A comparison of electron beam lithography resists … · Nishida, “Quantum Wire Fabrication by...

10
A comparison of electron beam lithography resists PMMA and ZEP520A

Transcript of A comparison of electron beam lithography resists … · Nishida, “Quantum Wire Fabrication by...

Page 1: A comparison of electron beam lithography resists … · Nishida, “Quantum Wire Fabrication by E-beam Elithography Using HighResolution and High- Sensitivity E- -Beam Resist ZEP-520”,

A comparison ofelectron beam lithography resists

PMMA and ZEP520A

Page 2: A comparison of electron beam lithography resists … · Nishida, “Quantum Wire Fabrication by E-beam Elithography Using HighResolution and High- Sensitivity E- -Beam Resist ZEP-520”,

material properties

property PMMA ZEP520

manufacturer Micro Chem (USA) Zeon Chemicals (Japan)

polymer poly methyl methacrylate

1:1 co-polymerα-chloromethacrylate, α-methylstyrene

chemical formula (C5O2H8)n C3H3O2Cl, C9H10

molecular weight 950,000 55,000

solution suspension anisole anisole

appearance clear liquid clear liquid

density 1.18 g/cm3 1.053 g/cm3

Tg / melting point 105º C 105º C1, 145º C2

melting point 160º C ?

refractive index @ 600 nm

1.49 1.56

1ZEP520A Technical Report Ver.2 Oct 2010, http://www.zeonchemicals.com/pdfs/ZEP520A.pdf2Nishida, “Quantum Wire Fabrication by E-beam Elithography Using High-Resolution and High-Sensitivity E-Beam Resist ZEP-520”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 31 (1992) pp. 4508-4514

2

Page 3: A comparison of electron beam lithography resists … · Nishida, “Quantum Wire Fabrication by E-beam Elithography Using HighResolution and High- Sensitivity E- -Beam Resist ZEP-520”,

chemical structure

PMMA ZEP

3

Page 4: A comparison of electron beam lithography resists … · Nishida, “Quantum Wire Fabrication by E-beam Elithography Using HighResolution and High- Sensitivity E- -Beam Resist ZEP-520”,

PMMA Process Conditions

Substrate: 4” silicon wafer cleaved into 1”x1” piece, then spun

Coat: PMMA A6 resist 6000RPM, 3000 RPM / sec, 60sec 180°C hot plate bake for 90 sec Thickness: 301 nm (measured on the Nanospec reflectometer)

Expose: 2 nA current, 100 kV accelerating voltage, 8 nm shot pitch Dose varied for 100 nm line features

Develop: 1:1 MIBK:IPA immersion for 2 minutes Isopropanol immersion for 30 seconds N2 blow dry

4

Page 5: A comparison of electron beam lithography resists … · Nishida, “Quantum Wire Fabrication by E-beam Elithography Using HighResolution and High- Sensitivity E- -Beam Resist ZEP-520”,

ZEP520A Process Conditions

Substrate: 4” silicon wafer cleaved into 1”x1” piece, then spun

Coat: ZEP520A resist 5000 RPM, 2500 RPM / sec, 60sec 180°C hot plate bake for 2 minutes Thickness: 312 nm (measured on the Nanospec reflectometer)

Expose: 2 nA current, 100 kV accelerating voltage, 8 nm shot pitch Dose varied for 100 nm line features

Develop: Amyl acetate immersion for 2 minutes Isopropanol immersion for 30 seconds N2 blow dry

5

Page 6: A comparison of electron beam lithography resists … · Nishida, “Quantum Wire Fabrication by E-beam Elithography Using HighResolution and High- Sensitivity E- -Beam Resist ZEP-520”,

Dose sensitivity curve

dose sensitivity curve for 75 x 75 um squares ZEP520 has higher contrast (although PMMA develop conditions could be modified) dose to clear ZEP520 = ~220 uC/cm2 PMMA = ~270 uC/cm2

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500dose (uC/cm2)

thic

knes

s (A

ng)

PMMAZEP520

6

Page 7: A comparison of electron beam lithography resists … · Nishida, “Quantum Wire Fabrication by E-beam Elithography Using HighResolution and High- Sensitivity E- -Beam Resist ZEP-520”,

SEM image of 100 nm line and space

284.2uC/cm2 308.7uC/cm2 333.2uC/cm2

PMMA

190 uC/cm2 200 uC/cm2 210 uC/cm2

ZEP520

7

Page 8: A comparison of electron beam lithography resists … · Nishida, “Quantum Wire Fabrication by E-beam Elithography Using HighResolution and High- Sensitivity E- -Beam Resist ZEP-520”,

ICP Etch Process Conditions

Substrate: 4” SiO2 coated silicon carrier wafer resist samples (ZEP520, PMMA) mounted simultaneously on carrier wafer and etched

together

Etch: Plasma Therm ICP recipe = DKB_SI press = 5 mTorr 16 sccm Cl2 4 sccm Ar 50W RIE power 200W coil power etch time = 30 sec

8

Page 9: A comparison of electron beam lithography resists … · Nishida, “Quantum Wire Fabrication by E-beam Elithography Using HighResolution and High- Sensitivity E- -Beam Resist ZEP-520”,

Post etch cross section comparison

100 nm line and space x-section images post silicon ICP etching resist still remaining

PMMA, 333.2 uC/cm2 ZEP520, 200 uC/cm2

9

Page 10: A comparison of electron beam lithography resists … · Nishida, “Quantum Wire Fabrication by E-beam Elithography Using HighResolution and High- Sensitivity E- -Beam Resist ZEP-520”,

etch rate and selectivity data

first etch run

second etch run

comparison of Si to resist etch selectivity

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

PMMA A6 ZEP520

resist

sele

ctiv

ity (S

i:res

ist)

first etch runsecond etch run

resistpre-etch resist

thickness (Ang)post-etch

thickness (Ang) etched resist (Ang)resist etch rate

(Ang/sec)etched silicon

(Ang)silicon etch rate (Ang/sec)

selectivity (Si to resist)

PMMA A6 3013 1077 1936 65 419 14.0 0.22ZEP520 3117 2125 992 33 446 14.9 0.45

resistpre-etch resist

thickness (Ang)post-etch

thickness (Ang) etched resist (Ang)resist etch rate

(Ang/sec)etched silicon

(Ang)silicon etch rate (Ang/sec)

selectivity (Si to resist)

PMMA A6 3329 1742 1587 53 372 12.4 0.23ZEP520 2996 2199 797 27 384 12.8 0.48

10