Σημειώσεις Α Μέρος Χωροταξία
description
Transcript of Σημειώσεις Α Μέρος Χωροταξία
-
2012-2013
..
2012
-
1.
. E 18, , , , ., , , ( ) . , . (Hall 1999).
19 20 (,) . , , . . , , - .
1930 , - -
-
. . , Patric Geddes (1854-1932) 1915 , (conurbations) . (regional planning) 1929-1932 . . - (, ) - (national/regional planning) Barlow (1937) (Royal Commission on theGeographical Distribution of the Industrial Population). (special areas) (trading estates) . To 1945 .
/ . 1945 . 1947 Jean-Franois Gravier (Paris et le dsert franaiss), , . Eugne Claudius-Petit (1950) (Pour un plan national damnagementdu territoire) ( ) . (,, , ) - - -
-
.
(1949). -. , , ,, . , .
, :
.
. , , . , .
-
: (Johnston., 1981; p.255). , . : , , , . . , / . Peter Hall (1991) :, - (national/regional planning), , . , (regional/local planning), .
:() (adaptive) () (developmental).
. , , .
-
. , . - - , .
; ; :
1) : , (.. -, -), , (.. , ) ..
2) : , .
3) : , , , .
4) : , , , , .
5) : , , .
6) : , .
7) : .
8) : , ,, , , ..
9) : , , .
-
10) : , , .
11) : , .
. , , , . , .
2.
2.1
. , . , , , (, , , ) : . , , - . , , , , . : -, - -. ., , . -
-
(.. , , , ).
2.2
. (physical planning) ( , , ). .
. , , , ... , : , , , , -.
(development planning) - . , , , , , , . , , ( ). , , . , , , , .
-
(sectoral planning) , , , . - ( ), , , , , ... , - . , , - . ( , , , , , ). : . .
. , , . (environmental planning), .
. , ( ).
. (indicativeplanning),
-
, . , , ., , , ... , . , . (.. ), , . , , .
: () () .
:) ) ) )
, , - . , .
-
.
. , (). , , , . , , , () . , . ( ), . , , . , , .. , .
:
() , , () () () , () ,
() ()
.
. , , , ,
-
. .
3 - Glasson(1975: 5) (8) :
1. .2.
/ .3. / .4. .5. :
) , ,
) .
6. ( ) .
7. :) )
8. .
. . , , , . , . :
-
( , , , , , , , , .)
( ..., , , , , , .)
( ,, , , .)
( , , ,.. , ).
( , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .)
( , , ,, , , , .)
(, , , ,.... .)
( , , , .)
( , , , , .)
( , Natura, , , , , , , , , , , , .)
, , , , (.. , , ). . , , ,
-
, , .
, , , , , , . .
.
( , , .)
( .... , .....)
(, , , , .) . . . . . . . ,
... ,......, .... . .
, , , .
-
4.
4.1
, , , , - - , , . , - . ( , , , , ). , , . , . ( ), , ...
, , . ,
-
. . , .
- . , : , . , , / . , , - . , - , (Keeble, 1976), .
Hall (1991) : - (national/regional planning) . , (regional/local planning), .
-
5.
5.1
, , , . H /.
: , - , . , . , , , .
(region), () (Chambers Twentieth Century Dictionary). . , , . , . , ().
-
( , ), , . .
19 ., Vidal de la Blanche , pays. pay / . Vidal de la Blanche ( ), . . , - , (Husain, 1995: p. 203-205, 328).
pays (ettner 1907, Whittlesey 1929 Hartshorne 1939) . ettner . , . Whittlesey (1929) , Hartshorne . . Hartshorne
-
, , .. Hartshorne , . ettner - Grigg (1965) . , - - (aggett 1977).
5.2
( 20 ) :
(formal) ( ) (functional) ( )
(formal regions), . Dickinson (1974) , , , . , (functional regions), / ( 1). ,
-
, .
, Dickinson , , - (Human Ecology). (regionalisation), . , (city region), , , . . , ., , , .
, , . , , , , .. , , .. , , .. , , . , ( 2).
-
. . (formal region), , .
1:
-
, -
,
-
-
5.2.1 : , . , , , , . . ( ). . , .
, , (.. , , , , ..). , . , .. , . , .
, - - ( ) . ( ). , . ,
-
, , (.. ).
5.2.2 : . , - , , , , , ADS, ISDN . , , , , . .
, , , . Chandrasekhar & Chatterjee (1972) . . , , . , , , .
-
1:
.
: Jayasri Ray Chaudhuri, An Introduction to Development and Regional Planning with specialreference to India, Orient Longman, India, 2001, p. 14.
-
2:
. . .
: Ray et al 2001: 15.
-
6.
, , . , . , .
6.1
- , . , , 60, . . . , , 80, . , , , . ,
-
. , , .
Maastricht(1991) -.
, . , ( ) . - - ( ). , , . - .
6.2
Marcou (2003), . :) (Administrative regionalization)
-
) (Regionalizationthrough the existing local authorities)
) (Regional decentralization)) (Regional autonomy)) (Regionalization through
the federate authorities)
., , ( ..), . , / (.. , . ), . , , , (.. )., ( ) (.. ) , . : (.. , , , .).(Marcou, 1998, Marcou, 2003).
) (Administrative regionalization)
, / ( ),
-
. , , , , , , , . , , , . , , (, , , ). , ., , ( 1 ..) (Marcou, 2003).
) (Regionalizationthrough the existing local authorities)
, ( ), . , , . ... , , , , , . ,
-
, , .
) (Regional decentralization)
, . , , . , , , . . , , , . :
i. O , , - , ,
ii. (.. ),
iii. . (Marcou, 2003)
) - (Regional autonomy)
-
, . , , , , . , , . , . , . ( ). , , . , . , , . , , (, ), (-). , . (.. , ). . (Marcou, 2003).
) (Regionalization throughthe federate authorities)
-
, . . - . , . , . -, .
-
7.
:
(formal)1) 2)
(functional)1) 2) 3)
7.1.1 (formal) . , . (.. > 5002) . (.. , , ) , . :
1) (The weighted index numbermethod)
H Boudeville, clusteranalysis. , , , , , . Hcluster analysis .
-
2) , (.. ), . .
7.1.2 (functional)O . (.. ) . :
1) (flow analysis) > . . :
(.. , . ) (.. ,
) (..
) ( , ) ( , )2) (Gravitational Analysis)
.
-
. , , . . , . , , : /, / , , , (. , ) (., , ..). , , (Glasson, 1975: p. 27-29, Jonston , 1983:. 140-141). , Zipf, Reilly, Stouffer .. . . : , : , , , . :
ij = [PiPj/dij] : Tij = i j
Pi Pj =
dij =
. i n , :
-
Vi = k[Pj/dij]
3) ( ) . , . , , , ,, . , ( ), , ( ), , . . , 24. , ( 2004). , (.. ), /. , ( , , , ) :
-
) ) ) .
, , , , ., (regionalism) . , . - , .
-
8.
; , ; 2 3 , 1. , . 1995 2010, (1.0% ) .
- - :
.
E .
, .
, , . :
-
) ( ), o , / .) ( ) , , .) , , , . / ( /, ) / (.. ) .) ( , , .) / .) (.. ) .) (.. , , , , ) (.. ,, ) .) (Agro-BusinessDistricts,
-
(marketing, management, , , ).) () . , , . . :
1. The Rural Areas of the European Union -Common gricultural Policy (CAP)(EU 268/75, 797/85, 2328/93):- (mountainous areas),- (less favoured areas) - (other areas)
2. European Commission 1994. Europe 2000+ Cooperation for Europeanterritorial development:- - - (rural areas used for tourism)- (rural areas with diverse activities)- --
3. Commission of the European Communities 1988 The future of the ruralsociety COM 88 501, Brussels:- - (peri urban rural areas)- -
4. OECD 1992 Rural Development Policy, Paris OECD:
-
- (isolated rural areas)- (intermediate rural areas)- (integrated rural areas)
5. Second Cohesion Report CEC 2000- (rural areaswhich are integrated into the overall economy and which are characterisedby economic and population growth).- (intermediate rural areas)- (remote rural areas, usually sparselypopulated and in many cases located in peripheral parts of the Union farfrom urban centers).
(/ ) , . ,, , , , . , (.. ), , , .
(Rural Planning)
:
i.
-
ii.
Leader. , .
-
9. -
( 11). (3.529 km) (1.359.750 km2). . , , , . (). (Po), . Alfld, . 2% Ladoga .
:
Inforegio 2003
-
11: (Volga) 3531 : , Kazakhstan
: Kama Vyatkai Oka,
(Danube) 2858
: , A, ,, , ,, , : Belgrade Budapest Bratislava ,Chernovtsy
(Ural) 2428 : , Kazakhstan (Dnepr) 2201 : , , Kama 2032 : Don 1870 : : Rostov VoronezhPecora 1809 : Oka 1478 : Belaja 1420 : Vjatka 1367 :
(Dnestr) 1352: , : Dnepropetrovsk Kiev Pinsk, Chernigov,Bryansk
(Rhein) 1326
: , Liechtenstein, ,Germany, , : , , ,,
Northern Dvina 1302 : ,(Elbe) 1165
: ,:Magdeburg Dresden Prague PotsdamBerlin
Vycegda 1100 : ,Donec 1053 : , Desna 1050 : , Vistola 1047 : : Gdansk, Warsaw, CracowW. Dvina 1020 : , , (Loire) 1020 : : Nantes Tours Orlans (Tagus) 1007 : . : oo (Rhne) : , : Asignon, Lyons, GenevaGaronne : : Bordeaux Inforegio 2003
-
, / .
, , : . (river or coastal catchment planning) - . :
.
.
- .
, , .
- - (Sequential est) .
-
. , (, , ) ,