates

Channels Considered• Non-Anomalous annihilations : e+e- → π π /
or decays : τ→ππ ντ (constraint)
• Anomalous Processes : e+e- → π γ/ηγ/π π π (Anomalous Effective Lagrangian pieces)
• Radiative decays widths (VPγ, η/η’→ππγ)• ISR data : NOT INCLUDED
OVERCONSTRAINED MODEL & Breaking Scheme
Relying on more than 40 (scan) data sets
K K
13M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates

V π π Couplings: I=1 part of ω and φ
2 I
iag �
*At leading order : ρ term unchanged (I=1 part)*small s-dependent ω and φ couplings (I=1 part)* Charged and neutral rho’s: same coupling to pions
14
0(1 )(1 ) ( )
2( )V
VV
i gh s
as
�
Mixing Angles I=1 terms
M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates

ρ couplings to γ/W
• (γ/W) V transitions : = +
Full agreement between data
15
M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates
One loop corrections
( ) 2( )1 (1 )
3 3 3VV s
sf
Wf ag fh VVW
f
z
ande e

ρ couplings to γ/W
• (γ/W) V transitions : = +
Full agreement between data
16
M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates
One loop corrections
( ) 2( )1 (1 )
3 3 3VV s
sf
Wf ag fh VVW
f
z
ande e

ρ couplings to γ/W
• (γ/W) V transitions : = +
Full agreement between data
17
M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates
One loop corrections
( ) 2( )1 (1 )
3 3 3VV s
sf
Wf ag fh VVW
f
z
ande e

M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates 18
ρ couplings to γ/W
( )f
Wf
F s
Re[F(s)]
Im[F(s)]

Dipion Spectra
M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates 19
spectrum spectrume e
2χ 8688Np
2χ 130127Np
(Pr 98%)ob

e+e- Fit Residuals
M. Benayoun, e+ e- versus tau 20
e+e- Data

M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates 21
Tau Fit Residuals

M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates 22
Tau Residuals

NSK18:: Dipion Mass Spectrum
•
• s-dependent (missing) effect !
23
M. Davier NP Proc. Supp. 169 (2007) 288
M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates

M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates 24
3-pion Data
2χ 200179Np

M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates 25
2χ 3536Np
K+ K-
KL KS
2χ 118119Np
e+e- → K Kbar Data

M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates 26
2χ 3536Np
K+ K-
KL KS2χ 118
119Np
e+e- → K Kbar Data Ratio

e+e- → π0 γ
27M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates
2χ 6790Np

e+e- → ηγ Data
28M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates
2χ 121182Np

M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates 29
Effect of Global Fitting on aµ(ππ)L.O. Contribution of ππ to g-2
Integrated from 0.630 to 0.958 GeV/c (x10-10)
Reconstructed value consistent with exp. average Global fits provide improved uncertainties
Probabilities provided by the (underlying) global fits
FSR Corrected Data Set 1010 aµ(ππ) χ2/dof Probability
Exp. Average 360.65 ± 2.55
All NSK +- 360.00 ± 1.64 177/208 93%
++ 359.80 ± 1.47 263/293 90%
++ (π0/η) γ 360.09 ± 1.60 437/549 99%
++ (π+ π- π0) 360.91 ± 1.45 661/727 96%
++ K Kbar 362.79 ± 1.43 858/882 71%

M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates 30
Data Set 1010 aµ(ππ) χ2/dof Probability
Exp. Average 360.65 ± 2.55
All NSK +- 360.00 ± 1.64 177/208 93%
++ 359.80 ± 1.47 263/293 90%
++ (π0/η) γ 360.09 ± 1.60 437/549 99%
++ (π+ π- π0) 360.91 ± 1.45 661/727 96%
++ K Kbar 362.79 ± 1.43 858/882 71%
Effect of Global Fit on aµ(ππ)L.O. Contribution of ππ to g-2
Integrated from 0.630 to 0.958 GeV/c (x10-10)
Reconstructed value consistent with exp. average Global fits provide improved uncertainties
Probabilities provided by the (underlying) global fits

M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates 31
Data Set 1010 aµ(ππ) χ2/dof Probability
Exp. Average 360.65 ± 2.55
All NSK +- 360.00 ± 1.64 177/208 93%
++ 359.80 ± 1.47 263/293 90%
++ (π0/η) γ 360.09 ± 1.60 437/549 99%
++ (π+ π- π0) 360.91 ± 1.45 661/727 96%
++ K Kbar 362.79 ± 1.43 858/882 71%
Effect of Global Fit on aµ(ππ)L.O. Contribution of ππ to g-2
Integrated from 0.630 to 0.958 GeV/c (x10-10)
Reconstructed value consistent with exp. average Global fits provide improved uncertainties
Probabilities provided by the (underlying) global fits

Contributions to g-2 up to ()
32M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates
Channel Solution B Solution A Exp. Average
+- 498.54 ± 1.97 497.98 ± 1.76 498.53 ± 3.73
π0 γ 4.64 ± 0.04 4.28 ± 0.04 3.35 ± 0.11
η γ 0.65 ± 0.01 0.67 ± 0.01 0.48 ± 0.01
η' γ 0.01 ± 0.00 0.01 ± 0.00 ---
π+ π- π0 42.03 ± 0.60 40.88 ± 0.52 43.24 ± 1.47
KL KS 12.02 ± 0.09 12.07 ± 0.08 12.31 ± 0.33
K+K- 16.87 ± 0.20 16.93 ± 0.18 17.88 ± 0.54
Total up to 1.05 GeV
574.76 ± 2.10 572.82 ± 1.90 575.79 ± 4.06
Excl. ISR
Uncertainties uniformly improved by a factor 2

Below 1.05 GeV• Most of Hadronic VP estimated from our Model (574.76 ±
2.10/ 572.82 ± 1.90)• Missing channels (ηπ π, π π π π, etc…) HVP estimated
from data (1.55 ± 0.57)
Above 1.05 GeV• LO HVP estimated from data and pQCD (111.41 ± 4.10)
• Total LO HVP : B → 687.72 ± 4.63 // A → 685.78 ± 4.55
M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates 33
VMD estimate of LO HVP

• LO HVP + HO HVP + LBL +QED +EW giveaµ= ( 11 659 175.37 ± 5.31) 10-10 (B)
Oraµ= ( 11 659 173.43 ± 5.25) 10-10 (A)
M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates 34
VMD estimate of g-2

M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates 35
VMD estimate of g-2

Conclusions
1/ HLS with BKY and Vector Meson Mixing provides a good simultaneous fit of
e+e- → → π π /K+K-/ KLKS/ π γ/ηγ/π π π
2/ A simultaneous account ofe+e- → → π π & τ→ππ ντ
3/ VMD physics correlations improve g-2 (Uncertainty : HVP up to uniformly improved by 2)
36M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates

Backup Slides
37M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates

NSK1:: HLS : A VMD Model (I)
• The Hidden Local Symmetry model is :
A unified VMD framework including e+e- → π π /Kkbar /π γ /η γ /π π π & τ→ππ ντ&
PVγ couplings & η/η’ γπ π/γγ & ……Few basic parameters : e, fπ ,Vud,Vus, a (≈2), g ,…Present Limits : Up to the ≈ φ mass region ( 1.05 GeV) No scalars mesons, no ρ’, no ρ’’ ……
38M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates
M. Harada & K. Yamawaki Phys. Rep. 381 (2003) 1
M.Bando et al. Phys. Rep. 164 (1988) 217

VMD :: The HLS Framework
• Hidden Local Symmetry Model (HLS) as a whole
LA, LV, LYM , Lanomalous
(π/K form factors, VPPP, γPPP, VPγ & Pγγ couplings)
• BKY-like flavor U(3)/SU(3) breaking mechanisms
M.Bando, T. Kugo & K. Yamawaki Phys. Rep. 164 (1988) 217M. Harada & K. Yamawaki Phys. Rep. 381 (2003) 1
M.Benayoun & H.O’Connell PR D 58 (1998) 074006
M. Benayoun et al. PR D 59 (1999) 114027A. Bramon, A. Grau & G. Pancheri PL B 345 (1995) 263
G. Morpurgo PR D 42 (1990) 1497
M. Benayoun, L. DelBuono & H. O’Connell EPJ C 17 (2000) 593
M. Benayoun et al. EPJ C 55 (2008) 139
M.Bando, T. Kugo & K. Yamawaki Phys. Rep. 164 (1988) 217
39M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates

The Hidden Local Symmetry Model :The Non-Anomalous Sector
• Define
• Define covariant derivatives
• Then and
• The Full HLS Lagrangian :
40
/
/e
f
R
Pi
L
,L RD D †
/ // L R L RL R D /
22
4A V
fL Tr L R
HLS A YMVL LL a L Expanded form: M.Benayoun & H.O’Connell PR D 58 (1998) 074006
/ / // /L R L R L R L R L RV GD igi Universal Vector Coupling
PS field matrix
M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates

The Covariant Derivatives
• Covariant derivatives ≠ for left- right-ξ fields :
• With :
41
/ / // /L R L R L R L R L RV GD igi
2
2LG A WQ T
gTe W
,RG eQA
T± is CKM matrix reduced to Vus and Vud termsM. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates

Anomalous Annihilations/Decays
• Non-Anomalous annihilations : e+e- → π π / or decays : τ→ππ ντ
• Anomalous Processes : e+e- → π γ/ηγ/π π π :: Other Effective Lagrangian pieces
K K
3
1 2 3
4 1 4
2
2
2
2
3
2( )
4
( )4
( ) (3
1 )4
( )1 ( )
V P P
PPP
PPP
V AV
V
AA
c
P A
c
c
c c c
c c c
NL Tr L
NL i Tr
L
gV V g
gV
e eL
P Pf
c
f
P
42M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates

SIDE RESULT : Prediction for η/η’→ ππ γ
Г(η’→ ππ γ)=53.11±1.47PDG : 60±5 keV
Г(η→ ππ γ)=55.82±0.83PDG : 60±4 eV
Lineshapes and yields : tests for g value and ρ0 lineshape
M. Benayoun et al. ArXiv 0907.4047
43M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates

BELLE/ALEPH/CLEO
44M. Benayoun, VMD & g-2 estimates