6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

48
STRESS CYCLES

description

good

Transcript of 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

Page 1: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

STRESS CYCLES

Page 2: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

Repeated Stress Cycle

Page 3: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

Completely Reversed Stress Cycle

σm = 0

R = -1

Page 4: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

Random Stress Cycle

Page 5: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

STRESS-LIFE DIAGRAM

(HIGH CYCLE FATIGUE)

Page 6: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

Basquin Relation

NF (σa)p = C

Page 7: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

Stress – Life Approach

Endurance Limit or Fatigue Limit

Yield Strength

Page 8: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

There is a strong correlation between fatigue

strength and tensile strength.

(From Forrest, Fatigue of Metals, Pergamon Press, London, 1962)

σe ≈ 0.5 σu for steels

σe (for 108 cycles)≈ 0.35 σu

for non-ferrous alloys

Page 9: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

Statistical Nature of Fatigue

Ti6Al4V

Page 10: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

Statistical Nature of Fatigue

Page 11: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

Effect of mean stress on fatigue

Page 12: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

GOODMAN DIAGRAM

(gives the maximum allowable stress amplitude

for a different mean stress)

Page 13: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

GOODMAN DIAGRAM

Page 14: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

x = 1 for Goodman line

x = 2 for Gerber parabola

σu = σo for Soderberg line

Effect of mean stress on fatigue

Page 15: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

EXAMPLE

SOLUTION

Page 16: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013
Page 17: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

STRESS STRAIN LOOP FOR CONSTANT

STRAIN CYCLE

Page 18: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

STRAIN-LIFE DIAGRAM

(LOW CYCLE FATIGUE)

Page 19: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

Coffin- Manson Relation

(Low cycle fatigue)

Page 20: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013
Page 21: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

STRAIN-LIFE EQUATION

(FOR ALL FATIGUE LIVES)

Page 22: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

CUMULATIVE FATIGUE DAMAGE

Page 23: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

CUMULATIVE FATIGUE DAMAGE

Page 24: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

CUMULATIVE FATIGUE DAMAGE

Page 25: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

A multipurpose traffic bridge has been in service for three years and

each day carries a large number of trains, trucks, and automobiles. A

subsequent highway analysis reveals a sharp difference between

expected actual traffic patterns that threatens to shorten the usefull life

span of the bridge. Fortunately, a nearby second bridge was recently

completed that can assume all of the train traffic. Given the following

fatigue information, estimate the remaining lifetime for the first bridge,

assuming that it will carry only truck and automobile traffic.

VEHICLE FATIGUE

LIFETIME

VEHICLES/

DAY

Automobiles 108 5000

Trucks 2x106 100

Trains 105 30

CUMULATIVE FATIGUE DAMAGE

Example

Page 26: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

Trains

Trucks

Page 27: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

a) First establish the amount of fatigue damage

accumulated during the initial 3-year service period:

Accumulated damage in initial 1095 days: 0.438.

That is 43.8% of the combined fatigue lifetime.

b) Remaining fatigue lifetime: 56.2% of the combined

fatigue lifetime.

D= remaining days of service

D= 5620 days(15.4 years) for automobile + truck traffic

only.

D= 3.85 years, if the train traffic were to be continued.

Page 28: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

FRACTURE MECHANICS

APPROACH TO FATIGUE

(Damage Tolerant Design)

Page 29: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

C-T SPECIMEN

Crack Growth Rate Measurement

1) Crack length, a is

measure against

number of cycles, N

2) a vs N diagram is

drawn

3) Crack growth rate,

da/dN is calculated

from the slope.

STUDY:

http://aluminium.matter.o

rg.uk/content/html/eng/d

efault.asp?catid=176&pa

geid=2144416584

Page 30: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

a vs N DIAGRAM

Page 31: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

Driving Force for Crack Growth

• The driving force for crack growth is the in

the stress intensity factor range during

cycling.

0Rfor

0Rfor

a(a/W)K

max

minmax

f

Page 32: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013
Page 33: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

Crack Growth Rate Diagram

(da/dN vs ΔK)

Page 34: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

REMAINING FATIGUE LIFE

ac

ac

Page 35: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

General Solution:

c

o

a

a

mp

a(a/W)A

daN

)f

co

3323pa

1

a

1

YA

2N

)(/

m=3;; constant Y= f(a/W) :

NF

NF

Page 36: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

EXAMPLE PROBLEM

• A relatively large sheet of steel is to be exposed to cyclic tensile and compressive stresses of magnitudes +100 MPa and -50 MPa respectively. Prior to testing, it has been determined that the length of the largest straight-through center crack is 2.0 mm. Estimate the fatigue life of this sheet if its plane strain fracture toughness is 25 MPa.m1/2 and the values of m and A are 3 and 1X10-12

respectively for Δσ in MPa and a in mm. Assume Y=1.

• Answer: 2ao= 2 mm, so ao= 1 mm

ac= 0.01989 m = 19.89 mm

NF= 8.81 X 106 cycles

TF= 204 days (For a loading frequency of 0.5 Hz)

Page 37: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

AN EXAMPLE FROM DIETER

Page 38: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

AN EXAMPLE FROM DIETER

Page 39: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

FACTORS AFFECTING THE

FATIGUE LIFE

• Geometrical Design

• Surface Roughness

• Surface Strength

• Residual Stresses

• Size

• Environment

• Metallurgical Structure

Page 40: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

GEOMETRICAL DESIGN

(Remove stress concentrators)

BAD

BETTER

Page 41: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013
Page 42: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

EFFECT OF STRESS CONCENTRATION

Page 43: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

SURFACE ROUGHNESS

Page 44: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

Reduction factor for fatigue limit of steel due to

various surface treatments (Surface Finish)

• Sensitivity to

surface condition

increases with

increasing

strength.

• Corrosion has a

significant effect

on fatigue limit

Page 45: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

SURFACE TREATMENT

Shot Peening

Carburizing, Nitriding, Induction Hardening, Electroplating

Decarburization?

Page 46: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

COMPRESSIVE RESIDUAL STRESS

(Put surface into compression)

Page 47: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

EFFECT OF CORROSION

Page 48: 6. FATIGUE Diagrams S-N Goodman Da-dN 2013

TOPICS TO THINK ABOUT

1) Why does shot peening improve the fatigue life

of a metal component?

2) Why does carburizing increase the fatigue life of

a steel component?

3) What microstructure is the best for the optimum

fatigue properties in heat treated low alloy

steels?

4) What kind of fatigue (low cycle or high cycle)

should be considered for the ribbed steels in

steel reinforced concrete during an earthquake?

5) What effect will have the decarburization of a

steel component on the fatigue performance of

it?