Correlation Femtoscopy R. Lednický, JINR Dubna & IP ASCR Prague
1 Study of resonances with Dubna-Mainz-Taipei (DMT) dynamical model Shin Nan Yang National Taiwan...
-
Upload
francis-aubrey-tate -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
3
Transcript of 1 Study of resonances with Dubna-Mainz-Taipei (DMT) dynamical model Shin Nan Yang National Taiwan...
1
Study of resonances withStudy of resonances with
Dubna-Mainz-Taipei (DMT) dynamical Dubna-Mainz-Taipei (DMT) dynamical modelmodel
Shin Nan YangShin Nan Yang
National Taiwan UniversityNational Taiwan University
INT Program on Lattice QCD studies of excited resonances and multi-hadron systems
July 30 - August 31, 2012
Dubna: KamalovMainz: Drechsel, TiatorTaipei: GY Chen, CT Hung, CC Lee, SNY
Outline• Motivation • DMT πN model• DMT model for electromagnetic production of pion• Results for the resonances• Multiple poles feature of resonances in the
presence Riemann sheet• Summary
3
Motivation To construct a meson-exchange model forπN scattering and e.m. production of pion so that a consistent extraction of the resonance properties like, mass, width, and form factors, from both reactions can be achieved. Comparison with LQCD results requires reliable extraction. consistent extractions → minimize model dependence? The resonances we study are always of the type which results from dressing of the quark core by meson cloud. → understand the underlying structure and dynamics
What is the low-lying excited spectrum of mesons and baryons?
Experimentally, how are they extracted ?
SCIENTIFIC GOALS of This Program
5
Taipei-Argonne πN model: meson-exchange N model below 400 MeV
0
N
0
Bethe-Salpeter equation
,
where
sum of all irreducible two-particle Feynman amplitues
relativistic free pion-nuc
can be r
leon propagator
ewritten as
N N
N
N N
N
T B B G T
T B
B
G
B
N
N
0
0
0
,
with
(
) .
N
N
N N
T
B BB G BG
G
6
Three-dimensional reduction
0
0
0
Choose a such that
1. becomes
( , )
three-dimensio
2. can reproduce N elas
na
tic
l
cut
N NN NT B B T
G k P
G
G
Cooper-Jennings reduction scheme
7
Choose to be given byNB
42
24 2 2
10
,
n
nF p
n m p
n
tree approximation of a chiral effective Lagrangian
8C.T. Hung, S.N. Yang, and T.-S.H. Lee, Phys. Rev. C64, 034309 (2001)
9
DMT πN model:extension of Taipei-Argonne model
to energies ≦ 2 GeV
Inclusion of ηN channel and effects of ππN channel in S11
Introducing higher resonances as indicated by the data
G.Y. Chen et al., Phys. Rev. C 76 (2007) 035206.
Inclusion of ηN channel in S11
,ij ij ik k kjk
t E E E g E t E B
ij iRijj EE E
0†(0)
0, ,0 if or = iR jRR
ij
R
Bij
h hE
E Mv i j
0 0
0 2
, ; , ;, ; .
2
i i i j j jRij
R R
f q E g g f q Eq q E
iE M E
(if only one R)
Effects of is taken into account with the introduction of instead of including channels
N2 ( )R E
( , N, )N
11
decomposition of bkg and reson.
0
0
where
,
,
.
B B BN N N N
R R RN N
BN N
N
RN
N
t E t E t
t E E g E t E
t E E E
E
g E t
(in the case of only one (in the case of only one resonance) resonance)
12
0
0
Resonance mass and width
Re ,
2 Im .
0
,
Re ,
R R
R R R R
R R R R
R R
E M E
M M M
M M
M
MR, ΓR
depend on B
Nt
0
0
RRRN
RR
h Et E
E M
h
EE
0 00N RR
BRh g Eh tE E h
0 0 0 00 0 0
BNRR R R Rh g E h h t Eg g hE
Note that both
the dressed vertex
and self energy
depend on
R
R
BN
h
t
13
Introduction of higher resonances
If there are n resonances, then
1
, ; , ;n
NRR
ij ijn
q q E q q E
Bij i
Rijj EE E
,ij ij ik k kjk
t E E E g E t E
Coupled-Coupled-channels channels
equations can equations can be solvedbe solved
results of our fits to the SAID s.e. partial results of our fits to the SAID s.e. partial waveswaves
nonresonant backgroundbare resonances
single-energy pw analysis from SAID
requires 4 resonances in S11
15
To order e, the t-matrix for N → N is written as
Dynamical model for N → N
0
00
where
transition potential,
( ) ( )
-matrix,
1
( )
,
( )
N
N N
t Et E
t
E H
g Ev v
v
t
g E
two two ingredientsingredients
Both on- & off-shell (gauge invariance?)
, Nv t
16
• Multipole decomposition
where (), R() : N scattering phase shift and
reaction matrix in channel • k=| k|, qE : photon and pion on-shell
momentum
( ) ( ) ( )
( ( )2( )
0
)
( , ; ) exp( )cos
' ( , '; ) ( ', )( , ) '
( ')N
E
EE
N
t q k E i i
q q q E q kq k P dq
v
E
R
E qv
Off-shell rescatterings
17
( )
background transition potential
contribution of a bare resonance
( ) )
(( )
(
If the transition potential consists ot two terms,
,
where
then one obtains
RB
R
B
B
v E
R
v E
v
t E
v E
v
t
v
0
0
( ))
( ( ) ( )
( )) ( )(
)
,
with
R
R R
B B
N
N
R
B v v g E
t E
t E v v
t E
g
t
E t E
E
E
both tB and tR satisfyFermi-Watson theorem,respectively.
18
2 ( ) ,, ( ) ( ) , 2
0
' ( , '; ) ( ', )exp( )cos [ ( , ) ' ]
( ')
BN EB B
N
q R q q E v q kt i v W Q P dq
E E q
Bv
DMT Model
PV only
19
In DMT, we approximate the resonance contribution AR(W,Q2) by the
following Breit-Wigner form
with
f R = Breit-Wigner factor describing the decay of the resonance R
R (W) = total width
MR = physical mass
(W) = to adjust the phase of the total multipole to be equal to the corresponding N phase shift ().
Note that refers to a bare vertex
2 22 2
( ) ( )( , ) ,( ) R R R RR i
R
R
R R
f W M f WA W Q e
M W iA
MQ
2( ) R
A Q
20
Results of DMT model near threshold, (depends only on )
and B BNv t
21M. Weis et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 38 (2008) 27
22
Photon Beam Asymmetry near ThresholdPhoton Beam Asymmetry near Threshold
Data: A. Schmidt et al., PRL 87 (2001) @ MAMIDMT: S. Kamalov et al., PLB 522 (2001)
Sensitive w.r.t. multipole 1 (1/ 2)M
D. Hornidge (CB@MAMI)private communication
D. Hornidge (CB@MAMI)private communication
D. Hornidge (CB@MAMI)private communication
MAID
DMT
Results on resonance properties
• Δ deformation
• Masses, widths, poles positions of the resonances
Dashed (dotted) curves are results for
including (excluding) the principal value integral contribution.
Bt
( ) ( ) , 2
2 ( ) ,
0
,
' ( , '; ) ( ', )'
(
exp( )cos { ( , )
')}
BN E
B
N
B
q R q q
i v W
E v q kP dq
t
E E q
Q
△ deformation
(hyperfine qq interaction → D-state component in the △ )
REM=-2.4%
A1/2(10-3GeV-1/2)
A3/2(fm2)
PDG -135 -255 -0.072 3.512
LEGS -135 -267 -0.108 3.642
MAINZ -131 -251 -0.0846 3.46
DMT-134
(-80)
-256
(-136)
-0.081
(0.009)
3.516
(1.922)
SL-121
(-90)
-226
(-155)
-0.051
(0.001)
3.132
(2.188)
Comparison of our predictions for the helicity amplitudes, and with experiments and Sato-Lee’s prediction. The numbers within the parenthesis in red correspond to the bare values. Small bare value of indicate that bare Delta is almost spherical.
NQ
NQ
N
N
NQ
Resonance masses, widths, and pole positions
bare and physical resonance masses, total widths, bare and physical resonance masses, total widths, branching ratios and background phases branching ratios and background phases
for N* resonances (I=1/2)for N* resonances (I=1/2)
bare phys
our analysisPDG
our analysisPDG
baremass
physical mass
additional res.
additional res.
additional res.
resonance parametersresonance parametersfor for resonances (I=3/2) resonances (I=3/2)
baremass
physical mass
our analysisPDG
resonance parametersresonance parametersfor for resonances (I=3/2) resonances (I=3/2)
baremass
physical mass
our analysisPDG
additional res.
Results for resonance pole positions
S11 pole positions S11 pole positions
P11 pole positions P11 pole positions
P33 pole positions P33 pole positions
What do the LQCD results correspond to the quantities extracted from
experiments?
Comparison with EBAC’s results
Features of EBAC vs. DMT
1. 8 coupled-channels (γN, πN, ηN, σN, ρN, πΔ, KΛ, KΣ)
2. different treatments in a. derivation of background potential
b. prescription in maintaining gauge invariance
N* poles from EBAC-DCC vs. DMT
L2I 2JEBAC(MeV)
DMTPDG
(MeV)
S11(1535) 1540 - 191i 1449 - 34i (1490 ~ 1530) - ( 45 ~ 125)i
(1650)
1642 - 41i 1642 - 49i (1640 ~ 1670) - ( 75 ~ 90)i
S31(1620) 1563 - 95i 1598 - 68i (1590 ~ 1610) - ( 57 ~ 60)i
P11(1440)
1356 - 76i1364 - 105i
1366 - 90i (1350 ~ 1380) - ( 80 ~ 110)i
(1710)
1820 - 248i 1721 - 93i (1670 ~ 1770) - ( 40 ~ 190)i
P13(1720)
1765 - 151i 1683 - 120i (1660 ~ 1690) - ( 57 ~ 138)i
P31(1750)
1771 - 88i 1729 - 35i 1748 - 262i
(1910) ****
Not found 1896 - 65i (1830 ~ 1880) - (100 ~ 250)i
P33(1232)
1211 - 50i 1218 - 45i (1209 ~ 1211) - ( 49 ~ 51)i
D13(1520)
1521 - 58i 1516 - 62i (1505 ~ 1515) - ( 52 ~ 60)i
D15(1675)
1654 - 77i 1657 - 66i (1655 ~ 1665) - ( 62 ~ 75)i
D33(1700)
1604 - 106i 1609 - 67i (1620 ~ 1680) - ( 80 ~ 120)i
F15(1680)
1674 - 53i 1663 - 58i (1665 ~ 1680) - ( 55 ~ 68)i
F35(1905)
1738 - 110i 1771 - 95i (1825 ~ 1835) - (132 ~ 150)i
F37(1950)
1858 - 100i 1860 - 100i (1870 ~ 1890) - (110 ~ 130)i
Two poles feature of P11(1440)
Appearance of π△ complex branch cut
pole A: unphys. sheetpole B: phys. sheet
Group Arndt et al. (85) CMB(90) EBAC(11)
1st pole (1359,-100) (1370,-114) (1356,-76)
2nd pole (1410,-80) (1360,-120) (1364,-105)
Multiple poles in the presence of Riemann sheets
A. One branch cut of squared root nature only
1.
0
0
0
0
( 2 )1 0
1
0
0
2
0
Two sheets: let , then
0 2 ,
: 2 4 .
If we write , 0 2 , t
sheet I:
II
are both poles of
( )( ) , ( ) : anal
hen
ytica
, and .
Residues (
( )
l
i
i
i
i
g zf z z g z
z z
z r e
z re
z
f z
re
g
r
R
z e
0 0( 2 )1 0 2 2 0
unle ( ) ss contains a factor like .
) ( )
i iz r e R g z e
g z z
r
2.
0
0
0
20
0
20
two Riemann sheets
appearing in one of the
( ) ,
Pole
Again, there are and, there
is
depending on
0 (s
( ) will appear
two Riemann sheets.
in sheet I or II
he
only one pole
et I)
ip
af z z
z z
z r e z
0 or 2 (sheet II)
Analytic functions with two cuts of squared root nature
• product form a cut can be drawn by connecting za and zb
two Riemann sheets are needed.
additive form four Riemann sheets are required to make
function of this kind single-valued. This is the case with pion-nucleon
scattering amplitude
( )( )a bz z z z
a bz z z z
Two classes of functions with two additive branch points
(a) two cuts starting from za a and zand zbb
4 Riemann sheets4 Riemann sheets
pole zpole z00 appears in all 4 sheetsappears in all 4 sheets, with equal residues if g(z) is , with equal residues if g(z) is
analyticalanalytical
(b) (b) 3 branch points z3 branch points zaa, z, zbb, and z, and z00, but only 4 Riemann sheets are , but only 4 Riemann sheets are
neededneeded
to make fto make f22(z) single-valued(z) single-valued
polepole appears only in 2 sheetsappears only in 2 sheets with different residues even if with different residues even if
h(z) is analyticalh(z) is analytical
10
( )( ) a b
g zf z z z z z
z z
2
0
( )( ) .a b
h zf z z z z z
z z
20z
SNY, Chinese J. Phys. 49 (2011) 1158.
N. Suzuki, T. Sato, T.-S.H. Lee, Phys. Rev. C82 (2010) 045206
0
0
RRRN
RR
h Et E
E M
h
EE
Summary The DMT coupled-channel dynamical model
gives excellent description of the pion scattering and pion photoproduction data from threshold up to W ≦ 2GeV
• Excellent agreement with 0 threshold production data. Two-loop contributions small. For electroproduction, ChPT might need to go to O(p4).
• DMT predicts = 3.514 N, =-0.081 fm2, and REM=-2.4%, all in close agreement with the
experiments. dressed is oblate
• Bare is almost spherical. The oblate deformation of the dressed arises almost exclusively from pion
cloud
N NQ
The resonance masses, width, and pole positions extracted with DMT agree, in general, with PDG numbers.
The most serious discrepancy appears in S11 channel
● four resonances are found, instead of three listed on PDG ● Pole position for S11(1535): (1449,-34i ) (DMT), (1510 ± 20, -85±40i) (PDG),
(154,-191i ) (EBAC),
Two poles are found corresponding to P11(1440) in several analyses, including SAID(85), CMB(90), GWU(06), Juelich(09), and EBAC(11), where a complex branch cut associated with the opening ofπΔ channel is included in the analysis.
We demonstrate that multiple poles structure is a common feature of all resonances when additional
Riemann sheet appears.
END
57
2 22 2
( ) ( )( , ) ,( ) R R R RR i
R
R
R R
f W M f WA W Q e
M W iA
MQ
Efforts are being undertaken to use the Efforts are being undertaken to use the dressed propagators and vertices obtained dressed propagators and vertices obtained in DMT πN model to achieve consistency in in DMT πN model to achieve consistency in the analyses ofπN and π-production.the analyses ofπN and π-production.