•™›—¨— - ¤‘  ©¤‘...

download  •™›—¨— - ¤‘  ©¤‘ §‌™‘ œ•¤‘ ¤—‌ §¥‌¤‘ (1974-81) 3.3.3

If you can't read please download the document

  • date post

    23-Feb-2018
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    224
  • download

    4

Embed Size (px)

Transcript of  •™›—¨— - ¤‘  ©¤‘...

  • ABSTRACT

    1.

    1.1

    1.2

    1.3

    2.

    ..

    2.1

    2.2

    2.3 1936

    2.4 1958

    2.5

    2.5.1 1963

    2.5.2

    2.5.3 1979

    2.5.4 . . . 1988

    2.5.5 . . . 2003

    3.

    .

    3.1

    3.2 1950

    3.3 1960-90

    3.3.1 (1967-74)

    3.3.2 (1974-81)

    3.3.3 1337 ... 1988 (1981-89)

    3.4 ...

    4.

    2009/010

  • : .

    e-mail: irisserpe@gmail.com

    . . ( 50). . . . , , (, , ). .

    ABSTRACT This paper was produced as part of the course "Approaches of planning in

    Greece". The subject of this paper is related to the arbitrary structures. As a case study selected to be Heraklion Crete, is one of the most famous cases of cities dominated by arbitrary structures in Greece, the basic reason was the phenomenon of migration (especially the internal migration at '50s). The aim of the paper is to investigate the development of settlements and integration processes in the city plan. Heraklion is the appropriate city and the most typical example showing that the urban design follows the evolution of the city. Historical circumstances and political instability were two of the reasons promoting the phenomenon. The small range of this paper is based in a theoretical background of urban planners, but it focuses on the example of Heraklion analyzing of the urban development and leads to some conclusions resulting from the gradual breakdown of the subject.

    1.

    1.1 .

    , , , . .

    2009/10

    mailto:irisserpe@gmail.com

  • , (2005), , .) : ;, , , ' , ... . , , , , , .. , , .

    , (1990), , . 192), , , , , . . , , . , , -. , , .

    1.2

    , . , .

    , ( ). , , , .. . , , .

    , . , - - ( 1990).

    1.3 ,

    , 50. , ,

    2009/10

  • , .

    , . . , , 22. , , .

    . . ( ) ( ) . , , . , , . , , - . , . , ... ( 1990, 201-4).

    . : , , ; ( 1990, . 204), , . ( 1977, , . 87-100) , - [] , , . , , . , , .. , .

    , , , , . , .

    2009/10

  • 2009/10

    2 ..

    2.1 , 1901, ,

    332/1901 , , , . , , , . , 3.000 ., 300 1.300 . , 1900, , , . 1901, . , , , ( 25 , ), , , , .

    37, , 1902, . , , . . , , 4 , 6 50 . . , .

    : . , , , , .

    2.2 1921, ,

    6.000 . , , , , : ( 2000 )1.

    1923, . , 11 , 15.000 , . , , , 1913, 25.000 , 1928 ,

    1 2000 : , . , 2000.

  • 40.000 . , .

    , . , , , , ( , ). , .

    , , 45% . - , . , 1932, 15 ( , , , , , , , , , , , , , ). 1937 . , .

    . , , .

    2.3 1936

    1. 1936

    2009/10

  • 1936, .. 31-10/3-11-1936 ... 488 [] , , , , , , 1902 , . , , , . 36 , .

    , , 11 . , 17 . 200 . , , 7 . , 10 . 100 . , . , 4 , 6 50 , 1902.

    , , . , , , , , . . 3741/1929 , , , . 1939, .

    2.4 1958

    2. 1958

    2009/10

  • , . , 1958 , , . , , 36, . , .

    , , , , , . , , , , , , , . , , -. , , .

    , 50 .

    2.5 1958,

    , , 1996. , , , .

    2.5.1 1963 .. ,

    , , , , . , , , , , ,

    . , . , , . , . , , , , .. , , .

    2009/10

  • 3. , , 1963

    ,

    , . , , . . , . , , , .

    , , , , . . , , , , , 1967.

    2.5.2

    . , , , . , , , , , , , , , , , , .

    2009/10

  • , , . , , .

    2.5.3 1979 1979 947/1979,

    : . . .., . . , , , , , .

    , , , , . .. , , , . , , , .

    4. , 1979

    2009/10

  • 2009/10

    , , , .. , .

    , . , , , .

    , , - .. (, , , , 5 10)2. . , .

    , , , , . - , , , .

    , , , 1980. , , , .

    2.5.4 . . . 1988 1988 ( 458),

    , , . , , , , , , , , , .

    , , , , , . , - . 2 , , , , 5 10

  • 5. 1988

    , , , . , , , . , , , ..., , , , , ..., 2003.

    , , , , , , .... , , , , , .

    , , . , 1996. , .

    2.5.5 . . . 2003 ... 2003,

    . , , , . ...

    2009/10

  • 2003 , , , . , ... 88, , , .

    , ..., .. . . , . , , ... , , , , .

    , ( ). ... . .

    6.

    3 .

    , . , , . , , . , , , , , , , ,

    2009/10

  • , . , , . , , , , , , , , .

    . 1958 , , . , 70, 80. 20 , , 1983, . .....

    , , . , 30.000 2 . 1983, . ..., 1988. . , .

    3.1

    . , , .

    . 1951-81, . 1951 1981, . 16%. .

    1970. , . .

    , , . , , ,

    2009/10

  • , , , , ..

    . 1984, .

    1: . , . - , 152 (5%).

    2. . . , 302 (9,90%).

    3. . . 62 , 441 (14,40 %).

    4. . . . 101 (3,30 %).

    5. . . .

    6. . . . ( ) , 550 (18%).

    7. . - - . , 773 (25,30 %).

    8. . . 125 (4.10%).

    9. . . , 360 (11.70%).

    7. . 1984

    2009/10

  • , (.. ) .

    , , , . .

    , , . .

    3.2 1950 50

    , . .

    , . (, , ). .

    , , , .