1 Objective Finish with PM measurements Discuss Friday’s filed measurements 1.

28
1 Objective • Finish with PM measurements • Discuss Friday’s filed measurements 1

Transcript of 1 Objective Finish with PM measurements Discuss Friday’s filed measurements 1.

Page 1: 1 Objective Finish with PM measurements Discuss Friday’s filed measurements 1.

1

Objective

• Finish with PM measurements

• Discuss Friday’s filed measurements

1

Page 2: 1 Objective Finish with PM measurements Discuss Friday’s filed measurements 1.

ASHRAE Transaction 2004

Properties

Page 3: 1 Objective Finish with PM measurements Discuss Friday’s filed measurements 1.

Properties and sources

ASHRAE Transaction 2004

Page 4: 1 Objective Finish with PM measurements Discuss Friday’s filed measurements 1.

Optical instruments Mie Theory for Scattering

• Forward-scattering and back-scattering• Functions of (λ, θ, dp, Vp)

• Often see size parameter, α = πd/λ

Page 5: 1 Objective Finish with PM measurements Discuss Friday’s filed measurements 1.
Page 6: 1 Objective Finish with PM measurements Discuss Friday’s filed measurements 1.

MEASURE MASS CONCENTRATION •Photometers

• Typically relative instruments• Sensitive to particle speed

•Nephelometer• Measure scattering for aerosol sample (~ 1L) over wide

range of angles ()• Particle density is function of the light reflected into the detector

– Scatered light depends on properties of the particles such as their shape, color, and reflectivity.

• Determines mass concentration much more accurately than photometer

• Often calibrated to single particle composition

Light scattering methods (Detection Sensor)

Page 7: 1 Objective Finish with PM measurements Discuss Friday’s filed measurements 1.

Condensation Nuclei Counter (CNC)

PARTICLE COUNTER •Subject aerosol stream to alcohol (or water) vapor•Cool air stream to cause condensation•Count particles with an optical particle counter

•Closely related to a condensation particle counter (CPC)

Page 8: 1 Objective Finish with PM measurements Discuss Friday’s filed measurements 1.

Cascade Impactor

Page 9: 1 Objective Finish with PM measurements Discuss Friday’s filed measurements 1.

Optical Particle Counter

• Similar to photometer, but particles are isolated• May require dilution

• 0.065 – 20 µm• Practically 0.1 – 5 µm

• Some devices just count

Page 10: 1 Objective Finish with PM measurements Discuss Friday’s filed measurements 1.
Page 11: 1 Objective Finish with PM measurements Discuss Friday’s filed measurements 1.

General Discussion of Accuracy

• For what size aerosol?• For what concentration of aerosol?

• Even gravimetric

• For instruments that size• Not counting particle vs. putting particle in wrong

bin

• Manufacturer’s accuracy is not often useful• Must calculate your own based on knowledge of

instrument

Page 12: 1 Objective Finish with PM measurements Discuss Friday’s filed measurements 1.
Page 13: 1 Objective Finish with PM measurements Discuss Friday’s filed measurements 1.

Aerodynamic Particle Sizer

• One of many time-of-flight instruments• Two laser beams separated by known distance• Particle is accelerated between beams• Time between beams being broken is

calibrated to test aerosol• 0.5 - 20 um

Page 14: 1 Objective Finish with PM measurements Discuss Friday’s filed measurements 1.

APS

• Small particles move at the air velocity• Large particles lag air velocity• Problems

• Small particles not-Stokesian• Bigger density sized as larger particle• Shape also influences drag• Multiple particles in sizing chamber (same as other devices)

Page 15: 1 Objective Finish with PM measurements Discuss Friday’s filed measurements 1.

APS air and particle flow diagram

15

Page 16: 1 Objective Finish with PM measurements Discuss Friday’s filed measurements 1.

1616

Page 17: 1 Objective Finish with PM measurements Discuss Friday’s filed measurements 1.

Particle Mobility Analyzer

• Particle is subjected to careful (difusive) electric charging• Charge on particle is proportional to diameter

• Electric mobility is known

• Particles are sorted by charge• Particles are counted by other technique (mostly the

condensation method)• 0.001 – 1 µm

Page 18: 1 Objective Finish with PM measurements Discuss Friday’s filed measurements 1.

The SMPS

Consists of

1. Electrostatic

classifier (EC)

2. Differential mobility analyzer (DMA)

3. Condensation particle counter (CPC)

Page 19: 1 Objective Finish with PM measurements Discuss Friday’s filed measurements 1.

SMPS Best for 2.5nm - 0.5m

• Can’t precisely classify larger particles b/c• Fraction of +1 and +2 charged particles begin to

converge• Changing voltages begins to cause equal fractions of

particles of the same size to fall in different bins

• Smaller particles• Fraction of charged particles gets close to 0, so

different voltages can’t control mobility

Page 20: 1 Objective Finish with PM measurements Discuss Friday’s filed measurements 1.

Control methods/devices

• No device works (well) for all particle sizes

(a) (b)Efficiency as a function of particle diameter as measured with (a) Optical particle counter and (b) Aerodynamic particle sizer

Page 21: 1 Objective Finish with PM measurements Discuss Friday’s filed measurements 1.

Summary

• Wide variety of instruments available for particle measurement

• What size of aerosol are you interested in?• Do you need sizing or is counting sufficient?• Do you need real-time data?• What type of aerosol are you trying to

measure?• How much accuracy do you need?• How much money do you have?

Page 22: 1 Objective Finish with PM measurements Discuss Friday’s filed measurements 1.

22

Future Measurement Exercise

• Get manual and record data from:• TSI Aerotrack optical handheld particle counter

(4)• P-Trak (2)• DustTrak• SidePak

• Colocate all instruments in a room and see concentrations that result from different sources

• Main purpose is to understand all instruments 22

Page 23: 1 Objective Finish with PM measurements Discuss Friday’s filed measurements 1.

Other Particle Measurement Issues

• Sampling line losses• Sampling particles in moving air stream• Particle composition• Bioaerosol sampling

Page 24: 1 Objective Finish with PM measurements Discuss Friday’s filed measurements 1.

24

Sampling Line Losses

• Extensive literature on subject• Generally an issue for large (>1 μm) and small (<

0.05 μm) particles

• What are mechanisms that cause loss and how do we minimize them?

• Calculating line loss• Values from literature, software, or use equivalent

lines• Best approach is measurement

24

Page 25: 1 Objective Finish with PM measurements Discuss Friday’s filed measurements 1.

25

Isokinetic Sampling

• http://www.knowledgepublications.com/hydrogen/images/Hydrogen_Gen_Gas_Gas_Stream_Lines.gifΩ√

25

Page 26: 1 Objective Finish with PM measurements Discuss Friday’s filed measurements 1.

26

Particle Composition

• Collect sample of particles on filter• Analyze as you would for liquid or solid

compounds• Challenges?

• SMPS w/ mass spec.• Very expensive and response time issues

26

Page 27: 1 Objective Finish with PM measurements Discuss Friday’s filed measurements 1.

27

Bioaerosol Sampling

• Many issues• Fungi, bacteria, other stuff, metabolic byproducts• Quantitative or presence/absence• Culturable, viable, DNA-based• Inhibitors

27

Page 28: 1 Objective Finish with PM measurements Discuss Friday’s filed measurements 1.

Field Measurements (Friday 2:20 p.m.)

• Address • 5404 Odessa Lane, 78731

• Type of measurement • Residential building – characterization

• Envelope air tightness

• Duct testing

• HVAC testing

• Air quality T, RH, PM, CO, O3,…

• …..

• Teams• ….

28